Podcasts about maiolo

(00:00:00) The Geek Matrix Pod reviews DC's Weekly Comics Releases This week, that's: (00:33:10)#BirdsOfPrey 13 (00:38:58)#JusticeSocietyOfAmerica 11 (00:52:00)#PoisonIvy 25 (01:07:00)#AbsolutePower 3 (01:24:39)#Batman 152 Plus our Honorable Mentions covered each week by Josh! Here's the run down – Trinity Special: World's Finest #1 – 6/10 Just a collected reprint of the Trinity Backups that have been in Wonder Woman recently. There's no difference. The Penguin #12 – I don't like this title at all, so I won't grade it. Doesn't seem fair. Plastic Man No More! #1 – 8.5/10 Lins, Edgar, and Maiolo make a really good team for this particular story, and Cantwell crafted a Plastic Man story that I am already hooked on, one issue in. The Boy Wonder #5 – 8.25/10 – What a great ending for the 5 issue series. The art isn't my usual preference and it took half an issue to get used to. But beside that, I truly enjoyed this series, and the ride it took Damian on. And the cool little spin that it put on We Are Robin, Damian edition. #DCAllIn #ComicsAreForEveryone #ComicsAreGreat #MakeComicsGreatAgain #AbsolutePower #DCComics #comics #comicbooks #GeekMatrix #TheGeekMatrix #TGM #GekkMatrixPod --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thegeekmatrixcomics/support

Meet Steph Maiolo, the Football Operations Manager at the Sydney Swans Football Club.Over the past 6 years, she's climbed her way up the ladder at the Swans, starting as an intern, to a coordinator, to now a manager! Lots to look out for including how to work in football operations and the skills you need to do so.If you enjoy this chat with Steph, come along to the Sydney SportsGrad Meetup on May 16th, where she'll be one of our guest speakers! You can grab a ticket via our website linked below.Make sure you tune in, it's a great one.We cover:(00:42) Who is Steph Maiolo?(01:40) Welcome to the SportsGrad Podcast! Here's what's happening inside the Community…(04:47) Welcome to the podcast Steph!(05:50) Quick-fire questions(11:28) What does it look like being a Football Operations Manager in the AFL?(12:14) How Steph went from an intern at the Swans through to a Manager(13:46) What was Steph doing that made her stand out for promotions?(15:41) Advice Steph would have for interns looking to stand out(16:22) Steph's favourite parts of working in football operations(17:33) What a match day looks like versus a regular day and how Steph stays organised(20:24) What does the off-season look like for those working in the AFL?(22:30) Challenges in Steph's role(24:04) Times Steph has had to navigate mistakes at work(25:19) The top skills needed to be a Football Operations Manager(28:17) If you want to work in a similar role, this is what Steph recommends you do…(31:14) Advice for networking events---Additional episodes you may enjoy:#193 - Suzie Rhydderch (Sydney Swans) - How to be a psychologist in the AFL#244 - Katie Staniforth (Cricket Australia) - Event Manager at Cricket Australia---Want a weekly dose of career inspo? Get industry stories, upcoming events, and the latest sports jobs in your inbox each Friday.

Silvia Iaccarino dialoga con Pino Maiolo autore di "Mio figlio tra bullismo e cyberbullismo. Vittima, bullo o complice?"https://amzn.to/3QTIqP5 Il volume rimanda a casi concreti ed esperienze di vita vissuta e – attraverso una serie di narrazioni e box – aiuta le famiglie a orientarsi nella complessità dei fenomeni di bullismo e cyberbullismo, ad affrontare le problematiche connesse e a sostenere il proprio figlio che ne sia vittima e/o a intervenire in modo adeguato qualora sia bullo o complice. È suddiviso in tre sezioni: Conoscere: descrive con taglio divulgativo origine le caratteristiche dei due fenomeni; Capire: inquadra le situazioni problematiche vissute dai ragazzi coinvolti in tali dinamiche e aiuta le famiglie a comprenderle alla luce delle conoscenze acquisite; Intervenire: fornisce suggerimenti e indicazioni operative su come e cosa fare per aiutare concretamente il proprio figlio, spiegando ai genitori come sostenerlo e come intervenire, se e quando rivolgersi alle autorità e chiedere il sostegno degli specialisti. È utile per: conoscere le problematiche legate ai fenomeni, sempre più diffusi, di bullismo e cyberbullismo, e sapere come intervenire se ne sono coinvolti i propri figli.

The Swordsman Hero approached the small child and knelt down beside her. She turned to look up to him, and handed him a small doll. It was crudely constructed, made from scraps of cloth with broken buttons for eyes. It appeared to be stuffed with various bits of grass and weeds. He handed it back to the girl, and she gently placed it upon a freshly disturbed plot of dirt. Looking around, the Swordsman Hero could see that the area was dotted with similar patches of dirt in  various stages of regrowth. He didn't have to ask the child what this was - a small cemetery. There were no headstones or markers of any kind, only small dolls dotting each plot of dirt. There were at least a dozen of them, though the area was in enough disarray that it would be hard to know for sure.   Thanks a ton to Robert for coming on the show! Go check out his book using the links below: The Book With No Answers on Amazon His Instagram   Also be sure to check out our website and sponsors:   Our Website   Get hydrated 2X faster with great flavor and with 3X the electrolytes with Liquid IV. Get 20% off when you go to Liquid I.V. 's website and use code DJP15 at checkout   Use my special code: DJP15 to save 30% off your first month of any Zencastr paid plan.  Go to zencastr.com/pricing and use code DJP15 and you'll get 30% off your first month of any Zencastr paid plan.

Join us for this episode of Learning Uncut as we delve into learning transformation with Bendigo Bank's Capability team leaders, Caroline Petha, Jo Doody, and David Maiolo. They discuss their individual responsibilities and collaborative strategies in capability, learning design, ecosystem and learning culture development. Their work demonstrates the value of integrated efforts across teams, and the role of partnerships with business leaders and external partners. Though longer than our usual episodes, it's worth the time to appreciate the complementary work of each team. Timestamps are available below if you'd like to go straight to a specific topic.   Introduction of Organisation and Capability Team: 0:01:56 Learning Experience at Bendigo Bank 0:11:21 Building the Case for Change: 0:15:20 Ben U Learning Strategy: 0:21:46 Shifts in Capability and Leadership: 0:24:34 Shifts in Learning Design: 0:36:06 Shifts in Content 0:45:13 Design Team Changes: 0:49:03 Shifts in Learning Ecosystem and Culture: 0:50:30 Critical Success Factors and Tips: 1:07:09   Host: Michelle Ockers Transcript and related resources: https://learninguncut.global/podcast/125/ Podcast information and more episodes: https://learninguncut.global/podcast/

Entertainment promoter Mario Maiolo joins Graham Cornes.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this episode, Kelly chats with Susan Maiolo Angelicola, EM, on her work as a nurse practitioner and what it's like to live with multiple sclerosis.

¿Les parece difícil la programación de software? ¿Dificilísima? ¿Lo ven cómo una habilidad hipercompleja reservada solo para los ingenieros en computación? En los últimos años, el desarrollo de software se ha vuelto mucho más sencillo, gracias a herramientas como el Low Code, o “Poco Código”. A diferencia del lenguaje de programación tradicional, las plataformas de Low Code minimizan al extremo el uso de códigos complejos, lo que permite que personas sin habilidades en el desarrollo de software puedan diseñar aplicaciones ellas mismas. Precisamente, de Low Code, sus ventajas, y su potencial para el desarrollo del software en Uruguay discutimos hoy en una nueva edición de La Mesa TIC junto a: Aníbal Gonda consultor en informática, «evangelizador técnico» de GeneXus; Sofía Maiolo, ingeniera en computación, Customer Experience Manager en WorkWithPlus; Santiago Lowy, coordinador de ventas en Interamericana de Cómputos.

This episode is the first in our special mini-series, Access to Care. Many times on this program, we talk about the importance of therapy. However, we acknowledge that therapy is a privilege, and is not always accessible or affordable to those that need it most. I've invited some of my previous guests to talk about access to care: where to find affordable therapy, and the tools and resources that are available, should therapy not be accessible.Today we welcome back therapist Lisa Gajda. Lisa was a professional dancer for over 30 years, appearing in 18 Broadway shows. She specializes in anxiety, depression, trauma, performing artists, parenting and relational issues.Lisa and I discuss the importance of community and she offers some guidelines for artists who are interested in creating their own support groups, in addition to resources for low-cost therapy.

Another day of nonsense and some helpful pointers.

--->Support the Coalition for the Poudre River Watershed!!  Email Megan at Megan@poudrewatershed.org and Follow them on Social Media! @poudrewatershed--->Support the Poudre River Fest! Visit Website and click on the link "Get Involved"  and follow them on Social Media! @poudreriverfest--->Attend the Festival! Save the Date! August 21st at New Belgium Brewery!--->Shout out to Lara Smedley. The Poudre River Event Coordinator with her business Smedley Events Meet Megan Maiolo-Heath-Grew up in Monument, Colorado and always loved the outdoors-Attended CU Boulder for her Undergrad in Psychology-Attended University of Colorado Denver for her Masters in  Public Administration -Became a raft guide on Clear Creek. Where she developed her confidence, obsession and love for rivers-After working in Ecuador, she realized there that she wanted to fight for the river -Lives in Ft. Collins now MEGAN'S NON PROFIT HISTORY/CONNECTION-7 years ago Megan started working for Trees, Water & People Non Profit before landing at CPRW (Coalition for Poudre River Watershed)-2012/2013 Hyde Park Fire happened which lead to creating the "Coalition for the Hyde Park Fire" to address post fire mitigation and restoration work. Trees, Water and People was the fiscal sponsor for that until they became the official Coalition for the Poudre River Watershed 501c3.-She started as a board member for CPRW, later consulted and then at the end of 2020, she applied and got the Communications Outreach and Marketing Manager Position. GET TO KNOW THE POUDRE RIVER WATERSHED-Headwaters are at Poudre Lake in Rocky Mountain National Park-3 Major Tributaries but the main stem comes out of RMNP-Large area covers about 1900 sq/miles-Upper Poudre has 75 miles of Wild & Scenic River-Lower Poudre is designated as a National Heritage Area (for its importance in the development of the Western Water Law)-Flows into the South Platte Basin (Greeley,CO)-Covers so much terrain (Head waters up in the High Mountains of RMNP, to Poudre Canyon to Ft. Collins, to plains through Winsor, into Greeley and ending in the Platte River)-Hard Working River providing so much water to agriculture and 300,000 people in the front rangeStory behind the name- French Trappers caught in a snow storm back in the early 1800's. Stashed a bunch their stuff including their gunpowder...hence the name..."Cache Le Poudre". "Stash the Powder".Native American History- was a meeting place for several tribes in the west. Learn more at PoudreHeritage.orgOther Non Profits helping protect the Poudre RiverNational Heritage Area- Managed by the Poudre Heritage AllianceSave the Poudre- Focused on water infrastructure, dams and reservoirsCoalition for the Poudre River Watershed (CPRW)- Focused on  collaborative approach to Watershed management and Forest and River RestorationCPRW-Mission to improve and maintain the ecological health of the Poudre River Watershed through "Community Collaboration" REQUEST FROM THE CPRWLearn more about your local watershed and water law!Get involved! Support CPRW with your money, time and more education!Practice Water ConservationInstall a rain barrelChange out part of your lawn for xeriscape (check in and see if you can apply for a rebate!)Low flow toilets and shower heads (check in and see if you can apply for a rebate!)Collaborate & Support the CPRW or the Poudre River with:In Kind DonationsDonateVolunteerGive Percentage of Profits for one day, one product, or a new product POUDRE RIVER FESTIVAL HISTORY & DETAILSFirst festival was May of 2014 after the massive floods of 2013. Bring people together to better understand the river, celebrate and raise funds for flood, forest and river restoration projects.3 GOALSEducationCelebrationRestorationsMeet the 6 Organizations that created the Poudre River Fest!Bird Conservancy of the RockiesNational Association for InterpretationWildlands Restoration VolunteersCache Le Poudre River National Heritage AreaCity Of Fort CollinsCoalition for the Poudre River Festival (CPRW)*Huge Shout out to all of the Breweries in Colorado taking action and getting involved!2021 HYBRID Poudre River Fest ScheduleMay 7th -- Virtual Event focused around WildlifeJune 25th -- Virtual Event focused on RecreationJuly 15th -- Virtual & In Person Event focused around Every Day WaterAugust 21st -- Big Celebration in person event at New Belgium Brewery

In this episode of the Build Hatch Podcast, we had the opportunity to hear from Dave Maiolo from Roda Developments In this episode we talk about: Dave grew up in the Eastern suburbs of Melbourne born to Italian immigrant parents. He was surrounded by trades and always had aspirations to become a tradie. Straight out of school, Dave started his carpentry apprenticeship but it wasn't until 10 years later that he really found alignment in his values for the industry. Dave's experience as a carpenter and the natural progression into building when he stepped out with a friend to start his own business. Carpentry vs building and the process of attaining a building licence in Victoria. Being good at your craft vs the other side of business management. Knowing your contracts, staged payments and the numbers are all critical to a builder's success. How the name ‘Roda Developments' came about and the first renovation they completed, which led to the boom of their business. Every build and every contract is an opportunity to learn and develop. Dave is a problem solver – and always uses feedback from clients and staff to come up with solutions to move forward in business. A typical project for Roda Developments. Educational marketing and how this process works to bring in new clients. Design, yield and pricing. The challenge of 30% of all tenders coming to fruition and the work required to break ground on a site. Due-diligence within the construction industry and the changes Dave would like to see across the industry as a whole. The value in nurturing relationships between design and build with the client as this process can take up to two years. Outside of work, Dave is spoilt for choice when it comes to his free time and enjoys spending time with friends and family. The future for Roda Developments. The constant need to pivot in business and re-adjust, which has become evident for Dave post-Covid. A day in the life of Dave as the Director of Roda Developments. The law of attraction and trusting the team that you have built. Dave reflects on his business journey and the trust he has for his staff which, has become a core part of his business model. Sit back and enjoy this helpful interview with Dave Maiolo from Roda Developments.   Links: Roda Developments Follow @roda_developments on Instagram Build Hatch Follow @buildhatch on Instagram 

How can I handle a breakup? How can I grow in confidence after a relationship ends? How can I let myself trust a good guy? How do you avoid guys using you? How do you learn boundaries? Answering your questions with the gal who helped me navigate so many of my relationships + breakups, my college best friend! Ready to level up your life? Because I got you, girl!  Connect with me!  Instagram: @alaina.hamade  https://www.instagram.com/alaina.hamade/   Website: alainahamade.com

In Salotto con Federica Maiolo | Lei è fotografa appassionata di Travel&Food. In questa intervista si racconta e, insieme, abbiamo condiviso pensieri comuni. Abbiamo parlato di passioni che si trasformano in business e della fotografia che serve per trasmette emozioni. Ispirare è essenziale per creare una scatto che ti faccia quasi percepire il profumo di una ricetta appena sfornata, immaginare il vento che ti accarezza i capelli durante uno dei suoi viaggi. Caratteristiche fondamentali che Federica utilizza per creare lo storytelling attraverso il suo canale digitale. Verità, stile preciso, cura nei dettagli è ciò che ci suggerisce di seguire per creare un feed coerente e condividere la propria filosofia.

Entrevue avec Ilario Maiolo, candidat du Parti conservateur dans Saint-Léonard-Saint-Michel : Sa circonscription est un château fort fédéral libéral.

Jessica Maiolo has been fighting up the ranks in paintball since 2007. Not only has she had to overcome the challenge of playing competitive paintball at a higher level but trying to compete (and be taken seriously as an athlete) in a sport mostly played by men. Enjoy!

Divorce is not for the faint of heart, so Dannie shares the plan that she created to take on the world after her divorce. She shares the secret of this plan to help with some of the other big transformations in her life. Plus, Liberty Weyandt from the Lynch Law Group. She concentrates her practice in family matters including divorce, equitable distribution, support, child custody and pre and post nuptial agreements. Liberty discusses what to be prepared for after your divorce.

Monday's Marvel is 'Old Man Logan 8' by Jeff Lemire, Andrea Sorrentino, and Marcelo Maiolo from Marvel. @TwoPlai discusses the Old Man Logan character's history and present (and future?), and a single-issue story that touches on trauma and relationships. @TwoPlai is recording late at night, so apologies that he sounds so sleepy and slow. But this is just the start of a week focused on works of Jeff Lemire. Let's dig deep!

Oculus makes the Rift VR headset available for pre-order at a surprising price. Is this the glorious VR future we were promised?WRUPToddStar Wars: The Old RepublicDuaneStar Wars: The Old RepublicXenoblade Chronicles XTokaidoTabletop EpisodeTakenokoTabletop EpisodeLinksMore on Steam Christmas Day security leakOculus Rift VR headset available for pre-order for $599You can pre-order Oculus Rift without paying up frontRazer’s Open Source Virtual Reality programHTC Vive VR headset to let you see the world aorund you while you playNvidia: VR requires 7x the processing power of a normal gameRazer announces Stargazer camera as “world’s most advanced webcam”Razer Seirēn Pro studio microphoneTorment: Tides of Numenera hits Steam Early Access this monthStar Wars Battlefront sells 12M in 60 daysDecade-old PC game Galactic Civilizations II gets a huge patchMLG assets bought by Activision BlizzardAssassin’s Creed taking 2016 off, next entry to be a prequel set in ancient EgyptJoe “linefreeze” Maiolo’s YouTube ChannelLet’s Play Assassin’s Creed playlistStar Citizen’s Star Marine FPS will be “more lethal” than Call of Duty

It’s time for another backstage interview with the panelists from the Potluck Audio Conference. This time I interviewed Alex Maiolo and Rob Christensen. Alex Maiolo Alex Maiolo owns Chapel Hill, N.C.’s, Seriously Adequate Studio, which is another way of saying “he took over half of the garage, and filled it with the gear he’s amassed... The post Interview With Recording Engineers and Producers Alex Maiolo and Rob Christensen appeared first on Audio Issues.

In Cry Havoc: How the Arms Race Drove the World to War, 1931-1941 (Basic Books, 2010), Joe Maiolo proposes (I want to write “demonstrates,” but please read the book and judge for yourself) two remarkably insightful theses. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. The first is that the primary result of the disaster that was World War I was not the even great catastrophe that was World War II, but rather a new kind of state and one that is still with us. Maiolo’s argument goes something like this. World War I caught the Great Powers flatfooted. They did not believe they were going to fight a protracted war; they thought things would be done quickly and with the men and materiel on hand. Instead, things bogged down and a massive war of attrition–something they had no experience with–ensued. In order to fight this war successfully (meaning to stay in it for the long term), the Great Powers had to fundamentally restructure their economies, something no state had ever had to do, at least in modern time. In a word, the government took over production and distribution in order to optimize the flow of arms and supplies. Many statesmen found this move objectionable, but all believed it necessary. Once the war was over, they remained convinced that the only way to deter their enemies and, in the case they couldn’t, fend them off, was to retain control of large segments of the economy and plan to take control of even larger segments. The ability to make war on a World-War-I scale and for a World-War-I duration had to be built into the “plan.” Thus the leaders of all the Great Powers effectively militarized their economies in anticipation of the next great conflict. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. Maiolo’s second insight has to do with the origins of World War II itself. Most historians agree that it was “Hitler’s War.” He planned it, he armed Germany for it, and he started it. Maiolo doesn’t necessarily disagree with this position, but he offers an interesting counter-factual that puts it in a different light. What if there had been no Hitler? Would the statesmen of Europe have avoided a second great conflict? Maiolo suggests not, and for an interesting reason. Several of the Great Powers–the Soviets and Germans in particular–were very dissatisfied with the settlement at Versailles. They would not stand pat in any case. Given what we know about Soviet and German plans for and movements toward rearmament before 1933 (thanks, it should be said, to Maiolo’s own research), it is not clear that leaders other Stalin or Hitler might not have done exactly what Stalin and Hitler did in 1939, that is, take what they felt was rightfully “theirs” by force of arms. And as Maiolo shows, they would have had plenty of arms at their disposal in any case. The Europeans were going to go at again; it was simply a question of when. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Cry Havoc: How the Arms Race Drove the World to War, 1931-1941 (Basic Books, 2010), Joe Maiolo proposes (I want to write “demonstrates,” but please read the book and judge for yourself) two remarkably insightful theses. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. The first is that the primary result of the disaster that was World War I was not the even great catastrophe that was World War II, but rather a new kind of state and one that is still with us. Maiolo’s argument goes something like this. World War I caught the Great Powers flatfooted. They did not believe they were going to fight a protracted war; they thought things would be done quickly and with the men and materiel on hand. Instead, things bogged down and a massive war of attrition–something they had no experience with–ensued. In order to fight this war successfully (meaning to stay in it for the long term), the Great Powers had to fundamentally restructure their economies, something no state had ever had to do, at least in modern time. In a word, the government took over production and distribution in order to optimize the flow of arms and supplies. Many statesmen found this move objectionable, but all believed it necessary. Once the war was over, they remained convinced that the only way to deter their enemies and, in the case they couldn’t, fend them off, was to retain control of large segments of the economy and plan to take control of even larger segments. The ability to make war on a World-War-I scale and for a World-War-I duration had to be built into the “plan.” Thus the leaders of all the Great Powers effectively militarized their economies in anticipation of the next great conflict. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. Maiolo’s second insight has to do with the origins of World War II itself. Most historians agree that it was “Hitler’s War.” He planned it, he armed Germany for it, and he started it. Maiolo doesn’t necessarily disagree with this position, but he offers an interesting counter-factual that puts it in a different light. What if there had been no Hitler? Would the statesmen of Europe have avoided a second great conflict? Maiolo suggests not, and for an interesting reason. Several of the Great Powers–the Soviets and Germans in particular–were very dissatisfied with the settlement at Versailles. They would not stand pat in any case. Given what we know about Soviet and German plans for and movements toward rearmament before 1933 (thanks, it should be said, to Maiolo’s own research), it is not clear that leaders other Stalin or Hitler might not have done exactly what Stalin and Hitler did in 1939, that is, take what they felt was rightfully “theirs” by force of arms. And as Maiolo shows, they would have had plenty of arms at their disposal in any case. The Europeans were going to go at again; it was simply a question of when. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Cry Havoc: How the Arms Race Drove the World to War, 1931-1941 (Basic Books, 2010), Joe Maiolo proposes (I want to write “demonstrates,” but please read the book and judge for yourself) two remarkably insightful theses. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. The first is that the primary result of the disaster that was World War I was not the even great catastrophe that was World War II, but rather a new kind of state and one that is still with us. Maiolo’s argument goes something like this. World War I caught the Great Powers flatfooted. They did not believe they were going to fight a protracted war; they thought things would be done quickly and with the men and materiel on hand. Instead, things bogged down and a massive war of attrition–something they had no experience with–ensued. In order to fight this war successfully (meaning to stay in it for the long term), the Great Powers had to fundamentally restructure their economies, something no state had ever had to do, at least in modern time. In a word, the government took over production and distribution in order to optimize the flow of arms and supplies. Many statesmen found this move objectionable, but all believed it necessary. Once the war was over, they remained convinced that the only way to deter their enemies and, in the case they couldn’t, fend them off, was to retain control of large segments of the economy and plan to take control of even larger segments. The ability to make war on a World-War-I scale and for a World-War-I duration had to be built into the “plan.” Thus the leaders of all the Great Powers effectively militarized their economies in anticipation of the next great conflict. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. Maiolo’s second insight has to do with the origins of World War II itself. Most historians agree that it was “Hitler’s War.” He planned it, he armed Germany for it, and he started it. Maiolo doesn’t necessarily disagree with this position, but he offers an interesting counter-factual that puts it in a different light. What if there had been no Hitler? Would the statesmen of Europe have avoided a second great conflict? Maiolo suggests not, and for an interesting reason. Several of the Great Powers–the Soviets and Germans in particular–were very dissatisfied with the settlement at Versailles. They would not stand pat in any case. Given what we know about Soviet and German plans for and movements toward rearmament before 1933 (thanks, it should be said, to Maiolo’s own research), it is not clear that leaders other Stalin or Hitler might not have done exactly what Stalin and Hitler did in 1939, that is, take what they felt was rightfully “theirs” by force of arms. And as Maiolo shows, they would have had plenty of arms at their disposal in any case. The Europeans were going to go at again; it was simply a question of when. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Cry Havoc: How the Arms Race Drove the World to War, 1931-1941 (Basic Books, 2010), Joe Maiolo proposes (I want to write “demonstrates,” but please read the book and judge for yourself) two remarkably insightful theses. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. The first is that the primary result of the disaster that was World War I was not the even great catastrophe that was World War II, but rather a new kind of state and one that is still with us. Maiolo’s argument goes something like this. World War I caught the Great Powers flatfooted. They did not believe they were going to fight a protracted war; they thought things would be done quickly and with the men and materiel on hand. Instead, things bogged down and a massive war of attrition–something they had no experience with–ensued. In order to fight this war successfully (meaning to stay in it for the long term), the Great Powers had to fundamentally restructure their economies, something no state had ever had to do, at least in modern time. In a word, the government took over production and distribution in order to optimize the flow of arms and supplies. Many statesmen found this move objectionable, but all believed it necessary. Once the war was over, they remained convinced that the only way to deter their enemies and, in the case they couldn’t, fend them off, was to retain control of large segments of the economy and plan to take control of even larger segments. The ability to make war on a World-War-I scale and for a World-War-I duration had to be built into the “plan.” Thus the leaders of all the Great Powers effectively militarized their economies in anticipation of the next great conflict. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. Maiolo’s second insight has to do with the origins of World War II itself. Most historians agree that it was “Hitler’s War.” He planned it, he armed Germany for it, and he started it. Maiolo doesn’t necessarily disagree with this position, but he offers an interesting counter-factual that puts it in a different light. What if there had been no Hitler? Would the statesmen of Europe have avoided a second great conflict? Maiolo suggests not, and for an interesting reason. Several of the Great Powers–the Soviets and Germans in particular–were very dissatisfied with the settlement at Versailles. They would not stand pat in any case. Given what we know about Soviet and German plans for and movements toward rearmament before 1933 (thanks, it should be said, to Maiolo’s own research), it is not clear that leaders other Stalin or Hitler might not have done exactly what Stalin and Hitler did in 1939, that is, take what they felt was rightfully “theirs” by force of arms. And as Maiolo shows, they would have had plenty of arms at their disposal in any case. The Europeans were going to go at again; it was simply a question of when. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Cry Havoc: How the Arms Race Drove the World to War, 1931-1941 (Basic Books, 2010), Joe Maiolo proposes (I want to write “demonstrates,” but please read the book and judge for yourself) two remarkably insightful theses. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. The first is that the primary result of the disaster that was World War I was not the even great catastrophe that was World War II, but rather a new kind of state and one that is still with us. Maiolo’s argument goes something like this. World War I caught the Great Powers flatfooted. They did not believe they were going to fight a protracted war; they thought things would be done quickly and with the men and materiel on hand. Instead, things bogged down and a massive war of attrition–something they had no experience with–ensued. In order to fight this war successfully (meaning to stay in it for the long term), the Great Powers had to fundamentally restructure their economies, something no state had ever had to do, at least in modern time. In a word, the government took over production and distribution in order to optimize the flow of arms and supplies. Many statesmen found this move objectionable, but all believed it necessary. Once the war was over, they remained convinced that the only way to deter their enemies and, in the case they couldn’t, fend them off, was to retain control of large segments of the economy and plan to take control of even larger segments. The ability to make war on a World-War-I scale and for a World-War-I duration had to be built into the “plan.” Thus the leaders of all the Great Powers effectively militarized their economies in anticipation of the next great conflict. The military industrial complex was born three decades before Eisenhower put a name on it. Maiolo’s second insight has to do with the origins of World War II itself. Most historians agree that it was “Hitler’s War.” He planned it, he armed Germany for it, and he started it. Maiolo doesn’t necessarily disagree with this position, but he offers an interesting counter-factual that puts it in a different light. What if there had been no Hitler? Would the statesmen of Europe have avoided a second great conflict? Maiolo suggests not, and for an interesting reason. Several of the Great Powers–the Soviets and Germans in particular–were very dissatisfied with the settlement at Versailles. They would not stand pat in any case. Given what we know about Soviet and German plans for and movements toward rearmament before 1933 (thanks, it should be said, to Maiolo’s own research), it is not clear that leaders other Stalin or Hitler might not have done exactly what Stalin and Hitler did in 1939, that is, take what they felt was rightfully “theirs” by force of arms. And as Maiolo shows, they would have had plenty of arms at their disposal in any case. The Europeans were going to go at again; it was simply a question of when. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

O filme solo sobre o mutante mais famoso dos X-Men, Wolverine, chegou aos cinemas do mundo. E aí? O que aconteceu? Valeu a pena esperar? Não seria melhor lançar um X-Men 4? Será que dessa vez a Fox se redimiu e lançou um produto bom nos cinemas? Conversamos sobre tudo isso nessa PARTE 2 desse Duplex. Se você não assistiu ao filme, saiba que essa parte está repleta de spoilers. Jurandir Filho (o Juras), Thiago Siqueira (o Siqueira), Thiago Sampaio (o Sampaio, substituindo o Ph) e Maiolo (desenhista e colorista) se reuniram novamente, desta vez para bater um papo sobre X-Men Origens: Wolverine. O resultado desse filme acarretará em um não lançamento do projeto solo sobre Magneto? E a polêmica da cópia vazada? Tire as suas garras e saiba tudo aqui!

O filme solo sobre o mutante mais famoso dos X-Men, Wolverine, chegou aos cinemas do mundo. E aí? O que aconteceu? Valeu a pena esperar? Não seria melhor lançar um X-Men 4? Será que dessa vez a Fox se redimiu e lançou um produto bom nos cinemas? Conversamos sobre tudo isso nessa PARTE 2 desse Duplex. Se você não assistiu ao filme, saiba que essa parte está repleta de spoilers. Jurandir Filho (o Juras), Thiago Siqueira (o Siqueira), Thiago Sampaio (o Sampaio, substituindo o Ph) e Maiolo (desenhista e colorista) se reuniram novamente, desta vez para bater um papo sobre X-Men Origens: Wolverine. O resultado desse filme acarretará em um não lançamento do projeto solo sobre Magneto? E a polêmica da cópia vazada? Tire as suas garras e saiba tudo aqui!

Wolverine é o personagem mais famoso do universo X-Men. Isso é fato! O mutante com instintos animais aguçados, com garras de adamantium e com poder de cura bastante acelerado, apesar de toda a sua arrogância, consegue despertar uma simpatia enorme entre os fãs da série. Com a estréia de X-Men Origens: Wolverine nos cinemas, muitos se perguntam como nasceu o personagem. Respondemos tudo aqui em mais edição do Duplex, onde comentamos sobre os quadrinhos na PARTE 1. Já a PARTE 2 é totalmente focada no filme. Por isso, prepare-se para ver o filme conferindo a PARTE 1 e depois que assistir ao filme, escute a PARTE 2. Jurandir Filho (o Juras), Raphael Santos (o Ph), Thiago Siqueira (o Siqueira) e Maiolo (desenhista e colorista) se reuniram e conversaram sobre a origem do personagem. Qual a primeira revista que ele apareceu? Por que ele não se lembra do seu passado? O que é Arma X? Quem é o seu principal inimigo? Por que a sua personalidade é uma das suas características mais marcantes? Quem criou? Qual o cenário atual? Tudo isso e muito mais.

Wolverine é o personagem mais famoso do universo X-Men. Isso é fato! O mutante com instintos animais aguçados, com garras de adamantium e com poder de cura bastante acelerado, apesar de toda a sua arrogância, consegue despertar uma simpatia enorme entre os fãs da série. Com a estréia de X-Men Origens: Wolverine nos cinemas, muitos se perguntam como nasceu o personagem. Respondemos tudo aqui em mais edição do Duplex, onde comentamos sobre os quadrinhos na PARTE 1. Já a PARTE 2 é totalmente focada no filme. Por isso, prepare-se para ver o filme conferindo a PARTE 1 e depois que assistir ao filme, escute a PARTE 2. Jurandir Filho (o Juras), Raphael Santos (o Ph), Thiago Siqueira (o Siqueira) e Maiolo (desenhista e colorista) se reuniram e conversaram sobre a origem do personagem. Qual a primeira revista que ele apareceu? Por que ele não se lembra do seu passado? O que é Arma X? Quem é o seu principal inimigo? Por que a sua personalidade é uma das suas características mais marcantes? Quem criou? Qual o cenário atual? Tudo isso e muito mais.