Podcasts about corroboration

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 25, 2025 15:32

From the archives: 6-25-23DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 8:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)

How Strong Is The DNA Evidence Found On The Knife Sheath?

dna crime idaho true crime individual knife preservation databases courtroom forensic collected statistical bryan kohberger sheath dna evidence corroboration corroborating

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 2, 2025 11:41

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.So, just how powerful is the DNA evidence against Bryan Kohberger? Let's talk about it!(commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's DNA on Knife Sheath Is 'Surefire' Evidence—Criminologist (newsweek.com)

KBryan Kohberger Challenges The DNA Evidence Compiled Against Him

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 14, 2024 11:42

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)

True Crime Rewind: Bryan Kohberger And The Disputed DNA Evidence

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 27, 2024 12:14

From the archives: 6-25-23DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)

From The Archives: Bryan Kohberger Challenges The DNA Evidence Against Him

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 3, 2024 15:26

From the archives: 6-25-23DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 8:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)

From The Archives: How Strong Is The DNA Evidence On The Knife Sheath?

dna crime idaho true crime individual archives knife preservation databases courtroom forensic collected statistical bryan kohberger sheath dna evidence corroboration corroborating

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 7, 2024 11:41

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.So, just how powerful is the DNA evidence against Bryan Kohberger? Let's talk about it!(commercial at 8:36)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's DNA on Knife Sheath Is 'Surefire' Evidence—Criminologist (newsweek.com)

From The Archives: Bryan Kohberger And The DNA Challenges Ahead Of Him

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 25, 2024 12:14

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)

From The Archives: Bryan Kohberger And The DNA Challenges Ahead Of Him

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 11, 2024 15:32

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)

From The Archives: How Strong Is The DNA Evidence Found On The Knife Sheath?

dna crime idaho true crime individual archives knife preservation databases courtroom forensic collected statistical bryan kohberger sheath dna evidence corroboration corroborating

Play Episode Listen Later May 25, 2024 11:41

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.So, just how powerful is the DNA evidence against Bryan Kohberger? Let's talk about it!(commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's DNA on Knife Sheath Is 'Surefire' Evidence—Criminologist (newsweek.com)

Bad Boy for Life: Diddy Faces the Music

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2024 5:52

In the gripping episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," guest Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent, delves into the murky waters surrounding Diddy's legal troubles. With federal raids shining a harsh spotlight on his once-glamorous life, the civil lawsuits, particularly the Rodney Jones lawsuit, paint a picture of a man surrounded by allegations so grim they make the reader yearn for a metaphorical shower. Coffindaffer outlines how these civil suits likely catalyzed federal interest, leading to in-depth investigations corroborated by evidence beyond the lawsuits' claims. Interviews with those making accusations, supported by digital evidence and corroborative testimonies, have propelled the case into the federal spotlight. The conversation then turns to Diddy's rapidly diminishing circle of friends and associates, suggesting a lonely figure whose entourage may have been more about convenience than loyalty. As federal agents leverage vulnerabilities to turn insiders into informants, Diddy's world unravels, leaving him exposed to the stark realities of his actions. The episode portrays a man whose empire, built on music and fame, is now besieged by legal woes and a glaring lack of genuine support, reflecting on the transient nature of loyalty in the face of adversity. Allegations in civil lawsuits trigger federal investigation. Federal involvement likely stemmed from direct complaints, not casual perusal of lawsuits. Corroboration of complaints with substantial evidence was crucial for the investigation to proceed. Interviews with a broad range of individuals connected to Diddy, from staff to "friends." Speculation on Diddy's dwindling support system and the role of federal agents in leveraging informants. The isolation of Diddy amidst legal troubles and the absence of genuine support. #Diddy #JenniferCoffindaffer #TonyBrueski #HiddenKillers #FederalRaid #CivilLawsuits #RodneyJonesLawsuit #LegalTroubles #Informants #LoyaltyTest Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Bad Boy for Life: Diddy Faces the Music

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2024 5:52

In the gripping episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," guest Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent, delves into the murky waters surrounding Diddy's legal troubles. With federal raids shining a harsh spotlight on his once-glamorous life, the civil lawsuits, particularly the Rodney Jones lawsuit, paint a picture of a man surrounded by allegations so grim they make the reader yearn for a metaphorical shower. Coffindaffer outlines how these civil suits likely catalyzed federal interest, leading to in-depth investigations corroborated by evidence beyond the lawsuits' claims. Interviews with those making accusations, supported by digital evidence and corroborative testimonies, have propelled the case into the federal spotlight. The conversation then turns to Diddy's rapidly diminishing circle of friends and associates, suggesting a lonely figure whose entourage may have been more about convenience than loyalty. As federal agents leverage vulnerabilities to turn insiders into informants, Diddy's world unravels, leaving him exposed to the stark realities of his actions. The episode portrays a man whose empire, built on music and fame, is now besieged by legal woes and a glaring lack of genuine support, reflecting on the transient nature of loyalty in the face of adversity. Allegations in civil lawsuits trigger federal investigation. Federal involvement likely stemmed from direct complaints, not casual perusal of lawsuits. Corroboration of complaints with substantial evidence was crucial for the investigation to proceed. Interviews with a broad range of individuals connected to Diddy, from staff to "friends." Speculation on Diddy's dwindling support system and the role of federal agents in leveraging informants. The isolation of Diddy amidst legal troubles and the absence of genuine support. #Diddy #JenniferCoffindaffer #TonyBrueski #HiddenKillers #FederalRaid #CivilLawsuits #RodneyJonesLawsuit #LegalTroubles #Informants #LoyaltyTest Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Bad Boy for Life: Diddy Faces the Music

The Downfall Of Diddy | The Case Against Sean 'Puffy P Diddy' Combs

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2024 5:52

In the gripping episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," guest Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent, delves into the murky waters surrounding Diddy's legal troubles. With federal raids shining a harsh spotlight on his once-glamorous life, the civil lawsuits, particularly the Rodney Jones lawsuit, paint a picture of a man surrounded by allegations so grim they make the reader yearn for a metaphorical shower. Coffindaffer outlines how these civil suits likely catalyzed federal interest, leading to in-depth investigations corroborated by evidence beyond the lawsuits' claims. Interviews with those making accusations, supported by digital evidence and corroborative testimonies, have propelled the case into the federal spotlight. The conversation then turns to Diddy's rapidly diminishing circle of friends and associates, suggesting a lonely figure whose entourage may have been more about convenience than loyalty. As federal agents leverage vulnerabilities to turn insiders into informants, Diddy's world unravels, leaving him exposed to the stark realities of his actions. The episode portrays a man whose empire, built on music and fame, is now besieged by legal woes and a glaring lack of genuine support, reflecting on the transient nature of loyalty in the face of adversity. Allegations in civil lawsuits trigger federal investigation. Federal involvement likely stemmed from direct complaints, not casual perusal of lawsuits. Corroboration of complaints with substantial evidence was crucial for the investigation to proceed. Interviews with a broad range of individuals connected to Diddy, from staff to "friends." Speculation on Diddy's dwindling support system and the role of federal agents in leveraging informants. The isolation of Diddy amidst legal troubles and the absence of genuine support. #Diddy #JenniferCoffindaffer #TonyBrueski #HiddenKillers #FederalRaid #CivilLawsuits #RodneyJonesLawsuit #LegalTroubles #Informants #LoyaltyTest Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Ancient Corroboration Of Jesus: His Miracles and Resurrection -The Bob Siegel Show Ep 837

The Bob Siegel Show

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 2, 2024 17:38

Bob discusses testimony about Jesus from ancient sources and historians, OUTSIDE of the New Testament, many of whom were not followers of Christ but still refer to His trial, miracles and even resurrection from the dead! (Repeat program, First podcast: 4-5-21) For detailed information on the today's topic, check out Bob's book: I'd […]

jesus christ resurrection miracles new testament ancient repeat corroboration bob siegel

Ancient Corroboration Of Jesus: His Miracles and Resurrection -The Bob Siegel Show Ep 837

CGM Radio - CrossNetwork Global Media

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 2, 2024 17:38

Bob discusses testimony about Jesus from ancient sources and historians, OUTSIDE of the New Testament, many of whom were not followers of Christ but still refer to His trial, miracles and even resurrection from the dead! (Repeat program, First podcast: 4-5-21) For detailed information on the today's topic, check out Bob's book: I'd […]

jesus christ resurrection miracles new testament ancient repeat corroboration bob siegel

A Look Back: Bryan Kohberger, The Knife Sheath And The DNA Found On It

news dna crime idaho true crime individual knife preservation databases courtroom forensic collected statistical bryan kohberger sheath xana kohberger corroboration corroborating

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 20, 2024 11:40

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.So, just how powerful is the DNA evidence against Bryan Kohberger? Let's talk about it!(commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's DNA on Knife Sheath Is 'Surefire' Evidence—Criminologist (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A Look Back: Bryan Kohberger And The DNA Challenge He Faces

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 15, 2024 15:32

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

ICYMI: Bryan Kohberger And The Huge DNA Challenge Ahead Of Him

home dna crime idaho car true crime individual preservation databases suspect courtroom forensic collected statistical icymi bryan kohberger kohberger corroboration corroborating

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 13, 2024 15:32

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)

ICYMI: Bryan Kohberger And The Challenge To The DNA Evidence Collected Against Him

music benefits new zealand guilt acast swedish expand thames voice acting bonus content early release corroboration ad free listening

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 26, 2024 15:32

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)

S3 | Episode 13 | Corroboration

GUILT

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 1, 2023 77:43

**FREE Episodes released weekly on Mondays. Subscribers get ad free listening, early release and bonus episodes**In 1989 two Swedish backpackers, Heidi Paakkonen and Sven Urban Hoglin arrived in New Zealand for the trip of a lifetime. And never went home. They were last seen alive together in Thames on April 7th 1989. One year after their mysterious disappearance Urban Hoglin's body would be found and confirmed a brutal murder. But to this day Heidi's body has never been found. Season 3 of GUILT will see Ryan attempt to finally bring an end to this mystery and send Heidi home to her family where she belongs. Ryan will uncover never before heard witnesses, fresh evidence in a Season of the podcast that really has to be heard to be believed.If you have any information relevant to the case of the murder of Heidi Paakkonen and Urban Hoglin in 1989, please contact us. You can do this anonymously at brevitystudiosnz@gmail.comVoice Acting in this episode:Joakim Berg as Sven Urban HoglinMusic:Theme Song: Traditional 'Polska Fran Knaggalve'Series Directed & Produced: Brevity StudiosHosted & Narrated: Ryan WolfSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/guilt. Expand your listening experience and support the creation of this podcast by becoming an Acast+ Subscriber. Benefits include, Early Release, Ad Free Listening and Bonus Content. https://plus.acast.com/s/guilt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A Look Back: How Strong Is The DNA Evidence On The Knife Sheath From The Moscow Murders?

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 5, 2023 11:41

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.So, just how powerful is the DNA evidence against Bryan Kohberger? Let's talk about it!(commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's DNA on Knife Sheath Is 'Surefire' Evidence—Criminologist (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

A Look Back: Bryan Kohberger Challenges The DNA Evidence Against Hiim

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 24, 2023 15:32

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

A Look Back: Bryan Kohberger Challenges The DNA Evidence Against Hiim

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 24, 2023 15:32

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

A Look Back: Bryan Kohberger And The DNA Evidence Against Him

news dna crime idaho true crime individual preservation databases courtroom forensic collected statistical spreaker prime network bryan kohberger dna evidence xana kohberger corroboration corroborating

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 30, 2023 11:44

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.So, just how powerful is the DNA evidence against Bryan Kohberger? Let's talk about it!(commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's DNA on Knife Sheath Is 'Surefire' Evidence—Criminologist (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

Episode 61: A Critical Rationalist Defense of Corroboration

The Theory of Anything

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 17, 2023 190:12

What did Popper say about corroboration in science? Can a theory NEVER be supported with evidence in any sense at all? Is the Popperian “war on words” justified? Are the positivists, Bayesianists, verificationists, and inductivists really wrong about EVERYTHING? --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/four-strands/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/four-strands/support

defense popper rationalist corroboration

Ep. 167 - Precedential Decisions from 7/3/2023 - 7/9/2023 (reasonable relocation; Pakistani Taliban; corroboration; Chinese Christian; unable or unwilling to protect; crime of violence; malice; deficient NTA in absentia motion to reopen)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 10, 2023 48:44

Ullah v. Garland, No. 22-1026 (4th Cir. July 6, 2023)reasonable relocation; for the rest of one's life standard; remand for a grant of asylum; family members left behind; Pro-American imputed political opinion; DHS burden; Pakistani Taliban; Pakistan Chen v. Garland, No. 21-1371 (4th Cir. July 6, 2023)corroboration; reasonableness of obtaining evidence; Wambura; threshold determination; otherwise credible; L-A-C-; one-year asylum deadline; changed circumstances; failure to consider evidence; State Department Reports; House Church; Christian; China Osorio-Morales v. Garland, No. 22-2909 (7th Cir. July 5, 2023)unable or unwilling; family violence; failure to report to police; police investigation; systemic failure to protect; Honduras Uriostegui-Teran v. Garland, No. 22-2472 (8th Cir. July 6, 2023) particularity; social distinction; particular social group; family group; ranchers; Mexico; willful blindness Circuit HousekeepingNinth (Mendoza Linares v. Garland) and Eleventh Circuits United States v. Lung'aho, No. 22-3168 (8th Cir. July 6, 2023) and Janis v. United States, No. 22-2471 (8th Cir. July 6, 2023)crime of violence; arson; maliciously; malice; more than recklessness; post-Borden; mens rea; murder; malice aforethought; extreme recklessness Madrid-Mancia v. Att'y Gen. U.S., No. 21-2291 (3d Cir. July 3, 2023)deficient NTA in absentia motion to reopen; § 239(a); use of the word or; follow up notice of hearing; statutory interpretation; statute as a whole; failure to update addressSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30 Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Challenges The DNA Evidence Against Him (6/25/23)

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 25, 2023 15:32

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Challenges The DNA Evidence Against Him (6/25/23)

Daf Yomi with Rav Yitzchak Etshalom

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 25, 2023 15:32

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.It's important to note that while DNA evidence is highly reliable, human error or mishandling of samples can introduce inaccuracies. Therefore, proper collection, preservation, analysis, and interpretation of DNA evidence are crucial to ensure its effectiveness in convicting criminals.According to new court filings, Bryan Kohberger's defense team is challenging the validity of the DNA samples that have been taken and used to connect Kohberger to the crime scene. In this episode, we take a look at the new claims by Kohberger's team and if there is any validity to them.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Lawyer Says No Victim DNA Found in Suspect's Home or Car (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

"The Dive" Masekhet Gittin #2: Exclusivity of Corroboration - או כולו בקיום הגט או כולו בתקנת חכמים

Play Episode Listen Later May 31, 2023 48:55

Source Sheet

dive exclusivity gittin corroboration

Murder In Moscow: How DNA Will Be Crucial To The Prosecution Securing A Conviction (5/24/23)

Play Episode Listen Later May 24, 2023 11:41

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.So, just how powerful is the DNA evidence against Bryan Kohberger? Let's talk about it! (commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's DNA on Knife Sheath Is 'Surefire' Evidence—Criminologist (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

Murder In Moscow: How DNA Will Be Crucial To The Prosecution Securing A Conviction (5/24/23)

Play Episode Listen Later May 24, 2023 11:41

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool in modern criminal investigations, often playing a crucial role in identifying and convicting criminals. Here is a summary of how DNA evidence is used in the process:Crime scene collection: When a crime occurs, investigators collect biological material such as blood, hair, saliva, or other bodily fluids from the crime scene. These samples may be found on weapons, clothing, or other objects relevant to the crime.Preservation and analysis: Collected samples are carefully preserved to maintain their integrity and prevent contamination. Forensic scientists extract DNA from the biological material and analyze it in a laboratory. The DNA is compared to the DNA profiles of known individuals, such as suspects or individuals connected to the case.DNA profiling: The extracted DNA is subjected to a process called DNA profiling, which examines specific regions of the DNA sequence that vary between individuals. This profiling creates a unique DNA profile, often referred to as a DNA fingerprint, which can differentiate one person from another with a high degree of accuracy.Database searches: DNA profiles obtained from crime scene evidence can be compared against DNA databases that store profiles of convicted criminals, arrestees, and unidentified individuals. If a match is found between the crime scene DNA and a profile in the database, it can provide a lead in identifying a suspect.Individual identification: If there is no immediate match in the DNA databases, investigators may collect DNA samples from potential suspects or individuals connected to the case, such as victims or witnesses. By comparing their DNA profiles to the crime scene DNA, investigators can exclude innocent individuals and focus on potential suspects.Statistical analysis: Forensic scientists and statisticians use probability calculations to evaluate the significance of a DNA match. These calculations estimate the likelihood of finding the observed DNA profile in the general population, aiding in assessing the strength of the evidence.Courtroom presentation: When DNA evidence is introduced in court, forensic experts testify about the reliability and significance of the findings. They explain the methodology used, the statistical analysis performed, and the match between the crime scene DNA and the defendant's DNA profile, if applicable.Corroboration with other evidence: DNA evidence is often used in conjunction with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, fingerprints, or surveillance footage. Corroborating evidence strengthens the overall case and supports the prosecution's argument for the defendant's guilt.So, just how powerful is the DNA evidence against Bryan Kohberger? Let's talk about it! (commercial at 8:51)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's DNA on Knife Sheath Is 'Surefire' Evidence—Criminologist (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

Ep. 155 - Precedential Decisions from 4/10/2023 - 4/16/2023 (credibility; corroboration; immaterial inconsistency; U Visa waivers; discretion & jurisdiction; adjustment of status; bonafide marriage; expunged arrests & police reports; Ron DeSantis)

The Ugly Truth About The Girl Next Door

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 17, 2023 35:08

Malets v. Garland, No. 19-4216 (2d Cir. Apr. 14, 2023)credibility; Matter of Y-I-M-; corroboration; Zombie Precedent; remand despite deference; omissions; fraudulent passports and asylum; trivial inconsistency; immaterial inconsistency; IJ characterization of inconsistency; live testimony; Ukraine Mejia Vega v. USCIS, et al., No. 16-56795 (9th Cir. Apr. 14, 2023)U visa waivers; federal court jurisdiction; INA § 242(a)(2)(B)(ii); discretionary determinations; INA § 212(d)(3)(A)(ii); Kucana; FRCP 12(b)(1); Matter of Hranka Doyduk v. Att'y Gen. U.S., No. 21-3333 (3d Cir. Apr. 14, 2023)expungement; discretion; 18 Pa. C.S. § 9122(a)(1); legal challenge; Patel; discretion; adjustment of status; Matter of Arreguin; arrest reports; use of the word “the” Alzaben v. Garland, No. 22-1561 (1st Cir. Apr. 14, 2023)conditional LPR; waiver of joint filing requirement; bonafide marriage; Patel; discretion; mixed question of law and fact; infidelity City of South Miami v. Florida Immigrant Coalition, Inc., et al., No. 21-13657 (11th Cir. Apr. 13, 2023)organizational standing; Ron DeSantis immigration policies; concrete injurySponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30 Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Corroboration

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 24, 2023 4:11

In this episode we respond to the claims by Cornerstone that there has never been corroboration offered to support Kait's allegations…..complete ridiculousness. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/traffickednextdoor/message

cornerstone kait corroboration

Episode 79: Credibility, Corroboration, Repetition, Proximity

Drk Mode

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 20, 2023 61:06

The guys (and Jon Prosser, briefly) discuss WWDC and a potential March/April event.

credibility repetition wwdc proximity corroboration

Ep. 146 - Precedential Decisions from 2/7/2023 - 2/13/2023 (torture; withholding - corroboration & credibility; nexus - family, gangs, extortion & revenge; deficient exclusion proceedings; divorce in Virginia & Ghana; good moral character; Pat

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 13, 2023 51:17

Hernandez-Martinez v. Garland, No. 21-1448 (1st Cir. Feb. 2, 2023)CAT; torture definition; single act; single incident; business owners in Guatemala who have high profit; severity of harm Aguilar-Escoto v. Garland, No. 18-1590 (1st Cir. Feb. 7, 2023)withholding of removal notwithstanding adverse credibility finding; corroboration; failure to consider evidence; domestic violence; Honduras; de novo review of past persecution; Patel Barnica-Lopez v. Garland, No. 21-1313 (1st Cir. Feb. 8, 2023)nexus; one central reason; family membership; revenge; W-Y-C- & H-O-B-; Honduras Matter of J-L-L-, 28 I&N Dec. 684 (BIA 2023)deficient case initiating document; Form I-122; exclusion; Niz-Chavez and Pereira; non-LPR cancellation of removal Adjei v. Mayorkas, No. 21-1615 (4th Cir. Feb. 7, 2023)Virginia divorce law; domicile in foreign country; Ghana marriage and divorce law; comity; Full Faith and Credit Mohndamenang v. Garland, No. 21-60380 (5th Cir. Feb. 6, 2023)corroboration; Matter of L-A-C-; affidavits; Cameroon Hernandez v. Garland, No. 22-3120 (6th Cir. Feb. 6, 2023)good moral character; Patel; Guerro Lasprilla; weighing evidence; mixed question of law and fact; non-LPR cancellation; DUI; Castillo-Perez Islas-Saldana v. Garland, No. 22-1366 (8th Cir. Feb. 7, 2023)motion to reconsider; administrative closure; abuse of discretion Aguilar Montecinos v. Garland, No. 21-2333 (8th Cir. Feb. 10, 2023)nexus; fear of gangs; power of MS-13; extortion as persecution; Honduras; Chenery ; harmless error*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your host!Case notes!Recent criminal-immigration article (p.18)!DISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Ep. 135 - Precedential Decisions from 11/21/2022 - 11/27/2022 (CAT & under color of law; regulatory violations & fundamental rights; corroboration; past persecution; venue; jurisdiction; best interests of the child standard; habeas & prolonged