Podcasts about Lipscomb

Greg recaps Monday's college basketball results, talks to Ben Wilson of VSIN about the Mountain West landscape & Tuesday's games & Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Tuesday college basketball game. Podcast Highlights 1:23-Recap of Monday's results 13:06-Interview with Ben Wilson 30:12-Start of picks with Canisius vs St. Peter's 32:04-Picks & analysis for Baylor vs West Virginia 34:39-Picks & analysis for Davidson vs VCU 37:05-Picks & analysis for St. Bonaventure vs Dayton 39:28-Picks & analysis for Iona vs Monmouth 41:34-Picks & analysis for Maryland vs Michigan 44:10-Picks & analysis for UNC vs Miami 46:31-Picks & analysis for Ball St vs Toledo 48:24-Picks & analysis for South Carolina vs Arkansas 50:26-Picks & analysis for UCF vs East Carolina 52:36-Picks & analysis for Western Michigan vs Akron 54:17-Picks & analysis for Ohio vs Miami OH 56:33-Picks & analysis for Missouri vs Ole Miss 58:26-Picks & analysis for Kent St vs Eastern Michigan 1:00:35-Picks & analysis for Kansas vs Oklahoma 1:02:43-Picks & analysis for Niagara vs Manhattan 1:05:01-Picks & analysis for Butler vs UConn 1:07:01-Picks & analysis for IUPUI vs Ohio St 1:09:12-Picks & analysis for USF vs Houston 1:11:55-Picks & analysis for Loyola Chicago vs Evansville 1:13:50-Picks & analysis for Richmond vs Fordham 1:15:42-Picks & analysis for Bowling Green vs Northern IL 1:17:33-Picks & analysis for Kansas St vs Texas 1:29:32-Picks & analysis for Clemson vs Syracuse 1:21:22-Picks & analysis for Wisconsin vs Northwestern 1:23:17-Picks & analysis for Air Force vs Boise St 1:25:31-NY Post Pick Iowa St vs Texas Tech 1:27:54-Picks & analysis for Tennessee vs Vanderbilt 1:30:36-Picks & analysis for Duke vs Florida St 1:32:56-Picks & analysis for Cal Poly vs CS Bakersfield 1:35:16-Picks & analysis for Utah St vs Fresno St 1:38:00-Start of extra game picks with Lipscomb vs Eastern Kentucky 1:40:08-Picks & analysis for Florida Gulf Coast vs Stetson 1:41:39-Picks & analysis for Jacksonville vs Liberty 1:43:38-Picks & analysis for North Alabama vs Belarmine 1:45:33-Picks & analysis for Central Arkansas vs Jacksonville St Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Benjamin Lipscomb about four women philosophers in the early 20th century who revolutionized ethical studies. They discuss how he came to write this book and how these four women came to know each other and discuss ethics. They talk about how facts and values are different and the towering presence of Aristotle's philosophy. They describe the environment of Oxford in the 1920s and how much misogyny and sexism played a part in academia during this period. They discuss the life and philosophy of Iris Murdoch, Anscombe's philosophy and the impact of Wittgenstein, the philosophy of Philippa Foot, and contributions of Mary Midgley to philosophy and other fields of study. They also mention whether these women saw themselves as feminists and their legacy within philosophy.  Benjamin Lipscomb is a professor of philosophy and Director of the Honors Program at Houghton College where he specializes in ethical theory and history of philosophy. He has his PhD from the University of Notre Dame and is active in his religious community. His book, The women are up to something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionize Ethics can be found here. 

Greg recaps Monday's college basketball results, talks to Kevin Sweeney of Sports Illustrated about what we've seen in conference play thus far & Tuesday's games & Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Tuesday college basketball game. Podcast Highlights 1:25-Recap of Monday's results 8:54-Interview with Kevin Sweeney 25:00-Start of picks with Quinnipiac vs Canisius 27:15-Picks & analysis for Iona vs Fairfield 29:19-Picks & analysis for Hofstra vs Towson 31:15-Picks & analysis for USC vs Stanford 33:31-Picks & analysis for Rutgers vs Penn St 35:26-Picks & analysis for South Carolina vs Tennessee 37:43-Picks & analysis for Northern Illinois vs Kent St 40:08-Picks & analysis for Buffalo vs Western Michigan 42:25-Picks & analysis for St. Louis vs Dayton 44:38-Picks & analysis for Bowling Green vs Ohio 46:40-Picks & analysis for UMass vs Davidson 49:04-Picks & analysis for Northeastern vs James Madison 51:34-Picks & analysis for Texas Tech vs Baylor 54:33-Picks & analysis for DePaul vs Marquette 57:17-Picks & analysis for St. Bonaventure vs La Salle 59:26-Picks & analysis for George Washington vs La Salle 1:01:44-Picks & analysis for Toledo vs Miami OH 1:03:52-Picks & analysis for Delaware vs Drexel 1:05:58-Picks & analysis for Ball St vs Akron 1:07:54-Picks & analysis for Kentucky vs Vanderbilt 1:10:18-Picks & analysis for Central Michigan vs Eastern Michigan 1:12:14-Picks & analysis for Pittsburgh vs Syracuse 1:14:22-Picks & analysis for UT Rio Grande Valley vs Stephen F Austin 1:16:17-Picks & analysis for Indiana St vs Northern Iowa 1:18:21-NY Post Pick Iowa St vs Kansas 1:20:34-Picks & analysis for Miami vs Florida St 1:22:30-Picks & analysis for Illinois vs Nebraska 1:24:47-Picks & analysis for Oklahoma vs Texas 1:26:40-Picks & analysis for Ole Miss vs Texas A&M 1:28:53-Picks & analysis for Oklahoma St vs West Virginia 1:31:28-Picks & analysis for Providence vs Creighton 1:33:46-Picks & analysis for Auburn vs Alabama 1:36:09-Picks & analysis for Valparaiso vs Loyola CHI 1:38:17-Picks & analysis for San Jose St vs Fresno St 1:40:18-Picks & analysis for New Mexico vs UNLV 1:42:23-Start of extra game picks Stetson vs Jacksonville 1:44:00-Picks & analysis for Eastern Kentucky vs North Alabama 1:46:02-Picks & analysis for North Florida vs Liberty 1:47:46-Picks & analysis for Lipscomb vs Jacksonville St 1:49:19-Picks & analysis for Central Arkansas vs Bellarmine Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Greg recaps Saturday's college basketball results, talks to Lukas Harkins of Heat Check CBB about teams that have moved the most in his bracketology projections & Sunday's games & Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Sunday college basketball game. Podcast Highlights 1:28-Recap of Sunday's results 23:26-Interview with Lukas Harkins 38:42-Start of picks with Minnesota vs Indiana 41:03-Picks & analysis for Quinnipiac vs Niagara 43:20-Picks & analysis for IPFW vs Robert Morris 45:36-Picks & analysis for Cleveland St vs Youngstown St 47:22-Picks & analysis for Rider vs Marist 49:34-Picks & analysis for Fairfield vs Siena 51:42-NY Post Pick Cincinnati vs Memphis 54:26-Picks & analysis for Hofstra vs James Madison 56:41-Picks & analysis for Elon vs Charleston 58:44-Picks & analysis for UW Milwaukee vs Oakland 1:00:44-Picks & analysis for Northeastern vs Towson 1:02:57-Picks & analysis for Washington vs Colorado 1:05:17-Picks & analysis for Northwestern vs Ohio St 1:07:27-Picks & analysis for Montana vs Montana St 1:09:35-Picks & analysis for Wisconsin vs Maryland 1:11:48-Picks & analysis for Lipscomb vs Central Arkansas Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Hey, hope you enjoy this recap of last night's game. Don't forget that a new episode of Goal to Geaux is coming later today.

Coach John Brady of the LSU Sports Radio Network joins Matt to talk LSU Basketball and preview tonight's game vs. Lipscomb. Matt updates the COVID situation with the New Orleans Saints. Overrated or Underrated in segment three. Musso wraps the hour with Tigers in the Pros. The post AFR 12-22-2021 Hour 2 | LSU-Lipscomb in hoops appeared first on 1045 ESPN.

Coach John Brady of the LSU Sports Radio Network joins Matt to talk LSU Basketball and preview tonight's game vs. Lipscomb. The post John Brady previews LSU-Lipscomb appeared first on 1045 ESPN.

Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Wednesday College basketball game and talks to college basketball statistician Evan Miyakawa of EvaMiya.com about how COVID pauses effect teams, what team should be ranked number one, & which players have had the biggest impact on their team this season Podcast Highlights 3:16-Start of picks with William & Mary vs Valparaiso 5:50-Picks & analysis for Eastern Washington vs Texas Tech 8:23-Picks & analysis for Wofford vs Duquesne 10:22-Picks & analysis for Idaho St vs UC Santa Barbara 12:20-Picks & analysis for St. Thomas vs Denver 14:23-Picks & analysis for Southern Illinois vs San Francisco 16:42-Picks & analysis for Portland vs UC Davis 18:51-Picks & analysis for Western Carolina vs Charlotte 21:03-Picks & analysis for Pacific vs Cal 23:04-Picks & analysis for Youngstown St vs WVU 25:06-Picks & analysis for Troy vs Mercer 27:50-Picks & analysis for Murray St vs Auburn 30:22-Picks & analysis for Northern Kentucky vs Indiana 32:37-Picks & analysis for Charleston vs Old Dominion 34:40-Picks & analysis for East Tennessee St vs Georgia 36:54-Picks & analysis for Hofstra vs Monmouth 39:09-NY Post Pick Arizona vs Tennessee 41:44-Picks & analysis for MTSU vs Chattanooga 43:22-Picks & analysis for Western Illinois vs Omaha 45:11-Picks & analysis for UMKC vs South Dakota 47:05-Picks & analysis for Oral Roberts vs South Dakota St 48:52-Picks & analysis for North Dakota vs North Dakota St 50:48-Picks & analysis for Texas St vs Houston 52:55-Picks & analysis for Clemson vs Virginia 54:51-Picks & analysis for UW Green Bay vs Minnesota 56:54-Picks & analysis for Boise St vs Washington St 59:00-Picks & analysis for Illinois vs Missouri 1:01:27-Picks & analysis for VA Tech vs Duke 1:03:22-Picks & analysis for UC San Diego vs San Diego St 1:05:18-Picks & analysis for Dixie St vs Southern Utah 1:06:52-Picks & analysis for Missouri St vs St. Mary's 1:08:42-Picks & analysis for San Diego vs UNLV 1:10:22-Picks & analysis for Liberty vs Northern Iowa 1:11:52-Picks & analysis for Wyoming vs Stanford 1:13:46-Picks & analysis for USF vs BYU 1:15:34-Picks & analysis for Vanderbilt vs Hawaii 1:17:41-Picks & analysis for NC Central vs Sam Houston St 1:19:20-Picks & analysis for Bradley vs UTEP 1:21:01-Picks & analysis for Western Kentucky vs Kentucky 1:22:57-Picks & analysis for Chicago St vs Drake 1:26:22-Interview with Evan Miyakawa 1:40:40-Start of extra games picks with Hartford vs Sacred Heart 1:42:20-Picks & analysis for MD Eastern Shore vs George Washington 1:44:06-Picks & analysis for Campbell vs UNC Wilmington 1:45:52-Picks & analysis for Texas A&M CC vs Notre Dame 1:47:38-Picks & analysis for Towson vs Navy 1:49:21-Picks & analysis for Stony Brook for Florida 1:51:14-Picks & analysis for Colgate vs Vermont 1:53:09-Picks & analysis for Delaware St vs Temple 1:54:47-Picks & analysis for St. Peter's vs Fairleigh Dickinson 1:56:35-Picks & analysis for Army vs South Carolina 1:58:37-Picks & analysis for Bucknell vs Richmond 2:00:41-Picks & analysis for Robert Morris vs St Francis PA 2:02:37-Picks & analysis for Prairie View vs Wichita St 2:04:08-Picks & analysis for Bethune Cookman vs Marist 2:05:53-Picks & analysis for UMBC vs Mount St Mary's 2:07:44-Picks & analysis for FGCU vs Canisius 2:09:36-Picks & analysis for North Alabama vs UCF 2:11:21-Picks & analysis for Kennesaw St vs Nebraska 2:13:18-Picks & analysis for MS Valley St vs UAB 2:15:11-Picks & analysis for Alcorn St vs Oklahoma 2:16:49-Picks & analysis for Longwood vs Abilene Christian 2:18:49-Picks & analysis for Lipscomb vs LSU 2:20:32-Picks & analysis for Alabama St vs Texas Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

It's our eighth college basketball episode of the season! Every Wednesday morning, the Three Man Weave crew of Jim Root, Ky McKeon and Matt Cox will join Big Bets On Campus to talk all things gambling in college hoops! This week, the guys give out their favorite underdogs (01:20), most-likely candidates for big blowouts (08:02), favorite Power 5 matchups (15:03)), favorite mid-major matchups (24:14), and the “Trashman Games of the Week” (31:25). They wrap up the episode with a spotlight on conference play, the 2021 Diamond Head Classic, how to approach teams after a COVID pause, and why we shouldn't be willingly betting on bad teams (35:10). Game previews include Old Dominion vs. Charleston (02:01), Pittsburgh vs. Notre Dame (03:47), Houston vs. Cincinnati (05:10), Nebraska vs. Kennesaw State (06:04), LSU vs. Lipscomb (08:15), Baylor vs. Northwestern State (09:33), Gonzaga vs. North Alabama (10:54), Texas Tech vs. Alabama State (12:32), Tennessee vs. Arizona (15:12), Duke vs. Virginia Tech (17:43), Mizzou vs. Illinois (20:00), Xavier vs. UConn (22:27), St. Mary's vs. Missouri State (24:19), Liberty vs. Northern Iowa (26:04), Monmouth vs. Hofstra (27:56), Weber State vs. Fresno State (29:51), Temple vs. Delaware State (31:31), Fairleigh Dickinson vs. St. Peter's (32:57), Oregon State vs. Sacramento State (34:05), South Dakota State vs. Oral Roberts (35:28), and UC-Davis vs. UC-Riverside (36:29).

Leonard Hamilton joins the show to discuss the challenges that the team is facing early in the season, how they are going to try to turn their season around and their game against Lipscomb tonight. The guys also look back at the 2019 and 2020 Signing Days.

Greg recaps Tuesday's college basketball results, looks for trends with the most and least efficient offenses and how it correlates to against the spread record & Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Wednesday college basketball game. Podcast Highlights 1:32-Recap of Tuesday's results 9:35-How trends with the most & least efficient offenses correlates to against the spread record 17:56-Start of picks with Chattanooga vs Belmont 20:04-Picks & analysis for Marshall vs Ohio 21:51-Picks & analysis for FAU vs VCU 23:46-Picks & analysis for Akron vs Wright St 26:09-Picks & analysis for South Dakota St vs Missouri St 28:26-Picks & analysis for UCF vs Temple 30:14-Picks & analysis for Middle Tennessee St vs Ole Miss 32:05-Picks & analysis for SE Missouri State vs South Illinois 33:43-Picks & analysis for Lamar vs Texas St 35:45-Picks & analysis for Morehead St vs Xavier 37:33-Picks & analysis for CS Bakersfield vs Abilene Christian 39:38-Picks & analysis for UC Irvine vs USC 41:48-Picks & analysis for Northern Colorado vs Arizona 43:49-Picks & analysis for Utah St vs Webers St 45:48-NY Post Pick Portland vs Oregon 47:59-Picks & analysis for UC San Diego vs Denver 50:11-Picks & analysis for Omaha vs UNLV 52:09-Picks & analysis for New Mexico St vs Washington St 54:15-Start of extra game picks Howard vs Georgetown 55:48-Picks & analysis for Winthrop vs Elon 57:54-Picks & analysis for Fairfield vs Fairleigh Dickinson 59:51-Picks & analysis for NC Central vs Gardner Webb 1:01:51-Picks & analysis vs Georgia Southern vs Campbell 1:03:34-Picks & analysis for FIU vs Jacksonville St 1:05:28-Picks & analysis for Nicholls vs Wisconsin 1:07:23-Picks & analysis for Bellarmine vs South Dakota 1:09:03-Picks & analysis for Lipscomb vs Florida St 1:11:01-Picks & analysis for Alabama St vs UCLA Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

2021-12-05 Dharma Talk | Genjokoan | Ann Lipscomb by Appamada

Greg recaps Tuesday's college basketball results, talks to Eli Boettger of Heat Check CBB about the conferences that have over & underachieved thus far along with Wednesday's big games & Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Wednesday college basketball game. Podcast Highlights 1:56-Recap of Tuesday's results 15:14-Interview with Eli Boettger 31:07-Start of picks with Ball St vs Xavier 33:22-Picks & analysis for Penn vs St. Joe's 36:01-Picks & analysis for TN Tech vs Western Carolina 37:54-Picks & analysis for Canisius vs Northern Kentucky 39:59-Picks & analysis for Indiana vs Wisconsin 41:47-Picks & analysis for Central Michigan vs Youngstown St 44:28-Picks & analysis for Niagara vs Eastern Michigan 46:56-Picks & analysis for UConn vs West Virginia 49:25-Picks & analysis for Quinnipiac vs Dartmouth 51:45-Picks & analysis for Evansville vs SE Missouri St 53:39-Picks & analysis for Missouri St vs Little Rock 55:45-Picks & analysis for Utah vs TCU 57:58-Picks & analysis for Dayton vs SMU 1:00:05-Picks & analysis for Buffalo vs Western Kentucky 1:02:25-Picks & analysis for E Washington vs Colorado 1:04:24-Picks & analysis for IPFW vs SIU Edwardsville 1:06:21-Picks & analysis vs Michigan St vs Minnesota 1:08:23-Picks & analysis for Air Force vs Montana 1:10:28-Picks & analysis for Towson vs Ohio St 1:12:25-Picks & analysis for Cornell vs VA Tech 1:14:22-Picks & analysis for Marquette vs Kansas St 1:16:27-Picks & analysis for South Dakota St vs Idaho 1:18:49-Picks & analysis for Utah St vs BYU 1:20:43-Picks & analysis for Drake vs Omaha 1:22:47-Picks & analysis for Utah Valley vs Souther Utah 1:25:03-Picks & analysis for CS Fullerton vs San Diego St 1:27:16-Picks & analysis for Seattle vs UNLV 1:29:14-Picks & analysis for Fresno St vs San Francisco 1:31:03-Picks & analysis for Idaho St vs Cal 1:33:07-NY Post Pick Wyoming vs Arizona 1:34:24-Picks & analysis for Weber St vs Washington St 1:37:31-Start of extra games picks with Chattanooga vs UNC Asheville 1:39:13-Picks & analysis for Coppin St vs George Washington 1:40:57-Picks & analysis for Hofstra vs Stony Brook 1:43:13-Picks & analysis for North Florida vs Florida 1:45:03-Picks & analysis for Wagner vs Penn St 1:47:00-Picks & analysis for Lafayette vs Delaware 1:48:49-Picks & analysis for Wofford vs Gardner Webb 1:50:33-Picks & analysis for Lipscomb vs Miami 1:52:44-Picks & analysis for St Francis NY vs St. Peter's 1:54:31-Picks & analysis for Holy Cross vs Fairfield 1:56:27-Picks & analysis for Marist vs Binghamton 1:58:37-Picks & analysis for Loyola MD vs St. Bonaventure 2:00:36-Picks & analysis for UMass Lowell vs Boston U 2:02:22-Picks & analysis for St Francis PA vs American 2:04:04-Picks & analysis for Alabama A&M vs North Alabama 2:05:50-Picks & analysis for Jacksonville St vs VCU 2:07:24-Picks & analysis for Samford vs Alabama St 2:09:10-Picks & analysis for New Hampshire vs Bryant 2:11:08-Picks & analysis for McNeese St vs Louisiana 2:12:56-Picks & analysis for UT Rio GV vs Texas A&M CC 2:15:04-Picks & analysis for UMBC vs Georgetown 2:16:53-Picks & analysis for Arkansas St vs Arkansas PB Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Greg recaps Wednesday's college basketball results, talks to Curtis Rogers of 710 ESPN in Seattle about Thursday's Pac-12 games and the conference as a whole & Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Thursday college basketball game! Podcast Highlights 1:27-Recap of Wednesday's results 20:36-Interview with Curtis Rogers 37:59-Start of picks with Northern Kentucky vs Cleveland St 40:06-Picks & analysis for Wright St vs IPFW 42:03-Picks & analysis for Detroit vs IUPUI 44:03-Picks & analysis for Montana St vs Northern Colorado 46:12-Picks & analysis for Oral Roberts vs TCU 48:13-Picks & analysis for Lamar vs Mississippi St 50:39-Picks & analysis for Oakland vs UIC 52:41-Picks & analysis for Robert Morris vs UW Green bay 54:59-Picks & analysis for Youngstown St vs UW Milwaukee 56:53-Picks & analysis for Washington vs Arizona 58:45-Picks & analysis for Denver vs Wyoming 1:00:31-Picks & analysis for Northern Arizona vs Weber St 1:02:14-Picks & analysis for Valpo vs Drake 1:04:11-Picks & analysis for Portland St vs Idaho St 1:06:10-Picks & analysis for Southern Utah vs Eastern Washington 1:08:10-Picks & analysis for UTSA vs Grand Canyon 1:10:21-Picks & analysis for St. Mary's vs Utah St 1:12:20-Picks & analysis for Montana vs Sacramento St 1:14:11-Picks & analysis for Cal Poly vs Cal Baptist 1:15:56-Picks & analysis for Eastern Michigan vs UC San Diego 1:17:41-Picks & analysis for Oregon St vs Cal 1:19:36-Start of extra games with Sacred Heart vs Lafayette 1:21:28-Picks & analysis for Fairleigh Dickinson vs Drexel 1:23:00-Picks & analysis for Long Island vs Towson 1:24:41-NY Post pick Missouri vs Liberty 1:26:37-Picks & analysis for Delaware vs Delaware St 1:28:11-Picks & analysis for Jacksonville vs Charleston Southern 1:29:55-Picks & analysis for Lipscomb vs Belmont Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

It's our fifth college basketball episode of the season! Every Wednesday morning, the Three Man Weave crew of Jim Root, Ky McKeon and Matt Cox will join Big Bets On Campus to talk all things gambling in college hoops! This week, the guys give out their favorite underdogs (01:58), most-likely candidates for big blowouts (15:18), favorite Power 5 matchups (22:57), favorite mid-major matchups of the week (31:47), and the game they would rather “claw their eyes out” than actually watch (37:56). They wrap up the episode with a spotlight on some early season conference games from around the NCAA (39:02). Game previews include SMU vs. UNLV (02:12), TCU vs. Oral Roberts (04:39), LSU vs. Ohio (07:23), DePaul vs. Loyola Chicago (09:37), Illinois vs. Rutgers (11:27), Purdue vs. Iowa (12:10), Providence vs. Rhode Island (13:11), Arkansas vs. Central Arkansas (15:18), Iowa State vs. Arkansas-Pine Bluff (17:21), Mississippi State vs. Lamar (20:02), Texas vs. Texas-Rio Grande Valley (20:56), Oklahoma vs. Florida (23:02), North Carolina vs. Michigan (25:03), Maryland vs. Virginia Tech (26:03), Kansas vs. St. John's (28:49), Gonzaga vs. Alabama (30:17), Belmont vs. Lipscomb (31:47), UTEP vs. New Mexico State (33:34), Furman vs. Charleston (35:05), UW-Green Bay vs. Robert Morris (37:09), Liberty vs. Mizzou (38:52), Florida State vs. Syracuse (39:24), Marist vs. Iona (40:54), and Cleveland State vs. Northern Kentucky (42:11).

Haley and Jillian experience their first movie based episode in which they discuss a touching story about a man seeking revenge for his son...oh whoops I mean gun. This episode is the true story of Hugh Glass, the man behind The Revenant. Happy Thanksgiving. Sources: Hugh Glass: American Frontiersman; Arikara People; Grizzly Bear, Encyclopedia Britannica An Unforgettable Man: Hugh Glass, HughGlass.org The Real Story of 'The Revenant' is Far Weirder (and Bloodier) Than the Movie, Steve Friedman, The Hollywood Reporter The Incredible True Story of the Revenant's Hugh Glass, Katie Serena, All That Is Interesting Karankawa Indians, Carol A. Lipscomb, Texas State Historical Association The Karankawa Indians of Texas, Shannon Selin Pawnee History, PawneeNation.org Further Reading/Viewing: The Revenant, 2015, Amazon Prime Video The Revenant, Michael Punke

Greg recaps Monday's college basketball results, talks to Andy Dieckhoff of Heat Check CBB to look at the most impactful players thus far this season & look forward to this Tuesday's big games, & Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Tuesday college basketball game. Podcast Highlights 1:35-Recap of Monday's results 20:12-Interview with Andy Dieckhoff 36:21-Start of picks with Penn vs Towson 38:01-Picks & analysis for Nevada vs George Mason 39:52-Picks & analysis for Louisiana vs Marshall 41:57-Picks & analysis for Wofford vs South Carolina 43:28-Picks & analysis for Omaha vs Texas Tech 45:12-Picks & analysis for Tennessee St vs Nebraska 46:56-Picks & analysis for Washington vs South Dakota St 48:58-Picks & analysis for Northern Colorado vs San Jose St 50:52-NY Post Pick UCLA vs Gonzaga 53:06-Picks & analysis for Portland vs Portland St 54:58-Picks & analysis for Sacramento St vs UC Davis 57:00-Picks & analysis for Evansville vs Vermont 59:20-Picks & analysis for Akron vs Appalachian St 1:01:24-Picks & analysis for Rice vs Oakland 1:03:29-Picks & analysis for Fordham vs Delaware 1:05:32-Picks & analysis for Charlotte vs Drexel 1:07:45-Picks & analysis for Tulane vs Toledo 1:09:36-Picks & analysis for Valparaiso vs Coastal Carolina 1:11:27-Picks & analysis for James Madison vs Wright St 1:13:11-Picks & analysis for Long Beach St vs Murray St 1:15:03-Picks & analysis for Kent St vs George Washington 1:16:49-Picks & analysis for Missouri St vs East Tennessee St 1:18:46-Picks & analysis for Southern Utah vs Yale 1:20:36-Picks & analysis for UW Milwaukee vs Bowling Green 1:22:34-Picks & analysis for Middle Tennessee St vs Rider 1:24:23-Picks & analysis for Bucknell vs Mercer 1:26:03-Picks & analysis for Texas A&M vs Butler 1:27:49-Picks & analysis for Wisconsin vs Houston 1:29:28-Picks & analysis for Chaminade vs Notre Dame 1:31:16-Picks & analysis for Oregon vs St. Mary's 1:33:10-Picks & analysis for Georgia vs Northwestern 1:35:09-Picks & analysis for Virginia vs Providence 1:36:48-Picks & analysis for Buffalo vs Stephen F Austin 1:38:38-Picks & analysis N Illinois vs St. Louis 1:40:44-Picks & analysis for Illinois vs Kansas St 1:42:44-Picks & analysis for Arkansas vs Cincinnati 1:44:32-Picks & analysis for CS Fullerton vs UT Rio Grande Valley 1:46:44-Start of Extra Game Picks with Quinnipiac New Hampshire 1:48:35-Picks & analysis for Liberty vs Bethune Cookman 1:50:39-Picks & analysis for UNC Asheville vs UNC 1:52:28-Picks & analysis for Hartford vs Merrimack 1:54:04-Picks & analysis for Lipscomb vs Tennessee Tech 1:55:46-Picks & analysis for USC Upstate vs South Carolina St 1:57:31-Picks & analysis for American vs UMBC 1:59:15-Picks & analysis for LIU vs St. Peter's 2:01:03-Picks & analysis for Central Connecticut St vs Maine 2:03:05-Picks & analysis for Jackson St vs Indiana 2:04:52-Picks & analysis for St. Francis NY vs St. John's 2:06:37-Picks & analysis for Lehigh vs Columbia 2:08:27-Picks & analysis for Rhode Island vs FGCU 2:10:26-Picks & analysis for Bellarmine vs Central Michigan 2:12:04-Picks & analysis for Kennesaw St vs Wake Forest 2:13:36-Picks & analysis for North Carolina A&T vs Stanford Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

The 2022 College Basketball season rolls on today with some more great games. Chris breaks down his 3 favorite games on today's ​card. Drop your picks for Tuesday down below. 0:00 - Intro 0:51 - Lipscomb vs Tennessee Tech 4:34 - Columbia vs Lehigh 7:20 - Gonzaga vs UCLA 11:34 - Closing Website: https://hottipbets.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/HotTipBets Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hottipbets Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HotTipBet TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hottipbets YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRVq69qbkTnmbwBUUXKz9LQ Chris' Social: Betstamp: https://www.betstamp.app/u/HotTipBetsChris Twitter: https://twitter.com/HotTipBetsChris Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hottipbetschris

2021-11-21 Dharma Talk | Nicole Marais: My Zen Journey So Far | Interviewed by Ann Lipscomb by Appamada

Jack Edwards had a hat trick as the Knights collected their second win of the season. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

AJ Brown delivered a very important message on mental health and the effects that it has. Buck and Lucas listen to AJ and talk about the deep meaning of mental health. Plus, Lipscomb Academy Head Coach Trent Dilfer joins the show.

AJ Brown delivered a very important message on mental health and the effects that it has. Buck and Lucas listen to AJ and talk about the deep meaning of mental health. Plus, Lipscomb Academy Head Coach Trent Dilfer joins the show.

Flyer Feedback from Wednesday, November 17, 2021

Dayton Flyer Basketball from Wednesday, November 17, 2021

Greg talks about ways to narrow down his picks for those that are lower volume bettors, recaps Tuesday's college basketball results, talks to Kelly Hines of Tulsa World about the American Conference & Summit League along with Tulsa & Oral Roberts' outlook, & Greg picks & analyzes EVERY Wednesday college basketball game. Podcast Highlights 2:48-Ways to narrow down Greg's picks 6:21-Recap of Tuesday's results 24:58-Interview with Kelly Hines 39:24-Start of picks with IUPUI vs UTSA 41:43-Picks & analysis for Boston College vs Rhode Island 43:46-Picks & analysis for Drexel vs St. Joseph's 45:49-Picks & analysis for George Mason vs Maryland 48:02-Picks & analysis for La Salle vs Delaware 50:02-Picks & analysis for Michigan St vs Butler 52:10-Picks & analysis for Toledo vs Oakland 54:51-Picks & analysis for Marist vs Princeton 56:56-Picks & analysis for Detroit vs Mississippi St 59:13-Picks & analysis for VCU vs Vanderbilt 1:01:01-NY Post Pick South Alabama vs Alabama 1:03:49-Picks & analysis for Northern Iowa vs Arkansas 1:05:42-Picks & analysis for Omaha vs Kansas St 1:07:45-Picks & analysis for Tulane vs Florida St 1:09:30-Picks & analysis for Montana St vs South Dakota St 1:11:22-Picks & analysis for Northern Colorado vs Texas 1:13:15-Picks & analysis for Valpo vs Stanford 1:15:07-Picks & analysis for Missouri St vs Sam Houston St 1:17:07-Picks & analysis for St. John's vs Indiana 1:19:17-Picks & analysis for Little Rock vs Loyola Marymount 1:21:42-Picks & analysis for Utah Valley vs Long Beach St 1:23:38-Picks & analysis for UC Davis vs Pepperdine 1:26:06-Picks & analysis for UC Riverside vs San Diego 1:28:14-Start of extra games Houston Baptist vs Texas A&M 1:30:18-Picks & analysis for Denver vs Texas A&M CC 1:32:05-Picks & analysis for UMass vs Central Connecticut St 1:33:50-Picks & analysis for Merrimack vs Army 1:35:56-Picks & analysis for LIU vs UConn 1:37:45-Picks & analysis for Lipscomb vs Dayton 1:39:33-Picks & analysis for Binghamton vs Columbia 1:41:32-Picks & analysis for Rider vs Bucknell 1:43:49-Picks & analysis for Harvard vs Albany 1:45:35-Picks & analysis for Charleston Southern vs Wake Forest 1:47:24-Picks & analysis for St. Peter's vs Wagner 1:49:21-Picks & analysis for Loyola MD vs Coppin St 1:51:37-Picks & analysis for Stetson vs Miami OH 1:53:46-Picks & analysis for Central Arkansas vs Baylor 1:55:33-Picks & analysis for Prairie View vs Grand Canyon 1:57:36-Picks & analysis for Texas Southern vs Air Force 1:59:43-Picks & analysis for Bellarmine vs St. Mary's 2:01:35-Picks & analysis for North Florida vs UCLA Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

It's our third college basketball episode of the season! Every Wednesday morning, the Three Man Weave crew of Jim Root, Ky McKeon and Matt Cox will join Big Bets On Campus to talk all things gambling in college hoops! This week, the guys give out their favorite underdogs (01:52), most-likely candidates for big blowouts (16:47), favorite Power 5 matchups (21:09), favorite mid-major matchups of the week (29:23), and the game they would rather “claw their eyes out” than actually watch (33:54). They wrap up the episode with a spotlight on the upcoming tournaments in college hoops: the Maui Invitational (36:42), the Charleston Classic (39:17), the Myrtle Beach Invitational (41:02), and the U.S. Virgin Islands Paradise Jam (42:36). Game previews include Maryland vs. George Mason (02:28), Dayton vs. Lipscomb (05:04), Loyola Marymount vs. Little Rock (07:48), Creighton vs. Brown (11:32), Memphis vs. Western Kentucky (14:23), Baylor vs. Central Arkansas (16:58), St. John's vs. Fairleigh Dickinson (18:43), Xavier vs. Ohio State (21:40), Wichita State vs. Arizona (24:03), a hypothetical match-up of Michigan and Arizona (25:21), Purdue vs. North Carolina (25:56), Tennessee vs. Villanova (27:46), Oakland vs. Toledo (29:31), St. Peter's vs. Wagner (31:25), UTSA vs. IUPUI (34:06), Houston vs. Butler (38:30), St. Bonaventure vs. Boise State (39:24), Davidson vs. New Mexico State (41:11), Utah State vs. Penn (41:32), Old Dominion vs. Indiana State (42:12), and Colorado State vs. Bradley (42:43).

Three games, three wins. Harrison Bowne rejoins the pod to discuss Charleston's busy weekend, and preview the game everyone has circled. Tommy and Harrison recap the SC State, Lipscomb, and Loyola MD games, Brenden Tucker's hot shooting, Dalton Bolon's injury and much more before turning their attention to Tuesday's matchup with the Tar Heels.

Greg talks about why he does not do in-game bets, recaps Thursday's college basketball results, talks to Jim Root of the Three Man Weave his opening night takeaways and his thoughts on Thursday's games, & Greg picks & analyze EVERY Thursday college basketball game! Podcast Highlights 2:52-Why Greg doesn't do in game bets 3:57-Recap of Thursday's college basketball action 10:32-Picks & analysis for Northeastern vs Georgia St 12:44-E Washington vs UC Davis 14:45-N Dakota St vs Cal Poly 16:49-Utah St vs Richmond 19:03-Illinois St vs E Michigan 21:24-W Michigan vs Michigan St 23:36-E Tennessee St vs Appalachian St 25:55-Picks & analysis for Ket St vs Xavier 28:09-Picks & analysis for Wright St vs Marshall 30:39-Picks & analysis for Niagara vs Ohio St 32:44-Picks & analysis for UNC Greensboro vs N Kentucky 34:59-Picks & analysis for Marist vs Columbia 37:28-Picks & analysis for N Illinois vs Indiana 39:26-Picks & analysis for Canisus vs E Carolina 41:38-Picks & analysis for Furman vs Louisville 43:57-Picks & analysis for Fordham vs Manhattan 46:13-Picks & analysis for Wofford vs Clemson 48:28-Robert Morris vs Kentucky 50:23-Penn vs George Mason 52:14-Morehead St vs UAB 54:10-W Carolina vs Wake Forest 56:02-Picks & analysis for UMKC vs Iowa 57:49-Picks & analysis for E Illinois vs St. Louis 59:56-Picks & analysis for Abilene Christian vs Texas A&M 1:01:45-Picks & analysis for Louisiana vs So Miss 1:03:53-Picks & analysis for S Dakota St vs Alabama 1:06:02-Picks & analysis for UW Green Bay vs Wisconsin 1:07:46-Picks & analysis for LA Monroe vs Auburn 1:09:36-Tarleton St vs Kansas 1:11:41-Picks & analysis for Rice vs Houston 1:13:35-Picks & analysis for Oakland vs Oklahoma St 1:15:29-Picks & analysis for Oregon St vs Iowa St 1:17:32-Picks & analysis for UTSA vs Oklahoma 1:19:35-Picks & analysis for UMass vs Yale 1:21:21-Picks & analysis for Texas St vs LSU 1:23:12-Picks & analysis for SIU Edwardsville vs Chicago St 1:25:38-Picks & analysis for Austin Peay vs S Illinois 1:27:39-Picks & analysis for Indiana St vs Purdue 1:29:51-Picks & analysis for Pitt vs W Virginia 1:32:02-Picks & analysis for Sam Houston vs Nebraska 1:34:07-Picks & analysis for Arkansas St vs Illinois 1:35:57-Picks & analysis for So Illinois vs Dixie St 1:38:01-Picks & analysis for San Diego St vs BYU 1:39:48-Picks & analysis for Brown vs UNC 1:41:54-Picks & analysis for UT Rio GV vs Arizona 1:43:54-Picks & analysis for Idaho St vs Pepperdine 1:45:42-Picks & analysis for San Diego vs Nevada 1:47:56-Picks & analysis for Seattle vs Washington St 1:49:41-Picks & analysis for Stanford vs Santa Clara 1:51:45-Picks & analysis for SMU vs Oregon 1:54:13-NY Post Pick Villanova vs UCLA 1:56:19-Picks & analysis for W Kentucky vs Minnesota 1:58:34-Picks & analysis for Princeton vs S Carolina 2:02:58-Start of extra game picks with Hartford vs Campbell 2:04:49-Picks & analysis for S Carolina St vs Loyola MD 2:06:25-Picks & analysis for FDU vs Drexel 2:08:10-Picks & analysis for Bryant vs Rhode Island 2:09:56-Picks & analysis for C Arkansas vs Butler 2:11:29-Picks & analysis for USC Upstate vs Charlotte 2:13:14-Picks & analysis for American vs William & Mary 2:14:55-Picks & analysis for VMI vs Presbyterian 2:16:57-Picks & analysis for Radford vs Virginia 2:18:54-Picks & analysis for Army vs Duke 2:20:23-Picks & analysis for Coppin St vs Rider 2:22:27-Picks & analysis for Bethune Cookman vs Middle Tennessee 2:24:43-Charleston So vs Ole Miss 2:26:18-Holy Cross vs Boston College 2:28:15-Jackson St vs LA Tech 2:30:36-Lipscomb vs Charleston 2:32:34-Stetson vs GA Tech 2:34:14-Cornell vs Lafayette 2:36:00-High Point vs Northwestern 2:38:15-Grambling vs Texas Tech 2:40:05-New Hampshire vs Marquette 2:42:00-Incarnate Word vs Baylor 2:43:46-Virginia Tech vs Navy 2:45:39-N Florida vs Grand Canyon 2:47:40- Arkansas PB vs Colorado St 2:49:28-LIU vs Fresno St 2:51:22-Texas So vs St. Mary's Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hosted by Andrew Keen, Keen On features conversations with some of the world's leading thinkers and writers about the economic, political, and technological issues being discussed in the news, right now. In this episode Andrew is joined by Benjamin J.B. Lipscomb, the author of The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics, to discuss the fascinating history of four women philosophers who shaped the intellectual history of the 20th century. ________________________ Linda Greenhouse, the winner of the 1998 Pulitzer Prize, writes about the Supreme Court and the law. She reported on the Supreme Court for The New York Times from 1978 to 2008 and currently teaches at Yale Law School. Visit our website: https://lithub.com/story-type/keen-on/ Email Andrew: a.keen@me.com Watch the show live on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ajkeen Watch the show live on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ankeen/ Watch the show live on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lithub Watch the show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/LiteraryHub/videos Subscribe to Andrew's newsletter: https://andrew2ec.substack.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week, Steve and Dana are joined by New York Times columnist and Slate graduate Jamelle Bouie. First, the panel discusses Marvel's most recent big picture, Eternals—which Dana reviewed for Slate. Next, the panel gives an update on their feelings about HBO's hit TV show Succession, which is currently in its third season. Finally, the panel explores the controversy involving Critical Race Theory. In Slate Plus, the panel discusses Jamelle's new podcast Unclear and Present Danger. Email us at culturefest@slate.com. Endorsements Dana: Something small, but in hopes to find the entire thing: this 2 minute clip of Welsh actor Michael Sheen performing a segment of Welsh poet Dylan Thomas's drama Under Milk Wood. Jamelle: Norman Jewison's classic 1987 film Moonstruck, starring Cher and Nicolas Cage, which is currently in the Criterion Collection. Steve: A slightly odd endorsement of a book review. Peter Salmon's article for Prospect Magazine, titled “Boo to the Boo-Hurrahs: how four Oxford women transformed philosophy,” is a review of Benjamin J. B. Lipscomb's novel The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics. The book and review discuss the female-led movement to take on the male consensus in philosophy during the 1930s and ‘40s which saw the world as value free. Podcast production by Cameron Drews. Production assistance by Nadira Goffe. Outro music is “Self Made Woman” by Katharine Appleton. Slate Plus members get ad-free podcasts, a bonus segment in each episode of the Culture Gabfest, full access to Slate's journalism on Slate.com, and more. Sign up now at slate.com/cultureplus. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week, Steve and Dana are joined by New York Times columnist and Slate graduate Jamelle Bouie. First, the panel discusses Marvel's most recent big picture, Eternals—which Dana reviewed for Slate. Next, the panel gives an update on their feelings about HBO's hit TV show Succession, which is currently in its third season. Finally, the panel explores the controversy involving Critical Race Theory. In Slate Plus, the panel discusses Jamelle's new podcast Unclear and Present Danger. Email us at culturefest@slate.com. Endorsements Dana: Something small, but in hopes to find the entire thing: this 2 minute clip of Welsh actor Michael Sheen performing a segment of Welsh poet Dylan Thomas's drama Under Milk Wood. Jamelle: Norman Jewison's classic 1987 film Moonstruck, starring Cher and Nicolas Cage, which is currently in the Criterion Collection. Steve: A slightly odd endorsement of a book review. Peter Salmon's article for Prospect Magazine, titled “Boo to the Boo-Hurrahs: how four Oxford women transformed philosophy,” is a review of Benjamin J. B. Lipscomb's novel The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics. The book and review discuss the female-led movement to take on the male consensus in philosophy during the 1930s and ‘40s which saw the world as value free. Podcast production by Cameron Drews. Production assistance by Nadira Goffe. Outro music is “Self Made Woman” by Katharine Appleton. Slate Plus members get ad-free podcasts, a bonus segment in each episode of the Culture Gabfest, full access to Slate's journalism on Slate.com, and more. Sign up now at slate.com/cultureplus. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week, Steve and Dana are joined by New York Times columnist and Slate graduate Jamelle Bouie. First, the panel discusses Marvel's most recent big picture, Eternals—which Dana reviewed for Slate. Next, the panel gives an update on their feelings about HBO's hit TV show Succession, which is currently in its third season. Finally, the panel explores the controversy involving Critical Race Theory. In Slate Plus, the panel discusses Jamelle's new podcast Unclear and Present Danger. Email us at culturefest@slate.com. Endorsements Dana: Something small, but in hopes to find the entire thing: this 2 minute clip of Welsh actor Michael Sheen performing a segment of Welsh poet Dylan Thomas's drama Under Milk Wood. Jamelle: Norman Jewison's classic 1987 film Moonstruck, starring Cher and Nicolas Cage, which is currently in the Criterion Collection. Steve: A slightly odd endorsement of a book review. Peter Salmon's article for Prospect Magazine, titled “Boo to the Boo-Hurrahs: how four Oxford women transformed philosophy,” is a review of Benjamin J. B. Lipscomb's novel The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics. The book and review discuss the female-led movement to take on the male consensus in philosophy during the 1930s and ‘40s which saw the world as value free. Podcast production by Cameron Drews. Production assistance by Nadira Goffe. Outro music is “Self Made Woman” by Katharine Appleton. Slate Plus members get ad-free podcasts, a bonus segment in each episode of the Culture Gabfest, full access to Slate's journalism on Slate.com, and more. Sign up now at slate.com/cultureplus. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Locked On Cougars Podcast for Wednesday, November 10, 2021 Wednesday's podcast began with a look back at BYU men's basketball's 69-59 season-opening victory over Cleveland State. Jake Hatch talked about his takeaways, both good and bad, including Alex Barcello's continued brilliance, three-point shooting being shaky and best wishes for big man Richard Harward Attention then shifted to BYU football as the Cougars moved up one spot in the newest College Football Playoff rankings that were revealed Tuesday night. Jake shared his thoughts on the move up the poll and why he still believes that the pathway for BYU to play in a bigger bowl game than the Independence Bowl is still laid out for BYU Finally, the show wrapped up with other BYU news and notes, including a fantastic season-opening win for the BYU women's basketball program over Lipscomb as well as the men's golf program in a good position going into the final day of the Saint Mary's Invitational today Support Us By Supporting Our Locked On Podcast Network Sponsors!  Built Bar - Built Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to BuiltBar.com and use promo code “LOCKEDON15,” and you'll get 15% off your next order. BetOnline.AG - There is only one place that has you covered and one place we trust to place our wagers. That's BetOnline! Sign up today for a free account at betonline.ag and use the promo code "LOCKEDON" for your 50% welcome bonus. PrizePicks - Don't hesitate, check out PrizePicks.com and use promo code: “LOCKEDON” or go to your app store and download the app today. PrizePicks is daily fantasy made easy! Follow the Locked On Cougars podcast on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to stay up-to-date with the latest with regards to the podcast and BYU sports news. Please remember to subscribe, rate and review the show. Also, please consider subscribing to the Yawk Talk Newsletter that Jake writes and is delivered directly to your email inbox. If you are interested in advertising with Locked On Cougars or the Locked On Podcast Network, please email us at LockedOnBYU@gmail.com or contact us here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Locked On Cougars Podcast for Tuesday, November 9, 2021 It's opening night college basketball and the BYU men's and women's basketball programs open the 2021-22 season at the Marriott Center with games against Cleveland State and Lipscomb, respectively. Jake Hatch previews the game(s) and explains what you need to know about the Vikings as they come to face Mark Pope and co. Attention then shifted to recruiting for BYU football as the Cougars are in the mix for 2023 five-star prospect Cormani McClain and Jake caught up with BYU superfan Ty Nielson, who has a relationship with McClain, as he explained his connection to Cormani and why he is visiting BYU Part two of Jake's conversation with Ty Neilson rounded out the show as Ty explains that he believes BYU is a legit contender to sign McClain. Jake also talked about Jaren Hall taking home a player of the week award coming out of the Idaho State game as well as women's soccer earning a No. 4 seed into the NCAA Tournament the begins this weekend Support Us By Supporting Our Locked On Podcast Network Sponsors!  Built Bar - Built Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to BuiltBar.com and use promo code “LOCKEDON15,” and you'll get 15% off your next order. BetOnline.AG - There is only one place that has you covered and one place we trust to place our wagers. That's BetOnline! Sign up today for a free account at betonline.ag and use the promo code "LOCKEDON" for your 50% welcome bonus. PrizePicks - Don't hesitate, check out PrizePicks.com and use promo code: “LOCKEDON” or go to your app store and download the app today. PrizePicks is daily fantasy made easy! Follow the Locked On Cougars podcast on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to stay up-to-date with the latest with regards to the podcast and BYU sports news. Please remember to subscribe, rate and review the show. Also, please consider subscribing to the Yawk Talk Newsletter that Jake writes and is delivered directly to your email inbox. If you are interested in advertising with Locked On Cougars or the Locked On Podcast Network, please email us at LockedOnBYU@gmail.com or contact us here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The College Basketball Experience (@TCEonSGPN) on the Sports Gambling Podcast Network previews the upcoming Atlantic Sun season. Pick Dundee aka (@TheColbyD) breaks down each and every team in the Atlantic Sun and keys in what the conference pecking order will be when its all said and done. Will Liberty and Darius McGhee win another ASUN Championship? Can Jacksonville State and Darian Adams lead the Gamecocks to the big dance? Could KJ Johnson and Lipscomb be a contender in the ASUN this year? How will Eastern Kentucky and Jomaru Brown fare in their new conference? Will Dylan Penn and Bellarmine be a threat to win the ASUN in their 2nd year at the D1 level? Will North Florida and Carter Hendricksen play a role in the ASUN Championship this year? Will Cyrus Largie and Florida Gulf Coast get the program back to where it used to be? Will Chase Johnston and Stetson be a tough out for everybody in the ASUN? How will the Jacksonville Dolphins do with Bryce Workman and company returning? Could Spencer Rodgers and Kennesaw State be one of the more improved teams in the ASUN? Can Jamari Blackmon and North Alabama roar their way to conference contention? Will a healthy Collin Cooper make all the difference for Central Arkansas? We talk it all on this special edition episode of The College Basketball Experience. Make sure you subscribe to The College Football Experience at sg.pn/tcfe Follow - Twitter | Instagram Watch - YouTube | Twitch Subscribe - Apple | Spotify Read - SportsGamblingPodcast.com Discuss - Slack | Reddit Download the SGPN APP today https://sgpn.app and leave us a rating & review. Support for this episode - WynnBet | PropSwap.com code “SGP” | Prediction Strike code SGPN Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Welcome back to season two! Art can be beautiful and thought-provoking, and when it is created in service to others, it becomes inspirational. Lipscomb Academy has been the recipient of multiple art installations from one very talented artistic family, and they are sharing their gifts with us. Hosted by Dr. Brad Schultz and Amanda Price, this …. is Mustangs Unbridled.

In this edition of In The Circle, we focus on the A-SUN conference in 2022 and beyond. Guests include Lipscomb Head Coach Kristin Ryman, Jacksonville's Head Coach Erica Ayers, and North Florida Head Coach Marcie Higgs. First, Eric Lopez talks with Ryman about Lipscomb hosting Alabama in the fall, the 2022 season, and her playing career at Lipscomb. Eric then previews Jacksonville with coach Ayers and more about realignment in A-SUN. Coach Higgs talks about some of the new faces at UNF, a preview of the upcoming season, and how she sees the A-SUN playing out in 2022.

Jett Wilson scored twice as the Admirals collected win #2 on the season. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

It's week ten of the 104.5 High School Football Game of the Week. Lucas Panzica and Will Boling are on the call and bring you the action live from Lipscomb Academy.

Fear Level: SpoopyTrigger Warnings: Attempted sexual assault, stabbing, strangling, racism, voodoo, descriptions of childhood traumaSupport us on our Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/progressivelyhorrifiedSometimes a cop chases a strangler into a toy store and before he can die, that strangler uses his correspondence course in voodoo to transfer his consciousness to a stuffed doll. Director: Tom Holland Writers: Don Mancini, John Lafia, Tom Holland Stars: Catherine Hicks, Chris Sarandon, Alex Vincent Talking Points: Dark and Gritty Paw Patrol Showbusiness bad Single mom superhero REAGAN! Childhood trauma and bad toys Jack me up Elmo 80s Horror Lightning Putting traumatized children in Arkham Mount Rushmore of horror icons Malignant, again, we can't stop talking about it Fully absent dads A literal magical negro Please check out our guests!Daniel KibblesmithTwitter: @kibblesmithWatch "Inside Job" on Netflix now!Emmanuel LipscombTwitter: @elipscomb2Cam Collins:Twitter: @cammycatSteve SeighTwitter: @dead_anchoressTalking Comics PodcastBronwyn Kelly-SeighOn twitter: @shinybabybCheck out her podcast: "Ladies of Valhalla"Support LoV on PatreonFollow Emily on twitter @megamothEmily's Website: Megamoth.netFollow Ben on twitter @benthekahnOrder Ben's new book, Renegade Rule.Follow Jeremy on twitter @jrome58Visit his website at JeremyWhitley.comRSS Feed: https://feeds.transistor.fm/progressively-horrifiedWebsite: https://progressivelyhorrified.transistor.fm/Join our Patreon at: patreon.com/progressivelyhorrified to support the show, get bonus episodes, early access to upcoming episodes, and a cool Progressively Horrified t-shirt.Join us next week to talk about Saw★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Nicolas Redisi and Kyle Alsaker each had hat tricks in a dominant win for the Bears. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

We're previewing one of the games of the year in Tennessee this fall between Lipscomb Academy and CPA with head coaches Ingle Martin and Trent Dilfer.

Pharmacy companies are an important part for Spencer Health Solutions, and pharmacists are an integral part of fulfilling our mission to serve patients in their homes. Hi, I'm Tom Rhodes, CEO, Spencer Health Solutions. We have had the opportunity to bring patient pharmaceutical and digital health thought leaders to previous podcasts. However, today we're speaking with our first pharmacist, digital health advocate and analyst, Timothy Aungst, also known as the digital apothecary. He joins our host Janet Kennedy for an insightful conversation and a call to action to the pharmacy industry on the People Always, Patients Sometimes podcast.   Janet Kennedy: (00:45) Welcome to People Always, Patients Sometimes. I'm very excited that today's guest is Timothy Aungst, the digital apothecary. He is an associate professor of pharmacy practice and also a clinical pharmacist. Timothy, welcome to the podcast.   Timothy Aungst: (01:03) Thank you, Janet, I'm really excited to be here today to talk about, you know, all this stuff that's been going on.   Janet Kennedy: (01:08) It's been a crazy couple of years and that's one of the things that I wanted to talk to you about. I found you because I read your primer, "Digital Health Primer for Pharmacists." You published it in February of 2019. At that time you wrote, "after being involved in the digital health space for almost a decade, I can say with complete sincerity, that the topic is still relatively out of the realm of the general pharmacy profession grasp." Okay. You put a challenge out there. 10 years you've been involved in digital health and you're saying pharmacy is still not up to speed. Would you say that that's true two years later?   Timothy Aungst: (01:52) Yes. I still would stand by that. I would argue that we have seen entrepreneurship within the pharmacy profession gravitate towards digital health at large, but I would also conversely say that as a profession for pharmacists, we have not really actually actively engaged in this area. We still lack a large number of educational roles and trying to get people aware of the space. There is a lack of discussion around it. Most of our public organizations that provide guidance on what our next steps for the profession don't really think about it in, I think it's for that reason, I still would say the gap is there. Now that is changing. I would say that there has been a semi call to action amongst several pharmacy organizations, whether it's say PHA, ACP and several others who are now trying to get the profession up to speed on what digital health is.   Timothy Aungst: (02:44) And that's been a big focus of mine serving as so-called subject matter expert or key opinion leader to help get information out there regarding the topic. But very, at this time it's quite topical just because we are not actively highly engaged with it. I would probably say we're maybe like two or three years behind other healthcare professions, such as the medical community. The American medical association has an active digital health component that they've been pushing, I would say probably for about two or three years at this point, have reports coming out, organizations associated with it. And I think pharmacists have to play catch up to that. And depending on key stakeholders at this current time that may or may not go fast or may go slow. And that's one thing I'm actively keeping my eye on.   Janet Kennedy: (03:27) Well, I'm curious about whether pharmacists or the pharmacy is even included in some of this digital health development.   Timothy Aungst: (03:36) I'm always a person who would've actually separate the two. The pharmacist and the pharmacy, I think are no longer synonymous organizations. You don't need a pharmacy to have a pharmacist. I think it's going to be what we see in the 2020s or 2030s at this point. I think those two things will actually diverge and that will just come down to logistics and also some legal parameters I think people are pushing right now. Technicians will be empowered to take on most of the stuff on site and pharmacists will probably feel remote. That being the case then to accomplish that, and also to get pharmacies up to speed where healthcare is going, I think the pharmacy businesses will engage in digital health activities. For good or for bad. The big news right now, right, is that Elizabeth Holmes is in court with Theranos. And if we look at Thernos, who was one of the biggest backers? That was Walgreens. And I always looked at what happened with Walgreens being burned there is a reason why they actually had a huge number of digital health initiatives back in the 2010s. And I think they pulled back because they got burned so heavily.   Timothy Aungst: (04:31) In the meantime, we see, let's say a business like CVS Health going down a whole vertical pipeline. Now we got Aetna involved, we got long-term care stuff, we got them pushing to go into kidney disease with dialysis treatments. They are partnering up with digital health companies all over the place. One of the biggest ones, for example, was Sleepio for a digital therapeutic that they've been piloting out there, which has actually initial positive results I'm actually reading through right now. So some of these companies are more involved than others. And I think it's going to come down to, you know, what assets they have to really push that. Whether they see the market going a certain way and they want to meet consumer demands because they are also aware of that, with the changing dynamics within healthcare, pharma is going down the digital health path. Payers are looking at this. Employers are looking at this and even the big tech companies are pushing this stuff out there. So are they going to let other people dictate to them the incumbents of what to do, or are they going to be the drivers themselves? And I think that's going to be something that's going to be interesting to watch.   Janet Kennedy: (05:34) Well, so you mentioned the need to separate the pharmacist from pharmacy. So speaking from the individual's perspective, do you hear pharmacists talking about wanting more and better tools to be able to help their patients or are they just basically the Amazon employee at the warehouse where they're just cranking out the work?   Timothy Aungst: (05:57) See, I used to think we're still on the razor's edge between two possibilities: one was pharmacists finding some kind of clinical services they pay for under some, say, value-based care agreements. And by providing clinical services would receive renumeration that would allow them to be so-called clinicians in health care. Or the other one was being fully remote and being consigned to these activities, to these virtual workshops where they basically just review medications that have been turned out by Amazon or other companies like true pill, et cetera. There might be a third path, which is a mix between the two. And that's kind of where I'm more leaning towards right now from a pharmacist perspective. Yes, there is a huge interest in digital pathway as a means to basically call back clinical services and kind of like be able to provide services that could then actually have objective feedback in terms of what they did, that they could then bill for services and, you know, make money from it.   Timothy Aungst: (06:51) But I don't know if that's going to be enough at this current point to actually say, "oh, well, you're now a remote clinical pharmacist that overviews these data's on people's adherence or their information on disease states, and you get this much," because one of the issues is actually even though they're like remote patient monitoring services that we're seeing CPT codes being pushed up by CMS and such, they're in the physician still. So the pharmacist almost has to still be partnered with someone else in order to receive the renumeration. And then at that point in time, you know, it was kind of like, what slice of the pie are you going to get? And I think that's really what concerns me is that from a healthcare perspective, the pharmacist is still really trapped in their other engagements, which has traditionally held us back. And I think this is because we again have very little stakes in digital health and we were coming to the table kind of late. The other people have already kind of figured this out and have already been making inroads. Making propositions to other organizations to get themselves ahead. And we're kind of almost, I don't want to say asking for crumbs, but we're going to have to really do our best claw back some of this stuff for ourselves. And that's going to delay, I think those aspects.   Janet Kennedy: (07:56) And do you see the trade associations being the ones that should be leading this charge?   Timothy Aungst: (08:01) I think the trade associations unfortunately all have different stances out why they would want to engage in this stuff. The trade associations value pharmacists to different extents. And within a pharmacy community, we know with the alphabet soup of different pharmacy organizations, they don't all have one central voice. They don't all have one central take on what is the role of pharmacists. I've heard some people say we have a pharmacist practice at the top of their license. I don't know what that means. To be quite honest, whenever I hear that I kind of have to roll my eyes, because what is the top of their license? I think in their eyes probably is just, you know, sending off for prescriptions. So that's great. That's what they see as the business that they have to focus on. I could see definitely some trade associations making an argument to empower technicians, to move back at scale back the role of the pharmacist as a, you know, as a rate limiting step in terms of evaluating prescriptions and getting them out the door.   Timothy Aungst: (08:53) And also because there are high cost margin right there, and that would reduce the overhead versus some other trade associations are definitely more clinically focused and would push that down too. So within pharmacy, the unfortunate thing right now is there are some tenuous arguments going on about, you know, who has the right step for the profession or which to be used, how to utilize them. And I think those are the conversations, the hard conversations to have to occur now versus later, because this whole approach of them to let's say digital health and such could become very fragmented. You could see some people that operate large corporations would probably want to use digital health for alternative means versus maybe some smaller companies. And I think that's going to really, for me, I have to bemoan them is that's gonna really muddy the waters and I guess, slow down the process of any adoption by the profession. So yes, I think the trade professions will probably be key here, but I would also, or you, because historically they don't always get along or had the same thought processes that this is going to be another area. That's going to be a sticking point where argue about how to do this.   Janet Kennedy: (09:57) You know, I find that health care was still slow to come to digital tools and platforms. I'm curious to know whether, with your ear to the ground, do you find that patients are pushing their desire for digital health into the healthcare system? And do you find that that's being impacted or felt on the pharmacy side?   Timothy Aungst: (10:21) And this is a good question because you know, who's the drivers for change. I think it's one of the things that always comes up. Patients are often said to be one of the major drivers, and I do believe that to a certain points payers are probably one of the biggest drivers I would argue though, overall, because they ultimately are paying the money. Patients themselves are vocal population that can dictate those favorable or unfavorable role, lots of different programs and services at the end of the day. So from that perspective, I think with the ongoing pandemic, we saw this huge push for, you know, delivery of services for the ability to have a so-called digital front door. And you know, what was in the news the other day was that Walgreens got in trouble apparently because they're whole vaccine signup and testing site wasn't secure. And the data is now - someone's getting into it. And this, I think is going to give some feedback to people like, you know, if we have to do remote practice, sign up and go through an app or make an account and et cetera, but you can't even keep my data secure - Is that good or bad?   Timothy Aungst: (11:17) You know, is that a company I'm going to trust? And those are the things that they're hitting people now it's not so much like, oh, you know, I have a brick and mortar business. People come and buy things and they leave. I just had to worry about the credit cards now I have to worry about their online accounts. I have to worry about health history that's been uploaded or shared. This is definitely a new area I think people are considering. Hospitals and health systems have been dealing with this for years. They've been getting hit by malware attacks for a long time. Now people will ask you for cryptocurrency just to unlock their systems, for goodness sake. And because of this, the population does expect a digital front door, digital services. And I think ultimately businesses have had to pivot to address an answer to that.   Timothy Aungst: (11:57) But I don't think they traditionally had that as a, you know, as something that is a high concern for them in the pandemic was a force multiplier that really had to make them rush into, this for good or for bad. I mean, the pandemic is going to go on for awhile. We're going to see this go up in waves, in different parts of the United States. So these companies are going to have a long time to pilot certain programs, but I think many of them have recognized, no matter what, post pandemic, this is going to be a status quo. So whatever works now has to work in the future as well.   Janet Kennedy: (12:27) Well, certainly the pandemic has made a lot of things happen faster; that we have seen an acceleration of the interest in some kinds of digital health, particularly tele-health, which sounds new to a lot of people, but it's been around for 20 years. And I know you've been around in the digital health space for over a decade. So let's step back for a second. Could you tell me a little bit about the digital apothecary and why did you start it?   Timothy Aungst: (12:54) Sure. So the digital apothecary was kind of like just a little passion product, a little thing that I spread out based on my interests. So I started off as a resident during my PGY1. I got an iPad in 2011. So keep in mind the iPad came out 2010. So one of the things that I did was I actually started processing orders in the hospital using my iPad through Citrix. And this is funny because this is a period where we had so-called COWs, or computers on wheels, or WOWs, workstation on wheels, as they're often called now, and people would argue over these things to process orders in the hospital, et cetera. And I just basically started using my iPad to do all this stuff. And people started catching attention, like why is he doing this stuff faster? He's looking for information faster in there and blah, blah, blah.   Timothy Aungst: (13:36) And I was like, yeah, cause I had this device that can do this. I start thinking of something, what is a good app? What is a good thing? And so I started reviewing and looking at stuff and then I joined another group called iMedicalApps and we start reviewing mobile apps. We actually wrote a bunch of papers about how to quantify what is and what is not a good app and to use clinically for patients in patient care. And we gave presentations all over place on this topic. And that was a huge thing for me. And this was when it was mobile health that was my focus. And then circa 2014-15, I moved on to just the bigger digital health space and started writing for different organizations and serving as a speaker advisor consultant for different companies actually were asking a lot of these questions. The years I started thinking with remote patient monitoring, questions about tele-health, pharmacy, how to adopt medication adherence is a big one for me as well.   Timothy Aungst: (14:20) And it kind of really changed my thought process in terms of like, you know, this stuff's just kind of adjunctive to care versus, okay, this is going to be actually part in driving care. Eventually digital health, I kinda thought to myself, is just a interim term. I think digital health eventually turns into just health. It's kind of the same period we went through with like digital banking. We don't call it digital banking anymore, we just call it banking. When you go onto your app cash or check or use Venmo, like no one calls it really digital banking. I think that's where healthcare is at. So I noticed there wasn't that many people around the space. There is one person I look up to is Kevin Clawson, who's now into blockchain for healthcare down at Lipscomb. He was a great mentor for me early on. And it was a few other people I've talked to them such as Brent Fox about this too.   Timothy Aungst: (15:01) And, but the reality is in the academia circles, that generally there was not a lot of pharmacists, I think, into digital health or into this technology thing. So I kind of got into it, talking about it. I had a lot of people say this was like a waste of time. And I really had to take a thought for myself academically - do I really want to dedicate all my time towards investigating and research in this space. Or should I start moving towards something else as an academic? And I chose to keep on it. And I'm actually pleased because now with the, you know, things are really changing the payment like that, people really want to talk more about it. People aren't real into telehealth. And they were like, who even knows about this in pharmacy? Then my name comes up because that's been something I've been talking about for so long.   Timothy Aungst: (15:39) People are looking at different digital health technologies and like, okay, who's in digital talking about, oh, Timothy's talking about it. Timothy's been talking about it for so long now. So it's kind of just in many ways for me, unfortunately, the pandemic has been a driving force around trying to actually get my message out more than it was in the past. I think if the pandemic had not happened digital health would not have seen the rampant advancements that it has, and probably would have been towards the tail end of 2020s that I foresee that would have taken off in versus the early 2020s at this time.   Janet Kennedy: (16:09) One of the things you mentioned in your primer was that digital health definitely isn't informatics. Can you tell me what you mean by that?   Timothy Aungst: (16:20) Oh, this is, this is, this is a good one. Okay. So this is unbearably one of the hardest questions I had to deal with in terms of talking within my community. So there's always been a push in pharmacy, informatics, you know informational management information, using different data streams and such, EHR management, et cetera, et cetera. And that's been a group that's been around for decades. I would probably say early two thousands, 1990s. We saw them out there and there's always been pharmacy informatics people. And it's the, you know, the American informatics Association and such, or AMIA. But you know, when, when I started talking about digital health, one thing that I actually got in trouble with early on was people like, isn't it just informatics. I was like, what do you mean? Like this is technology. I was like, "technology is not synonymous with informatics." Informatics definitely plays a role in digital health and managing all the data streams that come down.   Timothy Aungst: (17:04) But I would argue that the traditional informatics thought processes around management of health. It does not mean lik,e this whole digital health kind of ecosystem. And that's actually where I would have conversations with people like, oh, they'll get all this person, their informatics person, we have the conversation and people will talk about, you know, KPIs, C-Colon and different things in programming. And they'll be like, "Yeah, I don't do any of this stuff. That's not my business. I'm more interested in the clinical workflow design associated with this stuff and how to actually evaluate one technology versus another and blah, blah, blah." And so that does overlap. Yes, it does. But I think some people have assumed that, especially in pharmacy and for pharmacists, that informatics would subsume and take over digital health. And that's one area I'm not too sure on. I think some people may want that. And some people don't. I for one don't. I think informatics works within digital health space in that it's definitely a conversation and there's been other publications around this that kind of delved into a little bit more different therapeutic areas like oncology. But early on, It was very, very difficult actually to separate the two. I think at this time, most of it is separated, but I, that was a early conversation I had had with people.   Janet Kennedy: (18:13) Okay. I'm interested in the amount of data that could be available through digital health apps and how a pharmacist might actually interact with that. So I'm really getting around to a conversation about adherence. Right now, when we think of adherence, it's the next fill - did you get the next prescription filled? But there's 30 or even 90 days in between those fills. If you had that data and it was daily, would a pharmacist be able to actually manage that information, and would they want to?   Timothy Aungst: (18:48) So here is a loaded question. And I mean this, cause this is an area that I'm fully invested - I love this topic. It is too many stakeholders, I think we can go over in detail about maybe some, the big ones like, you know, who cares about adherence at the end of the day? You know, is it, the patient, is it the clinician, is the payer? I would argue payers recognize there's enough research out there saying that on average, a patient takes for medications, hopefully their diseases won't progress and they'll get better. Same with the clinicians and same with the patients who probably think that to a certain extent. But when we look at adherence data, if we look at HEOR and stuff like that, like what do they use as their metrics? Half the time it's like medication possession ratio, right? And I am not convinced that thing is actually really, really useful.   Timothy Aungst: (19:29) I think globally? Yes. I think scalable factor for most organizations, that is the go-to way to doing this. And yet I think about all the patients that I visit in their homes that have boxes of medications still stacked away. And it's like, why are they getting it? Well, you know, I just buy it because I'm told I have to buy it. So you buy your medication and then you store it away, but you're not taking it? And you know, I can't help it go walk away and thinking back my head, like, you know, what? If they show up in a report, people are going to say they're adherent. I just walked into their house and they had like 12 Advair discuses sitting there, and their COPD is still not doing good. Why? No, they're not probably taking and using it correctly, right? But anyone else would probably see that and not make that tie together.   Timothy Aungst: (20:10) So I think the biggest problem we've focused and seen in adherence is there's been no way to actually really assess if people have been taking their medications. So we argue about a topic that is potentially anywhere between $300 and $500 billion, which is really, I think, around medication optimization - which adherence is one of those things. But we've had very little quantitative data to back up our arguments. We've had qualitative data; but from a quantitative side, we've never really been able to scale. Even pharma has struggled with this in their clinical trials. You know, we've seen things like MEMSCAP and everything else out there for years trying to make a market here, and they've never really blown up. And then the 2010s, we had a flood in the market of all these different digital health devices because they recognize that stuff, but not all of them have been successful.   Timothy Aungst: (20:54) And the question is why? And I think it's because we've come to realize that adherence is very, very, very challenging. Human behavior is very challenging. I think humans are very chaotic in terms of adherence and such. So it comes back to the key stakeholders, you know? Why does the pharmacy care about, you know, adherence? To me, if pharmacy cares about adherence, instead of talking about value for the pharmacy, is the more prescriptions that are dispensed equal more profits. So if a patient's taking their medication on time, theoretically and filling on time, then that profit margin, at least is correct - 12 refills a year for a monthly supply versus if they're not, then they're not refilling and then you're not billing and you're not making money from it. So as a pharmacy, clinicians I think also have kind of a mixed feeling around adherence. To be honest, I think this might be actually one of the biggest conversations that should occur is there are therapeutic areas where we want a hundred percent adherence or at least above 90%.   Timothy Aungst: (21:47) There are therapeutic areas where I think we could be fine if people were not truly adherent. If you miss your Metformin a few days a month, am I going to care? Probably not? Your statin, and probably not? You know, and this comes down to, you know, how maybe severe a patient is, you know, how high their co-morbidity is. But there's certain diseases where, you know, what if I miss getting a biologic therapy by a day or two? Is I can really ruin me? Some day, we'll say yes. Some day we'll say no. But there's other therapeutic areas. Like let's say schizophrenia; you know, if they miss your medication, will it be problematic? Yeah. Probably. And the payers are going to be concerned about that. Cause that increases ER visits and hospitalizations, right? So often when we talk about adherence I feel like it's such a global issue that people focus on when it's very granular and it's really around different sensitivities associated with therapeutic areas that I don't really see a lot of people talk about, at large, associate with that technology.   Timothy Aungst: (22:40) That technology always seems focused just on trying to solve adherence from a very global perspective. While I think clinically we've had a lot of research talking about adherence from a very small perspective in terms of what diseases and such does it really impact. And so there isn't this mismatch behind there. So there's a financial aspect, there is the clinical aspects I think. And then there's some design aspects, you know, solving adherence, you know? What does it take to do that? And is actually the money invested really worth it? I think it's one thing that's often not discussed like, you know, just because we can solve adherence; should we? And again, they come back to the fact that we blocked a lot of objective information in many ways. If this goes to your question, would we want to actually have this data?   Timothy Aungst: (23:21) We are opening Pandora's box. We now know more about people's habits than we have in the past. So to gives some examples would be, let's go with inhalers. Propeller both have this interesting study where they evaluated people's utilization of inhalers and found them, I think they found 60, 80% of people were using their inhaler or Saba rescue inhaler incorrectly. Okay. That's actually really, really concerning, right? Because that's higher than what we probably have historically noted in research. Secondly, if these are patients that we've been signing off saying that they've been adherent or a technique is good, this really calls into question what and how well we've actually been approaching this area for decades. And I think that's actually one of the big things I'm actually concerned about. And I think many companies are kind of thinking about is, you know, we're getting a more objective information about people's habits than we ever had a past.   Timothy Aungst: (24:09) And in many ways this could be good, or it could be downright terrible if we're not prepared for the ramifications that everything we thought we knew may be wrong. And I think that's actually an area that most of us may be concerned about because that calls in attention like; okay, we find out that we've been wrong and we've not doing things perfectly. That's great. Well now we've got to fix it. No fix is going to come out overnight. So solving adherence also probably means finding out this data and understanding it while also trying to solve the underlying questions about how do we address some of these issues? Thinking about it clinically, thinking about our workflow. So when pharmacists want to see adherence on a daily basis, I don't think that'd be a problem, but I would throw back then this, what is the value of it? What is the value knowing if someone took their medication on a daily basis? Do they skip through the center pro clinically, is that meaningful? Maybe, maybe not depending on how bad their hypertension is, right? Or maybe heart failure or some other condition? From a peer perspective then maybe yes. And then along with that though, could also be focused on the money that you get for people not refilling on time. So these are the things I think that need to really be questioned.   Janet Kennedy: (25:17) Well, it's also the question of the firehose or the very specific stream of data that's relevant. So yes, any digital solution is going to gather all the information, but you wouldn't need all the information. What you would need is the alert that says based on the parameters for this patient, with these meds, now we need to worry about adherence and it could be on day four or five for a lesser impactful drug. It could be on day two for something that is of imperative nature that they take it. So that's the benefit of course, of being overwhelmed by analytics and informatics is that you can also then design the algorithm that sets the actions.   Timothy Aungst: (26:02) And that is the biggest issue then at this time, because who decides what the algorithm looks like? And this is a question that I throw most companies. And when I actually hear back, is well do it. But do you actually have the clinical staff and know how to do it? That's the issue. So I'm actually very curious if a company will come along, and actually would build this in their backend. You know, like we already have drug information databases out there, right? You know, is someone going to make something like this that they could then sell out to other companies to then utilize? Are they going to build it in-house, or would these alerts be optionable for a clinical site or a business? That would be nice. But you know, if you gave me a package deal and say, "you know, we could default this or you can change it, whatever you want."   Timothy Aungst: (26:46) Then I think that might change the conversation because it's just, you know, how many medications are out there? It's like, you know, NDC codes sitting on the shelf in pharmacies, enormous. So from a theoretical perspective, yes, this could be very possible. For practical perspective, who's going to build it and the timeframe it's going to take to build that is going to be enormous because the fact of matter is we can't build it because we don't know the data around some of this stuff, these questions. And that's the, that's a factor with Pandora's box. It opened up this huge conversation because we have the objective data to back it up now, compared in the past. But we don't know really, you know, what is the right answer? We don't know. If you go through like the literature and start like, you know, going into like pubmed and other things, how many days can you go without skipping his medication? It's not like there's gonna be a publication saying, oh, you can do this, this, this. That stuff doesn't exist, because we've never known.   Janet Kennedy: (27:34) All right. Well that sounds like the call to action to the industry, is we've got to start talking about, you know, when you have this data from digital health, how are you going to apply it and make it be not just an endless stream of numbers, but something that is actionable that supports the patient's health journey?   Timothy Aungst: (27:53) Actionable data is key. The when to have an action is the unknown. And this is where I think companies could freak out users; because it's easy enough for a patient to call me and say, you know, I've missed my medication past three days, and be like, okay, well you should take your medication or titrate back up, or let's have you in the off spot. And having the patients take that on. All right. Cause they self activated and they chose to do this. I didn't know that until they told me, right? So my liability or whatever we want to call it is limited on a patient discretion, because they own what happened to them. The minute you start putting this subjective information out there, that means the ownership and responsibility shifted to some group that never was responsible in the past. So to expect that people like selling them, want this data and use it, you may hear people say, no, not really.   Timothy Aungst: (28:43) And if you peel back the layers, you'll probably eventually find out it's this trepidation around, "I don't know what to do with this data." And I don't really trust the company to tell me what to do with this data, because I don't know where they're pulling that from. So there's gotta be some kind of evidence-based approach around there, but where is the evidence? And then this is where the ground falls out from all of us is, that Aetna says it exists. And that to me, I think is the overwhelming issue around truly objectifying medication here is the fact that we don't know what to do with it this time. And it's very troubling. So for me personally, I think this is great. This is what we should do. Are we there yet? I don't think so. And I think one of the biggest problems has been, it's not the technology. It's not even like the process of logistics; I think it's the overloading clinical scenarios that we never really hadn't think about in the past, and who's going to be responsible for what?   Janet Kennedy: (29:37) Okay. You have now laid some pretty big questions that could take us down another rabbit hole for at least an hour. So I'm going to hold those thoughts for our next conversation. And Timothy, just thank you very much for joining us on People Always, Patients Sometimes. Would you mind sharing how they can find you online?   Timothy Aungst: (29:58) You can find me on LinkedIn, you can find me on Twitter. Usually just my name. If you look it up, you'll find it. My website, thedigitalapothecary.com is also out there where I write about a lot of stuff. A lot of it is theory crafting, a lot of it is focused on next steps and such or issues I see in the industry. So you're welcome to come and contact me and reach out.   Janet Kennedy: (30:17) Excellent. Well, I think we're going to have a part two of this conversation. So I look forward to seeing you on the podcast again soon.   Timothy Aungst: (30:24) Thank you very much for having me.

Full Game Replay. John Wilkerson and Rob Demastus had the call for this week's Catholic game. Lipscomb defeated Catholic 44-0. Aired on FM 99.1.

Former NFL QB and current Elite 11 and Lipscomb Academy HC Trent Dilfer discusses the NFL, Vols and more at the Knoxville QB Club.

Former NFL QB and current Elite 11 and Lipscomb Academy HC Trent Dilfer discusses the NFL, Vols and more at the Knoxville QB Club.

Show Notes:Credits:Host: Carol Ann Lloydwww.carolannlloyd.comCreative Director: Lindsey LindstromMusic: Historical Documentary licensed through Audio Jungle/Envato MarketsSources Mentioned:Borman, Tracy. Witches: James I and the English Witch Hunts.Davies, Owen. "A Spell-binding History of Witches" (History Extra).Lipscomb, Suzannah (Presenter). Witches: a Century of Murder.Lipscomb, Suzannah. Witchcraft: A Ladybird Expert Book.  Summary:From early days in Jewish and Egyptian cultures to the middle ages, and from the surge of witch hunts across Europe in the 16th and 17th century to a new resurgence in self-identified witches today, the notion of witches and witchcraft is part of our history. As Alice Hoffman wrote in Practical Magic, “There's a little witch in all of us.”

Great news in the #freebritney case and our man on the ground, Jared Lipscomb is here to share everything that happened in the 9/29 hearing which he was present at!    Produced by Dear Media

Fear Level: ScaryTrigger Warnings: Jump scares, nudity, mild gore, stalking, cops, bad portrayals of therapy, violence against womenSupport us on our Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/progressivelyhorrifiedIn 1978 there was no such thing as the "slasher" genre. Psycho and Black Christmas were oddities in the thriller genre. Until one very tall man stole a tan station wagon and drove it Haddonfield to steal a featureless white mask from the general store, walk slowly with a butcher knife, and steal headstones. And thus was cinema changed forever. Director: John Carpenter Writers: John Carpenter and Debra Hill Stars: Jamie Lee Curtis, Donald Pleasance, and Tony Moran Talking Points: All nurses should have capes Station wagons and bellbottoms Setting and place setting Annie - A flannel bi? Discuss. Bob and Linda - should they have a burger shop and three kids Spoopy house Let's play dog or skunk! Loomis diagnoses you with a case of medical evil Laurie - Haddonfield's only good babysitter Can you gaslight a child about a thing you've already tries to tell other people about? Hedges - Michael taught Homer how to do that thing. A FIGHT! Totemic evil or malicious madmen - which would you like to kill you? Should Halloween ever have had sequels? John Carpenter's called shot on The Thing. Incidental nipples A debate about the staining power of butter Please check out our guests!Brad Michael ElmoreTwitter: https://twitter.com/BradMichaelElm1Go Buy "Bit" right now!Watch "The Wolfman's Hammer" free on YouTube!Alicia Whitley on twitter: @aliciawhitleyAlicia Whitley on Instagram: @alburnetAllie Mullin on twitter: @alliemullinAllie Mullin on Instagram: @alliemullinAllie's Photography Website: alliemullin.comBob ReyerListen to Bob on the Talking Comics Podcast every week: http://talkingcomicbooks.com/category/podcast-2/RSS Feed: https://feeds.simplecast.com/TfzwpjPlEmmanuel LipscombTwitter: @elipscomb2Katie SchenkelTwitter: @justplaintweetsBuy The Cardboard Kingdom: Roar of the Beast NOW!Follow us on twitter @proghorrorpodFollow Emily on twitter @megamothEmily's Website: Megamoth.netFollow Ben on twitter @benthekahnPre-Order Ben's new book, Renegade Rule.Follow Jeremy on twitter @jrome58Visit his website at JeremyWhitley.comRSS Feed: https://feeds.transistor.fm/progressively-horrifiedWebsite: https://progressivelyhorrified.transistor.fm/Join our Patreon at: patreon.com/progressivelyhorrified to support the show, get bonus episodes, early access to upcoming episodes, and a cool Progressively Horrified t-shirt.Join us next week to talk about FRIDAY THE 13TH★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Become a member of Michael Moore's Substack here: https://www.michaelmoore.com/subscribe A full transcript of this episode will soon be available here: https://rumble.media/category/podcast/transcripts/ Watch "Fahrenheit 9/11" here: https://youtu.be/cebnlqi9RGQ?t=2282 ***** After the free screening of “Fahrenheit 9/11” to mark the 20th anniversary of 9/11, Mike spoke with spoke with Lila Lipscomb, the mother from Flint, Michigan who lost her son in Iraq, and former Marine Corporal Abdul Henderson, who refused to follow any further orders to fight in a war based on lies. Both Lila and Abdul shared their stories in Fahrenheit 9/11. With America re-considering the legacy of 9/11 and America's so-called "war on terror", Mike is reunited with Lila and Abdul to get their thoughts and hear updates on their lives. ***** Underwriters: TrueBill -- Save money by cancelling your unused subscriptions at Truebill.com/RUMBLE --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/rumble-with-michael-moore/message