Podcasts about Forsberg

This week John Wyatt Greenlee returns as guest host and he's looking for a six fingered man. 

Send The Parable Podcast a TextHave you ever wondered, is this the end of my story? Please meet Ashley Forsberg as she shares about her parable journey of walking through rejection and walking in confidence. Ashley is a passionate communicator, weaving faith, storytelling, and scripture into theologically rich messages of healing and hope. A pastor, author, and entrepreneur, she helps others hear God, engage with him, and reorient their life towards Him. Whether speaking, coaching, or traveling the USA with her family, she finds joy in God's goodness and deep restoration.Connect with AshleyWebsite | Instagram | BooksReflection QuestionsIs there a story or a part of yourself that you need to share in order to truly heal and become a healthier emotional you?In what ways can you deeply abide in God this week to connect to Him?Ways to Support The Parable Podcast #1 Subscribe or Follow the podcast to ensure you catch every episode of The Parable Podcast on your preferred podcast platform (such as iTunes, Spotify). #2 Recommend this podcast to a friend, providing a great chance to begin your own Parable Conversation. #3 Looking for a speaker for your Church, Women's Group, or event? Contact Danielle to learn more.

On this episode of The Garden Report Bobby Manning is joined by NBC Sports Boston Reporter Chris Forsberg. The duo react the Jaylen Brown news and discuss the future of the Boston Celtics from the possibility of trading Jaylen Brown to Derrick White and why the Celtics might keep Kristaps Porzingis. 0:00 - Intro Guest 0:28 - Jaylen Brown gets surgery 5:50 - More or less likely there's a Jaylen trade?  7:58 - Prizepicks 11:01 - How will Celtics build into the future?  18:33 - Would you do a Derrick White trade?  23:08 - Could the Celtics keep Kristaps Porzingis?  29:03 - Forsberg's Celtics plan: "Threading the needle"  33:47 - What will the Celtics do in the NBA Draft?  37:34 - Will the Knicks ask to interview Joe Mazzulla?  38:15 - Who will Knicks hire as Head Coach? 39:05 - Joe Mazzulla future with Celtics 42:28 - Wrapping up Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

While Mickey-Jo was in New York, he stopped by the Samuel J Friedman Theatre to meet Jasmine Forsberg, one of Broadway's most exciting rising stars.Jasmine, who caught international attention with her showstopping rendition of 'Heart of Stone' as Jane Seymour in Six, was previously seen in Here Lies Love and is now part of the stellar company of Stephen Sondheim's Old Friends.Check out what Jasmine and Mickey-Jo discussed ahead of his visit to the show...•get in person / live stream tickets to see MickeyJoTheatre LIVE at the Phoenix Arts Club:https://phoenixartsclub.com/events/mickeyjotheatre-live/About Mickey-Jo:As one of the leading voices in theatre criticism on a social platform, Mickey-Jo is pioneering a new medium for a dwindling field. His YouTube channel: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠MickeyJoTheatre⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ is the largest worldwide in terms of dedicated theatre criticism, where he also share features, news and interviews as well as lifestyle content for over 80,000 subscribers. Since establishing himself as a theatre critic he has been able to work internationally. With a viewership that is largely split between the US and the UK he has been fortunate enough to be able to work with PR, Marketing, and Social Media representatives for shows in New York, London, Edinburgh, Hamburg, Toronto, Sao Pãolo, and Paris. He has also twice received accreditation from the world renowned Edinburgh Festival Fringe. His reviews and features have also been published by WhatsOnStage, for whom he was a panelist to help curate nominees for their 2023 and 2024 Awards as well as BroadwayWorldUK, Musicals Magazine and LondonTheatre.co.uk. He has been invited to speak to private tour groups, at the BEAM 2023 new musical theatre conference at Oxford Playhouse, and on a panel of critics at an event for young people considering a career in the arts courtesy of Go Live Theatre Projects. Instagram/TikTok/X: @MickeyJoTheatre

Listen to ASCO's Journal of Clinical Oncology Art of Oncology article, "A Whipple of Choice” by Dr. Carl Forsberg, who is an Assistant Professor of Strategy and History at Air Force War College. The article is followed by an interview with Forsberg and host Dr. Mikkael Sekeres. Dr Forsberg shares his experience with an uncommon cancer treated by a new therapy for which no directly relevant data were available. Transcript Narrator: A Whipple of Choice, by C. W. Forsberg, PDH I sat across from a hepatobiliary surgeon on a gray October afternoon. “To be frank,” he told me, “we don't know what to recommend in your case. So we default to being conservative. That means a Whipple surgery, even though there are no data showing it will improve your outcome.” The assessment surprised me, diverging from my expectation that doctors provide clear recommendations. Yet the surgeon's willingness to structure our conversation around the ambiguity of the case was immensely clarifying. With a few words he cut through the frustrations that had characterized previous discussions with other physicians. I grasped that with an uncommon cancer treated by a novel therapy with no directly relevant data, I faced a radical choice. My situation that afternoon was worlds away from where I was 5 months earlier, when I was diagnosed with presumed pancreatic cancer at the age of 35. An early scan was suspicious for peritoneal metastasis. The implications seemed obvious. I prepared myself for the inevitable, facing my fate stoically except in those moments when I lingered next to my young son and daughter as they drifted to sleep. Contemplating my death when they were still so vulnerable, I wept. Then the specter of death retreated. Further tests revealed no metastasis. New doctors believed the tumor was duodenal and not pancreatic. More importantly, the tumor tested as deficient mismatch repair (dMMR), predictable in a Lynch syndrome carrier like me. In the 7 years since I was treated for an earlier colon cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy had revolutionized treatment of dMMR and high microsatellite instability tumors. One oncologist walked me through a series of recent studies that showed extraordinary responses to ICI therapy in locally advanced colon and rectal tumors with these biomarkers.1-4 He expressed optimism that my cancer could have a similar response. I embarked on a 24-week course of nivolumab and ipilimumab. After 6 weeks of therapy, a computed tomography (CT) scan showed a significant reduction in tumor size. My health rebounded as the tumor receded. This miraculous escape, however, was bound by the specter of a Whipple surgery, vaguely promised 6 months into my treatment. At the internationally renowned center where I was diagnosed and began treatment with astonishing efficiency, neither oncologists nor surgeons entertained the possibility of a surgery-sparing approach. “In a young, healthy patient like you we would absolutely recommend a Whipple,” my first oncologist told me. A second oncologist repeated that assessment. When asked if immunotherapy could provide a definitive cure, he replied that “if the tumor disappeared we could have that conversation.” My charismatic surgeon exuded confidence that I would sail through the procedure: “You are in excellent health and fitness—it will be a delicious surgery for me.” Momentum carried me forward in the belief that surgery was out of my hands. Four months into treatment, I was jolted into the realization that a Whipple was a choice. I transferred my infusions to a cancer center nearer my home, where I saw a third oncologist, who was nearly my age. On a sunny afternoon, 2 months into our relationship, he suggested I think about a watch-and-wait approach that continued ICI therapy with the aim of avoiding surgery. “Is that an option?” I asked, taken aback. “This is a life-changing surgery,” he responded. “You should consider it.” He arranged a meeting for me with his colleague, the hepatobiliary surgeon who clarified that “there are no data showing that surgery will improve your outcome.” How should patients and physicians make decisions in the absence of data? My previous experience with cancer offered little help. When I was diagnosed with colon cancer at the age of 28, doctors made clear recommendations based on clear evidence. I marched through surgery and never second-guessed my choices. A watch-and-wait approach made sense to me based on theory and extrapolation. Could duodenal tumors treated by ICIs behave that differently from colorectal cancers, for which data existed to make a watch-and-wait approach appear reasonable? The hepatobiliary surgeon at the regional cancer center told me, “I could make a theoretical argument either way and leave you walking out of here convinced. But we simply don't know.” His comment reflects modern medicine's strict empiricism, but it foreclosed further discussion of the scientific questions involved and pushed the decision into the realm of personal values. Facing this dilemma, my family situation drove me toward surgery despite my intuition that immunotherapy could provide a definitive cure. The night before I scheduled my Whipple procedure, I wrote in my journal that “in the face of radical uncertainty one must resort to basic values—and my priority is to survive for my children. A maimed, weakened father is without doubt better than no father at all.” To be sure, these last lines were written with some bravado. Only after the surgery did I viscerally grasp that the Whipple was a permanent maiming of the GI system. My doubts lingered after I scheduled surgery, and I had a final conversation with the young oncologist at the cancer center near my home. We discussed a watch-and-wait approach. A small mass remained on CT scans, but that was common even when tumors achieved a pathological complete response.5 Another positron emission tomography scan could provide more information but could not rule out the persistence of lingering cancer cells. I expressed my low risk tolerance given my personal circumstances. We sat across from one another, two fathers with young children. My oncologist was expecting his second child in a week. He was silent for moments before responding “I would recommend surgery in your situation.” Perhaps I was projecting, but I felt the two of us were in the same situation: both wanting a watch-and-wait approach, both intuitively believing in it, but both held back by a sense of parental responsibility. My post-surgery pathology revealed a pathological complete response. CT scans and circulating tumor DNA tests in the past year have shown no evidence of disease. This is an exceptional outcome. Yet in the year since my Whipple, I have been sickened by my lack of gratitude for my good fortune, driven by a difficult recovery and a sense that my surgery had been superfluous. Following surgery, I faced complications of which I had been warned, such as a pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, and pancreatic enzyme insufficiency. There were still more problems that I did not anticipate, including, among others, stenoses of arteries and veins due to intraabdominal hematomas, persistent anemia, and the loss of 25% of my body weight. Collectively, they added up to an enduringly dysfunctional GI system and a lingering frailty. I was particularly embittered to have chosen surgery to mitigate the risk that my children would lose their father, only to find that surgery prevented me from being the robust father I once was. Of course, had I deferred surgery and seen the tumor grow inoperable or metastasize between scans, my remorse would have been incalculably deeper. But should medical decisions be based on contemplation of the most catastrophic consequences, whatever their likelihood? With hindsight, it became difficult not to re-examine the assumptions behind my decision. Too often, my dialogue with my doctors was impeded by the assumption that surgery was the obvious recommendation because I was young and healthy. The assumption that younger oncology patients necessarily warrant more radical treatment deserves reassessment. While younger patients have more years of life to lose from cancer, they also have more years to deal with the enduring medical, personal, and professional consequences of a life-changing surgery. It was not my youth that led me to choose surgery but my family situation: 10 years earlier, my youth likely would have led me to a watch-and-wait approach. The rising incidence of cancer among patients in their 20s and 30s highlights the need for a nuanced approach to this demographic.  Calculations on surgery versus a watch-and-wait approach in cases like mine, where there are no data showing that surgery improves outcomes, also require doctors and patients to account holistically for the severity of the surgery involved. Multiple surgeons discussed the immediate postsurgical risks and complications of a pancreaticoduodenectomy, but not the long-term challenges involved. When asked to compare the difficulty of my prior subtotal colectomy with that of a pancreatoduodenectomy, the surgeon who performed my procedure suggested they might be similar. The surgeon at the regional cancer center stated that the Whipple would be far more difficult. I mentally split the difference. The later assessment was right, and mine was not a particularly bad recovery compared with others I know. Having been through both procedures, I would repeat the subtotal colectomy for a theoretical oncologic benefit but would accept some calculated risk to avoid a Whipple. Most Whipple survivors do not have the privilege of asking whether their surgery was necessary. Many celebrate every anniversary of the procedure as one more year that they are alive against the odds. That I can question the need for my surgery speaks to the revolutionary transformation which immunotherapy has brought about for a small subset of patients with cancer. The long-term medical and personal consequences of surgery highlight the urgent stakes of fully understanding and harnessing the life-affirming potential of this technology. In the meantime, while the field accumulates more data, potentially thousands of patients and their physicians will face difficult decisions on surgery verses a watch and- wait approach in cases of GI tumors with particular biomarkers showing exceptional responses to ICI therapy.7,8 Under these circumstances, I hope that all patients can have effective and transparent conversations with their physicians that allow informed choices accounting for their risk tolerance, calculations of proportionality, and priorities.  Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: Hello, and welcome to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology, which features essays and personal reflections from authors exploring their experience in the oncology field. I'm your host, Dr. Mikkael Sekeres. I'm Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Hematology at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Miami. Today, we are so happy to be joined by Dr. Carl Forsberg, Assistant Professor of Strategy and History at the Air Force War College. In this episode, we will be discussing his Art of Oncology article, "A Whipple of Choice." At the time of this recording, our guest has no disclosures. Carl, it is such a thrill to welcome you to our podcast, and thank you for joining us. Dr. Carl Forsberg: Well, thank you, Mikkael, for having me. I'm looking forward to our conversation. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: So am I. I wanted to start, Carl, with just a little bit of background about you. It's not often we have a historian from the Air Force College who's on this podcast. Can you tell us about yourself, where you're from, and walk us through your career? Dr. Carl Forsberg: Sure. I was born and raised in Minnesota in a suburb of Minneapolis-St. Paul and then went to undergraduate on the East Coast. I actually started my career working on the contemporary war in Afghanistan, first as an analyst at a DC think tank and then spent a year in Kabul, Afghanistan, on the staff of the four-star NATO US headquarters, where I worked on the vexing problems of Afghanistan's dysfunctional government and corruption. Needless to say, we didn't solve that problem. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: Wow. Dr. Carl Forsberg: I returned from Afghanistan somewhat disillusioned with working in policy, so I moved into academia, did a PhD in history at the University of Texas at Austin, followed by postdoctoral fellowships at Harvard and Yale, and then started my current position here at the Air Force War College. The War Colleges are, I think, somewhat unusual, unique institutions. Essentially, we offer a 1-year master's degree in strategic studies for lieutenant colonels and colonels in the various US military services. Which is to say my students are generally in their 40s. They've had about 20 years of military experience. They're moving from the operational managerial levels of command to positions where they'll be making strategic decisions or be strategic advisors. So we teach military history, strategy, international relations, national security policy to facilitate that transition to a different level of thinking. It really is a wonderful, interesting, stimulating environment to be in and to teach in. So I've enjoyed this position here at the War College quite a lot. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: Well, I have to tell you, as someone who's been steeped in academic medicine, it sounds absolutely fascinating and something that I wouldn't even know where to start approaching. We have postdoctoral fellowships, of course, in science as well. What do you do during a postdoctoral fellowship in history and strategy? Dr. Carl Forsberg: It's often, especially as a historian, it's an opportunity to take your dissertation and expand it into a book manuscript. So you have a lot of flexibility, which is great. And, of course, a collegial environment with others working in similar fields. There are probably some similarities to a postdoc in medicine in terms of having working groups and conferences and discussing works in progress. So it was a great experience for me. My second postdoc occurred during the pandemic, so it turned out to be an online postdoc, a somewhat disappointing experience, but nevertheless I got a lot out of the connections and relationships I formed during those two different fellowships. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: Well, there are some people who used the pandemic as an excuse to really just plow into their writing and get immersed in it. I certainly wrote one book during the pandemic because I thought, “Why not? I'm home. It's something where I can use my brain and expand my knowledge base.” So I imagine it must have been somewhat similar for you as you're thinking about expanding your thesis and going down different research avenues. Dr. Carl Forsberg: I think I was less productive than I might have hoped. Part of it was we had a 2-year-old child at home, so my wife and I trying to, you know, both work remotely with a child without having childcare really for much of that year given the childcare options fell through. And it was perhaps less productive than I would have aspired for it to be. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: It's terrifically challenging having young children at home during the pandemic and also trying to work remotely with them at home. I'm curious, you are a writer, it's part of your career, and I'm curious about your writing process. What triggers you to write a story like you did, and how does it differ from some of your academic writing? Dr. Carl Forsberg: Yeah. Well, as you say, there is a real difference between writing history as an academic and writing this particular piece. For me, for writing history, my day job, if you will, it's a somewhat slow, painstaking process. There's a considerable amount of reading and archival work that go into history. I'm certainly very tied to my sources and documents. So, you know, trying to get that precision, making sure you've captured a huge range of archival resources. The real narrative of events is a slow process. I also have a bad habit of writing twice as much as I have room for. So my process entailed a lot of extensive revisions and rewriting, both to kind of shorten, to make sure there is a compelling narrative, and get rid of the chaff. But also, I think that process of revision for me is where I often draw some of the bigger, more interesting conclusions in my work once I've kind of laid out that basis of the actual history. Certainly, writing this article, this medical humanities article, was a very different experience for me. I've never written something about myself for publication. And, of course, it was really driven by my own experiences of going through this cancer journey and recovering from Whipple surgery as well. The article was born during my recovery, about 4 months after my Whipple procedure. It was a difficult time. Obviously kind of in a bad place physically and, in my case, somewhat mentally, including the effects of bad anemia, which developed after the surgery. I found it wasn't really conducive to writing history, so I set that aside for a while. But I also found myself just fixating on this question of had I chosen a superfluous Whipple surgery. I think to some extent, humans can endure almost any suffering with a sense of purpose, but when there's a perceived pointlessness to the suffering, it makes it much harder. So for me, writing this article really was an exercise, almost a therapeutic one, in thinking through the decisions that led me to my surgery, addressing my own fixation on this question of had I made a mistake in choosing to have surgery and working through that process in a systematic way was very helpful for me. But it also, I think, gave me- I undertook this with some sense of perhaps my experience could be worthwhile and helpful for others who would find themselves in a situation like mine. So I did write it with an eye towards what would I like to have read? What would I like to have had as perspective from another patient as I grappled with the decision that I talk about in the article of getting a Whipple surgery. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: So I wonder if I could back up a little bit. You talk about the difficulty of undergoing a Whipple procedure and of recovery afterwards, a process that took months. And this may come across as a really naive question, but as, you know, as an oncologist, my specialty is leukemia, so I'm not referring people for major surgeries, but I am referring them for major chemotherapy and sometimes to undergo a bone marrow transplant. Can you educate us what makes it so hard? Why was it so hard getting a Whipple procedure, and what was hard about the recovery? Dr. Carl Forsberg: Yeah, it was a long process. Initially, it was a 14-day stay in the hospital. I had a leaking pancreas, which my understanding is more common actually with young, healthy patients just because the pancreas is softer and more tender. So just, you know, vast amount of pancreatic fluid collecting in the abdominal cavity, which is never a pleasant experience. I had a surgical drain for 50-something days, spent 2 weeks in the hospital. Simply eating is a huge challenge after Whipple surgery. I had delayed gastric emptying for a while afterwards. You can only eat very small meals. Even small meals would give me considerable stomach pain. I ended up losing 40 lb of weight in 6 weeks after my surgery. Interestingly enough, I think I went into the surgery in about the best shape I had been in in the last decade. My surgeon told me one of the best predictors for outcomes is actual muscle mass and told me to work out for 2 hours every day leading up to my surgery, which was great because I could tell my wife, "Sorry, I'm going to be late for dinner tonight. I might die on the operating table." You can't really argue with that justification. So I went in in spectacular shape and then in 6 weeks kind of lost all of that muscle mass and all of the the strength I had built up, which just something discouraging about that. But just simply getting back to eating was an extraordinarily difficult process, kind of the process of trial and error, what worked with my system, what I could eat without getting bad stomach pains afterwards. I had an incident of C. diff, a C. diff infection just 5 weeks after the surgery, which was obviously challenging. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: Yeah. Was it more the pain from the procedure, the time spent in the hospital, or psychologically was it harder? Dr. Carl Forsberg: In the beginning, it was certainly the physical elements of it, the difficulty eating, the weakness that comes with losing that much weight so quickly. I ended up also developing anemia starting about two or 3 months in, which I think also kind of has certain mental effects. My hemoglobin got down to eight, and we caught it somewhat belatedly. But I think after about three or 4 months, some of the challenges became more psychological. So I started to physically recover, questions about going forward, how much am I going to actually recover normal metabolism, normal gastrointestinal processes, a question of, you know, what impact would this have long-term. And then, as I mentioned as well, some of the psychological questions of, especially once I discovered I had a complete pathological response to the immunotherapy, what was the point to having this surgery? Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: And the way you explore this and revisit it in the essay is absolutely fascinating. I wanted to start at the- towards the earlier part of your essay, you write, "The surgeon's willingness to structure our conversation around the ambiguity of the case was immensely clarifying." It's fascinating. The ambiguity was clarifying to you. And the fact that you appreciated the fact that the surgeon was open to talking about this ambiguity. When do you think it's the right thing to acknowledge ambiguity in medicine, and when should we be more definitive? When do you just want someone to tell you, “Do this or do that?” Dr. Carl Forsberg: That's a great question, which I've thought about some. I think some of it is, I really appreciated the one- a couple of the oncologists who brought up the ambiguity, did it not at the beginning of the process but a few months in. You know, the first few months, you're so as a patient kind of wrapped up in trying to figure out what's going on. You want answers. And my initial instinct was, you know, I wanted surgery as fast as possible because you want to get the tumor out, obviously. And so I think bringing up the ambiguity at a certain point in the process was really helpful. I imagine that some of this has to do with the patient. I'm sure for oncologists and physicians, it's got to be a real challenge assessing what your patient wants, how much they want a clear answer versus how much they want ambiguity. I've never obviously been in the position of being a physician. As a professor, you get the interesting- you start to realize some students want you to give them answers and some students really want to discuss the ambiguities and the challenges of a case. And so I'm, I imagine it might be similar as a physician, kind of trying to read the patient. I guess in my case, the fact was that it was an extraordinarily ambiguous decision in which there wasn't data. So I think there is an element, if the data gives no clear answers, that I suppose there's sort of an ethical necessity of bringing that up with the patient. Though I know that some patients will be more receptive than others to delving into that ambiguity. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: Well, you know, it's an opportunity for us to think holistically about our patients, and you as a patient to think holistically about your health and your family and how you make decisions. I believe that when we're in a gray zone in medicine where the data really don't help guide one decision versus the next, you then lean back towards other values that you have to help make that decision. You write beautifully about this. You say, "In the face of radical uncertainty, one must resort to basic values, and my priority is to survive for my children. A maimed, weakened father is without doubt better than no father at all." That's an incredibly deep sentiment. So, how do you think these types of decisions about treatment for cancer change over the course of our lives? You talk a lot about how you were a young father in this essay, and it was clear that that was, at least at some point, driving your decision. Dr. Carl Forsberg: Yeah, I certainly have spent a lot of time thinking about how I would have made this decision differently 10 years earlier. As I mentioned the article, it was interesting because most of my physicians, honestly, when they were discussing why surgery made sense pointed to my age. I don't think it was really my age. Actually, when I was 23, I went off to Afghanistan, took enormous risks. And to some extent, I think as a young single person in your 20s, you actually have generally a much higher risk tolerance. And I think in that same spirit, at a different, earlier, younger stage in my life, I would have probably actually been much more willing to accept that risk, which is kind of a point I try to make, is not necessarily your age that is really the deciding factor. And I think once again, if I were 70 or 60 and my children, you know, were off living their own lives, I think that also would have allowed me to take, um, greater risk and probably led me to go for a watch-and-wait approach instead. So there was a sense at which not the age, but the particular responsibilities one has in life, for me at least, figured very heavily into my medical calculus. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: It's so interesting how you define a greater risk as watch and wait, whereas a surgeon or a medical oncologist who's making recommendations for you might have defined the greater risk to undergo major surgery. Dr. Carl Forsberg: And I thought about that some too, like why is it that I framed the watch and wait as a greater risk? Because there is a coherent case that actually the greater risk comes from surgery. I think when you're facing a life and death decision and the consequence, when you have cancer, of course, your mind goes immediately to the possibility of death, and that consequence seems so existential that I think it made watch and wait perhaps seem like the riskier course. But that might itself have been an assumption that needed more analysis. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: Do you think that your doctor revealing that he also had young children at home helped you with this decision? Dr. Carl Forsberg: I think in some ways for a doctor it's important to kind of understand where your patient is in their own life. As a patient, it was interesting and always helpful for me to understand where my physicians were in their life, what was shaping their thinking about these questions. So I don't know if it in any way changed my decision-making, but it definitely was important for developing a relationship of trust as well with physicians that we could have that mutual exchange. I would consider one of my primary oncologists, almost something of a friend at this point. But I think it really was important to have that kind of two-way back and forth in understanding both where I was and where my physician was. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: I like how you frame that in the sense of trust and hearing somebody who could make similar considerations to you given where he was in his family. One final question I wanted to ask you. You really elegantly at the end of this essay talk about revisiting the decision. I wonder, is it fair to revisit these types of decisions with hindsight, or do we lose sight of what loomed as being most important to us when we were making the decisions in real time? Dr. Carl Forsberg: That's a great question, one that is also, I think, inherent to my teaching. I teach military history for lieutenant colonels and colonels who very well may be required, God willing not, but may be required to make these sort of difficult decisions in the case of war. And we study with hindsight. But one thing I try to do as a professor is put them in the position of generals, presidents, who did not have the benefit of hindsight, trying to see the limits of their knowledge, use primary source documents, the actual memos, the records of meetings that were made as they grappled with uncertainty and the inherent fog of war. Because it is, of course, easy to judge these things in hindsight. So definitely, I kept reminding myself of that, that it's easy to second guess with hindsight. And so I think for me, part of this article was trying to go through, seeing where I was at the time, understanding that the decision I made, it made sense and with what I knew, it was probably the right decision, even if we can also with hindsight say, "Well, we've learned more, we have more data." A lot of historical leaders, it's easy to criticize them for decisions, but when you go put yourself in their position, see what the alternatives were, you start to realize these were really hard decisions, and I would have probably made the same disastrous mistake as they would have, you know. Let's just say the Vietnam War, we have our students work through with the original documents decisions of the Joint Chiefs in 1965. They very frequently come to the exact same conclusions as American policymakers made in 1965. It is a real risk making judgments purely on the basis of hindsight, and I think it is important to go back and really try to be authentic to what you knew at the time you made a decision. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: What a great perspective on this from a historian. Carl Forsberg, I'd like to thank you, and all of us are grateful that you were willing to share your story with us in The Art of Oncology. Dr. Carl Forsberg: Well, thank you, and it's yeah, it's been a, it's a, I think in some ways a very interesting and fitting place to kind of end my cancer journey with the publication of this article, and it's definitely done a lot to help me work through this entire process of going through cancer. So, thank you. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres: Until next time, thank you for listening to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology. Don't forget to give us a rating or review, and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode. You can find all of ASCO's shows at asco.org/podcasts. Until next time, thank you so much. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.   Show notes:Like, share and subscribe so you never miss an episode and leave a rating or review.  Guest Bio: Dr. Carl Forsberg is a Assistant Professor of Strategy and History at the Air Force War College.

The Boston Celtics face a critical offseason! In the first episode of "The C;season," Chris Forsberg, Drew Carter, and Kevin O'Connor discuss the financial crunch caused by the new CBA, Jason Tatum's injury, and potential trades for Jaylen Brown, Drew Holiday & more. Will the Celtics rebuild or try to stay competitive? Get the inside scoop!2:00-How the CBA impacts the moves the Celtics might make9:30-Forsberg explores 3 potential trade paths for C's to take this summer19:00-Why Celtics fans should trust in Brad Stevens28:30-Will new CBA might make it easier to navigate this offseason WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

Imorse startade Laila sin resa mot att skaffa ett MC-kort. Vi laddar även inför hockey-VM genom att prata med Sveriges stolthet Peter "Foppa" Forsberg!

Jedna porážka ve skupině znamená pro Česko na mistrovství světa čtvrtfinálové peklo. Tým se přesunul z Dánska do Švédska a čeká ho souboj s domácím týmem hvězd. Cesta přes kolos s velkými jmény z NHL ale existuje.Švédsko má momentálně éru, kterou český hokej zažíval v na přelomu tisíciletí. V NHL nastupuje tolik hráčů, že by sestavilo klidně tři týmy. K tomu je potřeba připočítat i švédskou ligu, která je nejkvalitnější v Evropě a desítky hráčů po dalších předních soutěžích. Ve čtvrtfinále (čtvrtek ve 20:20) se Česko střetne s kolosem.„Švédi mají přes 30 obránců v NHL, my tam nemáme ani tolik hráčů celkem. Když se podíváte na střely jejich útočníků na MS? Tak je jedno, jestli zrovna pálí Forsberg, Lindholm nebo někdo další, to není zásadní. Ale vždycky u nich vidíte skvělý švih, nevíte, kdy puk vyletí, ale víte, že to bude strašná rána,“ vypočítává v podcastu Nosiči ledu bývalý útočník a dnes trenér Michal Mikeska.Jeden z pořadatelů MS na soupisku zaregistroval 21 hráčů z NHL a většina z nich hraje ve svých klubech klíčové role. Mika Zibanejad je několik let hvězdou New York Rangers, z Leo Carlsona je už ve 20 letech komplexní hokejista, který nasbíral v Anaheimu 45 bodů. Lucas Raymond dává pravidelně góly v Detroitu a výčet by klidně mohl pokračovat dál.Má Česko proti švédské soupisce plné hvězd šanci? Kam by měl v české sestavě zařadit David Kämpf a kde měl národní tým mezery proti USA? Poslechněte si čtvrtý díl druhé řady Nosičů ledu. Pořadem vás provázejí Pavel Ryšavý a Michal Mikeska, kteří zpovídají hosty ve studiu a chystají i díly přímo z Dánska a ze Švédska, kde se hraje MS 2025. Od 17. dubna vyjde každý týden minimálně jeden díl. Najdete nás na Seznam Zprávách, Podcasty.cz, Stream.cz, Spotify a Apple Podcasts. 

Lasse Granqvist och Tommy Åström med Ishockey-VM på hemmaplan. ”Så ska Sverige bli världens främsta hockeynation” - gästande Mike Helber lägger ut nya riktningen för svensk ishockey med mindre hets som leder till fler spelare. Därför har Juniorkronorna så svårt att vinna guld och därför har Damkronorna tappat mark. Drömfemman i VM 2025. Kärleksbombning av säsongen 2004/2005 då Elitserien blev NHL med stjärnor som Chara, Gaborik, Hossa, Lundqvist, Forsberg, Zetterberg, Alfredsson med flera. Mike Helber berättar öppenhjärtigt om säsongens stora kris, när han fick hantera ”sexskandalen” då Linköpings största stjärnor anklagades för våldtäkt under landslagsturnering. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

(00:00) Chris Forsberg covers the Boston Celtics for NBC Sports Boston. He joins the show to share his thoughts on the Celtics. (15:13) Forsberg breaks down Celtics’ cap crunch: Is trading Jaylen Brown the only way out? CONNECT WITH TOUCHER & HARDY: linktr.ee/ToucherandHardy For the latest updates, visit the show page on 985thesportshub.com. Follow 98.5 The Sports Hub on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Watch the show every morning on YouTube, and subscribe to stay up-to-date with all the best moments from Boston’s home for sports!

The Celtics blow a 20-point second-half lead to the New York Knicks in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals and lose 108-105 in overtime. Boston set an NBA playoff record with 60 three-point attempts and only made 15 on their way to the loss. What went wrong for Boston, and how concerned should we be? Chris Forsberg and Abby Chin break it all down… plus, we go inside the locker room to hear from Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown 1:00- Forsberg and Abby react to the loss11:05- Jayson Tatum press conference24:00- Jaylen Brown press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

Margo is joined by Monika Forsberg, an award-winning illustrator and surface pattern designer known for her playful, colorful, and striking work across books, fabrics, homewares, toys, and more. Born and raised in a small coastal town in Swedish Lapland, Monika moved to London in 1995 where she now lives with her husband, two children, and a delightful mix of pets. She's a keen swimmer, aspiring stamp collector, and former animator who believes in being versatile over niche. Her work is rich with curiosity, imagination, and a deep love for creative exploration. In this warm and meandering conversation, Monika and Margo dive into the layered realities of a creative career—one that doesn't always follow a linear path but is all the more beautiful for it.   Margo and Monika discuss: Monika's upbringing in Swedish Lapland and how it shaped her worldview Moving to the UK and studying art in multiple forms Embracing versatility over specialization in creative work The joys (and challenges) of working with client briefs Why personal projects are essential to her process How she uses Instagram and Substack to share more authentically Dreaming up whimsical projects—like a fantastical fair Approaching tricky client relationships with honesty and grace Continuing to grow, shift, and stay creatively energized   Connect with Monika:  Website: walkyland.com Instagram: @monika_forsberg   Connect with Margo:  Website: www.windowsillchats.com Instagram: @windowsillchats Patreon: www.patreon.com/inthewindowsill The Foundry: https://www.yourtantaustudio.com/thefoundry

Chris Forsberg reacts to the news that Payton Pritchard has officially been named the 2024-25 NBA Sixth Man of the Year. Forsberg shares his thoughts on Pritchard's journey before sharing an extended sit-down interview he had with the Celtics guard earlier this spring. 1:00- Forsberg reacts to Pritchard's season and the growth he's made over the last few seasons10:40- Payton Pritchard joins Forsberg for an extended interview to share his thoughts on his growth over the last few seasons with the Celtics, his favorite nicknames, and more21:35- Al Horford and Pritchard discuss the possibility of Pritchard winning the award Tuesday morning before the news was announced Presented by 24 Auto Group Watch the full Payton Pritchard documentary:https://youtu.be/yElGpa9drlE WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

On this episode of the It's All Your Fault podcast presented by Farm Bureau Insurance of Tennessee, Jeremy K. Gover and Emma Lingan discuss: Where would the Nashville Predators be without the three big free agent signings?Predictions for whether Andrew Brunette has a job next weekWhat players could help the Milwaukee Admirals in their Calder Cup run?What does next season's blue line look like?Could an extra blueliner or two wind up in a draft day trade?Another quick start, another game of catch-up!Matthew Wood gets his first NHL pointRyan Ufko makes his NHL debutWill their work ethic in game 82 help decide Brunette's future in Nashville?Follow both of our hosts on Twitter at @ItsGovertime & @emma_lingan and then follow the show @IAYFpodcast !

The Celtics beat the Hornets 93-86 in the regular season finale. With the win, Boston improves to 61-21 on the season, good enough for the second seed in the Eastern Conference playoff bracket. 1:00- Chris Forsberg shares his thoughts after the win7:30- Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter join Tom Giles to offer instant reaction, then Abby Chin catches up with Payton Pritchard in an exclusive 1-on-1 interview15:20- Luke Kornet drops another hilarious and self-deprecating response when asked about the origins of his ‘feud' with Derrick White and the importance to him of winning the Tommy Award16:10- Pritchard shares his thoughts on the possibility of winning the Sixth Man of the Year Award this season Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

The Celtics get their 60th win of the season with a 130-94 blowout win over the Charlotte Hornets. Chris Forsberg and Kayla Burton react to the win, plus they break down Luke Kornet's hilarious “attack ad” against Derrick White as he makes his pitch to win the season-long Tommy Award, and D-White's response after the game. 1:00- Forsberg and Kayla react to the win24:45- Jayson Tatum postgame press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

The Celtics lose to the Orlando Magic 96-76 in their final road game of the regular season. Boston, playing without its top six players, was unable to get anything going all night, shooting just 39% from the field and 17.5% from three in the loss. 1:00- Chris Forsberg shares his thoughts on the game6:55- Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter join Tom Giles to offer instant reaction after the loss13:05- Payton Pritchard press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

The Sens are red-hot and on the verge of their first playoff berth in eight years — but the Sabres? Really? Kardinal, Canuck, and Pan break down a wild week featuring back-to-back shutouts, a baffling loss to Buffalo, and a playoff picture that's suddenly very real.   Also in the mix: Forsberg's surprise start, Ridly Greig's chihuahua energy, Ovi hitting 895, skunks in the yard, QR code tipping rage, and some playoff ticket drama. It's a little hockey, a little chaos — classic Sens Callups. #GoSensGo

On this episode of the It's All Your Fault podcast presented by Farm Bureau Insurance of Tennessee, Jeremy K. Gover and Emma Lingan discuss: Even when the Preds play well, why can't they win?How much blame to we lay at GM Barry Trotz's feet?Will things naturally balance themselves out next season?Is there a dark horse candidate to replace Andrew Brunette behind the bench?Why have the Preds scored 1 goal or less in 9 of their last 13 games?There are five games left... what are we looking for in the final five games?How did Matthew Wood look in his NHL debut?Follow both of our hosts on Twitter at @ItsGovertime & @emma_lingan and then follow the show @IAYFpodcast !

The Celtics beat the Suns, 123-103 to improve to 57-20 on the season, and also break the NBA record for most three-pointers made in a season with 1,364. 1:00- Chris Forsberg and Kayla Burton share their thoughts after the game11:40- Abby Chin catches up with Jaylen Brown in an exclusive 1-on-1 interview, then Forsberg, Brian Scalabrine, Eddie House join Kayla to offer instant reaction to the win16:15- Luke Kornet joins our PGL crew for an exclusive interview19:30- Jayson Tatum praises Al Horford's selflessness as a teammate21:35- Jaylen Brown press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

Ett fullmatat avsnitt där vi aprilskämtar samt:

The Celtics beat the Grizzlies 117-103 to win their ninth straight game and improve to 56-19 on the season. Boston set records, both individual and team, in the game with Derrick White breaking the franchise record for three-pointers made in a season and the team going 6-0 on a road trip for the first time ever. 1:00- Chris Forsberg and Kayla Burton share their thoughts after the win15:40- Forsberg and Eddie House join Tom Giles to offer instant reaction, then Abby Chin catches up with Jayson Tatum in an exclusive 1-on-1 interview23:00- Xavier Tillman discusses getting the start in his first game back in Memphis since being traded to Boston last season24:05- Derrick White press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

On this episode of the It's All Your Fault podcast presented by Farm Bureau Insurance of Tennessee, Jeremy K. Gover and Emma Lingan discuss: Is there actually a scenario in which the Nashville Predators bring back Head Coach Andrew Brunette?Why not rule Colton Sissons out for the season?Should we put pressure on prospects to come in and deliver?When will Matthew Wood make his NHL debut?Is Filip Forsberg the lone bright spot in an otherwise miserable year?Follow both of our hosts on Twitter at @ItsGovertime & @emma_lingan and then follow the show @IAYFpodcast !

NHL analyst Mike Johnson on Sidney Crosby is still elite, Ovi chasing down Gretzky, Stütze needs some wingers, Habs fighting for the final playoff spot and fireworks between the Canadiens and Panthers.

Senators weekend, Ullmark and Forsberg sharing the net, Dylan Cozens, Ridly Greig penalty call on Crosby, Blue Jays opening weekend and the Yankees and the torpedo bat.

Bringing a ball glove to a baseball game, Senators fight for a point in Pittsburgh, strong goaltending from Ullmark and Forsberg, Battle of Ontario closer to reality, Brady Tkachuk, Habs surprise the Panthers and Carter Yakemchuk.

The Celtics beat the Spurs 121-111 win over the San Antonio Spurs to improve to 5-0 on their west coast road trip and clinch a top-2 seed in the Eastern Conference playoffs. Luke Kornet led the way with 15 points and a career-high 16 rebounds for Boston in the win. 1:00- Chris Forsberg and Kayla Burton share their thoughts after the win11:30- Abby Chin catches up with Kornet in an exclusive 1-on-1 interview, then Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter offer instant reaction following the game16:55- Jrue Holiday shares what it's like playing with ‘mallet finger' with his injured finger18:00- Jayson Tatum press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

Warnesy and The Coach are joined by Ottawa Senators winger Drake Batherson! We dive deep into the Sens playoff race, the current standings, and discuss the positive impact of Steve Staios' additions to the team this season. Drake describes his attempt at the iconic Forsberg move in Detroit during the Dad's trip, and we touch on the team's recent injuries. Plus, Drake gives us an exclusive office tour! We also revisit some of John Tortorella's greatest moments—will he land another NHL coaching gig?

Chris Forsberg is joined by Kayla Burton on the latest Celtics Talk Podcast to discuss Jayson Tatum's ankle injury and react to some of Forsberg's favorite moments from Playoff Media Day1:00 - How do you feel about Tatum's injury?7:00 - Jaylen Brown shares favorite Luke Kornet story 12:30 - KP, Jaylen and Kornet explain '1,2,3... Baja' 18:00 - Jrue Holiday explains new celebration 21:00 - Al Horford opens up about his son Ean WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

Chris Forsberg is joined by Kayla Burton on the latest Celtics Talk Podcast to discuss Jayson Tatum's ankle injury and react to some of Forsberg's favorite moments from Playoff Media Day1:00 - How do you feel about Tatum's injury?7:00 - Jaylen Brown shares favorite Luke Kornet story 12:30 - KP, Jaylen and Kornet explain '1,2,3... Baja' 18:00 - Jrue Holiday explains new celebration 21:00 - Al Horford opens up about his son Ean WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

On this special episode of BroadwayRadio, Matt Tamanini is in conversation with a returning guest on a very special day. Just hours after he spoke with Jasmine Forsberg, she took to the Samuel J. Friedman Theatre in the first Broadway preview of “Stephen Sondheim’s Old Friends.” The pair discusses working read more The post Special Episode: Jasmine Forsberg on the ‘bonkers’ journey that brought her to ‘Old Friends’ appeared first on BroadwayRadio.

An undermanned New York squad gets by a poor Toronto team in Harrison in a less than impressive performance that highlighted the importance of Emil Forsberg to the Red Bulls. Guest Host: Daniel Rebain Inside this episode:: -A look back at New York's second win of the season -We'll name our Bull of the Week (few surprises) -The Red Bulls hit I-95 this weekend for the 100th match all-time v the Revs, we'll preview -A chat with former Red Bull and current MLS Season Pass broadcaster LLOYD SAM -A VERY full email bag  

We've talked regularly about the housing needs in Michigan, but what about the true affordability of housing and how it drives economic growth. Joining Chris to talk about the effects of housing affordability is the President of TA Forsberg, Mr. Brent Forsberg!

On this episode of the It's All Your Fault podcast presented by Farm Bureau Insurance of Tennessee, Jeremy K. Gover and Emma Lingan discuss: The Hockey News says Predators HC Andrew Brunette is on the hot seatWho would you replace him with?Do we have proof that Brunette still has a firm grip on the locker room?Where were his comments about veterans in December??With 4 points & 15 shots on goal in his last 2 games, is Filip Forsberg trying to lead?Did you know that the Nashville Predators are NOT officially eliminated?Follow both of our hosts on Twitter at @ItsGovertime & @emma_lingan and then follow the show @IAYFpodcast !

The shorthanded Celtics hang on to beat the Brooklyn Nets 115-113 to take both ends of the team's back-to-back toad trip. Despite playing without Derrick White and Al Horford, and losing Jaylen Brown to back spasms, Boston used the return of Kristaps Porzingis and Payton Pritchard's record-setting night to get the win. 1:00- Chris Forsberg shares his thoughts after the win11:05- Kristaps Porzingis catches up with Abby Chin in an exclusive 1-on-1 interview to react to his first game back after missing the last eight with a respiratory illness. Then, Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter join Kayla Burton to offer instant reaction16:20- Kristaps Porzingis press conference21:20- Jayson Tatum shares his thoughts on KP's return and Pritchard's record-setting night23:10- Joe Mazzulla praises Pritchard's competitiveness23:35- Payton Pritchard reacts to setting the NBA record for most three-pointers off the bench in a season Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

(00:00) NBC Sports Boston’s Chris Forsberg, who covers the Celtics, joins Fred, Hardy, and Wallach in-studio. (15:26) The Forsberg Effect comes in full swing with the teased Hardy & Forsberg golf show. (30:36) Hardy has texts from Daniel as he’s setting people up with his driver, or should we say, really good friend. And, SargeGPT chimes in and offers his advice. CONNECT WITH TOUCHER & HARDY: linktr.ee/ToucherandHardy For the latest updates, visit the show page on 985thesportshub.com. Follow 98.5 The Sports Hub on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Watch the show every morning on YouTube, and subscribe to stay up-to-date with all the best moments from Boston’s home for sports!

In this bonus episode of Recycled Content, guest host and leader in the recycling space, Maite Quinn, President of Re-Colab and Resource Recycling, Inc. interviews Marisa Adler, Senior Consultant at RRS, and Beth Forsberg, Senior VP & Chief Sustainability Officer at Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona, to highlight Resource Recycling's first-ever Textile Recovery Summit at the Plastics Recycling Conference. The conversation explores the growing importance of textile recovery, the innovative solutions driving circularity in the textile industry, and the role of synthetic fibers in textiles. They also dive into how lessons from plastics recycling can be applied to textiles and the future of recovery technologies. Tune in to hear about exciting new opportunities and initiatives for sustainability in the textile industry, and don't miss the Textile Recovery Summit from March 24th-26th!

NHL analyst Cheryl Pounder on the Sens and trade deadline, FanDuel, Ullmark or Forsberg tonight in Chicago, interesting names arise on the Sens at the deadline and the BSens get some bodies back and win.

The Celtics lose to the Pistons, 117-97 to fall to 42-17 on the season. Boston tied the game going into the half, but ran out of steam in the second half, suffering their second-largest margin of defeat this season. 1:00- Chris Forsberg and Abby Chin share their thoughts on the loss – and debate the proper pronunciation of “crayon”10:35- Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter join Abby to offer instant reaction following the game19:45- Joe Mazzulla reacts to teams continuing to give Boston their best shot night after night20:30- Jayson Tatum praises the energy from the Detroit home crowd21:20- Kristaps Porzingis press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

In this special, President's Day episode, Alex speaks with Grayson Forsberg and they talk about everything. As they rate drinks ranging from an Aperol Spritz to High Noons, they cover weird Instagram algorithms, the flaws of our two party system, foreign policy blunders, their next reality show, and much more. 

On this episode of the It's All Your Fault podcast presented by Farm Bureau Insurance of Tennessee, Jeremy K. Gover and Emma Lingan discuss: With 56 points still on the table, can the Preds make the playoffs?How excited are you for the 4 Nations Tournament?Where does claimed defenseman Andreas Englund fit in?What does the latest waiver claim say about the Preds defense corps?The Nashville Predators season has been disappointing… but what's been the best story?Wait… a Pekka Rinne comeback???Follow both of our hosts on Twitter at @ItsGovertime & @emma_lingan and then follow the show @IAYFpodcast !

On this episode of the It's All Your Fault podcast presented by Farm Bureau Insurance of Tennessee, Jeremy K. Gover and Emma Lingan discuss: Is it time? Is it time to start selling?Have we run out of words to describe the 2024-25 Nashville Predators?Should Nashville trade Ryan O'Reilly?Is this just who the Preds are?Is it too convenient to just say that everything that could go wrong has gone wrong?Why does the Four Nations Tournament feel like a chore?Follow both of our hosts on Twitter at @ItsGovertime & @emma_lingan and then follow the show @IAYFpodcast !

Chris Forsberg, Eddie House and Tom Giles break down the C's 118-110 comeback win over the 76ers. Plus, Abby Chin talks exclusively with Jaylen Brown and Forsberg dives into the shocking Luka Doncic trade. WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

The Celtics beat the Pelicans, 118-116 on Jayson Tatum's game-winner with 0.1 seconds remaining to give Boston the win on the road. With the win, the Celtics improve to 34-15 on the season. 1:00- Chris Forsberg shares his thoughts after the game9:35- Forsberg, Kayla Burton, Eddie House and Drew Carter offer instant reaction, then, Abby Chin catches up with Jaylen Brown in an exclusive 1-on-1 interview18:40- Kristaps Porzingis press conference21:25- Jayson Tatum press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

The Celtics beat the Magic, 121-94 in an impressive across-the-board win over an Eastern Conference contender after their lackluster effort vs. the Raptors on Wednesday night. Jayson Tatum led the way for Boston with 30 points in the win. 1:00- Chris Forsberg shares his thoughts after the win11:40- Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter join Kayla Burton to offer instant reaction to the game, then, Abby Chin catches up with Jaylen Brown20:15- Joe Mazzulla praises Jaylen's efforts in the win22:00- Kristaps Porzingis press conference24:40- Eddie and Tom Giles break down Tatum's performance vs. Orlando26:55- Jayson Tatum press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

The Celtics pull out the 120-119 win over the New Orleans Pelicans to improve to 28-11 on the year. The game came down to the wire, but Boston did just enough to secure the one-point win in the final seconds. 1:00- Chris Forsberg shares his thoughts on the win11:10- Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter join Kayla Burton to offer instant reaction, then Abby Chin catches up with Jayson Tatum in an exclusive 1-on-1 interview15:35- Joe Mazzulla press conference20:40- Jayson Tatum press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

The Celtics lose to the Oklahoma City Thunder, 105-92, on the road. Boston led by 10 points at the half but scored only 27 points in the second half in a tough loss to the best team in the Western Conference. 1:00- Chris Forsberg shares his thoughts after the loss8:00- Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter join Tom Giles to offer instant reaction16:40- Kristaps Porzingis press conference22:25- Jayson Tatum press conferencePresented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok

The Celtics beat the Houston Rockets, 109-86 to improve to 2-0 on their four-game west coast road trip. Boston, playing without Jaylen Brown and Al Horford, used an 11-0 run to start the fourth quarter to blow the game open and take down the Western Conference' third-place team the night after they locked down and beat Anthony Edwards and the Timberwolves. 1:00- Chris Forsberg shares his thoughts after the win10:40- Forsberg, Eddie House, Brian Scalabrine and Drew Carter join Kayla Burton to offer instant reaction, then Abby Chin catches up with Payton Pritchard in an exclusive 1-on-122:55- Derrick White shares what he learned from former coach Ime Udoka27:55- Kristaps Porzingis press conference Presented by 24 Auto Group WATCH every episode of the Celtics Talk podcast on YouTubeFollow NBC Sports Boston:NBCSportsBoston.comX @NBCScelticsFacebookInstagramTikTok