Podcasts about senior researcher

Tehillah Niselow & Ndumiso Mngomezulu are in conversation with Dr Katherine Gill, Senior Researcher at the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation specialising in HIV Prevention Clinical Trials, Adolescent and STI research as well as Prof. Fareed Abdullah, Director of the Office of AIDS & TB Research at South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) and Monwabisi Sidwell Mbasa, Treatment Action Campaign Gauteng Provincial ChairpersonSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Senior Researcher at ancestry.com, Deborah Carter joins Denis, taking your calls and answering your questions about anything ancestry related.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Negar Mortazavi speaks to Alberto Fittarelli about Israel-liked influence operations that were pushing for regime-change in Iran during the 12 day war. Alberto Fittarelli is a Senior Researcher at Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto.

Bongani Bingwa speaks to Dr. Heleen Hofmeyr, Senior Researcher at Stellenbosch University and Co-author of the Teacher Preferences and Job Satisfaction in South Africa report, about the growing crisis in South Africa’s education system. With overcrowded classrooms, rising incidents of school violence, and dwindling resources, teachers are under immense pressure. The conversation explores how these challenges are affecting teacher morale, job satisfaction, and ultimately, the quality of education for South African learners. 702 Breakfast with Bongani Bingwa is broadcast on 702, a Johannesburg based talk radio station. Bongani makes sense of the news, interviews the key newsmakers of the day, and holds those in power to account on your behalf. The team bring you all you need to know to start your day Thank you for listening to a podcast from 702 Breakfast with Bongani Bingwa Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 06:00 and 09:00 (SA Time) to Breakfast with Bongani Bingwa broadcast on 702: https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/36edSLV or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/zEcM35T Subscribe to the 702 Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/v5mfetc Follow us on social media: 702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/Radio702 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This episode of The New Abnormal podcast features Dr Emma Louise Briant, an internationally recognised expert and professor of information warfare & propaganda.She helps policymakers, governments, business leaders, journalists and the public understand and respond to the challenge of contemporary online threats.Her research, testimony and solutions on the rapid evolution of surveillant propaganda and its implications for democracy were central in exposing the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Her work has informed civil society organisations, the UN, US Congress, UK Parliament, Canadian Parliament, New Zealand Parliament, and EU Parliament. Emma's books include the Routledge Handbook of the Influence Industry, Bad News for Refugees, and Propaganda & Counter-Terrorism. She also served as advisor for Emmy-nominated ‘People You May Know', and as Senior Researcher for Oscar-shortlisted ‘The Great Hack'.She's an absolutely fascinating person, so I really enjoyed listening to Emma's perspectives, and hope you will too!

Wir fragen Hartmut Stahl: Wieso muss Sport nachhaltiger werden? Wie sieht die Klimabilanz einer Fußball-Europameisterschaft aus? Wo entstehen bei großen und kleinen Sportveranstaltungen Probleme für Umwelt und Klima? Und welche Lösungen gibt es dafür? Können Sportevents sogar zum Vorbild für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung werden? Unser Gesprächspartner ist Dr. Hartmut Stahl, Senior Researcher im Bereich Ressourcen & Mobilität und Experte für Umweltaspekte im Sport. Er berät Veranstalter, Verbände und Politik, wie sich der Sportsektor nachhaltiger gestalten lässt. Alle von uns erwähnten Quellen und weiterführenden Texte in den Shownotes der Episode auf www.oeko.de/podcast

On 19 July 2025, China began construction on a 60,000-megawatt hydropower project at Medog, with three times the output of Three Gorges and roughly the UK's entire annual power production. This is a 1.2-trillion-yuan investment (USD 170 B) that Beijing frames as clean energy and development. It is located in southeast Tibert, and only 30km upstream of India. Delhi hears strategic risk. Tibetans see cultural erasure. And over 100 million people downstream are wondering who controls their tomorrow.Today, we are joined by Brian Eyler and Palmo Tenzin. Brian is the Director of the Stimson Center's Southeast Asia and Energy, Water and Sustainability programs. He is widely recognised as a leading voice and expert on transboundary water-energy-food nexus security issues in the Mekong River basin, having spent more than 15 years living and working in China. He is the co-lead on the Mekong Dam Monitor, an award-winning open-source platform providing near-real-time monitoring of dams and environmental impacts along the Mekong.Palmo is an Advocacy Officer and Senior Researcher for the International Campaign for Tibet. Her research specialises in Chinese politics and contemporary Tibet, Sino-Tibetan relations and Asia-Pacific security. Before working at the ICT, Palmo held a position working in the Australian government and the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. She is the author of the report published in December 2024 titled, ‘Chinese Hydropower: Damning Tibet's Culture, Community and Environment', which she has presented at the UN Human Rights Council in March, the European Parliament in May and most recently at World Water Week in Sweden.The International Risk Podcast brings you conversations with global experts, frontline practitioners, and senior decision-makers who are shaping how we understand and respond to international risk. From geopolitical volatility and organised crime, to cybersecurity threats and hybrid warfare, each episode explores the forces transforming our world and what smart leaders must do to navigate them. Whether you're a board member, policymaker, or risk professional, The International Risk Podcast delivers actionable insights, sharp analysis, and real-world stories that matter.Dominic Bowen is the host of The International Risk Podcast and Europe's leading expert on international risk and crisis management. As Head of Strategic Advisory and Partner at one of Europe's leading risk management consulting firms, Dominic advises CEOs, boards, and senior executives across the continent on how to prepare for uncertainty and act with intent. He has spent decades working in war zones, advising multinational companies, and supporting Europe's business leaders. Dominic is the go-to business advisor for leaders navigating risk, crisis, and strategy; trusted for his clarity, calmness under pressure, and ability to turn volatility into competitive advantage. Dominic equips today's business leaders with the insight and confidence to lead through disruption and deliver sustained strategic advantage.Tell us what you liked!

John Maytham speaks to Jean Redpath, Senior Researcher at the Dullah Omar Institute, University of the Western Cape, to unpack what Fazel’s suspension means for South Africa’s intelligence community. She provides insight into the broader implications for governance, accountability, and trust in the country’s security institutions. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The government's major restructuring of local government will be a formidable challenge for local officials and political leaders in 164 district councils across 21 English county areas and 19 small neighbouring unitary authorities. For local government reorganisation to truly act as a catalyst for local public service reform, as envisaged by central government, services currently delivered by outgoing district councils – like waste collection and housing – will need to be merged and delivered from day one of the new unitary authorities' existence.   This means harmonising service provision, staff terms and conditions, establishing new management structures and resolving issues such as incompatible ICT systems, culture clashes between teams and overcome incompatible business processes.   What are the challenges and options facing local district council leaders? How long does it take to merge these services? What are the risks and opportunities? What have been the greatest barriers to successful transformation in earlier rounds of local government reorganisation? And what structures and service delivery options are available to the new unitary authorities?   To answer these questions and more, this IfG event brought together an expert panel, including:   Professor John Denham, Research Fellow and Director of the Centre for English Identity and Politics at the University of Southampton Liz Elliott, Deputy Chief Executive – Transformation at Harborough District Council Justin Galliford, Chief Executive at Norse Group Rachel Joyce, Assistant Chief Executive – Local Engagement at North Yorkshire Council   The event was chaired by Dr Matthew Fright, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government.   We would like to thank Norse Group for kindly supporting this event. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Senior Researcher at ancestry.com, Deborah Carter joins Denis, taking your calls and answering your questions about anything ancestry related.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

All 20 living hostages held by Hamas in Gaza are back in Israel after two years in captivity. The freed hostages mark a major development in the US-brokered ceasefire deal. Bodies of 28 deceased hostages remain in Gaza but are due to be returned. In exchange, Israel is releasing 250 Palestinian prisoners serving long sentences and over 1,700 Gaza detainees held without charge since October 2023 attacks. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump reportedly suggested President Isaac Herzog pardon Prime Minister Netanyahu, who's facing corruption and abuse of power allegations dating back to a 2020 investigation. Elvis Presslin spoke to Senior Researcher at the Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection (MISTRA), Na'eem Jeenah

A potential coup is unfolding In Madagascar. An elite military unit, CAPSAT, has declared control of the armed forces and is demanding President Andry Rajoelina's resignation. This follows youth-led protests against the government. Yesterday, the armed forces minister recognized a military-backed officer as the new army chief. President Rajoelina has called the move an attempted coup. Meanwhile, South Africa has voiced deep concern over the unrest and is urging all parties to remain calm and respect Madagascar's democratic process. Elvis Presslin spoke to Martin Ewi, Senior Researcher at Institute for Security Studies, ISS

German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius wants to spend €35B, or $41B, on space assets and technologies, including satellites with active defense capabilities. This is huge. Laura Winter speaks with Antje Nötzold, a Senior Researcher at the University of the Federal Armed Forces; and Torsten Kriening, CEO and Publisher of SpaceWatch.Global, and host of Space Cafe podcast.

To seek asylum, people often have to cross borders undocumented, embarking on perilous trajectories. Due to the war in Afghanistan, the rule of the Taliban, and severe human rights violations, over the past decades thousands of people have risked their lives to seek safety. By what means do they make these journeys, especially when they lack money and passports?Over the course of three years, Hannah Pool accompanied a group of Afghan friends and families as they attempted "The Game" - Game zadan: the route to Europe to seek asylum. The resulting ethnography follows them across their entire trajectories: through Iran, Turkey, Greece, and along the so-called Balkan route. In each place, Pool details the economic interactions and social relationships essential for acquiring, saving, borrowing, spending, and exchanging money to facilitate their undocumented migration routes.The Game: The Economy of Undocumented Migration from Afghanistan to Europe (Oxford UP, 2025) bridges economic sociology and migration studies to illustrate how migrants decide to trust people to facilitate their movement along these routes, focusing particularly on debt, special monies, bribes, donations, and gift-giving. Throughout the migration trajectory, relationships with family, fellow migrants, smugglers, humanitarian actors, and border control officials shape and are shaped by access to financial resources.Ultimately, the book highlights the dangers in undocumented border-crossing and delves into the core of what it means to flee: Who has the means to escape dangerous conditions to seek asylum? Hannah Pool is a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

To seek asylum, people often have to cross borders undocumented, embarking on perilous trajectories. Due to the war in Afghanistan, the rule of the Taliban, and severe human rights violations, over the past decades thousands of people have risked their lives to seek safety. By what means do they make these journeys, especially when they lack money and passports?Over the course of three years, Hannah Pool accompanied a group of Afghan friends and families as they attempted "The Game" - Game zadan: the route to Europe to seek asylum. The resulting ethnography follows them across their entire trajectories: through Iran, Turkey, Greece, and along the so-called Balkan route. In each place, Pool details the economic interactions and social relationships essential for acquiring, saving, borrowing, spending, and exchanging money to facilitate their undocumented migration routes.The Game: The Economy of Undocumented Migration from Afghanistan to Europe (Oxford UP, 2025) bridges economic sociology and migration studies to illustrate how migrants decide to trust people to facilitate their movement along these routes, focusing particularly on debt, special monies, bribes, donations, and gift-giving. Throughout the migration trajectory, relationships with family, fellow migrants, smugglers, humanitarian actors, and border control officials shape and are shaped by access to financial resources.Ultimately, the book highlights the dangers in undocumented border-crossing and delves into the core of what it means to flee: Who has the means to escape dangerous conditions to seek asylum? Hannah Pool is a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/middle-eastern-studies

To seek asylum, people often have to cross borders undocumented, embarking on perilous trajectories. Due to the war in Afghanistan, the rule of the Taliban, and severe human rights violations, over the past decades thousands of people have risked their lives to seek safety. By what means do they make these journeys, especially when they lack money and passports?Over the course of three years, Hannah Pool accompanied a group of Afghan friends and families as they attempted "The Game" - Game zadan: the route to Europe to seek asylum. The resulting ethnography follows them across their entire trajectories: through Iran, Turkey, Greece, and along the so-called Balkan route. In each place, Pool details the economic interactions and social relationships essential for acquiring, saving, borrowing, spending, and exchanging money to facilitate their undocumented migration routes.The Game: The Economy of Undocumented Migration from Afghanistan to Europe (Oxford UP, 2025) bridges economic sociology and migration studies to illustrate how migrants decide to trust people to facilitate their movement along these routes, focusing particularly on debt, special monies, bribes, donations, and gift-giving. Throughout the migration trajectory, relationships with family, fellow migrants, smugglers, humanitarian actors, and border control officials shape and are shaped by access to financial resources.Ultimately, the book highlights the dangers in undocumented border-crossing and delves into the core of what it means to flee: Who has the means to escape dangerous conditions to seek asylum? Hannah Pool is a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

To seek asylum, people often have to cross borders undocumented, embarking on perilous trajectories. Due to the war in Afghanistan, the rule of the Taliban, and severe human rights violations, over the past decades thousands of people have risked their lives to seek safety. By what means do they make these journeys, especially when they lack money and passports?Over the course of three years, Hannah Pool accompanied a group of Afghan friends and families as they attempted "The Game" - Game zadan: the route to Europe to seek asylum. The resulting ethnography follows them across their entire trajectories: through Iran, Turkey, Greece, and along the so-called Balkan route. In each place, Pool details the economic interactions and social relationships essential for acquiring, saving, borrowing, spending, and exchanging money to facilitate their undocumented migration routes.The Game: The Economy of Undocumented Migration from Afghanistan to Europe (Oxford UP, 2025) bridges economic sociology and migration studies to illustrate how migrants decide to trust people to facilitate their movement along these routes, focusing particularly on debt, special monies, bribes, donations, and gift-giving. Throughout the migration trajectory, relationships with family, fellow migrants, smugglers, humanitarian actors, and border control officials shape and are shaped by access to financial resources.Ultimately, the book highlights the dangers in undocumented border-crossing and delves into the core of what it means to flee: Who has the means to escape dangerous conditions to seek asylum? Hannah Pool is a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

To seek asylum, people often have to cross borders undocumented, embarking on perilous trajectories. Due to the war in Afghanistan, the rule of the Taliban, and severe human rights violations, over the past decades thousands of people have risked their lives to seek safety. By what means do they make these journeys, especially when they lack money and passports?Over the course of three years, Hannah Pool accompanied a group of Afghan friends and families as they attempted "The Game" - Game zadan: the route to Europe to seek asylum. The resulting ethnography follows them across their entire trajectories: through Iran, Turkey, Greece, and along the so-called Balkan route. In each place, Pool details the economic interactions and social relationships essential for acquiring, saving, borrowing, spending, and exchanging money to facilitate their undocumented migration routes.The Game: The Economy of Undocumented Migration from Afghanistan to Europe (Oxford UP, 2025) bridges economic sociology and migration studies to illustrate how migrants decide to trust people to facilitate their movement along these routes, focusing particularly on debt, special monies, bribes, donations, and gift-giving. Throughout the migration trajectory, relationships with family, fellow migrants, smugglers, humanitarian actors, and border control officials shape and are shaped by access to financial resources.Ultimately, the book highlights the dangers in undocumented border-crossing and delves into the core of what it means to flee: Who has the means to escape dangerous conditions to seek asylum? Hannah Pool is a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day

To seek asylum, people often have to cross borders undocumented, embarking on perilous trajectories. Due to the war in Afghanistan, the rule of the Taliban, and severe human rights violations, over the past decades thousands of people have risked their lives to seek safety. By what means do they make these journeys, especially when they lack money and passports?Over the course of three years, Hannah Pool accompanied a group of Afghan friends and families as they attempted "The Game" - Game zadan: the route to Europe to seek asylum. The resulting ethnography follows them across their entire trajectories: through Iran, Turkey, Greece, and along the so-called Balkan route. In each place, Pool details the economic interactions and social relationships essential for acquiring, saving, borrowing, spending, and exchanging money to facilitate their undocumented migration routes.The Game: The Economy of Undocumented Migration from Afghanistan to Europe (Oxford UP, 2025) bridges economic sociology and migration studies to illustrate how migrants decide to trust people to facilitate their movement along these routes, focusing particularly on debt, special monies, bribes, donations, and gift-giving. Throughout the migration trajectory, relationships with family, fellow migrants, smugglers, humanitarian actors, and border control officials shape and are shaped by access to financial resources.Ultimately, the book highlights the dangers in undocumented border-crossing and delves into the core of what it means to flee: Who has the means to escape dangerous conditions to seek asylum? Hannah Pool is a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

To seek asylum, people often have to cross borders undocumented, embarking on perilous trajectories. Due to the war in Afghanistan, the rule of the Taliban, and severe human rights violations, over the past decades thousands of people have risked their lives to seek safety. By what means do they make these journeys, especially when they lack money and passports?Over the course of three years, Hannah Pool accompanied a group of Afghan friends and families as they attempted "The Game" - Game zadan: the route to Europe to seek asylum. The resulting ethnography follows them across their entire trajectories: through Iran, Turkey, Greece, and along the so-called Balkan route. In each place, Pool details the economic interactions and social relationships essential for acquiring, saving, borrowing, spending, and exchanging money to facilitate their undocumented migration routes.The Game: The Economy of Undocumented Migration from Afghanistan to Europe (Oxford UP, 2025) bridges economic sociology and migration studies to illustrate how migrants decide to trust people to facilitate their movement along these routes, focusing particularly on debt, special monies, bribes, donations, and gift-giving. Throughout the migration trajectory, relationships with family, fellow migrants, smugglers, humanitarian actors, and border control officials shape and are shaped by access to financial resources.Ultimately, the book highlights the dangers in undocumented border-crossing and delves into the core of what it means to flee: Who has the means to escape dangerous conditions to seek asylum? Hannah Pool is a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

Speakers:    Tim Leunig, Chief Econonist at Nesta Dave Penman, General Secretary at the FDA Dr Gemma Tetlow, Chief Economist at the Institute for Government Paul Whiteman, General Secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers   This event was chaired by Ben Paxton, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government.   This event was held in partnership with the FDA. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speakers:   Maya Ellis MP, Member of the Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee Mayor Steve Rotheram, Mayor of the Liverpool City Region Professor Lisa Collins, Pro-Vice Chancellor, Research and Innovation at the University of Surrey Dr Rebecca McKee, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government   This event was chaired by Thomas Pope, Deputy Chief Economist at the Institute for Government.   This event was held in partnership with the University of Surrey. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speakers:    Jake Richards MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary at the Ministry of Justice Deputy Mayor Kate Green, Deputy Mayor for Safer and Stronger Communities, Greater Manchester Clare Moody, Police and Crime Commissioner for Avon & Somerset Cassia Rowland, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government Fiona Rutherford, Chief Executive of JUSTICE   This event was chaired by Nick Davies, Programme Director at the Institute for Government.   This event was held in partnership with JUSTICE. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This event is part of the Institute for Government's Labour Party Conference 2025 fringe programme. Speakers: Maya Ellis MP, Member of the Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee Mayor Steve Rotheram, Mayor of the Liverpool City Region Professor Lisa Collins, Pro-Vice Chancellor, Research and Innovation at the University of Surrey Dr Rebecca McKee, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government This event was chaired by Thomas Pope, Deputy Chief Economist at the Institute for Government. This event was held in partnership with the University of Surrey. 

This event is part of the Institute for Government's Labour Party Conference 2025 fringe programme. Speakers: Jake Richards MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary at the Ministry of Justice Deputy Mayor Kate Green, Deputy Mayor for Safer and Stronger Communities, Greater Manchester Clare Moody, Police and Crime Commissioner for Avon & Somerset Cassia Rowland, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government Fiona Rutherford, Chief Executive of JUSTICE This event was chaired by Nick Davies, Programme Director at the Institute for Government. This event was held in partnership with JUSTICE.

This event is part of the Institute for Government's Labour Party Conference 2025 fringe programme. Speakers: Tim Leunig, Chief Econonist at Nesta Dave Penman, General Secretary at the FDA Dr Gemma Tetlow, Chief Economist at the Institute for Government Paul Whiteman, General Secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers This event was chaired by Ben Paxton, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government. This event was held in partnership with the FDA.

The 25-year-old African Growth and Opportunity Act, Agoa, expired yesterday, leaving more than 30 Sub-Saharan African countries in limbo. This landmark trade agreement granted duty-free access to the US market for thousands of African products, supporting hundreds of thousands of jobs across the continent. The Trump administration has expressed support for a one-year extension of Agoa, but uncertainty looms as Congressional approval hangs in the balance. President Trump's tariff-heavy trade policies have already impacted Agoa's benefits, with some African exports facing US import taxes between 10% and 30%. Dr. Mmatlou Kalaba, Senior Researcher at the Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy spoke to Elvis Presslin to elaborate on the impact of AGOA's expiration

Lester Kiewit speaks to Dr Jean Redpath, Senior Researcher at Africa Criminal Justice Reform, at the Dullah Omar Institute at University of the Western Cape. They discuss reasons why we are seeing vigilante attacks in Khayelitsha. It is a sprawling area that an under resourced SAPS neglects despite a special commission in 2014 showing the shortcomings of law enforcement and the lack of trust in police. Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit is a podcast of the CapeTalk breakfast show. This programme is your authentic Cape Town wake-up call. Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit is informative, enlightening and accessible. The team’s ability to spot & share relevant and unusual stories make the programme inclusive and thought-provoking. Don’t miss the popular World View feature at 7:45am daily. Listen out for #LesterInYourLounge which is an outside broadcast – from the home of a listener in a different part of Cape Town - on the first Wednesday of every month. This show introduces you to interesting Capetonians as well as their favourite communities, habits, local personalities and neighbourhood news. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Good Morning Cape Town with Lester Kiewit. Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays between 06:00 and 09:00 (SA Time) to Good Morning CapeTalk with Lester Kiewit broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/xGkqLbT or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/f9Eeb7i Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

ชมวิดีโอ EP นี้ใน YouTube เพื่อประสบการณ์การรับชมที่ดีที่สุด https://youtu.be/fkOTgt0o3QE สกินแคร์หรือเครื่องสำอางที่ใช้กันอยู่ทุกวันนี้ เคยสงสัยไหมว่าสารที่เคลมกันว่ามีประสิทธิภาพเมื่อใส่เข้าไปในสกินแคร์มันออกฤทธิ์ได้จริงหรือไม่ ใส่เข้าไปในปริมาณเท่าไร แล้วได้มีการทดลองในมนุษย์ว่าปลอดภัยหรือไม่ Top to Toe คุยกับ ดร.ธวิน เอี่ยมปรีดี Senior Researcher, ศูนย์นาโนเทคโนโลยีแห่งชาติ (NANOTEC), สวทช. CEO & CTO, บริษัท โครโนไลฟ์ จำกัด นักวิจัยด้านสกินแคร์ตัวจริงว่าทำไมเทรนด์ของสกินแคร์ทุกวันนี้จึงเน้นเรื่อง Longevity การกล่าวอ้างถึงวัตถุดิบเมื่อลงสูตรสกินแคร์แล้วได้ผลจริงหรือ ขั้นตอนการทดสอบสกินแคร์ทำอย่างไร และเราจะเลือกสกินแคร์ได้ประสิทธิภาพจริงๆ อย่างไร

A new survey has revealed a significant number of Kiwis want the Government to prepare for catastrophic events that could bring about the end of the world. New University of Otago research shows two-thirds of respondents believe the Government should draft action plans for threats such as a nuclear war, bioweapons or mass famine and supply chain collapse. Professor Nick Wilson, senior researcher at the Faculty of Medicine's Department of Public Health, says New Zealand's well-placed to weather out a nuclear winter - but there's plenty the nation's not prepared for. "Although we're a great producer of food, all that food production relies on diesel, which is imported. So we haven't got a single biofuel refinery that could keep our agricultural machinery going, for example." LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of The Singing Teachers Talk Podcast, Alexa chats with Rachael Drury about practical ways voice teachers can use AI to save time, spark creativity, and streamline admin — without losing the vital human connection that makes teaching so powerful. From lesson planning and practice tools to lyric writing and accountability, find out how AI can become a helpful ally in your teaching toolkit. WHAT'S IN THIS PODCAST?1:24 What can AI NOT do?14:02 How can we use AI positively as singing teachers?27:42 Helpful AI tools33:30 Are there any loopholes?41:23 How can teachers continue to advocate for the arts in the face of AI? About the presenter, click HERERELEVANT MENTIONS & LINKSSinging Teachers Talk Podcast - Ep.222 The Rise of AI: What It Means for Singers and TeachersChatGPTSinging Teachers Talk Podcast - Ep.155 & 156 Part One & Two: Building Neurodiversity-Inclusive Voice StudiosSunoUdioMidjourneyStability AICanvaTonaraErol StudiosSing ScopeYousicianTuneCoreSound CloudDeezerSinging Teachers Talk Podcast Ep.224 Your Brain on Art: The Science of Creativity and HealingYour Brain on Art by Susan Magsamen & Ivy RossIndependent Society of MusiciansABOUT THE GUESTDr Rachael Drury is a violinist, educator and researcher specialising in the evolving relationship between music, technology and the law. Rachael's successful career as a musician has seen her perform with ensembles like the Hallé and BBC Philharmonic, and in 2019 she returned to academia to explore how new technologies are reshaping the music industry. Her PhD at the University of Liverpool focused on the legal and economic impact of generative AI on copyright, authorship and musicians' livelihoods. Rachael now teaches across music industry studies and performance, while also serving as Senior Researcher and AI Officer at the Independent Society of Musicians. Her work informs copyright policy and creative rights, and she regularly speaks at national and international events. She is passionate about supporting musicians, students and teachers as they navigate the fast-changing digital music landscape.SEE FULL BIO HEREE: rachael.drury@ism.orgInstagram: @rachael_drury BAST Training helps singers gain the confidence, knowledge, skills & understanding required to be a successful singing teacher. "The course was everything I hoped it would be and so much more. It's an investment with so much return. I would recommend this course to any teacher wanting to up-skill, refresh or start up." Kelly Taylor, NZ ...morebasttraining.com | Subscribe | Email Us | FB Group

In this episode of Behind the Genes, we explore how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being applied in genomics through cross-sector collaborations. Genomics England and InstaDeep are working together on AI and machine learning-related projects to accelerate cancer research and drive more personalised healthcare. Alongside these scientific advances, our guests also discuss the ethical, societal and policy challenges associated with the use of AI in genomics, including data privacy and genomic discrimination. Our guests ask what responsible deployment of AI in healthcare should look like and how the UK can lead by example. Our host, Francisco Azuaje, Director of Bioinformatics Genomics England is joined by Dr Rich Scott, Chief Executive Officer at Genomics England Karim Beguir - Chief Executive Officer at InstaDeep Harry Farmer – Senior Researcher at Ada Lovelace Institute If you enjoyed today's conversation, please like and share wherever you listen to your podcasts. And for more on AI in genomics, tune in to our earlier episode: Can Artificial Intelligence Accelerate the Impact of Genomics? "In terms of what AI's actually doing and what it's bringing, it's really just making possible things that we've been trying to do in genomics for some time, making these things easier and cheaper and in some cases viable. So really it's best to see it as an accelerant for genomic science; it doesn't present any brand-new ethical problems, instead what it's doing is taking some fairly old ethical challenges and making these things far more urgent."   You can download the transcript, or read it below.   Francisco: Welcome to Behind the Genes. [Music plays] Rich: The key is to deliver what we see at the heart of our mission which is bringing the potential of genomic healthcare to everyone.  We can only do that by working in partnership.  We bring our expertise and those unique capabilities.  It's about finding it in different ways, in different collaborations, that multiplier effect, and it's really exciting.  And I think the phase we're in at the moment in terms of the use of AI in genomics is we're still really early in that learning curve. [Music plays] Francisco: My name is Francisco Azuaje, and I am Director of Bioinformatics at Genomics England.  On today's episode I am joined by Karim Beguir, CEO of InstaDeep, a pioneering AI company, Harry Farmer, Senior Researcher at the Ada Lovelace Institute, and Rich Scott, CEO of Genomics England.  Today we will explore how Genomics England is collaborating with InstaDeep to harness the power of AI in genomic research.  We will also dive into the critical role of ethical considerations in the development and application of AI technologies for healthcare.  If you've enjoyed today's episode, please like, share on wherever you listen to your podcasts. [Music plays] Let's meet our guests. Karim: Hi Francisco, it's a pleasure to be here.  I am the Co-Founder and CEO of InstaDeep and the AI arm of BioNTech Group, and I'm also an AI Researcher. Harry: I'm Harry Farmer, I'm a Senior Researcher at the Ada Lovelace Institute, which is a think-tank that works on the ethical and the societal implications of AI, data and other emerging digital technologies, and it's a pleasure to be here. Rich: Hi, it's great to be here with such a great panel.  I'm Rich Scott, I'm the CEO of Genomics England. Francisco: Thank you all for joining us.  I am excited to explore this intersection of AI and genomics with all of you.  To our listeners, if you wish to hear more about AI in genomics, listen to our previous podcast episode, ‘Can Artificial Intelligence Accelerate the Impact of Genomics', which is linked in this podcast description. Let's set the stage with what is happening right now, Rich, there have been lots of exciting advances in AI and biomedical research but in genomics it's far more than just hype, can you walk us through some examples of how AI is actually impacting genomic healthcare research? Rich: Yeah, so, as you say, Francisco, it is a lot more than hype and it's really exciting.  I'd also say that we're just at the beginning of a real wave of change that's coming.  So while AI is already happening today and driving our thinking, really we're at the beginning of a process.  So when you think about how genomics could impact healthcare and people's health in general, what we're thinking about is genomics potentially playing a routine part in up to half of all healthcare encounters, we think, based on the sorts of differences it could make in different parts of our lives and our health journey.  There are so many different areas where AI, we expect, will help us on that journey.  So thinking about, for example, how we speed up the interpretation of genetic information through to its use and the simple presentation of how to use that in life, in routine healthcare, through to discovery of new biomarkers or classification that might help us identify the best treatment for people.  Where it's making a difference already today is actually all of those different points.  So, for example, there's some really exciting work we're doing jointly with Karim and team looking at how we might use classification of the DNA sequence of tumours to help identify what type of tumour - a tumour that we don't know where it's come from, so what we call a ‘cancer of unknown primary' - to help in that classification process.  We're also working with various different people who are interested in classification for treatment and trials, but there's also lots in between recognising patterns of genomic data together with other complex data.  So we've been doing a lot of work bringing image data together with genomic data and other health data so that you can begin to recognise patterns that we couldn't even dream of.  Doing that hand in hand with thinking about what patients and participants want and expect, how their data is used and how their information is held, bringing it all together and understanding how this works, the evidence that we need before we can decide that a particular approach is one that policymakers, people in healthcare want to use, is all part of the conversation. Francisco: Thank you, Rich, for speaking of cutting-edge AI applications and InstaDeep.  Karim, could you give us a glimpse into your work and particularly how your technologies are tackling some of the biggest challenges in genomic research? Karim: Absolutely, and I think what's exciting is we've heard from Rich and, you know, this is like the genomics expertise angle of things and I come from the AI world and so do most of the InstaDeep team.  And really what's fascinating is this intersection that is being extremely productive at the moment where technologies that have been developed for like multiple AI applications turn out to be extremely useful in understanding genomic sequences.  This is a little bit, our journey, Francisco.  Back in 2021/2022 we started working on the very intriguing question at the time of could we actually understand better genomic sequences with the emerging technologies of NLP, natural language processing.  And you have to put this in context, this was before even the word ‘generative AI' was coined, this was before ChatGPT, but we had sort of like an intuition that there was a lot of value in deploying this technology.  And so my team, sort of like a team of passionate experts in research and engineering of AI, we tackled this problem and started working on it and the result of this work was our nucleotide transformer model which we have open sourced today; it's one of the most downloaded, most popular models in genomics.  And what's interesting is we observed that simply using the technologies of what we call ‘self-supervised learning' or ‘unsupervised learning' could actually help us unlock a lot of patterns. As we know, most of genomics information is poorly understood and this is a way actually, with using the AI tool, to get some sense of the structure that's there. So how do we do this?  We basically mask a few aspects of the sequence and we ask the system to figure them out.  And so this is exactly how you teach a system to learn English, you know, you are teaching it to understand the language of genomics, and, incredibly, this approach when done at scale - and we train a lot on the NVIDIA Cambridge-1 supercomputer – allows you to have results and performances that are matching multiple specialised models.  So until then genomics and use of machine learning for genomics was for a particular task, I would have developed a specific model using mostly supervised learning, which is, I am showing you a few examples, and then channelled these examples and tried to match that, and so essentially you had one model per task.  What's really revolutionary in this new paradigm of AI is that you have a single model trained at very largescale, the AI starts to understand the patterns, and this means that very concretely we can work with our partners to uncover fascinating relationships that were previously poorly understood.  And so there is a wealth of potential that we are exploring together and it's a very exciting time. Francisco: What you're describing really highlights both the potential and the opportunities but also the responsibility we have with these powerful tools, its power, and this brings up some important ethical considerations.  And we have Harry…  Harry, we have talked about ethics frameworks in research for decades but AI seems to be rewriting the rulebook.  For your work at the Ada Lovelace Institute what makes AI fundamentally different from previous technologies when it comes to ethical considerations and how does this reshape our approach to ensuring these powerful tools benefit society as a whole? Harry: So I think when you are considering these sorts of ethical questions and these sorts of ethical challenges posed by AI and genomics it really depends on the sort of deployment that you're looking at.  From the conversation we've had so far, I think what's been hinted at is some of the diversity of applications that you might be using AI for within the context of genomics and healthcare.  So I think there's obviously big advances that have been alluded to in things like drug discovery, in things like cancer and cancer diagnosis, also these advances around gene editing, all of which have been on steroids, by artificial intelligence and particularly machine learning and deep learning. The area that we have been looking at at the Ada Lovelace Institute, and this was a project that we were doing in collaboration with the NCOB, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, was looking at what we were calling ‘AI-powered genomic health prediction', which is very related to a technique called ‘polygenic scoring', for those who might be interested.  And that's looking at the emerging ability to make predictions about people's future health on the basis of their DNA, and it was thinking about what that ability might mean for UK society and also for how we are thinking about and delivering healthcare in the UK. Now, thinking about what the ethical challenges might be for that, I think you need to think about what specifically AI is bringing to that technique, so what it's bringing to genomic health prediction.  I think with some of the other deployments, the list of things that AI is bringing is quite similar, so it's helping with data collection and processing, so speeding up and automating data collection and preparation processes that otherwise are quite slow and very labour-intensive.  AI's also helping with the analysis of genomic and phenotype data, so helping us to understand the associations between different genomic variations and between observable traits, and this is something which without AI can often be prohibitively complex to do, and it's also sometimes suggested that on the deployment end AI can be a tool that can help us use genomic insight in healthcare more widely.  So one example of this might be using an AI chat bot to explain to a patient the results of a genomic test.  That's something that's only been mooted and I don't think there are current examples of that at the moment but that's one of the downstream applications of AI in the context of genomics. So in terms of what AI's actually doing and what it's bringing, it's really just making possible things that we've been trying to do in genomics for some time, making these things easier and cheaper and in some cases viable.  So really it's best to see it as an accelerant for genomic science; it doesn't present any brand-new ethical problems, instead what it's doing is taking some fairly old ethical challenges and making these things far more urgent.  So in terms of what those problems actually are, some of the big ones will be around privacy and surveillance, genomic health predictions produce a lot of intimate sensitive data about people and generating those insights requires the collection and the storage and the processing of a lot of very sensitive data as well.  We also have issues related to privacy around genomic discrimination, so this is the worry that people will be treated differently and in some cases unfairly on the basis of health predictions made about them.  And one of the really typical examples here is the worry that people might face higher insurance costs if they're found through genomic testing to be more likely to develop particular diseases over their life course. And then you also have a bunch of issues and questions which are more structural, so these are questions about how the availability of this kind of insight into people's future health might change or put pressure on existing ways of thinking about health and thinking about healthcare and some extreme cases thinking about the social contract.  So these are questions like does the viability of genomic health prediction lead to a radically more preventative approach to healthcare and what might this mean for what the state demands of you as a user of healthcare and as a recipient of that.  And there are also some important questions about the practicalities of delivering genomic medicine in the NHS, so questions like how does the NHS retain control and sovereignty over genomic analysis and data capacities, how do we test their efficacy at a public health level, and also – and this is something that we might talk about a bit later – what's the best deployment model for these capacities.  So that's some of the ethical and I think policy challenges that we need to be dealing with in this space. Francisco: Thank you, Harry.  And those principles you have outlined provide a solid foundation for discussing different types of applications. [Music plays] Let's talk about the InstaDeep and Genomics England partnership that is investigating the application of InstaDeep's powerful foundation model, the nucleotide transformer, and other cutting edge techniques to address several challenges in cancer research.  I have the privilege of working closely with this partnership and the potential here is immense.  Karim, could you break down for our listeners what you are working on together and what innovations you are aiming for? Karim: Absolutely, Francisco.  Actually, we are very excited by the collaboration with Genomics England.  Genomics England not only has one of the best data assets in the world when it comes to genomics, like a very well curated dataset but also a wealth of expertise on these topics, and on my side the InstaDeep team brings fundamental knowhow of machine learning models but also, as you mentioned, like powerful developed models already, such as our nucleotide transformer and others.  The culture of InstaDeep has always been to build AI that benefits everyone – this is literally in our mission – and so in particular, specifically on like current topics, really like the goal is to try to identify partners between genomic sequences of patients and the particular phenotypes or approaches.  And one of the key projects, which I mentioned that, is the one of cancer of unknown primary origin.  So when you have situations where you are not sure where a particular cancer emerged from it is critical to be able to extract this information to have the best potential care, and this is actually something where understanding of genomic sequences can bring this capability.  And so we've been getting some successful results in the collaboration but in many ways this is just the beginning.  What we are seeing is a great wealth of possibilities linking genotypes, so the information which is on the sequences themselves, the genomic sequences, and phenotypes, like the particular state of the patient, and the fact that the Genomics England team has those joint datasets creates incredible opportunities.  So we are looking at this really like identifying together what are the most useful ‘low-hanging fruits', if you want, in terms of like potentially improving a patient's care and moving forward from that. Francisco: And this collaborative approach you are describing raises questions about accelerating innovation in general.  When two organisations like Genomics England and InstaDeep come together it's like a multiplier effect in terms of expertise, data, and other resources.  Could you both share how this partnership is accelerating discoveries that might have taken years? Rich: Yeah, I mean, I think this…  Francisco, you frame it really nicely because this is what makes it so exciting to be in our position at Genomics England because what we do is we bring the particular understanding and expertise, digital infrastructure and custodianship of the National Genomic Research Library together, but actually the key is bringing the potential of genomic healthcare to everyone.  We can only do that by working in partnership, we bring our expertise and those capabilities.  And, as you say, it's about finding it in different ways, in different collaborations, that multiplier effect, and it's really exciting.  And I think the phase we're in at the moment in terms of the use of AI in genomics is we're still really early in that learning curve.  And so, as you've heard already through what Karim and I have said and also what Harry has said, there are multiple different aspects that we need to look at together, bringing different angles and understandings, and we see ourselves…  We often describe ourselves as a ‘data and evidence engine', that final word ‘evidence' is really important and it comes in the round.  So Harry really eloquently talked about a number of different considerations from an ethical perspective that need to be there.  What we need if we're going to move genomics forwards in terms of its potential to make a difference for people's lives, we need evidence around clinical efficacy of different approaches, that's absolutely a given and everyone always jumps at…  so it's almost first in line.  We need understanding about the health economics, you know, how much difference does it make for a particular investment, is it worth that investment.  Critically, it also is founded on, you know, how you might use this technology in different ways, how you use it in clinical pathways, you know, is it something that actually is addressing the particular questions which really hold back the delivery of better care.  Also in that evidence piece is an understanding of patients' and participants' expectations on how their data might be used, their expectations on privacy, the expectations that we have on understanding how equitable the use of a particular approach might be, or at least our understanding of how confident we are about the equity of the impact, and it's bringing together those different perspectives.  And that's one of the things that helps us construct the team at Genomics England so we have the expertise to help others access the data in the National Genomic Research Library for purposes our participants support but also help generate that sort of rounded package of evidence that will end up moving the dial.  So that it's not just about proving a cool widget, because that's great on its own, what drives Karim and the team is to make a difference in terms of outcomes, and that's exactly what drives us and our participants too. Francisco: And this and other partnership approaches brings up important questions about responsible innovation, and this naturally leads us to the next question for Harry, how do we harness these powerful tools when protecting our communities? Harry: Yeah, so if we are thinking about over-surveillance and the ways that vulnerable groups might be affected by the use of genomics and healthcare, I think we're talking about at least two different things here.  So one problems around the representativeness of data is it does lead to issues which you could classify as issues of differential accuracy.  So in the context of genomic prediction what you have is genomic predictive tools being more accurate for white Europeans and those with white European ancestry compared to other population groups.  And this is a product of the fact that genomic datasets and genomic predictions, the terminologies don't port well between different populations, which means if you train a genomic predictive tool on a bunch of people with white European ancestry the predictions you might make using that tool for other groups won't be as accurate as for the white Europeans.  And this can be actively harmful and dangerous for those in underrepresented groups because you are making predictions about people which just won't have the accuracy that you would expect in the context that you were deploying it. And I already mentioned this a bit in my previous answer, you have worries about discrimination, and there are a few different things here.  So with some historically marginalised groups and marginalised groups now there are longstanding historical sensitivities about being experimented on, about particular fears about eugenics and about being categorised in particular ways.  And it's worth saying here that there is obviously a racial dimension to this worry but I think there's also a class dimension, by which I mean you're far more vulnerable to being categorised unfavourably if you're poor or if you don't have a particular kind of status within society.  There is also within discrimination the idea that genomics might be used to explain away differences between different groups which in fact have a political or an economic basis.  So one example of this was during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were attempts by some commentators to explain away the fact that non-white communities had worse rates of mortality from COVID to try and attribute a genetic or a genomic basis to those differences rather than looking at some of the socioeconomic factors behind that.  So those are some worries as well. Now, when it comes to protecting particular groups I think there are a few things that can be done fairly straightforwardly.  So, one is work to improve the diversity and the representativeness of datasets.  Obviously, that's easier said than done, though it's a very clear thing that we can aspire towards and there is good work, I'm aware, that is going on in this space, some of which is being spearheaded by Genomics England, amongst other groups.  Another is just being very careful about how the results of population level genomic studies are communicated to avoid giving that impression of explaining away differences between different groups simply as things determined by genomics about which we can do nothing rather than things which have historical or socioeconomic bases.  But I also think the broader lesson is that some of these harms and these forms of discrimination are things that could theoretically affect anyone; they're not just limited to affecting marginalised groups. Genomic health predicting can produce bases for all of us to be discriminated against, things that have nothing to do with our race, our class, our sex or any other protected characteristic.  So I think there has to be thinking about how we establish or sure up more universal protections against genomic discrimination.  One thing that we can do here is simply stronger data protection law, and one of the things that we talk about in some of our reports is that how data protection law as it stands could do with being less ambiguous when it comes to how it treats genomic data and phenotype data produced as a result of genomic analysis. [Music plays] Francisco: Harry, you are in a unique position at the Ada Lovelace Institute where you bridge this gap between AI developers, researchers, policymakers and the public.  Your recent report on AI in genomics with the Nuffield Council on Bioethics offers an important blueprint for responsible AI innovation in general, so based on this cross-sector perspective, what guiding principles do we need to embrace as we navigate this intersection of AI and genomics? Harry: So I think in addition to the specific recommendations we set out in the final report of that work - which is called ‘Predicting the Future of Health' and which you can find on our website and also on the NCOB website – I think one of the biggest messages was the importance of finding a deployment model for genomic health prediction that respects that technology's strengths, what it can actually do, because there are limitations to this technology, and also which avoids circumstances in which the associated risks are difficult to deal with.  So another way of putting this is that we need a deployment model that, as well as making sure that we're ready to cope with the risks of genomic health prediction, the things like law, regulation and governance also proactively tries to design out some of those risks and finds ways of deploying this technology such that those risks don't present themselves in either as extreme a manner or don't present themselves in ways which makes them difficult to deal with. So one question that we posed in our research was whether some ways of integrating genomic health prediction may present more challenges regarding privacy, discrimination and then these other challenges that we'd identified around dependency and fragility and others. And having looked at some of the different broad approaches to using genomic health prediction within the NHS and within the UK's health system, we found that one presented by far fewest of the risks identified above, while still presenting some of the most certain benefits of genomic health prediction.  And this was using it really primarily as a targeted diagnostic tool - and this is a vision in which the NHS uses genomic health prediction quite sparingly in the first instance - and in situations to improve treatment and outcomes for those who are seriously ill or who have been identified as needing to take particular precautions regarding their health.  We think the more situational vision has a few advantages.  So one, is it allows patient and people using the health service to retain greater control over data.  We think that can also have a positive knock-on effect for worries about discrimination.  And here what you have is the absence of those pressures to share your data.  It means that it's easier for you as the user of the healthcare system to resist genomic discrimination simply by keeping your data private.  And there are some cases where that option… it shouldn't be the only option but where that option is really important. And then also one of the features of this vision is that the smaller scale of the use of genomic health prediction, presumed, can make outsourcing to third parties, which the NHS is probably likely to need to do in some cases.  It's also a vision, I think, that overall allows you to capture some of the more certain benefits to genomic health prediction which are about improvements to accuracy in predictions about people's future health at the margin, and therefore this is a deployment of this technology which is deploying it principally to people who will benefit and we know will benefit from marginal improvements in accuracy to predictions made about their future health rather than wanting to deploy those marginal improvements to the vast majority of the population where the benefit is less certain.  So this is a vision we hope sets out a way of getting some of the more certain benefits of this technology while minimising some of those broader more systemic risks. Francisco: Thank you, Harry.  Karim? Karim: Totally agree with Harry about the need for smart regulation in the field so that we make sure we have good uses of the technology but avoid the potential pitfalls.  I wanted to emphasise two points which I believe are important.  First, we are really in a fast-moving situation when we look at like AI progress.  We have seen incredible improvements over the last ten years and in particular what we call ‘artificial general intelligence', which is essentially systems that are matching human cognitive abilities, are now around the corner.  This might sound surprising but literally the last obstacles to reach AGI are being solved right now, and this means that in the next 12-24 months you will have systems that are incredibly capable.  So this emphasises the need for the type of measures and type of smart approach that Harry has described.  And I would say when you look at the intersection of AI and genomics this is a particularly important one and why it's the case, because so far in genomics our obstacle has not been data, it has been interpretation of a flood of data.  The progress that AI is making, like I just described now, means that very soon extraordinary capabilities will be available to improve patients' outcomes.  I want to inject a sense of how important is our conversation today, given what is happening, an exponential progress in AI, exponentially growing data in genomics and relatively exponential potential to build the technology for good.  But, like in other fields, we see that AI is an extremely powerful technology and we need to make sure it is used for good in fact and this is why the conversation that we have today is so important. Harry: Obviously I agree with the conclusion to all of this, is that we need to think very hard about the way that artificial intelligence and its deployment in healthcare and also just in many different walks of life is going to be affecting the way we think about public service delivery, affecting the way that we think about scientific development.  It's worth noting, though, that I think one of the biggest challenges from a policy perspective on artificial intelligence is being able to distinguish the wheat from the chaff.  There are obviously areas where AI has made huge and incredibly impressive progress over the past few years and where we reasonably expect that to continue over the next few years, but there are also areas where some of the stories being told about the capabilities of future systems probably won't be matched by the reality, but there is I think a really big and very live debate about exactly what we can reasonably expect from these technologies and therefore what the deployments of them are. Francisco: Thank you.  We are approaching the end of the episode and I'd like to conclude with a couple of questions.  Genomics England has built quite an ecosystem of industry partnerships, how do collaborations like the one with InstaDeep fit into your broader mission for the company? Rich: So linking this to the conversation that we've just been having, which is AI is making a real difference in terms of technologies that we can test, we can develop evidence on, and that is rightly creating excitement, I think our approach…  The expectation of our participants is that our role is to sit there and help people develop evidence and you can make judgments on policy based on those and that is what will drive adoption.  I think the thing that really excites me for the UK, most particularly in genomics, is our ability to be the place in the world where you can come with a new technology, whether it's genomic sequencing technology, whether it's a genomic AI approach to train that to develop evidence on its efficacy, and, if it's proven to be effective to be worth the bang for the buck to perform to the expectations that patients, the public, would have of it in terms of equity and so forth also to deploy it.  I think there is a real reason for excitement around that and it's a real opportunity that the government has highlighted and that we absolutely buy into that the UK can be the best place to do that for academics and for industry.  And our participants see real opportunity and are eager for that work to be done so that we have the evidence on which to decide what should be deployed and where.  We see opportunities in all sorts of different areas, so certainly in terms of drug discovery and all the way through to simplifying tasks which at the moment just limit the rate at which the existing uses of genomics in healthcare can happen. So I think there's opportunities across the whole length, if you like, the sort of end to end, and the breadth of opportunity, and industry, companies like InstaDeep and others that we work with, are really crucial to that.  And what we do is think about the digital infrastructure we need to, you know, have those teams able to interact with within the National Genomic Research Library carrying out their approved research projects.  Also what support they need, and that comes in different shapes and sizes, depending on the ask and also the company.  So sometimes sort of leaning in more, particularly at the start of programmes, to help people shape the question, working with our participants, thinking about the wider evidence that you might need, for example, those sort of things that Harry's touched on, but also thinking about what hands-on support companies need, because not every company is anywhere close to Karim and InstaDeep's expertise.  Sometimes this is also about supporting people to have some of those tools that they don't have or some of the knowhow that's very specific to areas of genomics, so it's absolutely crucial to it.  And I think that point of the UK being the place to come and develop that evidence in its full breadth so that policy decisions can be made not based on hype but on evidence in the round, on what will make a difference. Francisco: And, Karim, looking ahead, also in retrospect, what have been your key learnings about making this cross-sector partnership work? Karim: We live in an extraordinary time and I want to emphasise the potential of scientific discovery in the next two or three years.  AI is going to move from, let's say, digital style, you know, technologies like coding and maths towards more like science and biology.  In particular, genomics is going to be a fascinating area in terms of potential, and I agree with Rich and Harry, it's all in the end about proving on the ground the potential of those capabilities.  And at InstaDeep we are passionate about the tech – I think you might have felt that – but we're also passionate about the applications.  The best results come when you bring expertise from multiple domains; machine learning and AI experts will require the expertise of genomic experts, biologists, healthcare practitioners, to be able to translate the potential of those technologies in concrete outcomes.  And we've seen this on multiple successful projects we've done with Genomics England but really this suggests that we are going to have in the next 3-5 years way more progress than we had in the last five and really my wish is that collectively we seize this opportunity and we do it in a responsible and thoughtful manner. [Music plays] Francisco: We'll wrap up there.  Thank you to our guests, Karim Beguir, Harry Farmer and Rich Scott, for joining me today as we discuss the role of AI in genomics research.  If you wish to hear more like this, please subscribe to Behind the Genes on your favourite podcast app.  Thank you for listening.  I have been your host, Francisco Azuaje.  This podcast was edited by Bill Griffin at Ventoux Digital and produced by Naimah Callachand. [Music plays]    

Stephen Grootes speaks to Kevin Lings, Chief Economist at Stanlib Asset Management and Jacolize Meiring, Senior Researcher & Head of the Personal Finance Research Division at The Bureau of Market Research about the severe strain on South Africa's middle class, citing signs such as shifting consumer behavior, rising debt levels, and stagnant income growth. In other interviews, Ayabonga Cawe, Itac chief commissioner, chats about the surge in caseload for South Africa's International Trade Administration Commission due to the US tariffs and global overcapacity issues, particularly in steel production, which could impact exporting companies and jobs. The Money Show is a podcast hosted by well-known journalist and radio presenter, Stephen Grootes. He explores the latest economic trends, business developments, investment opportunities, and personal finance strategies. Each episode features engaging conversations with top newsmakers, industry experts, financial advisors, entrepreneurs, and politicians, offering you thought-provoking insights to navigate the ever-changing financial landscape. Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Money Show Listen live Primedia+ weekdays from 18:00 and 20:00 (SA Time) to The Money Show with Stephen Grootes broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj and CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show, go to https://buff.ly/7QpH0jY or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/PlhvUVe Subscribe to The Money Show Daily Newsletter and the Weekly Business Wrap here https://buff.ly/v5mfetc The Money Show is brought to you by Absa Follow us on social media 702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/702 on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalkCapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalkCapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/Radio702CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stephen Grootes speaks to Kevin Lings, Chief Economist at Stanlib Asset Management, and Jacolize Meiring, Senior Researcher & Head of the Personal Finance Research Division at The Bureau of Market Research, about the severe strain on South Africa's middle class, citing signs such as shifting consumer behavior, rising debt levels, and stagnant income growth. The Money Show is a podcast hosted by well-known journalist and radio presenter, Stephen Grootes. He explores the latest economic trends, business developments, investment opportunities, and personal finance strategies. Each episode features engaging conversations with top newsmakers, industry experts, financial advisors, entrepreneurs, and politicians, offering you thought-provoking insights to navigate the ever-changing financial landscape.    Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Money Show Listen live Primedia+ weekdays from 18:00 and 20:00 (SA Time) to The Money Show with Stephen Grootes broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj and CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show, go to https://buff.ly/7QpH0jY or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/PlhvUVe Subscribe to The Money Show Daily Newsletter and the Weekly Business Wrap here https://buff.ly/v5mfetc The Money Show is brought to you by Absa     Follow us on social media   702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702   CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/Radio702 CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

With the summer holiday season upon us, this is your guide to the dos and don'ts or spending money while abroad. Which? Senior Writer Grace Witherden & Jo Rhodes, a Senior Researcher at Which? Travel share their expert knowledge on the best cards to use, where to get your physical cash, and the best ways to avoid fees. Sign our Stop Fleecing Fans petition & sign up to our free weekly Money newsletter Click here to send us an email Get 50% off an annual Which? membership Become a Which? Money member This episode was originally published in August 2024.

AI is shaking up the music industry — but what does that mean for singers, teachers, and creatives? In this episode, Alexa chats with Dr. Rachael Drury to unpack how generative AI is impacting songwriting, session work, copyright law, and even live performance. We explore what's at risk, what's protected, and what we can still hold onto as humans in a digital age. Whether you're AI-curious or already feeling the shift, this is your essential guide to understanding AI's role in music today, and how to stay empowered through it.WHAT'S IN THIS PODCAST?0:33 What actually is AI?5:22 Examples of computer generated music9:43 What areas of the music industry are seeing the most and least AI impact?17:23 What about holograms?27:42 How can we tell if AI is impacting our creative jobs?32:25 AI & copyright53:24 When will AI take over the creative industry?55:15 Moving forwards positivelyAbout the presenter, click HERERELEVANT MENTIONS & LINKSIlliac Suite by Lejaren HillerSuno and Mikey ShulmanUdio (featured songs are original tracks created using Udio; used with attribution for demonstration purposes)Openai JukeboxBeethoven XABBA VoyageBASE HologramThe BlossomsIndependent Society of MusiciansSection 9.3 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act Seb CuttillISM The Rise of AI: Friend or Foe?Intellectual Property OfficeUK MusicABOUT THE GUESTDr Rachael Drury is a violinist, educator and researcher specialising in the evolving relationship between music, technology and the law. Rachael's successful career as a musician has seen her perform with ensembles like the Hallé and BBC Philharmonic, and in 2019 she returned to academia to explore how new technologies are reshaping the music industry. Her PhD at the University of Liverpool focused on the legal and economic impact of generative AI on copyright, authorship and musicians' livelihoods. Rachael now teaches across music industry studies and performance, while also serving as Senior Researcher and AI Officer at the Independent Society of Musicians. Her work informs copyright policy and creative rights, and she regularly speaks at national and international events. She is passionate about supporting musicians, students and teachers as they navigate the fast-changing digital music landscape.FULL BIO HEREE: rachael.drury@ism.org IG: @rachael_druryBAST Training helps singers gain the confidence, knowledge, skills & understanding required to be a successful singing teacher. "The course was everything I hoped it would be and so much more. It's an investment with so much return. I would recommend this course to any teacher wanting to up-skill, refresh or start up." Kelly Taylor, NZ ...morebasttraining.com | Subscribe | Email Us | FB Group

John Maytham chats to Lucy Jamieson – Senior Researcher at the Children’s Institute at UCT, about the South Africa Council of Educators new policy regarding teacher behaviour and corporal punishment in schools. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dr Suzi Lyons, Senior Researcher at the Health Research Board, outlines the State agency's latest data on alcohol related treatment figures in Ireland

Topics include: How to find suitable journals; how to respond to reviews; the role of journals in acdemic discourse; the policies and politics of journals. Discussants: Silvia Figueirôa is Professor at the University of Campinas, Brazil, and has edited several collective volumes. Joseph D. Martin is Associate Professor at Durham University, UK, chair of the editorial board of Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, editor-in-chief of Physics in Perspective, and book reviews editor for the British Journal for the History of Science. Doubravka Olšáková is Senior Researcher in History at Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic, and deputy editor of Centaurus. Tiago Saraiva is Full Professor of History at the Drexel University, USA, co-editor of History and Technology and a member of the Cambridge History of Technology editorial team. Recorded on March 27, 2025. For more information visit: https://www.chstm.org/node/78650

After announcing plans to recognise Palestinian Statehood unless Israel meets his demands, is the Prime Minister on the right side of history? Iain speaks with Senior Researcher at the Institute of International Relations Prague, Dr Azriel Bermant, and Director of Communications for Yachad , a British-Jewish organisation working towards a peaceful resolution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, Danielle Bett.On Cross Question, Iain is joined by Jonathan Gullis, Will Hutton, Zoe Strimpel and Natasha Devon.

Today, on the Hudson Mohawk Magazine, Mark Dunlea speaks with Ben Murray, a Senior Researcher with Food and Water Watch on the Trump administration's Artificial Intelligence Action Plan and the environmental impacts of the AI industry. Then, Benno Greene reports on the Milk with Dignity campaign by Migrant Justice. Later on, retired national weather serviceman Hugh Johnson joins us to talk about some recent flash floods, and this week's weather. After that, we have the Everybody Moves piece that profiles immigration stories from people in our community. This week we heard from Rosaly. Finally, Rebecca Alston interviews Aila about music and activism Co-hosts: Lennox Apudo & Sean Bernyk Engineer: Jalaya Reid

On July 23, 2025, the Trump administration issued an Artificial Intelligence Action Plan. The plan is viewed as heavily promoting the AI industry and seeks to reduce the ability of individual states to adopt their own regulations. Environmental groups are concerned about the massive electricity and water demands of the AI Industry. Ben Murray, a Senior Researcher with Food and Water Watch, discusses the issue with Mark Dunlea for Hudson Mohawk Magazine.

Ein Vortrag der Strafrechtlerin Johanna RinceanuModeration: Katrin Ohlendorf ********** Das Netz ist mittlerweile der Ort für gesellschaftlichen und politischen Diskurs. Damit unterliegt er auch den Strukturen und Dynamiken des Internets, vor allem der Social-Media-Plattformen. Was bedeutet das für die Meinungsfreiheit? Johanna Rinceanu ist Strafrechtlerin und Senior Researcher am Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung von Kriminalität, Sicherheit und Recht. Ihren Vortrag "Meinungsfreiheit in der digitalen Welt?" hat sie am 13.05.2025 im Rahmen der Reihe "Die Verfassung der Freiheit – Demokratieprobleme der Gegenwart" am Hamburger Institut für Sozialforschung gehalten. ********** +++ Deutschlandfunk Nova +++ Hörsaal +++ Vortrag +++ Menschenrechte +++ Meinungsfreiheit +++ Freiheit +++ Datenschutz +++ Menschenwürde +++ Recht +++ Gesetze +++ Internet +++ Überwachung +++ Zensur +++ Hate Speech +++ Desinformation +++ Fake News +++ Soziale Medien +++ Social Media +++ Meta +++ Facebook +++ Instagram +++ Alphabet +++ Apple +++ Microsoft +++ Amazon +++ Big Five +++ Big Tech +++ GAFAM +++ GAMAM +++ GAMMA +++ Tiktok +++ Google +++ EU +++ Europäische Union +++ Digital Services Act +++ DSA +++ China +++ USA +++**********Ihr hört in diesem Hörsaal:00:02:19 - Vortragsbeginn**********Quellen aus der Folge:Das Gesetz über digitale Dienste, engl.: Digital Services Act (DAS)Rinceanu, Johanna, & Stephenson, Randall (2022). Eine Diagnose digitaler Krankheiten. MaxPlanckForschung, 2022(3), 14-19.**********Mehr zum Thema bei Deutschlandfunk Nova:KI im demokratischen Rechtsstaat: Digital Services Act und Robo-RichterTiktok: EU-Politik fehlt bislang auf PlattformHongkong: China könnte Autonomie Hongkongs entmachten**********Den Artikel zum Stück findet ihr hier.**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: TikTok und Instagram .

Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara this week refused to attend a dismissal hearing called by a newly formed ministerial committee, writing earlier that government decision to change the firing method is illegal and driven by external and corrupt considerations. Dr. Amir Fuchs, a Senior Researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute, told KAN reporter Naomi Segal that the government bid to oust the attorney general is part of a dangerous wave that threatens Israeli democracy. (Photo: Noam Revkin Fenton/Flash90) See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Content Warning: Themes of racism, violence, and police brutality are discussed throughout this episode. Please proceed with caution and care. The U.S. has persistently relied on armed law enforcement to enforce traffic laws. However, existing evidence does not support the notion that police traffic enforcement improves public safety. In fact, police traffic enforcement has serious adverse consequences for community health and well-being, with disproportionate impacts on Black communities. Last year, the Thurgood Marshall Institute published a research brief, Safe Roads for All, which found that police traffic enforcement is not associated with safer roads. This episode of Justice Above All builds upon what is discussed in that brief and presents a community-centered public health approach to traffic safety. Our guests come from the transit safety and police reform worlds. Together, they agree that we can reimagine traffic safety in a way that prioritizes public health and eliminates our heavy reliance on policing. Today's host is Dr. Sandhya Kajeepeta, Senior Researcher and Statistician at the Thurgood Marshall Institute. She is in conversation with the following guests: -Kim Saltz: Justice in Public Safety Project Legal Fellow, Legal Defense Fund Amber Sherman: Policy Organizer, Decarcerate Memphis Tiffany Smith: Program Manager, Vision Zero Network For more information on this episode, please visit https://tminstituteldf.org/driving-while-black. This episode was written and produced by Jakiyah Bradley and Dr. Sandhya Kajeepeta. Resonate Recording provided production support.If you enjoyed this episode please consider leaving a review and helping others find it! To keep up with the work of LDF please visit our website at www.naacpldf.org and follow us on social media at @naacp_ldf. To keep up with the work of the Thurgood Marshall Institute, please visit our website at www.tminstituteldf.org and follow us on Twitter at @tmi_ldf.

Gene and cohost Tim Swartz present a unique approach to evaluating the 1947 Roswell, NM UFO event: a mock trial. The guest is Christopher Johnston, J.D., a renowned trial attorney and Certified Civil Trial Specialist based at the Law Group of Iowa in Des Moines. He has held a lifelong fascination with UFOs, and this passion has resulted in the publication of his first novel, "Roswell: The Truth on Trial: The Evidence Speaks – You Decide." The novel has been described by D. Boeke, a Senior Researcher with the U.S. Department of Energy (Ret.), as, “The X-Files meets Law and Order!” Beyond the courtroom, Chris, a Founding Member of The Hollywood Disclosure Alliance, is also a lifelong Ufologist with a background in both astrobiology and space law. He has completed certificate coursework in Astrobiology and earned a Certificate in Space Law through the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), bridging the gap between scientific inquiry and legal accountability in the expanding domain of space exploration. Chris is a contributing member of the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) and has authored multiple articles for the MUFON Journal, including The Infratempestrial Hypothesis—a provocative exploration of ancient terrestrial intelligence's and their role in shaping humanity's understanding of the UFO phenomenon. This episode focuses not just on the Roswell trial, but on this fascinating look at the UFO mystery. His website: lawgroupofiowa.com/blog/putting-roswell-on-trial-a-legal-look-at-ufo-evidence-and-government-claimsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-paracast-the-gold-standard-of-paranormal-radio--6203433/support.

US expert Emma Shortis joins Democracy Sausage to talk about the reshaping of the US-Australia relationship, misguided assumptions and finding Australia's place in the world. Can Trump be treated as an aberration in US foreign policy or has he permanently reshaped the global order? Does fealty to Trump's America make Australia safer or should we rejig our relationship? And what can we learn from our neighbours in the region and their approach to foreign policy? On this episode of Democracy Sausage, Dr Emma Shortis joins Professor Mark Kenny to discuss what the world could look like after America – and where Australia fits in. Emma Shortis is Senior Researcher in the International & Security Affairs Program at The Australia Institute. Her research focuses on the history and politics of the United States and its role in the world. She is the author of After America: Australia and the New World Order and Our Exceptional Friend: Australia's Fatal Alliance with the United States. Mark Kenny is the Director of the ANU Australian Studies Institute. He came to the University after a high-profile journalistic career including six years as chief political correspondent and national affairs editor for The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times. Democracy Sausage with Mark Kenny is available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pocket Casts, Google Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. We'd love to hear your feedback on this series, so send in your questions, comments or suggestions for future episodes to democracysausage@anu.edu.au. This podcast is produced by The Australian National University. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Max Smeets, Co-Director of Virtual Routes and Senior Researcher at ETH Zurich, joins Lawfare's Jonathan Cedarbaum and Justin Sherman to discuss his recently released book “Ransom War: How Cybercrime Became a Threat to National Security.” They discuss the history of ransomware (including the term itself), how the threats have evolved over the years, and some of the major drivers of innovation and entrepreneurialism within the ransomware ecosystem. They discuss Max's findings on the “trust paradox” facing ransomware groups, the internal business dynamics of ransomware gangs, how governments leverage ransomware operators to their own ends, and how the United States and Europe can respond to future threats.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Join us for the special episode in partnership with UN Women to commemorate the International Day of Women in Diplomacy. This conversation on gender equality in diplomacy features insights from the Director of UN Women in Geneva, Sofia Calltorp, and Dr. Sarah Chehab, a Senior Research Fellow at the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy, in Abu Dhabi. Dr. Chehab shares the journey of founding the Women in Diplomacy Research Program and provides the stark statistics on gender representation from the Women in Diplomacy Index. With compelling data, Dr. Chehab discusses the pressing need to bridge the gap in senior diplomatic roles and sparks discussion on the importance of feminist foreign policy. Also joining the conversation, Sofia Calltorp, Director of UN Women in Geneva, shares her extensive experience in diplomacy and humanitarian affairs. She offers insights into UN Women's global efforts and highlights key developments in gender-responsive foreign policies. This episode navigates through the challenges and triumphs of women's representation in diplomacy, emphasizing the crucial role of gender equality in achieving sustainable and inclusive peace and governance on a global scale. Tune in for an engaging dialogue on the future of diplomacy and the critical steps needed to ensure equal representation for all. Resources: Ask a Librarian! The UN Secretary General's report on the 30-year review and appraisal of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action - https://docs.un.org/E/CN.6/2025/3 CSW 69 Political Declaration- https://docs.un.org/E/CN.6/2025/L.1 Women in Politics: 2025- https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2025/03/women-in-politics-map-2025 Women in Diplomacy research programme, Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy: https://www.agda.ac.ae/research/publications-multimedia-events/women-in-diplomacy Where to listen to this episode  Apple podcasts:  https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-next-page/id1469021154 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/10fp8ROoVdve0el88KyFLy YouTube: https://youtu.be/Nn7Z6YolbXc Content    Guests: Dr. Sara Chehab, Senior Researcher, Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy, United Arab Emirates Ms. Sofia Calltorp, Director, UN Women Geneva Host, production and editing: Amy Smith, UN Library & Archives Geneva Recorded & produced at the United Nations Library & Archives Geneva 

******Support the channel******Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenterPayPal: paypal.me/thedissenterPayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: https://tinyurl.com/yb3acuuyPayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9lPayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpzPayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9mPayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao ******Follow me on******Website: https://www.thedissenter.net/The Dissenter Goodreads list: https://shorturl.at/7BMoBFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/thedissenteryt/Twitter: https://x.com/TheDissenterYT This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/ Dr. Willem Frankenhuis is an Associate Professor of Evolutionary Psychobiology at the University of Amsterdam and a Senior Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law.  He studies how people develop in harsh and unpredictable environments. He also uses mathematical modeling to explore the evolution of plasticity, the ability of organisms to adjust to environmental conditions. In this episode, we talk about human development in harsh and unpredictable environments. We start by defining harsh and unpredictable environments. We then talk about expected human childhood, repeated and chronic childhood adversity, strengths and abilities that develop in high-stress environments, hidden talents, enhanced emotion detection, adaptive impulsive behavior, present-oriented psychology, violence in deprived communities, and the development of resilience. Finally, we discuss phenotypic plasticity, and life history theory in psychology and biology.--A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, BERNARDO SEIXAS, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, BR, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, LUCY, MANVIR SINGH, PETRA WEIMANN, CAROLA FEEST, MAURO JÚNIOR, 航 豊川, TONY BARRETT, NIKOLAI VISHNEVSKY, STEVEN GANGESTAD, TED FARRIS, ROBINROSWELL, AND KEITH RICHARDSON!A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, NICK GOLDEN, CHRISTINE GLASS, IGOR NIKIFOROVSKI, PER KRAULIS, AND BENJAMIN GELBART!AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!