Podcasts about Lieutenant

Send us Fan MailRon Cloward is a retired Lieutenant with the Modesto Police Department in California, bringing more than 35 years of experience in law enforcement and nearly 21,000 hours of K-9 training.During his 26-year police career, he handled three patrol dogs and, along with his final partner, Pele, earned Top Dog and Top Competitor honors in 1997. After being promoted to Sergeant in 2000, he became trainer for Modesto PD's 14-team K-9 unit. Following his promotion to Lieutenant in 2005, he assumed command of the unit while continuing to serve as its trainer until retiring in 2011.Widely respected throughout the K-9 community, Cloward has been a member of the Western States Police Canine Association (WSPCA) for more than 25 years. He has served multiple terms as President, as well as Secretary, and contributed to a California P.O.S.T. committee. He has instructed at conferences nationwide and authored numerous articles published in Police K-9 Magazine.A strong advocate for advancing K-9 training, Cloward emphasizes realistic, scenario-based training designed to develop more effective handlers, safer deployments, and stronger K-9 teams.We are pleased to have Vested Interest in K9's as a sponsor. Vested Interest in K9s, Inc. is a 501c(3) non-profit whose mission is to provide bullet and stab-protective vests and other assistance to dogs. Check it out www.vik9s.org.   Please welcome  Ray Allen Manufacturing as a sponsor to the podcast. Go to the most trusted name in industry for all of your k9 related equipment. For a 10% discount use the RAMWDDP10 discount code.Welcome our sponsor Gold Coast K9.   Gold Coast K9 trains and deploys hand-selected service dogs for personal and family protection, police agencies, and school districts. Their training programs rank among the best and most trusted in the world. Follow Gold Coast k9 on all social media platforms.  For 10% off merchandise use the GCK910 discount code on their website www.goldcoastk9.comWelcome our newest sponsor NCK9LLC.  Located in Four Oaks NC, just east of Raleigh NC. Jim O'Brien and staff offer a variety of K9 services. Contact them at Phone : 919-353-7149 Email: jobrien@nck9.us

Patrick K. O'Donnell recounts how in late summer 1944, the Rangers were assigned to assist in capturing the port of Brest, a fortress Hitler ordered to be held at all costs. During a scouting mission, Lieutenant Edlund and three scouts discovered a narrow path through a massive minefield filled with "Bouncing Bettys." Edlund bluffed his way into the command bunker of a major German gun battery, which housed battleship-sized 12-inch guns. Once inside, he threatened the commanding officer with a hand grenade, vowing to blow them both up unless the entire fort surrendered. His audacity worked, and over 200 Germans surrendered the battery without a fight, earning Edlund the Distinguished Service Cross. Following the fall of Brest, the Rangers were moved to the Hürtgen Forest, a location described as a "factory of death." The forest was a nightmare of dense mines, bunkers, and pre-registered artillery fire. American command made the strategic error of attempting to push through the forest rather than bypassing it, resulting in casualties comparable to the entire Korean War. By December, the Rangers were held in reserve near the town of Bergstein. Their objective was Hill 400, the highest point in the forest, which provided a commanding view of the entire region. Unbeknownst to the Allies, the Germans defended the hill with fanaticism because it overlooked the secret assembly areas for Hitler's planned Ardennes Offensive, the Battle of the Bulge. (5)1944

Congrats to another graduating class of Air Force Academy 2nd Lieutenants. Jeff has his annual discussion with FCA leadership and highlights what God is doing at USAFA with Ty Wright, Caleb McKee, Ryan Carter, and Jon Fagins.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us Fan MailWell, well, well...Bob and I met in May 1996, when we both attended the Pima County Jail Correctional Academy. Our motto, "Class 96-2: Be Rough, Be Tough, Beware!" I cannot believe it has been 30 years!He was promoted to Deputy in 97', and a bunch of us followed him in 98'. Corrections was a great stepping stone job, but the streets is where it's at! I can't wait for you all to hear about what brought Bob to Arizona from Chicago, and the experiences he has had over the years.He is coming back, we scratched the surface but he has more he wants you all to know. Welcome the newest member of The Squad and be sure to catch his "Part 2" coming up in the near future. Come see me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/choir.practice.94 or on Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/cp_sfaf/

Send us Fan MailTina Silva is the founder of Equestrian Safety Group and Executive Director of Devil Dog Ranch. A former Lieutenant in the fire service, she brings real-world emergency response expertise to equestrian safety education. With a background spanning multiple disciplines, farm management, and coaching vaulters and riders, Tina's mission is to make the equestrian world safer for horses and riders at every level. Elizabeth Rinehart was recently named Best Child Rider at the prestigious Devon Horse Show. "Lizzie" grew up riding practically from the time she could walk, and she comes from a true horse family. Her parents, Richard and Catherine Rinehart, own Rinehart Farms, which means Elizabeth has had horses in her blood her entire life.Piper's mission is to educate young equestrians in every facet of the industry and to empower young women in particular to find their voices and stories — and to share them. She has spent her entire career focusing on education through various channels, including The Plaidcast, North America's most listened-to horse show podcast; co-authoring the Show Strides book series; and by providing educational articles, grants, and experiential learning opportunities for riders of all ages and levels. theplaidhorse.comThank you so much for joining us today on the Plaidcast. This podcast is a labor of love, and every single episode exists because of this incredible community of riders, trainers, barn managers, parents, and horse lovers who show up in the barn, in the ring, and right here with us.At The Plaid Horse, our commitment goes far beyond the show ring. We believe deeply in the power of literacy and education and that every rider, at every level, deserves access to knowledge, stories, and ideas that make them a better horseperson and a better human being. Reading matters. Learning matters. And the stories we tell each other in this sport matter more than we sometimes realize.Whether you are a junior rider picking up your first copy of The Plaid Horse  Magazine, a professional trainer looking for inspiration, or someone who simply loves horses and everything this world stands for then this community is for you. You belong here.We build this together. Every article, every episode, every conversation is an opportunity to learn something new, to feel less alone in the challenges of this sport, and to be reminded of why we fell in love with horses in the first place.Until next time, keep reading, keep learning, keep riding, and remember that the horse world is better when we build it together. I will see you at the ring!

An Andy's Theory (or prediction?) finally comes true - SECUNDA!! And is Kasidy Yates up to something? The crew continues to discuss her whether she's onscreen or off.[Episode discussion begins around 1:38 (!)]Post your PRIORITY ONE comments and/or questions here and they'll get special consideration to be read in the TNC prime pod or Patreon bonus pods! And if you're in the President's Circle, you may be the honored recipient of a Christopher Pike Medal of Valor! [Brief and concise raises your chances of reaching air as there is generally no editing of hails, but you do you!]If you have jingles or sound bites or images to send, use sttncpod@gmail.com but let us know whether you're on the Lieutenants level or in the President's Circle and include the title of episode your hail is regarding in the subject heading.Send voice hails to (816) TREK-TNC – be sure to mention that you're a member of these lofty lounges so we can give you the special attention a Starfleet officer deserves!Or, y'know, just feel free to chat here with each other, for you special members of our crew are indeed the best and the brightest.

On a warm summer's day a new class of fire lieutenants was attending the FDNY's First Line Supervisors Training program or FLSTP at the Fire Academy on Randall's Island. Members were in the midst of a live burn drill, rotating through the riding positions, when Lieutenant Kevin Travis began to feel progressively unwell. He removed himself from the building and collapsed outside. Immediately a CODE RED was transmitted, which let everyone on scene know that this emergency transmission wasn't part of the drill. In this episode, host Captain Randy Li, discusses how seconds count when someone is in cardiac arrest, and how lifesaving treatment was administered to Lieutenant Travis immediately by those on scene with guests Lieutenants Kevin Travis (retired) and Stephen McGowan, and Paramedics Nyla Page and Veronica Cruz.

This week we take a look at one of the most unique recurring characters in all of Trek, Lt. Reginald Barclay! We’ll revisit all of the episodes in which he appears and recount some of our favorite Broccoli moments, talking about what makes this character special. Earth Station Trek is a part of the ESO […] The post Lieutenant Broccoli – Earth Station Trek – Episode 265 appeared first on The ESO Network.

This week we take a look at one of the most unique recurring characters in all of Trek, Lt. Reginald Barclay! We'll revisit all of the episodes in which he appears and recount some of our favorite Broccoli moments, talking about what makes this character special. Earth Station Trek is a part of the ESO Podcast Network, Executive Producer Mike Faber. #startrek #barclay #nextgeneration #voyager #hollowpursuits

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Be sure and join us with our special guest, 37 year FDNY veteran, Captain John Ceriello. John started his career as a Volunteer firefighter with Roslyn Highlands FD in 1981, and in February of 1988 he was appointed to the FDNY. He was assigned to Engine 225 in East New York in April of that same year. In the Spring of 89 he transferred to Squad 18 as an inaugural member! In 2002 he was then transferred to Rescue 1. Then in July of 2005 he was promoted to Lieutenant assigned to the 7th division. In 2006 he returned to SOC in the SOC Support Ladder Unit. In 2007 he was assigned to another Squad, Squad 252. 2015 rolls around and wouldn't you know it, John was promoted to Captain and assigned to Chief Galvin in training. From 2016 to 2019 Cap covered the 11th Division. In May of 2019 Captain Ceriello was covering in Rescue 1, ultimately being assigned to R1 in January 2020. Captain Ceriello stayed with Rescue 1 until he retired in August of 2025. No doubt Cap has some great stories for us and we can't wait to hear them. Gonna be another great show. We will get the whole skinny. You don't want to miss this one. Join us at the kitchen table on the BEST FIREFIGHTER PODCAST ON THE INTERNET!You can also Listen to our podcast ...we are on all the players #lovethisjob #GiveBackMoreThanYouTake #Oldschool #Tradition #Learyfirefightersfoundation #firefighter #FDNYRescue1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/gettin-salty-experience-firefighter-podcast--4218265/support.

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Captain Andrew Serra spent 25 years with the FDNY, beginning his career as a Firefighter in Ladder 131, with rotations in Engine 231 and Engine 155, before moving to Squad 1. He later served as a Lieutenant in Engine 231 and ultimately as Captain of Ladder 20. Beyond the firehouse, Capt Serra is an accomplished writer and author of several books, including Tradition Continuesand Hell's Hundred Acres. His passion for history, New York City, and cities abroad has deeply influenced both his fire service career and his work as an author, shaping a perspective rooted in tradition, culture, and the enduring character of urban life. Registration is open for our Fall Leadership Development Course on the Farm in western Maryland. 

Kevin Holst joins The Great Battlefield podcast to talk about his career in politics and his role at the Democratic Lieutenant Governors Association, where they recruit, support and elect Democratic Lieutenant Governors.

Mike and Chris close the book on Season Seven with "The Conspirators," a 1978 episode that takes Columbo somewhere the series rarely ventured: the murky, morally weighted world of real geopolitical conflict. Clive Revill — Tony-nominated stage actor, Matilda's trainer in the boxing kangaroo film of the same name, and the original voice of Emperor Palpatine in The Empire Strikes Back — plays Joe Devlin, an Irish poet and public charmer who moonlights as a gun-runner for the IRA. Devlin doesn't irritate Columbo the way most killers do — he disarms him. They exchange verse, play darts, share whiskey, and trade jokes about their respective cultures, two sides of the same immigrant coin. We weigh whether all that conviviality comes at the cost of tension. An episode this pleasant can sometimes forget to be dangerous.Directed by Leo Penn and written by Howard Berk, "The Conspirators" is not Season Seven's sharpest hour.  As the last Columbo of the 1970s, the last on NBC, and the last new case the Lieutenant would face for nearly eleven years, it leaves a lot to be desired. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-shabby-detective-yet-another-columbo-podcast--5084441/support.

This show has been flagged as Clean by the host. Robert A. Heinlein Robert A. Heinlein was the author who many people claim kicked off the Golden Age, though that can be the subject of many a barroom argument. E.E. “Doc” Smith was already an established writer by this time, and A.E. van Vogt was contemporaneous with Heinlein. But Heinlein managed to outshine everyone in very short order. He was widely known as “The Dean of Science Fiction Writers,” which testifies to his stature in the community, and along with Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov he was one of the Big Three of the Golden Age. He was the first person to be named a Science Fiction Grand Master in 1974. Four of his novels won Hugo Awards (Double Star, Starship Troopers, Stranger in a Strange Land, and The Moon is a Harsh Mistress), and 7 more works were given Retro-Hugo awards, which are awarded for works that were written before the Hugos were established. He also had many more works nominated for both awards, as well as many other awards like Nebula Awards. In short, he was a big deal to the science fiction community at large, and to me personally. I was, for a short time, managing the web site for The Heinlein Society, and I have read every work of his that I am aware of. Heinlein Background Robert Anson Heinlein was born in 1907 in Butler, Missouri, and grew up in Kansas City, Missouri, which he described as the middle of the Bible Belt, and this background is reflected in some of his stories, particularly the later ones. His family tradition had it that the Heinlein's had fought in every American war beginning with the War of Independence, and Robert and his brothers all joined the armed forces. Robert lied about his age when he was 16 in order to enlist in the Missouri National Guard, and a few years later obtained an appointment to the Naval Academy, graduating in 1929 with the equivalent of a bachelors degree in engineering (the Naval Academy did not award degrees at the time). His engineering background is very apparent in his writings. He served on several ships, rising to the rank of Lieutenant, before being discharged in 1934 due to pulmonary tuberculosis. It seems likely that if he did not contract this illness he would have continued his career in the Navy, and with World War II coming, well, who knows what might have happened. But he did get ill, and had to find things to do. He notably got involved with Upton Sinclair's socialist organization EPIC (End Poverty in California). He ran for office unsuccessfully, running as a left-Democrat in a conservative district. And while he had a disability pension from the Navy, he turned to writing to pay off his mortgage. Heinlein's Writing Heinlein was originally known as a “hard” science fiction writer, meaning one who puts plausible and accurate science at the heart of the story. But looking at his entire career, he was equally comfortable writing fantasy, though not the faux medieval kind that many writers. In fact, he coined the term “speculative fiction” to describe the kind of stories he wrote. And if he wanted to he was quite capable of mixing the hard science and the fantasy, particularly in his later novels. And his output was very substantial. Asimov wrote more than Heinlein, but Heinlein stuck to fiction, while Asimov wrote in a variety of fields, so Heinlein's output in the general area of science fiction/fantasy is the greater. And he is known for works of all lengths from short stories to novels. A useful guide to his works is the book Robert A. Heinlein: A Reader's Companion, by James Gifford. This book covers all of his science fiction/fantasy works known as of 2000, and gives additional information about the writing and circumstances of the stories. But in 2003 an early work was discovered and published. It was a novel called For Us The Living, and while you can see the germ of Heinlein's style in this novel, it is also a very early work written in 1938 and is not one of his best. He would get a lot better than this. In any case, it was not published at the time, and is mostly of interest to Heinlein superfans or scholars. Heinlein got his real start in 1939 with a short story called Life-line, which was published in John W. Campbell's Astounding magazine. Isaac Asimov had published a few stories by this time, and his first for John W. Campbell's Astounding was in the previous month, July 1939, so as you can see this was a very fertile time in the development of the genre. Heinlein's story was about a scientist who developed a technology to predict a person's time of death. This totally threatens the insurance industry, and one of the CEO's put out hit on the scientist, which he of course already knows about having tested himself. This is not the best short story, but it was quite competent, and John W. Campbell immediately asked for more. More short stories followed. In the November 1939 issue of Astounding the story Misfit appeared. It introduces the character of Andrew Jackson “Slipstick” Libby, a young man with little education but a great ability to do mathematics in his head. And his ability turns out to be just what is needed during a construction project in space when things go wrong. And in 1940 he had 9 more stories published. And at this point he faced a problem. He was becoming so prolific that for a number of reasons he had to employ pseudonyms for some of his stories. One reason was that he couldn't have too many stories in one magazine in his name, it made the editor look bad. In any case all of the stories are now published under Heinlein's name. And of the 9 stories, 6 were either nominated for or won Retro Hugo awards, and several also won Prometheus Hall of Fame Awards, for the best libertarian or anti-authoritarian works. So you can see that his was a talent that exploded on the scene, so that you could legitimately divide the science fiction history into pre-Heinlein and post-Heinlein periods. 11 more stories of various lengths followed in 1941, and 5 in 1942. There were mostly short stories, but a few novellas and novelettes appeared. But he was really a short fiction writer at this time, and there are some extraordinary stories in this group. He was the most successful writer of speculative fiction of the time, and passed along some advice to anyone who wanted to be a successful writer. Heinlein's Rules of Writing Because he was so successful, it should come as no surprise that aspiring writers frequently wrote to him for advice, and in response he formulated his Rules of Writing. This is taken from his On The Writing of Speculative Fiction : You must write. Finish what you start. You must refrain from rewriting, except to editorial order. You must put your story on the market. You must keep it on the market until it has sold. He goes on to say in this article : “The above five rules really have more to do with how to write speculative fiction than anything said above them. But they are amazingly hard to follow—which is why there are so few professional writers and so many aspirants, and which is why I am not afraid to give away the racket!” This is very good advice, but as Heinlein points out his rules are indeed hard to follow. For example, Rule #1: You must write. Many people want to be a writer, but not as many really want to write, and there is a very distinct difference. Just as many people want to be a rock star, but don't want to spend years dead broke playing in dive bars to get there. But it is also fair to point out that Heinlein was a rare talent, and I doubt if simply following his rules would make anyone else a similar success. They are good rules, no doubt, but Heinlein was already very familiar with and well-read in the field before he started writing. That finishes this particular exploration of where Heinlein came from and how be began his career. And since it all started with short fiction, I next want to focus on that. beginning with his Future History. This starts our look at the works of Robert A. Heinlein, the third of the Big Three authors of the Golden Age. Links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein https://www.amazon.com/Robert-Heinlein-Readers-Companion/dp/0967987407 https://www.amazon.com/Us-Living-Comedy-Customs/dp/074325998X/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Writing_of_Speculative_Fiction https://www.palain.com/science-fiction/the-golden-age/robert-a-heinlein/ Provide feedback on this episode.

For the full, ad-free, 50-minute podcast, either subscribe to Discograffiti's Patreon at the Major Tier or higher, or just grab the episode as a one-off at the same link: https://www.patreon.com/discograffiti Purchase the 32-episode Jefferson Airplane series at a 33% discount (hear as they appear): https://www.patreon.com/collection/2123066   New to the show? Start at Jefferson Airplane Part 1. Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/discograffiti/id1592182331?i=1000765230378 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/5l7O6r4JMTfH7FsGT3EXj3?si=AE4HUYPKSs2Ymc1I8TdSKQ The Full Version: https://www.patreon.com/posts/full-episode-1-1-156815363   Discograffiti is the deep-dive podcast for music obsessives. Feed Your Head: The Great Jefferson Airplane Deep Dive is an audio documentary that was consciously crafted to act as the ultimate repository of fact and opinion on one of the greatest bands to ever walk the face of the earth, the almighty Jefferson Airplane. It includes long-form interviews, commentary on their history, wild stories, and star ratings for every release.  Part 3 of the series covers the very early years of the band in the style of an audiobook documentary, as the Airplane's original visionary Marty Balin seeks out the best of the best and winds up pulling together a band that will soon change the course of music history. Here are just a few of the many things discussed in this episode of Discograffiti: Marty Balin's early music dalliances; Piecing together his dream band, one member at a time; The unbelievable first original that they performed; Marty's genius plan to foist his band on San Francisco with a true splash; Jorma Kaukonen and Jack Casady: the origin story of a 70-year musical love affair; The incredibly rare first recording by Jack & Jorma; How Jorma was seduced into the Airplane; The true origin of the band's name; The bargaining chip used by their first manager Matthew Katz to convince the group that he was their man;  And their public debut as a band.   CONNECT Join our Soldiers of Sound Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1839109176272153 Patreon:  https://www.patreon.com/discograffiti Podfollow: ⁠⁠https://podfollow.com/1592182331⁠⁠ YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClyaQCdvDelj5EiKj6IRLhw Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/discograffitipod/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Discograffiti/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/Discograffiti Order the Digital version of the METAL MACHINE MUZAK 2xLP (feat. Lou Barlow, Cory Hanson, Mark Robinson, & W. Cullen Hart): https://www.patreon.com/discograffiti/shop/197404 Order the $11 Digital version of the MMM 2xLP on Bandcamp: https://discograffiti.bandcamp.com/album/metal-machine-muzak Order the METAL MACHINE MUZAK Double Vinyl + Digital package: https://www.patreon.com/discograffiti/shop/169954 Merch Shop: https://discograffitipod.myspreadshop.com/all Venmo Dave A Tip: @David-Gebroe Web site: http://discograffiti.com/   CONTACT DAVE Email: dave@discograffiti.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hooligandave Instagram:  https://www.instagram.com/davidgebroe/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/DaveGebroe There is no other Patreon in existence where you get more for your money. 4 shows a week is what it takes these days to successfully blot out our unacceptable reality…so do yourself a favor and give it a shot for at least one month to see what I'm talking about.   If you're already a member, please comment below about your experience.   https://www.patreon.com/discograffiti   Dave's Show Notes are available at a separate link for Lieutenants & up.

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdf

In a sworn interview with DOJ Office of Inspector General investigators conducted on June 14, 2021, an unnamed lieutenant and former correctional officer from MCC New York was questioned as part of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death and the broader security failures surrounding his incarceration. The interview began with investigators explicitly stating that the probe focused not only on Epstein's death itself, but also “everything that surrounds that time,” including job performance failures and security breakdowns. The correctional officer agreed to a voluntary interview under oath and spent much of the early questioning outlining his career history, including prior work as a New York City probation officer, a brief stint with New York State corrections, and his transfer to MCC New York in 2013 after beginning his BOP career at Allenwood in Pennsylvania.The deposition is another piece of the sprawling federal effort to reconstruct exactly what happened inside MCC New York before Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019. Investigators were clearly trying to map out the staffing structure, chain of command, and personnel who were present during the chaotic period surrounding Epstein's incarceration, including after his first alleged suicide attempt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00111284.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

US history, and Lt. Raul Diaz was on the frontlines for all of it. The decorated and controversial law enforcement figure identified the shifting tide in the Magic City when law enforcement lost their grip on crime as a new breed of criminal flooded South Florida to ply their billion-dollar trade.In a deadly exclamation mark, Colombian cocaine godmother Griselda Blanco and her assassins swept through the city with a bloody and ruthless ambition that left countless dead bodies along the way. Lt. Diaz organized and spearheaded the multi-agency task force CENTAC-26 to combat Blanco and the cartels.Raul came to the US at age thirteen accompanied by only his younger brother and overcame insurmountable odds after finally finding law enforcement as his calling. He never did things the traditional way, and that wasn't a popular position in the regulated world of police work.His successes came at a costly price, both professionally and personally, putting him in the crosshairs of those with an axe to grind, shockingly on both sides of law enforcement. The man profiled in books, documentaries, and the Netflix series Griselda is here to share the story previously told by others—now, finally told by the one man who knows the truth behind every kilo, kidnapping, and corpse. KILLING THE LIEUTENANT: Fighting Miami's Cocaine Wars, Hunting Griselda Blanco, and My Fight To Stay Alive—Lt. Raul J. Diaz and Sean Oliver

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

Happy May the 4th! Someone on the show reminded me that this episode exists, so what better day to release it (other than the day it intended for original in... The post Star Wars In Character – Captain Bolivian and Lieutenant Hija first appeared on NEOZAZ.

Happy May the 4th! Someone on the show reminded me that this episode exists, so what better day to release it (other than the day it intended for original in 2025). So without further ado, in this "lost" episode we discuss the two characters that without their involvement, there would be no Star Wars. Originally recorded…February 2025.

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

The deposition of the unnamed MCC lieutenant reveals not just operational failures, but a striking level of evasiveness that runs throughout the testimony. When pressed on critical details—staffing levels, required inmate checks, chain of command responsibilities, and awareness of Epstein's status—the lieutenant repeatedly falls back on vague answers, limited recollection, or an inability to provide specifics. This pattern isn't occasional—it's consistent, especially on the exact points where clarity matters most. Rather than offering firm timelines or accountability, the testimony often drifts into generalities, creating the impression that either key information was not retained or not being fully disclosed.That evasiveness becomes even more glaring when discussing the hours leading up to and immediately following Epstein's death. Questions about whether protocols were followed, who was responsible for monitoring, and how breakdowns occurred are met with uncertainty or deflection, leaving major gaps in the narrative. Instead of clarifying what went wrong, the testimony reinforces the sense of confusion and lack of oversight already seen in other MCC accounts. The result is a record that feels less like a clear explanation and more like a fragmented, incomplete account—one that raises as many questions about credibility and accountability as it answers about the failures inside the facility.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00062649.pdf

Be sure and join us live Thursday night, April 30th at 8pm on our Youtube Channel with our special guest, 81 year old , 15 year FDNY veteran, Lieutenant Mike Williams. Lt. Williams was appointed to the FDNY on 7/13/1970. -Assigned to E-210:-1970 Transferred to Eng 90: 1/1973 -Transferred to Lad 41: -1/1974 -Transferred to Lad 58:-11/1975 -Promoted to Lt -1983 to Div 3 -Retired in 1985. Gonna be a great show. We will get the whole skinny. You don't want to miss this one. Join us at the kitchen table on the BEST FIREFIGHTER PODCAST ON THE INTERNET! You can also Listen to our podcast ...we are on all the players #lovethisjob #GiveBackMoreThanYouTake #Oldschool #TraditionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/gettin-salty-experience-firefighter-podcast--4218265/support.

In this episode of Things Police See, host Steve Gould welcomes back the legendary Lt. Joe Kenda, the "Homicide Hunter" and host of American Detective. With a career solving 387 homicides and maintaining a staggering 93% solve rate, Kenda dives deep into the reality of criminal investigation—far beyond the Hollywood myths of car chases and gun battles.   Joe Kenda shares candid stories about his journey from a "college boy" rookie to a Lieutenant of Detectives in Colorado Springs. He discusses the intense emotional toll of the job, his unwavering mission to seek justice for victims, and the "2%" of humanity that keeps law enforcement on the streets. Whether you're a fan of ID Channel's Homicide Hunter, a true crime enthusiast, or interested in the raw reality of law enforcement, this interview provides an unfiltered look into the mind of one of America's most famous detectives. Reasons We Serve - Podcast https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpZRETIomuKamZC30nUBKkg Contact Steve - steve@thingspolicesee.com Support the TPS show by joining the Patreon community today!
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=27353055 Sergeant Steve YouTube Channel  https://www.youtube.com/@TheSergeantSteve

Cathy Lanier is the Chief Security Officer of the National Football League, where she oversees security across the league office and all 32 clubs. Before the NFL, she served as Chief of Police of Washington, D.C., from 2007 to 2016 — the first woman in the role and the longest-serving chief in the force's history — where her strategies helped cut violent crime by 21 percent even as the city's population grew 15 percent.This episode is brought to you by:Eight Sleep Pod Cover 5 sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating: EightSleep.com/Tim Shopify global commerce platform, providing tools to start, grow, market, and manage a retail business: Shopify.com/timHelix Sleep premium mattresses: HelixSleep.com/TimWealthfront high-yield cash account: Wealthfront.com/Tim Wealthfront disclaimer: New clients get 3.30% base APY from program banks + additional 0.75% boost for 3 months on your uninvested cash (max $150k balance). Terms and conditions apply. The Cash Account offered by Wealthfront Brokerage LLC (“WFB”) member FINRA/SIPC, not a bank. The base APY as of 1/30/26 is representative, can change, and requires no minimum. Tim Ferriss, a non-client, receives compensation from WFB for advertising and holds a non-controlling equity interest in the corporate parent of WFB, which creates a conflict of interest. Individual experiences and outcomes will differ. Instant withdrawals may be limited by your receiving firm and other factors. Investment advisory services provided by Wealthfront Advisers LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser. Securities investments: not bank deposits, not bank-guaranteed or FDIC-insured, and may lose value.TIMESTAMPS:[00:00] Start.[01:38] Cathy Lanier: from Tuxedo to the top.[03:22] Dad vanishes; Mom holds the line (and takes shorthand to the TV).[08:08] Bused into DC: straight-A student turns chronic truant.[10:37] Married at 15, signed over for $100 off child support.[12:54] The baby-in-the-crib wake-up call.[16:37] GED by a single point; secretary by day, waitress by night.[20:18] The Washington Post ad that changed everything.[20:39] 1990 MPD: into the crack cocaine wars.[23:46] Grandma's gospel: no excuses, damned for doing.[26:23] Mount Pleasant riots: trial by brick, and a better-way epiphany.[33:23] Donny Exum's nudge — and sergeant at 26.[38:56] Being a woman on the '90s force: harassment and the 90-day dodge.[49:38] Marion Barry exits, Chuck Ramsey enters.[51:08] Lieutenant: the sweet spot. Captain: the desk (but keep the cuffs).[56:58] 9/11 and the surprise transfer to Special Ops.[58:07] Mentors lend confidence — and a counterterrorism bureau built from scratch.[1:00:14] Live Sarin, VX, and training with bioweapons legends.[1:02:22] Text the 50, get the 411: the tip line gambit.[1:03:36] Cultivating sources: the white Escalade payoff.[1:09:02] Attention to detail: OCD as a superpower.[1:10:43] Teletubby pagers to smartphones — and the Thomas Maslin reckoning.[1:15:14] NFL security: the scope of "everything."[1:17:10] Red teaming, explained.[1:18:53] NFL vs. MPD: diversity and complexity that goes to 11.[1:21:24] The book club: The Tipping Point and Blink.[1:23:32] Decisions under pressure — and with incomplete information.[1:28:34] Billboard wisdom: it's not what happens; it's what you do.[1:30:08] Parting thoughts.*For show notes and past guests on The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast.For deals from sponsors of The Tim Ferriss Show, please visit tim.blog/podcast-sponsorsSign up for Tim's email newsletter (5-Bullet Friday) at tim.blog/friday.For transcripts of episodes, go to tim.blog/transcripts.Discover Tim's books: tim.blog/books.Follow Tim:Twitter: twitter.com/tferriss Instagram: instagram.com/timferrissYouTube: youtube.com/timferrissFacebook: facebook.com/timferriss LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/timferrissSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.