Podcasts about shield act

As Dave Bittner is at the RSA Conference this week, our hosts ⁠⁠Maria Varmazis and ⁠⁠Joe Carrigan⁠⁠, are sharing the latest in social engineering scams, phishing schemes, and criminal exploits that are making headlines. We start with some follow-up from José on episode 335, sharing how UK banking features like Faster Payments and the “Check Payee” function might have helped prevent a scam involving fake banking apps—and he even tells a wild tale of someone using a fake app to reverse-scam a bike thief. Joe covers the House's overwhelming passage of the SHIELD Act to ban revenge porn—including deepfakes—and why critics say it could threaten encryption. He also shares a strong warning about trust and the real risks of sharing intimate images. Maria has the story of a surge in sophisticated subscription scams, where cybercriminals use fake “mystery box” websites, social media ads, and influencer impersonations to trick users into handing over credit card data and signing up for hidden recurring payments. Bitdefender researchers warn these polished scams are part of a broader evolution in social engineering, designed to bypass skepticism and evade detection. Our Catch of the Day comes from listener Rick, who received a suspicious email that appears to be from Harbor Freight—a popular U.S. retailer known for affordable tools and equipment—offering a “free gift” to the recipient… classic bait for a likely scam. Resources and links to stories: ⁠House Passes Bill to Ban Sharing of Revenge Porn, Sending It to Trump TAKE IT DOWN Act Trump's hasty Take It Down Act has “gaping flaws” that threaten encryption Congress Passes TAKE IT DOWN Act Despite Major Flaws Mystery Box Scams Deployed to Steal Credit Card Data Have a Catch of the Day you'd like to share? Email it to us at ⁠⁠hackinghumans@n2k.com⁠⁠.

“Your questioning and critiquing is everything that is needed for 2025 and beyond. And if or when it is construed [by the system] as as a deficiency, unprofessionalism, or ineptitude, I hope that by priming people to keep their eyes open for those responses, it can be more of a collective yawn.” - Rupi LeghaIn this episode I'm joined by Rupi Legha, psychiatrist, educator, and scholar-activist—whose work radically interrogates the role of psychiatry in upholding racial injustice. Together, we explore what it means to be an anti-racist clinician in a field that silences dissent, punishes disclosure, and pathologizes defiance—especially in Black, Brown, and Indigenous folks. We talk about the emotional and ethical toll of navigating psychiatric training while attempting to stay true to liberatory values. We talk about forced restraint, overmedication, and the ways psychiatry can reinforce white supremacist ideology in both overt and covert ways. And we ask the hard questions: What is worth saving in psychiatry? What should be dismantled? What might take its place?Also in this episode:deciding how much to disclose about your own lived experiences with mental health as a clinicianwhat psychiatric residency training is actually likeexperiencing moral injurythe racist and coercive practices deeply rooted in the history of psychiatryadvice for younger cliniciansnavigating family dynamics in child crisis carethe future of psychiatry as a professionanti-racist training for cliniciansBioDr. Rupinder K. Legha is a double board-certified child, adolescent, and adult psychiatrist, educator, and independent scholar-activist. She is the founder of the Antiracism in Mental Health Fellowship and a nationally recognized leader working at the intersection of structural trauma, racial justice, and youth mental health. Dr. Legha's clinical and scholarly work challenges how psychiatric systems interpret defiance and distress—especially in Black, Brown, and Indigenous youth—and seeks to transform the profession through person-centered, antiracist, and liberatory care.Links: Rupi's Website: https://rupileghamd.com/Shield Act: https://rupileghamd.com/shieldactAnti-Racist Fellowship: https://edu.rupileghamd.com/fellowship-sales-pageHistory of ODD Diagnosis video : https://rupileghamd.com/speaking/v/oddResources:Get the book: ⁠⁠Mad Studies Reader: Interdisciplinary Innovations in Mental Health⁠Become a member: ⁠The Institute for the Development of Human Arts⁠Train with us: ⁠Transformative Mental Health Core CurriculumSessions & Information about the host: ⁠⁠JazmineRussell.com⁠⁠Disclaimer: The DEPTH Work Podcast is for educational and entertainment purposes only. Any information on this podcast in no way to be construed or substituted as psychological counseling, psychotherapy, mental health counseling, or any other type of therapy or medical advice.

#Congressional #RAINN #TakeitDownOn this special episode of the Circuspreneur Podcast, host Shenea Stiletto discusses her participation in RAINN's upcoming Congressional Day of Action in Washington D.C. The Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network is an American nonprofit anti-sexual assault organization, the largest in the United States. Shenea will use her experience as a Survivor of USA Gymnastics to advocate for the following bills, TAKE IT DOWN ACT, SHIELD ACT, DEFIANCE ACT, PROTECT OUR CHILDREN ACT, NO TIME LIMITS ACT, Protect Our Children Act, the Debbie Smith Grant Program, and RAINN Hotline funding.

In this episode. episode, Brian Tate, CEO of the IPA, discusses the latest regulatory proposals from the FDIC, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the Federal Reserve He considers how they might change the relationships between fintechs and issuing banks, and how they might change the operations of both kinds of companies. This episode was recorded on September 23, 2024, so keep in mind that things may have changed by the time you hear it. Important Update: Since the recording of this podcast, the IPA has learned that the SHIELD Act – the bill mentioned in the show pertaining to political donations – has been pulled from the schedule. For IPA Members: Did you know the Association recently published a compliance guide to help fintechs, banks, and other companies ensure their compliance programs are up to date? You can find it in the members-only section of our website. Not a Member Yet? Learn more about the benefits of IPA membership at IPA.org.

On this week of Serious Privacy, Paul Breitbarth of Catawiki and Dr. K Royal cover a privacy mishmash - starting with the shot heard ‘round the world (assassination attempt on Donald Trump), followed by morality expectations of some professionals (like teachers, at least one teacher was fired for comments on the attempt), the FTC's actions against Calmara, #HeHealth's controversial app (and kudos to the team who had to go through all those pics and videos) and NGL Labs, a viral #TikTok doctor who lost her license, SHIELD Act, and an FCC settlement against CaptionCall. We also covered the Turkish KVKK's long awaited guidance on international data transfers, UK priorities as stated in the King's Speech, a Dutch enforcement against Kruidvat.nl  for €600,000s for online tracking, and a little about the Olympics. #livelearnlaugh If you have comments or questions, find us on LinkedIn and IG @seriousprivacy @podcastprivacy @euroPaulB @heartofprivacy and email podcast@seriousprivacy.eu. Rate and Review us! Proudly sponsored by TrustArc. Learn more about NymityAI at https://trustarc.com/nymityai-beta/ #heartofprivacy #europaulb #seriousprivacy #privacy #dataprotection #cybersecuritylaw #CPO #DPO #CISO

A new bill in Congress would stop illegal aliens from squatting in U.S. homes. “We're trying to get out in front of it to protect American homeowners,” Rep. Dan Meuser, R-Pa., says.Leonel Moreno, an illegal immigrant from Venezuela, recently went viral on social media after a video post explaining how to take advantage of squatting laws in the U.S. Under U.S. law, Moreno told his followers that “if a house is not inhabited, we can seize it.” In response to the video, and growing reports over illegal aliens squatting in homes in New York and his state of Pennsylvania, Meuser introduced the Safeguarding Homes from Illegal Entry, Living, and Dwelling Act, or the SHIELD Act. The bill makes trespassing “a deportable crime,” Meuser says. “So if an illegal were to claim squatter rights and enter an individual's home illegally without any rental paperwork or legitimate lease” then, Meuser says “they can be arrested and deported and prohibited from ever entering the United States again.”Meuser joins “The Daily Signal Podcast” to discuss the growing need for the SHIELD Act, and what, if anything, he anticipates President Joe Biden will do to address growing concern over the crisis at the southern border. Enjoy the show! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A week later and we’re still thinking about the hearing that saw half a dozen tech CEOs testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on keeping kids safe online. It left us wondering: Why do lawmakers hold these hearings then fail again and again to pass federal laws to keep Big Tech in check? One thing was clear: The importance of keeping kids safe online is one of the few things that a lot of Democratic and Republican senators agree on. Take for example the SHIELD Act, a bill co-sponsored by members of both parties. One of those members is Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. She told Marketplace’s Lily Jamali it’s hard to get bills like that through Congress given how much influence tech companies wield in Washington.

A week later and we’re still thinking about the hearing that saw half a dozen tech CEOs testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on keeping kids safe online. It left us wondering: Why do lawmakers hold these hearings then fail again and again to pass federal laws to keep Big Tech in check? One thing was clear: The importance of keeping kids safe online is one of the few things that a lot of Democratic and Republican senators agree on. Take for example the SHIELD Act, a bill co-sponsored by members of both parties. One of those members is Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. She told Marketplace’s Lily Jamali it’s hard to get bills like that through Congress given how much influence tech companies wield in Washington.

Join Dr. Mary Anne Franks as she unpacks the complexities of civil rights, technology, and online harm, shedding light on the urgent need for change in the digital landscape. Gain valuable insights into the legal and ethical dimensions of these issues and explore potential solutions for a safer and more responsible online world.  Dr. Mary Anne Franks is a renowned legal scholar, expert, author, activist, media commentator, and law professor. She recently joined the George Washington University School of Law as the Eugene L. and Barbara A. Bernard Professor in Intellectual Property, Technology, and Civil Rights Law. Prior to that, she taught at the University of Miami School of Law as the Michael R. Klein Distinguished Scholar Chair.  Dr. Franks teaches classes that delve into cutting-edge and feminist legal theories about First Amendment law, Second Amendment law, criminal law, criminal procedure, family law, and law, and technology. And her scholarly work focuses on online harassment, free speech, discrimination, and violence. She also serves as President and Legislative and Technology Policy Director of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI - www.cybercivilrights.org),  a non-profit organization that works to combat online abuses that threaten civil rights and civil liberties. Its vision is a world in which law, policy, and technology align to ensure the protection of civil rights and civil liberties for all. CCRI turns 10 years old in August 2023.  Dr. Franks' work in advocating for legislative, technological, and social reform on the issue of nonconsensual pornography ("revenge porn") has been instrumental in drafting state legislation against the practice in the U.S. She has worked tirelessly on a federal criminal bill, first the Intimate Privacy Protection Act (IPPA), which evolved into the ENOUGH Act, and again into the SHIELD Act, which is still in the works.  In May 2019, Dr. Franks published The Cult of the Constitution: Our Deadly Devotion to Guns and Free Speech (https://www.amazon.com/Cult-Constitution-Mary-Anne-Franks/dp/1503603229), which won a gold medal at the 2020 Independent Publisher Book Awards as well as the 2020 Association of American Publishers PROSE Award for Legal Studies and Excellence in Social Sciences. She is presently working on her second book, Fearless Speech.  In this interview, Dr. Franks reflects on the progress made over the past decade in raising awareness about the non-consensual disclosure of intimate images, social media harms, and how to combat both the misconceptions and the grave consequences faced by those at the mercy of big tech and lobbyists (often the same). She opines on the various legal terminology as it's developed, as well as the legal framework that has emerged in both tort law (products liability) and privacy law.   The conversation also delves into the broader spectrum of online abuses, including social media addiction, mob mentality, stalking, sexual extortion (or “sextortion”), and defamation, to name a few. Dr. Franks explains how social media platforms amplify the scale and reach of bad online actors engaged in internet-based abuses, as well as the critical role of social media platforms in combating social media harms.  At the center of much of the social media liability debate is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. The law includes two main provisions. The first provision, known as the "Good Samaritan" provision, grants immunity to platforms that take action in good faith to moderate or remove content that they consider objectionable or harmful. This provision encourages platforms to engage in content moderation without fear of legal repercussions.  The second provision protects platforms from being treated as the publisher or speaker of the user-generated content. This means that even if a platform chooses not to moderate or remove certain content, it cannot be held liable for that content as if it had created or endorsed it.  CDA 230 has been a subject of debate and controversy in recent years, as some argue that it allows platforms to evade responsibility for harmful content, while others maintain that it is crucial for enabling free expression and innovation on the internet. The law has faced calls for reform and revision to address issues such as online harassment, misinformation, and the spread of illegal content. According to Dr. Franks, at the core of this debate is the need to question whether the level of immunity Section 230 provides to internet intermediaries is justified.  While she acknowledges the challenges faced by social media platforms in moderating an enormous volume of user-generated content, Dr. Franks suggests that platforms should in fact be held responsible based on their knowledge, intent, and contribution to harmful actions. There are, however, concerns about the lack of proactive measures implemented by social media platforms, as well as the lack of incentives for platforms to prioritize user safety. Dr. Franks underlines the necessity of holding platforms accountable and creating safer online environments, particularly for minors. She emphasizes the need to reevaluate current legislation and industry practices to align them with the collective responsibility of reducing harm and promoting user well-being. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Anne_Franks  CCRI: www.cybercivilrights.org  SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1224353  Book: The Cult of the Constitution https://www.amazon.com/Cult-Constitution-Mary-Anne-Franks/dp/1503603229  Twitter: https://twitter.com/ma_franks    Don't forget to like and subscribe to stay updated on the latest developments in this complex legal battle.   LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mass-tort-news Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/masstortnewsorg Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/masstortnews.org

Two years after her revenge porn nightmare began, Darieth Chisolm won the case against her ex-boyfriend. Should tech companies make it harder to weaponize their platforms against women?In this episode you will learn:About Darieth's personal experience with revenge pornHer challenge of taking legal action outside of the U.S.The impact of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)Examples of first steps on how victims can take legal actionObstacles to taking down nude content that is published onlineA brief history of policies like the SHIELD Act and Enough ActHow Freedom of Speech should not apply when it is enacted with the intent to do harmThe pervasiveness of victim shaming and victim blamingThe importance of parents having conversations about nude photos with their childrenResources for victims of revenge porn (linked below)How Darieth is supporting victims todayLinks and mentions:50 Shades of Silence DocumentarySHIELD ActEnough ActSpeakServeSoar.com membershipCyber Crimes Act of 2015 in Jamaicawww.50shadesofsilence.com/Candi CastleberryDMCA.comChe Pinkerton Connect with Darieth:TwitterLinkedInWebsiteYouTubeDid you enjoy this episode? Text it to a friend or tag us on Twitter at @inforallpodcast.Please note: this episode was recorded before the COVID-19 Pandemic and the George Floyd protests.

The New York SHIELD Act updated and expanded the state's data breach notification requirements and introduced new and broad cybersecurity requirements that exceed those imposed by most other states around the country. Jason G. Weiss and Peter Baldwin dive into the details of this sweeping new law and discuss how it raises the bar on cybersecurity regulations.

Amy Goldsmith and special guest Brian Califano talk to Rich Schoenstein about the implications of the recently adopted SHIELD Act and other considerations for the on-line security of businesses and workers who are operating remotely. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Struggling to comply with the New York SHIELD Act? Confused about the definitions of "private information" and "breach"? Wondering who should run point on compliance efforts? Tune in as Matthew Bernstein, Information Governance Strategist at MC Bernstein, data offers insights and advice for companies striving to comply with the New York privacy and security regulation.

Two years after her revenge porn nightmare began, Darieth Chisolm won the case against her ex-boyfriend. Should tech companies make it harder to weaponize their platforms against women?In this episode you will learn:About Darieth's personal experience with revenge pornHer challenge of taking legal action outside of the U.S.The impact of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)Examples of first steps on how victims can take legal actionObstacles to taking down nude content that is published onlineA brief history of policies like the SHIELD Act and Enough ActHow Freedom of Speech should not apply when it is enacted with the intent to do harmThe pervasiveness of victim shaming and victim blamingThe importance of parents having conversations about nude photos with their childrenResources for victims of revenge porn (linked below)How Darieth is supporting victims todayLinks and mentions:50 Shades of Silence DocumentarySHIELD ActEnough ActSpeakServeSoar.com membershipCyber Crimes Act of 2015 in Jamaicawww.50shadesofsilence.com/Candi CastleberryDMCA.comChe Pinkerton Connect with Darieth:TwitterLinkedInWebsiteYouTubeDid you enjoy this episode? Text it to a friend or tag us on Twitter at @inforallpodcast.Please note: this episode was recorded before the COVID-19 Pandemic and the George Floyd protests.

In today's episode, we speak with Kevin Thomas, New York State Senator, District 6. In our brief conversation, we learned so much about the good that he is bringing to the state of NY around data privacy. He talks about his background before office, the difference between the NY privacy and Shield acts, and a positive outcome at home during these difficult times. Below are some of the questions from the episode. Such a pleasure and Joy to have Kevin on and thankful for his efforts in our ever-changing and rising world of data privacy. Please enjoy! 1. The SHIELD Act is now in force – what was the impetus for it and when do you expect we’ll see some enforcement actions based on it?  How does it differ from the NY Privacy Act?2. What impact has the CCPA had on privacy in the U.S.?3. Would you share with us with goes on behind the scenes during the legislative process?  What would voters be surprised to learn?-The Senator is also currently in the process of writing legislation to create a code of ethics for tracking health data amid the COVID-19 health crisis -- which brings on an interesting/timely point of conversation, how data privacy is becoming an important topic during the pandemic.

  As President Trump says coronavirus is no big deal and cuts CDC funding because ‘who needs scientists or facts’, Jay and Tom suspend their breathing masks shopping to consider some of the top compliance articles and stories which caught their eye this week.  1.     The Wells Fargo DOJ/SEC settlement.  2.     Lawrence Hoskins FCPA verdicts overturned by trial court.  3.     The Ethisphere 2020 WME awards are out. Even better news this year.  4.     Compliance Week takes a deep dive into coronavirus and its impacts.  5.     NY state Shield Act coming into effect shortly. Is your company ready?  6.     Wow moments in compliance, Part 2. Geert Vermeulen continues his 5-part series.  7.     What is cognitive diversity and why does it matter? Vera Cherepanova reports.   8.     Will corruption cost Equatorial Guinea its IMF bailout? Rick Messick in the Global Anti-Corruption Blog.  9.     On the Compliance Podcast Network, Tom concludes his one month look at the role of HR in compliance on 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program.This week saw the following offerings: Monday-using promotion to encourage compliance; Tuesday-tone in the middle of an organization; Wednesday-tone at the bottom of an organization; Thursday-Gap Analysis for HR;  Friday-10 questions to pose to HR. Note 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program now has its own iTunes channel. If you want to binge out and listen to only these episodes, click here.  10.  Join Tom in Houston on March 10 as Convercent is hosting a Roundtable, from 12-2 at Steak 48. Our featured speaker will be Philip Winterburn and featured guest is Terri Springer from HP. We will focus on key KPIs for compliance. Information and Registration here.  11.  Join Tom in NYC on Thursday, March 12 as Convercent is hosting an Innovation Forum from 3:30-7 PM at Santina. This event will allow you to network with like-minded individuals within the ethics and compliance space and hear from Thomas Fox and Philip Winterburn as well. For more information and registration click here.  12.  If not Houston or NYC, how about joining Tom in Philly? Join Baker Tilly and the Philadelphia Chapter of the Institute of Internal Auditors for the 2020 Fraud and Ethics Symposium. Information here and registration here.  Tom Fox is the Compliance Evangelist and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Jay Rosen is Mr. Monitor and can be reached at jrosen@affiliatedmonitors.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Kip Boyle, CEO of Cyber Risk Opportunities, and Jake Bernstein, JD and CyberSecurity Practice Lead at Focal Law Group, give an update on CCPA and the New York SHIELD Act.

New legislation aimed at curbing foreign influence in U.S. elections also appears to be aimed at curbing Americans' influence in U.S. elections. Scott Blackburn of the Institute for Free Speech comments. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Foreign offers of assistance to federal campaigns would have to be reported to law enforcement under a bill the House plans to take up this week. Other provisions in the “SHIELD Act” would require disclosures on online political ads similar to those in print or on television and would make social media platforms keep records of ad requests. On this episode of Bloomberg Government's “Suspending the Rules” podcast, legislative analyst Michael Smallberg and senior editor for money and politics Ken Doyle break down the bill, Republicans' opposition to it, and its prospects in the Senate. Contact the BGOV podcast team at BGOVpodcast@bgov.com. Listen and subscribe to Suspending the Rules from your mobile device:  Via Apple Podcasts | Via Overcast | Via Stitcher | Via Spotify Hosts: Adam M. Taylor, Sarah Babbage Audio Editor: RJ Jewell

New York's new "SHIELD Act" purports to be a "game changing" enhancement to existing data breach notification and data protection laws.  In reality, it stinks.  It's not a tough law, it's not a game changer, and it won't make a difference in the way most MSPs conduct business.   Music: "Werq" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License

Extra bits of fun wrap a bunch of ZDNET articles. 0:00 - Intro 7:19 - IP over Avian Carriers 9:30 - Disappearing Sunday Comic 10:50 - Chrome Extension Notes 12:32 - Cast/Snip is Shelved 13:30 - SHIELD Act 15:37 - AT&T Employee Bribes 18:48 - Chilean Voter Data Leak 22:44 - WiFi Dragonblood 27:08 - Raspberry Pi High Speed Camera 29:15 - Kingdom Hearts 31:48 - MacBook Touchscreen 34:10 - 4500 Year Old Yeast  

In this clip from our show 'Believe', we discuss “World News.“ "David Adair on EMP Attacks, The SHIELD Act & How to Protect Yourself" What is an EMP attack? What's the SHIELD Act? National Spokesperson for the SHIELD Act David Adair joins us to help us prepare. Hosted by: Nicholas Upchurch Our website: http://www.believe.love  

In Episode 60 of the Super Podcast Action Committee, hosts Andrew Eisen and E. Zachary Knight talk about the latest SHIELD Act, the many letters of Treehouse Avatar Technologies, Nintendo’s EVO misstep, Square Enix’s bad idea to deal with jailbroken iOS devices, and fake geek girls. You can also find us on Facebook, on Twitter ...Continue reading ‘Super Podcast Action Committee – Episode 60’ »

Shakespeare's Histories are an odd category; they don't encompass all of the Shakespearean plays that are from historical events. I prefer to think of them as "Shakespeare's modern history", since they are events whose effects still mattered in Shakespeare's time. Please Support the SHIELD ActIf you want to hear more of Tom's Shakespeare recordings, here's one to start off with!

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 031. This is my appearance on the Smash Walls Radio Podcast, Episode 9: Patent Shenanigans, with host Trevor Hultner. We discussed patent trolls, the SHIELD Act, and related matters. For more on that issue, see Patent trolls as mafioso (and that's a compliment) and The SHIELD Act doesn't go far enough: protect victims of all patent aggressors, not just “trolls”. Update: See Trevor Hultner: Patent “Trolls” are Bad. Patents are Worse.

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 031. This is my appearance on the Smash Walls Radio Podcast, Episode 9: Patent Shenanigans, with host Trevor Hultner. We discussed patent trolls, the SHIELD Act, and related matters. For more on that issue, see Patent trolls as mafioso (and that’s a compliment) and The SHIELD Act doesn’t go far enough: protect victims of all patent aggressors, not just “trolls”. Update: See Trevor Hultner: Patent “Trolls” are Bad. Patents are Worse.

Justin and Jason discuss Udi's stay in Pasadena and his working relationship with Justin, how to manage sessions between a Javascript client and a RESTful API, solving the Catalyst network problems and why Jason thinks Javascript isn't the easiest language for kids to learn, thoughts on the Code.org video, how Pluggio was hacked, the evolution of the Catalyst stack and how Jason uses Node.js in combination with LAMP, the tradeoffs of building a startup on cutting edge technologies, the progress being made on AnyFu, the results of the Uber nearest cabs challenge, Jason's thoughts on the Upverter hackathon, the SHIELD Act and how patent trolls are going after popular podcasters, Justin's TV recommendations and why Jason listens to podcasts about the The Walking Dead, and Udi's concluding thoughts on America.

Podcast Patent Update: EFF & The SHIELD Act If you have not yet listened to Episode 292 of Podcast Answer Man where I introduced the Podcasting Patent Lawsuit, you may want to consider listening to that episode first. Now, several podcasters have received letters from Personal Audio, LLC with a request to contact them to […] The post 298 Podcast Patent Lawsuit Update – Support The SHIELD Act! appeared first on The Cliff Ravenscraft Show.