POPULARITY
38 episodes with accusers
22 episodes with accusers
18 episodes with accusers
17 episodes with accusers
12 episodes with accusers
17 episodes with accusers
6 episodes with accusers
5 episodes with accusers
4 episodes with accusers
7 episodes with accusers
2 episodes with accusers
3 episodes with accusers
4 episodes with accusers
8 episodes with accusers
3 episodes with accusers
7 episodes with accusers
2 episodes with accusers
4 episodes with accusers
In our latest edition of Words of Grace, Benjamin Winslett shares a recent sermon preached at Flint River Primitive Baptist Church, focusing on two false accusations made against Christ during His mock trials, before the crucifixion. Drawing from Isaiah 53:7-9, we explore the silence of Jesus before His accusers, the meaning behind the phrases “He … Continue reading "Answering Christ’s Accusers | Isaiah 53"
A new MP3 sermon from Carey Baptist Church is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Peter And John Stand Before The Sadducees & Indict Their Accusers | Acts 4 Subtitle: Book Of Acts Speaker: Pastor Benjamin Donahue Broadcaster: Carey Baptist Church Event: Radio Broadcast Date: 4/28/2025 Bible: Acts 4:1-20 Length: 14 min.
In this document, Sean Combs' legal team opposes the government's motion in limine that seeks to avoid disclosing the identities of certain witnesses in the criminal case against him. The defense argues that the government has not demonstrated any credible or individualized threat posed by Combs to justify withholding this information. They note that the government relies on generic assertions about witness safety without offering specific allegations of intimidation, coercion, or retaliation tied directly to Combs. The motion, they claim, lacks the evidentiary foundation required under legal precedent to support such an extreme restriction on the defendant's constitutional rights.Combs' attorneys also argue that shielding witness identities until just before trial would severely handicap the defense by preventing them from conducting thorough investigations, preparing cross-examinations, and assessing credibility—core components of a fair trial. They emphasize that protective measures, such as protective orders and redactions where necessary, already exist to mitigate genuine safety concerns without infringing on due process. Ultimately, the filing urges the court to deny the government's motion, framing it as an overreach that would tilt the trial unfairly in favor of the prosecution.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.266.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In this document, Sean Combs' legal team opposes the government's motion in limine that seeks to avoid disclosing the identities of certain witnesses in the criminal case against him. The defense argues that the government has not demonstrated any credible or individualized threat posed by Combs to justify withholding this information. They note that the government relies on generic assertions about witness safety without offering specific allegations of intimidation, coercion, or retaliation tied directly to Combs. The motion, they claim, lacks the evidentiary foundation required under legal precedent to support such an extreme restriction on the defendant's constitutional rights.Combs' attorneys also argue that shielding witness identities until just before trial would severely handicap the defense by preventing them from conducting thorough investigations, preparing cross-examinations, and assessing credibility—core components of a fair trial. They emphasize that protective measures, such as protective orders and redactions where necessary, already exist to mitigate genuine safety concerns without infringing on due process. Ultimately, the filing urges the court to deny the government's motion, framing it as an overreach that would tilt the trial unfairly in favor of the prosecution.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.266.0.pdf
In this document, Sean Combs' legal team opposes the government's motion in limine that seeks to avoid disclosing the identities of certain witnesses in the criminal case against him. The defense argues that the government has not demonstrated any credible or individualized threat posed by Combs to justify withholding this information. They note that the government relies on generic assertions about witness safety without offering specific allegations of intimidation, coercion, or retaliation tied directly to Combs. The motion, they claim, lacks the evidentiary foundation required under legal precedent to support such an extreme restriction on the defendant's constitutional rights.Combs' attorneys also argue that shielding witness identities until just before trial would severely handicap the defense by preventing them from conducting thorough investigations, preparing cross-examinations, and assessing credibility—core components of a fair trial. They emphasize that protective measures, such as protective orders and redactions where necessary, already exist to mitigate genuine safety concerns without infringing on due process. Ultimately, the filing urges the court to deny the government's motion, framing it as an overreach that would tilt the trial unfairly in favor of the prosecution.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.266.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The Hake Report, Tuesday, April 22, 2025 ADI Disavow tee https://hake.printify.me/product/19356961/i-disavow-monkey-covering-mouth-t-shirt-gildan-5000-heavy-cottonTIMESTAMPS* (0:00:00) Start* (0:03:21) Accusers* (0:11:38) Hey, guys! I Disavow mint green tee* (0:15:26) STEPHEN, IN: W. Bush, Austin-Karmelo theory* (0:28:45) BRIAN, NOLA: Tariffs? Trump for himself? Deported Abrego Garcia* (0:46:33) TERRI, OR: Earth Day: Ira Einhorn killed ex-gf. Activist misery. Nurses.* (1:09:39) MEADE, Richmond: Fort Bragg renamed but not to Braxton but Roland* (1:16:43) MEADE: Ride a horse, shoot a gun, girls invading!* (1:20:07) Super…* (1:21:08) Coffee: "ridiculous" that Karmelo cried self-defense?* (1:26:50) CHASE, TX: Women; Angels or Aliens* (1:35:11) HADEN, TX: Trump a criminal? "Self defense"? Jesus is God?* (1:47:31) Anchor Baby coming* (1:48:25) Covid dot gov redirect … No Ardene* (1:58:30) ALLEN, MI: Earth Day, Lenin's b-day; Commies marking their territory* (2:09:01) RICK, VA: Lose a fight right; The truth, Fox News, JLP* (2:19:18) Anchor Baby next; Joel Friday back tomorrow* (2:20:06) WAYNE, TX: Baptism of the Spirit* (2:24:40) WAYNE: Istanbul, tariffs… Ephesus* (2:30:31) ANTHONY, CA… Jesus is God question, Orthodox* (2:48:28) News: Robbie Williams anxious scurvy, FSU female students* (2:53:10) PastPresentFuture - "The Hake Report"LINKSBLOG https://www.thehakereport.com/blog/2025/4/22/the-hake-report-tue-4-22-25PODCAST / Substack HAKE NEWS from JLP https://www.thehakereport.com/jlp-news/2025/4/22/jlp-tue-4-22-25Hake is live M-F 9-11a PT (11-1CT/12-2ET) Call-in 1-888-775-3773 https://www.thehakereport.com/showVIDEO YouTube - Rumble* - Facebook - X - BitChute (Live) - Odysee*PODCAST Substack - Apple - Spotify - Castbox - Podcast Addict*SUPER CHAT on platforms* above or BuyMeACoffee, etc.SHOP - Printify (new!) - Spring (old!) - Cameo | All My LinksJLP Network: JLP - Church - TFS - Nick - Joel - Punchie Get full access to HAKE at thehakereport.substack.com/subscribe
On today's show we will look at a recent edition of Table Talk where Rick Renner is calling out podcasters as accusers of the brethren. Daystar Petition: https://tinyurl.com/ycxwe4ye Jonathan & Suzy Lamb GiveSendGo: https://www.givesendgo.com/GEBG9 Richardson Nutritional Center: https://tinyurl.com/mudzzy3n Zstack Protocol: https://zstacklife.com/?ref=LAURALYNN Antibiotics at: Sales@larxmedical.com Promo code: LLTT Need some Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine? Fast shipping with guaranteed delivery in Canada and the US. Contact Mia for more information. SozoHealth@proton.me ☆ We no longer can trust our mainstream media, which is why independent journalists such as myself are the new way to receive accurate information about our world. Thank you for supporting us – your generosity and kindness to help us keep information like this coming! ☆ ~ L I N K S ~ ➞ DONATE AT: https://www.lauralynn.tv/ or lauralynnlive@protonmail.com ➞ TWITTER: @LauraLynnTT ➞ FACEBOOK: Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson ➞ RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/LauraLynnTylerThompson ➞ BITCHUTE: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/BodlXs2IF22h/ ➞ YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/LauraLynnTyler ➞ BRIGHTEON: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/lauralynntv ➞ DLIVE: https://dlive.tv/Laura-Lynn ➞ ODYSEE: https://odysee.com/@LauraLynnTT:9 ➞ GETTR: https://www.gettr.com/user/lauralynn ➞ LIBRTI: https://librti.com/laura-lynn-tyler-thompson
In a motion filed on April 4, 2025, the U.S. government asked the court to implement protective measures for three key victim-witnesses expected to testify in the criminal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government argued that Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4 should be permitted to testify under pseudonyms to safeguard their privacy, dignity, and mental well-being. Unlike Victim-1—confirmed to be Cassie Ventura—who has agreed to testify using her full name, the other three requested anonymity due to concerns about harassment, stigma, and professional fallout. Prosecutors further requested that the defense be barred from revealing these individuals' personal details in open court and that any court exhibits containing their names be sealed, with redacted versions available to the public.The motion cited precedent from similar federal cases, including those involving sex trafficking and abuse, where anonymity was granted to protect victims from retraumatization and undue exposure. The government emphasized that these requests were narrowly tailored to balance the victims' privacy rights with the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights. The motion was brought under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771), which ensures victims are treated with fairness and respect, and it stressed that denying these protections could discourage victim cooperation or inhibit truthful testimony. If granted, the court's decision would mark a significant procedural step in shaping how key testimony will be handled in Diddy's high-profile federal trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In a motion filed on April 4, 2025, the U.S. government asked the court to implement protective measures for three key victim-witnesses expected to testify in the criminal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government argued that Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4 should be permitted to testify under pseudonyms to safeguard their privacy, dignity, and mental well-being. Unlike Victim-1—confirmed to be Cassie Ventura—who has agreed to testify using her full name, the other three requested anonymity due to concerns about harassment, stigma, and professional fallout. Prosecutors further requested that the defense be barred from revealing these individuals' personal details in open court and that any court exhibits containing their names be sealed, with redacted versions available to the public.The motion cited precedent from similar federal cases, including those involving sex trafficking and abuse, where anonymity was granted to protect victims from retraumatization and undue exposure. The government emphasized that these requests were narrowly tailored to balance the victims' privacy rights with the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights. The motion was brought under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771), which ensures victims are treated with fairness and respect, and it stressed that denying these protections could discourage victim cooperation or inhibit truthful testimony. If granted, the court's decision would mark a significant procedural step in shaping how key testimony will be handled in Diddy's high-profile federal trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In a motion filed on April 4, 2025, the U.S. government asked the court to implement protective measures for three key victim-witnesses expected to testify in the criminal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government argued that Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4 should be permitted to testify under pseudonyms to safeguard their privacy, dignity, and mental well-being. Unlike Victim-1—confirmed to be Cassie Ventura—who has agreed to testify using her full name, the other three requested anonymity due to concerns about harassment, stigma, and professional fallout. Prosecutors further requested that the defense be barred from revealing these individuals' personal details in open court and that any court exhibits containing their names be sealed, with redacted versions available to the public.The motion cited precedent from similar federal cases, including those involving sex trafficking and abuse, where anonymity was granted to protect victims from retraumatization and undue exposure. The government emphasized that these requests were narrowly tailored to balance the victims' privacy rights with the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights. The motion was brought under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771), which ensures victims are treated with fairness and respect, and it stressed that denying these protections could discourage victim cooperation or inhibit truthful testimony. If granted, the court's decision would mark a significant procedural step in shaping how key testimony will be handled in Diddy's high-profile federal trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf
In a motion filed on April 4, 2025, the U.S. government asked the court to implement protective measures for three key victim-witnesses expected to testify in the criminal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government argued that Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4 should be permitted to testify under pseudonyms to safeguard their privacy, dignity, and mental well-being. Unlike Victim-1—confirmed to be Cassie Ventura—who has agreed to testify using her full name, the other three requested anonymity due to concerns about harassment, stigma, and professional fallout. Prosecutors further requested that the defense be barred from revealing these individuals' personal details in open court and that any court exhibits containing their names be sealed, with redacted versions available to the public.The motion cited precedent from similar federal cases, including those involving sex trafficking and abuse, where anonymity was granted to protect victims from retraumatization and undue exposure. The government emphasized that these requests were narrowly tailored to balance the victims' privacy rights with the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights. The motion was brought under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771), which ensures victims are treated with fairness and respect, and it stressed that denying these protections could discourage victim cooperation or inhibit truthful testimony. If granted, the court's decision would mark a significant procedural step in shaping how key testimony will be handled in Diddy's high-profile federal trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf
In a motion filed on April 4, 2025, the U.S. government asked the court to implement protective measures for three key victim-witnesses expected to testify in the criminal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government argued that Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4 should be permitted to testify under pseudonyms to safeguard their privacy, dignity, and mental well-being. Unlike Victim-1—confirmed to be Cassie Ventura—who has agreed to testify using her full name, the other three requested anonymity due to concerns about harassment, stigma, and professional fallout. Prosecutors further requested that the defense be barred from revealing these individuals' personal details in open court and that any court exhibits containing their names be sealed, with redacted versions available to the public.The motion cited precedent from similar federal cases, including those involving sex trafficking and abuse, where anonymity was granted to protect victims from retraumatization and undue exposure. The government emphasized that these requests were narrowly tailored to balance the victims' privacy rights with the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights. The motion was brought under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771), which ensures victims are treated with fairness and respect, and it stressed that denying these protections could discourage victim cooperation or inhibit truthful testimony. If granted, the court's decision would mark a significant procedural step in shaping how key testimony will be handled in Diddy's high-profile federal trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In a motion filed on April 4, 2025, the U.S. government asked the court to implement protective measures for three key victim-witnesses expected to testify in the criminal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government argued that Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4 should be permitted to testify under pseudonyms to safeguard their privacy, dignity, and mental well-being. Unlike Victim-1—confirmed to be Cassie Ventura—who has agreed to testify using her full name, the other three requested anonymity due to concerns about harassment, stigma, and professional fallout. Prosecutors further requested that the defense be barred from revealing these individuals' personal details in open court and that any court exhibits containing their names be sealed, with redacted versions available to the public.The motion cited precedent from similar federal cases, including those involving sex trafficking and abuse, where anonymity was granted to protect victims from retraumatization and undue exposure. The government emphasized that these requests were narrowly tailored to balance the victims' privacy rights with the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights. The motion was brought under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771), which ensures victims are treated with fairness and respect, and it stressed that denying these protections could discourage victim cooperation or inhibit truthful testimony. If granted, the court's decision would mark a significant procedural step in shaping how key testimony will be handled in Diddy's high-profile federal trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The Psalms are a collection of 150 Songs carefully placed inside 5 books of Psalms: Book 1:1-41, Book 2:42-72, Book: 3:73-89, Book 4:90-106, Book 5:107-150. The first three books are primarily lament Psalms. Sadness, anger, and bewilderment are prayed out. The final two books include two very angry Psalms, 109 and 137, but these books are dominated by Praise. The final six Psalms thunder with the praise of the "I Am "God. The five books of Psalms are clearly intended as responsive speech to the five books of the Pentateuch, Genesis - Deuteronomy. The Pentateuch is the story of "I am" calling Israel to be His crisis relief for the entire creation. The Psalms are prayed from the time of David, 1000 B.C., from inside the story the Hebrew scripture tells. The Psalter was not collected into its current form until the 4th century B.C. By then Israel had been in exile for two hundred years. Yet the Israel of the 2nd Temple, 530 B.C. to 70, AD., is singing her faith in the rebuilt temple and those living outside Judea are singing inside synagogues throughout the Roman empire. The Psalms were Jesus' prayer book and were prayed by the early church. (Matt. 27:46, Col. 3:16, Eph. 5:19) We will pray and praise a representative collection of the Great Psalms of the Psalter -Psalms 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 19, 22, 23, 42, 51, 73-74, 88-89, 90, 104-106, 109, 110, and 139. We will pray out to the Lord God our emotions and struggles, but we will continue praying through from confusion, doubt, and anger to more clarity, trust, and peace. We will be encouraged, rebuked, and discipled by the ancient Songs of Israel, Jesus, and our Church Fathers and Mothers. The "I Am," the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, will bless us as we draw near to God together. Come join us on the Way.
In Episode 161 of Not on Record, Diana and Joseph dissect a recent sexual assault case where their client was acquitted due to critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, which was undermined by dash cam footage and phone records. The complainant alleged a 12-minute assault, choking, and forcible confinement at her workplace, but the defense presented dash cam evidence showing the accused being waved into the office, another person entering during the alleged assault, and the accused leaving within a timeframe that contradicted her account; additionally, a five-minute phone call she made to her father during the alleged assault further weakened her timeline. Confronted with this evidence during cross-examination, the complainant was forced to admit details she previously denied, leading the defense to argue that the allegations were fabricated to preempt a racial discrimination complaint filed against her, and ultimately leading the judge to deem her testimony unbelievable and acquit the defendant. Website: http://www.NotOnRecordpodcast.com Sign up to our email list - http://eepurl.com/hw3g99 Social Media Links Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/NotonRecord Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/notonrecordpodcast/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@notonrecordpodcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/notonrecord Telegram: https://t.me/NotOnRecord Minds: http://www.minds.com/notonrecord Audio Platforms Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4F2ssnX7ktfGH8OzH4QsuX Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/not-on-record-podcast/id1565405753 SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/notonrecord Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-842207 For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP http://www.nrlawyers.com. Produced by Possibly Correct Media www.PossiblyCorrect.com #Podcast #law #MeToo
This audio recording from a church service on March 16, 2025, centers on a passage from John 8 about the adulterous woman brought before Jesus. The sermon uses this biblical story to illustrate God's grace and offer of second chances to those burdened by their sins, no matter how significant they may seem. It emphasizes that Jesus confronts accusers, leaving individuals to face their sin before a merciful savior. The message encourages listeners not to be intimidated by judgment and to recognize Jesus as Lord, offering forgiveness and the opportunity to live anew, free from the bondage of past mistakes. Ultimately, it conveys that God's grace is always available, providing endless chances for redemption and a life without continued sin.Support the showThanks for listening! Follow us on Facebook or Instagram more info colonialkc.org
The so-called "congressional hush fund" refers to the egregious misuse of taxpayer dollars to quietly settle sexual harassment and misconduct claims against members of Congress and their staff. Managed through the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights (OCWR), this fund has been used for decades to pay off accusers, shielding politicians from public accountability while keeping their misconduct hidden from voters. Rather than forcing individual offenders to bear the financial and reputational consequences of their actions, this system has effectively allowed elected officials to use public money as a personal damage-control mechanism. The settlements, often accompanied by strict non-disclosure agreements, have ensured that the public remains in the dark about the full extent of misconduct within the halls of power.This corrupt and unethical practice highlights the deep rot within the political establishment, where lawmakers—who are supposed to represent the people—operate under a different set of rules, immune to the very standards they impose on others. Instead of facing criminal charges or public disgrace, offenders have been protected by a taxpayer-funded safety net, enabling repeat offenses and further entrenching a culture of impunity. The fact that these payouts were made with no transparency, and without the consent of the very taxpayers footing the bill, is a grotesque violation of public trust. Despite public outrage and calls for reform, only limited changes have been made, with many settlements still shrouded in secrecy, leaving Americans to wonder just how many powerful figures have escaped justice at their expense.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Congress paid $17 million in settlements. Why we know so little about that money. | CNN Politics
The so-called "congressional hush fund" refers to the egregious misuse of taxpayer dollars to quietly settle sexual harassment and misconduct claims against members of Congress and their staff. Managed through the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights (OCWR), this fund has been used for decades to pay off accusers, shielding politicians from public accountability while keeping their misconduct hidden from voters. Rather than forcing individual offenders to bear the financial and reputational consequences of their actions, this system has effectively allowed elected officials to use public money as a personal damage-control mechanism. The settlements, often accompanied by strict non-disclosure agreements, have ensured that the public remains in the dark about the full extent of misconduct within the halls of power.This corrupt and unethical practice highlights the deep rot within the political establishment, where lawmakers—who are supposed to represent the people—operate under a different set of rules, immune to the very standards they impose on others. Instead of facing criminal charges or public disgrace, offenders have been protected by a taxpayer-funded safety net, enabling repeat offenses and further entrenching a culture of impunity. The fact that these payouts were made with no transparency, and without the consent of the very taxpayers footing the bill, is a grotesque violation of public trust. Despite public outrage and calls for reform, only limited changes have been made, with many settlements still shrouded in secrecy, leaving Americans to wonder just how many powerful figures have escaped justice at their expense.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Congress paid $17 million in settlements. Why we know so little about that money. | CNN Politics
The so-called "congressional hush fund" refers to the egregious misuse of taxpayer dollars to quietly settle sexual harassment and misconduct claims against members of Congress and their staff. Managed through the Office of Congressional Workplace Rights (OCWR), this fund has been used for decades to pay off accusers, shielding politicians from public accountability while keeping their misconduct hidden from voters. Rather than forcing individual offenders to bear the financial and reputational consequences of their actions, this system has effectively allowed elected officials to use public money as a personal damage-control mechanism. The settlements, often accompanied by strict non-disclosure agreements, have ensured that the public remains in the dark about the full extent of misconduct within the halls of power.This corrupt and unethical practice highlights the deep rot within the political establishment, where lawmakers—who are supposed to represent the people—operate under a different set of rules, immune to the very standards they impose on others. Instead of facing criminal charges or public disgrace, offenders have been protected by a taxpayer-funded safety net, enabling repeat offenses and further entrenching a culture of impunity. The fact that these payouts were made with no transparency, and without the consent of the very taxpayers footing the bill, is a grotesque violation of public trust. Despite public outrage and calls for reform, only limited changes have been made, with many settlements still shrouded in secrecy, leaving Americans to wonder just how many powerful figures have escaped justice at their expense.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Congress paid $17 million in settlements. Why we know so little about that money. | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Big O is asked about Justin Tucker
On November 4, 2024, Sean "Diddy" Combs celebrated his 55th birthday at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. His day began with a standard prison breakfast at 6 a.m., featuring biscuits and gravy, oven-browned potatoes, bread, and oatmeal. Lunch at 11 a.m. included options such as cheese pizza, Italian pasta salad, and green beans. For dinner, served after the 4 p.m. headcount, the menu offered choices like chicken or tofu fried rice accompanied by black beans and carrots.These meals mark a significant departure from Combs' previous lavish birthday celebrations. In 2023, he hosted a star-studded party at LAVO restaurant in London, attended by celebrities like Janet Jackson and Naomi Campbell. His 50th birthday in 2019 featured a grand event at his Beverly Hills mansion with guests including Beyoncé, Jay-Z, and Kim Kardashian. Currently, Combs is awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering, and prostitution, having been denied bail since his arrest in September 2024.Prosecutors in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs have expressed concerns about revealing the identities of anonymous accusers, citing serious issues of witness safety and potential obstruction. They argue that early disclosure of these identities could expose witnesses to intimidation or harm, especially given Combs' influence and the nature of the allegations. This stance is in response to Combs' defense team's request for the accusers' names to prepare for trial, which prosecutors contend is premature and could jeopardize the integrity of the proceedings.Additionally, prosecutors emphasize that disclosing accusers' identities at this stage is tantamount to providing an early witness list, which is not customary in criminal cases. They maintain that protecting the anonymity of the accusers is crucial to prevent any potential interference with the judicial process and to ensure that witnesses can testify without fear of retaliation. This approach aims to balance the defendant's right to a fair trial with the necessity of safeguarding the accusers and upholding the integrity of the legal process.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy investigators raise ‘serious concerns' for victims' safety | Fox Newssource:Exclusive | Sean 'Diddy' Combs' birthday meal in prison revealed as he turns 55 behind bars
On November 4, 2024, Sean "Diddy" Combs celebrated his 55th birthday at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. His day began with a standard prison breakfast at 6 a.m., featuring biscuits and gravy, oven-browned potatoes, bread, and oatmeal. Lunch at 11 a.m. included options such as cheese pizza, Italian pasta salad, and green beans. For dinner, served after the 4 p.m. headcount, the menu offered choices like chicken or tofu fried rice accompanied by black beans and carrots.These meals mark a significant departure from Combs' previous lavish birthday celebrations. In 2023, he hosted a star-studded party at LAVO restaurant in London, attended by celebrities like Janet Jackson and Naomi Campbell. His 50th birthday in 2019 featured a grand event at his Beverly Hills mansion with guests including Beyoncé, Jay-Z, and Kim Kardashian. Currently, Combs is awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering, and prostitution, having been denied bail since his arrest in September 2024.Prosecutors in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs have expressed concerns about revealing the identities of anonymous accusers, citing serious issues of witness safety and potential obstruction. They argue that early disclosure of these identities could expose witnesses to intimidation or harm, especially given Combs' influence and the nature of the allegations. This stance is in response to Combs' defense team's request for the accusers' names to prepare for trial, which prosecutors contend is premature and could jeopardize the integrity of the proceedings.Additionally, prosecutors emphasize that disclosing accusers' identities at this stage is tantamount to providing an early witness list, which is not customary in criminal cases. They maintain that protecting the anonymity of the accusers is crucial to prevent any potential interference with the judicial process and to ensure that witnesses can testify without fear of retaliation. This approach aims to balance the defendant's right to a fair trial with the necessity of safeguarding the accusers and upholding the integrity of the legal process.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy investigators raise ‘serious concerns' for victims' safety | Fox Newssource:Exclusive | Sean 'Diddy' Combs' birthday meal in prison revealed as he turns 55 behind barsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Justin Tucker ENTERS Deshaun Watson TERRITORY! More Accusers EMERGE as NFL Investigation LOOMS!
Women alleging they were assaulted by a group of infamous playboy brothers have come forward to share their distressing experiences on cameraSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, originally designed to dismantle organized crime syndicates like the mafia, has evolved into a powerful legal tool used to prosecute a wide range of criminal enterprises, including those involving high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. RICO allows prosecutors to target entire criminal organizations, holding leaders accountable for the actions of their subordinates by linking various crimes—such as fraud, drug trafficking, and sexual misconduct—into a broader criminal enterprise. This statute has been instrumental in cases like those of R. Kelly and Keith Raniere, where both men were convicted for operating criminal networks that exploited vulnerable individuals under the guise of legitimate businesses or celebrity status.Sean Combs now faces RICO charges, as prosecutors allege that he operated a criminal enterprise involving sexual misconduct and other criminal activities, with enablers supporting and facilitating his actions. The RICO charges mark a significant escalation in Combs' legal battle, and the potential for superseding indictments could further expand the scope of the case. As seen in previous high-profile RICO cases, this approach enables prosecutors to systematically dismantle the criminal network around the defendant. The outcome of Combs' case could set a new precedent for how the legal system addresses powerful figures in the entertainment industry, reaffirming that no one is beyond the reach of the law, regardless of their wealth or influence.At Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024 hearing, he appeared in Manhattan federal court before Judge Arun Subramanian. The session mainly involved setting deadlines for both the defense and prosecution to file their legal arguments in preparation for the upcoming trial, which is expected to take place in May of 2025.Diddy remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. His defense continues to push for his release on bail, which has been denied multiple times due to concerns about witness tampering and flight risk. His legal team had previously offered a $50 million bail package, which included home detention and electronic monitoring, but it was rejected as the court considered him a potential danger to the community.During Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024, hearing, his legal team addressed concerns about potential media leaks related to evidence in his case. His attorneys requested that the court impose a gag order to prevent further leaks from law enforcement, which they claim have already influenced public perception and could affect the fairness of the trial. Diddy's team alleges that government agents leaked sensitive material, including a 2016 surveillance video, to the media, compromising his right to a fair trial. The judge has asked the sides to draw up acceptable language for the order.The charges against Diddy include sex trafficking and racketeering, with allegations dating back to 2008. Prosecutors claim that he ran a criminal enterprise, coercing women with the help of his associates and using violence, blackmail, and other forms of intimidation to silence victims. The court appearance also allowed for both sides to discuss procedural aspects, such as evidence handling, and outline the next steps leading up to the high-profile trial. Diddy has pleaded not guilty to all charges(commercial at 14:00)to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May trial date set for Diddy to face sex trafficking charges | AP News
Get Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxAll Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeWhat's up, STS Nation? Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the podcast that promises to bring you the very best guests in all of #TrueCrime. Tonight, we're revisiting the shocking case of the Alexander Brothers, who are accused of serious criminal misconduct involving dozens of women. New developments include a civil lawsuit just filed against the brothers and a joint preliminary court hearing scheduled for this Wednesday. #BestGuests • Attorney Jordan Merson, representing several of the alleged victims, offering legal insights into the latest civil suit. • Maria, an alleged victim of the Alexander Brothers, bravely sharing her story anonymously. • Attorney Ronald Richards, closely following the case, analyzing what these new legal developments could mean. #STSNation, don't miss this in-depth discussion as we explore the latest updates in one of the most talked-about cases today.#AlexanderBrothers #CivilLawsuit #PreliminaryHearing #TrueCrime #SurvivingTheSurvivor #JusticeForVictims #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #Podcast #TrueCrimePodcast #JordanMerson #RonaldRichards #VictimStories
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, originally designed to dismantle organized crime syndicates like the mafia, has evolved into a powerful legal tool used to prosecute a wide range of criminal enterprises, including those involving high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. RICO allows prosecutors to target entire criminal organizations, holding leaders accountable for the actions of their subordinates by linking various crimes—such as fraud, drug trafficking, and sexual misconduct—into a broader criminal enterprise. This statute has been instrumental in cases like those of R. Kelly and Keith Raniere, where both men were convicted for operating criminal networks that exploited vulnerable individuals under the guise of legitimate businesses or celebrity status.Sean Combs now faces RICO charges, as prosecutors allege that he operated a criminal enterprise involving sexual misconduct and other criminal activities, with enablers supporting and facilitating his actions. The RICO charges mark a significant escalation in Combs' legal battle, and the potential for superseding indictments could further expand the scope of the case. As seen in previous high-profile RICO cases, this approach enables prosecutors to systematically dismantle the criminal network around the defendant. The outcome of Combs' case could set a new precedent for how the legal system addresses powerful figures in the entertainment industry, reaffirming that no one is beyond the reach of the law, regardless of their wealth or influence.At Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024 hearing, he appeared in Manhattan federal court before Judge Arun Subramanian. The session mainly involved setting deadlines for both the defense and prosecution to file their legal arguments in preparation for the upcoming trial, which is expected to take place in May of 2025.Diddy remains in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. His defense continues to push for his release on bail, which has been denied multiple times due to concerns about witness tampering and flight risk. His legal team had previously offered a $50 million bail package, which included home detention and electronic monitoring, but it was rejected as the court considered him a potential danger to the community.During Sean "Diddy" Combs' October 10, 2024, hearing, his legal team addressed concerns about potential media leaks related to evidence in his case. His attorneys requested that the court impose a gag order to prevent further leaks from law enforcement, which they claim have already influenced public perception and could affect the fairness of the trial. Diddy's team alleges that government agents leaked sensitive material, including a 2016 surveillance video, to the media, compromising his right to a fair trial. The judge has asked the sides to draw up acceptable language for the order.The charges against Diddy include sex trafficking and racketeering, with allegations dating back to 2008. Prosecutors claim that he ran a criminal enterprise, coercing women with the help of his associates and using violence, blackmail, and other forms of intimidation to silence victims. The court appearance also allowed for both sides to discuss procedural aspects, such as evidence handling, and outline the next steps leading up to the high-profile trial. Diddy has pleaded not guilty to all charges(commercial at 14:00)to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May trial date set for Diddy to face sex trafficking charges | AP NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A 'trusted' OBGYN from Beverly Hills is facing a scathing series of accusations from almost 200 women who claim he sexually harassed them, fondled them and performed procedures inappropriately. From Elmo to Jail? A home inspector who went viral for getting caught on camera pleasuring himself with the child's toy, while on the job, is in trouble with the law again. Plus, a suspect leads cops on a high-speed chase so he can steal a kiss. Jennifer Gould reports. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Jessica Alba and Husband Cash Warren Separate After 16 Years of Marriage (PEOPLE) (19:47)Scott Disick joins Khloe Kardashian for launch of new podcast 'Khloe in Wonder Land' (24:22)Allison Holker Addresses Book Criticism, Says She Believes Stephen 'tWitch' Boss 'Would Choose' to Share His Story to Help Others (PEOPLE) (32:59)'School of Rock' child stars get married 22 years after meeting on Jack Black movie (NY Post) (41:43)'The Fall of Diddy' Docuseries to Feature On-Camera Interviews With Mogul's Accusers and Former Employees (PEOPLE) (48:13) Toast with Jackie (@JackieOshry) and Claudia Oshry (@girlwithnojob) Lean InThe Camper and The Counselor by Jackie OshryMerchThe Toast PatreonGirl With No Job by Claudia OshrySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Prosecutors in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs have expressed concerns about revealing the identities of anonymous accusers, citing serious issues of witness safety and potential obstruction. They argue that early disclosure of these identities could expose witnesses to intimidation or harm, especially given Combs' influence and the nature of the allegations. This stance is in response to Combs' defense team's request for the accusers' names to prepare for trial, which prosecutors contend is premature and could jeopardize the integrity of the proceedings.Additionally, prosecutors emphasize that disclosing accusers' identities at this stage is tantamount to providing an early witness list, which is not customary in criminal cases. They maintain that protecting the anonymity of the accusers is crucial to prevent any potential interference with the judicial process and to ensure that witnesses can testify without fear of retaliation. This approach aims to balance the defendant's right to a fair trial with the necessity of safeguarding the accusers and upholding the integrity of the legal process.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy investigators raise ‘serious concerns' for victims' safety | Fox News
Get Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxAll Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeWhat's up, STS Nation! Welcome to another episode of Surviving the Survivor, the podcast that promises to bring you the very #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime! Breaking developments in the shocking case of real estate moguls Oren and Alon Alexander. In federal court today, one of the Alexander brothers was denied pretrial release, with the judge ruling them a significant flight risk. Meanwhile, Oren Alexander's bail hearing and potential removal to another jurisdiction have been postponed to Tuesday. This comes as a new civil lawsuit was filed by a Pennsylvania woman, alleging that during the 2017 X Games in Aspen, she and two friends were drugged and assaulted by the Alexander twins. The claims mirror disturbing allegations from over 40 women who have come forward accusing the brothers of sexual assault and sex trafficking over a decade. Stay tuned as we break down the latest legal battles, civil lawsuits, and shocking allegations surrounding the Alexanders. #AlexanderBrothers #TrueCrime #SexTrafficking #CivilLawsuit #FederalCourt #SurvivingTheSurvivor #TrueCrimeCommunity #BailDenied #BreakingNews #JusticeMatters
Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing two new sexual assault lawsuits filed in December 2024. The first lawsuit, brought by an anonymous Jane Doe, alleges that Combs drugged and raped her in 1991 during a charity basketball event in New York City. According to the complaint, the plaintiff was introduced to Combs at the event, where he offered her a drink that caused her to feel disoriented. She claims to have regained consciousness in a private room, where Combs allegedly assaulted her. Combs' legal team has denied these allegations, describing them as false and financially motivated.The second lawsuit was filed by LaTroya Grayson, who asserts that she was sexually assaulted at Combs' "White Party" in New York City in October 2006. Grayson alleges that after winning a radio contest to attend the event, she consumed a beverage provided by the event staff, after which she lost consciousness. She later awoke in a hospital with no memory of the events, missing clothing, and signs of assault. Grayson claims to have experienced significant physical and emotional distress following the incident. Combs' representatives have refuted these claims, maintaining his innocence and criticizing the lawsuits as opportunistic attempts to tarnish his reputation.(commercial at 9:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy hit with two more sexual assault lawsuits as claims against him mount ahead of criminal trial | Daily Mail Online
Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing two new sexual assault lawsuits filed in December 2024. The first lawsuit, brought by an anonymous Jane Doe, alleges that Combs drugged and raped her in 1991 during a charity basketball event in New York City. According to the complaint, the plaintiff was introduced to Combs at the event, where he offered her a drink that caused her to feel disoriented. She claims to have regained consciousness in a private room, where Combs allegedly assaulted her. Combs' legal team has denied these allegations, describing them as false and financially motivated.The second lawsuit was filed by LaTroya Grayson, who asserts that she was sexually assaulted at Combs' "White Party" in New York City in October 2006. Grayson alleges that after winning a radio contest to attend the event, she consumed a beverage provided by the event staff, after which she lost consciousness. She later awoke in a hospital with no memory of the events, missing clothing, and signs of assault. Grayson claims to have experienced significant physical and emotional distress following the incident. Combs' representatives have refuted these claims, maintaining his innocence and criticizing the lawsuits as opportunistic attempts to tarnish his reputation.(commercial at 9:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy hit with two more sexual assault lawsuits as claims against him mount ahead of criminal trial | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
It began with three new lawsuits filed against Sean “Diddy” Combs, the music mogul whose decades-long career as a producer, rapper, and record executive has come under an unprecedented legal and public relations siege. These lawsuits, filed anonymously under the names John Doe in New York courts, add yet another layer to a mounting series of accusations against Combs, alleging a disturbing pattern of sexual abuse, coercion, and violence. This time, however, the spotlight shifts to male accusers who claim they were drugged, raped, and silenced by Combs and his associates. The Latest Allegations The allegations are harrowing. One man alleges that during a summer 2020 party at Combs' East Hampton mansion, he was served a drink that left him fading “in and out of consciousness,” only to wake up to find himself assaulted by Combs and others. Another accuser claims he was drugged and raped in February 2020 during what he thought was a professional meeting to discuss unpaid work wages at the InterContinental Hotel in Times Square. The third lawsuit recounts a 2019 incident at the Park Hyatt Hotel in Manhattan, where the accuser says he was assaulted after being drugged at an afterparty hosted by Combs. In each case, the alleged victims describe feelings of fear, confusion, and powerlessness, with some reporting that they were handed money afterward and warned against speaking out. For Combs, these accusations are just the latest in a series of legal troubles that have engulfed his once-untouchable reputation. He is already facing over two dozen lawsuits from individuals—including minors—alleging drugging, sexual assault, and physical violence spanning decades. In addition to these civil lawsuits, Combs is also fighting federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering, with prosecutors accusing him of orchestrating a network of enablers to facilitate systematic abuse. These allegations include claims of so-called “Freak Offs,” drug-fueled events involving coerced sexual acts that reportedly targeted vulnerable individuals. The recent lawsuits, however, mark a significant shift, not only because the accusers are male but also because of the explicit allegations of financial and emotional manipulation used to ensure their silence. One accuser alleges that after he regained consciousness following the assault at the Park Hyatt Hotel, an unidentified man handed him $2,500 in cash. Another describes being told by Combs that reporting the incident would only make him “look like an idiot.” These details paint a chilling portrait of power dynamics exploited to suppress victims and maintain control over them. Combs has repeatedly denied all allegations, categorizing them as lies and opportunistic fabrications. His legal team has vowed to challenge each claim, characterizing the lawsuits as baseless attempts to exploit his wealth and fame. In their official statements, they have threatened to seek sanctions against the attorneys representing the accusers. Meanwhile, the legal and cultural ramifications of these cases continue to ripple through the music industry and beyond. The timing of these lawsuits is critical. Filed under New York's Adult Survivors Act—a legal provision allowing victims of sexual abuse to bring forth claims otherwise barred by the statute of limitations—the cases underscore a broader reckoning with the entertainment industry's history of abuse and power imbalances. Attorney Tony Buzbee, representing several of the accusers, has described the lawsuits as an overdue opportunity for survivors to take back their power. Prosecutors, for their part, have painted a damning picture of Combs' alleged methods, describing a system of intimidation, blackmail, and even violence designed to ensure victims' silence. Federal investigators have tied Combs to incidents of arson, physical assaults, and threats against those who attempted to speak out. The scope and severity of the charges have kept Combs in federal custody since his September arrest, with a trial set for May next year. These allegations are not isolated. They come as part of a growing wave of accusations against powerful figures in entertainment, drawing comparisons to cases like Harvey Weinstein and R. Kelly. In these instances, the legal battles were as much about accountability as they were about uncovering the systemic structures that allowed such behavior to persist for years. For Combs, the stakes could not be higher. If convicted of racketeering, he faces a potential life sentence, a prospect that underscores the seriousness of the charges leveled against him. As the legal process unfolds, one question looms large: how many more victims might come forward? While the lawsuits currently in play involve incidents from 2019 to 2022, the broader investigation into Combs' actions suggests a far longer timeline of alleged misconduct. The ramifications for his legacy—and for the culture of accountability within the music industry—are profound. For now, Combs remains behind bars, awaiting a trial that promises to be a watershed moment in the ongoing fight for justice and survivor advocacy. The legal troubles surrounding Sean “Diddy” Combs represent not only a personal reckoning but also a critical inflection point for the entertainment industry. With the rise of movements like #MeToo and increased scrutiny on the abuse of power by influential figures, cases like these expose the often-hidden dynamics of celebrity culture. They underscore how fame and fortune can be weaponized to silence victims and perpetuate cycles of abuse. As the allegations against Combs continue to surface, they reveal a pattern of behavior that, if proven true, suggests an extensive abuse of trust and authority. Among the broader implications is the question of industry complicity. How many people in Combs' orbit knew of these alleged incidents, and how many chose to look the other way? The lawsuits implicate not only the accused but also the systems and enablers that allowed such behavior to go unchecked for so long. This is a stark reminder that accountability must extend beyond individual perpetrators to include those who enabled their actions. For survivors, filing these lawsuits under the Adult Survivors Act is a significant step forward. It demonstrates the power of legal reforms in providing pathways to justice for victims who have long been silenced. The law has allowed individuals to revisit their traumatic experiences and hold their abusers accountable, even years after the incidents occurred. Therefore, this case serves as both a cautionary tale and a symbol of resilience for others who may be considering coming forward. Meanwhile, the ripple effects of these allegations are being felt across the music and entertainment industries. As the media coverage grows, so does the public's awareness of the prevalence of abuse and the need for systemic change. For Combs, the consequences are far-reaching. Beyond the immediate legal ramifications, his professional empire—including Bad Boy Records and his other ventures—is at risk of irreparable damage. Partnerships, sponsorships, and affiliations are likely to face intense scrutiny as companies seek to distance themselves from the growing scandal. The upcoming trial, set for May next year, will undoubtedly be a focal point for both the legal community and the public. It will test the strength of the allegations against Combs and provide an opportunity for both sides to present their cases in court. For the accusers, it represents a chance to have their voices heard and to seek justice after years of silence. For Combs, it is an opportunity to mount a defense and challenge the narrative that has emerged around him. The trial's outcome could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, particularly those involving high-profile individuals. As these events continue to unfold, they serve as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance, accountability, and support for survivors. The allegations against Combs have sparked important conversations about power, privilege, and the responsibility of those in influential positions. Whether these conversations lead to meaningful change remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the era of unquestioned celebrity immunity is rapidly coming to an end. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
It began with three new lawsuits filed against Sean “Diddy” Combs, the music mogul whose decades-long career as a producer, rapper, and record executive has come under an unprecedented legal and public relations siege. These lawsuits, filed anonymously under the names John Doe in New York courts, add yet another layer to a mounting series of accusations against Combs, alleging a disturbing pattern of sexual abuse, coercion, and violence. This time, however, the spotlight shifts to male accusers who claim they were drugged, raped, and silenced by Combs and his associates. The Latest Allegations The allegations are harrowing. One man alleges that during a summer 2020 party at Combs' East Hampton mansion, he was served a drink that left him fading “in and out of consciousness,” only to wake up to find himself assaulted by Combs and others. Another accuser claims he was drugged and raped in February 2020 during what he thought was a professional meeting to discuss unpaid work wages at the InterContinental Hotel in Times Square. The third lawsuit recounts a 2019 incident at the Park Hyatt Hotel in Manhattan, where the accuser says he was assaulted after being drugged at an afterparty hosted by Combs. In each case, the alleged victims describe feelings of fear, confusion, and powerlessness, with some reporting that they were handed money afterward and warned against speaking out. For Combs, these accusations are just the latest in a series of legal troubles that have engulfed his once-untouchable reputation. He is already facing over two dozen lawsuits from individuals—including minors—alleging drugging, sexual assault, and physical violence spanning decades. In addition to these civil lawsuits, Combs is also fighting federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering, with prosecutors accusing him of orchestrating a network of enablers to facilitate systematic abuse. These allegations include claims of so-called “Freak Offs,” drug-fueled events involving coerced sexual acts that reportedly targeted vulnerable individuals. The recent lawsuits, however, mark a significant shift, not only because the accusers are male but also because of the explicit allegations of financial and emotional manipulation used to ensure their silence. One accuser alleges that after he regained consciousness following the assault at the Park Hyatt Hotel, an unidentified man handed him $2,500 in cash. Another describes being told by Combs that reporting the incident would only make him “look like an idiot.” These details paint a chilling portrait of power dynamics exploited to suppress victims and maintain control over them. Combs has repeatedly denied all allegations, categorizing them as lies and opportunistic fabrications. His legal team has vowed to challenge each claim, characterizing the lawsuits as baseless attempts to exploit his wealth and fame. In their official statements, they have threatened to seek sanctions against the attorneys representing the accusers. Meanwhile, the legal and cultural ramifications of these cases continue to ripple through the music industry and beyond. The timing of these lawsuits is critical. Filed under New York's Adult Survivors Act—a legal provision allowing victims of sexual abuse to bring forth claims otherwise barred by the statute of limitations—the cases underscore a broader reckoning with the entertainment industry's history of abuse and power imbalances. Attorney Tony Buzbee, representing several of the accusers, has described the lawsuits as an overdue opportunity for survivors to take back their power. Prosecutors, for their part, have painted a damning picture of Combs' alleged methods, describing a system of intimidation, blackmail, and even violence designed to ensure victims' silence. Federal investigators have tied Combs to incidents of arson, physical assaults, and threats against those who attempted to speak out. The scope and severity of the charges have kept Combs in federal custody since his September arrest, with a trial set for May next year. These allegations are not isolated. They come as part of a growing wave of accusations against powerful figures in entertainment, drawing comparisons to cases like Harvey Weinstein and R. Kelly. In these instances, the legal battles were as much about accountability as they were about uncovering the systemic structures that allowed such behavior to persist for years. For Combs, the stakes could not be higher. If convicted of racketeering, he faces a potential life sentence, a prospect that underscores the seriousness of the charges leveled against him. As the legal process unfolds, one question looms large: how many more victims might come forward? While the lawsuits currently in play involve incidents from 2019 to 2022, the broader investigation into Combs' actions suggests a far longer timeline of alleged misconduct. The ramifications for his legacy—and for the culture of accountability within the music industry—are profound. For now, Combs remains behind bars, awaiting a trial that promises to be a watershed moment in the ongoing fight for justice and survivor advocacy. The legal troubles surrounding Sean “Diddy” Combs represent not only a personal reckoning but also a critical inflection point for the entertainment industry. With the rise of movements like #MeToo and increased scrutiny on the abuse of power by influential figures, cases like these expose the often-hidden dynamics of celebrity culture. They underscore how fame and fortune can be weaponized to silence victims and perpetuate cycles of abuse. As the allegations against Combs continue to surface, they reveal a pattern of behavior that, if proven true, suggests an extensive abuse of trust and authority. Among the broader implications is the question of industry complicity. How many people in Combs' orbit knew of these alleged incidents, and how many chose to look the other way? The lawsuits implicate not only the accused but also the systems and enablers that allowed such behavior to go unchecked for so long. This is a stark reminder that accountability must extend beyond individual perpetrators to include those who enabled their actions. For survivors, filing these lawsuits under the Adult Survivors Act is a significant step forward. It demonstrates the power of legal reforms in providing pathways to justice for victims who have long been silenced. The law has allowed individuals to revisit their traumatic experiences and hold their abusers accountable, even years after the incidents occurred. Therefore, this case serves as both a cautionary tale and a symbol of resilience for others who may be considering coming forward. Meanwhile, the ripple effects of these allegations are being felt across the music and entertainment industries. As the media coverage grows, so does the public's awareness of the prevalence of abuse and the need for systemic change. For Combs, the consequences are far-reaching. Beyond the immediate legal ramifications, his professional empire—including Bad Boy Records and his other ventures—is at risk of irreparable damage. Partnerships, sponsorships, and affiliations are likely to face intense scrutiny as companies seek to distance themselves from the growing scandal. The upcoming trial, set for May next year, will undoubtedly be a focal point for both the legal community and the public. It will test the strength of the allegations against Combs and provide an opportunity for both sides to present their cases in court. For the accusers, it represents a chance to have their voices heard and to seek justice after years of silence. For Combs, it is an opportunity to mount a defense and challenge the narrative that has emerged around him. The trial's outcome could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, particularly those involving high-profile individuals. As these events continue to unfold, they serve as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance, accountability, and support for survivors. The allegations against Combs have sparked important conversations about power, privilege, and the responsibility of those in influential positions. Whether these conversations lead to meaningful change remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the era of unquestioned celebrity immunity is rapidly coming to an end. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Jay-Z's lawyers have come forward with information from a woman who called their offices, claiming she'd been dropped as a client by Tony Buzbee's law firm because she wouldn't lie. A sworn affidavit from one of Jay-Z's attorneys details how the woman says she felt manipulated. Law&Crime's Jesse Weber sat down with renowned celebrity criminal defense attorney Bradford Cohen to discuss the accusations.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW: Go to https://ground.news/Sidebar to cross-examine where your information is coming from and be a critical thinker. Save 50% off the Ground News Vantage plan and stay fully informed on the law, politics and more. HOST:Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweberLAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokeVideo Editing - Michael Deininger and Christina FalconeScript Writing & Producing - Savannah Williamson & Juliana BattagliaGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Fani Gets FINAL WARNING from Congress over Buried Evidence (COMPLY OR ELSE!)Pete Hegseth's Lawyer WARNS Accusers and Trump DOUBLES DOWN (STOP LYING!)TikTok BAN One Step Closer After Appeal Ruling (WILL IT HAPPEN?)
In the case of Jane Doe v. Leon Black, No. 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC, Defendant Leon Black filed a motion to amend the case caption to reveal the plaintiff's identity, arguing that she had not maintained confidentiality regarding her identity. The court directed the plaintiff to submit all relevant Twitter direct messages by November 12, 2024, and allowed the defendant to provide additional information on the plaintiff's alleged failure to keep her identity confidential by November 15, 2024. The court is currently considering the defendant's motion to amend the case caption.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.165.0.pdf
One of our favorite criminals, Razzlekhan is going to Prison! Sponsor: Go to https://hexclad.com/ITDAILY to get up to 42% off during HexClad's biggest sale of the year. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
On this episode, Tony Brueski digs into the heated legal battle over anonymity in the Sean Combs sexual abuse cases. With multiple plaintiffs seeking to shield their identities, Combs's defense team is pushing back, claiming it's an unfair obstacle to his defense. Judges are now tasked with weighing the accusers' fears of retaliation against the foundational principles of a fair trial. Brueski breaks down the complexities of these cases, exploring how courts across the country handle anonymity in sexual assault cases and what it could mean for future high-profile litigation. It's a deep dive into the delicate balance between protecting victims and upholding justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
On this episode, Tony Brueski digs into the heated legal battle over anonymity in the Sean Combs sexual abuse cases. With multiple plaintiffs seeking to shield their identities, Combs's defense team is pushing back, claiming it's an unfair obstacle to his defense. Judges are now tasked with weighing the accusers' fears of retaliation against the foundational principles of a fair trial. Brueski breaks down the complexities of these cases, exploring how courts across the country handle anonymity in sexual assault cases and what it could mean for future high-profile litigation. It's a deep dive into the delicate balance between protecting victims and upholding justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Judge Say's Diddy's Jane & John Doe Accusers Need To Be Named Did Diddy's alleged past just get even darker? In this episode, the layers of allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs go deeper, with chilling claims stretching back nearly two decades, including accusations involving minors. Former prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis breaks down the complexities of these cold-case accusations, shedding light on the legal and societal challenges victims face when coming forward years after alleged incidents. We also dive into the world of Jane and John Does in court, questioning whether anonymity is truly possible in high-stakes cases against powerful figures. With so much to lose—and even more to uncover—is justice for these alleged victims within reach? #DiddyAllegations #TrueCrime #LegalAnalysis #HiddenKillers #JusticeSystem #EricFaddis #SurvivorVoices Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Did Diddy's alleged past just get even darker? In this episode, the layers of allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs go deeper, with chilling claims stretching back nearly two decades, including accusations involving minors. Former prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis breaks down the complexities of these cold-case accusations, shedding light on the legal and societal challenges victims face when coming forward years after alleged incidents. We also dive into the world of Jane and John Does in court, questioning whether anonymity is truly possible in high-stakes cases against powerful figures. With so much to lose—and even more to uncover—is justice for these alleged victims within reach? #DiddyAllegations #TrueCrime #LegalAnalysis #HiddenKillers #JusticeSystem #EricFaddis #SurvivorVoices Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
High profile attorney Lisa Bloom talks about Diddy, Weinstein, and more! ----- Promote Your Music with No Jumper - https://nojumper.com/pages/promo CHECK OUT OUR ONLINE STORE!!! https://nojumper.com NO JUMPER PATREON / nojumper CHECK OUT OUR NEW SPOTIFY PLAYLIST https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5te... Follow us on SNAPCHAT / 4874336901 Follow us on SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/4z4yCTj... iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/n... Follow us on Social Media: / 4874336901 / nojumper / nojumper / nojumper / nojumper JOIN THE DISCORD: / discord Follow Adam22: / adam22 / adam22 / adam22 adam22bro on Snapchat Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Listen to this week's episode of the Dateline: True Crime Weekly podcast with Andrea Canning. Seven years after two middle school girls are found stabbed to death near the banks of an Indiana creek, spawning rumors of a pagan sacrifice, a local man stands trial. Across the country in San Francisco, testimony begins in the case of another stabbing: the 2023 death of tech mogul, Bob Lee. And details from six new civil suits filed against Sean Combs. Plus, Keith Morrison drops by to talk about his latest podcast, "The Man in the Black Mask." To get new episodes every Thursday, follow here: https://link.chtbl.com/dtcw_fdlw
On today's episode, Andy & DJ discuss the Biden-Harris administration being blasted for running out of money to deal with Hurricane Helene after blowing on migrants, Politico saying J.D. Vance's facial hair is about 'conveying aggression' and showing his hatred of feminism, and 13 bombshell revelations from lawyer filing suits on behalf of 120 Sean 'Diddy' Combs accusers.
Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
in this episode i'm talking about diddy's new Lawsuit~Tony Buzz representing 50 accusers+R. Kelly defends Diddy and warns celebs NOT to laugh
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
