Podcasts about C14

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2021 for the province/territory of British Columbia.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, OntarioThe Province or Territory of British Columbia accepted 20 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2021, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).To delve into the history of news in British Columbia, follow this link: https://myar.me/tag/bc If you have an interest in gaining comprehensive insights into the Canadian Federal Spouses and Partners sponsorship program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or should you require guidance post-selection, we extend a warm invitation to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We strongly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings conducted every Thursday. We kindly request you to carefully review the available resources. Subsequently, should any queries arise, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session held on Fridays. You can find the details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with professional assistance in navigating the immigration process. Additionally, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant 

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2022 for the province/territory of Ontario.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario The Province or Territory of Ontario accepted 5 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2022, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).  Dive into the archives of news from the Province of Ontario through this link: https://myar.me/tag/on/ If you are interested in gaining comprehensive insights into the Quebec Investor Program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or if you require guidance after selection, we warmly invite you to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We strongly encourage you to participate in our complimentary Zoom resource meetings held every Thursday. We kindly ask you to carefully review the available resources. If you have any questions, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session on Fridays. You can find details for both meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to offering professional assistance throughout your immigration journey. In addition, IRCNews provides valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate for you with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant 

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in  2023, for Total visas issued by IRCC.   Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario  In 2023, a total of 35 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits were issued by IRCC, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).   If you have an interest in gaining assistance with Work Permits based on your country of Citizenship, or should you require guidance post-selection, we extend a warm invitation to connect with us via https://myar.me/c. We strongly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings conducted every Thursday. We kindly request you to carefully review the available resources. Subsequently, should any queries arise, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session held on Fridays. You can find the details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom. Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with professional assistance in navigating the immigration process. Additionally, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in  2022, for Total visas issued by IRCC.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario  In 2022, a total of 70 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits were issued by IRCC, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).  If you have an interest in gaining assistance with Work Permits based on your country of Citizenship, or should you require guidance post-selection, we extend a warm invitation to connect with us via https://myar.me/c. We strongly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings conducted every Thursday. We kindly request you to carefully review the available resources. Subsequently, should any queries arise, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session held on Fridays. You can find the details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom. Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with professional assistance in navigating the immigration process. Additionally, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2023 for the province/territory of British Columbia.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario    The Province or Territory of British Columbia accepted 20 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2023, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).To delve into the history of news in British Columbia, follow this link: https://myar.me/tag/bc If you have an interest in gaining comprehensive insights into the Canadian Federal Spouses and Partners sponsorship program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or should you require guidance post-selection, we extend a warm invitation to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We strongly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings conducted every Thursday. We kindly request you to carefully review the available resources. Subsequently, should any queries arise, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session held on Fridays. You can find the details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with professional assistance in navigating the immigration process. Additionally, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant 

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2023 for the province/territory of Ontario.    Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario   The Province or Territory of Ontario accepted 10 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2023, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).  Dive into the archives of news from the Province of Ontario through this link: https://myar.me/tag/on/ If you are interested in gaining comprehensive insights into the Quebec Investor Program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or if you require guidance after selection, we warmly invite you to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We strongly encourage you to participate in our complimentary Zoom resource meetings held every Thursday. We kindly ask you to carefully review the available resources. If you have any questions, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session on Fridays. You can find details for both meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to offering professional assistance throughout your immigration journey. In addition, IRCNews provides valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate for you with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant   

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2022 for the province/territory of Quebec.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario  The Province or Territory of Quebec accepted 5 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2022, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).  Access archived news articles from Quebec via this link: https://myar.me/tag/qc If you are interested in gaining comprehensive insights into the Federal Startup Business Program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or if you need guidance post-selection, we cordially invite you to connect with us via https://myar.me/c We highly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings held every Thursday. We kindly request you to thoroughly review the available resources. Subsequently, if you have any questions, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session on Fridays. You can find details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to providing professional assistance throughout your immigration journey. Furthermore, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant   

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14,  (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in  2021, for Total visas issued by IRCC.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario  In 2021, a total of 100 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits were issued by IRCC, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).If you have an interest in gaining assistance with Work Permits based on your country of Citizenship, or should you require guidance post-selection, we extend a warm invitation to connect with us via https://myar.me/c. We strongly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings conducted every Thursday. We kindly request you to carefully review the available resources. Subsequently, should any queries arise, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session held on Fridays. You can find the details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom. Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with professional assistance in navigating the immigration process. Additionally, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2022 for the province/territory of Manitoba.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario The Province or Territory of Manitoba accepted 5 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2022, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).To delve into the history of news in Manitoba, follow this link: https://myar.me/tag/mb If you have an interest in gaining comprehensive insights into the Canadian Federal Spouses and Partners sponsorship program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or should you require guidance post-selection, we extend a warm invitation to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We strongly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings conducted every Thursday. We kindly request you to carefully review the available resources. Subsequently, should any queries arise, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session held on Fridays. You can find the details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with professional assistance in navigating the immigration process. Additionally, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant.   

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2022 for the province/territory of British Columbia.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario The Province or Territory of British Columbia accepted 25 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2022, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).To delve into the history of news in British Columbia, follow this link: https://myar.me/tag/bc If you have an interest in gaining comprehensive insights into the Canadian Federal Spouses and Partners sponsorship program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or should you require guidance post-selection, we extend a warm invitation to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We strongly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings conducted every Thursday. We kindly request you to carefully review the available resources. Subsequently, should any queries arise, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session held on Fridays. You can find the details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with professional assistance in navigating the immigration process. Additionally, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant  

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2022 for the province/territory of Alberta.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario  The Province or Territory of Alberta accepted 25 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2022, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).  Stay informed about past events in Alberta by visiting this link: https://myar.me/tag/ab If you are interested in gaining comprehensive insights into the Federal Canadian Experience Class or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or if you need guidance post-selection, we cordially invite you to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We highly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings held every Thursday. We kindly request you to thoroughly review the available resources. Subsequently, if you have any questions, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session on Fridays. You can find details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to providing professional assistance throughout your immigration journey. Furthermore, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant   

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2021 for the province/territory of Quebec.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario The Province or Territory of Quebec accepted 55 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2021, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).Access archived news articles from Quebec via this link: https://myar.me/tag/qc If you are interested in gaining comprehensive insights into the Federal Startup Business Program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or if you need guidance post-selection, we cordially invite you to connect with us via https://myar.me/c We highly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings held every Thursday. We kindly request you to thoroughly review the available resources. Subsequently, if you have any questions, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session on Fridays. You can find details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to providing professional assistance throughout your immigration journey. Furthermore, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant   

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2021 for the province/territory of Ontario.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario  The Province or Territory of Ontario accepted 15 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2021, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers).Dive into the archives of news from the Province of Ontario through this link: https://myar.me/tag/on/ If you are interested in gaining comprehensive insights into the Quebec Investor Program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or if you require guidance after selection, we warmly invite you to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We strongly encourage you to participate in our complimentary Zoom resource meetings held every Thursday. We kindly ask you to carefully review the available resources. If you have any questions, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session on Fridays. You can find details for both meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to offering professional assistance throughout your immigration journey. In addition, IRCNews provides valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate for you with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant 

Canada Immigration LMIA-Exempt Work Permit figures for C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers) in 2021 for the province/territory of Manitoba.  Good day ladies and gentlemen, this is IRC news, and I am Joy Stephen, an authorized Canadian Immigration practitioner bringing out this Canada Work Permit application data specific to LMIA work permits or employer driven work permits or LMIA exempt work permits for multiple years based on your country of Citizenship. I am coming to you from the Polinsys studios in Cambridge, Ontario The Province or Territory of Manitoba accepted 10 LMIA-Exempt Work Permits in 2021, under C14, (Intra-Company Transferees Television and film production workers). To delve into the history of news in Manitoba, follow this link: https://myar.me/tag/mb If you have an interest in gaining comprehensive insights into the Canadian Federal Spouses and Partners sponsorship program or other Canadian Federal or Provincial Immigration programs, or should you require guidance post-selection, we extend a warm invitation to connect with us via https://myar.me/c.  We strongly recommend attending our complimentary Zoom resource meetings conducted every Thursday. We kindly request you to carefully review the available resources. Subsequently, should any queries arise, our team of Canadian Authorized Representatives is readily available to address your concerns during the weekly AR's Q&A session held on Fridays. You can find the details for both these meetings at https://myar.me/zoom.  Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with professional assistance in navigating the immigration process. Additionally, IRCNews offers valuable insights on selecting a qualified representative to advocate on your behalf with the Canadian Federal or Provincial governments, accessible at https://ircnews.ca/consultant.  

Svingerudsteinen hittades nästan slumpartat hösten 2021 i en gravplats vid Tyrifjorden nordväst om Oslo i Norge. Svingerudsteinens runor ristades så tidigt som år ett till år 250 e. Kr. Det gör den till världens äldsta runsten som vi känner till.De upp till 2 000 år gamla inskriptionerna är från den allra äldsta perioden i runskriftens gåtfulla historia. Runskriften uppstod bland germaner sannolikt utifrån det latinska alfabetet, alternativt det grekiska eller etruskiska.I detta avsnitt av podden Historia Nu samtalar programledaren Urban Lindstedt med Kristel Zilmer, professor i runologi vid Kulturhistoriska museet i Oslo.Runor är skrivtecken som uppstod århundradena efter Kristi födelse och brukades av germaner. "Runraden" kallas futhark på grund av de sex första runornas ordningsföljd: ᚠᚢᚦᚬᚱᚴ (jämför alfabet). De äldsta runfynden härrör från det sena 100-talet e.Kr. Flera olika runrader användes för olika språk, och vissa runtecken införlivades även i varianter av det latinska alfabetet, vilket allteftersom (i Norden på 1000–1200-talet) ersatte runorna, även om spridda bruk av dessa länge levde kvar på sina håll – i Dalarna skrevs det exempelvis runor ända in på 1800-talet.Den rödbruna Svingerudsteinen är inte större än 31x32. De som ristade talade fornnordiska som är moderspråket för de nordiska språk som idag talas i Skandinavien. På stenens framsida framträder åtta runor tydligt bland andra inskriptioner. Omskrivet i bokstäver står det: idiberug. Är stenen gjord "för Idibera"? Eller var det meningen att man skulle skriva namnet "Idibergu" eller släktnamnet "Idiberung"?Stenen har flera typer av gravyrer. Vissa linjer bildar ett rutmönster, det finns små sicksackfigurer och andra intressanta saker. Alla markeringar är inte språkliga, och man kan få intrycket av att någon har imiterat, utforskat eller lekt med att skriva. Kanske höll en eller flera personer på att lära sig att hugga runor.C14-datering av de övriga gravfynden visar att stenen härstammar från en tidpunkt mellan åren 0 och 250 efter Kristus. Epoken är känd som romersk järnålder. På stenen finns en blandning av olika inskrifter, för det mesta tunna streck som påminner om klotter. Den tydligaste inskriptionen är åtta runor som bildar ordet ”idiberug”.Skrivsätten i äldre inskrifter varierade mycket, och språket förändrades mycket från det att dessa runor ristades fram till vikingatiden och medeltiden. Det är därför krävande att tolka budskapet på stenen.Bild: Svingerudsteinen hittades i en flatmarksgrav i Svingerud nordost om Oslo vid utgrävningar som genomfördes av Kulturhistorisk museum i Oslo. Daterad genom andra gravfynd bedöms den vara från år 0- 250 evt. Fotograf: Urban Lindstedt Bild: Urban Lindstedt Musik: Electra to the Baltic Sea av Giuseppe Rizzo, Storyblocks audio. Lyssna också på Ölands fornborgar – kultplatser och försvarsanläggningar. Vill du stödja podden och samtidigt höra ännu mer av Historia Nu? Gå med i vårt gille genom att klicka här: https://plus.acast.com/s/historianu-med-urban-lindstedt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

"Voces del Misterio", gracias a la Asociación Ispal "Misterios y Leyendas", estuvo presente en esta conferencia de Juan José Benítez en el que habla de su nuevo libro e investigación "La cara oculta de México". La nueva investigación del periodista navarro supera todo lo anterior (sesenta y siete libros publicados). En un primer momento, J. J. Benítez pensó que esos miles de figurillas de barro cocido y piedras grabadas eran una falsificación. Las sucesivas dataciones —con C14 y termoluminiscencia— le convencieron: son auténticas. Voces del Misterio: ESPECIAL J.J.Benítez con LA CARA OCULTA DE MÉXICO.

Mérida estrena nueva propuesta cultural, el Festival "CineBeat", con 28 conciertos y 4 proyecciones de películas en diferentes locales y monumentos de la capital extremeña. CineBeat comenzará 'a latir"en el Pórtico del Foro, con un concierto de Letter from C14 y Kike Pastrana; en el Templo de Diana, sonará El buen hijo, el cantante de este grupo es extremeño, de Mérida, igual que la mayoría de grupos como The Buzzos, Interfectos, Dimayo o Albarregas... Bandas que actuarán en locales como Malamadre, Jazz Bar, Maruja Limón, Barocco; También en restaurantes y monumentos. La otra gran apuesta de CineBeat es el cine, hay certamen de videoclips, y se han programado cuatro películas de temática musical: Una sobre los Talking Heads ("Stop Making Sense"); "I am everything", que intenta hacer justicia al gran Little Richard; "Opus", que tiene como protagonista al compositor japonés Ryuichi Sakamoto; y "Eterna", documental sobre la vida y obra de la rapera Gata Cattana. Un festival que amplía la oferta cultural de Mérida, más allá del Festival de Teatro Clásico y del Stone, y que cuenta con el respaldo del Ayuntamiento y de la consejería de Cultura de la Junta de Extremadura.Escuchar audio

Ukraine, Euromaiden, C14, C14's ties to the SBU, the US colonial government in Ukraine, George Soros, "Sorosites," the Ukraine-Russia War, the initial Sorosite perception of Zelensky, Igor Kolomoisky, Joe Biden, Burisma, the Sorosites' evolving view of Zelensky, the failed 2023 counteroffensive, Zelensky's future prospects, Donald Trump, what happens to Ukraine with a Trump victoryPeter's substack:https://eventsinukraine.substack.com/Music by: Keith Allen Dennishttps://keithallendennis.bandcamp.com/Additional Music: Ilsahttps://ilsa.bandcamp.com/album/preyer Get bonus content on Patreon Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Heute mal Lust auf eine neue Folge Sprachpfade? Denn in der neuesten Folge geht es ja um kleine Wörtchen mit großer Bedeutung für die mündliche Kommunikation – die Modalpartikeln eben!In dieser Episode schauen wir uns die Feinheiten der deutschen Sprache an und erkunden, wie Modalpartikeln wie 'doch', 'ja', 'mal', 'eben' und viele andere unser tägliches Gespräch beeinflussen und bereichern.Wir erklären, was Modalpartikeln sind und wie sie verwendet werden, um Nuancen, Emotionen und soziale Hinweise in Gesprächen zu vermitteln. Außerdem beleuchten wir, warum diese kleinen, oft unscheinbaren Wörter so wichtig sind und wie sie das Verständnis und die Dynamik von Unterhaltungen prägen.Folge dem Link zur neuesten Folge und entdecke die unsichtbaren Helfer der deutschen Sprache, die dich bei der Kommunikation unterstützen werden.Ein Podcast von Anton und Jakob. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sprachpfade---Literatur: Ballweg, Joachim. 2009. C14. Modalpartikel. In Ludger Hoffmann (ed.), Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten, 547–554. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217087.547.Jany, Berit. 2022. „Das kann ja jeder sagen“: Neue Einsichten und Ansätze zur Vermittlung der Modalpartikeln im DaF-Unterricht. Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław. Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe (21). 101–115. https://doi.org/10.23817/lingtreff.21-6.Müller, Sonja. 2014. Modalpartikeln (Kurze Einführungen in Die Germanistische Linguistik, Band 17). Universitätsverlag Winter.---Gegenüber Themenvorschlägen für die kommenden Ausflüge in die Sprachwissenschaft und Anregungen jeder Art sind wir stets offen. Wir freuen uns auf euer Feedback! Schreibt uns dazu einfach an oder in die DMs: anton.sprachpfade@protonmail.com oder jakob.sprachpfade@protonmail.com

Our climate change series concludes with a discussion of the various lines of evidence indicating that recent warming is the result of human-produced greenhouse gases, including greater warming at night, cooling of the stratosphere, and relative depletion of C14 in the atmosphere. We then consider the various expected impacts of climate change, including increased extreme weather events, acidification of the oceans, changes to crop yields, and affects on various ecosystems. We end with an analysis of the relative costs and benefits of mitigation, and discuss likjely climate projections for the remainder of the 21st century. Recommended pre-listening is Episode 143: Climate Modelling. If you enjoyed the podcast please consider supporting the show by making a PayPal donation or becoming a Patreon supporter. https://www.patreon.com/jamesfodor https://www.paypal.me/ScienceofEverything Check out out youtube channel! The Science of Everything Podcast - YouTube

Radiometric dating is widely used to establish the age of various artifacts.  Carbon 14 is used to assess the age of artifacts assumed to be in the range of 50,000 years or less.  Logical and empirical grounds challenging the "standard" interpretation of C14 dating is discussed.

Die Namibiese Gasvryheidsvereniging het gereageer op die gru-busongeluk waar twee toeriste die week omgekom het. Die ongeluk het op die C14-grondpad plaasgevind. Gitta Paetzold van die vereniging sê daar sal moet gekyk word na die stand van paaie sowel as voertuie wat toeriste vervoer.

Die Erongo-polisie ondersoek ‘n saak van strafbare manslag en roekelose of nalatige bestuur na die bus-ongeluk op die C14. Twee vroulike toeriste, 69 en 72 jaar oud, is in die ongeluk dood. Kosmos 94.1 Nuus het met hoofinspekteur Ileni Shapumba van die Erongo-polisie gepraat...

Daar is berigte van ‘n groot ongeluk waarby twee toeris-busse betrokke was. Volgens die jongste inligting het dit op die C14 in die Kuiseb-pas by die Kuiseb-rivier plaasgevind. Sean Naude van die Namibia Marshall Rangers het die jongste.

In this episode, we continue our deep dive into one of the most intriguing and controversial relics, the Shroud of Turin. Building on our previous discussion of the shroud's historical journey, today we shift our focus to its scientific aspects. If you haven't listened to the first part of this exploration, I highly recommend going back for a complete understanding.Our discussion will navigate through various scientific analyses and archaeological contexts to answer a pivotal question: Could the Shroud of Turin authentically date back to the first century? We'll explore the burial customs of the Second Temple period, the weave patterns of ancient textiles, and modern scientific methods like carbon dating and pollen analysis.Special thanks to our Patreon supporters, members portal subscribers, and APN supporters whose contributions enrich our exploration of these mysterious topics. Your support keeps our investigations thorough and grounded.As always, you can find additional resources, source citations, and contact information on our website at http://diggingupancientaliens.com. If you enjoy the podcast, please consider leaving us a five-star review—it really helps!Now, let's dig into the science and controversies surrounding the Shroud of Turin.In this episode: Summary 01:58 Archaeology of Jewish Burial Tradition 3:58 Can a crucified person be buried? 7:58 Is the Turin Shroud of the correct weave pattern? 17:28 Numismatic evidence 25:54 C14 dating the Shroud of Turin 30:12 Pollen on the Shroud 37:26 How was the Turin Shroud made? 40:22Links: Episode page Website Email Facebook Twitter Instagram TikTok YouTubeSupport the show: Patreon Become a APN memberMusicThe intro music is Lily of the woods by Sandra Marteleur, and the outro is named “Folie hatt” by Trallskruv.ArchPodNet APN Website: https://www.archpodnet.com APN on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/archpodnet APN on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/archpodnet APN on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/archpodnet Tee Public StoreAffiliates Motion: https://www.archpodnet.com/motion Liquid I.V.Ready to shop better hydration, use my special link https://zen.ai/thearchaeologypodnetworkfeed to save 20% off anything you order.

一、思想問題：你我的讚美與天地的讚美有什麼不同？ 二、鑰節： 148:14 他將他百姓的角高舉，因此他（或譯：他使）一切聖民以色列人，就是與他相近的百姓，都讚美他！你們要讚美耶和華！ 讚美神的對象不斷聚焦：vv.1-6天體要讚美；vv.7-13地上萬物要讚美；v.14神的百姓要讚美。天地萬物的確彰顯神的智慧與奇妙，但是只有神的百姓可以與祂相近，可以親近神、擁有神的形像，可以與神有最美的互動與關係。願每一位按著神形像樣式所創造的子民，起來大力讚美神。 三、經文結構： A1-6 天上讚美：天使、日月星，5-6 讚美的理由：因神吩咐而立定。 B7-13 地上讚美：海、火山、野獸與人，13 讚美的理由：因神的名要被尊崇。 C14 神的百姓讚美：14 讚美的理由：因神榮耀百姓。 四、結構亮光： 本篇在哈利路亞詩篇中，展現了天地共組大詩班，一同讚美神的雄壯、榮耀。結構採ABC架構，A是天上的讚美（vv.1-6），B是地上的讚美（vv.7-13），而C是讚美最後的高潮，集中在人的讚美。 A的部分：天上的讚美。 包括v.2天使、v.3日頭、月亮、星宿，和v.4天上的天，應當是形容最高的天，與天上的水就是雲，這一切都應當讚美神。 vv.5-6提到了讚美的理由，因為神的話語創造了這一切，v.6神的話語立定一切，並且神的話語不能廢去，也有翻譯為「神所定的邊界不能越犯」。 B的部分：地上的讚美。 包括v.7大海與大魚，v.8火、冰雹、雪、霧氣、狂風、v.9大山、小山、樹木、香柏樹、v.10野獸、牲畜、昆蟲、飛鳥、v.11地上的君王、首領、審判官，一切萬物、一切有權位者都應當要讚美神；v.12讚美神的對象跨越年齡（老人與孩童）、跨越階級（首領與少年）、跨越性別（男女），神配得我們的讚美。 C的部分： v.14是神百姓的讚美，神要高舉祂的百姓，神要主動親近祂的百姓，並且使我們成聖；神喜悅天上的讚美、地上的讚美，但是神更喜悅的是，與祂立約的百姓起來讚美神。 vv.13-14 也提到了讚美的原因，與vv.5-6比較，都提到了神的「名」，而其差異處在：天上受造物讚美神，是因為神的吩咐、神的安排，是被動地被神安排；但是人的讚美卻是神主動要與我們立約、要親近我們，並且神期待我們主動地回應神。我們是萬物中惟一可以讓神心動、讓神最喜悅的受造物，你我屬主的子民應當把握這樣的特權，大力讚美、討神喜悅。 五、反省問題： 我是否常常主動地思想神、親近神、讚美神？我的讚美是否能讓神感動、窩心？ －－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－ 講員： 貴格會合一堂 徐坤靖牧師 聖經之鑰-各卷書播放清單： https://thfc.pse.is/3epsdf 【聖經之鑰 相關資源】YouTube： https://thfc.pse.is/3cfams電子書： https://thfc.pse.is/3ccluu Powered by Firstory Hosting

In this episode of Digging Up Ancient Aliens, the host, Fredrik, revisits Gunung Padang, a site in Indonesia that has become known due to a study and a pseudo-documentary on Netflix.We compare Ancient Aliens narratives and Graham Hancock's Atlantis Hyperdiffusion Theory. The then-sitting government initiated the excavation project at Gunung Padang in 2011 as part of a strategy to redefine nationalistic ideas and create a new national monument founded on an imagined advanced civilization.Now, both Ancient Aliens, Graham Hancock, and other Atlantis believers claim that the site reveals a 300-foot-tall step pyramid dating back at least 10,000 years. We will spend this episode looking at the hard evidence, the funding, and the reality of the claims, both from Ancient Aliens, Graham Hancock, Danny Hilman Natawidjaja, and others.It will be an information-packed episode where we will discover how pseudoscience actively defunds vulcano monitoring programs. How Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis has been disproven and how to not do your C14 dating. We also spent time among the Toraja people in Indonesia and learned about their culture. And what on Earth does Megan Fox have to do with any of this?In this episode: Gunung Padang 2:34 Follow the money 6:14 The paper: "Geo-archaeological prospecting of Gunung Padang buried prehistoric pyramid in West Java, Indonesia" 14:21 Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis - busted! 20:00 Misuse of mythology 25:56 The Toraja people 32:16 Tongkonan 34:03 What is Gunung Padang? 39:47Links:Episode pageDigging up Ancient Aliens on the web: Website Email Facebook Twitter Instagram TikTok YouTubeSupport the show: Patreon Become a APN memberArchPodNet APN Website: https://www.archpodnet.com APN on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/archpodnet APN on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/archpodnet APN on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/archpodnet Tee Public StoreMusicThe intro music is Lily of the woods by Sandra Marteleur, and the outro is named “Folie hatt” by Trallskruv.Affiliates Motion: https://www.archpodnet.com/motion Liquid I.V.Ready to shop better hydration, use my special link https://zen.ai/thearchaeologypodnetworkfeed to save 20% off anything you order.

In this episode of Digging Up Ancient Aliens, the host, Fredrik, revisits Gunung Padang, a site in Indonesia that has become known due to a study and a pseudo-documentary on Netflix. We compare Ancient Aliens narratives and Graham Hancock's Atlantis Hyperdiffusion Theory. The then-sitting government initiated the excavation project at Gunung Padang in 2011 as part of a strategy to redefine nationalistic ideas and create a new national monument founded on an imagined advanced civilization. Now, both Ancient Aliens, Graham Hancock, and other Atlantis believers claim that the site reveals a 300-foot-tall step pyramid dating back at least 10,000 years. We will spend this episode looking at the hard evidence, the funding, and the reality of the claims, both from Ancient Aliens, Graham Hancock, Danny Hilman Natawidjaja, and others.It will be an information-packed episode where we will discover how pseudoscience actively defunds vulcano monitoring programs. How Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis has been disproven and how to not do your C14 dating. We also spent time among the Toraja people in Indonesia and learned about their culture. And what on Earth does Megan Fox have to do with any of this?As always, sources and a transcript can be found at the episode page.In this episode:Gunung PadangFollow the moneyThe paper: "Geo-archaeological prospecting of Gunung Padang buried prehistoric pyramid in West Java, Indonesia"Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis - busted!Misuse of mythologyThe Toraja peopleTongkonan What is Gunung Padang?Contact:Website: https://diggingupancientaliens.comEmail: fredrik@diggingupancientaliens.comFacebook: facebook.com/Digging-up-Ancient-Aliens-108173641647111/Twitter: twitter.com/DUAncientAliensInstagram: instagram.com/digging_up_ancient_aliens/TikTok: tiktok.com/@digging_up_ancient_alienStore: https://diggingupancientaliens.com/merchBecome a supporter! Sign up for Patreon or membership here: https://diggingupancientaliens.com/support MusicThe intro music is Lily of the woods by Sandra Marteleur, and the outro is named “Folie hatt” by Trallskruv. Visit Trallskruvs website here...

* Flat Earth, Diamonds, Dinosaur DNA, and more. Fred and Ryan Williams grab a mic and camera for RSR's first ever Man On The Street Interviews! See how the general public responds to questions about champs and man, C14 in Diamonds, whether or not the earth is flat or round, and more. One of Ryan's leading questions includes asking two different couples if they are ring shopping, you won't want to miss their reactions! * “Interesting Fact of the Week”. RSR begins a new weekly segment, where Fred's co-host is challenged to answer the interesting fact posed as a question. Will they be on the receiving end of a buzzer, or applause! * January is Telethon Month. Please help RSR and the Dominic Enyart Show improve their Youtube video outreach! VIDEO upload in progress, ETA today @ 4:30pm MST!

* Flat Earth, Diamonds, Dinosaur DNA, and more. Fred and Ryan Williams grab a mic and camera for RSR's first ever Man On The Street Interviews! See how the general public responds to questions about champs and man, C14 in Diamonds, whether or not the earth is flat or round, and more. One of Ryan's leading questions includes asking two different couples if they are ring shopping, you won't want to miss their reactions! * “Interesting Fact of the Week”. RSR begins a new weekly segment, where Fred's co-host is challenged to answer the interesting fact posed as a question. Will they be on the receiving end of a buzzer, or applause! * January is Telethon Month. Please help RSR and the Dominic Enyart Show improve their Youtube video outreach!

Au Togo, le mandat des députés expire le 31 décembre, mais pour l'instant, aucune date n'est fixée pour les prochaines législatives. Va-t-on vers un report des élections ? Si oui, pourquoi ? L'analyse de Bergès Mietté, qui est chercheur associé au laboratoire pluridisciplinaire « Les Afriques dans le monde », à Sciences Po Bordeaux, dans le sud-ouest de la France. RFI : Le mandat des députés togolais expire le 31 décembre, mais on ne connait toujours pas la date des prochaines législatives. Est-ce qu'on va vers un « glissement », comme on dit au Congo ? Bergès Mietté : Effectivement, on s'interroge aujourd'hui sur la capacité du Togo à tenir cet engagement-là, avec l'organisation des élections législatives et locales à la date indiquée.Oui, parce qu'il faut le temps de faire campagne…Effectivement.Donc on ne votera pas avant le 31 décembre ? Au regard de la situation actuelle, il est peu probable que les élections se tiennent effectivement selon le calendrier constitutionnel.S'il y a glissement, ce sera une première dans l'histoire du Togo depuis l'arrivée au pouvoir de Faure Gnassingbé en 2005. Est-ce parce que le pouvoir ne veut plus d'aide étrangère pour financer les élections et est-ce parce qu'il manque d'argent ? Je pense que cette idée fait sens. J'ignore l'état réel de la trésorerie togolaise à l'heure actuelle, mais certaines sources évoquent des difficultés de trésorerie pour organiser efficacement les élections législatives et locales prévues cette fin d'année.En 2018, l'opposition avait boycotté les législatives. Cette fois-ci, l'ANC de Jean-Pierre Fabre et la DMP de Brigitte Adjamagbo-Johnson disent vouloir aller à ce scrutin, pourquoi ce changement de stratégie ?  Ce qu'il faut dire, c'est que la C14, la principale coalition politique de l'opposition, avait boycotté les législatives de décembre 2018, effectivement, en raison des irrégularités constatées. Force est de constater que cet appel au boycott n'avait pas fait consensus au sein de l'opposition, puisque d'autres partis de l'opposition ont bel et bien participé à ce scrutin, c'est notamment le cas de l'UFC de Gilchrist Olympio, qui était presque en état fantomatique depuis son alliance avec le RPT (au pouvoir) en 2010. À bien des égards, la non-participation de l'ANC à ce scrutin a permis à l'UFC, qui a en partage le même bastion politique que l'ANC, de se régénérer et de renouer avec l'Assemblée nationale en tant que principal parti institutionnel de l'opposition nationale. On compte également le parti d'Agbéyomé Kodjo, l'ancien Premier ministre, le MPDD, ainsi que le parti de Gerry Taama, le Nouvel engagement togolais. Je pense que l'ANC et bien d'autres partis ont pu tirer des enseignements de ce boycott passé, c'est pour cette raison qu'ils ont décidé pour les élections législatives et locales à venir de participer activement et ont appelé leurs sympathisants à se mobiliser.Pour préparer au mieux ces législatives, l'opposition a fortement mobilisé ses partisans lors du dernier recensement de la population. C'était il y a six mois. Mais ce recensement fait polémique. Pourquoi ? L'opposition dénonce les processus en cours parce qu'il y a eu des irrégularités. Plusieurs citoyens togolais n'ont pas pu s'enrôler.Oui, beaucoup d'opposants disent que les difficultés d'enrôlement, c'était dans le sud du pays qui est, comme par hasard, le fief de l'opposition… Tout à fait. Selon l'opposition, le but, c'est que ces populations ne participent pas véritablement au processus électoral, à la différence des Togolais de la région septentrionale, par exemple, parce que, selon l'opposition, la forte participation des Togolais du Sud peut effectivement avoir des conséquences sur la primauté du parti au pouvoir. Et selon l'opposition, durant les processus d'enrôlement sur les listes électorales, tout est fait de manière à ce que certains Togolais du Sud ne puissent pas y participer.Autre sujet polémique, le découpage électoral. Pourquoi est-ce une telle pomme de discorde au Togo ? Ce qu'il faut dire, c'est que la problématique du découpage électoral est un sujet de discorde permanent dans le pays. L'opposition appelle à un découpage à partir du critère démographique, de sorte que chaque député représente exactement le même nombre de citoyens au Parlement. Il se trouve malheureusement que, depuis 1991, il existe d'énormes disparités et incohérences que l'opposition et la société civile togolaise dénoncent. Pour vous donner quelques chiffres, le Parlement togolais compte 91 députés et la région maritime – la plus peuplée, au sud du pays, avec Lomé et sa périphérie ­– qui abrite un peu plus de 3,5 millions d'habitants compte effectivement 25 sièges de député, autant que la région des plateaux, dont la population ne représente que le tiers de celle de la région maritime. Ce sont ces disparités-là que les partis politiques de l'opposition et la société civile dénoncent.Donc le fief de l'opposition est sous-représenté à la Chambre alors que le fief du pouvoir est sur-représenté ? Effectivement. Je pense que c'est le nœud de discorde au Togo.

In 2016 the Canadian government passed the C14 bill, allowing some individuals to have assistance from a medical practitioner in ending their own life. Jan Ditchfield is the founder of a non-profit called Bridge C14, A Network of Peer-to-Peer Connections and Community Supports Through All Stages of Medical Assistance in Dying (AKA Maid). She is also someone with first-hand experience with how the laws (& the stigmas) impact the loved ones who decide to have a Maid death. Her mother was one of the first in her region to choose a Maid death. In this episode, we talk about fear of death, judgment, how the Maid approval process works & how her organization is supporting families.If you like this episode, you'll also like episode 165: GRIEVING DURING THE HOLIDAYS: SNEAKY SYMPTOMS & FINDING JOYGuest: https://www.bridgec14.org/ | https://www.facebook.com/BridgeC14/ | https://twitter.com/bridgec14 | https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7BC4dwXZswpmzCMC2bfCGw | https://www.instagram.com/bridge.c14 Host:  https://www.meredithforreal.com/  | https://www.instagram.com/meredithforreal/  | meredith@meredithforreal.com | https://www.youtube.com/meredithforreal  | https://www.facebook.com/meredithforrealthecuriousintrovertSponsors: https://uwf.edu/university-advancement/departments/historic-trust/ | https://www.ensec.net/

Host Rico Basso, Pastor Robert Baltodano, and Dr. Jason Lisle Question Timestamps: (1:00) - Discussion with Dr. Jason Lisle on Bible manuscripts and Biblical creation. Travis, SC (9:41) - Could you explain the distant starlight problem and your response to it? Email (12:49) - What kind of physics will there be in heaven? Tim, FL (15:59) - Was the original Bible corrupted by Satan? Are there any scripture fragments from before the time of Christ? Tim, NY (20:36) - Is there anything good in us that God pursues, or thinks is worth saving? John, KY (34:54) - Did God use evolution to create everything? Tim, TX (40:10) - Did Adam's age start counting at his creation or at the Fall? Carol, NY (41:41) - What resources do you have that explain that the Bible is valid to be studied and trusted? Victoria, NJ (46:58) - Who says that God's day is 24 hours? Couldn't God's day be a million years? Oswald, Facebook (51:15) - What translation do you prefer for word-for-word Bible translations? Andrew, NJ (53:10) - What do scientists claim is the answer when C14 is found in dinosaur bones? Questions? 888-712-7434 Questions@bbtlive.org  

-- Finches Diversify in Decades, Opals Form in Months,  Man's Genetic Diversity in 200 Generations, C-14 Everywhere: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams present their classic program that led to the audience-favorites rsr.org/list-shows! See below and hear on today's radio program our list of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things! From opals forming in months to man's genetic diversity in 200 generations, and with carbon 14 everywhere it's not supposed to be (including in diamonds and dinosaur bones!), scientific observations fill the guys' most traditional list challenging those who claim that the earth is billions of years old. Many of these scientific finds demand a re-evaluation of supposed million and billion-year ages. * Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken 2,300,000 years to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in at most 17 years, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. Hear about this also at rsr.org/spetner. * Opals Can Form in "A Few Months" And Don't Need 100,000 Years: A leading authority on opals, Allan W. Eckert, observed that, "scientific papers and textbooks have told that the process of opal formation requires tens of thousands of years, perhaps hundreds of thousands... Not true." A 2011 peer-reviewed paper in a geology journal from Australia, where almost all the world's opal is found, reported on the: "new timetable for opal formation involving weeks to a few months and not the hundreds of thousands of years envisaged by the conventional weathering model." (And apparently, per a 2019 report from Entomology Today, opals can even form around insects!) More knowledgeable scientists resist the uncritical, group-think insistence on false super-slow formation rates (as also for manganese nodules, gold veins, stone, petroleum, canyons and gullies, and even guts, all below). Regarding opals, Darwinian bias led geologists to long ignore possible quick action, as from microbes, as a possible explanation for these mineraloids. For both in nature and in the lab, opals form rapidly, not even in 10,000 years, but in weeks. See this also from creationists by a geologist, a paleobiochemist, and a nuclear chemist. * Finches Speciate in Two Generations vs Two Million Years for Darwin's Birds?  Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands are said to have diversified into 14 species over a period of two million years. But in 2017 the journal Science reported a newcomer to the Island which within two generations spawned a reproductively isolated new species. In another instance as documented by Lee Spetner, a hundred birds of the same finch species introduced to an island cluster a 1,000 kilometers from Galapagos diversified into species with the typical variations in beak sizes, etc. "If this diversification occurred in less than seventeen years," Dr. Spetner asks, "why did Darwin's Galapagos finches [as claimed by evolutionists] have to take two million years?" * Blue Eyes Originated Not So Long Ago: Not a million years ago, nor a hundred thousand years ago, but based on a peer-reviewed paper in Human Genetics, a press release at Science Daily reports that, "research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye colour of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today." * Adding the Entire Universe to our List of Not So Old Things? Based on March 2019 findings from Hubble, Nobel laureate Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and his co-authors in the Astrophysical Journal estimate that the universe is about a billion years younger than previously thought! Then in September 2019 in the journal Science, the age dropped precipitiously to as low as 11.4 billion years! Of course, these measurements also further squeeze the canonical story of the big bang chronology with its many already existing problems including the insufficient time to "evolve" distant mature galaxies, galaxy clusters, superclusters, enormous black holes, filaments, bubbles, walls, and other superstructures. So, even though the latest estimates are still absurdly too old (Google: big bang predictions, and click on the #1 ranked article, or just go on over there to rsr.org/bb), regardless, we thought we'd plop the whole universe down on our List of Not So Old Things!   * After the Soft Tissue Discoveries, NOW Dino DNA: When a North Carolina State University paleontologist took the Tyrannosaurus Rex photos to the right of original biological material, that led to the 2016 discovery of dinosaur DNA, So far researchers have also recovered dinosaur blood vessels, collagen, osteocytes, hemoglobin, red blood cells, and various proteins. As of May 2018, twenty-six scientific journals, including Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Bone, and Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, have confirmed the discovery of biomaterial fossils from many dinosaurs! Organisms including T. Rex, hadrosaur, titanosaur, triceratops, Lufengosaur, mosasaur, and Archaeopteryx, and many others dated, allegedly, even hundreds of millions of years old, have yielded their endogenous, still-soft biological material. See the web's most complete listing of 100+ journal papers (screenshot, left) announcing these discoveries at bflist.rsr.org and see it in layman's terms at rsr.org/soft. * Rapid Stalactites, Stalagmites, Etc.: A construction worker in 1954 left a lemonade bottle in one of Australia's famous Jenolan Caves. By 2011 it had been naturally transformed into a stalagmite (below, right). Increasing scientific knowledge is arguing for rapid cave formation (see below, Nat'l Park Service shrinks Carlsbad Caverns formation estimates from 260M years, to 10M, to 2M, to it "depends"). Likewise, examples are growing of rapid formations with typical chemical make-up (see bottle, left) of classic stalactites and stalagmites including:- in Nat'l Geo the Carlsbad Caverns stalagmite that rapidly covered a bat - the tunnel stalagmites at Tennessee's Raccoon Mountain - hundreds of stalactites beneath the Lincoln Memorial - those near Gladfelter Hall at Philadelphia's Temple University (send photos to Bob@rsr.org) - hundreds of stalactites at Australia's zinc mine at Mt. Isa.   - and those beneath Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance. * Most Human Mutations Arose in 200 Generations: From Adam until Real Science Radio, in only 200 generations! The journal Nature reports The Recent Origin of Most Human Protein-coding Variants. As summarized by geneticist co-author Joshua Akey, "Most of the mutations that we found arose in the last 200 generations or so" (the same number previously published by biblical creationists). Another 2012 paper, in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology (Eugenie Scott's own field) on High mitochondrial mutation rates, shows that one mitochondrial DNA mutation occurs every other generation, which, as creationists point out, indicates that mtEve would have lived about 200 generations ago. That's not so old! * National Geographic's Not-So-Old Hard-Rock Canyon at Mount St. Helens: As our List of Not So Old Things (this web page) reveals, by a kneejerk reaction evolutionary scientists assign ages of tens or hundreds of thousands of years (or at least just long enough to contradict Moses' chronology in Genesis.) However, with closer study, routinely, more and more old ages get revised downward to fit the world's growing scientific knowledge. So the trend is not that more information lengthens ages, but rather, as data replaces guesswork, ages tend to shrink until they are consistent with the young-earth biblical timeframe. Consistent with this observation, the May 2000 issue of National Geographic quotes the U.S. Forest Service's scientist at Mount St. Helens, Peter Frenzen, describing the canyon on the north side of the volcano. "You'd expect a hard-rock canyon to be thousands, even hundreds of thousands of years old. But this was cut in less than a decade." And as for the volcano itself, while again, the kneejerk reaction of old-earthers would be to claim that most geologic features are hundreds of thousands or millions of years old, the atheistic National Geographic magazine acknowledges from the evidence that Mount St. Helens, the volcanic mount, is only about 4,000 years old! See below and more at rsr.org/mount-st-helens. * Mount St. Helens Dome Ten Years Old not 1.7 Million: Geochron Laboratories of Cambridge, Mass., using potassium-argon and other radiometric techniques claims the rock sample they dated, from the volcano's dome, solidified somewhere between 340,000 and 2.8 million years ago. However photographic evidence and historical reports document the dome's formation during the 1980s, just ten years prior to the samples being collected. With the age of this rock known, radiometric dating therefore gets the age 99.99999% wrong. * Devils Hole Pupfish Isolated Not for 13,000 Years But for 100: Secular scientists default to knee-jerk, older-than-Bible-age dates. However, a tiny Mojave desert fish is having none of it. Rather than having been genetically isolated from other fish for 13,000 years (which would make this small school of fish older than the Earth itself), according to a paper in the journal Nature, actual measurements of mutation rates indicate that the genetic diversity of these Pupfish could have been generated in about 100 years, give or take a few. * Polystrates like Spines and Rare Schools of Fossilized Jellyfish: Previously, seven sedimentary layers in Wisconsin had been described as taking a million years to form. And because jellyfish have no skeleton, as Charles Darwin pointed out, it is rare to find them among fossils. But now, reported in the journal Geology, a school of jellyfish fossils have been found throughout those same seven layers. So, polystrate fossils that condense the time of strata deposition from eons to hours or months, include: - Jellyfish in central Wisconsin were not deposited and fossilized over a million years but during a single event quick enough to trap a whole school. (This fossil school, therefore, taken as a unit forms a polystrate fossil.) Examples are everywhere that falsify the claims of strata deposition over millions of years. - Countless trilobites buried in astounding three dimensionality around the world are meticulously recovered from limestone, much of which is claimed to have been deposited very slowly. Contrariwise, because these specimens were buried rapidly in quickly laid down sediments, they show no evidence of greater erosion on their upper parts as compared to their lower parts.- The delicacy of radiating spine polystrates, like tadpole and jellyfish fossils, especially clearly demonstrate the rapidity of such strata deposition. - A second school of jellyfish, even though they rarely fossilized, exists in another locale with jellyfish fossils in multiple layers, in Australia's Brockman Iron Formation, constraining there too the rate of strata deposition. By the way, jellyfish are an example of evolution's big squeeze. Like galaxies evolving too quickly, galaxy clusters, and even human feet (which, like Mummy DNA, challenge the Out of Africa paradigm), jellyfish have gotten into the act squeezing evolution's timeline, here by 200 million years when they were found in strata allegedly a half-a-billion years old. Other examples, ironically referred to as Medusoid Problematica, are even found in pre-Cambrian strata. - 171 tadpoles of the same species buried in diatoms. - Leaves buried vertically through single-celled diatoms powerfully refute the claimed super-slow deposition of diatomaceous rock. - Many fossils, including a Mesosaur, have been buried in multiple "varve" layers, which are claimed to be annual depositions, yet they show no erosional patterns that would indicate gradual burial (as they claim, absurdly, over even thousands of years). - A single whale skeleton preserved in California in dozens of layers of diatom deposits thus forming a polystrate fossil. - 40 whales buried in the desert in Chile. "What's really interesting is that this didn't just happen once," said Smithsonian evolutionist Dr. Nick Pyenson. It happened four times." Why's that? Because "the fossil site has at least four layers", to which Real Science Radio's Bob Enyart replies: "Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha", with RSR co-host Fred Williams thoughtfully adding, "Ha ha!" * Polystrate Trees: Examples abound around the world of polystrate trees:  - Yellowstone's petrified polystrate forest (with the NPS exhibit sign removed; see below) with successive layers of rootless trees demonstrating the rapid deposition of fifty layers of strata. - A similarly formed polystrate fossil forest in France demonstrating the rapid deposition of a dozen strata. - In a thousand locations including famously the Fossil Cliffs of Joggins, Nova Scotia, polystrate fossils such as trees span many strata. - These trees lack erosion: Not only should such fossils, generally speaking, not even exist, but polystrates including trees typically show no evidence of erosion increasing with height. All of this powerfully disproves the claim that the layers were deposited slowly over thousands or millions of years. In the experience of your RSR radio hosts, evolutionists commonly respond to this hard evidence with mocking. See CRSQ June 2006, ICR Impact #316, and RSR 8-11-06 at KGOV.com. * Yellowstone Petrified Trees Sign Removed: The National Park Service removed their incorrect sign (see left and more). The NPS had claimed that in dozens of different strata over a 40-square mile area, many petrified trees were still standing where they had grown. The NPS eventually removed the sign partly because those petrified trees had no root systems, which they would have had if they had grown there. Instead, the trees of this "fossil forest" have roots that are abruptly broken off two or three feet from their trunks. If these mature trees actually had been remnants of sequential forests that had grown up in strata layer on top of strata layer, 27 times on Specimen Ridge (and 50 times at Specimen Creek), such a natural history implies passage of more time than permitted by biblical chronology. So, don't trust the National Park Service on historical science because they're wrong on the age of the Earth. * Wood Petrifies Quickly: Not surprisingly, by the common evolutionary knee-jerk claim of deep time, "several researchers believe that several millions of years are necessary for the complete formation of silicified wood". Our List of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things includes the work of five Japanese scientists who proved creationist research and published their results in the peer-reviewed journal Sedimentary Geology showing that wood can and does petrify rapidly. Modern wood significantly petrified in 36 years these researchers concluded that wood buried in strata could have been petrified in "a fairly short period of time, in the order of several tens to hundreds of years." * The Scablands: The primary surface features of the Scablands, which cover thousands of square miles of eastern Washington, were long believed to have formed gradually. Yet, against the determined claims of uniformitarian geologists, there is now overwhelming evidence as presented even in a NOVA TV program that the primary features of the Scablands formed rapidly from a catastrophic breach of Lake Missoula causing a massive regional flood. Of course evolutionary geologists still argue that the landscape was formed over tens of thousands of years, now by claiming there must have been a hundred Missoula floods. However, the evidence that there was Only One Lake Missoula Flood has been powerfully reinforced by a University of Colorado Ph.D. thesis. So the Scablands itself is no longer available to old-earthers as de facto evidence for the passage of millions of years. * The Heart Mountain Detachment: in Wyoming just east of Yellowstone, this mountain did not break apart slowly by uniformitarian processes but in only about half-an-hour as widely reported including in the evolutionist LiveScience.com, "Land Speed Record: Mountain Moves 62 Miles in 30 Minutes." The evidence indicates that this mountain of rock covering 425 square miles rapidly broke into 50 pieces and slid apart over an area of more than 1,300 square miles in a biblical, not a "geological," timeframe.  * "150 Million" year-old Squid Ink Not Decomposed: This still-writable ink had dehydrated but had not decomposed! The British Geological Survey's Dr. Phil Wilby, who excavated the fossil, said, "It is difficult to imagine how you can have something as soft and sloppy as an ink sac fossilised in three dimensions, still black, and inside a rock that is 150 million years old." And the Daily Mail states that, "the black ink was of exactly the same structure as that of today's version", just desiccated. And Wilby added, "Normally you would find only the hard parts like the shell and bones fossilised but... these creatures... can be dissected as if they are living animals, you can see the muscle fibres and cells. It is difficult to imagine... The structure is similar to ink from a modern squid so we can write with it..." Why is this difficult for evolutionists to imagine? Because as Dr. Carl Wieland writes, "Chemical structures 'fall apart' all by themselves over time due to the randomizing effects of molecular motion."Decades ago Bob Enyart broadcast a geology program about Mount St. Helens' catastrophic destruction of forests and the hydraulic transportation and upright deposition of trees. Later, Bob met the chief ranger from Haleakala National Park on Hawaii's island of Maui, Mark Tanaka-Sanders. The ranger agreed to correspond with his colleague at Yellowstone to urge him to have the sign removed. Thankfully, it was then removed. (See also AIG, CMI, and all the original Yellowstone exhibit photos.) Groundbreaking research conducted by creation geologist Dr. Steve Austin in Spirit Lake after Mount St. Helens eruption provided a modern-day analog to the formation of Yellowstone fossil forest. A steam blast from that volcano blew over tens of thousands of trees leaving them without attached roots. Many thousands of those trees were floating upright in Spirit Lake, and began sinking at varying rates into rapidly and sporadically deposited sediments. Once Yellowstone's successive forest interpretation was falsified (though like with junk DNA, it's too big to fail, so many atheists and others still cling to it), the erroneous sign was removed. * Asiatic vs. European Honeybees: These two populations of bees have been separated supposedly for seven million years. A researcher decided to put the two together to see what would happen. What we should have here is a failure to communicate that would have resulted after their "language" evolved over millions of years. However, European and Asiatic honeybees are still able to communicate, putting into doubt the evolutionary claim that they were separated over "geologic periods." For more, see the Public Library of Science, Asiatic Honeybees Can Understand Dance Language of European Honeybees. (Oh yeah, and why don't fossils of poorly-formed honeycombs exist, from the millions of years before the bees and natural selection finally got the design right? Ha! Because they don't exist! :) Nautiloid proves rapid limestone formation. * Remember the Nautiloids: In the Grand Canyon there is a limestone layer averaging seven feet thick that runs the 277 miles of the canyon (and beyond) that covers hundreds of square miles and contains an average of one nautiloid fossil per square meter. Along with many other dead creatures in this one particular layer, 15% of these nautiloids were killed and then fossilized standing on their heads. Yes, vertically. They were caught in such an intense and rapid catastrophic flow that gravity was not able to cause all of their dead carcasses to fall over on their sides. Famed Mount St. Helens geologist Steve Austin is also the world's leading expert on nautiloid fossils and has worked in the canyon and presented his findings to the park's rangers at the invitation of National Park Service officials. Austin points out, as is true of many of the world's mass fossil graveyards, that this enormous nautiloid deposition provides indisputable proof of the extremely rapid formation of a significant layer of limestone near the bottom of the canyon, a layer like the others we've been told about, that allegedly formed at the bottom of a calm and placid sea with slow and gradual sedimentation. But a million nautiloids, standing on their heads, literally, would beg to differ. At our sister stie, RSR provides the relevant Geologic Society of America abstract, links, and video. *  Now It's Allegedly Two Million Year-Old Leaves: "When we started pulling leaves out of the soil, that was surreal, to know that it's millions of years old..." sur-re-al: adjective: a bizarre mix of fact and fantasy. In this case, the leaves are the facts. Earth scientists from Ohio State and the University of Minnesota say that wood and leaves they found in the Canadian Arctic are at least two million years old, and perhaps more than ten million years old, even though the leaves are just dry and crumbly and the wood still burns! * Gold Precipitates in Veins in Less than a Second: After geologists submitted for decades to the assumption that each layer of gold would deposit at the alleged super slow rates of geologic process, the journal Nature Geoscience reports that each layer of deposition can occur within a few tenths of a second. Meanwhile, at the Lihir gold deposit in Papua New Guinea, evolutionists assumed the more than 20 million ounces of gold in the Lihir reserve took millions of years to deposit, but as reported in the journal Science, geologists can now demonstrate that the deposit could have formed in thousands of years, or far more quickly! Iceland's not-so-old Surtsey Island looks ancient. * Surtsey Island, Iceland: Of the volcanic island that formed in 1963, New Scientist reported in 2007 about Surtsey that "geographers... marvel that canyons, gullies and other land features that typically take tens of thousands or millions of years to form were created in less than a decade." Yes. And Sigurdur Thorarinsson, Iceland's chief  geologist, wrote in the months after Surtsey formed, "that the time scale," he had been trained "to attach to geological developments is misleading." [For what is said to] take thousands of years... the same development may take a few weeks or even days here [including to form] a landscape... so varied and mature that it was almost beyond belief... wide sandy beaches and precipitous crags... gravel banks and lagoons, impressive cliffs… hollows, glens and soft undulating land... fractures and faultscarps, channels and screes… confounded by what met your eye... boulders worn by the surf, some of which were almost round... -Iceland's chief geologist * The Palouse River Gorge: In the southeast of Washington State, the Palouse River Gorge is one of many features formed rapidly by 500 cubic miles of water catastrophically released with the breaching of a natural dam in the Lake Missoula Flood (which gouged out the Scablands as described above). So, hard rock can be breached and eroded rapidly. * Leaf Shapes Identical for 190 Million Years?  From Berkley.edu, "Ginkgo biloba... dates back to... about 190 million years ago... fossilized leaf material from the Tertiary species Ginkgo adiantoides is considered similar or even identical to that produced by modern Ginkgo biloba trees... virtually indistinguishable..." The literature describes leaf shapes as "spectacularly diverse" sometimes within a species but especially across the plant kingdom. Because all kinds of plants survive with all kinds of different leaf shapes, the conservation of a species retaining a single shape over alleged deep time is a telling issue. Darwin's theory is undermined by the unchanging shape over millions of years of a species' leaf shape. This lack of change, stasis in what should be an easily morphable plant trait, supports the broader conclusion that chimp-like creatures did not become human beings and all the other ambitious evolutionary creation of new kinds are simply imagined. (Ginkgo adiantoides and biloba are actually the same species. Wikipedia states, "It is doubtful whether the Northern Hemisphere fossil species of Ginkgo can be reliably distinguished." For oftentimes, as documented by Dr. Carl Werner in his Evolution: The Grand Experiment series, paleontogists falsely speciate identical specimens, giving different species names, even different genus names, to the fossil and living animals that appear identical.) * Box Canyon, Idaho: Geologists now think Box Canyon in Idaho, USA, was carved by a catastrophic flood and not slowly over millions of years with 1) huge plunge pools formed by waterfalls; 2) the almost complete removal of large basalt boulders from the canyon; 3) an eroded notch on the plateau at the top of the canyon; and 4) water scour marks on the basalt plateau leading to the canyon. Scientists calculate that the flood was so large that it could have eroded the whole canyon in as little as 35 days. See the journal Science, Formation of Box Canyon, Idaho, by Megaflood, and the Journal of Creation, and Creation Magazine. * Manganese Nodules Rapid Formation: Allegedly, as claimed at the Wikipedia entry from 2005 through 2021: "Nodule growth is one of the slowest of all geological phenomena – in the order of a centimeter over several million years." Wow, that would be slow! And a Texas A&M Marine Sciences technical slide presentation says, “They grow very slowly (mm/million years) and can be tens of millions of years old", with RWU's oceanography textbook also putting it at "0.001 mm per thousand years." But according to a World Almanac documentary they have formed "around beer cans," said marine geologist Dr. John Yates in the 1997 video Universe Beneath the Sea: The Next Frontier. There are also reports of manganese nodules forming around ships sunk in the First World War. See more at at youngearth.com, at TOL, in the print edition of the Journal of Creation, and in this typical forum discussion with atheists (at the Chicago Cubs forum no less :). * "6,000 year-old" Mitochondrial Eve: As the Bible calls "Eve... the mother of all living" (Gen. 3:20), genetic researchers have named the one woman from whom all humans have descended "Mitochondrial Eve." But in a scientific attempt to date her existence, they openly admit that they included chimpanzee DNA in their analysis in order to get what they viewed as a reasonably old date of 200,000 years ago (which is still surprisingly recent from their perspective, but old enough not to strain Darwinian theory too much). But then as widely reported including by Science magazine, when they dropped the chimp data and used only actual human mutation rates, that process determined that Eve lived only six thousand years ago! In Ann Gibbon's Science article, "Calibrating the Mitochondrial Clock," rather than again using circular reasoning by assuming their conclusion (that humans evolved from ape-like creatures), they performed their calculations using actual measured mutation rates. This peer-reviewed journal then reported that if these rates have been constant, "mitochondrial Eve… would be a mere 6000 years old." See also the journal Nature and creation.com's "A shrinking date for Eve," and Walt Brown's assessment. Expectedly though, evolutionists have found a way to reject their own unbiased finding (the conclusion contrary to their self-interest) by returning to their original method of using circular reasoning, as reported in the American Journal of Human Genetics, "calibrating against recent evidence for the divergence time of humans and chimpanzees,"  to reset their mitochondrial clock back to 200,000 years. * Even Younger Y-Chromosomal Adam: (Although he should be called, "Y-Chromosomal Noah.") While we inherit our mtDNA only from our mothers, only men have a Y chromosome (which incidentally genetically disproves the claim that the fetus is "part of the woman's body," since the little boy's y chromosome could never be part of mom's body). Based on documented mutation rates on and the extraordinary lack of mutational differences in this specifically male DNA, the Y-chromosomal Adam would have lived only a few thousand years ago! (He's significantly younger than mtEve because of the genetic bottleneck of the global flood.) Yet while the Darwinian camp wrongly claimed for decades that humans were 98% genetically similar to chimps, secular scientists today, using the same type of calculation only more accurately, have unintentionally documented that chimps are about as far genetically from what makes a human being a male, as mankind itself is from sponges! Geneticists have found now that sponges are 70% the same as humans genetically, and separately, that human and chimp Y chromosomes are  "horrendously" 30%

Le Pont Lafayette affiche une nouvelle configuration de circulation. Après de longues semaines de travaux durant l'été 2023, l'ouvrage fait désormais la part belle aux mobilités douces... En tous cas, piétons, vélos et bus peuvent désormais circuler sans se gêner... Le gros changement, c'est pour les cyclistes. Ces derniers devaient jusque-là emprunter une piste cyclable, sur le trottoir et encombrée par les candélabres. Idéal pour apprendre à slalomer. Beaucoup moins en terme d'efficacité et de confort. Le pont a fait l'objet d'un profond réaménagement malgré son âge. Julien Mazille est chargé d'opérations pour la Métropole de Lyon. Il nous explique les travaux : "Les poteaux ne sont pas très esthétiques, mais ils sont fixés au pont. Les démonter aurait été très compliqué. On a donc élargi les trottoirs et on a placé une séparation en granit dans l'alignement des candélabres..." Sur le pont Lafayette, fini les deux voies réservées aux automobilistes. Il n'en reste qu'une, dans le sens pour aller vers la rive gauche. Les voies réservées aux bus sont au centre. Ce pont est particulièrement fréquenté par les lignes C3, C13, C14, 27. Soit quotidiennement 900 bus et plus de 24 000 usagers Pour Bruno Bernard, président de la Métropole : "Cela fait 30 ans qu'on avait une piste cyclable sur le trottoir. Cyclistes et piétons se gênaient mutuellement. Il était temps de résoudre ce point noir. Il y aura toujours une place pour la voiture, tant qu'on n'aura pas suffisamment développer les transports." Le pont Lafayette est une axe stratégique, entre le 2ème, le 6ème et le 3ème arrondissement. Il suffit de rester quelques minutes côté rive gauche pour le constater. Ce réaménagement est finalement plutôt bien accueilli par le maire du 6ème, Pascal Blache... après quelques points de crispations à l'annonce du projet par les écologistes. "On voit passer sur ce pont, des centaines de vélos, en direction du 3ème, du 6ème, de Villeurbanne... Pareil pour les bus; Tous ces aménagements sont utiles pour fluidifier... C'est moins pertinent pour le pont Morand. mais les déplacements évoluent au fil du temps..." Un comptage systématique des véhicules mais aussi des piétons et des vélos a été installé dans la chaussée du pont. Pres de 10 000 voitures et encore davantage de vélos sont attendus au quotidien sur le pont Lafayette . La circulation automobile devrait chuter lorsque la rue Grenette sera réservée aux transports urbains, dans le cadre du plan d'apaisement de la presqu'île.

Douglas Vogt joins us to chat about Bill 4488, The US Govt's acknowledgment of his Nova Pole Reversal research, the UN and the global search for underground tunnels. We get into Sun Spot Max, CIA infiltration in research like Chan Thomas - Adam and Eve, Hapgood, the JASON group, Darpa dumb DUMBS, and Govt AI analysis confirming his work. This government bill mentions "Human Extinction" 17 times! and Catastrophe many many more.   In the second half we get deeper into what happens in a Pole reversal, if you survive the flood, the dust, and the Nova, what comes next - thousands of feet of snow if you are in the wrong underground location. Where IS the best place to be? We get more into CIA disinfo, why they won't just tell everyone what's going on. Who knows the depth of this or do they just know of the Carrington threats? We are swimming through an ocean of lies. How important is Philosophy? Doug gets into the C14 dating of lava around the world that shows these reversals, Navy Melting Ice experiments, trying for funding to create door to block out water and pressure, the inner core, the deadliest secret, how Piso destroyed science so so long ago....   The Diehold Foundation was created in 1997 to accomplish four major goals: 1. Fund geological expeditions to gather information on the past climate and biomass of selected regions of the earth. The period of interest is from 10,000 BP to 120,000 BP. Collect samples to be tested and C14 dated. We believe we can determine what side of the earth will be facing the sun when it novas during the next geomagnetic reversal (polar reversal). 2. Develop and expand the Theory of Multidimensional Reality and its applications. 3. Expand our finding on the Hebrew alphabet and its similarity to Quantum Computing and its programming. 4. Finish our work at the real Mount Sinai with another expedition.   THE NOVA PRODUCES THE HEAT THAT PRODUCES THE ICE AGE. https://dieholdfoundation.com/ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjBe55XpYzc0HzkK-8lgQtA https://vectorpub.com/   To gain access to the second half of show and our Plus feed for audio and podcast please clink the link http://www.grimericaoutlawed.ca/support.   For second half of video (when applicable and audio) go to our Substack and Subscribe. https://grimericaoutlawed.substack.com/ or to our Locals  https://grimericaoutlawed.locals.com/   Help support the show, because we can't do it without ya. If you value this content with 0 ads, 0 sponsorships, 0 breaks, 0 portals and links to corporate websites, please assist. Many hours of unlimited content for free. Thanks for listening!!   Support the show directly: https://www.patreon.com/grimerica Our Audiobook Site: www.adultbrain.ca Our Audiobook Youtube Channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@adultbrainaudiobookpublishing/videos Grimerica Media Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@grimerica/featured Darren's book www.acanadianshame.ca Check out our next trip/conference/meetup - Contact at the Cabin www.contactatthecabin.com Other affiliated shows: www.grimerica.ca The OG Grimerica Show www.Rokfin.com/Grimerica Our channel on free speech Rokfin Join the chat / hangout with a bunch of fellow Grimericans  Https://t.me.grimerica https://www.guilded.gg/chat/b7af7266-771d-427f-978c-872a7962a6c2?messageId=c1e1c7cd-c6e9-4eaf-abc9-e6ec0be89ff3   Get your Magic Mushrooms delivered from: Champignon Magique  Mushroom Spores, Spore Syringes, Best Spore Syringes,Grow Mushrooms Spores Lab Get Psychedelics online Leave a review on iTunes and/or Stitcher: https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/grimerica-outlawed http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/grimerica-outlawed Sign up for our newsletter http://www.grimerica.ca/news SPAM Graham = and send him your synchronicities, feedback, strange experiences and psychedelic trip reports!! graham@grimerica.com InstaGRAM https://www.instagram.com/the_grimerica_show_podcast/  Purchase swag, with partial proceeds donated to the show www.grimerica.ca/swag Send us a postcard or letter http://www.grimerica.ca/contact/ ART - Napolean Duheme's site http://www.lostbreadcomic.com/  MUSIC Tru Northperception, Felix's Site sirfelix.bandcamp.com  

Wir erstrahlen im neuen Glanz und präsentieren uns im neuen Look!Für so eine besondere Folge haben wir uns deshalb einen außergewöhnlichen Gast eingeladen. Herzlichen Willkommen Heiko Antoniewicz! Die neuesten Trends, alte Gerichte neu denken und alles zu Aromen und Gewürzen erfahrt ihr in Folge #88.  Und übrigens? Wie gefällt euch der neue Küchenschnack Look? www.mkn.compodcast@mkn.deInstagram:                                 https://www.instagram.com/antoniewiczheiko/?hl=deWebsite:                            https://antoniewicz.shop/Kochbücher:                     https://antoniewicz.shop/collections/kochbucherNeues Kochbuch:           https://www.amazon.de/Sous-vide-Standardwerk-Grundrezepte-Antoniewicz/dp/3985410674/ref=sr_1_6?adgrpid=68557647022&hvadid=606567221240&hvdev=c&hvlocphy=9042905&hvnetw=g&hvqmt=e&hvrand=14939385674314842658&hvtargid=kwd-300155655530&hydadcr=22_2631296&keywords=heiko+antoniewicz+sous-vide&qid=1684307154&sr=8-6Übersicht:00:15    Einleitung01:00     Nina Stiller – Photography03:30    Herzlich willkommen Heiko Antoniewicz05:30     Flavour Paring – Aromakombinationen06:10     Maispourlade mit Pastinake06:30    Schweinbauch mit 36 Monate gereiften Schwarzwurzeln08:20    Kartoffelkochwasser mit Löwenzahnkaffee11: 30   Kalt sieden. Kochen bei 60°C14:10    Zitronen Huhn15:40    Wirtschaftliche Situation nach Corona20:00     Seminare für Profis und Hobbyköche21:50    Regenerieren und Fertigprodukte23:40    Ich halte duale System für gescheitert27:20    KüchenMeister Titel35:45    Social Media & Instagram36:20    ChatGPT38:35    Was ist Umami39:45    Ein neues sous vide buch42:45    Du hast Dich weiterentwickelt44:35    10 Fragen und Antworten50:00     IKA – Olympiade der Köche Culinary Olympics52:45    Wo kann man Dich im Netz finden?54:20    Abmoderation mit der richtigen Aussprache 

Aboveground nuclear weapons testing in the 1950s and '60s has exposed every living thing on Earth to harmful radiation -- but has also made dating the remains of living things much more accurate. Learn more in this episode of BrainStuff, based on this article: https://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-tests-bomb-pulse.htmSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En este programa hacemos un doble viaje: viajamos a los fondos marinos para hacer un viaje al pasado. Viajamos hacia los sedimentos marinos para conocer como fueron los climas del pasado. Y lo hacemos de la mano de Isabel Cacho Lascorz.⭐ *// * ⭐ * * ⭐ PATROCINADO POR GEOINNOVA, PROFESIONALES DEL TERRITORIO Y DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE - https://geoinnova.org ⭐ *// * ⭐ * * ⭐ Isabel Cacho Lascorz (Invitado) Geóloga y doctora en Geología, especialista en la reconstrucción de la variabilidad climática a partir del análisis de sedimentos marinos. Profesora Catedrática de la Universidad de BarcelonaTwitter: https://twitter.com/@isabelcacho8 y https://twitter.com/GRCGM https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabel_Cacho_Lascorz https://webgrec.ub.edu/webpages/000009/cat/icacho.ub.edu.html# *** TEMAS TRATADOS****No necesariamente en este ordenQué son los sedimentos marinos y como nos ayudan a estudiar el climaProcedencia de los sedimentosDatación temporal de sedimentosMarcadores de tiempo: C14, Estratigrafía isotópicaCambio Climático actualVariación corriente del Atlántico NorteVariación climática en el Mediterráneo*** SECCIÓN DE GEOINNOVA ***La sección de Geoinnova nos la trae Luis Quesada, su director.

Den kosmiske stråling fra universet har til alle tider været et vilkår for livet på Jorden. Vi er måske ikke vant til at tænke på det, men Jordens magnetfelt og atmosfære er med til at beskytte os mod de energirige partikler, der konstant bombarderer kloden. Hvis vi i fremtiden rejser mellem stjernerne eller endda bosætter os på fjerne planeter med en svagere atmosfære, vil vi være udsat for langt større doser af disse partikler, som vores kroppe næppe ville kunne holde til. Men selvom vi er mere beskyttede på Jorden, er der stadig stråling, der slipper igennem atmosfæren og henfalder ned mod jorden – og den er også med til at forme vores liv på forskellige måder. Den kosmiske stråling skaber nemlig den radioaktive kulstofisotop C14, som alt liv indoptager fra atmosfæren, og hvis henfald gør det muligt at datere arkæologiske fund. Men det er ikke kun vores billede af fortiden, der kan ændre sig ved hjælp af den kosmiske stråling – det er måske også vores egne kroppe. For kunne den kosmiske stråling, som det er blevet foreslået, tænkes at være en væsentlig faktor til, at vores arvemateriale muterer? Til Bloom 2022 udviklede Christian Skjødt Hasselstrøm kunstværket 'µ', der indfanger den kosmiske stråling. I podcasten går han, i dialog med partikelfysiker Jørgen Beck Hansen, i dybden med værkets tilblivelse og den kosmiske strålings vilde perspektiver. Christian Skjødt Hasselstrøm er en kunstner og komponist, der arbejder i spændingsfeltet mellem lyd, installation og videnskab. I sine stedspecifikke og videnskabeligt inspirerede værker undersøger han, hvordan vi sanser vores omgivelser – ofte med afsæt i glemte teknologier. µ var en totalinstallation skabt specifikt til Bloom af kunstneren Christian Skjødt Hasselstrøm.  Jørgen Beck Hansen er lektor i eksperimental subatomar fysik ved Niels Bohr Institutet på Københavns Universitet og en af landets førende eksperter i kosmisk stråling.

Svingerudsteinen hittades nästan slumpartat hösten 2021 i en gravplats vid Tyrifjorden nordväst om Oslo i Norge. Svingerudsteinens runor ristades så tidigt som år ett till år 250 e. Kr. Det gör den till världens äldsta runsten som vi känner till.De upp till 2 000 år gamla inskriptionerna är från den allra äldsta perioden i runskriftens gåtfulla historia. Runskriften uppstod bland germaner sannolikt utifrån det latinska alfabetet, alternativt det grekiska eller etruskiska.I detta avsnitt av podden Historia Nu samtalar programledaren Urban Lindstedt med Kristel Zilmer, professor i runologi vid Kulturhistoriska museet i Oslo.Runor är skrivtecken som uppstod århundradena efter Kristi födelse och brukades av germaner. "Runraden" kallas futhark på grund av de sex första runornas ordningsföljd: ᚠᚢᚦᚬᚱᚴ (jämför alfabet). De äldsta runfynden härrör från det sena 100-talet e.Kr. Flera olika runrader användes för olika språk, och vissa runtecken införlivades även i varianter av det latinska alfabetet, vilket allteftersom (i Norden på 1000–1200-talet) ersatte runorna, även om spridda bruk av dessa länge levde kvar på sina håll – i Dalarna skrevs det exempelvis runor ända in på 1800-talet.Den rödbruna Svingerudsteinen är inte större än 31x32. De som ristade talade fornnordiska som är moderspråket för de nordiska språk som idag talas i Skandinavien. På stenens framsida framträder åtta runor tydligt bland andra inskriptioner. Omskrivet i bokstäver står det: idiberug. Är stenen gjord "för Idibera"? Eller var det meningen att man skulle skriva namnet "Idibergu" eller släktnamnet "Idiberung"?Stenen har flera typer av gravyrer. Vissa linjer bildar ett rutmönster, det finns små sicksackfigurer och andra intressanta saker. Alla markeringar är inte språkliga, och man kan få intrycket av att någon har imiterat, utforskat eller lekt med att skriva. Kanske höll en eller flera personer på att lära sig att hugga runor.C14-datering av de övriga gravfynden visar att stenen härstammar från en tidpunkt mellan åren 0 och 250 efter Kristus. Epoken är känd som romersk järnålder. På stenen finns en blandning av olika inskrifter, för det mesta tunna streck som påminner om klotter. Den tydligaste inskriptionen är åtta runor som bildar ordet ”idiberug”.Skrivsätten i äldre inskrifter varierade mycket, och språket förändrades mycket från det att dessa runor ristades fram till vikingatiden och medeltiden. Det är därför krävande att tolka budskapet på stenen.Bild: Svingerudsteinen hittades i en flatmarksgrav i Svingerud nordost om Oslo vid utgrävningar som genomfördes av Kulturhistorisk museum i Oslo. Daterad genom andra gravfynd bedöms den vara från år 0- 250 evt. Fotograf: Urban LindstedtMusik: Electra to the Baltic Sea av Giuseppe Rizzo, Storyblocks audio.Lyssna också på Ölands fornborgar – kultplatser och försvarsanläggningar.Klippare: Emanuel Lehtonen Vill du stödja podden och samtidigt höra ännu mer av Historia Nu? Gå med i vårt gille genom att klicka här: https://plus.acast.com/s/historianu-med-urban-lindstedt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Valentine's Day is upon us, and love is in the air-- love for relative and absolute dating methods, that is! Anna brings the science with C14 dating and its gang of radiometric friends, boggles minds with flipped magnetic poles and the last time archaeological material saw the sun, and finds some hot tree-ring takes in California. Meanwhile, Amber goes on a bit of a jag about ancient imperialism, makes a lot of jokes that even she hates, embraces the nihilism of climate change, and attempts to explain the law of superposition via cake. So, the usual— but that's why you love us!Dating in Archaeology (The Canadian Encyclopedia)10 Chronometric Methods in Paleoanthropology (Handbook of Paleoanthropology, downloaded via ResearchGate)Everything Worth Knowing About ... Scientific Dating Methods (Discover)Redwood Cross-Section of Time (Roadside America) more like RUDE-side America, amirite?Explainer: what is radiocarbon dating and how does it work? (The Conversation)What is OSL? (Utah State University)K-12 Resources about Radiocarbon Dating (C14Dating.com)Research illuminates inaccuracies in radiocarbon dating (Phys.org)Radiocarbon, The Calibration Curve and Scythian Chronology (Impact of the Environment on Human Migration in Eurasia, downloaded via Wayback Machine)Correlating the Ancient Maya and Modern European Calendars with High-Precision AMS 14C Dating (Scientific Reports)The bible and radiocarbon dating: Archaeology, text and science (via ResearchGate)The Iron Age Architecture at Hasanlu: An Essay (Expedition)East of Assyria? Hasanlu and the problem of Assyrianization, in Imperial Peripheries in the Neo-Assyrian Period (via Academia.edu)

Episode 175 – 10 Facts Every Christian Needs to Know 3 – Facts about Facts Welcome to Anchored by Truth brought to you by Crystal Sea Books. In John 14:6, Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” The goal of Anchored by Truth is to encourage everyone to grow in the Christian faith by anchoring themselves to the secure truth found in the inspired, inerrant, and infallible word of God. Script: Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD: though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall become like wool. Isaiah, chapter 1, verse 18, English Standard Version ******** VK: Hello! I’m Victoria K. Welcome to Anchored by Truth brought to you by Crystal Sea Books. We’re excited to be with you today as we continue the new series we recently started on Anchored by Truth, which we are calling “10 Facts Every Christian Needs to Know.” In the studio today we have RD Fierro. RD is an author and the founder of Crystal Sea Books and he is the one picking the facts we are covering in this series. RD, why did you entitle this series “10 Facts Every Christian Needs to Know?” I’m sure many listeners would think that there are far more than just 10 facts that are pertinent to the Christian faith. There are surely thousands of facts that are important to a thorough understanding of Christianity. Picking 10 seems a bit counter-intuitive. After all, here on Anchored by Truth we’ve probably talked about hundreds or thousands of facts that help demonstrate that the Bible is the inspired, inerrant, and infallible word of God. RD: Well, I’d first like to start by thanking everyone for joining us here today. And you are absolutely right that there are thousands, or perhaps hundreds of thousands of facts that are relevant to the Christian faith. I have wanted to do this series for a while to highlight a couple of key points. But, not all facts are equal and that’s something I want to talk about today. One of the ways we can be confident about the truth of the Christian faith is that Christianity permits us to test it by examining its principle source – the Bible – through the lens of logic, reason, and evidence. Relevant facts are a major part of the evidence that can help us in our examination. But just as in other situations - say a court case – not all facts bear equal weight in helping settle the truth of the major claim at issue. Some facts are informative and in conjunction with others help frame how the jury may view the decision they have to make. But some facts aren’t just informative. They are dispositive. VK: One definition of the term “dispositive” that we found on “yourdictionary.com” says that dispositive means “That disposes of, or settles, a dispute, question, etc.; conclusive; decisive.” Dispositive can mean facts or evidence that are pertinent to the outcome of a legal case but in the law it quite often refers to facts or evidence that – as the definition says – settles the matter. But I think you’re going to need to give us an example of to tell us what you’re trying to get at. RD: Well, let’s say that I was accused of robbing a bank. VK: But you’re innocent, right? RD: Yes. I’m innocent. But the police were given a description of someone who roughly matches my height and weight. And they said the bank robber was wearing an old brown coat and hat and they heard from my neighbor that I have an old brown coat and hat. When the police talk to me they tell me the bank was robbed on the 13th. But I can prove that on the 13th I was in Montana giving a speech to a crowd of 500 people at the exact time the bank was being robbed. The fact that I was thousands of miles away would be dispositive in demonstrating that I was not the one who robbed the bank. Now there may be other facts that might also be equally dispositive but all I really need is one. VK: You mean that there may be other facts that are equally strong in ruling you out as a possibility for the bank job. Maybe the robber was 6 feet 8 inches tall but you’re a foot shorter. Maybe the robber had a physical deformity like a missing finger on one hand but you still have, thankfully, all of your fingers. Maybe a bank guard shot the robber and they know that your blood type doesn’t match his. In other words there might be many facts that rule you out as a suspect but you’re saying you really only need one to settle the matter. I suppose they could say you had an accomplice. RD: They could and that is a great illustration of another point that we need to talk about. All of us, every single one of us, views the world and any particular set of facts through a set of starting axioms. That’s true for Christians and it’s true for non-Christians. And therefore when we present conclusions we very rarely simply present a set of sort-of bare facts. When we talk about conclusions we have almost always applied some level of analysis to a set of facts. We have filtered facts through our set of starting axioms, hopefully applied valid logical principles, and drawn a conclusion either deductively or inductively. VK: Deductive reasoning is reasoning from the general to the specific. Inductive reasoning goes in the opposite direction – from the specific to the general. Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations or facts, looks for patterns, and then formulates a hypothesis or conclusion based on the determination of whether a pattern exists based on those specific observations. Someone who notices that every time they eat dairy products they have some unpleasant gastric experience might come to the conclusion they are lactose intolerant. They arrived at their conclusion inductively. Conversely, if a mother told her daughter that everyone in her family is lactose intolerant the daughter might test the idea that she is lactose intolerant by exposing herself to specific dairy products and then see if she has the same problems. The daughter started with a general premise that she was likely lactose intolerant and then confirmed that premise with specific observations. The daughter reasoned deductively. RD: Yes. The point is that arriving at reasonable hypotheses or conclusions requires not just facts but also the application of valid logical processes. But we all begin that process with a set of starting axioms. So, we need to be aware of those starting axioms and we need to be sensitive to whether or not, as we evaluate facts and apply logic, whether those starting axioms are remaining valid. VK: What you’re saying is that it is possible that as we gather evidence and apply logic we may come to realize that our starting axioms are themselves in jeopardy. And, unfortunately, we have examples of people who adhere to sets of starting axioms long past the point where those axioms have remained valid. RD: Exactly. And that is particularly prevalent in the debates that swirl around the Bible and critical portions of the truth that the Bible presents. And there is no more glaring example of where some people adhere to starting axioms than when it comes to the history that is contained in the book of Genesis – which is why we started with the first two facts that we did in our “10 Facts” series. VK: The first fact that we discussed that every Christian needs to know is that science confirms that the universe and earth are thousands of years old, not millions or billions of years old. The second fact that we covered was that the complexity of life makes it impossible that life could have arisen as a result of the random collision of atoms and molecules – even if you could explain the existence of the atoms and molecules to begin with. We started with those two facts because they get to the heart of whether the opening chapters of the book of Genesis – which are the opening chapters of the Bible – is, in fact, true. RD: Yes. So, let’s take that first fact – that science provides solid evidence that the conventional idea that the universe is 14 Billion years old is untenable. So, when we did our episode on that fact, which was the first episode in this “10 Facts” series – we pointed out 3 lines of evidence that are a real problem for the conventional view on the age of the universe: the presence of soft tissue in dinosaur remnants, the faint young sun paradox, and lunar recession. VK: And anyone who would like to get a more in-depth understanding of those lines of evidence can review the podcast version of that show which is available from most podcast apps or our website, crystalseabooks.com. RD: So, in that show we cited three lines of evidence that the conventional supposed-age of the universe is wrong. But there are dozens of other lines of evidence as well such as the presence of carbon-14 in diamonds. Carbon-14 is a radioactive form of carbon and it decays very quickly. The half-life of carbon-14 is 5,730 years. That means that after 5,730 years the amount of carbon-14 present would decrease by half. After 11,460 years only a quarter of the original amount would be left. After 17,190 years only an eighth and so on and so on. If the entire earth had started out as carbon-14, which it didn’t, in less than a million years there wouldn’t be enough carbon-14 left to be detectable. VK: This does not mean that the earth is a million years old. It is simply a way of putting an extreme upper limit on the age of the earth. Because we find trace amounts of carbon-14 in diamonds it means that the earth cannot be anywhere near a million years old. RD: Right. Now we know that carbon-14 can be produced by cosmic rays entering the upper levels of the earth’s atmosphere but this would not account for the presence of detectable carbon-14 in diamonds. Diamonds are essentially a closed system so there is no way carbon-14 formed in the atmosphere today could penetrate a diamond so it would be detectable within one. But scientists have detected carbon-14 in diamonds. The point is that this is yet another line of evidence that the earth is nowhere near the 4.5 Billion years old that conventional science claims it to be. The presence of detectable carbon-14 in diamonds is evidence that the earth is thousands of years old not millions or billions. The presence of detectable carbon-14 in diamonds is devastating to the whole idea of a billions of years old earth and therefore devastating to the entire evolutionary hypothesis. VK: In our last episode you said “Deep time is the root of the evolutionary weed.” Deep time is the idea that the universe is 14 Billion years old and the earth is 4.5 Billion years old. Evolution needs deep time because without it the whole idea that the random collision of unintelligent atoms and molecules could have produced life – let alone atomic physicists or molecular biologists – is ridiculous. So, what you are getting at is that the fact that science confirms that the universe and earth are thousands of years old, not millions or billions of years old is dispositive in the destruction of the evolutionary hypothesis. Without deep time evolution dies as an hypothesis even worthy of contemplation. RD: Exactly. And that’s why in this episode of Anchored by Truth I wanted to take a break from the presentation of the 10 facts themselves and ensure that we were focusing listener attention on why these facts are so important to their faith. We are not doing this so much to provide an apologetic or evangelistic tool as we are to ensure that our listeners are able to be confident in their faith. Recently, I had a conversation with a young believer – much younger than me anyway – and he told me that before his conversion the one question that he kept asking himself was how can you be sure which faith is the true one? Well, properly understood and presented Christianity can answer that question clearly and comprehensively. And it’s the only faith that can with an answer that covers all of the various disciplines by which we discern truth. VK: Your point is that Christianity, by means of the Bible, answers all of the big questions. Where did the universe come from? How did life begin? Where did man come from? Why is there pain and trouble in the world? Why can people still be hopeful in the midst of a troubled world? Why do people feel a compulsion to distinguish between right and wrong in such a way that they frame moral and ethical systems and standards by which they live and want others to live? And why does mankind have a near universal apprehension of the divine – the sense that has pervaded every culture regardless of location, time in history, or other traditions that there is a supernatural realm that lies outside our physical senses? RD: Yes. Christianity can give meaningful, intelligent, and reasonable answers to those questions. And the answers that Christianity gives are consistent with what we know about the physical order in which we live (physics, chemistry, biology, geology) and the revealed history of humanity (history, archeology, sociology), and also provides verifiable evidence of the supernatural by means of fulfilled prophecy. But to be able to give those answers intelligently Christians must have a basic awareness of how facts, evidence, and logic are applied when sorting through competing truth claims. VK: Our lives today are lived in a world where truth claims that compete with Christianity assault us on a daily basis. Supposedly science tells us that the universe started with a big bang billions of years ago and life arose randomly and chaotically by the undirected collision of inanimate particles. Supposedly human beings resulted from a lengthy series of genetic mutations that transformed carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, sodium, and other non-living chemical elements into a being that can write sonnets, invent telescopes that can study galaxies billions of light years away, grieve over their failures and yet pursue future greatness. And even for those people who are willing to acknowledge that physics and chemistry alone cannot produce biology they must contend with hundreds of claims about how the supernatural world is ordered and what supernatural beings may or may not exist. And those messages come to us through just about every show that arrives on a television or computer screen, is playing at a local theater, or is transmitted through radio waves or the internet. When you think about it, it’s enough to almost make you want to stay in bed in the morning. RD: But in the midst of all that Christians can turn to Deuteronomy 31:8 and hear God telling us “I will never leave you or forsake you.” And we can turn to the Gospel of John 16:33 Jesus tells us that “in this world we will have tribulation” but that we can remain at peace because he has overcome the world. Well, one of the biggest ways Jesus has overcome the world is because He has the truth on his side. He is, in fact, THE TRUTH. He made and sustains everything so truth is actually dependent on him and not He on the truth but that is a subject for a different day. For today, we need to focus on the fact that one of the reasons Christians can be confident that their faith is the true faith is because the Bible gives abundant evidence of being true. VK: The Bible simultaneously proclaims the truth but in its unmatched reliability, fidelity, and accuracy it contains evidence of the truth of the claims. But to be able to use that truth we must understand the relationship of facts to sorting among competing truth claims. And one of the most interesting things I have heard you point out is that when we have dispositive facts at our disposal we may have one or many, but all we really need is one. Can you explain that a bit more as it applies to our principle concern about 10 facts every Christian needs. RD: Sure. Let’s go back to the fact the General Theory of Evolution needs lots of time to even be worthy of attention. That’s why Charles Darwin’s views didn’t flourish until another Charles, Charles Lyell, popularized the idea of uniformitarianism. Uniformitarianism is the idea that “the present is the key to the past.” Lyell is often called a “Scottish geologist” but his actual training and educations was as a lawyer. Before Lyell most scientists subscribed to some form of catastrophism – the premise that most of the features we see on the earth’s surface were the result of previous catastrophes such as Noah’s flood. But Lyell postulated that rather than a Biblical flood carving features such as the Grand Canyon it was actually done by slow erosion over eons. VK: And Darwin was well aware of Lyell wasn’t he? RD: Yes. Darwin had a copy of Lyell’s book, Principles of Geology, with him in the infamous voyage of the British 10-gun brig named the Beagle under the command of a Captain FitzRoy. Lyell’s idea that there were eons of time available on the earth allowed Darwin to posit that biological changes may have occurred in the same way Lyell posited that geological change had occurred – slowly and gradually. But Darwin had no idea of, for instance, the complexity of a living cell. In Darwin’s day they knew about cells but cells were thought to be simple blobs of protoplasm. VK: Darwin wrote long before the explosion in knowledge of molecular biochemistry which didn’t occur until the middle of the 20th century – about a 100 years after Darwin wrote The Origin of the Species. But today we are well aware that far from being simple structures living cells are, in fact, complex micro-systems. The complexity of the simplest living cell dwarfs the complexity of any mechanical device invented by man. The irreducible and specified complexity of living cells and creatures is dispositive evidence that such a system could have been produced by random and undirected activity. RD: Yes. And we covered that in greater detail in our last episode of Anchored by Truth. But back to the point that we were covering – that the General Theory of Evolution needs billions of years to work. Well, we’ve now covered 4 lines of evidence, facts if you will, that demonstrate that the earth is more likely thousands of years old than billions. We’ve talked about lunar recession, the faint young sun paradox, the presence of soft tissue in dinosaur remains, and the decay rate of carbon-14. Any single one of those facts is dispositive evidence that evolution does not have billions of years to work with. Said differently, they do not all have to be true to show that the earth is only thousands of years old. Any one of those lines of evidence is sufficient to do the trick. VK: I see what you’re saying. All of those lines of evidence demonstrate the same thing. But if one or two were somehow shown to be in error that doesn’t save the evolutionary time frame. All of them would have to be false to save the evolutionary time frame. And not just those 4 lines of evidence are available to show that the time needed for evolution to be conceivable isn’t available. Creation Ministries International has a single article that contains 101 lines of evidence that show that the earth is far more likely to be on the order of thousands of years old. But given that this is true why do most conventional scientists continue to support the idea that the earth and universe are billions of years old. RD: That goes back to the compulsive power of a person’s starting set of axioms. Most scientists look at the age of the universe or earth from the starting point that it is billions of years old. That’s what their training and education have led them to believe. That’s what they had to believe to get their degrees, their funding, and their approval from colleagues. So, when they come to evidence that doesn’t agree with their starting axioms they start trying to find a suitable explanation for how their axioms can remain in place but account for the evidence that doesn’t fit. In the case of lunar recession they might say the moon has not always orbited the earth – that at some distant time in the past the earth “captured” the moon as it was flying by. In the case of the faint young sun paradox they say that the faint young sun could keep the earth warm enough for life because the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was 1,000 times greater than it is now. To account for the problem the varying evidence presents they have to invent explanations. VK: But if the moon was “captured” by the earth or the level of carbon dioxide was much higher in the past those ideas violate their presumption that all of the forces operating today have been operating in the same way in the past. In other words to save deep time they have to sacrifice the idea of uniformitarianism. Right? RD: Right. And that’s the beautiful thing about the Bible and Christianity. The time frames that we learn from the Bible don’t require any of that. This is not to say that the Biblical time periods don’t have some challenges they must address with respect to dating. There are some and Christian scientists routinely work on solutions to those problems. But this all goes back to the basic point. There are facts, a great many of them, that help that young Christian get an answer to his basic question of “how can I know which religion is true?” VK: And that includes the most widespread religion of our day which might be termed “secularism.” If belief in God is a “religious” viewpoint, then not believing in God is also a “religious” viewpoint. It’s the opposite position on the same question. In our culture we like to label a belief in God as being religious but we don’t put that same label on not believing in God. And that has led to a lot of mischief hasn’t it. RD: Yes. In our culture we have said that we must separate “church and state.” But when we interpret that phrase to mean we must expunge religion, especially Christianity from our public institutions, we have not become religiously neutral – we have become religiously hostile. We have replaced religious tolerance with secular coercion under the label of neutrality. But this is also a discussion for another day. For today, the point we need for people to remember is that not all facts, not all lines of evidence, are of equal value in arriving at valid conclusions. So, when we come to facts that apply to our faith we need to become aware of, even master, certain facts that are in conflict with the substructure for secularism in our culture. And that subculture is the theory of evolution. Without evolution the culture has no credible alternative to God as creator. VK: The General Theory of Evolution has two Achilles heels: time and complexity. Without deep time no one contends that there would have been enough random activity to produce one fortuitous event of the first so-called “self replicating molecule.” But as we now know life consists of far more than just one molecule. Life consists of millions of molecules all working properly and all working together. The simplest cell will not work if its component parts don’t function properly individually and collectively. The same is true for body systems that those cells build. That’s irreducible complexity. The cells and body systems must be organized in very specific ways. They must exist as systems that have utility, function, and purpose so they must have been developed and must be maintained in very specific configurations. In other words, they are specified in their design and function. That’s specified complexity. RD: Right. The first two facts we have covered in our “10 Facts” series are dispositive in demonstrating that the conventional view that God is not necessary to explain life has fatal flaws. VK: Life is complex – irreducibly, specifically, and informationally. But let’s hasten to add that as complex as it is to us, it presents no challenge to an omniscient God. Today let’s listen to a prayer of adoration for our Creator God. The complexity of life tells us that only an omniscient, omnipotent, and infinite God could create it. And the fact that He gave us the ability to appreciate His creation tells us that He genuinely wants to have a personal relationship with each of us so that for all eternity we can enjoy fellowship with Him and proclaim His unmatched glory. ---- PRAYER OF ADORATION FOR THE CREATOR VK: Before we close we’d like to remind our audience that a lot of our radio episodes are linked together in series of topics so if they missed any episodes in this series or if they just want to hear one again, all of these episodes are available on your favorite podcast app. To find them just search on “Anchored by Truth by Crystal Sea Books.” If you’d like to hear more, try out crystalseabooks.com where “We’re not perfect but our Boss is!” (Opening Bible Quotes from the New Living Translation) Psalm 139,verse 14, New Living Translation Diamonds: a creationists best friend - creation.com C14 dinos - creation.com Satan’s Strategy Cast doubt on God’s goodness Deny God’s truth Elevate self-importance Establish a replacement in the mind and heart for God’s truth

Episode 173 – 10 Facts Every Christian Needs to Know 1 Welcome to Anchored by Truth brought to you by Crystal Sea Books. In John 14:6, Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” The goal of Anchored by Truth is to encourage everyone to grow in the Christian faith by anchoring themselves to the secure truth found in the inspired, inerrant, and infallible word of God. Script: Then God said: Let there be light, and there was light. God saw that the light was good. God then separated the light from the darkness. God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” Evening came, and morning followed—the first day. Genesis, chapter 1, verses 3 through 5, New American Bible Revised Edition ******** VK: Hello! I’m Victoria K. Welcome to Anchored by Truth brought to you by Crystal Sea Books. We’re excited to be with you today as we begin a new series on Anchored by Truth. So, to announce the series and tell us why we are doing it, we have RD Fierro in the studio. RD is an author and the founder of Crystal Sea Books. RD, you’ve entitled this series “10 Facts Every Christian Needs to Know.” This ought to be fascinating. I’m not sure how many facts there are that pertain to the Christian faith but way more than 10. How in the world are you going to pick 10 from the hundreds or thousands of facts that are relevant to those who put their trust in Christ? RD: Well, I’d first like to start by expressing my gratitude for everyone who is joining us here today whether on the radio broadcast or the podcast. And you are absolutely right that there are hundreds, thousands, or perhaps hundreds of thousands of facts that shape and fill the Christian faith. And that is the one of the points that we want to make by doing this series. The Christian faith is a faith of facts. VK: Well, that’s an interesting phrase – “a faith of facts.” That phrase alone starts to raise questions. I think most people would see or draw a distinction between faith and facts. RD: And I think you’re right about that. Many people in our world think that if we’re talking about faith and facts we’re talking about two different categories of ideas. But that is a modern fiction. The great theologians through the ages have always recognized that authentic, saving faith has three dimensions. Authentic, saving faith consists of content, assent to the content, and trust in that content. Well, the content of authentic, saving faith must consist of facts or it’s not faith at all. It might be gullibility, credulity, or imaginative fantasy but it is not faith. If someone says I believe moon fairies visit me at night and sprinkle glow berries at the foot of my bed, that’s not faith. And if someone chooses to label that kind of belief as “faith” it’s certainly not what the Bible means, or classic Christian theology means, when we use the term. VK: And while critics might assert that we are playing word games there is a very concrete distinction between Biblical faith and the “glow berry” kind. Christian faith always begins with and ends with the truth. Truth is that which corresponds to reality. We make this point regularly on Anchored by Truth. It is a critical distinction. Belief in moon fairies and glow berries might give a small child a distraction but it won’t help an adult struggling with addiction, or financial troubles, or a sick loved one, or comfort with a desperate illness. Authentic, saving faith will help with all of those situations and a great many more. RD: So, when we say that Christianity is a faith with facts we are saying that it is a faith grounded in the real world – in time and place – but it is nevertheless a faith that recognizes that there is a real realm that is outside of the created order that is perceived through the senses. We know the reality of that other realm from the Bible which is why we must become so familiar with the Bible that we can use its truth to guide us through our lives in the created order until Jesus brings us safely into that unseen realm at his side. VK: So, during this series you want to give people a group of facts that will help them reinforce their confidence in their faith and in the Bible. You don’t see this series so much as evangelistic tool – though it could help with that – as much as you do helping believers fend off the world’s attacks on their faith. RD: Yes. Classically the believer’s enemies are the world, the flesh, and the devil. Well, in the modern “world” the world’s enmity with Christ has been steadily escalating. The contemporary reliance on instantaneous and mass media has allowed false messages to move instantly and continuously. And one of the messages with which Christians are bombarded today is the whole notion of what is sometimes termed “deep time.” VK: Deep time is essentially the idea that the universe and the earth are billions of years old. The secular world must have deep time in order to maintain the illusion that the General Theory of Evolution is plausible. Evolution needs billions of years of time to change bacteria into biologists. The only supposed creative force evolution has is beneficial mutation - in other words the random interaction of unthinking matter. To make the whole evolutionary hypothesis plausible the scheme needs lots of time. Lots of time is necessary so that lots of those random, chaotic, interactive events can take place. They need untold trillions of those interactions in the hope that a few of them will produce a living being so complex that the code that describe its construction can contain 3 billion data elements. RD: The task to turn an amoeba into an anthropologist is even more formidable than just having the 3 billion base pairs that comprise human DNA properly organized and functioning. When DNA was first discovered it was thought to be similar to other chemical components of living beings. The initial idea was that somehow the chemistry controlled the biology. VK: But we now know with absolute certainty that the chemistry of DNA is not sufficient to explain its operation within the human body or any other living creature for that matter. Just as the chemistry of ink and paper does not control the message printed on the paper, the chemistry of DNA does not control the messages it provides. DNA is far more akin to a language that conveys information to other chemical structures and its complexity goes well beyond its numerical attributes. RD: Yes. And we’re going to get more into that in a future show. But for today I just want to stick with the issue of time and specifically that there is abundant scientific evidence that deep time does not exist. The best science tells us, in fact, that the Biblical time frame is far more reasonable that the secular alternatives. So, the first fact that every Christian needs to know is that science confirms that the universe and earth are thousands of years old, not millions or billions. VK: Ok. That’s a very bold proclamation given that probably 95% of the people who call themselves scientists would probably disagree with it. RD: I recognize that. And it would be a lot easier for us at Anchored by Truth to simply go along with conventional thinking. But as we started out saying Christianity is a faith of facts and the facts of science are not helpful to a billions of years old earth. VK: I think we better get into some specific examples of what you’re thinking about. RD: I agree. So, today we’re going to talk about 3 specific lines of evidence that demonstrate that the earth is far more likely thousands of years old than billions of years old. And the 3 lines we’re going to talk about are all mentioned in an article on the Creation Ministries International website entitled “age of the earth.” VK: And we are going to put a link to that article on the podcast notes that accompany the podcast version of this show. So, if your podcast app supports written notes you can just go to them and find a link. If not, the Creation Ministries International website is creation.com and you can just search for “age of the earth.” RD: Right. So, the article we’re linking to contains references to these 3 lines of evidence but the article itself actually contains 101 forms of evidence that earth is far younger than normally thought. VK: We don’t have time on one of our shows to go through 101 lines of evidence, do we? RD: Nope. So, I just wanted to pick a few of the many, many lines of evidence just to give our audience a sample of why they don’t need to accept the proclamation of the world that directly challenges a straightforward reading of the book of Genesis. VK: So, what is the first line of evidence you want to discuss? RD: The first thing that demonstrates that the conventional understanding of the age of the earth is in error is that biologists and paleontologists have recovered blood cells, blood vessels, and proteins from dinosaur remains that were supposedly millions of years old. But even the scientist, who made the discovery, Mary Schweitzer, has admitted that contemporary science has no explanation for how such tissue could have survived intact for 65 million years which was the supposed age of the bone. VK: And since that first discovery of dinosaur soft tissue in the mid-1990’s many other similar discoveries have followed. The first discovery of dinosaur soft tissue was in a T. Rex bone but since then they have found intact soft tissue in other species as well. RD: Right. The Tyrannosaurus Rex bone that contained the first soft tissue discovered was supposedly 65 million years old. But then they discovered the protein collagen in the bone of a hadrosaur which was purportedly 80 million years old. That has been followed by the discovery of the protein osteocalcin in an Iguanodon bone that is thought to be 120 million years old – twice as old as the T. Rex. VK: The dilemma for the scientists is how could such soft tissue have survived for those enormous amounts of time? In his book, The Greatest Hoax on Earth, Dr. Jonathan Sarfati says, “Yet analysis of collagen stability shows that it would last only 2.7 [million years] at freezing point under the most favorable preservation conditions. At 10 [degrees centigrade] the limit was 180,000 years and 15,000 years at 20 [degrees centigrade]; [it is normally thought] dinosaurs were supposed to live in a warm climate.” RD: So, the discovery of soft tissue in dinosaur bones, and not just in one but in many, poses a huge challenge for conventional time periods. But it poses no challenge for Biblical time frames. While Biblical scholars are not uniform on their dating schedules it’s fair to say that most scholars believe the earth is about 6,500 years old. But let’ just say that they were off 1 or 2 thousand years. That still does not pose a problem for the preservation of the soft tissue. The analyses of the preservation possibilities even under the warmer conditions allows easily for the tissue to be preserved for the Biblical time frame. And it is reasonable to say that the availability of the dinosaur soft tissue is far more consistent with the time frames laid out in the Bible than with any of the secular speculations. VK: At this point we should remind the listeners that whether the dinosaur soft tissue was thousands of years old or millions no one alive on the earth today was there to see it. So, all that any scientist, or anyone else for that matter, can do is to look at current evidence and see how that evidence fits in with a particular hypothesis or theory. And all scientists, whether they are Christians or not, look at evidence through a lens comprised of a set of starting axioms. The evidence might be consistent with the expectations that arise from those starting axioms or it might not be. What we are pointing out here is that, contrary to popular belief, the preservation of soft tissue from dinosaurs creates many additional questions for the conventional time frames but none at all for Biblical ones. So, what’s next? RD: Well, another conundrum for the conventional idea that the earth and universe are billions of years old is what is often termed “the faint young sun paradox.” VK: A “young sun paradox” – this should be interesting. RD: It is. Let’s start out by noting that one commonly accepted idea for how the sun generates energy is by nuclear fusion – the combination of hydrogen atoms into helium atoms deep within the core of the sun. According to Einstein’s famous equation, E=mc2, as the thermonuclear fusion occurs massive amounts of energy are released. But the combination of multiple hydrogen atoms into few helium atoms takes up less space. So, over billions of years the sun would shrink in size but it would increase in brightness. As the sun increased in brightness its energy output would increase meaning the energy that would hit the earth would increase. VK: So, the “faint young sun” means that if the sun-earth system were really 4.5 billion years old as conventional dating asserts the sun would have been far less bright billions of years ago. It would have been “fainter” in the earth’s sky 4 billion years ago than it is today. A fainter, weaker sun would mean a lot cooler earth. So, the question is how much cooler would the earth have been? RD: Reasonable estimates say the earth would have received anywhere from 20% – 30% less sunlight than it does today. VK: And how much cooler would the earth have been with that much less sunlight? RD: The current average temperature of the earth is about 60 degrees Fahrenheit. With 25% less sunlight the average temperature of the earth would have been below freezing – about 25 degrees Fahrenheit. In other words with a sun that is 20% to 30% less bright the entire globe would have been glaciated – essentially a solid ball of ice. That certainly would not have been a condition in which any kind of life would have developed much less spread widely and begun to create the kind of biodiversity we see on the earth today. VK: In fact, most scientists believe that the primordial world was much warmer than it is today. Whenever we see movies with dinosaur scenes in them we are always regaled with lush, tropical vegetation surrounding them. But, of course, there is a “faint young sun” paradox only if the earth is billions of years old. If the earth is only several thousands of years old the way the Bible tells us the paradox never arises. There is simply not sufficient time for the sun to have been any different than it is today. Well, I’m sure secular scientists are aware of this difficulty so how do they respond? RD: The most common response is that the level of greenhouse gases in the primordial earth’s atmosphere was much, much higher than today. This higher level of greenhouse gas provided a much thicker “blanket” than our current atmosphere does. But the problem is that the level of greenhouse gases needed to compensate for the lower luminosity is hundreds of times the present atmospheric levels of such gases. Not only is that an inconceivable proposition but according to analyses information from so-called “ancient soils” does not give any indication of dramatically greater levels of carbon dioxide which is the most abundant greenhouse gas. Recently, newer solutions have been proposed involving only slightly higher levels of greenhouse gases but with a lower level of planetary albedo. Albedo is the reflective level of the atmosphere. With lower albedo more sunlight would penetrate the atmosphere and keep things warmer. VK: Does this solve the problem? RD: Not really. The models that have been proposed use a one-dimensional form of climate modeling but all responsible climate models use a three-dimensional model. In our podcast notes we’ll link to a couple of articles on creation.com but this a comment from one of the articles entitled The Faint Young Sun Paradox and the Age of the Solar System. “…any climate model, other than a three-dimensional general circulation model with a realistic ocean, biosphere, and cryosphere (the snow/ice component), is inaccurate. For example, such a one-dimensional model ignores important feedbacks, such as the powerful ice albedo feedback. As snow and ice increase, the albedo increases to cause further cooling.” VK: Ok. Well, just to remind everyone today we’re discussing the first fact in our new series “10 facts every Christian needs to know.” And the first fact that you believe all Christians need to firmly grasp is that there is abundant scientific evidence that confirms that the universe and earth are thousands of years old, not millions or billions of year old. And the reason this fact is so important is because the General Theory of Evolution needs billions of years to perform its magic of turning colliding molecules into computer scientists. Without these billions of years – deep time as it is sometimes called – even the evolutionists admit their paradigm wouldn’t work. So, the evidence we’re providing today demonstrates that that deep time just isn’t reflected in what we see in the created order that surrounds us. So, we have time to do one more line of evidence. Where do you want to go now? RD: Let’s talk about what is termed “lunar recession.” After the first missions to the moon we were able to place mirrors on the moon that allow us to bounce laser pulses off them. We can then measure very precisely the length of time it takes the returning photons to reach the earth and thereby determine with a high degree of precision the distance between the earth and the moon. So, we’ve done that and we now know that the moon is moving away from the earth about 1.5 inches per year. VK: Now if the earth-moon system is only several thousand years old as the Bible tells us one and a half inches a year is no big deal. But, if the earth-moon system is billions of years old all that changes. And the conventional understanding is that the earth is 4.5 billion years old. Right? RD: Right. In fact, lunar recession means that in a system billions of years old the moon would have been a lot closer to the earth than it is today. The calculations about the movement of the moon place a maximum age on the earth-moon system at about 1.4 billion years old. At that point the moon would have been below the Roche limit. The Roche limit is the distance from a central body, such as a planet, inside of which orbiting debris cannot coalesce. In other words, the moon would have been torn apart if had been below the Roche limit. As a result of this various theories have been proposed to explain how the earth and moon have arrived in their current configuration in such precise balance. But none of these theories such as the “capture” theory or adjusting the earth’s tidal parameters resolve the problem. VK: We have to remember that the moon is the principle cause of tidal action on the earth and it is well understood that tidal action is important to the earth’s eco-system. If the moon had been a lot closer to the earth in the past there would have been enormous tides – tides so large they would have swept over huge portions of the land. That would have been devastating for the formation of any land dwelling creatures. But we also know that tides are important for keeping the boundary between the earth and land healthy and beneficial for life as it exists. The harmony between the earth and moon is an essential part of making life on this earth possible. RD: Again, lunar recession in an earth-moon system thousands of years old is not a problem. The relative position change of the two bodies is negligible. But try to take that back millions or billions of years and now there are lots of difficulties that arise that must be explained away. This is a problem for science because the mantra of contemporary science is uniformitarianism. The present is the key to the past. VK: But the present is not the key to the past for an earth-moon system where the current recession rate of the moon puts a limit on the age of the system that rules out evolutionary time scales. RD: Yes. So, these are just three of the lines of evidence that show that good science supports an age for the earth that is consistent with the Bible but a challenge for the most widely held conventional beliefs. Now, notice I’m being careful about how I say this. Present empirical observations cannot “prove” the age of the earth. Only an eyewitness to events could do that. All empirical observations are made by observers in the present who must integrate the information they get from current observations into what we might receive from recorded events and then interpret that information. But notice that the three lines of evidence that we have mentioned today pose no problems for a Biblical timeframe but do so for evolutionary schedules. And these are just 3 of the lines of evidence out of the 101 lines that are contained in the article we first mentioned. And that article, even with the 101 points of evidence it covers, is illustrative and not exhaustive. The big point – the fact every Christian needs to know is that there is abundant scientific evidence that the earth is only thousands of years old, not billions of years old. And this fact alone destroys any possibility of evolution as it is normally envisioned. Evolution needs deep time. But empirical observations, even when aligned with a typical uniformitarian perspective, do not provide deep time. Empirical observations just pose one problem after another and each solution that is proposed to resolve them tends to raise more problems that must be resolved. None of that is necessary for those who simply trust the Bible’s historicity. VK: Well, as you said the only way to know when the earth was created would be from an eyewitness and that’s what the Bible provides. God was there at the beginning and the Bible is His testimony to the world of what He did. It’s up to us to decide whether we will accept His testimony to us or continue to shove Him aside in favor of our manufactured idols such as evolution or deep time. There is really no need to do that scientifically despite what our culture continually insists. As we always do we want to close with prayer. Today let’s listen to a prayer of adoration for the Holy Spirit who is the One who hovered over the water and testifies to us that it was God who is the one and only Creator of everything. ---- PRAYER OF ADORATION FOR THE HOLY SPIRIT VK: Before we close we’d like to remind our audience that a lot of our radio episodes are linked together in series of topics so if they missed any episodes in this series or if they just want to hear one again, all of these episodes are available on your favorite podcast app. To find them just search on “Anchored by Truth by Crystal Sea Books.” If you’d like to hear more, try out crystalseabooks.com where “We’re not perfect but our Boss is!” (Opening Bible Quotes from the New American Bible Revised Edition) Genesis, chapter 1, verses 3 through 5, New American Bible Revised Edition Age of the earth - creation.com Young sun paradox - creation.com The young faint Sun paradox and the age of the solar system - creation.com The moon's recession and age - creation.com Paleozoic Corals and Lunar Recession - creation.com C14 dinos - creation.com

Keep your Spirit Lifted with Joy ACROSS 3 KONTINENTS podcast Copyright Charshee Links 61,262 EPISODE 23 Season3 Be aware of Neo-Nazi, Far-Right, and Military Battalion Hate-groups AZOV, C14, Svarozhich, Rusich, Ratibor, Atomwaffen, The Base, Pride and Modernity, Social National Assembly, Far Right Party, Right Wing politicians, Russian Imperial Movement, National Democratic Party (Germany), Skinhead, Svoboda Party, aforementioned Hate-groups are Murdering Innocent Indigenous Peoples as well as others in Turtle Island so-called U.S, Australia, Azania so-called-South Africa, Brazil, Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Lativa, Italy, Austria, Greece, Germany, England, Palestine, Belarus. Please Research all Hate-groups using search engine https://www.Startpagesearch.com and https://www.duckduckgo.com

Photo:   Mark IV tank C14. Commanded by 2nd Lt Francis James Arnold. Photographed with German forces after the Battle of Cambrai. CBS Eye on the World with John Batchelor CBS Audio Network @Batchelorshow 5/8: Brothers in Arms: One Legendary Tank Regiment's Bloody War from D-Day to VE-Day, by James Holland  Hardcover – November 16, 2021 https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08YS123SZ/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_tkin_p1_i0 In the annals of World War II, certain groups of soldiers stand out, and among the most notable were the Sherwood Rangers. Originally a cavalry unit in the last days of horses in combat, whose officers were landed gentry leading men who largely worked for them, they were switched to the “mechanized cavalry” of tanks in 1942. Winning acclaim in the North African campaign, the Sherwood Rangers then spearheaded one of the D-Day landings in Normandy on June 6, 1944; led the way across France; were the first British troops to cross into Germany, and contributed mightily to Germany's surrender in May 1945. Inspired by Stephen Ambrose's Band of Brothers, the acclaimed WWII historian James Holland memorably profiles an extraordinary group of citizen soldiers constantly in harm's way. Their casualties were horrific, but their ranks immediately refilled. Informed by never-before-seen documents, letters, photographs, and other artifacts from Sherwood Rangers' families—an ongoing fraternity—and by his own deep knowledge of the war, Holland offers a uniquely intimate portrait of the war at ground level, introducing heretofore unknowns such as the Commanding Officer Stanley Christopherson, the squadron commander John Semken, Sergeant George Dring, and other memorable characters who helped the regiment become the single unit with the most battle honors of any ever in the British army. He weaves the Sherwood Rangers' exploits into the larger narrative and strategy of the war, and also brings fresh analysis to the tactics used. Following the Sherwood Rangers' brutal journey over the dramatic eleven months between D-Day and V-E Day, Holland presents a vivid and original perspective on the endgame of WWII in Europe. ..  ..  ..  Permission s: Photographer  Unknown author Archive description   Description provided by the archive when the original description is incomplete or wrong. You can help by reporting errors and typos at Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error reports.I. Weltkrieg 1914 - 1918Title Bei Cambrai, erbeuteter englischer Panzer Original caption For documentary purposes the German Federal Archive often retained the original image captions, which may be erroneous, biased, obsolete or politically extreme. . English: Mark IV tank C14 (No 509 female). Commanded by 2nd Lt Francis James Arnold. Photographed with German forces after the Battle of Cambrai. Depicted placeBei CambraiDateDecember 1917Collection German Federal Archives    Current location Sammlung von Repro-Negativen (Bild 146) Accession number   Bild 146-1998-098-10 Source | This image was provided to Wikimedia Commons by the German Federal Archive(Deutsches Bundesarchiv) as part of a cooperation project. The German Federal Archive guarantees an authentic representation only using the originals (negative and/or positive), resp. the digitalization of the originals as provided by the Digital Image Archive. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license. | Attribution: Bundesarchiv, Bild 146-1998-098-10 / CC-BY-SA 3.0 You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work   to remix – to adapt the workUnder the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

"Stealing Ukraine" Hosts: Darren Weeks, Vicky Davis Website for the show: https://governamerica.com Vicky's websites: https://thetechnocratictyranny.com and http://www.channelingreality.com COMPLETE SHOW NOTES AND CREDITS AT: https://governamerica.com/radio/radio-archives/22458-govern-america-march-5-2022-stealing-ukraine Listen LIVE every Saturday at 11AM Eastern time at http://live.governamerica.com Text GOVERN to 80123 to be notified of live broadcasts that occur outside of our regularly-scheduled Saturday broadcasts. These rare broadcasts are moved if circumstances warrant. American foreign and domestic policy is a wrecking ball. Empire and the Westphalian system of nation-states. Jesse Jackson set the talking points for the takedown of America. University study indicates Pfizer COVID shot modifies DNA. Clot shot injuries continues as silent genocide sweeps the world. Bill introduced to criminalize First Amendment speech, as Big Tech companies given deadline to turn over information on users for posting "misinformation" (the truth) about COVID. Biden's State of the Union confusion. Deep dive analysis of the situation in Ukraine, leading up to the present day, and where it is likely headed next. Russia is being deplatformed and isolated in very the same way the technocrats deplatform and isolate patriots. What is the U.S. strategy? Is there a deeper purpose for the conflict?

if you have ever felt overwhelmed or lost when it comes to the science of nutrition, then this is the episode for you! britt is serving up some major brain gains, going in depth on macros, micros, vitamins & minerals— WHY nutrition matters, WHAT role nutrition plays in our health & HOW you can make educated strides with using food to fuel a healthy, happy life full of fun & gains.Timestamps1:00 weekly recap2:36 britt's YouTube BEGINNER SERIES3:10 focusing on nutrition4:40 the big picture5:22 education is key 6:30 macros vs micros7:55 why's & what's 8:22 MICROS: fruit's & vegetables 8:34 story time w/ britt10:40 vitamins & minerals11:05 vitamin A11:35 B vitamins13:20 earth's vitamins14:13 vitamin C14:45 vitamin D15:50 calcium17:05 iron17:27 potassium18:00 YOU ARE NOT ALONE18:15 britt's tips21:40 MACROS: protein, fat & carbs22:00 CARBS25:10 whole vs refined 25:22 PROTEIN27:50 sources 28:50 FAT29:20 sources30:00 saturated vs unsaturated30:30 omega 3's32:30 whole-nutrient-dense-foods33:22 balance34:20 get the most out of your workouts 34:30 *disclaimer*35:09 SHARE THIS WITH ME!YouTube vidsMy gym routine & tips for beginners:https://youtu.be/Zg4X4clW_VoMy fitness journey:https://youtu.be/ulqafyeEKqkWeek of workouts:https://youtu.be/sedCYV7XknkFollow the podcast@funandgains.podcastFollow Brittinsta // @_brittanyluptonyoutube // Brittany Luptontiktok // brittanyluptonContact Ushello@funandgainspodcast.com

* The Flesh: Just as gravity affects our physical universe, our flesh affects our spiritual lives. On this special edition of Real Science Radio, we present a previously aired episode of Theology Thursday. * Trading Genesis: Check out Bob Enyart's theistic evolution presentation in Malibu:             * From the RSR Email Inbox:Forwarded conversation Subject: Guys, this email thread btw some guy Ken and me re dino bones cracks me up... ------------------------ From: Bob Enyart  Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:56 PM To: Jane Albright, Kevin Lea In chronological order... On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:30 PM, k  wrote: Dan says you will pay me 10,000 to test some material for you.  Please let me know how to collect the 10k.  I could use the money, also please let me know how you would like to freight the material to me and where you would like me to freight it to for testing. ------------------------ On 9/30/2015 2:42 PM, Bob Enyart wrote: 10,000 what? Dan who?  Ken, maybe you've emailed the wrong person? - Bob EnyartKGOV.com  -  RealScienceRadio.com  -  rsr.org  -  DinosaurSoftTissue.com   ------------------------ On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:45 PM, k  wrote: Hi Bob,     Ah maybe, sorry if so.     A friend told me to get in contact with you about collecting ten thousand dollars to test some material.  I know now it was a joke...   LOL     Sorry again, ~ Ken ------------------------ On 9/30/2015 3:20 PM, Bob Enyart wrote: :)  - Bob EnyartKGOV.com  -  RealScienceRadio.com  -  rsr.org  -  DinosaurSoftTissue.com https://youtu.be/t8FfF2BgP9E [RSR Trading Genesis video]https://youtu.be/ML-p2CV8SHU [RSR Dino Soft Tissue video trailer] ------------------------ On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:13 PM, k  wrote: Very sorry, but my friend Dan is pretty worked up, I think the joke will not die...   So I will send you what he says and I promise not to take any more of your important time. " You should reply to him and tell him that you would like to date a dinosaur bone for C-14 and that you have heard he offers 10,000 dollars (link him to the video) for someone to do it. Then he will probably clarify.. " Again, please forgive me for this, ~ Ken   ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bob Enyart  Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:46 PM Subject: Re: 10 dogs To: k Yes, of course, a thousand pardons Ken for not understanding you right off.  Your friend Dan is right to be worked up. There's real money to be made here. This brief YouTube video documents our verbal offer to paleontologist Jack (smell-these-dino-bones) Horner, and then a scan of our written grant offer follows, as does an excerpt from our rsr.org/soft-tissue page... youtu.be/PXy7EH13lCo [Bob's call to Jack Horner]And Ken, then there's this, from atop our rsr.org/dino-soft-tissue page...    * Summer 2015 UPDATE: Two Dinosaur Soft Tissue Predictions Confirmed! Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams had predicted on air and in writing atrsr.org/predictions that: - Dinosaur soft tissue will be found not only in rare circumstances, but rather easily, i.e., when looked for. CONFIRMED in JUNE 2015! The journal Nature Communications reported original tissue in six of eight dinosaur bones investigated, leading to the conclusion that "preservation is more common than previously thought." And: - Original dinosaur and other soft tissue will be found largely independent of the claimed age of the fossil. CONFIRMED in April 2014! The Journal of Paleontology reported original soft tissue in Precambrian "beard worms" that are allegedly 530 million years old! Here, RSR presents the scientific journals reporting, the kinds of biological material found so far, and the dinosaurs yielding up these exciting discoveries: Scientific Journals: Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, Proceedings of the Royal Society, Bone, Acta Histochemica, the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, and others below in our chronological catalog, "the web's most complete list of dinosaur soft tissue discoveries," as published in many leading journals, according to a co-author of one of those papers. Biological Material Found: As of April 2015, in fossils from dinosaur-layer and deeper strata, researchers have discovered flexible and transparent blood vessels, red blood cells, many various proteins including the microtubule building block tubulin, collagen, the cytoskeleton component actin, and hemoglobin, bone maintenance osteocyte cells, pigment and evidence of melanosomes, DNA-related histone proteins, and powerful evidence for DNA including positive results from multiple double-helix tests.  Dinosaur and Dinosaur-Layer Creatures: The dinosaurs and other Mesozoic creatures that have yielded their biological material are hadrosaur, titanosaur, ornithomimosaur [ostrich-like dinosaurs], mosasaur, [bird-like] Anchiornis huxleyi, triceratops, Lufengosaurs, T. rex, and Archaeopteryx. As you view the exciting scientific discoveries below in this chronological catalog, please feel free to listen to Real Science Radio co-hosts Fred Williams and Bob Enyart observe their annual tradition of presenting dinosaur soft tissue and other amazing discoveries including short-lived left-handed amino acids, DNA, and Carbon 14, all in bones and other specimens from dinosaur-layer Mesozoic and even deeper strata.           And finally, as you probably know Ken (although Dan might be a bit slow on the uptake), and as first realized by Libby when he discovered carbon dating, if we can identify carbon 14 atoms that are actually a part of the collagen protein lattice, then they cannot be contamination, but have to be original 14c, which, when we document that in dinosaur protein, then everyone who is anti-science will tightly close their eyes, but everyone else will then have even more incontrovertible evidence that dinosaurs are young, all of them. And, when they lose the dinosaurs, they lose it all. Because dinosaurs have become missionary lizards. For dinosaur soft tissue means that the secular worldview is wrong, which leaves only one man standing, and that is Jesus Christ, who is God. Thanks for writing! - Bob Enyart co-hostRealScienceRadio.com    1-800-8Enyart    rsr.org ---------- From: k  Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:33 PM Subject: Re: 10 dogs To: Bob Enyart Hi Bob,     Thanks very much for the reply!   :-)     Talk to you soon, ~ Ken  

In this bonus episode welcome very special guests from across the pond - Damian and Jesse. In this collaboration special we discuss our podcast origin stories, a near death experience, C14 and the pop sound of Jesse's 18th beer. Make sure you've got a bit of time as this bonus episode with our great friends at The Damian and Jesse Show is a little over two hours long!! Check out The Damian and Jesse Show - great podcast and well worth a listen! If you want to get away from the strains of everyday life, this weekly show will try to put a smile on your face or make you laugh with us (or at us!). Just Forget About It! We're available here: Twitter Instagram TikTok LinkTree YouTube Intro music (Secret Agent Rock) courtesy of John_Bartmann Outro music (Robocall) courtesy of Legally Blind Logo Designed by Just Forget About IT Images courtesy of The Damian and Jesse Show and Dave. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/jfaipodcast/message