Podcasts about double effect

More at https://www.philosophytalk.org/shows/philippa-foot. Philippa Foot invented the thought experiment that famously became known as the Trolley Problem. Despite the vast industry of “trolleyology” it inspired, Foot's goal to illuminate debates on abortion and euthanasia often gets lost in the mix. So, how did Foot use this thought experiment to distinguish between doing versus allowing? What did she mean by the "Doctrine of Double Effect"? Why did she think that cultivating classic virtues—justice, courage, prudence, and temperance—was in our own rational self-interest? And what made her later change her mind? Josh and Ray explore her life and thought with John Hacker-Wright from the University of Guelph, author of "Philippa Foot's Moral Thought."

Saint John Bosco's "Preventative Method" of raising children: reason, religion and kindness. The moral principle of double-effect: when there are no good choices. Conspiracy of Guardian Angels. The meaning of Romans 12,16: "...wise in your own conceits." If Old Law ended, why still 10 Commandments? Did Christ receive Communion at Last Supper? Trump's executive orders? SSPX and Communion fast? Hold fast! This episode was recorded on 1/28/2025. Our Links: http://linkwcb.com/ Please consider making a monetary donation to What Catholics Believe. Father Jenkins remembers all of our benefactors in general during his daily Mass, and he also offers one Mass on the first Sunday of every month specially for all supporters of What Catholics Believe. May God bless you for your generosity! https://www.wcbohio.com/donate Subscribe to our other YouTube channels: ‪@WCBHolyMassLivestream‬ ‪@WCBHighlights‬ May God bless you all!

In this episode I address some of the issues concerning the Fifth Commandment as it applies to “end of life issues” and situations. I address euthanasia, assisted suicide, and the question of the “ordinary and extraordinary” therapeutic means that should or may be used for prolonging the life of a terminally ill patient. ----- - You can find these topics in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, numbers 2276 to 2283 AND 2295 to 2301. - Article by the USCCB on “End of Life” issues (see chapter FIVE), https://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/health-care/upload/Ethical-Religious-Directives-Catholic-Health-Care-Services-fifth-edition-2009.pdf - NCBC document with a summary of “End of Life” moral principles: https://stjohns-excelsior.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/A-Catholic-Guide-to-End-of-Life-Decisions.pdf - Vatican Document on End of Life issues, with words of Pope Pius XII: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070801_nota-commento_en.html - Article on the “Principle of Double Effect”: https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/abortion-and-double-effect - Fr. Patrick Wainwright is a priest of Miles Christi, a Catholic Religious Order. - Visit the Miles Christi Religious Order website: https://www.mileschristi.org - This Podcast's Website: www.forcollegecatholics.org - To learn about the Spiritual Exercises (silent weekend retreat) preached by the Priests of Miles Christi, visit: https://www.mileschristi.org/spiritual-exercises/ - Recorded at Miles Christi “Family Center” in South Lyon, Michigan. - Planning, recording, editing, and publishing by Fr. Patrick Wainwright, MC. - Gear: SHURE MV7 USB microphone. - Intro music from pond5.com

A possible new motive becomes apparent. After all this time, was the driving force behind Dr John Bodkin Adams actually compassion and kindness? Have we been basking in the presence of an ‘Angel Of Mercy' since day one? Or, is this about the ultimate control one human-being can have, over another? The grim reaper in a crisp white doctor's coat? The jury is out. Presented by Vinny Hurrell. Produced, edited and mixed by Vinny Hurrell. The Executive Editor is Andy Martin A BBC Northern Ireland Production

In this episode I welcome Dr. Janet Smith. Janet Smith recently retired from Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, MI, where for nearly 20 years she held the Father McGivney Chair of Life Ethics.  She has published and spoken on the Church's teaching on sexuality and on other moral issues.  She has served on one Vatican Council and two Vatican commissions.  She writes regularly for various Catholic publications and does interviews for both Catholic and secular media outlets. More than two million copies of her talk, “Contraception: Why Not” have been distributed. We talk about ectopic pregnancies, the “principle of double effect” and more! Don't miss this amazing and enlightening episode! - Dr. Janet Smith's website: www.janetsmith.org , where you can get a free copy of her talk “Contraception: Why Not”. - During the interview, we spoke about the St. Paul VI Institute, founded in 1985 by Thomas W. Hilgers, MD, as an EXCELLENT alternative to “in Vitro Fertilization” (IVF). - You can find these topics in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, numbers 1897 to 1904 AND 2270 to 2275. - Article on the “Principle of Double Effect”: https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/abortion-and-double-effect - Fr. Patrick Wainwright is a priest of Miles Christi, a Catholic Religious Order. - Visit the Miles Christi Religious Order website: https://www.mileschristi.org - This Podcast's Website: www.forcollegecatholics.org - To learn about the Spiritual Exercises (silent weekend retreat) preached by the Priests of Miles Christi, visit: https://www.mileschristi.org/spiritual-exercises/ - Recorded at Miles Christi “Family Center” in South Lyon, Michigan. - Planning, recording, editing, and publishing by Fr. Patrick Wainwright, MC. - Gear: SHURE MV7 USB microphone via Squadcast. - Intro music from pond5.com

In this episode I welcome Fr. John of God, a priest of Miles Christi, as we reflect on several applications of the Fifth Commandment (“Thou shall not kill”) in our lives. We talk about the illicit manipulation of embryos; the permanent and unchangeable teaching of the Church about the evil of abortion; in what cases the “principle of double effect” can be applied to preserve the life of a mother, and many other interesting topics! Listen in to get a glimpse into the richness of the Catholic teaching on promoting and protecting the well-being of unborn children! - You can find these topics in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, numbers 1897 to 1904 AND 2270 to 2275. - Article on the “Principle of Double Effect”: https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/abortion-and-double-effect - Fr. Patrick Wainwright is a priest of Miles Christi, a Catholic Religious Order. - Visit the Miles Christi Religious Order website: https://www.mileschristi.org - This Podcast's Website: www.forcollegecatholics.org - To learn about the Spiritual Exercises (silent weekend retreat) preached by the Priests of Miles Christi, visit: https://www.mileschristi.org/spiritual-exercises/ - Recorded at Miles Christi “Family Center” in South Lyon, Michigan. - Planning, recording, editing, and publishing by Fr. Patrick Wainwright, MC. - Gear: SHURE MV7 XLR dynamic microphones and Zoom H6 portable recorder. - Intro music from pond5.com

Today, Father Casey of Breaking in the Habit answers questions that people have about sex. In doing so, he exposes some really weird loopholes that I don't think he thought of.Cards:William Lane Craig Says Christians are MISERABLE!:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFBe1sPSg9MOriginal Video: https://tinyurl.com/26pghdy6Sources:Solomon in History and Tradition: https://tinyurl.com/22hk9xk8From In the Garden of Delights: https://tinyurl.com/24w3c889“Validity” and “liceity” in conjugal acts: A reply to Stephen Napier on the HIV-condom debate: https://tinyurl.com/24v588h3Should You Stay Together Only for the Kids?: https://tinyurl.com/27pzy2g5Ectopic Pregnancy and Double Effect: https://tinyurl.com/2ypyg33rWomen sharing personal stories about abortion bans have become a political force: https://tinyurl.com/2atra6ceNowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US: https://tinyurl.com/2otdtkuhStates With Abortion Bans See Continued Decrease in U.S. MD Senior Residency Applicants: https://tinyurl.com/286nwmhcCanadian Indian residential school system: https://tinyurl.com/24js5x2zAll my various links can be found here:http://links.vicedrhino.comThis content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.orgBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/viced-rhino-the-podcast--4623273/support.

Dr. Jacobs tackles your philosophical and theological questions in today's episode. He answers audience comments on topics ranging from how humans participate with external reality beyond mere mental images, examines nature human nature versus shared traits, delve into divine foreknowledge via Jeremiah, discuss the doctrine of double effect and the trolley problem, and investigates classical perspectives on free will. From metaphysical realism to patristic traditions, this discussion offers fresh insights into age-old questions. Stay tuned for our upcoming series on the problem of evil later this month.  All the links:  X: https://x.com/NathanJacobsPod Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0hSskUtCwDT40uFbqTk3QS Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-nathan-jacobs-podcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thenathanjacobspodcast Substack: https://nathanajacobs.substack.com/ Website: https://www.nathanajacobs.com/ Academia: https://vanderbilt.academia.edu/NathanAJacobs (00:01:55) The Most Important Question background  (00:03:03) Is Darwinism just nominalism applied to biology?  (00:26:39) How can materialism / utilitarianism co-exist with social engineering?  (00:38:23) How does realism apply to adoption?  (00:58:36) Participation vs. manifestation  (01:12:37) How could God know us before we existed?  (01:25:58) What is true freedom?  (01:40:24) The trolley problem and the doctrine of double effect  (01:44:49) Can realism and nominalism both be correct?  (01:52:00) What makes human nature unique from other shared traits?

Did the early Church have anything to say about abortion and same-sex marriage? Why do we not have the same belief on the Eucharist as with Protestants? Is it a mortal sin to pray with Protestants? and more on today's Open Line with Colin Donovan.

Did the early Church have anything to say about abortion and same-sex marriage? Why do we not have the same belief on the Eucharist as with Protestants? Is it a mortal sin to pray with Protestants? and more on today's Open Line with Colin Donovan.

Questions about the legitimacy of the principle of double effect when it comes to abortion and saving the mother's life, whether laws should protect the unborn baby at the expense of the mother's life, laws for non-viable pregnancies, and changing pro-choice areas vs. leaving.   Is it just a cop-out to cite the principle of double effect when the unborn baby dies as a result of saving the mother's life? What should lawmakers do when it comes to situations where the mother has to choose between her life and her baby's life? Should she be forced to carry the baby and die as a result? Do pro-life abortion policies make it difficult for doctors to assist pregnant patients because they have to wait until the mother is in danger to address non-viable pregnancies? Is it better to stay in an area that's historically pro-choice and try to change it or move to a pro-life area?

Today's transcript⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ We depend on donations from exceptional listeners like you. To donate, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠click here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Daily Rosary Meditations is now an App, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠click here for more info.⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To find out more about The Movement and enroll: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.schooloffaith.com/membership⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Prayer requests⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe by email⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Download our app⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Donate⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

SPECIAL GUEST  Brother Andre Marie Host of ReConquest aired only on the Crusade Radio Network Follow Brother on GAB and X - @Brother_Andre HEADLINE: Voices of Catholic Political Conscience, Past and Present by Brother Andre Marie We are on Buzzards Bay not actually Martha's Vineyard. Pools and bathtubs that is the only place Maggie will swim. To put it bluntly, the thirty-two years intervening from Buchanan's speech and the twenty-eight since the publication of Bork's book have witnessed the acceptance by the “conservative” mainstream of sodomy, abortion, and other forms of deep moral depravity. (I fear that the Republicans were always OK with usury, itself morally depraved and a font of other forms of moral turpitude.) Witness the talks from the just concluded Republican National Convention, where Lara Trump and others chose to include “gay or straight” into the categories of human diversity cast into irrelevance by the transcendent humanity of Americans that the Party of Trump embraces. We even heard a trite pious platitude of depravity, “It's all love” — a variation on the theme of “Love is love” — echoing in the hallowed halls of Milwaukee's Fiserv Forum, uttered by a porn star, no less. Peter Thiel who is a homosexual, PayPal which is one of his many corporate entities, they will deplatform you if you are anti-homosexual.  This is the new Republican party. The moral issues and natural law have been removed. Edward Feser on X posts a photo of a baby in utero with the comment “The Real Forgotten Man”. We don't endorse parties or candidates b/c we have the 501c(3) status but we can mention when things or platforms or stances are wrong. JD Vance was asked about the abortion pill. Aside from the moral question of lying, it is scandalize to say the abortion drug is okay. If he said that he is against the current LA law that has now categorized it a Class A controlled substance. They had 15 minutes of Make Israel Great Again and I cut it off during the convention. This is a difficult needle to thread here. Politics and Abortion The lesser of two evils and all. Someone must step up to the table and say no you are wrong and here is why. Social Moral teachings and statements in our platform - why can't we have that? What is so darned mystifying about these questions? Let's call a spade a spade and this is moral depravity. Amber Rose - why do we need to platform a porn star? When you select the people who speak at something like this, you are sending a signal. The Big Tent welcomes people who think the moral law is optional.  We need to stop and say…NO we are not okay with that. Let's push hard against this. We have a pro-abortion party in the Democrats and now we have a pro-choice party. That is the two choices in my humble opinion.  States Issues -  Political King Makers - that is a whole different level of donations. The claim is that JD Vance is a creature who is a product of Theil and others. The Lesser of Two Evils - Catholics should excise this from their language. We can never do evil so that a good can come from it. You aren't supposed to pick evil ever. The principle of double effect - a choice b/w two things. The good effect to save the mothers life.  The bad effect is that the child when removed from the tubes will die. If you do nothing the child and mother will die. There is a whole other role - the moral calculous that is not the lesser of two evils, it should be called The Principle of Double Effect! HEADLINE: The Lesser of Two Evils by Brother Andre Marie  Take The Win phrase - people say this and I don't believe this. Take the Win is often used to say something happened that isn't perfect but we can work with it but that labels and attitude that we can actually work with it. When this is applied to the political realm means….SHUT UP.

It can be confusing to understand what actually constitutes euthanasia.   Patrick dives into a profound discussion with 16-year-old Elizabeth from Minnesota about the intricacies of euthanasia, life support, and the principle of double effect, all through the lens of Catholic moral theology.   Elizabeth, curious and concerned, asks about the Church's stance on euthanasia and the moral implications of withdrawing life support. Patrick clarifies that the Church vehemently opposes euthanasia as it involves intentionally ending an innocent life, categorizing it as a grave sin.   The conversation deepens as Elizabeth wonders about the morality of discontinuing artificial life support for someone unlikely to recover. Here, Patrick introduces the concept of "ordinary" vs. "extraordinary" means of sustaining life. He explains that while ordinary means (like feeding and hydration) must always be provided if the patient can physically tolerate them, extraordinary means (like a ventilator) may be ethically withdrawn if they no longer contribute to the recovery or the continuation of life.   Enter the principle of double effect, a crucial element in Catholic moral reasoning that Patrick lays out. This principle helps distinguish actions with dual outcomes—where one is intended and ethical, while the other, although foreseen, is unintended. For instance, removing a life support machine is intended to cease the intervention that prolongs dying, not to cause death itself.   Patrick uses the example of an ectopic pregnancy to further illustrate this principle. In such cases, removing the affected fallopian tube to save the mother's life, though it results in the loss of the baby in the womb, is morally permissible because the death of the little child is not the intended effect.  

What is the principle of double effect? What is the concept of double effect in relationship to ethics?

The despicable and horrendous attacks by Hamas against civilians last week, including beheading children and kidnapping the elderly, seems a throwback to some distant, barbaric past of human history. We may have thought the world had long ago outgrown such barbarity, but it hasn't. In fact, as shocking as it is, the kinds of atrocities carried out by the Hamas terrorists are the norms of warfare, at least throughout most of human history. Modern notions of just war, proportionality, and distinguishing between civilians and combatants are exceptions to the kinds of warfare conducted by the Assyrians and Babylonians, ancient Greece, the Vikings, the Mongols, and the Aztecs. Massacre sites found by archaeologists in North America reveal how entire villages were slaughtered by Native Americans centuries before European contact.   Similar barbarity continues today, especially in modern undeclared wars such as the Rwandan genocide, the actions of terror groups like Boko Haram, and in African civil wars. Close parallels can be seen in the horrific treatment by government actors of the Uyghurs in China, the Rohingya in Burma, and dissidents in North Korea.   Such brutality should sicken us, though it is far more common in human history, even modern history, than we admit. But, if it's so horrifyingly and historically “normal,” where did the world get the idea that such barbarity is so wrong?   The idea that non-combatants should not be killed in war can occasionally be found in ancient discussions of warfare, typically due to pragmatic reasons such as needing peasants to work the conquered land. Christian Just War Theory, in sharp contrast, saw the protection of non-combatants as a matter of principle, not pragmatism. That principle was grounded in a view of human value unique and distinct to Christianity, that every human being is made in the image and likeness of God.  Despite the Enlightenment's hostility to faith and the pervasive scientism of the nineteenth century, Christian ideas about Just War and the value of the individual retained a strong enough hold on Western culture to shape the Geneva Conventions on the conduct of war. Also, Western domination ensured that countries and military officers would be held accountable for systematic violations of the Conventions as happened, for example, in the Nuremberg Trials after World War II.  As long as these core ethical ideas of the Judeo-Christian tradition hold sway, they act as a check on the worst impulses of our fallen nature, impulses that quickly come to surface in time of war. Of course, war crimes and violations of human dignity still occur by Western actors and should never be accepted or tolerated. However, when barbarities are considered war crimes and violations, rather than norms, they happen far less than in cultures where that ethical tradition is missing.   Last Saturday, the world saw that, in no uncertain terms, that ethical tradition is missing in large parts of the Middle East. This is especially true of Islamic nations. Outside of a few reformers, Islam rejects as idolatry the idea that humans are made in the image of God. The Hadiths, a source of Islamic authority second only to the Quran, calls for the extermination of the Jews, a fact explicitly noted in the Hamas charter. Without grounding for the value and dignity of individuals, a group can be easily defined as “other,” which justifies all actions carried out against them.   It's important to note that the rejection of the value of each person also means that Hamas can use their own people as pawns and agents of propaganda. Thus, Hamas places missiles and military centers in hospitals and schools, knowing that any attacks will lead to civilian casualties that can be paraded before the rest of the world. In other words, dead women and children are the intended plan, not the unexpected consequence.   When attacks like what happened last Saturday occur, Israel has to target missile sites and other military targets to keep its own citizens safe. When doing so produces civilian casualties, it's tragic, but it's still an example of what Thomas Aquinas called “Double Effect.” In his example, it is ethical to take the life of another person, even though that's usually sin, if it is the only way to prevent him from killing you or another person. This is the situation Israel faces. The only way to stop the attacks is to bomb important military sites and to break up the network. So, when civilians die, as an unintended but inevitable consequence, these deaths are on the heads of Hamas for intentionally placing their civilians in harm's way.  Given the politics and history of the region, it is expected for many in the Middle East to cheer on Hamas' massacres while decrying any response by Israel. Their reaction is shaped by a culture, a culture that has been shaped by an Islamist worldview.   On the other hand, many of those in Western nations who defended or even celebrated the massacre in Israel have been shaped by a different set of worldview assumptions, what might also be called a Critical Theory mood. This worldview is also antithetical to Christian ideals about human equality and the value and dignity of the individual. It sees people as belonging to groups, and some of those groups are evil by designation.   With the decline of Christian influence on the West, we should expect to see a resurgence of the kind of bloodlust and sadism that characterized most of human history. All this underscores why worldview is important. Christianity is and has been good for the world, and its decline will bring horrific consequences.  This Breakpoint was co-authored by Glenn Sunshine. For more resources to live like a Christian in this cultural moment, go to breakpoint.org. 

La tech entre les lignes, la chronique qui décrypte les articles tech animée par Louis de Diesbach.  Cette chronique est extraite de l'épisode : Data & IA "FOR GOOD" : croire en un monde meilleur ?   Dans cette chronique, Louis nous explique en quoi ce dilemme fait appel à notre éthique et notre morale et pourquoi il est clé. Pour aller plus loin, voici les sources de cette chronique :  - The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect  - Would you kill the fat man   ***** À PROPOS DE TRENCH TECH *****  LE talkshow « Esprits Critiques pour Tech Ethique »   Écoutez-nous sur toutes les plateformes de podcast

Join us for a discussion with Dr David Molyneux, medical doctor, medical ethics tutor and current postgraduate researcher at the University of Leeds. In this episode we introduce the thought experiment of the trolley problem and the doctrine of double effect to discuss three cases of 'real trolley problems' we have seen in the Covid-19 pandemic.We explore the issues of delaying care for non-Covid-19 patients in attempts to minimize exposure to the virus, the strategy of herd immunity, and managing the potential deaths that come with realising lockdown.Released 16 July 2020. Presented by Gabriela Arriagada Bruneau.Ethics Untangled is produced by the IDEA Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds.Twitter: @EthicsUntangledFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ideacetlLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idea-ethics-centre/

Collegium Institute undergraduate fellow talks with Dr. Joshua Stuchlik, Professor of Philosophy at University of St. Thomas, Minnesota, and assistant editor of the American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, about his new book, Intention and Wrongdoing: In Defense of Double Effect.

Cale introduces you to the ”engineer nun” who just might give Elon Musk a run for his money! Plus: the long-awaited return of Bible Trivia Tuesdays! And, Cale gets cornered by a tricky question on morality!   https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/abortion-and-double-effect Nun builds power plant: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/04/reliable-hydroelectric-energy-congo?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=social_video&utm_term=&utm_content=25860_DRC_Nun_Power&utm_campaign=social_video_2022

Can you explain sola fide vs James?, Is there ever a legitimate reason for an abortion?, and more on today's Called to Communion.

In which Phineas explains to Cee how one the recent decisions from the Supreme Court affects her uterus, and what exactly they said because, to quite Brett Kavanaugh's diary I assume, "You can't read if you have a uterus because they go where your eye balls should be." The episode starts off with Phineas glossing over Judith Jarvis Thomson's violist argument and Philippa Foot's Doctrine of Double Effect essay to say where he's coming from and why the 'women's bodily autonomy' fails before getting into the truly stupid things that Samuel Alito said. Sources: The decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf The Vox article: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23167397/abortion-public-opinion-polls-americans  The abortion statistics: https://www.aecf.org/blog/child-welfare-and-foster-care-statistics https://nacac.org/help/how-to-adopt/steps-to-adoption/learn-about-adoption/ https://www.state.nj.us/njfosteradopt/adoption/AdoptiveParentHandbook_5.2013.pdf (edited)

The greater the power anything has for good, the greater the power it correspondingly has for evil. This is called the Principle of Double Effect. An example of this might be nuclear power. When you harness nuclear power, it can be used for such good in generating electricity for people's homes and for businesses. But when it's made into a bomb, it can be incredibly destructive. Another application of this principle goes like this: the greater the power anything has for joy in this life, the greater the power it also correspondingly has for pain. You see, God has given us a number of wonderful gifts that bring much joy and goodness to our lives, but they bring this joy and goodness when they're used and enjoyed the way God intended. But, when these same gifts are misused and abused by us, they can bring an incredible amount of pain and sorrow to our lives. I believe this is particularly true of sex. Our sexuality is one of the most meaningful and powerful sources of joy in this life, but it's only when we experience it in the way God designed it. However, when our sexuality is misused and abused, it is the source of unbelievable pain and heartache. Unfortunately, large numbers of young people are finding their lives damaged emotionally, psychologically and physically because of careless and ill-advised decisions they've made with their bodies. Today I'm presenting the Biblical view of sexuality - the way God designed it. I contend that the healthiest, most meaningful, most satisfying and most pleasurable sexual experience is found between a man and a woman in a covenant relationship called marriage.

Môže byť za určitých okolností vojna spravodlivá? Čo je vlastne pointou tejto otázky? Zdá sa, že samotný pojem „spravodlivá vojna“ je oxymoron rovnako ako „teplý sneh“ či „ubližujúca láska“, ale zástancovia tejto teórie, ktorá je stará – nuž veľmi stará – by oponovali jednoduchou otázkou:----more---- Ak by vojna nebola nikdy správna, teda, ak by nebolo nikdy morálne prípustné brániť sa násiliu, ktoré si nás chce nielen podmaniť, zotročiť či zabiť nás, ale taktiež zničiť hodnoty, inštitúcie a ideály, ktoré sme si roky budovali a udržiavali; no ak by nebolo správne brániť, čo je nám drahé, je riešením len pacifizmus, nulová tolerancia násilia, úplná poddajnosť a žitie podľa princípu „mocní robí, čo chce, a slabí trpí to, čo musí“? Ako verím začínate vidieť, otázka možnosti tzv. spravodlivej vojny je komplexná, kontroverzná, ale taktiež nevyhnutná – a ako si o chvíľu povieme, síce jej korene siahajú do antiky, prvú jasnú formuláciu tzv. teórie spravodlivej vojny nachádzame až u kresťanských mysliteľov ako Augustína z Hippo a neskôr u Tomáša Akvinského a oživenie tejto teórie máme možnosť vidieť aj v druhej polovici dvadsiateho storočia. Aké sú teda princípy, podľa ktorých sa má daná krajina správať počas vojny a dokonca podmienky, ktoré jej umožňujú do vojny vstúpiť?   Prečítajte si túto dávku aj ako článok na SME.   Súvisiace dávky: PD#244: Spôsobuje náboženstvo vojny a násilie?, http://bit.ly/davka244 PD#243: C. S. Lewis: Ako žiť vo vojnových časoch?, http://bit.ly/davka243 Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Just War (In Our Time), https://bbc.in/36X50SC Alexander Moseley, Just War Theory (IEP), https://iep.utm.edu/justwar/ SethLazar, War (SEP), https://stanford.io/3DG3AYH Michael Walzer on Just War Theory (Big Think), https://bit.ly/3r3p4K2 SethLazar, Helen Frowe (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Ethics of War, https://bit.ly/3uUCmcD Thomas Nagel, „War and Massacre“, https://bit.ly/3j3vEM9 Elizabeth Anscombe, „War and Murder“, https://bit.ly/3KdAfas Elizabeth Anscombe, „Military Ethics“ (IEP), https://bit.ly/3xaeGDV Prednáška „Anscombe, War and Murder, and Double Effect“, https://bit.ly/3j3vog9 *** Baví ťa s nami rozmýšľať? Získaj extra obsah cez Patreon (https://bit.ly/PDtreon), podpor náš  ľubovoľným darom (https://bit.ly/PDdar) a čo tak štýlový merč? (https://bit.ly/mercPD) Ďakujeme!

Patricia-My child is learning the Hail Mary in catechism. They added a part in the prayer which concerns me about other things they are changing. What should I do? Charles- I thank the Lord that the USA invented the atomic Bomb first because if another country had found the tech first it could have been much worse. David-Can you expound on the Doctrine of Double Effect? Donna-can we make something good out of something evil? Dan-On the atomic bomb issue, sometimes you have to take a life to save a life Geri-I struggle with forgiveness in my mind. Listening to RR has helped me forgive myself. Cindy-I want comment on my moms reaction to the A bombs of WWII. Wasn't till she learned about the truth of what the bombs did that she had a change of me Sam-I found an article about how Japan said that all their civilians had to function as Militia. Would that justify the dropping of the Bomb? Bill-How do you reconcile the doctrine of self defense with the dropping of the Atom bombs.

Is it ever right to go to war? Dr. Lawrence Terlizzese provides understanding of just war tradition from a biblical perspective.

Colin gives us a lesson on religious liberty, Can a Catholic woman take contraceptives for other medical reasons?, Is the story of Jonah allegorical or factual?, Can I be Catholic and Muslim?, and more on today's Open Line Friday with EWTN V.P. of Theology Colin Donovan.

Dr. Rachael Wiseman and I talk about why Elizabeth Anscombe does not agree with Philippa Foot's arguments about the doctrine of double effect. For Anscombe, the doctrine of double effect does not say anything about what we should do; it tells us that there are some things we should not do. *content warning: discussion of murder and some events in WWII, and brief comments on abortion With Amy Ward

What is the Principle of Double Effect? What makes an action moral or immoral? Find out on this episode with Jen and Father JD! Questions? Episode Ideas? Email us! sthilarychurch@htdiocese.org

In this episode, Bishop Richard and Nic Zumaran speak with Rev Dr Andrew James on moral reasoning and focus in particular on casuistry. What is casuistry, and what impact does it have on the spiritual life and theological study? What other forms of moral reasoning are there? Resources John Paul II - "http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor.html (Veritatis Splendor)" Servais Pinckaers - "https://books.google.com.au/books/about/The_Sources_of_Christian_Ethics.html?id=jL1D-an9w5UC&redir_esc=y (Sources of Christian Ethics)" Alasdair MacIntyre - "https://iep.utm.edu/mac-over/#SH4a (After Virtue)" Peter Knauer - "https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1126&context=nd_naturallaw_forum (The Hermeneutic Function of the Principle of Double Effect)"

In this episode, the hosts discusses the effect that the media has on perpetuating and enforcing racism in the United States. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/young-intellect/support

In this episode, Jason and Dr. Smith discuss the intricacies of the Principle of Double Effect. We cover: - Review of the sources of morality - The 4 rules of the Principle of Double Effect - Independent consequences and actions - Foreseeable bad consequences - Proportionality - Several Examples of applying PDE - Seriousness of judging human actions Support the work of CSA - https://catholicstudiesacademy.com/donate-to-csa/

Dana Kay Nelkin is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, San Diego, and an Affiliate Professor at the University of San Diego School of Law. Her areas of research include moral psychology, ethics, bioethics, and philosophy of law. She is the author of Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2011), and a number of articles on a variety of topics, including self-deception, friendship, the lottery paradox, psychopathy, forgiveness, moral luck, and praise and blame. She is also a co-editor of the The Ethics and Law of Omissions, The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility, and Forgiveness: New Essays. Her work in moral psychology includes participation in an interdisciplinary research collaboration of philosophers and psychologists, The Moral Judgements Project, which brings together normative and descriptive enquiries about the use of moral principles such as the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Other roles include membership of the advisory board of the UC San Diego Institute for Practical Ethics, service as the North American representative to the Society of Applied Philosophy, and on the Academic Advisory Board of the UC National Center for Free Speech and Civic Engagement. This podcast is an audio recording of Professor Nelkin's talk - 'Equal Opportunity' - at the Aristotelian Society on 30 March 2020. The recording was produced by the Backdoor Broadcasting Company.

I. A Powerful Sign-II. A Blessed Promise-III. A Double Effect

I chat about the Double Effect & Goal Setting and of course, the usual rants. Reach out on twitter or insta @caselkapettit

Episode 4 – Physician Assisted Suicide, Voluntary Euthanasia, and Progress Dementia Disorder (PDD) In the second part of this two part interview, Dr. Toni Nicoletti interviews Mr. Samuel H. LiPuma, AssociateProfessor at Cuyahoga Community College and Dr. Joseph P. DeMarco, professor emeritus in philosophy at Cleveland State University, on their new book, The Dying Experience: Expanding Options for Dying and Suffering Patients. The episode begins with a discussion of the definition of a rational suicide and when a rational suicide is morally permissible. The authors then discuss how this definition can be used to expand the moral justification of physician assisted suicide beyond terminal patients to include patients with progressive dementia disorder. Practical problems with this expansion are discussed and the authors also discuss problems with criticisms of arguments against physician assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia, rejecting the Doctrine of Double Effect as a legitimate way to distinguish justified from unjustified cases that involve hastening death.

Spoiler Alert! Today, after allowing plenty of time for the audience to see Avengers: Endgame, the boys discuss the movie. Along the way we discuss fatalism and the moral questions surrounding time and space travel.  We also spoil every single Marvel movie, so seriously don't listen if you don't want spoilers. Thanks for listening. We love you 3,000. Time Stamps: Rey's still got it! (and some Avengers talk) 1:45 Time Travel: 30:00 The Principle of Double Effect: 1:19:00

Bioethicist John Di Camillo explains the principle of double effect and illustrations its application through a number of case studies.

Rhonda Rana joins me on Science Chat to talk about the Trolley Problem, consequentialism and the Doctrine of Double Effect.... really

Three things must align for the principle of double effect to take place: the object, the intention, and the circumstance. Although a difficult concept to understand, Fr. Tim Furlow breaks it down in this Catholic Bytes episode with the drama of home invasion and murder.

Philosopher Dr. Diana Brickell answered questions on doctrine of double effect, the obligation to report a crime, cutting ties with homophobic family members, and more in this 3 May 2015 episode of Philosophy in Action Radio. http://www.PhilosophyInAction.com

Philosopher Dr. Diana Brickell answered questions on doctrine of double effect, the obligation to report a crime, cutting ties with homophobic family members, and more in this 3 May 2015 episode of Philosophy in Action Radio. http://www.PhilosophyInAction.com

Barbara Nicolosi leads a session on the principle of double effect, which is used for discernment in difficult moral dilemmas. The discussion included a consideration of just war, capital punishment, and stem cell research. In this class, Barbara also covered the first three commandments as they relate to the moral life. What behaviors are contrary to the worship of God alone? What does the second commandment forbid? And what does it mean to keep holy the Sabbath? Duration: 125 minutes.

Barbara Nicolosi leads a session on the principle of double effect, which is used for discernment in difficult moral dilemmas. The discussion included a consideration of just war, capital punishment, and stem cell research. In this class, Barbara also covered the first three commandments as they relate to the moral life. What behaviors are contrary to the worship of God alone? What does the second commandment forbid? And what does it mean to keep holy the Sabbath? Duration: 125 minutes.

Transcript -- Would you let someone die, to save five others? Would you kill someone to save five others? Explore trolleys, killing and the doctrine of double effect with Michael Otsuka. Find out more about Michael, and ethics, at www.open2.net/ethicsbites.

Would you let someone die, to save five others? Would you kill someone to save five others? Explore trolleys, killing and the doctrine of double effect with Michael Otsuka. Find out more about Michael, and ethics, at www.open2.net/ethicsbites.