Podcasts about Raewyn Connell

In this episode, Eric Hsu and Louis Everuss launch the fourth season of their podcast by examining a concept that sociologists continue to engage with to produce insightful understandings of how social life is gendered. They use Connell and Messerschmidt's article in Gender & Society and an earlier piece by Connell in Teachers College Record to explore how the concept of hegemonic masculinity has been theorised, applied, critiqued, and refined in various sociological discussions. Louis does three things of note in this episode. He recounts a time he felt pressured to get in a fight at a nightclub. He admits he's never seen Back to the Future. And he wonders why he isn't receiving more cash in envelopes from podcast listeners. Music and sound effects for this episode come from various sources and is licensed under the Creative Commons 0 License, the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0, EFF Open Audio License, or is covered by a SFX (Multi-Use) License or a Commercial License from Epidemic Sound (www.epidemicsound.com). Tracks include:https://freesound.org/people/Tuben/sounds/272044/https://www.epidemicsound.com/track/xO2QwSlKHf/https://www.epidemicsound.com/sound-effects/tracks/81383ee2-40cf-4750-a20b-95b9ea28ec58/https://www.epidemicsound.com/track/Auyt43gJVD/https://www.epidemicsound.com/track/A2V5xRtt5S/https://www.epidemicsound.com/sound-effects/tracks/4364b350-da9c-4fb1-9bb8-2073d91e7625/https://www.epidemicsound.com/track/Gicq7Ti4tJ/https://www.epidemicsound.com/sound-effects/tracks/f2c96e92-c270-4238-ac59-b5d846c3b2af/https://www.epidemicsound.com/sound-effects/tracks/3164c95a-57c2-4b6f-9dd7-5dc244262316/https://www.epidemicsound.com/track/L4nmsegX0X/The opinions expressed in the Sociology of Everything podcast are that of the hosts and/or guest speakers. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of anyone else at UniSA or the institution at large.The Sociology of Everything podcast | www.sociologypodcast.com

Hello, cet été je vous propose de découvrir un super épisode du podcast Comme un poisson dans l'eau de Victor Duran-Le Peuch, le podcast contre le spécisme. Il s'agit d'un épisode avec Nora Bouazzouni sur les liens entre alimentation et sexisme. Abonnez-vous à Comme un poisson dans l'eau, et bonne écoute ! On explore dans cet épisode avec la journaliste et autrice Nora Bouazzouni la façon dont le genre influence notre alimentation, et en particulier notre consommation d'animaux. Dans la plupart des pays du monde, il y a beaucoup plus de femmes qui sont végétariennes ou véganes que d'hommes. Et je voulais comprendre pourquoi ! Est-ce que c'est juste une question de pratiques différenciées selon le genre, la norme masculine dominante consistant à aimer le sport, les voitures et… manger des animaux ? Ou est-ce qu'il y a quelque chose de plus profond derrière cela ? Pourquoi est-ce que la viande paraît si essentielle à la masculinité, même à la virilité ? Est-ce que le fait que les femmes sont plus sensibles en général au sort des animaux ne s'explique pas par la perception entre leur oppression commune avec les animaux autres qu'humains, ou peut-être par des liens intimes entre la domination spéciste et la domination patriarcale ? Ce sont autant de questions que j'ai soulevées dans la discussion avec mon invitée, dont les réponses sont passionnantes et très éclairantes. Je vous laisse découvrir, bonne écoute ! ________________________________ Références et sources citées dans l'entretien : - la sociologue Raewyn Connell a développé le concept de 'masculinité hégémonique', notamment dans son ouvrage Masculinités (1995) - Le coût de la virilité (2021) - Lucile Peytavin - épisodes du podcast Les couilles sur la table sur les voitures (Ep 27 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVyRobljXQE) , et sur l'alcool (Ep 43 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ0Ify7Fmmg) - Le sexisme. Une affaire d'hommes (2020) - Valérie Rey-Robert - La publicité affreuse de Charal : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzhnBDnxPlE - L' "efféminage" est un néologisme créé par la chercheuse en philosophie Marie-Frédérique Pellegrin - Le génie lesbien - Alice Coffin - La crise de la masculinité. Autopise d'un mythe tenace (2018) - Francis Dupuis-Déri - épisode du podcast Kiffe ta race sur les masculinités asiatiques : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pVH0vobbwc Recommandations de Nora Bouazzouni : - Épisode "Picasso, séparer l'homme de l'artiste" du podcast Vénus s'épilait-elle la chatte ? : https://www.venuslepodcast.com/episodes/picasso%2C-séparer-l'homme-de-l'artiste - Aude Vidal : ses livres et son blog Mon blog sur l'écologie politique : https://blog.ecologie-politique.eu - La série Severance : https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11280740/ ________________________________ SOUTENIR : https://linktr.ee/poissonpodcast Comme un poisson dans l'eau est un podcast indépendant et sans publicité : votre soutien est indispensable pour qu'il puisse continuer à exister. Merci d'avance ! Les comptes Instagram, Twitter, Facebook et Mastodon du podcast sont également à retrouver dans le link tree ! CRÉDITS Comme un poisson dans l'eau est un podcast créé et animé par Victor Duran-Le Peuch. Charte graphique : Ivan Ocaña Générique : Synthwave Vibe par Meydän Musique : Days Past par In Closing

Thank you to paid FET supporters. Your support allows me to do things like:* Appear as an expert witness at the Senate Inquiry into Shared Equity (was 5th March)* Appear at the Senate Inquiry into Retirement (on Tuesday 12th March). * Conduct a seminar on housing economics for NSW regulator IPART (also 12th March)The season for change in higher learning is now.Not only have I started Fresh Economic Thinking as an independent place to do science—conduct research, teach, and engage in public debate—I am also involved as a mentor and teacher at Nova Academia.Nova Academia is a new college based in a castle outside of Theux, Belgium, run by a team of academics to create an “academic oasis” for research and teaching and to challenge great minds. The image above is the new campus. It makes me think of the X-men, where gifted students got together in a castle for intensive training in their craft but also to build life skills. Here's the pitch.Where once you were challenged intellectually and became responsible adults, university students find themselves in large impersonal bureaucratic systems that treat you as fragile and in need of protection from wrongthink. You are taught compliance and dogma, leaving you unprepared for the demands of work and adulthood. We – a group of outspoken academics, thinkers, and citizens – have seen our universities abandon you. Why waste your life in such soulless places? Come join our oasis in a beautiful castle in the Ardennes. Live on a campus with freedom of speech. Discover yourself and the world, and escape from constant fear and online distractions. An open community where art, aesthetics, movement, and genuine interactions are as important as academic content. Is this for you? It is not a place for passive consumers: it is where you will expand your thinking, become a more responsible adult, set up creative activities for others to join, design solutions to economic and social problems, and prepare for future jobs and studies. Graduates and academics will have made friends, acquired valuable critical and job-relevant skills, and developed improvements to major sectors of our society.Currently, the subject areas are economics, political economy, and health and well-being. If you are thinking of pursuing further education in these areas, consider this option. To begin over the next couple of years, the basic course structures are one-year live-in programs that start with 6-months of core curriculum then specialisation and research.* The Gap-Year Program is for high-school leavers and undergraduates looking for a challenge to expand their horizons and get exposure to new disciplines. * The Finishing Year Program is for recent graduates and professionals looking to spend time in deep learning about a topic, perhaps one outside their technical expertise. * The Avant-Garde Program is for young leaders looking to make a difference in the world. There are two actions to take if this sparks your interest. First, go here to the website to get the vibe of the place. It is very early days. Pricing is yet to be confirmed. At the moment, Nova Academia is for risk-takers and leaders. It is an experiment in learning. Second, attend the online information session on 16th March 2024 (which is unfortunately around midnight in Australia). As I noted, I am part of the mentorship group that students will have access to and will be teaching in early 2025 in some form about the economics of corruption and property markets. More details about the vision for this new education project are in the below document. Read more below from Paul Frijters about the problems he sees in modern universities that have left open a market niche for places like Nova Academia.Problems With the Modern UniversityProfessor Paul FrijtersWe observe three interconnected problems with modern academia. Each problem hampers universities' ability to deliver on their mission to curate free and critical thought, produce new knowledge, and graduate students prepared to serve the needs of their communities.1. Bureaucratic bloatUniversities today are administratively bloated, a phenomenon also noted by many others (e.g., Raewyn Connell) that self-perpetuates via national and international bureaucracies. Bureaucracy naturally expands and expands, costing the time of academics and students. US universities in 2010 were found to function perfectly well with an administration-to-faculty personnel ratio of just 1 to 3, but the typical ratio observed that year was at least 5 to 3, and getting worse. Yale recently reported that it has as many administrators as it has students. This bloat represents easily 50 percent of all expenses in a university and perhaps more than that in terms of lost productivity, if one includes both additional expenses and the production prevented by over-regulation.An example of how this bureaucracy is self-perpetuating is seen in the process of accreditation. Accreditation agencies, whether private or public, largely measure the presence of administrative staff, policies, and requirements (processes, procedures, KPIs, progress reports, databases, ethics committees, and so on). In turn, accreditation is used as a prerequisite for student access to state loans, for purposes of fulfilling job requirements, or for academics to be able to apply for research grants from state agencies. Receipt of research income is then used in marketing to students and to pursue higher levels of accreditation. In this way, the university bureaucracy is both mandated and protected by the associated national and international institutions around accreditation, research grants, state job applications, and state loans. Only institutions with large endowments – either private endowments, as in the States, or state subsidies in the form of free public land or other state-provided resources – are able to keep up and become known as high-status universities in this bureaucratic race.Administrative bloat has many other consequences, amongst which is that many university functions now follow bureaucratic rather than academic logic, ignoring the purely academic benefits to activities and focusing instead on finding and privileging reasons for the bureaucracy's own existence. This leads to a perennial search for problems that can be exaggerated and turned into a justification for more administration (e.g., ‘Is there a problem I can pretend to solve by creating an additional compliance problem?').A clear example of this is seen in human subjects ethics policies, which today involve many committees and result in the strange reality that social science academics, whose job it is to do research about humanity, are bound by rules that in no way bind millions of businesses and government departments that treat people far worse than they are treated in most research involving human subjects. The bureaucracy has created a kind of administrative ritual, justified by the need to be careful when doing research with human subjects, that demands yet more administration, goes far further than the law of the land, and naturally crowds out individual responsibility.2. Universities as businesses The modern university has become a business run for the personal glory and profit of its management, rather than an institution serving a public-good function that reflects the desire for knowledge in a whole community. Universities are now large property owners, suppliers of visas, organisers of consultancy services and places where business and management careers are made, all of which feed a commercial but not necessarily a community mission. Universities today play a real ‘game of mates' (Murray and Frijters, 2022).This new orientation has many consequences. One is an inability to effectively caretake the physical and mental health of students, because the question of ‘what good could we do' is neither the starting point nor any longer built into the self-image of the university. A second is the loss of a positive community story, leaving a vacuum that is now filled with self-hatred and divisive doomsday stories. A third is that relevant research has been replaced by performative research. Fourth, truth is no longer treated seriously, having been replaced by feel-good promises. Fifth, public lectures have reduced in importance and publishing is increasingly seen as a pure status game, leading to territorial issues. Worst of all perhaps is the demise of the university as a place where people try to solve community problems. 3. Mediocrity and cowardice Second-rate and disconnected teaching, based on what students with limited understanding enjoy hearing, is coupled in today's universities with disconnected theories that are largely for sale (e.g., content for schools of medicine influenced by Big Pharma, theories on taxation and private property pushed by billionaire think tanks, and old textbooks rehashing tired theories that dominate the market and from which disciplines cannot escape). With mass teaching have come low-quality students, dragging standards down, but also the reality that university activities become relevant to institutions (including the state) wishing to manipulate whole populations – reducing universities' independence.Immersive teaching and travel are seen today merely as risks, rather than core activities, by university managers who do not weigh the risks versus benefits of university activities with respect to fulfilling a community service role.The result of these trends, coupled with broader social trends over the past generation, are alarming. Cognitive outcomes and several indicators of university success in the West are now visibly suffering relative to a mere 20 years ago. Not only do our children have lower IQs and a reduced capacity to think abstractly, but the mobility of young people is lower. On top of this, the returns to college graduation vary widely by degree, and facing large numbers of negative-return degrees, over 50 per cent of Americans think degrees are not worth the cost.These problems feed into each other and mutually reinforce a bad equilibrium for the system as a whole. The incentives are strong for university staff who are low-quality and demotivated to find ways of avoiding higher-quality demands or demands to reduce bureaucracy (which would lead to layoffs). A peer-review system that has metastasized into a mechanism for punishing real innovation and reward for super-specialists by established territorial groups spawns textbooks and academic societies reflecting those territories, creating more barriers to real renewal. The increased importance of research status signaling makes all of this worse, as ‘winning' on the terms of the existing system becomes more important, punishing innovation and broad thinking even more.Joy and spiritual meaning have been replaced in today's universities by dull, low-quality mass teaching and mass research. Strong lock-in effects make escape for existing universities nigh impossible. As early as 2012, we observed that an Australian university wanting to do something about quality or bureaucracy would upset the unions, the existing students, the local politicians, and even the alumni (who would suddenly hear from their own university that the degree they thought was great was in fact not great). New entrants would face extreme pressures to copy the basic failed model, both due to demands for bureaucracy by accreditors and students, and due to the need to look good on signalling measures (rankings, research income, etc.). A pessimist might think the only way to change is for the whole system to eventually lose legitimacy and then implode as the demand for education finds substitutes abroad and in external institutions, like homeschooling.With great upheavals, making a portion of the population lose faith in the state and in the many institutions associated with power and money, come new opportunities. The signs that we may be at such a juncture now are seen in the increasing percentage of people who have lost faith in the news and in local politicians (shown in surveys like this one), the prevalence of beliefs that standards have fallen, and the rising percentage of people opting out by homeschooling or paying for private education rather than trusting the state. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.fresheconomicthinking.com/subscribe

Dzisiejsze rozważania nad tym, czym jest męskość hegemoniczna, zostały w całości oparte na moich lekturach publikacji australijskiej badaczki Raewyn Connell, a także na opracowaniach i analizach jej tekstów popełnionych przez innych autorów. Szerzej odnoszę się także do jej społecznej teorii płci kulturowej i tego, jaki ma to związek z patriarchatem. Męskość określana hegemoniczną, według twórczyni teorii, zapewnia grupie mężczyzn dominację zarówno nad kobietami, jak i nad pozostałą grupą mężczyzn będących z różnych względów w mniejszości. Nadrzędne są jednak dążenia do akceptacji i legitymizacji patriarchatu, który gwarantując mężczyźnie pozycję dominującą, jednocześnie wymaga od kobiety pełnej subordynacji. Zapraszam! Oryginalny, anglojęzyczny artykuł Raewyn Connell opublikowany w The Australian and New Zealand journal of sociology. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/144078337901500302 "Męskość jako kategoria kulturowa, praktyki męskości", Wydawnictwo Portalu Wiedza i Edukacja https://depot.ceon.pl/bitstream/handle/123456789/2199/Męskość-jako-kategoria-kulturowa1.pdf "Socjologia płci Płeć w ujęciu globalnym", Raewyn Connell https://www.znak.com.pl/ksiazka/socjologia-plci-plec-w-ujeciu-globalnym-raewyn-connell-39991

Guest is amazing researcher Raewyn Connell talking about her new book Research, Politics, Social Change

Oggi a Cult, ultima puntata della stagione invernale: Mario Cervio Gualersi riferisce dal Campania Teatro Festival 2023; una mostra a Torino dedicata a Mimmo Jodice; Emanuela Abbatecola ha curato la traduzione di "Il genere preso sul serio" di Raewyn Connell ed. Fondazione Feltrinelli); Maurizio Di Rienzo è il direttore artistico del Trieste Short Film Festival; la celebre lista di fumetti per sopravvivere alle vacanze di Antonio Serra...

Today's episode deals with colonization and its relation to sexuality and masculinity. If we read thoroughly Australian sociologist Raewyn Connell, “hegemonic masculinities” were constructed as white, while subordinate masculinities were reserved for people of color, less close to the ideal and closer to deviance. It's also important to adopt an intersectional point of view here since we'll be talking about a history that has been told for decades by the ones who colonized, overshadowing the reality of the ones who were colonized and seeking freedom from the oppressor. Yet, the fear of ideological rape and territorial penetration has grown in French people's minds since the fifties. Algerian hyper-virility was opposed to a crisis of French masculinity, thought to be the cause of defeat in Algeria. The far right presented itself as the possibility of restoring a virile authority versus the quote “twinks” and “dandies” of May 68 who were deemed as too effeminate to fight against the Arab invasion. Apparently, it would have given the figure of the Algerian pimp – an engine of the Arab invasion in France according to the far-right - and that of the Maghrebi immigrant worker whose hypersexuality and sexual misery would lead to the need to resort to prostitutes and to relentlessly rape white women...Todd Shepard is a Professor of History at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, USA. In 2008, he wrote The Invention of Decolonization: The Algerian War and the Remaking of France and co-wrote "Guerre d'Algérie : le sexe outragé" with Catherine Brun in 2016. In 2017, his book Sex, France, and Arab Men, 1962-1979 has become in English-speaking academic environments the new reference on how “sexual Orientalism” re-emerged in post-decolonization French politics. So he's the best person to go to for a nice discussion French far right politics, May '68, prostitution, gay rights, sexual libertinism and rape explicitly grappled with questions of imperialism, the Algerian war, colonial violence, and post-decolonization racism.

On explore dans cet épisode avec la journaliste et autrice Nora Bouazzouni la façon dont le genre influence notre alimentation, et en particulier notre consommation d'animaux. Dans la plupart des pays du monde, il y a beaucoup plus de femmes qui sont végétariennes ou véganes que d'hommes. Et je voulais comprendre pourquoi ! Est-ce que c'est juste une question de pratiques différenciées selon le genre, la norme masculine dominante consistant à aimer le sport, les voitures et… manger des animaux ? Ou est-ce qu'il y a quelque chose de plus profond derrière cela ? Pourquoi est-ce que la viande paraît si essentielle à la masculinité, même à la virilité ? Est-ce que le fait que les femmes sont plus sensibles en général au sort des animaux ne s'explique pas par la perception entre leur oppression commune avec les animaux autres qu'humains, ou peut-être par des liens intimes entre la domination spéciste et la domination patriarcale ? Ce sont autant de questions que j'ai soulevées dans la discussion avec mon invitée, dont les réponses sont passionnantes et très éclairantes. Je vous laisse découvrir, bonne écoute ! ________________________________ Références et sources citées dans l'entretien : - la sociologue Raewyn Connell a développé le concept de 'masculinité hégémonique', notamment dans son ouvrage Masculinités (1995) - Le coût de la virilité (2021) - Lucile Peytavin - épisodes du podcast Les couilles sur la table sur les voitures (Ep 27 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVyRobljXQE) , et sur l'alcool (Ep 43 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ0Ify7Fmmg) - Le sexisme. Une affaire d'hommes (2020) - Valérie Rey-Robert - La publicité affreuse de Charal : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzhnBDnxPlE - L' "efféminage" est un néologisme créé par la chercheuse en philosophie Marie-Frédérique Pellegrin - Le génie lesbien - Alice Coffin - La crise de la masculinité. Autopise d'un mythe tenace (2018) - Francis Dupuis-Déri - épisode du podcast Kiffe ta race sur les masculinités asiatiques : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pVH0vobbwc Recommandations de Nora Bouazzouni : - Épisode "Picasso, séparer l'homme de l'artiste" du podcast Vénus s'épilait-elle la chatte ? : https://www.venuslepodcast.com/episodes/picasso%2C-séparer-l'homme-de-l'artiste - Aude Vidal : ses livres et son blog Mon blog sur l'écologie politique : https://blog.ecologie-politique.eu - La série Severance : https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11280740/ ________________________________ SOUTENIR : https://linktr.ee/poissonpodcast Comme un poisson dans l'eau est un podcast indépendant et sans publicité : votre soutien est indispensable pour qu'il puisse continuer à exister. Merci d'avance ! Les comptes Instagram, Twitter, Facebook et Mastodon du podcast sont également à retrouver dans le link tree ! CRÉDITS Comme un poisson dans l'eau est un podcast créé et animé par Victor Duran-Le Peuch. Charte graphique : Ivan Ocaña Générique : Synthwave Vibe par Meydän Musique : Days Past par In Closing

Nicole talks to Griffith Review Editor, Ashley Hay, about he incredible works and writers in Griffith Review issue #75 - Learning Curves, all about education. "From preschool to postgrad, from private to public, and from sandstone to the school of life, what do the parameters of our educational experiences add up to? What does a good education look like in a country with an increasingly segregated school system, public funding for private institutions, and a tertiary sector that’s facing an uncertain financial and philosophical future?" Featuring new work by Raewyn Connell, Bri Lee, Andrew Leigh, Melanie Myers, Pasi Sahlberg, Gabbie Stroudand Miriam Sved, among many others. SHOW NOTES: Nicole Abadee Website: https://www.nicoleabadee.com.au Facebook: @booksbooksbookspodcast OR @nicole.abadee Twitter: @NicoleAbadee Instagram: @booksbooksbookspodcast OR @nicoleabadee Griffith Review Issue # 75 "Learning Curves" Website: https://www.griffithreview.com/editions/escape-routes/ Facebook: @griffithreview Twitter: @GriffithReview Instagram: @griffithreviewSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

L'Ifop vient de réaliser un sondage assez improbable sur les «hommes déconstruits». L'occasion de rappeler ce que cette expression est censée signifier, et de quelle manière elle a été récemment vidée de sa substance pour devenir un catalyseur de bonne conscience. Un mercredi sur deux, Mansplaining observe les masculinités à travers des œuvres culturelles et des faits d'actualité. Parce que la parole masculine est dominante, sauf lorsqu'il s'agit d'interroger les privilèges des hommes. Références: «Clément Viktorovitch: hommes, la grande déconstruction?», Franceinfo, YouTube «Valérie Pécresse: “Je combats le mouvement wokiste et, au-delà, tous ces mouvements qui veulent nous déconstruire”», BFMTV, Twitter «Alain Finkielkraut : “Le patriarcat n'existe plus”», France Inter, YouTube Alpha Mâle – Séduire les femmes pour s'apprécier entre hommes, Mélanie Gourarier, Seuil, 2017 Masculinités – Enjeux sociaux de l'hégémonie, Raewyn Connell, Éditions Amsterdam, 1995 (nouvelle édition 2022) «Déconstruction des normes masculines: les hommes disent un petit oui», Libération Yannick Jadot face à ELLE: «À la maison, c'est moi qui repasse mes chemises», Elle.fr Mansplaining est un podcast de Thomas Messias, produit par Slate.fr sous la direction de Christophe Carron et Benjamin Saeptem Hours. Réalisation: Aurélie Rodrigues Montage: Mona Delahais Prise de son: Thomas Messias Musique: «Warm Sea», Savvier Si vous aimez Mansplaining, pensez à l'exprimer en lui donnant la note maximale sur votre plateforme de podcast préférée, en en parlant autour de vous, et en laissant plein de commentaires bienveillants sur les réseaux sociaux. Suivez Slate Podcasts sur Facebook et Instagram (retrouvez-y aussi le compte de Mansplaining). Pour échanger et découvrir de nouveaux podcasts, rejoignez le Slate Podcast Club sur Facebook.

La société laisse peu de place aux personnalités introverties, souvent considérées avec mépris ou indifférence. Mais le genre joue également un rôle dans la façon dont l'introversion est prise en compte. Comment les hommes introvertis sont-ils perçus? Doivent-ils lutter contre leur nature ou au contraire cultiver cette précieuse différence? Un mercredi sur deux, Mansplaining observe les masculinités à travers des œuvres culturelles et des faits d'actualité. Parce que la parole masculine est dominante, sauf lorsqu'il s'agit d'interroger les privilèges des hommes. Références: The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (Ben Stiller, 2013) Free Guy (Shawn Levy, 2021) «À l'école, les introvertis, ça va sans dire», Libération «Gender & Temperament: The One-Two Punch That Can Hold You Back», Quiet Rev Coline Pierré et Loïc Froissart, Introverti·e·s mode d'emploi, Éditions du Rouergue, 2021 Chez soi – Une odyssée de l'espace domestique, Mona Chollet, Zones, 2015 La force des discrets, Susan Cain, Livre de Poche, 2014 Masculinités – Enjeux sociaux de l'hégémonie, Raewyn Connell, Amsterdam, 2014 Mansplaining est un podcast de Thomas Messias, produit par Slate.fr sous la direction de Christophe Carron et Benjamin Saeptem Hours. Réalisation: Aurélie Rodrigues Montage: Guillaume Assal Prise de son: Thomas Messias Musique: «Warm Sea», Savvier Si vous aimez Mansplaining, pensez à l'exprimer en lui donnant la note maximale sur votre plateforme de podcast préférée, en en parlant autour de vous, et en laissant plein de commentaires bienveillants sur les réseaux sociaux. Suivez Slate Podcasts sur Facebook et Instagram (retrouvez-y aussi le compte de Mansplaining). Pour échanger et découvrir de nouveaux podcasts, rejoignez le Slate Podcast Club sur Facebook.

Pour illustrer le concept de masculinité hégémonique, c'est bien souvent le nom de Clint Eastwood qui est utilisé, comme dans Masculinités, l'ouvrage fondateur de Raewyn Connell. À 91 ans, l'acteur-réalisateur sort son quarantième film, Cry Macho, qui sonne comme une tentative tardive d'interroger son rapport à son statut d'homme. Un mercredi sur deux, Mansplaining observe les masculinités à travers des œuvres culturelles et des faits d'actualité. Parce que la parole masculine est dominante, sauf lorsqu'il s'agit d'interroger les privilèges des hommes. À lire sur le même sujet: Chez Clint Eastwood, les héros se cachent pour pleurer Références: Cry Macho (Clint Eastwood, 2021) Gran Torino (Clint Eastwood, 2009) L'Homme des hautes plaines (Clint Eastwood, 1973) Brice Hortefeux: «Quand il n'y en a qu'un, ça va… » Raewyn Connell, Masculinités – Enjeux sociaux de l'hégémonie (éditions Amsterdam, 2014) Valérie Rey-Robert, Une culture du viol à la française (Libertalia, 2019) Valérie Rey-Robert, Le sexisme, une affaire d'hommes (Libertalia, 2020) Mansplaining est un podcast de Thomas Messias, produit par Slate.fr sous la direction de Christophe Carron et Benjamin Saeptem Hours. Montage: Aurélie Rodrigues Lecture: Hélène Decommer Musique: «Warm Sea», Savvier Si vous aimez Mansplaining, pensez à l'exprimer en lui donnant la note maximale sur votre plateforme de podcast préférée, en en parlant autour de vous, et en laissant plein de commentaires bienveillants sur les réseaux sociaux. Suivez Slate Podcasts sur Facebook et Instagram (retrouvez-y aussi le compte de Mansplaining). Pour échanger et découvrir de nouveaux podcasts, rejoignez le Slate Podcast Club sur Facebook.

With more people coming out as gender fluid, transitioning or on a spectrum of gender identity, it's clear the biological constraints of gender today have loosened. But how do we deal with enduring gender-based social inequality and injustice? Will we ever get to a point in society where gender doesn't matter?  Jesse Bering is an award-winning science writer, psychologist, and academic.  Raewyn Connell is one of Australia's leading social scientists. She is best known internationally as a sociologist of gender and a pioneer of research on masculinities and best known in Australia for work on class inequality and social justice in education.  Cordelia Fine is an Associate Professor at Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne. Her popular science book, Delusions of Gender: The Real Science of Sex Differences was described “required reading for every neurobiology student, if not every human being.”  Elizabeth Anne Riley, PhD is a Sydney-based counsellor, academic & clinical supervisor specialising in gender diversity. 

In this episode the guys dive into masculinity. (3:00) : Weekly Updates (13:56) : Defining masculinity (18:30) : Traits that are considered masculine (29:00) : The social construction of masculinity (35:18) : Raewyn Connell on masculinities (37:55) : Other characteristics of masculinity (46:00) : Negative associations with masculinity (52:22) : Emasculation (58:00) : Pride https://www.voicesofyouth.org/blog/masculinity-and-femininity https://othersociologist.com/2012/10/09/raewyn-connell-on-masculinities/ https://othersociologist.com/2013/08/10/social-construction-masculinity/amp/ Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City by Elijah Anderson https://www.amazon.com/Code-Street-Decency-Violence-Moral/dp/0393320782/ref=nodl_ All support is appreciated! Instagram: the_t.e.p Twitter: T_TEPodacst

Ce second épisode hors-série estival de Mansplaining est l'occasion de célébrer le vingtième anniversaire d'un formidable thriller psychologique, doublé d'une étude remarquable sur la masculinité hégémonique : Harry, un ami qui vous veut du bien, le film de Dominik Moll. Un épisode garanti sans spoilers. Un mercredi sur deux, Mansplaining observe les masculinités à travers des œuvres culturelles et des faits d'actualité. Parce que la parole masculine est dominante, sauf lorsqu'il s'agit d'interroger les privilèges des hommes. Si vous aimez Mansplaining, pensez à l'exprimer en lui donnant la note maximale sur iTunes et ailleurs, en en parlant autour de vous, et en laissant plein de commentaires bienveillants sur les réseaux sociaux. Suivez Slate Podcasts sur Facebook et Instagram (retrouvez-y aussi le compte de Mansplaining). Pour échanger et découvrir de nouveaux podcasts, rejoignez le Slate Podcast Club sur Facebook. Références: «Masculinités, colonialité et néolibéralisme. Entretien avec Raewyn Connell», Contretemps, 10 septembre 2013 «Les nouveaux pères ne sont pas des gens fabuleux», Slate.fr, 14 juin 2014  «De journaliste à skipper, il raconte son changement de vie», Brut/FranceTV info, 31 octobre 2019 Harry, un ami qui vous veut du bien (Dominik Moll, 2000)  Musique: «Warm Sea», Savvier

In this episode we are joined by Clifton Evers. Clifton is a lecturer in media and cultural studies at Newcastle University and founding member of The Shadow Places Network. Clifton discusses how reading Raewyn Connell forced him to reflect on his own lived experience with and performances of masculinity and sent him down a research path that […]

In this episode we are joined by Tristan Bridges, editor of the Journal of Men and Masculinities and Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Bridges joins us to reflect on the influence Raewyn Connell has had on his understandings of masculinity and power from his initial encounters with her writings to […]

@alsgalassi e @julianafrln recebem @_mirandices para um papo sobre FEMINISTOS: homens que se autodenominam feministas. No papo, importante para mulheres mas principalmente para os homens, entenda melhor sobre local de fala, privilégio masculino e branco, luta de classes e mais. E a nossa FO-DAS-TI-CA convidada ainda deixa uma lista de leitura essencial pra entender melhor o assunto e parar de passar pano pra esquerdomacho. Se liga: O que é lugar de fala? - Djamila Ribeiro; Calibã e a Bruxa - Silvia Federici; O Ponto Zero da Revolução - Silvia Federici; Breve História do Feminismo - Carla Cristina Garcia; A Mulher na Sociedade de Classes - Heleieth Saffioti; Dominação Masculina - Pierre Bourdieu. Autores citados: Simone de Beauvoir, Silvia Federici, Judith Butler, Angela Davis, Heleieth Saffioti, Djamila Ribeiro, Flávia Biroli, Lélia Gonzalez, Raewyn Connell. Não esquece de seguir o O GIN EM DIA no Instagram: @oginemdia!

On episode 12 Sam interviews Professor Emerita Raewyn Connell, who  has had a long and distinguished  academic career as a sociologist. On the show we discuss feminist theory, sociology, and the ongoing struggle for trans rights across […] http://media.rawvoice.com/joy_archives/p/joy.org.au/transgenderwarriors/wp-content/uploads/sites/435/2019/10/112-Raewyn-Connell-Part-1-Podcast.mp3 Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 56:07 — 68.3MB) Subscribe or Follow Us: Android | Google Podcasts | RSS The post Transgender Warriors: Professor Emerita Raewyn Connell appeared first on Transgender Warriors.

Today Raewyn Connell returns to FreshEd to talk about her new book, The Good University. In it, Raewyn takes a deep dive into the labor that makes a university possible while also detailing the main troubles the institution currently faces. She argues that a good university must work for the social good rather than for profit. It must embrace its democratic roots and protect the process of being truthful. Raewyn Connell is Professor Emerita at the University of Sydney. She is an active trade unionist and advocate for workers’ rights, student autonomy and educational reform. http://www.freshedpodcast.com/raewynconnell2/ Twitter: @FreshEdpodcast Facebook: FreshEd Email: info@freshedpodcast.com Photo by Peter Hall

In this episode, Cathy + e discuss the social role of masculinity. e presents the definitions of masculinity and its feminist origins, the theories of sociologist Raewyn Connell, + moves into the theory of today. Comics discussion moves beyond the image into social relations + how production can be gendered. Cathy discusses masculinity in adolescence, the violence of it being taken to the extreme, and how art education + comics has a role in the gendered lives of students.For episode citation: https://comicarted.com/blog/2019/2/1/drawing-a-dialogue-episode-18

Pour terminer cette première saison, on vous propose ce grand entretien avec Eric Fassin. Professeur de sociologie à l’Université Paris-8 Vincennes-Saint Denis dans le département de Science Politique et celui des Études de genre, chercheur au Laboratoire d'études de genre et de sexualité du CNRS, Eric Fassin est incontournable pour qui s’intéresse au genre. Et en plus, il s’exprime clairement sur ces sujets parfois difficiles à appréhender. On lui a donc demandé un cours particulier.Dans la première partie de cette conversation, on prend le temps de revenir sur les concepts dont il a été beaucoup question dans le podcast cette année. Que faire de l’expression “masculinité toxique” et “masculinité positive” ? Est-ce qu’on peut changer son désir ? Comment sont nées les études de masculinités ? Pourquoi on parle de masculinités au pluriel ? Pourquoi la chercheuse Raewyn Connell est tellement importante quand on veut étudier ces sujets ? Qu'est-ce que c'est la masculinité hégémonique exactement ? Pourquoi le masculinisme, c'est pas l'équivalent du féminisme ? Retrouvez la suite de cet entretien jeudi 28 juin.RÉFÉRENCESEric Fassin : « Au-delà du consentement : pour une théorie féministe de la séduction », Raisons politiques, vol. 46, no. 2, 2012, pp. 47-66.Séminaire « Actualité sexuelle. Politiques du genre, de la sexualité et de la filiation », animé par Éric Fassin, Michel Feher et Michel Tort."Masculinités, colonialité et néolibéralisme". Entretien avec Raewyn Connell (2013, Contretemps).CRÉDITSLes couilles sur la table est un podcast de Victoire Tuaillon, produit par Binge Audio. Production : Joël Ronez. Rédaction en chef : David Carzon. Réalisation : Quentin Bresson. Chargée d’édition et production : Camille Regache. Direction générale : Gabrielle Boeri-Charles. Direction artistique : Julien Cernobori. Éditrice : Albane Fily. Générique : Théo Boulenger. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Does the moral claim for recognition on the part of trans women challenge what it now means to be a ‘woman'? Does it redefine our understanding of the relationship between gender and biology?

Do we have a problem when politicians such as Justin Trudeau and Theresa May call themselves feminist? Especially if they back policies which in their root cause are anti-feminist? And the other big one, does feminism truly lead to a liberation of traditional masculinity? Or does it just critique? And if it just critiques, where does that lead the men who want to find their own masculinity? Ally Fogg, writer for The Guardian and many other publications, has been asking these questions for years. And not only that has worked to push the UK government for a more gender inclusive language when they talk about issues like violence. We spoke in the summer a little after the many terrorist attacks in the UK, which we get a chance to speak about, and we also talk about the dangers of labels, especially on politicians. I would encourage you to check out Ally’s fight with the UK government in the role of mislabelling male victims of abuse over at his blog. I would also encourage you to check out one of his latest posts about stopping men being violent through the lens of Raewyn Connell. Asking instead the question “why does society value violent men?” which makes it hard for men to walk away from violence. This episode of Modern Manhood is brought to you by the Edmonton Community Foundation which is host to the Well Endowed Podcast, check out their new episode with the one and only, George Takei I will also be speaking at the upcoming Rad Dad's event called The Summit. Check out Rad Dads on Instagram and Twitter if you want to come. Modern Manhood is a proud member of the Alberta Podcast Network, powered by ATB

Do we have a problem when politicians such as Justin Trudeau and Theresa May call themselves feminist? Especially if they back policies which in their root cause are anti-feminist? And the other big one, does feminism truly lead to a liberation of traditional masculinity? Or does it just critique? And if it just critiques, where does that lead the men who want to find their own masculinity? Ally Fogg, writer for The Guardian and many other publications, has been asking these questions for years. And not only that has worked to push the UK government for a more gender inclusive language when they talk about issues like violence.  We spoke in the summer a little after the many terrorist attacks in the UK, which we get a chance to speak about, and we also talk about the dangers of labels, especially on politicians.  I would encourage you to check out Ally’s fight with the UK government in the role of mislabelling male victims of abuse over at his blog. I would also encourage you to check out one of his latest posts about stopping men being violent through the lens of Raewyn Connell. Asking instead the question “why does society value violent men?” which makes it hard for men to walk away from violence. This episode of Modern Manhood is brought to you by the Edmonton Community Foundation which is host to the Well Endowed Podcast, check out their new episode with the one and only, George Takei I will also be speaking at the upcoming Rad Dad's event called The Summit. Check out Rad Dads on Instagram and Twitter if you want to come. Modern Manhood is a proud member of the Alberta Podcast Network, powered by ATB

The FreshEd team is going on summer holidays. We’ll return with new shows starting September 11. In the meantime, we are going to play re-runs of some of our favorite shows. Today, we hear from Raewyn Connell, a Professor Emerita at the University of Sydney. She has been an advisor to United Nations initiatives on gender equality and peacemaking, and, in 2010, the Australian Sociological Association established the Raewyn Connell Prize for the best book in Australian sociology. Before I head off, I want to ask for your help. Would you be able to support FreshEd with a donation of $5? Please consider donating by visiting www.freshedpodcast.com/support

Suddenly it’s not queer to hear people talking about 'gender fluidity’, ‘gender transition’ or a spectrum of gender identity – did the world conversation decide gender no longer matters? And if the biological constraints of gender have been loosened, how do we deal with enduring gender-based social inequality and injustice? Jesse Bering is an award-winning science writer. His "Bering in Mind" column at Scientific American was a 2010 Webby Award Honoree. Bering's first book, The Belief Instinct (2011), was included on the American Library Association's Top 25 Books of the Year. This was followed by a collection of essays - the critically acclaimed Why Is the Penis Shaped Like That? (2012), and Perv (2013), a New York Times Editor's Choice. All three books have been translated into many different languages. An expert in psychology and religion, he began his career at the University of Arkansas, as an Assistant Professor of Psychology from 2002-2006. He then served as the Director of the Institute of Cognition and Culture at the Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland, where he was a Reader in the School of History and Anthropology until 2011. Presently, he is Associate Professor of Science Communication at the University of Otago, New Zealand. His next book, on the science of suicidology, will be released in 2017. Raewyn Connell is one of Australia's leading social scientists. She is best known internationally as a sociologist of gender and a pioneer of research on masculinities and best known in Australia for work on class inequality and social justice in education. She’s author or co-author of 23 books including Gender In World Perspective,Southern Theory, Masculinities, Schools & Social Justice, Gender & Power, Making the Difference, and Ruling Class Ruling Culture. Her work has been translated into 18 languages. She is a long-term participant in the labour movement and peace movement, and is now Professor Emerita at the University of Sydney, and a Life Member of the NTEU. Cordelia Fine is an Associate Professor at Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne. Her second popular science book, Delusions of Gender: The Real Science of Sex Differences was described as “a welcome corrective” (Nature), ”carefully researched and reasoned" (Science) and “required reading for every neurobiology student, if not every human being.” (PLoS Biology). It was short-listed for the Victorian Premier's Literary Award for Non-Fiction, the Best Book of Ideas Prize (UK), the John Llewellyn Rhys Prize for Literature (UK) and the international cross-genre Warwick Prize (2013), and the New York Times advised readers to "read this book". Cordelia also writes regularly for the popular press, including pieces in The Monthly, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Guardian and Financial Times, and her latest book, Testosterone Rex, will be published in early 2017. Elizabeth Anne Riley, PhD is a Sydney-based counsellor, academic & clinical supervisor specialising in gender diversity. Elizabeth has extensive experience working with gender diverse clients and has a PhD titled ‘The needs of gender variant children and their parents’ Elizabeth also has a Masters in Counselling and provides gender specific support and counselling for children, youth & their families. Elizabeth delivers professional development in gender diversity for schools, clinicians and other service providers and has 10 publications in the area of gender identity. As an advocate for the trans community Elizabeth appears for Mardis Gras interviewing transgender trailblazers, including  Chaz Bono and Catherine MacGregor. Elizabeth’s media presence includes Insight, 60 Minutes, A Current Affair, The Project, ABC’s 7.30, Radio National & JJJ.

In a recent paper for the University of Johannesburg, Raewyn Connell shared some of her thinking on the decolonization of knowledge. In many ways she aimed to re-think the history of knowledge itself, moving away from the Northern bias and colonial structures in mainstream social science. She argues, “The relationship between knowledge produced in different parts of the world is not as simple as “Western” domination. Knowledge flows in multiple directions from the metropole to the periphery and from the periphery to the metropole.” Raewyn is a Professor Emerita at the University of Sydney. She has been an advisor to United Nations initiatives on gender equality and peacemaking, and, in 2010, the Australian Sociological Association established the Raewyn Connell Prize for the best book in Australian sociology. After her interview, Will Brehm wanted to ask Raewyn an additional question. You can find Raewyn's answer online at www.FreshEdPodcast.com

Many questions women ask ourselves about how to achieve equality can only be answered if we understand men and masculinity. The Women’s Liberation Movement triggered a worldwide debate about men, and a generation of research about what proved to be masculinities - in the plural. Over the last thirty years, knowledge has accumulated about men’s diversity and collective power, and the making and re-making of masculinities. This helps us understand men’s predominance in the corporate and political world, and problems of private life from how to share housework to how to stop domestic violence. How can we understand the dilemmas of men and boys today - and their potential for a more peaceful and gender-equal world?

Professor Raewyn Connell from the University of Sydney Faculty of Education and Social Work) gives her ‘last lecture’ celebrating 43 years of groundbreaking teaching and research, and a body of work that has reshaped the study of sociology. Professor Connell is a recipient of the American Sociological Association's award for distinguished contribution to the study of sex and gender, and of the Australian Sociological Association's award for distinguished service to sociology in Australia. Her teaching fields have included general sociology, social theory, sociology of education, gender relations, sexuality, and research methods. A Sydney Ideas talk on 5 September, 2014 http://sydney.edu.au/sydney_ideas/lectures/2014/professor_raewyn_connell.shtml