Podcasts about Infringement

Dream Infringement Episode 404: Road Trips In this episode, Bobby and Emily are joined by guests Aishwarya and Gowri to talk about Road trips. Are you there for the destination, the journey, or the breakfast burrito? They share stories of their own road trips, debate the perfect road trip coffee order, and road trip snacks.

Dream Infringement Episode 403: Breaking Up Is Hard to Do - Part Two A continuation where we explore the stories behind famous band breakups and what happened next.

Dream Infringement Episode 402: Breaking Up Is Hard to Do - Part One Bands don't always last forever. Creative differences, personal conflicts, changing ambitions, and the occasional larger-than-life ego have led some of music's biggest acts to call it quits. In this episode, we explore the stories behind famous band breakups and what happened next.

Dream Infringement Episode 401: Catching Up with Emily & Jennifer In this episode, Emily and Jennifer sit down for a relaxed conversation about what's been happening in their lives lately. This episodes feels like catching up with old friends over coffee.

Dream Infringement Episode 400: One Shot, Take Two We look at the stories behind some of music's most memorable one-take recordings and discover what happens when everything comes together at exactly the right moment.

Dream Infringement Episode 399: One Shot, Part One Most recordings are built from multiple takes, edits, overdubs, and countless hours in the studio. But sometimes a musician steps up to the microphone, the tape starts rolling, and magic happens on the very first try. We explore remarkable songs whose original recording was the one that made the final cut.

A trademark dispute now before the Beijing Intellectual Property Court (BIPC) could help clarify one of the most important questions in China's trademark system: Where should the boundary lie for the registration and protection of commercial brands derived from public cultural elements?北京知识产权法院正在审理的一起商标争议，有望厘清中国商标制度中最重要的问题之一：源于公共文化元素的商业品牌，其注册与保护的边界究竟在哪里？On July 16, the BIPC heard an administrative trademark lawsuit filed by Louis Vuitton Malletier against the China National Intellectual Property Administration, with Huang Minyao, a clothing business operator from Shantou, Guangdong province, as a third party.7月16日，北京知识产权法院开庭审理了路易威登马利耶诉国家知识产权局商标权行政纠纷一案，广东汕头服装经营者黄敏瑶作为第三人参加诉讼。A four-petal floral design trademark that Huang applied for is deemed by LV to be confusingly similar to its iconic monogram pattern.黄敏瑶申请注册的四瓣花图形商标，被路易威登认为与其标志性的Monogram图案构成近似，容易导致混淆。The dispute arose after CNIPA rejected LV's challenge to the petal-shaped trademark registered by Huang.此前，国家知识产权局驳回了路易威登对该花瓣图形商标的无效宣告请求，争议由此产生。It is the sixth trademark lawsuit LV has filed against CNIPA, having won three and lost two of the previous five cases.这是路易威登针对国家知识产权局提起的第六起商标诉讼，此前五起案件中，路易威登三胜两负。Unlike the earlier high-profile dispute between LV and Shenzhen-based Molly Tea Catering Management, this is not an infringement case but an administrative lawsuit that challenges the legality of a regulatory decision.与早前路易威登与深圳“莫莉茶饮”公司之间备受关注的那起纠纷不同，本案并非侵权诉讼，而是针对行政机关行政决定合法性提起的行政诉讼。The two cases are deeply connected in legal principle, but administrative trademark disputes differ fundamentally from infringement lawsuits in nature, subject matter, and standards of proof.两案在法律原理上深度关联，但商标行政诉讼与侵权诉讼在性质、审理对象和证明标准上存在根本差异。Infringement litigation determines whether conduct falls within the scope of an exclusive trademark right, whereas administrative litigation examines the legality of decisions made by trademark authorities on registration applications, oppositions, or invalidation requests.侵权诉讼解决的是被诉行为是否落入商标专用权保护范围的问题，行政诉讼则审查商标行政机关在注册申请、异议或无效宣告等程序中作出的决定是否合法。This means BIPC will not rule on whether Huang infringed LV's rights, but will review whether CNIPA properly applied the current Trademark Law provisions concerning distinctiveness, similarity, well-known trademark protection, and public interest reservations when it rejected LV's plea for invalidation.这意味着北京知识产权法院不会就黄敏瑶是否侵犯路易威登权利作出裁判，而是审查国家知识产权局在驳回路易威登无效宣告请求时，是否正确适用了现行《商标法》关于显著性、近似性、驰名商标保护和公共利益保留等条款的规定。This requires the court to return to the authorization conditions under the Trademark Law.这要求法院回归《商标法》关于商标授权条件的规定。Under the current provision, signs consisting solely of generic names, graphic elements, place names, or other features lacking inherent distinctiveness — including public cultural resources such as traditional patterns, natural imagery and geometric designs — shall not be registered unless they have acquired distinctiveness through use and become readily identifiable with particular goods or services.根据现行规定，仅有本商品的通用名称、图形、地名或者其他缺乏显著特征的标志——包括传统纹样、自然图形、几何图形等公共文化资源——不得作为商标注册，但经过使用取得显著特征、便于识别的除外。If the disputed trademark involves public cultural elements such as traditional patterns or natural floral designs that typically possess weak inherent distinctiveness, the court will focus on whether CNIPA fully considered this factor and rigorously examined evidence of acquired "secondary meaning".如果争议商标涉及传统纹样或自然花卉图案等公共文化元素，因其通常自身显著性较弱，法院将重点审查国家知识产权局是否充分考虑了这一因素，并严格审查了“获得显著性”的证据。Public reaction to the LV-Molly Tea infringement case has already demonstrated widespread concern over attempts to register and monopolize traditional motifs such as the four-petal flower or Baoxiang patterns.公众对路易威登与“莫莉茶饮”侵权案的广泛关注，已经反映出社会对四瓣花、宝相纹等传统纹样被注册和垄断的普遍担忧。At the authorization stage, the issue is even more fundamental: If public cultural elements inherently lack distinctiveness and the applicant fails to prove that the symbol has acquired an independent identity distinct from its public-domain meaning, is administrative approval justified in the first place?在授权阶段，问题更为根本：如果公共文化元素本身缺乏显著性，申请人又未能证明该标志已获得独立于公共领域含义的识别功能，那么行政机关的核准是否还有依据？Trademark law is not meant to enclose public cultural resources as private property through registration, but to protect commercial identifiers that distinguish goods or services and thereby promote fair competition.商标法的目的不是通过注册将公共文化资源圈定为私有财产，而是保护能够区分商品或服务来源的商业标识，从而促进公平竞争。For traditional cultural elements that have public interest, trademark examination should adopt a prudent stance.对于具有公共属性的传统文化元素，商标审查应当采取审慎态度。Regulators must prevent market players from privatizing commonly available design resources through registration and obstructing other operators' fair use of cultural elements.监管者必须防止市场主体通过注册将公共领域的设计资源私有化，阻碍其他经营者对文化元素的合理使用。On the other hand, they must respect the goodwill accumulated by enterprises through creative transformation and sustained commercial use.另一方面，也必须尊重企业通过创造性转化和持续商业使用所积累的商誉。The key lies in balancing "distinctiveness" against "public domain preservation" without lowering examination standards for auxiliary graphic elements simply because an applicant has a formidable reputation in other product categories.关键在于平衡“显著性”与“公共领域保护”，不能因申请人在其他商品类别上享有较高声誉，就降低对其商标中辅助图形要素的审查标准。In this case, LV may argue that its well-known trademark deserves cross-class protection.在本案中，路易威登可能会主张其驰名商标应获得跨类保护。However, China's Trademark Law and related judicial interpretations clearly state that the recognition of a well-known trademark should follow the principles of "case-by-case determination" and "protection as needed".然而，中国的《商标法》及相关司法解释明确规定，驰名商标的认定应当遵循“个案认定”和“按需保护”的原则。Cross-class protection is justified only if there is evidence that the public would be misled and the registrant's interests are likely to be damaged. In this administrative proceeding, the court needs to determine whether CNIPA correctly applied this standard.只有在有证据证明公众可能产生误认、且注册人利益可能因此受损的情况下，跨类保护才有依据。在本行政诉讼中，法院需要审查国家知识产权局是否正确适用了这一标准。It is worth noting that the protection of well-known trademarks cannot extend indefinitely.值得指出的是，驰名商标的保护不能无限扩张。Even if some LV trademark symbols enjoy extremely high reputation, it does not automatically mean that every separately registered graphic element — particularly those resembling public cultural motifs — enjoys the same level of protection across all categories.即使路易威登的部分商标标志享有极高知名度，也并不自动意味着其注册的每一个图形要素——尤其是那些与公共文化元素相似的图形——都能在所有类别上获得同等保护。Judicial review should guard against "goodwill spillover", whereby a brand's overall reputation is indiscriminately poured into each registered element, thereby improperly extending the exclusivity of the trademark.司法审查应当警惕“商誉溢出”现象，避免品牌整体声誉不加区分地覆盖到每一个注册要素，导致商标权不当扩张。Although this is an administrative case, its ruling will have a significant effect on similar cases in the future.虽然本案是行政诉讼，但其判决对未来类似案件将产生重要影响。The judgment should accomplish three objectives: First, it should strictly examine the source of distinctiveness of the disputed mark, distinguishing inherent distinctiveness from acquired distinctiveness, and ensure that the natural recognizability of public cultural elements is not mistaken for the trademark owner's original contribution.判决应当实现三重目标：第一，严格审查争议商标显著性的来源，区分固有显著性与获得显著性，确保公共文化元素的天然可识别性不被误认为商标权人的原创贡献。Second, it should accurately apply the principle of "protection as needed" for well-known trademarks and prevent the abuse of cross-class protection.第二，准确适用驰名商标“按需保护”原则，防止跨类保护被滥用。Third, it should fully address public interest considerations in its reasoning, clarifying the protection boundaries for trademarks comprising public cultural elements and leaving adequate room for fair use by the public and other market entities.第三，在裁判说理中充分回应公共利益考量，明确含有公共文化元素的商标的保护边界，为公众和其他市场主体保留合理使用空间。A trademark right is essentially a tool for market identification, not a shackle on cultural resources.商标权本质上是市场标识工具，而非文化资源的枷锁。As China continues strengthening intellectual property protection while fostering a fair and competitive business environment, safeguarding the public domain at the trademark authorization stage becomes increasingly important.中国在持续强化知识产权保护的同时，也在着力营造公平竞争的市场环境。在此背景下，在商标授权阶段保护公共领域的重要性日益凸显。Traditional patterns, natural imagery, and geometric designs should remain part of humanity's shared treasury of creativity rather than become legal barriers enabling a handful of enterprises to monopolize markets.传统纹样、自然图形和几何设计，应当继续作为人类共同的创作财富，而不应成为少数企业垄断市场的法律屏障。The BIPC ruling may well provide a landmark answer on how China's trademark system can balance private incentives with public interest.北京知识产权法院的判决，有望就中国商标制度如何平衡私人激励与公共利益提供标志性答案。monogram pattern /ˈmɒnəɡræm ˈpætən/ Monogram图案（LV标志性花纹）invalidation request /ɪnˌvælɪˈdeɪʃən rɪˈkwest/无效宣告请求distinctiveness /dɪˈstɪŋktɪvnəs/显著性inherent distinctiveness /ɪnˈherənt dɪˈstɪŋktɪvnəs/固有显著性cross-class protection /krɒs klɑːs prəˈtekʃən/跨类保护case-by-case determination /keɪs baɪ keɪs dɪˌtɜːmɪˈneɪʃən/个案认定protection as needed /prəˈtekʃən æz ˈniːdɪd/按需保护goodwill spillover /ɡʊdˈwɪl ˈspɪləʊvə/商誉溢出

Send us Fan MailRoyce has already made his distrust for the Constitutionally ignorant Robert Cekada known, and he builds on that to make the case for abolishment for all federal gun control laws and the vile agency (ATF) that unconstitutionally regulates, via infringements, our right to keep and bear arms.Cekada, like the agency he heads, cannot be trusted, and the rules they claim to be rolling back are not exactly being done away with, and certain definitions, like "engaged in the business", are being left in place. The ATF, which is trying to survive, is not the only problem, it's also the reason they exist in the first place; to enforce gun control laws that the government was forbidden to pass in the first place.Hit the link below to sign the petition to abolish them all.Click Here Abolish the ATF and Repeal the NFA Support the showThe Watch Floor - YouTubeAskari Media GroupBuy Paul Eberle's book "Look at the Dirt"Paul Eberle (lookatthedirt.com)

Dream Infringement Episodes 397 & 398: David vs. Goliath Stories As part of KSKQ's Spring Pledge Drive, we're celebrating the underdogs. Join us as we explore remarkable David vs. Goliath stories, because community radio is an underdog too. Every show, every volunteer, and every listener helps keep independent local media alive.

Dream Infringement Episodes 397 & 398: David vs. Goliath Stories As part of KSKQ's Spring Pledge Drive, we're celebrating the underdogs. Join us as we explore David vs. Goliath stories, because community radio is an underdog too. Every show, every volunteer, and every listener helps keep independent local media alive.

Dream Infringement Episode 395: Thanks, I Hate It Sometimes an artist's biggest hit becomes the very song they're tired of hearing. In this solo episode, Jennifer takes a look at musicians who grew to dislike, resent, or even openly hate the songs that made them famous.

Dream Infringement Episode 396: Favorites from 2025 The Dream Infringement crew looks back at some of our favorite discoveries from 2025. From books we couldn't put down and movies that stuck with us long after the credits rolled, to products, hobbies, and unexpected finds that made our lives a little better.

Dan is back giving the sermons, he talks about the NHL Draft and the Wild, Wolves, World Cup, and touches on the latest Clark Controversy.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dan is back giving the sermons, he talks about the NHL Draft and the Wild, Wolves, World Cup, and touches on the latest Clark Controversy.

Send us Fan MailIn this episode Scarlet Keys is joined with Forensic Musicologist Dr. Joe Bennett.  Joe breaks down the chords in this song and shares Nashville tunings for the guitar.Joe gets granular in this discussion as he compares Lenny Kravit's "It Ain't over 'til it's over" with "Ruin the friendship" and clarify's what constitutes copyright infringement. He talks about copyrighting your songs and how to protect your original work while still finding inspiration from songs you love.Chord progression in "Ruin the Friendship:D  GMaj7/B  Csus2  G5Nashville tunings:Need two sets of guitar stringsTake off the 4 thickest strings and replace with much lighter strings replace bass strings with much lighter strings.Bass to treble change tuning to: BE are the same but others are an octave higher How to copyright your songs and protect your workcopyright.gov work.Support this podcast:https://buymeacoffee.com/scarlet.keys Venmo: @scarlet-keysSongwriting retreats:Star Island In person songwriting retreat: https://starisland.org/program/songwriting-intensive-the-art-of-the-song/Support this podcast: Join the “What's in a Song” community: https://buymeacoffee.com/scarlet.keysScarlet's instagram: https://www.instagram.com/scarletkeysofficial/  To purchase Scarlet Keys' book "What if it All Goes Right: Practicing Hope in the Hardest Times" featured on NPR and the Wall Street Journal:https://www.amazon.com/What-All-Goes-Right-Practicing/dp/B0CTYVQ9Q8Joe Bennett:To learn more about forensic musicology and professor Joe Bennett: https://joebennett.net/Mailing list:https://www.scarletkeys.com/Mixed by Peter Sykes: https://www.petersykesmusic.com/Scarlet's website: https://www.scarletkeys.comScarlet's instagram: https://www.instagram.com/scarletkeysofficial/To purchase Scarlet Keys' book "The Craft of Songwriting:https://www.amazon.com/Craft-Songwriting-Music-Meaning-Emotion/dp/0876391927/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2PP55NU6E9ST6&keywords=the+craft+of+songwriting&qid=1659573139&sprefix=the+craft+of+songwritin%2Caps%2C153&sr=8-1

Send us Fan MailShow Notes:1:35 Patrick McGranaghan's background 2:45 McGranaghan's work with Pierre Valentin3:05 focus on collision of culture and infrastructure4:45 “evidential fog” around AI in the arts6:00 abstract nature of these AI issues 7:00 his writing on these issues to navigate these issues8:30 EU's AI framework “recognizes the structural nature of the problem” – can't be minor updates to old copyright debates, “AI creates problems of scale, opacity and jurisdictional arbitrage that traditional legal categories do not solve very elegantly.” 10:00 incentive for jurisdiction shopping11:40 Getty v. Stability AI in the UK 14:05 EU AI Act's extraterritorial obligations 15:00 EU AI Act, Article 53: general purpose models brought into EU must comply with EU copyright law, including opt out reservations; and detailed summary of training data17:55 UK's approach is more exposed to loopholes19:25 opt in versus opt out systems21:35 Kadrey v. Meta 22:55 the burden placed on creators by the opt out system 25:45 sporadic licensing deals and unclear remuneration standard27:30 interoperability 28:40 impact of robots.txt31:15 Alan Robertshaw re: impact of AI on the practice of law34:50 AI defamation cases36:20 McGranaghan - need for lawyers regardless of AI37:25 Robertshaw - legal professions' varied approaches to AI38:55 AI and astronomy40:30 moral conflict with not compensating artists43:00 justices/injustices related to AI46:45 market harm created by AI49:25 definition of justice 53:05 protections that artists can use, e.g., robots.txt, metadata, units based protection, Glaze and Nightshade 58:00 mark Patrick hopes to make around AI and art Please share your comments and/or questions at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.comMusic by Toulme.To hear more episodes, please visit Warfare of Art and Law podcast's website.To leave questions or comments about this or other episodes of the podcast and/or for information about joining the 2ND Saturday discussion on art, culture and justice, please message me at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.com. Thanks so much for listening!This podcast and its content may not be used for training or developing AI systems without permission.© Stephanie Drawdy [2026]

This week on Everyone Needs An Episode, we are breaking down the biggest headlines in culture, hip-hop, and the legal dramas currently dominating the news cycle. From the lyrical dismantling at the Roots Picnic to the fallout of leaked tapes and trademark battles, we bring the insight you need. In this episode, we cover: Jay-Z's Roots Picnic Freestyle: We dissect the heavy-hitting bars, the triple entendres, and the nine individuals caught in the crosshairs of Jigga's latest lyrical masterclass. Meek Mill vs. Nike: A deep dive into the Dreams and Nightmares trademark drama. Was it copyright infringement, or a major marketing fumble? We analyze the IP implications. The Diddy & Daphne Joy Situation: Addressing the disturbing leak, extortion claims, and the reality of revenge porn in the digital age. Anthony Edwards & Financial Allegations: The conversation surrounding NBA star Anthony Edwards' child support disclosures and the public reaction to his financial management. Trending News: We touch on the Michael Misick corruption scandal in Turks and Caicos, the Atlanta judge and deputy chief chamber scandal, and the bizarre AI-in-therapy phenomenon 0:00 Intro & The Chris Brown Music Debate 4:21 Meek Mill vs. Nike: The Dreams and Nightmares IP Dispute 20:54 Jay-Z's Roots Picnic Freestyle Breakdown 38:28 Surviving Diddy: Daphne Joy & The Tape Leak 49:11 Anthony Edwards: Child Support & Financial Claims 54:45 Justice for Lisa Ray? The Michael Misick Corruption Case 58:44 Scandal in Atlanta: The Judge & Deputy Chief Chambers Affair 1:05:35 The Lisa Kudrow & Dionne Warwick Confusion 1:07:47 The "Astrid" AI Phenomenon: When AI Hits Therapy Brand new voicemail: ‪(314) 649-3113‬ Subscribe to the Everyone Needs an Aquarius Patreon https://bit.ly/3tXnnCz  Email the show at straightolc@gmail.com           Follow SOLC Network online Instagram: https://bit.ly/39VL542                                    Twitter: https://bit.ly/39aL395                                     Facebook: https://bit.ly/3sQn7je                            To Listen to the podcast Podbean https://bit.ly/3t7SDJH                                YouTube http://bit.ly/3ouZqJU                                Spotify http://spoti.fi/3pwZZnJ                                Apple http://apple.co/39rwjD1                                                         IHeartRadio http://ihr.fm/2L0A2y 

Episode 394: Samples In this first show of the year, Emily shares some updates about her and our lives over the past few months. She follows the theme of songs that sample other songs, and the way music can echo, layer, and carry meaning across time. How pieces of the past continue to live on in unexpected ways, just like the people we love.

Episode 393: I See the Light In this last show of the year, in a mostly solo episode, Emily explores the theme of light—how it affects our mood, our energy, and the way we experience the world. Through music and reflection, she looks at the many meanings of light, and Weston joins in for part of the journey.

Episode 392: Darkness / Night In this mostly solo episode, Emily explores the many moods of the night through music, poetry, and reflection. From peaceful and dreamy to mysterious and introspective, this episode weaves together songs from across genres that capture what it feels like when the world quiets down.

Dave talks to Alan Li from Copycatch AI to discuss how Amazon sellers can defend their products from infringement, understand the legal tools available, and learn the process of filing lawsuits to deter counterfeiters. Alan Li shares his experience with IP rights, when to pursue legal action, and how to maximize settlements. Timestamps 00:48 - IP infringement challenges on Amazon 01:16 - How Copycatch.ai helps get listings removed 03:08 - Filing lawsuits on contingency and settlement strategies 05:48 - How to distinguish infringement from generic design similarity 06:46 - Copyright protections for artistic and structural design elements 08:02 - Easiest IP to defend: trademarks vs copyrights vs patents 10:42 - The importance of registering copyrights before enforcement 13:20 - Cost and process of registering trade dress, patent, and copyright 14:31 - How to efficiently protect images and designs for e-commerce 18:31 - Filing ex parte lawsuits and obtaining TROs for swift action 20:36 - When to go straight to litigation rather than DMCA takedowns 23:34 - Estimating settlement amounts based on competitor sales and revenues 26:28 - Using settlement and sales resurgence as part of your IP strategy 29:38 - Challenges of traditional legal fees and how contingency offers a solution 31:12 - Supporting small businesses and mom-and-pop Amazon sellers 32:15 - Building enforceable IP portfolios for ongoing protection 35:19 - How to contact Alan Lee for IP infringement issues Resources & Links Copycatch.ai Quiet Light Brokerage Jungle Scout Helium 10

Episode 391: Fall Pledge Drive 2025 We've got the music in us, and apparently everywhere else too. In this year's pledge drive episode, Emily and Jennifer explore the unexpected roles music plays in the world, from CPR timing to the sounds animals respond to, and some of the stranger ways music has been used. It's all about the power of a good beat.

Episode 390: Rainbow Series (Part Four) Airdate: 10/27/25 We finish our rainbow series by stepping outside the spectrum: black, white, and gray. Are they colors… or the absence of them?

You're shocked when you see what appears to be your breakthrough product being sold online by an outfit you've never heard of. What can you do? Procopio Partners Miku Mehta, Neil Salyards and Steve Beuerle walk entrepreneurs through ways to protect your products and brand–including trademarks, copyrights, and design patents–and what to do after infringement is spotted. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Episode 389: Rainbow Series (Part Three) We wrap up our rainbow journey with purple, indigo, and pink. Along the way, Weston and Indigo join in, including a special interview with Indigo about what it's like to share a name with a color.

Episode 388: Rainbow Series (Part Two) Our rainbow journey continues with the cooler side of the spectrum, green and blue. We explore how they show up in music, mood, and memory.

Episode 387: Rainbow Series (Part One) We're kicking off a colorful new series! In Part One of our rainbow journey, we explore the warm side of the spectrum: red, orange, and yellow in music.

EPISODE 386 - AIRDATE 08/04/2025 FAVORITE MOVIE SCORES Last time, we talked about the songs you can sing along to; this time, it's all about the music you feel. We dive into some of our favorite movie scores, the instrumental pieces that shape emotion, build tension, and make scenes unforgettable without saying a word. From subtle background moments to sweeping, iconic themes, these are the sounds that stay with us long after the movie ends.

EPISODE 385 - AIRDATE 07/28/2025 REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY In this solo episode, Jennifer explores the subtle art of reverse psychology, how telling someone not to do something can be the very thing that makes them want to do it. From classic moments in literature like Tom Sawyer's fence-painting scheme to examples throughout history, we take a look at how this tactic works,.

Episode 384: Movie Songs From instantly recognizable anthems to sweeping cinematic scores, we're talking about the music that makes movie moments unforgettable. We share some of our favorite songs featured in films that stayed with us long after the credits roll.

EPISODE 383 - AIRDATE 07/14/2025 DEAL BREAKERS PART 2 We're back to finish what we started. Emily and Bobby continue the rapid-fire gauntlet of relationship deal breakers, pushing Jennifer to make some tough calls. Along the way, we uncover a few surprising opinions, questionable tolerances, and the things that might not be deal breakers after all.

Episode 381: Deal Breakers (Part One) Airdate 6/30/2025 Emily and Bobby put Jennifer in the hot seat with a rapid-fire round of relationship deal breakers. From the obvious to the oddly specific, we sort through what we absolutely couldn't live with… and the surprisingly weird things we might.

Episode 382: Out of Your Mind In this solo episode, Jennifer dives into some of Reddit's “urban legend” posts - stories that seem supernatural at first, but turn out to have very real (and sometimes dangerous) explanations. From mysterious Post-it notes to strange phrases that don't quite make sense, we explore how things like carbon monoxide exposure and medication mix-ups can quietly distort reality -and how to protect yourself from slipping into the same confusion.

Supreme Court strikes down President Donald Trump's global 'reciprocal' tariffs, ruling 6-3 that his use of an emergency powers law was unconstitutional because, as Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, 'The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch.' President Trump calls the decision 'deeply disappointing' and that he is 'absolutely ashamed' of the justices who voted in the majority, but the President also says he will rely on other laws that do give him the ability to set tariffs and immediately sets a 10% global tariff; we will hear from the President & Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and talk to Vox Media's Supreme Court reporter Ian Millhiser (14); President Trump says he is considering a limited military strike on Iran if negotiations over Iran's nuclear program do not reach an acceptable agreement; Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy says tests for Commercial Driver's Licenses will from now on be given only in English; National Governors Association hears from pollster Frank Luntz at its Winter Meeting in DC; NASA says the wet dress rehearsal of the Artemis II moon mission went well; First Lady Melania Trump donates her second inaugural gown to the Smithsonian Museum of American History. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

That was fast. ByteDance has already said it will put guardrails on Seedance 2.0 after a viral video of Tom Cruise vs. Brad Pitt set Hollywood into a legal feeding frenzy. Disney and others threatened the former TikTok owner, and within a day they backed off. How long will this last? Really?Watch the podcast episodes on YouTube and all major podcast hosts including Spotify.CLOWNFISH TV is an independent, opinionated news and commentary podcast that covers Entertainment and Tech from a consumer's point of view. We talk about Gaming, Comics, Anime, TV, Movies, Animation and more. Hosted by Kneon and Geeky Sparkles.Get more news, views and reviews on Clownfish TV News - https://more.clownfishtv.com/On YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/ClownfishTVOn Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4Tu83D1NcCmh7K1zHIedvgOn Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/clownfish-tv-audio-edition/id1726838629

Joe Abasciano, who was wrongfully terminated, has filed a complaint with the post commission after he used his first amendment. rights.  Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

Send us a textIP attorney Massimo SterpiMassimo Sterpi photo by Eolo Perfido Show Notes:1:30 Sterpi's work with emerging tech2:30 shift in use of emerging tech/arts issues3:55 Brazilian artist Eduardo Kac's transgenic work4:30 blockchain / NFT as a testing area5:10 generative AI and copyright6:20 copyrighted works as training data 12:25 11 Nov 2025 judgment by Munich Regional Court in GEMA v. OpenAI (Case No. 42 O 14139/24)14:20 fair use in the US17:05 copyright of outputs23:55 "A Single Piece of American Cheese"26:00 Gema decision's impact on OpenAI's business model29:00 UK decision in Getty v. Stability AI32:30 harmonisation 34:20 collective licensing as a solution for AI training36:20 view of justice/injustice with emerging tech in the arts38:40 cultural impact of emerging tech42:00 Christie's auction of "Portrait of Edmond de Belamy"43:40 2024 Venice Biennale - The Conference on Art and AI's “The Neo-Synthetic: A Dialogue on Art, A.I., and Emergent Aesthetics”44:30 expanding area regarding the roles involved in outputs46:40 authenticity becoming enigmatic47:00 attempts to create digital scarcity47:55 different standards of creativity 48:30 neighboring rights for AI50:00 Italy's protection of “simple photographs” versus “photographic works”50:40 UK's Section 9(3) copyright of outputs fictionally attributed to human involved52:40 Agentic AI  Please share your comments and/or questions at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.comMusic by Toulme.To hear more episodes, please visit Warfare of Art and Law podcast's website.To leave questions or comments about this or other episodes of the podcast and/or for information about joining the 2ND Saturday discussion on art, culture and justice, please message me at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.com. Thanks so much for listening!© Stephanie Drawdy [2025]

Brad and Tyler welcome Josh Rosenbaum to relive the best and worst of the year in pro wrestling and pop culture. Josh is a math teacher at Camelback High School with unique, first-hand insights into the industry. The trio discusses John Cena's retirement tour, Naomi's ascension, Harley Cameron's puppets, and much more. Other topics include:Michael B. Jordan in “Sinners”Naphessa Collier and the WNBAThe Hardys and TNA's RevivalFallyn Grey and her ascension0:00 Intro2:02 The Monty Williams “It Was Good Until It Wasn't” Award5:40 Biggest Real-Life Babyface8:46 Funniest Moment11:34 Best Wrestling Promo14:44 Best Non-Wrestling Promo18:00 Favorite Live Event Memory21:57 Greatest Gimmick27:57 ClosingFollow 19 Media Group:Twitter: @19MGroupInstagram: 19mediagrouphttps://www.19MediaGroup.comDiscover our favorite podcast gear and support the show—shop our studio must-haves on our Amazon Affiliate page! https://www.amazon.com/shop/19mediagroupWant to join the conversation or invite us to your platform? Connect with us and share your vision (budget-friendly collaborations welcome)!  https://bit.ly/19Guest

Brian is: Managing Director, GlassRatner LinkedIn bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brianbuss I am Rolf Claessen and my co-host Ken Suzan and I are welcoming you to episode 170 of our podcast IP Fridays! We also want to wish you a happy holiday season and a successful year 2026! Today's interview guest is Brian Buss. He is the managing director of GlassRatner and my co-host Ken Suzan talks with him about the valuation of intellectual property rights and damages in infringement cases. But before we jump into the interview, I have news for you! A US start-up called Operation Bluebird is trying to take over the “Twitter” trademark. It has asked the USPTO to cancel Twitter word marks, arguing that Elon Musk's company X no longer uses them after the rebrand. Led by a former Twitter trademark lawyer, Operation Bluebird also filed its own “Twitter” trademark application. Commentators note that X could face challenges defending the legacy marks if they are truly no longer in use. In parallel, the US debate on patent quality and review procedures is intensifying. The USPTO proposed controversial rule changes that would restrict Inter Partes Review (IPR). The proposal triggered substantial backlash, with more than 11,000 public comments submitted—over 4,000 of them via the civil liberties group EFF. In the EU, a major trademark reform will take effect on 1 January 2026. It aims to simplify procedures, recognize new types of marks (including hologram, multimedia, and motion marks), and make fees more SME-friendly (e.g., lower base fees for the first class and discounts for timely renewals). Opposition procedures will be further harmonized across the EU, including a mandatory “cooling-off” period, so mid-sized brand owners should adjust filing and monitoring strategies accordingly. The Unified Patent Court (UPC) continues to see strong uptake, especially in Germany. In the first 18 months since its launch on 1 June 2023, well over 900 cases were filed, with German local divisions (Munich, Düsseldorf, Mannheim, Hamburg) leading in patent actions. While many early cases were filed in German, English now dominates as the main language of proceedings. The court has largely met its timelines, with oral hearings typically held within 12 months of filing. China has reached a milestone in its patent system: for the first time, a country has surpassed 5 million active invention patents. CNIPA emphasizes a strategic shift from “quantity to quality,” citing growth in “high-value” patents and higher commercialization rates for university inventions. China has also led global PCT filings for six consecutive years—signals of rapid technological progress relevant to IP planning for German SMEs. On 4 December 2025, the USPTO issued new guidance on “Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations.” These declarations allow applicants to submit additional evidence to support patent eligibility for emerging technologies such as AI systems and medical diagnostics, aiming to reduce the risk that breakthrough inventions are excluded from protection under strict eligibility case law. In December, the European Patent Office (EPO) introduced new patent-quality measures. Third parties can now submit observations on published applications or granted patents via a simplified online form. These Third-Party Observations—supported by evidence and even filed anonymously—go directly to examination teams to flag potential obstacles early. The Interview with Brian Buss: Ken Suzan interviews Brian Buss, a valuation and damages expert who describes his work as “financial detective” work: identifying what intellectual property and other intangible assets are worth and how they translate into measurable economic benefits such as sales, profit, earnings, or cash flow. Buss emphasizes that “IP” should be understood broadly, not only as formal rights (patents, trademarks, copyrights), but also as brands, technology portfolios, internet and social media assets, know-how, and other business intangibles that help generate economic value. A central point is that IP is often a company's most valuable resource but is rarely measured well. Buss cites a “value gap” he observed in middle-market public companies: market capitalization often exceeds the asset values shown on balance sheets, and much of the gap is explained by intangible assets and IP. He argues that valuation helps companies understand ROI on IP spend (prosecution, protection, enforcement) and supports better strategic decision-making. He outlines common scenarios that trigger IP valuation: internal management needs (understanding performance drivers), disputes about resource allocation (e.g., technology vs. marketing), external events (M&A, licensing, partnerships, franchising, divestitures), and pricing strategy (how exclusivity supported by IP should affect product/service pricing). On “how” valuation is performed, Buss summarizes the three standard approaches—cost (replacement/replication cost), market (comparable transactions), and income (present value of future benefits). He adds that strong IP valuation requires integrating three dimensions of analysis: financial factors (performance data and projections), behavioral factors (customer demand drivers, perceptions, brand recall, feature importance), and legal factors (registration/enforcement history and competitive IP landscape). For practical readiness, he advises companies to improve data discipline: maintain solid books and records; develop credible budgets, forecasts, and business plans; document marketing activities; and actively collect/monitor website and social analytics (e.g., traffic sources, engagement). He stresses that these datasets inform valuation even for technology assets like patents, because they reveal whether protected features are actually marketed and valued by customers. A concrete example is domain names, which he frames as “virtual real estate.” In due diligence for a domain sale, he would focus on analytics showing whether the domain itself drives traffic (direct type-ins, branded search terms, bookmarks) versus traffic driven by other marketing efforts. The key question is whether the address is known and used as a pathway to the business. In closing, Buss argues that while gathering the necessary information requires effort, the investment typically pays off through greater awareness of the most valuable assets, better strategic decisions, and stronger support for growth opportunities. He presents IP valuation as a virtuous cycle of information, insight, and improved decision-making—summed up in his recurring theme: knowledge of IP value is “power” to increase business profitability and enterprise value. Here is the full transcript: Ken Suzan: Our guest today on the IP Fridays podcast is Brian Buss. Brian is a managing director with Glass-Rattner Advisory and Capital Group. Brian provides financial analysis, corporate finance, and expert testimony around the world. Ken Suzan: Mr. Buss provides strategic advice for owners of intellectual property portfolios, transactional services such as acquisition due diligence and purchase price allocation, and valuation services for trademarks, patents, copyrights, brand assets, trade secrets, technology assets, and intangibles. Ken Suzan: During his career, Mr. Buss has provided valuation opinions and financial analysis in business disputes and in transactions, and he has been retained as a testifying expert and consulting expert in federal court, state courts, and arbitration proceedings. Ken Suzan: As an expert, Mr. Buss has provided over 100 expert opinions, served as an expert witness at trial and deposition, and has been published in numerous journals and publications. He is also a participant in the International Task Force on Intellectual Property Reporting for Brands. Ken Suzan: Brian holds an MBA from San Diego State University and a bachelor's degree from Claremont McKenna College. Welcome, Brian, to the IP Fridays podcast. Brian Buss: Thank you, Ken, for having me. I appreciate the opportunity. Ken Suzan: Excellent, Brian. Can you tell our listeners a little bit about your professional background and what you do in the world of IP? Brian Buss: Sure. I'm a valuation professional and an economic damages expert. Most of my work involves valuing intellectual property and intangible assets and, in litigation contexts, assessing economic damages—often related to IP disputes. My role is frequently to translate legal or technical issues into financial outcomes. Ken Suzan: When people hear “IP,” they often think patents, trademarks, and copyrights. In your work, how broadly do you define intellectual property and intangible assets? Brian Buss: I define it very broadly. Of course, there are the formal rights—patents, trademarks, copyrights—but there are many other intangible assets that drive value: brand reputation, customer relationships, proprietary know-how, trade secrets, data, software, domain names, social media assets, and the systems and processes a business builds over time. All of those can create economic value, even if they're not always captured well on a balance sheet. Ken Suzan: Why is IP valuation important for companies—especially mid-sized businesses that may not have a large in-house legal or finance team? Brian Buss: Because IP and intangible assets can be a large portion—sometimes the largest portion—of what makes a business valuable, yet they're often not measured or managed with the same discipline as tangible assets. Valuation can help companies understand what is actually driving revenue, profit, and enterprise value. It can also help them justify investment in IP creation, protection, and enforcement, and it can support strategic decisions like licensing, partnerships, acquisitions, or pricing. Ken Suzan: You've talked elsewhere about a “value gap” between what's on the balance sheet and what the market thinks a company is worth. Can you explain that concept? Brian Buss: Sure. If you look at many companies—particularly in the middle market—you'll often see that market capitalization exceeds the asset values recorded on the balance sheet. A significant portion of that difference is attributable to intangible assets and IP that accounting rules don't fully recognize unless there's an acquisition. That “gap” is essentially the market saying, “There is value here beyond tangible assets,” and much of it comes from intangibles. Ken Suzan: What are the most common situations where a company needs an IP valuation? Brian Buss: There are a few big categories. One is transactions—M&A, due diligence, purchase price allocation, and financing. Another is licensing and partnerships—setting royalty rates, structuring deals, or evaluating whether a proposed license makes economic sense. A third is internal management: understanding ROI on R&D, marketing, or IP spend, or resolving internal debates about what is really driving business performance. And of course, litigation—damages, reasonable royalties, lost profits, and other economic remedies tied to IP. Ken Suzan: In practical terms, how do you value IP? What methods do you use? Brian Buss: The valuation profession generally relies on three approaches: the cost approach, the market approach, and the income approach. The cost approach looks at what it would cost to recreate or replace the asset. The market approach looks at comparable transactions—if you can find good comparables. The income approach is often the most relevant for IP: it looks at the present value of future economic benefits attributable to the IP, based on cash flows, risk, and time. Ken Suzan: In addition to the financial methods, what other factors matter? For example, legal strength or market perception? Brian Buss: Exactly. A strong valuation integrates financial, behavioral, and legal analysis. Financial is obvious—historic results, projections, margins, pricing. Behavioral is about demand drivers—what customers value, how they perceive the brand, how features influence purchasing decisions, and what drives loyalty or switching. Legal involves the nature of the IP rights, scope, enforceability, registration and maintenance history, and the competitive landscape. IP exists at the intersection of all three. Ken Suzan: What kind of information should a company have ready if they want to do an IP valuation? Brian Buss: Good books and records are essential—reliable financial statements, product-level revenue and cost data if possible, and credible budgets and forecasts. They should also document marketing activities, product positioning, and the role of IP in commercialization. For digital and brand assets, analytics matter—website traffic sources, conversion data, engagement metrics, and social media statistics. The more you can connect the IP or intangible asset to measurable economic outcomes, the stronger the valuation. Ken Suzan: That's interesting—people might not think that marketing analytics matter for patents. Can you explain how those link up? Brian Buss: Sure. A patent might cover a particular feature or technology, but the key economic question is: does that feature drive demand? If customers value it and it supports pricing power, adoption, or market share, that's important. Marketing materials, customer communications, sales training, and analytics can help show what the company emphasizes and what resonates with customers. It helps tie the legal right to real-world economic value. Ken Suzan: You mentioned domain names earlier. Many people underestimate them. How do you think about domain names as an asset? Brian Buss: I often describe domain names as virtual real estate. The question is whether the domain is a meaningful pathway to the business. In a valuation context, you'd look at the domain's role in generating traffic—direct navigation, branded search, bookmarks, and repeat visits. You'd also look at how much traffic is attributable to the domain itself versus paid marketing. If the domain is known and drives organic traffic and credibility, it can be quite valuable. Ken Suzan: So, if you're doing due diligence on a domain sale, what would you look for? Brian Buss: I'd look closely at analytics: traffic volume over time, sources of traffic, geographic distribution, conversion rates, and the relationship between marketing spend and traffic. If traffic is mostly paid and disappears when marketing stops, that's different than sustained direct navigation. I'd also look at brand alignment, risk factors, and whether there are disputes or competing rights. Ken Suzan: For a mid-sized company listening to this, what are the biggest “misses” you see—things companies do that reduce the value they can capture from IP? Brian Buss: A big one is not collecting and organizing information that demonstrates value. Another is not aligning IP strategy with business strategy—filing patents or trademarks without a clear plan for how they support products, markets, and revenue. Some companies also underinvest in documenting commercialization and customer impact, which becomes important in transactions and disputes. And sometimes they simply don't revisit their portfolios to understand what is still relevant and what is not. Ken Suzan: How should companies think about ROI on IP spend—both the costs of prosecution and the costs of enforcement? Brian Buss: They should start by identifying the economic role of the IP: is it supporting pricing power, is it protecting market share, is it enabling licensing revenue, is it reducing competitive entry? Then they can compare the costs—filing, maintenance, monitoring, enforcement—against the value it protects or creates. Valuation can provide a framework for that, and it can also help prioritize where to spend resources. Ken Suzan: When valuation is used in litigation, what are the typical types of damages analysis you're asked to perform? Brian Buss: Commonly, reasonable royalty analysis, lost profits, unjust enrichment, and sometimes disgorgement depending on the jurisdiction and the claims. The specifics depend on the legal framework, but the core is the same: quantify the economic harm and connect it causally to the alleged infringement or misappropriation, using financial data, market evidence, and assumptions that can be tested. Ken Suzan: Are there misconceptions about valuation that you'd like to correct for our audience? Brian Buss: One misconception is that valuation is purely subjective or that it's just an “opinion.” A good valuation is grounded in data, established methodologies, and transparent assumptions. Another is that intangibles can't be measured. They can be measured—often through the economic benefits they create and through evidence of customer behavior and market dynamics. It takes work, but it's doable. Ken Suzan: If a company wants to prepare for a future transaction—say a sale or a major partnership—what are some practical steps they can take now to make their IP story stronger? Brian Buss: Maintain clean records, develop credible forecasts, and document the link between IP and business results. Make sure registrations and maintenance are up to date. Track how IP supports products and competitive differentiation. Collect evidence of brand strength and customer loyalty. And if possible, structure internal reporting so you can see performance by product line or offering. That helps in due diligence and helps buyers or partners understand what they're paying for. Ken Suzan: Any final thoughts or advice for owners of intellectual property portfolios, transactional professionals, or executives listening to this? Brian Buss: I'd emphasize that the investment in gathering the information needed for evaluation typically pays off. It creates awareness of the most valuable assets, supports better strategic decisions, and makes it easier to pursue growth opportunities. IP valuation is a virtuous cycle of information gathering, analysis, deeper understanding, and then decision-making. Knowledge is power, and knowledge of the value of your IP is the power to increase the profitability and value of your business. IP valuation is a key element of the management toolkit. Ken Suzan: Brian, well said, and thank you so much for taking time today to be on the IP Fridays podcast. Brian Buss: Thank you, Ken. I really appreciate the opportunity.

Send us a textPhotographer credit for Anja Neubauer: self-portrait created with an AI tool.Show Notes:2:30 Prof. Tim McFarlin's focus on copyright and authorship3:30 Dr. Caterina Moruzzi's philosophical/design perspective / focus on authenticity5:00 Dr. Anja Neubauer's focus on global AI/copyright framework5:50 Artist Lisa Lebofsky's perspective on AI as a nomadic painter8:45 “Authenticity Unmasked”–looking at the artistic process not the product9:55 “Authenticity Unmasked” insight-centrality of human perspective12:00 Neubauer–redefinition of terms like originality in light of emerging tech13:30 Getty v. Stability finding  outputs are not copies so not infringements14:55 McFarland–genAI's scale and redefining understanding of terms17:05 US state and federal laws 19:00 need for unified global protection19:50 Alan Robershaw – UK Getty decision's technical focus on the process 21:40 Defining originality 22:10 Getty opinion at 601 v. AI models are memorizing/making copies 24:00 Robertshaw - one step away from judicial definition of consciousness24:40 McFarland – scale is the concern25:35 Lebofsky – how prior claims of infringement fit into AI/appropriation of artists' works26:20 McFarland – ‘substantially similar' takings are prima facie infringement subject to fair use defense27:10 consideration of outputs flooding the market harm 29:25 Lebofsky – use of AI through tools like AI Charm Lab app 31:00 Lebofsky's view of threats to her style and her language 32:45 human requirement for ‘authorship' and consumer trends35:55 Moruzzi – human effort to value the process37:15 Process visible in generative AI circa 2015 v. current genAI's less visibility and thus less authenticity38:30 Anthroprocentric – human need for authorship40:20 Robershaw - Monkey-selfie case; animal versus machine personhood 43:15 McFarland – Arkansas statute on AI44:40 Gould – UK Section 9(3) - limited copyright for output in person who organized the output45:00 Neubauer – issue of term “equipment” for tools 46:50 Gould – current copyright legislation is not fit for purpose48:35 Distinction between camera use and AI model training49:05 Copyright Criminals documentary regarding music sampling 50:00 Sampling case involving Kraftwerk 51:35 Moruzzi – response to consultations53:00 McFarland – extent of law v. parallel tracks to copyright or other alternatives to preserve and protect human creativity54:00 Stefania Salles Bruins–solutions outside the law54:40 Copyright not fit for purpose 55:20 Neubauer - Shift in definition of artwork55:45 Lebofsky – how to establish boundaries57:25 Robertshaw re: Lebofsky's paintings58:00 Salles Bruins – Lebofsky's coding that cannot be replicatedPlease share your comments and/or questions at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.comMusic by Toulme.To hear more episodes, please visit Warfare of Art and Law podcast's website.To leave questions or comments about this or other episodes of the podcast and/or for information about joining the 2ND Saturday discussion on art, culture and justice, please message me at stephanie@warfareofartandlaw.com. Thanks so much for listening!© Stephanie Drawdy [2025]

Vládna koalícia môže čeliť ďalšej kríze. Hlas už v koalícii nechce byť za handru a sťažuje sa, že keď premiér Fico odvolal vicepremiéra Kmeca, porušil koaličnú zmluvu. Hlas by chcel, aby takto premiér konal aj pri ministroch Rážovi a Migaľovi. Problém má aj SNS s Huliakovým návrhom o hazarde a Hulika s návrhom o Envirofonde. Je teda vo vláde a v koalícii kríza? Môžu ministri vôbec spolupracovať ak sú tak rozhádaní?A prečo návrh ministra Tarabu o Envirofonde odmietli obchodné komory a zamestnávateľské a priemyselné zväzy? Chce minister pomôcť Andrejovi Babišovi za naše peniaze upratať znečistený Istrochem? A budú do konca roka v každom našom národnom parku vysoké vlajkové stožiare? Prečo preto musel skončiť šéf parku v Pieninách?Braňo Závodský sa rozprával s ministrom životného prostredia a nominantom Slovenskej národnej strany Tomášom Tarabom.

This week Peter & Mike have a design discussion about IPs, and how close is too close. _________________________ YouTube - www.youtube.com/channel/UCrOtGhui_jdLdoQNI7PU4Pg X - @onestopcoopshop Discord - discord.gg/p4jX8AF Merch: one-stop-co-op-shop.creator-spring.com/ Donate to One Stop Co-op Shop - www.patreon.com/onestop Email - onestopcoopshop@gmail.com

On this episode, associates recap the panels and discussions held during the AlgoRhythms Symposium, a conference centered on copyright, music, and artificial intelligence.

EPISODE 380 - AIRDATE 06/09/2025 FAMILIAR SONGS, UNFAMILIAR LANGUAGES On this solo episode of Dream Infringement, Jennifer explores familiar songs in unfamiliar ways, covers from around the world. From Rolling Stones classics reimagined abroad, to the burning question: can Nickelback's “How You Remind Me” be redeemed if it's sung in Greek? All the way to more recent hits, it's a musical trip across borders and languages.

EPISODE 379 - AIRDATE 06/02/2025 SOUNDTRACKING OUR FAVORITE BOOKS This week on Dream Infringement, we're sharing some of our favorite books and pairing them with songs that capture their tone, theme, or spirit. From page to playlist, it's a celebration of the stories we love and the music that feels like they belong together.

EPISODE 378 - AIRDATE 05/12/2025 MAIN CHARACTER ENERGY This week on Dream Infringement, we're embracing Main Character Energy. We've each picked songs that make us feel like the protagonist of our own story, the soundtrack for walking into a room, staring out a window dramatically, or conquering life's little battles. Tune in for a playlist that proves sometimes the world really does revolve around you.

EPISODE 377 - 04/28/2025 SHORTCUTS On this episode of Dream Infringement, Jennifer takes the mic for a solo show all about shortcuts. From the very first webcam ever invented, to “desire lines” that show us where paths really want to be, to the workers who carved a hole in the Great Wall of China just to get to work a little quicker, this week is a journey through the clever, the rebellious, and the surprising ways we try to save time.

EPISODE 376 - AIRDATE 4/14/2025 PLEDGE DRIVE PART 2 This week on Dream Infringement, our Spring Pledge Drive continues with Part Two of Childhood Fears. We're digging deeper into the shadows of our younger years, those irrational terrors, half-remembered nightmares, and the fears that stuck around longer than we'd like to admit. Tune in as we laugh, cringe, and commiserate over the things that once loomed so large in our imaginations, all while keeping community radio strong with your support!

On this episode of Something To Wrestle, John Layfield and Conrad take us on a journey through John's early years traveling the globe wrestling in Japan, Mexico and Germany. John shares stories that will blow your mind involving the Japanese mafia, Super Porky, Vampiro, sumo wrestlers and so much more. MAGIC SPOON - Get $5 off your next order at MagicSpoon.com/WRESTLE. Magic Spoon—hold on to the dream!  FACTOR - Eat smart with Factor. Get started at https://www.factormeals.com/wrestle50off and use code wrestle50off to get 50% off your first box plus free shipping. BLUECHEW - Try your first month of BlueChew FREE at BlueChew.com FREEBIRD ROAD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd6MCIEkztQ SAVE WITH CONRAD - Stop throwing your money on rent! Get into a house with NO MONEY DOWN and roughly the same monthly payment at https://nationsgo.com/conrad/ ADVERTISE WITH BRUCE - If your business targets 25-54 year old men, there's no better place to advertise than right here with us on Something to Wrestle You've heard us do ads for some of the same companies for years...why? Because it works! And with our super targeted audience, there's very little waste. Go to https://www.podcastheat.com/advertise now and find out more about advertising with Something to Wrestle. FOLLOW ALL OF OUR SOCIAL MEDIA at https://nationsgo.com/conrad/ On AdFreeShows.com, you get early, ad-free access to more than a dozen of your favorite wrestling podcasts, starting at just $9! And now, you can enjoy the first week...completely FREE! Sign up for a free trial - and get a taste of what Ad Free Shows is all about. Start your free trial today at https://adfreeshows.supercast.com/ Get all of your Something to Wrestle merchandise at https://boxofgimmicks.com/collections/stw Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this episode of Something To Wrestle, John Layfield and Conrad take us on a journey through John's early years traveling the globe wrestling in Japan, Mexico and Germany. John shares stories that will blow your mind involving the Japanese mafia, Super Porky, Vampiro, sumo wrestlers and so much more. MAGIC SPOON - Get $5 off your next order at MagicSpoon.com/WRESTLE. Magic Spoon—hold on to the dream!  FACTOR - Eat smart with Factor. Get started at https://www.factormeals.com/wrestle50off and use code wrestle50off to get 50% off your first box plus free shipping. BLUECHEW - Try your first month of BlueChew FREE at BlueChew.com FREEBIRD ROAD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd6MCIEkztQ SAVE WITH CONRAD - Stop throwing your money on rent! Get into a house with NO MONEY DOWN and roughly the same monthly payment at https://nationsgo.com/conrad/ ADVERTISE WITH BRUCE - If your business targets 25-54 year old men, there's no better place to advertise than right here with us on Something to Wrestle You've heard us do ads for some of the same companies for years...why? Because it works! And with our super targeted audience, there's very little waste. Go to https://www.podcastheat.com/advertise now and find out more about advertising with Something to Wrestle. FOLLOW ALL OF OUR SOCIAL MEDIA at https://nationsgo.com/conrad/ On AdFreeShows.com, you get early, ad-free access to more than a dozen of your favorite wrestling podcasts, starting at just $9! And now, you can enjoy the first week...completely FREE! Sign up for a free trial - and get a taste of what Ad Free Shows is all about. Start your free trial today at https://adfreeshows.supercast.com/ Get all of your Something to Wrestle merchandise at https://boxofgimmicks.com/collections/stw Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices