Podcasts about Weds

Bobby talks about the apology issued by Bailey Zimmerman since the charges came out earlier this week. Amy talked about an executive who was fired after a viral video showed her dumping trash out of a Knicks-themed public trash can in New York City. Abby shares the story of getting to see Taylor Swift at a pop up performance last night. We didn’t get to it yesterday, so we did more TV and Movie Reviews on Wednesday. We hear about Toy Story 5, Project Hail Mary and more! Eddie got an alert saying that one of my kid’s identities is in the dark web. Amy is surprised how fast moved on an investment after she texted him an idea about a great opportunity. Raymundo also wants to attend another Pop-A-Shot competition. Is Bobby going to pay for him to go??See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Eddie’s day started chaotic but turned good. He also has a big meeting today that he’s excited about. Amy’s daughter got a cool new job where she will be helping people! Bobby shares the message he got from the Operations Manager of a restaurant who hand delivered his pizza after a recent mishap. Lunchbox’s kids just got a clean bill of health! Eddie had a great day yesterday, Bobby finished a new show and Morgan is glad she didn’t die.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby addresses a listener's question about what we are and not allowed to talk about on-air. Bobby plays a clip of a famous person having a recorded meltdown. The show tries to identify the celebrity delivering the tirade. Eddie and Amy both share their latest parenting confessions that include Eddie turning to ChatGPT to help him with an issue with his 12-year old son. Bobby shares his new way to drop off gifts to friends that have recently had babies.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Martyn Parson Weds 17th June 2026 BBR Show #309. On www.bootboyradio.co.uk Please Play, Like, Comment, Follow, Download & Share.

How do we build a deeper relationship with God through his word?Strengthening Faith 3 God's Word 1Brian UyedaOriginal Air Date: 2026.06.21We believe The Bible, God's word, is inspired by Him, through the Holy Spirit and is sufficient for everything you need in life – guidance, wisdom, strength, encouragement and HOPE. His word reveals His nature and character and His plan of redemption through His Son Jesus Christ, through whom we can have eternal salvation when we choose to follow Him. We also believe the Bible remains relevant in our world today and its power is experienced when personally and consistently applied and practiced.Part of your journey may include choosing a Bible translation and there are many. To help you choose, it is important to know that a “translation” is word-for-word while a “paraphrase” is thought- for- thought. If you are new to Bible reading or don't yet have one, we offer FREE Bibles that are English Standard Version translation – a very easy to read Bible. Other options are Bible Apps you can download to your phone, or sites like: www.Bible.org, www.biblegateway.com or www.blueletterbible.org.We invite you to join us for weekend services:Saturday Evening at 5:30pm. Question and Answer period after service.Morning Social at 10:00am: A time to connect with others over coffee and donuts.Sunday Morning at 10:30amPromiseland Kids' Ministry: Toddler – Sr. High, Sunday at 10:30 am, offers Christian education and worship for children and youth.If you have missed a message or are viewing from home, you can catch weekend services on our Facebook page and YouTube by going to www.crossroads-ridgecrest.org, or through the church app. We also have podcasts available by looking up Crossroads Community Church - available on several podcast apps.Have a question for one of our Pastors? Submit your questions via text at: (760) 301-4840 for our Ask It! Your Questions Answered segment every week. Watch or Listen what others ask!If you have any questions or would like to make an appointment, please call (760)384-3333 Weds. – Fri. 10am-4pm, text (760)301-4840, or email ccc@ccc-rc.org

We talked about a country banning social media for kids under 16 years ago. We find out from Bobby how he feels about kids being on phones now that he has a daughter. Lunchbox shares his grievances with Morgan interviewing one of his favorite celebrities, Snooki from Jersey Shore. Bobby gives him space to get it all out in the open of why he is so upset. Amy shares the new true-crime doc on Netflix called Maternal Instincts that might be the best one she's ever seen.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby shares why he is facing a crisis right now regarding his family. Amy reveals why she did not respond to Lunchbox’s recent text. We talked about a Colorado teacher fired after students allegedly pressured to kiss classmates in skits. We talked about 3 bodies found in a foreclosed home auctioned to the new owner. Eddie said a country artist texted him and was acting weird. And Bobby tests out a new game on us!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy found a new beauty product that is changing her life. A caller shares his complaint with our Tell Me Something Good podcast and we address it. Lunchbox heard from one of his friends he met while competing on the Price Is Right. Eddie shared how he got a work project that he thought was going to suck and he ended up loving to do it. Bobby shared a cool family moment that happened yesterday.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The new-look Jets front office under GM Darren Mougey is proving hyper-aggressive and analytical, completely reshaping the roster by securing center Joe Tippmann early to beat market inflation. Meanwhile, the NFL is scrambling as elite but embattled quarterback Brendan Sorsby officially enters the July Supplemental Draft following his massive college betting scandal. Join me with my new Sustack newsletter, Jets Underground. Go to: www.JetsUnderground.Substack.com Sponsor Schupak Sports: This episode is brought to you by Schupak Sports. Check out our latest gear and resources for athletes and coaches at www.SchupakSports.com Connect with the Boys Twitter/X: @schupakSports Website: www.SchupakSports.com Support the Show Subscribe: Never miss an episode on Apple Podcasts or Spotify! Review: Love the show? Leave us a review—it helps other Jets fans find us.

This Day in Legal History: The Watergate BurglaryOn this day in 1972, at roughly 2:30 in the morning, a security guard at the Watergate office complex on Virginia Avenue in Washington named Frank Wills noticed that the latches on a stairwell door had been taped over and called the District police. The police arrested five men inside the offices of the Democratic National Committee on the sixth floor: James McCord, Bernard Barker, Virgilio Gonzalez, Eugenio Martinez, and Frank Sturgis. McCord was the security coordinator for the Committee to Re-Elect the President. Two days later, the FBI traced a $25,000 cashier's check found in Barker's bank account to the Committee to Re-Elect's finance chairman. The burglary itself was a third-rate one — bad lockpicking, surveillance gear that did not work, men carrying address books that linked them to the White House — but the legal consequences took two years to play out and rewrote large parts of American constitutional law in the process.The Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, chaired by Sam Ervin of North Carolina, conducted public hearings in the summer of 1973 that produced the disclosure of the White House taping system. The Saturday Night Massacre in October 1973 — Nixon's firing of Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox and the resignations of Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus — produced the legal scholarship that became the modern law of presidential removal and the Ethics in Government Act of 1978's independent-counsel framework. United States v. Nixon in July 1974 produced the doctrine that executive privilege is qualified rather than absolute and must yield to a demonstrated need in a criminal proceeding, a holding that is still the foundational separation-of-powers case the Court returns to whenever an administration claims that internal deliberations cannot be subpoenaed.The articles of impeachment voted by the House Judiciary Committee in late July 1974 produced the modern template for impeachment-as-constitutional-remedy that has been deployed four times since. Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974. The constitutional residue of what began with five men and a roll of tape in a Watergate stairwell is in the Federal Election Campaign Act amendments, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the Inspector General Act, the Presidential Records Act, the post-Saturday-Night-Massacre statute book that defines what limits an administration faces when it tries to use the criminal-justice system politically. Fifty-four years on, the question of how much of that residue has held up is, as the saying goes, the question.U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman of the Eastern District of Wisconsin on Tuesday denied former Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan's post-trial motion to vacate her December 2025 conviction for felony obstruction of a federal proceeding. Dugan had been charged after she let Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who had appeared in her courtroom in April 2025 on a state misdemeanor, and his attorney leave through a side door of her courtroom after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers had assembled in the public hallway to arrest him on a federal civil immigration warrant. A jury found Dugan guilty of obstruction and acquitted her of the lesser concealing-an-individual count.Her post-trial motion pressed two principal arguments. The first was that the Fourth Circuit's recent decision in United States v. Edwards — which addressed the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 1505 obstruction as applied to interference with administrative agency proceedings — applies to ICE warrant service and so the trial court should have given a narrower jury instruction. The second was that her conduct was protected by the doctrine of judicial immunity for acts taken on the bench. Judge Adelman rejected both. On Edwards, the court held that the Fourth Circuit's reasoning addresses a different statutory provision and a different agency context, and that Dugan's case is governed by Seventh Circuit precedent on the obstruction statute she was convicted under.On judicial immunity, the court held that the doctrine is a civil shield against private damages liability and does not bar federal criminal prosecution for affirmative conduct in aid of evading federal law-enforcement officers. Dugan's team has announced that the case will go to the Seventh Circuit. Sentencing is now back on the calendar. The appellate question that will dominate the briefing is the one Judge Adelman teed up: whether a state judge taking administrative action in the courthouse — guiding a litigant to a back exit — falls inside or outside the federal obstruction statute's reach when the action is calculated to defeat federal law-enforcement service. That issue has not been squarely decided in the Seventh Circuit. The case is going to be the vehicle.Ex-Judge Loses Bid To Undo ICE Obstruction Conviction | Law360A Maryland federal judge on Tuesday denied SCOTUSblog co-founder Thomas C. Goldstein's post-trial motion for acquittal or, in the alternative, a new trial on the twelve counts on which a jury had convicted him in February — tax evasion, assisting in the preparation of false returns, willful failure to pay over employment taxes, and false statements to mortgage lenders. The case is one of the more striking falls in modern Supreme Court practice. Goldstein had argued for years before the Court and was, for two decades, one of the most visible private SCOTUS practitioners in the country, with SCOTUSblog itself becoming the standard public-facing reference for Supreme Court news.The criminal case grew out of his recreational high-stakes poker, which prosecutors used to build out a pattern of unreported gambling income, gambling debts paid out of law-firm funds, and gambling losses claimed as business expenses. The post-trial motion principally argued that the trial court's jury instructions on willfulness improperly conflated the negligence standard with the higher mens rea Cheek v. United States requires in federal tax-evasion prosecutions, and that the court had wrongly excluded evidence going to Goldstein's claimed reliance on his accountants' advice. The court rejected both. On the willfulness instruction, the court found the instruction tracked the Fourth Circuit's pattern instruction on Cheek and made clear to the jury that a good-faith misunderstanding of the law was a defense. On the accountant-reliance evidence, the court held that the offer of proof was insufficient to establish that Goldstein had actually relied on professional advice in the particular omissions the indictment turned on, as opposed to relying on his own judgment. Sentencing is now the next event.The federal sentencing guidelines on the tax counts alone, with the loss amount the jury found, point to a substantial custodial term. Watch for an appeal that focuses on the willfulness instruction; that is the cleanest reversible-error vehicle in the record.SCOTUSblog Founder Goldstein Denied Acquittal Or Retrial | Law360A Delaware federal judge on Tuesday denied Guardant Health's post-trial motion to vacate, reduce, or stay enforcement of the $83.4 million jury verdict TwinStrand Biosciences won against it in late 2023 for willful infringement of diagnostic-sequencing patents covering duplex-sequencing technology used in liquid-biopsy cancer-screening assays. The court also declined to enhance the award under 35 U.S.C. § 284, even though the jury had found willfulness, reasoning that the multi-factor Read v. Portec analysis the Federal Circuit has refined in Halo Electronics and its progeny cut both ways here: Guardant's pre-suit notice and continued use of the accused technology supported some enhancement, but its defenses on infringement and validity, while ultimately rejected, were not objectively reckless.The decision is notable for two doctrinal reasons. First, it reflects how district courts are continuing to deploy Halo's discretion-based framework in the post-pandemic-era diagnostic-patent landscape, where the gap between objectively defensible defenses and reckless infringement is being drawn case by case in a way that is making certworthy issues for the Federal Circuit and, eventually, the Supreme Court. Second, it underscores the $83.4 million is significant but not transformative: the broader competitive question in the diagnostic-sequencing space is whether Guardant can design around the asserted claims fast enough to keep its cancer-screening assays on the market without paying a recurring royalty to TwinStrand. Guardant has indicated it will appeal to the Federal Circuit. Both the underlying infringement findings and the no-enhancement ruling are likely to be appealed in parallel — Guardant on infringement and validity, TwinStrand on the refusal to enhance. The verdict stands for now.Del. Judge Upholds $83.4M Patent Verdict Against Guardant | Law360My Bloomberg Tax column this week argues that the IRS's disclosure of taxpayer address information to ICE should be understood less as a narrow immigration-enforcement controversy and more as a tax-data governance failure.I argue that Section 6103 does not make IRS data impossible to share, but it does make confidentiality the default and disclosure the exception. That distinction matters because a statutory exception should not become a bulk-transfer mechanism whenever another agency wants access to IRS records. The IRS holds unusually sensitive information because taxpayers are legally compelled to provide it, so any interagency disclosure should require necessity, precision, security, and auditability on a record-by-record basis.The TIGTA report is troubling because the IRS apparently built an automated matching process that was vulnerable to bad ICE inputs, inconsistent formatting, malformed records, and weak matching rules. ICE also had unresolved safeguard issues and missed corrective-action deadlines before the data transfer. In my view, that combination means the problem was not simply that data moved; it was that protected taxpayer information moved through a process that treated matching quality and backend security as implementation details rather than core privacy protections.The broader point is that bad data inputs are not just a programmer's inconvenience. If the IRS relies on another agency's messy file to decide whether protected tax information can be disclosed, the quality of that file becomes part of the taxpayer-confidentiality analysis. Loose input standards and crude matching rules effectively expand the statutory exception beyond what Congress authorized.My proposed fix is straightforward: before the IRS discloses taxpayer information, requesting agencies should have to provide clean, structured, validated data; legally certify the need for each record; meet defined match-confidence thresholds; submit ambiguous cases for manual review; and accept strict limits on use, retention, and auditing. The column's central line is that Section 6103 exceptions should operate like locked doors, not loading docks.IRS Sharing Taxpayer Info With ICE Is a Data Governance Issue This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

How Do We Build a Deeper Relationship with God Through Solitude?Strengthening Faith 2 SolitudeBrian UyedaOriginal Air Date: 2026.06.14We believe The Bible, God's word, is inspired by Him, through the Holy Spirit and is sufficient for everything you need in life – guidance, wisdom, strength, encouragement and HOPE. His word reveals His nature and character and His plan of redemption through His Son Jesus Christ, through whom we can have eternal salvation when we choose to follow Him. We also believe the Bible remains relevant in our world today and its power is experienced when personally and consistently applied and practiced.Part of your journey may include choosing a Bible translation and there are many. To help you choose, it is important to know that a “translation” is word-for-word while a “paraphrase” is thought- for- thought. If you are new to Bible reading or don't yet have one, we offer FREE Bibles that are English Standard Version translation – a very easy to read Bible. Other options are Bible Apps you can download to your phone, or sites like: www.Bible.org, www.biblegateway.com or www.blueletterbible.org.We invite you to join us for weekend services:Saturday Evening at 5:30pm. Question and Answer period after service.Morning Social at 10:00am: A time to connect with others over coffee and donuts.Sunday Morning at 10:30amPromiseland Kids' Ministry: Toddler – Sr. High, Sunday at 10:30 am, offers Christian education and worship for children and youth.If you have missed a message or are viewing from home, you can catch weekend services on our Facebook page and YouTube by going to www.crossroads-ridgecrest.org, or through the church app. We also have podcasts available by looking up Crossroads Community Church - available on several podcast apps.Have a question for one of our Pastors? Submit your questions via text at: (760) 301-4840 for our Ask It! Your Questions Answered segment every week. Watch or Listen what others ask!If you have any questions or would like to make an appointment, please call (760)384-3333 Weds. – Fri. 10am-4pm, text (760)301-4840, or email ccc@ccc-rc.org

Amy has unfortunate news about the health effects of drinking. Bobby has a bizarre way that debt collectors are getting their money and how they are terrifying people. We found out why Eddie might be an accidental millionaire. Amy wants to be authentic about co-parenting and why it’s not always as easy as maybe she has portrayed in the past. Caller Milo in New York called in after having an early 5am drink and Bobby crowned him the caller of the day. He just wanted to talk about Giving Tuesday but we went down a wormhole with him.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy talked about a 79-Year-Old Multi-Millionaire who is looking for a younger woman to be in a relationship with and take care of financially. Bobby asks Amy a question that he hopes doesn't offend her. A listener called in to share his frustrations with Bobby and something he said on the show recently. We address his concerns to see if he has a reason to sound so angry. Our voicemails were flooded with listeners giving their thoughts if Eddie is hot or not. The verdict is in! Amy shared tips from a survivor on how to survive a kidnapping.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Yesterday, we got a peek into a day in Bobby and Amy’s life. Today, we get a look into 1 day of Lunchbox’s life. From going to the pool with his kids to going to an end of season dinner with his soccer team. Bobby talked about hanging out with Josh Ross and Shaboozey yesterday. Two very unique experiences and one was very unexpected. Eddie saw an old co-worker on the road and it blew his mind. Morgan’s life flashed before her eyes and she is lucky to be alive.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: Kennedy Signs the Equal Pay ActOn this day in 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act, the first federal statute aimed directly at sex-based wage discrimination. The law took the form of an amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which meant that it slid into an existing enforcement framework run by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor — a deliberate choice that bypassed the need to build new institutional machinery and harnessed thirty years of FLSA caselaw and habits of compliance. The legal hook is the Act's “equal pay for equal work” command: employers may not pay employees of one sex less than employees of the opposite sex for jobs requiring “equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions.”Four affirmative defenses are written into the text — a seniority system, a merit system, a system measuring earnings by quantity or quality of production, or “any other factor other than sex” — and that fourth catch-all has done more work in litigation than the other three combined, shaping how courts evaluate market-based, education-based, and prior-salary-based pay differentials decades later. The wage gap at the moment Kennedy signed was about 59 cents on the dollar; six decades on, by the Bureau of Labor Statistics's standard measure, it sits closer to 84 cents. That tells you something about how a clean, structurally well-designed statute can still leave a lot of the work undone, because the gap is and always was about more than identical pairs of jobs at the same employer.The Equal Pay Act is not the whole story of American workplace-equality law; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, and a long line of state-law analogues do much of the modern enforcement work. But June 10, 1963 is the day Congress, with the President's signature, said for the first time that paying a woman less than a man for the same work was unlawful, full stop. Everything that has followed in this corner of the law has been built on top of that sentence.The Federal Circuit on Monday affirmed a Delaware district court judgment invalidating four Purdue Pharma patents covering an abuse-deterrent, low-toxicity version of the opioid OxyContin, in a decision the patent bar has been waiting on for months. The case is Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Epic Pharma LLC. The patents covered Purdue's reformulation of OxyContin to make the pills crush-resistant and to reduce a manufacturing impurity, and the asserted innovation grew, the company said, out of its discovery of the source of a particular toxic impurity that had previously eluded chemists at competing labs. Purdue's argument on appeal was, in essence, that the discovery of the impurity's source was itself nonobvious, and that the resulting patents inherited that nonobviousness. The Federal Circuit said no.The panel held that the relevant obviousness inquiry asks whether the claimed reformulation — not the discovery that motivated it — would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention, and that once the prior art is taken into account, the answer is yes. The practical consequence of the ruling is large. It opens the door wider for generic abuse-deterrent OxyContin alternatives and clarifies a doctrinal point pharmaceutical companies have been pressing on for years: a hard-won research insight does not, on its own, automatically save a patent from obviousness if the resulting product was within the prior art's reach. Purdue's options now are a rehearing petition at the Federal Circuit, a cert petition at the Supreme Court (which the company has already pursued in a related case last spring), or quiet acceptance. Expect a cert petition. Expect the cert petition to be denied. Watch the generic-drug filings that follow.Fed. Circ. Panel Backs Invalidation Of OxyContin PatentThe plaintiffs in the Eastern District of Virginia lawsuit over the Trump administration's $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” — a story we covered earlier htis week— went back to Judge Leonie Brinkema on Tuesday and asked for permission to conduct limited discovery into whether the Justice Department's recent representation that it would stop work on the fund is a real commitment or a litigation convenience.The plaintiffs' problem is straightforward: acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has filed papers saying the program is “not going forward,” but President Trump publicly described the fund last week as a “great idea” that many Republicans support, and the executive order that created the fund has not been formally rescinded. From a litigation-strategy standpoint, the plaintiffs do not want to walk away from a live case on the strength of a DOJ filing, accept dismissal as moot, and then find out three months later that the fund has been quietly resurrected under a different name.Judge Brinkema has a hearing scheduled for Friday, June 12, on whether to extend the temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction. The Tuesday filing teed up the broader mootness fight that will dominate Friday's hearing: when does a federal agency's promise to stop doing something actually deprive a court of jurisdiction to enjoin the underlying program, and what discovery, if any, is a plaintiff entitled to before that determination is made. The doctrine here — voluntary cessation, capable of repetition yet evading review, and the heavy burden the Supreme Court has placed on the party claiming mootness — favors the plaintiffs procedurally. Whether Brinkema agrees on Friday is the question to watch.‘Anti-weaponization' fund challengers question its demise – Roll CallSCOTUSblog's John Elwood walked through a useful relist roundup on Tuesday, and the four cases sitting in the relist pile are worth flagging because each of them touches a different load-bearing wall in federal practice. The first is a prolonged-detention challenge to immigration custody under Section 1226(c). The ACLU is asking the Court to clarify that very long mandatory-detention periods trigger procedural due process review under the Mathews v. Eldridge balancing test, picking up on the Second Circuit's willingness to do so. The second is Newberry v. Texas, a case where Texas itself has confessed error — a rare procedural posture in which the State agrees the defendant should win — and the question is what the Court does when the parties on both sides ask for the same remedy. The third is Kian v. Florida, a Sixth Amendment challenge to the use of six-person juries in serious felony cases, on the theory that the historical understanding of “jury” in the founding era assumed twelve and that the Court's mid-twentieth-century cases approving six-person juries were wrong on the originalist analysis. The fourth is Maxwell v. Thomas, a federal habeas case asking whether the First Step Act‘s halfway-house and home-confinement provisions are properly enforceable through 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petitions, an issue with a real circuit split. None of these have been granted yet — they are relists, which means at least one Justice is interested but the Court has not yet decided whether to hear them — but the mix is the part to watch: it tells you what the Justices are circling without committing to. Expect at least one of these to be granted before the term ends.A random assortment of relists: prolonged detention, confessions of error, small juries, and new rules on habeas | SCOTUSblog This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

The Leeds United reserve goalkeeper is linked to United, which is hardly likely to thrill, while Brentford slap a £70m price tag on their star striker, which is hardly likely to entice United to make an offer. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

New episode; scary movie good or bad?;donald trump wears diapers???

Martyn Parson Weds 3rd June 2026 BBR Show #308. On www.bootboyradio.co.uk Please Play, Like, Comment, Follow, download & Share.

How do we build a deeper relationship with God through a stronger prayer life?Strengthening Faith Part 1 PrayerBrian UyedaOriginal Air Date: 2026.06.07We believe The Bible, God's word, is inspired by Him, through the Holy Spirit and is sufficient for everything you need in life – guidance, wisdom, strength, encouragement and HOPE. His word reveals His nature and character and His plan of redemption through His Son Jesus Christ, through whom we can have eternal salvation when we choose to follow Him. We also believe the Bible remains relevant in our world today and its power is experienced when personally and consistently applied and practiced.Part of your journey may include choosing a Bible translation and there are many. To help you choose, it is important to know that a “translation” is word-for-word while a “paraphrase” is thought- for- thought. If you are new to Bible reading or don't yet have one, we offer FREE Bibles that are English Standard Version translation – a very easy to read Bible. Other options are Bible Apps you can download to your phone, or sites like: www.Bible.org, www.biblegateway.com or www.blueletterbible.org.We invite you to join us for weekend services:Saturday Evening at 5:30pm. Question and Answer period after service.Morning Social at 10:00am: A time to connect with others over coffee and donuts.Sunday Morning at 10:30amPromiseland Kids' Ministry: Toddler – Sr. High, Sunday at 10:30 am, offers Christian education and worship for children and youth.If you have missed a message or are viewing from home, you can catch weekend services on our Facebook page and YouTube by going to www.crossroads-ridgecrest.org, or through the church app. We also have podcasts available by looking up Crossroads Community Church - available on several podcast apps.Have a question for one of our Pastors? Submit your questions via text at: (760) 301-4840 for our Ask It! Your Questions Answered segment every week. Watch or Listen what others ask!If you have any questions or would like to make an appointment, please call (760)384-3333 Weds. – Fri. 10am-4pm, text (760)301-4840, or email ccc@ccc-rc.org

Giants analyst & legend, Mike Krukow joins the Morning Show to break down the Giants getting a split in Milwaukee behind a great start from Logan Webb on Weds & the offense banging out 12 runs yesterday on the back of a lead-off jack from Casey Schmitt, a salami from Haase, 4 hits from Jung Hoo, & Bryce Eldridge getting on base 4 times. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby gives an update on his Tuesday of Giving where he goes into his DM's to help people out with money. But one request was way too much. Bobby asks the question: If aliens came down and asked us to show them music, what song would we play them to best represent humans? Eddie said his son had a friend over and did something so despicable while under his roof that he is considering banning him from their house. You’ve probably broken at least one law behind the wheel without realizing it… and some things you swear are illegal are actually totally allowed. Bobby has a list of how many of these driving laws surprise you! Bobby also shares his odd grooming habit that we have questions about...See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby shared what request of Scuba Steve’s he had to say no to. We also get into a discussion of how much money it would take for show members to be the face of controversial products and companies. Amy tells us about the most dysfunctional zoo in America and its crazy history of unfortunate events. Amy reveals why she thought she was about to get punished today. Lunchbox shares why he is mad at Scuba Steve. We talked about cities we visited that we felt were overrated.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby is excited that one of his favorite shows is getting a 3rd season. Amy’s dog had an emergency at 2am but she shares why it turned out to be good timing. She was happy to catch this early! Lunchbox is excited for the NBA final starting tonight. Morgan shares an uplighting health update. Eddie shared that one of his old friends sent him a big gift for his kids. Scuba has some great professional news.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: The National Defense Act of 1916On this day in 1916, President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Defense Act, the law that quietly built the legal scaffolding for how the United States deploys soldiers, both abroad and at home, for the next century-plus. The Act roughly tripled the size of the regular Army, formally created the National Guard as a federalized reserve force out of the patchwork of state militias that had existed since the founding, and established the Reserve Officers' Training Corps at colleges and universities. The legal hook is the dual-status structure that the Act created and that we still use today: the National Guard belongs simultaneously to its state and to the federal government, normally takes orders from the governor, but can be “federalized” by the President under specific statutory authorities and pulled out of state command for federal missions. That structure has driven a long line of constitutional fights about the limits of presidential authority to call up the Guard, about whether and when the Insurrection Act applies, and about how the Posse Comitatus Act constrains the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement. June 3 is not a day most people associate with American military law, but the 1916 statute is doing quiet work behind every modern headline about troops at a border, troops in a city, or troops in a hurricane.The Eleventh Circuit on Tuesday handed down a ruling that strips hip-hop group 2 Live Crew of the copyrights it thought it had successfully clawed back to five of its albums, including “As Nasty as They Wanna Be,” because one member's bankruptcy from the 1990s swept his future termination rights into the bankruptcy estate. Federal copyright law has a wonderfully democratic provision in Section 203: an author who signed away a copyright can, 35 years later, send a termination notice and take it back, regardless of what the original contract said. The catch the Eleventh Circuit identified is Section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, which scoops up almost everything you own into the bankruptcy estate when you file — including, the court said, the right to send that termination notice years later, even though the right cannot be sold or contracted away in any other context. The practical consequence for 2 Live Crew is that member Mark Ross, who performed as Brother Marquis, had unwittingly transferred his future termination interests to his bankruptcy trustee when he filed Chapter 7 years earlier, so when the group's heirs and surviving members later tried to take the copyrights back from Lil' Joe Records in 2020, they were one vote short of the majority the statute requires. The case, Lil' Joe Records v. Christopher Won Jr. et al., No. 24-13978, is described in the opinion as “a question of first impression at the intersection of copyright and bankruptcy” — which is lawyer-speak for “we just made up the rule, and now it's the rule.” Expect every copyright-termination case where any author has ever filed for bankruptcy to cite this decision for the next decade.11th Circ. Reverses 2 Live Crew's Copyright Clawback Win | Law360President Trump on Tuesday quietly signed a finalized version of the AI cybersecurity executive order that he had abruptly scrapped during a planned signing ceremony on May 21, and the final version is notably narrower than the one that was on the table a month ago. The new order asks Treasury, the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and other federal agencies to design a voluntary framework under which developers of so-called frontier AI models — the largest and most general-purpose systems — would share their models with the federal government for up to 30 days before public release so the government can scan for security vulnerabilities. The legal posture is worth pausing on: this is a voluntary framework, not a regulation, which means it lives in the same constitutional space as a chamber-of-commerce best-practices document rather than as a binding rule subject to APA notice and comment. That structure is partly a workaround for the fact that there is no federal statute giving any agency authority to mandate pre-release safety testing of AI models, and partly a response to industry pressure: Trump explained on May 21 that he scrapped the earlier 90-day version because he thought it could be “a blocker” to U.S. leadership in AI. Whether developers actually opt in is the open question, and the order is structured so that participation will likely depend on a mix of national-security pressure, federal procurement leverage, and quiet diplomacy with the major labs. Expect the first real fight to be over what counts as a “frontier” model, and who decides.Finalized Trump Order Seeks Early Cyber Tests Of AI Models | Law360The U.S. Senate on Tuesday confirmed Katie Lane to be a federal district judge in Montana, making her the first judicial nominee of Trump's second term to be confirmed despite a “not qualified” rating from the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary. The ABA's role here is informal but historically important: since 1953 the Standing Committee has rated federal judicial nominees as “well qualified,” “qualified,” or “not qualified” based on professional competence, integrity, and judicial temperament, and the rating has carried real weight with senators of both parties — until it didn't. The Trump administration formally cut ties with the ABA review process during the first term, on the theory that the ABA's ratings reflected an ideological bias against conservative nominees, and the second administration has been even more open about ignoring “not qualified” ratings as a matter of policy. The legal stakes of this are modest in any individual case — a “not qualified” judge serves the same lifetime appointment with the same constitutional power as a “well qualified” one — but cumulatively the practice changes the relationship between the bar and the bench in a way that is hard to undo, and it nudges the federal judiciary in a direction that depends almost entirely on the political branches' definitions of professional fitness. Lane, who is now confirmed, will join the District of Montana, a small but busy bench. Watch this space: there are several more nominees in the pipeline with similar ratings.US Senate confirms Trump judicial nominee deemed ‘not qualified' by ABA | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

As reported on this podcast, United had more or less concluded the Ederson deal for a lower fee than most originally thought. They appear to have the West Ham midfield next in their sights. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Former NFL TE  Dominique Dafney joins the show to talk his football career, nfl broadcasting boot camp, reacts to the blockbuster trades of AJ Brown and Myles Garrett, and more!  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Martyn Parson Weds 27th May 2026 BBR Show #307.. On www.bootboyradio.co.uk Please Play, Like, Comment, Follow, Download & Share.

Will Grace Sustain You?Grace 7 Grace That SustainsDionne SalmondsOriginal Air Date: 2026.05.31We believe The Bible, God's word, is inspired by Him, through the Holy Spirit and is sufficient for everything you need in life – guidance, wisdom, strength, encouragement and HOPE. His word reveals His nature and character and His plan of redemption through His Son Jesus Christ, through whom we can have eternal salvation when we choose to follow Him. We also believe the Bible remains relevant in our world today and its power is experienced when personally and consistently applied and practiced.Part of your journey may include choosing a Bible translation and there are many. To help you choose, it is important to know that a “translation” is word-for-word while a “paraphrase” is thought- for- thought. If you are new to Bible reading or don't yet have one, we offer FREE Bibles that are English Standard Version translation – a very easy to read Bible. Other options are Bible Apps you can download to your phone, or sites like: www.Bible.org, www.biblegateway.com or www.blueletterbible.org.We invite you to join us for weekend services:Saturday Evening at 5:30pm. Question and Answer period after service.Morning Social at 10:00am: A time to connect with others over coffee and donuts.Sunday Morning at 10:30amPromiseland Kids' Ministry: Toddler – Sr. High, Sunday at 10:30 am, offers Christian education and worship for children and youth.If you have missed a message or are viewing from home, you can catch weekend services on our Facebook page and YouTube by going to www.crossroads-ridgecrest.org, or through the church app. We also have podcasts available by looking up Crossroads Community Church - available on several podcast apps.Have a question for one of our Pastors? Submit your questions via text at: (760) 301-4840 for our Ask It! Your Questions Answered segment every week. Watch or Listen what others ask!If you have any questions or would like to make an appointment, please call (760)384-3333 Weds. – Fri. 10am-4pm, text (760)301-4840, or email ccc@ccc-rc.org

Bobby and Amy get vulnerable and go into their direct messages to read the rude things listeners have said to each of them recently. Bobby shares the new team he has invested in that sparks other members of the show to pony up some money as well. Is it real or is Bobby just being scammed now? In the Bobby Feud, can you name the Top 10 most rewatchable TV shows of all-time?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We talked about the tragic story of a woman who was killed by a patio umbrella while eating at a South Carolina restaurant. After starting with tragedy, we had to lighten it up. We talked about the weird way a famous athlete uses toothpaste that had divided the internet and a man who claims to be a prophet that tried to part the sea like Moses. Lunchbox brought up a story about Taylor Swift and gave us his rumor report on her and Travis Kelce’s relationship. We get into a discussion about our family’s mugshots and he reveals he has a half-brother?! Raymundo shares why he is upset with Lunchbox for thunder stealing last week. Bobby got a message from an attorney with their advice on what should happen between Lunchbox and Amy’s money issues.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy shared how she was able to track down a dress that she spotted a celebrity wearing and is going to wear at a big event. But how inadvertently, she may have taken an opportunity from Lunchbox and Morgan. Eddie shared a big moment for his 7-year-old finally learning something. Morgan’s family rescued a stray animal. Lunchbox saved 8 lives yesterday. Bobby is excited for the Women's College World Series and Arkansas making it for the first time!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: Black Monday and the End of the NIRAOn May 27, 1935 — a day quickly dubbed “Black Monday” by the press — the United States Supreme Court delivered three unanimous decisions that gutted central pieces of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal in a single morning. The most consequential was A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, in which the Court struck down the National Industrial Recovery Act. The case grew out of the prosecution of a Brooklyn kosher poultry slaughterhouse for violating the “Live Poultry Code,” one of the hundreds of industry codes drafted by trade groups and given the force of federal law by the National Recovery Administration. The Court held that the NIRA's code-making scheme was an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to private actors and the executive, and that the federal government's Commerce Clause authority did not reach the intrastate sale of poultry to local butchers. Justice Cardozo, concurring, famously described the statute as “delegation running riot.”The same day, in Humphrey's Executor v. United States, the Court cabined the President's power to remove members of independent regulatory commissions, a holding that would shape the constitutional status of agencies like the FTC, SEC, and FCC for the next ninety years. And in Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford, the Court invalidated the Frazier-Lemke Farm Bankruptcy Act as an uncompensated taking from secured creditors. Roosevelt was, by all accounts, furious — and Black Monday became the proximate cause of his 1937 court-packing plan, which failed in Congress but is generally credited with prompting the “switch in time” that produced the more deferential commerce-clause and administrative-law jurisprudence of Jones & Laughlin Steel and the decades that followed. The nondelegation doctrine the Court announced in Schechter has, famously, not been used to strike down a federal statute since — though it has been the subject of growing interest from the current Court's conservative majority, which makes the ninety-first anniversary of Black Monday more than just a historical footnote.Former President Joe Biden has sued the Department of Justice to block the release of audio recordings and transcripts from his interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur, the prosecutor who investigated Biden's handling of classified documents and declined to bring charges. According to the filing, Biden argues that releasing the recordings would skirt federal law restricting disclosure of materials gathered in a special counsel probe, and would effectively turn protected investigative material into political fodder. The suit follows a 2024 Freedom of Information Act action by the conservative Heritage Foundation seeking the same recordings, and comes against the backdrop of repeated efforts by the current administration to make Hur-era material public — efforts the Biden team has argued are intended to embarrass the former president rather than to serve any legitimate investigative or oversight function. The transcripts of the Hur interviews were released back in 2024, but the audio itself has been the subject of executive privilege fights ever since. Worth watching for what the court does with the privilege claims, and for how the Special Counsel regulations are treated now that there is an ex-president on each side of these disputes.Former President Biden sues DOJ over release of interview audio | ReutersThe Trump administration is asking a California federal judge to throw out an expanded challenge to its sweeping reorganization of the federal workforce, calling the litigation a “litigation safari.” In a Friday motion to dismiss filed in AFGE v. Trump, the administration urged Judge Susan Illston to toss a supplemental complaint that broadened the case to cover, among other things, the downsizing of FEMA and a set of forward-looking workforce planning documents the administration issued last October. The original suit, filed in April 2025 by a coalition including the American Federation of Government Employees, SEIU, and the cities of Chicago, Baltimore, and San Francisco, challenged layoffs and reorganizations at more than twenty federal agencies. Judge Illston enjoined the workforce plans last May, but the Supreme Court stayed her injunction in July, and she has since declined to dismiss the case outright.The administration's argument is essentially jurisdictional: that the October planning documents are too tentative to constitute “final agency action,” that there is no specific DHS order behind the FEMA contract lapses the plaintiffs point to, and that individual FEMA terminations must run through the administrative civil-service process rather than land in district court. The “litigation safari” framing — that the plaintiffs are simply “roving the executive branch to explore various employment issues” — is rhetorically catchy but glosses over the more interesting underlying question: how cleanly the Administrative Procedure Act's “final agency action” requirement maps onto a coordinated, rolling, and openly cross-agency reorganization. A ruling on the dismissal motion is expected later this summer.Trump Admin Looks To Ax Expanded Suit Over Staffing Cuts - Law360Billionaire insurance magnate Greg Lindberg was sentenced in the Western District of North Carolina to twelve years in federal prison across two separate criminal cases — eighty-seven months on charges that he tried to bribe the state's insurance commissioner, and 144 months on wire-fraud charges arising from a $2 billion scheme in which prosecutors said he treated the insurance companies he controlled as a personal piggy bank. The sentences will run concurrently. Judge Max Cogburn also entered a preliminary restitution order of $1.6 billion based on a court-appointed special master's recommendation, which Lindberg's defense team described as the largest restitution award in state history.Prosecutors said the scheme harmed more than two hundred thousand victims, most of them elderly annuity holders, at least twenty thousand of whom died before any promised payouts arrived. The bribery case has its own complicated history — Lindberg was first convicted in 2020, had that conviction vacated by the Fourth Circuit in 2022 over faulty jury instructions, and was reconvicted on retrial in 2024. He pleaded guilty to the separate wire-fraud and money-laundering counts in November 2024. Judge Cogburn credited Lindberg's “extraordinary cooperation” with prosecutors and the special master, but also noted, with what reads like real exasperation in the transcript, that Lindberg has continued to file pro se civil lawsuits against the insurance companies he once owned and that the case illustrates how much of our regulatory apparatus can be “bought and sold like sacks of potatoes.” The government had sought roughly fourteen and a half years; Lindberg had asked for four.‘Regretful' Billionaire Gets 12 Years For $2B Fraud, Bribery - Law360The Colorado Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a debt buyer suing a consumer must attach to its complaint a non-affidavit writing that actually shows the buyer owns that consumer's debt — not just a generic bill of sale showing that the buyer purchased some bundle of receivables from the original creditor. The case, Wright v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, involved a $671.29 Victoria's Secret credit-card balance that Comenity Bank had sold to Portfolio Recovery in 2018. Portfolio Recovery's complaint attached a bill of sale and an affidavit identifying the last four digits of Wright's account number, and the lower courts found that sufficient under Colorado's Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The Colorado Supreme Court, in the first opinion authored by recently appointed Justice Susan Blanco, reversed and held the affidavit could not cure a complaint that didn't first satisfy the statute's non-affidavit-writing requirement.The practical consequence is significant: the four largest debt buyers alone filed close to forty thousand cases in Colorado county courts between 2013 and 2015, accounting for around eight percent of the state's county-court civil docket, and many of those complaints have historically relied on exactly the kind of generic bill-of-sale-plus-affidavit packaging the court just rejected. Consumer advocates argue the ruling will help consumers — most of whom never had any relationship with the debt buyer — understand and respond to the suits filed against them; the debt-buying industry will, in the near term, need to retool its pleading practices statewide.Colo. Justices Say Debt Buyer Must Show It Owns The Debt - Law360 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

One of Bobby’s favorite shows is returning and he’s excited! We get into a discussion of the shows we are loving right now but question their logic. Amy is trying out a toothbrush that is changing her life. Eddie changed a tire all by himself after he felt his son was doubting him. Lunchbox is excited for the Survivor finale. Morgan has an update on her cat’s new friend.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby shared how Baby Billie's first restaurant experience went and how he messed up so bad he had to admit he was wrong to his wife. A listener called in to say how she is so behind on the podcast and wants to know our biggest life updates of the last 6 months. Bobby has a report of all the major life changes of the show you need to know involving breakups, babies and big wins. We celebrate Jon Pardi's birthday today with some of the crazy stories he's told us over the years including the time he got stabbed across the stomach. We talked about a man who won $10 million dollars in the lottery but never told his family. Bobby wants to know if any show members could keep a lottery prize that big without telling anybody.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby opens up why he is feeling weird today but hasn’t told anymore. Law enforcement is warning residents to watch for hidden surveillance devices after deputies investigating a burglary where they discovered cameras concealed inside bushes near homes. A listener has a question on why Lunchbox freaks out on celebrities in public but doesn’t pay attention to them when they are in studio and also how he dragged his wife in a comment about not being in ‘high heel’ shape. Eddie said that a higher up saw a workspace of a show member and said it looked bad! Eddie asks Amy to look at his face to see if it’s skinnier.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby reveals that he has a list of people he has grudges with on his phone, how many he has and the point of the list. We do get him to reveal one...oh boy. We also got into the rudest celebrities that we've ever met. Bobby revealed why Amy almost quit the show and he fought for her to stay on. We have breaking news with a BIG day for Lunchbox.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby shares a mistake he has been making that might be causing him to lose his hearing. A listener wants to know what type of bad luck each of us have because she is constantly dealing with care tire issues. Bobby shares a list of events you have to buy a gift for people such as graduation or when they have a baby. Eddie brings in the numbers of why we should start a vending machine business. We get into the money details and whether Bobby is going to buy in. We also got into a debate on what things are considered a sport such as cheerleading, poker and bird watching. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby and his family took advantage of the good weather yesterday and he shares the way they measure how fast Baby Billie is growing. Amy talked about her experience at the Opry last night, but it takes a big detour with how Amy pronounces crayon. Eddie has a plan on how to get his kids to do the dishes. Lunchbox got to watch his favorite team last night in full for the first time. Morgan tried to save a bird.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We find out that Amy might have fun out alone with Riley Green and she starts blushing when talking about it. We talked to our listener Naomi who just received a $30,000 bonus and needs advice on how to spend it. Does she go on vacation or does she be responsible and save it? Bobby talked about the crazy video of investigators saying the driver pulled onto the sidewalk and allegedly attempted to strike a teenager riding a bike, then chased them!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby is worried about Abby but is the good news that she is okay?! We debate on whether we need to send her home or if she can stay answering phones with a cough. Amy shares why she feels good about no longer paying to do her nails…but we lose sight of what her good news is. Instead, we get into a discussion of ‘quiet luxury’ and Amy rags on Bobby. Eddie’s son got a BIG accomplishment in baseball. Bobby gives an update on how Baby Billie is sleeping.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy went to dinner last night and got a warning from her son that she was almost about to become a victim of kidnapping. We investigate if there is any truth to the warning or internet hoax. We talked about Summer House and how Eddie watched it for the first time. He has NO IDEA how people watch that show. It leads Bobby to reveal what his true guilty pleasure shows. We also talked about toxic bosses, the best pizza and another missing scientist that has to do with a secret government weapon.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

We find out if Lunchbox got selected for Jury Duty. Eddie brings his evidence to appeal the results to his testosterone test. He thinks the first results may have been compromised. How well do you know your country music lyrics? Raymundo asks a question about a famous country song to see who knows the most about lyrics.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy was nervous to ask her ex-husband for help but ended up with great news! She also reveals the good news of them not having to use their emergency code word. Bobby shares the new item his baby is loving right now. Eddie’s son now knows what he wants to be when he grows up. Morgan did something for the first time in 7 months after being sidelined with a disease.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bobby talked about pizza now being delivered by drones. Lunchbox shares how a true crime podcast solved a cold case from the 80s. Keith Urban stops by the studio with two brand-new songs and a whole new vibe. He breaks down his new project that includes collaborations with Little Big Town, The Doobie Brothers, and John Mayer. Keith also teases a full album coming later this summer, how he’s approaching live shows with this new sound, his top 5 Kieth Urban songs and the one lyric he gets asked about the most. We talked about a man who was recovering in the hospital after a metal chopstick became stuck in his throat for eight years. We talked to a listener who worked in a hospital and a patient had a crazy food stuck in their body. We addressed why listeners were disappointed with us.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Who will have more testosterone, Eddie or Lunchbox? We want to know as we patiently await the results. Eddie accuses Lunchbox of cheating and we investigate. There is drama in all of our DMs. Bobby had a celebrity like his story and that same celeb sent a message to the Bobby Bones Show Instagram. We address the drama which may lead to an even more uncomfortable situation for someone in the studio.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Amy reveals how she was on a very difficult phone call yesterday when she got an unexpected visit from her deceased mom. We debate if she sounds crazy or is okay because it brought her peace? One of Bobby’s favorite shows has returned and he’s loving it. Lunchbox reached a new milestone getting his kids to be clean.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.