Podcasts about gonda

De discussie over vrouwen in de SGP gaat een nieuwe ronde in. Op de partijdag van de SGP wordt er gestemd over een voorstel om het beginselprogramma aan te passen, zodat er meer ruimte komt voor vrouwen binnen de partij. Presentator Margje Fikse gaat hierover in gesprek met: * Gonda van den Heuvel, oud-voorzitter SGP-vrouwengroep Sapientia * Wim van Duijn, SGP-raadslid Katwijk

In a candid conversation with Paul Holmes, chief impact officer Michael Gonda discussed the past year at McDonald's from inflation to the election, from E.coli and DEI.

Dr. Gary Null provides a commentary on "Universal  Healthcare"       Universal Healthcare is the Solution to a Broken Medical System Gary Null, PhD Progressive Radio Network, March 3, 2025 For over 50 years, there has been no concerted or successful effort to bring down medical costs in the American healthcare system. Nor are the federal health agencies making disease prevention a priority. Regardless whether the political left or right sponsors proposals for reform, such measures are repeatedly defeated by both parties in Congress. As a result, the nation's healthcare system remains one of the most expensive and least efficient in the developed world. For the past 30 years, medical bills contributing to personal debt regularly rank among the top three causes of personal bankruptcy. This is a reality that reflects not only the financial strain on ordinary Americans but the systemic failure of the healthcare system itself. The urgent question is: If President Trump and his administration are truly seeking to reduce the nation's $36 trillion deficit, why is there no serious effort to reform the most bloated and corrupt sector of the economy? A key obstacle is the widespread misinformation campaign that falsely claims universal health care would cost an additional $2 trillion annually and further balloon the national debt. However, a more honest assessment reveals the opposite. If the US adopted a universal single-payer system, the nation could actually save up to $20 trillion over the next 10 years rather than add to the deficit. Even with the most ambitious efforts by people like Elon Musk to rein in federal spending or optimize government efficiency, the estimated savings would only amount to $500 billion. This is only a fraction of what could be achieved through comprehensive healthcare reform alone. Healthcare is the largest single expenditure of the federal budget. A careful examination of where the $5 trillion spent annually on healthcare actually goes reveals massive systemic fraud and inefficiency. Aside from emergency medicine, which accounts for only 10-12 percent of total healthcare expenditures, the bulk of this spending does not deliver better health outcomes nor reduce trends in physical and mental illness. Applying Ockham's Razor, the principle that the simplest solution is often the best, the obvious conclusion is that America's astronomical healthcare costs are the direct result of price gouging on an unimaginable scale. For example, in most small businesses, profit margins range between 1.6 and 2.5 percent, such as in grocery retail. Yet the pharmaceutical industrial complex routinely operates on markup rates as high as 150,000 percent for many prescription drugs. The chart below highlights the astronomical gap between the retail price of some top-selling patented pharmaceutical medications and their generic equivalents. Drug Condition Patent Price (per unit) Generic Price Estimated Manufacture Cost Markup Source Insulin (Humalog) Diabetes $300 $30 $3 10,000% Rand (2021) EpiPen Allergic reactions $600 $30 $10 6,000% BMJ (2022) Daraprim Toxoplasmosis $750/pill $2 $0.50 150,000% JAMA (2019) Harvoni Hepatitis C $94,500 (12 weeks) $30,000 $200 47,000% WHO Report (2018) Lipitor Cholesterol $150 $10 $0.50 29,900% Health Affairs (2020) Xarelto Blood Thinner $450 $25 $1.50 30,000% NEJM (2020) Abilify Schizophrenia $800 (30 tablets) $15 $2 39,900% AJMC (2019) Revlimid Cancer $16,000/mo $450 $150 10,500% Kaiser Health News (2021) Humira Arthritis $2,984/dose $400 $50 5,868% Rand (2021) Sovaldi Hepatitis C $1,000/pill $10 $2 49,900% JAMA (2021) Xolair Asthma $2,400/dose $300 $50 4,800% NEJM (2020) Gleevec Leukemia $10,000/mo $350 $200 4,900% Harvard Public Health Review (2020) OxyContin Pain Relief $600 (30 tablets) $15 $0.50 119,900% BMJ (2022) Remdesivir Covid-19 $3,120 (5 doses) N/A $10 31,100% The Lancet (2020) The corruption extends far beyond price gouging. Many pharmaceutical companies convince federal health agencies to fund their basic research and drug development with taxpayer dollars. Yet when these companies bring successful products to market, the profits are kept entirely by the corporations or shared with the agencies or groups of government scientists. On the other hand, the public, who funded the research, receives no financial return. This amounts to a systemic betrayal of the public trust on a scale of hundreds of billions of dollars annually. Another significant contributor to rising healthcare costs is the widespread practice of defensive medicine that is driven by the constant threat of litigation. Over the past 40 years, defensive medicine has become a cottage industry. Physicians order excessive diagnostic tests and unnecessary treatments simply to protect themselves from lawsuits. Study after study has shown that these over-performed procedures not only inflate costs but lead to iatrogenesis or medical injury and death caused by the medical  system and practices itself. The solution is simple: adopting no-fault healthcare coverage for everyone where patients receive care without needing to sue and thereby freeing doctors from the burden of excessive malpractice insurance. A single-payer universal healthcare system could fundamentally transform the entire industry by capping profits at every level — from drug manufacturers to hospitals to medical equipment suppliers. The Department of Health and Human Services would have the authority to set profit margins for medical procedures. This would ensure that healthcare is determined by outcomes, not profits. Additionally, the growing influence of private equity firms and vulture capitalists buying up hospitals and medical clinics across America must be reined in. These equity firms prioritize profit extraction over improving the quality of care. They often slash staff, raise prices, and dictate medical procedures based on what will yield the highest returns. Another vital reform would be to provide free medical education for doctors and nurses in exchange for five years of service under the universal system. Medical professionals would earn a realistic salary cap to prevent them from being lured into equity partnerships or charging exorbitant rates. The biggest single expense in the current system, however, is the private health insurance industry, which consumes 33 percent of the $5 trillion healthcare budget. Health insurance CEOs consistently rank among the highest-paid executives in the country. Their companies, who are nothing more than bean counters, decide what procedures and drugs will be covered, partially covered, or denied altogether. This entire industry is designed to place profits above patients' lives. If the US dismantled its existing insurance-based system and replaced it with a fully reformed national healthcare model, the country could save $2.7 trillion annually while simultaneously improving health outcomes. Over the course of 10 years, those savings would amount to $27 trillion. This could wipe out nearly the entire national debt in a short time. This solution has been available for decades but has been systematically blocked by corporate lobbying and bipartisan corruption in Washington. The path forward is clear but only if American citizens demand a system where healthcare is valued as a public service and not a commodity. The national healthcare crisis is not just a fiscal issue. It is a crucial moral failure of the highest order. With the right reforms, the nation could simultaneously restore its financial health and deliver the kind of healthcare system its citizens have long deserved. American Healthcare: Corrupt, Broken and Lethal Richard Gale and Gary Null Progressive Radio Network, March 3, 2025 For a nation that prides itself on being the world's wealthiest, most innovative and technologically advanced, the US' healthcare system is nothing less than a disaster and disgrace. Not only are Americans the least healthy among the most developed nations, but the US' health system ranks dead last among high-income countries. Despite rising costs and our unshakeable faith in American medical exceptionalism, average life expectancy in the US has remained lower than other OECD nations for many years and continues to decline. The United Nations recognizes healthcare as a human right. In 2018, former UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon denounced the American healthcare system as "politically and morally wrong." During the pandemic it is estimated that two to three years was lost on average life expectancy. On the other hand, before the Covid-19 pandemic, countries with universal healthcare coverage found their average life expectancy stable or slowly increasing. The fundamental problem in the U.S. is that politics have been far too beholden to the pharmaceutical, HMO and private insurance industries. Neither party has made any concerted effort to reign in the corruption of corporate campaign funding and do what is sensible, financially feasible and morally correct to improve Americans' quality of health and well-being.   The fact that our healthcare system is horribly broken is proof that moneyed interests have become so powerful to keep single-payer debate out of the media spotlight and censored. Poll after poll shows that the American public favors the expansion of public health coverage. Other incremental proposals, including Medicare and Medicaid buy-in plans, are also widely preferred to the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare mess we are currently stuck with.   It is not difficult to understand how the dismal state of American medicine is the result of a system that has been sold out to the free-market and the bottom line interests of drug makers and an inflated private insurance industry. How advanced and ethically sound can a healthcare system be if tens of millions of people have no access to medical care because it is financially out of their reach?  The figures speak for themselves. The U.S. is burdened with a $41 trillion Medicare liability. The number of uninsured has declined during the past several years but still lingers around 25 million. An additional 30-35 million are underinsured. There are currently 65 million Medicare enrollees and 89 million Medicaid recipients. This is an extremely unhealthy snapshot of the country's ability to provide affordable healthcare and it is certainly unsustainable. The system is a public economic failure, benefiting no one except the large and increasingly consolidated insurance and pharmaceutical firms at the top that supervise the racket.   Our political parties have wrestled with single-payer or universal healthcare for decades. Obama ran his first 2008 presidential campaign on a single-payer platform. Since 1985, his campaign health adviser, the late Dr. Quentin Young from the University of Illinois Medical School, was one of the nation's leading voices calling for universal health coverage.  During a private conversation with Dr. Young shortly before his passing in 2016, he conveyed his sense of betrayal at the hands of the Obama administration. Dr. Young was in his 80s when he joined the Obama campaign team to help lead the young Senator to victory on a promise that America would finally catch up with other nations. The doctor sounded defeated. He shared how he was manipulated, and that Obama held no sincere intention to make universal healthcare a part of his administration's agenda. During the closed-door negotiations, which spawned the weak and compromised Affordable Care Act, Dr. Young was neither consulted nor invited to participate. In fact, he told us that he never heard from Obama again after his White House victory.   Past efforts to even raise the issue have been viciously attacked. A huge army of private interests is determined to keep the public enslaved to private insurers and high medical costs. The failure of our healthcare is in no small measure due to it being a fully for-profit operation. Last year, private health insurance accounted for 65 percent of coverage. Consider that there are over 900 private insurance companies in the US. National Health Expenditures (NHE) grew to $4.5 trillion in 2022, which was 17.3 percent of GDP. Older corporate rank-and-file Democrats and Republicans argue that a single-payer or socialized medical program is unaffordable. However, not only is single-payer affordable, it will end bankruptcies due to unpayable medical debt. In addition, universal healthcare, structured on a preventative model, will reduce disease rates at the outset.    Corporate Democrats argue that Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a positive step inching the country towards complete public coverage. However, aside from providing coverage to the poorest of Americans, Obamacare turned into another financial anchor around the necks of millions more. According to the health policy research group KFF, the average annual health insurance premium for single coverage is $8,400 and almost $24,000 for a family. In addition, patient out-of-pocket costs continue to increase, a 6.6% increase to $471 billion in 2022. Rather than healthcare spending falling, it has exploded, and the Trump and Biden administrations made matters worse.    Clearly, a universal healthcare program will require flipping the script on the entire private insurance industry, which employed over half a million people last year.  Obviously, the most volatile debate concerning a national universal healthcare system concerns cost. Although there is already a socialized healthcare system in place -- every federal legislator, bureaucrat, government employee and veteran benefits from it -- fiscal Republican conservatives and groups such as the Koch Brothers network are single-mindedly dedicated to preventing the expansion of Medicare and Medicaid. A Koch-funded Mercatus analysis made the outrageous claim that a single-payer system would increase federal health spending by $32 trillion in ten years. However, analyses and reviews by the Congressional Budget Office in the early 1990s concluded that such a system would only increase spending at the start; enormous savings would quickly offset it as the years pass. In one analysis, "the savings in administrative costs [10 percent of health spending] would be more than enough to offset the expense of universal coverage."    Defenders of those advocating for funding a National Health Program argue this can primarily be accomplished by raising taxes to levels comparable to other developed nations. This was a platform Senator Bernie Sanders and some of the younger progressive Democrats in the House campaigned on. The strategy was to tax the highest multimillion-dollar earners 60-70 percent. Despite the outrage of its critics, including old rank-and-file multi-millionaire Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, this is still far less than in the past. During the Korean War, the top tax rate was 91 percent; it declined to 70 percent in the late 1960s. Throughout most of the 1970s, those in the lowest income bracket were taxed at 14 percent. We are not advocating for this strategy because it ignores where the funding is going, and the corruption in the system that is contributing to exorbitant waste.    But Democratic supporters of the ACA who oppose a universal healthcare plan ignore the additional taxes Obama levied to pay for the program. These included surtaxes on investment income, Medicare taxes from those earning over $200,000, taxes on tanning services, an excise tax on medical equipment, and a 40 percent tax on health coverage for costs over the designated cap that applied to flexible savings and health savings accounts. The entire ACA was reckless, sloppy and unnecessarily complicated from the start.    The fact that Obamacare further strengthened the distinctions between two parallel systems -- federal and private -- with entirely different economic structures created a labyrinth of red tape, rules, and wasteful bureaucracy. Since the ACA went into effect, over 150 new boards, agencies and programs have had to be established to monitor its 2,700 pages of gibberish. A federal single-payer system would easily eliminate this bureaucracy and waste.    A medical New Deal to establish universal healthcare coverage is a decisive step in the correct direction. But we must look at the crisis holistically and in a systematic way. Simply shuffling private insurance into a federal Medicare-for-all or buy-in program, funded by taxing the wealthiest of citizens, would only temporarily reduce costs. It will neither curtail nor slash escalating disease rates e. Any effective healthcare reform must also tackle the underlying reasons for Americans' poor state of health. We cannot shy away from examining the social illnesses infecting our entire free-market capitalist culture and its addiction to deregulation. A viable healthcare model would have to structurally transform how the medical economy operates. Finally, a successful medical New Deal must honestly evaluate the best and most reliable scientific evidence in order to effectively redirect public health spending.    For example, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a former Obama healthcare adviser, observed that AIDS-HIV measures consume the most public health spending, even though the disease "ranked 75th on the list of diseases by personal health expenditures." On the other hand, according to the American Medical Association, a large percentage of the nation's $3.4 trillion healthcare spending goes towards treating preventable diseases, notably diabetes, common forms of heart disease, and back and neck pain conditions. In 2016, these three conditions were the most costly and accounted for approximately $277 billion in spending. Last year, the CDC announced the autism rate is now 1 in 36 children compared to 1 in 44 two years ago. A retracted study by Mark Blaxill, an autism activist at the Holland Center and a friend of the authors, estimates that ASD costs will reach $589 billion annually by 2030. There are no signs that this alarming trend will reverse and decline; and yet, our entire federal health system has failed to conscientiously investigate the underlying causes of this epidemic. All explanations that might interfere with the pharmaceutical industry's unchecked growth, such as over-vaccination, are ignored and viciously discredited without any sound scientific evidence. Therefore, a proper medical New Deal will require a systemic overhaul and reform of our federal health agencies, especially the HHS, CDC and FDA. Only the Robert Kennedy Jr presidential campaign is even addressing the crisis and has an inexpensive and comprehensive plan to deal with it. For any medical revolution to succeed in advancing universal healthcare, the plan must prioritize spending in a manner that serves public health and not private interests. It will also require reshuffling private corporate interests and their lobbyists to the sidelines, away from any strategic planning, in order to break up the private interests' control over federal agencies and its revolving door policies. Aside from those who benefit from this medical corruption, the overwhelming majority of Americans would agree with this criticism. However, there is a complete lack of national trust that our legislators, including the so-called progressives, would be willing to undertake such actions.    In addition, America's healthcare system ignores the single most critical initiative to reduce costs - that is, preventative efforts and programs instead of deregulation and closing loopholes designed to protect the drug and insurance industries' bottom line. Prevention can begin with banning toxic chemicals that are proven health hazards associated with current disease epidemics, and it can begin by removing a 1,000-plus toxins already banned in Europe. This should be a no-brainer for any legislator who cares for public health. For example, Stacy Malkan, co-founder of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, notes that "the policy approach in the US and Europe is dramatically different" when it comes to chemical allowances in cosmetic products. Whereas the EU has banned 1,328 toxic substances from the cosmetic industry alone, the US has banned only 11. The US continues to allow carcinogenic formaldehyde, petroleum, forever chemicals, many parabens (an estrogen mimicker and endocrine hormone destroyer), the highly allergenic p-phenylenediamine or PBD, triclosan, which has been associated with the rise in antibiotic resistant bacteria, avobenzone, and many others to be used in cosmetics, sunscreens, shampoo and hair dyes.   Next, the food Americans consume can be reevaluated for its health benefits. There should be no hesitation to tax the unhealthiest foods, such as commercial junk food, sodas and candy relying on high fructose corn syrup, products that contain ingredients proven to be toxic, and meat products laden with dangerous chemicals including growth hormones and antibiotics. The scientific evidence that the average American diet is contributing to rising disease trends is indisputable. We could also implement additional taxes on the public advertising of these demonstrably unhealthy products. All such tax revenue would accrue to a national universal health program to offset medical expenditures associated with the very illnesses linked to these products. Although such tax measures would help pay for a new medical New Deal, it may be combined with programs to educate the public about healthy nutrition if it is to produce a reduction in the most common preventable diseases. In fact, comprehensive nutrition courses in medical schools should be mandatory because the average physician receives no education in this crucial subject.  In addition, preventative health education should be mandatory throughout public school systems.   Private insurers force hospitals, clinics and private physicians into financial corners, and this is contributing to prodigious waste in money and resources. Annually, healthcare spending towards medical liability insurance costs tens of billions of dollars. In particular, this economic burden has taxed small clinics and physicians. It is well past the time that physician liability insurance is replaced with no-fault options. Today's doctors are spending an inordinate amount of money to protect themselves. Legions of liability and trial lawyers seek big paydays for themselves stemming from physician error. This has created a culture of fear among doctors and hospitals, resulting in the overly cautious practice of defensive medicine, driving up costs and insurance premiums just to avoid lawsuits. Doctors are forced to order unnecessary tests and prescribe more medications and medical procedures just to cover their backsides. No-fault insurance is a common-sense plan that enables physicians to pursue their profession in a manner that will reduce iatrogenic injuries and costs. Individual cases requiring additional medical intervention and loss of income would still be compensated. This would generate huge savings.    No other nation suffers from the scourge of excessive drug price gouging like the US. After many years of haggling to lower prices and increase access to generic drugs, only a minute amount of progress has been made in recent years. A 60 Minutes feature about the Affordable Care Act reported an "orgy of lobbying and backroom deals in which just about everyone with a stake in the $3-trillion-a-year health industry came out ahead—except the taxpayers.” For example, Life Extension magazine reported that an antiviral cream (acyclovir), which had lost its patent protection, "was being sold to pharmacies for 7,500% over the active ingredient cost. The active ingredient (acyclovir) costs only 8 pennies, yet pharmacies are paying a generic maker $600 for this drug and selling it to consumers for around $700." Other examples include the antibiotic Doxycycline. The price per pill averages 7 cents to $3.36 but has a 5,300 percent markup when it reaches the consumer. The antidepressant Clomipramine is marked up 3,780 percent, and the anti-hypertensive drug Captopril's mark-up is 2,850 percent. And these are generic drugs!    Medication costs need to be dramatically cut to allow drug manufacturers a reasonable but not obscene profit margin. By capping profits approximately 100 percent above all costs, we would save our system hundreds of billions of dollars. Such a measure would also extirpate the growing corporate misdemeanors of pricing fraud, which forces patients to pay out-of-pocket in order to make up for the costs insurers are unwilling to pay.    Finally, we can acknowledge that our healthcare is fundamentally a despotic rationing system based upon high insurance costs vis-a-vis a toss of the dice to determine where a person sits on the economic ladder. For the past three decades it has contributed to inequality. The present insurance-based economic metrics cast millions of Americans out of coverage because private insurance costs are beyond their means. Uwe Reinhardt, a Princeton University political economist, has called our system "brutal" because it "rations [people] out of the system." He defined rationing as "withholding something from someone that is beneficial." Discriminatory healthcare rationing now affects upwards to 60 million people who have been either priced out of the system or under insured. They make too much to qualify for Medicare under Obamacare, yet earn far too little to afford private insurance costs and premiums. In the final analysis, the entire system is discriminatory and predatory.    However, we must be realistic. Almost every member of Congress has benefited from Big Pharma and private insurance lobbyists. The only way to begin to bring our healthcare program up to the level of a truly developed nation is to remove the drug industry's rampant and unnecessary profiteering from the equation.     How did Fauci memory-hole a cure for AIDS and get away with it?   By Helen Buyniski   Over 700,000 Americans have died of AIDS since 1981, with the disease claiming some 42.3 million victims worldwide. While an HIV diagnosis is no longer considered a certain death sentence, the disease looms large in the public imagination and in public health funding, with contemporary treatments running into thousands of dollars per patient annually.   But was there a cure for AIDS all this time - an affordable and safe treatment that was ruthlessly suppressed and attacked by the US public health bureaucracy and its agents? Could this have saved millions of lives and billions of dollars spent on AZT, ddI and failed HIV vaccine trials? What could possibly justify the decision to disappear a safe and effective approach down the memory hole?   The inventor of the cure, Gary Null, already had several decades of experience creating healing protocols for physicians to help patients not responding well to conventional treatments by the time AIDS was officially defined in 1981. Null, a registered dietitian and board-certified nutritionist with a PhD in human nutrition and public health science, was a senior research fellow and Director of Anti-Aging Medicine at the Institute of Applied Biology for 36 years and has published over 950 papers, conducting groundbreaking experiments in reversing biological aging as confirmed with DNA methylation testing. Additionally, Null is a multi-award-winning documentary filmmaker, bestselling author, and investigative journalist whose work exposing crimes against humanity over the last 50 years has highlighted abuses by Big Pharma, the military-industrial complex, the financial industry, and the permanent government stay-behind networks that have come to be known as the Deep State.   Null was contacted in 1974 by Dr. Stephen Caiazza, a physician working with a subculture of gay men in New York living the so-called “fast track” lifestyle, an extreme manifestation of the gay liberation movement that began with the Stonewall riots. Defined by rampant sexual promiscuity and copious use of illegal and prescription drugs, including heavy antibiotic use for a cornucopia of sexually-transmitted diseases, the fast-track never included more than about two percent of gay men, though these dominated many of the bathhouses and clubs that defined gay nightlife in the era. These patients had become seriously ill as a result of their indulgence, generally arriving at the clinic with multiple STDs including cytomegalovirus and several types of herpes and hepatitis, along with candida overgrowth, nutritional deficiencies, gut issues, and recurring pneumonia. Every week for the next 10 years, Null would counsel two or three of these men - a total of 800 patients - on how to detoxify their bodies and de-stress their lives, tracking their progress with Caiazza and the other providers at weekly feedback meetings that he credits with allowing the team to quickly evaluate which treatments were most effective. He observed that it only took about two years on the “fast track” for a healthy young person to begin seeing muscle loss and the recurrent, lingering opportunistic infections that would later come to be associated with AIDS - while those willing to commit to a healthier lifestyle could regain their health in about a year.    It was with this background that Null established the Tri-State Healing Center in Manhattan in 1980, staffing the facility with what would eventually run to 22 certified health professionals to offer safe, natural, and effective low- and no-cost treatments to thousands of patients with HIV and AIDS-defining conditions. Null and his staff used variations of the protocols he had perfected with Caiazza's patients, a multifactorial patient-tailored approach that included high-dose vitamin C drips, intravenous ozone therapy, juicing and nutritional improvements and supplementation, aspects of homeopathy and naturopathy with some Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ayurvedic practices. Additional services offered on-site included acupuncture and holistic dentistry, while peer support groups were also held at the facility so that patients could find community and a positive environment, healing their minds and spirits while they healed their bodies.   “Instead of trying to kill the virus with antiretroviral pharmaceuticals designed to stop viral replication before it kills patients, we focused on what benefits could be gained by building up the patients' natural immunity and restoring biochemical integrity so the body could fight for itself,” Null wrote in a 2014 article describing the philosophy behind the Center's approach, which was wholly at odds with the pharmaceutical model.1   Patients were comprehensively tested every week, with any “recovery” defined solely by the labs, which documented AIDS patient after patient - 1,200 of them - returning to good health and reversing their debilitating conditions. Null claims to have never lost an AIDS patient in the Center's care, even as the death toll for the disease - and its pharmaceutical standard of care AZT - reached an all-time high in the early 1990s. Eight patients who had opted for a more intensive course of treatment - visiting the Center six days a week rather than one - actually sero-deconverted, with repeated subsequent testing showing no trace of HIV in their bodies.   As an experienced clinical researcher himself, Null recognized that any claims made by the Center would be massively scrutinized, challenging as they did the prevailing scientific consensus that AIDS was an incurable, terminal illness. He freely gave his protocols to any medical practitioner who asked, understanding that his own work could be considered scientifically valid only if others could replicate it under the same conditions. After weeks of daily observational visits to the Center, Dr. Robert Cathcart took the protocols back to San Francisco, where he excitedly reported that patients were no longer dying in his care.    Null's own colleague at the Institute of Applied Biology, senior research fellow Elana Avram, set up IV drip rooms at the Institute and used his intensive protocols to sero-deconvert 10 patients over a two-year period. While the experiment had been conducted in secret, as the Institute had been funded by Big Pharma since its inception half a century earlier, Avram had hoped she would be able to publish a journal article to further publicize Null's protocols and potentially help AIDS patients, who were still dying at incredibly high rates thanks to Burroughs Wellcome's noxious but profitable AZT. But as she would later explain in a 2019 letter to Null, their groundbreaking research never made it into print - despite meticulous documentation of their successes - because the Institute's director and board feared their pharmaceutical benefactors would withdraw the funding on which they depended, given that Null's protocols did not involve any patentable or otherwise profitable drugs. When Avram approached them about publication, the board vetoed the idea, arguing that it would “draw negative attention because [the work] was contrary to standard drug treatments.” With no real point in continuing experiments along those lines without institutional support and no hope of obtaining funding from elsewhere, the department she had created specifically for these experiments shut down after a two-year followup with her test subjects - all of whom remained alive and healthy - was completed.2   While the Center was receiving regular visits by this time from medical professionals and, increasingly, black celebrities like Stokely Carmichael and Isaac Hayes, who would occasionally perform for the patients, the news was spreading by word of mouth alone - not a single media outlet had dared to document the clinic that was curing AIDS patients for free. Instead, they gave airtime to Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, who had for years been spreading baseless, hysteria-fueling claims about HIV and AIDS to any news outlet that would put him on. His claim that children could contract the virus from “ordinary household conduct” with an infected relative proved so outrageous he had to walk it back,3 and he never really stopped insisting the deadly plague associated with gays and drug users was about to explode like a nuclear bomb among the law-abiding heterosexual population. Fauci by this time controlled all government science funding through NIAID, and his zero-tolerance approach to dissent on the HIV/AIDS front had already seen prominent scientists like virologist Peter Duesberg stripped of the resources they needed for their work because they had dared to question his commandment: There is no cause of AIDS but HIV, and AZT is its treatment. Even the AIDS activist groups, which by then had been coopted by Big Pharma and essentially reduced to astroturfing for the toxic failed chemotherapy drug AZT backed by the institutional might of Fauci's NIAID,4 didn't seem to want to hear that there was a cure. Unconcerned with the irrationality of denouncing the man touting his free AIDS cure as an  “AIDS denier,” they warned journalists that platforming Null or anyone else rejecting the mainstream medical line would be met with organized demands for their firing.    Determined to breach the institutional iron curtain and get his message to the masses, Null and his team staged a press conference in New York, inviting scientists and doctors from around the world to share their research on alternative approaches to HIV and AIDS in 1993. To emphasize the sound scientific basis of the Center's protocols and encourage guests to adopt them into their own practices, Null printed out thousands of abstracts in support of each nutrient and treatment being used. However, despite over 7,000 invitations sent three times to major media, government figures, scientists, and activists, almost none of the intended audience members showed up. Over 100 AIDS patients and their doctors, whose charts exhaustively documented their improvements using natural and nontoxic modalities over the preceding 12 months, gave filmed testimonials, declaring that the feared disease was no longer a death sentence, but the conference had effectively been silenced. Bill Tatum, publisher of the Amsterdam News, suggested Null and his patients would find a more welcoming audience in his home neighborhood of Harlem - specifically, its iconic Apollo Theatre. For three nights, the theater was packed to capacity. Hit especially hard by the epidemic and distrustful of a medical system that had only recently stopped being openly racist (the Tuskegee syphilis experiment only ended in 1972), black Americans, at least, did not seem to care what Anthony Fauci would do if he found out they were investigating alternatives to AZT and death.    PBS journalist Tony Brown, having obtained a copy of the video of patient testimonials from the failed press conference, was among a handful of black journalists who began visiting the Center to investigate the legitimacy of Null's claims. Satisfied they had something significant to offer his audience, Brown invited eight patients - along with Null himself - onto his program over the course of several episodes to discuss the work. It was the first time these protocols had received any attention in the media, despite Null having released nearly two dozen articles and multiple documentaries on the subject by that time. A typical patient on one program, Al, a recovered IV drug user who was diagnosed with AIDS at age 32, described how he “panicked,” saw a doctor and started taking AZT despite his misgivings - only to be forced to discontinue the drug after just a few weeks due to his condition deteriorating rapidly. Researching alternatives brought him to Null, and after six months of “detoxing [his] lifestyle,” he observed his initial symptoms - swollen lymph nodes and weight loss - begin to reverse, culminating with sero-deconversion. On Bill McCreary's Channel 5 program, a married couple diagnosed with HIV described how they watched their T-cell counts increase as they cut out sugar, caffeine, smoking, and drinking and began eating a healthy diet. They also saw the virus leave their bodies.   For HIV-positive viewers surrounded by fear and negativity, watching healthy-looking, cheerful “AIDS patients” detail their recovery while Null backed up their claims with charts must have been balm for the soul. But the TV programs were also a form of outreach to the medical community, with patients' charts always on hand to convince skeptics the cure was scientifically valid. Null brought patients' charts to every program, urging them to keep an open mind: “Other physicians and public health officials should know that there's good science in the alternative perspective. It may not be a therapy that they're familiar with, because they're just not trained in it, but if the results are positive, and you can document them…” He challenged doubters to send in charts from their own sero-deconverted patients on AZT, and volunteered to debate proponents of the orthodox treatment paradigm - though the NIH and WHO both refused to participate in such a debate on Tony Brown's Journal, following Fauci's directive prohibiting engagement with forbidden ideas.    Aside from those few TV programs and Null's own films, suppression of Null's AIDS cure beyond word of mouth was total. The 2021 documentary The Cost of Denial, produced by the Society for Independent Journalists, tells the story of the Tri-State Healing Center and the medical paradigm that sought to destroy it, lamenting the loss of the lives that might have been saved in a more enlightened society. Nurse practitioner Luanne Pennesi, who treated many of the AIDS patients at the Center, speculated in the film that the refusal by the scientific establishment and AIDS activists to accept their successes was financially motivated. “It was as if they didn't want this information to get out. Understand that our healthcare system as we know it is a corporation, it's a corporate model, and it's about generating revenue. My concern was that maybe they couldn't generate enough revenue from these natural approaches.”5   Funding was certainly the main disciplinary tool Fauci's NIAID used to keep the scientific community in line. Despite the massive community interest in the work being done at the Center, no foundation or institution would defy Fauci and risk getting itself blacklisted, leaving Null to continue funding the operation out of his pocket with the profits from book sales. After 15 years, he left the Center in 1995, convinced the mainstream model had so thoroughly been institutionalized that there was no chance of overthrowing it. He has continued to counsel patients and advocate for a reappraisal of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis and its pharmaceutical treatments, highlighting the deeply flawed science underpinning the model of the disease espoused by the scientific establishment in 39 articles, six documentaries and a 700-page textbook on AIDS, but the Center's achievements have been effectively memory-holed by Fauci's multi-billion-dollar propaganda apparatus.     FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE   To understand just how much of a threat Null's work was to the HIV/AIDS establishment, it is instructive to revisit the 1984 paper, published by Dr. Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute, that established HIV as the sole cause of AIDS. The CDC's official recognition of AIDS in 1981 had done little to quell the mounting public panic over the mysterious illness afflicting gay men in the US, as the agency had effectively admitted it had no idea what was causing them to sicken and die. As years passed with no progress determining the causative agent of the plague, activist groups like Gay Men's Health Crisis disrupted public events and threatened further mass civil disobedience as they excoriated the NIH for its sluggish allocation of government science funding to uncovering the cause of the “gay cancer.”6 When Gallo published his paper declaring that the retrovirus we now know as HIV was the sole “probable” cause of AIDS, its simple, single-factor hypothesis was the answer to the scientific establishment's prayers. This was particularly true for Fauci, as the NIAID chief was able to claim the hot new disease as his agency's own domain in what has been described as a “dramatic confrontation” with his rival Sam Broder at the National Cancer Institute. After all, Fauci pointed out, Gallo's findings - presented by Health and Human Services Secretary Margaret Heckler as if they were gospel truth before any other scientists had had a chance to inspect them, never mind conduct a full peer review - clearly classified AIDS as an infectious disease, and not a cancer like the Kaposi's sarcoma which was at the time its most visible manifestation. Money and media attention began pouring in, even as funding for the investigation of other potential causes of AIDS dried up. Having already patented a diagnostic test for “his” retrovirus before introducing it to the world, Gallo was poised for a financial windfall, while Fauci was busily leveraging the discovery into full bureaucratic empire of the US scientific apparatus.   While it would serve as the sole basis for all US government-backed AIDS research to follow - quickly turning Gallo into the most-cited scientist in the world during the 1980s,7 Gallo's “discovery” of HIV was deeply problematic. The sample that yielded the momentous discovery actually belonged to Prof. Luc Montagnier of the French Institut Pasteur, a fact Gallo finally admitted in 1991, four years after a lawsuit from the French government challenged his patent on the HIV antibody test, forcing the US government to negotiate a hasty profit-sharing agreement between Gallo's and Montagnier's labs. That lawsuit triggered a cascade of official investigations into scientific misconduct by Gallo, and evidence submitted during one of these probes, unearthed in 2008 by journalist Janine Roberts, revealed a much deeper problem with the seminal “discovery.” While Gallo's co-author, Mikulas Popovic, had concluded after numerous experiments with the French samples that the virus they contained was not the cause of AIDS, Gallo had drastically altered the paper's conclusion, scribbling his notes in the margins, and submitted it for publication to the journal Science without informing his co-author.   After Roberts shared her discovery with contacts in the scientific community, 37 scientific experts wrote to the journal demanding that Gallo's career-defining HIV paper be retracted from Science for lacking scientific integrity.8 Their call, backed by an endorsement from the 2,600-member scientific organization Rethinking AIDS, was ignored by the publication and by the rest of mainstream science despite - or perhaps because of - its profound implications.   That 2008 letter, addressed to Science editor-in-chief Bruce Alberts and copied to American Association for the Advancement of Science CEO Alan Leshner, is worth reproducing here in its entirety, as it utterly dismantles Gallo's hypothesis - and with them the entire HIV is the sole cause of AIDS dogma upon which the contemporary medical model of the disease rests:   On May 4, 1984 your journal published four papers by a group led by Dr. Robert Gallo. We are writing to express our serious concerns with regard to the integrity and veracity of the lead paper among these four of which Dr. Mikulas Popovic is the lead author.[1] The other three are also of concern because they rely upon the conclusions of the lead paper .[2][3][4]  In the early 1990s, several highly critical reports on the research underlying these papers were produced as a result of governmental inquiries working under the supervision of scientists nominated by the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine. The Office of Research Integrity of the US Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper was “fraught with false and erroneous statements,” and that the “ORI believes that the careless and unacceptable keeping of research records...reflects irresponsible laboratory management that has permanently impaired the ability to retrace the important steps taken.”[5] Further, a Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations led by US Representative John D. Dingell of Michigan produced a staff report on the papers which contains scathing criticisms of their integrity.[6]  Despite the publically available record of challenges to their veracity, these papers have remained uncorrected and continue to be part of the scientific record.  What prompts our communication today is the recent revelation of an astonishing number of previously unreported deletions and unjustified alterations made by Gallo to the lead paper. There are several documents originating from Gallo's laboratory that, while available for some time, have only recently been fully analyzed. These include a draft of the lead paper typewritten by Popovic which contains handwritten changes made to it by Gallo.[7] This draft was the key evidence used in the above described inquiries to establish that Gallo had concealed his laboratory's use of a cell culture sample (known as LAV) which it received from the Institut Pasteur.  These earlier inquiries verified that the typed manuscript draft was produced by Popovic who had carried out the recorded experiment while his laboratory chief, Gallo, was in Europe and that, upon his return, Gallo changed the document by hand a few days before it was submitted to Science on March 30, 1984. According to the ORI investigation, “Dr. Gallo systematically rewrote the manuscript for what would become a renowned LTCB [Gallo's laboratory at the National Cancer Institute] paper.”[5]  This document provided the important evidence that established the basis for awarding Dr. Luc Montagnier and Dr. Francoise Barré-Sinoussi the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of the AIDS virus by proving it was their samples of LAV that Popovic used in his key experiment. The draft reveals that Popovic had forthrightly admitted using the French samples of LAV renamed as Gallo's virus, HTLV-III, and that Gallo had deleted this admission, concealing their use of LAV.  However, it has not been previously reported that on page three of this same document Gallo had also deleted Popovic's unambiguous statement that, "Despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified,” replacing it in the published paper with a statement that said practically the opposite, namely, “That a retrovirus of the HTLV family might be an etiologic agent of AIDS was suggested by the findings.”  It is clear that the rest of Popovic's typed paper is entirely consistent with his statement that the cause of AIDS had not been found, despite his use of the French LAV. Popovic's final conclusion was that the culture he produced “provides the possibility” for detailed studies. He claimed to have achieved nothing more. At no point in his paper did Popovic attempt to prove that any virus caused AIDS, and it is evident that Gallo concealed these key elements in Popovic's experimental findings.  It is astonishing now to discover these unreported changes to such a seminal document. We can only assume that Gallo's alterations of Popovic's conclusions were not highlighted by earlier inquiries because the focus at the time was on establishing that the sample used by Gallo's lab came from Montagnier and was not independently collected by Gallo. In fact, the only attention paid to the deletions made by Gallo pertains to his effort to hide the identity of the sample. The questions of whether Gallo and Popovic's research proved that LAV or any other virus was the cause of AIDS were clearly not considered.  Related to these questions are other long overlooked documents that merit your attention. One of these is a letter from Dr. Matthew A. Gonda, then Head of the Electron Microscopy Laboratory at the National Cancer Institute, which is addressed to Popovic, copied to Gallo and dated just four days prior to Gallo's submission to Science.[8] In this letter, Gonda remarks on samples he had been sent for imaging because “Dr Gallo wanted these micrographs for publication because they contain HTLV.” He states, “I do not believe any of the particles photographed are of HTLV-I, II or III.” According to Gonda, one sample contained cellular debris, while another had no particles near the size of a retrovirus. Despite Gonda's clearly worded statement, Science published on May 4, 1984 papers attributed to Gallo et al with micrographs attributed to Gonda and described unequivocally as HTLV-III.  In another letter by Gallo, dated one day before he submitted his papers to Science, Gallo states, “It's extremely rare to find fresh cells [from AIDS patients] expressing the virus... cell culture seems to be necessary to induce virus,” a statement which raises the possibility he was working with a laboratory artifact. [9]  Included here are copies of these documents and links to the same. The very serious flaws they reveal in the preparation of the lead paper published in your journal in 1984 prompts our request that this paper be withdrawn. It appears that key experimental findings have been concealed. We further request that the three associated papers published on the same date also be withdrawn as they depend on the accuracy of this paper.  For the scientific record to be reliable, it is vital that papers shown to be flawed, or falsified be retracted. Because a very public record now exists showing that the Gallo papers drew unjustified conclusions, their withdrawal from Science is all the more important to maintain integrity. Future researchers must also understand they cannot rely on the 1984 Gallo papers for statements about HIV and AIDS, and all authors of papers that previously relied on this set of four papers should have the opportunity to consider whether their own conclusions are weakened by these revelations.      Gallo's handwritten revision, submitted without his colleague's knowledge despite multiple experiments that failed to support the new conclusion, was the sole foundation for the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Had Science published the manuscript the way Popovic had typed it, there would be no AIDS “pandemic” - merely small clusters of people with AIDS. Without a viral hypothesis backing the development of expensive and deadly pharmaceuticals, would Fauci have allowed these patients to learn about the cure that existed all along?   Faced with a potential rebellion, Fauci marshaled the full resources under his control to squelch the publication of the investigations into Gallo and restrict any discussion of competing hypotheses in the scientific and mainstream press, which had been running virus-scare stories full-time since 1984. The effect was total, according to biochemist Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure. In a 2009 interview, Mullis recalled his own shock when he attempted to unearth the experimental basis for the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Despite his extensive inquiry into the literature, “there wasn't a scientific reference…[that] said ‘here's how come we know that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS.' There was nothing out there like that.”9 This yawning void at the core of HIV/AIDS “science" turned him into a strident critic of AIDS dogma - and those views made him persona non grata where the scientific press was concerned, suddenly unable to publish a single paper despite having won the Nobel Prize for his invention of the PCR test just weeks before.  10   DISSENT BECOMES “DENIAL”   While many of those who dissent from the orthodox HIV=AIDS view believe HIV plays a role in the development of AIDS, they point to lifestyle and other co-factors as being equally if not more important. Individuals who test positive for HIV can live for decades in perfect health - so long as they don't take AZT or the other toxic antivirals fast-tracked by Fauci's NIAID - but those who developed full-blown AIDS generally engaged in highly risky behaviors like extreme promiscuity and prodigious drug abuse, contracting STDs they took large quantities of antibiotics to treat, further running down their immune systems. While AIDS was largely portrayed as a “gay disease,” it was only the “fast track” gays, hooking up with dozens of partners nightly in sex marathons fueled by “poppers” (nitrate inhalants notorious for their own devastating effects on the immune system), who became sick. Kaposi's sarcoma, one of the original AIDS-defining conditions, was widespread among poppers-using gay men, but never appeared among IV drug users or hemophiliacs, the other two main risk groups during the early years of the epidemic. Even Robert Gallo himself, at a 1994 conference on poppers held by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, would admit that the previously-rare form of skin cancer surging among gay men was not primarily caused by HIV - and that it was immune stimulation, rather than suppression, that was likely responsible.11 Similarly, IV drug users are often riddled with opportunistic infections as their habit depresses the immune system and their focus on maintaining their addiction means that healthier habits - like good nutrition and even basic hygiene - fall by the wayside.    Supporting the call for revising the HIV=AIDS hypothesis to include co-factors is the fact that the mass heterosexual outbreaks long predicted by Fauci and his ilk in seemingly every country on Earth have failed to materialize, except - supposedly - in Africa, where the diagnostic standard for AIDS differs dramatically from those of the West. Given the prohibitively high cost of HIV testing for poor African nations, the WHO in 1985 crafted a diagnostic loophole that became known as the “Bangui definition,” allowing medical professionals to diagnose AIDS in the absence of a test using just clinical symptoms: high fever, persistent cough, at least 30 days of diarrhea, and the loss of 10% of one's body weight within two months. Often suffering from malnutrition and without access to clean drinking water, many of the inhabitants of sub-Saharan Africa fit the bill, especially when the WHO added tuberculosis to the list of AIDS-defining illnesses in 1993 - a move which may be responsible for as many as one half of African “AIDS” cases, according to journalist Christine Johnson. The WHO's former Chief of Global HIV Surveillance, James Chin, acknowledged their manipulation of statistics, but stressed that it was the entire AIDS industry - not just his organization - perpetrating the fraud. “There's the saying that, if you knew what sausages are made of, most people would hesitate to sort of eat them, because they wouldn't like what's in it. And if you knew how HIV/AIDS numbers are cooked, or made up, you would use them with extreme caution,” Chin told an interviewer in 2009.12   With infected numbers stubbornly remaining constant in the US despite Fauci's fearmongering projections of the looming heterosexually-transmitted plague, the CDC in 1993 broadened its definition of AIDS to include asymptomatic (that is, healthy) HIV-positive people with low T-cell counts - an absurd criteria given that an individual's T-cell count can fluctuate by hundreds within a single day. As a result, the number of “AIDS cases” in the US immediately doubled. Supervised by Fauci, the NIAID had been quietly piling on diseases into the “AIDS-related” category for years, bloating the list from just two conditions - pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and Kaposi's sarcoma - to 30 so fast it raised eyebrows among some of science's leading lights. Deeming the entire process “bizarre” and unprecedented, Kary Mullis wondered aloud why no one had called the AIDS establishment out: “There's something wrong here. And it's got to be financial.”13   Indeed, an early CDC public relations campaign was exposed by the Wall Street Journal in 1987 as having deliberately mischaracterized AIDS as a threat to the entire population so as to garner increased public and private funding for what was very much a niche issue, with the risk to average heterosexuals from a single act of sex “smaller than the risk of ever getting hit by lightning.” Ironically, the ads, which sought to humanize AIDS patients in an era when few Americans knew anyone with the disease and more than half the adult population thought infected people should be forced to carry cards warning of their status, could be seen as a reaction to the fear tactics deployed by Fauci early on.14   It's hard to tell where fraud ends and incompetence begins with Gallo's HIV antibody test. Much like Covid-19 would become a “pandemic of testing,” with murder victims and motorcycle crashes lumped into “Covid deaths” thanks to over-sensitized PCR tests that yielded as many as 90% false positives,15 HIV testing is fraught with false positives - and unlike with Covid-19, most people who hear they are HIV-positive still believe they are receiving a death sentence. Due to the difficulty of isolating HIV itself from human samples, the most common diagnostic tests, ELISA and the Western Blot, are designed to detect not the virus but antibodies to it, upending the traditional medical understanding that the presence of antibodies indicates only exposure - and often that the body has actually vanquished the pathogen. Patients are known to test positive for HIV antibodies in the absence of the virus due to at least 70 other conditions, including hepatitis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, syphilis, recent vaccination or even pregnancy. (https://www.chcfl.org/diseases-that-can-cause-a-false-positive-hiv-test/) Positive results are often followed up with a PCR “viral load” test, even though the inventor of the PCR technique Kary Mullis famously condemned its misuse as a tool for diagnosing infection. Packaging inserts for all three tests warn the user that they cannot be reliably used to diagnose HIV.16 The ELISA HIV antibody test explicitly states: “At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence and absence of HIV antibody in human blood.”17   That the public remains largely unaware of these and other massive holes in the supposedly airtight HIV=AIDS=DEATH paradigm is a testament to Fauci's multi-layered control of the press. Like the writers of the Great Barrington Declaration and other Covid-19 dissidents, scientists who question HIV/AIDS dogma have been brutally punished for their heresy, no matter how prestigious their prior standing in the field and no matter how much evidence they have for their own claims. In 1987, the year the FDA's approval of AZT made AIDS the most profitable epidemic yet (a dubious designation Covid-19 has since surpassed), Fauci made it clearer than ever that scientific inquiry and debate - the basis of the scientific method - would no longer be welcome in the American public health sector, eliminating retrovirologist Peter Duesberg, then one of the most prominent opponents of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis, from the scientific conversation with a professional disemboweling that would make a cartel hitman blush. Duesberg had just eviscerated Gallo's 1984 HIV paper with an article of his own in the journal Cancer Research, pointing out that retroviruses had never before been found to cause a single disease in humans - let alone 30 AIDS-defining diseases. Rather than allow Gallo or any of the other scientists in his camp to respond to the challenge, Fauci waged a scorched-earth campaign against Duesberg, who had until then been one of the most highly regarded researchers in his field. Every research grant he requested was denied; every media appearance was canceled or preempted. The University of California at Berkeley, unable to fully fire him due to tenure, took away his lab, his graduate students, and the rest of his funding. The few colleagues who dared speak up for him in public were also attacked, while enemies and opportunists were encouraged to slander Duesberg at the conferences he was barred from attending and in the journals that would no longer publish his replies. When Duesberg was summoned to the White House later that year by then-President Ronald Reagan to debate Fauci on the origins of AIDS, Fauci convinced the president to cancel, allegedly pulling rank on the Commander-in-Chief with an accusation that the “White House was interfering in scientific matters that belonged to the NIH and the Office of Science and Technology Assessment.” After seven years of this treatment, Duesberg was contacted by NIH official Stephen O'Brien and offered an escape from professional purgatory. He could have “everything back,” he was told, and shown a manuscript of a scientific paper - apparently commissioned by the editor of the journal Nature - “HIV Causes AIDS: Koch's Postulates Fulfilled” with his own name listed alongside O'Brien's as an author.18 His refusal to take the bribe effectively guaranteed the epithet “AIDS denier” will appear on his tombstone. The character assassination of Duesberg became a template that would be deployed to great effectiveness wherever Fauci encountered dissent - never debate, only demonize, deplatform and destroy.    Even Luc Montagnier, the real discoverer of HIV, soon found himself on the wrong side of the Fauci machine. With his 1990 declaration that “the HIV virus [by itself] is harmless and passive, a benign virus,” Montagnier began distancing himself from Gallo's fraud, effectively placing a target on his own back. In a 1995 interview, he elaborated: “four factors that have come together to account for the sudden epidemic [of AIDS]: HIV presence, immune hyper-activation, increased sexually transmitted disease incidence, sexual behavior changes and other behavioral changes” such as drug use, poor nutrition and stress - all of which he said had to occur “essentially simultaneously” for HIV to be transmitted, creating the modern epidemic. Like the professionals at the Tri-State Healing Center, Montagnier advocated for the use of antioxidants like vitamin C and N-acetyl cysteine, naming oxidative stress as a critical factor in the progression from HIV to AIDS.19 When Montagnier died in 2022, Fauci's media mouthpieces sneered that the scientist (who was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2008 for his discovery of HIV, despite his flagging faith in that discovery's significance) “started espousing views devoid of a scientific basis” in the late 2000s, leading him to be “shunned by the scientific community.”20 In a particularly egregious jab, the Washington Post's obit sings the praises of Robert Gallo, implying it was the American scientist who really should have won the Nobel for HIV, while dismissing as “

Welcome to Top of the Morning by Mint, your weekday newscast that brings you five major stories from the world of business. It's Monday, July 22, 2024. My name is Nelson John. Let's get started:Last Friday, a global tech blackout hit airports, hospitals, banks, and more. As more systems rely on a few tech service providers, can we avoid future blackouts? Blackouts can recur due to human errors like faulty code or incorrect updates. Tech firms regularly push updates to fix issues, but unknown bugs can slip through. Cyberattackers exploit these bugs, making global blackouts a recurring risk. Complete insulation from blackouts isn't possible, but resilience is. In today's Primer, Mint's tech correspondent Shouvik Das explains what happens during a cyberattack and how you can stay safe from one.A train accident in Uttar Pradesh's Gonda district on Thursday afternoon - just five days before the Union budget - has left four passengers dead and over 30 injured. This accident was not the first in recent times. In fact, over the course of the last year, India has seen a string of major train accidents - the biggest one being the derailment of the Coromandel Express in Odisha's Balasore district last June. So how is the government planning to ensure a safer Indian Railways for its passengers? The Railways budget allocation has risen from 0.3% of GDP in 2018-19 to 0.8% in 2024-25. However, much of the capital expenditure has gone towards new lines, track renewals, and rolling stock, with less than 20% allocated to safety. This neglect has coincided with several fatal accidents. Payal Bhattacharya from Mint's data team explains why a big budget for the railways does not really guarantee safety.This summer, the country saw one of the harshest heatwaves in recent memory. Our cities are getting hotter day by day while rampant climate change disturbs weather cycles. To counter this, the government is planning to promote urban forests. A senior environment ministry official told Mint's Puja Das that the plan is a part of Modi 3.0's 100-day agenda.Under the Nagar Van Yojana (NVY) scheme launched in 2020, the ministry aims to boost urban biodiversity to mitigate pollution, provide cleaner air, reduce noise, and harvest water. Urban forests are also expected to address issues like the rising mosquito population and monkeys encroaching on cities due to dwindling green spaces.The story of COVID-related deaths is not over yet. A new study by researchers from several universities, including Oxford, pegs the number of “excess deaths” at 1.19 million. That's almost 12 lakh lives we're talking about. What are excess deaths? The term refers to the difference between the number of lives lost in an unusual period (like a pandemic year) and a normal year. Published in the Science Advances journal on 19 July, the study indicates that life expectancy at birth was 2.6 years lower and mortality 17% higher in 2020 compared to 2019. This data is based on a subsample of 14 states and Union Territories. The report has been rejected by the government for its methodology. So what was the methodology and what key insights does the report bring to the table? Mint's data editor Tanay Sukumar explains.L&T Finance, a subsidiary of engineering group Larsen and Toubro, has been in the NBFC game for nearly three decades. But despite its long presence, the company remains lower down the order. Almost 94 per cent of its loan book is retail loans and stands at around 86,000 crore rupees. To put it in perspective, Mahindra Finance, which started three years before L&T Finance, in 1991, is well ahead with assets under management of ₹1 trillion at the end of the last fiscal year. Bajaj Finance, which started out in 1987 as Bajaj Auto Finance, an NBFC focusing on two- and three-wheeler finance, has eclipsed them both with an AUM of ₹3.3 trillion as of 2023-24. Sudipta Roy, a finance professional with over two decades of experience, has been brought in as the CEO. Roy would be expected to turn the company's fortunes around. Mint's Shayan Ghosh takes a deep dive into the company's strategies around increasing regulations and integrating AI into its risk management. We'd love to hear your feedback on this podcast. Let us know by writing to us at feedback@livemint.com. You may send us feedback, tips or anything that you feel we should be covering from your vantage point in the world of business and finance.

Top news of the day: Trump: 'I am running to be president for all of America, not half of America', At least 3 dead as Chandigarh-Dibrugarh Express derails in UP's Gonda, high-level probe initiated, Air India plane bound for US makes unscheduled Russia landing, Indian Squad for SL Gambhir era begins with 'Surya Uday' in T20s, Netflix adds over 8 million customers in Q2, extends lead over rivals

This is the Catch Up on 3 Things for the Indian Express and I'm Flora Swain.It's the 18th of July and here are today's headlines.he Supreme Court today said that any order for conducting the NEET-UG 2024 afresh has to be on the concrete footing that the sanctity of the entire medical entrance exam was affected. The counsel, as per LiveLaw, told the top court that the NTA has said that the inflation of the mark is attributed to the decrease in the syllabus, however, there is an increase and decrease in the syllabus. The judges further asked about the spread of NEET question papers.Several coaches of the Chandigarh-Dibrugarh Express overturned Thursday afternoon in Gonda district of Uttar Pradesh after the train derailed from the tracks. Two persons are dead and the number of people injured in the accident was yet to be known, according to UP Relief Commissioner GS Naveen Kumar. Meanwhile, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has directed immediate deployment of rescue and relief personnel at the spot, the Chief Minister's Office said. Emergency helpline numbers have also been issued for assistance.Stock indices soared today with the BSE Sensex hitting a fresh all-time high at 81,523 and was up over 800 points. The NSE Nifty 50 index registered a new peak at 24,838, and was up over 200 points. Earlier in the day, the 30-share BSE Sensex opened on a weak note, but bounced back later and climbed 193.9 points to hit a new record peak of 80,910.45.Karnataka BJP leaders staged protests against the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government today in Bengaluru, demanding the chief minister's resignation over the alleged Karnataka Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation Ltd. (KMVSTDC) scam. The opposition BJP leaders, including the party's state unit President B Y Vijayendra, were detained as they tried to lay siege to Vidhana Soudha. In today's Karnataka Legislative Assembly session, the BJP labeled the Congress government a “Tughlaq government” for delaying the Bill on reservations for locals in private sector management.The Bangladesh government will hold talks with protesting students, Law Minister Anisul Haq said as unrest over job quotas continued today. Protesters called for a nationwide shutdown, with protest coordinator Nahid Islam saying that all establishments will remain closed, and only hospitals and emergency services will remain operational. Meanwhile, the Federal Minister said that mobile internet has been temporarily suspended in the country in the wake of the protests. The Indian High Commission in Dhaka has advised its nationals to avoid travel.This was the Catch-Up on the 3 Things by The Indian Express.

In this episode of The Digital Executive, host Brian Thomas interviews Rob Gonda, the CEO of DVX and a visionary leader in business and technology. Rob shares insights from his extensive experience leading digital transformations at major companies, including McDonald's, where he tripled the company's market cap as Chief Digital and Data Officer. He emphasizes the importance of rewiring not just technology but also people, and discusses how data-driven solutions can drive exponential business growth.Rob delves into the impact of AI on consumer behavior and the need for companies to stay ahead of trends by understanding and leveraging their data. He also highlights the critical shift from resilience to adaptability in corporate strategy, offering valuable advice for C-suite executives on overcoming challenges in digital transformation. Tune in to learn how to navigate and thrive in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Mortyr a Finnegan jsou dva průvodci našich hrdinů v Outlands. Společně s nimi se celá skupina vydává vstříc dobrodružství a první místo, které je očekává je Tir na Og. Toto místo se ovšem kvůli zbrklému prohledávání krypty stává osudným pro Finnegana a naši hrdinové se rozhodnou ho oživit, na to jim ovšem chybí drahokamy a nejbližší místo, které by je mohlo mít, je svět Wonderhome. Pláň boha craftingu a výtvorů, svět Gonda.

This is the Catch Up on 3 Things for the Indian Express and I'm Flora Swain.It's the 29th of May and here are today's headlines.Prime Minister Narendra Modi today hinted at a “conspiracy” behind the “deteriorating health condition” of Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik. Addressing a rally in Baripada, Modi said there is a need for a detailed probe to “uncover the mystery” about Patnaik's health. Though the PM did not mention anyone by name, his comments are ostensibly a reference to Patnaik's close aide and former IAS officer V K Pandian, whom he had earlier accused of capturing the CM's office and residence.The Delhi government today announced that a Rs 2000 fine would be imposed on anyone found to be wasting water. This includes washing cars with a hose, letting their water tanks overflow or using private connections for commercial activity. The announcement comes as the national capital faces a water crisis and soaring temperatures. The Regional Meteorological Centre of Delhi has warned of heatwave to severe heatwave conditions in all districts today. Delhi Lieutenant-Governor V K Saxena, in view of severe heatwave conditions in the national Capital, directed for paid leave to labourers at construction sites from 12 noon to 3 pm.Two men died when an SUV that was allegedly part of the convoy of BJP candidate Karan Bhushan Singh allegedly hit their motorcycle. Karan, the son of incumbent MP Brij Bhushan Singh is contesting in Karnalganj police station area of Uttar Pradesh's Gonda district that voted on May 20 in the fifth phase of the Lok Sabha polls. The police have seized the SUV and arrested its driver.After DNA samples matched with those missing after the Rajkot TRP gaming zone fire, investigators confirmed today its co-owner Prakashchand Hiran alias Prakash Jain was among those killed on 25th of May. Hiran, who was also among the six TRP Game Zone partners facing charges of culpable homicide (not amounting to murder) over the fire, was reported missing by his family on Tuesday. Forensic investigators on Wednesday confirmed the identities of 25 of the 27 DNA samples and remains they collected from the fire site. In all 28 people are suspected to have been killed in the fire.The escalation of Israeli shelling and airstrikes resulting in the tragic loss of at least 37 lives outside the southern Gaza city of Rafah on Tuesday has ignited widespread international condemnation with the "All Eyes on Rafah" campaign gaining momentum on social media. The "All Eyes on Rafah" campaign, spanning across social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok, serves as a poignant call to action from activists and humanitarian groups. It's a plea for global awareness, urging people not to turn away from the war unfolding in Rafah. More than 108k posts on Instagram with #alleyesonrafah have been shared on Instagram till now.This was the Catch-Up on the 3 Things by The Indian Express.

Sharjeel Imam, The JNU Scholar Granted Bail By Delhi HC In 2020 Riots Case, Gonda: SUV in convoy of Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh's son Karan Bhushan hits bike, 2 youth killed, ‘All eyes on Rafah': 45 civilians killed in Israeli strike, triggers global outrage, Swati Maliwal row: Arvind Kejriwal's aide Bibhav Kumar moves Delhi HC challenging his arrest, BCCI to neglect deadline as Gautam Gambhir mum on India head coach role, no notable foreign names apply

We try to answer one of your questions, how much to spend on your breeding bulls.  We have producer updates, bull sale results and lots more. Join Jeff 'Tigger' Erhardt, the Boss Lady Rebecca Wanner aka 'BEC', and our crew as we bring you the latest in markets, news, and Western entertainment on this all-new episode of the Ranch It Up Radio Show. Be sure to subscribe on your favorite podcasting app or on the Ranch It Up Radio Show YouTube Channel. EPISODE 170 DETAILS We are in that busy time of year when many producers are pouring over various sale catalogs trying to find their next herdsires and/or additions to their bull battery.  There is no “tried and true” method to determine how much we should spend. It all comes down to personal perception and what we think we need to improve our herds and take our genetics to a certain level.  Marty Ropp has marketed more bulls than you and I will ever see in a lifetime and he joins us today to answer your very specific questions.   We have bull sale results, producers updates, news you need to hear about fake and cultivated meat and lots more.  It's all covered on this brand new episode of The Ranch It Up Radio Show! ALLIED GENETIC RESOURCES The seedstock business offers only two important value propositions: Genetic Improvement and Customer Service. The owner/members of Allied Genetic Resources understand this as well as anyone in the genetics business, and that is why Allied works with this committed group in an effort to enhance both important areas. Chosen for their combined reputation for value and service, these producers truly understand that if their customers are profitable in the long term, they have the greatest potential to be successful as well.   They call this their “Full Circle” approach to the beef business. Valuable and ever improving genetics for the commercial beef industry is the foundation. Built around profit potential and simplicity, the nearly 80 independent Allied owners design, build and then service genetic products that set the industry standard for value. In all, more than 6000 commercial bulls will be marketed by this group with a coast to coast spread of suppliers and customers. With multiple options for designed, composited and purebred seedstock developed in nearly every production environment, you can be assured of consistent supply backed by years of successful experience breeding and marketing genetics. Once the foundation is secured, crucial customer services set our business apart. Allied is designed to work with the customer base of our owner/members. Without advanced service, selected genetics can still fall short of expectation. Everyone involved with Allied Genetic Resources is committed to making sure the customer comes first, maximizing the opportunity to benefit from good choices and quality relationships. Commercial producers all across America are choosing to work more closely with the Allied team because they know we work for them. Whether it is accessing genetics designed for your program's success, assistance with proven commercial marketing options, strategic alignment with the beef business, or even developing long term strategies, the simple mission of Allied staff is commercial customer success.   Allied Genetic Resources - Sale Management The Allied Genetic Resources Sale Management team has been your trusted source for marketing and sourcing Seedstock for well over a decade.  With over 50 years of combined experience, we have the knowledge and expertise to help move your program forward.  Our professional sales staff knows the ins and outs of conducting a successful production sale.   There are many services we offer with full-service sale management.  Some of the services provided include marketing plan creation and execution, sale book preparation and design, sale cattle selection, and advice on preparation, to name a few.  Sale day services include assistance with sale penning, sale order, clerking, as well as sourcing cattle for customers.  You can trust our knowledge and expertise to help handle the details that are required to have a successful sale.  The team travels nationwide and has clients all across the country.  If you are looking for your next herd bull or donor cow, or if you are a commercial producer looking to source top notch bulls or commercial females to move your program forward, please call any one of our team members.  With our vast customer base, we can find the genetics to fit your needs.      COW COUNTRY NEWS Cultivated Meat Law Passes Arizona House Committee According to Meating Place, The Arizona House Committee on Land, Agriculture and Rural Affairs voted in favor of House Bill 2244, which would make it illegal to label a product that is not derived from livestock or poultry as “meat.” The 6-3 vote was championed by Rep. Quang Nguyen, who says the FDA's labeling requirements for cultivated meat are "not enough" to prevent consumer confusion. A second Arizona House bill, proposed by Rep. David Marshall, was set to be discussed on Monday, but Rep. Marshall withdrew the measure from consideration while he worked on amendments. That bill would institute a total ban on production and sale of cultivated meat in the state. House Bill 2244 will now be brought before the entire House for approval.   Cultivated Meat Flagged As Threat To Genetic IP Meating Place says that although animal proteins cultivated outside the animal itself are far from being readily available to consumers, players in the animal ag industry are looking at the horizon and see a potential threat to the decades of investment in improved livestock genetics.   “What can potentially happen is [cultivated meat] companies can isolate cell lines from animals, which they then will use to grow their lab-grown meat products and basically piggyback on all of the work that these seedstock producers have done,” said Michael Gonda, livestock genetics professor at South Dakota State University, in an interview with AgWeek.   As yet, no mechanism has been drawn up for compensating producers for the investment in their genetic lines.   “All these companies need is a handful of animals to collect these cell lines from and so there are not a lot of protections there for [the] producers,” Gonda said.   “It's probably two, three, four years down the road, but the rules need to be made now because if we wait that long, we are already going to be behind,” Todd Wilkinson, president of National Cattlemen's Beef Association and cattle producer from De Smet, S.D., told AgWeek. UPCOMING BULL SALES ANGUS GELBVIEH BALANCER RED ANGUS SIMMENTAL SIMANGUS Clear Springs Cattle Company: February 9, 2024, Starbuck, Minnesota Prairie Hills Gelbvieh: February 10, 2024, Gladstone, North Dakota Wasem Red Angus: February 15, 2024, Richardton, North Dakota Mason Angus & SimAngus: March 2, 2024, Broken Bow, Nebraska   BULL SALE REPORT & RESULTS Churchill Cattle Company Van Newkirk Herefords Gardiner Angus Ranch Cow Camp Ranch FEATURING Marty Ropp Allied Genetic Resources https://alliedgeneticresources.com/ @AlliedGeneticResources   Kirk Donsbach: Stone X Financial https://www.stonex.com/   @StoneXGroupInc      Mark Van Zee  Livestock Market, Equine Market, Auction Time https://www.auctiontime.com/ https://www.livestockmarket.com/ https://www.equinemarket.com/ @LivestockMkt @EquineMkt @AuctionTime   Shaye Koester Casual Cattle Conversation https://www.casualcattleconversations.com/ @cattleconvos Questions & Concerns From The Field? Call or Text your questions, or comments to 707-RANCH20 or 707-726-2420 Or email RanchItUpShow@gmail.com FOLLOW Facebook/Instagram: @RanchItUpShow SUBSCRIBE to the Ranch It Up YouTube Channel: @ranchitup Website: RanchItUpShow.com https://ranchitupshow.com/ The Ranch It Up Podcast available on ALL podcasting apps. Rural America is center-stage on this outfit. AND how is that? Because of Tigger & BEC... Live This Western Lifestyle. Tigger & BEC represent the Working Ranch world by providing the cowboys, cowgirls, beef cattle producers & successful farmers the knowledge and education needed to bring high-quality beef & meat to your table for dinner. Learn more about Jeff 'Tigger' Erhardt & Rebecca Wanner aka BEC here: TiggerandBEC.com https://tiggerandbec.com/ #RanchItUp #StayRanchy #TiggerApproved #tiggerandbec #rodeo #ranching #farming References https://www.stonex.com/ https://www.livestockmarket.com/ https://www.equinemarket.com/ https://www.auctiontime.com/ https://gelbvieh.org/ https://www.imogeneingredients.com/ https://alliedgeneticresources.com/ https://westwayfeed.com/ https://medoraboot.com/ https://www.bek.news/dakotacowboy http://www.gostockmens.com/ https://www.lucky7angus.com/ https://www.bredforbalance.com/ https://www.wasemredangus.com/ https://ranchchannel.com/ https://prairiehillsgelbvieh.com/ https://www.dvauction.com/ https://www.meatingplace.com/Industry/News/Details/113132 https://www.meatingplace.com/Industry/News/Details/113127 https://www.churchillcattle.com/ https://www.vannewkirkherefords.com/ https://www.gardinerangus.com/ http://cowcampranch.com/

THERE IS NO BYTE SIZED EPISODE THIS WEEK BECAUSE I AM MAKING YOU ALL LISTEN TO THIS EPISODE!! (because I think we should all read the study that we talk about~recently released by the Fetzer Institute~you know what a taskmaster I am, but I guarantee the study is so super groovy you'll feel bad you missed out!) It's no secret that there's recently been a worldwide pandemic, and it was clear to me that people were suffering in so many different ways during it...loneliness, depression, the loss of loved ones, missing rites of passage (prom? high school graduation?) and for me, especially, witnessing how society became more polarized and fractured. I will never forget people fighting over toilet paper in the supermarket, and being willing to hurt another human over it.  That suffering and grief hasn't gone away, and I would argue, it's only morphed into other places and spaces in our lives...and while the world has gone back to "normal" so many of us are just trying to survive the day. We talk big grief in this world, in our own lives, how to survive, how to thrive. We talk how children can be wise little nuggets, and how our community is what is going to be what helps us, and sometimes save us. The study is truly fascinating...I urge you to click on the link below to check it out. Did people become more spiritual? More religious? Less? How did the pandemic affect our ability to find and create meaning in our world? You'll just have to read it to find out! Thank you for listening all, and for more information, the website: bytesizedblessings.com WHAT DOES SPIRITUALITY MEAN TO US? A Study of Spirituality in the United States Since COVID PLEASE CONSIDER LEAVING A RATING OR REVIEW. I'LL LOVE YOU FOREVER! Attributions: Music: Yesteryears (DECISION) by Sascha Ende Free download: https://filmmusic.io/song/244-yesteryears-decision Licensed under CC BY 4.0: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license Music: Sheltered Swan by Sascha Ende Free download: https://filmmusic.io/song/4973-sheltered-swan Licensed under CC BY 4.0: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license Music: Betelgeuse by Sascha Ende Free download: https://filmmusic.io/song/5780-betelgeuse Licensed under CC BY 4.0: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license Music: Imagefilm 031 by Sascha Ende Free download: https://filmmusic.io/song/532-imagefilm-031 Licensed under CC BY 4.0: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license Music: Happy Clappy Castagnette by Sascha Ende Free download: https://filmmusic.io/song/5125-happy-clappy-castagnette Licensed under CC BY 4.0: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license Music: Knuddelnachtmonster by Sascha Ende Free download: https://filmmusic.io/song/172-knuddelnachtmonster Licensed under CC BY 4.0: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license Music: Imagefilm 028 by Sascha Ende Free download: https://filmmusic.io/song/505-imagefilm-028 Licensed under CC BY 4.0: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

Eva Gonda Rivera es una de las personas más ricas de México, con una fortuna que ronda los 5,841 millones de dólares, según Forbes. Aunque mantiene un perfil bajo, se trata de la heredera de Femsa.

Gleich einen kompletten Satz hat Gonda aus Baunatal im Song "Waterfalls" von Michael Schulte entdeckt.

http://bit.ly/nzes-dnesViac o etnickej skupine Gonda nájdete na:https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/16855/INSMS kalendár na rok 2023: bit.ly/SMSkalendar2023

About TimTim Gonda is a Cloud Security professional who has spent the last eight years securing and building Cloud workloads for commercial, non-profit, government, and national defense organizations. Tim currently serves as the Technical Director of Cloud at Praetorian, influencing the direction of its offensive-security-focused Cloud Security practice and the Cloud features of Praetorian's flagship product, Chariot. He considers himself lucky to have the privilege of working with the talented cyber operators at Praetorian and considers it the highlight of his career.Tim is highly passionate about helping organizations fix Cloud Security problems, as they are found, the first time, and most importantly, the People/Process/Technology challenges that cause them in the first place. In his spare time, he embarks on adventures with his wife and ensures that their two feline bundles of joy have the best playtime and dining experiences possible.Links Referenced: Praetorian: https://www.praetorian.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/timgondajr/ Praetorian Blog: https://www.praetorian.com/blog/ TranscriptAnnouncer: Hello, and welcome to Screaming in the Cloud with your host, Chief Cloud Economist at The Duckbill Group, Corey Quinn. This weekly show features conversations with people doing interesting work in the world of cloud, thoughtful commentary on the state of the technical world, and ridiculous titles for which Corey refuses to apologize. This is Screaming in the Cloud.Corey: This episode is sponsored in part by our friends at Thinkst Canary. Most Companies find out way too late that they've been breached. Thinkst Canary changes this. Deploy Canaries and Canarytokens in minutes and then forget about them. Attackers tip their hand by touching 'em giving you the one alert, when it matters. With 0 admin overhead and almost no false-positives, Canaries are deployed (and loved) on all 7 continents. Check out what people are saying at canary.love today!Corey: Kentik provides Cloud and NetOps teams with complete visibility into hybrid and multi-cloud networks. Ensure an amazing customer experience, reduce cloud and network costs, and optimize performance at scale — from internet to data center to container to cloud. Learn how you can get control of complex cloud networks at www.kentik.com, and see why companies like Zoom, Twitch, New Relic, Box, Ebay, Viasat, GoDaddy, booking.com, and many, many more choose Kentik as their network observability platform. Corey: Welcome to Screaming in the Cloud. I'm Corey Quinn. Every once in a while, I like to branch out into new and exciting territory that I've never visited before. But today, no, I'd much rather go back to complaining about cloud security, something that I tend to do an awful lot about. Here to do it with me is Tim Gonda, Technical Director of Cloud at Praetorian. Tim, thank you for joining me on this sojourn down what feels like an increasingly well-worn path.Tim: Thank you, Corey, for having me today.Corey: So, you are the Technical Director of Cloud, which I'm sort of short-handing to okay, everything that happens on the computer is henceforth going to be your fault. How accurate is that in the grand scheme of things?Tim: It's not too far off. But we like to call it Praetorian for nebula. The nebula meaning that it's Schrödinger's problem: it both is and is not the problem. Here's why. We have a couple key focuses at Praetorian, some of them focusing on more traditional pen testing, where we're looking at hardware, hit System A, hit System B, branch out, get to goal.On the other side, we have hitting web applications and [unintelligible 00:01:40]. This insecure app leads to this XYZ vulnerability, or this medical appliance is insecure and therefore we're able to do XYZ item. One of the things that frequently comes up is that more and more organizations are no longer putting their applications or infrastructure on-prem anymore, so therefore, some part of the assessment ends up being in the cloud. And that is the unique rub that I'm in. And that I'm responsible for leading the direction of the cloud security focus group, who may not dive into a specific specialty that some of these other teams might dig into, but may have similar responsibilities or similar engagement style.And in this case, if we discover something in the cloud as an issue, or even in your own organization where you have a cloud security team, you'll have a web application security team, you'll have your core information security team that defends your environment in many different methods, many different means, you'll frequently find that the cloud security team is the hot button for hey, the server was misconfigured at one certain level, however the cloud security team didn't quite know that this web application was vulnerable. We did know that it was exposed to the internet but we can't necessarily turn off all web applications from the internet because that would no longer serve the purpose of a web application. And we also may not know that a particular underlying host's patch is out of date. Because technically, that would be siloed off into another problem.So, what ends up happening is that on almost every single incident that involves a cloud infrastructure item, you might find that cloud security will be right there alongside the incident responders. And yep, this [unintelligible 00:03:20] is here, it's exposed to the internet via here, and it might have the following application on it. And they get cross-exposure with other teams that say, “Hey, your web application is vulnerable. We didn't quite inform the cloud security team about it, otherwise this wouldn't be allowed to go to the public internet,” or on the infrastructure side, “Yeah, we didn't know that there was a patch underneath it, we figured that we would let the team handle it at a later date, and therefore this is also vulnerable.” And what ends up happening sometimes, is that the cloud security team might be the onus or might be the hot button in the room of saying, “Hey, it's broken. This is now your problem. Please fix it with changing cloud configurations or directing a team to make this change on our behalf.”So, in essence, sometimes cloud becomes—it both is and is not your problem when a system is either vulnerable or exposed or at some point, worst case scenario, ends up being breached and you're performing incident response. That's one of the cases why it's important to know—or important to involve others in the cloud security problem, or to be very specific about what the role of a cloud security team is, or where cloud security has to have certain boundaries or has to involve certain extra parties have to be involved in the process. Or when it does its own threat modeling process, say that, okay, we have to take a look at certain cloud findings or findings that's within our security realm and say that these misconfigurations or these items, we have to treat the underlying components as if they are vulnerable, whether or not they are and we have to report on them as if they are vulnerable, even if it means that a certain component of the infrastructure has to already be assumed to either have a vulnerability, have some sort of misconfiguration that allows an outside attacker to execute attacks against whatever the [unintelligible 00:05:06] is. And we have to treat and respond our security posture accordingly.Corey: One of the problems that I keep running into, and I swear it's not intentional, but people would be forgiven for understanding or believing otherwise, is that I will periodically inadvertently point out security problems via Twitter. And that was never my intention because, “Huh, that's funny, this thing isn't working the way that I would expect that it would,” or, “I'm seeing something weird in the logs in my test account. What is that?” And, “Oh, you found a security vulnerability or something akin to one in our environment. Oops. Next time, just reach out to us directly at the security contact form.” That's great. If I'd known I was stumbling blindly into a security approach, but it feels like the discovery of these things is not heralded by an, “Aha, I found it.” But, “Huh, that's funny.”Tim: Of course. Absolutely. And that's where some of the best vulnerabilities come where you accidentally stumble on something that says, “Wait, does this work how—what I think it is?” Click click. Like, “Oh, boy, it does.”Now, I will admit that certain cloud providers are really great about with proactive security reach outs. If you either just file a ticket or file some other form of notification, just even flag your account rep and say, “Hey, when I was working on this particular cloud environment, the following occurred. Does this work the way I think it is? Is this is a problem?” And they usually get back to you with reporting it to their internal team, so on and so forth. But let's say applications are open-source frameworks or even just organizations at large where you might have stumbled upon something, the best thing to do was either look up, do they have a public bug bounty program, do they have a security contact or form reach out that you can email them, or do you know, someone that the organization that you just send a quick email saying, “Hey, I found this.”And through some combination of those is usually the best way to go. And to be able to provide context of the organization being, “Hey, the following exists.” And the most important things to consider when you're sending this sort of information is that they get these sorts of emails almost daily.Corey: One of my favorite genre of tweet is when Tavis Ormandy and Google's Project Zero winds up doing a tweet like, “Hey, do I know anyone over at the security apparatus at insert company here?” It's like, “All right. I'm sure people are shorting stocks now [laugh], based upon whatever he winds up doing that.”Tim: Of course.Corey: It's kind of fun to watch. But there's no cohesive way of getting in touch with companies on these things because as soon as you'd have something like that, it feels like it's subject to abuse, where Comcast hasn't fixed my internet for three days, now I'm going to email their security contact, instead of going through the normal preferred process of wait in the customer queue so they can ignore you.Tim: Of course. And that's something else you want to consider. If you broadcast that a security vulnerability exists without letting the entity or company know, you're also almost causing a green light, where other security researchers are going to go dive in on this and see, like, one, does this work how you described. But that actually is a positive thing at some point, where either you're unable to get the company's attention, or maybe it's an open-source organization, or maybe you're not being fully sure that something is the case. However, when you do submit something to the customer and you want it to take it seriously, here's a couple of key things that you should consider.One, provide evidence that whatever you're talking about has actually occurred, two, provide repeatable steps that the layman's term, even IT support person can attempt to follow in your process, that they can repeat the same vulnerability or repeat the same security condition, and three, most importantly, detail why this matters. Is this something where I can adjust a user's password? Is this something where I can extract data? Is this something where I'm able to extract content from your website I otherwise shouldn't be able to? And that's important for the following reason.You need to inform the business what is the financial value of why leaving this unpatched becomes an issue for them. And if you do that, that's how those security vulnerabilities get prioritized. It's not necessarily because the coolest vulnerability exists, it's because it costs the company money, and therefore the security team is going to immediately jump on it and try to contain it before it costs them any more.Corey: One of my least favorite genres of security report are the ones that I get where I found a vulnerability. It's like, that's interesting. I wasn't aware that I read any public-facing services, but all right, I'm game; what have you got? And it's usually something along the lines of, “You haven't enabled SPF to hard fail an email that doesn't wind up originating explicitly from this list of IP addresses. Bug bounty, please.” And it's, “No genius. That is very much an intentional choice. Thank you for playing.”It comes down to also an idea of whenever I have reported security vulnerabilities in the past, the pattern I always take is, “I'm seeing something that I don't fully understand. I suspect this might have security implications, but I'm also more than willing to be proven wrong.” Because showing up with, “You folks are idiots and have a security problem,” is a terrific invitation to be proven wrong and look like an idiot. Because the first time you get that wrong, no one will take you seriously again.Tim: Of course. And as you'll find that most bug bounty programs are, if you participate in those, the first couple that you might have submitted, the customer might even tell you, “Yeah, we're aware that that vulnerability exists, however, we don't view it as a core issue and it cannot affect the functionality of our site in any meaningful way, therefore we're electing to ignore it.” Fair.Corey: Very fair. But then when people write up about those things, well, they've they decided this is not an issue, so I'm going to do a write-up on it. Like, “You can't do that. The NDA doesn't let you expose that.” “Really? Because you just said it's a non-issue. Which is it?”Tim: And the key to that, I guess, would also be that is there an underlying technology that doesn't necessarily have to be attributed to said organization? Can you also say that, if I provide a write-up or if I put up my own personal blog post—let's say, we go back to some of the OpenSSL vulnerabilities including OpenSSL 3.0, that came out not too long ago, but since that's an open-source project, it's fair game—let's just say that if there was a technology such as that, or maybe there's a wrapper around it that another organization could be using or could be implementing a certain way, you don't necessarily have to call the company up by name, or rather just say, here's the core technology reason, and here's the core technology risk, and here's the way I've demoed exploiting this. And if you publish an open-source blog like that and then you tweet about that, you can actually gain security support around such issue and then fight for the research.An example would be that I know a couple of pen testers who have reported things in the past, and while the first time they reported it, the company was like, “Yeah, we'll fix it eventually.” But later, when another researcher report this exact same finding, the company is like, “We should probably take this seriously and jump on it.” It sometimes it's just getting in front of that and providing frequency or providing enough people around to say that, “Hey, this really is an issue in the security community and we should probably fix this item,” and keep pushing others organizations on it. A lot of times, they just need additional feedback. Because as you said, somebody runs an automated scanner against your email and says that, “Oh, you're not checking SPF as strictly as the scanner would have liked because it's a benchmarking tool.” It's not necessarily a security vulnerability rather than it's just how you've chosen to configure something and if it works for you, it works for you.Corey: How does cloud change this? Because a lot of what we talked about so far could apply to anything. Go back in time to 1995 and a lot of what we're talking about mostly holds true. It feels like cloud acts as a significant level of complexity on top of all of this. How do you view the differentiation there?Tim: So, I think it differentiated two things. One, certain services or certain vulnerability classes that are handled by the shared service model—for the most part—are probably secure better than you might be able to do yourself. Just because there's a lot of research, the team is [experimented 00:13:03] a lot of time on this. An example of if there's a particular, like, spoofing or network interception vulnerability that you might see on a local LAN network, you probably are not going to have the same level access to be able to execute that on a virtual private cloud or VNet, or some other virtual network within cloud environment. Now, something that does change with the paradigm of cloud is the fact that if you accidentally publicly expose something or something that you've created expo—or don't set a setting to be private or only specific to your resources, there is a couple of things that could happen. The vulnerabilities exploitability based on where increases to something that used to be just, “Hey, I left a port open on my own network. Somebody from HR or somebody from it could possibly interact with it.”However, in the cloud, you've now set this up to the entire world with people that might have resources or motivations to go after this product, and using services like Shodan—which are continually mapping the internet for open resources—and they can quickly grab that, say, “Okay, I'm going to attack these targets today,” might continue to poke a little bit further, maybe an internal person that might be bored at work or a pen tester just on one specific engagement. Especially in the case of let's say, what you're working on has sparked the interest of a nation-state and they want to dig into a little bit further, they have the resources to be able to dedicate time, people, and maybe tools and tactics against whatever this vulnerability that you've given previously the example of—maybe there's a specific ID and a URL that just needs to be guessed right to give them access to something—they might spend the time trying to brute force that URL, brute force that value, and eventually try to go after what you have.The main paradigm shift here is that there are certain things that we might consider less of a priority because the cloud has already taken care of them with the shared service model, and rightfully so, and there's other times that we have to take heightened awareness on is, one, we either dispose something to the entire internet or all cloud accounts within creations. And that's actually something that we see commonly. In fact, one thing I would like to say we see very common is, all AWS users, regardless if it's in your account or somewhere else, might have access to your SNS topic or SQS Queue. Which doesn't seem like that big of vulnerability, but I changed the messages, I delete messages, I viewed your messages, but rather what's connected to those? Let's talk database Lambda functions where I've got source code that a developer has written to handle that source code and may not have built in logic to handle—maybe there was a piece of code that could be abused as part of this message that might allow an attacker to send something to your Lambda function and then execute something on that attacker's behalf.You weren't aware of it, you weren't thinking about it, and now you've exposed it to almost the entire internet. And since anyone can go sign up for an AWS account—or Azure or GCP account—and then they're able to start poking at that same piece of code that you might have developed thinking, “Well, this is just for internal use. It's not a big deal. That one static code analysis tool isn't probably too relevant.” Now, it becomes hyper-relevant and something you have to consider with a little more attention and dedicated time to making sure that these things that you've written or deploying, are in fact, safe because misconfigured or mis-exposed, and suddenly the entire world is starts knocking at it, and increases the risk of, it may really well be a problem. The severity of that issue could increase dramatically.Corey: As you take a look across, let's call it the hyperscale clouds, the big three—which presumably I don't need to define out—how do you wind up ranking them in terms of security from top to bottom? I have my own rankings that I like to dole out and basically, this is the, let's offend someone at every one of these companies, no matter how we wind up playing it. Because I will argue with you just on principle on them. How do you view them stacking up against each other?Tim: So, an interesting view on that is based on who's been around longest and who is encountered of the most technical debt. A lot of these security vulnerabilities or security concerns may have had to deal with a decision made long ago that might have made sense at the time and now the company has kind of stuck with that particular technology or decision or framework, and are now having to build or apply security Band-Aids to that process until it gets resolved. I would say, ironically, AWS is actually at the top of having that technical debt, and actually has so many different types of access policies that are very complex to configure and not very user intuitive unless you speak intuitively JSON or YAML or some other markdown language, to be able to tell you whether or not something was actually set up correctly. Now, there are a lot of security experts who make their money based on knowing how to configure or be able to assess whether or not these are actually the issue. I would actually bring them as, by default, by design, between the big three, they're actually on the lower end of certain—based on complexity and easy-to-configure-wise.The next one that would also go into that pile, I would say is probably Microsoft Azure, who [sigh] admittedly, decided to say that, “Okay, let's take something that was very complicated and everyone really loved to use as an identity provider, Active Directory, and try to use that as a model for.” Even though they made it extensively different. It is not the same as on-prem directory, but use that as the framework for how people wanted to configure their identity provider for a new cloud provider. The one that actually I would say, comes out on top, just based on use and based on complexity might be Google Cloud. They came to a lot of these security features first.They're acquiring new companies on a regular basis with the acquisition of Mandiant, the creation of their own security tooling, their own unique security approaches. In fact, they probably wrote the book on Kubernetes Security. Would be on top, I guess, from usability, such as saying that I don't want to have to manage all these different types of policies. Here are some buttons I would like to flip and I'd like my resources, for the most part by default, to be configured correctly. And Google does a pretty good job of that.Also, one of the things they do really well is entity-based role assumption, which inside of AWS, you can provide access keys by default or I have to provide a role ID after—or in Azure, I'm going to say, “Here's a [unintelligible 00:19:34] policy for something specific that I want to grant access to a specific resource.” Google does a pretty good job of saying that okay, everything is treated as an email address. This email address can be associated in a couple of different ways. It can be given the following permissions, it can have access to the following things, but for example, if I want to remove access to something, I just take that email address off of whatever access policy I had somewhere, and then it's taken care of. But they do have some other items such as their design of least privilege is something to be expected when you consider their hierarchy.I'm not going to say that they're not without fault in that area—in case—until they had something more recently, as far as finding certain key pieces of, like say, tags or something within a specific sub-project or in our hierarchy, there were cases where you might have granted access at a higher level and that same level of access came all the way down. And where at least privilege is required to be enforced, otherwise, you break their security model. So, I like them for how simple it is to set up security at times, however, they've also made it unnecessarily complex at other times so they don't have the flexibility that the other cloud service providers have. On the flip side of that, the level of flexibility also leads to complexity at times, which I also view as a problem where customers think they've done something correctly based on their best knowledge, the best of documentation, the best and Medium articles they've been researching, and what they have done is they've inadvertently made assumptions that led to core anti-patterns, like, [unintelligible 00:21:06] what they've deployed.Corey: This episode is sponsored in part by our friends at Uptycs, because they believe that many of you are looking to bolster your security posture with CNAPP and XDR solutions. They offer both cloud and endpoint security in a single UI and data model. Listeners can get Uptycs for up to 1,000 assets through the end of 2023 (that is next year) for $1. But this offer is only available for a limited time on UptycsSecretMenu.com. That's U-P-T-Y-C-S Secret Menu dot com.Corey: I think you're onto something here, specifically in—well, when I've been asked historically and personally to rank security, I have viewed Google Cloud as number one, and AWS is number two. And my reasoning behind that has been from an absolute security of their platform and a pure, let's call it math perspective, it really comes down to which of the two of them had what for breakfast on any given day there, they're so close on there. But in a project that I spin up in Google Cloud, everything inside of it can talk to each other by default and I can scope that down relatively easily, whereas over an AWS land, by default, nothing can talk to anything. And that means that every permission needs to be explicitly granted, which in an absolutist sense and in a vacuum, yeah, that makes sense, but here in reality, people don't do that. We've seen a number of AWS blog posts over the last 15 years—they don't do this anymore—but it started off with, “Oh, yeah, we're just going to grant [* on * 00:22:04] for the purposes of this demo.”“Well, that's horrible. Why would you do that?” “Well, if we wanted to specify the IAM policy, it would take up the first third of the blog post.” How about that? Because customers go through that exact same thing. I'm trying to build something and ship.I mean, the biggest lie in any environment or any codebase ever, is the comment that starts with, “To do.” Yeah, that is load-bearing. You will retire with that to do still exactly where it is. You have to make doing things the right way at least the least frictionful path because no one is ever going to come back and fix this after the fact. It's never going to happen, as much as we wish that it did.Tim: At least until after the week of the breach when it was highlighted by the security team to say that, “Hey, this was the core issue.” Then it will be fixed in short order. Usually. Or a Band-Aid is applied to say that this can no longer be exploited in this specific way again.Corey: My personal favorite thing that, like, I wouldn't say it's a lie. But the favorite thing that I see in all of these announcements right after the, “Your security is very important to us,” right after it very clearly has not been sufficiently important to them, and they say, “We show no signs of this data being accessed.” Well, that can mean a couple different things. It can mean, “We have looked through the audit logs for a service going back to its launch and have verified that nothing has ever done this except the security researcher who found it.” Great. Or it can mean, “What even are logs, exactly? We're just going to close our eyes and assume things are great.” No, no.Tim: So, one thing to consider there is in that communication, that entire communication has probably been vetted by the legal department to make sure that the company is not opening itself up for liability. I can say from personal experience, when that usually has occurred, unless it can be proven that breach was attributable to your user specifically, the default response is, “We have determined that the security response of XYZ item or XYZ organization has determined that your data was not at risk at any point during this incident.” Which might be true—and we're quoting Star Wars on this one—from a certain point of view. And unfortunately, in the case of a post-breach, their security, at least from a regulation standpoint where they might be facing a really large fine, is absolutely probably their top priority at this very moment, but has not come to surface because, for most organizations, until this becomes something that is a financial reason to where they have to act, where their reputation is on the line, they're not necessarily incentivized to fix it. They're incentivized to push more products, push more features, keep the clients happy.And a lot of the time going back and saying, “Hey, we have this piece of technical debt,” it doesn't really excite our user base or doesn't really help us gain a competitive edge in the market is considered an afterthought until the crisis occurs and the information security team rejoices because this is the time they actually get to see their stuff fixed, even though it might be a super painful time for them in the short run because they get to see these things fixed, they get to see it put to bed. And if there's ever a happy medium, where, hey, maybe there was a legacy feature that wasn't being very well taken care of, or maybe this feature was also causing the security team a lot of pain, we get to see both that feature, that item, that service, get better, as well as security teams not have to be woken up on a regular basis because XYZ incident happened, XYZ item keeps coming up in a vulnerability scan. If it finally is put to bed, we consider that a win for all. And one thing to consider in security as well as kind of, like, we talk about the relationship between the developers and security and/or product managers and security is if we can make it a win, win, win situation for all, that's the happy path that we really want to be getting to. If there's a way that we can make sure that experience is better for customers, the security team doesn't have to be broken up on a regular basis because an incident happened, and the developers receive less friction when they want to go implement something, you find that that secure feature, function, whatever tends to be the happy path forward and the path of least resistance for everyone around it. And those are sometimes the happiest stories that can come out of some of these incidents.Corey: It's weird to think of there being any happy stories coming out of these things, but it's definitely one of those areas that there are learnings there to be had if we're willing to examine them. The biggest problem I see so often is that so many companies just try and hide these things. They give the minimum possible amount of information so the rest of us can't learn by it. Honestly, some of the moments where I've gained the most respect for the technical prowess of some of these cloud providers has been after there's been a security issue and they have disclosed either their response or why it was a non-issue because they took a defense-in-depth approach. It's really one of those transformative moments that I think is an opportunity if companies are bold enough to chase them down.Tim: Absolutely. And in a similar vein, when we think of certain cloud providers outages and we're exposed, like, the major core flaw of their design, and if it kept happening—and again, these outages could be similar and analogous to an incident or a security flaw, meaning that it affected us. It was something that actually happened. In the case of let's say, the S3 outage of, I don't know, it was like 2017, 2018, where it turns out that there was a core DNS system that inside of us-east-1, which is actually very close to where I live, apparently was the core crux of, for whatever reason, the system malfunctioned and caused a major outage. Outside of that, in this specific example, they had to look at ways of how do we not have a single point of failure, even if it is a very robust system, to make sure this doesn't happen again.And there was a lot of learnings to be had, a lot of in-depth investigation that happened, probably a lot of development, a lot of research, and sometimes on the outside of an incident, you really get to understand why a system was built a certain way or why a condition exists in the first place. And it sometimes can be fascinating to kind of dig into that very deeper and really understand what the core problem is. And now that we know what's an issue, we can actually really work to address it. And sometimes that's actually one of the best parts about working at Praetorian in some cases is that a lot of the items we find, we get to find them early before it becomes one of these issues, but the most important thing is we get to learn so much about, like, why a particular issue is such a big problem. And you have to really solve the core business problem, or maybe even help inform, “Hey, this is an issue for it like this.”However, this isn't necessarily all bad in that if you make these adjustments of these items, you get to retain this really cool feature, this really cool thing that you built, but also, you have to say like, here's some extra, added benefits to the customers that you weren't really there. And—such as the old adage of, “It's not a bug, it's a feature,” sometimes it's exactly what you pointed out. It's not necessarily all bad in an incident. It's also a learning experience.Corey: Ideally, we can all learn from these things. I want to thank you for being so generous with your time and talking about how you view this increasingly complicated emerging space. If people want to learn more, where's the best place to find you?Tim: You can find me on LinkedIn which will be included in this podcast description. You can also go look at articles that the team is putting together at praetorian.com. Unfortunately, I'm not very big on Twitter.Corey: Oh, well, you must be so happy. My God, what a better decision you're making than the rest of us.Tim: Well, I like to, like, run a little bit under the radar, except on opportunities like this where I can talk about something I'm truly passionate about. But I try not to pollute the airwaves too much, but LinkedIn is a great place to find me. Praetorian blog for stuff the team is building. And if anyone wants to reach out, feel free to hit the contact page up in praetorian.com. That's one of the best places to get my attention.Corey: And we will, of course, put links to that in the [show notes 00:30:19]. Thank you so much for your time. I appreciate it. Tim Gonda, Technical Director of Cloud at Praetorian. I'm Cloud Economist Corey Quinn, and this is Screaming in the Cloud. If you've enjoyed this podcast, please leave a five-star review on your podcast platform of choice, whereas if you've hated this podcast, please leave a five-star review on your podcast platform of choice, along with an angry comment talking about how no one disagrees with you based upon a careful examination of your logs.Corey: If your AWS bill keeps rising and your blood pressure is doing the same, then you need The Duckbill Group. We help companies fix their AWS bill by making it smaller and less horrifying. The Duckbill Group works for you, not AWS. We tailor recommendations to your business and we get to the point. Visit duckbillgroup.com to get started.Announcer: This has been a HumblePod production. Stay humble.

This week's show featured new music from Marlon Williams, Jalen N'Gonda and more. Sam also gets an early taste of the upcoming reissue of The Beatles album Revolver. 

Esteban Gonda presenta su álbum "Classical Flamenco" inspirado en las obras esenciales que consolidaron a la guitarra flamenca de concierto como instrumento solista.

Vandaag een leuke aflevering. Nouja, leuk zijn mijn onderwerpen niet. Maar ik vind het een intrigerende zaak. Heeft hij het gedaan of niet? En als hij het gedaan heeft, waarom zoveel risico? En als hij het wel gedaan heeft, waarom geloven er toch mensen dat hij het niet gedaan heeft?

Michael Gonda is the Chief Communications Officer of McDonald's, a position he's held for the past 8 months. Michael is responsible for setting integrated communications strategies that advance the message of the brand and drive business impact in more than 100 markets around the world. He oversees corporate communications, including media relations and financial communications; global public affairs and public policy; issues and crisis management; internal and strategic communications and communications for McDonald's International Operated Markets and International Development Licensee Markets. Prior to joining McDonald's, Michael had previous stints at Chobani and Weber Shandwick, and Michael was recently added to PRWeek's 2022 Power List.  In this conversation with Lippe Taylor CEO Paul Dyer, Michael gets into why legacy brands need to fight harder for relevance, details about his meteoric leadership rise, and fun anecdotes around the recent McDonald's Indiana sign war.  Thank you as always for listening, don't forget to subscribe.  ----- Produced by https://podcastlaunch.pro (Simpler Media)

Vandaag hebben we het over de zaak van Gonda Drent. Gonda kwam om tijdens een brand in haar huis. Maar kwam ze wel daadwerkelijk om door de brand of was het toch een misdrijf? Deze aflevering wordt mede mogelijk gemaakt door Storytel. Wil je 30 dagen gratis Storytel proberen? Beluister en bekijk nu meer dan 300.000 luisterboeken en e-books via: story.tel/crimetok

Čo chýbalo v pretekoch, to vám vynahradí náš debriefing, ktorý tentoraz posilnil Ričardiňo Gonda! Vynechá Hamilton preteky v Kanade? Podarí sa Mercedesu docieliť zmenu pravidiel? Ktorý pilot je zásadne proti? Ako môže Ferrari ešte zachrániť sezónu? Ukázal Verstappen Perézovi skutočnú hierarchiu v Red Bulle? Prečo sa McLarene zamotal v stratégiách? Ako sa stať pretekovým inžinierom? Čo vám a nám v tejto sezóne zatiaľ chýba? Príjemné počúvanie a tešíme sa na vás v Brne :) Náš MERCH nájdete tu: https://eshop.josefkral.cz/ https://www.formulastore.sk/bwoah-e1 INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/stevoeiselef1/ https://www.instagram.com/josef_kral/

Henk is niet alleen directeur van Nimeto, maar vooral een Wieky de Viking binnen het onderwijssysteem. Hij is, met zijn team, druk bezig om dit systeem te vernieuwen. Of het nu gaat over diplomering, over nieuwe vormen van onderwijs of het curriculum op maat. Dit vraagt veel creativiteit. Gonda kwam met een mooie olifant in de kamer: word je gevraagd om les te komen geven, maar mag je niet omdat je geen Master heb. Kortom, in deze MonkeyTalk gaat het over de vele regeltjes en hoe daar mee om te gaan. Veel plezier!Website Nimeto: https://www.nimeto.nlPodcast-tip: GIEP, te vinden via elke podcast-app of Spotify.Laat je weten wat je van deze MonkeyTalk vond? Review of sterretjes geven en de podcast aanraden bij al je vrienden waardeer ik enorm.Wie is Irene Koel?Gepokt en gemazeld toegepast, creatieve strateeg. Ik help bedrijven en organisaties bij ontwikkeling van strategie en marketinginnovatie, zodat eigenheid ontstaat en van daaruit relevante ontwikkeling. Ik start daarbij altijd vanuit een sterke merkidentiteit en het creatief concept dat daaruit volgt. Het draait tenslotte om authenticiteit. Ik werk graag samen met hetteam, zodat de creativiteit in de cultuur wakker gekust wordt. Waardevolle groei ontstaat altijd van binnenuit. Ik geef daarnaast lezingen (over creativiteit en innovatie) en les. Ik doe vrijwilligerswerk in India om banen te creëren voor vrouwen, ik investeer in sociale bedrijven en zit in een paar besturen of ‘Raden van Advies'. En ben voorzitter van een EFFIE-jury. Wil je meer weten over MonkeyTalk, MonkeyDo, ons innovatie-spelprogramma, over de voorapers, over Irene Koel? Kijk dan op www.thezooooo.com, daar vind je alles.Of check en volg Irene op LinkedIn. Waarom MonkeyTalk?Met MonkeyTalk wil ik graag je creativiteit opporren en aanwakkeren. Want iedereen is creatief en de wereld heeft, in deze transitie-fase, jouw creativiteit hard nodig. Met MonkeyTalk deel ik mijn ervaring en netwerk, wil ik je inspireren en concrete tips geven. Ik hoop dat je hersenen even een ommetje maken als je de aflevering luistert. Om daarna weer fris, fruitig en creatief de wereld in te gaan. Met deze aangewakkerde creativiteit ben je dan zelf ook een inspirerende vooraper, zoals we dat bij The Zooooo noemen. Daar hoop ik op. En vraag ik je vooral te doen. Als je je abonneert op MonkeyTalk krijg je automatisch een melding als er een nieuwe aflevering is. En het is natuurlijk heel fijn als je MonkeyTalk deelt in je netwerk en heel veel sterretjes geeft. Dank!Wil je vriend worden van MonkeyTalk? Geweldig, heel graag.Deze MonkeyTalks (nu al zo'n 33 uur luisterplezier) met ervaring, inspiratie en dikke tips krijg je allemaal gratis. Ik investeer en geef graag door, maar als je wilt steunen is dat altijd fijn en het voelt best eerlijk. Hoe? Kijk op https://petje.af/monkeytalkVoor 3 euro per maand, maar je mag ook zelf het bedrag bepalen. Of je kan eenmalig meteen het jaarbedrag doneren. Bij 100 petjes ga ik iets leuks doen voor de petjes. Reuze dank!

I had so much fun chatting with Judith about her books, our writing journies, and all things cozy. I hope you'll check out her books and follow her on her website https://www.judithgonda.com/, or on Facebook and Twitter. To support the show, join me on my Patreon page at Patreon.com/TheCozySleuth or on Ko-fi.com/thecozysleuth

El sector uruguayo de las Tecnologías de la Información (TI) vivió un verdadero sacudón la semana pasada, cuando se conoció la venta de una de las empresas emblemáticas de ese rubro en nuestro país. El pasado jueves, la multinacional de origen argentino Globant informó que había alcanzado un acuerdo para adquirir la uruguaya GeneXus. Esta empresa, liderada por los ingenieros Nicolás Jodal y Breogán Gonda, que hoy cuenta con 150 profesionales y más de 30 años en el mercado, fue la creadora de la primera herramienta inteligente para crear y mantener software de manera automática, que es utilizada por miles de clientes en América Latina y Asia, entre ellos Mitsubishi, Honda y el Banco Itaú. La compradora, Globant, es más joven (nació en 2003), está dedicada a “reinventar los negocios mediante soluciones tecnológicas innovadoras”, emplea a 23.500 personas, tiene presencia en 18 países, entre ellos Uruguay, trabaja con firmas como Google, Disney o Yahoo. ¿Qué implica esta operación para el sector de las TI en Uruguay? ¿Y qué implica para los creadores de Genexus? ¿A qué se dedicarán ahora? Hoy En Perspectiva conversamos con con los co-fundadores de Genexus, Breogán Gonda y Nicolás Jodal.

( 本期节目是会员专享，在播客中仅提供前9分钟试听。) 旧上海的百老汇 上海是国歌《义勇军进行曲》最早的唱响地。从上个世纪20年代开始，随着电影、戏剧等娱乐业的蓬勃发展，上海形成以跑马厅为中心的剧院群，留下一段堪称“东方百老汇”的辉煌历史。 相关链接： 上海跑马厅 混响时间 范文照 C. H. Gonda

¿Les parece difícil la programación de software? ¿Dificilísima? ¿Lo ven cómo una habilidad hipercompleja reservada solo para los ingenieros en computación? En los últimos años, el desarrollo de software se ha vuelto mucho más sencillo, gracias a herramientas como el Low Code, o “Poco Código”. A diferencia del lenguaje de programación tradicional, las plataformas de Low Code minimizan al extremo el uso de códigos complejos, lo que permite que personas sin habilidades en el desarrollo de software puedan diseñar aplicaciones ellas mismas. Precisamente, de Low Code, sus ventajas, y su potencial para el desarrollo del software en Uruguay discutimos hoy en una nueva edición de La Mesa TIC junto a: Aníbal Gonda consultor en informática, «evangelizador técnico» de GeneXus; Sofía Maiolo, ingeniera en computación, Customer Experience Manager en WorkWithPlus; Santiago Lowy, coordinador de ventas en Interamericana de Cómputos.

In today's episode, we have Nikki Gonda, the founder of Moon Box—an incredible business that's designed to change the way you cycle. Today, Nikki provides us with so many great tools and resources to educate you on your body's natural cycle, reducing period pain and balancing your hormones. We also touch on issues like PMS, cramps, endometriosis and skin health, empowering you to make positive, long-term changes. SOCIAL Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/happywayau TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@happywayau Pinterest: https://pinterest.com/happywayau Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/happyway Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0yQ2MEmFqbO9p0mdbvGG7Y  Apple podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/the-happy-way-podcast/id1578867556   Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/happywayau YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/happywayau MORE FROM NIKKI: https://www.instagram.com/mymoonbox/

A quen non lle vai agradar unha loanza? Unha palabra cariñosa? Un recoñecemento? Pero o certo é que hai xente que se adica a isto, non que cobre por opinar senón que vive de facer crítica. E a estas persoas é moito máis difícil, polo tanto significativo, arrincarlles palabras boas. As malas non, esas téñenas sempre a man e en pista de despegue. Por iso cando os astros se conxuran e un deles fai o esforzo sobrehumano de rir durante unha comedia, hai que enmarcalo. Isto mesmo fixo a guionista Araceli Gonda cunha das críticas de Cuñados, agora con 16 candidaturas aos Mestre Mateo e gala na que ela tamén opta a mellor guión por Hierro. Pero Araceli ten carreira de sobra para falar de facer pilotos ou escenas de sexo entre personaxes. Xunto a ela parolamos sobre facer spoilers, comentar audiovisual en redes sociais, o xeito de consumo de series actualmente, Fleabag e unha carreira de minijobs: de xornalista de deportes ata dramaturga.

Three guests share their part in a journey that involves reuniting with family in Greece.Gonda Van Steen is a researcher, author, and the Koraes Chair of Modern Greek and Byzantine History, Language, and Literature at King's College in London. In this episode she explains a piece of Greece's history that is not super well-known. For the past ten years she has been researching the adoptions of thousands of Greek-born children sent to the United States and to the Netherlands in the 1950s and 1960s. She has also helped several of those Greek-born adoptees learn about their roots and connect with their families. Today, she continues to work on encouraging Greece to acknowledge these individuals as citizens of Greece. A mother and daughter she's helped are Maria Papadopoulou and Alexis Zeluff. They share their struggles with the paperwork, how they're embracing their heritage, and the emotions and joys of uncovering the truth of Maria's adoption and reuniting with their family in Greece, specifically with Maria's birth mother.Learn More: Book: Adoption, Memory, and Cold War Greece: Kid pro quo? By Gonda Van Steen (Ekdoseis Potamos published the Greek translation in November 2021)Article: “Opinion: Bring Them Back!” By Mary Cardaras and Gonda Van Steen YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Gonda+Van+SteenEmail: gonda.van_steen@kcl.ac.uk 

IK GEEF ME OVER

Vandaag nemen we jullie mee naar Hoogezand, waar na een brand het lichaam van de 30 jarige jonge moeder Gonda Drent werd gevonden. Luister mee om alles over deze zaak te weten te komen.

3 - Vendégünk Gonda Gábor fegyvermester by Balázsék

Online hallgatásért, friss sztárhírekért, programajánlókért, valamint a legújabb tracklistákért és mixek visszahallgatásáért keresd weboldalunkat: http://www.radio1.hu Lemaradtál reggel Balázsékról? Hallgasd vissza a műsort! - http://balazsek.radio1.hu Kövess minket a közösségi médiában! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/radio1hungary Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/radio1hungary TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@radio1hungary YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/radio1hungary Viber: https://vb.me/radio1communityweb Töltsd le a Rádió 1 mobilos applikációját és nézz minket élőben! - https://www.radio1.hu/mobilapp

Vyplýva to z najnovších prepočtov European Investment Centre (EIC) a Konzervatívneho inštitútu M. R. Štefánika (KI), približujúcich celkové bremeno ľudí povinnými platbami na príklade zamestnanca s priemernou mzdou. Klesá zaťaženie občanov alebo naopak stúpa? A nie je čas na znižovanie daňovo-odvodového bremena občanov, rodín a firiem?

Vandaag bespreek ik de moordzaak van Gonda Drent. Zij werd op 12 december 1996 dood aangetroffen in haar woning in Hoogezand nadat er een brand was uitgebroken. Al snel werd voor de politie duidelijk dat er sprake was van een misdrijf, maar het heeft nog heel lang geduurd voordat haar moordenaar werd veroordeeld. Meer hierover hoor je in de aflevering! De foto's die bij deze zaak horen vind je terug op onze instagram pagina, https://bit.ly/3pyCytS (@alsdedood_podcast).

www.beyondthepixiedust.com

in this episode we dive into all things about the coding of living with your cycle, the sacredness of bleeding and the truth of what most of us, we were never taught around being a woman or those with female bodies. You can find Dani here at @danigonda. 

Desta vez vai de familias!! Estivo con nós Araceli Gonda, guionista de Cuñados. Detrás dos focos tamèn hai estrelas! Parte do éxito dunha das pelis da tempada leva o seu bo facer. Falamos un pouco de todo, que aparte de escribir tamén hai que vivir --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/bocachanclas/message

Ivett Gonda is a two time Olympian, martial artist and stunt performer in the Vancouver film industry. Born in Hungary, Ivett emigrated to Canada with her family when she was 4 years old, and joined the neighbourhood Taekwondo studio at age 8. Moving up the competitive ranks, she climbed the ladder quickly, from the junior national level all the way to the Olympics. After retirement from competitive sport in 2016, Ivett found her way to film. Since then she’s worked as a stunt performer on TV shows such as Siren, Arrow, Supergirl, Batwoman and Legends of Tomorrow. We talk about film fighting, stunt falls, wirework and free diving; all elements of Ivett’s life on set. We also discuss the parallels of professional sport and stunt work in film!

Don't miss out on the next #womenintech podcast episode, get notified by signing up here http://womenintechshow.com. Be featured in the Women in Tech Community by creating your profile here http://womenintechvip.com/“Remix: Charlyn Gonda, Marite Aleksandra Silava, and Liva Perkone”#womenintech Show is a WeAreTech.fm production.To support the Women in Tech podcast go to https://www.patreon.com/womenintechTo be featured on the podcast go to http://womenintechshow.com/featureHost, Espree Devorahttps://twitter.com/espreedevorahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/espreeGuest,Charlyn Gondahttps://twitter.com/chardanehttps://www.linkedin.com/in/charlyngGuest,Marite Aleksandra Silava https://twitter.com/mariteasilavahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/marite-aleksandra-silava-36052a33/Guest,Liva Perkone https://www.linkedin.com/in/livaperkone/https://www.instagram.com/livaperkone/Be featured in the Women in Tech Community by creating your profile here http://womenintechvip.com/In LA? Here’s some awesome resources for you to become immersed in the LA Tech scene -For a calendar of all LA Startup events go to, http://WeAreLATech.comGet Podcast Listeners, http://getpodcastlisteners.com/Resources Mentioned:Uber Eats, https://www.ubereats.com/en-US/Swedbank, https://www.swedbank.com/TechChill, https://techchill.co/Credits:Produced and Hosted by Espree Devora, http://espreedevora.comStory Produced, Edited and Mastered by Cory Jennings, https://www.coryjennings.com/Production and Voiceover by Adam Carroll, http://www.ariacreative.ca/Team support by Janice GeronimoMusic by Jay Huffman, https://soundcloud.com/jayhuffmanShort Title: Charlyn Gonda, Marite Aleksandra Silava, Liva Perkone

Cyclical Living is not another template, it's a concept that calls every part of you forward. Your maiden, mother, wild women and crone (just to name a few ;) ) It has you tuning in with every moment of every day, acknowledging each emotion, desire and sensation that comes from your body.  In the episode we hear the beautiful Dani's unique and inspiring interpretation of what living in tune with flow has empowered and enriched her whole life. We talk all this magic and shadows. ENJOY!

Bekal Utsahi was a popular poet who made extensive use of Awadhi language in his shayari. He was born Mohd. Shafi Khan in Balrampur, Uttar Pradesh on June 1, 1930. Bekal was given the pseudonym Utsahi by Jawahar Lal Nehru, India's first Prime Minister. This happened during an election campaign of the Congress party in Gonda, in which Bekal Warsi welcomed Pandit Nehru by narrating the poetry "Kisan Bharat Ka". Nehru was awestruck and said,"Yeh hamara utsahi shayar hai". Since that day, he came to be known as Bekal Utsahi in the literary circles. His most famous nazm is 'Ai Meri Jan-e-ghazal….'. Bekal was a member of Rajya Sabha. In 1976, he was awarded the Padmshree in the field of literature. He passed away on 2nd December 2016. Source: Wikipedia.If you like our podcast please share it with your friends. Leave a review. Feedback is always welcome and much appreciated. Abdul Raoof Siddiquiemail: raoof3@yahoo.comInstagram @urdu.ghazal

In this fully loaded episode the guys get into some hilarious antics with SDSU professor, Dr. Michael Gonda. They also take some time to dig into the future of genetically modified food and Doug and Clays strange interaction with a man named John. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/other-guys/support

In this fully loaded episode the guys get into some hilarious antics with SDSU professor, Dr. Michael Gonda. They also take some time to dig into the future of genetically modified food and Doug and Clays strange interaction with a man named John. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/other-guys/support

Thanks 4 Saving My Life! (Parody of Monsters by All Time Low, featuring Demi Lovato & blackbear)Original written by: Alex Gaskarth, Andrew Goldstein, Demi Lovato, Jack Barakat, Kevin Fisher, & Matthew MustoThis song is dedicated to Mepolizumab/ Nucala(the research medication that continually saves my life), to the Mayo Clinic (for caring for me for all of these years), and to my wonderful friends and family, who have traveled with me through hell and back to keep me on this planet!!! I love you all!!!!P.S. Also, thank you to gastroenterologists Dr. Kane and Dr Bi for giving me the guts to make my music! Lyrics:Kind, thank you for saving me, GlaxoSmithKlineThank you, Kay Bachman,Keeping tracking every timeThank you for MepoWithout it, I would dieThanks for saving my lifeDecembers in Rochester, In Marriott hotels:Only with the best peopleFamily and friends, They’re more than swellMab’ explosions quickly changin’My body’s internal chemistry.I know my eosinophils are finally listenin’With a normal CBC!I’m thankin’ them, kind,Thank you for saving me, GlaxoSmithKlineThank you, Kay BachmanKeeping track every timeThank you for Mepo,Without it, I would have diedThanks 4 saving my lifeKind, thank you to Ryan, Adam, & Sam for the Mayo drivesMom, Dad, & Dan,You guys saved my lifeWithout you, I definitely would have diedThanks 4 saving my life!I’m indebted to the way you helped,From soothing words, to ice creamDriving from Rochester to Tulsa,Back and forth, can be exhausting You just bear my burdens sweetlyCause you’re all so truly lovingCharlton, Damon, Mayo, Gonda, and Hilton when I’m dyingKnow, you inspire my rhymes You create my dreamsClaire, Julia, and Svetlana Never gave up on meThank you Dr. Pardanani, Weiler, & Dr. Pongdee To Dr Paul, to Dr. Paul, Miles, & OliverI’m thankin’ them, kindThank you for saving me, GlaxoSmithKlineThank you, Colleen, for scheduling every timeThank you for MepoWithout it, I would have diedThanks 4 saving my lifeKind, thank you to Ryan, Adam, & Sam for the Mayo drivesMom, Dad, and Connie,You guys saved my lifeWithout you, I definitely would have diedThanks 4 saving my life!Valley of the shadow of death still don’t have my head.God’s love enraptured me instead Without Him, I definitely would have died Thanks 4 saving my life!Rad, thank you to Josh Jones and his sis MegsThank you to my Uncle Ray and to my Aunt BethMark, Steve, & Michael Without you, I definitely would have diedThanks 4 saving my life!I’m thankin’ them, kind,Thank you for saving me, GlaxoSmithKlineThank you to Colleen for scheduling every timeThank you for Mepo,Without it, I would have diedThanks 4 saving my life!Kind, thank you to Ryan, Adam, & Sam for the Mayo drivesDean, Dan, and BrettYou guys saved my life!Without you, I definitely would have died,Thanks 4 saving my lifeGrandma Kate, that’s rightThanks 4 saving my life!Amy Novander, that’s rightThanks 4 saving my life!Written by: Melissa Smith (AKA Melzy of Wonderland on Youtube, & Mel’s Music on Spreaker, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, JioSaavn, Castbox, Deezer, Podcast Addict, Google Podcasts, iHeartRadio, Podchaser, & Facebook)

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.11.10.376822v1?rss=1 Authors: Walter, J. D., Hutter, C. A. J., Garaeva, A. A., Scherer, M., Zimmermann, I., Wyss, M., Rheinberger, J., Ruedin, Y., Earp, J. C., Egloff, P., Sorgenfrei, M., Hürlimann, L., Gonda, I., Meier, G., Remm, S., Thavarasah, S., Zimmer, G., Slotboom, D. J., Paulino, C., Plattet, P., Seeger, M. A. Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global crisis. Here, we report the generation of synthetic nanobodies, known as sybodies, against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We identified a sybody pair (Sb#15 and Sb#68) that can bind simultaneously to the RBD, and block ACE2 binding, thereby neutralizing pseudotyped and live SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Cryo-EM analyses of the spike protein in complex with both sybodies revealed symmetrical and asymmetrical conformational states. In the symmetric complex each of the three RBDs were bound by both sybodies, and adopted the up conformation. The asymmetric conformation, with three Sb#15 and two Sb#68 bound, contained one down RBD, one up-out RBD and one up RBD. Bispecific fusions of the sybodies increased the neutralization potency 100-fold, as compared to the single binders. Our work demonstrates that linking two binders that recognize spatially-discrete binding sites result in highly potent SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors for potential therapeutic applications. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info

Heb je in deze tijd van #covid19 weer eens zin om te #dansen en te #feesten? Luister naar de podcast van woensdag 7 oktober 2020 via SoundCloud en volg TOMOS via iTunes, Spotify of Google Podcastst. Lezing door Gonda van der Ploeg.

Parece clichê, mas não é. Nunca é demais lembrar que as mulheres representam a maioria da população brasileira, mas ainda não são figurinhas carimbadas nos respectivos espaços de elaboração e discussão de políticas públicas seja em nível municipal, estadual e federal. Organizadas, elas estão começando a ocupa posições importantes na proposição de ideias e no debate de medidas de promoção à cidadania. Para tratar da organização das mulheres na busca por cada vez mais quebras de paradigmas, rompimento do status quo, os cronistas conversam neste #JCExpress com Camilla Gonda, acadêmica de Direito e Ciências Sociais e idealizadora do projeto Por+ELAS na política.

Dancer. Writer. Speaker. Conference Organizer. Kotlin Guru. All around awesome person... Today’s guest, ladies and gentlemen, is Victoria Gonda! Victoria's blog: https://victoriagonda.com Android Test Driven Development By Tutorials Book: https://store.raywenderlich.com/products/android-test-driven-development-by-tutorials Increase Your Product Quality Through Accessibility: Kotlin Mumbai OR RayWenderlich.com Chicago Roboto Conference: https://chicagoroboto.com Twitter: @ttgonda

Knihomoľov zápisník Peter Gonda by Denník Postoj

Don't miss out on the next #womenintech podcast episode, get notified by signing up here http://womenintechshow.comWomen in Tech: Charlyn Gonda“Finding Food From Local Restaurants”#womenintech Show is a WeAreTech.fm production.To support the Women in Tech podcast go to https://www.patreon.com/womenintechTo be featured on the podcast go to http://womenintechshow.com/featureHost, Espree Devorahttps://twitter.com/espreedevorahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/espreeGuest,Charlyn Gonda of Uber Eatshttps://twitter.com/chardanehttps://www.linkedin.com/in/charlyngIn LA? Here’s some awesome resources for you to become immersed in the LA Tech scene -For a calendar of all LA Startup events go to, http://WeAreLATech.comTo further immerse yourself into the LA Tech community go to http://wearelatech.com/vipBe featured in the Women in Tech Community by creating your profile here http://womenintech.co/Links Mentioned:Uber Eats, https://www.ubereats.com/en-US/12 Months of Makes, https://medium.com/@charlyn/12-months-of-makes-88bc288d41dfParticle, https://www.particle.io/Adafruit, https://www.adafruit.com/People Mentioned:Peter Levels, https://twitter.com/levelsioLimor Fried, https://www.linkedin.com/in/ladyada/Credits:Produced and Hosted by Espree Devora, http://espreedevora.comStory produced, Edited and Mastered by Adam Carroll, http://www.ariacreative.ca/Show Notes by Karl Marty, http://karlmarty.comMusic by Jay Huffman, https://soundcloud.com/jayhuffmanShort Title: Food From Local Restaurants

Nikki is the Founder of My Moonbox and is your go-to girl when it comes to anything menstrual cycle related. Through years of study and research, Nikki's mission is to empower females with a holistic approach to balancing hormones and relieving period problems naturally. She developed a range of products and a 12 week program that helps to support women on their cycles naturally and holistically, with the aim of relieving symptoms of period pain and PMS! But, building her business has been no easy feat! In this episode we deep dive into her trials and tribulations from her idea to launch. Join us for the ride!   In this episode we talk about:  How she created her Moonbox products and why she didn't white-label them What her biggest issues have been since starting her business and how she's overcome them How to persevere for the long haul and create a resilient mindset when trying launch a business Letting go of control, delegation and how she's dealt with that How she's helped narrate the feminine space to be less taboo when talking about our periods Her top tips to bring yourself back into alignment with your menstrual flow   Connect with Nikki on Instagram:  @mymoonbox My Moon Box 12 Week Program   Connect with your hosts on Instagram:  @girlinterruptedco @saevilrow - Rachelle Saevil @uptothebeatfit - Gina Buber Want our EXCLUSIVE Wednesday Weekly Words of Wisdom delivered right to your inbox? Join HERE. Interested in being on our show? Email us at: hello@girlinterrupted.co

ROSSINI: El Barbero de Sevilla (Obertura) (7.42). London Festival Orchestra. Dir.: A. Scholz. BEETHOVEN: Obertura Leonora nº 3, Op. 72A (14.44). Orq. Fil. de Berlín. Dir.: A. Vandernoot. PERGOLESI: Stabat mater dolorosa (Stabat mater) (3.27). J. Faulkner (sop.), A. Gonda (mez.), Camerata Budapest. Dir.: M. Halasz. BEETHOVEN: Sinfonía nº 3 en Mi bemol mayor, Op. 55 "Eroica" (Cuarto movimiento: Finale: Allegro) (12.04). Academy of Ancient Music. Dir.: C. Hogwood. Escuchar audio

This episode we check our work before we do it, and Victoria Gonda gives gets us up to speed with Test driven development. Later Alex tells us what he's learnt this season after he's worked with coroutines. The post TDD for Android with Victoria Gonda – Podcast S10 E06 appeared first on Ray Wenderlich.

Richard Gonda je jeden z najväčších talentov motoristického športu. Svoju kariéru začal v minikárach ako 9 ročný, a teraz, už ako „starý“ macher, skúsil elektronické športy. V čase karanténnych opatrení sa preorientoval na hráča počítačových hier. A nielen to, úspešne zvláda streamovanie a marketing. Aké to je šoférovať reálne vozidlo a aké to je potom presedlať a súťažiť v elektronickom športe? V podcaste ho vyspovedal Števo Eisele.

No episódio número 21 do Podcast Melhoria Contínua, Natasha Gonda fala sobre questões que envolvem a sustentabilidade empresarial. Ela apresenta boas práticas simples de serem implementadas que impactam rapidamente no valor da conta de energia das empresas. E ela vai mais além. Também aponta estratégias e aspectos que profissionais de facilities e empresas de modo geral podem adotar não só para serem sustentáveis, mas também para servirem de exemplo para outras organizações e outros profissionais. Seu podcast pra dominar a Gestão de Facilities, Ativos e Manutenção e elevar o seu conhecimento ao próximo nível! Você que nos ouve via iPhone - iOS - ou Android não se esqueça de deixar sua avaliação e colocar as estrelinhas na loja do seu aplicativo. Isso nos ajuda a levar o Melhoria Contínua e a melhoria contínua para muito mais pessoas! Estamos no Spotify! - Visite bit.ly/melhoria-continua-podcast e assine e acesse www.infraspeak.com.br

EPISÓDIO GRAVADO NO DIA 14 de Março de 2020 Natasha Gonda e Marcelo Leite debatem os impactos causados pelo avanço do COVID 19 no ambiente de trabalho. Marcelo compartilha um pouco de como tem sido a sua experiência e os cuidados que tem tomado para se precaver e prevenir. Já a Natasha, enquanto Gestora de Facilities ou Facility Manager, também compartilha um pouco do que tem vivido e apresenta boas práticas e procedimentos que tem adotado para minimizar os impactos do vírus nas pessoas e nas equipes que comanda. Seu podcast pra dominar a Gestão de Facilities, Ativos e Manutenção e elevar o seu conhecimento ao próximo nível! Você que nos ouve via iPhone - iOS - ou Android não se esqueça de deixar sua avaliação e colocar as estrelinhas na loja do seu aplicativo. Isso nos ajuda a levar o Melhoria Contínua e a melhoria contínua para muito mais pessoas! Estamos no Spotify! - Visite bit.ly/melhoria-continua-podcast e assine e acesse www.infraspeak.com.br

Inez Bye https://www.instagram.com/inezbye/ is joined by Nikki Gonda https://www.instagram.com/mymoonbox/ who is the founder of @mymoonbox, a 12 week online period and hormone support program with monthly gift boxes, to chat all things alleviating period pain, regulating your hormones, eating + exercising for your optimal cycle plus MORE. 10% off My Moonbox program with the code 'peacefulbody10': https://mymoonbox.com.au/   _____________________________________________________________   Enquire about fitness & nutrition coaching with Inez Bye here: https://www.inezbyefitness.com/mentoring

About our guest: Nikki is a period expert and founder of the epic company Moonbox. Moonbox is about transforming the way women experience their periods. It's about busting period taboos & creating a world without period pain, shame and monthly suffering. It's about providing a holistic, effective & long term approach to balancing hormones & relieving menstrual symptoms naturally – without the pill, drugs or surgery. We are going to share all about how you can get amongst this goodness Nikki has created in the podcast so make sure you listen to the end of this episode. Podcast Questions: Nikki's doorway into optimising women's cycles What a healthy period looks like PMS - normal or just common? How to support the follicular phase of the cycle How to ensure you ovulate and how to know if you have Supporting your luteal phase Menstrual cups and period undies  Ways to track your cycle Natural contraception - what are your options All about Moonbox Final question; what is one thing you do for your health daily?    _________ Resources: - Natural condoms by Jonny Lovers - Daysy fertility and period tracker - Period undies by ModiBodi   Social & Website Links: https://mymoonbox.com.au/ https://www.facebook.com/mymoonboxau https://www.instagram.com/mymoonbox/ https://www.instagram.com/mymoonbox/ https://www.pinterest.com.au/mymoonbox/  

Multifunkčný profesionálny pretekár, európsky šampión F3 Open Cup 2013 a pohodový chalanisko konečne odhalil zo svojho súkromia! Okrem iného prezradil ako mu Charles Leclerc v roku 2016 vyfúkol miesto v akadémii Ferrari, ako sa takmer pobil po jednej kolízii, ale aj ako sa omylom spálil na dovolenke. A spomenie aj Lenku ;) Ročník výroby: 1994 (omg!!!) Koníček: otužovanie Jeho tvár znie povedome: Robert Wickens Instagram: @richardgonda

Bom, aqui, mais uma vez, estamos bostejando, porém agora ao invés de continuar fingindo que acredita e gosta de uns signos diferenciados, Gonda fica puto e começa e xingar qualquer ser pensante que algum dia já tenha acreditado que estrelas a milhares de anos-luz tenham algo a revelar na sua mísera e ínfima vida. Espero de verdade que seu ouvido não estoure.

Test your knowledge with Elissa Gonda, about the common therapies that come from Traditional Chinese Medicine.  Elissa Gonda C.A., MSOM is a nationally certified, licensed acupuncturist with Bachelor of Arts degrees in Nutrition and Psychology, and a Master of Science degree in Oriental Medicine. She completed an advanced internship at the Guangzhou Institute for Traditional Chinese Medicine in Guangzhou, China.  A lifetime struggle with asthma, allergies, and chronic sinusitis led Elissa to become interested in alternative medicine. Acupuncture, dietary and lifestyle changes, as well as Chinese herbal medicine restored Elissa to the state of health that she had longed for since childhood. Elissa treats children and adults with a wide variety of health concerns. She enjoys helping people feel well, and hopes to empower her patients to be healthy in mind, body and spirit. Connect with Elissa at her practice located in Madison, Wisconsin at Dane County Family Acupuncture. Consult with Naturopath Rosanne for a custom health plan at Natureofhealing.org. Find her books, The Nature of Healing, Heal the Body Heal The Planet, and Free Your Voice Heal Your Thyroid.  

In this episode I chat with MyMoonbox founder Nikki to discuss all things hormonal health, birthing her business, balancing work and play, The Pill and more. She unpacks her program and dives deep into having happy hormones. If you have a womb, this one is for you!Nikki has passed on a cheeky 10% discount for my listeners! Enter the code 'EP10' at the checkout to cash in!

Austen, Travis, and Meal review Dark Dungeons and interview the director of Dark Dungeons L Gabriel Gonda in this weeks Trashed Talk episode. Dark Dungeons is amazing, so please check it out and the rest of Gabriel's future projects.  Watch Dark Dungeons on Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/Dark-Dungeons-Alyssa-Kay/dp/B01LX0AX3H/.  Or at https://watch.thefantasy.network/browse if you would prefer a non-amazon source.  For people who want to see more of Strowlers and The Gamers can sign up to renew them here, and they'll get an email when the next Kickstarter goes live. (link: http://fan-supported.com/) fan-supported.com. 

Today we get to know Charlyn Gonda of Uber Eats. Uber Eats is the easy way to get food delivered. To support the Women in Tech podcast go to https://www.patreon.com/womenintech - tweet @womenintechshow and @EspreeDevora. https://www.ubereats.com/en-US/ https://medium.com/@charlyn/12-months-of-makes-88bc288d41df http://twitter.com/womenintechshow https://twitter.com/espreedevora

new mixtape series. all new music from Liberia. TRACKLIST =========== 1. One Night - F.A Feat. Ice Prince 2. Last Kiss (feat. RICKSLYN) - Bucky Raw 3. Everything Takes Time (Unreleased) - Skylett White 4. Wine Your Waist - Bucky Raw 5. Bang Bang - L’DreZ Feat. Jaredo 6. Oh Na Na - Joey Costar feat. Eighty 7. Game Over - Jodi Clarke 8. Greedy Gutt - D12 & Kizzy W 9. Morning - C.I.C 10. One More Night - Shuravee 11. Live Without You - B-Face feat. Taweh Da Great 12. Go Slow - Dee Lyrics 13. Back - F.A. Feat. Seyishay 14. Go Down - Djb3atz feat. Jaredo X Stunna X Pck 15. Eat I Eat - Jaredo Feat. Luwizzy 16. Mammie Peppeh - Bucky Raw 17. Caller Boi - Rocka$H Feat. JB (Soulfresh) 18. No Money - Dj Versatile Ft Yung Muse 19. In the Ring (feat. L'frankie) - Jaredo 20. One More Round - MC Caro 21. Bounce - Kobazzie 22. Marry Me (Prod. Bennysoundz) - Dickson Man 23. Trouble Trouble - Tialae Feat. Big Steve 24. Wocho - L’DreZ Feat. Jaredo 25. Vibe - Togar Howard 26. White Teeth Black Heart - T-Man Williams 27. Eat Sunthn - BIGG TIMEE 28. Small Boy - Black Diamond (Black-1) 29. Banana - Friday The CellPhoneMan 30. S' SoSo - BIGG TIMEE 31. Lay 60s - Bigg Timee 32. Bypass - AG Da Profit Feat. Shauibu 33. Wicked - Togar Howard 34. Lazy - Benji Cavalli 35. You Vex - Bigg Timee Feat. Pretty Mo 36. Nai Juke - JH$llywood 37. Bah Way - Joey Costar feat. Starks Vader 38. Boogie Man - BarsBrown Feat. Mazee Blanco & Kilo 39. Wake - Lib Foreign 40. Bad Man Shanga - Dollaz Deniro 41. Nobody - Foreign Ward Feat. Snoti 42. Feakor - Pitty D'best 43. Haters - Slumlife Wee & Lib Tay 44. Sit Down Deh - Mazee Blanco 45. Fountain - Lib Foreign 46. Old Lady (Jukaju) - T-Sweet 47. Rockey Shakey - T-Man Williams 48. Frisky Tata - Kzee 49. Jeh Bring It - Bucky Raw 50. Gonda (feat. Rich Goone) - X-ten 51. Ehnn - Mazee Blanco 52. Dat Her - BIGG TIMEE 53. Woomi - Bucky Raw 54. The Geez 2018 - Co.Z 55. Pro Poor Agenda (feat. Takun J) - Bucky Raw 56. Eat Over My Head (Clean) - Tito Gee 57. Laypay Laypay - T-Man Williams

View the show notes and links, plus learn about the latest competition and showcase submissions, and claim your free copy of the Ink & Cinema Kickstart Kit (for screenwriters, authors, and filmmakers) at InkAndCinema.com

A private merchant banking firm, with offices in Santa Monica, London and Sydney, Australia, they provide private equity, Venture Capital and advisory services to start ups and growing companies, focusing on Biotechnology, AI, Blockchain, Software and Precious Metals.  Rick discusses what he sees as the key to success in these ventures.

Nicolas Gonda was recently named one of Indiewire's inaugural “Influencers”, Variety's “10 Producers to Watch” and Details Magazine's “Digital Mavericks" for his work in the independent film industry. He is Co-Founder of Tugg, a web-platform that enables audiences to choose the films that play in their local theaters. He is also an independent film producer of several critically acclaimed films including Terrence Malick's THE TREE OF LIFE, winner of the Palme d'Or at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival. If you would like to learn more about Carole Dean and From the Heart Productions visit www.FromtheHeartProductions.com.

Gabe Gonda deconstructs a Toronto delicacy See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Another member of the Gonda clan has been added to the These Things Matter roster! Join Larry Gonda, aka: Taylor's dad, as he talks about The Who. Well, The Who, high school in the 70s, canned hams, being a dad in the 80s, and *gasp* marijuana!

We are very honored to have fellow Westword Podcast award-winner and Pop Culture extraordinaire (not to mention badass DJ) Miss Taylor Gonda! Both the Empty Girlfriends have had the pleasure of being on her & Kevin O'Brien's amazing podcast These Things Matter (@TTM_Podcast) discussing why pop culture has changed our lives & now we grabbed Gonda for an incredible discussion on her ever-changing perspectives on love, sex and the sacred nature our cycles. We figured this would be the best time to have Taylor because this week is the These Things Matter Podcast's 4 year anniversary!!! Holy crap congratulations! Check out their live recording on Wednesday 4/13 @ 8pm at Buntport Theater ($5) & go to their Anniversary party on Friday 4/15 at 9pm ($7) at Syntax Physic Opera for an incredible time. Also make sure to follow sweet baby Taylor on Twtiter at @TaylorGonda & on Instagram at @shmayloresque.

Aníbal Gonda, evangelizador técnico de Genexus, pasó por el programa La Nube para hablar sobre los avances tecnológicos que suceden en un futuro cercano y cómo estos impactan en la vida de las personas. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Aníbal Gonda, Technical Evangelist Endeavor Mentor de Genexus, compañía que le permite crear, diseñar y publicar una aplicación en 45 minutos, explicó... See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Nicolas Gonda who co-founded Tugg, Inc, explains their web-platform that enables people to choose the films that play in their local theaters and promote their own events. www.tugg.com To learn about Carole Dean and From the Heart Productions visit http://www.FromtheHeartProductions.com  

Welcome back to Business of Film, episode 15. This week we welcome Nicholas Gonda, Co-Founder of TUGG, a web-platform that lets YOU bring the movies you want to your local theater. Things we talk about in this episode: – How social media affects the experience of going to the movies. – Understand how theatres assess ... The post BoF #15 Nicholas Gonda, Co-Founder TUGG appeared first on Craft Truck.

Our guest is Nicolas Gonda, film producer/co-founder of Tugg, a startup that allows movie fans to choose what films screen at their local theaters. Check out www.Tugg.com

Anibla Gonda nos platica acerca de su conferencia 5 Tips para la Tecnología móvil

Crowdfund your Indie film into your local theater. Create virtual film festivals through your local cinema. Learn how Nicolas Gonda has created a process to crowdfund movies and films screenings.