Podcasts about breastaurants

For almost 30 years, Jellyrolls rocked Disney World guests with it's dueling piano magic. But now? High energy piano versions of popular music will be sung no more. Jellyrolls has closed. Candice LeRae and Johnny Gargano return to Podcast: The Ride to unpack their feelings about this historic place. Will they side with Jellyrolls lover Mike or Jellyrolls disliker Scott?  And where does Jason stand on this important matter? The stakes have never been higher. "⁠⁠⁠Breastaurants⁠⁠⁠" episode is up at: ⁠⁠⁠Patreon.com/PodcastTheRide⁠⁠⁠ FOLLOW PODCAST: THE RIDE: ⁠⁠⁠https://twitter.com/PodcastTheRide⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/podcasttheride⁠⁠⁠ BUY PODCAST: THE RIDE MERCH: ⁠⁠⁠https://www.teepublic.com/stores/podcast-the-ride⁠⁠⁠ PODCAST THE RIDE IS A FOREVER DOG PODCAST ⁠⁠⁠https://foreverdogpodcasts.com/podcasts/podcast-the-ride⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today, this is what's important: Paparazzi, The Man Show era, sex toys, condoms, chokers, television theme songs, & more. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textRestaurants.Breastaurants. Vegas.Heart attacks. shelwereadapoem@gmail.com@ShelWeRead

Hawk Tuah Girl Update! Monetize your fame!People that went Viral!Breastaurants are closing!Is Chik-Fil-A the best Fast food restaurant! Are they even the best Chicken SandwichBurger King Long Chicken Sandwich - Love it or hate!You can get McDonalds PounderNCAA football 2025Golden Pants - Worse National Anthem Ever! Ingred Andress vs Enrico Pallazzo!The shot heard around the world! Bourbon Nerd Whiskey of the Week - Dickle 15yr Whiskey - Flintstone VitaminCheck out our Website:https://lifefromthepatio.comBuy some Merch:https://lifefromthepatio.com/merchfollow us on TikTok:https://tiktok.com/@lifefromthepatio2#bourbon #whiskey #fye #comedy #podcast #funnyvideo #buffalotrace #distillery#buffalo #LFTP#oldforester #jimbeam #heavenhill #Bluenote#Shortbarrel#rye #ark #arknights #arkansas#nba #nfl #razorbacks

Christine's comedy might be legendary, but Hooters is no place for it. Follow us on TikTok! https://tiktok.com/@beachtoosandy Get your Clam Volcano pin!!! https://store.dftba.com/collections/beach-too-sandy-water-too-wet Support us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/beachtoosandy Xtine's Etsy: https://www.etsy.com/shop/hauntedtofu Xandy's Stream: twitch.tv/xandyschiefer Check out our Instagram: instagram.com/beachtoosandy Logo by Courtney Aventura. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Shaq goes into a Christmas tree, killer robots are coming, and forget Chuck E Cheese for your kids birthday, does this instead.

Breastaurants, Vinyl, Leering and much more covered in today's episode! Clips for today's episode were taken from Letterkenny (0906) Follow us on Facebook! Follow Megan on Instagram! For questions, comments, or to give YOUR take on today's episode, email us at casualjosh0@gmail.com, and we'll read it on the next episode! Go show Josh's music some love, or book him to mix your next project! #LittleBitLoud #LittleBitLoudMedia Pitter Patter! - NMF Team --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/not-my-forte/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/not-my-forte/support

Episode 188 - Al Jackson!  Al is a hilarious comedian who has toured with Andrew Dice Clay, Jim Norton, Dave Attell, Steve-O and many more.  He also worked as a writer on Shaquille O'Neal's TV show.  Currently he can be seen on Daily Blast Live where he has some great discussions with his co-hosts.  We have our own honest discussion here including why companies really go woke, comedy road life, breastaurants, and much more! 0:00:00 - Intro0:01:40 - Past Guests & Clips0:02:50 - Wearing a Suit & Cursing 0:07:50 - Daily Blast Live & Differing Opinions 0:12:53 - Social Media 0:15:10 - Covid & Information 0:19:10 - Dopesick & Drug Companies0:20:10 - Wokeness & Financial Gain 0:28:56 - Comedy Clips Go Viral 0:32:00 - Having Honest Discussions 0:33:10 - Hooters & Breastaurants 0:40:15 - Finding a Girl You Enjoy 0:43:55 - Retired Partier & Road Life 0:48:15 - Tik Tok & New Generation of Shows0:52:00 - Al's Schedule & Projects 0:53:40 - Black People Doing White Things 0:56:30 - A.D.D. & Completing Tasks 0:59:57 - Mercy Housing & Helping People1:03:45 - Wrap Up Al Jackson website:http://www.aljacksonlive.comMercy Housing website:https://www.mercyhousing.orgChuck Shute website:http://chuckshute.comSupport the show (https://venmo.com/Chuck-Shute)

Sorry For Screaming Ep.76 -Gerald at Tight Ends -Alan doesn't know when women are dressed inappropriately -There's no male equivalent to the “Breastaurant” -Men doing dangerous things for money -Gerald tries to be a male prostitute -“Pretty Woman” but in reverse -“What does $150 get you?” -James Harden on a budget -& Much More!

In today’s episode we discuss generations. We specifically talk stereotypes of the millennials. Do we agree? Do we disagree? Did V do too much research and cause these episodes to go on for forever? We also talk briefly about Breastaurants! (Cue the giggles)

The Johnny B Show Cut of the Day

On this episode we talk Buying Doge Coin, Breastaurants, Tech News, Moving Needs & More!

We call a winner, and beat a dead horse. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/dyke-michaels/support

Today's episode reunites the A-Team with Dyke, Bridget and Kris. Then we give Ericka Oakley a call and find out what she's been doing during the lockdown.  --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/dyke-michaels/support

We are back with a two-parter, a deep dive, a true exploration of America's favorite pastime: eatin' a steak while lookin' at tits. In this episode we talk about the dawn of The Playboy Club in 1963 and the "iconic" look of the food and cocktail servers - Bunnies. We learn that Gloria Steinem went deep cover as a Bunny to do a journalistic expose' and inform the public about the work uniform that caused bleeding, chafing, and internal organ crushing. We read some infuriating Server Submitted Stories and then welcome our friend and former cater-waiter Sasheer Zamata to reminisce about a pretty sweet job on her college campus. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/side-work-podcast/support

Tonight at the dinner table we discuss; Jay-Z deal with the NFL, “Breast”aurants, parents annoying back to school post, & more.

It’s the dog days of summer and your Sports Lordz are here with a new episode to keep you cool. This week, we discuss taking a Sopranos tour, and Kevin and Jimmy share the story of their first victory out on the softball diamond. We look into the new phenomenon of NFL players being jealous of NBA player empowerment and what that could potentially mean for the future of both sports. SEC Media Days are underway in Hoover, Alabama and we get discuss horny guy restaurants, a.k.a. “breastaurants, and tell tales of going with our parents. We take brief brake from the fun to discuss the tragic tale of NFL ineman Richie Incognito, and then get back to fun sharing stories of almost getting arrested. It’s happened more than you think! Later, we’re joined by infamous high school football coach and star of MTV’s mid-aughts hit reality show Two-A-Days, Coach Rush Propst. Coach Propst tells us about his multiple families, the correct way to pronounce the word “school”, the army of children he’s raising, and promotes his latest DVD. This classic episode ends as all classic episodes do, with a dose of DABS! This episode is sponsored by Don Giorno Frozen Pizza, from the new line of products by actor Steve Schirripa. Follow us on twitter @SportsLordz

Joshua Brisco talks to Matt Derrick of Chiefs Digest about his time at Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge. Plus, Inturchin Tucker delivers the headlines to Josh, Rudy Salazar and Beards McFly. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Ross Bolen Podcast returns for its 181st episode. Hosted by Ross Bolen featuring Intern AJ. Presented by Bolen Media. (0:00) Intro (22:04) Houston Rockets Season Wrap-Up (52:27) Paper Straw Problems (56:36) Boss, Nut, And Trash Moments (1:11:06) Families That Eat At Hooters (1:28:53) Announcements Pay your dues at Patreon.com/RossBolenPodcast for 2 additional and exclusive episodes of RBP each month, columns, other written content by Ross, and more. Recorded and produced by Mike Moody and Grant Davis at Permanent RCRD Studios in Austin, TX. permanentrcrd.com www.rossbolenpodcast.com
 888-WRBOLEN
 Twitter: @WRBolen, @RossBolenPod 
Instagram: @WRBolen, @TheRossBolenPodcast
 Snapchat: @WRBolen

In which we explain the squeaky-clean tawdriness of casual dining chains that put all the servers in tank tops, and Ken wonders if you can eat hot wings ironically. Certificate #37739.

Episode: 01 | Sex Boat Profits? Guest Host: Kevin Cruz The main focus of this episode started with some conversation Jamal had with some childhood bruhs in his group chat. Once he was told about the price of a ticket to this "paradise" for men, he had to try and figure out how the host business, Sex Island, makes it profit. Kevin joins him to try to work out the numbers. And like Kevin says, it's sketch as hell. 00:20 - Is a day enough 03:48 - Trains 06:50 - The proper way to ask a stripper where she works 09:37 - Breastaurants as the norm is weird 14:45 - Greatest Sponsor Ever 15:39 - Sex Island 18:00 - How profitable is a sex island vacation business 23:38 - Never forget Fyre Festival Follow the IG: @scpbpod Background music: This podcast features the song “FakeLove (makaihbeats.net)" by Makaih Beats is licensed under a Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Best Of Segment: Are "Breastaurants" (i.e. Hooters, Twin Peaks) done?

For this episode of The Future Is A Mixtape, Jesse & Matt have a discussion with Frantz Pierre--a community activist and organizer who's leading a revolutionary project to educate Los Angeles residents about the benefits of Universal Basic Income via a local, first-of-its-kind, pilot program. But how might Frantz Pierre and other fellow comrades create this program on a citywide scale when the mythology and romance of the “work ethic” and the sin of “laziness” are so indoctrinated in our communities and belief systems? How will we demand “wages” if such an enslaved chunk of our lives--going to jobs we hate--has been entirely automated, and work for the 99% no longer exists? And if and when the argument is truly won, where will the money come from? This podcast will aim to answer those questions. It will also detail why this utopian notion should be viewed as the “New Common Sense” in our global age of shafted, precarious employment, and why UBI is an essential spring-step toward human liberation. Mentioned In This Episode: Frantz Pierre's Twitter Account Information About Pierre's Grassroots Basic Income Project for Los Angeles: The Official Page for The Basic Income Project - Los AngelesThe Facebook Page for The Basic Income Project - Los Angeles To Find Basic Income LA on Twitter The Basic Income Project - Los Angeles Indiegogo Campaign The Millennials Are Killing Everything! Here Is a List of Links and Articles on the Subject of Their Zombie-Schemes to Dismember Everything in Their Blind Rampage-Path: The Millennials' Morbid Obsession with Avocado-Toast Instead of Saving for Their Own Homes, Millennial Couples Aren't Buying Diamonds, They're Killing Buffalo Wild Wings and Applebee's, the Napkins Industry, Breastaurants, and More. Do 80% of Small Businesses Really Fail Within the First 18 Months? Fugitive Pieces: The only website on the internet that mentions Jesse's first business: “Soapbox” in Bellingham, Washington: An Anarchist InfoShop (Started in 2005); Matt unearthed an old photo of the shop. Why Community Land Trusts (CLTs) Are Vital to Making Universal Basic Income (UBI) & Guaranteed Housing Work for the Long Term Fast Company: “Everyone in the World Hates Their Jobs--But Americans Hate Theirs the Most” David Graebers' Legendary Essay “On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs” Originally Published in Strike Magazine, but Reprinted as “Why Capitalism Creates Pointless Jobs” in Evoncomics Getting Two Workers for the Price of One: Domestic Workers (Often Women) Reproduce the Future Source of Labor Without Financial Reward; For Further Analyses, Here Are Some Fundamental Marxist Views on Domestic Work A Term Rarely Heard (or Felt) by Millennials: “Golden Handcuffs” The Los Angeles Magazine: “Mayor Garcetti Has His First Opponent, Apparently” (Discusses Frantz Pierre's Run for Mayor and His Idea for Dealing with the Drought) Here is Within Reason's YouTube Interview with LA Mayoral Candidate, Frantz Pierre: Part 1 & Part 2. (In the Race for LA's Mayor: 24 People Registered; 11 Made the Ballot with Pierre Coming in Eighth Place in Vote Tally.) Strange Currencies: The LA Chapter of The League of Women Voters Didn't Hold a Debate in 2017; And Corporate-Owned Media (Like the “Esteemed” LA Times) Didn't Bother to Make Visible the Opposition--Relegating Only a Minor Discussion of the Two Top Candidates, but No One Else: Duly Cited Here. Why Basic Income & Housing First Models for the Homeless Are Best When Put Together in the Mixing Pot. Case in Point: the city of Medicine Hat in Alberta, Canada; It's Homeless Population Has Stayed at Zero for Two Years Running. J.E. King & John Marangos: “Two Arguments for Basic Income: Thomas Paine (1737-1809) and Thomas Spence (1750-1814)” The Biography of Abu Bakr & His Visionary Idea for What We Know Call Universal Basic Income: “The first Muslim caliph, Abu Bakr, introduced a guaranteed minimum standard of income, granting each man, woman, and child ten dirhams annually; this was later increased to twenty dirhams.” Additionally, a wider purview of Bakr's influence in Pakistan and other Muslim nations can be found in Grace Clark's book. The Alaska Permanent Fund: America's Quiet Basic Income Tradition . . . When It Started 1982, Every Alaskan Citizen Got About $1000 a Year. The Modern World's First Experiment with Universal Basic Income Happened in Manitoba, Canada from 1974-79: A History of “Mincome” and Its Results. Scholar and Shaper on the Basic Income Debate, Evelyn L. Forget, Provided the First Breakthrough Study on the Positive Health Effects That Came as a Result of Canada's Mincome Experiment: “The Town With No Poverty.” During Nixon's Administration, When Daniel Patrick Moynihan Served as the Assistant Secretary for the Department of Labor, He Walked Away from America's Potential First Expansion with Basic Income (Called Family Assistance Aid) because of the Professor's Concern with Early Studies Showing Higher Divorce Rates and the Program's Potentially Adverse Effects on Children and the Nuclear Family. Daniel Geary in The Atlantic: “The Moynihan Report: An Annotated Edition” A History of Basic Income Satiric Film-Shorts from CollegeHumor: “How to Tell If You're a Basic Bitch” & “How to Tell If You're a Basic Bro” “Fair Enough” as a Uniquely Irish Phrase The Importance of Storytelling and Testimony for The Basic Income Project Here's Why Frantz and Other Comrades Are Doing an Education-Based Basic Income Campaign . . . A Promotional Trailer for The Basic Income Project - Los Angeles Scott Santen's Essay, “How to Reform Welfare and Taxes to Provide Every American Citizen with a Basic Income” The Guardian: “Stephen Hawking Blames Tory Politicians for Damaging NHS” Learning Why Deflation Benefits the 1%, While Inflation Is Great for the 99% in Novara Radio's Interview: “The Production of Money: In Conversation with Ann Pettifor.”BIEN (Basic Income Earth Network): “Will Basic Income Cause Inflation?” The New York Times: “Guaranteed Income for All? Switzerland's Voters Say No Thanks” (In Article: “About 77 percent of voters rejected a plan to give a basic monthly income of 2,500 Swiss francs, or about $2,560, to each adult, and 625 francs for each child under 18, regardless of employment status, to fight poverty and social inequality and guarantee a ‘dignified' life to everyone.”) Rutger Bregman's TEDTalk: “Poverty Isn't a Lack of Character; It's a Lack of Cash” The United States' Bureau of Labor and Statistics: Union Membership Rates in Private (6%) Versus Public (34%) Workplaces Spain's Largest & Most Legendary Worker Co-Op: Mondragon Corporation Business Insider: “8 High-Profile Entrepreneurs Who Have Endorsed Universal Basic Income” The Los Angeles Times: “Full Employment: Dangers in Good Times” The Los Angeles Times: “California Faces a Looming Teacher Shortage, and the Problem Is Getting Worse” National Public Radio (NPR): “Where Have All the Teachers Gone?” The Los Angeles Times: “If California's a 'Bad State for Business,' Why Is It Leading the Nation in Job and GDP growth?” Global Voices: “Are Employee Transportation Allowances the Cause of Japan's Commuter Hell?” The New Republic: “I'm Insanely Jealous of Sweden's Work-Family Policies. You Should Be, Too.” Heather Long in The Guardian (U.S. Edition): “Americans Love to Ask People ‘What Do You Do' It's a Habit We Should Break” Why Is It a Chinese Custom to Ask How Much You Make? ABCNews: “Research: Older adults are happiest Americans” The Guardian: “Does Early Retirement Mean an Early Death?” The Telegraph: “Find a Hobby and Get Happy, Danish Style”Martin Luther King's Speech Advocating for Guaranteed Income at Stanford University (1967) To Email with Queries About Frantz's Project or Get Involved In This Movement: BasicIncomeLA@gmail.comTwo Podcasts and Their Respective Episodes That Jesse & Matt Referenced as Sources Throughout Our Discussion with Frantz: The UPSTREAM Podcast: Universal Basic Income - “Part One: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?” The FREAKONOMICS Podcast: “Is the World Ready for a Guaranteed Basic Income? Other Links Exploring UBI (But Not Mentioned in the Podcast): Bootstraps: An In-Development Documentary in Support of Universal Basic Income From The Website's Concept Description: “Twenty Americans from all walks of life have just won a lottery: a guaranteed check every week that's big enough to cover basic living expenses. What will they do with this opportunity?” Scott Santens in Medium: “The BIG Library: Books About Basic Income” The Huffington Post: “A Universal Basic Income is the Future”  The Boston Review: “No Racial Justice Without Basic Income”    Feel Free to Contact Jesse & Matt on the Following Spaces & Places: Email Us: thefutureisamixtape@gmail.com Find Us Via Our Website: The Future Is A Mixtape Or Lollygagging on Social Networks: Facebook Twitter Instagram

Millennials are rejecting Breastaurants and here's why...

We discuss the idea that "millennials" are the reason that various businesses and industries are dying out. This includes diamonds, various restaurants including "Breastaurants", napkins, bar soap, cereal, golf, home ownership, home improvement stores, motorcycles, yogurt, designer bags, fabric softener, and banks to name a few. It's hard to tell exactly what age range "millennials" refers to exactly, but 1980 - 2004 and 1976 to 1994 are two of the more popular ranges, though the common idea is that 1980 is the usual starting point. We discuss ideas such as school debt and the length of "baby boomer" careers as potential factors to the supposed situation. Based on the dying industries, we are thinking that this group has started to take saving money, efficiency, and support of responsible manufacturing/sourcing of goods seriously. Maybe these people accusing millennials of intentionally damaging businesses/industries are off base because it is for the better? These types of shifts away from extravagance are a reflection of the recent global downturns. This talk is short, but packed with ideas about this goofy and crazy topic!Here is the Business Week article we refer to in this episode: http://www.businessinsider.com/millennials-are-killing-list-2017-8 Here is the meme site we refer to: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/millennials-are-killing

PILOT EPISODE

Koren Symone is so excited about International Women's Day she decides to let you all in on the inner workings of Breastaurants! She shares her experiences in the land of boob oriented restaurant serving and how she finessed more money than you. Judge if you want, she doesn't care.

Dad’s need to get away and do Dad stuff, so Aaron & Jason take a road trip to South Carolina where Aaron is performing at the beautiful Kiawah Island Golf Resort. While in the car home, they discuss lots of important issues: “Breastaurants,” Carolina drivers, chivalry isn’t dead, Bojangles, highway justice, the crazy Q&A lady, man-to-man accountability and of course, corn beef. Follow Us: www.AaronKleiber.com @AaronKleiber @JmClark8 @GrownDad Like ‘GrownDadBusiness’ on Facebook too! Produced by Epicast.TV - EpicastNetwork.com/Services

Kid, Don and Pooty Tang do a porn review where the family is sitting around the table and step brother and step sister start handjobbing each other and then go into a room and get each other off.  Pooty is only worried about the turkey that nobody eats and The Kid reminds her that the turkey as actual air in it and floats on water. Don Tang tells us about fucking an inflatable goat. We do one of our new segments called Breastaurants where we discuss the local waitresses and if we like their boobies or not. We make fun of Red Eye and his sharing of the most idiotic girly shit that we've ever heard in our life. We do a lits bash and push more of our hottie of the week Cassy Ventura.  Go Deep. 

In 1983, the first Hooters restaurant opened, unofficially inventing the "attentive service sector" restaurant industry. Colloquially known as breastauarants, these man cave-themed eateries trade on young women's sex appeal to serve up booming profits. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers

JJ wastes his time talking about out of control honking in Beverly Hills.Mike pays tribute to his friend John AxelsonAnd they both waste their time talking about breastaurants, Twin Peaks, Streamin' Garage's new pilot, Houston, casting couches, and the constant audio issues they have. So come waste time with us, won't you?

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 134. [Update: Transcript is here, and appended below.] This is my appearance as a Guest panelist on This Week in Law, Episode 267 (July 18, 2014).  Brief description: “Are patent trolls losing ground? Dish Anywhere in the Aereo aftermath, FCC gets 1 million comments on U.S. net neutrality debate and more!" Once again, the hosts and the other guest were congenial to my radical anti-IP views, and the other guest, law professor Harry Surden, basically acknowledged that there is no clear empirical evidence in favor of the patent system. (BTW the title of the show stemmed from my use of the fancy SAT word eleemosynary—it's used in Louisiana law on occasion, which is how I know, but it is obscure, but a fun word, so I had to drop it in the conversation... Some of my previous posts related to some of the topics discussed: Net Neutrality Developments Against Net Neutrality A Libertarian Take on Net Neutrality Costs of the Patent System Revisited Yet Another Study Finds Patents Do Not Encourage Innovation Patent trolls as mafioso (and that's a compliment) My previous two appearances on TWiL were: KOL104 | This Week in Law 97: God Creates. We Patent. IP, Net Neutrality, etc (2011) and KOL103 | This Week in Law 133: Beyonce, Bad Laws, and Breastaurants (2011). Transcript THIS WEEK IN LAW 267 (TRANSCRIPT) Aug 11th 2014 This Week in Law Episode 267 - Jul 18 2014 Google, Dropbox, Canon and other c… Denise Howell: Next up on This Week in Law, Stefan Kinsella and Harry Surden join Evan Brown and me. We'll talk about the FCC getting the soppa treatment, piloting a Nautilus through SCOTUS' patent wonderland. We're going to have some other strange boats, too. And talk about the law's role regarding kids' cruelty on social media. Much more too on This Week in Law. Netcasts You Love, From People You Trust. This is TWiT! (TWiT logo) Bandwidth for This Week in Law is provided by CacheFly at CacheFly.com (CacheFly logo) Advertisement: This is TWiL, This Week in Law, with Denise Howell and Evan Brown, Episode 267 recorded July 18, 2014 Eleemosynary, My Dear Watson Denise: (bagandbaggage.com - @dhowell) Hi folks, I'm Denise Howell. And you're joining us for This Week in Law, thank you so much for joining us.  We are thrilled to have you and we hope you will be thrilled to be here. We have an awesome panel for you today. We haven't done too much on the Supreme Court's recent patent decisions and we're definitely going to get to that today, plus a whole bunch of other great stuff at the intersection of law and technology. And to help us understand it all, we've got Stephan Kinsella joining us once again here on the show. Hello Stephan. Stephan Kinsella: (stephankinsella.com - @nskinsella) Hello. Denise glad to be here. Denise: Great to have you back. What's going on with you these days? Stephan: Well, trying to stay out of the Houston see in the summer, but having a good summer and following all these patent cases and IP developments. It's interesting to watch, but so far everything is going very well. The good thing about being on your show, I save time I listen to it anyway, so I can save the podcast for a walk. Denise: That's wonderful; great, we could save you some time. And make room for somebody else in your podcast lineup. Also joining us a return visitor to TWiL is Harry Surden from University of Colorado law school at Boulder. Harry Surden: (harrysurden.com - @HarrySurden) Hey, Denise. How are you? Denise: I'm doing well, thank you so much for joining us. Great to have you back. Harry: It's really great to be back. Denise: So, tell us about Boulder in the summertime; make us all jealous. Harry: Boulder in the summer is outstanding. I mean, I can't say enough about it. There's millions of hikes just within the city's borders and it's beautiful. This has been a particularly mild summer.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 134. This is my appearance as a Guest panelist on This Week in Law, Episode 267 (July 18, 2014).  Brief description: “Are patent trolls losing ground? Dish Anywhere in the Aereo aftermath, FCC gets 1 million comments on U.S. net neutrality debate and more!" Once again, the hosts and the other guest were congenial to my radical anti-IP views, and the other guest, law professor Harry Surden, basically acknowledged that there is no clear empirical evidence in favor of the patent system. (BTW the title of the show stemmed from my use of the fancy SAT word eleemosynary—it's used in Louisiana law on occasion, which is how I know, but it is obscure, but a fun word, so I had to drop it in the conversation... Some of my previous posts related to some of the topics discussed: Net Neutrality Developments Against Net Neutrality A Libertarian Take on Net Neutrality Costs of the Patent System Revisited Yet Another Study Finds Patents Do Not Encourage Innovation Patent trolls as mafioso (and that’s a compliment) My previous two appearances on TWiL were: KOL104 | This Week in Law 97: God Creates. We Patent. IP, Net Neutrality, etc (2011) and KOL103 | This Week in Law 133: Beyonce, Bad Laws, and Breastaurants (2011).

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 103. This is my appearance as a Guest panelist on This Week in Law, Episode 133 (Oct. 13, 2011), entitled "Beyonce, Bad Laws, and Breastaurants." The two hosts and fellow guest panelist were all lawyers. We had a wide-ranging two-hour discussion about a variety of legal and policy matters, including a number of IP problems covering patent, copyright, trademark, and even trade secret. We also discussed the Occupy Wall Street movement, Apple's use of IP to squelch clones and competition, copyright threats against Beyonce for her dance moves, and many others as indicated by the links on the episode's show notes. The video is below; it's also on the TWiL page for this episode; you can also subscribe to the audio or video podcast for this show; here's their FaceBook page. A few more backup links and points below about some of the issues discussed. At one point we got into a discussion of Obama's use of a signing statement to approve ACTA as an "executive agreement" (see ACTA, Executive Agreements, and the Bricker Amendment), I noted that under international law, violation by a host state of the citizen of another state gave rise to a right for the violated citizen's home state to use military force against the host state. I remarked that one danger of internationalizing intellectual property by means of executive agreements and treaties is that it could give western nations an excuse to military force against countries that allow piracy. However, this was a bit of an overstatement since, as I explain in International Investment, Political Risk, and Dispute Resolution: A Practitioner's Guide (see this excerpt), this type of "gunboat diplomacy" is ostensibly no longer permitted since the founding of the UN in 1945: "Today, some investors hailing from militarily and politically powerful States might favor the threat or use of force to obtain restitution or compensation for expropriated property. Such an option is no longer available, however, due to fundamental changes in international law and politics. In particular, the United Nations Charter has since 1945 prohibited the use of force to resolve disputes, except in the case of self-defence. Today, it is generally accepted that a State may not use force against another State in response to a taking of the property of one of its nationals." The quote I mentioned about the problem with making law by legislation is by James Carter, who wrote, in 1884, in opposing the attempt to codify New York's common law: At present, when any doubt arises in any particular case as to what the true rule of the unwritten [i.e., judge-found, common-law developed] law is, it is at once assumed that the rule most in accordance with justice and sound policy is the one which must be declared to be the law. The search is for that rule. The appeal is squarely made to the highest considerations of morality and justice. These are the rallying points of the struggle. The contention is ennobling and beneficial to the advocates, to the judges, to the parties, to the auditors, and so indirectly to the whole community. The decision then made records another step in the advance of human reason towards that perfection after which it forever aspires. But when the law is conceded to be written down in a statute, and the only question is what the statute means, a contention unspeakably inferior is substituted. The dispute is about words. The question of what is right or wrong, just or unjust, is irrelevant and out of place. The only question is what has been written. What a wretched exchange for the manly encounter upon the elevated plane of principle! I mentioned the tension between antitrust and patent/copyright law; more discussion of this issue can be found in endnote 1 here; We discussed the America Invents Act; I've since completed a detailed writeup about this: The American Invents Act and Patent Reform: The Good, the Meh, and the Ugly;

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 103. This is my appearance as a Guest panelist on This Week in Law, Episode 133 (Oct. 13, 2011), entitled "Beyonce, Bad Laws, and Breastaurants." The two hosts and fellow guest panelist were all lawyers. We had a wide-ranging two-hour discussion about a variety of legal and policy matters, including a number of IP problems covering patent, copyright, trademark, and even trade secret. We also discussed the Occupy Wall Street movement, Apple's use of IP to squelch clones and competition, copyright threats against Beyonce for her dance moves, and many others as indicated by the links on the episode's show notes. The video is below; it's also on the TWiL page for this episode; you can also subscribe to the audio or video podcast for this show; here's their FaceBook page. A few more backup links and points below about some of the issues discussed. At one point we got into a discussion of Obama's use of a signing statement to approve ACTA as an "executive agreement" (see ACTA, Executive Agreements, and the Bricker Amendment), I noted that under international law, violation by a host state of the citizen of another state gave rise to a right for the violated citizen's home state to use military force against the host state. I remarked that one danger of internationalizing intellectual property by means of executive agreements and treaties is that it could give western nations an excuse to military force against countries that allow piracy. However, this was a bit of an overstatement since, as I explain in International Investment, Political Risk, and Dispute Resolution: A Practitioner’s Guide (see this excerpt), this type of "gunboat diplomacy" is ostensibly no longer permitted since the founding of the UN in 1945: "Today, some investors hailing from militarily and politically powerful States might favor the threat or use of force to obtain restitution or compensation for expropriated property. Such an option is no longer available, however, due to fundamental changes in international law and politics. In particular, the United Nations Charter has since 1945 prohibited the use of force to resolve disputes, except in the case of self-defence. Today, it is generally accepted that a State may not use force against another State in response to a taking of the property of one of its nationals." The quote I mentioned about the problem with making law by legislation is by James Carter, who wrote, in 1884, in opposing the attempt to codify New York's common law: At present, when any doubt arises in any particular case as to what the true rule of the unwritten [i.e., judge-found, common-law developed] law is, it is at once assumed that the rule most in accordance with justice and sound policy is the one which must be declared to be the law. The search is for that rule. The appeal is squarely made to the highest considerations of morality and justice. These are the rallying points of the struggle. The contention is ennobling and beneficial to the advocates, to the judges, to the parties, to the auditors, and so indirectly to the whole community. The decision then made records another step in the advance of human reason towards that perfection after which it forever aspires. But when the law is conceded to be written down in a statute, and the only question is what the statute means, a contention unspeakably inferior is substituted. The dispute is about words. The question of what is right or wrong, just or unjust, is irrelevant and out of place. The only question is what has been written. What a wretched exchange for the manly encounter upon the elevated plane of principle! I mentioned the tension between antitrust and patent/copyright law; more discussion of this issue can be found in endnote 1 here; We discussed the America Invents Act; I've since completed a detailed writeup about this: The American Invents Act and Patent Reform: The Good, the Meh, and the Ugly;

NYC area Stand-up comedians Vicky Kuperman and Max Cohen were in Boston, so they stopped by our studios to hang out with us for a while! We discuss it all from Coconut Jelly Beans to Rebecca Black! Dereck does the Weird News of the Week, and we also discuss why Breastaurants are suddenly so popular. You don't want to miss a second of this wacky show!