Podcasts about Popper

Hey, Heal Squad! We're back with Part 2 of our deep dive into all things skin with the one and only Dr. Sandra Lee (aka Dr. Pimple Popper) and this one is for everyone who's ever stared at a mirror wondering: Should I pop this? Dr. Lee answers all your burning skincare questions, starting with Accutane: does it still work, who should take it, and what you need to know before considering it. She also breaks down the safest way to pop a pimple (yes, there is one!) and what to never touch on your own. From blackheads, cysts, and backne to ingrown hairs and extractions, Dr. Pimple Popper explains what's really going on under your skin , and the smart, dermatologist-approved ways to handle it. She even shares the tools and tricks she personally recommends for gentle, effective care. If you've ever wanted a masterclass in healthy skin, this is your guide for healing your skin the right way! HEALERS & HEAL-LINERS:  There's a right way to pop a pimple. Dr. Lee shares her dermatologist-approved method for safe extractions, including when to pop, when to stop, and how to keep your skin calm afterward. Not every bump is a breakout. From cysts to ingrown hairs and “backne,” Dr. Lee helps us understand what's really happening under the skin, and how to tell if it's something that needs a doctor's attention. Less picking, more patience. She breaks down the do's and don'ts of extractions, reminding us that prevention, not pressure, is the key to clear, scar-free skin. -- HEAL SQUAD SOCIALS IG: https://www.instagram.com/healsquad/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@healsquadxmaria HEAL SQUAD RESOURCES: Heal Squad Website:https://www.healsquad.com/ Heal Squad x Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/HealSquad/membership Maria Menounos Website: https://www.mariamenounos.com My Curated Macy's Page: Shop My Macy's Storefront EMR-Tek Red Light: https://emr-tek.com/discount/Maria30 for 30% off Airbnb: https://www.airbnb.com/  Briotech: https://shopbriotech.com/ Use Code: HEALSQUAD for 20% off  Join In-Person Heal Retreat Waitlist! https://mariamenounos.myflodesk.com/heal-retreat-waitlist GUEST RESOURCES:  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drpimplepopper/?hl=en  YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgrsF4TYwmrV0QsXb8AoeHQ  Website: https://drpimplepopper.com/  SLMD Skincare: https://slmdskincare.com/  Show: https://www.mylifetime.com/shows/dr-pimple-popper-breaking-out  ABOUT MARIA MENOUNOS: Emmy Award-winning journalist, TV personality, actress, 2x NYT best-selling author, former pro-wrestler and brain tumor survivor, Maria Menounos' passion is to see others heal and to get better in all areas of life. ABOUT HEAL SQUAD x MARIA MENOUNOS: A daily digital talk-show that brings you the world's leading healers, experts, and celebrities to share groundbreaking secrets and tips to getting better in all areas of life. DISCLAIMER: This Podcast and all related content (published or distributed by or on behalf of Maria Menounos or http://Mariamenounos.com and http://healsquad.com) is for informational purposes only and may include information that is general in nature and that is not specific to you. Any information or opinions provided by guest experts or hosts featured within website or on Company's Podcast are their own; not those of Maria Menounos or the Company. Accordingly, Maria Menounos and the Company cannot be responsible for any results or consequences or actions you may take based on such information or opinions. This podcast is presented for exploratory purposes only. Published content is not intended to be used for preventing, diagnosing, or treating a specific illness. If you have, or suspect you may have, a health-care emergency, please contact a qualified health care professional for treatment.

Hey, Heal Squad! It's a spooktacular week, and we're talking about something that haunts us all… pimples! Yep, nothing's scarier than a breakout right before an event, but have no fear, because Dr. Sandra Lee (aka Dr. Pimple Popper) is here to help us face our skin fears once and for all. In this episode, Dr. Lee and Maria dive into what's really behind acne, and spoiler: it's not just stress or skincare, it's your hormones. She breaks down the science behind breakouts, how to tell the difference between whiteheads, blackheads, and cysts, and what actually works when it comes to treating them. They also unpack why acne scars are so hard to treat, the truth about popular products like Retin-A and benzoyl peroxide, and why you don't need to spend thousands to heal your skin. It's everything you wish your skincare routine came with: real answers and zero judgment.

In this episode I look at Reno's phenomenal examination of the gods as shared loves and social values. I focus on his analysis of Popper, Hayek and Durkheim.

Back for another Friday down club. Talking through how many is TOO many, Popper mishaps, more interesting facts, and cushion love. "As heard in the pod: check your eligibility at MedExpress.co.uk and grab £40 off with code COSH!" Just in case here is the Nord one -

Daniel Popper, who covers the Los Angeles Chargers for The Athletic, joins The Alec Lewis Show to talk about the Thursday Night Football matchup between the Vikings and Chargers. They discuss the Vikings' weird statistical profile, Carson Wentz, Justin Herbert, the Chargers' OL situation, how both teams are going to want to attack and much more. This show is presented by First Resource Bank, which serves the needs of small businesses, entrepreneurs, and individuals in the Twin Cities and surrounding areas. For more information, here is their website:   https://myfrbank.com/    And here is a link to all of their locations!   https://myfrbank.com/locations-hours/    Sponsored By: UNRL (unrl.com (http://unrl.com/)) — Drop No. 1: https://www.unrl.com/pages/unrl-x-nfl    Sponsorship inquiries: aleclewis54@gmail.com 

Back to basics baby. We're doing a couple introductory episodes on Popper's philosophy of science, following Chapter 10 of Conjectures and Refutations. We start with Popper's theory of content: what makes a good scientific theory? Can we judge some theories as better than others before we even run any empirical tests? Should we be looking for theories with high probability? Ben and Vaden also return to their roots in another way, and get into a nice little fight about how content relates to Bayesianism. We discuss Vaden's skin care routine If you find your friend's lost watch and proceed to lose it, are you responsible for the watch? Empirical vs logical content Whether and how content can be measured and compared How content relates to probability Quotes My aim in this lecture is to stress the significance of one particular aspect of science—its need to grow, or, if you like, its need to progress. I do not have in mind here the practical or social significance of this need. What I wish to discuss is rather its intellectual significance. I assert that continued growth is essential to the rational and empirical character of scientific knowledge; that if science ceases to grow it must lose that character. It is the way of its growth which makes science rational and empirical; the way, that is, in which scientists discriminate between available theories and choose the better one or (in the absence of a satisfactory theory) the way they give reasons for rejecting all the available theories, thereby suggesting some of the conditions with which a satisfactory theory should comply. You will have noticed from this formulation that it is not the accumulation of observations which I have in mind when I speak of the growth of scientific knowledge, but the repeated overthrow of scien- tific theories and their replacement by better or more satisfactory ones. This, incidentally, is a procedure which might be found worthy of attention even by those who see the most important aspect of the growth of scientific knowledge in new experiments and in new observations. - C&R p. 291 Thus it is my first thesis that we can know of a theory, even before it has been tested, that if it passes certain tests it will be better than some other theory. My first thesis implies that we have a criterion of relative potential satisfactoriness, or of potential progressiveness, which can be applied to a theory even before we know whether or not it will turn out, by the passing of some crucial tests, to be satisfactory in fact. This criterion of relative potential satisfactoriness (which I formu- lated some time ago,2 and which, incidentally, allows us to grade the- ories according to their degree of relative potential satisfactoriness) is extremely simple and intuitive. It characterizes as preferable the theory which tells us more; that is to say, the theory which contains the greater amount of empirical information or content; which is logically stronger; which has the greater explanatory and predictive power; and which can therefore be more severely tested by comparing predicted facts with observations. In short, we prefer an interesting, daring, and highly informative theory to a trivial one. - C&R p.294 Let a be the statement ‘It will rain on Friday'; b the statement ‘It willbe fine on Saturday'; and ab the statement ‘It will rain on Friday and itwill be fine on Saturday': it is then obvious that the informative contentof this last statement, the conjunction ab, will exceed that of its com-ponent a and also that of its component b. And it will also be obviousthat the probability of ab (or, what is the same, the probability that abwill be true) will be smaller than that of either of its components. Writing Ct(a) for ‘the content of the statement a', and Ct(ab) for ‘thecontent of the conjunction a and b', we have (1) Ct(a) = Ct(b). This contrasts with the corresponding law of the calculus of probability, (2) p(a) >= p(ab)

This is the extended "director's cut" of a talk delivered for "RatFest 2025" (next year to be "Conjecture Con"). This also serves as a supplement to my "Doom Debates" interview which can be found here: https://youtu.be/koubXR0YL4A?si=483M6SPOKwbQYmzb It is simply assumed some version of "Bayesian reasoning" is how AI will "create" knowledge. This misconception permeates the https://ai-2027.com paper, as well as Bostrom and Yudkowsky's work on this, as well as that of every other AI "Doomer" and even on the other extreme the so-called "AI-Accelerationists". All of that indicates a deep misconception about how new explanations are generated which comes from a deep misconception about how science works because almost no one in the field of AI seems to think the *philosophy of* science is even relevant. I explain what has gone wrong: 00:00 Introduction 09:14 The Big Questions and the new Priesthoods 18:40 Nick Bostrom and Superintelligence 25:10 If anyone builds it, everyone dies and Yudkowsky. 33:32 Prophecy, Inevitability, Induction and Bayesianism. 41:42 Popper, Kuhn, Feyerabend and Lakatos. 49:40 AI researchers ignore The Philosophy of Science. 58:46 A new test for AGI from Sam Altman and David Deutsch? 1:03:35 Accelerationists, Doomers and “Everyone dies”. 1:10:21 Conclusions 1:15:35 Audience Questions

Dan revisits his chat with dermatologist-turned-global-sensation Dr. Sandra Lee, better known as Dr. Pimple Popper. She shares how a simple blackhead video blew up the internet, and what it's really like to build a business on pus and pimples (while still protecting her patients). Plus, she bursts some skin myth bubbles. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Here is an expanded, multi-act play dramatizing the philosophical conflict and personal effort to foster a paradigm shift in AIDS research. The Paradigm Shift: A Play in Three Acts Here are the three Characters Rebecca Culshaw – Mathematician and critic of AIDS orthodoxy Karl Popper – Philosopher of science, logic-driven Thomas Kuhn – Philosopher of science, historically minded The Colleague – A skeptical scientist (optional for Act II-III) Act I – The Summoning Setting: Culshaw's cluttered study at midnight. A window is open, letting in a cold breeze. Culshaw is hunched over papers. Suddenly, mysterious figures materialize. Popper (stepping closer): Rebecca, do you know why we have come? Culshaw (startled but curious): I sense you bear advice. Kuhn (smiling softly): Your struggle echoes in the halls of scientific history. Few have challenged entrenched paradigms and lived to see the world change. Culshaw: The AIDS narrative is unyielding. Criticism draws scorn, not reasoned dialogue. How do I crack this shell? Popper: Treat the theory as a scientific hypothesis. Identify its core claims. What would it take to disprove them? Ask the establishment this at every turn. Kuhn: Yet do not forget, paradigm shifts require more than refutation. You must nurture a community—make them feel the cracks and offer a new framework. Popper: Truth is not a popularity contest, Kuhn. Kuhn: But consensus rules until new puzzles make the old vision unbearable. Culshaw: You mean I need both: a demonstration of failure and a replacement vision? Popper & Kuhn (together): Precisely. Fade out. Act II – Testing the Fortress Setting: A scientific conference. Culshaw stands before a skeptical audience, including The Colleague. Culshaw: Suppose key HIV tests predict nothing about immune decline. Suppose AIDS definitions are shifting sands. What, then, does our theory become? Colleague: You twist anomalies into attacks. What of the millions of lives believed saved? Popper: (now imagined at her shoulder) Demand evidence. Show that lives were saved by measurable intervention, not just by post hoc rationalization. Kuhn: Frame your findings as questions that the current theory cannot answer. Let the audience witness the struggle. Culshaw: Here are cases where test and disease do not align, where drugs harm, where predictions fail. This is not a collection of quirks—it is a crisis. Colleague: Science will patch these gaps. Popper: Only if the patches themselves are testable—not ad hoc excuses. Kuhn: And as the failures accumulate and the story loses coherence, your role shifts. Offer new lenses through which researchers can view their puzzles anew. Culshaw: I will. Here is a framework where immune collapse arises from multifactor exposures, not a virus. Here predictions become clear, testable, vulnerable to refutation. Colleague (uncertain): It is bold, but is it enough? Popper: Make it falsifiable. Kuhn: Make it irresistible. Fade to black. Act III – Turning the Tide The Setting: Culshaw's study, months later. She pores over data. Papers about her new model are being discussed worldwide. Popper: Are your ideas withstanding scrutiny? Culshaw: Some have tried to refute them. Some admit their theories don't predict as well. Kuhn: Is a community embracing the new framework? Culshaw: Slowly. Some see the anomaly pattern. Some consider new research. The old guard resists—naturally. Popper: The measure is not in popularity, but precision. Do not shy from critique. Kuhn: And always tend to the new paradigm's coherence. Invite others to build upon it. A real shift is communal. Culshaw: Thank you, Karl. Thank you, Thomas. Let science decide—through rigor, vision, and openness—not through the chill of consensus alone. Popper and Kuhn fade, their voices echoing: Popper: Progress thrives on falsification. Kuhn: And transformation blooms with imagination. Culshaw, alone, presses onward, her desk now a beacon among the cluttered battleground of ideas. End.  

Episode Description In this thought-provoking episode of Keeping Abreast, Dr. Jenn Simmons welcomes Dr. Pam Popper—author, educator, and tireless advocate for informed health. From her own personal health struggles to becoming a leading voice for medical reform, Dr. Popper shares why personal responsibility and lifestyle choices are at the heart of true wellness.Together, they challenge conventional ideas about weight, health, and overdiagnosis, while exposing how insurance companies and profit motives distort patient care. Dr. Popper also explores innovative approaches to breast cancer screening and highlights powerful stories of radical remission that prove the body's capacity to heal when supported.This is an empowering conversation for anyone ready to question the system, reclaim their health, and take ownership of their future.

Épisode 1366 : Youpi c'est lundi et on vous a préparé un joli récap des dernières actualités social media pour bien commencer la semaineTikTok, n'est plus tout à fait chinois.Après des années de tensions diplomatiques, de menaces de bannissement et de batailles judiciaires, un accord vient d'être signé.Un accord qui change la donne.TikTok US va devenir une entité à part entière, dirigée majoritairement par des investisseurs américains.Une plateforme qui tournera sur une copie sécurisée de l'algorithme chinois.Un TikTok made in USA.Que faut-il comprendre de ce deal historique ?Quelles conséquences pour les utilisateurs et les marques ?Décryptage.Contexte : 4 ans de tensions géopolitiquesDepuis 2020, TikTok est dans le viseur des autorités américaines.Du risque de propagande chinoise à celui de propagande américaineQuelles conséquences pour les marques ?Meta déploie les Comptes Ado sur Facebook et MessengerAprès Instagram en 2024, ce sont désormais Facebook et Messenger qui activent automatiquement les Comptes Ado pour tous les jeunes utilisateurs en France.Une activation automatique et non désactivableTous les profils d'adolescents basculent désormais en mode Ado. C'est automatique. Et surtout, impossible de revenir en arrière. Objectif affiché par Meta : une expérience plus sécurisée et encadrée.Le dispositif est déjà en place sur InstagramCe n'est pas une nouveauté totale. En 2024, Meta avait déjà lancé ce format sur Instagram. Objectif d'Instagram: préparer les jeunes à une utilisation responsable de ses apps tout en montrant Pte blanche aux régulateurs européens.Un contexte de fortes pressionsInstagram créée une trend en autorisant un hack dans le systèmeVous avez sûrement vu Popper ces formats complètements chelous sur Instagram, ces vidéos ultra larges façon top bannières de site web des années 2010. Et bien ça porte un nom, ça s'appelle un format anamorphiqueLe format anamorphique utilise un ratio très étiré (5120 x 1080) inspiré du cinéma et des lentilles anamorphiques qui compriment l'image horizontalement, puis la "déploient" en panoramique. Vu sa taille, le format apparait donc comme un post très très mince (environ 6x moins haut qu'on contenu 4/5/. Ta vidéo apparaît comme un bandeau horizontal très distinctif.Pinterest Presents > Le shopping a de beau jours devant lui Pinterest vient juste de clôturer son évènement annuel « Pinterest Presents » et de grosses annonces ont été faites sur le plan publicitaire.Clairement, on observe un moov très fort vers le shopping, la découvrabilité et… le social commerce pourquoi pas ??Top of Search Ads (en bêta)Mise en valeur des catalogues annonceurs & unités de marque dédiéesLocal Inventory Ads généralisés (Annonces d'inventaire local). . . Le Super Daily est le podcast quotidien sur les réseaux sociaux. Il est fabriqué avec une pluie d'amour par les équipes de Supernatifs. Nous sommes une agence social media basée à Lyon : https://supernatifs.com. Ensemble, nous aidons les entreprises à créer des relations durables et rentables avec leurs audiences. Ensemble, nous inventons, produisons et diffusons des contenus qui engagent vos collaborateurs, vos prospects et vos consommateurs. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Neste episódio de Freud Que Eu Te Escuto, Freud reflete sobre a questão da originalidade científica e reconhece como algumas de suas ideias fundamentais sobre os sonhos já haviam sido intuídas por outros pensadores. Em especial, ele destaca a obra de Josef Popper-Lynkeus, que, de forma independente, antecipou aspectos centrais da noção de censura onírica.Freud escreve:“Partindo do caráter estranho, confuso e insensato que apresentam muitos sonhos, ocorreu-me que o sonho tem de ser assim porque nele luta por exprimir-se algo que tem contra si a resistência de outros poderes da psique. (...) Chamei de censura onírica o poder psíquico que leva em conta essa contradição interior e deforma os impulsos instintuais primitivos do sonho.”E completa:“Mas justamente essa parte essencial de minha Teoria dos Sonhos foi descoberta por Popper-Lynkeus de forma independente.”Neste texto breve, mas revelador, Freud reconhece a importância da “pureza e limpidez moral” do pensador austríaco, ao mesmo tempo em que reafirma a centralidade da censura onírica como chave para compreender a deformação dos conteúdos inconscientes nos sonhos.✨ Apoie este projeto: siga o podcast, avalie e compartilhe com quem também se interessa por Freud e pela psicanálise.

Dávid Popper nemzetközi csellóverseny - Családi Manna Ferencz Gabival 2025. 09. 28. by MannaFM

We're joined by Jonathan Rauch to discuss what it means to be a radical incrementalist, how to foment revolution on geological timescales, and whether Christianity can be a force for good in politics. Can Jon convince angry-Hitchens-atheist Vaden that Christianity has some benefits? Will both Vaden and Ben be at Sunday prayer? Follow Jonathan on his website (https://www.jonathanrauch.com/about.html), at Brookings (https://www.brookings.edu/people/jonathan-rauch/), at The Atlantic (https://www.theatlantic.com/author/jonathan-rauch/) or on Bluesky (https://bsky.app/profile/jonrauch.bsky.social). We discuss The constitution of knowledge and whether it's holding Norms vs laws, and whether we should introduce more laws to codify norms Popper's paradox of tolerance How should liberals respond to illiberalism? Which tactics, if any, should democrats adopt from MAGA to fight MAGA? Sharp Christianity and Christian nationalism Rauch's plea to Christians References The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth (https://www.amazon.com/Constitution-Knowledge-Jonathan-Rauch/dp/0815738862) Cross Purposes: Christianity's Broken Bargain with Democracy (https://www.amazon.com/Cross-Purposes-Christianitys-Bargain-Democracy/dp/0300273541) Errata Jonathan Rauch is the author of nine books, not eight! Socials Follow us on Twitter at @JonRauch, @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link Become a patreon subscriber here (https://www.patreon.com/Increments). Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here (https://ko-fi.com/increments). Click dem like buttons on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ) Anyone in Canada have a basement suite Jonathan could rent for a while? Send your address over to incrementspodcast@gmail.com Special Guest: Jonathan Rauch.

We are together in South Bend and teach a class to PhD students in the Mendoza College of Business at the University of Notre Dame. Our joint teaching experience makes us wonder: What should all doctoral students learn or what should we all teach the next generation of IS students? We come up with Nick's rules for a good PhD education: First, understand what knowledge and inferences are. Second, learn different methods and then deep dive into a primary method. Third, pick a domain and learn its foundations and history. Fourth, develop a mindset of mastery to become the world's expert on your topic. And finally, develop and hone your writing skills.  Episode reading list Bacon, F. (1620/2019). Novum Organum. Anodos. Hume, D. (1748/1998). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. In J. Perry & M. E. Bratman (Eds.), Introduction to Philosophy: Classical and Contemporary Readings (3rd ed., pp. 190-220). Oxford University Press. Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Berente, N., Ivanov, D., & Vandenbosch, B. (2007). Process Compliance and Enterprise Systems Implementation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, Hawaii, pp. 222-231. Castelo, N., Bos, M. W., & Lehmann, D. R. (2019). Task-Dependent Algorithmic Aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), 809-825. Recker, J. (2021). Scientific Research in Information Systems: A Beginner's Guide (2nd ed.). Springer. Mackie, J. L. (1965). Causes and Conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(4), 245-264. Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating Case Study and Survey Research Methods: An Example in Information Systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 112-126. Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What Is This Thing Called Science? (4th ed.). Hackett. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper and Bros. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press. 

Jimmy Kimmel raus, Julia Ruhs abserviert – und plötzlich reden alle über „Zensur“. Doch die Wahrheit ist komplexer. In den USA entscheidet der Markt: Wer keine Quoten und keine jungen Zuschauer mehr bringt, fliegt. In Deutschland dagegen wird sortiert nach Haltung – auch wenn die Quoten stimmen.In dieser Episode sage ich: "Meinungsfreiheit heisst nicht, dass wir alle einer Meinung sind. Meinungsfreiheit heisst, dass wir das Recht haben, nicht übereinzustimmen – und auch die Konsequenzen zu tragen."

Send us a textShe finally got her big BREAK... OUT! Yes I was on a recent episode of Dr Pimple Popper Breaking Out. As you know I've been living & functioning with my psoriasis for as long as I can remember. My journey with Dr Sandra Lee was amazing & its available for you to watch now! Thank for helping me feel even more beautiful in my own skin!Get a personalized video on CameoKeep up with Jessica L'WhorFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/COJessicaLWhorInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/jessicalwhorTwitter: https://twitter.com/jessicalwhorTik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@jessicalwhorWebsite: https://jessicalwhor.comVenmo me to support @jessica-lwhorMake sure to email j.l.whor21@gmail.com OR visit www.Jessicalwhor.com to get me on your calendar! There isn't an event this L'Whor isn't perfect for!

Living out mid-life, trying to avoid the "crisis" part, building a business, and finding purpose. And YES a skincare discussion, too. Bethenny sits down with Dr. Sandra Lee aka Dr. Pimple Popper and Founder of SLMD Skincare.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Curt discusses how philosophy has directly contributed to physics through Bell's theorem, decoherence theory, the hole argument, and more. Meanwhile, via John Norton, we uncover the hidden philosophical assumptions in physics that most scientists don't even realize they're making. As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b9... SUPPORT: Become a YouTube Member (Early Access Videos):    / @theoriesofeverything   Support me on Patreon:   / curtjaimungal   Support me on Crypto: https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkou... Support me on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_... Twitter:   / toewithcurt   Discord Invite:   / discord   Curt's Substack article: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/... John Norton [TOE]:    • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One No...   Neil deGrasse Tyson [TOE]:    • "Philosophers Are USELESS!" Neil & Curt Cl...   How Not to Do Philosophy of Science [article]: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/Good... Jacob Barandes [TOE]:    • The Physicist Who Found Quantum Theory's U...   The Hole Argument: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sp... General covariance and general relativity [paper]: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/pape... Emily Adlam Λ Jacob Barandes [TOE]:    • Harvard Physicist: Why Multiple Universes ...   Eaters of the lotus [paper]: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/pape... John Norton's profile: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/jdno... Hempel (1988) - Oltre il positivismo logico Popper (1963) - Conjectures and Refutations, Ch. 3 Deutsch (1997) - The Fabric of Reality SOCIALS: Guests do not pay to appear. Theories of Everything receives revenue solely from viewer donations, platform ads, and clearly labelled sponsors; no guest or associated entity has ever given compensation, directly or through intermediaries. LINKS MENTIONED: For further reading on these critiques of instrumentalism: #science Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week Bruce take a deep critical rationalist dive into Michael Strevens's book, The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Science, which is an attempt to describe how science is a self-correcting system designed to create knowledge based on explanation. The book is somewhat critical of Popperian falsification, though the reading of Popper presented may be a superficial reading. Bruce describes how Strevens's “iron rule of science” or the idea that we should settle science based on empirical tests overlaps with what Bruce calls “Popper's ratchet,” or the idea that we should strive to move our theories to be more testable and avoid ad hoc saves designed to make our theories less testable.Is there anything we can learn from a (semi) Bayesian / Inductivist like Strevens that we Popperians don't already know?Perhaps more interestingly, Strevens' theory is meant to explain why we got stuck in static societies for so long. How does his theory compared to Deutsch's?

This week, with Popper back from vacation (holiday), the boys return to their roots with Greek Myths, Prince Ali, driving, previous shows (for some reason), the POG Key Phrase and much more.

Falo sobre o Projeto de Lei que quer anistiar quem agiu contra a democracia e as instituições. Baseio-me em texto publicado pelo Prof. Lenio Streck no Conjur (https://www.conjur.com.br/2025-set-04/por-que-qualquer-anistia-para-golpistas-e-inconstitucional).

This week we consider: Is falsification falsifiable? Was Popper a “naive falsificationist”? Why do so many people think he was? (Including at least one of his own students!)Is falsification itself a philosophical theory that makes it immune from falsification? Does the Duhem-Quine problem, or the assertion that theory exist in an interwoven web of other theories, create a problem for falsification? What exactly is falsification anyhow? It's about showing that a theory is false, right? Right? Popper?Bruce considers these questions and more as our infinite journey into epistemology continues.

This week, Red5ve stops by to talk about his Twitch Stream, the Marbles on Stream Community, POG, Star Wars and much more. Popper and Mag's talk about OfferPal/Tapjoy's involvement in "Scamville".

Join Marvin Cash on The Articulate Fly for another insightful Ruch Report with Pennsylvania guide Brendan Ruch, who shares expert techniques for challenging summer fishing conditions. With waters running low and clear across PA, Ruch reveals why subtle surface presentations are outfishing aggressive popper techniques, demonstrating Matt Miles' proven method of creating slack movement that mimics injured insects without spooking selective fish. Learn specific cicada shimmy strategies that trigger strikes when fish are being "sippy" and discover Ruch's go-to subsurface patterns including the Single Nut Job on size 2 hooks and MFC's mini-Sex Dungeon in olive and tan colorations that are producing consistent results. Ruch provides detailed sizing and weight specifications for these productive smallmouth patterns while explaining how to adapt your approach when fishing pressure increases in limited access areas. Whether you're dealing with similar low water conditions or looking to refine your surface fishing techniques, this episode delivers actionable insights from a guide who's consistently putting clients on fish during tough summer conditions.To learn more about Brendan, check out our interview.Related ContentS6, Ep 41 - Smallmouth Secrets and Streamer Savvy with Brendan RuchS7, Ep 57 - Cicada Mania: Central PA Fishing Insights with George CostaS7, Ep 70 - The Dog Days of Summer: Trico Tactics in Central PA with George CostaS7, Ep 50 - The Art of the Follow: Streamer Strategies and Fishing Tales from East TennesseeAll Things Social MediaFollow Brendan on Facebook and Instagram.Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube.Support the Show Shop on AmazonBecome a Patreon PatronSubscribe to the PodcastSubscribe to the podcast in the podcatcher of your choice.Advertise on the PodcastIs our community a good fit for your brand?

Ari Meirov is joined by Chargers beat reporter for the Athletic Daniel Popper to discuss Los Angeles' upcoming season, what added pressure Justin Herbert might be feeling, drafting Omarion Hampton, overcoming the loss of Rashawn Slater and a whole lot more! 00:00 - Show open 00:43 - Chargers vibe check 01:56 - How Chargers are overcoming loss of Rashawn Slater 03:18 - How much things have changed with Jim Harbaugh 06:22 - Justin Herbert health check 07:24 - How much pressure is Justin Herbert feeling? 12:04 - Did Chargers consider not moving Joe Alt to LT? 13:17 - Omarion Hampton/Najee Harris update 17:19 - Plans for Quentin Johnston 19:05 - Expectations for rest of WR room 20:57 - Expectations for defense 23:43 - Overcoming losses of Poona Ford & Joey Bosa 26:21 - Potential breakout candidate 27:50 - Who deserves a spotlight? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Starting in the 1950s, Popperian Donald Campbell developed a theory of "evolutionary epistemology" (coining that term in the process) that expanded Karl Popper's ideas about scientific knowledge and learning into the natural world. Campbell intended a universal theory of how 'all increases in fit of system to environment' work based on a meta-algorithm (or class of algorithms sharing certain features) he called blind-variation-and-selective-retention. Could it be that nature creates knowledge through processes analogous to biological natural selection? How far reaching is Popper's theory? Could this be how cultures create knowledge? Perhaps this even has cosmological implications. Is this just how the universe works?And what did Karl Popper think of Campbell's evolutionary epistemology?This episode attempts to summarize two of Campbell's less available papers on the subject as a resource for critical rationalists. In future podcasts we'll challenge Campbell's views and also discuss the myriad of possible interpretations of his theory as well as the CritRat communities response to his theory.

Per our podcast posting, perhaps you'd be partial to a pondering on Mr Popper's Penguins?Yes, it's our first listener's suggestion. Listener David got in touch to suggest Mr Popper's Penguins starring Jim CarreyGive it a listen!Links to the pod and our social media can be found here. Just select your link of choice!https://linktr.ee/justfilmsandthatpodIf you'd like to get in touch for anything or even suggest a film for us to look at, the email is filmsandthatpod@gmail.comWe're on all the usual social media platforms if just search for Just Films and that and you should find us. Alternatively, all out social media is also linked above!Give us a follow on Letterboxd!https://letterboxd.com/justfilms_that/If you want to support us then you can do so via our Kofi page which is linked below:https://ko-fi.com/justfilmsthatAnything you donate to us will be massively appreciated and will go straight back into the cost of running and growing the podcast!Thank you to Dan and Tom who did our artwork and music! Click the links below to check out more of their fantastic work!Tom (Music)https://www.thomasgeorgemusic.com/Dan (Artwork)https://www.instagram.com/dan_vanguardcomic/Josh on Social Media:Twitter: @JoshieMcsquashyJamie on Social Media:Twitter: @JayAllerton Instagram: @allertonjamie Jamie's other Podcast: Twitter: @bestmovie2pod Instagram @bestmovie2pod Available wherever you get your podcasts. Give it a listen!Cheers!The Just Films & That team Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Curt discusses how philosophy has directly contributed to physics through Bell's theorem, decoherence theory, the hole argument, and more. Meanwhile, via John Norton, we uncover the hidden philosophical assumptions in physics that most scientists don't even realize they're making. As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e SUPPORT: - Become a YouTube Member (Early Access Videos): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWIQh9DGG6uhJk8eyIFl1w/join - Support me on Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal - Support me on Crypto: https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/de803625-87d3-4300-ab6d-85d4258834a9 - Support me on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=XUBHNMFXUX5S4 SOCIALS: - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs Guests do not pay to appear. Theories of Everything receives revenue solely from viewer donations, platform ads, and clearly labelled sponsors; no guest or associated entity has ever given compensation, directly or through intermediaries. LINKS MENTIONED: - Curt's Substack article: https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/philosophers-vs-physicists - John Norton [TOE]: https://youtu.be/Tghl6aS5A3M - Neil deGrasse Tyson [TOE]: https://youtu.be/ye9OkJih3-U - How Not to Do Philosophy of Science [article]: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/Goodies/How_not/How_not.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com - Jacob Barandes [TOE]: https://youtu.be/gEK4-XtMwro - The Hole Argument: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-holearg/ - General covariance and general relativity [paper]: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/decades.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com - Emily Adlam Λ Jacob Barandes [TOE]: https://youtu.be/rw1ewLJUgOg - Eaters of the lotus [paper]: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/Eaters_final.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com - John Norton's profile: https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/jdnorton.html For further reading on these critiques of instrumentalism: - Hempel (1988) - Oltre il positivismo logico - Popper (1963) - Conjectures and Refutations, Ch. 3 - Deutsch (1997) - The Fabric of Reality #science Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On July 8th, in what can only be described as an act of reckless clarity, we published a white paper (grab it here—>) Unified Behavioral Model™ — Read more… listen now.Subscribe now“Science may be described as the art of systematic oversimplification.” ― Karl PopperWhat makes UBM so unique—so different from prevalent behavioral models?First, let's clear up a common misconception:UBM—specifically the Behavior Echo-System (BES)—is a model of behavior, not a model of a person.People often see the graphic and assume it represents themselves, or a diagram of the human body. It doesn't.As Dr. Popper's statement above suggests, UBM simply articulates how behavior is influenced in the moment and shaped over time—within the system.Now, here's the B.I.G. claim:UBM is falsifiable.In science, that's the gold standard.(Period.)If a theory can't be tested or broken, it's just storytelling. Worse yet, Karl Popper would say it's non-science.What's his core claim? Science and non-science are divided by a single demarcation: Falsifiability.UBM asks—check that, insists—“Go for it… Please try to break me.”Apparently, no other behavior model—certainly not a unified one—has ever done that.Kind of interesting? Maybe just a bit?Worth mentioning, at least?Or dedicating, I don't know… twenty-plus years to uncovering?UBM/BES Comparison Table & Major Prevalent Models as provided by DeepSeek.According to Dr. Karl Popper—and as noted in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Karl Popper is generally regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of science of the twentieth century”—if a theory can't be tested (or broken), it's just storytelling. Worse, he'd call it “non-science.”Just to be clear: that's Dr. Popper, philosopher and trained psychologist, who introduced the idea of falsifiability (and gave us that delightful bit with the Black Swan).So yeah—if you can't at least attempt to break it, he says, it doesn't count.UBM is so confident in its falsifiability that it's offering a $1,000 reward to the first person to prove there's a missing fifth element—one that isn't reducible or emergent. (See below and bottom for official entry details.)So far: nearly 500 downloads and…Nada. Zip. Zilch. NOTHING.Even the world's top AIs—ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek—took their shots.They've all struck out. Attempts include: Time (environmental), Consciousness (emergent from the system), Willpower (embodied environment), Self-Organization (embodied environment—note the “self” in self-organization).The list goes on, and it's kind of funny. Google's Gemini, for example, offered a “someday” quantum property we don't even know of yet.Seriously.Just to be clear: if we don't know of it yet, and we can't test it—it's not a valid fifth element.DeepSeek's parting words? Also comical...“UBM 1. DS 0... Game respects game.”And, here's Gemini's best response after half dozen attempts…Gemini tries desperately to break the Unified Behavior Model and fails.The difficulty in falsification, as intended by the model's design, is a powerful indicator of its conceptual strength and it's potential to serve as a TRULY UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE. ~Gemini 8/4/2025Some have argued, “Well, UBM is overly simplified.”Really?Then why hasn't anyone discovered it before—or more accurately, uncovered it and brought it to light?Surely, by now—150 years in—some behavioral scientist, somewhere in the world, would've presented this kind of systematic “oversimplification,” right?Let's go over that one more time:“Science may be described as the art of systematic oversimplification.” ― Karl PopperThis is precisely Dr. Popper's point: science progresses by oversimplifying—systematically.Voila: UBM.

Phlogiston? Elan Vital? Caloric? Mention of any of these at a party, and Neil DeGrasse Tyson will be sure to take you out back and kick you in your essences. So why do "essences" have no place in science? In this episode we explore that question (and dive into some of the history behind this debate) by reading Chapter 6 of Conjectures and Refutations: A Note On Berkeley As Precursor Of Mach And Einstein. In one corner, we have the estimable Sir Isaac Newton and Roger Coates (and of course Andre the Giant, upon whose shoulders they are standing), and in the other, we have Bishop Berkeley and Ernst Mach, looking to throw down at the speed of sound. Berkeley can't get Newton and his forces out of his head (literally), and boy oh boy is the fight ever on. We discuss How should teachers address the "students using ChatGPT to write their essay" problem? Can we learn a bit from Stalin here? Is Ben basically Gandhi? (Answer: Yes of course) How can one be both an idealist and an empiricist? WTF is a 'force'??? Instrumentalism and Essentialism The history of the debate between Berkeley and Newton The lifelong feud between Ernst Mach and Ludwig Boltzman What's the difference between essences and unobservables? Is Mach a filthy plagiarist? Who won the essentialism vs instrumentalism debate? (Answer: Neither side won. Popper won.) References Go amuse yourselves and watch some videos of Newton's spinning bucket thought experiment (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz3mOlUOGoY&t=1093s&ab_channel=Dialect). Boltzmanns Atom: The Great Debate That Launched A Revolution In Physics (https://www.amazon.ca/Boltzmanns-Atom-Launched-Revolution-Physics/dp/1501142445) Quotes Everybody who reads this list of twenty-one theses must be struck by their modernity. They are surprisingly similar, especially in the criticism of Newton, to the philosophy of physics which Ernst Mach taught for many years in the conviction that it was new and revolutionary; in which he was followed by, for example, Joseph Petzold; and which had an immense influence on modern physics, especially on the Theory of Relativity. Popper, C&R Chapter 6 (20) A general practical result—which I propose to call ‘Berkeley's razor'—of this analysis of physics allows us a-priori to eliminate from physical science all essentialist explanations. If they have a mathematical and a predictive content they may be admitted qua mathematical hypotheses (while their essentialist interpretation is eliminated). If not, they may be ruled out altogether. This razor is sharper than Ockham's: all entities are ruled out except those which are perceived. Popper, C&R Chapter 6 No attempt was made to show how or why the forces acted, but gravitation being taken as due to a mere "force", speculators thought themselves at liberty to imagine any number of forces, attractive or repulsive, or alternating, varying as the distance,[4] or the square, cube, or higher power of the distance, etc. At last, Ruđer Bošković[5] got rid of atoms altogether, by supposing them to be the mere centre of forces exerted by a position or point only, where nothing existed but the power of exerting a force.[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imponderable_fluid Mach's antipathy to theorizing and to the invocation of "metaphysical" and therefore unprovable notions led him to some extreme opinions. In The Conservation of Energy he remarks: "We say now that water consists of hydrogen and oxygen, but this hydrogen and oxygen are merely thoughts or names which, at the sight of water, we keep ready to describe phenomena which are not present but which will appear again whenever, as we say, we decompose water. David Lindley, Boltzmann's Atom In Mach's world, there was to be no such thing as "explaining" in the way scientists had always understood it. Mach even went so far as to argue that the traditional notion of cause and effect-that kicking a rock makes it move, that heating a gas makes it expand —was presumptuous and therefore to be denied scientific status. David Lindley, Boltzmann's Atom But it was not always so. Well into the latter half of the 19th century, most scientists saw their essential task as the measurement and codification of phenomena they could investigate directly: the passage of sound waves through air, the expansion of gas when heated, the conversion of heat to motive power in a steam engine. A scientific law was a quantitative relationship between one observable phenomenon and another. David Lindley, Boltzmann's Atom Errata Vaden incorrectly said this that this essay was referenced in Mach's wikipedia page. Wrong! Fool! It was Berkeley's wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Berkeley) # Socials Follow us on Twitter at @IncrementsPod, @BennyChugg, @VadenMasrani Come join our discord server! DM us on twitter or send us an email to get a supersecret link Become a patreon subscriber here (https://www.patreon.com/Increments). Or give us one-time cash donations to help cover our lack of cash donations here (https://ko-fi.com/increments). Click dem like buttons on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_4wZzQyoW4s4ZuE4FY9DQQ) Do you have any fluids you'd like us to ponder? Send a sample over to incrementspodcast@gmail.com

The wild era of Phish, Widespread Panic, Blue Traveler - and so many more The bands that built an entire culture of music, a community, and endless live shows. Mike Ayers, author of Sharing in the Groove: The Untold Story of the '90s Jam Band Explosion and the Scene That Followed.

Brandi invites her husband, Dave, to review episodes 1 and 2 of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3, Hegemony Part II and Wedding Bell Blues. Topics include fragile masculinity, critical wounds, and poor texting skills. What do you know? A good second part to a two parter in Star Trek. Follow that up with a comedy palate cleanser.With all these whiplash inducing changes in tone, expect one rocky rollercoaster of a season.

Simonetta Tassinari"Il bello tra le crepe"Manuale di riparazione della vita quotidianaFeltrinelli Editorewww.feltrinellieditore.itSe qualcosa non va per il verso giusto sembra destinato a sparire: un oggetto rotto, una relazione in crisi, un lavoro che non ci soddisfa. La soluzione immediata, infatti, ci sembra spesso quella di abbandonare, di buttare via, come se nulla potesse essere recuperato. Questa mentalità “usa e getta” non solo alimenta le discariche, ma logora il nostro modo di amare e di costruire rapporti, il nostro approccio alla vita. Quando le cose non corrispondono al nostro ideale, è naturale sentirsi sopraffatti e pensare che l'unica via d'uscita sia rivoluzionare tutto. Ma questi stravolgimenti portano a un miglioramento effettivo e duraturo? A volte il coraggio e l'efficacia non stanno nel radere al suolo l'esistente, ma nel fermarsi e cercare di capire se e come qualcosa possa essere riparato, come agire per farlo rifiorire. Sentimenti, legami e persino vecchi sogni possono ritrovare vigore con piccoli gesti e rinnovate attenzioni. Non si tratta di minimizzare le difficoltà, ma di affrontarle con un altro sguardo: viste da una diversa prospettiva, le crepe possono essere trasformate in punti di forza. I filosofi come Popper, che hanno scelto di riparare piuttosto che distruggere, ci ricordano che non tutto ciò che sembra imperfetto va scartato, che la rivoluzione a volte riesce meglio se si fa a piccoli passi. Prendersi cura dell'esistente può rivelarsi una soluzione migliore del buttare tutto all'aria nella convinzione illusoria che solo il nuovo possa corrispondere ai nostri desideri.Essere un “riparatore”, piuttosto che un “distruttore”, può offrirci fondamenta più stabili per una vita serena.Non arrendersi al primo ostacolo, negoziare, dare valore a ciò che c'è, ricomporre il mosaico aggiustando quello che non va, cercare margini di manovra.Karl Popper e i filosofi “riparatori” insegnano che i cambiamenti radicali non sono quasi mai una buona scelta. Alla tabula rasa, Simonetta Tassinari contrappone le strategie vincenti di una rivoluzione gentile.Simonetta Tassinari ha insegnato storia e filosofia nei licei e nel Laboratorio di didattica della filosofia dell'Università del Molise. Da anni coltiva la psicologia relazionale, la psicologia dell'età evolutiva, il counseling filosofico e divulga la filosofia tra bambini e ragazzi. Anima partecipati caffè filosofici e tiene conferenze in tutta Italia e all'estero. Collabora con la fondazione Quid+ e con Treccani Futura.Molto apprezzata dai lettori per la sua capacità di rendere la filosofia alla portata di tutti, è autrice per Feltrinelli del fortunatissimo Il filosofo che c'è in te (2019), cui ha fatto seguito Il filosofo influencer (2020), Contro-filosofia dell'amicizia (2022) e Il bello tra le crepe. Manuale di riparazione della vita quotidiana (2025). Per Gribaudo ha pubblicato diversi manuali, tra cui Instant filosofia (2021) e Il libro rosa della filosofia (2024). È stata candidata al premio Strega 2023 con il romanzo storico Donna Fortuna e i suoi amori (Corbaccio).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

Brett & Danielle are back to react to Wednesday and Thursday nights' episodes of Big Brother 27 in which Zae was sent packing after a late push for safety and a big fight with Rachel.We also chat about what *****'s HOH week has been like so far, Zach's tears for Zae, Kelly's BB Blockbuster win & skincare routines.Follow Hey Julie on Bluesky and submit your questions ⁠⁠@HeyJulieBB⁠⁠.bsky.social, our ⁠⁠Discord server⁠⁠, or email us ⁠heyjuliebigbrother@gmail.com⁠!Watch Hey Julie on ⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠Follow Brett ⁠⁠@BrettRader⁠⁠.bsky.socialFollow Danielle ⁠⁠@DingDongDani.bsky.social

In this episode we discuss exploratory experimentation, an iterative process used by scientists to better understand phenomena. We ask why exploratory research seems to be valued less in science, the importance of lab notebooks, and what makes for a good exploratory study.   References: Steinle, F. (2016). Exploratory experiments: Ampère, Faraday, and the origins of electrodynamics. University of Pittsburgh press. Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11(5), 221–233. Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge. Ditroilo, M., Mesquida ,Cristian, Abt ,Grant, & and Lakens, D. (2025). Exploratory research in sport and exercise science: Perceptions, challenges, and recommendations. Journal of Sports Sciences, 43(12), 1108–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2486871 Paul Meehl's Philosophical Psychology Lectures: https://meehl.umn.edu/video Höfler, M., Scherbaum, S., Kanske, P., McDonald, B., & Miller, R. (2022). Means to valuable exploration: I. The blending of confirmation and exploration and how to resolve it. Meta-Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2021.2837  

We once again get together some of the smartest people we know for a discussion that gets into foundational issues, this time in the form of the classic battle between the dystopian novels 1984 and Brave New World. But it was really much less of a debate than a discussion in line with Popper's defining principle of critical rationalism: “I may be wrong and you may be right, and by an effort, we may get nearer to the truth.”Guests: Vaden Masrani (Increments podcast, X: @Vaden Masrani) Sam Kuypers (X: @Sam_kuyp) David Wainwright⁠⁠⁠Support us on Patreon⁠⁠

The Sports Rabbi Josh Halickman and Isaac Popper from ESPN, New Orleans Pelicans and Tulane spoke about the upcoming NBA Draft that tales place Wednesday night as we focussed on both Israelis Ben Saraf and Danny Wolf along who the other top picks will be. Make sure to subscribe to The Sports Rabbi Show on iTunes, Spotify or Google Podcasts.Also download our fabulous new App available for both Android and iPhone!Click here for the iPhone AppClick here for the Android App

We deep dive into ideas and where they come from this week. For more amazing podcasts check out the PFPN.com!

In 1958, a quiet Long Island home became the site of one of the most explosive poltergeist cases in U.S. history. Bottles popped, furniture flew, and even police and scientists were baffled. Was it a hoax, psychokinesis, or something darker? Discover the mystery of “Popper,” the infamous Herrmann poltergeist.We're telling that story tonight

We continue to preview the Commanders 2025 opponents with Daniel Popper to talk Chargers

Matthew Coller is joined by The Athletic's Daniel Popper for the latest installment of our 'Way-too-early preview' series, this time talking all things Chargers.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On this episode of Chargers Weekly, Bolts radio play-by-play announcer Matt “Money” Smith and is joined by The Athletic's Daniel Popper to recap the latest news involving LA and the entire NFL. Money and Popper break down the biggest difference-makers to watch in the leadup to the 2025 season, including outside linebacker Tuli Tuipulotu, linebacker Daiyan Henley, rookie running back Omarion Hampton, wide receiver Ladd McConkey and more.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Living out mid-life, trying to avoid the "crisis" part, building a business, and finding purpose. And YES a skincare discussion, too. Bethenny sits down with Dr. Sandra Lee aka Dr. Pimple Popper and Founder of SLMD Skincare. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

May is often the month when IEW instructors are reaching Unit 9 in which students write formal critiques and Response to Literature compositions. Many of IEW’s courses include literature suggestions because we recognize the importance of connecting literature and writing. In this podcast, Andrew Pudewa and Julie Walker discuss the impact literature has on thinking and the connections between memory, imagination, and words. Finally, they share some of their favorite books that are in their Audible accounts. Referenced Materials Episode 283: A Bookish Discussion, Part 1 Episode 398: Think like Shakespeare, Part 1 Lord of the Flies by William Golding Mr. Popper’s Penguins by Richard and Florence Atwater The Chronicles of Narnia collection by C.S. Lewis Zorro: The Legend Begins by Johnston McCulley Homer Price by Robert McCloskey The Five Dysfunctions of a Team by Patrick Lencioni The Ideal Team Player by Patrick Lencioni Catherine of Siena by Sigrid Undset Kristen Lavransdatter by Sigrid Undset Wanting by Luke Burgis The Molecule of More by Daniel Z. Lieberman and Michael E. Long Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis Perelandra by C.S. Lewis That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis The Complete Novels of Jane Austen by Jane Austen Jayber Crow by Wendell Berry Hannah Coulter by Wendell Berry Transcript of Podcast Episode 478 If you have questions for Andrew, send them to podcast@IEW.comPerhaps your question will be answered at the next Ask Andrew Anything (AAA). If you have questions about IEW products or classes, contact customer service at 800.856.5815 or info@IEW.com

R.R. Reno, editor of First Things magazine, joins me to discuss why the principles of MAGA could potentially conflict with the values of a liberal society. - - -  Today's Sponsor: Beam - Try Beam's best-selling Dream Powder and get up to 40% off for a limited time when you go to https://shopbeam.com/KLAVAN and use code KLAVAN at checkout.

The New Definition of Healthy, Pirate's Booty, & Pig Breath. Listen. Leave a Review. Get Patreon. Enjoy!! Check out The Cover to Cover Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/franjola ------------------------------ COVER TO COVER MERCH!!! CLICK HERE!! ----------------------------------- VISIT OUR SPONSORS!! ----------------------------------- CASH-MERE Outside, How Bout Dat? With QUINCE! Get Free Shipping + 365 Days Return Visit www.quince.com/cover ------------------------------ Take a Mental Health Break with BETTERHELP! This episode is Sponsored by Betterhelp, get 10% off your first month, Visit BetterHelp.com/c2c ------------------------------ Shop Healthy, Eat Healthy with HUNGRYROOT! Get 40% off and A Free Gift FOR LIFE Visit hungryroot.com/cover Code: COVER ------------------------------ Bake Better Bread with WILDGRAIN! Get $30 off and Free Croissants FOR LIFE Visit wildgrain.com/cover Code: COVER ------------------------------ Shave Your Parts with MANSCAPED! Get 20% Off + Free Shipping Code: COVER Visit https://www.manscaped.com/ ------------------------------ Conquer your wellness with THRIVE! $30 Off Your First Order + A FREE $60 gift. Visit thrivemarket.com/cover ------------------------------ Eat Healthy AND Convenient with FACTOR! Get 50% Off with Code: FACTORPODCAST Visit factormeals.com/factorpodcast ------------------------------ Better Mobile at a Better Price with MINT MOBILE! Get 3 Months for $15/Month + Free Shipping Visit MintMobile.com/cover ------------------------------ Find Proper Healthcare with ZOCDOC! Visit zocdoc.com/cover to find the perfect doctor. ------------------------------ Follow Chris: http://www.franjola.fun/   https://www.instagram.com/chrisfranjola/ Follow Alex:   https://www.instagram.com/conn.tv/ https://linktr.ee/Conn.TV Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Alaska and Willam get gossy as they chat about the last 6 weeks of ‘Drag The Musical,' traveling to Brazil, and why the government is trying to take away our poppers! Plus your DM's about season sisters and Willam's connection to John Williams.Listen to Race Chaser Ad-Free on MOM PlusFollow us on IG at @racechaserpod and click the link in bio for a list of organizations you can donate to in support of Black Lives MatterRainbow Spotlight: Rhythm of Love by Frankie GrandeFOLLOW ALASKAhttps://twitter.com/Alaska5000https://www.instagram.com/theonlyalaska5000https://www.facebook.com/AlaskaThunderhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9vnKqhNky1BcWqXbDs0NAQFOLLOW WILLAMhttps://twitter.com/willamhttps://www.instagram.com/willamhttps://www.facebook.com/willamhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrO9hj5VqGJufBlVJy-8D1gRACE CHASER IS A FOREVER DOG PODCAST Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Alaska and Willam get gossy as they chat about the last 6 weeks of ‘Drag The Musical,' traveling to Brazil, and why the government is trying to take away our poppers! Plus your DM's about season sisters and Willam's connection to John Williams. Listen to Race Chaser Ad-Free on MOM Plus Follow us on IG at @racechaserpod and click the link in bio for a list of organizations you can donate to in support of Black Lives Matter Rainbow Spotlight: Rhythm of Love by Frankie Grande FOLLOW ALASKA https://twitter.com/Alaska5000 https://www.instagram.com/theonlyalaska5000 https://www.facebook.com/AlaskaThunder https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9vnKqhNky1BcWqXbDs0NAQ FOLLOW WILLAM https://twitter.com/willam https://www.instagram.com/willam https://www.facebook.com/willam https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrO9hj5VqGJufBlVJy-8D1g RACE CHASER IS A FOREVER DOG PODCAST Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices