Podcasts about Validity

Mike Green, chief strategist at Simplify Asset Management, says that we're living through "a period of genuine uncertainty, and a period in which forecasts that would have been made even three or four months ago no longer seem to have any real validity." He says that the current set up for a trade/tariff war is setting the economy up for a repeat of real troubles, and made comparisons as varied as the Great Depression, the Covoid downturn, the Great Financial Crisis and others, and while he is optimistic that those dire scenarios can still be avoided, he also says that investors can't rule them out. Rahul Sen Sharma, president and co-chief executive officer at Indxx discusses how global markets — and indexes representing various regions and industries around the world — are performing amid the current market uncertainty. Plus, Raymond Bridges of the Bridges Capital Tactical ETF brings his "aggressively cautious" approach — which melds macroeconomic big-picture views with technical analysis and volatility factors — to the Market Call.

Scientific credibility depends on valid research. But with growing concerns about replication failures and questionable research practices, how can scientists ensure their findings stand up to scrutiny?  In this episode, Under the Cortex explores the VALID checklist, a newly developed tool that helps researchers systematically assess the quality of their studies. Özge Gürcanlı Fischer Baum speaks with Susanne Kerschbaumer from the University of Vienna and asks how the checklist offers tailored guidance for different types of research designs. Kerschbaumer explains how the study published in APS's journal Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science addresses this important issue. Together, they discuss why validity is more than just good methodology, how researchers can avoid common pitfalls, and what the future of scientific rigor looks like.  You can access the checklist using the following link: www.validchecklist.com  If you're interested in learning more about this research, visit psychologicalscience.org.  Send us your thoughts and questions at  underthecortex@psychologicalscience.org 

Send us a textIn this episode Matt and Matt discuss the Validity of illegal parking, The loss of Les Binks, The chilling discovery of the Killing Machine, The DonCon2 lineup is locked in.Weird News including, Primate trades, A Bone bordello , A hot roadside assistance call, A McD's UFC, and a Profane parrot decompressed and returned to the ground.We hope the sun shines right where you want it. 

Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. continues discussing the importance of validity and reliability in jury research and specifically talks about the use of the clopening in jury research. The clopening is a combined opening and closing statement - basically a summary presentation of the case. The issue with the clopening is that it impacts your validity and reliability because jurors don't hear clopenings in a real trial so any feedback collected is skewed. Also, in order to get the most accurate data in jury research, you have to measure immediately after the presented stimulus/information. For example, if you want feedback on your opening, you must measure immediately after the delivery of the opening. If you want feedback on a witness, the measurement must come immediately after the mock jurors hear from that witness. Waiting to gather feedback until all witnesses have been shown will not provide an accurate measurement. The most scientifically sound methodology for conducting jury research is to take measurements immediately after completing delivery of each piece of content that you want feedback on. Any other process for data collection will compromise your validity.  Watch the video of this episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/ZBE

Significant changes are currently unfolding for individuals pursuing Italian dual citizenship. A newly issued emergency decree from the Italian government introduces restrictions, including generational limits on those applying for citizenship by ancestry or jure sanguinis, while also signaling possible reforms to the recognition process through female ancestors and the overall application structure. These developments may have a considerable impact on eligibility for dual citizenship and the future of Italian citizenship by descent. In this episode of the Italian Citizenship Podcast hosted by Italian attorney Marco Permunian and dual citizen expat podcaster Rafael Di Furia, we'll learn more about how these new rules affect current and future applications, what exceptions may apply, and what to expect from the proposed legislative changes.For help with the Italian citizenship process and more information about Italian Citizenship Assistance visit ICA's website:https://ItalianCitizenshipAssistance.comTo contact Italian Attorney Marco Permunian and his team of dual-citizenship experts and attorneys you can use the contact form on the Italian Citizenship Assistance website:https://italiancitizenshipassistance.com/contact/To see more from Rafael Di Furia about life in Italy and life as a dual-citizen expat check out his YouTube channel and website:Http://YouTube.com/RafaelDiFuriaHttp://RafaelDiFuria.com#italiancitizenship #italiandualcitizenship #dualcitizenshipTopics & Timestamps:0:00 – Intro & Opening Thoughts0:42 - The recent update5:35 - Validity of the Decree7:18 - Proposed changes13:00 - If and when the proposals could be approved13:38 - Review of the decree14:51 - Closing Thoughts & Outro

Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. describes the scientific concepts of validity and reliability in research and why they are individually and collectively so important when conducting jury research. The question that validity helps answer is: are you measuring what you think you are measuring? Bill gives examples of how you can limit or improve your validity through witnesses and presentations in jury research. It's critically important to secure a clean read in your research and Bill explains how to achieve that.  Reliability in research refers to the consistency and repeatability of a measurement, so that if the same process is repeated under the same conditions, it should yield similar results. Having reliability in your data means you can count on the results and increases confidence in the findings to better guide decision-making on your case. Watch the video of this episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/1lp

In this episode of The TTL Podcast, Mon-Chaio and Andy dive deep into the world of employee surveys. They discuss whether these surveys truly work, their best practices, and the research behind them. Exploring the role of culture in company performance, they uncover the nuances of implementing and interpreting surveys. The episode provides actionable insights for leaders aiming to diagnose and improve their organizational culture.ReferencesMeasuring employee engagement and interpreting survey resultsEmployee Survey Research: A Critical Review of Theory and PracticeDiagnosing organizational cultures: A conceptual and empirical review of culture effectiveness surveysFollowing Up on Employee Surveys: A Conceptual Framework and Systematic Review

Pastor Jordan Wednesday March 12th 2025

March 20, 2025 - We break down the ruling from the state's top court that upheld the constitutionality of the Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government with Richard Rifkin, legal director for the Government Law Center at Albany Law School.

Moneytracker Don Grant talks about spending as a political statement. Explains the popularity of some products...

This presentation by Dr. Descartes Li looks at some of the complexities and controversies about psychiatric diagnoses. It examines the DSM-5's "Harmful Dysfunction" definition, contrasting it with the NIMH's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project. The lecture also discusses philosophical approaches to understanding mental illness, including reductionism, cultural relativism, emergentism, and mechanistic approaches to psychiatric diagnosis. Finally, it outlines four perspectives for viewing mental disorders: disease, dimensional, behavioral, and life story, advocating for a comprehensive approach to diagnosis. About the Speaker Dr. Descartes Li is professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, Weill Institute for Neurosciences. He currently serves as director of the UCSF Bipolar Clinic and the UCSF Electroconvulsive Therapy Service for the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. He is a dedicated teacher in the School of Medicine and internationally. He is a member of the UCSF Academy of Medical Educators. Organizer: Patrick O'Reilly   A Psychology Member-led Forum program. Forums at the Club are organized and run by volunteer programmers who are members of The Commonwealth Club, and they cover a diverse range of topics. Learn more about our Forums. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hosts Jo Firestone & Manolo Moreno play listener-created games with callers!Games played: aNIMAL or bNIMAL submitted by Robert McDougall from Celbridge, Ireland, Short Kingz submitted by Michael Miller from Phoenix, Arizona, and MAYOR MCPlease submitted by “My Pal Sisco” from Los Angeles, CaliforniaCallers: Devon from Los Angeles, California; Michael from Phoenix, Arizona; Jimmy & Tanya from Porter, Maine; Jenna from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Sam from Emeryville, California; Dorian from Las Vegas, NevadaOutro theme by Amy Whitlock from Stockton, CaliforniaNew video about the penultimate Dr. Gameshow Earwolf episode recording is available at moslo.xyzThis episode sponsored by:  ZocDoc - Go to ZocDoc.com/GAMESHOW to find and instantly book a top-rated doctor today!Green Chef - Go to GreenChef.com/gameshowfree and use code gameshowfree for free salads for two months and 50% off your first box!

Having received his Ph.D. in mathematical logic at Brandeis University, Rabbi Dr. Dovid Gottlieb went on to become Professor of Philosophy at Johns Hopkins University. Today he is a senior faculty member at Ohr Somayach in Jerusalem. An accomplished author and lecturer, Rabbi Gottlieb has electrified audiences with his stimulating and energetic presentations on ethical and philosophical issues. In Jewish Philosophy with Rabbi Dr. Gottlieb, we are invited to explore the most fascinating and elemental concepts of Jewish Philosophy. https://podcasts.ohr.edu/ podcasts@ohr.edu

This week, Pastor Tim preaches from 1 Corinthians 15:1-11, where Paul shares with us The Centrality of the Gospel, the Validity of the Gospel, and the Conclusivity of the Gospel. Support the show

Robert Whitaker discusses the failures of psychiatry's disease model and explores alternative approaches to mental health care. Learn about new paradigms for understanding and treating mental health issues. #MentalHealth #PsychiatryReform #AlternativeCare

This Tuesday, don't miss a special highlight episode as we gear up for an unforgettable conversation dropping this Thursday.Wesley Huff, Central Canada Director for Apologetics Canada, shares with the guys how his debate with Billy Carson unexpectedly led to an invitation from Joe Rogan to appear on his podcast. During their conversation, Rogan seemed more open to Christianity than in the past, acknowledging Jesus as a historical figure and recognizing Christianity's value. Wes and the guys discuss the reliability of scripture, citing historical accuracy and external evidence, and recommend Scribes and Scripture for further exploration. They note a cultural shift from atheism to seeing Christianity as useful, as seen in figures like Jordan Peterson, and express hope that God is working through them. Emphasizing that salvation comes through faith rather than intellectual arguments, Wes explains that even those who witnessed Jesus' miracles did not always believe. He also touches on the formation of the biblical canon, explaining how early Christians carefully discerned which writings were truly inspired to preserve the integrity of God's word.Send us a textThanks for listening! If you've been helped by this podcast, we'd be grateful if you'd consider subscribing, sharing, and leaving us a comment and 5-star rating! Visit the Living Waters website to learn more and to access helpful resources!You can find helpful counseling resources at biblicalcounseling.com.Check out The Evidence Study Bible and the Basic Training Course.You can connect with us at podcast@livingwaters.com. We're thankful for your input!Learn more about the hosts of this podcast.Ray ComfortEmeal (“E.Z.”) ZwayneMark SpenceOscar Navarro

Plan Een Gratis Consult: https://projectijzersterk.nl/bookingLinks naar andere lessen:Het #1 Dieet Voor VETVERLIES - SUPER EASYhttps://open.spotify.com/episode/46XSmXmgxfxMmsy72agIo3?si=f33ce51853df4b80De Makkelijkste Weg Naar Een Afgetraind Lijf - Voor DRUKKE Mensenhttps://open.spotify.com/episode/2LwXin5DUwr7pxbkeJrpJm?si=4260967041ed4c23Waarom Jij Altijd Moe Benthttps://open.spotify.com/episode/4LgaBZwOHsCrBviYSiNQWb?si=66b7891a66e94f7dVolg ons op sociale mediaIG: https://www.instagram.com/project_ijzersterk/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIhIMkbZpa8SWsQ7mJiCW6A/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@project_ijzersterk0:00 Waarom Jij Geen Vet Verliest - 4 Verborgen Fouten0:40 Fout 1: Gezond eten om vet te verliezen4:50 Fout 2: Onderschatten van je calorie-inname10:50 Fout 3: Overschatten van je calorie-verbranding12:30 Fout 4: Je meet je progressie verkeerdBronnen:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7918325/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12396160/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26205763/https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Fulltext/2014/09000/Validity_of_Consumer_Based_Physical_Activity.20.aspx

Summary   In this episode, Blockchain Wayne interviews Dan Averbukh from validity Base, exploring the intersection of blockchain technology and data verification. Dan shares his journey from finance to crypto, the inception of validity Base, and its applications in various sectors. The conversation delves into the importance of data integrity, privacy concerns, and the open protocol architecture of validity Base, emphasizing its role in creating a reliable and verifiable track record for financial data. The episode concludes with insights on how to get started with validity Base and its future potential.   Learn more about validity Base: https://www.vbase.com/   Takeaways   Dan Averbukh transitioned from finance to crypto after discovering Bitcoin. validity Base was created to address trust issues in financial data. Blockchain technology offers a single source of truth for data verification. The importance of privacy in sharing financial data is paramount. validity Base allows users to create verifiable track records without sharing underlying data. The platform is built on an open protocol, promoting interoperability. Users can control their data and avoid being locked into a single provider. Polygon blockchain is currently used for data commitments. The first 100 data stamps per month on validity Base are free. Getting started with validity Base is simple and accessible for users.    Chapters   00:00 Introduction to Blockchain and validity Base 02:57 Dan Averbukh's Journey into Crypto 06:12 Understanding validity Base and Its Applications 08:57 The Importance of Data Verification 11:55 Privacy and Data Control in Blockchain 14:55 Interoperability and Open Protocols 17:54 Getting Started with validity Base 21:06 Conclusion and Future Directions

Jason Timpf of Hoops Tonight joins in to break down the NBA Trade Deadline moves! Luka to the Lakers, Jimmy To Golden State, Fox to the Spurs and Much More! 00:00 - Intro 00:40 - Luka Doncic Trade Conspiracy Theories 01:13 - Validity of Conspiracy Theories 04:35 - Lakers Playoff Outlook with Doncic 08:32 - Lakers as Top Tier Contender? 12:40 - Jimmy Butler's Fit with Warriors 13:43 - Warriors' Irrational Decision Making 16:34 - Importance of Star Players Winning 18:14 - Responsibility of Keeping Superstars 22:05 - Jimmy Butler's Role in Warriors 24:43 - Khris Middleton for Kuzma Trade 29:15 - Luka Doncic and LeBron James Connection 32:53 - Luka Doncic Album Rollout LOL 34:35 - De'Aaron Fox Trade to Spurs 39:15 - The Concept of a Fringe Star 42:46 - KD Rejects Warriors Reunion 44:34 - Outro Subscribe to Combo's Court wherever you listen! Sign up on PrizePicks using the promo code “Combo” Make a deposit of $5 or more and receive $50 instantly here: prizepicks.onelink.me/ivHR/COMBO

What does the Bible say about creation and the shape of the earth and can the Bible be trusted as a reliable source? In this episode, Amy is joined by author, speaker, and father of 8, Matt Long, who started out needing the "scientific evidence" to fully trust the Bible. Matt has spent years of research and studying the Biblical shape of the Earth, to now share with others what he believes to be true.  We also discuss why Matt believes the Bible is the most accurate and reliable collection of books in the history of the world. We break down the deception of education institutions, NASA, and other ways the world has misguided us. We share why the hope in understanding this truth about creation, truly opens your eyes to seeing every other deception that is out there. ----------------------------------------------------------- *Amy is a Christian counselor- schedule a session: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.biblicalguidancecounseling.com/appointments⁠⁠⁠⁠ ------------------------------------------------------------- Matt Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mattsonofchris/ Matt Book: mattlongbook.com

With little nuggets being dropped by others, Arcand starts to believe there is some validity and truth to Jerod Mayo's frustrations and anger for being fired by Robert Kraft. What helps? The Brian Flores situation in Miami.

In this episode, Justin and Rob are joined by discuss Nicholas Vine on the Validity of Subspecies. Who will win? You decide. Reptile Fight Club!Follow Justin Julander @Australian Addiction Reptiles-http://www.australianaddiction.comIGFollow Rob @ https://www.instagram.com/highplainsherp/Follow MPR Network @FB: https://www.facebook.com/MoreliaPythonRadioIG: https://www.instagram.com/mpr_network/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtrEaKcyN8KvC3pqaiYc0RQSwag store: https://teespring.com/stores/mprnetworkPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/moreliapythonradio

Title: Episode 3a - Measurements (ex: reliability and validity) Target Audience This activity is directed to physicians who take care of hospitalized children, medical students, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants working in the emergency room, intensive care unit, or hospital wards. Objectives: Upon completion of this activity, participants should be able to: 1.      Review measurements in a study. 2.      Review validity in research. 3.      Review reliability in research. Course Directors: Tony R. Tarchichi MD — Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC.) Paul C. Gaffney Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine. Philana Lin M.D. MSc - University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine - Associate Professor in the Department of Pediatrics - Pediatric Infectious Disease Division Conflict of Interest Disclosure: No other planners, members of the planning committee, speakers, presenters, authors, content reviewers and/or anyone else in a position to control the content of this education activity have relevant financial relationships to disclose. Accreditation Statement: In support of improving patient care, the University of Pittsburgh is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.  The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine designates this enduring material activity for a maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditsTM. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Other health care professionals will receive a certificate of attendance confirming the number of contact hours commensurate with the extent of participation in this activity.   Disclaimer Statement: The information presented at this activity represents the views and opinions of the individual presenters, and does not constitute the opinion or endorsement of, or promotion by, the UPMC Center for Continuing Education in the Health Sciences, UPMC / University of Pittsburgh Medical Center or Affiliates and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.  Reasonable efforts have been taken intending for educational subject matter to be presented in a balanced, unbiased fashion and in compliance with regulatory requirements. However, each program attendee must always use his/her own personal and professional judgment when considering further application of this information, particularly as it may relate to patient diagnostic or treatment decisions including, without limitation, FDA-approved uses and any off-label uses. Released 1/23/2025,  Expires 1/23/2028 The direct link to the course is provided below: COMING SOON

The Roman Catechism of Trent (RCT) p.161-164. The Sacraments, ep. 4. -STV: https://spiritustv.com/@padreperegrino -Donate: https://www.padreperegrino.org/donate/ -Telegram: https://t.me/padreperegrino

This is the second part of the conversation on validity of qualitative research with Noora Ronkainen and Gareth Wiltshire. The discussion draws on their article Rethinking validity in qualitative sport and exercise psychology research: a realist perspective and provides an overview of the debates, arguments of the paper, and the story behind the writing. We also discuss their new article A realist approach to thematic analysis: making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes, which moves to consider how the realist perspective - including considerations of validity - can inform each step of thematic analysis. If you haven't listened to the first part of the episode yet, you can find it here: https://paresearcher.podbean.com/e/ronkainenwiltshire/ ___________ This podcast episode is sponsored by Fibion Inc. | Better Sleep, Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity Research with Less Hassle --- Collect, store and manage SB and PA data easily and remotely - Discover ground-breaking Fibion SENS --- Learn more about Fibion Flash - a versatile customizable tool with HRV and accelerometry capability.  --- SB and PA measurements, analysis, and feedback made easy. Learn more about Fibion Research. --- Fibion Helix – Ideal for large scale studies. Scalable and affordable with patented precision. --- Fibion G2 – validated data on sitting, standing, activity types, energy expenditure, with participant friendly reports.   --- Learn more about Fibion Sleep and Fibion Circadian Rhythm Solutions. --- Fibion Kids - Activity tracking designed for children. --- Explore our Wearables, Experience sampling method (ESM), Sleep, Heart rate variability (HRV), Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity article collections for insights on related articles. --- Refer to our article "Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Measurements" for an exploration of active and sedentary lifestyle assessment methods. --- Learn about actigraphy in our guide: Exploring Actigraphy in Scientific Research: A Comprehensive Guide. --- Gain foundational ESM insights with "Introduction to Experience Sampling Method (ESM)" for a comprehensive overview. --- Explore accelerometer use in health research with our article "Measuring Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Accelerometers ". --- For an introduction to the fundamental aspects of HRV, consider revisiting our Ultimate Guide to Heart Rate Variability. --- Follow the podcast on Twitter https://twitter.com/PA_Researcher  Follow host Dr Olli Tikkanen on Twitter https://twitter.com/ollitikkanen  Follow Fibion on Twitter https://twitter.com/fibion  Check our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@PA_Researcher   

Listen to this interview of Roberto Verdecchia, Assistant Professor, University of Florence, Italy; and also, Per Runeson, Professor, Lund University, Sweden. We talk about their coauthored papers Threats to Validity in Software Engineering Research: A Critical Reflection (IST 2023) and Threats to Validity in Software Engineering — hypocritical paper section or essential analysis? (ESEM 2024). Per Runeson : "I think what we've seen in our work here on threats to validity — and it was certainly our intention in conducting it in the first place — is, to have the researcher take the initiative and really adopt a reflective attitude. Because, research is not only about investigating facts and testing hypotheses. It's also about reflecting on the learning process, and it's about the extent to which you can trust what you've learned in doing that research, but also it's about the way forward from there, that is, how do we take the work forward into the future." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

On this extra special birthday episode of the Best of Bias Podcast Lydell Dinero discusses sports and pop culture topics from the past couple weeks. Tune in as he talks NFL Playoff Updates, NBA Check In, Gelo's Hit Single, Tik Tok's upcoming ban, Black Panther (T' Challa) recast Ideas, Netflix's new anime Sakamoto Days, Dare Devil: Born Again trailer review and much more

There is a long tradition of debates on how to address the quality and rigor of qualitative research. In sport and exercise psychology (SEP), the relativist perspective has been the dominant viewpoint in these debates. In the absence of published critiques of the relativist perspective in SEP, Drs Ronkainen and Wiltshire wrote a paper Rethinking validity in qualitative sport and exercise psychology research: a realist perspective. They argued that the relativist approach becomes problematic when attempting to reject the “anything goes” problem because of the assumptions of internal, multiple, and mind-dependent realities. Drawing on realist literature in other fields of social science, they proposed using realist principles of ontological plausibility, empirical adequacy and practical utility in working with threats to validity. ___________ This podcast episode is sponsored by Fibion Inc. | Better Sleep, Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity Research with Less Hassle --- Collect, store and manage SB and PA data easily and remotely - Discover ground-breaking Fibion SENS --- Learn more about Fibion Flash - a versatile customizable tool with HRV and accelerometry capability.  --- SB and PA measurements, analysis, and feedback made easy. Learn more about Fibion Research. --- Fibion Helix – Ideal for large scale studies. Scalable and affordable with patented precision. --- Fibion G2 – validated data on sitting, standing, activity types, energy expenditure, with participant friendly reports.   --- Learn more about Fibion Sleep and Fibion Circadian Rhythm Solutions. --- Fibion Kids - Activity tracking designed for children. --- Explore our Wearables, Experience sampling method (ESM), Sleep, Heart rate variability (HRV), Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity article collections for insights on related articles. --- Refer to our article "Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Measurements" for an exploration of active and sedentary lifestyle assessment methods. --- Learn about actigraphy in our guide: Exploring Actigraphy in Scientific Research: A Comprehensive Guide. --- Gain foundational ESM insights with "Introduction to Experience Sampling Method (ESM)" for a comprehensive overview. --- Explore accelerometer use in health research with our article "Measuring Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Accelerometers ". --- For an introduction to the fundamental aspects of HRV, consider revisiting our Ultimate Guide to Heart Rate Variability. --- Follow the podcast on Twitter https://twitter.com/PA_Researcher  Follow host Dr Olli Tikkanen on Twitter https://twitter.com/ollitikkanen  Follow Fibion on Twitter https://twitter.com/fibion  Check our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@PA_Researcher   

Listen to this interview of Roberto Verdecchia, Assistant Professor, University of Florence, Italy; and also, Per Runeson, Professor, Lund University, Sweden. We talk about their coauthored papers Threats to Validity in Software Engineering Research: A Critical Reflection (IST 2023) and Threats to Validity in Software Engineering — hypocritical paper section or essential analysis? (ESEM 2024). Per Runeson : "I think what we've seen in our work here on threats to validity — and it was certainly our intention in conducting it in the first place — is, to have the researcher take the initiative and really adopt a reflective attitude. Because, research is not only about investigating facts and testing hypotheses. It's also about reflecting on the learning process, and it's about the extent to which you can trust what you've learned in doing that research, but also it's about the way forward from there, that is, how do we take the work forward into the future." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Watch this video Right Now and Ads-FREE on our independent platform: https://remnant-tv.com/v/1317?channelName=RemnantTV Book Michael for your event: https://catholicspeakers.com/profiles/michael-matt  Meet Michael Matt in March at the TLM Friends Conference: https://www.tlm-friends.org/divine-mercy-conference-restoring-tradition-renewing-hope-prepare-for-a-brighter-tomorrow In this 2025 kickoff episode, Michael Matt answers YOUR questions and explains the goals for RTV in the new year! Topics include: What to expect from the Trump Administration Will the US go to war for Israel? Validity of the Novus Ordo sacraments The 3rd Secret of Fatima Plus, Syrian Christians take to the streets to defend Christianity, Justin Trudeau resigns as PM of Canada, and Pope Francis appoints Cardinal McElroy to the Archdiocese of Washington, DC. It's going to be an interesting year, and RTV is up to the challenge to proclaim Christ King no matter what happens! Support RTV: https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/donate-today Sign up for Michael Matt's Weekly E-Letter: https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/subscribe-today/free-remnant-updates Follow Michael Matt on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Michael_J_Matt Subscribe to The Remnant Newspaper, print and/or digital versions available: https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/subscribe-today Listen to Michael Matt's podcasts: SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/1AdkCDFfR736CqcGw2Uvd0 APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-michael-j-matt-show/id1563298989

In this episode of The ADHD Skills Lab, Skye and I explore the critical question: is executive functioning even real or is it a poorly defined construct that's been misunderstood for decades?Curious what's inside?What the DSM says about executive function..What's the difference between an executive function task vs. executive function measure?Some ADHD'ers may not struggle with executive dysfunction at all.CTA: If this is you, let us know! I have follow-up questions!Thanks for being here! Until next time,Sarah Russell (Podcast Producer)References:1. Validity of the Executive Function Theory of ADHD: A Meta-Analytic Review2. Executive Functioning Rating Scales: Ecologically Valid or Construct Invalid?P.S. Skye here! Whenever you're ready, here are 4 ways I can help you have Focused, Balanced Days with ADHD. 1. Subscribe for sections of my new book ‘Focused Balanced Days with ADHD' in your inbox — Click Here 2. Grab a Quick ADHD Win — Click Here 3. Join Our Focused Balanced Days Coaching Program If you're an overwhelmed professional who's been late diagnosed with ADHD and wants research-based, practical strategies, send me a message and tell me a little about your profession and struggles, and I'll be in touch! — Click Here 4. Work with me Privately If you'd like to work directly with me to build your engine and create meaningful change fast... send me a message and tell me a little about your profession and struggles, and I'll get you all the details! — Click Here Learn more here.

SPORTS: Validity of a post-employment restriction | Jan. 6, 2025Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.netFollow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotionSubscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digitalSign up to our newsletters: https://tmt.ph/newslettersCheck out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

DEAR PAO: Tests to determine the validity of entrapment | Jan. 2, 2025Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.netFollow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotionSubscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digitalSign up to our newsletters: https://tmt.ph/newslettersCheck out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Brian and Wayne discuss personal updates, including Brian's birthday and health, before diving deep into controversial Bigfoot evidence presented by Todd Standing. They critically analyze Todd's claims about AI and Photoshop in Bigfoot imagery, his position as an "expert", and potential motives behind his actions. Listener interactions, including a poem by a fan and debates about Sasquatch evidence, add depth to the conversation.Sylvanic Bigfoot YouTube ChannelGet Our FREE NewsletterGet Brian's Book Sasquatch Unleashed The Truth Behind The LegendLeave Us A VoicemailVisit Our WebsiteSupport Our SponsorsVisit Untold Radio AMVisit HIMS.COM 00:00 Birthday Blues and Celebrations 03:05 Listener Voicemails and Questions 03:37 The Challenges of Audiobook Narration 08:01 Listener Stories and Feedback 14:55 Addressing Criticism and Support 21:02 A Poem for the PO Freaks 23:22 Shoutout to Tiffany and Future Plans 23:56 Discussing Bigfoot Evidence 24:48 AI and Photoshop in Sasquatch Evidence 25:08 Questioning the Authenticity of Photographs 26:00 Debating the Validity of Sasquatch Sightings 26:28 Analyzing the Sasquatch Photograph 27:17 Skepticism and Evidence in Sasquatch Research 29:12 The Role of AI in Identifying Fake Images 30:13 Todd Standing's Claims and Controversies 33:42 Criticism of Todd Standing's Methods 37:33 The Business of Bigfoot Clickbait 47:59 Community Reactions and Final ThoughtsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/that-bigfoot-podcast--5960602/support.

Learning to teach math teachers better with Erin Krupa, Associate Professor College of Education at North Carolina State University, and Jonathan Bostic, Professor and Director of Grant Innovations in the College of Education and Human Development at Bowling Green State University. Listen as Erin and Jonathan share about the importance and benefits of building a community, and also about the project Validity Evidence for Measurement in Mathematics Education. Validity Evidence for Measurement in Mathematics Education website https://mathedmeasures.org/ (https://mathedmeasures.org/) Math Ed Podcast episode 2409: Jonathan Bostic - math ed measures and validity (https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/mathed/episodes/2024-10-21T18_57_39-07_00) Bostic, J., Krupa, E.,, & Shih, J. (Eds.) (2019). Quantitative measures of mathematical knowledge: Researching instruments and perspectives (https://www.routledge.com/Quantitative-Measures-of-Mathematical-Knowledge-Researching-Instruments-and-Perspectives/Bostic-Krupa-Shih/p/book/9780367670757). New York, NY: Routledge. Bostic, J., Krupa, E., & Shih, J. (2019). Assessments in mathematics education contexts: Theoretical frameworks and new directions (https://www.routledge.com/Assessment-in-Mathematics-Education-Contexts-Theoretical-Frameworks-and-New-Directions/Bostic-Krupa-Shih/p/book/9780367670764). New York, NY: Routledge. AMTE STaR Program (https://amte.net/star) Special Guests: Erin Krupa and Jonathan Bostic.

This session focuses on the fundamentals of effective recruitment and selection processes, emphasizing metrics, tools, and best practices that HR professionals can use to attract, assess, and retain top talent. Key concepts highlight both strategic and operational approaches to building a strong workforce. Key Topics Covered Employment Branding and EVP: Building an attractive employer reputation and offering a compelling employee value proposition to recruit and retain talent. Recruitment Metrics: Understanding metrics like yield ratios, quality of hire, cost per hire, and days to fill for measuring recruitment efficiency and effectiveness. Candidate Screening and Tools: Leveraging Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and recruitment management systems to streamline the hiring process. Reliability and Validity in Assessments: Ensuring consistency and accuracy in tests and evaluations, including measures like predictive and content validity. Bias in Recruitment: Recognizing and mitigating biases such as anchoring, halo/horn effect, and confirmation bias to ensure fair hiring practices. Legal Considerations: Key cases like Griggs v. Duke Power and Washington v. Davis underline the importance of job-related hiring practices. Assessment Centers and Simulations: Utilizing methods such as in-basket exercises and expectancy charts to evaluate candidates comprehensively. Ethical Hiring: Addressing negligent hiring risks and applying the Qualified Privilege Doctrine to provide honest and lawful feedback about candidates. This session equips HR professionals with actionable insights and techniques to enhance recruitment strategies, ensure legal compliance, and foster equitable hiring processes, illustrated by practical examples from leading organizations.

Kirk Cameron interviews Alisa Childers on the growing Deconstruction Movement and also interviews Homicide Detective J. Warner Wallace on the validity of scripture. Jaggy and I thank you for tuning in and SHARING!

❓How Do We Know If God Is Telling Us to Do Something in Our Life?

Today, Father Casey of Breaking in the Habit answers questions that people have about sex. In doing so, he exposes some really weird loopholes that I don't think he thought of.Cards:William Lane Craig Says Christians are MISERABLE!:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFBe1sPSg9MOriginal Video: https://tinyurl.com/26pghdy6Sources:Solomon in History and Tradition: https://tinyurl.com/22hk9xk8From In the Garden of Delights: https://tinyurl.com/24w3c889“Validity” and “liceity” in conjugal acts: A reply to Stephen Napier on the HIV-condom debate: https://tinyurl.com/24v588h3Should You Stay Together Only for the Kids?: https://tinyurl.com/27pzy2g5Ectopic Pregnancy and Double Effect: https://tinyurl.com/2ypyg33rWomen sharing personal stories about abortion bans have become a political force: https://tinyurl.com/2atra6ceNowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US: https://tinyurl.com/2otdtkuhStates With Abortion Bans See Continued Decrease in U.S. MD Senior Residency Applicants: https://tinyurl.com/286nwmhcCanadian Indian residential school system: https://tinyurl.com/24js5x2zAll my various links can be found here:http://links.vicedrhino.comThis content is CAN credentialed, which means you can report instances of harassment, abuse, or other harm on their hotline at (617) 249-4255, or on their website at creatoraccountabilitynetwork.orgBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/viced-rhino-the-podcast--4623273/support.

If you're overwhelmed with skincare, this episode is for you. I chat with Amy Koberling, a Dermatology PA, who likes to keep skincare simple and evidence-based. We discuss practical tools to improve the health and appearance of your skin.  Amy's websiteFollow Amy on IGFollow Amy on Tiktok0:00: Introduction to Amy Koberling, PA 1:55: How exercise affects your skin 4:24: Skincare is more than just aesthetics7:36: Steps you can take to improve your skin 14:47: Skincare treatments  17:46: Amy's thoughts on filler and botox 23:43: Validity of clean beauty products 26:51: How environmental toxins affect your skin 28:42: Foods that improve skin health 35:15: Alcohol and skin health 14-day free Evlo trialFollow Dr. Shannon on InstagramFollow The Doctor Shannon Show on Instagram 

In this weeks episode of the Happy Healthy Human podcast Eric and Luke share watch some videos related to fitness..They may agree with and some mayyyyybe might be a stretch...tune in to the full episode to see their reactions.

David and Tamler share a few brief thoughts on the election and then raise some questions about Tucker Carlson being attacked by a demon as he slept in the woods with his wife and four dogs (still don't believe in ghosts, people?). In the main segment we talk about one of the most popular measures in social psychology – the cognitive reflection test (CRT). Originally designed to identify differences in people's ability to employ reflection (system 2) to override their initial intuition (system 1), this three-item measure has mushroomed into its own industry with researchers linking CRT scores to job performance, religious belief, conspiracy theorizing and more. But what psychological attribute is this test supposed to measure exactly, and how can we determine its validity? And has the dual process system 1/system 2 framework outlived its usefulness?  Tucker Carlson was totally mauled by a demon and not scratched by his dogs [youtube.com] Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42. Blacksmith, N., Yang, Y., Ruark, G., & Behrend, T. (2018, July). A Validity Analysis of the Cognitive Reflection Test Using an Item-Response-Tree Model. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 18090). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Erceg, N., Galić, Z., & Ružojčić, M. (2020). A reflection on cognitive reflection–testing convergent/divergent validity of two measures of cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision making, 15(5), 741-755. Meyer, A., & Frederick, S. (2023). The formation and revision of intuitions. Cognition, 240, 105380.

Welcome to the 199th episode of The 10 Minute Leadership Podcast! In this episode, we will learn about the importance of validity and leadership. We will understand what is misinformation, disinformation, and what we need to do to remain valid and accurate with information we pay forward. Happy learning!

Have you ever doubted your story's value? In this episode of the Communication Queens podcast, host Kimberly Spencer, a former screenwriter turned master communications coach, passionately discusses the power of personal storytelling in podcast guesting. She introduces her new book, "Make Every Podcast Want You," which offers NLP communication strategies and practical tips for becoming an irresistible podcast guest. Kimberly shares a heartfelt conversation with a client who doubted the significance of her own story, emphasizing that everyone's experiences are valuable and worth sharing. Through her own journey of overcoming trauma, Kimberly inspires listeners to embrace their unique narratives and connect authentically with others.

In this episode of Do This, Not That, host Jay Schwedelson welcomes Guy Hanson, Vice President of Customer Engagement at Validity, to discuss email deliverability, best practices, and industry insights.=================================================================Best Moments:(01:36) Guy's journey into the email marketing industry(05:27) Difference between email delivery and deliverability(11:37) The rise of "snooze" email delivery options(16:57) Best practices for email send times(22:19) Guy's podcast "Email After Hours" and other resources=================================================================Guest Bio:Guy Hanson is the Vice President of Customer Engagement at Validity and a recognized email and data industry expert. With a background in digital printing at Xerox, Guy transitioned into email marketing at the turn of the millennium. He spent nearly a decade at Return Path before joining Validity, where he continues to be a thought leader in email deliverability and best practices. Guy hosts the podcast "Email After Hours" and is a frequent speaker and contributor in the email marketing space.Don't forget to check out Guy's podcast, Email After Hours!=================================================================MASSIVE thank you to our Sponsor, Marigold!!Marigold is a relationship marketing platform designed to help you acquire new customers and turn them into superfans with their best-in-class loyalty solutions. Don't take my word for it though, American Airlines, Honeybaked Ham, Title Boxing, and Notre Dame University are also customers!Regardless of your size, check out Marigold today to get the solution you need to grow your business!Check out this free content from marigold that Jay has loved digesting, 5 Steps For Selecting The Right Email Marketing Platform.

Four pro-life voters filed a lawsuit after a state interim report found “widespread” fraud in the signature collection effort to place abortion Amendment 4 on the November ballot. Constitutional expert, lawyer, author, pastor, and founder of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver discusses the important topics of the day with co-hosts and guests that impact life, liberty, and family. To stay informed and get involved, visit LC.org.

Jonathan Bostic from Bowling Green State University discusses MathEdMeasures.org and the work of the VM2ED (Validity Evidence for Measurement in Mathematics Education) project, with Erin Krupa and others. https://MathEdMeasures.org/ Jonathan's professional webpage List of past episodes

Today we give you our conversation about performance validity tests with Dr. Kyle Boone. Kyle is a board certified clinical neuropsychologist in private practice in Torrance, California. This episode represents an extension of our prior discussion with Kyle about test security, so listen to that one if you can, although it's not a prerequisite for this one. Show notes are available at www.NavNeuro.com/151 _________________ If you'd like to support the show, here are a few easy ways: 1) Get APA-approved CE credits for listening to select episodes: www.NavNeuro.com/INS  2) Tell your friends and colleagues about it 3) Subscribe (free) and leave an Apple Podcasts rating/review: www.NavNeuro.com/itunes 4) Check out our book Becoming a Neuropsychologist, and leave it an Amazon rating   Thanks for listening, and join us next time as we continue to navigate the brain and behavior! [Note: This podcast and all linked content is intended for general educational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of psychology or any other professional healthcare advice and services. No professional relationship is formed between hosts and listeners. All content is to be used at listeners' own risk. Users should always seek appropriate medical and psychological care from their licensed healthcare provider.]

Research about menopause right now is finally beginning to really get its moment. Or is it? What's something you can trust? And what's stated as “science-based” or “science-backed”? What can you trust and what should you question? Think of this as a crash course in Research 101. In fact, I think that was a required course my first semester in grad school. The content is as important or more today when you have influencers talking about studies, in fact sponsoring their own to back up their products. You see both experts and influencers on line and are left to sort out one from the other yourself. Questions We Answer in this Episode: How to know if a source is credible? [00:36:00] What determines a peer-reviewed journal? [00:18:50] Are all studies on PubMed or Science Direct peer-reviewed? [00:36:00] Are all studies from Google Scholar (AI) peer-reviewed? [00:37:00] What makes some research studies better than others? [00:04:50] In short this will be a bit like a vocabulary lesson so you can filter news regarding research about menopause for yourself. The  spoiler alert is this: the gold standard in health research are those that are interventional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. In the planning stages and then results and discussion these things will be considered and determined: Reliability is at least 3 independent experiments giving the same results. Relevant to you with subjects just like you. Recency is often within the last 10 years with exception Validity is about how well findings apply to those not in the study. (discussion is about communicating things that may interfere with it being applicable to a diagnosis or a protocol or treatment) Confidence level aiming at 95% confidence level requires a result across a large number of subjects to show it Sample size A good maximum sample size is often around 10% of the population, as long as it doesn't exceed 1,000 people. At least 100 subjects. Larger than 30, less than 500. The answers vary considerably. What you should expect: Written for professionals Authors names and a contact included Bibliography included Peer-reviewed journal How do you know if it's a peer-reviewed journal? Go to the journal (not the article to find out). The journal website includes information for authors about the publication process. A board of experts review and evaluate before acceptance for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Two Additional Terms to Know Regarding Research About Menopause Qualitative - descriptive is more loosely gathered data that might be polls or surveys and interpreting the responses without giving a percentage. This might also come from a review of literature which isn't actually conducting a study but is reviewing a pool of studies to seek common denominators about the research methods and results. Quantitative - based on numbers and is going to result in for instance a percent of muscle lost on average each decade, or over 80% of women describe libido issues. Mixed -  including both There are many types of studies starting with observational and interventional. Observational studies look at what effects habits, beliefs or events affect certain outcomes. For instance, a study that reported an association between increased meat eating and cancer. However, the study was conducted based on a survey where participation was compensated. Participants in such studies may be motivated by the ease of collecting $20 for reporting their habits but might be consuming hot dogs and bologna and Spam, unlike you who are choosing other options that are organic, grass-fed and finished wild options. The headlines? Satisfy a great need by the media to get views, clicks and engagement. Interventional studies, just as it sounds, provide some kind of imposed change to subjects. For instance, providing an example on research about menopause, a study published in Obesity on post menopausal women in a weight loss program divided groups into long sleepers vs short sleepers. They compared results from the change in sleep while other conditions (eating and exercise) were controlled. Though this may not fall directly under current research about menopause, a recently published study in JAMA in July 2024 found older adults (av age 71) who lifted heavy weights for 1 year retained their strength for 4 years while those doing moderate weight training did not. This was a randomized longitudinal study. Types of Research About Menopause Longitudinal vs Cross sectional Looking at the same co-hort over time checking in periodically to see what results occur vs look at different segments of the population one time. In research about menopause, perhaps none is more well-known than The Nurses Health Study. It is a longitudinal observational study looking at the effects of certain habits over time. Some of Dr Loren Fishman's studies on 12 yoga poses have been longitudinal studies showing increase in bone density over time. Some also were retrospective looking back at what happened in women who had done yoga more than every other day. New studies that would take specific poses and see which of those were most beneficial would be prospective, or  going forward in time. Active treatment vs placebo studies are where all receive the treatment vs some subjects receive the actual drug or treatment and others receive a placebo sugar pill. Sometimes this is an exercise intervention. Where the actual protocol tested is resistance training exercise and the placebo also does resistance training but without protocol Control group means that a subset group does not have the treatment or follow protocol. For instance in Fishman's studies an experimental group would have done the yoga poses and a control group was also post menopausal but did not do the yoga poses. Open vs Blind/Double Blind: everyone knows who is in which group (experimental, placebo or control) vs subjects or researchers don't know vs neither researchers nor subjects know which is which. Randomized control vs case control References: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6188693/#:~:text=The validity of a research,associations%2C interventions%2C and diagnosis. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2821225 Other Episodes You Might Like: Living Longer is NOT the Goal: Research on Longevity: https://www.flippingfifty.com/living-longer/ Science that Makes Exercise Essential for Menopause Health: https://www.flippingfifty.com/exercise-essential-for-menopause-health/ Boost Weight Loss with Exercise and Eating Timing: Science Studies: https://www.flippingfifty.com/boost-weight-loss-with-exercise-and-eating-timing-science-studies/ Resources: Hot Not Bothered Challenge: https://www.flippingfifty.com/hot-not-bothered-challenge-2023/ Stronger: https://www.flippingfifty.com/get-stronger/