Podcasts about european court of justice

PRESS REVIEW – Tuesday October 22: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni pushes back with a decree to save her flagship anti-migration policy from an European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling. In other news, a two-day "Preparing to settle in Gaza" conference in Israel is attended by several Israeli government ministers, including from the Likud camp. Also, fracking is at the heart of the US election campaign for voters in a Pennsylvanian town still reeling from a pollution scandal. Finally, we bring you news of what non-avian dinosaurs used their wings for.

Justinas Jarusevicius, Partner, Motieka Law FirmFinancial services need to be regulated but over-stringent regulation may stifle innovation. Lithuanian lawyer Justinas Jarusevicius represented ABC Projektai in a case that went all the way to the European Court of Justice, helping the firm to regain its payment institution licence. It's a case that, he believes, highlights the need to strike a balance between regulatory freedom and oversight. Robin Amlôt of IBS Intelligence speaks to Justinas Jarusevicius. 

The European Commission's attempt to claim jurisdiction under the EU merger rules over Illumina's acquisition of GRAIL ultimately resulted in a stinging court defeat for the regulator. But why did it lose and what will happen now to merger reviews of "below threshold" transactions in the EU? Nicole Kar, partner at Paul, Weiss in London, joins Matthew Hall and James Hunsberger to discuss the Commission's 2021 re-interpretation of its powers under Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation, the European Court of Justice judgment striking that down and the alternative avenues for the Commission or EU countries to claim jurisdiction over killer and reverse killer transactions. Listen to this episode to learn more about how to analyse the risk and practical steps to take in relation to these transactions. With special guest: Nicole Kar, Partner, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Related Links: European Commission March 2021 guidance on use of Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation European Commission FAQ on March 2021 Article 22 guidance General Court judgment 13 July 2022 on application of Article 22 by European Commission in Illumina/GRAIL Advocate General opinion 21 March 2024 on application of Article 22 by European Commission in Illumina/GRAIL European Court of Justice judgment 3 September 2024 on application of Article 22 by European Commission in Illumina/GRAIL Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Client Memorandum "Mind the Gap: ECJ Judgment Determines European Commission Cannot Review Deals Below Member State Merger Control Thresholds" Hosted by: James Hunsberger, Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP and Matthew Hall, McGuireWoods London LLP

In this special episode of 'The Agents Angle' ⁠ the focus is firmly on the recent ruling from just 4 days ago at the ECJ (European Court of Justice) in the case of former French international footballer Lassana Diarra* vs FIFA*. With the case being of Belgian origin, the show is joined by Willem Alexander-Devlies (of Altius and ATFIELD Sports Law), an expert on Belgian and European sports law to look further at the ruling and the impact it may have. Whilst some have labeled this ruling as 'Bosman 2.0', ⁠'The Agents Angle' ⁠⁠ aims to take a pragmatic view on a subject whereby a 'major ruling' that 'will change the landscape of football' MAY not be as 'earthshaking' and an end to the current transfer system as some have said (or hoped). ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠EMAIL : ⁠⁠questions@theagentsangle.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SUPPORT THE SHOW via KoFi⁠⁠⁠⁠ ====== SHOW RUNNING ORDER : (00:17) - Introduction to a Special Episode. > (00:55) - Overview and Brief Synopsis of the "Diarra" Case. > (02:38) - 3 Questions Examined by the ECJ (European Court of Justice). > (04:22) - Basics of the 'Diarra' Ruling. > (07:31) - Specialist Opinion on The Diarra Case - Importantly Belgian Case So With a Belgian Perspective. > (08:01) - Special Guest Interview : Willem Alexander-Devlies. > (08:54) - Overview of the 'Diarra' Decision and Ruling By The ECJ. > (13:51) - The Role of The Belgian Court So Far AND Moving Forward. > (16:48) - A European Ruling That Impacts Football Worldwide. > (18:45) - Impact on Players, Player Contracts and Registrations. > (22:06) - Impact on Football Agents, Both Long and Short Term. > (25:23) - Any Knock-On Effect for Agent Regulation (FFAR) Case at ECJ. > (29:12) - Reactions to The Diarra Ruling - FIFpro, FIFA, ECA, Agent Associations. > (32:36) - Escaping the 'Court of FIFA' & Players Buying Out of Contracts. > (37:24) - Question Marks Over FIFAs Authority & Legitimacy 'In the Face' of Numerous Challenges. > (38:51) - Diarra Ruling May Trigger More Cases Challenging FIFA Regarding ITCs and Minors. > (40:22) - Disclaimer > ====== RELATED LINKS : ATFIELD Sports Law Altius Law -- ⁠Press Release : Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-650/22 (DIARRA) - (PDF : English)⁠ ⁠Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar C-650/22 (DIARRA)⁠ --⁠ ECJ - Opinion of Advocate General Rantos - Sportsperson/Minors⁠ ====== FEATURED ARTICLES : ⁠Is this the end for football's entire transfer system or not? (Or something else entirely?)⁠ ⁠"My big picture thoughts following 'Diarra'"⁠ (John Mehrzad KC): -- ⁠"If potential young athletes become professionals, a contract with an undertaking related to a percentage on the future potential professional income might be considered as "unfair" if not properly balanced".⁠ (Marine Montejo) ====== ASSOCIATED STATEMENTS/POSTS : Dupont Hissel (Diarra/FIFpro Laywers) FIFPRO The Football Forum EFAA ECA ===== SHOW LINKS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠WEBSITE : ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.theagentsangle.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter (X)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ====== CREDITS : Theme Music : Agent Red by Abbynoise Music from #Uppbeat : https://uppbeat.io/t/abbynoise/agent-red

The Government has said that it will accept the European Court of Justice's decision to uphold its 2016 finding that Apple underpaid taxes to the tune of 13 billion euro. Niall Collins-Minister of State Department of Further and Higher Education and TD for Limerick County and Richard Boyd-Barrett-PBP/Solidarity TD for Dun Laoghaire

Thomas Hubert from the Currency.

This week on NEXT.io Weekly News, we spotlight a significant legal development as a case involving player losses in Germany escalates to the European Court of Justice. We'll explore the background of the lawsuit, where a German player is contesting significant losses, arguing that they were incurred through an operator not fully compliant with local regulations. Special Guest: Dr. Jörg Hofmann, Partner Melchers Law Firm This week's sessions are brought to you by Playson and Sponsored by Hub88. Hang out with Conor Mulheir and Nico Jansen on our Weekly News live stream, every Thursday at 3 PM CET across all our social media channels. We'll dive into the freshest iGaming news and explore the most captivating stories of the week.  Be cool, be curious, be in the know!

AP correspondent Karen Chammas reports on large fine issued to Hungary by the European Court of Justice, over migration asylum rules.

European Court of Justice today confirmed that “neither UEFA nor FIFA can impose sanctions on clubs that participate in alternative competitions”. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nwosu-chizoba-david/message

Real Madrid and Barcelona celebrate the European Super League's victory against UEFA and FIFA as the Spanish giants call out organisations' 'MONOPOLY' while backing a revival of plans for the rebel competition --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nwosu-chizoba-david/message

Lorcan Allen, Business Editor at The Business Post, looks ahead to the ruling due this morning from the European Court of Justice on the long-running Apple tax case.

This week we're looking at the European Court of Justice. How does it operate? How political is it? And is public opinion ever taken into account? One of the chief stumbling blocks in negotiations over the Northern Ireland Protocol has concerned the role of the EU's top court, the European Court of Justice, and parts of the Conservative Party are ever agitated by the quite separate European Court of Human Rights and its role in adjudicating on human rights disputes. So we have made two episodes looking at these institutions, starting with this one. We're focusing this week on the European Court of Justice. Joining us is Dr Michal Ovádek, Lecturer in European Institutions, Politics and Policy here in the UCL Department of Political Science. Michal has recently published an article on a 2018 European Court of Justice ruling concerning the pay of Portuguese judges. That might seem a little obscure. But it turns out that the case had important real-world impacts, and also tells us a lot about how the court operates. Mentioned in this episode: "The making of landmark rulings in the European Union: the case of national judicial independence." Michal Ovádek. Journal of European Public Policy For more information and to access the transcript: https://ucl-uncovering-politics.simplecast.com/episodes Date of episode recording: 2023-02-23 Duration: 31:32 Language of episode: English (UK)

 Presenter:Alan Renwick Guests: Michal Ovádek Producer: Eleanor Kingwell-Banham

Zu Gast im Criminal Compliance Podcast ist Herr Dr. Carsten Höink. Bereits im letzten Jahr war Dr. Höink im Rahmen unseres Criminal Compliance Podcasts zu Gast und hat über die Missbrauchsbekämpfung in der Umsatzsteuer berichtet. In der heutigen Folge beleuchtet Dr. Höink im Interview mit Dr. Rosinus die aktuellen Entwicklungen aus dem letzten Jahr, insbesondere in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH zur Missbrauchsbekämpfung im Umsatzsteuerrecht. Dr. Höink erläutert zunächst den Hintergrund für die Missbrauchsbekämpfung im Umsatzsteuerrecht und in welchem Maße diese und die diesbezügliche Rechtsprechung des EuGH auch im strafrechtlichen Kontext relevant wird. Er berichtet über eine Entscheidung des EuGH über ein Vorlageverfahren vom Finanzgericht Nürnberg aus dem Jahr 2022 und beleuchtet diese kritisch. Dem EuGH wurde die Frage vorgelegt, ob eine mehrfache Versagung von Vorsteuerabzug zulässig war, obwohl nur eine Steuerhinterziehungstat vorlag und der Fiskus wirtschaftlich nur einmal geschädigt wurde. Weiter sprechen Dr. Höink und Dr. Rosinus über die Entscheidung des EuGH aus dem Dezember 2022 „Aguila Part Prod Com SA“ sowie das Verfahren „HA.EN.“, welches in Litauen spielt. Herr Dr. Höink beleuchtet ferner die Mitte 2022 veröffentlichte Verwaltungsanweisung des Bundesministeriums der Finanzen zu § 25f UStG. Zuletzt geht es im Podcast um die Auswirkungen der Entwicklungen auf die Tax Compliance Praxis. Hier geht's zur Folge #93 „Missbrauchsbekämpfung in der Umsatzsteuer“: https://criminal-compliance.podigee.io/93-cr Hier geht's zur Entscheidung des EuGH vom 24. November 2022 in der Rechtssache A, C-596/21: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=267737&pageIndex=0&doclang=de&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=689183 Hier geht's zu den Schlussanträgen der Generalanwältin Kokott vom 5. Mai 2022 in der Rechtssache HA.EN.,C-227/21: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?mode=LST&pageIndex=0&docid=258887&part=1&doclang=DE&text=&occ=first&cid=1211089 Hier geht's zum Urteil des EuGH vom 15. September 2022 in der Rechtssache HA.EN., C-227/21: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=265549&pageIndex=0&doclang=DE&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1213341 Hier geht's zur Entscheidung des EuGH vom 1. Dezember 2022 in der Rechtssache Aguila Part Prod Com SA, C-512/21: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=268235&pageIndex=0&doclang=de&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=689183 Hier geht's zum BMF-Schreiben vom 15. Juni 2022: https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Downloads/BMF_Schreiben/Steuerarten/Umsatzsteuer/Umsatzsteuer-Anwendungserlass/2022-06-15-USt-Beteiligung-Steuerhinterziehung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3 Dr. Rosinus im Gespräch mit: Herr Dr. Carsten Höink ist Rechtsanwalt, Steuerberater und Diplom Finanzwirt (FH). Er ist Partner bei INDICET Partners, eine auf Umsatzsteuerrecht, Zollrecht und Verbrauchsteuerrecht spezialisierte Kanzlei. Dr. Höink ist zertifizierter Incoterms Trainer. Nach dem Wechsel aus dem gehobenen Dienst der Finanzverwaltung im Jahr 2005 fokussierte Herr Dr. Höink die Beratung als Rechtsanwalt und Steuerberater auf die Umsatzsteuer und war unter anderem in einer Big4 Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft als Partner für Indirekte Steuern tätig. Herr Dr. Höink berät seither nationale und internationale Mandate im Bereich Umsatzsteuer bzw. europäische Mehrwertsteuer. Herr Dr. Höink ist telefonisch erreichbar unter +492519321190 oder per E-Mail unter carsten.hoeink@indicet.de. https://www.rosinus-on-air.com https://rosinus-partner.com

One of the chief stumbling blocks in negotiations over the Northern Ireland Protocol has concerned the role of the EU's top court, the European Court of Justice, and parts of the Conservative Party are ever agitated by the quite separate European Court of Human Rights and its role in adjudicating on human rights disputes. So we have made two episodes looking at these institutions, starting with this one. We're focusing this week on the European Court of Justice. Joining us is Dr Michal Ovádek, Lecturer in European Institutions, Politics and Policy here in the UCL Department of Political Science. Michal has recently published an article on a 2018 European Court of Justice ruling concerning the pay of Portuguese judges. That might seem a little obscure. But it turns out that the case had important real-world impacts, and also tells us a lot about how the court operates. Mentioned in this episode:"The making of landmark rulings in the European Union: the case of national judicial independence." Michal Ovádek. Journal of European Public Policy 

In this second interview, we remeet with Sergej Stoma from the Diversity Development Group to discuss two important court rulings in Lithuania following the European Court of Justice ruling we spoke about in the first episode of this series. What does the future for migrants entering Lithuania look like? Listen to find out.

Barcelona, Real Madrid, and Juventus bring anti-monopoly case against UEFA and FIFA to the highest court in the European Union over the dispute of forming a Super League. Proposals for a European Super League in association football consist of recurring attempts by individual teams or consortiums of association football clubs to advocate for the creation of an additional tier of European football outside of the traditional footballing pyramids of each national football association. A monopoly is when one company and its product dominate an entire industry whereby there is little to no competition and consumers must purchase that specific good or service from the one company. An oligopoly is when a small number of firms, as opposed to just one, dominate an entire industry. The European Court of Justice, formally just the Court of Justice, is the supreme court of the European Union in matters of European Union law. Futbol Club Barcelona, commonly referred to as Barcelona and colloquially known as Barça, is a Spanish professional football club based in Barcelona, Spain, that competes in La Liga, the top flight of Spanish football. Real Madrid Club de Fútbol, commonly referred to as Real Madrid, is a Spanish professional football club based in Madrid. Founded on 6 March 1902 as Madrid Football Club, the club has traditionally worn a white home kit since inception. Juventus Football Club, colloquially known as Juventus and Juve, is a professional football club based in Turin, Piedmont, Italy, that competes in the Serie A, the top tier of the Italian football league system.

Peadar Mac Fhlannchadha, Assistant General Secretary of Conradh na Gaeilge, on a historic day as the European Court of Justice hears its first case 'as Gaeilge.'

The next trade war will be over transatlantic data flows, and it will make the fight with China look like a picnic. That's the subject of this episode's interview. The European Court of Justice is poised to go nuclear – to cut off US companies' access to European customer data unless the US lets European courts and data protection agencies refashion its intelligence capabilities according to standards no European government has ever been required to meet. Maury Shenk and I interview Peter Swire on the Schrems cases that look nearly certain to provoke a transatlantic trade and intelligence crisis. Actually, Maury interviews Peter, and I throw bombs into the conversation. But if ever there were a cyberlaw topic that deserves more bomb-throwing, this is it. In the News Roundup, David Kris tells us that the trial of alleged Vault7 leaker Joshua Schulte is under way. And the star of the first day is our very own podcast regular, Paul Rosenzweig.  If you're wondering whether more cybersecurity regulation is what the country needs, you should be paying attention to the Pentagon, which has embraced cybersecurity regulation for its contractors. Matthew Heiman reports that DOD isn't finding the path easy. DOD has released its final cybersecurity plan for contractors, but the audit process needed to enforce it remains a mystery. That's SNAKE spelled backwards: David tells us about a new strain of ransomware; ominously, it is targeting industrial control systems. I manage to find a very modest silver lining. Nate Jones sums up the cybersecurity lessons from the voting debacle in Iowa.  Nate also reports on the FCC's latest half-step toward suing one or more telcos for selling phone-location data. Matthew covers the Maze ransomware that has ravaged law firms in recent weeks. He argues that it's only a matter of time before such attacks become dog-bites-man stories. Matthew also notes that Google and Facebook have apparently dropped plans to terminate their transpacific cable in Hong Kong. US national security concerns seem to have driven the decision. Looks like the Great Decoupling could be spurring a very real physical decoupling. Nate makes the best of the 2020 version of a Worthwhile Canadian Initiative: The Senate Intel Committee's third volume of its Russian electoral interference report. It's sober and responsible and bipartisan – and disappeared from the news cycle overnight. And to bring you up to speed on past stories:  A Brazilian judge has declined to accept charges against Glenn Greenwald, “for now.”  The poster child for the facial recognition moral panic can't catch a break: Clearview AI has been hit with cease-and-desist from Google and Facebook. Tag-teaming with Bill Barr, child-welfare activists are attacking Facebook over its encryption plans and what that means for exploited kids.  One of the first CCPA lawsuits has been filed, against Salesforce. And This Week in Silicon Valley content moderation: Letterboxd banned a black libertarian film critic's reviews. James O'Keefe's Twitter account was suspended after he named a Bernie Sanders staffer who spoke fondly of gulags and electoral violence. And Twitter banned the widely popular Zero Hedge account after it named a Chinese researcher who it thought might have a role in coronavirus. Download the 299th Episode (mp3). You can subscribe to The Cyberlaw Podcast using iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Pocket Casts, or our RSS feed! As always, The Cyberlaw Podcast is open to feedback. Be sure to engage with @stewartbaker on Twitter. Send your questions, comments, and suggestions for topics or interviewees to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com. Remember: If your suggested guest appears on the show, we will send you a highly coveted Cyberlaw Podcast mug!   The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of the firm.

Senior fellow at The UK in a Changing Europe, Professor Catherine Barnard speaks to Matthew Wright on Talk Radio about what the European Court of Justice does, how it works within the EU sphere and why it is a significant player in EU law.

TechLaw10 hosts Jonathan Armstrong and Eric Sinrod discuss legal issues related to information technology. In this episode, Jonathan and Eric discuss compliance issues when corporations encourage interaction on social media.

Rosalind English discusses the latest GMO ruling in the European Court of Justice with plant geneticist Ottoline Leyser. Professor Leyser considers the problems that come from focussing on the origin of plants rather than their characteristics, and ponders on the alternatives open to the UK after Brexit. #OttolineLeyser #GMcrops #GMO #PlanetGenetics #EuropeanCourtofJustice

We will “take back control of our laws” after Brexit. But who will interpret, apply and enforce them? The role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is already emerging as one of the most explosive elements of the Brexit process. The Prime Minister says its jurisdiction in Britain will end, but could the court still have some role in UK law? Will it be responsible for resolving future disputes about Britain’s “divorce bill” and citizens’ rights, as the EU demands? Are other forms of dispute resolution possible? At the event, Raphael Hogarth, Research Associate at the Institute for Government, presented the key findings from the Institute for Government’s research on Brexit, dispute resolution and the ECJ. To discuss the findings, our panel included: Michael-James Clifton, Chief of Staff to the President of the Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association Dr Holger Hestermeyer, Shell Reader in International Dispute Resolution at King’s College London Professor Catherine Barnard, Professor of European Union Law at the University of Cambridge This event was chaired by Jill Rutter, Programme Director at the Institute for Government.

Laura Reed of Freedom House and Darian Pavli of the Open Society Justice Initiative discuss a recent controversial decision by the European Court of Justice about search engine results. Speakers: Laura Guzman, Darian Pavli, Laura Reed. (Recorded: Jul 16, 2014)

On Friday 31 October 2014, the Cambridge European Society hosted a lecture by Estelle Wolfers (PhD at the Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge) entitled “Influencing Luxembourg: the UK Government at the Court of Justice' at the Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge.

Alcohol Alert, June 2014: Eric Carlin, Director of Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP), explains the ins and outs of a court decision referring the case of Scottish legislation on minimum unit pricing to Europe. In May 2012, the Scottish Government passed the Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Act at Holyrood, with scant opposition from MSPs across the political spectrum. Two years on, the law is still to be implemented, due to a challenge led by the Scotch Whisky Association over the question of its legality, which has recently been referred from the Court of Session in Edinburgh to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. You can find out more by subscribing to our newsletter; please visit our website www.ias.org.uk and click on "Alcohol Alert" to read the latest Issue: http://www.ias.org.uk/What-we-do/Alcohol-Alert.aspx

On 3 March 2014, Judge Nicholas Forwood delivered a lecture entitled "Protecting Individual Rights: Role of the General Court of Justice of the EU" as a guest of the Cambridge University Students' Pro Bono Society. Judge Forwood is the British judge in the General Court of Justice of the European Union, and spoke about how this institution can protect individual rights and about the recent developments in the area of European Human Rights law. More information about the Society is available from the website at http://www.cambridgeprobono.bravesites.com/

On 3 March 2014, Judge Nicholas Forwood delivered a lecture entitled "Protecting Individual Rights: Role of the General Court of Justice of the EU" as a guest of the Cambridge University Students' Pro Bono Society. Judge Forwood is the British judge in the General Court of Justice of the European Union, and spoke about how this institution can protect individual rights and about the recent developments in the area of European Human Rights law. More information about the Society is available from the website at http://www.cambridgeprobono.bravesites.com/

On 3 March 2014, Judge Nicholas Forwood delivered a lecture entitled "Protecting Individual Rights: Role of the General Court of Justice of the EU" as a guest of the Cambridge University Students' Pro Bono Society. Judge Forwood is the British judge in the General Court of Justice of the European Union, and spoke about how this institution can protect individual rights and about the recent developments in the area of European Human Rights law. More information about the Society is available from the website at http://www.cambridgeprobono.bravesites.com/

Eleanor Sharpston QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivering a lecture describing the roles and responsibilities of the Advocate General on 26th November 2012.

Eleanor Sharpston QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivering a lecture describing the roles and responsibilities of the Advocate General on 26th November 2012.

Eleanor Sharpston QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivering a lecture describing the roles and responsibilities of the Advocate General on 26th November 2012.

Eleanor Sharpston QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivering a lecture describing the roles and responsibilities of the Advocate General on 26th November 2012.

Gráinne De Búrca, NYU School of Law - 8 October 2012. 2012-10-08.

The Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS) hosts an annual public lecture in honour of Lord Mackenzie-Stuart, the first British Judge to be President of the Court of Justice. Among the eminent scholars of European legal studies invited to give the lecture are Professor Joseph Weiler, former Judge David Edwards of the European Court of Justice, and Advocate-General Francis Jacobs of the European Court of Justice. The texts of the Mackenzie-Stuart Lectures are published in the Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. On 6th November 2009, Eleanor Sharpson QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivered the annual CELS (Centre for European Legal Studies) Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture for 2009 entitled "Addressing Linguistic Transparency in the ECJ". More information about this lecture is available from the Centre for European Legal Studies website at http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/mackenzie_stuart_lectures/ This entry provides an audio source for iTunes U.

The Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS) hosts an annual public lecture in honour of Lord Mackenzie-Stuart, the first British Judge to be President of the Court of Justice. Among the eminent scholars of European legal studies invited to give the lecture are Professor Joseph Weiler, former Judge David Edwards of the European Court of Justice, and Advocate-General Francis Jacobs of the European Court of Justice. The texts of the Mackenzie-Stuart Lectures are published in the Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. On 6th November 2009, Eleanor Sharpson QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivered the annual CELS (Centre for European Legal Studies) Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture for 2009 entitled "Addressing Linguistic Transparency in the ECJ". More information about this lecture is available from the Centre for European Legal Studies website at http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/mackenzie_stuart_lectures/ This entry provides an audio source for iTunes U.

The Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS) hosts an annual public lecture in honour of Lord Mackenzie-Stuart, the first British Judge to be President of the Court of Justice. Among the eminent scholars of European legal studies invited to give the lecture are Professor Joseph Weiler, former Judge David Edwards of the European Court of Justice, and Advocate-General Francis Jacobs of the European Court of Justice. The texts of the Mackenzie-Stuart Lectures are published in the Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. On 6th November 2009, Eleanor Sharpson QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivered the annual CELS (Centre for European Legal Studies) Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture for 2009 entitled "Addressing Linguistic Transparency in the ECJ". More information about this lecture is available from the Centre for European Legal Studies website at http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/mackenzie_stuart_lectures/ This entry provides an audio source for iTunes U.

The Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS) hosts an annual public lecture in honour of Lord Mackenzie-Stuart, the first British Judge to be President of the Court of Justice. Among the eminent scholars of European legal studies invited to give the lecture are Professor Joseph Weiler, former Judge David Edwards of the European Court of Justice, and Advocate-General Francis Jacobs of the European Court of Justice. The texts of the Mackenzie-Stuart Lectures are published in the Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. On 6th November 2009, Eleanor Sharpson QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivered the annual CELS (Centre for European Legal Studies) Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture for 2009 entitled "Addressing Linguistic Transparency in the ECJ". More information about this lecture is available from the Centre for European Legal Studies website at http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/mackenzie_stuart_lectures/

The Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS) hosts an annual public lecture in honour of Lord Mackenzie-Stuart, the first British Judge to be President of the Court of Justice. Among the eminent scholars of European legal studies invited to give the lecture are Professor Joseph Weiler, former Judge David Edwards of the European Court of Justice, and Advocate-General Francis Jacobs of the European Court of Justice. The texts of the Mackenzie-Stuart Lectures are published in the Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. On 6th November 2009, Eleanor Sharpson QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivered the annual CELS (Centre for European Legal Studies) Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture for 2009 entitled "Addressing Linguistic Transparency in the ECJ". More information about this lecture is available from the Centre for European Legal Studies website at http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/mackenzie_stuart_lectures/

The Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS) hosts an annual public lecture in honour of Lord Mackenzie-Stuart, the first British Judge to be President of the Court of Justice. Among the eminent scholars of European legal studies invited to give the lecture are Professor Joseph Weiler, former Judge David Edwards of the European Court of Justice, and Advocate-General Francis Jacobs of the European Court of Justice. The texts of the Mackenzie-Stuart Lectures are published in the Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. On 6th November 2009, Eleanor Sharpson QC, Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities delivered the annual CELS (Centre for European Legal Studies) Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture for 2009 entitled "Addressing Linguistic Transparency in the ECJ". More information about this lecture is available from the Centre for European Legal Studies website at http://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/mackenzie_stuart_lectures/