Podcasts about Popper

Matthew Coller is joined by The Athletic's Daniel Popper for the latest installment of our 'Way-too-early preview' series, this time talking all things Chargers.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On this episode of Chargers Weekly, Bolts radio play-by-play announcer Matt “Money” Smith and is joined by The Athletic's Daniel Popper to recap the latest news involving LA and the entire NFL. Money and Popper break down the biggest difference-makers to watch in the leadup to the 2025 season, including outside linebacker Tuli Tuipulotu, linebacker Daiyan Henley, rookie running back Omarion Hampton, wide receiver Ladd McConkey and more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Living out mid-life, trying to avoid the "crisis" part, building a business, and finding purpose. And YES a skincare discussion, too. Bethenny sits down with Dr. Sandra Lee aka Dr. Pimple Popper and Founder of SLMD Skincare. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

May is often the month when IEW instructors are reaching Unit 9 in which students write formal critiques and Response to Literature compositions. Many of IEW’s courses include literature suggestions because we recognize the importance of connecting literature and writing. In this podcast, Andrew Pudewa and Julie Walker discuss the impact literature has on thinking and the connections between memory, imagination, and words. Finally, they share some of their favorite books that are in their Audible accounts. Referenced Materials Episode 283: A Bookish Discussion, Part 1 Episode 398: Think like Shakespeare, Part 1 Lord of the Flies by William Golding Mr. Popper’s Penguins by Richard and Florence Atwater The Chronicles of Narnia collection by C.S. Lewis Zorro: The Legend Begins by Johnston McCulley Homer Price by Robert McCloskey The Five Dysfunctions of a Team by Patrick Lencioni The Ideal Team Player by Patrick Lencioni Catherine of Siena by Sigrid Undset Kristen Lavransdatter by Sigrid Undset Wanting by Luke Burgis The Molecule of More by Daniel Z. Lieberman and Michael E. Long Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis Perelandra by C.S. Lewis That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis The Complete Novels of Jane Austen by Jane Austen Jayber Crow by Wendell Berry Hannah Coulter by Wendell Berry Transcript of Podcast Episode 478 If you have questions for Andrew, send them to podcast@IEW.comPerhaps your question will be answered at the next Ask Andrew Anything (AAA). If you have questions about IEW products or classes, contact customer service at 800.856.5815 or info@IEW.com

Tachtig jaar geleden formuleerde filosoof Karl Popper de tolerantieparadox: een open samenleving kan intolerantie niet tolereren. Progressief-liberalen én (radicaal)rechtse politici beroepen zich vandaag de dag op Popper, maar trekken geheel verschillende conclusies over de betekenis van zijn woorden. Hoe komen we uit de paradox? In gesprek met kamerlid Groenlinks-PvdA Lisa Westerveld, wetenschappelijk directeur TeldersStichting Patrick van Schie, journalist Filosofie Magazine Alexandra van Ditmars en journalist De Groene Amsterdammer Coen van de Ven.‘Onbeperkte tolerantie leidt uiteindelijk tot het verdwijnen van tolerantie. Als we niet bereid zijn om een tolerante samenleving te verdedigen tegen de aanval van intoleranten, dan zullen de toleranten vernietigd worden – en tolerantie met hen', zo schreef de Oostenrijks-Britse filosoof Karl Popper in de nasleep van de Tweede Wereldoorlog in De open samenleving en haar vijanden (1945).Tachtig jaar later, met radicaalrechts in veel westerse landen aan het roer, is het denken van Popper actueler dan ooit. Karl Popper is een icoon van het liberalisme. Maar ook Geert Wilders zegt door zijn denken geïnspireerd te zijn. In dit programma onderzoeken we Poppers tolerantieparadox: tegen welk soort onverdraagzaamheid moeten we ons weren en wanneer dient (veronderstelde) intolerantie slechts als excuus voor eigen onverdraagzaamheid? Oftewel: hoe geven we anno 2025 de open samenleving vorm?Programmamaker: Veronica BaasModerator: Kees FoekemaIn samenwerking met Filosofie Magazine.Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Here we discuss fidesim and critical rationalism. Fideism has many definitions, but at least how we are thinking of it, it is the idea that something like faith has validity in the process of moving closer to truth through reason.Our starting point is a paper written by prominent Popperian Joseph Agassi about how William Bartley, another critical rationalist philosopher closely associated with Popper, had a falling out with Popper after he accused Popper of being a fideist, which Popper apparently did not consider a compliment. But was Bartley perhaps correct?Note: we decided to cover this paper before we even realized it was about fideism which -- by pure dumb luck -- happened to be part of the topic of our last episode (#106: Karl Popper and God) where Bruce declared himself a Fideist. As such, episode #106 is not required listening, but you might find Popper's views on God and his views on epistemological fideism an interestingly interplay.⁠Support us on Patreon⁠

Joshua Umahi and Zack Spring welcome "friend of the show" Newsday Sports NBA Columnist Steve Popper back to the program ahead of the Knicks' pivotal Game 3 matchup vs the defending champion Boston Celtics. Popper gives his insight on how the Knicks pulled off two consecutive 20-pt comebacks in Games 1 & 2 to take a shocking 2-0 lead, Tom Thibodeau's gameplan tweaks in this series, and where Saturday's game ranks in terms of Madison Square Garden lore.

Lutz Elija Popper wurde 1938 als zweiter Sohn eines jüdischen Arztes in Wien geboren. Die Familie emigrierte nach Bolivien und kehrte 1947 zurück. Im Gespräch mit Barbara Kedl-Hecher erzählt Popper von der Verteibung seiner Eltern, der Kindheit in Bolivien, den Herausforderungen des Wiener Alltags nach der Rückkehr und über seine Arbeit als Zeitzeuge in Schulen.Wenn euch die Folge gefallen hat, freuen wir uns, wenn ihr unseren Podcast bewertet und abonniert (falls ihr das noch nicht gemacht habt). Feedback könnt ihr uns auch an podcast(at)ma53.wien.gv.at schicken. Folgt uns auf unseren Social Media Kanälen:https://www.facebook.com/wien.athttps://bsky.app/profile/wien.gv.athttps://twitter.com/Stadt_Wienhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/city-of-vienna/https://www.instagram.com/stadtwien/Und abonniert unseren täglichen Newsletter:http://wien.gv.at/meinwienheute Weitere Stadt Wien Podcasts: Historisches aus den Wiener Bezirken in den Grätzlgeschichten büchereicast der Stadt Wien Büchereien

Jordan Bayne stops by to talk about this year's MetaCannes on Thetadrop, her new partnership with Goldfinch Entertainment, and so much more that Popper had to leave.

Aunque aseguraba que París era la ciudad donde había sido feliz, el escritor peruano Mario Vargas Llosa, fallecido el 13 de abril pasado, vivió buena parte de su vida en Londres, ciudad donde escribió 'Conversación en La Catedral', uno de sus obras maestras. Recorrido por el Londres íntimo de Vargas Llosa con un reportaje de Luisa Pulido, corresponsal de RFI en Reino Unido. "Conversación en La Catedral" es el único libro que Mario Vargas Llosa "salvaría del fuego", según dijo en alguna ocasión el Nobel de Literatura peruano. Esa novela fue escrita en la entonces Biblioteca Británica, en Londres, en los años 60. Fue la misma biblioteca donde, en medio de miles de libros, se sentaron Marx y Lenin.Hoy ese lugar se ha convertido en una sala de lectura del Museo Británico, imponente edificio cilíndrico, color mármol, de casi 43 metros de diámetro y ubicado a pocos pasos de la entrada del museo. Ahí entrevistamos al profesor Stephen Hart, especialista en literatura Latinoamericana en la University College London (UCL), sobre ese periodo en la vida del autor peruano."Cuando Vargas Llosa venía aquí para estudiar, creo que se sentía como un miembro más de la comunidad de los escritores más importantes de la historia, entre otros, Marx. Sentía la importancia de la escritura y la literatura, pero también de la ciencia, pues aquí también venían los científicos", dice Hart.'Conversación en La Catedral', obra perfectaStephen Hart, quien fue alumno de Vargas Llosa en los años 70 en la Universidad de Cambridge, es un gran admirador de "Conversación en La Catedral"."Lo más importante en esa novela es la exploración técnica, el sentido de la técnica que desarrolla en ella Vargas Llosa. Es una obra perfecta. La manera en que utiliza la técnica de los vasos comunicantes, la idea que uno tiene un espacio por aquí y luego otro espacio, otro tiempo, y hay luego una fusión de todo ello", apunta.  Mario Vargas Llosa llegó en 1967 a Londres, procedente de París, para ser profesor de literatura en dos universidades. Medio siglo después, una foto de Vargas Llosa maduro, canoso y serio, adorna una de las enormes ventanas del centro de idiomas del King's College. Ahí se resalta, con orgullo, que el escritor y político, laureado con el Nobel de Literatura en 2010, fue profesor de esa universidad entre 1967 y 1970.El escritor Enrique Zattara relata esos primeros años del Nobel en Londres."Vargas Llosa estaba viviendo en París desde hacía unos años gracias a una beca. Ahí había viajado con la mujer. Ahí tuvo su primer hijo. Pero aparentemente su situación legal no le permitía quedarse. Entonces comenzó a buscar otras alternativas", explica Zattara.Para el autor peruano fue claro desde joven que “se iba a preocupar toda su vida por trabajar de algo que tuviera que ver con la escritura, que su trabajo iba a ser escritor”, explica Zattara y precisa: “Era muy ambicioso, en el buen sentido”, apunta Zattara."El Nobel obtiene un contrato en Saint Mary's College, al oeste de Londres. Ahí se instala con su mujer y su primer hijo, en un barrio relativamente popular cuya población es mayoritariamente de origen irlandés. Luego, al año siguiente, pasa a ser profesor de Siglo de Oro en el Departamento de Idiomas en el Kingrs College, en el centro de la ciudad", recuerda también el escritor Enrique Zattara.Vida austera"A los 31 años, su vida era muy sencilla", cuenta también Zattara. "Él mismo contaba que su vida era muy austera. Cuando no trabajaba, se iba a la Biblioteca Nacional, que en ese momento estaba en el Museo Británico. Iba a leer los fines de semana. Como pagarle a una niñera por ocuparse de los niños salía muy caro, lo que hacía era salir una vez al teatro por semana con Patricia [su mujer]", cuenta Zattara.  Esa vida también estuvo marcada por la academia, el periodismo y la familia. Transcurría en el hoy exclusivo sector de Earl's Court, en el oeste de Londres. Las cartas que recibía de sus amigos y compadres escritores del "Boom Latinoamericano", fueron enviadas a la calle Philbeach, número 7, código postal SW5. Era una mansión blanca con puertas negras. No se tienen más detalles.La magia de LondresLo que sí es indudable para el director del Instituto Cervantes en Londres, Víctor Ugarte, es que "la constante oferta cultural de Londres para un creador como Vargas Llosa, o para cualquier persona amante de la cultura, es increíble. Pocas ciudades en el mundo pueden competir con esa oferta tan enorme, tanto pública, como los grandes museos, como privada, las pequeñas galerías".Aunque Londres no se destaca en su obra, la ciudad sí fue importante para Vargas Llosa intelectualmente y de crecimiento como escritor, estima Ugarte.Ir a teatro, correr en el parque"Claro, le gustaba mucho ir a conciertos, asistir a conferencias, visitar museos, pero también practicar deporte, por ejemplo, correr en el parque. Estaba en un ambiente no latino, con lo cual podía concentrarse en su trabajo de una forma más, digamos, individual. Eso, según dice, le ayudó mucho para su creatividad. Vargas Llosa tenía un proceso muy disciplinado. Se levantaba temprano, escribía por la mañana para que no le molestaran los ruidos", relata Ugarte.Carlos Fuentes y su familia vivieron en la misma zona casi 20 años después. La amistad entre el escritor mexicano y el escritor peruano fue siempre entrañable. La periodista Silvia Lemus, viuda de Carlos Fuentes, se confió sobre esta amistad a RFI."Mario era muy, muy terrenal, pero también muy estimulante, no solo en la literatura, sino también, como usted sabe, en la política", dice.  Enrique Zattara, que hace caminatas que recorren los lugares frecuentados por escritores como Vargas Llosa, afirma que Earls Cour fue un barrio que fascinó al peruano."El Earls Court de Vargas Llosa no es como el barrio de ahora. El que él conoció era un barrio, digamos, ‘jiposo', [de ‘hippie', figura contestataria de los setenta], lleno de gente rara. A él le gustaba mucho todo eso. Incluso hay una parte de una novela suya que transcurre en Londres, Travesuras de la niña mala. El personaje vive en un apartamento que es, realmente, donde él vivía. Vargas Llosa cuenta muchas cosas del barrio que aún hoy se pueden ver", dice Zattara.Londres fue una experiencia formativa en la vida y carrera literaria del autor, nos explica el escritor peruano, Gunter Silva. "Era la época del apogeo de la contracultura, los hippies, las protestas estudiantiles, la juventud rebelde, la libertad sexual, el rechazo a toda forma de autoridad, las drogas psicodélicas, el rock and roll, las minifaldas. Londres era pura efervescencia. La ciudad tenía algo de carnaval libertario sin necesidad de censura ni comisarios", dice Silva.Evolución política hacia la derechaEn ese momento Vargas Llosa vive una evolución política. Según sus palabras, ahí "dejó de ser socialista para convertirse en liberal y gran admirador de Margaret Thatcher", la Dama de Hierro, la primera mujer primera ministra, famosa por sus políticas de recortes y transformación económica en la década de los 80.Él mismo quiso convertirse en presidente del Perú y lanzó su candidatura en 1990. Si bien pasó a la segunda vuelta, fue derrotado por Alberto Fujimori.Gunter Silva recuerda que por esos años el Nobel afianzó su visión política."En Londres, Mario Vargas Llosa leyó por primera vez a Popper, a Hayek. Esas ideas sobre la sociedad abierta, el individuo como centro, la protección de las libertades individuales, el rechazo al totalitarismo, influyeron profundamente en su visión política. Londres fue, en ese sentido, más que un lugar físico, fue una ciudad mental, un laboratorio moral", sostiene Silva.De socialista a admirador de ThatcherNo solo Popper y Hayek lo inspiraron. El profesor Stephen Hart estima que Margaret Thatcher también fue una fuente de inspiración política para el escritor. Inclusive recurriría a ella para su campaña a la presidencia."Sabemos que era un gran admirador de Margaret Thatcher porque le escribió una carta. Yo he visto esta carta. Esta carta fue vendida por [la casa de subastas] Sotherby's. En ella Vargas Llosa habla de su admiración por Thatcher. También expresa su apoyo a la democracia popular en todo el mundo, el rechazo de las nacionalizaciones, así como el énfasis en las privatizaciones", apunta Hart.Ahora bien, ¿el Nobel peruano llegó a extrañar Londres?"Me dijo que sí, que la extrañaba; extrañaba ese orden con alma que tenía Londres", responde su compatriota y escritor Gunter Silva, quien le planteó la pregunta hace varios años."Extrañaba lo estimulante que podía ser la ciudad. Me habló de los tés con scones, de los tandooris, de la cantidad de obras de teatro que se exhibían cada noche. Pero también me confesó que donde verdaderamente había sido feliz era en París".

Lori is joined by Steve Popper, covering the Knicks for Newsday, to get his thoughts on their Game Four win against Detroit.

R.R. Reno, editor of First Things magazine, joins me to discuss why the principles of MAGA could potentially conflict with the values of a liberal society. - - -  Today's Sponsor: Beam - Try Beam's best-selling Dream Powder and get up to 40% off for a limited time when you go to https://shopbeam.com/KLAVAN and use code KLAVAN at checkout.

Lori and Steve Popper of Newsday breakdown game one of the New York Knicks playoff run and what to expect moving forward.

Some thoughts (arguments?) on Hugo Mercier's Not Born Yesterday (https://www.amazon.com/Not-Born-Yesterday-Science-Believe/dp/0691178704), which advances the thesis that humans are not as gullible as is commonly thought. This is our second episode on Mercier's work, and we're as intrigued as ever. But this time we have different interpretations of his thesis, so it's a good thing the man himself is coming on soon to sort us out. We discuss If humans are less gullible than is commonly believed Evolution of Communication Theory Gazelles jumping in the air Are humans too stubborn? Is one of your hosts who shall go unnamed too stubborn? When do humans actually change their minds? Does Mercier's work conflict with Popper? How much of our reasoning is motivated reasoning? How much is social conformity? Socials Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link Become a patreon subscriber here (https://www.patreon.com/Increments). Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here (https://ko-fi.com/increments). Click dem like buttons on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ) Did you know that "gullible" isn't in the dictionary? Tell us at incrementspodcast@gmail.com.

Join Dr. Pamela A. Popper as she delves into the intricate relationship between cognitive function and Alzheimer's disease. Learn about the latest research, prevention strategies, and how to support brain health effectively. Discover ways to enhance cognitive function and delay the onset of Alzheimer's. #BrainHealth #AlzheimersPrevention #CognitiveFunction

Join Dr. Joshua Helman, Dr. Pamela A. Popper, and Dr. Antonio Jimenez as they discuss the synergy between whole foods and evidence-based medicine. Learn how combining these approaches can naturally empower your health. #WholeFoods #EvidenceBasedMedicine #NaturalHealth

Dr. Pamela A. Popper provides valuable insights on how to effectively navigate the healthcare system. Learn practical tips to become a more informed and empowered healthcare consumer. #HealthcareGuide #PatientEmpowerment #HealthNavigation

Watch the 9malls review of the Opopop Popcorn Popper Kitchen Gadget. Will this be my favorite popcorn popper going forward? Watch the surprising hands on test to find out. #popcorn #popcornreview #gadgetreview #gadgets #kitchengadgets Find As Seen On TV Products & Gadgets at the 9malls Store: https://www.amazon.com/shop/9malls Please support us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/9malls Disclaimer: I may also receive compensation if a visitor clicks through to 9malls, or makes a purchase through Amazon or any affiliate link. I test each product on site thoroughly and give high marks to only the best. We are independently owned and the opinions expressed here are our own.

Dr. John A. McDougall and Dr. Pamela A. Popper reveal the secrets to longevity through whole food diets and integrative health practices. Learn how plant-powered nutrition can enhance your vitality and wellness. #Longevity #PlantBased #IntegrativeHealth

Want to hear just how Dr. Pimple Popper became so successful? Let's go behind the scenes. This week, we're joined by Dr. Sandra Lee aka Dr. Pimple Popper, as she discusses how she ended up working in television. Listen in as she offers insight into the new media world, shares the importance of telling patient stories, and tells us just what makes pimple popping so satisfying. Each Thursday, join Dr. Raja and Dr. Hadar, board-certified dermatologists, as they share the latest evidence-based research in integrative dermatology. For access to CE/CME courses, become a member at LearnSkin.com.   Sandra Lee, MD, known as Dr. Pimple Popper, and Dr. Sandra Lee across most social media platforms and YouTube, as well as on SLMDskincare.com.  

The New Definition of Healthy, Pirate's Booty, & Pig Breath. Listen. Leave a Review. Get Patreon. Enjoy!! Check out The Cover to Cover Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/franjola ------------------------------ COVER TO COVER MERCH!!! CLICK HERE!! ----------------------------------- VISIT OUR SPONSORS!! ----------------------------------- CASH-MERE Outside, How Bout Dat? With QUINCE! Get Free Shipping + 365 Days Return Visit www.quince.com/cover ------------------------------ Take a Mental Health Break with BETTERHELP! This episode is Sponsored by Betterhelp, get 10% off your first month, Visit BetterHelp.com/c2c ------------------------------ Shop Healthy, Eat Healthy with HUNGRYROOT! Get 40% off and A Free Gift FOR LIFE Visit hungryroot.com/cover Code: COVER ------------------------------ Bake Better Bread with WILDGRAIN! Get $30 off and Free Croissants FOR LIFE Visit wildgrain.com/cover Code: COVER ------------------------------ Shave Your Parts with MANSCAPED! Get 20% Off + Free Shipping Code: COVER Visit https://www.manscaped.com/ ------------------------------ Conquer your wellness with THRIVE! $30 Off Your First Order + A FREE $60 gift. Visit thrivemarket.com/cover ------------------------------ Eat Healthy AND Convenient with FACTOR! Get 50% Off with Code: FACTORPODCAST Visit factormeals.com/factorpodcast ------------------------------ Better Mobile at a Better Price with MINT MOBILE! Get 3 Months for $15/Month + Free Shipping Visit MintMobile.com/cover ------------------------------ Find Proper Healthcare with ZOCDOC! Visit zocdoc.com/cover to find the perfect doctor. ------------------------------ Follow Chris: http://www.franjola.fun/   https://www.instagram.com/chrisfranjola/ Follow Alex:   https://www.instagram.com/conn.tv/ https://linktr.ee/Conn.TV Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The man, the myth, the legend Daniel Popper is back to assess the Chargers' first few weeks of free agency and their draft strategy moving forward. Let's rock. Spin that s*** DJ! Make sure to join up as channel members at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBnSd0Mx4BHUXlpxVegCoOg/join To make your selections, go to PrizePicks.com/GUILTY and use code GUILTY for a first deposit match up to $100! Follow us on Twitter! Podcast: @GACPodcast17 Steven: @StevenIHaglund Tyler: @tylerjschoon Tyler's Patreon: https://patreon.com/TylerSchoon?utm_medium=unknown&utm_source=join_link&utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator&utm_content=copyLink #BlueWireVideo #NFL #Chargers #NFLPodcasts

Alaska and Willam get gossy as they chat about the last 6 weeks of ‘Drag The Musical,' traveling to Brazil, and why the government is trying to take away our poppers! Plus your DM's about season sisters and Willam's connection to John Williams. Listen to Race Chaser Ad-Free on MOM Plus Follow us on IG at @racechaserpod and click the link in bio for a list of organizations you can donate to in support of Black Lives Matter Rainbow Spotlight: Rhythm of Love by Frankie Grande FOLLOW ALASKA https://twitter.com/Alaska5000 https://www.instagram.com/theonlyalaska5000 https://www.facebook.com/AlaskaThunder https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9vnKqhNky1BcWqXbDs0NAQ FOLLOW WILLAM https://twitter.com/willam https://www.instagram.com/willam https://www.facebook.com/willam https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrO9hj5VqGJufBlVJy-8D1g RACE CHASER IS A FOREVER DOG PODCAST Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

From the FDA to the Lego Werewolf Masochism stories. This week's pod is all about our weekend sex parties and shenanigans including but not limited to: Lego domination, werewolves, Amanda Lepore, vomming and St Patty's Day~! What a wild week it's been.— VIIA: 21+, Try VIIA Hemp THCV! https://bit.ly/viiawatts and use code WATTS for 25% OFF (and 50% off certain bundles this week)!! —— Over 2 Million Butts Love TUSHY. Get 10% off TUSHY with the code WATT at https://hellotushy.com/watt #tushypod —- Watts Socials -Discord: https://discord.gg/bxqDQVcKH7Amps Linktree: https://linktr.ee/pupampKristofer Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mrkristoferSAFEWORD MERCH: http://www.safewordshop.comTWITCH: http://twitch.tv/wattsthesafewordWatts Your Safeword Podcast:Itunes: http://apple.co/2QkMDwkSpotify: http://spoti.fi/2QjPNjLTwitters:http://twitter.com/WattsTheSafewrdhttp://twitter.com/PupAmphttp://twitter.com/kristoferwestonInstagrams:https://instagram.com/PupAmp/https://instagram.com/mrkristoferwestonhttps://instagram.com/wattsthesafewordFacebook: http://ow.ly/Z5nvMPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/WattsTheSafewordOpening by the magical Aethernaut https://aethernaut.bandcamp.comMusic by Joakim Karud http://youtube.com/joakimkarud

Question: I am a registered psychotherapist and I reject Freudian and Jungian beliefs. However, I did find that when you remove these demonic influences and stick with the "science" behind psychology and filter it through the Bible that it's a powerful tool. Proverbs in particular along with New Testament scriptures encourage us to guard our heart and mind, renew our mind with God's Word, and find peace of mind. The Bible is actually the BASIS of TRUE Psychotherapy if you study the subject biblically. What do you say?Response: It's instructive that just in the last week we have been contacted by Christian psychologists who insist that "psychotherapy" by name has been discarded by Christians who limit themselves to being called Biblical Counselors. Further, secular psychologists have also gone down this path. We appreciate your "rejection" of Freudian and Jungian beliefs. It is clear that your heart is for those you seek to help. With that in mind, the pertinent question to ask, however, is how thorough that process has been? We say that because some of these counselors are still using the teachings of those you correctly label as "demonic influences."Other psychologists have "come out" with the same concern for how they have been trained, and what they have learned in practices that span several decades.More recently, the Transgender movement has shown that "science" has very little to do with an utterly emotional, anti-science practice. So, we have to make sure we've gutted the structure of psychology/psychotherapy.There is, however, the often seen reference to the “Science” of psychology. There's a fascinating article entitled The Puzzle of Paul Meehl: An intellectual history of research criticism in psychology (i.e., checking them out from the perspective of real science [https://bit.ly/4ihy1qX]).Professor Andrew Gelman writes, "There's nothing wrong with Meehl. He's great. The Puzzle of Paul Meehl is that everything we're saying now, all this stuff about the problems with Psychological Science and PPNAS and Ted Talks and all that, Paul Meehl was saying 50 years ago. And it was no secret. So how is it that all this was happening, in plain sight, and now here we are?"Meehl concluded his 1967 article by saying, "Some of the more horrible examples of this process would require the combined analytic and reconstructive efforts of Carnap, Hempel, and Popper to unscramble the logical relationships of theories and hypotheses to evidence. Meanwhile our eager-beaver researcher, undismayed by logic-of-science considerations and relying blissfully on the ‘exactitude' of modem statistical hypothesis-testing, has produced a long publication list and been promoted to a full professorship. In terms of his contribution to the enduring body of psychological knowledge, he has done hardly anything."We will pray that as you devise your way, the Lord will direct your steps further.

This week, the gals are diving into the latest buzz, from the mysterious new ‘menty B' taking the spotlight according to Republican lawmakers. Find out if you have it!  Plus, the astronauts stuck in space for months might finally have a way back to Earth, but honestly, who wants to return? Spoiler alert: not them. Meanwhile, Kanye West and Kim Kardashian are at it again, this time over a spicy new track featuring America's favorite trafficker, Mr. Diddy himself, and their daughter, North West. And if you're exploring new experiences, you might want to stock up on poppers while you still can—get the scoop on all the hot topics this week!

Pop some popcorn and loosen your belts because this week's episode of Butt Honestly! Dr. Carlton and Dangilo are back with their unfiltered thoughts on the popper ban (because how dare they), and they're setting the record straight on U=U—what it means and how it works. Plus, we're diving headfirst into some juicy drama with a vengeful update in the saga of Trampage and acsteamy Butt Dial from a listener fresh off their first Atlantis Cruise. Let's just say it's wetter than the open seas!Since March is Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month (and yes, we're rocking that blue!), the guys are dropping some knowledge to help you keep your backdoor in check.And because you can't get enough, our Hit It and Quit It segment is BACK with five scorching questions:What are the signs of colon cancer? A listener's feeling backed up and wondering if it's more than just a bad burrito.I'm a top, but I can't finish while topping—what gives? One frustrated listener is desperate to bust a nut without the help of his hands.Anal Botox for fissures—is it brilliant or a one-way ticket to Shartsville? Someone's worried about accidentally turning their ass into a Slip ‘N Slide, and Dr. Carlton's here to ease the fear.Truvada and kidney function—is every other day dosing a good idea? A listener's doc recommended it, but does that even make sense?I want TRT, but my T levels are just above the low range—how do I convince my doc? We're talking low energy, no sex drive, and gaining weight. The guys give out tips on making your case.Plus, we've got a listener question that takes a hard look at the realities of hookups that might involve BB—how do you assess risk when you're not entirely sure how compliant someone is with their meds? Dr. Carlton and Dangilo tackle the tricky topic with their signature blend of honesty and humor.And just when you think it can't get steamier, we've got an Atlantis Cruise story that's as hot as it is scandalous. To top it all off, the guys wrap things up with their Love Lounge of the Week—a little sweetness to balance out the spice.Hit play and hold on tight—this episode's gonna leave you breathless!Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Acclaimed actress Teresa Palmer joins The Art of Kindness with Robert Peterpaul to discuss uplifting others, acts of kindness from Emily Blunt and Ryan Gosling, her new show Mix Tape and more. Teresa Palmer is a globally recognized performer who has been nominated for multiple Best Actress awards, including Critics Choice and many others from her home country in Australia. You'll likely recognize Teresa from her extensive onscreen work, often alongside some of the most acclaimed talents in the industry. She shared the screen with Cate Blanchett and Christian Bale in Knight of Cups. Appeared alongside Andrew Garfield in Mel Gibson's Oscar-nominated film Hacksaw Ridge, with Danielle Radcliffe in December Boys and Adam Sandler and Keri Russel in Bedtime Stories... the list goes on. According to IMDb, some other most popular credits are I Am Number Four,Warm Bodies and Take Me Home Tonight. More recently, you may have spotted Teresa wielding a sword in the SAG Award-winning blockbuster The Fall Guy, starring Ryan Gosling, Emily Blunt, and Hannah Waddingham. And that's not even touching on her TV career, which most recently includes leading the cast of the cult hit A Discovery of Witches. Teresa's TV work continues with The Last Anniversary, an adaptation of Liane Moriarty's book, and the show that brought us together: Mix Tape. Follow Teresa: @teresapalmer Follow us: @artofkindnesspod / @robpeterpaul youtube.com/@artofkindnesspodcast Support the show! (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/theaok) Got kindness tips or stories? Want to just say hi? Please email us: artofkindnesspodcast@gmail.com Music: "Awake" by Ricky Alvarez & "Sunshine" by Lemon Music Studio. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today on What's My Frame I'm joined by the incredible, Marci Liroff. Marci has been involved with filmmakers as a casting director, producer, and acting coach for the last 40+ years. Her extensive credits as a casting director span more than 60 films and several television series.In 2019, Marci completed an extensive training course with the premier Intimacy Coordinator, Amanda Blumenthal of Intimacy Professionals Association (IPA) and is a Certified Intimacy Coordinator. Current credits range from indie films to tv series. She was the IC the Colin Farrell Apple + series Sugar and on the second and third seasons of the STARZ series, Hightown. She spent nine months on location working on the series.Her casting experience is vast. While working at the renowned casting office of Fenton-Feinberg Casting she, along with Mike Fenton, cast such films as Bob Clark's A Christmas Story and Porky's; the Academy Award-nominated Poltergeist; Steven Spielberg's E.T.- The Extra Terrestrial and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and Ridley Scott's Blade Runner.After establishing her own casting company in 1983, MARCI LIROFF CASTING, Marci cast several successful films including Footloose, St. Elmo's Fire, Pretty in Pink, The Iron Giant, The Spitfire Grill, Untamed Heart, Freaky Friday, Mean Girls, Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, Mr. Popper's Penguins, Vampire Academy, Magic Camp and The Sublime and Beautiful, which she produced as well.As an ally to the LGBTQIA + community, Marci has supported the national group GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network) which works to ensure that LGBTQIA + students are able to learn and grow in a school environment free from bullying and harassment. Liroff has coached their student ambassadors along with the president of the organization, Eliza Byard, for their yearly GLSEN event.Marci is a proud member of The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, The Teamsters 399 and The Casting Society of America, CSA, where she served on the Board of Governors.Marci Liroff ICIntimacy Coordinator ResourcesStandards and Protocols for the Use of Intimacy Coordinators--What's My Frame, hosted by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Laura Linda Bradley⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Join the WMF creative community now!Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@whatsmyframe⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IMDb⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠What's My Frame? official site⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠What's My Frame? merch⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

https://youtu.be/ad5KEuKz1a8 Podcast audio: How does science work, and how does it differ from religion or pseudo-science? According to Karl Popper's “falsificationism,” science, unlike religion and pseudo-science, doesn't claim certainty; it aims only to disprove its hypotheses, and this is the source of its rationality. Popper proposed his theory as an alternative to the view that science distinguishes itself by proving its conclusions inductively. In this lecture, Mike Mazza discuss the reasons behind Popper's anti-inductivism and falsificationism and how they undercut the rationality of science. Recorded live on June 16 in Anaheim, CA as part of OCON 2024.

Lori is joined by Steve Popper, who covers the Knicks for Newsday, to break down the Knicks loss to the Celtics and their struggles against elite teams.

Join Dr. Pamela A. Popper as she delves into the intricate relationship between cognitive function and Alzheimer's disease. Learn about the latest research, prevention strategies, and how to support brain health effectively. Discover ways to enhance cognitive function and delay the onset of Alzheimer's. #BrainHealth #AlzheimersPrevention #CognitiveFunction

Join Dr. Joshua Helman, Dr. Pamela A. Popper, and Dr. Antonio Jimenez as they discuss the synergy between whole foods and evidence-based medicine. Learn how combining these approaches can naturally empower your health. #WholeFoods #EvidenceBasedMedicine #NaturalHealth

Nick gasped. Big deal! The Dark Empath lives and he feels. Open the box and win, but not money. Nice shot, Spielberg. Also thanks to big Javier for sending us mead and beer. We'll have a taste test soon! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The first part of my discussion of the differing visions of science and how scientific knowledge "grows" (or not) according to Thomas Kuhn vs Karl Popper as outlined in this chapter of "The Beginning of Infinity". Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" explains the concept of a "paradigm" and "paradigm shifts" comparing "revolutionary" and "normal" periods of science. Kuhn's work remains the most cited in the social sciences and so far more people - especially in academia - are familiar with his work that Popper's. What explains this? What does Kuhn have to say? And what does a "critical rationalist" perspective on the growth of knowledge have to say in response to Kuhn?

Dr. Pamela A. Popper provides valuable insights on how to effectively navigate the healthcare system. Learn practical tips to become a more informed and empowered healthcare consumer. #HealthcareGuide #PatientEmpowerment #HealthNavigation

Dr. John A. McDougall and Dr. Pamela A. Popper reveal the secrets to longevity through whole food diets and integrative health practices. Learn how plant-powered nutrition can enhance your vitality and wellness. #Longevity #PlantBased #IntegrativeHealth

As whores for criticism, we wanted to have Kasra on to discuss his essay The Deutschian Deadend (https://www.bitsofwonder.co/p/the-deutschian-deadend). Kasra claims that Popper and Deutsch are fundamentally wrong in some important ways, and that many of their ideas will forever remain in the "footnotes of the history of philosophy". Does he change our mind or do we change his? Follow Kasra on twitter (https://x.com/kasratweets) and subscribe to his blog, Bits of Wonder (https://www.bitsofwonder.co/p/the-deutschian-deadend). We discuss Has Popper had of a cultural impact? The differences between Popper, Deutsch, and Deutsch's bulldogs. Is observation really theory laden? The hierarchy of reliability: do different disciplines have different methods of criticism? The ladder of abstractions The difference between Popper and Deutsch on truth and abstraction The Deutschian community's reaction to the essay References Bruce Neilson's podcast on verification and falsification: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/episode-61-a-critical-rationalist-defense/id1503194218?i=1000621362624 Popper on certainty: Chapter 22. Analytical Remarks on Certainty in Objective Knowledge Quotes By the nature of Deutsch and Popper's ideas being abstract, this essay will also necessarily be abstract. To combat this, let me ground the whole essay in a concrete empirical bet: Popper's ideas about epistemology, and David Deutsch's extensions of them, will forever remain in the footnotes of the history of philosophy. Popper's falsificationism, which was the main idea that he's widely known for today, will continue to remain the only thing that he's widely known for. The frustrating fact that Wittgenstein is widely regarded as a more influential philosopher than Popper will continue to remain true. Critical rationalism will never be widely recognized as the “one correct epistemology,” as the actual explanation (or even the precursor to an explanation) of knowledge, progress, and creativity. Instead it will be viewed, like many philosophical schools before it, as a useful and ambitious project that ultimately failed. In other words, critical rationalism is a kind of philosophical deadend: the Deutschian deadend. - Kasra in the Deutschian Deadend There are many things you can directly observe, and which are “manifestly true” to you: what you're wearing at the moment, which room of your house you're in, whether the sun has set yet, whether you are running out of breath, whether your parents are alive, whether you feel a piercing pain in your back, whether you feel warmth in your palms—and so on and so forth. These are not perfectly certain absolute truths about reality, and there's always more to know about them—but it is silly to claim that we have absolutely no claim on their truth either. I also think there are even such “obvious truths” in the realm of science—like the claim that the earth is not flat, that your body is made of cells, and that everyday objects follow predictable laws of motion. - Kasra in the Deutschian Deadend Deutsch writes: Some philosophical arguments, including the argument against solipsism, are far more compelling than any scientific argument. Indeed, every scientific argument assumes the falsity not only of solipsism, but also of other philosophical theories including any number of variants of solipsism that might contradict specific parts of the scientific argument. There are two different mistakes happening here. First, what Deutsch is doing is assuming a strict logical dependency between any one piece of our knowledge and every other piece of it. He says that our knowledge of science (say, of astrophysics) implicitly relies on other philosophical arguments about solipsism, epistemology, and metaphysics. But anyone who has thought about the difference between philosophy and science recognizes that in practice they can be studied and argued about independently. We can make progress on our understanding of celestial mechanics without making any crucial assumption about metaphysics. We can make progress studying neurons without solving the hard problem of consciousness or the question of free will. - Kasra in the Deutschian Deadend, quoting Deutsch on Solipsism At that time I learnt from Popper that it was not scientifically disgraceful to have one's hypothesis falsified. That was the best news I had had for a long time. I was persuaded by Popper, in fact, to formulate my electrical hypotheses of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission so precisely and rigorously that they invited falsification - and, in fact, that is what happened to them a few years later, very largely by my colleagues and myself, when in 1951 we started to do intra- cellular recording from motoneurones. Thanks to my tutelage by Popper, I was able to accept joyfully this death of the brain-child which I had nurtured for nearly two decades and was immediately able to contribute as much as I could to the chemical transmission story which was the Dale and Loewi brain-child. - John C. Eccles on Popper, All Life is Problem Solving, p.12 In order to state the problem more clearly, I should like to reformulate it as follows. We may distinguish here between three types of theory. First, logical and mathematical theories. Second, empirical and scientific theories. Third, philosophical or metaphysical theories. -Popper on the "hierarchy of reliability", C&R p.266 Socials Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link Become a patreon subscriber here (https://www.patreon.com/Increments). Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here (https://ko-fi.com/increments). Click dem like buttons on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ) Are you a solipsist? If so, send yourself an email over to incrementspodcast@gmail.com. Special Guest: Kasra.

The second in the series on "The Myth of the Framework" paper. Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction with some reflections on Joe Rogan and Gad Saad 05:14 Section IVa reading - on “Confrontations” 06:32 Section IVa reflection 09:48 Section IVb reading 10:17 Section IVb reflection 12:14 Section IVc reading - tolerance and respect 13:26 Section IV c reflection on Herodotus and tolerance 15:08 Section IV d reading. When should a discussion reach agreement? 16:39 Section IV d reflection. Quibbling with Popper? True Theories or Best Explanations? 28:54 Section IV e reading Goodwill 30:00 Section IV e Reflection on Goodwill, courtesy and politeness. And an anecdote about “professors”. 36:54 Interlude: Popper's Introduction to “The Myth of the Framework” - expertise and authority 40:00 Section V a Reading Clash of civilisations 40:56 Section V a Reflection (including remarks on Piers Morgan and Tucker Carlson) 44:00 Section V b “Culture Clash” the impact on Greek Philosophy and Rationality - Reading and reflection interleaved. 57:15 Section VI a Reading - How we make the world understandable to ourselves 57:55 Section VI a Reflection on the task of “reason”. 59:23 Section VI b Reading: The invention of explanations and the two components of rationality. 1:00:13 Secton VI b Reflection on rationality 1:03:40 Section VI c Popper's conjecture on the origins of the critical method I 1:05:08 Section VI c Reflection on Hesiod's Theogony. 1:07:05 Section VI d Reading Popper's conjecture part II 1:08:08 Reflection on Popper's Conjecture 1:09:04 Section VI e Reading on Anixmander's theory 1:10:12 Section VI e Reflection on Anixmander's theory 1:11:25 Section VI f Conjecturing about conjectures and “The Critical Tradition I” 1:12:52 Section VI f Reflections on “The Critical Tradition” 1:13:16 Section VI g The Critical Tradition II 1:14:33 Section VI g Reflections on “The Critical Tradition II” and “schools” of philosophy. 1:15:30 Section VI h The Ionian School 1:16:36 Section VI h Reflections on the modern critical method and thoughts about Aristarchus and Parallax measurements 1:20:50 Section VI I Conclusion

Le paradoxe de la tolérance, formulé par le philosophe autrichien Karl Popper dans son ouvrage La société ouverte et ses ennemis (1945), soulève une question fondamentale sur les limites de la tolérance dans une société démocratique. Il met en lumière le risque qu'une tolérance illimitée puisse, paradoxalement, conduire à la disparition même de la tolérance.1. Énoncé du paradoxePopper affirme que "si une société est infiniment tolérante, elle risque d'être détruite par les intolérants". Autrement dit, si une société accepte sans restriction toutes les idées et opinions, y compris celles prônant l'intolérance et la destruction des valeurs démocratiques, ces forces intolérantes finiront par dominer et supprimer la tolérance elle-même.Ce paradoxe suggère qu'une société ouverte et tolérante doit établir des limites à la tolérance, notamment envers les idéologies qui cherchent à la détruire. Popper ne préconise pas une suppression immédiate des idées intolérantes, mais il insiste sur la nécessité de les confronter par le débat rationnel. Toutefois, si ces idées se montrent imperméables à la raison et incitent à la violence ou à la suppression des droits fondamentaux, alors la société doit légitimement interdire leur expression et leur diffusion.2. Les implications du paradoxeLe paradoxe de la tolérance soulève des questions cruciales pour les démocraties modernes, notamment en matière de liberté d'expression. Jusqu'où une société démocratique doit-elle tolérer des discours ou des mouvements qui remettent en cause ses principes fondamentaux, comme l'égalité, la liberté et le respect des droits humains ?En d'autres termes, faut-il tolérer les idées totalitaires, racistes ou extrémistes sous prétexte de liberté d'opinion ? Popper soutient que si ces idées ne sont pas contrôlées, elles peuvent prendre de l'ampleur et miner les bases de la démocratie, rendant impossible toute cohabitation pacifique.3. Application contemporaineAujourd'hui, le paradoxe de Popper est souvent invoqué dans les débats sur les discours de haine, l'extrémisme politique et la censure sur les réseaux sociaux. Il sert d'argument pour justifier des lois contre les discours incitant à la haine ou à la violence, tout en soulevant la difficulté de fixer les limites sans compromettre la liberté d'expression légitime.Le paradoxe de la tolérance met en évidence une tension inhérente aux sociétés démocratiques : pour préserver un espace de liberté, elles doivent parfois imposer des restrictions. Cela signifie qu'une tolérance absolue peut conduire à sa propre disparition, rendant nécessaire une vigilance et des mesures adaptées face aux menaces intolérantes. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

On this episode of Chargers Weekly, host Matt “Money” Smith is joined by beat reporter Daniel Popper from The Athletic to recap the latest news involving LA and the entire NFL. They recap Head Coach Jim Harbaugh's first year as Head Coach, preview how General Manager Joe Hortiz will attack the 2025 offseason, and Popper gives his plan for how the Bolts should handle the draft & free agency.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What can ancient philosophers teach you about exercise, economics, and the myth of celebrity?Join the team at the IAI for three articles about life, ideas, and status in ancient Greece. Written by Etienne Helmer, Steve Fuller, and Sabrina B. Little, these articles cover a range of thought-provoking concepts, including; why Plato wants you to go for a run, how Athenian values can improve our current economic predicament, and what we can learn from the (perhaps embellished) stories of Socrates and Jesus.Sabrina B. Little is an Assistant Professor at Christopher Newport University and the author of "The Examined Run: Why Good People Make Better Runners," published by Oxford University Press. Sabrina's research is in virtue ethics, classical philosophy, and moral psychology. She is also a 5-time US Champion and World Championship silver medallist in trail and ultramarathon running.Steve Fuller is a postmodern philosopher, Professor of Sociology at the University of Warwick, and the author of "Popper vs. Kuhn," and "Dissent Over Descent: Intelligent Design's Challenge to Darwinism."Etienne Helmer is a philosopher at the University of Puerto Rico, specialising in the philosophy of economics, politics, and the sociology of ancient Greece.To witness such debates live buy tickets for our upcoming festival: https://howthelightgetsin.org/festivals/And visit our website for many more articles, videos, and podcasts like this one: https://iai.tv/You can find everything we referenced here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

IT IS THURSDAY!!!! You know what that means- ya girls are feeling YAPPY! Our intro consists of the best and the worst of Dunkin, heart break when they take your favorite items off the menu, mangos, mango juul pods, and only God knows what else! Before long, Morgan begins to tell us the case of Popper's Poltergeist. The 1958 Ghoul that terrorized the Herrman Family, along with Duke's Parapsychologist, the local Detective, the news, the public, and even random minsters with Swords that they stab in the ground dramatically to cleanse a house... look- we LOVE a drama queen. But, here's the catch- all this sh*t went down in ONE MONTH. Moving on... Taylar tells the horrific case of the Murders of Danny and Kathy Freeman and the abduction, torture, and murders of Ashley Freeman and Lauria Bible from Welch, OK December 30, 1999. Which (only after 17 years of the Craig County SD, along with the OSBI, kicking rocks for shits and gigs and Tommy Lynn Sells, of course, having to throw his two cents in) was finally solved, thanks to a new sheriff kinda giving a shit!!! We will talk to you besties next week!! Love ya SO BIG!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Cindy Spoonby (Syd Steinberg, The Bedtime Podcast) walks us into the hellscape of catering.  Syd Steinberg: @sydsteinbo -- SHOW INFORMATION Mega HQ Get ad free + bonus content with MEGA PREMIUM Support Us on Patreon Instagram: @MegaThePodcast Twitter: @MegaThePodcast Follow Holly and Greg Holly Laurent: Twitter | Instagram Greg Hess: Twitter | Instagram Music by Julie B. Nichols Edited by Brian Biancardi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

I take another deep dive into a deeply insightful and original lecture by Karl Popper: The Myth of the Framework. In this first part (of 4) I spend most of the episode unpacking our motivations, Popper's own thoughts on his success in combating bad ideologies and the purposes of discussion. Indeed this piece can be considered an instruction manual for discussions: how to have them and why. Below: timestamps for this episode: 00:00 Purpose of this new series 05:41 Woke, DEI and Popper 10:47 Popper in his own words on his “success” 12:23: Marxism and Relativism as “ideas that survive” 19:47 Popper in the modern day 22:30 Frameworks and “echo chambers”. 26:05 Some personal anecdotes and reflections 32:43: Defending an idea is different to explaining one. 35:00 Personal anecdotes. 47:47 Discussions 49:33 Why do we talk to each other? :) 59:13 The Myth of the Framework. Section 1 1:01:04 Commentary Section 1 1:03:33 The Myth of the Framework Section 2 1:04:29 Commentary Section 2 1:06:15 The Myth of the Framework Section 3a 1:07:07 Commentary Section 3a 1:12:12 The Myth of the Framework Section 3b 1:13:40 Commentary Section 3b 1:16:39 Should we “talk” to North Korea? 1:26:12 The West and its enemies 1:28:42 The Myth of the Framework Section 3c 1:29:59 Commentary Section 3c 1:32:25 The Myth of the Framework Section 3d 1:33:24 Closing Reflection

G.W.F. Hegel was widely seen as the greatest philosopher of his age. Ever since, his work has shaped debates about issues as varied as religion, aesthetics and metaphysics. His most lasting contribution was his vision of history and politics. In Hegel's World Revolutions (Princeton UP, 2023), Richard Bourke returns to Hegel's original arguments, clarifying their true import and illuminating their relevance to contemporary society. Bourke shows that central to Hegel's thought was his anatomy of the modern world. On the one hand he claimed that modernity was a deliverance from subjection, but on the other he saw it as having unleashed the spirit of critical reflection. Bourke explores this predicament in terms of a series of world revolutions that Hegel believed had ushered in the rise of civil society and the emergence of the constitutional state. Bourke interprets Hegel's thought, with particular reference to his philosophy of history, placing it in the context of his own time. He then recounts the reception of Hegel's political ideas, largely over the course of the twentieth century. Countering the postwar revolt against Hegel, Bourke argues that his disparagement by major philosophers has impoverished our approach to history and politics alike. Challenging the condescension of leading thinkers—from Heidegger and Popper to Lévi-Strauss and Foucault—the book revises prevailing views of the relationship between historical ideas and present circumstances Richard Bourke is professor of the history of political thought and a fellow of King's College at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of a number of books, including Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke (Princeton). Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel. Twitter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

This lecture discusses key ideas from the 20th century philosopher Karl Popper's article "Towards A Rational Theory Of Tradition", found in his book Conjectures and Refutations. It focuses specifically on his discussion of the various social functions that traditions play in human life, a significant part of which is to provide predictability. Popper also discusses why utopian and idealist plans to erase current conditions of society and start anew are bound to fail To support my ongoing work, go to my Patreon site - www.patreon.com/sadler If you'd like to make a direct contribution, you can do so here - www.paypal.me/ReasonIO - or at BuyMeACoffee - www.buymeacoffee.com/A4quYdWoM You can find over 3000 philosophy videos in my main YouTube channel - www.youtube.com/user/gbisadler Purchase Popper's Conjectures and Refutations - https://amzn.to/4dFvJjA

On the afternoon of February 9, 1958, a complaint was called into Long Island's seventh police precinct regarding a series of “strange occurrences” taking place in the caller's home. According to the caller, Lucille Herrmann, for nearly a week the caps and lids of bottles in the basement had been popping off inexplicably, while other bottles and containers were tipping over and spilling their contents for no obvious reason. Elsewhere in the house, items were flying off shelves without the aid of human hands, and toys were breaking without explanation. Not only were the disturbances destructive to the Herrmann's home and property, but they were also psychologically upsetting, since they seemed to be happening on their own.Lucille Herrmann's call to the Seaford Police Department kicked off a two-month-long fascination with what many came to believe was genuine poltergeist activity in the Herrmann's Long Island, NY home. What began as a simple call to the police for assistance quickly escalated into near daily media coverage and interest from a variety of paranormal investigators and skeptics, all determined to identify and explain the cause of the ostensibly supernatural occurrences in what became known as “the house of flying objects.”The Herrmann's case of poltergeist activity is considered by many to be the first modern investigation into poltergeist disturbances and would serve as the inspiration for Stephen Spielberg's 1982 horror film, Poltergeist. Despite the considerable attention, however, the case remains unexplained to this day.Thank you to the Incredible Dave White of Bring Me the Axe Podcast for research and Writing support!ReferencesAllen, Tom. 1958. "A haunted house is not a home." Daily News (New York, NY), March 9: 30.Aronson, Harvey. 1958. "Expert sees no hoax in bottle-popping." Newsday, March 7: 3.Associated Press. 1958. "Bottles--all kind--flip their tops." Democrat and Chronicle , February 11: 1.—. 1958. "Bottle tops rout pop." Elmira Star-Gazette, February 23: 1.—. 1958. "Bottles pop, Davy falls for angel." Press and Sun-Bulletin, February 17: 11.Dorman, Michael. 1987. "Ghost stories." Newsday, October 25: 9.Elmira Advertiser. 1958. "Herrmanns' house quiet." Elmira Advertiser, March 27: 4.Kahn, Dave. 1958. "Bottle-popping force shakes our reporter." Newsday, February 24: 3.—. 1958. "Bottle-popping report points to Jimmy." Newsday, May 15: 5.—. 1958. "Experts are working, bottle-pop force isn't." Newsday, February 27: 4.—. 1958. "Flying figurines drive family out of Seaford home." Newsday, February 22: 5.—. 1958. "Has the LI bottle-popping force popped its last." Newsday, March 17: 7.—. 1958. "Jimmy a bottle-popper? No, sasy father." Newsday, February 28: 5.—. 1958. "Our bottle-proper's decision: he's baffled." Newsday, February 25: 5.—. 1958. "'Spirit' gets rough, starts hurling things." Newsday, February 21: 5.—. 1958. "Two more bottles blow tops at LI house." Newsday, February 12: 4.Newsday. 1958. "All's quiet on the bottle front." Newsday, March 3: 5.—. 1958. "Clues remnmain cold in bottle mystery, but bottles get hot." Newsday, February 17: 5.—. 1958. "Expert ponders bottle popping." Newsday, February 15: 10.—. 1958. "Look out! Things are popping again." Newsday, March 4: 5.Nickell, Joe. 2012. The Science of Ghosts: Searching for Spirits of the Dead. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Roll, William G. 1976. The Poltergeist. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.United Press. 1958. "Boy likely was spook, says expert." Press and Sun-Bulletin (Binghamton, NY), May 15: 25.Ziaman, Ronald. 1958. "Teen interviews." Brooklyn Daily, June 26: 14.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.