Podcasts about Radiometric dating

Radiometric dating is founded on assumptions that can't be proven and appear to be, well, false! It doesn't confirm an old earth.

A new MP3 sermon from Answers in Genesis Ministries is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Radiometric Dating—Proof of Long Ages? Subtitle: Answers with Ken Ham Speaker: Ken Ham Broadcaster: Answers in Genesis Ministries Event: Radio Broadcast Date: 4/16/2025 Length: 1 min.

A new MP3 sermon from Answers in Genesis Ministries is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Radiometric Dating—Proof of Long Ages? Subtitle: Answers with Ken Ham Speaker: Ken Ham Broadcaster: Answers in Genesis Ministries Event: Radio Broadcast Date: 4/16/2025 Length: 1 min.

This livestream is about to go NUCLEAR as this week the team looks at what actually goes on with Radiometric Dating and why we should all be wary as to what we are told!

On today's Bible Answer Man broadcast (11/29/24), Hank shares on radiometric dating and the age of the Earth.Hank also answers the following questions:What do you think of Kent Hovind and his views on creation and the age of the Earth? Joe - Oklahoma City, OK (3:19)Did angels and human women marry, propagate, and produce the giants in Genesis 6? Patsy - AR (6:35)Should Christians save for retirement and have life insurance policies, or is this not trusting the Lord? Melinda - IL (8:55)Are the days of creation longer than 24 hours in Genesis 1:11? Archie - Decatur, IL (15:12)

Radiometric dating methods are often cited as evidence for millions of years of evolution, but are these methods reliable? Dr. Mark Harwood explores how these dating techniques rely on multiple assumptions that can be adjusted to fit pre-existing beliefs about Earth’s age. He shares startling examples of inconsistencies, like rocks of known age returning wildly inaccurate dates, challenging the accuracy of dating methods as a whole. Dr. Harwood suggests that the real authority lies in eyewitness historical accounts, particularly those found in the Bible. He discusses how adopting a deep-time perspective contradicts the biblical timeline, potentially undermining its authority and the gospel message.

Radiometric dating is widely used to establish the age of various artifacts.  Carbon 14 is used to assess the age of artifacts assumed to be in the range of 50,000 years or less.  Logical and empirical grounds challenging the "standard" interpretation of C14 dating is discussed.

A key issue related to the difference between believing in an "old earth" or "young earth" is one's opinion about the interpretations of radiometric dating.  Carbon 14 dating is a key technique used to date artifacts.  Factors involved in Carbon 14 dating are discussed.  This and next weeks programs were originally broadcast on May 9 and 16, 2023.

On today's Bible Answer Man broadcast (03/06/24), Hank answers the following questions:Matthew 8:28-31 says there were two possessed men. Mark and Luke both indicate there was one. Is this a biblical contradiction? Steven - Dallas, TX (0:51)Genesis 2:24 says that a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife. Should children live with their parents until they marry? Jo - Kansas City, KS (6:02)I believe in an old Earth. Does Genesis 1:1 teach that Earth already existed and needed to be recreated as a new Earth? Jo - Kansas City, KS (9:14)My question is about Genesis 1, specifically verses 3 and 14. What is the difference between the light in these two days? David - St. Louis, MO (15:11)Do you believe in the principles of radiometric dating? Rick - AB (20:38)I was told by a friend that Jairus's name in Mark 5:22 means “he shall awaken” and therefore signals that this story is fictitious. What are your thoughts on this? Amanda - Columbia, IL (23:55)

The amount of helium present in zircons is explained by a young earth and accelerated nuclear decay.

Paul Garner and Paul Larson talk about scientific evidence supporting the view that the earth is only thousands of years old.

Data of radiometric dating is better explained by accelerated nuclear decay and a young earth.

Carbon Dating proves the earth is old… right? This one phrase has been repeated so many times that it is now locked into the minds of (what seems like) everyone on the planet! “Carbon Dating proves the earth is old.” Many in the church have decided the Bible got the age of the earth wrong and have reinterpreted Genesis because of this little phrase! Indeed, if Carbon Dating proved an Old Earth, it would be a problem for Young Earth Creationists! So why are we still Young Earth Creationists?  Join Eric Hovind and Dr. Brian Thomas for the answers you have been looking for when it comes to Radiometric Dating!     Watch this Podcast on Video at https://creationtoday.org/on-demand-classes/what-about-carbon-dating/ Join Eric LIVE each Wednesday at 12 Noon CT for conversations with Experts. You can support this podcast by becoming a Creation Today Partner at CreationToday.org/Partner

This program discusses the article "Deep Time Philosophy Impacts Radiocarbon Measurements" in the 2019 vol 55 No 4 issue of Creation Research Society Quarterly.  The article critiques the assumptions and interpretations of radiocarbon dating on logical and empirical grounds.

What is radiometric dating? How is it done? Is it accurate? Some scientists say a sample is millions of years old, yet others reject those ages?  In this two part program these and other questions are addressed.  They key to the controversy is the assumptions used and their effect on the interpretation of the data.

In this episode on Earth SciShow, MrEarthGuy dives into the history of radioactivity and its implications on geology. Radiometric dating is one of the most accurate techniques we have to date samples of the ancient Earth and measure its age. By using Uranium-238 and Lead-206 we are able to using isotopic ratios to determine how old a sample is. We have applied this technique to terrestrial bound crystals like Zircon, and more exotic samples from lunar rocks and meteorites. #Earth #Geology #Science

Tickets to join DEBATECON 2 in-person in Plano, TX on Saturday, November 19th here:https://www.eventbrite.com/e/debatecon-2-the-1st-debatecon-was-so-epic-we-had-to-do-another-tickets-442416288027The crowdfund (IndieGoGo) link mentioned in stream: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/debatecon-2/x/25367284#/Welcome to Modern-Day Debate. Our vision is to provide a neutral debate platform so everyone has their fair shot to make their case on a level playing field. LINKS TO GUESTS:King Crockoduck: https://www.youtube.com/c/KingCrocoduckDavid McQueen: https://answersingenesis.org/bios/david-mcqueen/https://www.icr.org/article/chemistry-oil-explained-by-flood-geology/https://www.masterbooks.com/the-mineral-book-hardback-singleGuest Moderator Kaz: https://www.youtube.com/c/AtheistEdgeGuest Moderator SFT:https://www.youtube.com/c/StandingForTruthMinistriesRules for chat & MDD more broadly:-Chats disrespectful toward speakers will receive a warning. *Attack the ideas instead of the person, and you'll be fine. -Chatters continuing the disrespect after a warning will be banned.-Chatters violating TOS (e.g., hate speech) are banned without warning.________________________________________________________________________________YouTube takes 30% of all super chats. Want to send a super-chat question in without helping YouTube profit more? Send your question via Venmo (@ModernDayDebate) or PayPal (moderndaydebate@Gmail.com) and add your question into the message box when sending your donation._________________________________________________________________________________OUR CHANNEL/PODCAST & HOW TO SUPPORT IT:My name is James and I'm a PhD student in psychology in Colorado. Currently, the mainstream "news" networks are slanted, overproduced (e.g., lack spontaneity and authenticity) and overly-controlling in terms what views or people they will allow. We're working on growing a truly non-partisan platform that allows for raw, unedited takes on the big questions of our time. If this resonates with you, consider joining us in carrying out this vision:Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ModernDayDebatePayPal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/ModernDayDebate________________________________________________________________OUR PODCASTApple: apple.co/2LpVzR2Spotify: spoti.fi/3nJwiOA________________________________________________________________________________OUR SOCIAL MEDIATwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/moderndaydebateDiscord: https://discord.gg/Qp7VtZ2Twitter: https://twitter.com/ModernDayDebate (@ModernDayDebate)Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ModernDayDebate______________________________________________________________________________________DISCLAIMER The views shared by guests on Modern-Day Debate are not necessarily representative of the views of Modern-Day Debate, James, or any university he has or has had any affiliation with. This includes our debate podcast.______________________________________________________________________________________I'm a Christian. If you ever want prayer or just someone to talk to after a horrible day, please reach out and let me know. moderndaydebate@gmail.com__________________________________________________________________________________#Debate #Podcast

A new MP3 sermon from Answers in Genesis Ministries is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Radiometric Dating—Proof of Long Ages? Subtitle: Answers with Ken Ham Speaker: Ken Ham Broadcaster: Answers in Genesis Ministries Event: Radio Broadcast Date: 9/12/2022 Length: 1 min.

A new MP3 sermon from Answers in Genesis Ministries is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Radiometric Dating—Proof of Long Ages? Subtitle: Answers with Ken Ham Speaker: Ken Ham Broadcaster: Answers in Genesis Ministries Event: Radio Broadcast Date: 9/12/2022 Length: 1 min.

A new MP3 sermon from Answers in Genesis Ministries is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Radiometric Dating—Proof of Long Ages? Subtitle: Answers with Ken Ham Speaker: Ken Ham Broadcaster: Answers in Genesis Ministries Event: Radio Broadcast Date: 9/12/2022 Length: 1 min.

How old are earth's rocks? Many people answer, “millions of years old.” That's often because of wrong thinking regarding radiometric dating.

In this episode: Creationists Explain Radiometric Dating: The RATE Project Overview SUMMARY: Todd and Paul discuss the RATE project that was conducted by several scientists and supported by the Institute for Creation Research and the Creation Research Society. They discuss the findings of the RATE project and how it affects the interpretation of nuclear decay that is evidenced in the rocks of the Earth. *Show Notes This episode references three books. Technical works: Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth volume 1 edited by Larry Vardiman, Andrew Snelling, and Eugene F. Chaffin. https://tinyurl.com/44uuhwp9 Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth Volume 2 edited by Larry Vardiman, Andrew Snelling, and Eugene Chaffin https://tinyurl.com/mr45tfkf Not as technical work Thousands….not Billions: Challenging the Icon of Evolution, Questioning the Age of the Earth by Don DeYoung https://tinyurl.com/mvzsh5e2 For questions and comments email podcast@coresci.org Like and Share Please consider supporting this work by going to https://coresci.org/connect or https://biblicalcreationtrust.org *Disclaimer: Things mentioned in the Show Notes are not endorsements of people, places, or things discussed in the podcast, but rather a record of what was spoken about and helpful links to material for our listeners.

In this episode Todd and Paul are joined by Dr. Ben Clausen of the Geoscience Research Institute to continue their discussion about radiometric dating. What is radiation? What makes certain atoms unstable? How are radiometric dates calculated? Find out the answer to these questions and more in the latest episode of the science podcast that's just for you!

What are the dating methods geologists use to date rocks? How do these methods work and are they reliable? Join Todd and Paul on this episode as they begin to answer these questions. Learn the basic principles and assumptions behind these methods and why they are used to date rocks. For questions and comments email podcast@coresci.org For show notes visit coresci.org/podcast

This is the fourth and final episode in the four-part series with Charlie Wolcott. In this episode, Charlie discusses some new research that he has undertaken which seems to be pointing in a completely different direction from radiometric dating! He discusses what it could be like when the scientific community finally breaks up with radiometric dating methods. Enjoy the finale!

Charlie is back for the third time to discuss radiometric dating. He opens the discussion by analyzing what is it that can cause radiometric clocks to be reset and continues the discussion, examining the paradigm behind the dating methods. He addresses the deep time assumptions that go into the method. Stay tuned for the final episode!

Can radioactive dating be put to the test? Indeed, it can be put to test case! In this video, Charlie Wolcott, an AP Physics teacher, will be examining the falsifiable nature of radiometric dating. Will these methods stand up to scrutiny?

Scientists have embraced a toxic partner, namely, radiometric dating. Is it time for scientists to break up with radiometric dating? AP Physics teacher Charlie Wolcott says, yes! Join Charlie in this four-part series on radiometric dating. In this first episode, Charlie will be going over the facts and fiction of radiometric dating.

In this episode the Jared and Jordan talk about the age of the earth some more. Is it 6000 years old? No. No it is not. And Jordan takes a deep dive into radiometric dating to prove it!

Again we are going through “Cost” by Russ Miller. I am going over uniformity and how it is not supported by Biblical events or Biblical science. I will also be reading about radiometric dating which is used to falsely prove millions and billions of year-theories which are not supported by Biblical science either. I will be going over assumptions that prove how radiometric dating is not reliable evidence for false science.

Date doctoring; why you can trust the Bible's timeline VS radiometric dating methods often used to convince people against the trustworthiness of scripture. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/answerstv/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/answerstv/support

How does radiometric dating fit with the view of a young earth? Is the earth billions of years old, or thousands of years old?

Radiohalos are the result of nuclear decay. They provide powerful evidence that the earth is young and radiometric dating is highly inaccurate.

The science isn’t as certain as some scientists want you to think. There’s a theoretical limit to how old you can date things with carbon-14. The fact that we find it in every carbon source on earth, the planet cannot be more than one million years old according to the dating methods. Learn all about it with Rob and Joseph!

Russ gives a presentation, with slides, about the standard model processes that take place in stars to generate elements, how that process eventually results in novas and supernovas, and how supernovas and other similar very high energy events generate cosmic rays. When these cosmic rays hit earth, they result in "cosmogenic nuclides" like the radioactive Carbon 14 that is so often used to date material in archaeological settings. We also run through a short list of the most often used dating techniques, how they work, what the problems are, what the ranges are, and what the margins of error are. We also look at the various assumptions and methods and theory behind these techniques.

Today, we read a Mike Riddle chapter from AiG's Answers Book 1, all about carbon dating. And Mike basically ignores one of the most important aspects of carbon dating in order to make his point.Sources:Evidence from detrital zircons for the existence of continental crust and oceans on the Earth 4.4 Gyr ago: https://bit.ly/3casHXARadiocarbon in Dinosaur Fossils: Compatibility with an Age of Millions of Years: https://bit.ly/3c0kkhhCarbon dating, the archaeological workhorse, is getting a major reboot: https://go.nature.com/363ULZ2Assumptions of Radiometric Dating: https://bit.ly/2KDezuIFluctuations in measured radioactive decay rates inside a modified Faraday cage: Correlations with space weather: https://go.nature.com/3qMZtlOCan the decay half-life of a radioactive material be changed?: http://bit.ly/31smOOgWhy is Earth's core molten?: https://bit.ly/3qTwKM2The Imperative Of Non-stationary Natural Law In Relation To Noah’s Flood (CRSQ Volume 27, 1990)(PDF): https://go.aws/2BuqoyqRadiocarbon dating : Bowman, Sheridan: http://bit.ly/2VdkGZAIron Age Potters Carefully Recorded Earth's Magnetic Field — By Accident: https://n.pr/3a0gFgZRATE’s Radiocarbon: Intrinsic or Contamination?: https://bit.ly/3odauvbThe origin and early evolution of birds: https://bit.ly/3qVAX2aOriginal Article: https://bit.ly/3on46m2Cards:Evidence for Evolution - Dating Methods (2:57):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B196InuBV4IThe Dating of Ice Cores (10:42):https://youtu.be/dj6xF5uGsvE

My AP Biology ThoughtsEpisode # 16Welcome to My AP Biology Thoughts podcast, my name is Arthur and I am your host for episode 16 called Fossil Record Radioactive Dating. Today we will be discussing the techniques used to precisely determine the age of fossils.  Segment 1: Introduction to Fossil Record Radioactive DatingA powerful tool that scientists can use to precisely determine the age of samples is radioactive dating.  Exponential decay: The amount of a substance decreases in proportion to its current value.   Half life: A constant amount of time for the amount of the remaining sample to halve.   Carbon 14: A naturally-occurring radioactive isotope of carbon present in small quantities in all organisms. It has a half life of around 5700 years.  Segment 2: Example of Radiometric datingSince all living organisms are constantly exchanging carbon with the environment, an organism will have around 1 C-14 atom per 1 trillion carbon atoms. Once an organism dies, it stops exchanging carbon with the environment, so the amount of C-14 remaining in the organism will exponentially decay. By observing the amount of C-14 remaining and comparing it to the established baseline amount, we can calculate the age of samples. For example, if we had a tissue sample with an observed C-14 concentration of one per 4 trillion carbon atoms, as that is a quarter of the original amount, we know that two half lives have elapsed, meaning the sample is around 11400 years old. We were able to determine that the preserved “Ice Man” is around 5300 years old via this method. The amount of carbon-14 had to have been 1 atom per 1.9 trillion carbon atoms. Sources: https://www2.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/13/4.html (https://www2.lbl.gov/abc/wallchart/chapters/13/4.html) Segment 3: Digging Deeper with Radiometric datingHow does this topic fit into the greater picture of evolution? By being able to accurately date ancient samples, we can create temporally accurate phylogenetic trees, allowing us to better understand organisms' ancestry and evolutionary relationships. Thank you for listening to this episode of My AP Biology Thoughts. For more student-ran podcasts, make sure that you visithttp://www.hvspn.com/ ( www.hvspn.com). Thanks for listening!  Music Credits:"Ice Flow" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Subscribe to our PodcastApple Podcasts Spotify Google Podcasts   Stitcher   https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC07e_nBHLyc_nyvjF6z-DVg (YouTube) Connect with us on Social Media Twitterhttps://twitter.com/thehvspn ( @thehvspn)

In this episode Russ gives a presentation, with slides, about the standard model processes that take place in stars to generate elements, how that process eventually results in novas and supernovas, and how supernovas and other similar very high energy events generate cosmic rays. When these cosmic rays hit earth, they result in "cosmogenic nuclides" like the radioactive Carbon 14 that is so often used to date material in archaeological settings.We also run through a short list of the most often used dating techniques, how they work, what the problems are, what the ranges are, and what the margins of error are. We also look at the various assumptions and methods and theory behind these techniques.As this was a slide show presentation, it may help to watch the video, so look for that on our youtube channel.Brothers of the Serpent Episode 181If you cannot see the audio controls, your browser does not support the audio element

Charlie Wolcott from Worldview Warriors talks about the faulty assumptions of Radiometric Dating methods and his research.If you would like to support our ministry...1. Give online at http://www.paypal.me/engageapologetics2. Make a check out to Coronado Baptist Church and write in the memo "Engage" and mail it to P.O. Box #12523, El Paso, Tx 79913Support the show (https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/engageapologetics)

Charlie Wolcott from Worldview Warriors talks about the faulty assumptions of Radiometric Dating methods and his research.If you would like to support our ministry...1. Give online at http://www.paypal.me/engageapologetics2. Make a check out to Coronado Baptist Church and write in the memo "Engage" and mail it to P.O. Box #12523, El Paso, Tx 79913Support the show (https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/engageapologetics)

Charlie Wolcott from Worldview Warriors talks about the faulty assumptions of Radiometric Dating methods and his research.If you would like to support our ministry...1. Give online at http://www.paypal.me/engageapologetics2. Make a check out to Coronado Baptist Church and write in the memo "Engage" and mail it to P.O. Box #12523, El Paso, Tx 79913Support the show (https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/engageapologetics)

Have you ever heard a science story on the news where they mention how old something is then ask yourself “how do they know that?” How is it possible to tell the age of something with any degree of certainty when there was no one around millions or billions of years ago? Well, there are answers to those questions.  Learn more about radiometric dating, and how we can measure the age of objects and the Earth, on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.   Sign up for the Travel Photography Academy: http://TravelPhotographyAcademy.com -------------------------------- Executive Producer James Makkyla Associate Producer Thor Thomsen   Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere   Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh   Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/EEDailyPodcast/ Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/

You don’t need radiometric dating to discover the first rock-n-roll song to top the Billboard charts was written by a guy from the 1800’s. But you DO need to know how that’s even possible. And I’m here to share a … Read the rest The post Radiometric dating and rock-n-roll reverberating appeared first on Tony Funderburk.

Can radiometric dating actually pinpoint the age of an object?

There is a great deal we are not being told about radiometric dating methods. Learn the truth with a geologist.

A new MP3 sermon from Answers in Genesis Ministries is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Is Radiometric Dating Reliable? Subtitle: Answers with Ken Ham Speaker: Ken Ham Broadcaster: Answers in Genesis Ministries Event: Radio Broadcast Date: 5/22/2020 Length: 1 min.

Today is what’s known as “Ascension Day.” It’s been forty days since Easter so on this day, we remember Christ’s ascension into heaven.

A new MP3 sermon from Answers in Genesis Ministries is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Is Radiometric Dating Reliable? Subtitle: Answers with Ken Ham Speaker: Ken Ham Broadcaster: Answers in Genesis Ministries Event: Radio Broadcast Date: 5/22/2020 Length: 1 min.

Come hear about the incredible evidence for a worldwide flood with Doctoral student Nate Loper. He is currently studying Anthropological Archaeology with a focus on Paleotopography. Nate works with Canyon Ministries at the Grand Canyon.Music from https://filmmusic.io"Crossing the Chasm" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.com)License: CC BY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Television and Trump,Dear White People (TV series), Atlanta (TV series), The Handmaid's Tale (TV series), (TV series),Harry Potter, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) ,Narcissism, Social media, OJ Simpson, The Kardashians, Survivor Reality Television, The Century of the Self, Millennium; Winners and Losers in the Coming Order Book by Jacques Attali, Amazon Camper Force, Vanlife, Digital Nomads, Dr. Fuster Cluck Calls in, Smart Phones, 2001 Space Odyssey, Did Stanley Kubrick Invent the iPad?, Slash is Stevie Ray Vaughn, Bud Trimmers, Trimmigrants, Weed Dispensaries, Hemp, Science, Scientism, Culture, Traditional Values and Education, Dinosaurs, Peer Review, Radiometric Dating, Fresh Meat in Ancient Dino Bones, Spontaneous generation.

Episode 73 - Radiometric Dating with Dr. Andrew Snelling by CrossViewRadio

Did a Japanese Probe find water all over the universe? Doesn't radiometric dating prove that the rocks around us are millions of years old? Join us as we talk about these talks and debunk the evolutionary story.

Has Radiometric Dating Poisoned Your Faith? Episode 11 Introduction ~ Radiometric dating can destroy your trust in the Bible. NorthwestRockAndFossil.com Northwest Treasures, Geology NorthwestRockAndFossil.com Find them on social media here: Facebook – Geology by Northwest Treasurers  Pinterest – Geology by Northwest Treasurers Some Observations about Radiometric Dating Many believe the earth is 4.5 billion years old. […] The post Radiometric Dating appeared first on Ultimate Homeschool Podcast Network.

Hey Everyone! In this week's lesson, we are talking about radiometric dating! We talk about what it is, what it means for recent creationism, and how to look at the world with a different set of assumptions. In this lesson, you'll learn: A short history of geological studies and dating. The one thing that hinders […]

Today’s topic is a semi-technical topic – Carbon 14 Dating. Today’s program is part 2 of the Carbon 14 discussion – for Part 1 Click Here. Scientists use a technique called Radiometric Dating to estimate the age of rocks and fossils. Carbon 14 is not used to date rocks as millions of years old but … Continue reading The post Carbon 14 Dating – Pt 2 appeared first on Creation Training Initiative with Mike Riddle.

Our topic for today is a semi-technical topic – Carbon 14 Dating. Scientists use a technique called Radiometric Dating to estimate the age of rocks and fossils. In this episode Mike is going to focus on one form of Radiometric Dating called Carbon 14. Sometimes it referred to as Radio Carbon or C14. Carbon 14 … Continue reading The post Carbon 14 Dating – Pt1 appeared first on Creation Training Initiative with Mike Riddle.

John and Myself(Chris) join returning guest Andreas(Unreal) for a captivating discussion involving: Japanese Paleolithic Hoax, Japan Tsunami, Numerology, San Fransisco Earthquake, NYC/New JerseyBombing, Train Derailing, The China Syndrome, Nutraceutical, No Nukes!, Nuclear Industry in France, Glycospate ,Ozone Hole, Rain Man, Autism, Silkwood, Christic Institute, Gilbert Grape, Geology Dinosaurs and the Jesuits, Radiometric Dating, Archaeology, Ancient History, The Dark Ages, Revisionist History, Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins, NASA, The Matrix, Cyclical Psyops, The Bible and Scholarship, Literacy, Dead Sea School, Superdollar , The Great Pyramids. Commute Music: Made In Japan by Buck Owens hoaxbusterscall.com

Radiometric Dating by Jay Hall

Join Kevin, Nancy, Tyler and Martina as they take a look at radioactivity and its role in dating methods. They meet up with christian geologist Jeff Greenberg, who studied at the university of North Carolina( now teaching geology in Wheaton college IL)  who also believes there is a place for science within his faith without resorting to creationism. Kevin returns from Imagine No Religion 6 with some great stories Nancy takes us through another This Day in History This episode was pre-recorded

Here we investigate radiometric decay used as a clock for geologic time. Alpha and Beta decays are discussed along with the concept of a parent elements half life as it turns to daughter element.

"It is one of the maladies of our age to profess a frenzied allegiance to truth in unimportant matters, to refuse consistently to face her where graver issues are at stake." Norman Douglas,Pedantry in the "anything goes" age,Select reading from 'A Treasury of Deception' By Michael Farquhar, Radiometric Dating, Stalactites, Stalagmites, StThe Age of the Pyramids, Fossilized Fried Chicken, Dave J, Stone Henge, September 23rd, Febuary(r), Rollo calls in,Mahershal calls in, Negentropic calls in,Expanded Cinema Book by Gene Youngblood, CGI the military and hoaxes, Music, concerts, Transformation of America, Cathy O'brien, The Internet, Jaron Lanier, Ebay, Paypal(Papel),Bit Coin,Banking,Decentralization........................hoaxbusterscall.com

Most often when discussing the age of the Earth or the solar system, scientists refer to radiometric dating. In kind, young-Earth creationists will try almost exclusively to poke holes in radiometric dating. But, before radioactive decay was discovered over one century ago, scientists in many different fields had already concluded that Earth was at least millions, if not hundreds of millions of years old. This episode discusses the reasoning they used.

After going over the basics of radiometric dating in Episode 38, here I discuss some of the main young-Earth creationist complaints about the technique, and their arguments to try to invalidate it.

Overview episode of radiometric dating via an interview with geologist Rachael Acks. We discuss the history, the how, and the why of radiometric dating as well as some of the caveats of issues with the method and cases where it can not work.

How does radiometric dating fit with the view of a young earth? Is the earth billions of years old, or thousands of years old?

Drought and oil in gulf, Radiometric dating anomalies, Francis Collins' views

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

Listen to learn more...

The beta counter is a device used to measure radiation levels, and has also been used to determine the age of rocks and other minerals. This video illustrates how this is possible.

Transcript -- The beta counter is a device used to measure radiation levels, and has also been used to determine the age of rocks and other minerals. This video illustrates how this is possible.

The beta counter is a device used to measure radiation levels, and has also been used to determine the age of rocks and other minerals. This video illustrates how this is possible.

Transcript -- The beta counter is a device used to measure radiation levels, and has also been used to determine the age of rocks and other minerals. This video illustrates how this is possible.

Answering more questions sent in by students.

Interview with Carl Zimmer; News Items: Tasmanian Tiger Gene Resurrected, Mobile Phones and Pregnancy, Is Scientology a Cult, Supernova Caught in the Act, Interview with Michael Shull about Discovering Missing Matter; Your Questions and E-mails: Radiometric Dating of Mt St Helens; Update on TAM6; Science or Fiction

Interview with Carl Zimmer; News Items: Tasmanian Tiger Gene Resurrected, Mobile Phones and Pregnancy, Is Scientology a Cult, Supernova Caught in the Act, Interview with Michael Shull about Discovering Missing Matter; Your Questions and E-mails: Radiometric Dating of Mt St Helens; Update on TAM6; Science or Fiction

A look at the science behind the techinque of radiometric dating. Also, listener email!