Podcasts about old earth creationism

Welcome to the sixth episode in a series called “The Failures of Old Earth Creationism.” Many Christians attempt to fit old earth ideology into their beliefs, adopting uniformitarian or evolutionary pieces into their worldview. While this is often done in an effort to appeal to science, it often leads to major issues logically, scientifically, and theologically. The Coconino Sandstone is a sedimentary rock formation famously exposed near the top of Grand Canyon, but it spreads much further, from northern Arizona, northwest Colorado, through Nevada, and Utah. This rock remains locked in geological controversy, as two counterclaims vie for its origin. Those who believe in an old earth claim that the feature was primarily wind-deposited, while others claim that the sandstone was formed by water. Which of these is true, and why is the answer so important? In today’s episode, we’ll take a look at the Coconino Sandstone, examining the claims made from both sides. Join host Renée Dusseau and Dr. Brian Thomas as they discuss this topic on episode 98 of The Creation Podcast. --- Join... More...

Episode 2.4Episode Description:In Part 2 of our deep dive into Genesis 1, we ask the big question: Which creation view best fits both the Bible and the observable universe? Building on our discussion of yom in Part 1, we compare major views—Young Earth, Old Earth, Theistic Evolution, and more—and examine how broader creation passages across Scripture (Job, Psalms, Romans, etc.) shape our understanding of Genesis.Michael makes the case that Old Earth Creationism aligns best with the text's linguistic structure, theological depth, and scientific evidence—from radiometric dating to starlight travel to the Big Bang. Along the way, we answer common objections and emphasize that the goal isn't to compromise Scripture, but to read it faithfully while recognizing God's revelation in both Word and world.Find our videocast here: https://youtu.be/fZX1nZbaJIUMerch here: https://take-2-podcast.printify.me/Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):⁠https://uppbeat.io/t/reakt-music/deep-stone⁠License code: 2QZOZ2YHZ5UTE7C8Find more Take 2 Theology content at https://www.take2theology.com/

Welcome to the fifth episode in a series called “The Failures of Old Earth Creationism.” Many Christians attempt to fit old earth ideology into their beliefs, adopting uniformitarian or evolutionary pieces into their worldview. While this is often done in an effort to appeal to science, it can cause major logical, scientific, and theological issues. A geological phenomenon known as the Great Unconformity exists all across the world. This erosional surface presents a problem to uniformitarian scientists and old-earth creationists alike. Where did it come from? How is it so remarkably smooth? What could cause an erosional surface to such a global extent? In today’s episode we’ll take a look at the Great Unconformity and unravel the mysteries within the rocks. Join host Renée Dusseau and Dr. Timothy Clarey as they discuss this topic on episode 97 of The Creation Podcast. --- Join ICR's YouTube channel to get access to perks Join us on Patreon ... More...

Welcome to the fourth episode in a series called “The Failures of Old Earth Creationism.” Many Christians attempt to fit old earth ideology into their beliefs, adopting uniformitarian or evolutionary pieces into their worldview. While this is often done in an effort to appeal to science, it can cause major logical, scientific, and theological issues. Proponents of biological evolution claim that creatures are evolving upward over millions of years, becoming better and ‘more fit’ to survive with each successive generation through the accumulation of ‘beneficial mutations.’ However, even the most cursory dive into genetics shows something entirely different. In fact, the accumulation of mutations is detrimental, and also causes major problems with the concept of biologically long ages. In today’s episode we’ll explore the evidence in an effort to reveal what’s going on beneath the skin. Join host Renée Dusseau and Dr. Jeff Tomkins as they discuss this topic on episode 96 of The Creation Podcast. Resources: Genetic Clocks Verify Recent Creation --- ... More...

Welcome to the third episode in a series called “The Failures of Old Earth Creationism.” Many Christians attempt to fit old earth ideology into their beliefs, adopting uniformitarian or evolutionary pieces into their worldview. While this is often done in an effort to appeal to science, it can cause major logical, scientific, and theological issues. Lake Suigetsu is a large lake located near the coast of the Sea of Japan with a depth of about 34 meters at its center. Old Earth Creationists claim that the sediments from this lakebed absolutely show that the Earth is at least 50 thousand years old. What evidence are these scientists looking at that supposedly provide ironclad proof that the Young Earth Creationist model is wrong? In today’s episode we’ll explore the evidence in an effort to uncover “The Truth About Lake Suigetsu,” dismantling the poor science that causes many well-meaning individuals down a path that only leads to error. Join host Trey Bowling and Dr. Jake Hebert as they discuss this topic on episode 95 of The Creation Podcast. Resources: Ice Cores Episode

Welcome to the second episode in a series called “The Failures of Old Earth Creationism.” Many Christians attempt to fit old earth ideology into their beliefs, adopting uniformitarian or evolutionary pieces into their worldview. While this is often done in an effort to appeal to science, it can cause major logical, scientific, and theological issues. The conversation surrounding human origins has always been an intriguing one. One of the most debated subjects is the nature of the beings labeled ‘hominids,’ particularly Neanderthals. Biblical Creationists firmly place Neanderthals in the ‘human’ category—descendants of Adam and Eve, thus bearing God’s image. Most evolutionary biologists today also agree with Neanderthals being mostly human, leaving their genetic mark on our DNA through interbreeding. Some old earth creationists suggest something quite different. They claim that Neanderthals were nothing more than animals—truly bipedal animals that are able to make and use tools, paint, and bury their dead—but animals nonetheless. Is there any truth to this idea? Were they just animals? Or were they fully human, bearing the image of God? In today’s episode, we’ll dig into “The Mystery of the Soulless Hominids,” ex... More...

Welcome to the first episode in a series called “The Failures of Old Earth Creationism.” Many Christians attempt to fit old earth ideology into their beliefs, adopting uniformitarian or evolutionary pieces into their worldview. While this is often done in an effort to appeal to science, it often leads to major issues logically, scientifically, and theologically. Today we’ll look at what is considered by many to be a strong argument for an old Earth: ice cores. Ice cores, cylindrical cores drilled from the thick ice sheets, are often presented as indisputable evidence of hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of years of Earth’s history, but how reliable are these claims? What assumptions lie beneath the surface of these interpretations? In this episode, we’ll discuss: what ice cores are and why they’re significant, the assumptions and flaws in Old Earth interpretations, and how ice cores ultimately align with a young Earth model. Join host Trey Bowling and Dr. Jake Hebert as they discuss this topic on episode 93 of The Creation Podcast. References: The debate mentioned in this podcast

In this exciting episode of Changing the Narrative, David Rives is joined by Dr. Mike Houts, NASA's Nuclear Research Manager at the Marshall Space Flight Center. They dive into Dr. Houts' impressive educational background and explore the groundbreaking work he's doing to develop more efficient systems for transporting astronauts and equipment throughout our solar system and beyond. Plus, they discuss the fascinating possibilities of what a realistic civilization on Mars could look like. Packed with insightful conversations about space, science, engineering, and the future of exploration, this episode is a must-watch for anyone interested in the next frontier of human discovery! SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNZS3IEQ Consider a tax-deductible donation to help us continue to make these videos each week: https://davidrivesministries.org/contributions/ If you are interested in arranging interviews with David Rives, and/or appearances, Contact: booking@davidrives.com or call (931)212-7990 David Rives has committed his life and ministry to the study of how God's word and our world connect. David believes that science not on proves the Bible, but that it also brings us into a deeper relationship with our Creator. Join us at David Rives Ministries as we dive into conversations of Dinosaurs and Fossils, Science and the Bible, The Worldwide Flood, Intelligent Design vs. Evolution, Young and Old Earth Creationism, and SO MUCH MORE! DavidRives #marsmission #nuclearengineering

Let's take a close look at the teachings of Hugh Ross, a well-known proponent of Old Earth Creationism. We will explore “The Good, The Bad, and The Unbiblical” of Ross's views.    We will answer the question, “Is it possible to reconcile modern science with the Bible's creation account?” and “Does Ross's interpretation of Genesis hold up under close examination?” Join us as we unpack his teachings on topics like the age of the earth, evolution, and the nature of creation, evaluating them through the lens of sound biblical doctrine.   Whether you are new to this conversation or have followed Hugh Ross's work for years, you should join this discussion with Eric Hovind and Dr. Terry Mortenson as they provide clarity and insight, helping you discern the truth. Watch this Podcast on Video at: https://creationtoday.org/on-demand-classes/hugh-ross-the-good-the-bad-and-the-unbiblical-creation-today-show-396/  Join Eric LIVE each Wednesday at 12 Noon CT for conversations with Experts. You can support this podcast by becoming a Creation Today Partner at CreationToday.org/Partner

In this video, Dr. Scott Aniol dives into the core differences between Old Earth Creationism (OEC) and Young Earth Creationism (YEC), and why many proponents of YEC find OEC problematic. We'll explore how the interpretation of Genesis plays a pivotal role, and what science says about the age of the earth. From theological implications to the integrity of biblical literalism, we examine why Young Earth Creationists argue that the timeline of creation is central to maintaining a literal understanding of Scripture. Watch as we break down the key contradictions in Old Earth Creationism and how it conflicts with the biblical narrative of a young earth, as well as what this means for the debate between faith and science.

Dr. Randy Guliuzza joins David Rives in a discussion about Darwin. How did his theory become mainstream so quickly? What was the genius in his writing that led him to appeal to Christians in the closing remarks of his book? Through it all, how can we, as Christians, identify the specific shortcomings of evolution and defend against it? Listen as they discuss all of this and more on Changing the Narrative. SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNZS3IEQ Consider a tax-deductible donation to help us continue to make these videos each week: https://davidrivesministries.org/contributions/ If you are interested in arranging interviews with David Rives, and/or appearances, Contact: booking@davidrives.com or call (931)212-7990 David Rives has committed his life and ministry to the study of how God's word and our world connect. David believes that science not on proves the Bible, but that it also brings us into a deeper relationship with our Creator. Join us at David Rives Ministries as we dive into conversations of Dinosaurs and Fossils, Science and the Bible, The Worldwide Flood, Intelligent Design vs. Evolution, Young and Old Earth Creationism, and SO MUCH MORE! davidrives #darwin #creationist

Join David Rives as he sits down with renowned field paleontologist Tommy Lohman to explore the fascinating world of modern paleontology. Together, they discuss how scientific discoveries continue to support the truths found in the Bible. Don't miss this insightful conversation bridging science and faith! SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNZS3IEQ Consider a tax-deductible donation to help us continue to make these videos each week: https://davidrivesministries.org/contributions/ If you are interested in arranging interviews with David Rives, and/or appearances, Contact: booking@davidrives.com or call (931)212-7990 David Rives has committed his life and ministry to the study of how God's word and our world connect. David believes that science not on proves the Bible, but that it also brings us into a deeper relationship with our Creator. Join us at David Rives Ministries as we dive into conversations of Dinosaurs and Fossils, Science and the Bible, The Worldwide Flood, Intelligent Design vs. Evolution, Young and Old Earth Creationism, and SO MUCH MORE!

In this sermon, Pastor Christopher talks about four Creation Certainties and the separation of water on the second day. He breaks down God's Deed, Decree, and Designation of Creation, and the cycle and purpose of everything. Christopher also touches on the uniqueness of Moses's description of God, and how he shows the differences between the other gods and the one true God. Finally, Christopher talks about the strengths and weaknesses of Old Earth Creationism. Thanks for listening! LAKEVIEW MISSIONARY CHURCH, 810 S. Evergreen Dr., Moses Lake, WA 98837, 509-765-5270, www.LakeviewMissionaryChurch.com Pastor Christopher sends a weekly update to our church every Wednesday with an encouraging article, prayer requests, and announcements. Subscribe here, http://eepurl.com/hC7SHD Scripture taken from the New American Standard Bible, Copyright The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission.

I had a chance to investigate the research of Dr. Hugh Ross and interview him years ago as a young producer at the Christian Broadcasting Network. That interview, unfortunately, never saw the light of day, but I was blessed to be able to talk with Dr. Ross again and it was a fascinating conversation. We talk about an alternative creation view that helped me tremendously in my faith journey as well as the fact that science and God are NOT at odds but that in fact, science proves the existence of God.Black Ovis - use code: QUEST and save 10% on SOLID HUNTING GEAR__________________________________________________________________________ OnX Maps – use code: QUEST and save 20% when you join / support the show___________________________________________________________________________ MTN OPS – use code: QUEST and save 20% on all products / support the show ___________________________________________________________________________ Heather's Choice, use code: QUEST – save 15% on backcountry meals @heatherschoice.com___________________________________________________________________________ Subscribe to my YouTube Channel! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGVP4F5g3SiOookJK01Jy5w Follow me on Instagram! https://www.instagram.com/thehuntersquest/ and @huntermcwaters____________________________________________________________________________ www.thehuntersquest.com

On today's Bible Answer Man broadcast (02/02/23), Hank answers the following questions:How do you break generational curses over your children?Many of my family members believe they get revelations from the Lord. What are your thoughts on modern-day prophets?I am an old-earth creationist because of the scientific evidence, but how can I back this up with the Bible?How can those who don't have access to the Bible and have never heard the gospel be saved? How do we understand the justice of God in light of this?

How does the Bible communicate about creation? And what do we learn from the creation story that shapes our view of God? In this episode, we discuss common beliefs about creation and the interpretations of Genesis 1.

Having looked at what the theory of evolution teaches last time, today we're going to think through how well evolution fits with the bible. Will Barlow covers two main scriptural objections that young earth creationists bring against evolution before exploring three more issues that arise from the perspective of old earth creationism. How does Genesis 1 fit with evolution? Listen to this episode on Spotify or Apple Podcasts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZysp0JF3CA&feature=emb_imp_woyt See below for notes. —— Links —— We are doing follow-up discussions to these episodes on YouTube. Check them out! See other episodes in this Scripture and Science Class Check out Barlow's previous podcast episodes Learn more about and support the church Barlow and his team are starting in Louisville, KY, called Compass Christian Church Find more articles and audios by Barlow on his website: Study Driven Faith Support Restitutio by donating here Designate Restitutio as your charity of choice for Amazon purchases Join our Restitutio Facebook Group and follow Sean Finnegan on Twitter @RestitutioSF Leave a voice message via SpeakPipe with questions or comments and we may play them out on the air Intro music: Good Vibes by MBB Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) Free Download / Stream: Music promoted by Audio Library. Who is Sean Finnegan?  Read his bio here —— Notes —— Genesis 1 and Evolution • Review of evolution• YEC and evolution• OEC and evolution• Non-literal views and evolution Review of evolution Misconception #1: “It's just a theory!”Misconception #2: It means to explain how life beganMisconception #3: Evolution says that humans evolved from apesMisconception #4: Evolution is a progression from simpler organisms to more complex organisms YEC and Evolution How does YEC view evolution? • In short, YEC reject the theory of evolution• YEC make both Scriptural and scientific arguments to defend their position - we will focus on the Scriptural arguments for now Scriptural Objection #1 “Adam and Eve are no longer the first humans, and original sin goes out the window. This does irreparable damage to the biblical redemption narrative. The Bible says that death came into the world because of man's sin (Romans 5:12) and that all of creation labors under a curse because of sin (Romans 8:22). Scripture also says that Christ is the last Adam, come to redeem us from the sin brought into the world through the first man, Adam (1 Corinthians 15:22, 45).” “If Adam were a mythical figure, which is what evolution demands, even in a Christianized form, the entire parallel between the two Adams and the kinsman redeemer concept is destroyed. By advocating evolution, theistic evolutionists are undermining the very tenets of Christianity.” Scriptural Objection #2 “Jesus, when explaining marriage to the Sadducees, referred to Adam and Eve as existing from the beginning of creation (Mark 10:6). According to those who accept millions of years, Adam and Eve only existed after billions and millions of years of death: this makes Jesus either ignorant or a liar.”Scriptural Objection #3 “Further, when God finished his creation he called everything very good (Genesis 1:31). In order for the millions of years to be true, God would have to be calling the fossil record, which records disease, death, violence, and suffering, very good. That is inconsistent with the character of God revealed throughout the rest of Scripture.” Answering YEC Scriptural Objections Genesis 1:26   Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth." Genesis 1:27   So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. Nothing in Genesis 1 or 2 says how God created man (or for that matter, any other plant or animal). Objection #1: No Literal Adam and Eve • Day-Age: Can fit a lot of evolutionary evidence, but believe in special creation of humans• Gap: Reconstitution of life; could hold to evolution in the “gap” period; believe in special creation of humans• Walton: Ancients unaware of the problem Objection #2: Adam and Eve existed from the “beginning of creation” • “Beginning,” in this context, can refer more to the institution of marriage than the physical creation of the Universe and Earth Objection #3: God called death in the fossil record “very good” • The original audience of Genesis would have had no concept of the fossil record, so we do not have to assume knowledge of it in our reading of this text OEC and Evolution In general, most OEC views still end up rejecting evolution • Most OEC view accept YEC critique #1 but refute critiques #2 and #3• The primary OEC view that does not reject evolution is Collins' non-literal view (which he calls BioLogos) Collins' View on Adam “In the first place, the biblical texts themselves seem to suggest that there were other humans present at the same time that Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden. Otherwise, where did Cain's wife, mentioned only after he left Eden to live in the land of Nod (Genesis 4:16-17), come from?” “Some biblical literalists insist that the wives of Cain and Seth must have been their own sisters, but that is both in serious conflict with subsequent prohibitions against incest, and incompatible with a straightforward reading of the text.” “The real dilemma for the believer comes down to whether Genesis 2 is describing a special act of miraculous creation that applied to a historic couple, making them biologically different from all other creatures that had walked the earth, or whether this is a poetic and powerful allegory of God's plan for the entrance of the spiritual nature (the soul) and the Moral Law into humanity.”-Francis Collins, The Language of God, pg. 207 Day-Age and Evolution Most Day-Age advocates reject evolution • I believe, however, that evolution could mostly work with Day-Age• The main sticking point is the origin of humans Gap Theory and Evolution Most Gap Theory advocates reject evolution • I believe, however, that evolution could mostly work with Gap Theory• The main sticking point is the origin of humans• The additional point of discontinuity would be the catastrophic event between verses 1 and 2 “According to its kind” and Evolution Some creationists have asserted that the phrase “according to its kind” would preclude evolution • Genesis 1:11-12 - Vegetation “according to its kind”• Genesis 1:21 - Sea creatures and birds• Genesis 1:26 - beasts of the earth Genesis 1:21   So God created the great sea creatures and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. However, in Genesis 1, “kind” appears to be a loose biological grouping • We still see this today• Species can only procreate within a genus• Often, offspring cannot procreate Does “according to its kind” mean that these animals will always stay inside of that “kind”? • Evolution suggests that animals can only procreate within a genus• Genesis 1 is talking about procreation• Thus, there is no difficulty hereGenesis 1 and Evolution Where does the text disagree with evolution? • YEC: all over the place• Day-Age: Just the origin or humans• Gap Theory: Origin of humans and the need to reconstitute life Origin of Humans Questions to consider as we examine the options: • Why do human life and civilization seem to advance suddenly approximately 10,000 years ago?• Language• Cities What about the genetic evidence? How do we address the evidence for the evolution of man presented by Francis Collins? • Even Collins admits that an efficient Creator could resolve much of the evidence• Mutations over the past 6,000 years could explain the non-functioning gene evidence Does the Bible preclude evolution? Not necessarily.In my judgment, the biggest issue Biblically is with the origin of humanity.What do you believe about Adam? The Tree of Life

In this special edition episode, Pastor Nate digs a little deeper from the Sunday message and discusses whether science disproves the creation account in scripture, what the different viewpoints on this subject are (Atheistic Naturalistic Evolution, Young Earth Creationism, Old Earth Creationism, Day Age Theory, Theistic Evolution, etc.) and digs in deeper to his own viewpoint on this. If you've had questions about how to reconcile your view of the Bible and creation with science, this is the episode for you!

Building on last week, Will Barlow continues to describe and analyze issues with the Big Bang Theory. He considers standard biblical and scientific objections brought forward by young earth creationists. After responding to these objections, he shows how each of the main Christian views of origins deals with the Big Bang. Listen to this episode on Spotify or Apple Podcasts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yonfcv5mf6I&feature=emb_imp_woyt The Big Bang In basic terms, what does the Big Bang theory say? • The Universe began approximately 13.7 billion years ago• Space and matter have been expanding and cooling since then What is the current state of the Big Bang? • We will never be able to travel back in time to observe the beginning• Physicists used high-energy collisions to test hypotheses related to the Big Bang• There is a physical restriction on understanding the first moment of the Big Bang Are there viable alternatives to the Big Bang? • Oscillating universe — Universes expand and contract until the right one pops out• Multiple Universes — Infinite number of Universes exist beyond our ability to observe them• Inflationary models• Hawking's theory YEC and the Big Bang How does YEC view the Big Bang? • In short, YEC reject several aspects of the Big Bang• YEC make both Scriptural and scientific arguments to defend their positionScriptural Objections What objections do YEC make about the Big Bang from Scripture?“The Bible tells us that God created heaven, earth, and everything within them in the span of six days (Exodus 20:11) and rested on the seventh day. This is the basis for our work week (Exodus 20:8). In contrast, the big bang model claims that the universe and earth formed over billions of years.” “Genesis tells us that God created the stars on the fourth day—three days after the earth was created. In contrast, the big bang model claims that stars existed billions of years before the earth.” “The Bible tells us that the earth was made from water (2 Peter 3:5; Genesis 1:2–9; Psalm 24:2), but the standard secular model teaches that the earth began as a molten planet which cooled over millions of years, and that the oceans were the result of asteroid or meteor impacts, or from dissolution of comets as they entered earth's atmosphere.” Scientific Objections What objections do YEC make about the Big Bang from science?Missing Monopoles: The Big Bang should have produced massive particles with only one charge (either positive or negative) Too Little Antimatter: The Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter, but instead, slightly more matter than antimatter exists. No Population III Stars: The Big Bang should have produced only hydrogen, helium, and lithium. These theoretically combined to form the first stars, but we can't find any. No Evidence for Inflation: One problem with the cosmic microwave background radiation is that it appears to have reached an impossible thermal equilibrium. Inflation theories have been proposed to solve this but there's no evidence for rapid early inflation. Scientific Objections How do YEC explain the distant light reaching us? • Exponential decay of the speed of light• Used historical sources cataloguing the speed of light• Propose that light reached its final speed in 1960 Answering YEC Scriptural Objections Creation in six 24-hour days, not 13.7 billion years • Day-Age: Each day could be longer• Gap: 13.7 billion years between vs. 1 and 2• Walton: ANE people not interested in physical creation Creation of Earth before Sun • Day-Age: Perspective of Earth observer• Gap: Reconstitution of Sun on day 4, could be function/purpose oriented• Walton: Creation is function oriented Earth made from water • Day-Age: This is not meant to be a physical description• Gap: Reconstitution of Sun on day 4, could be function/purpose oriented• Walton: Fits ANE understanding of the world Missing monopoles and CMBR problems • Rapid early inflation would dilute the monopoles, making them harder for us to observe• This also solves the cosmic microwave background radiation problem Too little antimatter • This actually just refutes an atheistic Big Bang model• OEC believe that God's hand guided creation, so this result is what a OEC would expect to see No population III stars • Actually, scientists have found metal-light stars already (at the far edge of what we can observe) - one generation removed from population III• Just because we haven't observed something does not mean that it doesn't exist “Appearance of Age” and the Big Bang • The “Appearance of Age” YEC view will agree with the scientific evidence• They will say that God is testing us to choose between His Word and science• The Day-Age view will agree with the scientific evidence for the Big Bang• Schroeder's model actually uses the Big Bang and general relativity Gap Theory and the Big Bang • The Gap Theory view will agree with the scientific evidence for the Big Bang• No reason to argue against the scientific evidence when a long time could have elapsed between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 Non-Literal Views and the Big Bang • Collins will agree with the scientific evidence for the Big Bang• Walton's Temple view does not even think about modern cosmology, so he doesn't really care Choices • Attack the scientific evidence for the Big Bang and hold a YEC view• Accept the scientific evidence for the Big Bang and hold an OEC view• Attack or accept the scientific evidence and hold a non-literal view

Old Earth Creationism With Dr. Kenneth KeathleyDonate (Paypal)https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=GC2Z86XHHG4X6___________________________________________________________________________________Exclusive Content (Patreon)https://www.patreon.com/TheRemnantRadio__________________________________________________________________________________We're social! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRemnantRadioInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/theremnantradio/___________________________________________________________________________________Our Favorite Bookshttps://www.amazon.com/shop/theremnantradio___________________________________________________________________________________Michael Rowntree's Church Bridgewayhttps://www.bridgewaychurch.com/___________________________________________________________________________________Michael Miller's Church Reclamation Churchhttps://reclamationdenver.com/___________________________________________________________________________________Kairos Classroom: Use Promo Code Remnant for 10% offhttps://kairosclassroom.com/classes__________________________________________________________________________________The Gospel Of Mark Group Packets https://the-remnant-radio.creator-spring.com/listing/the-gospel-of-mark-workbooks________________________________________________________________________Download Free Ebookhttps://theremnantradio.com/free-ebook-download-2/__________________________________________________________________________________Free Mini E-coursehttps://remnant-university.teachable.com/p/free-mini-course__________________________________________________________________________________Word & Spirit School Of Ministry (117 Video Discipleship Course)https://remnant-university.teachable.com/p/remnant-universityKairos Classroom: Use Promo Code "Remnant" for 10% offhttps://kairosclassroom.com/classes Kairos Classroom: Use Promo Code Remnant for 10% offhttps://kairosclassroom.com/classesSupport the show

We are back with our Round Table to discuss faith and science! Host Joshua Noel is joined by https://player.captivate.fm/collection/0fe41ec6-59bd-4860-a867-1d8ed2d74cb3 (Pastor Will Rose) of Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, https://player.captivate.fm/collection/cb84497a-984e-4c5b-ad9c-4b67b470f1fd (Father Jonathan )Resmini of Holy Trinity Orthodox Cathedral, Christian Ashley - student at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, traveling preacher https://player.captivate.fm/collection/06b0d5e9-8074-4239-b6db-ead47870ab88 (Brandon Knight) (host of https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/my-seminary-life/id1558302469 (My Seminary Life)), and Christian Scientist Dino Ablan. Do Christians have to choose to believe either Young Earth Creationism or Old Earth Creationism? What is theistic evolution? How should Christians approach the topic of abortion? What does the Church believe about mental health? How does Christianity affect mental health? What should the Church stand its ground on and what should we be silent on concerning science? We discuss all this and much more! Join in our discussions on faith and science in https://www.facebook.com/groups/434522234066940 (our Facebook group)! . To check out our other interviews and sources about different views of evolution and creationism in the Church, https://player.captivate.fm/collection/f5734099-ab51-45cc-a20c-486a14d4a8d1 (check out this playlist)! . For a good read on the different views of Christiniaty and Pschology's relationship, check out Eric L. Johnson's book, https://www.amazon.com/Psychology-Christianity-Views-Spectrum-Multiview/dp/0830828486/ref=pd_bxgy_img_sccl_1/132-4766841-2843212?pd_rd_w=1ezyZ&content-id=amzn1.sym.7757a8b5-874e-4a67-9d85-54ed32f01737&pf_rd_p=7757a8b5-874e-4a67-9d85-54ed32f01737&pf_rd_r=SRC5RNCMW5TV3D1R1N1D&pd_rd_wg=Wohrw&pd_rd_r=e927dc65-fba1-46e0-b37a-ba0f73371871&pd_rd_i=0830828486&psc=1 (here). . To check out the sources Pastor Will mentioned or other sources previous guests have mentioned or recommended, check out our https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fCffbWx3GNt3nJtUSwlby4iJaupjoIxvQWmU1vV-N8o/edit?usp=sharing (Reading List)! . Please consider sponsoring our show on Patreon, https://www.patreon.com/thewholechurchpodcast (here), for access to our extra content like our "Too Long; Didn't Listen" series, our "Pet Peeves" series, and our "Whole Church News" episodes! . Make a one-time donation, https://cash.app/$wholechurch (here). . Subscribe to our show, https://the-whole-church-podcast.captivate.fm/listen (here). . Rate us & leave a review, https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/the-whole-church-podcast-104837 (here).

I'm joined by Zac to talk about our Christian journey and how it interacts with apologetics. We also delve into further questions that we often recieve regarding challenges to faith and also literature.

Biblical Evidence for Old-Earth Creationism The Historical View of the Creation Days Scientific Evidence for Old-Earth Creationism

What is old earth creationism? Why do old earth creationists generally agree with the science community's estimates of the ages of the earth and universe? Is old earth creationism a biblical plausible viewpoint? An interview with Dr. Jonathan McLatchie. Jonathan McLatchie Jonathan's articles on Genesis chapters 1-11 This episode on YouTube

Unlike what many claim, I don't think animal death before Adam and Eve sinned undermines Scripture nor compromises the gospel. Answering the question about animal death before the fall is necessary for those who hold to Old Earth Creationism. I hope this video helps you think through this issue by providing a biblical response.

Young Earth Creationism holds that God created the universe in six, literal approximately 24 hour days thousands of years ago while Old Earth Creationism holds that God created the universe over varying long periods of time billions of years ago. In part 2 of Genesis and Science, Pastor Dan Cox reads from Genesis 1:1-2:3. Visit https://wlbiblechurch.org for study notes.

Real Science Radio's Bob Enyart interviews Terry Mortenson on his 2020 paper Inerrancy and Biblical Authority: How and Why Old-Earth Inerrantists Are Unintentionally Undermining Inerrancy. (RSR previously interviewed Dr. Mortenson on the subject of the Ph.D. he earned from England's Coventry University on the history of geology. That 2004 program discussed the nexus between lawyers and the geological claim about millions of years, or the relationship between the anti-monarchists and the Geological Society's growing opposition to the global flood.) See also RSR's List of Day-Age Theory Consequences.

Real Science Radio's Bob Enyart interviews Terry Mortenson on his 2020 paper Inerrancy and Biblical Authority: How and Why Old-Earth Inerrantists Are Unintentionally Undermining Inerrancy. (RSR previously interviewed Dr. Mortenson on the subject of the Ph.D. he earned from England's Coventry University on the history of geology. That 2004 program discussed the nexus between lawyers and the geological claim about millions of years, or the relationship between the anti-monarchists and the Geological Society's growing opposition to the global flood.) See also RSR's List of Day-Age Theory Consequences.

This week I'm joined again by Jonathan Antemie as we continue our discussion about Old Earth and Young Earth creationism, and where we, as Christians, draw the line between logic and faith. If you haven't already, listen to Part 1! Website: www.thepoddershouse.com Follow us on Instagram: @thepoddershouse https://www.instagram.com/thepoddershouse/ Listen: https://open.spotify.com/show/7azv2zSWBEGkx7R7Uelz39 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-podders-house/id1523564649

This week I'm joined by Jonathan Antemie as we discuss arguments for both Young and Old Earth creationism. For most of us evangelicals, Young Earth creationism is canonized in our teachings and theology, but this episode, we'll revisit passages of Scripture that may or may not suggest otherwise! Website: www.thepoddershouse.com Follow us on Instagram: @thepoddershouse https://www.instagram.com/thepoddershouse/ Listen: https://open.spotify.com/show/7azv2zSWBEGkx7R7Uelz39 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-podders-house/id1523564649

Gavin Ortlund works through what doctrines should divide and when unity should prevail. He argues for a theological triage, distinguishing between what is essential, urgent, important, and unimportant.

Jeff Zweerink (PhD, Iowa State University) is an astrophysicist specializing in gamma-ray astrophysics. He serves as a senior research scholar at Reasons to Believe.Support Adherent Apologetics: https://www.patreon.com/AdherentApologetics

In terms of a Christian worldview of how the world came to be, there are two distinct camps: those who believe the world was created literally according to the Genesis account and those who believe a more liberal view is required. Today, we go into detail and discuss the differences between these two views, as well as their shortcomings.Visit our website here & join the Facebook discussion group here!Resources:• "Science and Faith: Interpreting the Bible's Creation Stories" message by Tim Mackie• "Do we live on a young or an old earth? Ken Ham vs. Jeff Zweerink" Unbelievable? podcastCredits:• Music: Cheerful Happy Upbeat UpliftingReleased by: Free Music• Music: Gold AutumnReleased by: Free Music

In this episode Leah and Andrew explore the arguments for Young Earth and Old Earth Creationism. First, they talk about the Hebrew term yom (English: day) and the theological significance of Adam. Then Leah tackles a few of the arguments from Old Earth Creationism including a vast usage of the word yom in the Old Testament, evidence from the fossil record and Cambrian Explosion, and astronomical evidence. Andrew tackles the arguments for Young Earth Creationism including yom being understood as a 24 hour period, understanding Genesis as literal history, the Global Flood as cause for the fossil record, and more. While Christians have disagreed about exactly how God created the earth, they agree that God created it. Despite this agreement and the many disagreements, Leah and Andrew believe that an exploration into scripture, theology, and science is a fruitful endeavour as it allows the explorer to learn more about the creation and the Creator Himself.Support: All profits go back into creating the podcast.Patreon:www.patreon.com/apologeticssimplifiedTeespring Shop:https://teespring.com/stores/apologetics-simplifiedLet’s get social!Follow me on…Instagram: www.instagram.com/apologeticssimplifiedFacebook: www.facebook.com/apologeticssimplifiedTwitter: www.twitter.com/ApoloSimplifiedRecommended Resources:Youth Earth Creationism: Answers in Genesis: https://answersingenesis.org/Old Earth Creationism: Reasons to Believe: https://reasons.org/Four Views on Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design: https://amzn.to/2yzjx5fThe Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, 2 volume set https://amzn.to/2JFPTxI

This week, I make the case for Old Earth Creationism (OEC). OEC claims that the Earth is quite old and that God is responsible for Creation. I argue that there is a lot of physical evidence that indicates that the Earth is quite old and that this fact is perfectly compatible with Genesis. Also I return to giving out a face palm and sigh award. (February 14, 2020)

Is the earth really 6000 years old? Do any of us know what we're talking about? Maybe not, but you'll enjoy listening.  The young-earth viewThe old earth viewScience's role in our faithThe problem with Ken Ham

We examine theistic evolution and show that it is incompatible with Scripture - the historicity, uniqueness, and special creation of Adam is inevitably compromised. We also examine various views of Old Earth Creationism and show that Young Earth Creationism is the most faithful to the plain reading of Genesis 1-11.

THAT God Created matters more than HOW He did it. Nonetheless, the creation vs evolution debate rages on and divides those who believe in mainstream science from those who take Genesis 1 as literal history. So, what is it? Is it possible to believe in the truth of Genesis 1 and to believe the earth is billions of years old? Are science and the Bible enemies or, potentially, friends? This message examines three main “camps” of creation: 1. Young Earth Creationism, 2. Old Earth Creationism, and 3. Evolutionary Creation.

In this episode, Kenny interviews world-renowned astronomer and best-selling author Hugh Ross about various topics related to Old-Earth creationism and Old Testament hermeneutics. Dr. Ross is well-known for his defense of the "day-age" creationist position. In this interview Dr. Ross dialogues with Kenny about variations of Old-Earth Creationism, the literary framework hypothesis of Genesis 1, the creation accounts in the book of Job, the Garden of Eden, the extent of Noah's flood, and the most appropriate way to navigate the book of Genesis. The interview ends by touching on the Neanderthals, proto-humans, and Dr. Ross' opinion of the Leviathan and the Behemoth. Dr. Ross is the founder of Reasons to Believe, an organization that creates and provides various resources that show that science and faith are not enemies. Dr. Ross and his team have lectured at more than 300 universities across North America. Dr. Hugh Ross has an undergraduate degree in physics and later earned a Ph.D. in astronomy from the University of Toronto. For several years he continued his research on quasars and galaxies as a postdoctoral fellow at the California Institute of Technology. Dr. Ross has made countless media appearances, including The Dennis Prager Show, FOX News, The 700 Club, The Eric Metaxas Show, Coast to Coast AM with George Noory, and numerous podcasts. He has also appeared in numerous magazines and news articles such as Christianity Today, Charisma magazine, and The Wall Street Journal. Outside of Reasons to Believe, Dr. Ross teaches as an adjunct professor at both A.W. Tozer Seminary and Southern Evangelical Seminary. He also serves as a minister of apologetics at Sierra Madre Congregational Church where he conducts a weekly apologetics class. He and his wife live in Southern California. Check out Reasons to Believe's Website Check out Kenny's favorite books by Dr. Ross: Navigating Genesis and The Creator and the Cosmos Follow Dr. Ross on Facebook and Twitter  

A discussion of the theology of creation, the relationship of the Trinity to creation, and the effect of genre on Young Earth and Old Earth Creationism. Philo of Alexandria: http://www.iep.utm.edu/philo/. The pronunciation of creatio ex nihilo: https://forvo.com/word/creatio_ex_nihilo/. The teacher help for creation: http://adults.journeyonleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/01/Lesson06-Creation.pdf.

Listen to Josh & Sam continue their discussion of OEC by talking about scriptural support. They also get a little into politics and the Simpsons...Send comments, compliments, and complaints to @pbrcast or pbrcast@gmail.com

Listen to Josh & Sam continue their discussion of OEC by talking about scriptural support. They also get a little into politics and the Simpsons...Send comments, compliments, and complaints to @pbrcast or pbrcast@gmail.com

Why does Sam call himself a pastor? Why does Josh read old-earth creationist books from the 1800's? Does the Bible actually say no animals died before Adam and Eve sinned? Why don't bad memes about evolution convert atheists? Why are there no basketball courts in Forest Park? We can't promise good answers, but we strive for a reasonable discussion that's both humble and passionate.Send comments, compliments, and complaints to @pbrcast or pbrcast@gmail.com

Why does Sam call himself a pastor? Why does Josh read old-earth creationist books from the 1800's? Does the Bible actually say no animals died before Adam and Eve sinned? Why don't bad memes about evolution convert atheists? Why are there no basketball courts in Forest Park? We can't promise good answers, but we strive for a reasonable discussion that's both humble and passionate.Send comments, compliments, and complaints to @pbrcast or pbrcast@gmail.com

Straight Thinking #123: Is Old-Earth Creationism Biblical? Paul Copan Interview, part 2

Straight Thinking #122: Is Old-Earth Creationism Biblical? Paul Copan Interview, part 1

What is Old Earth Creationism? Does mainstream science have the age of the universe correctly estimated?

Sinkholes, Old-Earth creationism on trial, Murphy's law in the multiverse