Podcasts about evo devo

SAMPLER & SANS REPROCHES (Radio broadcast)Playlist N° 1360 - Lundi 21 Avril 2025 - Horaire : 20h00-22h00EBM - DARKTECHNO - INDUSTRIEL & RELATED MUSICGALAXIE RADIO 95.3FM --- www.galaxieradio.fr [ S&SR Selection de la semaine... MAJESTOLUXE "Wretched Conditions"] MAJESTOLUXE "Blood On The Ceiling" DIG Album: Wretched Conditions (Icons Creating Evil Art) FAITH IN FLESH "Psychodermatology" DIG Album: Body Is Language (Autoproduction) BILL LEEB « Neuromotive (STACKS Mix) » DIG Single : Neuromotive (Metropolis Records) ULTRA SUNN « Keep Your Eyes Peeled (JL Marchal Keep Your Feet Peeled Extended Mix) » DIG Single : Keep Your Eyes Peeled (JL Marchal Keep Your Feet Peeled Extended Mix) (ULTRA SUNN/JL MARCHAL) CYCLONE EYE « The Deal » DIG V/A : Electronic Saviors : Industrail Music To Cure Cancer Volume VII Reunion (Distortion Productions) MERRY CHICKLIT "Haunting Symphony" DIG EP: Haunting (Autoproduction) KOMPROMAT "I LET MYSELF GO BLIND" DIG Album: PLДYING/PRДYING (WARRIORECORDS) IMPLANT "The Conformer" DIG Album: The Chaos Machine Part.3 : Judging Sinners (Alfa Matrix) HUMAN VAULT "More Flesh" DIG Album : Abnormal Rehab (Aliens Productions) GAPING CHASM « Slaughter » DIG Album : Reflection (Aliens Productions) NIGHT RITUALZ « Vida (feat. Vick Vapors) » DIG Album : Night Ritualz (Metropolis Records) SILVER TEARS « Ernst » DIG Album : Silver Tears (AVANT ! Records) ELEKTROTERAPI « Melancholy (Tokee Remix) » DIG Album : Dialogue (Remixes) (ScentAir records) SYNAPTIC DEFECT « Lost (DARKMECHANIC-Remix) » DIG EP : Lost (Autoproduction) RUPESH CARTEL « Endless » DIG Album : Residual Light (Progress Productions) MAJESTOLUXE "Life As A Service" DIG Album: Wretched Conditions (Icons Creating Evil Art) TOUR DE FORCE « Elektro Kommando » DIG Single : Elektro Kommando (Autoproduction/EK PRODUCT) ABSURD MINDS « Herzlos (Flatline Mix) » DIG EP : Reworx (Scanner) ----SPECIAL A COLD NIGHT BEFORE THE DARK LAB 2 ----- LINE UP: SAD MADONA - PARADOX OBSCUR - QUAL - LINEA ASPERA + DJ KIDDO ----- SAT.03.MAY.2025. @ THE BLACK LAB / WASQUEHAL / FRANCE / Tickets here : https://ypl.me/zUO -- SAD MADONA "Crimes" DIG Single : Crimes (Autoproduction) PARADOX OBSCUR "Evo Devo" DIG Album: Morphogenesis (Metropolis Records) QUAL "How Many Graves ?" DIG Album : The Ultimate Climax (AVANT! Records) LINEA ASPERA "Attica" DIG Album : Preservation BIAS (DARK ENTRIES) THX TO : METROPOLIS RECORDS(Gary), JL MARCHAL & ULTRA SUNN, CYCLONE EYE (Sébastien), IMPLANT (Len), ALIENS PRODUCTIONS (Peter), AVANT! RECORDS (Andrea), SCENTAIR RECORDS (Vladimir), SYNAPTIC DEFECT (Marc), PROGRESS PRODUCTIONS (Torny), TOUR DE FORCE (Christian), SCANNER (Frank), PODCAST:YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/@SamplerEtSansReprochesYOUTUBE CHANNEL – NON STOP MUSIC -MIX ONLY + LIVE & INTERVIEWS REPORTS ITUNES :https://podcasts.apple.com/fr/podcast/sampler-sans-reproches/id1511413205 MIXCLOUD : https://www.mixcloud.com/SetSRradio/PODCLOUD :https://podcloud.fr/studio/podcasts/sampler-et-sans-reproches DEEZER :https://www.deezer.com/fr/show/1181282 GALAXIE RADIO http://galaxieradio.fr/ go to replay Sampler & Sans ReprochesAMAZON MUSIC https://music.amazon.fr/podcasts/9718c2fe-d841-4339-a3e5-82c31d018ed7/SAMPLER-SANS-REPROCHESHEARTHIS https://hearthis.at/sampler-sans-reproches/ ARCHIVE.ORG https://archive.org/download/1360-podcast-192/1360PODCAST192.mp3

Hello Interactors,As the year ends, I reflect on 2024's top five essays and a shared theme emerges: the systems that define our lives. These systems intertwine nature and nurture, machines and morality, and markets and minds.From evolution's harmony to the moral balance of economic power, the co-opting of language to the divides between prosperity and precarity, our journey has revealed deep connections between people, place, and power.Let's rewind and reweave these connections into a broader narrative that sets us on our way to another trip around the sun.NATURE, NURTURE, AND NODAL NETWORKSIn “DEVO, Darwin, and the Evo-Devo Dance,” we explored how evolution reflects the eternal interplay between biology and environment, progress and adaptation. The evolution of synthesizers — as my daughter's playful experiments with sound reminded me — offers a metaphor for humanity's relationship with technology.This relationship echoes the broader theme of systems and evolution. Iterative changes and interactions between tools and users offer the potential to create new possibilities. As noted in the essay,"DEVO's fusion of human and machine echoes these evolutionary dynamics, where both biological and technological systems evolve through reconfiguration and integration, creating emergent complexity that Darwin could not have imagined."Just as synthesizers blend natural sound waves with human creativity, humanity's interaction with technology evolves in cycles of adaptation and transformation, shaping both the tools we use and the societies we build. We shape our tools, and they shape us in return.The blend of nature's design and our technological imprint creates an ecosystem of mutual influence, much like the Evo-Devo theories of biology, where small tweaks in developmental genes lead to dramatic evolutionary outcomes.This interplay of creation and transformation mirrors the cycles of human progress. Just as Hox genes orchestrate body plans, societal changes—spurred by technology or ideology—reshape our collective body. Whether it's the mechanistic choreography of DEVO's performances or the emergence of Evo-Devo in biology, the boundaries between human and machine blur.Are we programming nature, or is nature programming us? Perhaps the answer lies not in drawing distinctions but in understanding common patterns. These questions highlight the complexities of how we, and other organisms and systems, grow, adapt, and evolve in a world increasingly interwoven with introduced technology.From the mechanized rhythms of industrialization to the organic flow of natural systems, human -- and nonhuman -- there exists a tension and balance between stability and change. The teleonomic goal-directed behavior of living systems together with society's driving pulse of technology has fused into an unrecognizable but somehow familiar new existence. Even as we invent tools to navigate this existence, we become part of the systems we create—both shapers and shaped.The orchestration of evolution — like the many-layered songs of a many-player band — shows a world of many, connected, but not always planned.MARKETS, MACHINES, AND MORALITYThe Industrial Revolution brought unparalleled progress but also profound moral dilemmas. In “Markets, Machines, and Morality,” we reflected on Adam Smith's dual identity as both an economist and a moral philosopher. For Smith, markets were not just mechanisms of exchange but reflections of human nature. His “Theory of Moral Sentiments” reminds us that sympathy, justice, and prudence are vital governors of economic power — like James Watt's centrifugal governor, which balanced the speed of steam engines.But history shows us that unchecked systems, whether economic or mechanical, often prioritize efficiency over empathy. From Bentham's utilitarian calculus to the exploitative practices of modern capitalism, we've seen how the quest for profit can erode the moral underpinnings of society. Today's tech-driven economies, much like the Industrial Age's steam engines, require careful regulation to prevent runaway consequences. Smith's ideals of community benevolence and fair markets resonate more than ever.The unchecked growth of industrial power also highlights the tensions between human ingenuity and ethical responsibility. The centrifugal governor's simple elegance stands as a metaphor for our need to impose limits on excess, whether in economic policies, technological innovation, or social systems. Without these balancing mechanisms, we risk spiraling into inequity, instability, and dehumanization — a lesson as relevant today as it was in Smith's time.Moreover, the moral fabric underpinning economic actions — sympathy, justice, prudence — often fades in the shadow of profit-driven systems. Yet, these values remain the quiet governors ensuring that society's engines run not just efficiently but equitably.Smith's vision was never limited to wealth accumulation; it was about creating a society where individual pursuits align with collective well-being. Unlike today's economic practices, which often prioritize short-term profit over long-term societal health, Smith emphasized the importance of moral virtues such as sympathy and justice in guiding market dynamics.His insights are less about the "invisible hand" and more reminders to steer not only by the metrics of progress but also by the compass of morality. Like a finely tuned machine, morality should govern the obscene, in a more steady and fair routine.LANGUAGE, LANDSCAPE, AND LOSSLanguage has the power to shape identities and wield influence. These were the themes in “Woke and Wealth” and “Molding Minds Through the Markets of Material Worlds.” Words like “woke” and “decolonize”—once rooted in justice—have been distorted, co-opted by power to serve as tools of division. Similarly, capitalism's framing of “Homo Economicus”—the rational, self-interested individual—has reshaped not just our identities but the very landscapes we inhabit.These constructed identities reflect the power dynamics embedded in economic and geographic systems. The urban centers that thrive on globalized knowledge economies are mirrored by rural regions left to grapple with stagnation and decline, as explored in “Main Street to Metropolis.” As noted in that essay,“Rural areas have become Republican strongholds, drawn to promises of reversing globalization, reshaping economic policies, and making their communities great again.”These places — shaped by policies, demographics, and technology — become symbols of our collective divisions. Yet even amidst these fractures, alternative identities emerge. “Homo Ecologicus,” focused on environmental stewardship, and “Homo Absurdum,” embracing creativity and imagination, remind us of humanity's potential for resilience, community, and connection.The co-opting of language — turning tools of empowerment into instruments of division — illustrates the ongoing struggle for control over cultural and political narratives. When words like “woke” are weaponized, the original call for awareness and justice is lost in a haze of ideological conflict.Meanwhile, the landscapes shaped by economic systems mirror these distortions, transforming places of shared community into arenas of exclusion and competition. Consider, for example, the gentrification of urban neighborhoods. Once vibrant hubs of diverse community life, these areas often transform into exclusive enclaves where rising costs push out long-time residents, replacing shared culture with economic segregation.Yet, within these landscapes of loss lies the potential for renewal. Rural areas, often overshadowed by urban centers, remain spaces where alternative identities thrive. These identities, rooted in stewardship, creativity, and resilience, offer glimpses of a world where humanity's diversity can flourish.The challenge lies in amplifying these voices, reclaiming the power of language, and reshaping the spaces we inhabit to reflect our shared values. Language shapes, landscapes mold — our shifting sense of self is an ancient story retold.CLOSING THE LOOPLooking back at these essays, a recurring theme emerges: the interplay of systems that define our lives is not a one-way street. Nature and nurture, markets and morality, language and identity are all intertwined, multi- referencial, and dynamic webs with mirroring interdependencies. Progress is not linear; it's a cycle of creation, transformation, and sometimes regression where changes to one aspect ripple through the entire system.This echoes the recurring themes explored earlier — from the evolving interplay between nature and technology to the moral balance necessary in markets and machines. Together, these cycles reveal how change, though uneven, can guide us toward resilience and renewal when approached with awareness and intention. Herein lies hope. We all possess the potential, and these systems the possibility, to recalibrate the systems we control to balance human progress with equity, efficiency with empathy, and innovation with ethics.These systems remind us that resilience lies in adaptability. Fire, when controlled, can foster growth and create fertile soil. Uncontrolled fire destroys. Water can unite by sustaining life, connect ecosystems, and enable communication and trade through rivers and oceans. But it can also erode, rot, create barriers, or flood habitats and communities.As we humans innovate and advance, we can pause to reflect on the systems we create. We can ensure they serve not just the few but the many. Like water and fire, the narratives we construct, whether through language, policy, or technology, have the power to unite or divide.Our collective task is to craft stories that inspire connection and foster growth built on shared values. As we step into a new year, what questions should we ask about the systems we create? How can we ensure they unite rather than divide? What would it take to build systems rooted in equity, empathy, and sustainability? Perhaps, most importantly, how do these systems reflect who we are—and who we aspire to be? This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit interplace.io

Hello Interactors,My daughter has developed a keen interest in synthesizers. She has even created illustrated characters named Morg and Snorf, inspired by keyboard brands like Korg and Nord. Recently, she borrowed an old Korg synthesizer and has begun composing her own music during what she calls, “Korg time”. The evolution of electronic music has been remarkable since its inception, with even classical composers now embracing technology in their work. Notably, Ada Lovelace, one of the earliest computer programmers, foresaw in 1842 that computers would eventually be used for music composition — a prediction that has come to fruition.The blending of acoustic music and computer-generated sounds prompts me to reflect on how we shape our environment, which in turn shapes us. This interplay mirrors the story of evolution: nature nurturing nature ad infinitum. However, I wonder if technology as we know it today will ever truly integrate into the fabric of nature. Will we see human-like robots or robot-like humans? What if technology is already embedded within nature, and we are on the brink of learning to program it just as we would a computer?Let's find out…MAN OR MACHINE?“Are we not men?” This was a question presumably posed to and by members of the band DEVO who masquerade as part human and part machine. The answer by the humorous humanoids was “We are Devo!”. This question and answer became the title of their first album in August of 1978. It served as both a declaration of their band name, DEVO, but also as a rhetorical question that questioned humanity during the early rise of digital technology and its perceived, and actualized, dehumanization.DEVO is an abbreviation of the term de-evolution. The band's founding member, lead singer, and keyboardist, Mark Mothersbaugh had come across a 1924 pamphlet produced by Rev. B.H. Shadduck titled “Jocko-Homo Heavenbound” which critiqued, often humorously, Darwinian evolutionary theory.“Jocko-Homo” translates to Ape-Man which refers to human's evolution from apes. The critique is born out of teleology — the belief organisms are the design of a Christian god…and may be subject to evolutionary decay. Some claimed that by not adhering to the moral precepts of strict forms of Christianity, like dancing or drinking alcohol, that you could pass along devolving genes to your children. As a society, it could lead to a backwards slide of humanity, a devolution.As art students at Kent State, Mothersbaugh and co-founding member and friend Gerry Casale were mostly drawn to the satire and comedic illustrations in ‘Jocko-Homo'. But the book's premise came to the fore when they witnessed the killing of student war protesters in 1973. It made them wonder if perhaps humans really were devolving. After all, the Ohio National Guard had acted more like killing machines, not thinking or feeling humans. They seemingly failed to ask themselves, “Are we not men?”Mothersbaugh and Casale had already begun experimenting with guitar laden punk rock when Mothersbaugh saw Brian Eno perform a synthesizer solo with the band Roxy Music. He'd heard plenty of synth solos from other bands of the 1960s and 70s, but no one played it like Eno — bending and twisting electronic knobs and dials like guitarists and singers bend strings and larynx muscles. Eno sounded and dressed like he'd been transported from the future or another planet.Just a few years later, Brian Eno became the producer for DEVO's first album, “Q: Are we not men? A: We are Devo!”. The album included the song “Jock-Homo” which featured short bursts of monkey sounds Eno synchronized with the machine-like beat of the song. Much like acts of the time, like Roxy Music and David Bowie, DEVO leveraged stage theatrics to convey their message. Their performances featured matching futuristic outfits, often with their red signature energy dome hats. Their choreographed robotic movements reinforced a cyborg-like identity serving as a visual critique of modern society's mechanization.As AI and robots of today have captured the attention of a global society seemingly in decay, it may sound cliché to say, but they, and their contemporaries, were ahead of their time. While I don't believe we are devolving, I do think DEVO accurately portrays, both theoretically and practically, a blending of man and machine that may just be part of developmental evolution — though perhaps not exactly as Darwin had envisioned. Interestingly, DEVO could not have known their band name would become part of a branch of evolutionary biology, called Evo-Devo, or evolutionary developmental biology. That abbreviated term emerged in the early 1980s, perhaps inspired by DEVO.GEOGRAPHY GUIDES GROWTHEvo-Devo, which evolved from 19th-century embryology, explores how the development of an organism grows and matures from a single cell into a fully formed adult. It considers how cell division, their differentiated specialization for specific functions, the development of the resultant organism's shape, and body structures and organs shape evolution.Early thinkers like Karl Ernst von Baer and Ernst Haeckel recognized how species shared similar early developmental stages but then differentiated at later stages. The genetic underpinnings of this wouldn't be fully understood until much later. Darwin recognized these genetic developments as potential drivers of evolutionary change, but it took the Modern Synthesis of the 1930s — which focused on genetics and natural selection — to realize these ideas.By the 1970s, the discovery of mutation genes like Hox genes (which control the body plan of animals) reignited interest in the connection between development and evolution. This research demonstrated how small tweaks in developmental processes could lead to dramatic changes in form. In the 1990s, Evo-Devo solidified as a field, with researchers like Sean B. Carroll emphasizing gene regulation's critical role in shaping life's diversity.Today, Evo-Devo has expanded, embracing genomics and epigenetics to explain how organisms evolve through the complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors, reflecting a broader and more dynamic vision of evolution. In a sense, DEVO's fusion of human and machine echoes these evolutionary dynamics, where both biological and technological systems evolve through reconfiguration and integration, creating emergent complexity that Darwin could not have imagined.While Darwin spent years observing the interplay between biology and the physical environments of the Galápagos and beyond, he also could not have fully anticipated the extent to which physical forces directly influence biological development and shape natural selection.Physical forces play a crucial role in shaping the development of complex biological structures. Mechanical stress, for instance, influences how cells behave during growth and regeneration. Cells respond to tension and pressure in their environment through mechanotransduction — where physical signals are converted into biochemical ones — allowing tissues to adapt to their surroundings.This process is essential, for example, for the simple healing of a small cut to the complex formation of organs where precise force patterns ensure proper development. Similarly, physical stressors like fluid dynamics and gravity are critical in determining the structural features of organisms. In mollusks, for example, the formation of their shells is heavily influenced by the mechanical forces exerted by water currents and the mollusk's own movements. These physical inputs guide how calcium carbonate is deposited, shaping the unique curvature and strength of their shells. These examples highlight how environmental forces and biological development are deeply intertwined, driving evolutionary change through the interaction of physical and genetic processes.This view aligns with the work of researchers like Michael Levin, who propose that environmental cues, including bioelectric and biochemical signals, play a crucial role in guiding the development and behavior of organisms. Michael Levin is a pioneering figure in the field of developmental biology and regenerative medicine, where his groundbreaking work explores how organisms use bioelectric signals to guide growth, regeneration, and even behavior.His research has expanded our understanding of how cells communicate beyond traditional biochemical and genetic pathways, showing that electrical signals between cells play a critical role in shaping an organism's development. Levin, and his collaborators, has demonstrated how manipulating these bioelectric signals with computer programs, they can reprogram biological processes — enabling, for example, the regeneration of complex structures like limbs in animals.This represents a major shift in biology, as it challenges the conventional view that genetic blueprints alone dictate development, highlighting instead the role of bioelectricity as an under appreciated but vital component of life's regulatory networks. In other words, genes can be thought of as hardware and they communicate, collaborate, and compete through bioelectronic circuitry, or software.BLURRING BOUNDARIES, REDEFINING LIFEMichael Levin's research, and others, emphasize that biological systems — whether single cells or complex organisms — operate through networks of bioelectrical, biochemical, and biomechanical signals, processing information much like computers. Cells communicate and make decisions through these signals, allowing them to respond to their environments. In this way, living organisms already function as computational entities, capable of performing sophisticated tasks typically associated with artificial systems.Levin's vision extends into synthetic biology, where organisms might be engineered to function like programmable devices. By manipulating bioelectric and cellular signals, scientists could design organisms capable of performing specific tasks, responding to commands, or adapting their behavior, effectively merging biology with computation. This concept could, for example, blur the distinction between biological pets and programmable machines, imagining a future where living systems are fully customizable.This integration of biology and technology is further reflected in the development of soft robotics and biohybrid systems, where machines incorporate biological tissues for enhanced sensory and adaptive functions. Levin's work on bioelectricity supports the idea that these biological machines could operate through naturally occurring computational processes, challenging traditional distinctions between organic life and artificial intelligence.Clearly these developments raise profound ethical questions, and Levin is the first to say it. It poses many questions about the nature of intelligence, the potential for sentient machines, and the rights of biologically-based computing systems. But these developments could also help advance some of our most pressing health problems.Including in the brain. There's already a brain grown in a petri dish that can learn to play Pong. Called organoids, these are lab-grown, miniature models of human organs, developed from stem cells, can replicate structural and functional characteristics of actual organs.Brain organoids, in particular, mimic basic aspects of brain architecture and neural activity, allowing researchers to study development, disease, and neurological functions in controlled environments. These "brains in a dish" have advanced to the point where they can exhibit learning behaviors, like playing Pong.In this experiment, a brain organoid was connected to electrodes, which allowed it to interact with a simplified version of game. Over time, the organoid learned to play the game by modulating its neural activity in response to feedback from the game environment. This groundbreaking demonstration revealed the potential of organoids not only for studying brain function but also for creating neural systems capable of learning and adapting, pushing the boundaries of artificial intelligence and bioengineering.Such advancements highlight the possibilities of merging biological neural systems with computational tasks, a direction that may influence both neuroscience research and the future of AI. I wonder if DEVO ever imagined their man-machine themes and robotic humanoid movements would have emerged, in experimental form, in their lifetime.DEVO and their contemporaries didn't just create music; they engineered an evolutionary shift in sound that mirrored both cultural and biological processes. By blending analog instruments with emerging technologies like synthesizers and drum machines, their work reflected the modularity featured in Evo-Devo, where biological traits evolve through the recombination of existing genetic modules. Just as Evo-Devo shows how small adjustments in developmental pathways lead to novel evolutionary outcomes, DEVO's music was a synthesis of tradition and innovation, where new soundscapes emerged from reconfiguring the familiar all influenced by the culture and environment in which they exist. This creative evolution parallels biological processes, where complexity arises not linearly but through recursive adaptation and innovation often resulting in sudden unexpected leaps.Much like geography's dynamic role in shaping biological evolution, DEVO's sound was also shaped by external forces — cultural, technological, and industrial. In biology, physical environments like mountains, rivers, and urban landscapes impose selective pressures that drive adaptation, and similarly, DEVO's music arose at the intersection of human creativity and technological advancement. These external forces didn't serve merely as a backdrop but as active, reshaping elements, much like how geographic isolation on islands drives rapid speciation. The adaptability of organisms to urban environments mirrors how DEVO adapted the rigid precision of machines into organic, expressive art, blending the mechanical with the human, much like how species blend with their changing habitats.This fusion of man and machine is now emerging in the cutting-edge field of synthetic biology, where organisms are engineered to function like programmable devices. In the same way that DEVO's music blurred the lines between human creativity and machine precision, synthetic biology allows for living systems to be designed with programmable traits, merging the biological with the technological. Maybe Morg and Snorf will not just be 3D models on a 2D screen, but real bio-sythentic musical pets that invent and collaborate on music together — and with us.These biohybrid systems, where living organisms can perform tasks traditionally associated with machines, further illustrate the evolution of complexity through reconfiguration. Whether in music or existence, the distinctions between what is natural and what is artificial are growing more ambiguous, illustrating the continuous evolution driven by adaptation, creativity, and the interaction with outside forces. References: Fortner, Stephen. "Devo: The Masters of Subversive Synth Rock Return." Keyboard, 1 Sept. 2010, https://www.moredarkthanshark.org/eno_int_keyboard-sep10.html.Wanninger, Andreas, and Tim Wollesen. "The Evolution of Molluscs." Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6 (2018): 1-22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6378612/.Conversation with ChatGPT on intersections between Evolution, Geography, and Biological Computing. September, 2024. https://chatgpt.com/. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit interplace.io

It was an astounding discovery in the early 1980's that the same genetic sequence, the homeobox, controlled the development of basic body plans across the animal kingdom, whether the result was a flatworm, an octopus, a mouse, or a human. This discovery of the conservation of a key developmental mechanism across phyla and vast stretches of evolutionary time helped launch the interdisciplinary field of evolutionary developmental biology, or Evo-Devo.  In Evolution and Development: Conceptual issues (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Alan Love explains and explores Evo-Devo and the philosophical problems that arise in its pursuit. Love, who is professor of philosophy at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, considers such issues as the type of scientific unity that arises from focusing on problem agendas rather than theory, the problem of determining when variation in traits gives rise to a novel trait, and how the identity of features at various levels of biological organization can be explained by particular causal mechanisms. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

It was an astounding discovery in the early 1980's that the same genetic sequence, the homeobox, controlled the development of basic body plans across the animal kingdom, whether the result was a flatworm, an octopus, a mouse, or a human. This discovery of the conservation of a key developmental mechanism across phyla and vast stretches of evolutionary time helped launch the interdisciplinary field of evolutionary developmental biology, or Evo-Devo.  In Evolution and Development: Conceptual issues (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Alan Love explains and explores Evo-Devo and the philosophical problems that arise in its pursuit. Love, who is professor of philosophy at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, considers such issues as the type of scientific unity that arises from focusing on problem agendas rather than theory, the problem of determining when variation in traits gives rise to a novel trait, and how the identity of features at various levels of biological organization can be explained by particular causal mechanisms. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/philosophy

It was an astounding discovery in the early 1980's that the same genetic sequence, the homeobox, controlled the development of basic body plans across the animal kingdom, whether the result was a flatworm, an octopus, a mouse, or a human. This discovery of the conservation of a key developmental mechanism across phyla and vast stretches of evolutionary time helped launch the interdisciplinary field of evolutionary developmental biology, or Evo-Devo.  In Evolution and Development: Conceptual issues (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Alan Love explains and explores Evo-Devo and the philosophical problems that arise in its pursuit. Love, who is professor of philosophy at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, considers such issues as the type of scientific unity that arises from focusing on problem agendas rather than theory, the problem of determining when variation in traits gives rise to a novel trait, and how the identity of features at various levels of biological organization can be explained by particular causal mechanisms. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It was an astounding discovery in the early 1980's that the same genetic sequence, the homeobox, controlled the development of basic body plans across the animal kingdom, whether the result was a flatworm, an octopus, a mouse, or a human. This discovery of the conservation of a key developmental mechanism across phyla and vast stretches of evolutionary time helped launch the interdisciplinary field of evolutionary developmental biology, or Evo-Devo.  In Evolution and Development: Conceptual issues (Cambridge University Press, 2024), Alan Love explains and explores Evo-Devo and the philosophical problems that arise in its pursuit. Love, who is professor of philosophy at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, considers such issues as the type of scientific unity that arises from focusing on problem agendas rather than theory, the problem of determining when variation in traits gives rise to a novel trait, and how the identity of features at various levels of biological organization can be explained by particular causal mechanisms.

-----------------Support the channel------------ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thedissenter PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: https://tinyurl.com/y95uvkao   This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: http://enlites.com/   Dr. Randall Beer is Professor of Cognitive Science and Informatics at Indiana University Bloomington. Dr. Beer's primary research interest is in understanding how coordinated behavior arises from the dynamical interaction of an animal's nervous system, its body and its environment. Toward this end, he works on the evolution and analysis of dynamical "nervous systems" for model agents, neuromechanical modeling of animals, biologically-inspired robotics, and dynamical systems approaches to behavior and cognition.   In this episode, we talk about biology and cognitive science. We first discuss autopoiesis, the work of Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela, and how it relates to cognition. We talk about motor behavior, a brain-body-environment framework, studying locomotion in C. elegans, and connectomics. We discuss the relationship between biology and cognition, and enactivism. We talk about computational-representationalist approaches, and dynamical approaches in cognitive science. We go through the history of the situated, embodied, and dynamical framework in cognitive science, and 4E cognition. We discuss minimally cognitive agents, and AI systems. Finally, we talk about evo-devo approaches in biology, developmental bias, and the extended evolutionary synthesis. -- A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, OLAF ALEX, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, JOHN CONNORS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, ADANER USMANI, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, CHARLES MOREY, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, BENJAMIN GELBART, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, NIKLAS CARLSSON, ISMAËL BENSLIMANE, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, KATE VON GOELER, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, LIAM DUNAWAY, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, ERIK ENGMAN, AND LUCY! A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, AND NICK GOLDEN! AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!

SAMPLER & SANS REPROCHES(Radio Transmission)Playlist N∞ 1250... - Lundi 23 Mai 2022 - Horaire : 20:00 >> 22:00EBM - SYNTHWAVE - INDUSTRIAL & RELATED MUSICGALAXIE RADIO 95.3FM www.galaxieradio.fr-----------------------------------------> [ S&SR Selection de la semaine... PARADOX OBSCUR "Morphogenesis" ] < Artiste - Titre - Version - Format - Production - Label > PARADOX OBSCUR "Krankes Herz" DIG LP: Morphogenesis (Metropolis Records) DARK MINIMAL PROJECT "Next Life (People Theatre Remix)" DIG LP: Cold Black Room (Autoproduction) JEAN-MICHEL JARRE "Here For You (feat. GARY NUMAN)" CD: Electronica 2 - The Heart Of Noise (Aero Productions / Sony Music) ETHAN FAWKES & DREADFOOL "Some Fall (Original Mix)" DIG EP: Some Fall (Nu Body Records) CONTAINER 90 "Eurovision Song Protest" DIG EP: Eurovision Song Protest (Sham Recordings) AKUSTIKKOPPLER "Mittenmang" LP: Alles Muss Raus (Block 4) METAL DISCO feat. INCIRRINA "Tension" DIG EP: In Motion (Werkstatt Recordings) 0=3 "Black Tears" DIG EP: Black Tears (Ukonx Recordings) SUICIDE COMMANDO "Bang bang bang (C-Lekktor Remix)" DIG EP: Bang Bang Bang (Out Of Line Music) LIGHTS OF EUPHORIA "Access Denied" DIG SINGLE: Access Denied (Infacted Recordings) INSEKT "Another Bacteria" CD: Stress (KK Records) PARADOX OBSCUR "Evo-Devo" DIG LP: Morphogenesis (Metropolis Records) NOGA EREZ "Toy" CD: Off The Radar (City Slang) VOX LOW "Sibylline" VINYL SPLIT 7": Treasure Hunting Vol. 3 (Astro Lab Recordings) BRYAN'S MAGIC TEARS "Orion's Gate Arrival" CD: Vacuum Sealed (Born Bad Records) W.H. LUNG "Want" DIG LP: Incidental Music (Melodic) JUNKSISTA "Oxytocyn" DIG EP: Oxytocyn High (COP International) STRUMA "Dead Religion (feat.Suzi)" DIG EP: The Industrial Prayer (Autoproduction) TREPANERINGSRITUALEN "Serpent Seed (Ancient Methods Remix)" DIG EP: Kainskult Remixed (aufnahme+wiedergabe) ALIEN SKIN "This Happy Life" DIG LP: Put Your Lips On My Lips (ScentAir Records) DISTORTION SIX "Lost Vision" DIG EP: Rive (Ant-Zen) LANDSCAPE BODY MACHINE "No Cable (25TH ANNIVERSARY REMASTER)" DIG SINGLE: No Cable 2022 Remix (Autoproduction) PROMO THANKS TO : PARADOX OBSCUR (Toxic Razor), RED SAND PR (Gary Levermore), DARK MINIMAL PROJECT (Guillaume Van De Rosieren), NU BODY RECORDS (Ethan Fawkes), CONTAINER 90 (Ronny Larsson), AKUSTIKKOPPLER (Malte Steiner), WERKSTATT RECORDINGS (Toxic Razor), UKONX RECORDINGS (Stéphane), OUT OF LINE MUSIC (Iris), INFACTED RECORDINGS (Torben Schmidt), Daniéle Ludwig (L'AERONEF), COP INTERNATIONAL (Christian), STRUMA (Henrik Fink Nilsson), SCENTAIR RECORDS (Vladimir), ANT-ZEN (Stefan Alt), LANDSCAPE BODY MACHINE (Craig Joseph Huxtable) ...

Join us for this virtual session of the series BioArt Talks @CBIS. Anna Lindemann will present her work as an Evo Devo Artist. In her creative work, Anna combines animation, video, music, and performance to explore the emerging field of evolutionary developmental biology (Evo Devo). Her work seeks to uncover narratives within rigorous scientific research, to visualize biological processes in novel ways, to define new artistic creative processes modeled on biological processes, and to examine the human emotion and subjectivity behind scientific research. As part of her talk, Anna will highlight several Evo Devo Artworks including The Colony, an art-science performance about sisterhood and the evolution of social life in humans and ants. https://www.mediasanctuary.org/event/evo-devo-art/

Today, on the Hudson Mohawk Magazine, We begin with Mark Dunlea speaking with Bob Cohen of Citizen Action about an upcoming Earth Day rally. Then, we dig into our archives for a segment by Meghan Marohn, our Hudson Mohawk Magazine Producer who is currently missing, in which she rows on the rivers with Dick Sleeper. Later on, we hear from Heroic Hearts Project about why the legalization of psychedelics could benefit people living with PTSD. After that, Brea Barthel heads to the Troy Public Library to Talk About Books for April picks for kids with Carol Roberts. Finally, we get a sneak peak of Friday's BioArt talk with Evo Devo artist Anna Lindemann.

John Smart has taught and written for over 20 years on topics like foresight and futurism as well as the drivers, opportunities, and problems of exponential processes throughout human history. John is President of the Acceleration Studies Foundation, co-Founder of the Evo-Devo research community, and CEO of Foresight University. Most recently, Smart is the author […]

In this installment of #ScientistOutLoud, the Lab Out Loud podcast welcomes research and teaching professor Prashant Sharma from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Using morphology and genomic data, Dr. Sharma and his lab recently challenged our understanding of arachnid classification, by adding horseshoe crabs to the same class as spiders and scorpions. Dr. Sharma joins co-hosts Brian Bartel and Dale Basler to remind them how modern classification works, describe why his team believes horseshoe crabs should be classified as arachnids, and discuss how this work showcases the process of science. About The Guest: Dr. Prashant Sharma is the principal investigator of the Sharma Lab in the department of Integrative Biology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The lab's research broadly addresses macroevolution of invertebrates through the lenses of phylogenetics, genomics, and comparative development, with emphasis on chelicerate arthropods (from sharmalabuw.org) Show notes at: https://laboutloud.com/2022/03/episode-262-horseshoe-crab-classification/

Surreal Sessions Podcast is a house music show brought to you by DJ/Podcaster Danēum. Showcasing South African & InternationaI house movement in an hourly segment // monthly and weekly. Expect some Deep/ Techno/ Dub/ Nu-Jazz/ Lounge/ Breaks/ Soulful/ Afro/ lofi/ Jazz/ Chillhop/ Mixed and blended just to set your soul,body and mind on fire!!

We on it again

Dr. Nathan Young of UCSF discuss evolutionary developmental biology using the limb as a model to understand the perspective. We talk about the importance of marrying all three disciplines to discover insights that otherwise wouldn't be within the purview of a single field. Find links to articles, books, and pics at AnthroBiology.com. Find the show on Instagram and Twitter @AnthroBiology.

Sorry for the wait!

The origins of language are unknown. Now that's out of the way we can get on with investigating several of the possibilities in this second episode of our series on language. This episode considers Daniel Everett's gradualism thesis that the hominid Homo erectus  was an early adopter of language as evidenced by their extensive travels and creation of icons and symbols. We explore this thesis, Pierces' semiotics model, and evidence from the fossil record. Remember, this is a gentle introduction to the topic which fills volumes. You can find much more detail in the reading list below. Show NotesThe Here and Now Podcast Language SeriesHow Language Began – Daniel Everett (2017)How Language Began – Daniel Everett TED talk (YouTube)Language: The cultural tool - Daniel Everett (2012)The Evolution of Language – W. Tecumseh Fitch (2010)Talking the Talk: Language Psychology and Science – Trevor Harley (2017)Homo erectus - WikipediaHomo erectus may have been a sailor and able to speak – The Guardian (2018)Homo floresiensis - making sense of the small bodied hominin fossils from Flores - K. Baab (2012) Oldowan tools Charles Pierce's Semiotic Theory of SignsThe Makapangskat Pebble The Here and Now Podcast on Facebook The Here and Now Podcast on Twitter Send me an emailSupport the show (https://www.patreon.com/thehereandnowpodcast)

Note: Sean B. Carroll the evolutionary biologist and Sean M. Carroll the quantum physicist are both equally awe-inspiring. They are not the same person. Sean’s new book A Series of Fortunate Events: Chance and the Making of the Planet, Life, and You (2020) can be found here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Fortunate-Events-Chance-Making-Planet/dp/0691218900/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1611219491&sr=1-1 Sean’s classic book Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom (2005) can be found here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Endless-Forms-Most-Beautiful-Science/dp/1849160481 His book and film The Serengeti Rules: The Quest to Discover How Life Works can be found here: https://www.seanbcarroll.com/the-serengeti-rules#:~:text=In%20The%20Serengeti%20Rules%2C%20award,the%20planet%20we%20depend%20upon. For more on Sean: https://www.seanbcarroll.com/ Follow Sean on Twitter @SeanBiolCarroll Further References Evo-Devo (Despacito Biology Parody) | A Capella Science - YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydqReeTV_vk The Hox gene family synteny on chromosome 3 of Drosophila melanogaster... | Download Scientific Diagram (researchgate.net): https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Hox-gene-family-synteny-on-chromosome-3-of-Drosophila-melanogaster-and-the-segments_fig4_322698687 Introduction to Trilobites: https://www.trilobites.info/trilobite.htm Eye Development - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/eye-development Timestamps 03:00 Misunderstandings about chance and probability 04:42 The precise timing of the asteroid strike 66 million years 07:48 Quantum fibrillation in the structure of DNA 14:34 Redundancy in the genome 17:50 How small the differences are that matter 20:51 The central insight of evo devo 28:38 Genetic switches and the choreography of development 32:13 It’s ain’t what you have, it’s the way that you use it. How diversity is achieved. 38:52 Homologous modular structures 43:20 Hox genes and the GPS coordinate system for the body 45:00 Williston’s law and why we have leeway to experiment 49:47 Polarities, how changes in the embryo create changes in the animal 55:02 Chance and the individual

About Evo Devo | Who is she? Molebogeng: Evo Devo is a Deep House and Soulful House Dj originally from Nkogolwe,Moses Kotane but currently based in Rustenburg. Her musical journey started in 2018, her love and passion for hitting the decks grew tremendously as she continuously received love and support everywhere she went. She has played in several places, also got featured as a guest dj on a few podcasts. She wants to inspire more women to follow their dreams and to not limit themselves Booking details and social media platforms |Instagram : @evodevo_dj |Twitter: @EvoDevo_Dj |Facebook : Evo Devo |Email : evodevo25@gmail.coevodevo25@gmail.com

Lunch stream check out MADEbyJIMBOB dot com!

"EVO-DEVO. This is how we go from single cells to people". Así es como dice la letra de esta parodia de 'Despacito' que tiene más de 3 millones de visitas en Youtube. En este podcast decidimos indagar sobre el tema y hablamos con dos expertxs de la biología del desarrollo para que nos cuenten qué es eso del evo-devo. Desde Viena, David Salamanca nos cuenta un poco de qué es esta rama de la biología y cuáles son las dificultades para estar trabajando en estos temas. Y desde Bogotá, Lucia Uribe nos habla específicamente de un tema que parece de ciencia ficción: La regeneración de tejidos. Los biólogos del desarrollo se han destacado por hacer experimentos bastantes controversiales, así que también les preguntamos a nuestros expertos del día de hoy si los biólogos del desarrollo juegan a ser dios. ¿Qué respondieron a esto? Están a un solo click de averiguarlo. Los credítos de la canción de 'Evo-Devo (Despacito Biology Parody)' pertenece a Acapella Science y el uso de la canción es usado solo con fines académicos y educativos.

Spacecraft // Surreal Sessions Operators // Evo Devo (Rusternburg,SA) Mission Type // XV

Spacecraft // Surreal Sessions Operators // Evo Devo (Rusternburg,SA) Mission Type // XV

The gang discusses two papers about arthropod evolution and development. One paper focuses on the evolution of arthropod segmentation, and the other summarizes research on the development of the insect wing. Meanwhile, Amanda has a beer with no unintended consequences, Curt makes a shocking discovery about marketing, and James goes from 0 to professional in milliseconds. As we did last time, here are some organizations you can donate to: https://blacklivesmatter.com/ https://bailproject.org/ https://www.aclu.org/   Up-Goer Five (Amanda Edition):  Today our friends look at small things with many legs and many body parts. The first paper is looking at how these small things with many legs and many body parts first grew the parts they needed to fly. The paper says lots of words about this, but there are two big ideas, saying that these body parts that the body parts these animals needed to fly grew from either the up on the side or down on the side. It turns out that maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle. No, really, they probably grew from both up and down on the side, there was another paper that came out while this one was being worked on that says that, and they talk about it in this paper. The second paper looks at how these animals came to have many body parts, and says how it is important that we look at the things that are very very very dead, as well as the very very very very tiny bits of living things that carry the things our bodies need to know to make stuff.    References: Chipman, Ariel D., and Gregory D. Edgecombe. "Developing an integrated understanding of the evolution of arthropod segmentation using fossils and evo-devo." Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286.1912 (2019): 20191881.   Clark-Hachtel, Courtney M., and Yoshinori Tomoyasu. "Exploring the origin of insect wings from an evo-devo perspective." Current opinion in insect science 13 (2016): 77-85. 

In episode 11 we chat to Dr Neil Gostling about all things evolution and biological development (Evo-Devo). Neil is easily one of the most engaging lecturers at the University of Southampton which has led to recognition from both his students (SUSU Excellence in Teaching Awards) and his peers (VC Teaching Award). His non hierarchical style and passion for his subject allow his students to flourish in the classroom and on his legendary field trips! - one of which is a nice little trip to the Galapagos Islands (MRes Evolution Degree).

Spitzer Spotify Playlist -https://open.spotify.com/playlist/1ew81d1apIyY6Pr8Z4vVSh - CAPTAIN ULITKA - [TWTR] twitter.com/Captain_Ulitka - SPITZER RADIO- [AIR] www.mixcult.net [FB] www.facebook.com/spitzerecords [ITUNES PDCST] https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/mixcult-vinyl-digital-podcast/id1441882336?mt=2 [SPOTIFY PDCST] https://open.spotify.com/show/6AHuslANYjWBBxIcXsyy8q [TWTR] twitter.com/MixCult [INSRG] instagram.com/mixcult [VK] https://vk.com/spitzeradio TL • Hilyard - From Omens [Stereoscenic] • 36 - Vesl [3six] • Snufmumriko - Horizonview [Tehnofonika] • Hilyard - Mercy Within [Stereoscenic] • Max Corbacho - Into The Ocean Of Time [Silentsun] • Celer -Text me when you wake up [Two Acorns] • Atmosphare - Lost and Recovered [Tehnofonika] • Eguana - Earth's Ghostly Future [Cosmicleaf] • Lars Leonhard - These Days [Not On Label] • Aviron - See My Thoughts [Cosmicleaf] • Lars Leonhard - Anchorage [Not On Label] Artwork by Ivan Agapov Booking and requests: info@mixcult.net Spitzer Records & Radio | www.mixcult.net

C'è grande attesa per la prima "foto" di un buco nero, che potrebbe essere presentata domani dai ricercatori dell'Event horizon telescope

In the news: Three new dinosaurs were described, the Argentinian theropod Pandoravenator fernandezorum, the Nigerian ornithomimosaur Afromimus tenerensis, and the Chinese titanosaur Zhuchengtitan zangjiazhuangensis; A new Evo-Devo study recreates proto-feathers from chicken genes; A new debate on Ornithoscelida; New Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom footage; and much more Dinosaur of the day Camarasaurus, a sauropod whose name means "chambered lizard" This episode is brought to you in part by TRX Dinosaurs, which makes beautiful and realistic dinosaur sculptures, puppets, and exhibits. You can see some amazing examples and works in progress on Instagram @trxdinosaurs To get access to lots of patron only content check out https://www.patreon.com/iknowdino For links to every news story, all of the details we shared about Camarasaurus, and our fun fact check out http://iknowdino.com/camarasaurus-episode-158/

 OMG, Audiommunity is back! With a... vengeance? That doesn't make any sense. But we're back!We've got a couple of new hosts - Please give a warm welcome to Chadene Tremaglio and Camilla Engblom! Kate is still holed up in a cave (lab) trying to wrap up her PhD. But she'll soon return... we hope...Audiommunity is now accepting donations via Patreon. The way it works is that you set up a pledge amount that we'll get each time we release an episode (up to a maximum you set). We'll keep doing this for free, but if you value the podcast, please consider tossing a buck or two our way!LinksThe "original" alcoholic ginger beerThomas Benjamin (Chadene lied... there's no wikipedia page!)Filtered Fecal Transplant PaperEvo Devo (Desposito Cover) - Also check out this guy's patreon page, this stuff is great! 

Soutenez nous sur Patreon.com/PodcastScience // Retrouvez nous sur PodcastScience.fm // Twitter: Twitter.com/PodcastScience // Facebook: Facebook.com/PodcastScience // Comment dire? on l’adore, c’est tout !  Et comme il est le maître de l’évolution, quoi de plus logique pour qu’il revienne nous en parler avec son calme et sa passion.  Nos oreilles, fruits d’une lente maturation qui dure depuis des siècles et des siècles, auront le doux plaisir aujourd’hui  d’entendre notre Taupo national qui viendra nous conter encore et encore notre histoire à tous, l’histoire du monde animal.  Aujourd’hui il s’agira plus particulièrement de mécanismes de régulation du matériel génétique et comment ces mécanismes jouent un rôle dans l’évolution. Pierre nous parlera notamment d’ailes de papillons, et nous, humbles auditeurs, nous nous envolerons grâce à lui  dans les sphères gracieuses du gai savoir... Images et notes : http://www.podcastscience.fm/emission/2017/07/08/podcast-science-305-evo-devo-2-le-retour

Soutenez nous sur Patreon.com/PodcastScience // Retrouvez nous sur PodcastScience.fm // Twitter: Twitter.com/PodcastScience // Facebook: Facebook.com/PodcastScience // Qu’est-ce que la biologie évolutive du développement (Evo-Devo) ? Comment un organisme passe-t-il d’une seule cellule à un être complexe ? En explorant différents organismes modèles, avec ou sans vertèbres, Taupo aka Pierre Kerner et Patrick Laurenti, deux enseignants-chercheurs du domaine, vont nous dévoiler quelques facettes de cette discipline fondamentale. L'Evo-Devo est une discipline chimère combinant les avancées techniques en génétique pour concilier deux disciplines de la biologie: l'évolution et le développement. A travers la comparaison des embryons de différentes espèces, l’observation de leurs points communs et de leurs différences, on peut comprendre petit à petit l’histoire évolutive des animaux, mais aussi les mécanismes responsables des diversités de formes entre espèces. Images et notes : http://www.podcastscience.fm/emission/2017/05/30/podcast-science-299-evo-devo/

Animal development is directed by a genetic toolkit shared by all animals — from fruit flies to frogs to human beings — rather than different animals having different genetic toolkits. UCLA Professor of Biological Chemistry Edward De Robertis explains that the field of evolutionary development (or Evo-Devo) seeks to understand how so many beautiful animal forms evolved through the use of the original genetic toolkit of the last common ancestor of all animals, urbilateria, which existed at least 560 million years ago. Series: "UCLA Faculty Research Lectures" [Science] [Show ID: 31409]

Animal development is directed by a genetic toolkit shared by all animals — from fruit flies to frogs to human beings — rather than different animals having different genetic toolkits. UCLA Professor of Biological Chemistry Edward De Robertis explains that the field of evolutionary development (or Evo-Devo) seeks to understand how so many beautiful animal forms evolved through the use of the original genetic toolkit of the last common ancestor of all animals, urbilateria, which existed at least 560 million years ago. Series: "UCLA Faculty Research Lectures" [Science] [Show ID: 31409]

Tiffany K. Chan '15 describes her Calderwood interview with Wellesley biologist Yui Suzuki. Suzuki is an evolutionary-developmental biologist who focuses his research on insect metamorphosis and regeneration. By conducting embryonic studies on several different insect species, he studies the change and control of developmental processes both throughout an individual’s lifetime but also in the evolutionary context of a species. Tiffany interviewed Suzuki as the final assignment for my Calderwood Seminar: Biology in the News. She not only introduces an emerging field of Biology but also showcases Suzuki’s path into the sciences.

Broadcast 10/03/2011 on 103.2 Dublin City FM PIC: 'Buzz Aldrin' pictured on the Moon, July 1969 by Neil Armstrong. Putting men on the Moon was a tremendous technical achievement, but is space exploration worth the effort & resources put into it? [Credit: NASA]  WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT? The Human Genome Project. What is it? and how will it change our lives? Tommie McCarthy, UCC, explains. THE QUESTION IS? Is space exploration worth all the time, effort and resources put into it? We ask Irish European Space Agency engineer, James Geary, who has worked on several exploration projects.  WRITERS' ROOM We talk to Wallace Arthur, Professor of Zoology, NUI Galway, and author of 'Evolution, A Developmental View', who has a different 'take' on evolution.  To contact the show, email: sciencespinning@dublincityfm.ie 

Certain genes that play a crucial role in the evolution of complex structures, such as the eye, turn out to be common to many different species.

Transcript -- Certain genes that play a crucial role in the evolution of complex structures, such as the eye, turn out to be common to many different species.

Alessandro Minelli spiega cosa si intende per biologia dello sviluppo

In this chapter of Darwin or Design, I chat with Evolutionary Biologist Sean Carroll. We talk about the field of evolutionary developmental biology and he brings us up to speed on what is happening in the field.

In this episode, freelance reporter Beth Baldwin talks about some of the goings-on at the recent annual meeting of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution, entitled "Genomes, Evolution, and Bioinformatics." And Kate Wong, Scientific American's paleontology and anthropology expert, talks about recent findings in human evolution as well as a new, unusual dinosaur discovery. Plus, we'll test your knowledge about some recent science in the news. Organizations and websites mentioned on this podcast include the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution, http://www.smbe.org; the conference page, http://www.smbe.org/geb; the Paleoanthropology Society, http://www.paleoanthro.org; the Scientific American blog, blog.sciam.com; the Scientific American Digital Archive, www.sciamdigital.com.

Why are evolutionary biologists interested in developmental biology?