Podcasts about ucc

Chris Ehmke and Tim Mahoney are joined by someone you have heard a few times on this show, Josh McCormack! Josh fresh off his UCC win earlier this spring decided he was done with wowing the masses and put down a new record on the dyno. 4,157 HORSEPOWER. Insanity. He walks the boys through how he accomplished it and what you can expect to see out of him in the future. 

Dr. Finola Doyle-O'Neill, Broadcast and Legal Historian with UCC, discusses the decision by RTÉ not to take part in next year's Eurovision if Israel is a participant.

Dr. Dave O'Leary, Senior Technical Officer at the department of Medicine in UCC, describes how he discovered an Asian hornet in a beer garden in Cork.

As a Senior Lecturer in clean energy at UCC, Dr Paul Deane knows a thing or two about energy efficiency...But in reality, when you go from transforming a vacant home from a G BER rating to an A grade energy efficient house, you realise that the practical learnings are pretty major...Dr Paul Deane joins Seán to discuss.

As a Senior Lecturer in clean energy at UCC, Dr Paul Deane knows a thing or two about energy efficiency...But in reality, when you go from transforming a vacant home from a G BER rating to an A grade energy efficient house, you realise that the practical learnings are pretty major...Dr Paul Deane joins Seán to discuss.

What a landmark for UCC and Cork University Press to mark this year - 100 years of publishing! It's being celebrated with a one-day Symposium looking back at the various books which have been released in that century of print, and a whole day of amazing speakers and guests coming together in UCC. Elmarie Mawe spoke to Head of Publishing, Sinéad Neville. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The TV show Traitors returns to RTÉ 1 television this evening. The show displays how difficult it can be to spot a liar, and how easy it can be to engage in deception. I spoke to Dr Gillian Murphy, senior lecturer in the School of Applied Psychology at UCC, about whether it's difficult to be a good liar.

How reliable is your memory?And would you ever admit to faking it? A new research project is set to analyse why we tend to fabricate false memories and just why our memory might be so unreliable and whether this is necessarily a bad thing…Dr Gillian Murphy, Senior Lecturer at the School of Applied Psychology in UCC joins Seán to discuss.

How reliable is your memory?And would you ever admit to faking it? A new research project is set to analyse why we tend to fabricate false memories and just why our memory might be so unreliable and whether this is necessarily a bad thing…Dr Gillian Murphy, Senior Lecturer at the School of Applied Psychology in UCC joins Seán to discuss.

A major project to investigate false memories which is led by University College Cork has today received significant EU funding. To tell us all about it Dr Gillian Murphy, Senior Lecturer in Applied Psychology at UCC.

Sermon from August 31, 2025 by Marcus Little

Sláintecare reforms are being introduced into the health system, which are playing a role in pushing up the cost of health insurance.VHI announced rises earlier in the year, as did Laya Healthcare and Irish Life Health…So, is private health insurance still worth the cost?Joining Andrea to discuss is Dr Brian Turner, Health Economist in UCC, Pharmacist Sheena Mitchell (@wondercare_irl) on Instagram and listeners.

Architect Ailish Drake, programme co-ordinator at UCC, Eleanor McSherry and deputy student president at TUS Gearoid Folan join Joe for the weekly coffee panel. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A new campaign at UCC aims to make health research more inclusive, to include under-served groups like women, ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, older adults, and people with disabilities. Pat hears about it with Frances Shiely, Director of Education and a Professor in patient focused research at the HRB Clinical Research Facility at UCC and a Senior Lecturer in Epidemiology in the School of Public Health.

Sermon from August 24, 2025 by Rev. Dr. Lillian Daniel.

In this episode, we hear about the remarkable life and legacy of Ireland's first female botanist, Ellen Hutchins.Featuring: Madeline Hutchins, who runs the Ellen Hutchins Festival and is Ellen's great-great-grandniece; Clare Heardman, co-founder and co-organiser of the Ellen Hutchins Festival; Virginia Teehan, CEO of The Heritage Council; Dr Colin Kelleher, keeper of the herbarium at the National Botanic Gardens; and Dr Eoin Lettice, lecturer in Plant Science at UCC.

Unsafe attitudes towards concussion among non-professional rugby players are still prevalent in Ireland. A new study by UCC's School of Medicine and Cork University Hospital revealed more than a third of players at school level said they would play on with a headache from a minor concussion. We discuss this further with Alix Popham, former Wales International and Founder of the Head for Change charity.

A recent development has turned much of what scientists believed about the origin of feathers on its head. We are delighted to speak with Prof. Maria McNamara and Dr Valentina Rossi from UCC's School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences about an amazing fossil discovery in France.

Sermon from August 10, 2025 by Brenda Tooley.

Three people of colour who came to Ireland as migrants talk to Dearbhail following the recent spate of racially motivated attacks. Writer, Cauvery Madhavan, Dr Aman De Sondy, Senior Lecturer at UCC and Natasha Maimba, UNICEF Youth Ambassador spoke about their own experiences with racism, their love for Ireland and their hope for the future.

Robert DiNozzi is Chief Growth Officer at Second Wind Consultants, where he leads brand strategy and key relationships with lenders, investors, intermediaries, and other stakeholders. He oversees corporate strategy, industry partnerships, and the development of growth models across banking, private equity, M&A, and franchising. DiNozzi also directs branding, content, and media efforts to convey Second Wind's mission of preserving and unlocking business value. Before joining Second Wind, DiNozzi spent 15 years in Hollywood as a film producer and executive, working with major studios like Warner Brothers, Disney, and Paramount. He produced the box-office hit Flightplan, founded a market-leading non-theatrical distribution company, and pioneered tech products, including a top-ranked voice-enabled productivity app and an accessible gaming platform. His experience spans creative development, structured finance, and global dealmaking. An expert in strategic storytelling, DiNozzi is known for aligning teams around compelling narratives that drive engagement and growth. He's led major brand collaborations with companies like Microsoft and BMW, and teaches the art of pitching story at the university level, combining his backgrounds in entertainment and business to inspire powerful communication.   During the show we discussed: Second Wind's core mission in action Using the UCC to resolve debt Preserving value during business distress How Second Wind differs from bankruptcy Turning unsustainable businesses profitable Industry adaptability of Second Wind's solutions Getting out of over-leveraged SBA loans Measuring long-term impact on businesses Common misconceptions about business turnaround   Resources: https://secondwindconsultants.com/  

While summer is the time when the evenings get longer, the sky is bluer and of course it's when the jellyfish are out in the Irish water. So, what jellyfish float in the Irish sea and are they as terrifying as some of us think? To tell us all was Dr Tom Doyle is a Lecturer in Zoology in the School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences at UCC.

On this episode 181 I am delighted to be joined by Ronan Conway. An expert in team cohesion and connection with clients including sports teams, corporates and the irish prison system.  At one point, he had it all on paper — a degree from UCC, a promising hurling career with Cork, and a good job in the tech industry. But beneath the surface, he was drifting. We explore the journey from feeling lost to finding his way and becoming a key figure in the high-performance sport space.We unpack what it really means to be a facilitator, how to create powerful environments for growth, and why the best teams already have the answers — they just need help finding them. From big career pivots, the art of facilitation, to Lambay Island retreats and lessons from Jack McCaffrey & Declan Darcy, this is a wide-ranging conversation on connection, team culture, and coaching from the inside out.Whether you're a coach, player, or just curious about the human side of high performance, this episode offers insights, stories, and practical advice to help build stronger teams — and more self-aware leaders.Read more about his work with the prison system and his programme the circle https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/gaelic-games/2024/11/09/no-hurler-on-the-ditch-ronan-conway-a-firm-believer-in-the-promise-of-team-development/ Find Ronan here: https://www.ronanconway.ie/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/ronan-conway-3513042b/ Follow The Sideline Live Social Media channels: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://twitter.com/thesidelinelive⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/thesidelinelive/⁠⁠⁠ Recorded using Samson Q2 microphone, Edited using GarageBandIntro music, Watered Eyes by a talented Irish artist, Dillon Ward check him out ⁠⁠here⁠⁠ . If you are looking to set up your own podcast get in touch with the Prymal Productions team ⁠⁠⁠www.prymal.ie⁠⁠⁠ 

We all may be guilty of stalking people online, perhaps a new person is starting work or your friend has a new guy on the scene…But, what constitutes cyberstalking? According to a study in the UK, cyberstalking has surged by 70% since 2012...Catherine O'Sullivan Senior Lecturer in Law in UCC and Eve McDowell, Co-Founder of Stalking in Ireland join Andrea to discuss.

Lenny Reed from Dynomite Diesel stops by and talks with us about an overlooked part of building injectors. This detail can make or break efficiency and reliability. We also talk about his UCC truck and how we haven't seen anything like this before. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When Luke Murphy was growing up in rural Kerry, his father, a chemistry lecturer and environmental scientist, had a habit of turning even the simplest questions into full-scale lessons. "Ask about water testing and you'd get a deep dive into inorganic chemistry. It was fascinating, but also totally overwhelming," Murphy recalls. "It really made me think about how hard it is for experts to communicate the value of what they do." Waking Dreams from County Kerry Years later, that early insight would become the foundation for Waking Dreams Media, the Dublin-based video production company Murphy founded in January 2021. What began as a solo venture during the bleakest days of Ireland's third pandemic lockdown has since evolved into a growing team. Today, Waking Dreams Media delivers strategic video communications for some of the country's most technically complex businesses. But Murphy insists this is not a story about creative cinematography or camera gear. Instead, his team's work is about making complicated ideas easier to grasp. In particular, he's found a sweet spot in helping founders and teams who are building the kinds of products that don't yet have a ready-made market, or whose value can't be easily summed up in a single sentence. "These aren't off-the-shelf products," Murphy explains. "They're innovations, often emerging from research, deep tech, or life sciences. The challenge is not just showing what the product does, but helping someone who's never seen anything like it before understand why it matters." From the story of a gravestone to the story of a product Murphy's entrepreneurial streak showed up early. While completing a degree in Film and Media at UCC, he worked freelance behind the camera to support himself. He also co-founded a startup called The Story Of, a business that used QR codes to link gravestones with short videos about a person's life. The concept gained serious traction, even attracting media attention in Australia. But what Murphy took from that experience wasn't just media momentum. It was clarity about what he actually enjoyed. "I realised I was less interested in being the founder of a tech company than I was in helping tech companies communicate what they do," he says. "I loved the storytelling side, especially when it meant getting to grips with something complex and making it accessible." This impulse shaped the vision for Waking Dreams Media. Today, the company works with clients ranging from UCC Innovation and Blockchain Ireland to SMEs building smart RFID tools or pharmaceutical spinouts. Several of the startups they've supported have gone on to raise high six-figure funding rounds and land enterprise contracts. And they've often usd the videos in pitch decks and investor meetings. In one instance, a multinational client saw over 100,000 organic impressions from a single video campaign. "We start with messaging, not cameras" According to Murphy, the biggest misconception about video production is that it's simply about visuals. "People often assume video means showing up with a camera and recording whatever's there. But that's not how it works when you're dealing with complex B2B products. You can't explain a semiconductor startup the same way you'd shoot a wedding." Devising a strategy is the first stage of every project Murphy takes on. Murphy's team works with clients to clarify their core messaging, and ask questions. What changes in the customer's daily life if they use this product? What makes it different from what already exists? Why should a buyer or investor trust you? That messaging document becomes the foundation for everything else, not just the video but the website, sales deck and investor materials. It is a tool for internal alignment as much as external explanation. As Murphy puts it, "It's not about polishing a script. It's about revealing the story that already exists." Clients say the results speak for themselves. One founder described their Waking Dreams video as "...

Dive into the intricate world of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) with our latest episode. Designed for law students and professionals alike, this episode unpacks the UCC's foundational principles, focusing on its role in simplifying and modernizing commercial transactions. Explore key articles, from sales and secured transactions to negotiable instruments, and understand how the UCC fosters uniformity and flexibility in the ever-evolving landscape of commerce. Whether you're preparing for exams or seeking practical insights, this episode is your essential guide to mastering the UCC.Purpose of the UCC: The UCC aims to simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing commercial transactions. It also seeks to permit the continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage, and agreement, and to make the law uniform among various jurisdictions.Variation by Agreement: The effect of UCC provisions can be varied by agreement, unless otherwise specified. However, the obligations of good faith, diligence, reasonableness, and care cannot be disclaimed by agreement, though parties may determine the standards for performance if those standards are not manifestly unreasonable.Definition of "Agreement" vs. "Contract": "Agreement" refers to the actual bargain of the parties as found in their language or implied from circumstances like course of dealing or usage of trade. "Contract" is the total legal obligation that results from the parties' agreement as affected by the UCC and other applicable rules of law.Good Faith Obligation: Every contract or duty within Subtitle I imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement. This means parties must act with honesty in fact and, in the case of a merchant, observe reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.Formation of a Sales Contract: A contract for the sale of goods can be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties. Even if one or more terms are left open, a contract does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties intended to make one and there is a reasonably certain basis for an appropriate remedy.Statute of Frauds for Sales: A contract for the sale of personal property is generally not enforceable beyond $5,000 in amount or value unless there is a writing indicating a contract for sale, stating a price, reasonably identifying the subject matter, and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. This specific rule does not apply to contracts for the sale of goods covered by Article 2.Merchantability Warranty: If the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of the kind, an implied warranty of merchantability is given, meaning the goods must be fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used, among other requirements. This includes the serving of food or drink for value.Holder in Due Course Requirements: To be a holder in due course, a person must take the instrument for value, in good faith, and without notice that it is overdue, has been dishonored, or has any defense against or claim to it on the part of any person. These elements ensure the holder is a legitimate and unsuspecting party.Security Interest Definition: A "security interest" is defined as an interest in personal property or fixtures that secures payment or performance of an obligation. A seller's retention or reservation of title to goods after shipment or delivery to the buyer is limited in effect to a reservation of a security interest.Scope of Article 9 (Secured Transactions): Article 9 applies to any transaction intended to create a security interest in personal property or fixtures (including goods, documents, instruments, accounts, contract rights, chattel paper, general intangibles) and to any sale of accounts, contract rights, or chattel paper. It broadly covers various forms of security agreements.

Sermon from July 27, 2025 by Barb Huitema.

Sermon podcast from the Sunday, 7-27-25 worship service - Peace Memorial Church, UCC in Palos Park, IL. Luke 11:1-13Video Sermon preview"Prayer" sermon podcast7-27-25 Worship Service

These sources primarily explain legal doctrines that can excuse contractual performance when unforeseen events occur, especially in the absence of a force majeure clause. They define impossibility, where performance is literally unachievable, and impracticability, which applies when performance becomes excessively difficult or expensive. The concept of frustration of purpose is also discussed, excusing performance when the contract's fundamental reason is destroyed. These principles, rooted in common law and codified in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), emphasize that the excusing event must be unforeseeable and not a risk assumed by the parties, often requiring objective impossibility rather than mere financial hardship.Objective impossibility means no one could possibly perform the contract due to an unforeseen event (e.g., destruction of the subject matter). Subjective impossibility, in contrast, refers to a particular party's personal inability or difficulty to perform (e.g., lack of funds), which typically does not excuse performance.New York law applies impossibility narrowly, requiring performance to be objectively impossible. It was deemed easiest for "non-essential" businesses forced to shut down 100% due to Gov. Cuomo's orders, but harder for service businesses able to work remotely, considering the temporary nature and availability of alternative means.UCC § 2-615 states that a seller of goods is not in breach if performance is made "impracticable by the occurrence of a contingency the non-occurrence of which was a basic assumption" or by compliance with a government regulation. It is essentially a codification of impossibility for goods, often applied more broadly as commercial impracticability.A classic example of frustration of purpose is renting an apartment to view a specific parade, and then the parade is canceled. Performance (renting the apartment) is still possible, but the fundamental reason for entering the contract (watching the parade) has been destroyed, making the performance worthless to the renter.A force majeure clause allows parties to predefine specific events (like natural disasters or pandemics) that will excuse contractual performance. It clarifies and can expand or narrow the scope of excusable events beyond what common law doctrines like impossibility or impracticability might cover, explicitly allocating risk.Courts are reluctant to excuse performance due to mere cost increases because commercial contracts are generally intended to cover such foreseeable market risks. Only extraordinary and disproportionate cost increases, far outside the normal range and unforeseeable, might qualify as true impracticability.To successfully assert commercial impracticability, a party must demonstrate that a supervening, unforeseen event occurred after contract formation, that this event was not caused by them, that it made performance extremely difficult or burdensome, and that its non-occurrence was a basic assumption of the contract.Under Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 261, a party's duty to render performance is discharged if, after the contract is made, their performance is made impracticable without their fault by an event whose non-occurrence was a basic assumption on which the contract was made.The absence of a force majeure clause might strengthen an argument for common law defenses because it suggests that the parties did not explicitly allocate the risk of events like a pandemic in their contract. This leaves room for courts to apply general legal principles regarding unforeseen circumstances.Two key practical steps are to carefully examine existing contracts to understand obligations and any force majeure provisions, and to communicate proactively and regularly with contract partners about disruptions, potential limitations, and ongoing updates.

A breach of contract occurs when a party to a valid agreement fails to perform their obligations without a legal excuse. A party can commit a breach through non-performance, where they simply do not do what was promised, or through defective/partial performance, where they do something but not in the agreed-upon way.A minor breach is insignificant and allows the contract's overall purpose to be fulfilled, requiring the non-breaching party to continue performance while suing for damages. A material breach, however, is so severe it defeats the contract's essential purpose, allowing the non-breaching party to terminate the contract and sue for full damages.Anticipatory breach occurs when a party clearly indicates they will not perform their future obligations before performance is due. The non-breaching party can immediately treat it as a breach and sue, or they can wait for the performance date, though the latter carries the risk of losing the right to terminate if performance eventually occurs.A failure of condition is when a prerequisite event for a party's duty to perform does not occur, thus discharging that duty without the party being at fault. A breach of contract, conversely, involves a failure to perform a duty that was owed, indicating a wrongful non-compliance with the contract terms.Frustration of purpose excuses performance when an unforeseen event destroys the underlying reason for entering the contract, even if performance remains technically possible. For example, if you rent a room specifically to watch a parade, and the parade is canceled (frustration), it differs from the building burning down (impossibility).The Perfect Tender Rule (UCC § 2-601) states that a buyer can reject goods if they fail to conform to the contract in any respect. A common exception is the seller's right to cure (UCC § 2-508), allowing them to correct defective performance within the contract time or under certain conditions.The main objective of compensatory damages is to place the non-breaching party in the financial position they would have been in had the contract been fully performed. This aims to protect the injured party's expectation interest by covering losses incurred due to the breach.A court might order specific performance when monetary damages are inadequate to compensate the injured party, such as in cases involving unique goods (e.g., rare art, custom-made items) or real estate. This remedy ensures the aggrieved party receives the exact performance promised in the contract.The duty to mitigate damages requires the non-breaching party to take reasonable steps to minimize their losses after a breach occurs. This concept is important because it prevents economic waste and ensures that damages awarded are only for unavoidable losses, encouraging efficient behavior.Restitution, as a remedy for breach of contract, aims to restore any benefit conferred by the non-breaching party to the breaching party. It primarily prevents unjust enrichment, ensuring that a party does not unfairly profit from another's loss or from an unenforceable contract.

These sources collectively illuminate the Parol Evidence Rule, a fundamental principle in contract law that generally restricts the use of extrinsic evidence—such as prior oral agreements or discussions—to contradict or modify the terms of a final written contract. They explain that the rule aims to promote finality, certainty, and reliability in agreements, emphasizing the importance of integration, which refers to whether the written contract is considered the complete and exclusive expression of the parties' intent. While highlighting the rule's common law origins and its more liberal application under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) for goods, the texts also detail crucial exceptions allowing extrinsic evidence for purposes like proving contract defenses, clarifying ambiguities, establishing conditions precedent, or demonstrating subsequent modifications or collateral agreements. Ultimately, understanding this rule is crucial for drafting, interpreting, and litigating contracts, as it dictates what external information a court will consider when determining contractual obligations.The primary purpose of the Parol Evidence Rule is to ensure finality, certainty, and reliability in written contracts. It limits the admissibility of extrinsic evidence (oral or written statements made prior to or contemporaneous with the contract) that would contradict or modify the terms of a written agreement intended by the parties as a final expression."Parol evidence" refers to oral or written statements made before or at the time the written contract is executed. "Subsequent modifications," however, are agreements made after the written contract is executed, and the Parol Evidence Rule does not bar their admission.A "partially integrated" agreement is one where the writing is final as to some terms but not the entire agreement. A "completely integrated" agreement, conversely, is intended as the exclusive and complete expression of all terms, meaning it is the sole source of the contract's terms.A merger clause is a provision stating the contract is the complete and exclusive agreement. It serves as strong evidence of complete integration, often dispositive under the "four corners" approach, but in modern "contextual" jurisdictions, it may only create a rebuttable presumption and is not always conclusive.Under the "four corners rule," courts determine if a contract is integrated by examining only the language within the written document itself. They do not look to any external evidence to ascertain the parties' intent regarding the writing's finality or completeness.Under the UCC, for contracts involving the sale of goods, terms can be explained or supplemented by evidence of "trade usage" or "course of dealing," even if the writing is unambiguous and fully integrated. This approach is more liberal than common law, recognizing the importance of commercial context.Parol evidence would be admissible to prove a condition precedent if, for example, parties orally agreed that a written contract for a property sale would only become binding if a specific zoning permit was approved, even if this condition wasn't in the written contract. This evidence shows the contract's effectiveness was conditional.Evidence of fraud is an exception to the Parol Evidence Rule because the rule is intended to uphold valid contracts, not to shield fraudulent behavior. Allowing evidence of fraud permits courts to determine if the agreement itself is void or voidable due to fundamental impropriety.If a contract is "partially integrated," extrinsic evidence that contradicts the written terms is generally prohibited. However, evidence of consistent additional terms—those that supplement or add to the written terms without negating them—is typically allowed.For parties, the Parol Evidence Rule emphasizes the critical importance of careful drafting to ensure all essential terms are included in the written document. It also highlights the need for clear integra

These sources collectively explain the Statute of Frauds, a legal principle originating in English law that mandates certain types of contracts be in writing and signed to be enforceable, primarily to prevent fraud and misunderstandings. Key contract categories falling under this statute include agreements for real estate interests, those impossible to perform within one year, promises to pay another's debt (suretyship), contracts made in consideration of marriage, and, under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), sales of goods valued at $500 or more. While the statute generally requires a written memorandum identifying the subject matter, essential terms, and signed by the party to be charged, exceptions like partial performance (especially in land contracts), promissory estoppel (detrimental reliance), and admissions in court exist to prevent injustice. Modern legal developments, including the E-SIGN Act and UETA, acknowledge the validity of electronic signatures and communications in satisfying these writing requirements.What is the primary purpose of the Statute of Frauds? The primary purpose of the Statute of Frauds is to prevent fraud and perjury by requiring certain significant contracts to be evidenced by a writing. This ensures that serious agreements are properly documented, reducing the likelihood of false claims or misunderstandings about whether a contract was formed.Name and briefly describe two categories of contracts that fall under the common law Statute of Frauds. Two categories are contracts for the sale of land and contracts that cannot be performed within one year. Contracts for the sale of land include interests like mortgages, leases over a year, and easements. The one-year rule applies to agreements objectively impossible to complete within a year from their making.Explain the "one-year rule" as it applies to the Statute of Frauds. What is the key test courts use for this rule? The "one-year rule" states that contracts that cannot be fully performed within one year from their making must be in writing. The key test courts use is the "possibility test," meaning if there's even the slightest theoretical possibility the contract could be completed within a year, it falls outside the statute and doesn't require a writing.Under the UCC, what is the monetary threshold for contracts for the sale of goods to fall within the Statute of Frauds? Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), contracts for the sale of goods must be evidenced by a writing if the price of the goods is $500 or more. Oral agreements for goods valued at less than $500 are generally enforceable without exception.Describe the "part performance" doctrine as an exception to the Statute of Frauds for land contracts. The "part performance" doctrine allows for the enforcement of an oral contract for the sale of land despite the lack of a writing. This exception applies if the buyer has taken possession of the property, made significant improvements, or paid a substantial part of the purchase price, showing clear reliance on the oral agreement.What does it mean for a contract to be "unenforceable" due to the Statute of Frauds, as opposed to "void"? An "unenforceable" contract means that it cannot be proven or enforced in a court of law if the statute is raised as a defense, but it is not inherently invalid or "void." The underlying agreement still exists, but the legal system won't compel its performance due to the lack of required formalities.How can an email potentially satisfy the "writing" and "signature" requirements of the Statute of Frauds? An email can satisfy these requirements if it identifies the subject matter and essential terms, and if it contains an electronic signature or symbol (like a typed name, letterhead, or even an authenticated email address) that demonstrates the sender's intent to authenticate or sign the record. Modern acts like ESign confirm the validity of electronic signatures.Explain the "main purpose doctrine" as

A groundbreaking fossil discovery is challenging what scientists thought they knew about the origins of feathers. This comes as an international team of researchers uncovered a new species of reptile in France earlier in the week. Among those scientists are three paleontologists from University College Cork. Speaking to Pat on the discovery was Professor Maria McNamara, paleontologist from the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences at UCC.

These sources collectively explain the fundamental concept of consideration in American contract law, defining it as a bargained-for exchange of legal value necessary for a promise to be enforceable. They differentiate it from illusory promises or gifts, which lack a genuine mutual obligation, and clarify that courts generally do not assess the adequacy of consideration as long as it exists and is not a sham, sometimes using the metaphor of a "peppercorn". The texts also highlight exceptions to the consideration requirement, notably promissory estoppel, which allows enforcement when one party reasonably relies on another's promise to their detriment, and address the pre-existing duty rule, detailing how modifications to existing contracts typically require new consideration or fall under specific exceptions like those found in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).A gratuitous promise is a one-sided promise made without any expectation of a return promise or performance and is generally not legally enforceable. A contractual promise, however, is part of a bargained-for exchange, involving mutual consideration, and is therefore legally enforceable.Consideration is a thing of legal value (money, property, an act, or forbearance) promised or exchanged between parties that binds them together in a contractual agreement. It serves as the mutual exchange that makes a promise enforceable by law.Courts generally do not inquire into the adequacy or relative value of consideration, focusing instead on whether any legal value was genuinely bargained for. For instance, paying a "peppercorn" (a nominal amount) for something of much greater value can still be valid consideration if it was truly exchanged.Past consideration is not valid because it refers to something given or performed before the contract is established; it was not bargained for or induced by the promisor's current promise. For consideration to be valid, it must be current or future and mutually agreed upon.The pre-existing duty rule states that a promise to perform an act that one is already legally obligated to do cannot serve as consideration for a new promise. Its main purpose is to prevent coercion and ensure that any new agreement involves a genuine, new exchange of value.An illusory promise is a commitment that appears to be a promise but does not actually bind the promisor to any specific action or obligation, often because they retain unfettered discretion. It fails to create a binding contract due to a lack of mutual obligation and real commitment.The purpose of the doctrine of promissory estoppel is to allow for the enforcement of a promise, even without traditional consideration, when injustice can only be avoided by doing so. It protects parties who have reasonably relied on a promise to their detriment.Three essential elements for promissory estoppel are: a clear and definite promise, reasonable reliance on that promise by the promisee, and a substantial detriment incurred by the promisee as a result of that reliance.Under promissory estoppel, courts typically award reliance damages, which aim to restore the aggrieved party to the position they were in before the promise was made. Expectation damages, which would give the benefit of the bargain, are generally not available, as the doctrine focuses on preventing injustice due to reliance rather than enforcing the full promise.The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), particularly for sales of goods (UCC § 2-209), permits contract modifications without requiring new consideration, provided that the modifications are made in good faith. This offers a more flexible framework compared to traditional common law.

These sources collectively explain the foundational principles of contract law, particularly focusing on offer and acceptance. They detail the six-step process for drafting effective legal contracts, from determining substance and analyzing the audience to organizing, writing, designing, and evaluating the document. The texts also differentiate between unilateral and bilateral contracts, clarifying how each is formed and accepted, with special attention to scenarios like the "Battle of the Forms" and the mailbox rule. Furthermore, the documents highlight the legal requirements and best practices for contract clauses, emphasizing clarity, consistency, and adherence to legal standards to prevent disputes and ensure enforceability.The "objective theory of assent" means that courts interpret a party's intent to contract based on their outward words and conduct, not their hidden subjective thoughts. This is important because it allows parties to rely on external manifestations of agreement, promoting certainty and predictability in contract formation.An "offer" is a definite proposal showing a clear intention to be bound upon acceptance, like "I'll sell my car for $5,000." An "invitation to treat" is merely an invitation to negotiate or make an offer, such as goods displayed with a price tag in a store.In a "unilateral contract," acceptance occurs through the completion of a specific act or performance, with only one promise made (e.g., a reward for finding a lost pet). In contrast, a "bilateral contract" involves an exchange of promises between two parties, and acceptance is typically a promise in return.The "Mailbox Rule" states that an acceptance is effective the moment it is dispatched (e.g., mailed), rather than when received by the offeror. A key exception is that it generally does not apply to option contracts, where acceptance must be received to be effective.A "counteroffer" is a response to an offer that materially changes its original terms. Under common law's "mirror image rule," a counteroffer automatically terminates the original offer, meaning it can no longer be accepted.An offer can be terminated by operation of law due to the death or mental incapacity of either party, the destruction of the contract's subject matter, or if the subject matter becomes illegal before acceptance.Under UCC § 2-205, a "firm offer" can be made irrevocable if it is made by a merchant, in a signed writing, and assures that the offer will be held open for a stated period, not exceeding three months.The "Battle of the Forms" arises when parties exchange standard business forms with conflicting terms. UCC § 2-207 attempts to form a contract despite non-matching terms, unlike common law's "mirror image rule" which would treat such a response as a counteroffer.Recitals, or premises, state background information that forms the foundation for the contract. Their purposes include clarifying the parties' intent (e.g., reasons for entering the contract) and bolstering the importance of certain conditions.Proper punctuation is crucial in contract drafting because incorrect or misplaced punctuation can create ambiguity, leading to different interpretations of contract terms and potentially resulting in costly legal disputes, as demonstrated by cases involving significant financial losses due to a single comma.

People living in more disadvantaged communities had more negative attitudes towards immigration, in particular, disadvantaged communities where there was an increase in migrants since 2011. That's according to ESRI research published today. To discuss this research further was Senior Policy Officer at the ESRI and co-author of the report Keire Murphy and Dr Mike Murphy Senior Lecturer in Applied Psychology in UCC.

Sermon podcast from the Sunday, 7-20-25 worship service - Peace Memorial Church, UCC in Palos Park, IL. Luke 10:38-42Video Sermon preview"Work" sermon podcast7-20-25 Worship Service

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) has long been at the heart of India's constitutional and cultural tensions — hailed by some as a promise of equality, and critiqued by others as a tool of homogenisation. As the political momentum around the UCC gathers pace once again, with the recent Uttarakhand legislation in the news, this session revisits the debate from a constitutional, feminist, and social justice lens. What does “uniformity” mean in a deeply plural society? Can equality be achieved without erasing difference? How do we center the lived realities of women, religious minorities, Dalits, and Adivasis in this conversation? In this episode of BIC Talks, Raag Yadava, Madhu Bhushan will be in conversation with Alok Prasanna. This is an excerpt from a conversation that took place in the BIC premises in May 2025. Subscribe to the BIC Talks Podcast on your favorite podcast app! BIC Talks is available everywhere, including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Overcast, Audible, and Amazon Music.

My sermon at St. Michael's UCC in Marshallville, Ohio on July 20, 2025.Luke 10:38-42Music: "Reflections" by Wild Wonder

Austin Denny joins us today to recap UCC 2025, some challenges at the drag strip, changes that would help the event, and he answers the question - can a Powerstroke win it all at UCC? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

 Sermon podcast from the Sunday, 7-13-25 worship service - Peace Memorial Church, UCC in Palos Park, IL. Luke 10:25-37Video Sermon preview"Neighbors" sermon podcast7-13-25 Worship Service

The Great Irish Fossil Hunt is a new campaign run by the Science Department in University College Cork to encourage the Irish public to find fossils and to submit photographs of their discoveries. Terry Flanagan travelled to Co. Tipperary to view fossils with Maria McNamara, Professor of Palaeontology at UCC.

The topic of this podcast by Scott J. Burnham is UCC § 2-601, which is popularly known as the Perfect Tender Rule. Learning Outcomes On completion of the podcast, the student will be able to: 1. Recite the Perfect Tender Rule. 2. Apply the Perfect Render Rule in light of its limitations and exceptions. Visit […]

 Sermon podcast from the Sunday, 7-6-25 worship service - Peace Memorial Church, UCC in Palos Park, IL. 2 Kings 5:1-14Video Sermon preview"Surprising" Sermon podcast7-6-25 Worship Service

Join us for Day1 Episode 4189 featuring Rev. Dr. Jenny Shultz-Thomas, pastor of Countryside Community Church, UCC and part of the Tri-Faith Initiative in Omaha, Nebraska. In her sermon "Shake the Dust, Share the Peace," based on Luke 10:1-11, 16-20, she reflects on Jesus' call to share God's inclusive love without coercion, embracing spiritual abundance, and carrying peace into a divided world.

What happens when a group of women dare to follow their calling—despite being told they can't? In this compelling episode, Martha Tatarnic speaks with documentary filmmaker Margo Guernsey about her powerful film The Philadelphia Eleven, which tells the story of the first women ordained as Episcopal priests in 1974. Margo reflects on her own evolving faith journey, the deep spiritual nature of storytelling, and how this film reignited her connection with church and community. They discuss the courage and solidarity required to challenge institutional injustice, the cost of following one's calling, and why this story of ecclesiastical disobedience remains incredibly timely today. Whether you're in ministry or simply seeking inspiration to live more truthfully, this conversation reminds us why history matters—and how faith and justice must always walk hand in hand. Topics Covered: Margo's journey from UCC upbringing to filmmaking as spiritual practice The groundbreaking ordination of the Philadelphia Eleven Why solidarity, trust, and long-term relationship-building matter The cost of truth-telling and challenging church hierarchy Representation, visibility, and the power of embodied leadership The importance of storytelling in shaping faith and future How churches can resist silence and engage with courage Hosting a screening and engaging your community with the film   Margo Guernsey (she/her) is a documentary Director/Producer, impact strategist, and founder of Time Travel Productions LLC. Her films include Councilwoman (America ReFramed 2019), No Time To Fail (America Reframed 2023), The Philadelphia Eleven (impact distribution 2023 - 2024 topping 500 screenings, American Public Television 2025), and THE OFFICIALS (TIME Studios, 2024). Prior to film, Margo worked as a union organizer, non-profit development director, and Spanish/English translator. Margo's work has received support from Chicken & Egg Pictures, ITVS, Catapult Film Fund, GoodPitch, Perspective Fund, Ford Foundation, Surdna Foundation, and LEF Moving Image Fund among others; and she was a Film Independent Fast Track Fellow. She speaks both Spanish and English and holds an MFA in Film (University of Miami), an MA in History (UMass Amherst), and a BA in History (Brown University). Margo teaches producing as affiliated faculty at Emerson College and is a member of the Documentary Producers Alliance and Global Impact Producers Alliance.   Mentioned Resources:

You have to see Patrick Brown's Cummins he is bringing to his first run at the UCC event. Chris sat down and talked with him about what he expects to see it do. Patrick is no stranger to competitions with having his eyes one time set on the Diesel Power Challenge nd having competed at King Of The Streets, he's ready to throw down at the UCC. Humble, determined, and doing wild things with such a cool Cummins, we are stoked to see what Patrick accomplishes this weekend!

One of the show's favorites is back, Robby Garcia joins Chris to discuss what he expects of his truck at this years UCC! This will be his 4th time competiting, a seasoned vet, and continually improving his results; these factors position Robby to finish quite high this year. One thing we know will happen, Robby will have a blast and bring that vibe to the whole field. Good luck, Robby!

Chris has Mike Brown on this episode! Mike has ditched the mega cab in favor of a leaner regular cab, will it push him to the top? Mike left last year's UCC finishing third in his inaugural run at the competition. New Cummins, big win? We are excited to find out. Thanks for joining the show, Mike!