POPULARITY
2 episodes with assessing risk
2 episodes with assessing risk
2 episodes with assessing risk
2 episodes with assessing risk
2 episodes with assessing risk
2 episodes with assessing risk
2 episodes with assessing risk
When it comes to enrichment, we often think we need fancy tools, expensive toys, or complicated activities—but what if the best enrichment was sitting in your recycling bin? In this episode of Enrichment for the Real World, Emily Strong (she/they) shares how you can use everyday household items—yes, even your trash—to bring joy, engagement, and behavioral diversity into your pet's life.You'll learn why pets might ignore new enrichment items at first (hint: it's not personal!), how to safely experiment with new objects, and why a little patience and creativity go a long way. Emily offers practical tips for encouraging interaction, assessing risk, and making adjustments as needed, all while sharing real-life examples of budget enrichment in action. Whether you're just getting started or looking to spice things up, this episode reminds us to be curious, flexible, and open to futzing around and finding out.TLDL (Too Long, Didn't Listen): 3 Key TakeawaysIt's all about the nuggets of wisdom. Here are the quick hits from this episode that will leave listeners feeling empowered and inspired.
Hey note investors! In today's episode, we're tackling a question that comes up all the time: Performing vs. Non-Performing Notes - which one is right for you? Scott Carson dives deep into the pros and cons of each, sharing his insights and experiences to help you make an informed decision for your investment strategy. Key Topics Covered:What are Performing Notes? Understand the definition of a performing note and why seasoning is crucial.Pros of Performing Notes: Learn about the advantages of steady income and a more passive investment approach.Where to Find Performing Notes: Explore platforms and sellers of performing notes, and why big banks aren't your best bet.Non-Performing Notes: A Deeper Dive: Discover why non-performing notes offer bigger discounts but require more work.Working with Borrowers: Why it's crucial to work with borrowers in default to maximize returns and avoid foreclosure.Re-Performing Notes: The Best of Both Worlds? Find out what re-performing notes are and the returns you can expect.Assessing Risk in Re-Performing Notes: Due diligence checklist to know to help mitigate some common tax errors.Investment Goals: Aligning investments with personal life goals, whether it is to create passive income or make some additional revenue.Financing your Notes: Understanding financing and knowing if it is right for you to finance your notes versus using cash.Actionable Takeaways:Understand your risk appetite and desired level of involvement.Factor in your financing strategy and required returns for investors.Identify potential opportunities for non-performing assets to become re-performing.Whether you're drawn to the steady income of performing notes or the potential for higher returns with non-performing assets, this video will give you the insights you need to choose the right path for your note investing journey.Watch the original VIDEO HERE!Links & Resources:Book a call with Scott Carson: HTTP://talkwithscottcarson.comNote Weekend (Free Monthly Class): HTTP://noteweekend.comThree-Day Workshop: HTTP://notebuyingfordummies.comMore Info: weclosenotes.comSubscribe for more note investing tips and strategies!Love the show? Subscribe, rate, review, and share!Here's How »Join the Note Closers Show community today:WeCloseNotes.comThe Note Closers Show FacebookThe Note Closers Show TwitterScott Carson LinkedInThe Note Closers Show YouTubeThe Note Closers Show VimeoThe Note Closers Show InstagramWe Close Notes PinterestSign up for the next FREE Note Weekend Class HERE!
Simple, flexible scent games that help your dog thrive—and give you a well-earned breather.If you've ever needed your dog to do something enriching without needing your full attention, or wanted to build your relationship through fun, sniffy games, this episode is your new best friend.In this week's episode of Enrichment for the Real World, Allie Bender and Emily Strong unpack the magic of scent work—and how it supports your dog's physical, mental, and emotional well-being and makes your life easier too. We're talking about games like “find it,” scatter feeding, and what we call the “anywhere but here” protocol, with tips for tailoring them to your specific household setup (no matter how chaotic it may be).You'll hear why scent work is more than just a fun activity—it can be used to teach your dog independence, encourage relaxation, and even build trust in tricky situations. Whether you need something that works behind a baby gate, away from food-stealing pets, or hands-free while you hop on a Zoom call, there's something here for you.TLDL (Too Long, Didn't Listen): 3 Key TakeawaysScent work is ridiculously adaptable.Whether you need to keep dogs separated, avoid food on the floor, or work behind a barrier, there's a nose game for that.Teaching “set it and forget it” is a game-changer.It takes effort up-front, but the payoff? A dog who can self-entertain while still engaging in healthy enrichment. Gold.“Find it” is the duct tape of dog training.This go-to cue can give you a pause button, channel your dog's energy, and lay the foundation for more complex games.Links & Resources from the Episode
Let us know your thoughts. Send us a Text Message. Follow me to see #HeadsTalk Podcast Audiograms every Monday on LinkedInEpisode Title:
This episode of the podcast features chapters 4 and 5 of Dancing the Tightrope. If you haven't listened to the first 3 chapters, I suggest listening to those first. It will help make sense of what's coming in these next few chapters. When I listened back to Chapter 3, where I read the sidebar blog “Where's My Choice Here?”, it was somewhat stunning to me that many of the threads that I pulled together for Dancing the Tightrope started well before the accident that lays the foundation for the book. I was already onto the themes of dealing with fear, adrenaline, pressure and uncertainty. In some ways, I had been bumping up against the glass ceiling of my beliefs; the pivotal fall from the horse offer me a way to shatter those beliefs if I chose to open myself up to seeing things in a new way. What's standing out for me in this process of creating an audio version of the book are the pivotal moments, where a seemingly innocuous choice created huge change. The small choice to go trail riding could have just as easily been the choice to give up horseback riding for good. The small choice to call Bruce could have just as easily been something I never got around to doing. The choice to go back for a second visit to Bruce was both a mystery and a big damn deal. In the world of the way I had done things up to this point, that second visit would not have happened. Yet it did - in this new world I was discovering. Chapter 4 talks about our second visit to Camden to understand what this somewhat strange approach to life, horses and learning to live in nature's world was all about. Chapter 5 shows you where I began to use what I was learning – somewhat naively at the time. In fact, reading it back now sometimes feels like I'm reading someone else's story. In Chapter 5, I'm still deciding if I should ever get back on a horse – something that's difficult to grasp, given that I'm riding all the time these days. Think about a decision you've made that now seems so obvious – or a decision you are grappling with that may someday become obvious. Maybe these chapters will help you sort through the risks and rewards with an improving mindset.
In this episode of "Your Retirement Highway," Kyle R. Jones takes the helm solo, as his business partner Matthew P. Allgaier enjoys some time off with his family. The episode begins with an update on some severe weather that recently affected Kyle's area in Western Clinton County, Illinois. Despite the property damage and power outages caused by the strong winds, Kyle is thankful that no fatalities were reported. He empathizes with the storm's impact on his community and reflects on the powerful forces of nature.Moving into the core of the show, Kyle shifts focus to investment strategies amid current market conditions. He advises listeners to review their risk tolerance, especially in the wake of recent market volatility. He discusses the potential consequences of buying the dip strategies and the importance of being prepared for both bullish and bearish market movements. Emphasizing the unpredictability of economic conditions, Kyle encourages investors to maintain a well-balanced portfolio aligned with their risk tolerance and long-term goals.
We're asked all the time about enrichment that isn't related to food. Well, here we are, folks! Today's episode is all about the safety category of enrichment. We'll discuss how to perform a risk assessment for your pet's enrichment strategy. You can find the full episode show notes here.
Cognitive Load Multipliers are quantitative factors used to assess and measure the impact of various stressors on human performance, particularly in high-risk industries such as pharmaceutical manufacturing, healthcare, and aviation. These multipliers help identify conditions that increase cognitive burden, such as task complexity, time pressure, fatigue, interruptions, and environmental distractions, which can significantly raise the likelihood of human error. By applying cognitive load multipliers, organizations can systematically evaluate and mitigate risks, optimize workflows, and enhance overall reliability. Understanding these multipliers allows for the development of targeted strategies, such as improving procedural clarity, minimizing multitasking, and designing error-resistant systems to ensure compliance and operational efficiency.To learn more, visit:https://humanerrorsolutions.com/Listen to more episodes on Mission Matters:https://missionmatters.com/author/ginette-collazo/
PODCAST SUPPORT: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/bryanair or become a YouTube Member YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5RqMLv9MwP-aHLKL1t1Uqg/join In this episode, we delve into the recent cyber attack on the South African Weather Service that disrupted essential services including aviation and marine operations. The BAP crew discusses the contingency challenges and the aviation industry's reaction to this crisis. Additionally, there's a focus on personal resilience, South African aviation, and a shout-out to Drikus's big weekend fight. The episode also touches on managing financial risks using the aviation risk equation, insights on the burgeoning future of Riyadh Air, and an exciting tip on a new mobile service provider: Melon Mobile. 00:00 Welcome to the worlds premier aviation podcast 00:11 Cyber Attack on South African Weather Service 00:24 Impact on Aviation and Marine Operations 00:59 Community Reactions and Workarounds 01:29 Aviation Stories and Pilot Experiences 02:04 Discussion on South African Issues 05:36 Ransomware and Cybersecurity 07:21 Pilot Incapacitation Incident 09:34 FlySafe Air Updates 15:43 Riyadh Air Expansion Plans 17:50 Aviation Motivation and Risk Management 22:58 Assessing Risk in Aviation 24:25 Applying Risk Management to Everyday Life 24:43 Financial Risk and Personal Crisis 27:59 Learning About Finances 29:08 The Journey of Financial Education 31:50 Understanding Financial Terminology 36:38 Listener Comments and Feedback 38:06 Upcoming Events and Final Thoughts Connect
In this episode of Power Producers Podcast, David Carothers is joined by Ryan Smith, founder of RLS Consulting, to discuss the evolving world of cybersecurity and how insurance professionals can better navigate this complex space. Drawing on Ryan's extensive experience, they delve into actionable strategies for producers to engage clients on cyber risk, overcome objections, and build meaningful solutions that go beyond the policy. Key Points: The Intersection of Cybersecurity and Insurance Ryan highlights how cybersecurity and cyber liability are complementary solutions addressing the same problem: mitigating and transferring cyber risk. Understanding both perspectives helps producers connect the dots and provide more value to clients. Education Over Fear The conversation emphasizes the importance of educating clients about their cyber risks without resorting to fear-based selling. Producers are encouraged to focus on business impacts rather than technical vulnerabilities, fostering a consultative approach. Assessing Risk and Incident Preparedness Ryan shares insights on helping clients assess their cyber risks and prepare for incidents. He stresses the importance of asking key questions about incident response plans, compliance requirements, and the company's readiness for cyber threats. Shifting Client Mindsets The discussion tackles common objections, such as overconfidence in IT departments or the belief that “it won't happen to us.” Ryan suggests producers approach these scenarios with empathy and education, aligning solutions with clients' business priorities. Valuable Resources for Producers Ryan points to trusted industry reports, such as Verizon's Data Breach Investigations Report and IBM's Cost of a Data Breach Report, as tools to support client conversations and reinforce the importance of proactive cyber risk management. Connect with: David Carothers LinkedIn Ryan L. Smith LinkedIn Kyle Houck LinkedIn Visit Websites: Power Producer Base Camp RLS Consulting Killing Commercial Crushing Content Power Producers Podcast Policytee The Dirty 130 The Extra 2 Minutes
In this episode, my guest is Dr. Ethan Kross, Ph.D., professor of psychology at the University of Michigan, director of the Emotion & Self-Control Laboratory, and author of the bestselling book Chatter. We discuss the purpose of the inner voice in your head and its impact on emotional well-being and motivation. We also explore practical tools to manage negative internal chatter and eliminate intrusive thoughts. Topics include how music, exercise, mental distancing techniques, and expressive writing can help rescript your inner dialogue to be self-encouraging and effective in creating outward behavioral changes. Dr. Kross explains why venting to others is self-defeating and offers better alternatives. Throughout the episode, he provides research-supported, actionable protocols to help you shift your internal dialogue and accompanying emotional state, fostering greater happiness and resilience. Access the full show notes for this episode at hubermanlab.com. Pre-order Andrew's new book, Protocols: protocolsbook.com Thank you to our sponsors AG1: https://drinkag1.com/huberman ExpressVPN: https://expressvpn.com/huberman Eight Sleep: https://eightsleep.com/huberman Joovv: https://joovv.com/huberman Function: https://functionhealth.com/huberman Timestamps 00:00:00 Dr. Ethan Kross 00:02:45 Sponsors: ExpressVPN & Eight Sleep 00:05:38 Inner Voice & Benefits 00:10:33 Music & Emotions 00:15:09 Shifting Emotions, Emotional Congruency, Facial Expressions 00:20:25 Resistance to Shifting Emotion; Tool: Invisible Support, Affectionate Touch 00:27:16 Tool: Expressive Writing; Sensory Shifters 00:30:41 Sponsors: AG1 & Joovv 00:33:27 Inner Voice Benefits, Thinking vs. Writing, Tool: Journaling 00:44:01 Decision Making, Individualization; Tool: Exercise 00:50:24 “Chatter,” Trauma, Depression, Anxiety 00:54:37 Sponsor: Function 00:56:25 Tool: Combating Chatter, Mental Distancing; Distraction & Social Media 01:04:30 Tools: 2 AM Chatter Strategy, Mental Time Travel; Venting 01:13:41 Time, Chatter & Flow 01:18:01 Focusing on Present, Mental Time Travel 01:22:49 Texting, Social Media, Sharing Emotions 01:28:31 AI & Individualized Tools for Emotional Regulation 01:33:07 Imaginary Friend, Developing Inner Voice; Negative Emotions 01:40:20 Tool: Nature & Cognitive Restoration; Awe; Screens, Modifying Spaces 01:49:34 Cities vs. Nature, Organizing Space & Compensatory Control 01:56:00 Emotional Regulation & Shifters, Screens 02:01:19 Historical Approaches to Manage Emotions; Motivation & Mental Tools 02:10:12 Mechanical & Behavioral Interventions, Emotional Regulation 02:15:52 Tool: Stop Intrusive Voices; Anxiety 02:21:55 Assessing Risk & Consequence; Flow & Cognitive Engagement 02:31:02 “Cognitive Velocity”; Resetting 02:36:43 Transition States, Tool: Goal Pursuit & WOOP 02:43:59 Attention, Emotional Flexibility; Avoidance 02:54:15 Emotional Contagion 03:00:22 Validating Emotions, Wisdom; Shift Book 03:06:59 Zero-Cost Support, YouTube, Spotify & Apple Follow & Reviews, Sponsors, YouTube Feedback, Protocols Book, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter Disclaimer & Disclosures
We’re not great at assessing risk, especially using ratios and percentages, but as Art Markman, Bob Duke, and Rebecca McInroy ask in this episode of Two Guys on Your Head, does it matter? The post Assessing Risk appeared first on KUT & KUTX Studios -- Podcasts.
Service Management Leadership Podcast with Jeffrey Tefertiller
This episode is about understanding risk Each week, Jeffrey will be sharing his knowledge on Service Delivery (Mondays) and Service Management (Thursdays). Jeffrey is the founder of Service Management Leadership, an IT consulting firm specializing in Service Management, Asset Management, CIO Advisory, and Business Continuity services. The firm's website is www.servicemanagement.us. Jeffrey has been in the industry for 30 years and brings a practical perspective to the discussions. He is an accomplished author with seven acclaimed books in the subject area and a popular YouTube channel with approximately 1,500 videos on various topics. Also, please follow the Service Management Leadership LinkedIn page.
Dealerships having loaner vehicles connected with their service departments isn't new since they have been valuable to boost customer retention and satisfaction. But potential risk when offering these loaners has grown significantly in recent times. Steve Levine, an owner and chief legal and compliance officer of Ignite Consulting Partners, explained what's been happening in this episode of the Auto Remarketing Podcast.
Slappin' Glass sits down this week with the Co-Founder of the Mission Critical Team Institute, Dr. Preston Cline! In this highly entertaining conversation with one of the world's best leaders when it comes to working with teams in high pressure situations the trio dive into Dr. Cline's thoughts on managing uncertainty, assessing risk, and discuss humor as a leader and being "robust" during the always fun "Start, Sub, or Sit?!"To join coaches and championship winning staffs from the NBA to High School from over 60 different countries taking advantage of an SG Plus membership, visit HERE!
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BZV865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until August 29, 2025.Critically Focusing Decision-Making and Communication Strategies to Reduce Recurrence in High-Risk HR+, HER2- EBC: Modeling Best Practices for Assessing Risk, Selecting Patients for Adjuvant CDK4/6i Therapy, and Fostering Treatment Adherence/Persistence In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Living Beyond Breast Cancer. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BZV865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until August 29, 2025.Critically Focusing Decision-Making and Communication Strategies to Reduce Recurrence in High-Risk HR+, HER2- EBC: Modeling Best Practices for Assessing Risk, Selecting Patients for Adjuvant CDK4/6i Therapy, and Fostering Treatment Adherence/Persistence In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Living Beyond Breast Cancer. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BZV865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until August 29, 2025.Critically Focusing Decision-Making and Communication Strategies to Reduce Recurrence in High-Risk HR+, HER2- EBC: Modeling Best Practices for Assessing Risk, Selecting Patients for Adjuvant CDK4/6i Therapy, and Fostering Treatment Adherence/Persistence In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Living Beyond Breast Cancer. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BZV865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until August 29, 2025.Critically Focusing Decision-Making and Communication Strategies to Reduce Recurrence in High-Risk HR+, HER2- EBC: Modeling Best Practices for Assessing Risk, Selecting Patients for Adjuvant CDK4/6i Therapy, and Fostering Treatment Adherence/Persistence In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Living Beyond Breast Cancer. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BZV865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until August 29, 2025.Critically Focusing Decision-Making and Communication Strategies to Reduce Recurrence in High-Risk HR+, HER2- EBC: Modeling Best Practices for Assessing Risk, Selecting Patients for Adjuvant CDK4/6i Therapy, and Fostering Treatment Adherence/Persistence In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Living Beyond Breast Cancer. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/BZV865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until August 29, 2025.Critically Focusing Decision-Making and Communication Strategies to Reduce Recurrence in High-Risk HR+, HER2- EBC: Modeling Best Practices for Assessing Risk, Selecting Patients for Adjuvant CDK4/6i Therapy, and Fostering Treatment Adherence/Persistence In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, and Living Beyond Breast Cancer. PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Lilly.
Does the construction industry need more attorneys, or do we simply need contractors to better understand the construction contract process? Josh Levy, CEO of Document Crunch and an attorney, believes it's all about understanding the process rather than hiring more lawyers. He offers deep insights into how they are helping project teams navigate the complex area of construction contracts.Many individuals are passionate about improving the construction industry through their expertise. In this episode, you will feel Josh's immense passion for making the industry safer and better through risk assessment and the negotiation process of construction contracts. Think it sounds dull? Trust me, this episode is anything but! Josh openly admits he's not a tech guy, even though Document Crunch is a leading AI company. For them, technology is secondary to solving contract compliance issues in the construction industry. We MUST reduce risk through proper assessment, understand proper negotiations, and educate project teams on contract obligations. How can the project team be supported? Let's dive into Dave and Steve's conversation with Josh Levy to find out how Crunching Contracts is the Intersection of AI and Assessing Risk.
Forensic psychotherapy is psychotherapy with people who have committed criminal offences. In this episode I talk with clinical psychologist and psychoanalyst Dr Stephen Blumenthal who is registered with the British Psychoanalytic Council and has over thirty years experience in treating people. Stephen started his professional life as a clinical psychologist in a secure unit with offenders. Stephen has also written a couple of books on forensic psychotherapy, the latest of which is called Assessing Risk, a Relationship Approach.I was in conversation with Stephen in Series 7, talking about shame, which would make a good companion listen to this one.In this episode we talk about what forensic psychotherapy is, what it can tell us about the person committing the crimes, as well as society in general and why talking groups, such as the one Stephen presides over, can radically diminish re-offending. All crime has a meaning. This would make a particularly interesting listen to those who are fascinated by true crime podcasts.If you'd like to support us you can leave a one off donation here: https://supporter.acast.com/conversations-with-annalisa-barbieriIf you'd like to listen to this episode, past or future ones, ad free then consider becoming a patron on Patreon, from just £3 a month. You also get early access to episodes. For £5 a month you get them as soon as they are produced.Produced by Hester Cant. Art work by Lo Cole. Music by Toby Dunham.IG: @annalisabarbieriLinks to further work: linktr.ee/annalisabarbieriSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/conversations-with-annalisa-barbieri. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Assessing Risk of Myelosuppression With PARP Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer: Karan Jatwani, MBBS by i3 Health
A listener sent in a question and a REAL LIFE dilemma she faced.She was presented an opportunity to take her studio out of her home… but it would require her taking a financial risk and investing in a commercial location.This is a different kind of episode… instead of Nate and I giving theoretical advice about expansion, scale, investment, and investing in a location…- - - - -Check out our free trainings and resources on school marketing, group lessons, and using AI in your music school:growyourmusicstudio.com/freeGet updates and FREE workshop invites from Nate and Daniel:growyourmusicstudio.com/7fmsIf the podcast has been helpful to you, leave a review here:growyourmusicstudio.com/7fmsReview*******SPONSOR - Piano Express from GroupLessons.comNow's the time of year to consider what programs you are going to be offering in your music studio this fall…And if you are looking for a program that will:Increase student retention…Increase the number of your beginners that become intermediate students…Help students go through their books faster (Proven! We did a study on this!)...Increase home practice time (Proven! We have years of data showing that this happens)And increase the profit in your studio (not just revenue)…… Then you need to head over to GroupLessons.com, sign up for a free demo, and we'll show you how hundreds of studios have easily started a new group program (sometimes in just a few weeks)... with little to no difficulty.You can even begin our owner training for free (download our shopping list, and look through our teacher guides and method).Click here for more information*******SPONSOR - Big Music GamesBig Music Games provides fun with a clear purpose. Ear training and music theory for students ages 4-14. Level up your student's ears & ignite their passion and motivation to practice with 15 levels of rhythm, melody, harmony and songwriting games. Join the tribe of teachers dedicated to improving the way the world educates the next generation of musicians. BigMusicGames.com/7FMS
Send us a Text Message.Are you constantly exhausted during the day no matter how much you sleep at night? If so, you may be one of the millions of people unknowingly suffering from sleep apnea. While it may seem like just bothersome snoring, this common disorder actually causes people to stop breathing repeatedly throughout the night, preventing them from getting quality sleep. In this enlightening episode, sleep expert Dr. Dylan Petkis reveals shocking truths about the causes of sleep apnea, debunking the myth that it only affects overweight people. Going beyond just anatomy, he explains the role that breathing pattern disorders play and how inflammation can also be a key driver. Dr. Petkis shares his integrative 6-step protocol to treat sleep apnea through resetting your natural breathing patterns. Listen in to understand what sleep apnea really is, determine if you are at risk even if not overweight, and gain actionable advice to start improving your sleep quality immediately. Here's what you'll discover: - Clear signs that you may have sleep apnea, even if not visibly overweight - The truth about what causes sleep apnea (it's not just obesity!) - Natural solutions and exercises to begin improving your breathing issues tonight - How you can treat sleep apnea without surgery or cumbersome CPAP machines As Dr. Petkis reminds us, "With the breath work...you kind of have the tools you already need to get started and start really making improvements." Your body has an incredible capacity to heal itself - it just needs a little support. Tune in now to equip yourself with the knowledge and techniques to finally get a restful night's sleep.Guest Links: https://petkusmd.com/homehttps://optimalcircadianhealth.com/https://www.facebook.com/OptimalCircadianHealth/https://www.instagram.com/petkusmdhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/dylan-petkus-86645978/https://www.tiktok.com/@optimal.circadian.healthChapter Markers00:00:26 The Power of Natural Solutions for Sleep Apnea00:03:32 Introducing Dr. Dylan Petkus00:23:45 Importance of Asking Understandable Questions00:24:41 Skepticism in Information Acceptance00:25:35 Challenges in Interpreting Research00:26:38 Public Distrust in Presented Information00:29:42 The Skepticism Around Polls and Research00:35:33 Understanding Sleep Apnea00:37:31 Clinical Definition of Sleep Apnea00:40:15 Understanding Breathing Patterns00:46:01 Prevalence of Sleep Apnea vs. Airway Narrowing00:46:54 Misconceptions about Sleep Apnea Causes00:49:54 Understanding Cellular Energy Production00:54:15 Prevalence of Sleep Apnea in Men01:00:25 Assessing Risk of Sleep Apnea01:02:32 Probability of CPAP Therapy for Sleep Apnea01:04:54 Factors for Improving Sleep01:08:42 Rectangle Breathing Technique for Better Sleep01:14:55 Measuring CO2 Tolerance with Controlled Pause01:17:21 Understanding Disordered Breathing and Sleep Apnea01:20:03 Natural Solutions for Sleep Apnea01:29:41 The Impact of Breath Work on Health01:30:11 Podcast Wrap-Up
Stalking is disturbingly common, yet often misunderstood by wider society. Professor Troy McEwan from the Swinburne University of Technology is a forensic psychologist specialising in understanding, assessing, and treating stalking behaviour. In this episode with Kathryn Fox, hear about the 5 different types of stalkers, and gain insights into their problematic behaviours. This episode is part 1 of 2. If you or someone you know is experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, domestic, family or sexual violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732, text 0458 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au for online chat and video call services.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
So who was really behind the creation of BLISTER, how did the whole thing get started, and was it actually due to a misunderstanding over a couple of beers on the weekend of Independence Day, 2010? Today, Jonathan Ellsworth and Michael Clarke discuss all of the above, as well as giant tortoises, some keys to long-lasting friendships, and more. RELATED LINKS:Get Yourself Covered: BLISTER+TOPICS & TIMES:Michael's Role In Blister's Existence (and Tortoises) (3:18)White Room Skis (7:00)Michael's Skiing Background (10:08)Jonathan's Intro to Skiing (15:06)Forming Opinions on Skis (20:44)How Blister Started Reviewing Gear (25:46)Outsider's Perspective on the Ski Industry (31:29)What's Changed Since Blister Started? (38:12)What Would You Do Differently? (45:35)Longevity & Assessing Risk (52:48)Maintaining Long-Term Friendships (1:04:44)CHECK OUT OUR OTHER PODCASTS:Blister CinematicCRAFTED GEAR:30Bikes & Big IdeasOff The Couch Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
NTD Good Morning—3/21/20241. Blinken Meets With Saudi Leader, Israel Readies Rafah Attack2. More US Citizens Evacuated From Haiti3. Biden Cancels $5.8B in Student Loan Debt4. Hearing on Allegations of Biden Family Influence Peddling5. Panel on Forced Organ Harvesting by CCP6. Senate Considering Public Hearing on Tiktok7. AG James Urges Court to Make Trump Pay Full Bond8. Biden Outpaces Trump in Fundraising by Wide Margin9. Texas Border Law Blocked Again in Legal Whiplash10. Are There Merits and Flaws to Texas' Immigration Law?11. Bus Company Agrees to Stop Bussing Illegal Migrants to NYC12. Biden Announces $8.5B Investment in Chip Manufacturing13. 1 in 4 Americans Dislike Both Biden and Trump14. Assessing Risk, Prevention of AI-Powered Robocalls15. CA: New Bill to Address Anti-Semitism on Campus16. Fourth Officer Sentenced in Torture Case17. Police: Angela Chao Was Drunk When She Drove Into Pond18. Key Takeaways From the Fed's Rate Decision, Conference19. Hundreds of Cherry Trees to be Removed in DC20. Trump's Team: 'Fatal Defect' in Immunity Rejection Ruling21. Trash Grabbing Robot to Clean up Space Junk22. NASA Accepting Applications for Astronauts
Hearing about risk is hard. Interpreting risk is even harder, but deciding which risks are comfortable for you is an essential part of birth!Meagan and Julie discuss how to tell the difference between relative and absolute risk, and what kind of conversations to have with your provider to help you better understand what the numbers mean. They also quote many stats and risk percentages around topics like blood transfusions, uterine rupture, eating during labor, epidurals, Pitocin, AROM, and episiotomies. And if you don't feel comfortable with accepting a certain risk, that is OKAY. We support your birthing in the way that feels best to you!Risk of Uterine Rupture with Vaginal Birth after Cesarean in Twin GestationsJournal of Perinatal Education ArticleWhat are the chances of being struck by lightning?Needed WebsiteHow to VBAC: The Ultimate Prep Course for ParentsFull Transcript under Episode Details 02:52 Review of the Week06:08 Determining acceptable risk for you and your provider 08:00 Absolute versus relative risk15:21 More conversations need to happen25:29 Risk of blood transfusion in VBAC, second C-section, and third C-section30:37 Understanding the meaning of statistical significance 32:05 “The United States is intervention intensive” 36:27 Eating during labor and the risk of aspiration under anesthesia43:03 Epidurals, Pitocin, AROM, episiotomies, and C-section percentages44:43 The perspective of birth doulas and birth photographersMeagan: Hello, hello everybody. Guess who I have today? Julie!Julie: Hello. Meagan: Hello. It's so good to have you on today. Julie: Of course. It's always fun to be here. Meagan: It really is. It's so fun. When we sit and chat before, it just feels so comfortable like that is the norm still for me even though it has been a while, it just feels so normal and I love it. I miss you and I love you and I am so excited to be here with you today. You guys, we are going to talk a little bit about risk. We know that in the VBAC world, there's a lot of risk that comes up. I should say a lot of talk about risk that comes up whether it be is it safe to even have a VBAC? Is it safe to be induced? What are our real risks of uterine rupture? Is it safe to VBAC with an epidural or without an epidural? What about at home out of the hospital? Is that safe? I don't know. Let's talk about that today. Julie: Let's talk about it. Meagan: Let's talk about it. I think it's really important to note that no matter what— and we're going to talk about this for sure today, but no matter what, you have to take the risks that you are presented and that is given and still decide what's best for you. That risk doesn't mean that is what you have to or can't do. Right? So I think while you are listening, be mindful or kind of keep that in the back of your mind of, “Okay, I'm hearing. I'm learning.” Let's figure out what this really means and then let's figure out what's truly best for you and your baby.02:52 Review of the WeekI do have a Review of the Week so I want to hurry and read that, then Julie and I will dive into risk and assessing. Julie: Dun dun, we're ready. Meagan: We are ready. Okay, holy cow. This is a really long review, so—Julie: You can do it. Meagan: Thank you to Sara R-2019 on Apple Podcasts for leaving this review. I love how Julie was like, “You can do it,” because she knows that I get ahead of what I'm reading in my mind and then I can't read, so let's see how many times it takes to read this review. Julie: You've got this. Meagan: Okay. It says, “A balanced and positive perspective.” It says, “As a physician myself I think it is unusual to find balanced resources for patients that represent the medical facts but also the patient experience and correct for some of the inaccuracies in medicine. This podcast does an amazing job of striking this balance!“I had an emergency C-section with my daughter 2 years ago. Despite understanding that the CS was medically appropriate and my professional experience, I still found the whole experience to be mildly traumatic and disappointing. This podcast was the main resource I used to help prepare for my second child's birth and my plan to have a VBAC. I am now holding my new baby in my arms with so much pride, love, self-confidence, and trust because I had a smooth and successful VBAC.“I am thankful for this podcast which gave me ideas, confidence, strength, and a sense of community in what is otherwise a very isolating experience. I especially appreciate the variety of stories that are shared, including VBAC attempts that result in another C section so that we can all prepare ourselves for the different outcomes. No matter what happens we are strong women and have a welcome spot in this community, even when we may feel alone with our thoughts and fears. Thank you, Julie and Meagan!Julie: Aw, I love that. Meagan: Yes, that was phenomenal. Congratulations Sara R-2019. If you are still listening here, congratulations and we are so happy for you and thank you for your amazing review. 06:08 Determining acceptable risk for you and your providerMeagan: All right, Julie. Are you ready? Julie: Here we go. Here we go. Can I talk for a minute about something you mentioned before the review? You were talking about risk and how it's not a one-size-fits-all because we were talking about this before. We all know that the uterine rupture risk is anywhere between .2%-1% or whatever depending on the study and what you look at. The general consensus among the medical community is .5%-1% is kind of where we are sitting, right? Now, some people might look at that risk and be like, “Heck yeah. That's awesome. Let's do this,” especially when you look at a lower risk than that that it's a catastrophic rupture. Some people might look at those numbers and be like, “This feels safe. Let's go.” Some people might look at those numbers and be like, “This feels scary. I just want to schedule a C-section.” Meagan: No, thank you. Julie: And that's okay. It is okay. However you approach risk and however you look at it is okay. We're not here to try and sway anybody. Obviously, we're The VBAC Link, so we are going to be big advocates for VBAC access, right? But we're also advocates for having all of the information so you can make the best decision no matter what that looks like. But also, I think another very important part of that is finding a provider whose view of risk is similar to your view of risk so that you guys have a similar way to approach things because if you find a provider who thinks that 1% risk of VBAC is really scary, it's not going to go good for you if you think a 1% risk for a VBAC is acceptable. So yeah, I just want to lay that out there in the beginning. Meagan, you touched on it in the beginning, but I feel like provider choice in risk is really important there. Meagan: It is. Julie: For sure. 08:00 Absolute versus relative riskMeagan: It is and also, one of the things we wanted to talk a lot about is absolute risk versus relative. So many times when people, not even just the actual percentage or 1 out of 5 is shared, it's the way it's shared. The way the words are rolling off of the tongue and coming out can be shared in a scarier way so when we say 1 out of 5, you're like, “Okay, that's a very small number. I could easily be one of those 5's.” It's the way these providers sometimes say it. A lot of the time, that's based on their own experience because now they are like, “Well, I am sharing this number, but I'm sharing a little extra behind the number because I've had the experience that was maybe poor or less ideal.” Does this make sense? Julie: Yeah. Meagan: Sometimes the way we say things makes that number seem even bigger or even worse or scarier. Julie: Right. It really comes down to absolute risk versus relative risk, right? Relative is your risk in relation to another thing that has risk. Absolute risk is the actual number. It's like 1 in 10. That is an absolute risk. You have a 1 in 100 chance of uterine rupture. That is an absolute risk. Your chance of uterine rupture doubles after three Cesareans. That's not true. That's not true. But that's a relative risk. I really like the example that I feel is really common for people to relate to is stillbirth after X amount of weeks. Evidence-Based–Meagan: That's a huge one. Julie: Yeah, it's a big one that gets thrown around all of the time and it sounds really scary when people say it. I love Evidence Based Birth. They have this whole article about due dates and risks associated with due dates and why due dates should really be adjusted and look at differently. They don't say that. They just present all of the data, but what I really like about that is they have a section here about stillbirth and they talk about absolute risk versus relative risk. I feel like that would be a great thing to start with. I'm just going to read it because it's so well-written. They said, “If someone said that the risk of having a stillbirth at 42 weeks compared to 41 weeks is 94% higher, then that sounds like a lot.” Your risk of stillbirth doubles at 42 weeks than if you were to just get induced at 41 weeks. Your baby is twice as likely to be stillborn if you go to 42 weeks. Meagan: Terrifying. Julie: Okay? 94% higher. That's almost double. That is scary. For me, I'd be like, “Uh, yeah. That is super scary.” Meagan: Done. Sign me up for induction. Julie: Right? Sign me up for induction. But when you consider the actual risks or the absolute risks, let's just talk about those numbers. 1.7 per 1,000 births if they are at 41 weeks. Stillbirth is 1.7 per 1000 births. At 42 weeks, it's 3.2 per 1000 so it's a .17% chance versus a .3% chance so you are still looking at really, really, really small numbers there. So yeah, it's true. 3.2 is almost double of 1.7 if you do the math. Sometimes math is hard so that's fine. We have to get out the calculator sometimes, but while it's true to say the risk of stillbirth almost doubles at 42 weeks, it could be kind of misleading if you're not looking at the actual numbers behind it. So I think that it's really important when we're talking about risks and the numbers and statistics to understand that there are different ways of measuring them and different ways of looking at them and different ways of how they're even calculated sometimes. So depending on how you look at them, you could even come up with different risks or different rates which can really sway your decision. We're not talking about a 5%-10% double which is still true. It's still double, but it's just a really small number. Now, I also want to do a plug-in for people who have been in that .3%. It might as well be 100%. I can't even imagine the trauma of having to have a loss like that. I can't. I have supported parents through that. I have documented families like that and documented their sweet babies for them. I can't imagine the pain that goes with that. But I also think it is very important to look at the actual numbers when you are making a decision. Now, maybe that .32% is too high for you and that's okay, but maybe it's not and that is a risk you are willing to accept. I feel like approaching it like that is so much better. If somebody ever says to you, “This risk of that is double” or whatever, I don't know. I'm just going to make up some random stuff here like, “If you drive in your car to school, you have a 1 in 10 chance of getting in a car crash but if you drive on a Wednesday, your risk doubles so now you have a 2 in 10 chance or 1 in 5 chance of getting in the car crash,” so maybe you would want to avoid driving to school on Wednesdays, but maybe you wouldn't. But if you say you're risk is higher of dying in a car crash if you go to school on Wednesdays, they would be like, “I'm not leaving the house on Wednesdays or ever.” I'm not leaving the house today because it's so dog-gone cold and I'm warm in my blanket. I don't know. I feel like looking at it like that. Actually, 1 in 10 is really high for getting in a car crash, but I don't know. I just feel like looking at that is really important for providers telling you, “Oh, your risk of uterine rupture doubles if we use Pitocin so I'm not going to use Pitocin.” Okay, we're looking at a small increase to an already small risk. We know that any type of artificial induction could lead to an increased risk of uterine rupture especially if it's mismanaged, but what we do know is that it's not– I don't want to say that because that might be wrong. When you are presented with the actual numbers, yes. It might double. I don't know what the actual numbers are, to be honest off the top of my head. I feel like maybe it doubles, but if you are already looking at a .2% to a .4% or a .5% to a 1% chance, what's the tradeoff there? What are your risks of just scheduling a repeat C-section instead of doing an induction? Is that worth it to you? What are the risks associated with repeat Cesareans? Are they bigger than that of using Pitocin to induce labor? What is that compared to the other one because there is another that is relative risk? The absolute risk is what the percentage is. I'm not even going to say the number. But if there's a risk of rupture using Pitocin relative to the risks that come with repeat Cesareans, those are risks that are relative to each other, so how does that compare? Because when we talk about it in just that singular form or that singular amount of risk without considering the other risks that might be associated with it because of the decisions we made from that risk– am I making sense here? Then you know, I don't know. I feel like there is just a lot more conversation to have sometimes when we are talking about risk. 15:21 More conversations need to happenMeagan: Yes. There are. There is a ton more conversation and that is what I feel like we don't see happening. There's a quick conversation. Studies show that 7 minutes are spent in our prenatal visits which is not a lot of time to really dive into the depths of risk that we are talking about when we say, “We can't induce you because Pitocin increases–”. This is another thing I've noticed is significantly. You have a serious–. Again, it comes down to the words we are using. Sometimes in these prenatal visits with our providers, we do not have the time to actually break down the numbers and we're just saying, “Well, you have a significantly higher risk with Pitocin of uterine rupture so we won't do that.” When we hear significantly, what do we do? We're like, “Ahh, that is big.” You know? Julie: Yeah. Meagan: We're just not having the conversation of risk enough and again, it's kind of being skewed sometimes by words and emotion. We were talking about this before. I remember we made a post– I don't know, probably a year and a half ago maybe. It seems like a while ago about the risk of complications in a repeat Cesarean meaning you have a C-section and then instead of going for a VBAC, you go for a repeat Cesarean which as you know, if you've been with us, is totally fine and respected here from The VBAC Link. A lot of the time, we don't talk– and when I say we, I mean the world. We don't talk about the actual risk of having a repeat Cesarean, right? Don't you feel like that, Julie? I don't know. As a doula, I feel like our clients who want to go for VBAC know a little bit more of the risk of having a VBAC, but they have not been discussed at all really with the risk surrounding a repeat Cesarean. We made a post talking about the risks of repeat Cesarean and I very vividly remember a lot of people coming at us with feeling that we were fearmongering.Julie: Or shaming. Meagan: Shaming, yep. A lot of people were feeling shamed or disrespected. People would say, “You claim to be CBAC supportive, but here you are making these really, really scary numbers.” Anyway, looking at that post and going into what we've talked about, in some of those posts, we did say things like, “You are going to have a 1 out of 10 chance of X, Y, Z,”Julie: Or twice as likely to need this. Twice as likely to need a blood transfusion or 5x more likely to have major complications. Things like that. Meagan: Yeah. We would say things like that. I remember specifically in regards to miscarriage. It's a very, very sensitive topic, but there are risks there. So a lot of people were triggered. In the beginning, we talked about the way providers say things and the way they put them out on paper and the absolute risk versus the relative and way they do that. We're guilty of that too. Right here at The VBAC Link, we were like, “This is the chance. These are the chances. You are 5x more likely to X, Y, Z.” So know that I don't want to make it sound like we are shaming anybody else for the different ways that they give the message of risk. Am I making sense? Julie: Yeah, and you know what? I feel like sometimes it's just about giving people the benefit of the doubt. We want to give providers the benefit of the doubt just because it's probably something that they've continuously heard and spoken and that's okay because we do it too sometimes. We go on that thing like, “Oh my gosh, maternal death.” I think the risk of maternal death is 10x higher in a C-section than it is in a VBAC which sounds really scary and makes me never ever want to have a C-section again, but when you look at that, it's .00001% to .0001% or whatever is 10x more. It is such a small level of risk, but it is higher. I feel like trying to look at both absolute and relative risk for any given thing together is really, really important. Yeah. Give people the benefit of the doubt. Give us the benefit of the doubt. We are in such an awful cultural climate right now where it's easy for people, especially on social media to jump on the attack train for anybody when we feel triggered or when we feel like people are being unjust to us or to other people and I hate that so stinking bad. Whenever I catch myself with those feelings, I try to take a step back and I've actually gotten pretty good at that, but it's so easy for us to get on that bandwagon of just railing against people who present information in certain ways or railing people without getting all of the information about that person.Before I go off too much on a soapbox in that direction, yeah. I feel like your provider when they are saying those things is probably not trying to coerce you into anything. Our providers, especially our hospital providers are incredibly overworked. They are incredibly stressed. Their time management skills have got to be off the charts because they are so overloaded with everything and they just don't have time to automatically sit down and explain things. But you know what I have found? Most of them, when you stop them and ask questions, they are more than happy to answer and explain. Sometimes, they are just repeating things they have heard all the time or that they have learned at some point or another without giving them a second glance. Do you know what? We all do that too. Me, Meagan, you listening right now. We all do that. We hear things. We regurgitate them. We hear things. We regurgitate them and we don't even think about questioning or challenging those things until somebody else brings it up to us to question or challenge those things. So, don't be afraid to ask your provider for more information or ask them what the real numbers are to those things. I have a really special place in my heart for our CBAC moms because there are lots of things that they are working through, so many emotional things, but I challenge not just people who have had a repeat Cesarean that was unwanted, but people just in all life, when something triggers you online, stop and explore that. Stop and question because that is probably an area of your life that you could use a little healing and work on. It could be a little bit of work. It could be a lot of work, but usually, when something triggers you, it's a challenge to look into it more because there is something that your body and mind have an unhealthy relationship with that needs to be addressed. Julie: Anyways, circling it back to risk. Meagan, take it away. Meagan: I just want to drop a shameless plug on our radical acceptance episodes that we did, so kind of piggybacking off of what she just said. We dive into that a little bit deeper in our radical acceptance episode. It really is so hard and like what she said, our heart goes out to moms that have a scheduled C-section that didn't want to schedule a C-section or felt like they were in a corner or felt like that was the best option, but not the option they wanted. There are so many feelings, but definitely go listen to radical acceptance part one and part two. 25:29 Risk of blood transfusion in VBAC, second C-section, and third C-sectionMeagan: I just want to quickly go down a couple of little risks. Blood transfusion– we have a 1.89% or 1 in 53 chance of a blood transfusion with a VBAC. To me, 1.89% is pretty low, to me, but it might not be to some. I don't know, Julie. How do you say the other? Okay, then blood transfusion in a repeat Cesarean is 1.65% in the second C-section. It's lower. So for vaginal birth, it's higher. I'm not good at math. Julie: No, vaginal birth, yeah. That's true. So 1 in 53 for VBAC versus a 1 in 65 for a repeat Cesarean. Yes, right. Meagan: For a third Cesarean, the chances of a blood transfusion go to 2.26%. Julie: Yes, so it's like 50% higher than if you have a VBAC for the third Cesarean, but it's slightly lower for the second C-section. See? I feel like we could have talked about this before, but I don't know if we say it often enough. When you are talking about overall risk for VBAC versus C-section, when you are looking at just the second birth, right? So first birth was a C-section, what are you going to do for your second birth? The risks overall are pretty similar for vaginal birth versus Cesarean. The overall total risk is pretty similar as far as your chances of having major complications and things like that. But when you get into three, four, five, six C-sections and vaginal births, that's when you really start to see significant changes in those risks. See? I used the word “significant” again, but we're going to talk about where the more C-sections you have, the higher your chances of having complications you have. The more vaginal births you have, your chances of complications actually go down. So when you are looking at if you want more than two kids, that might be something that you want to consider. If you are done with two kids, then that might be something that is not as big of a player in your choices. So yeah. Meagan: Yeah. Then there are things like twins. So when I was talking about it earlier, the word significantly, there was a systematic– I almost said something– systemic. Julie: Systemic review? Meagan: Yeah, see? I can't say it correctly. I can't. Published– oh, I'm trying to remember when it was published. We will get it in the show notes. It talks about the risk of uterine rupture with twins and it does say. It says “significantly higher in women with twin gestation”. That's kind of hard, I feel like because again, like we were saying, some reviews and studies and blogs and all of these things wouldn't say the word significantly. They may share a different one. I'm going to see if I can find the actual– maybe Julie can help me while I'm talking– study. Okay, it says three out of four studies in a group of zero cases of uterine rupture. Notably, the study with the largest patient population reported cases of uterine rupture in both groups and demonstrated a significantly greater risk of uterine rupture in the VBAC group. Meanwhile, the other three studies found no significant difference between rates of uterine rupture among groups 31-33. Nevertheless, the study shows that electing–”Okay, so I'm just going to say. It says, “Electing to have a PRCD reduces but does not eliminate the small risk of uterine rupture.” So what I'm reading here is that in some of them, it showed significantly greater, but then in 3 out of 4 reviews, and I don't even know actually how many people were in each of these reviews, but in 4 reviews, one had a greater risk and three didn't really show much of a difference, but we see that in the very beginning right here. “Uterine rupture is significantly higher in women with twins.” What do you think? If you are carrying twins and you see that, Julie, significantly higher enters into the vocabulary at all, what do you think?Julie: Well, I think I would want to schedule a C-section for my twins, probably. Meagan: Probably. 30:37 Understanding the meaning of statistical significance Julie: I want to just go off on a little tangent here for a second. I think it's really important when we are talking about studies that we know what statistically significant means because sometimes if you don't know much about digging into studies and things like that which I'm not going to go into too much right now– Meagan: It's difficult. Julie: It is difficult. It's really hard which is why I'm not going to go into it because I feel like we could have a whole hour-long podcast just for that. Statistically significant really just means that the difference or the increase or the change that they are looking into is not likely to be explained by chance or by random numbers which is why when you have a larger study, the results are more likely to be statistically significant because there is less room for error basically. A .1% increase can be just as statistically significant as a 300% increase because it just comes down to whether they are confident that it is a result that is not related to any chance or external environmental factors. I feel like it's really important to clarify that just because something is statistically significant doesn't mean that it's big, catastrophic, or a lot, it just means that it's not likely to be due to chance or anything random. 32:05 “The United States is intervention intensive.” Meagan: Yeah. I love that. Okay. There was one other thing I wanted to share. This was published in the Journal of Perinatal Education and it is a little more dated. It's been 10 years or so, but I just wanted to read it because it was really interesting to me. It doesn't even exactly go with risk and things, but it just talks about your chances which I guess, to me– do you know what I”m trying to say? Julie: They kind of go hand in hand. Meagan: To me, at least, they do. So when I read this, I was like, “Well, this is interesting.” I just wanted to drop it here and I think it's more just eye-opening. It says, “Maternity care in the United States is intervention intensive.” Now, if we didn't know this already, I don't know where I've been in the doula world for the last 10 years. Right? You guys, as doulas, obviously, we're not medical professionals, but as doulas, we see a lot of intervention and a lot of intervention that is completely unnecessary and a lot of intervention that leads to traumatic birth, unexpected or undesired outcomes and then they lead to other unnecessary interventions. It's the cascade. We talk about the domino effect or the cascade of interventions, but this is real so for them to type out, “Maternity care in the United States is intervention intensive–”Julie: You're like, “Yeah, where have you been?” Not you, but the writer. Meagan: Yeah, the writer. Yeah. It says, “The most recent national survey–” Now, again keep in mind it is 2024. This has been a minute since this was written. Julie: About 10+ years. Meagan: 10-12 years. Just keep that in mind. But it was interesting to me that even 10-12 years ago, this was where we were at because I feel like since I started as a doula, I've seen the interventions increase– the inductions, the unnecessary Cesareans increase a lot. Julie: Some of them, yeah. Yeah, especially inductions and Pitocin. Meagan: Not all of the time. I cannot tell you that in 10 out of 10 births that I attend, this is the case but through the years of me beginning doula work and what I have witnessed, it's increased. At least here in Utah, it seems that it has increased. It says, “The most recent national survey of women's pregnancy, birth, and postpartum experience reports that for women who gave birth in June 2011-2012,” so a little bit ago, “89% of women experienced electronic fetal monitoring.” Okay. Julie: That seems actually low to me for hospital births. Meagan: It does seem low because to me–Julie: I wonder if there had been a ton of stop and drops or something. Meagan: I don't know, but I agree. 89%. I feel like the second you get into the hospital, no matter VBAC or not, they want to monitor your baby. Julie: Strapped onto the monitor, yeah. Meagan: It says, “66% continuously.” So out of the 89%, it says 66% were continuously meaning they didn't do the intermittent every 30 minutes to an hour checking on baby for a quick 15 minutes to get another baseline, they just left that monitor on them which makes me wonder why. Usually, when a client of mine goes in and has that, they're like, “Oh, your baby had a weird decel so we are going to leave the monitor on longer,” and then they don't say anything. They just keep it on there. Maybe that's– I don't know. It says, “62% received intravenous fluids.” Julie: IV fluids. Meagan: Which to me, is also a lot. 36:27 Eating during labor and the risk of aspiration under anesthesiaMeagan: “79% experienced restrictions on eating.” 79%. You guys, we need to eat. We need to fuel our bodies. We are literally running a marathon times five in labor. We shouldn't be not eating, but 79% which doesn't surprise me, and “60% experienced restrictions on drinking in labor.” Why? Why are we being restricted from drinking and eating in labor unless we have other plans for how labor may go? Julie: That's exactly what it is. They're preparing you for an emergency Cesarean. That's what they're doing. That's exactly what restricting non-IV fluids is. It's not only that, but it is preparing you for the incredibly low risk of you having to go under general anesthesia, and then even people that go under general anesthesia have an incredibly low risk of aspirating and that is what it's coming down to. Don't even get me started on all of the flaws in all of the studies that went over aspiration during general anesthesia anyway because they are so significantly flawed that we are basing denying women energy and fuel during labor based on flawed studies that are incredibly outdated and on incredibly low risk during an incredibly already low risk. I mean, you probably don't want to down a cheeseburger while you're having a baby. I don't know. Maybe me. Just kidding. Even I didn't want a cheeseburger, but I wanted some little snacks, and some water to keep you hydrated. Yes. Oh my goodness. Let's please stop this. Sorry. Stepping off the soapbox. Meagan: You know, there is a provider here. I actually can't remember her name. It was way back in the beginning of my doula career and actually, it was in an area that is not one of my more common areas to serve. It was outside of my serving area. Anyway, we were at a birth and there was an induction. I remember being in there with her and the provider, an OB, walks in and is like, “Hey, how are you doing?” He was so friendly and kind and asked some questions like, “How are you feeling? What are you thinking about this?” Then she was getting ready to leave and she turned back and said, “Hey. I just thought about this. Have you eaten anything?” The mom was like, “No.” She was like, “Uh, you need to eat.” Julie: Yeah!Meagan: She had an epidural at this point. The mom was like, “Wait, what?” She was like, “You need to eat.” I literally remember my jaw falling, but had to keep my mouth up because I didn't want to look like I was weird. Anyway, I said, “That's something I've not usually heard from an OB especially after someone's had an epidural.” She was like, “Oh, I am very passionate about this.” She was like, “When I was finishing up school and graduating,” she had to write some big thing. Julie: Her dissertation probably. Meagan: Time capsule, I don't even remember what it was called. Some really, really big thing. She was like, “I specifically found passion about the lack of eating and drinking in labor.” She was like, “I did all of this stuff and what I found was you are more likely–” Here comes risk. “You are more likely to be struck in the head twice by lightning–” This is what she said. “Twice by lightning than you are to aspirate in a Cesarean after having an epidural.” Julie: I love this lady. Who is it? Meagan: I can't remember. I will have to text my client. Julie: Where was it? What hospital? Meagan: It was up in Davis County. Julie: Oh, interesting. Meagan: It was not an area for me. I said, “Whoa, really?” She said, “Yeah. You need to get that girl some food.” I was like, “Done. 100%.” Julie: More likely to get struck by lightning. Meagan: More likely to get struck by lightning twice in the head than you are to aspirate in a Cesarean after receiving an epidural. That stuck with me forever. Literally, here we are 10 years later. Julie: I love that because first of all–Meagan: I don't have documentation to prove that. She just said that. Julie: That is 100% relative risk. Aspirating during a C-section relative to getting struck by lightning twice. So that's cool. What are the numbers? I know that the numbers are super incredibly low and I feel like when you put in context like that, getting struck by lightning twice, I don't know anybody that's been struck by lightning once and who has been alive to tell about it. I know of a friend whose sister got struck by lightning and died when she was very young. I only know one person in my entire life who has been struck by lightning. Meagan: I just looked it up really quick. I don't even know if this is credible. I literally just looked it up really quickly. It says that the odds that one will be struck by lightning in the US during one's lifetime is 1 in 15,300. Julie: Wow. Meagan: Okay. Julie: So twice that is 1 in 30,000. That's a freaking low risk. Anyway, what I'm saying is that I love that OB first of all. I feel like from what I've read about aspiration under general anesthesia during a C-section seems right in line with those numbers and those chances because it's so rare, it's almost unheard of especially now with all of the technology that we have. It's fine because I'm not going to go on that soapbox. I love that. I love that analogy and that we're talking about that because 10 years from now or when our daughters are having babies, they're going to talk about how their poor moms couldn't eat when they were in labor because of the policies just like we talk about the twilight sleep and how our poor grandmas had to undergo twilight sleep when our moms were being born. I feel like that's just going to be one of those things where we will look back and be like, “What were we thinking?” 43:03 Epidurals, Pitocin, AROM, episiotomies, and C-section percentagesMeagan: Okay, I'm going to finish this off. It says, “67% of women who gave birth vaginally had an epidural during labor and 37% were given Pitocin to speed up their labors.” Sorry, but come on. That also may go to show, that we're going to do an epidural episode as well, that epidural maybe does really slow down labor. Maybe it really does impact the body's response to continuing labor in a natural way, so 31% of those people had to have help and assistance. It says, “20% of women had their membranes artificially ruptured,” which means they broke your bag of water artificially with the little whatever, breaking bag water hook thing versus it breaking spontaneously. Julie: Amniohook. Is it an amniohook? Meagan: Amniohook, yeah. “17% of women had an episiotomy.” I don't know. Julie: I feel like those numbers are probably lower now. Meagan: I think that's changed, yeah. “31% had a Cesarean.”Julie: That is right in line with the national average. Meagan: It is, still. “The high use of these interventions reflects a system-wide maternity care philosophy expecting trouble. There is an increasing body of research that suggests that the routine use of these interventions rather than decreasing the risk of trouble in labor and birth actually increases complications for both women and their babies.” 44:43 The perspective of birth doulas and birth photographersJulie: I believe it. Do you know what? Can I just get on another tangent here because I know that you all love my tangents? I really wish that somebody somewhere would do something and I don't know what that something is, to get the voices of birth doulas and birth photographers heard because this is why. Doulas and birth photographers– I've said this before. We see births in all of the places. We have a really, really unique point of view about birth in the United States because we attend births at home. We attend unassisted births. We attend births at home with unlicensed providers. We attend births at home and births at birth centers with licensed providers. We attend in-hospital births with midwives and we attend in-hospital births with OB/GYNs and some of us are lucky enough to attend out-of-hospital births with OB/GYNs because there are a handful of them floating around. We see birth in every single variety that it takes in the United States. I really wish that someone somewhere would do something to get those voices lifted and amplified because I feel like yes, a lot of that is going to be anecdotal, but I feel like the stories there have so much value with the state of our system in the relationship between home and hospital birth, how birth transfers happen when births need to be transported to hospitals, the mental health of the people giving birth, the providers and the care, and all of that. I feel like, like I said, somebody should do something to do something with all of that information that we all carry with us. I think it could provide so much value somewhere, right? I don't know what yet, but if anybody has an idea, message me. Find me on Instagram at @juliefrancombirth. Find me. Message me if you have any ideas. Maybe write a book or something. I don't know. Meagan: I've wanted to do an episode and title it “From a Doula's Perspective”. We could do that from a birth photographer and all that, but it's crazy. It's crazy. Julie: We see it all. Meagan: There was a birth just the other day with one of our sweet, dear clients where the provider was saying things that seemed scary even though the evidence of what was happening was really not scary, went into a scheduled induction, and the way they were handling it, I felt so guilty as a doula and I was like, “This is going to turn Cesarean. This is not good.” Sure enough, it did and it broke my heart because I was like, “None of that needed to happen,” but again, it goes to us deciding what's best for us. That mom had to decide what was best for her with the facts that we were giving, what the doctor was giving, and all of these things. Again, we don't judge anyone for the way they birth, but it's sometimes so hard to see people not get the birth they wanted or desired, or to have people literally doubt their ability because someone said something to them. Julie: Yeah. Meagan: You know–Julie: Yeah. I agree. It's just interesting. Anyways. Meagan: We are getting off our topic of risk, but risk is a hard conversation to have because there are different numbers. It can be presented differently and like I said, it can also have a tone to it that adds a whole other perspective. So know that if you are given a risk, it's okay to research that and question it and see if that really is the real risk and if that's the evidence-based information. We like to provide them here like we were saying earlier. We may be guilty and I hope you guys stick with us if we share some that might be a little jarring on both sides of the VBAC and C-section, but we love you. We're here for you. We understand risks are scary. They are also hard to break down and understand, but we are here for you. I love you guys and yeah. Anything else, Julie?Julie: No. I just want to say be kind to each other. Give each other the benefit of the doubt. Do everything you can to make the best decisions for you. Trust your intuition and find the right support team. We're all just trying to do our best– us at The VBAC Link, you as parents, providers as providers, and if you feel like you need to make a change, make it. Meagan: Make it. All right, okay everybody. We'll talk to you later. Julie: Bye!ClosingWould you like to be a guest on the podcast? Tell us about your experience at thevbaclink.com/share. For more information on all things VBAC including online and in-person VBAC classes, The VBAC Link blog, and Meagan's bio, head over to thevbaclink.com. Congratulations on starting your journey of learning and discovery with The VBAC Link.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/the-vbac-link/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Risk assessment, setting an example of leadership for your employees, and looking to the future are all part of an agency owner's daily schedule. But how often do we take the time to slow down, take a breath, and reflect on what leadership means to us and our company, now and going forward? Matt Phillips thinks we don't do this as often as we should. He's here today to discuss why taking time to reflect and develop as leaders will help our agencies, why finding the truth amidst limiting beliefs will help us grow, and much more. This week, episode 208 of The Digital Agency Growth Podcast is about developing leadership skills, overcoming limiting beliefs, and assessing risk!Watch our latest video training, How to Take Charge of Your Agency's Future Revenue. During this training, you'll learn how we get qualified appointments every week using tasteful and highly targeted email outreach.In this episode of The Digital Agency Growth Podcast, Matt Phillips shares the importance of setting aside time to contemplate your leadership and actionable steps you can take right now to hire the best possible person in every scenario. As a leadership coach and host of The Matt Phillips Podcast, Matt Phillips helps sales leaders achieve pro-level performance by developing and harnessing their mental toughness. Having worked with companies including Western Union, Marsh, and Robert Half, Matt knows that the status quo of promoting rockstar salespeople to sales leaders often leaves the new leader with significant gaps in their own leadership philosophy, confidence, and resilience. By combining his background as a professional baseball player with his global experience in sales, operations, and accounting, Matt supports business leaders and teams as they break through the mental roadblocks that arise in their daily grind to help them realize their potential in their personal and professional lives.In this episode, Dan and Matt discuss the following:What mental resilience means in everyday practice for your business.Matt's four archetypes that give insight into how people think and work.The importance of asking tough questions to uncover the truth and overcome fear-based limitations.How carving out time for thoughtful reflection on leadership, even with a busy schedule, will positively impact your business.Thank you for listening! If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to follow, rate and review the podcast and tell me your key takeaways!Learn more about The Digitial Agency Growth Podcast at https://www.salesschema.com/podcast/ and our Video training at https://salesschema.com/relationships CONNECT WITH MATT PHILLIPS:WebsiteThe Matt Phillips PodcastLinkedInInstagramCONNECT WITH DAN ENGLANDER:LinkedInSales Schema
On today's episode we are talking about how playing it safe might be killing your company. John Miller is the Founder of Scribewise, a dynamic content marketing agency dedicated to aiding B2B firms and healthcare providers in achieving growth through thought leadership and demand generation. His team of writers, designers, and strategists excels in humanizing complex business conversations by crafting and disseminating compelling, audience-focused content. With a firm belief in courageous marketing, John advocates for breaking free from the mundane and injecting excitement into the business world. His passion extends to his book, a manifesto at PlayingItSafeSucks.com, aimed at inspiring marketers and companies to adopt a bold and impactful mindset.Episode Highlights:Courageous Marketing Manifesto: The book, "Playing It Safe Sucks, A Courageous Marketing Manifesto," challenges the prevailing mindset of playing it safe, emphasizing the importance of making companies stand out, build credibility, and trust. Assessing Risk and Timing: Delving into the concept of risk in marketing, the discussion highlights the importance of assessing the right time for bold marketing moves and the need for internal champions to push innovative ideas.B2B Marketing Focus: The conversation underscores the distinctive aspects of B2B marketing, emphasizing the longer consideration cycle and the need to build trust at scale rather than merely focusing on website traffic or SEO.Effective Communication within Organizations: Addressing the challenges of communicating courageous marketing ideas within organizations, the emphasis is on starting small with experiments, proving concepts, and gradually expanding initiatives. Internal champions and alignment with company culture are vital.Navigating Uncertain Times: The discussion challenges the "Playing It Safe" mentality during uncertain times, urging marketers not to give in to the temptation of playing small. It encourages finding ways to bring innovative ideas to market, even in the face of internal politics and red tape.John's Top 3 Takeaways for the Audience:1. Be courageous in your marketing.2. For B2B companies, let go of your obsession with website traffic and SEO.3. Don't follow trends or follow the masses. Focus on figuring out your message and audience instead. How to Connect with John: Website: https://scribewise.com/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnmillerscribewise/
Download Chris's FREE E-Book on “How To Find Ultra High Net Worth Clients" from https://UHNWC.com/ Lowell Pratt (https://www.linkedin.com/in/lowell-pratt-cfa-53b89310/) joined the Burney Company in 1986, became a Portfolio Manager in 1992, was promoted to Director of Analysis in 1996 and became President in 2003. Lowell's passion is implementing improvements to Burney's quantitative analytical methods. In this episode, Chris and Lowell discussed: 1. Creating Legacies 2. Seeing Opportunities in Market Downturns 3. Inflation and The Road to Recovery 4. Assessing Risk and Rewards of Alternatives LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lowell-pratt-cfa-53b89310/ Website: https://burneyadvisorservices.com/ Maximize your marketing, close more clients, and amplify your AUM by following us on: Instagram: https://instagram.com/ultrahighnetworthclients TikTok: https://tiktok.com/ultrahighnetworthclients YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@uhnwc Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UHNWCPodcast Twitter: https://twitter.com/uhnwcpodcast iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/ultra-high-net-worth-clients-with-chris-brodhead/id1569041400 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4Guqegm2CVqkcEfMSLPEDr Website: https://uhnwc.com Work with us: https://famousfounder.com DISCLAIMER: This content is provided by Chris Brodhead for the general public and general information purposes only. This content is not considered to be an offer to buy or sell any securities or investments. Investing involves the risk of loss and an investor should be prepared to bear potential losses. Investment should only be made after thorough review with your investment advisor considering all factors including personal goals, needs and risk tolerance.
How confident are you in your ability to protect infants from severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection? Credit available for this activity expires: 12/5/2024 Earn Credit / Learning Objectives & Disclosures: https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/998947?ecd=bdc_podcast_libsyn_mscpedu
Caribou Honig is a partner at SemperViren Ventures, a VC firm that specializes in investing in workforce, healthcare, and financial technologies. In this episode, we discuss quitting jobs, taking risks, Insurance, and Venture capital in 2023. 0-1: Intro 1-5: Stupid Career Decisions 5-8: InsureTech 8-10: How will younger people become interested in insurance? 10-11: Opportunities at CapitalOne 11-13: Hierarchy of technology 13-16: Insurance API's 16-18: What Caribou Invests In 18-21: What do you look for in a founder? 21-23: Dilution in Venture Capital 23-27: Investing in companies in 2023 27-32: Should Venture Capital be democratized? 32-34: How to find business opportunities 34-35: InsureTech Niche 35-40: The math behind Insurance 40-42: Assessing Risk 43-47: Advice to college students
In this episode, we had the pleasure of interviewing Bethany Winston, owner, and Editor-in-Chief of Kidding Around Greenville, as she shares valuable insights on assessing risk in your small business. […] The post Assessing Risk in Your Small Business appeared first on Intelligent Investing.
Grab a chair, pop in those earbuds, and get ready to find real estate gems by mastering property analysis! Mind you, this will feel like detective work. Property analysts are like secret agents sifting through properties, considering all the details, and looking for clues as to what could drive growth. Is it the neighbourhood? The vibe? The future? Good analysts always know. Our guest, a property enthusiast, started her journey alongside her real estate agent mum, eventually diving into property analysis. She's now one of our financial superheroes, saving the day and always finding the top 1% of properties. So, if you're unsure about property investing, take this podcast as your pass to a thrilling adventure. Hit play and dive into the world of property analysis.
I love chess, and I love building businesses. Luckily, for me, the two are very similar. Here are some lessons that I've learned from playing chess that have helped me build my 8-figure business. Lesson 1: Control the Center.Lesson 2: Understanding Piece Value.Lesson 3: Proactive Piece Development.Lesson 4: Assessing Risk vs. Reward.Lesson 5: Thinking Several Moves Ahead.There's so much you can learn from this game that you can then take and apply to other areas of your life. So the next time you're feeling stuck, break out the ol' chess board and play a few games. You might find the answer on the board. LEAVE A REVIEW if you liked this episode!! Let's Connect On Social Media! youtube.com/anthonyvicino twitter.com/anthonyvicino instagram.com/theanthonyvicino https://anthonyvicino.com Join an exclusive community of peak performers at Beyond the Apex University learning how to build a business, invest in real estate, and develop hyperfocus. www.beyondtheapex.com Learn More About Investing With Anthony Invictus Capital: www.invictusmultifamily.com Multifamily Investing Made Simple Podcast Passive Investing Made Simple Book: www.thepassiveinvestingbook.com
Want to navigate oil and gas investments? Our talk with Steve Blackwell, CEO of InVito Energy Partners, offers key advice. He shares insights on assessing such investments, focusing on sponsors' and operators' backgrounds, team composition, and the ability to simplify complex evaluations and financial models. He also emphasizes the importance of low fees to ensure more of your capital is invested in assets.Investing in oil is risky, but Steve guides us on risk assessment, discussing how to gauge project failure likelihood and wildcatting. He values historical production data and considers infrastructure crucial when evaluating investments. He also explains best and worst-case scenarios, providing a thorough understanding of possible outcomes.Steve also explores oil and gas funds, tax considerations, and the potential for steady income from these investments. He explains fund evaluation, exit strategies, and the benefits of patience, like avoiding IDC recapture. We also delve into the advantages of oil and gas investments including tax deductions and long-term growth, and address intricate aspects of energy investments like the alternative minimum tax and intangible drilling cost deductions. Don't miss this episode full of essential advice! For more, email: sblackwell@invitoep.com
MetaSpiritual Podcast-This episode continues our series entitled Why Facts Don't Change Our Minds and Beliefs Are so Hard to Change?, based on an article by by Imed Bouchrika, PhD. We explore two topics from the article: “Causality and the Ignorance Gap” and “Emotions and Assessing Risk.” The post 2023-25: Facts-Beliefs-Part 3; Absolute Word-Reflection first appeared on Metaphysical Romp 2 Podcast.
After a three-year pause, borrowers must resume their federal student loan payments in October. In this episode, the Equifax Risk Advisory group discusses how the financial industry can navigate the road ahead by assessing their risk and finding opportunity. In this episode:· How the repayments will impact the financial industry· Will the additional monthly payment cause delinquencies to rise in other loan products· How clients can assess risk in their loan book· Strategies for addressing risk Resources: Fintech Solutions: Discover how our rich data, predictive analytics and cloud-native technologies can help fintechs successfully target and acquire more customers, mitigate fraud and make better business decisions. CreditForecast.com is a joint venture between Equifax and Moody's Analytics. Get actionable consumer credit, economic and demographic data, forecasts and analysis. Register for Market Pulse webinars to get relevant economic and credit insights to help your business make more confident decisions. Learn more about our Market Pulse podcast, and contact us at marketpulsepodcast@equifax.com
In this episode about risk Sascha and I explore the varied ways we gage the danger of any given situation. We talk about mothers, swings, logs in the woods. We make note of the ways our sure and imminent death plays into our calculations and how grateful we are for the hard, brave work past versions of ourselves have done in service of our current selves.Come join us on this friendly romp through risky landscapes!
Mark Parrett and Steven Manuel discuss the next in their Critical Skills of Money series: MULTIPLICATION. (This is the aspect of money management that people REALLY get JUICED about: how do we take money and turn it into MORE money?) Everybody gets amped at the idea, but multiplication is more about discipline than anything else. Being comfortable with taking some risk helps too. ALSO! If you're wondering how Mark's suits have been fitting him lately, this episode is for you! Abraham's Wallet exists to inspire and equip Biblical family leaders. Please partner with us in inspiring and equipping multi-gen families at https://abrahamswallet.com/donate/ About Abraham's Wallet: AW website: https://abrahamswallet.com/2017/11/27/what-is-abrahams-wallet/ Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/abrahams-wallet/id1462593706 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6xbcf3IhayaoKB4sTegPRw?si=4M-m7mwUR0GigEkgrf3aJA YouTube full episodes: https://www.youtube.com/@abrahamswallet Twitter: https://twitter.com/abrahamswallet Facebook: https://twitter.com/abrahamswallet Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abrahamswallet This Week's Episode Rundown: 0:00 Mark's Soap and Suit 4:21 Critical Skills of Money Recap 7:14 MULTIPLICATION 10:30 Biblical Backgrounds 17:21 Multiplication In Action 19:05 The Power of Compound Interest 30:11 Stewarding The Master's Money 37:17 Why Should We Multiply? 43:08 I'm Going to Be A Multiplier, by Gum! 44:51 BONUS SKILL: Understanding Risk 53:30 Assessing Risk 59:07 Recap & Close
In this episode of The Event Safety Podcast, we welcome back ESA Board Member and ESA Canada Executive Director Janet Sellery for a conversation on assessing risk. Topics of discussion include organizing risks factors, benefits & shortcoming of various assessment models, prioritizing process over specific tools, and more. They also drop some info on several upcoming events and ESA's new student membership program. Check it out!Notes:Notes:Triangle: The Fire That Changed America (Book)The Checklist Manifesto (Book)ESA Canada
Three Tips to Keep People Out of Poverty. Female Role Models. Assessing Risk. Feminists Explode Over Leo's Latest Girlfriend.Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode, the DA&A Group dive into Asian markets, focusing on the extent to which Chinese equities are still benefitting from re-opening tailwinds, and Japanese equities could fare in the context of the new BoJ Governor. Krupa Patel, Head of International Market Intelligence, is interviewed by Eloise Goulder, Head of the Data Assets & Alpha Group. This episode was recorded on March 6, 2023. The views expressed in this podcast may not necessarily reflect the views of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co and its affiliates (together “J.P. Morgan”), are not the product of J.P. Morgan's Research Department and do not constitute a recommendation, advice, or an offer or a solicitation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument. This podcast is intended for institutional and professional investors only and is not intended for retail investor use and is provided for information purposes only. Referenced products and services in this podcast may not be suitable for you and may not be available in all jurisdictions. J.P. Morgan may make markets and trade as principal in securities and other asset classes and financial products that may have been discussed. For additional disclaimers and regulatory disclosures, please visit: https://www.jpmorgan.com/disclosures/salesandtradingdisclaimer © 2023 JPMorgan Chase & Company. All rights reserved.
Josh Phillips, Senior Director and Head of Safety & Asset Protection for Chipotle Mexican Grill sits down with TalkLP Host Amber Bradley to talk deviating career paths, the best way to truly be open-minded, and the BEST career advice he's ever received. Josh also talks about the benefits of creating a real and authentic workplace...and WHY should that matter? Josh also opens up about the worst career advice he's ever received... AND all those solution providers that don't bother researching the business your pitching, don't bother calling Josh. Great advice: do your research and try to know the problem before walking in the door. Plus, understand how your solution is going to scale in large environments (#preach, Josh)! Josh is speaking at the Restaurant Loss Prevention & Security Association (RLPSA) Annual Conference in Denver April 2- 5 about threat assessment and building a Risk & Threat Assessment Policy/Program. For more information on attending RLPSA check out it out here.
In these "Mini Moments" we pull some of my favorite and most impactful mini lessons from past episodes of the Made for More Podcast to give you a quick digestible lesson in under 10 minutes. If you liked this mini moment, check out the rest of this full episode here - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-laptop-lifestyle-podcast/id1529443551?i=1000558588676 Summary There are two big things that hold people back from getting what they want: priorities and assessment/fear of risk. We often tell ourselves we really want something but our actions say otherwise in that we are likely not truly prioritizing the actions needed to change. So they hard question becomes not just "how bad do you really want this?" but "how bad do you really want this in regards to what you will have to trade or sacrifice to prioritize and achieve that thing?" Lastly, we provide a new way to think about risk, because most people only think about risk from one side. Our Favorite Quotes “Being decisive is one of the most successful traits of being a business owner.” If you want significant results, you've got to make big moves; risk-taking and taking action! No matter what level of entrepreneurship you're at, if you are a six-figure business owner or considering leaving your 9-5 job to start a business, you will be assessing the risk of what it takes to achieve your goals. “We live in the emotion, we don't dismantle this narrative that's controlling us.” Thanks for listening, and if you like what you've heard, I would greatly appreciate you shaing this episode with your friends or on your Instagram stories (and tag @laptop.lifestyle.co)! There are so many amazing women who need to hear this message and who are working to build their dream lifestyle, and I'd love you to help me spread the word. Resources and links mentioned in this episode: Laptop Lifestyle Co Links: Website Instagram Tik Tok YouTube Channel
Risk is a weird thing with us humans. Sometimes we grossly underestimate risk, while other times we grossly overestimate it. The biggest reason we whiff? Fear! We tend to rely too much on emotion, and not enough on what really matters. In today's episode, host Travis Shelton talks through a simple but effective way to analyze and assess risk. It's based on an article he was working on for Brainz Magazine. If you'd like to read the article, you can find it in the link below. Brainz Magazine Article: https://www.brainzmagazine.com/post/reframing-risk-making-better-decisions-by-removing-fear If you have questions or would like to connect with us outside of the podcast, here's where you can find us: Join our podcast community: https://www.facebook.com/groups/370457478238932 Online Course: https://www.meaningover.money (podcast listeners can get 25% off by using the promo code "podcast25") YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCasnj17-bOl_CZ0Cb9czmyQ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meaning_over_money Travis's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/travis_shelton_ Travis's website: https://www.travisshelton.com E-Mail Us: meaningovermoneypodcast@gmail.com --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/meaning-over-money/message
Tune in to hear: - As one of the founders of the discipline of financial therapy, what light can Dr. Archuleta shed on the origin story of this unique discipline?- What are the lines of demarcation between financial planning, financial therapy and traditional therapy? Should financial planners look to make referrals, when necessary, for financial therapists or is this a largely academic discipline?- What's a concrete example of a concern that is out of the scope of a traditional financial advisor's practice but not necessarily appropriate for a psychologist either?- What is solution-focused therapy and why did Dr. Archuleta find it to be particularly instrumental in a study she was doing?- How can we encourage people to be a little more thoughtful about their goal setting process?- What is “fuzzy trace theory” and what is its relationship to risk tolerance?https://www.linkedin.com/in/kristy-archuleta-ph-d-lmft-cft-i-tm-273a5722Compliance Code: 1047-OAS-6/15/2022
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
