Podcasts about Doing Good Better

Please make sure to click the 'Follow' the show - it really helps surface the show to a wider audience (which i thank you for!)What does it feel like to immersive in the landscape, to meet strangers with no barriers, to carry your home on your back and sleep under the stars? In this recap episode, adventurer and Desert Island Survival founder Tom Williams joins us to explore the raw intimacy of travel, from bike packing the Spanish coastlines to makeshift raft rides down the River Severn.LISTEN TO THE FULL EPISODE HERE Tom's passion isn't just for castaway survival—though that's his day job—it's for microadventures that anyone can begin. He shares his love for wild kayaking trips, inflatable river journeys, and a recent first-time bike tour across Spain. These aren't just travel stories. They're invitations to reconnect with our senses, our surroundings, and the strangers we meet along the way.And when it comes to giving back, Tom offers a deeply considered pay-it-forward: GiveDirectly (givedirectly.org), a nonprofit that sends money directly to people living in extreme poverty. No middlemen. No assumptions. Just trust in the agency of those who need it most. In Tom's words: “They don't lack motivation. They lack money.” You don't need to start with a grand escape. Begin with a weekend. Inflate a kayak. Ride your bike somewhere unknown. Share a meal with strangers. The more personal and low-to-the-ground the adventure, the more it opens you up. And as Tom puts it, “You smell the rosemary, you feel the landscape, and you can eat so much.”Resources & Guest Links:Tom Williams:Instagram: @tomwilliamsaloneWebsite: desertislandsurvival.comReferenced Charity:GiveDirectly: givedirectly.orgLearn more about the charity model: Doing Good Better by William MacAskillAdventure Mentions:Bike tour from Bilbao to ValenciaKayak microadventures in ChileSevern Estuary float trip (inspired by Alastair Humphreys' microadventure)Send us a textSupport the showThanks For Listening.If you enjoyed this episode, please leave a comment and subscribe for more exciting content. Follow us https://linktr.ee/adventurediaries for updates. Have a topic suggestion? Email us at ideas@adventurediaries.com. AdventureDiaries.com#AdventureDiaries #AdventureStories #NationalGeographic #Discovery #NaturalWorld

The philosophy of Effective Altruism captured the minds and wallets of Silicon Valley's elite - using reason and evidence to maximize positive impact. But is this clinical approach to the world's problems really possible? And what happens now, after the shocking downfall of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, once a leader of the Effective Altruism community?In this episode, let's examine Effective Altruism's core principles of earning to give, cause prioritization, and longtermism that drew in Bankman-Fried and many tech leaders. Did his professed altruism merely mask grotesque fraud and self-interest? Or was he a true believer whose actions undermined the very ideas he championed?And more importantly, what can we learn when it comes to our own giving?Links from today's episode:FTX's Collapse Casts a Pall on ‘Effective Altruism' Movement - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/13/business/ftx-effective-altruism.html Sam Bankman-Fried, Effective Altruism, and the Question of Complicity | The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/sam-bankman-fried-effective-altruism-and-the-question-of-complicity Effective Altruism's Philosopher King Just Wants to Be Practical https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/09/oxford-philosophy-professor-william-macaskill-effective-altruism-interview/671597/ The Most Good You Can Do by Peter Singer | Foundational text on Effective Altruismhttps://bookshop.org/p/books/the-most-good-you-can-do-how-effective-altruism-is-changing-ideas-about-living-ethically-peter-singer/8495814?ean=9780300219869 Doing Good Better by William MacAskill | Foundational text on Effective Altruismhttps://bookshop.org/p/books/doing-good-better-how-effective-altruism-can-help-you-help-others-do-work-that-matters-and-make-smarter-choices-about-giving-back-william-macaskill/7788582?ean=9781592409662 ICYMI another episode you might enjoy:Episode#107 Dr. King's Radical Money BeliefsConnect With Genet “GG” Gimja:Website https://www.progressivepockets.comTwitter https://twitter.com/prgrssvpckts Work With Me:Email progressivepockets@gmail.com for brand partnerships, business inquiries, and speaking engagements.Support the Show.

What are the facts around Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX about which all parties agree? What was the nature of Will's relationship with SBF? What things, in retrospect, should've been red flags about Sam or FTX? Was Sam's personality problematic? Did he ever really believe in EA principles? Does he lack empathy? Or was he on the autism spectrum? Was he naive in his application of utilitarianism? Did EA intentionally install SBF as a spokesperson, or did he put himself in that position of his own accord? What lessons should EA leaders learn from this? What steps should be taken to prevent it from happening again? What should EA leadership look like moving forward? What are some of the dangers around AI that are not related to alignment? Should AI become the central (or even the sole) focus of the EA movement?William MacAskill is an associate professor in philosophy at the University of Oxford. At the time of his appointment, he was the youngest associate professor of philosophy in the world. He also cofounded the nonprofits Giving What We Can, the Centre for Effective Altruism, and 80,000 Hours, which together have moved over $300 million to effective charities. He's the author of What We Owe The Future, Doing Good Better, and Moral Uncertainty.Further reading:Episode 133: The FTX catastrophe (with Byrne Hobart, Vipul Naik, Maomao Hu, Marcus Abramovich, and Ozzie Gooen) — Our previous podcast episode about what happened in the FTX disaster"Who is Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) really, and how could he have done what he did? – three theories and a lot of evidence" — Spencer's essay about SBF's personalityWhy They Do It: Inside the Mind of the White-Collar Criminal by Eugene SoltesStaffSpencer Greenberg — Host / DirectorJosh Castle — ProducerRyan Kessler — Audio EngineerUri Bram — FactotumWeAmplify — TranscriptionistsAlexandria D. — Research and Special Projects AssistantMusicBroke for FreeJosh WoodwardLee RosevereQuiet Music for Tiny Robotswowamusiczapsplat.comAffiliatesClearer ThinkingGuidedTrackMind EasePositlyUpLift[Read more]

Share this episode: https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/361-sam-bankman-fried-effective-altruism Sam Harris speaks with William MacAskill about the implosion of FTX and the effect that it has had on the Effective Altruism movement. They discuss the logic of “earning to give,” the mind of SBF, his philanthropy, the character of the EA community, potential problems with focusing on long-term outcomes, AI risk, the effects of the FTX collapse on Will personally, and other topics. William MacAskill is an associate professor of moral philosophy at Oxford University, and author of Doing Good Better, Moral Uncertainty, and What We Owe The Future. He cofounded the nonprofits 80,000 Hours, Centre for Effective Altruism, and Giving What We Can, and helped to launch the effective altruism movement, which encourages people to use their time and money to support the projects that are most effectively making the world a better place. Website: ​​www.williammacaskill.com Twitter: @willmacaskill Learning how to train your mind is the single greatest investment you can make in life. That’s why Sam Harris created the Waking Up app. From rational mindfulness practice to lessons on some of life’s most important topics, join Sam as he demystifies the practice of meditation and explores the theory behind it.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: University groups as impact-driven truth-seeking teams, published by anormative on March 14, 2024 on The Effective Altruism Forum. A rough untested idea that I'd like to hear others' thoughts about. This is mostly meant as a broader group strategy framing but might also have interesting implications for what university group programming should look like. EA university group organizers are often told to "backchain" our way to impact: What's the point of your university group? "To create the most impact possible, to do the greatest good we can" What do you need in order to create that? "Motivated and competent people working on solving the world's most pressing problems" And as an university group, how do you make those people? "Find altruistic people, share EA ideas with them, provide an environment where they can upskill" What specific things can you do to do that? "Intro Fellowships to introduce people to EA ideas, career planning and 1-1s for upskilling" This sort of strategic thinking is useful at times, but I think that it can also be somewhat pernicious, especially when it naively justifies the status quo strategy over other possible strategies.[1] It might instead be better to consider a wide variety of framings and figure out which is best.[2] One strategy framing I want to propose that I would be interested in testing is viewing university groups as "impact driven truth-seeking teams." What this looks like An impact-driven truth-seeking team is a group of students trying to figure out what they can do with their lives to have the most impact. Imagine a scrappy research team where everyone is trying to figure out the answer to this research question - "how can we do the most good?" Nobody has figured out the question yet, nobody is a purveyor of any sort of dogma, everyone is in it together to figure out how to make the world as good as possible with the limited resources we have. What does this look like? I'm not all that sure, but it might have some of these elements: An intro fellowship that serves an introduction to cause prioritization, philosophy, epistemics, etc. Regular discussions or debates about contenders for "the most pressing problem of our time" More of a focus on getting people to research and present arguments themselves than having conclusions presented to them to accept Active cause prioritization Live google docs with arguments for and against certain causes Spreadsheets attempting to calculate possible QALYs saved, possible x-risk reduction, etc Possibly (maybe) even trying to do novel research on open research questions No doubt some of the elements we identified before in our backchaining are imporant too - the career planning and the upskilling Testing fit, doing cheap tests, upskilling, getting experience I'm sure there's much more that could be done along these lines that I'm missing or that hasn't been thought of yet at all Another illustrative picture - imagine instead of university groups being marketing campaigns for Doing Good Better, we could each be a mini-80,000 hours research team,[3] trying to start at first principles and building our way up, assisted by the EA movement, but not constrained by it. Cause prio for it's own sake for the sake of EA Currently, the modus operandi of EA university groups seems to be selling the EA movement to students by convincing them of arguments to prioritize the primary EA causes. It's important to realize that the EA handbook serves as an introduction to the movement called Effective Altruism [4] and the various causes that it has already identified as being impactful, not as an introductory course in cause prioritization. It seems to me that this is the root of much of the unhealthy epistemics that can arise in university groups.[5] I don't think that students in my proposed team should sto...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Works in Progress: The Long Journey to Doing Good Better by Dustin Moskovitz [Linkpost], published by Nathan Young on February 14, 2024 on The Effective Altruism Forum. @Dustin Moskovitz has written a piece on his reflections on doing good, EA, FTX and other stuff. Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org

Val Thorens in summer, how Australian ski resorts are dealing with lift queues and all about the latest campaign from Protect Our Winters. Iain was joined by Jen Tsang from ThatsLaPlagne.com, and Lindsey Dixon from Protect our Winters. Intersport Ski Hire Discount Code Save money on your ski hire by using the code ‘SKIPODCAST' at intersportrent.com, or simply take this link for your discount to be automatically applied at the checkout. SHOW NOTES Lindsey was last on the show in Episode 168, talking about taking the train to Val d'Isere (1:00) Lindsey skied at Skieasy in Chiswick (3:00) Moving Mountains offers the same option in Sussex (4:30) Listen to Iain's report on skiing in Australia in Episode 182 (6:00) Jen and her family took part in the VT Summit Games (8:45) It snowed while Jen was in Les 3 Vallees (9:30) https://twitter.com/3Vallees_france/status/1688461637164929024  Find out more about the new sports centre Le Board (11:00) The soft play at Le Board sounds great fun (14:45) Chez Pepe Nicholas is a wonderful mountain restaurant in Les Menuires (17:00) Jen was in Les Gets for the Tour de France (21:00) It's going to be WARM in the Alps this week (26:45) https://twitter.com/skipedia/status/1692068589220626849  The 'Send It For Climate' campaign from Protect Our Winters is due to launch very soon (28:00) Postcards and postboxes will be available from partners such as Ellis Brigham and Patagonia (31:00) It was the ninth warmest July in Australia (33:15) Perisher has had some tough getting criticism on social, especially TikTok (33:45) Thredbo have brought in a cap on lift pass sales (35:00) Australia has ‘Lodges' that work very much like our chalets (39:00) Listen to Iain's interview with Helen Coffey, the non-flying travel editor of The Independent (42:00) Many offsetting projects have been discredited (42:30) Iain donated to an organisation called ‘Cool Earth' (43:00) William MacAskill is the author of a book called ‘Doing Good Better' and one of the founders of ‘Effective Altruism' (43:30) Feedback I enjoy all feedback about the show, I like to know what you think, ideas for features so please contact on social @theskipodcast or by email theskipodcast@gmail.com Doug: "Listened to #182 on a run and loved it." Simon Burgess: “I really enjoyed the Thredbo/Perisher episode. It brought back some really nice memories.” Bo Spanding: “Truly enjoying the podcast, but I'm wondering why you're never talking about Scandinavian ski resorts. There are a lot of good areas in those countries (except for Denmark of course).”  We featured Svalbard in Episode 94 and Norway in Episode 58, plus our special interview with cross country skiers Andrew Musgrave and Andrew Young, who are based in Norway (47:00) If you like the podcast, there are couple of things you can do to help: 1) Review us on Apple Podcasts 2) Buy me a coffee at BuymeaCoffee.com/theskipodcast You can follow me @skipedia and the podcast @theskipodcast

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: My EA Journey, published by Eli Kaufman on August 20, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. Summary: This is the story of my EA journey. Sharing it as I believe that my story could be relevant to others particularly those who arrive in EA mid-career or not having worked on a cause area before. Background: Around two years ago a podcast appeared on my spotify playlist. It was one of the 80,000 hours episodes. It piqued my curiosity and after listening to it I wanted to learn more. Listening to some other episodes I realized there are a lot of concepts I don't understand so that drove me to look for more resources online. Up until that point I have not come across EA. I had a broad interest in global health & development, philanthropy and doing good but no practical insight how to go about this. I started reading about EA online, then signed up for the virtual intro fellowship. Within a couple of months I read a few books (Doing Good Better, The Life You Can Save, The Precipice to name a few). I didn't expect that, but soon I started having realizations that would make an impact on my life. Career: I work in IT with background in operations and specialize in implementing solutions based on Salesforce platform for organizations. For years I have been working with organizations that I didn't feel particularly aligned with. I kind of accepted the reality that my work is not where my passion is and had other hobbies and interests which I was excited about. The realization that I could use my skills and expertise to do something impactful and meaningful was an important one. I figured out that sooner or later I will come across the right opportunity and in the meantime was actively networking. Here's a post I wrote at the time. Community: One of the main sources of inspiration for me was the people I met in the EA community and the stories they shared. Being part of such a community dedicated to doing good was something that resonated with me. I found out that where I live (Amsterdam) has a pretty active EA community (including an awesome co-working space) so had a chance to attend meetups, virtual and in-person events, attended a couple of EAGx conferences, signed up to a bunch of Slack spaces and interacted with people from around the world. Fast forward: I signed a giving pledge as I felt this is something that makes sense to me. I applied to a job with The END Fund and started there earlier this year, feeling excited about using my skills to help an highly effective organization in the field of Neglected Tropical Diseases. Main lessons: Initially it may seem that everyone in EA are so dedicated and it makes you feel you're not doing enough. Don't try to be a maximalist! Just do your bit. I found people in the EA community to be helpful, and willing to share their experiences, offer advice, point newcomers to a useful direction. (If you would like to chat feel free to reach out here) There are many resources out there such as career advice, coaching, specific professional and cause area groups, podcasts. Networking is perhaps the most important aspect if you're looking for a way to get more involved or make a career change. If you happen to live in a place with an active community - check out local events. If you don't - EA Anywhere is a good starting point. EAGx conferences are a great way to learn more and talk to people. Don't feel that only highly specialized experts can contribute to making the world better. Each of us has something to bring. Go ahead and take the first step - write a post, go to a conference. Who knows, perhaps it will put you on a life-changing journey? Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: EA Survey 2022: How People Get Involved in EA, published by WillemSleegers on July 21, 2023 on The Effective Altruism Forum. Summary Personal contact (22.6%), 80,000 Hours (13.5%), and a book, article, or blog post (13.1%) are the most common sources where respondents first hear about EA. 80,000 Hours, local or university EA groups, personal contacts, and podcasts have become more common as sources of where respondents first encounter EA. Facebook, Giving What We Can, LessWrong, Slate Star Codex / Astral Codex Ten, The Life You Can Save, and GiveWell have become less common. Respondents whose gender selection was 'woman', 'non-binary', or 'prefer to self-describe', were much more likely to have first heard of EA via a personal contact (30.2%) compared to respondents whose gender selection was 'man' (18.4%). 80,000 Hours (58.0%), personal contact with EAs (44.0%), and EA groups (36.8%) are the most common factors important for getting involved in EA. 80,000 Hours, EA Groups, and EAGx have been increasing in importance over the last years. EA Global, personal contact with EAs, and the online EA community saw a noticeable increase in importance for helping EAs get involved between 2020 and 2022. Personal contact with EAs, EA groups, the online EA community, EA Global, and EAGx stand out as being particularly important among highly engaged respondents for getting involved. Respondents who identified as non-white, as well as women, non-binary, and respondents who preferred to self-describe, were generally more likely to select factors involving social contact with EAs (e.g., EA group, EAGx) as important. Where do people first hear about EA? Personal contacts continue to be the most common place where people first hear about EA (22.6%), followed by 80,000 Hours (13.5%) and a book, article, or blog post (13.1%). Comparison across all years The plot below shows changes in where people report first hearing of EA across time (since we ran the first EA Survey in 2014). We generally observe that the following routes into EA have been increasing in importance over time: 80,000 Hours Local or university EA groups Personal contacts Podcasts And the following sources have been decreasing in importance: Facebook Giving What We Can LessWrong Slate Star Codex / Astral Codex Ten The Life You Can Save GiveWell Comparison across cohorts Several of the patterns observed in the previous section are also observed when we look at where different cohorts of EA respondents first encountered EA. We see that more recent cohorts are more likely to have encountered EA via 80,000 Hours and podcasts, and are less likely to have encountered EA via Giving What We Can, LessWrong, and GiveWell. No clear cohort effects were observed for other sources. Note that the figure below omits categories with few observations (e.g., EA Global, EAGx). Further Details We asked respondents to provide further details about their responses, and provide a breakdown for some of the larger categories. Details of other categories are available on request. 80,000 Hours The largest number of respondents who first heard of EA through 80,000 Hours reported doing so through an independent search, e.g., they were searching online for "ethical careers" and found 80,000 Hours. The second largest category was via the website (which is potentially closely related, i.e., contact with the website resulting from independent search). Relatively much smaller proportions mentioned reaching 80,000 Hours through other categories, including more active outreach (e.g., advertisements). Books, articles, and blogs A book was cited as the most common source of encountering EA when considering the category of books, articles, and blogs. Books Books by Peter Singer were by far the most frequently cited books, followed by Doing Good Better by Willia...

How can we do the most good for the world? What's the "elephant in the room" when it comes to opiate addiction? What does working for two years in the Alberta Oil Sands look like? . In Episode 89, the Gentlemen prove that they know how to read by taking turns sharing about something they've read recently. They present their key learnings, reflections, challenges, and questions to each other and have a brief conversation. The topics vary greatly, but they find harmony in the end. . Discussed in this episode: Doing Good Better by William MacAskill Opioids and the Elephant in the Room by Vincent Lam Ducks: Two Years in the Oil Sands by Kate Beaton . The Harmonious Gentlemen Book Club: The Gents are going to read The Wisdom of Your Body by Hillary L. McBride. Join them by reading it yourself! They will discuss the book in a future episode and would love to hear your thoughts along the way.

Doing Good Better by Stew BittmanInstead of selfless service, let's try self-FULL service! 

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Seeking feedback on a MOOC draft plan: Skills for Doing Good Better, published by Michael Noetel on December 16, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. This is a Draft Amnesty Day draft. That means it's not polished, it's probably not up to my standards, the ideas are not perfect, and I haven't checked everything. I was explicitly encouraged to post something imperfect! Commenting and feedback guidelines. I'm slightly nervous about the amount of feedback I'll get on this, but am doing it because I sincerely do want constructive feedback. Please let me know if my assumptions are wrong, my plans misguided, my focus for the course poorly calibrated, or my examples un-compelling. Google Doc for commenting available upon request. A few months ago, I posted a diatribe on how to better use evidence to inform education and field building in effective altruism. This a draft where I try to practice what I preach. John Walker and I have been exploring ideas for another EA Massively Open Online Course (MOOC). This is currently Plan A. Big-picture intent Why make a MOOC? There are many great forms of outreach to build the community of people who care about effective altruism and existential risk. In contrast with most approaches, MOOCs provide: Authority, via their university affiliation Credentials for completion, with a university badge Minimal marginal cost per learner, by design Designed well, they can provide high-quality, evidence informed learning environments (e.g., with professional multimedia and interactive learning). These resources can feed into the other methods of outreach (e.g., fellowships). Course pitch to learners Many people want to do good with their lives and careers. The problem is: many well-intentioned attempts to improve the world are ineffective. Some are even harmful. With the right skills, you can have a massive impact on the world. This MOOC provides many of those skills. Through this course, you'll learn how to use your time and money to do as much good as possible, and give you a platform to keep learning about how to improve the world. Underlying assumptions To be transparent, most of these assumptions are not based on direct data from the community or general public. Where support is available, I've linked to the relevant section of resources. Where not, I've listed methods of testing those assumptions but am open to corrections or other methods. There are some skills and frameworks used in EA that help us answer the essential question: “how can I do the most good, with the resources available to me?” (see also, MacAskill) Examples of what we mean by ‘skills and frameworks' current CEA website: scope sensitivity, trade-offs, scout mindset, impartiality, (less confidently: expected value, thinking on the margin, consequentialism, importance/value of unusual ideas, INT framework, crucial considerations, forecasting, and fermi estimates See old whatiseffectivealtruism.com page: maximisation, rationality, cosmopolitanism, cost-effectiveness, cause neutrality, counterfactual reasoning These skills and frameworks are less ‘double-edged' than the moral philosophy The moral obligations in EA (e.g., Singer's drowning child) are a source of motivation for many but also a source of burnout and distress (see also forum tags on Demandingness of morality and Excited vs. obligatory altruism) In contrast, the evidence that ‘improving competence and confidence leads to sustainable motivation' is supported by dozens of meta-analyses across domains with no major downsides, to my knowledge These skills and frameworks are less controversial than the ‘answers' (e.g., existential risk, farmed animal welfare) As put by CEA, “we are more confident in the core principles” Misconceptions about EA (e.g., per 80k: ‘EA is just about fighting poverty'; ‘EA ignores systemic chan...

Luisteraars! Vanwege gierende hoestbuien van Jesse kon de vorige Rudi & Freddie Show niet doorgaan. Daarmee is er vier weken aan content gehamsterd, die we nu in één podcast over je gaan uitstorten. Te beginnen met ons bezoek aan de EA Global Rotterdam-conferentie. EA staat voor effectief altruïsme, een club mensen die bezig is met nadenken over hoe je zoveel mogelijk goed kunt doen voor de wereld. Kun je cynisch over doen, maar het was eigenlijk hartstikke mooi! Veel mensen ontmoet die oprecht goede ideeën hebben over goed doen. Daar hebben we het over. Helaas moeten we het dan ook hebben over het feit dat dit waarschijnlijk onze laatste all-inclusive uitnodiging voor een EA-conferentie was. Eén van de grote geldschieters van EA was namelijk Sam Bankman-Fried, tot een paar maanden geleden een miljardair met een cryptobeurs, maar naar nu blijkt: een loeiende fraudeur (oh ironie). Verder: de kwestie Arib. Vorige week vertrok bijna de hele ambtelijke top van de Tweede Kamer nadat zij zich in de kou gezet voelden door de politiek en de pers. En daar hebben ze groot gelijk in. Met stijgende verbazing keek Jesse naar de berichtgeving over het onderzoek naar oud-Kamervoorzitter Khadija Arib. Tot slot: het Belastingplan 2023. Er is wat aan het schuiven in het belastingdebat. De huidige staatssecretaris lijkt redelijk serieus over het afschaffen van overbodige fiscale regelingen. Er sneuvelen er nogal wat in het volgende Belastingplan. De vraag is nu of hij even enthousiast blijft als het gaat over negatief beoordeelde regelingen als de bedrijfsopvolgingsfaciliteit (waardoor vaak vermogende nazaten van bedrijfseigenaren vrijwel belastingvrij een erfenis kunnen ontvangen) of de landbouwvrijstelling (een vrijstelling op de winst op agrarische grond voor boeren). Leesvoer bij deze aflevering: • Hij kwam weer eens voorbij, onze aflevering over effectief altruïsme. Nog één keertje dan, mocht je hem gemist hebben: Een modale Nederlander behoort tot de rijkste 3,5 procent van de wereld. Waarom geven we toch zo weinig aan goede doelen? (https://corr.es/d00437) • Je kunt het niet hebben over het effectief altruïsme zonder de naam William MacAskill te laten vallen. Wij tipten Doing Good Better, zijn meest bekende en invloedrijke boek. (https://corr.es/d4e60e) • We hadden het ook over belastingen. Een onderwerp waar onze eigen Jesse al vrij wat stukken over geschreven heeft. Voor de liefhebber: Belastingen: makkelijker kunnen we het maar niet maken (https://corr.es/53bda6) en Dit honderd jaar oude belastingvoordeeltje voor boeren kost ons nog steeds miljarden (en is nergens goed voor). (https://corr.es/587ceb) • Eerder sprak Jesse in een Freddie zonder Rudi Show met onderzoeker Wouter Leenders over hoe de superrijken in Nederland nauwelijks belasting betalen: Deze onderzoeker neemt je mee langs de fiscale sluiproutes van de superrijken. (https://corr.es/991613) • En we hadden een nieuw boek te promoten! Arjen van Veelen schreef Rotterdam. Een boek over het Leven, zoals Rutger het samenvatte. Je bestelt het in onze eigen kiosk. (https://corr.es/0f8675)

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: The Giving Store- 100% Profits to GiveDirectly, published by Ellie Leszczynski on October 26, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. TLDR: Here's a link to a store selling housewares, kids/babies supplies, pet products and out door products where 100% of the profits go to GiveDirectly. Now, shipping is 100% free on all items in the store! My name is Ellie Leszczynski and I am the Social Media Director for the Consumer Power Initiative (also known as CPI), founded by Brad West. I got interested in volunteering because once I heard about the idea and the mission, I knew I just had to be a part of it. After becoming familiar with the Effective Altruism community, I realized the EA principles really inspire me to think of how I can be better in my own life and give back to others. So I went on the EA website and ordered my free book - “Doing Good Better” by William MacAskill. I am now looking forward to reading his new book, “What We Owe the Future," as well. And I really am amazed by the community that has been developed around using our time, money, grit, and creativity to maximize our positive impact for everyone, including even insects raised in alternative farming or consciousness being generated by machine learning. This is a vast world with a lot of moving parts and ideas going on in it, and the Consumer Power Initiative is taking initiative to promote an altruistic mission that doesn't take much to share and spread. As example, I would like to introduce you to an online shop called the Consumer Giving Store. The Giving Store directs all of the profit that it generates to GiveDirectly, a highly-rated charity that does direct cash transfers to the global poor. The storefront was designed by Kagen Zethmayr, one of the members of the Consumer Power Initiative, and coded by Madhav Malhotra, an EA who was inspired by a discussion with Brad in the comments of one of his posts. You may already be familiar with it. At the Giving Store, you can buy products curated from a variety of sources at no-more-than-retail prices, whose sole purpose in being sold in this venue is to generate profits toward a worthy cause without added cost to the consumer. This fits into the broader idea of the Profit for Good model (also called “Guided Consumption”), which the Consumer Power Initiative is trying to promote and normalize. The Giving Store not only allows people to help GiveDirectly by buying goods, it also allows them to send a signal to the broader world that consumers care and want to help in what ways they can. We believe that the general public will choose to buy goods from Profit for Good Companies (“PFGs”) when they can do it without paying more or sacrificing quality. We are confident in the proposition that, however flawed and/or selfish members of the general public may be, they would rather the beneficiaries of effective charities, such as those that help the global poor, get the benefits of profit generated from their activity rather than the people who currently get said benefits: the very wealthy, especially if not even doing the work involved in this activity. The general public at large, however, cannot create this infrastructure or the initial steps for the community. This project will need EAs and others who put additional effort in trying to make the world a better place. Brad discusses the different players in the Profit for Good and their motivations here. Vincent van der Holst reviews some of the advantages Profit for Good firms have here. I gather that EA is all about how we can use our resources and our time to have the highest positive impact in the world. And using consumer sentiment and our economies to further effective charities could really transform the world with everyday choices! We would like to thank you in advance for any purchasing you might do on ...

The veterinary industry is projected to be short 41,000 veterinarians in the next seven years. How can we start to address this gap today? This week, Shawn & Ivan speak with Dr. Jess Trimble of Anipanion about telehealth staff augmentation. Jess recommends Doing Good Better by William MacAskill (amzn.to/3SiNz0p) Learn more about Jess at anipanion.com.

Most societies commemorate and revere distant ancestors, with portraits, statues, streets, buildings, and holidays. We are fascinated with the pyramids in Egypt, Stonehenge in England and the earliest origins of our species in the savannas of Africa.  Our interest in humankind's deep past has created a collective blind spot about the prospects of our distant descendants thousand years into the future. For most of us, the deep future is a fantasy world, something you read about in science fiction novels.  But a growing number of thinkers are pushing back against the attitude that the future is a hypothetical we can discount in the favour of the here and now. Instead, they argue it's high time we start thinking seriously about the idea that humanity may only be in its infancy. That as a species we could potentially be around for thousands of years, with trillions of fellow humans to be born, each with vast potential to shape our future evolution, possibly even beyond Earth.  In sum, humankind urgently needs a thousand year plan or it risks losing millennia of human progress to the existential risks that stalk our all too dangerous present.  William MacAskill is a leading global thinker on how humanity could and should think about a common future for itself and the planet. He is an associate professor in philosophy at the University of Oxford and co-founder of Giving What We Can, the Centre for Effective Altruism, and 80,000 Hours, all philosophically inspired projects which together have raised hundreds of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousand of life years to support charities working to preserve human kind's potential for the millenia to come. He is the author of the international bestseller, Doing Good Better and What We Owe The Future. QUOTE:  "The future could be very big, indeed, at least if we don't cause humanity's untimely demise in the next few centuries. We could have a very large future ahead of us. And that means that if there is anything that would impact the well-being of, not just the present generation, but all generations to come, that would be of enormous moral importance."  The host of the Munk Debates is Rudyard Griffiths - @rudyardg.   Tweet your comments about this episode to @munkdebate or comment on our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/munkdebates/ To sign up for a weekly email reminder for this podcast, send an email to podcast@munkdebates.com.   To support civil and substantive debate on the big questions of the day, consider becoming a Munk Member at https://munkdebates.com/membership Members receive access to our 10+ year library of great debates in HD video, a free Munk Debates book, newsletter and ticketing privileges at our live events. This podcast is a project of the Munk Debates, a Canadian charitable organization dedicated to fostering civil and substantive public dialogue - https://munkdebates.com/ Producer: Marissa Ramnanan  Editor: Adam Karch  

Read the full transcript here. What is longtermism? Is the long-term future of humanity (or life more generally) the most important thing, or just one among many important things? How should we estimate the chance that some particular thing will happen given that our brains are so computationally limited? What is "the optimizer's curse"? How top-down should EA be? How should an individual reason about expected values in cases where success would be immensely valuable but the likelihood of that particular individual succeeding is incredibly low? (For example, if I have a one in a million chance of stopping World War III, then should I devote my life to pursuing that plan?) If we want to know, say, whether protests are effective or not, we merely need to gather and analyze existing data; but how can we estimate whether interventions implemented in the present will be successful in the very far future?William MacAskill is an associate professor in philosophy at the University of Oxford. At the time of his appointment, he was the youngest associate professor of philosophy in the world. A Forbes 30 Under 30 social entrepreneur, he also cofounded the nonprofits Giving What We Can, the Centre for Effective Altruism, and Y Combinator–backed 80,000 Hours, which together have moved over $200 million to effective charities. He's the author of Doing Good Better, Moral Uncertainty, and What We Owe The Future.[Read more]

Read the full transcriptWhat is longtermism? Is the long-term future of humanity (or life more generally) the most important thing, or just one among many important things? How should we estimate the chance that some particular thing will happen given that our brains are so computationally limited? What is "the optimizer's curse"? How top-down should EA be? How should an individual reason about expected values in cases where success would be immensely valuable but the likelihood of that particular individual succeeding is incredibly low? (For example, if I have a one in a million chance of stopping World War III, then should I devote my life to pursuing that plan?) If we want to know, say, whether protests are effective or not, we merely need to gather and analyze existing data; but how can we estimate whether interventions implemented in the present will be successful in the very far future?William MacAskill is an associate professor in philosophy at the University of Oxford. At the time of his appointment, he was the youngest associate professor of philosophy in the world. A Forbes 30 Under 30 social entrepreneur, he also cofounded the nonprofits Giving What We Can, the Centre for Effective Altruism, and Y Combinator–backed 80,000 Hours, which together have moved over $200 million to effective charities. He's the author of Doing Good Better, Moral Uncertainty, and What We Owe The Future.

What is longtermism? Is the long-term future of humanity (or life more generally) the most important thing, or just one among many important things? How should we estimate the chance that some particular thing will happen given that our brains are so computationally limited? What is "the optimizer's curse"? How top-down should EA be? How should an individual reason about expected values in cases where success would be immensely valuable but the likelihood of that particular individual succeeding is incredibly low? (For example, if I have a one in a million chance of stopping World War III, then should I devote my life to pursuing that plan?) If we want to know, say, whether protests are effective or not, we merely need to gather and analyze existing data; but how can we estimate whether interventions implemented in the present will be successful in the very far future?William MacAskill is an associate professor in philosophy at the University of Oxford. At the time of his appointment, he was the youngest associate professor of philosophy in the world. A Forbes 30 Under 30 social entrepreneur, he also cofounded the nonprofits Giving What We Can, the Centre for Effective Altruism, and Y Combinator–backed 80,000 Hours, which together have moved over $200 million to effective charities. He's the author of Doing Good Better, Moral Uncertainty, and What We Owe The Future.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Announcing a new introduction to effective altruism, published by Clifford on August 23, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. We've released "a new intro essay for a general audience: "What is effective altruism?" An earlier post shared the essay and mentioned that there were still some changes to make. The essay is now finished and we'd be excited for people to share it on social media and with friends. The goal of the essay is to accurately get across what effective altruism is, rather than to be as inspiring as possible to new people who might get involved. Our hope is that this is the go-to explanation of what effective altruism is for someone who has already heard about the idea, and wants to better understand what it involves (e.g. someone actively searching “effective altruism” on google). We also imagine it being useful to people outside of the community such as journalists or university professors, and wanted to present EA in a way that's clear and puts our best foot forward to those kinds of audiences. In order to serve these aims, we decided to lead with a clear description of what EA is, followed by concrete examples of EA work, then the values that define EA, and then an FAQ responding to common misunderstandings or objections. In contrast, a more inspirational article might have started with a striking example or story. But we think this is better left to a wide range of articles with strong but narrow appeal, rather than the central explanation of what EA is. (Though we also think a relatively direct explanation can be inspiring to at least some readers, especially those with the most affinity for the ideas.) The article also doesn't aim to give people a ‘full' understanding of EA. Instead, we imagine people clicking through to materials in the resources pages, like Doing Good Better, the 80k intro to EA podcast series, or the handbook / introductory course This project took several months; we've spent time figuring out appropriate aims for the essay, drafting the key messages we wanted to get across, and working through several iterations of drafts from a number of authors. Some of the things we especially struggled with included: striking a balance between being engaging & concise, but also clear & defensible; figuring out which canonical examples to use and how to illustrate them visually; deciding how to frame the four values & several sentence description of EA. I'm really grateful to everyone who helped with this project, and to Ben Todd for writing the final version of the essay. Feedback is welcome, especially from people who didn't know much about EA prior to reading the essay. We might not work on significant changes in the near future, but expect to make iterations in the coming year or two, so we're collecting all the feedback we receive for then. Read the essay. Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: What We Owe The Future is out today, published by William MacAskill on August 16, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. So, as some of you might have noticed, there's been a little bit of media attention about effective altruism / longtermism / me recently. This was all in the run up to my new book, What We Owe The Future, which is out today! I think I've worked harder on this book than I've worked on any other single project in my life. I personally spent something like three and a half times as much work on it as Doing Good Better, and I got enormous help from my team, who contributed more work in total than I did. At different times, that team included (in alphabetical order): Frankie Andersen-Wood, Leopold Aschenbrenner, Stephen Clare, Max Daniel, Eirin Evjen, John Halstead, Laura Pomarius, Luisa Rodriguez, and Aron Vallinder. Many more people helped immensely, such as Joao Fabiano with fact checking and the bibliography, Taylor Jones with graphic design, AJ Jacobs with storytelling, Joe Carlsmith with strategy and style, and Fin Moorhouse and Ketan Ramakrishnan with writing around launch. I also benefited from the in-depth advice of dozens of academic consultants and advisors, and dozens more expert reviewers. I want to give a particular thank-you and shout out to Abie Rohrig, who joined after the book was written, to run the publicity campaign. I'm immensely grateful to everyone who contributed; the book would have been a total turd without them. The book is not perfect — reading the audiobook made vivid to me how many things I'd already like to change — but I'm overall happy with how it turned out. The primary aim is to introduce the idea of longtermism to a broader audience, but I think there are hopefully some things that'll be of interest to engaged EAs, too: there are deep dives on moral contingency, value lock-in, civilisation collapse and recovery, stagnation, population ethics and the value of the future. It also tries to bring a historical perspective to bear on these issues more often than is usual in the standard discussions. The book is about longtermism (in its “weak” form) — the idea that we should be doing much more to protect the interests of future generations. (Alt: that protecting the interests of future generations should be a key moral priority of our time.). Some of you have worried (very reasonably!) that we should simplify messages to “holy shit, x-risk!”. I respond to that worry here: I think the line of argument is a good one, but I don't see promoting concern for future generations as inconsistent with also talking about how grave the catastrophic risks we face in the next few decades are. In the comments, please AMA - questions don't just have to be about the book, can be about EA, philosophy, fire raves, or whatever you like! (At worst, I'll choose to not reply.) Things are pretty busy at the moment, but I'll carve out a couple of hours next week to respond to as many questions as I can. If you want to buy the book, here's the link I recommend:. (I'm using different links in different media because bookseller diversity helps with bestseller lists.) If you'd like to help with the launch, please also consider leaving an honest review on Amazon or Good Reads! Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Why You Should Give a TEDX Talk, published by Kearney Capuano on August 3, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. For helpful comments I thank Emma Williamson and Chloe Shrager TLDR: It's easy to give a TEDx Talk at your university, yet I think very few university students do. I think this talk has a unique opportunity to frame EA from a personal perspective, in a way that makes it more palatable to your average audience. I would advise against giving a “This is what Effective Altruism is” talk for various reasons (PR risks most notably). Instead, I would encourage people specifically interested in communications to deliver a talk to their university on something like “I care about the world. Here are some tools I learned from EA on how I can do my best to help,” or “I want to do good. EA principles helped me do that.” After doing my talk, my university EA group gained much more traction, many students reached out wanting to learn more about EA, audience members donated to AMF, hundreds of people received a Doing Good Better book, and a handful of students told me they are considering changing their career path. Watch Ted Talk Here In this post I will go over Who should give a TED Talk? Lessons learned from giving a TEDx Talk Why I might be wrong Part 1: Who should give a TED talk I don't encourage all people to give a Ted or Tedx talk. If you are thinking about giving a talk about EA, definitely consult others before doing so. I want to specify that this post is directed at people interested in communications. Specifically, I think giving a university Tedx talk on EA requires the ability to digest EA ideas and frame them in an appealing way for a “normal” college audience. If you are well versed in public speaking (or feel like you have the potential to be), are more eloquent than I am, and feel like your university may be a target audience for these ideas, I would encourage you to consider giving a Tedx Talk. Part 2: Lessons learned from giving a TED Talk Pros: “Weird EA ideas” can be communicated in a non-weird way. We should probably do this more often. There are many university students out there who are already thinking about these ideas but don't know EA exists. Ted and TedX talks are a great way of reaching these audiences. Talking to an audience about how much you care about these principles may inspire others to care. After the talk, three parents independently came up to me and said “This inspired me to donate to the Against Malaria Foundation. Being a student that takes these ideas seriously may rub off on other students to take these ideas seriously. So far, over twenty students at Georgetown have reached out to me after seeing the talk (either from being in the audience or watching the youtube clip) with various requests such as “Can we meet to talk through plans to shift my area of study towards one that better helps the world?” or “I've had thoughts like these before and can very much relate to the talk but I had no idea something like EA existed, can you teach me more?” or my favorite “Because of this talk I am changing my career plans” (three students told me this.) b. After the talk, students reached out about getting involved with the Georgetown EA group, and our website had substantially more views. Tedx Talks are a great way to encourage people to read books. I (well actually EA Books Direct) provided everyone in the audience with a copy of Doing Good Better. Days after the talk I walked around campus and saw a few people reading it on the lawn together. Seeing this made me smile. Ted talks reach a large audience. They're also a well-trusted brand. EA ideas may be taken more seriously when communicated through a credible, known source. Cons: This isn't the best information I could have provided for an Intro to EA talk. As I was preparing, I felt ...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Reasons I've been hesitant about high levels of near-ish AI risk, published by elifland on July 22, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. I've been interested in AI risk for a while and my confidence in its seriousness has increased over time, but I've generally harbored some hesitation about believing some combination of short-ish AI timelines[1] and high risk levels[2]. In this post I'll introspect on what comes out when I try to expand on reasons for this hesitation and categorize the reasons into seeming (likely) unjustified vs. potentially justified. I use justified as “should affect my credence in AI risk levels, timelines, etc.” and unjustified as the opposite. These categorizations are very tentative: I could imagine myself changing my mind about several considerations. I also describe my current overall attitude toward the importance of AI risk given these considerations. Unjustified Contrarian-within-EA instincts I have somewhat contrarian instincts and enjoy debating, playing devil's advocate, etc. It feels boring to agree with the 80,000 Hours ranking of AI risk as the most important problem; it would feel more fun to come up with a contrarian take and try to flesh out the arguments and get people on board. But this doesn't mean that the contrarian take is right; in fact, given my beliefs about how talented EAs are I should expect the current take to be more likely than the contrarian one before looking into it. Desire for kids I've always enjoyed spending time with kids and as such have likely wanted to have kids for as long as I can remember. It's hard for me to grapple with the idea that my kids' most likely reason to die young would be AI risk, and perhaps not even close. I've become more hesitant about my desire to have kids due to a high perceived risk level and also potential reduced productivity effects during a very important period; I'd want to be able to spend a lot of time with my kids and not treat them as a second priority to my work. This has been tough to swallow. Uncomfortable about implications for EA I got into EA via Doing Good Better and was originally excited about the opportunity to clearly save many lives throughout my career. I went vegan due to animal welfare concerns and still feel a lot of intuitive sympathy for the huge amounts of suffering many humans and animals are currently going through. It feels a bit sad to me that as my beliefs have been evolving it's been hard to deny that there's a decent chance that AI safety and things that feed into it (e.g. movement building, rationality/epistemics improvement, grantmaking, etc.) have a much higher EV than other activities all else equal. I might feel more at peace if my beliefs implied higher levels of variance in what the most impactful activities were. Having a relatively diverse and inclusive movement feels important and more fun than one where the most talented people are mostly funneled into the same few activities. Doubly so compared to a focus on AI that feels weird to many people and could be badly mistaken given our level of understanding. And I'd still be reluctant to encourage people who feel very passionate about what they do and are doing useful things to switch to working on AI safety. But it might just be a fact about the world that AI safety is by a substantial amount the most important cause area, and this is actually consistent with original EA arguments about unexpectedly high differences in impact between cause areas. And how I feel about this fact shouldn't influence whether I believe it's true. Feelings about AI risk figures I admire Eliezer in a lot of ways but I find it hard to get through his writing given his drawn out style, and he seems overly bombastic to me at times. I haven't read the sequences though I might at some point. I haven't gotten past Ch...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: 300+ Flashcards to Tackle Pressing World Problems, published by AndreFerretti on July 11, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. How often did you read an article to then forget it? With these 300+ flashcards, you can memorize key facts and test your knowledge of pressing world problems such as animal welfare, global health, longtermism, and meta-effective altruism. Get these flashcards at your fingertips from Thought Saver in the four embedded quizzes below, or download the Anki decks at the bottom. [Note: Sources are in the Thought Saver/Anki flashcards, as I didn't want to fill this post with links. Also, applying and understanding is more valuable than memorizing facts—see Bloom's Taxonomy. My favorite sources to dig deeper are Our World in Data, 80,000 Hours' problem profiles, and Doing Good Better by William MacAskill.] Animal Welfare 1% of US animal donations went to farmed animal organisations in 2015 3,000 US farm animals were killed for every shelter animal death in 2015 3% of US donations were aimed at helping the environment or animals in 2020 75% of agricultural land is used for livestock (including grazing and land to grow animal feed) 30B chickens were alive in 2020 A centralized nervous system is what enables animals to have experiences Animal shelters received 65% of US animal donations in 2015 Broiler chickens in factory farms are usually killed when 6 weeks old China is the country that produces the most meat in tons China is the country that produces the most pigmeat China is the country that produces the most seafood Clean meat Meat grown in cell culture rather than in an animal's body Cows eat 6 calories for each calorie of beef produced Does the majority of seafood production come from wild fish catch or fish farming?Fish farming Eating 300 eggs indirectly kills one chicken Eating 3,000 calories of chicken meat kills one chicken Effective animal campaigns affect 10-100 chicken-life years per $ spent Farmed hens make 20 times as many eggs as they were born to do Fish farming has increased 50-fold globally from 1960 until 2015 Flexitarian A person who has a primarily vegetarian diet but occasionally eats meat or fish foodimpacts.org An online tool ranking animal foods based on suffering and emissions Global meat production grew 200% between 1970-2020 Humanity farmed 1 trillion insects in 2020 Humanity killed 100B farmed fish in 2017 Humanity killed 2,000 land animals every second in 2016 Humanity killed 300B farmed shrimp in 2017 Humanity killed 69B farmed chickens for meat in 2018 Humanity killed 70B land animals in 2016 Less than 0.1% of global donations are aimed at helping farmed animals Mark Post developed the first cultured meat hamburger in 2013 Open Wing Alliance A coalition aiming to eliminate battery cages for chickens Over 90% of global farm animals lived in intensive farms in 2018 Peter Singer wrote Animal Liberation Speciesism Treating members of one species as morally more important than members of other species Switching to a plant-based diet spares 100 vertebrates every year (mostly fish and chicken) The average meat consumption per capita in China has grown 15-fold since 1961 The average meat consumption per capita in China was 60kg in 2017 The average meat consumption per capita in India was 4kg in 2017 The average meat consumption per capita in the United States was 120kg in 2017 The average global meat consumption per capita has grown from 20kg to 40kg between 1961-2014 The EU will ban cages for farmed chickens by 2027 The Humane League launched the Open Wing Alliance The United States is the country that produces the most cattle and poultry Three foods to avoid that remove the most animal suffering from your diet-Chicken -Eggs -Fish Top Charities recommended by Animal Charity Evaluators in 2021 -Faunalytics -The Humane League ...

Câu chuyện về chó Balto, Togo và những chú chó kéo xe là một trong những giai thoại có sức ảnh hưởng nhất về loài chó đối với người dân Mỹ. Lịch sử nước Mỹ ghi nhận sự kiện này là "Cuộc đua vĩ đại của lòng từ bi" (Great race of mercy) hoặc "Cuộc đua chuyển huyết thanh" (Serum run). ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Cuộc đua định mệnh: những chú chó vượt bão tuyết cứu một thị trấn khỏi dịch bệnh chết người Được viết bởi: Fei-Fei Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Cuoc-dua-dinh-menh-nhung-chu-cho-vuot-bao-tuyet-cuu-mot-thi-tran-khoi-dich-benh-chet-nguoi-knt --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Shopee thay đổi liên tục, TMĐT biến đổi hàng ngày luôn có cơ hội cho những người mới. Và nếu bạn đủ trì, đủ kiên nhẫn, đủ kiến thức và 1 chút may mắn thì không ai có thể cướp lấy cơ hội kinh doanh trên Shopee của bạn cả. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: 8 Lời khuyên dành cho seller mới Bán hàng Trên SHOPEE Được viết bởi: Vũ Minh Trà Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/8-Loi-khuyen-danh-cho-seller-moi-Ban-hang-Tren-SHOPEE-upKIStTF6NDF --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Lần đầu tiên mà bạn xem SE* là năm bao nhiêu tuổi? Có thể là ở độ tuổi dậy thì, có thể là chưa bao giờ xem, cũng có thể là vừa mới xem cách đây ít phút trước. Nhưng xem lúc nào cũng không quan trọng, quan trọng là chúng ta đã có đủ nhận thức để hiểu được việc xem Se* có ảnh hưởng thế nào đến chúng ta mà thôi. Dạo gần đây việc trẻ em xem se* đang là một báo động đỏ, vậy thì trẻ em xem se* thì lỗi thuộc về ai? ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: How I Recommend University Groups Approach the Funding Situation, published by sabrinac on July 4, 2022 on The Effective Altruism Forum. Thanks to Emma Abele, Harry Taussig, Jemima Jones, George Rosenfeld, James Aung, Emma Williamson and Matt Burtrell for all their helpful feedback and comments. I. Introduction Over the past few months, there's been a lot of discussion about the funding situation in EA and how it'll change the community's culture, epistemics, and public reputation. Like most sub-areas in the community, the funding situation will affect university groups and pose new challenges (and create new opportunities) for community-builders. I'm writing this post to address how the increase in funding uniquely affects university groups and propose how community-builders should mitigate potential risks. While I'm largely optimistic about the trajectory of university groups, I also have a number of community-health concerns which I outline below. Especially if some of the problems outlined in this post are true, we want to create healthy norms and cultures within EA groups before scaling them. I expect this post will be most useful for anyone who currently runs a university EA group. TLDR: The increase of funding for community groups is great overall, however, there are a few ways it'll uniquely negatively affect groups: Degrade group epistemics, especially because young people are more impressionable and drawn to potential employers offering them free stuff Expand the neartermist-longtermist divide within EA groups, which might be bad for multiple reasons Increase rent-seeking behavior (e.g. students who want funding and free trips to EA conferences) Groups can mitigate these concerns in the following ways: Ask for help when sensitive situations arise Communicate carefully about money in EA and why certain opportunities are free for students Create healthy group norms around spending, such as avoiding buying extravagant things Maintain altruistic signals such as buying vegan food, promoting effective giving, and talking candidly about why you got involved in EA The last section of the post also has an FAQ with questions that community-builders commonly get asked and sample responses. If you're a community-builder who's had problems with the issues I've detailed in this post, especially with problematic individuals in your group, I strongly encourage you to reach out to the community-health team for support. You can fill out this form to contact them or email Catherine Low directly (catherine@centreforeffectivealtruism.org). II. How the funding situation uniquely affects university groups Funding will create a lot of new opportunities for groups and their members. However, it'll also change group cultures, expand the opportunity gap between working on neartermist vs. longtermist causes, and attract people who are more rent-seeking than altruistically inclined. This section focuses on outlining increased funding's positive/negative effects on groups. You can skip to this section if you want to read my proposals for what groups should do. Degrading Epistemics I pretty much agree with everything that this post says in terms of money being an epistemic problem for groups, and this is my biggest concern. “Consider the case of a college freshman. You read your free copy of Doing Good Better and become intrigued. You explore how you can get involved. You find out that if you build a longtermist group in your university, EA orgs will pay you for your time, fly you to conferences and hubs around the world and give you all the resources you could possibly make use of. This is basically the best deal that any student society can currently offer. Given this, how much time are you going to spend critically evaluating the core claims of longtermism? And how likely are you to w...

Tư duy logic chính là quá trình con người sử dụng suy luận, phán đoán, nhận thức của bản thân trong việc nhận định, đánh giá để phản ánh hiện thực khách quan nhằm tìm hiểu sự vật. Vậy làm sao để rèn luyện tư duy logic? ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Tư duy logic và phương pháp rèn luyện Được viết bởi: Bảo Bình Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Tu-duy-logic-va-phuong-phap-ren-luyen-GZ3JSYtQVFDX --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Thế giới vật lý đang tận hưởng quãng thời gian hoà bình ổn định, lâu dài cùng sự ảnh hưởng của dân chủ và tự do hơn bao giờ hết. Nhưng những điều này dường như không tồn tại trên không gian mạng, khi hàng tỷ người dùng đã và đang trở nên giống nhau và thuần phục một sức mạnh đến từ việc trải nghiệm nội dung. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: AI – TRÍ TUỆ NHÂN TẠO ĐANG ĐƯỢC SỬ DỤNG ĐỂ THAO TÚNG HÀNH VI CỦA CON NGƯỜI NGÀY NAY NHƯ THẾ NÀO? Được viết bởi: Đức Nhân Link bài viết: https://b.link/youtube-AI-p1 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Bản thân các công ty sở hữu AI cũng bất ngờ trước kết quả của AI đem lại. AI đã khiến các công ty này rẽ sang một hướng khác đi chệch ra khỏi lý tưởng “Công nghệ sẽ làm thế giới tốt đẹp hơn” sang một hình thức khác là: sở hữu tâm trí của người dùng như một nô lệ để phục vụ cho những mục đích của những nền tảng và công ty công nghệ sở hữu AI. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: AI – TRÍ TUỆ NHÂN TẠO ĐANG ĐƯỢC SỬ DỤNG ĐỂ THAO TÚNG HÀNH VI CỦA CON NGƯỜI NGÀY NAY NHƯ THẾ NÀO? Được viết bởi: Đức Nhân Link bài viết: https://b.link/youtube-AI-p1 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

AI - Trí tuệ nhân tạo chính là một trong những phát minh ngoạn mục nhất trong lịch sử nhân loại. Một câu chuyện trải dài từ những ngày đầu tiên khi Ada Lovelace viết về suy nghĩ của mình sẽ thế nào khi máy móc trở nên thông minh hơn, cho tới thời điểm hiện tại khi các nền tảng với sự giúp đỡ của AI đang thao túng và điều khiển hành vi của con người, đặc biệt là thế hệ trẻ. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: AI – TRÍ TUỆ NHÂN TẠO ĐANG ĐƯỢC SỬ DỤNG ĐỂ THAO TÚNG HÀNH VI CỦA CON NGƯỜI NGÀY NAY NHƯ THẾ NÀO? Được viết bởi: Đức Nhân Link bài viết: https://b.link/youtube-AI-p1 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Khi nhắc đến công nghệ nano, đối tượng chính thường là những hạt có kích thước rất nhỏ, thật sự rất rất nhỏ. Nhưng tại sao những hạt có kích thước rất nhỏ lại có tác động lớn như vậy? Tại sao những thứ chúng ta còn không thể nhìn thấy lại có thể tái định hình thế giới? Hãy tưởng tượng thay vì lắp ráp một chiếc xe có những chức năng tùy biến thì chúng ta có thể lắp ráp những tế bào, những vật liệu có thể tác động đến những ngóc ngách nhỏ nhất của vũ trụ và cung cấp cho con người "quyền năng của Chúa". ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Công nghệ nano - Quyền năng của Chúa trong thế kỉ 21 Được viết bởi: Mr.White Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Cong-nghe-nano-Quyen-nang-cua-Chua-trong-the-ki-21-10gl --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Mỗi lần Cục dự trữ liên bang Mỹ (FED) điều chỉnh lãi suất, kinh tế thế giới lại rung động. Chỉ mới 10 ngày đầu năm 2016, 2.500 tỷ USD đã “bốc hơi” khỏi thị trường chứng khoán toàn cầu (riêng chứng khoán Trung Quốc là 1.800 tỷ USD). Nhiều nhà kinh tế đã lên tiếng cảnh báo, nền kinh tế thế giới đang tiến sát tới “bờ vực khủng hoảng”. Người ta đã gắn các cuộc khủng hoảng tài chính với chu kỳ tăng lãi suất của Cục dự trữ liên bang Mỹ (FED). Lần gần đây nhất với việc tăng lãi suất năm 2004 - 2006 đã làm rủi ro thị trường dưới chuẩn của Mỹ tăng lên, dẫn tới cuộc khủng hoảng tài chính năm 2008. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Những điều họ muốn che đậy chúng ta về bản chất thực sự của khủng hoảng kinh tế? Được viết bởi: Nguyễn Nam Khánh Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Nhung-dieu-ho-muon-che-day-chung-ta-ve-ban-chat-thuc-su-cua-khung-hoang-kinh-te-86x --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Những câu hỏi “tại sao” của mọi đứa trẻ luôn khiến cho cha mẹ chúng bị “phiền hà”. Trong khi đó, điều này lại khiến chúng cảm thấy tự tin khi có thể “thấu hiểu” được thế giới bên ngoài kia. Con người khi lớn lên, thường vô tình quên việc “tìm hiểu” sâu sắc những gì xung quanh mình, vì không có thời gian, và vì chấp nhận thường là một hành động “nhẹ nhàng” hơn. Tuy nhiên, chính nhờ thấu hiểu được sự hình thành và phát triển, chúng ta có năng lực nhìn thấy một thứ rất vĩ đại, to lớn, và quan trọng ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: FIRST PRINCIPLE – TƯ DUY NGUYÊN BẢN: CÁCH ĐỂ TẠO RA SỰ “SÂU SẮC” Được viết bởi: SimpleDay of Đăng Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/FIRST-PRINCIPLE-TU-DUY-NGUYEN-BAN-CACH-DE-TAO-RA-SU-SAU-SAC-ph6 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Sự kiện rúng động gần đây, người con gái đầu độc cha ruột bằng chất độc Xyanua - loại chất độc thường được dùng trong truyện Conan. Sau đó, cô đem thi thể cha mình ra ngoài vườn lấp lại bằng xi măng, đốt nhà rồi chạy qua nhà ông nội, kể về vụ việc có một người lạ đột nhập vào nhà mình. Vậy tại sao cô ấy lại làm thế ? Hãy cùng Spiderum tìm hiểu lý do đằng sau những vụ sát hại người thân nhé ! ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Tâm lý của những kẻ mưu sát người thân ruột thịt Được viết bởi: UnlockKitty Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Tam-ly-cua-nhung-ke-muu-sat-nguoi-than-ruot-thit-vsjtqCH1zBLE --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Bạn có biết rằng, Lợn thậm chí còn thông minh hơn cả chó và cá heo. Lợn cũng có những thói quen cực kỳ sạch sẽ hay Lợn cũng có 1 lịch sử vô cùng huy hoàng. Xin mời đến với Những sự thật thú vị mà tất cả chúng ta đều hiểu lầm về loài lợn. Hãy cùng đòi lại công bằng cho lợn nào các bạn ! ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

“Squid Game” (Trò chơi con mực) đã tạo nên cơn sốt toàn cầu bởi nội dung và cốt truyện chân thực, đặc biệt phản ánh khoảng cách giàu nghèo thời hậu dịch và cho thế giới bên ngoài một cái nhìn thoáng qua về sự bất bình đẳng trong xã hội Hàn Quốc hiện đại, phản ánh sự thật tàn khốc của xã hội Hàn Quốc ngày nay. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Một trong những thể hiện phổ biến nhất khi nói về đặc trưng tính cách dân tộc Việt Nam, đó là có xu hướng "không vui khi chứng kiến thành công của người khác". Trước giờ rất ít người dám thừa nhận điều này, đơn giản bởi đây là suy nghĩ không cần nói ra cũng thấy tồi. Dẫu vậy, sự thật vẫn luôn tồn tại. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://b.link/doing-good-better-youtube Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Bàn về tính đố kỵ của người Việt. Được viết bởi: Nguyễn Ngọc Long Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Ban-ve-tinh-do-ky-cua-nguoi-Viet-d9g --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Nhân loại đang sở hữu một quyền năng, bằng 1 cách rất dễ dàng với chi phí rẻ, biến những thứ nguyên liệu sẵn có trở thành bất cứ vật dụng gì mình cần để phục vụ cho cuộc sống. Và đó là nhựa. Rõ ràng công dụng của Nhựa là vô cùng khủng khiếp và chúng đã thay đổi cuộc sống của chúng ta. Nhưng liệu rằng, có khi nào công nghệ sản xuất nhựa vượt khỏi tầm tay kiểm soát của con người không? ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/DGB Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Quả thực là rất khó phủ nhận tính huyền bí về các câu chuyện tiên tri, hoặc có thể là khó để phá bỏ cảm giác huyền bí trong thế giới quan của những người thực sự cảm thấy vậy. Tiên tri mà không nói rõ sự kiện, không biết đường nào mà lần thì lời tiên tri nó vô dụng. Hoặc chỉ có tác dụng là giúp các bạn suy diễn ra sự màu nhiệm, huyền bí hơn thôi ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Tiên tri và bói toán vô dụng như thế nào? Được viết bởi: Trương Xuân Hoàng Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Tien-tri-va-boi-toan-vo-dung-nhu-the-nao-FRQuwCHcu3V0 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Một trong những ý kiến phổ biến nhất liên quan đến phụ nữ là BẠN KHÔNG THỂ HIỂU NỔI PHỤ NỮ ĐANG NGHĨ CÁI GÌ ĐÂU!!!!!!! (rất nhiều chấm than). Phụ nữ là loài động vật cực kì phức tạp. Tuy nhiên, không thể hiểu khác hoàn toàn với khó hiểu. Một khi bạn nghĩ điều gì là không thể, bạn không thèm quan tâm vì bạn nghĩ vô ích. Nếu thế thì tại sao trong thực tế vẫn có những thanh niên sát gái đến mức độ gây ức chế vô cực cho các FA? ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Hiểu phụ nữ, có thể hay không? Được viết bởi: Gerard Do Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Hieu-phu-nu-co-the-hay-khong-e9r --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Thương hiệu "chú thỏ bắc phoi" trị giá hàng tỉ đô. Ngài Hugh Marston Hefner, có lẽ không chỉ đơn thuần đứng sau thương hiệu “chú thỏ” trị giá hàng tỉ đô mà còn đặt nền móng cho triết lý “biết thế tao chả lấy vợ”. Tại sao á? Mời các độc giả cùng đi ngược lại dòng thời gian, chứng kiến đế chế Playboy từ thuở sơ khai, đạt đỉnh tăng trưởng và rơi vào lụi tàn để rút ra kết luận keke. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Sự trỗi dậy của đế chế Playboy: Thống trị đâu chỉ đơn thuần nhờ nhục dục? Được viết bởi: Da Babie Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Su-troi-day-cua-de-che-Playboy-Thong-tri-dau-chi-don-thuan-nho-nhuc-duc-zmv --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Dù bạn làm bất kỳ việc gì cũng nên bình tâm suy xét, làm việc chăm chỉ nhất định sẽ gặt hái được thành công. Một người bỏ thời gian công sức ở đâu sẽ tìm thấy thành tích ở đó, chỉ cần chúng ta làm việc chăm chỉ. Bạn hãy nhìn lại dấu chân mình trên cát. Kỳ thực mỗi công việc đều là một mỏ kim cương quý giá. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Hãy biết trân trọng viên kim cương của chính mình Được viết bởi: Anastar.vn Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Hay-biet-tran-trong-vien-kim-cuong-cua-chinh-minh-b2t --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Chiến tranh Uganda - Tanzania 1979, một bản cosplay xuất sắc của Chiến tranh biên giới Tây Nam 1979 của Việt Nam với các diễn viên: Idi Amin (Uganda) trong vai Pol Pot (Campuchia); Muammar Gaddafi (Libya) trong vai Đặng Tiểu Bình (Trung Quốc); Julius Nyerere (Tanzania) trong vai Lê Duẩn (Việt Nam); Yoweri Museveni (Uganda) trong vai Hunsen (Campuchia); và một số diễn viên khác… ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Bạn có biết, có một cuộc chiến cosplay hoàn hảo Chiến tranh biên giới Việt Nam 1979? Được viết bởi: Văn Minh Phương Tây Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Ban-co-biet-co-mot-cuoc-chien-cosplay-hoan-hao-Chien-tranh-bien-gioi-Viet-Nam-1979-nr8 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Bác sĩ thần kinh học Daniel Levitin viết: “Trong những nghiên cứu khác nhau về các nhà soạn nhạc, cầu thủ bóng rổ, các cây bút sáng tác tiểu thuyết, vận động viên trượt băng, nghệ sĩ dương cầm, tuyển thủ cờ vua, các doanh nhân công nghệ hay cả những tên tội phạm lão luyện, … hằng số 10,000 giờ này luôn luôn lặp lại. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Quy tắc 10000 giờ.… Được viết bởi: Bảo Hoàng Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Quy-tac-10000-gio-vtp --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Bài viết này thực ra không phải để phản bác những điều phổ biến đó, nhưng muốn chỉ ra những lỗ hổng trong những thứ nghe tưởng mĩ miều và đúng đắn ấy. Nhất là với các bạn nam vẫn còn đang tự ti, rụt rè hay chưa có gì trong tay hay trong chính bản thân bạn, những lời khuyên đó thực ra lại có thể trở nên toxic. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Anh em ạ, tán gái là phải có TIỀN Được viết bởi: Limitless Link bài viết: https://b.link/Tan-gai-la-phai-co-TIEN --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Khi nhắc tới nước Nga, chúng ta thường nghĩ đến hình ảnh một đất nước “bợm nhậu”. Chúng ta nghĩ về những Ivan, Dima, Vova hay Misha túm năm tụ ba với nhau và tu vodka như nước lọc. Chúng ta nghĩ đến những anh thanh niên mặc bộ đồ Adidas, nghe hardbass, đội mũ ushanka, tay cầm chai vodka nhảy múa. Đúng vậy, đó đều là những hình ảnh hài hước vui nhộn mà người nước ngoài hay thấy ở Nga. Tuy nhiên, đằng sau những tràng cười vui vẻ ấy là một bi kịch khổng lồ của một dân tộc bị rượu bia tàn phá trong hơn 4 thế kỉ, mà hậu quả của nó đến tận ngày hôm nay vẫn khiến các quan chức Điện Kremlin đau đầu. Một bi kịch đã tàn phá các thế hệ người dân Nga, và cũng là lời cảnh báo cho các nền văn minh khác trên thế giới. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/doing-good-better Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri ______________ Bài viết: Vodka đã phá hoại nước Nga như thế nào Được viết bởi: Navyblue Nerd Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Vodka-da-pha-hoai-nuoc-Nga-nhu-the-nao-LTefIcljQ8q9 --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Năm cũ đã qua, có lẽ đây cũng là lúc để ôn lại xem những mục tiêu mà mọi người đề ra cho năm qua đã đạt được đến đâu, và từ đó có thể đặt ra cho mình những mục tiêu mới cho năm mới. Tất nhiên việc làm này bao giờ cũng đem lại những sự hứng khởi nhất định, và với kinh nghiệm của một kẻ rất nhiều lần thất bại trong việc đạt mục tiêu, xin chia sẻ cùng các bạn một số điều tâm đắc sau đây. ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/DGB Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support

Tháng Hai có 28 ngày, và 4 năm một lần, tháng Hai mới lại có ngày thứ 29 - đó là điều mà ai cũng biết. Nhưng sự thật là vì sao tháng Hai lại chỉ có 28 ngày thì bạn biết không? Cho đến nay, một số giả thuyết vẫn tin rằng tháng Hai ban đầu có 29 ngày và Hoàng Đế Augustus đã lấy đi một ngày để thêm vào tháng Tám (August). Nhưng rất tiếc, đó chỉ là lời đồn đoán mà thôi. Vậy sự thật là gì? ______________ Cùng tìm hiểu cuốn sách "Doing Good Better" tại: https://book.spiderum.vn/DGB Theo dõi Kênh Podcast "Người Trong Muôn Nghề" tại đây: https://b.link/youtube-podcast-NTMN Ghé Nhà sách Spiderum trên SHOPEE ngay thôi các bạn ơi: https://shp.ee/ynm7jgy Kênh Spiderum Giải Trí đã có Podcast, nghe tại đây: https://anchor.fm/spiderum-giai-tri --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/spiderum/support