Podcasts about APA

Dr. Elyssa Helfer, CST, LMFT, explores the ethical and cultural dimensions of kink-affirming therapy, helping clinicians distinguish between abuse and healthy erotic expression to enhance ethical competence and cultural humility. Interview with Elizabeth Irias, LMFT. Earn CE credit for listening to this episode by joining our low-cost membership for unlimited podcast CE credits for an entire year, with some of the strongest CE approvals in the country (APA, NBCC, ASWB, and more). Learn, grow, and shine with Clearly Clinical Continuing Ed by visiting https://ClearlyClinical.com.

Why do some clients suddenly disappear—even when they're paying for coaching? The answer lies deeper than you think. Michelle MacDonald sits down with Dr. Kasey Jo Orvidas, Ph.D. in Psychology and expert in behavior change, to uncover the real reasons why clients ghost their coaches. From mindset shifts and discomfort avoidance to better expectation-setting and behavior-based communication tools, this conversation dives into the psychology of coaching that actually creates long-term change. Whether you're a health coach, fitness trainer, or someone invested in Women's Health and Fitness, this episode reveals essential strategies to foster accountability, build trust, and support sustainable personal growth. Get ready for real talk, practical tools, and inspiration to level up your coaching impact.Favorite Moments:5:27 "You're Paying Me Big Bucks—Get Your Piece of the Pie!"10:39 The 10-Minute Call That Can Reignite Client Engagement19:38 Why Knowledge Alone Doesn't Change Behavior46:12 You're Not Broken: Mindset Reframes for Women in Midlife“You're not broken—you're just you now.”GUEST: KASEY JO ORVIDAS Website | Email | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTube | FacebookFull Guest Bio: Kasey holds a Ph.D. in Psychology and is a certified health and fitness coach. She has spent a good chunk of her life developing some serious expertise in mindset and health behavior change. She has racked up numerous publications in a variety of peer-reviewed scientific journals (aka you can Google scholar her name and even cite her research in APA format for your high school paper–wow!). Although Kasey is no longer tethered to the chains of an academic career (if you know, you know), she still can't quite break free from the lure of p-values and scientific jargon. Knowing that most (normal) people aren't obsessed enough to get a Ph.D. in this stuff, Kasey created The Health Mindset Coaching Certification.CONNECT WITH MICHELLEWebsite | Instagram | YouTube | Facebook | XFull Michelle Bio: Michelle MacDonald is the creator of the FITNESS MODEL BLUEPRINT™ and host of the Stronger By Design™ podcast. Known globally for her transformation programs, Michelle empowers women to redefine aging through evidence-based strength training, nutrition, and mindset practices. Since 2012, she has coached thousands of women online, leveraging her expertise as a Physique Champion and ISSA Strength and Conditioning Specialist. She co-founded Tulum Strength Club and established The Wonder Women (TWW), inspiring countless transformations including her mother, Joan MacDonald (Train With Joan™). Michelle continues to lead the charge in women's fitness, launching the Stronger by Design™ fitness app in fall 2024.Where to Watch/Listen:WebsiteApple PodcastsSpotifyYouTube

The podcast show we are releasing today is a repurposing of part 2 of a webinar we produced on August 13, 2025, which explored the U.S. Supreme Court's pivotal 6-3 decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., a ruling that significantly curtails the use of nationwide or “universal” injunctions. A universal injunction is one which confers benefits on non-parties to the lawsuit. This case marks a turning point in federal court jurisprudence, with profound implications for equitable relief, national policy, and governance. Our distinguished panel of legal scholars, Suzette Malveaux (Roger D. Groot Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University School of Law), Portia Pedro (Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law), and Alan Trammell (Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University School of Law) are joined by experienced litigators Alan Kaplinsky, Carter G. Phillips (Former Assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States & Partner, Sidley Austin LLP), and Burt M. Rublin (Senior Counsel and Appellate Group Practice Leader, Ballard Spahr LLP). These panelists dive deep into the Court's decision, unpacking its historical foundation, analyzing the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions, and evaluating its far-reaching effects on all stakeholders, including industry groups, trade associations, federal agencies, the judiciary, the executive branch, and everyday citizens. This podcast show and the one we released last Thursday, September 25, cover these critical topics: ·        The originalist and historical reasoning behind the Court's rejection of universal injunctions ·        A detailed analysis of the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions ·        The ruling's impact on legal challenges to federal statutes, regulations, and executive orders ·        The potential role of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(2) class actions as alternatives to universal injunctions, including the status of the CASA case and other cases where plaintiffs have pursued class actions ·        The use of Section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act (the “APA”) to “set aside” or “vacate” unlawful regulations and Section 705 of the APA to seek stays of regulation effective dates ·        The viability of associational standing for trade groups challenging regulations on behalf of their members ·        The ruling's influence on forum selection and judicial assignment strategies, including “judge-shopping” ·        The Supreme Court's increasing use of its emergency or “shadow” docket, rather than its conventional certiorari docket, to render extraordinarily important opinions  This is a unique opportunity to hear from leading experts as they break down one of the most consequential and controversial Supreme Court decisions of this Supreme Court Term. These podcast shows will provide you with valuable insights into how this ruling reshapes the legal landscape. Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.

Recently I had to learn APA citation. Oof. It was a heavy lift, after a few decades with MLA. It gave me a refreshed sense of how overwhelming students likely find MLA. I found myself thinking, why can't I just link my sources in parentheses? Why can't I just reference the authors who informed my thinking inside my sentences? Why on earth does it matter if I use a comma or a semicolon, put the page first or put the page second? Why does APA even exist? Yeah, all the things our students probably think when we roll out our 26 page MLA redux, which doesn't even cover it all. And that's only the beginning of student frustration when it comes time for a research paper. Now, I struggle a little bit in recommending these alternatives to the research paper today, partly because my husband regularly references the research paper he wrote in high school as a landmark in his academic life. He loved it. He was so proud of his work. It set him on a path that eventually led all the way to a PHD program at UPenn. The other night, though, when we were debating the relative merits of 5 paragraph essays and research papers, he did mention that the rest of the class did not exactly excel on that research paper assignment, if the comments his teacher made as she passed back the papers were any sign. John Warner, in his book, Why They Can't Write, posits a possible reason for that lack of excelling. “The writing-related tasks we frequently visit upon students would prove difficult for even highly experienced writers. Writing on subjects with which we're newly familiar, in forms that are foreign, and addressed to audiences that are either undefined or unknown (other than 'for the teacher') bears little resemblance to the way we write for the world” (27). In other words, we often ask students to try and make themselves an expert on something they're not that interested in for a research paper, use a citation format that is next thing to a foreign language for them, tie themselves in knots trying to figure out how to convey what they've learned in an orderly way that generally leaves little room for their own voice or opinions, and do it all just to show their teacher, for a grade. Of course, that is how it has seemingly always been done. And after all, we survived. I remember learning MLA format in 7th grade, and creating my first research notecards. I dutifully scrawled quotation after quotation on those notecards, putting all the source information on the back. I can't remember what I wrote about though, for that 7th grade research paper. Literally nothing comes to mind. The first research assignment that I do remember came in 11th grade, when I participated in Minnesota's National History Day, making it to the State Finals with my project "The Column: Supporting Architecture through the Ages." I remember my architectural timeline, supported on a bridge of heavy white dominos across the front of my display board. I remember learning about Ionic, Corinthian, and Doric columns, and I've seen them all over the world in my travels since. I remember my virtual explorations of Athens, as I searched through various texts trying to figure out how the column worked, why it was so special, and what it looked like in buildings all over ancient Greece. I remember presenting my project in Duluth, sensing that I barely made it through with so many other great projects on hand, learning from the quality around me, and improving it before heading for Minneapolis. I remember going to Valley Fair, the amusement park I had had my eye on for years, after the state competition, with my Dad. It. Was. Awesome. My National History Day Project let me choose any topic of interest to me that fit whatever the general theme was that year. It let me use my love of design, color, lettering, and layout in addition to my research skills. It gave me an authentic audience to consider. I think I still had to use MLA citation format, but I was so busy with everything else that I wasn't about to let cracking that code stop me. I had a competition to win. (Not that I did, but I sure had fun trying). When I look back on my academic and professional life so far, research in service of real purpose, in an arena that truly interested me, with the ability to include modes that I enjoy working in, for an audience I truly hoped to impact, made all the difference in igniting my best work. So what if we warm our students up to research with activities, projects, and shorter writing pieces that focus more on elements like these, and less on notecards? What if, instead of jumping into huge MLA research papers with only one person - us - as the intended audience, we cast a wider net around the area of research and explore ways to give students more agency over topic, mode, and audience? This introduction is getting out of hand. Thirteen paragraphs in and we haven't played the music yet. It's lucky I'm not writing a five paragraph essay. So without further ado, let's talk about five alternatives to the research paper that help students practice key skills they can draw on later, if and when they choose a path that requires them to write lengthy academic research papers with full citations in APA or MLA. Sign up for the Full (Free) AI PBL Research Unit: https://sparkcreativity.kartra.com/page/aipbl  For a deep dive on the research carousel, check out episode 163, a case study with educator Jane Wisdom: https://nowsparkcreativity.com/2022/10/case-study-a-meaningful-21st-century-research-project.html  Sources Cited Warner, John. Why They Can't Write: Killing the 5 Paragraph Essay and other Necessities. John Hopkins University Press: 2020. Go Further:  Explore alllll the Episodes of The Spark Creativity Teacher Podcast. Get my popular free hexagonal thinking digital toolkit Join our community, Creative High School English, on Facebook. Come hang out on Instagram. Enjoying the podcast? Please consider sharing it with a friend, snagging a screenshot to share on the ‘gram, or tapping those ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ to help others discover the show. Thank you! 

Dr. Matt Zakreski, PsyD, reframes “deficits” as different operating systems, highlighting neurodiversity across giftedness, autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and OCD (the "big five"), and explores how clinicians can adapt care with supports that build on clients' strengths and maximize skills. Interview with Elizabeth Irias, LMFT. Earn CE credit for listening to this episode by joining our low-cost membership for unlimited podcast CE credits for an entire year, with some of the strongest CE approvals in the country (APA, NBCC, ASWB, and more). Learn, grow, and shine with Clearly Clinical Continuing Ed by visiting https://ClearlyClinical.com.

Untuk kedua kalinya, Mahkamah Konstitusi menolak gugatan soal syarat pendidikan capres-cawapres minimal S-1. Putusan ini menegaskan bahwa aturan tersebut masuk dalam ranah kebijakan pembentuk undang-undang dan tidak bertentangan dengan konstitusi. Apa dasar pertimbangan hakim MK hingga gugatan kembali ditolak?Simak penjelasan Praktisi Hukum sekaligus Mantan Hakim Konstitusi periode 2003–2006, Maruarar Siahaan, yang mengulas dampak putusan, posisi hak warga negara, hingga bagaimana DPR dan pemerintah seharusnya merespons tuntutan rakyat terkait syarat pendidikan capres-cawapres.

On August 28, 2025, a leopard was reported to have entered the Kutamandarakan Village Hall in Maleber District, Kuningan Regency. How did the leopard get into the village? What really happened? - Pada tanggal 28 Agustus 2025 dilaporkan adanya macan tutul yang masuk ke Balai Desa Kutamandarakan, Kecamatan Maleber, Kabupaten Kuningan. Bagaimana macan tutul itu bisa sampai masuk ke desa? Apa yang sebenarnya terjadi?

Popular culture has two competing narratives about manhood. Charlie Kirk rejected both of them and set an example that young men should follow. The dominant view is that masculinity is toxic. In 2018, the American Psychological Association issued guidelines declaring that “traditional masculinity ideology” limits “males' psychological development.” It also has negative influences on mental and physical health, APA claimed. Masculinity ideology includes “anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence,” according to the guidelines. The first APA guideline states, “Psychologists strive to recognize that masculinities are constructed based on social, cultural, and contextual norms.”...Article Link

In this episode, The Thoughtful Counselor welcomes Dr. Jeanne Stanley to discuss the admissions process for graduate programs in counseling. Jeanne and contributing host Dr. Theo Burnes discuss tips and strategies for master's-level counselors considering doctoral programs and undergraduate students contemplating graduate programs. Topics addressed include tips and strategies for students and mentors, advice for early career faculty who are engaging in the admissions process for the first time, the role of AI in the admissions process, and how to know when a graduate program is right for you.   For more on our guests, links from the conversation, and APA citation for this episode visit https://concept.paloaltou.edu/resources/the-thoughtful-counselor-podcast  The Thoughtful Counselor is created in partnership with Palo Alto University's Division of Continuing & Professional Studies. Learn more at concept.paloaltou.edu

This week on Tales from the Attitude Era, Rob and former WWF writer Tommy break down the go-home episode of RAW is WAR from April 24, 2000, just six days before the epic Backlash pay-per-view!The show is packed with final confrontations, including a verbal showdown where Chris Jericho delivers his infamous "lost her flower" line about Stephanie McMahon. This sets up a massive main event tag team match: The Rock & Chris Jericho vs. Triple H & Chris Benoit, which ends in absolute chaos.We also dive into:- Vince McMahon's return to TV to stir the pot between The Rock and his Backlash corner-man, Stone Cold Steve Austin.- Trish Stratus's series of sultry, table-themed vignettes designed to manipulate Bubba Ray Dudley.- Matt Hardy winning the Hardcore Championship in his home state of North Carolina.- The backstage story of the WWF being sued by the USA Network over television rights.- Kurt Angle's hilarious attempt to hire the APA to take out The Big Show.Join us for a review of a wild and pivotal Raw that set the final stage for one of the Attitude Era's most beloved pay-per-views.Follow Tales from The Attitude Era on all social mediahttp://youtube.com/@TFTAttitudeEra http://twitter.com/TFTAttitudeErahttp://instagram.com/TFTAttitudeErahttp://tiktok.com/@TFTAttitudeEraTommy Blacha made his name in Hollywood as a writer on Conan O'Brien, co-creator of Metalocalypse on Adult Swim, and a writer on shows like The Eric Andre Show and Da Ali G Show. But, a little-known fact about Tommy's career is that he was the head writer of WWE (WWF at the time)) during their most successful period, starting in 1999, taking over for Vince Russo, who left for the competition. This podcast, Tales from the Attitude Era will be a retrospective of Tommy's time in the head writer position and the roller coaster ride that is pro wrestling, co-hosted by Rob Pasbani. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

APA Communications Committee Deputy Chair FO Melissa Monahan talks with CA Cody Lasker and FO Mike Roman about how the National Communications Network (NCN) facilitates face-to-face conversations throughout the system so union leadership can hear directly from line pilots and vice versa. They also discuss how pilots can become NCN volunteers, which CA Lasker describes as a "a very low-threat, high-reward commitment." APA's goal is for 10 percent of the membership to serve as NCN volunteers as part of preparations for upcoming contract negotiations.

Pada 2028, Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) bakal menjadi ibu kota politik Indonesia. Ketetapan ini termuat dalam Perpres Nomor 79 Tahun 2025 yang diteken Presiden Prabowo pada 30 Juni 2025.Dalam lampiran Perpres disebutkan, ada sejumlah prasyarat yang harus dipenuhi, di antaranya, Kawasan Inti Pusat Pemerintahan (KIPP) IKN sudah terbangun 800-850 hektare, pembangunan gedung atau perkantoran harus mencapai 20 persen, persentase pembangunan hunian atau rumah tangga yang layak, terjangkau, serta berkelanjutan di IKN juga harus mencapai 50 persen.Di sisi lain, status baru IKN ini dinilai masih kabur dan berpotensi bermasalah. Pasalnya, tidak ada istilah ibu kota politik dalam Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara Nomor 21 Tahun 2023 (UU IKN).Bagaimana duduk perkara IKN sebagai ibu kota politik? Apakah ini keputusan tepat? Apa saja konsekuensinya? Siapa saja yang bakal terdampak terkait perubahan ini? Bagaimana wajah IKN ke depan?Di Ruang Publik KBR kita akan bahas topik ini bersama Peneliti Ahli Utama Pusat Riset Politik, Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Humaniora Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN) Syafuan Rozi dan Direktur Eksekutif Forum Masyarakat Peduli Parlemen Indonesia (Formappi) Lucius Karus.

Seringkah anak harus diingatkan terus-menerus untuk mengerjakan PR, tugas rumah, atau belajar? Jika iya, bisa jadi mereka terbiasa bergantung pada “alarm” orang tua. ⏰ Tapi, anak yang rajin akan mulai berpikir sendiri: "Apa lagi yang harus saya selesaikan hari ini?"

Today, in 2025, there are numerous mental health professionals on television and streaming podcasts who talk openly about the state of President Trump's mental health. They don't pull any punches, given the ample evidence from his public appearances and his frequent online diatribes. They say he has a personality disorder, that he's an antisocial malignant narcissist who's in serious cognitive and physical decline. The irony is that, back when I recorded this interview with forensic psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee, she and the other 27 contributors to their 2017 book The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump knew that they would be accused of violating the American Psychiatric Association's "Goldwater Rule." This principle states that psychiatrists are prohibited from offering opinions on the mental state of individuals that they have not personally evaluated.  This rule was created after, in 1964, Fact magazine published a survey asking psychiatrist to state whether they thought presidential candidate Barry Goldwater was psychologically fit to be President. The survey's results led to widespread ethical concerns and public outcry, prompting the APA to develop a formal set of ethics rules for its members. However, in her book and in the part of our conversation that was unfortunately edited out, Dr. Lee asserted that if a mental health professional saw someone publicly and repeatedly displaying behavior that gave her or him cause for concern, they have every right to sound the alarm, even ask the authorities to put the person in a 72-hr involuntary hold for evaluation. But Yale Medical School and the courts did not agree with her, and she was shown the door.  That was just 3 years ago. And yet, as I stated up front, mental health professionals are publicly calling out Trump's mental health problems and not suffering any consequences. As you listen to Dr. Lee, I think you'll agree that she and the other writers correctly described and predicted the how problematic it would be if Trump were put in power.

Apa pendapat anda tentang episode ini? https://open.firstory.me/user/cllnqvpto01n101w7acsdamo6/comments Powered by Firstory Hosting

Putri Suppavasa dari Kundakoliya hamil selama 7 tahun dan kemudian selama 7 hari dia mengalami nyeri persalinan. Dia terus merenungkan kualitas unik dari Buddha, Dhamma dan Sangha, kemudian menyuruh suaminya untuk menemui Buddha, memberikan penghormatan atas namanya, dan memberitahukan mengenai kondisinya. Ketika mengetahui keadaan Putri Suppavasa, Buddha berkata, “Semoga Suppavasa terbebas dari bahaya dan penderitaan; semoga dia melahirkan seorang putra yang mulia dengan selamat.” Bersamaan dengan itu, putri Suppavasa melahirkan. Sebagai perayaan atas kelahiran bayi tersebut, Buddha beserta beberapa bhikkhu diundang utk menerima persembahan makanan selama 7 hari, dan bayi yang baru lahir tersebut mempersembahkan air yang sudah disaring kepada Buddha dan para bhikkhu.Setelah dewasa, bayi tersebut menjadi bhikkhu dan dikenal dengan nama Sivali. Setelah rambutnya dicukur, Bhante Sivali mencapai ke-arahanta-an dan selanjutnya beliau dikenal sebagai bhikkhu yang paling banyak menerima persembahan. Pada suatu hari, para bhikkhu bertanya kepada Buddha, mengapa Bhante Sivali yang memiliki kualifikasi untuk menjadi seorang Arahat bisa terkurung di dalam rahim ibunya selama 7 tahun. Bagaimana jawaban Buddha? Apa yang diperbuat Bhante Sivali di masa lalu yang menyebabkan penderitaan tersebut?Di kelas ini Ashin Kheminda menjelaskan makna kata demi kata stanza 408-414 dari Kelompok Stanza tentang Brahmana (Brahmanavagga) hanya berdasarkan Pāḷi dan kitab komentarnya (Aṭṭhakathā).

Hai Wonder Kids, kembali dalam renungan anak GKY Mangga besar. Judul renungan hari ini adalahDIKENDALIKAN OLEH TUHAN YESUSMari kita membaca Firman Tuhan dariAMSAL 4: 23Jagalah hatimu dengan segala kewaspadaan, karena dari situlah terpancar kehidupan.Wonder Kids, Tahukah kamu bahwa hati dan pikiranmu seperti pusat kendali bagi seluruh hidupmu?Apa yang kamu pikirkan,Apa yang kamu rasakan,Dan bagaimana kamu bertindak—semua dimulai dari dalam hati.Allah rindu agar kamu memiliki pikiran seperti Tuhan Yesus. Firman Tuhan berkata:“Hendaklah kamu dalam hidupmu bersama, menaruh pikiran dan perasaan yang terdapat juga dalam Kristus Yesus.” — Filipi 2:5Apa artinya?• Ketika orang lain berkata hal buruk tentangmu, Tuhan Yesus ingin kamu tetap mengingat bahwa kamu berharga dan dikasihi-Nya.• Ketika muncul pikiran untuk menyontek, Tuhan Yesus ingin kamu jujur dan percaya bahwa kejujuran lebih penting daripada nilai.• Ketika kamu tergoda untuk marah, Tuhan Yesus bisa membantumu untuk tenang dan mengampuni.Tapi ingat: ini hanya bisa terjadi jika kamu mengizinkan Tuhan Yesus mengendalikan hatimu.Wonder Kids, kamu pasti tahu banyak pemimpin: Presiden, Kepala sekolah, Guru, Orang tua.Tapi… Siapakah Pemimpin di hatimu? Jika kamu berkata: “Tuhan Yesus!”, maka biarkan Dia memimpin caramu berpikir dan bertindak setiap hari.MARI KITA BERTUMBUH DI DALAM ANUGERAH TUHANHati yang dijaga oleh Tuhan Yesus akan menjadi sumber kehidupan yang baik—penuh kasih, pengampunan, dan kebenaran.Mari kita berdoaBapa, ajarI aku untuk menjaga hatiku dengan baik, karena dari sanalah terpancar kehidupan yang sejati. Dalam nama Tuhan Yesus aku berdoa, Amin.Wonder Kids, JAGALAH HATI KITA DENGAN HATI-HATI KARENA SEMUA YANG KITA LAKUKAN BERASAL DARI HATI. Tuhan Yesus memberkati

Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) yang digagas pemerintah kini tengah menjadi sorotan publik. Alih-alih menuai pujian, pelaksanaannya justru diwarnai berbagai persoalan. Mulai dari kasus dugaan keracunan massal di sejumlah daerah, hingga menu makanan yang ternyata berisi bahan ultra proses yang dinilai kurang sehat bagi anak-anak.Situasi ini memunculkan desakan dari berbagai kalangan agar program MBG dihentikan sementara untuk dilakukan evaluasi menyeluruh. Padahal, sejak awal MBG digadang-gadang sebagai program strategis untuk mendukung visi Indonesia Emas 2045, dengan meningkatkan kualitas gizi generasi muda.Namun, sederet permasalahan yang mencuat membuat publik bertanya-tanya: apakah program ini memang layak dilanjutkan dalam kondisi sekarang? Apa urgensi mempertahankan MBG di tengah pelaksanaan yang masih penuh masalah?Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, kami akan berbincang dengan Pakar Kebijakan Publik, Agus Pambagio, yang akan memberikan analisis terkait manfaat, risiko, serta langkah perbaikan yang perlu ditempuh agar program ini tidak sekadar menjadi proyek seremonial, melainkan benar-benar menghadirkan dampak positif bagi masa depan bangsa.

Program Makan Bergizi (MBG) dirancang untuk meningkatkan kualitas gizi anak sekolah, namun kasus keracunan yang terjadi belakangan ini justru menimbulkan banyak pertanyaan. Apa yang sebenarnya terjadi? Bagaimana memastikan makanan anak-anak aman sekaligus bergizi? Dalam episode ini, kita akan membahas pentingnya standar keamanan pangan, peran pengawasan, serta solusi jangka panjang agar program gizi benar-benar menjadi investasi kesehatan bagi generasi muda.Talk: Anggota Komisi IV DPR RI Firman Soebagyo

BUMN turun level, dari kementerian jadi lembaga.

Keracunan menu Makan Bergizi Gratis semakin menjadi sorotan masyarakat di sejumlah daerah. Apa saja gejala umum keracunan makanan yang perlu diwaspadai setelah mengonsumsi makanan bergizi gratis? talk bersama Direktur Pascasarjana Universitas YARSI / Adjunct Professor Griffith University, Prof Tjandra Yoga Aditama.

The best way is to, as Prabhupada said, train your eyes to spot offenses and take the ten offenses as very important. Don't take it as rote, that it's something we recite early in the morning before we start chanting. Instead, look into it and see how you can integrate those prohibitions into your lifestyle. And that's the only blockade between us and śuddha-nāma. As Bhaktivinoda points out in the Harir Nāma Cintāmaṇi, there are clouds and mist that block us from getting the full effect of the holy name. Those come in the form of aparādhas. Apa- rādha means we're not worshiping properly; we're making some offense. So, there are offenses to the holy name, offenses to devotees, and offenses in worshiping Krishna. If we study these very carefully and practice avoiding them as much as possible, then we move very quickly into the nāmābhāsa stage. In fact, just the endeavor to remove offenses means that we are in nāmābhāsa. When we're not, when we don't care for the offenses—in other words, we're not thinking about it, we're just chanting and we don't attend to the offenses, meaning we don't try to remove them, we are not vigilant—then we are a nāmāparādha. So, cultivate those and try to vigilantly avoid them. Then the holy name starts shining through much more quickly, and we can rise to the point of śuddha-nāma by that process: chanting and avoiding offenses. This is confirmed by Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, who says it's not just chanting Hare Krishna through which we attain perfection, but it's chanting Hare Krishna and avoiding the offenses at the same time. Of course, if one is offensive and you don't know how to avoid offenses, then the Padma Purāṇa says: nāmāparādha-yuktānāṁ nāmāny eva haranty agham aviśrānti-prayuktāni tāny evārtha-karāṇi ca Then, just chant non-stop. Don't stop chanting so that your mouth says some offensive thing. Just keep chanting and don't stop, and then you'll develop the intelligence to avoid offenses. ------------------------------------------------------------ To connect with His Grace Vaiśeṣika Dāsa, please visit https://www.fanthespark.com/next-steps/ask-vaisesika-dasa/ ------------------------------------------------------------ Add to your wisdom literature collection: https://iskconsv.com/book-store/ https://www.bbtacademic.com/books/ https://thefourquestionsbook.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------ Join us live on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FanTheSpark/ Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/sound-bhakti/id1132423868 For the latest videos, subscribe https://www.youtube.com/@FanTheSpark For the latest in SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/fan-the-spark ------------------------------------------------------------ #makejapagreatagain #mantrameditation #chantharekrishnaandbehappy #spiritualawakening #soul #spiritualexperience #spiritualpurposeoflife #spiritualgrowthlessons #secretsofspirituality #vaisesikaprabhu #vaisesikadasa #vaisesikaprabhulectures #spirituality #bhaktiyoga #krishna #spiritualpurposeoflife #krishnaspirituality #spiritualusachannel #whybhaktiisimportant #whyspiritualityisimportant #vaisesika #spiritualconnection #thepowerofspiritualstudy #selfrealization #spirituallectures #spiritualstudy #spiritualquestions #spiritualquestionsanswered #trendingspiritualtopics #fanthespark #spiritualpowerofmeditation #spiritualteachersonyoutube #spiritualhabits #spiritualclarity #bhagavadgita #srimadbhagavatam #spiritualbeings #kttvg #keepthetranscendentalvibrationgoing #spiritualpurpose

The podcast show we are releasing today is a repurposing of part 1 of a webinar we produced on August 13, 2025, which explored the U.S. Supreme Court's pivotal 6-3 decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., a ruling that significantly curtails the use of nationwide or “universal” injunctions. A universal injunction is one which confers benefits on non-parties to the lawsuit. This case marks a turning point in federal court jurisprudence, with profound implications for equitable relief, national policy, and governance. Our distinguished panel of legal scholars, Suzette Malveaux (Roger D. Groot Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University School of Law), Portia Pedro (Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law), and Alan Trammell (Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University School of Law) are joined by experienced litigators Alan Kaplinsky, Carter G. Phillips (Former Assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States & Partner, Sidley Austin LLP), and Burt M. Rublin (Senior Counsel and Appellate Group Practice Leader, Ballard Spahr LLP). These panelists dive deep into the Court's decision, unpacking its historical foundation, analyzing the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions, and evaluating its far-reaching effects on all stakeholders, including industry groups, trade associations, federal agencies, the judiciary, the executive branch, and everyday citizens. This podcast show and the one we release one week from today cover these critical topics: ·         The originalist and historical reasoning behind the Court's rejection of universal injunctions ·         A detailed analysis of the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions ·         The ruling's impact on legal challenges to federal statutes, regulations, and executive orders ·         The potential role of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(2) class actions as alternatives to universal injunctions, including the status of the CASA case and other cases where plaintiffs have pursued class actions ·         The use of Section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act (the “APA”) to “set aside” or “vacate” unlawful regulations and Section 705 of the APA to seek stays of regulation effective dates ·         The viability of associational standing for trade groups challenging regulations on behalf of their members ·         The ruling's influence on forum selection and judicial assignment strategies, including “judge-shopping” ·         The Supreme Court's increasing use of its emergency or “shadow” docket, rather than its conventional certiorari docket, to render extraordinarily important opinions  This is a unique opportunity to hear from leading experts as they break down one of the most consequential and controversial Supreme Court decisions of this Supreme Court Term. These podcast shows will provide you with valuable insights into how this ruling reshapes the legal landscape. Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.

Filmmaker's Toolkit Podcast with Chris O'Falt (IndieWire) Welcome to the Filmmaker's Toolkit Podcast, hosted by IndieWire's Chris O'Falt. This week we dive into one of the most urgent conversations in nonfiction filmmaking: the role of artificial intelligence. Like many in the film community, Chris is deeply wary of what AI means for the art form we love—but ignoring it isn't the answer. In this episode, Chris speaks with Stephanie Jenkins, longtime producer with Ken Burns and cofounder of the Archival Producers Alliance (APA). Jenkins has been at the forefront of setting industry guardrails for AI in documentary filmmaking, spearheading the APA's Best Practices for the Use of Generative AI in Documentaries and helping launch the AI Toolkit for Nonfiction Filmmakers. Together, they explore the promises, pitfalls, and pressing ethical questions surrounding AI in documentaries—drawing from surveys, real-world examples, and the lived experience of filmmakers working with archival materials. If storytellers and film lovers don't engage in this conversation, Silicon Valley will shape the future of nonfiction for us. Tune in to hear an eye-opening discussion and join the dialogue on how documentary filmmakers can protect creativity, history, and truth in the age of AI. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lara Okoloko, LICSW, traces codependency's roots in addiction culture, exposing the cultural and clinical gaps created when vague definitions pathologize normal caregiving. She then introduces evidence-based strategies that promote autonomy and reduce harm. Interview with Elizabeth Irias, LMFT. Earn CE credit for listening to this episode by joining our low-cost membership for unlimited podcast CE credits for an entire year, with some of the strongest CE approvals in the country (APA, NBCC, ASWB, and more). Learn, grow, and shine with Clearly Clinical Continuing Ed by visiting https://ClearlyClinical.com.

Check out the collection of fidgets Team Shiny loves! Is the 'overdiagnosing' of ADHD, autism, and other neurodevelopmental conditions a 'danger,' and to whom? Isabelle and David continue taking some common myths and misperceptions, questioning who and how we gatekeep 'neurodiversity' (including the idea that maybe there really is no 'neurotypical')--and how one group's fears that these labels harm us cannot negate the fear neurospicy folks have that they will be in trouble, or judged, or stigmatized for being who they are and unmasking. Also using the power of compassion and inviting more conversations, while not jumping to cancelling anyone--because everyone gets to fart in an elevator once or twice. -----Isabelle is coming in hot. She continues to explore her reaction to a podcast episode she listened to recently, Armchair Expert with guest Suzanne O'Sullivan on overdiagnosis, which went from covering seizure disorders to ADHD and autism, especially high-masking autism, real quick.  She is so frustrated that a non-expert on ADHD—someone like O'Sullivan, whose expertise is working with epilepsy and seizure disorders, has now spent so much time talking about ADHD and autism when that is not an area of expertise. David names that he thinks this is an important conversation to have, because we are validating the other perspectives. There is a medical model of disease sets us up to want to oppose or eradicate the ‘disease;' where things like neurodevelopment conditions like ADHD and autism are not something to be ‘cured' or ‘fixed.” David makes the comparison, its like a bunch of people sitting and talking about going to Mexico when no one has ever been there—cultural representation. For example, someone has mild amounts of anxiety throughout the day. They understand this anxiety as having ADHD. They use ADHD interventions to help them and they found a community, and it makes sense and they feel better, it works for them. And then someone comes up with a reason to say that person does not have ADHD, that this definition does not apply—why are we being so careful when it comes to gatekeeping diversity, including neurodiversity?  This wonderful person that David met at a training, named Shay, asked: is there anyone that is neurotypical? We could think of the difference between traits and states. And then he thought about personal examples. He doesn't know if there is someone "neurotypical." Would it to be less shocking that people have different neurological needs or educational differences if we recognized that there may be no 'one' baseline or group to compare everything to? And how quickly we dismiss difference--like knowing that because David listened to books, the argument that what he did was not 'reading'--but we get back to actual question, which is...what was the task, and did it get done?  Often, talking about the fantasy of how ADHD looks or how its supposed to be, it's more about other people. A lot of people with ADHD believe that if its easy for them, they're cheating. Because its supposed to be hard. Do most non-ADHD people think that way?  The debates are now that anxiety, bipolar disorder, OCD—these are neurological differences—they are also looking at causal factors to all these conditions that are not chosen. So is the only person who is ‘normal' the person who has no feelings, reactions, or responses?  Someone who has no big responses to stimuli, someone who is antisocial? Isabelle does fall into the categorizing and black and white thinking, and how its a part of learning, to categorize and generalize. This is not dissimilar to how people talk about race, gender, and about culturally defined parts of experiences because we collectively make them a thing—maybe its myth making and collective storytelling. There is a gravitational pull to the idea of being neurotypical or mentally ‘well' and then there's good and bad. Isabelle wonders where the compassion goes? David speaks up—they have compassion. People are scared. People are scared and when we're scared, we have a reflexive reactions. People have found safety or comfort in the label of ‘normal' or ‘neurotypical,' and they see difference as not good, and they're really trying to, in their mind, help people in their messaging. Terror management theory: when you're scared, you find a group of people who are like you and you band together to be less scared. So, there are a chunk of people out there who are getting very specific about who is in or out of the group.  David can have a lot of compassion for that fear, that fear about who gets to belong. But he also wants to speak to the neurodivergent person who is doing something you tell them will help—and it hurts them? It's a real fear we carry. David uses the example of his mom—bless her heart (see the Southern US use of this phrase on many levels below)—who grew up being told the importance of having arch support in shoes, and so when David had flat feet, she had him use these inserts—David is not blaming his mom, she did the best she could—lots of people are told not to touch things, don't go into the light. Every neurodivergent person has to have the fear “I'm doing this wrong, I'm in trouble, I'm doing something bad!” To little David: you know, you have flat feet, you have more stability around corners—but another voice would say “don't tell anyone you have flat feet, it's bad.” He has compassion for the fear people have that want everyone to be the same, to not stand out or be different, and there is also a fear that neurodivergent people sit with every day about whether or not they're allowed to act the way they act. Isabelle names that the podcasters were saying “oh, these diagnoses are an excuse to then act in ways that are socially awkward.” Ahem. Isabelle describes how this feels like when she describes her inner workings to someone in all the steps she takes when she sits down next to someone, wondering if this is the right physical distance, is she staring at their eyebrows too long, is she pausing appropriately, etc.—and when she unmasks and reveals this, the person considers it a compliment to say “I couldn't tell.” It's the idea that someone outside of you knows more about your experience than you do. The way that diagnoses connect to power and gatekeeping for services and Isabelle makes the point that those who are saying “over diagnosis is dangerous”—to whom? On what planet are folks who are neurospicy getting enough of the supports and services and resources and access that they need? The system is already failing most of us. David names: this isn't cancer, this isn't people getting chemo erroneously. There is no danger in identification, it's about getting our needs met. What do we do as a society to neglected people, and the more you know about your needs, the less of a danger being neglected becomes. This is a question of someone who knows a lot about things wandered over into another area and made bold statements without the expertise. Isabelle was extra miffed that she also dismissed the intersections of Autism, ADHD, POTS, hyper mobile Ehlers Danlos, and MCAS and ‘nonexistent' —so damaging and harmful. These are real things, the interconnectedness of them is being actively researched, just because you are new to the party does not make something false or untrue. As David puts it, in the 70's or 80's, the APA took a vote to decide if being gay was good or bad, essentially (“do we keep gayness as a disorder?” Yes folks, this was that recently. GAH.). Now imagine someone was asleep for ten years and missed that memo and is now walking around looking at pride flags wondering “why are there so man...

Pada suatu waktu, para bhikkhu membicarakan mengenai Arahat Theri Uppalavanna yang dilecehkan oleh pemuda Nanda yang kemudian ditelan bumi. Sehubungan dengan ini, mereka bertanya kepada Buddha apakah Arahat tidak menikmati kenikmatan indriawi meskipun mereka memiliki fisik yang sama dengan orang lain. Apa jawaban Buddha? Bagaimana sikap seorang Arahat terhadap kenikmatan indriawi?Di kelas ini Ashin Kheminda menjelaskan makna kata demi kata stanza 401-404 dari Kelompok Stanza tentang Brahmana (Brahmanavagga) hanya berdasarkan Pāḷi dan kitab komentarnya (Aṭṭhakathā).

Suatu ketika saat Buddha sedang berdiam di wihara Veluvana, YA. Sāriputta, dengan ditemani oleh 500 bhikkhu, memasuki desa Nālaka dan berdiri di depan pintu rumah ibunya sendiri untuk ber-piṇḍapāta. Ibunya mengundang mereka masuk ke dalam rumah, namun ketika ia sedang mempersembahkan makanan kepada anaknya, ia berkata, “Wahai pemakan makanan sisa, kau yang telah meninggalkan 80 crore untuk menjadi seorang bhikkhu, kau telah menghancurkan kami.” Kemudian ia mempersembahkan makanan kepada bhikkhu lain sembari berkata kepada mereka dengan kasar, “Kalian semua telah memanfaatkan anakku sebagai pembantumu; sekarang makan makananmu.”YA. Sāriputta tidak menjawab apa pun, melainkan hanya mengambil mangkuk makanannya dan kembali ke wihara. Sekembalinya ke wihara, para bhikkhu memberitahu Buddha bagaimana YA. Sāriputta dengan sabar menahan omelan dan hinaan dari ibunya. Apa jawaban Buddha? Bagaimana YA. Sāriputta bisa memiliki kesabaran seperti itu?Di kelas ini Ashin Kheminda menjelaskan makna kata demi kata stanza 395-400 dari Kelompok Stanza tentang Brahmana (Brahmanavagga) hanya berdasarkan Pāḷi dan kitab komentarnya (Aṭṭhakathā).

00:00:00 – Cold Open, Catchphrases & Alex Jones Week The boys warm up with “hey yo” catchphrase banter, then tee up a rowdy “Clips of the Week” from Alex Jones returning to air—wild out-of-context lines, masturbation jokes, and the general temperature turning up online. 00:10:00 – The Charlie Kirk Texts: “Too Perfect?” Deep read of the alleged shooter's immaculate, APA-style texts published by BBC; the crew doubts authenticity, riffs a dramatic reenactment, and flags how suspiciously exhaustive the exposition sounds. 00:20:00 – Utah, Investigations & Gizmodo's “Top 3 Conspiracies” Utah politics, drones over the event, and skepticism about authorities. Then into Gizmodo's roundup of viral narratives around Kirk's killing; a Hill soundbite slips and calls him “Charlie King.” Epstein FOIA talk pops up in hearings. 00:30:00 – “Just Look Harder” Theories & Palm-Gun Claims They dissect the crowd-video frame-hunting—hand signals, bodyguard moves—and mock the “palm gun” theory (Vince/VENIS cameo chatter), landing on “guy probably just scratched his arm.” 00:40:00 – Who's to Blame? Plus Star Trek Reactions They caution it's still early, call out info releases that muddy the waters, and pivot to fandom: Voyager's Chakotay posts sympathy while Tuvok memes “the only Kirk that matters,” showing culture-war spillover. 00:50:00 – Wrong-House Raid in Texas Breakdown of a local TV segment: Grand Prairie police hit the wrong address, shoot a homeowner in his own garage, then pursue charges against him—family demands accountability. Headlines queue up (AI “makes you dumb,” Florida health-chief woo, etc.). 01:00:00 – Trail Cam Mystery Lights in Chile Into the weird: a university wildlife camera in Patagonia snaps descending, blazing orbs; agencies and a UFO museum weigh plasmas, insects, or lens effects—no conclusive answer yet. 01:10:00 – Norway's Hessdalen & “Dusty Plasma” 101 Comparing Chile's lights to the Hessdalen research: long-lived plasma spheres, radar/optical matches, speeds, and geology-electrical hypotheses; also the region's lore of abductions around light-flap hotspots. 01:20:00 – High-Seas Gambler Jumps Overboard Wacky crime beat: a cruiser racks up ~$16.7K in casino debt, leaps off the ship near San Juan with ~$14.6K in cash, gets scooped by jet-skiing passersby, and is charged for failing to report currency. 01:30:00 – NASA vs. “3I Atlas is an Alien Mothership” The crew jokes through NASA's denial, imagines press-conference mayhem, and muses on odd brightness/rotation claims; Mars-sample talk and a “Jet-Ski Justice League” bit for good measure. 01:40:00 – Chuck E. Cheese, Ley Lines &… the UK Semi-serious theorycraft about arcades built on psychic fault lines morphs into news: Chuck E. Cheese expands to the UK; they riff that the brand's “fight club” aura might go international. 01:50:00 – Sign-Off, Parody Track & Housekeeping Wrap with show plugs, Spotify video move chatter, then a parody/“grunge” song riffing on those too-neat text messages; quick gags (“watch the skies, Mothman dispenses justice!”) and farewells.   Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research ▀▄▀▄▀ CONTACT LINKS ▀▄▀▄▀ ► Phone: 614-388-9109 ► Skype: ourbigdumbmouth ► Website: http://obdmpod.com ► Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/obdmpod ► Full Videos at Odysee: https://odysee.com/@obdm:0 ► Twitter: https://twitter.com/obdmpod ► Instagram: obdmpod ► Email: ourbigdumbmouth at gmail ► RSS: http://ourbigdumbmouth.libsyn.com/rss ► iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/our-big-dumb-mouth/id261189509?mt=2  

In the latest episode of our “Positive Rate” podcast, Communications Committee Deputy Chair FO Melissa Monahan speaks with LGA CA Matt Sheehan, who serves on the board of the charitable organization Above the Clouds. The organization's stated mission: “Above the Clouds delivers joy and hope through the wonder of flight to children and teens who have a serious illness or disability, are underserved and/or are facing other diversity.” During the APA Board of Directors' summer meeting, CA Sheehan asked the Board to consider sponsoring “Wings of Legacy,” an Oct. 5 fundraising event the charity hosts in Quincy, Mass., for a scholarship honoring the life of CA David Willey, a U.S. Navy veteran who also flew for Cape Air, Southern Air Transport, and New England Air. Earlier in his career, CA Sheehan also worked for Cape Air and cited CA Willey's mentorship as a major influence in his life. The Board subsequently approved a motion authorizing a $3,000 donation to the Wings of Legacy event. Each episode of “Positive Rate” features APA subject-matter experts working on the membership's behalf. The podcast is available through popular streaming services, including Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, and Spotify. You can search for “Positive Rate” or “Allied Pilots Association” on your platform of choice to subscribe and download. Your first opportunity to listen will be via AlliedPilots.org/Podcasts.

Sesepuh Sariputta sering dipuji oleh banyak orang karena kesabaran dan penahanan diri beliau. Murid beliau biasanya menceritakan tentang beliau: “Guru kami adalah seseorang dengan kesabaran dan penahanan diri yang hebat. Bila beliau disiksa atau dipukuli oleh orang lain, beliau tidak kehilangan kesabaran tetapi tetap tenang dan terkendali.” Karena sesepuh sering diceritakan seperti itu, seorang brahmana yang memiliki pandangan salah mengumumkan kepada para pengagum Sesepuh Sariputta bahwa dia akan memprovokasi beliau supaya marah. Pada saat itu, Sesepuh Sariputta yang sedang melakukan pindapatta muncul di sana; brahmana tersebut menghampiri sesepuh dan memukul keras punggungnya dengan tangan. Namun sesepuh bahkan tidak melihat ke sekelilingnya untuk mencari siapa orang yang memukulnya, melainkan tetap melanjutkan berjalan seperti tidak terjadi apa-apa. Apa yang terjadi selanjutnya? Bagaimana Buddha menanggapi kejadian tersebut?Di kelas ini Ashin Kheminda menjelaskan makna kata demi kata stanza 383-390 dari Kelompok Stanza tentang Brahmana (Brahmanavagga) hanya berdasarkan Pāḷi dan kitab komentarnya (Aṭṭhakathā).

Two counselor educators, professional counselors, and researchers discuss what decolonization is and is not in counselor education. Drs. Smith-Yliniemi and Malott describe what motivates them to continue learning about ways to infuse decolonizing principles in their educational and clinical work. Both share  practical examples and hopes for the future of decolonized practice. For more on our guests, links from the conversation, and APA citation for this episode visit https://concept.paloaltou.edu/resources/the-thoughtful-counselor-podcast  The Thoughtful Counselor is created in partnership with Palo Alto University's Division of Continuing & Professional Studies. Learn more at concept.paloaltou.edu  

Jede:r Vierte in Deutschland erlebt im Laufe des Lebens ein Trauma. In dieser Folge fragen sich Atze und Leon: Was ist Trauma eigentlich, wie oft betrifft es uns – und was hilft wirklich? Sie sprechen über die bewegende Geschichte von Marc Wallert, der 140 Tage in Geiselhaft lebte, und schauen auf die neuesten wissenschaftlichen Leitlinien zu Traumatherapie. Es geht darum, wie Trauma unser Denken und Fühlen verändert – und wie Heilung und Hoffnung trotzdem möglich sind. Fühlt euch gut betreut Leon & Atze Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/leonwindscheid/ https://www.instagram.com/atzeschroeder_offiziell/ Mehr zu unseren Werbepartnern findet ihr hier: https://linktr.ee/betreutesfuehlen Tickets: Atze: https://www.atzeschroeder.de/#termine Leon: https://leonwindscheid.de/tour/ VVK Münster 2025: https://betreutes-fuehlen.ticket.io/ Empfehlungen: Buch-Tipp: The End of Trauma‘ von George Bonanno Bonanno ist einer der führenden Resilienzforscher und zeigt in diesem Buch sehr eindrücklich, dass Resilienz nicht die Ausnahme ist, sondern die Regel. Quellen American Psychological Association. (2017). Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults. https://www.apa.org/ptsd-guideline/ptsd.pdf Offizielle Leitlinien der APA zur Behandlung von PTBS, Grundlage für die im Podcast diskutierten Empfehlungen Cyniak-Cieciura, M., Popiel, A., Zawadzki, B., & Pragłowska, E. (2015). Changes in dysfunctional posttraumatic cognitions and self-efficacy as mechanisms of cognitive-behavioral therapy for PTSD. Psychiatry Research, 229(1–2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.027 Untersuchung an Autounfall-Überlebenden mit PTBS, die zeigt, dass Veränderungen in negativen Gedanken zentral für den Therapieerfolg sind Dekel, S., Ein-Dor, T., & Solomon, Z. (2013). Posttraumatic stress disorder and change in self-perceptions: A longitudinal study of former prisoners of war. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21791 Längsschnittstudie an israelischen Veteranen, die zeigt, dass starke PTBS-Symptome langfristig zu immer negativeren Selbst- und Weltbildern führen können Hauffa, R., Rief, W., Brähler, E., Martin, A., Mewes, R., Glaesmer, H., … & Maercker, A. (2011). Lifetime traumatic experiences, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychiatric comorbidity in a representative sample of the German population. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 261(4), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-010-0142-0 Grundlage für Zahlen, wie viele Menschen in Deutschland traumatische Erlebnisse berichten und wie häufig daraus eine PTBS entsteht Rauch, S. A. M., King, A. P., Abelson, J. L., Tuerk, P. W., Smith, E., Rothbaum, B. O., … & Liberzon, I. (2015). Biological and symptom changes in posttraumatic stress disorder treatment: A randomized clinical trial. Depression and Anxiety, 32(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22331 Studie mit Veteranen, die untersucht, ob physiologische Reaktionen (z. B. Cortisol) während der Traumatherapie wichtige Hinweise auf den Therapieerfolg geben Stangl, W. (2021). Stichwort: "Trauma – Online Lexikon für Psychologie und Pädagogik." Online Lexikon für Psychologie und Pädagogik. https://lexikon.stangl.eu/647/trauma (2021-10-29) Allgemeine Definition und psychologischer Überblick zum Begriff Trauma Redaktion: Julia Ditzer Produktion: Murmel Productions

Sāmaṇera Sumana adalah murid dari Anuruddha Thera. Meskipun dia baru berusia tujuh tahun, namun dia adalah seorang Arahat yang memiliki kekuatan supernormal. Pada saat gurunya Anuruddha jatuh sakit di vihara yang berada di dalam sebuah hutan di Himalaya, dia mengambilkan air dari danau Anotatta yang jauhnya 500 yojana dari vihara. Perjalanan itu tidak ditempuh dengan jalan darat tetapi melalui jalan udara berkat kekuatan supernormalnya. Suatu hari, Anuruddha Thera membawa Sāmaṇera Sumana menghadap Buddha, yang sedang berdiam di vihara Pubbarama, sebuah vihara yang dipersembahkan oleh Visakkha. Di sana, para Bhikkhu muda dan Sāmaṇera menggodanya dengan menepuk kepalanya; menarik telinga, hidung, dan tangannya; dan bersenda gurau menanyakan apakah dia tidak merasa bosan. Buddha melihat kejadian tersebut dan berpikir bahwa beliau akan membuat para Bhikkhu muda itu melihat kualitas langka yang dimiliki Sāmaṇera Sumana yang masih muda. Apa yang kemudian dilakukan oleh Buddha? Bagaimana Sāmaṇera Sumana bisa memiliki kemampuan supernormal pada usia yang masih muda? Di kelas ini Ashin Kheminda menjelaskan makna kata demi kata stanza 382 dari Kelompok Stanza tentang Bhikkhu (Bhikkhuvagga) hanya berdasarkan Pāḷi dan kitab komentarnya (Aṭṭhakathā).

Inspired by the iconic Australian native flowers, Balinese musician Yande King's and Balinese dancer Putu Ayu Lestari have created Puspa Banksia dance. It will be performed with Gamelan DanAnda and Sanggar Lestari dancers at the Gamelan DanAnda's annual Spring Concert on the 14 Sep 2025 at Collingwood Town Hall in Melbourne. What can we expect from this collaborative creation? - Terinspirasi oleh bunga-bunga khas Australia yang ikonis, musisi Bali Yande King dan penari Bali Putu Ayu Lestari telah menciptakan tari Puspa Banksia. Tari ini akan ditampilkan bersama penari Gamelan DanAnda dan Sanggar Lestari pada Konser Musim Semi tahunan Gamelan DanAnda pada 14 September 2025 di Balai Kota Collingwood, Melbourne. Apa yang bisa kita nantikan dari karya kolaborasi ini?

Vakkali adalah seorang brahmana yang tinggal di Savatthi. Suatu hari, ketika melihat Buddha sedang ber-pindapatta di kota, dia sangat terkesan dengan pencapaian sarira Buddha Dia pun memohon izin untuk diterima di dalam Sangha hanya agar bisa berada di dekat Buddha. Sebagai Bhikkhu, Vakkali selalu berada di dekat Buddha; dia tidak peduli dengan tugas ke-Bhikkhu-an yang lainnya dan sama sekali tidak melatih meditasi konsentrasi.Oleh karena itu, Buddha berkata kepadanya, “Vakkali, tidak ada gunanya bagimu dengan berada di dekat-Ku dan memperhatikan wajah-Ku. Oleh karena sebenarnya, hanya dia yang melihat Dhamma-lah yang melihat-Ku. Dia yang tidak melihat Dhamma, tidak melihat-Ku.” Ketika mendengar kata-kata tersebut, Vakkali merasa sangat tertekan. Dia pergi seperti perintah Buddha, dan memanjat bukit Gijjhakuta dengan niat untuk bunuh diri dengan cara melompat dari puncak bukit. Apa yang selanjutnya terjadi? Bagaimana cara Buddha menanggapi kejadian tersebut?Di kelas ini Ashin Kheminda menjelaskan makna kata demi kata stanza 377-381 dari Kelompok Stanza tentang Bhikkhu (Bhikkhuvagga) hanya berdasarkan Pāḷi dan kitab komentarnya (Aṭṭhakathā).

Kencan Dengan Tuhan - Jumat, 12 September 2025Bacaan: Firman-Nya: "Siapakah yang memberitahukan kepadamu, bahwa engkau telanjang? Apakah engkau makan dari buah pohon, yang Ku larang engkau makan itu? Manusia itu menjawab: Perempuan yang Kau tempatkan di sisiku, dialah yang memberi dari buah pohon itu kepadaku, maka kumakan." Kemudian berfirmanlah TUHAN Allah kepada perempuan itu "Apakah yang telah kauperbuat ini?" Jawab perempuan itu: "Ular itu yang memperdayakan aku, maka kumakan." (Kejadian 3:11-13)Renungan: Seorang anak lahir setelah 11 tahun pernikahan. Mereka adalah pasangan yang saling mencintai dan anak itu adalah buah hati mereka. Saat anak itu berumur 2 tahun, suatu pagi si ayah melihat sebotol obat yang terbuka. Dia terlambat untuk ke kantor, maka dia meminta istrinya untuk menutupnya dan menyimpannya di lemari. Istrinya karena kesibukannya di dapur sama sekali melupakan hal tersebut. Anak itu melihat botol itu dan dengan riang memainkannya. Karena tertarik dengan warna obat tersebut lalu si anak memakannya semua. Obat tersebut adalah obat keras yang bahkan untuk orang dewasa pun hanya dalam dosis kecil saja. Sang istri segera membawa si anak ke rumah sakit. Tapi si anak tidak tertolong. Sang istri ngeri membayangkan bagaimana dia harus menghadapi suaminya. Ketika si suami datang ke rumah sakit dan melihat anaknya telah meninggal, dia melihat kepada istrinya dan mengucapkan 3 kata, "SAYA BERSAMAMU SAYANG." Reaksi sang suami yang tidak disangka-sangka adalah sikap proaktif. Si anak sudah meninggal dan tidak bisa dihidupkan kembali. Tidak ada gunanya mencari-cari kesalahan pada sang istri. Lagipula seandainya dia menyempatkan waktu untuk menutup dan menyimpan botol tersebut, maka hal itu tidak akan terjadi. Tidak ada yang perlu disalahkan. Si istri juga kehilangan anak semata wayangnya. Apa yang si istri perlu saat itu adalah penghiburan dari sang suami, dan itulah yang diberikan suaminya saat itu. Jika semua orang dapat melihat hidup dengan cara pandang seperti ini, maka akan terdapat lebih sedikit permasalahan di dunia ini. Salah satu sifat dosa adalah saling menyalahkan satu dengan yang lain. Adam menyalahkan Hawa, Hawa menyalahkan ular. Masing-masing tidak mau dipersalahkan, karena hal ini menyangkut tanggung jawab. Banyak orang lari dari tanggung jawab dan melemparkannya kepada orang lain. Tanpa kita sadari banyak orang menderita karena kita mau cari selamat sendiri. Hari ini kita diajak untuk mengatakan kebenaran tanpa harus mengorbankan atau mempersalahkan orang lain, "Jika ya, hendaklah kamu katakan: ya, jika tidak, hendaklah kamu katakan: tidak. Apa yang lebih dari pada itu berasal dari si jahat." (Mat 5:37). Tuhan Yesus memberkati. Doa:Tuhan Yesus, bantulah aku supaya menjadi pribadi yang bertanggung jawab atas apapun yang telah kulakukan dan tidak lari dari tanggung jawab atau mencari-cari kesalahan orang lain yang mengakibatkan hubungan kekeluargaan dan persahabatan menjadi renggang. Amin. (Dod).

John Cheong-Holdaway is a creative producer, musician, and economist who recently received an Award from the Indonesian Consul General Republic of Indonesia in Melbourne on the 17 Aug 2025. This award is a part of and given at the 80th Indonesian Independence Day celebration. What did John do to earn this Award? - John Cheong-Holdaway adalah seorang produser kreatif, musisi, dan ekonom, yang baru-baru ini menerima Penghargaan dari Konsul Jenderal Republik Indonesia di Melbourne pada 17 Agustus 2025. Penghargaan ini merupakan bagian dari dan diberikan pada perayaan Hari Kemerdekaan Indonesia ke-80. Apa yang John lakukan untuk mendapatkan penghargaan ini?

Dr. Jaimee Arnoff reviews evidence-based strategies to help caregivers support adolescents facing suicidal ideation or self-harm, including guidance on boundary setting, safety planning, and recognizing when to escalate to emergency services. Interview with Elizabeth Irias, LMFT. Earn CE credit for listening to this episode by joining our low-cost membership for unlimited podcast CE credits for an entire year, with some of the strongest CE approvals in the country (APA, NBCC, ASWB, and more). Learn, grow, and shine with Clearly Clinical Continuing Ed by visiting https://ClearlyClinical.com. DISCLAIMER: Please note that this episode discusses death by suicide and various forms of self-injurious behaviors, including discussion of redacted case examples.

Heritage poultry breeding isn't nostalgia—it's a disciplined, data-driven path to better birds and better outcomes. In Part 1 of this deep-dive, Frank Reese, Jr. joins Carey Blackmon and Jeff Mattocks to unpack what “heritage/standard-bred” really means, how USDA recognizes certified standard-bred labels, and why the American Poultry Association's Standard matters on the farm and in the marketplace. We cover picking your purpose (meat, eggs, or both), matching breeds and lines to goals, and the real-world economics of selling eggs, processing birds, and staying solvent. You'll hear practical guidance on breed/line selection (New Hampshires, Barred Plymouth Rocks, Delawares, Wyandottes, Buckeyes, Jersey Giants, Brahmas), realistic timelines and dress weights for frying vs. roasting birds, why roosters drive egg-production genetics in their daughters, and how to source from local breeders who select for utility—not just feathers. We also dig into maintaining a line without “chasing crosses,” culling with purpose, and building a small, sustainable program that pays its own way.Key takeaways • Define & defend “standard-bred/heritage” using APA standards and accepted definitions • Start with outcomes: eggs to offset feed vs. meat sales vs. both • Dual-purpose classics that still perform—and what to ask breeders about their selection goals • Processing economics 101: when small-scale works (and when to pivot) • Linebreeding, selection, and culling: how to actually improve year over year • Part 2 drops next Tuesday—subscribe so you don't miss the conclusionListen to this episode at www.thepoultrykeeperspodcast.com#PoultryKeepersPodcast #PoultryKeepers360 #PoultryBreedersNutrition #ShowProFarmSupply #HeritagePoultry #StandardBred #DualPurpose #BackyardChickens #HomesteadPoultry #PoultryBreeding #APA #GoodShepherdConservancy #BarredRock #NewHampshire #DelawareChicken #Wyandotte #Buckeye #JerseyGiant #Brahma #FlockManagementYou can email us at - poultrykeeperspodcast@gmail.comJoin our Facebook Groups:Poultry Keepers Podcast - https://www.facebook.com/groups/907679597724837Poultry Keepers 360 - - https://www.facebook.com/groups/354973752688125Poultry Breeders Nutrition - https://www.facebook.com/groups/4908798409211973Check out the Poultry Kepers Podcast YouTube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/@PoultryKeepersPodcast/featured

It's Monday, September 8th, A.D. 2025. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes heard on 140 radio stations and at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Adam McManus Russian pastor sent to prison labor camp for sermon On September 3, Russian Pastor Nikolay Romanyuk, age 63, was found guilty of making “Public calls to implement activities directed against the security of the Russian Federation,” reports International Christian Concern.   Despite the Russian pastor's age and poor health conditions, the court sentenced him to four years in a prison labor camp.   In a statement before the court, Pastor Romanyuk said, “Yes, I gave a sermon in which I touched on military, albeit forced, murder. I do not retract what I said. I set forth my personal view and attitude towards the taking of a human life. This is my personal attitude as a clergyman.”  Pastor Romanyuk gave his now-criminal sermon a week after Russia partially mobilized its forces against Ukraine in September 2022 at the Holy Trinity Pentecostal Church in a suburb of Moscow, Russia.   From the pulpit, Romanyuk preached, “It was written in our [church] doctrine that we are pacifists and cannot participate in this. It is our right to profess this on the basis of Holy Scripture.”  Svetlana Zhukova, Pastor Romanyuk's daughter, wrote on social media, “Imagine, Dad was convicted for his opinion, his position. There is no crime. Not a single person suffered from his actions. The state did not suffer at all.”  Acts 5:29 says, “We must obey God rather than men.”  Ted Cruz torches Tim Kaine for describing God-given rights as 'very, very troubling' Here in America, on September 3rd, the U.S. Foreign Relations Committee addressed the nomination of Riley Barnes to be Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. In response to Barnes' introductory statement before the committee, Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia objected to Barnes who underscored Secretary of State Marco Rubio's assertion that our rights come from God, not government, reports The Christian Post. Listen. KAINE: “This is a quote from Secretary Rubio, our rights come from God, our Creator, not from our laws, not from our governments. I find that very, very troubling. … “The notion that our rights do not come from our laws or our government should make people very, very nervous, because people of any religious tradition, or none, are entitled to the equal protection of the laws under the 14th Amendment. It shouldn't matter what their religious background is, what they think about God or the Creator, what their church affiliation is.” Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, another member of the U.S. Foreign Relations Committee, took issue with Senator Kaine. CRUZ: “Senator Kaine said, in this hearing, that he found it a radical and dangerous notion that you would say, ‘Our rights came from God and not from government.' I just walked into the hearing as he was saying that and I almost fell out of my chair, because that ‘radical and dangerous notion,' in his words, is literally the founding principle upon which the United States of America was created. “And if you do not believe me, then you can believe perhaps the most prominent Virginian to ever serve, Thomas Jefferson, who wrote, in the Declaration of Independence, ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and that they are endowed by their Creator,' -- not by government, not by the Democratic National Committee, but by God, -- ‘with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.' “I have to say, it is stunning to me that the principle that God has given us natural rights is now deemed by Democrats some radical and dangerous notion. Mr. Jefferson was right when he wrote those words. Government exists to protect those rights.” Christian foster parents sue Massachusetts for requiring them to support ‘gender transitions' A pair of Christian foster families in Massachusetts is suing the state for barring them from fostering more children based on their refusal to affirm gender confusion among kids in their care, reports LifeSiteNews.com. Alliance Defending Freedom is representing Nick and Audrey Jones, who have cared for seven small children since 2023; and Greg and Marianelly Schrock, who have cared for 28 children since 2019. Despite both couples effectively providing needed, loving homes without incident, the Massachusetts Department of Children & Families decided they can no longer continue to do so unless they're willing to affirm the gender confusion of future kids placed with them, including support for so-called “gender transitioning” and the use of biologically inaccurate pronouns. Their attorneys said, what Massachusetts is doing “is a violation of foster parents' religious freedom under the First Amendment as well as a reckless rejection of needed homes for orphaned or abandoned children.” Matthew 18:6 says, “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in Me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.” Jimmy Stewart's World War II heroism and his father's promise to pray And finally, do you recognize this voice? “Mary, I know what I'm gonna do tomorrow and the next day and next year, and the year after that. I'm shaking the dust of this crummy little town off my feet, and I'm gonna see the world: Italy, Greece, the Parthenon, the Colosseum. Then, I'm coming back here and go to college and see what they know. And then I'm gonna build things. I'm gonna build airfields, I'm gonna build skyscrapers a hundred  stories high. I'm going to build bridges a mile long.” If you guessed Jimmy Stewart, you're right.  He is the actor who famously portrayed George Bailey in the Christmas film “It's A Wonderful Life.” You'll be glad to know that Hollywood is now producing a movie about Stewart's life entitled “Jimmy” starring K.J. Apa, reports FaithWire.com. After earning five Oscars, Stewart felt somewhat of a “hollowness.” At that time in the early 1940s, the world's instability was coming to a head, with war clouds on the horizon. Stewart made a stunning decision. He had been a private pilot, but he decided to enlist in the Army Air Corps. He said, “I want to be something more than just a Tinseltown hero. I wanted to serve my country, serve my fellow Americans.” Stewart became a squadron commander — a job that involved leading thousands of men in bombing runs during the war. His father, Alexander, who will be portrayed by Neil McDonough, wrote a  letter which he slipped into Jimmy's uniform pocket before he went and that included a copy of Psalm 91, a Scripture which underscores the Lord's comfort and presence.  His dad wrote, “I will be praying for you the whole time you're away that God will be with you. You'll make it home safely.”  Jimmy Stewart kept that letter with him in his uniform on every mission that he went on. Providentially, the actor did make it back home, though he suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after seeing hundreds of his men shot down and killed. By the time Stewart left the battlefield, he was far from the Hollywood leading man he was before fighting on the frontlines. An old friend named Frank Capra, a Hollywood director who also served in World War II, told Stewart he had the “perfect role” for him.  It was “It's  A Wonderful Life.”  God used that film to re-energize Stewart's career. Alexander Stewart, his father, embodied the verse found in Malachi 4:6.  “[God] will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers.” Close And that's The Worldview on this Monday, September 8th, in the year of our Lord 2025. Follow us on X or subscribe for free by Spotify, Amazon Music, or by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

In this episode, Dèsa meets with Sutton King and Ariel Richer, the co-founders of the Urban Indigenous Collective, to delve into the intersection of collective healing and natural medicine, exploring how culturally tailored health services can empower Indigenous communities. Sutton and Ariel share their insights on reclaiming space for urban Indigenous peoples, fostering kinship, community-based participatory research, and utilizing Indigenous knowledge systems to create pathways for wellness. For more on our guests, links from the conversation, and APA citation for this episode visit https://concept.paloaltou.edu/resources/the-thoughtful-counselor-podcast  The Thoughtful Counselor is created in partnership with Palo Alto University's Division of Continuing & Professional Studies. Learn more at concept.paloaltou.edu

Risto is joined by a group of colleagues to discuss one article that we feel has been most influential on our current or past research. We're talking about articles that have had a profound impact on where our research went and discuss a little about the back story from each. Here are the APA citations of the articles if you want to look them up:Risto's article:Oliver, K. L., Hamzeh, M., & McCaughtry, N. (2009). Girly girls can play games/las niñas pueden jugar tambien: Co-creating a curriculum of possibilities with fifth-grade girls. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28(1), 90-110.Kevin's article:Sparkes, A. C., Templin, T. J., & Schempp, P. G. (1993). Exploring dimensions of marginality: Reflecting on the life histories of physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12(4), 386-398.Erin's Article:Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.Michael's article:Byra, M., & Karp, G. G. (2000). Data Collection Techniques Employed in Qualitative Research in Physical Education Teacher Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical education, 19(2).Emily's article:Prusak, K. A., Pennington, T., Graser, S. V., Beighle, A., & Morgan, C. F. (2010). Systemic success in physical education: The East Valley phenomenon. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29(1), 85-106.

Episod 6 KenaSoal menampilkan KJ diganding bersama hos jemputan Zaidel Baharudin dalam membincangkan beberapa isu besar serantau dan perkembangan terkini nasional. Episod ini membincangkan rusuhan politik di Indonesia, isu ketelusan pengisytiharan harta, serta persoalan sama ada F1 patut kembali ke Sepang. Sempena bulan kemerdekaan, episod ini turut mengupas makna sebenar patriotisme dan perpaduan rakyat Malaysia.00:00 Intro05:46 Rusuhan Indonesia@backpacker travelog: Apakah pelajaran yang kita boleh ambil dari rusuhan di Indonesia?@zaidrais: Ulasan mengenai kemelut politik di Indonesia; punca utama dan what they shud do.@iskandar frdaus: Opinion on rumah Indonesian minister kena storm/loot.@faiq azhs: Apa langkah awal Malaysia tidak meniadi rusuhan seperti di Indonesia?@nashriqjumati: Apa yang terjadi di Indonesia? zalboxer 79: Apa pendapat KS terhadapdemonstrasi di IndonesiaQusyairie (Brunei): Regarding Indonesia's escalating protests - if govt labels protests as radical/treason, does it calm or worsen? In democracy, is violence against demonstrators justified?28:39 F1 Malaysia@nabeehanazim: F1 di Malaysia berbaloi atau tidak? Menguntungkan atau tidak?@afiqxafiq: Do you think Sepang will be back for F1?37:44 Identiti Patriotik Malaysia@dzariff.jaafar: Are we less tolerant to one another? Lack of civic mindedness as a society.@aimanzakwanzms: Apa indikator semangat patriotik rakyat Malaysia? KS rasa rakyat Malaysia sudah semakin kurang patriotik? Apa penyelesaian praktikal jangka pendek KS untuk perpaduan negara?50:47 Pemikiran Kritis Era AI@al.shafiq22: How did you develop critical thinking? And for current Al development, may it help?01:01:06 Short Q's@amir. amanullah: New season started... MU? Newcastle? Apa prediction KJ & SH?@faisal.yusoff: Lagu Merdeka sepanjang zaman pilihan KS?

Join Jay Gunkelman, QEEGD (the man who has analyzed over 500,000 brain scans), Dr. Mari Swingle (i-Minds author), and host Pete Jansons for another engaging NeuroNoodle Neurofeedback Podcast episode discussing neuroscience, psychology, mental health, and brain training.✅ Topic 1 Explained Where did neurofeedback begin? We trace early milestones—from Barry Sterman's SMR “cat” experiments to slow cortical potentials and seizure applications.✅ Topic 2 Deep Dive How alpha–theta training entered addiction treatment, why phenotype-driven protocols matter, and what anterior cingulate focus can do for performance.✅ Topic 3 Insights The panel rants about APA guidance discouraging references older than 10 years—why pioneers still belong in today's citations.✅ Additional Topics

Linda Hershman, LMFT, examines how later-in-life parental divorce disrupts rituals, relationships, finances, and caregiving for Adult Children of Divorce (ACODs), highlighting ways to validate their grief and foster resilience across family systems. Interview with Elizabeth Irias, LMFT. Earn CE credit for listening to this episode by joining our low-cost membership for unlimited podcast CE credits for an entire year, with some of the strongest CE approvals in the country (APA, NBCC, ASWB, and more). Learn, grow, and shine with Clearly Clinical Continuing Ed by visiting https://ClearlyClinical.com.

On this episode of the Boss Lady Podcast, Teresa and Jennifer sit down with powerhouse leader Phebe Fuqua, FRA-RA, LEED, NOMA, APA, AIA, IEDC—CEO, Senior Strategist, keynote speaker, and author. Phebe is the CEO of Elite Eagle Developments Inc., and she's passionate about equipping leaders to remain steadfast and focused even when life's storms hit.Phebe will also be a featured speaker at this year's Boss Lady Women's Leadership Conference (Sept 18–19), where she will deliver her keynote 'Unshakable Through the Storm: Focused on the Call.' In this conversation, she shares her personal leadership journey, how to discover 'the call' in your own life, and what it takes to lead with clarity and resilience in challenging times.Connect with Phebe Fuqua: Elite Eagle Developments Inc. https://www.eliteeagledevelopments.org/ REGISTER FOR THE BOSS LADY CONFERENCE, SEPT 18, 19https://www.laddernetwork.org/conference

Thanks for reading Actual Intelligence with Dr. Steve Pearlman! Subscribe FREE to receive new posts and support my work.APA to Students: Don't Bother to Think for Yourselves Anymore. Let AI Do It.If in the future you want a psychologist who can actually think about psychology, or a doctor who can actually think about medicine, or a teacher who can think about what their teaching, or a lawyer who can actually think about the law, then the new American Psychological Association's (APA) A.I. policies should make you concerned. Maybe they should even make you angry.As many who've been to college already know, the APA's standards for what constitutes academic integrity and citing sources is the prevailing standard at most institutions. When students write papers or conduct any research, it's typically the APA's standards that they observe for what they are permitted to use and how they must disclose their use of it.Yet, when it comes to supporting critical thinking and actual intelligence, the APA's new standards just took a problematic if not catastrophic turn. And the irony is palpable. Of all the organizations that set standards for how students should use their brains, you might think that the American Psychological Association would want to hold the line in favor of actual thinking skills. You might think that with all of the emerging research on A.I.'s negative consequences for the brain—including the recent MIT study that showed arrested brain development for students using A.I. to write, which you can learn more about on my recent podcast—that the APA would adopt a vanguard position against replacing critical thinking with A.I. You might think that the APA would want to bolster actual intelligence, independent thought, evidence-based reasoning, etc. But instead of supporting those integral aspects of healthy brain development, the APA just took a big step in the opposite direction.I'm referring to the APA's new so-called “standards” for “Generative A.I. Use,” standards that open the doors for students to let Generative A.I. do their thinking for them. For example, the APA liscenses students to have A.I. “analyze, refine, format, or visualize data” instead of doing it themselves, provided, of course, that they just disclose “the tool used and the number of iterations” of outputs. Similarly, the APA welcomes students to have A.I. “write or draft manuscript content” for them, provided that they disclose the “prompts and tools used.”To be clear, the APA's new standards make it all too clear that it is very concerned that students properly attribute their uses of Generative A.I., but the American Psychological Association is not concerned about students using Generative A.I. to do their thinking for them. In other words, the APA has effectually established that it is okay if students don't analyze their own data, find their own sources, write their own papers, create research designs, or effectively do any thinking of their own; it's just not okay if students don't disclose it. In short, the leading and most common vanguard for the integrity of individual intellectual work just undermined the fundamental premise of education itself.What the APA could have done and should have done instead was to take a Gibraltarian stand against students using A.I. in place of their own critical thinking and independent thought. That is what it has done to this point. For example, students were simply not permitted to have a friend draft an essay for them. They were not, in many circles, they were not permitted to allow a friend to proofread their work unless the syllabus licensed them to do so. But for some reason, since it is an A.I. drafting the paper instead of a friend, the APA considers it permissible.Thanks for reading Actual Intelligence with Dr. Steve Pearlman! Subscribe free to receive new posts and support my work.Consistent with its history of guarding academic standards, the APA could have said that students who have an A.I. “analyze … data” or “write or draft manuscript content” were not using their own intellect and therefore cheating. Period. Doing so would have sent a strong message across all of academia that permitting students to use Generative Artificial Intelligence instead of their actual intelligence was a violation of academic integrity, not to mention a gross violation of the most fundamental premise of education itself: the cultivation the student's mind.To be fair, not all of the usages of A.I. referenced by the APA's new standards are cheating. For example, allowing students to use A.I. to “create … tables” or “figures” instead of painstakingly trying to build them in Microsoft word, would not replace the student's meaningful cognitive work.Furthermore, and more importantly, the APA's policies are not binding. Educators, departments, and/or institutions need not follow suit. Any given educator can still restrict A.I. usages and determine their own standards for what is acceptable in a given course, including the establishment of policies that would treat using A.I. to “analyze … data” as cheating (which it should be).And finally, the APA still asserts that “AI cannot be named as an author on an APA scholarly publication.” Yet, to co-opt a psychological term, that seems nothing if not “schizophrenic.” After all, if a student uses A.I. to find its resources, “analyze” their “data,” and “write” their “manuscript,” then why shouldn't it be listed as an author, if not the lead author? What, after all, is the student really doing anyway?Thus, as arguably the leading force for what constitutes academic integrity vs. cheating, the APA's move at least implicitly licenses students across academia to use Generative A.I. in ways that will undermine their individual work, critical thinking, and overall actual intelligence. Once again, the APA just told students everywhere that using A.I. to “write or draft manuscript content” for them, instead of thinking about it themselves, developing their ideas themselves, referencing sources for themselves, perhaps even reading sources for themselves, and on and on, is perfectly okay as long as they cite it when they do so.And while it remains true that faculty can do as they wish, imagine being that high school, college, or graduate school educator who has to stand against the APA. Imagine having to hold the line against what will be mounting droves of students who ask, “Why can't we use A.I. in your class when we use it in our other classes?” And who ask, “Why can't we use A.I. in your class when the American Psychological Association says it is fine?” Considering that educators with stricter A.I. policies are already seeing students unenroll from their courses, the new APA standards my prove catastrophic.So, that returns us to the emerging problem: If you think that academic institutions should graduate students who can think critically about their subject of “expertise”—if you want a doctor who can think about medical things—then the APA just told you that you had better thing again.(This article written with no Artificial Intelligence, only the actual kind.)If you support actual intelligence, please share this with other likeminded people.*** This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit pearlmanactualintelligence.substack.com

Members of the APA's Top Articles in Medical Education Committee discuss top articles from 2024.  Dr Gayatri Madduri hosts committee members Heidi Kloster and Berry Seelbach in this second and final episode in the series.  Articles in this episode are: Artificial Intelligence  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10916112/   Assessment in UME https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38696720/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39619001/  

Amanda Ann Gregory, LCPC, offers a critical look at forgiveness in trauma therapy, clarifying its elective role and its distinction from reconciliation, as well as providing practical tools to help therapists integrate these concepts responsibly into treatment. Interview with Elizabeth Irias, LMFT. Earn CE credit for listening to this episode by joining our low-cost membership for unlimited podcast CE credits for an entire year, with some of the strongest CE approvals in the country (APA, NBCC, ASWB, and more). Learn, grow, and shine with Clearly Clinical Continuing Ed by visiting https://ClearlyClinical.com.