Podcasts about esmo

This week's episode recaps some highlights from ESMO 2025: 1. Destiny-Breast05: T-DXd > T-DM1 in persistent HER2+ disease after neoadjuvant chemo + surgery 2. Keynote-905: Neoadjuvant Enfortumab Vedotin + pembro in cisplatin-ineligible bladder cancer 3. POTOMAC: Durvalumab + BCG in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer 4. IMvigor011: ctDNA-guided adjuvant atezolizumab in bladder cancer 5. Dynamic-III: ctDNA guide de-escalation or escalation of chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer 6. HARMONi-6: an excuse to talk about ivonescimab, a bispecific antibody unlike any other currently FDA approved

Silke, Tom and Brian discuss the prostate and RCC highlights from ESMO 2025

Tom and Brian discuss the bladder cancer highlights from ESMO 2025. Show throwing is discussed.

Alex Wyatt joins us to discuss Tom's IMvigor011 data and the field of ctDNA

Matt Galsky discusses the exciting Presidential session data from the Chinese phase 3 of DV+ toripalimab in advanced urothelial cancer.

Paul Nguyen and Chris Sweeney double team the ENZARAD data and put it into context with other data including STAMPEDE

Elena Castro describes the CAPITELLLO prostate cancer trial and her analysis from ESMO 2025

Scott Tagawa discusses his ESMO Presidential presentation on Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with mHSPC

Cristina Rodriguez joins us to discuss her data on front-line triplets, and we also discuss the prospective RNAseq-based biomarker OPTIC study

James Larkin joins to discuss adjuvant durva/treme vs observation in high risk resected RCC

Brad McGregor joins us on the heels of his #ESMO25 discussion of these important data in the NMIBC landscape.

In today's episode, leading experts across oncology specialties previewed the key studies and data they are most anticipating ahead of the 2025 ESMO Congress. Dana M. Chase, MD, a professor of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology in the Division of Gynecologic Oncology at UCLA, discussed her excitement to see findings from a phase 1 trial (NCT05403554) investigating NI-1801 in patients with heavily pretreated, mesothelin-expressing platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Premal H. Thaker, MD, MS, the David G. and Lynn Mutch Distinguished Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and director of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Research at Siteman Cancer Center in Saint Louis, Missouri, discussed the anticipation for findings from a multi-omic analysis of the phase 3 AtTEnd/ENGOT-EN7 trial (NCT03603184) of atezolizumab in patients with endometrial cancer and data demonstrating that the WES-derived Aneuploidy Score may identify patients with mismatch repair–deficient endometrial cancer who derive reduced benefit from immunotherapy. Zev Wainberg, MD, the Estelle, Abe, and Marjorie Sanders Chair in Cancer Research at UCLA, shared his anticipation for new data in gastrointestinal oncology, particularly the overall survival results from the phase 3 MATTERHORN trial (NCT04592913) of durvalumab plus fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel in patients with resectable gastric and gastroesophageal cancer, which are expected to provide pivotal updates following previously reported event-free survival outcomes. Sagus Sampath, MD, an associate clinical professor and medical director of the Department of Radiation Oncology at City of Hope in Duarte, California, highlighted the phase 2 NorthStar trial (NCT03410043) evaluating osimertinib (Tagrisso) with or without local consolidative therapy in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Silke joins us to discuss some important data being presented in prostate cancer. Brian and Tom also cover the RCC data at ESMO 2025

Tom and Brian preview the practice-changing bladder cancer data to be presented at ESMO 2025 in Berlin

In this episode of Onc Now, Luis Paz-Ares, Chair of the Medical Oncology Department at Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre in Madrid, Spain, shares his expert insights on the evolving science of lung cancer. From the critical role of prevention and smoking cessation through to the latest therapeutic breakthroughs, Paz-Ares offers a candid discussion on the progress, challenges, and hopes for the future of lung cancer research and treatment.  Timestamps:  00:00 – Introduction  01:09 – Key insights on lung cancers  02:26 – Luis's journey into oncology  04:10 – Highlights and lowlights of his role  08:30 – Delivering bad news to patients  10:30 – Current diagnosis process and treatment landscape  13:20 – Trends in lung cancer prevalence  16:00 – IMforte trial  21:15 – Biggest obstacles researchers and clinicians face today  22:50 – Non-smokers  24:40 – European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2025 predictions  26:00 – Luis's three wishes for cancer research    Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this episode belong to the speakers and do not necessarily represent the opinions of EMJ.  

Send us a textWelcome to The Oncology Journal Club Podcast Series 3Hosted by Professor Craig Underhill, Dr Kate Clarke & Professor Christopher Jackson | Proudly produced by The Oncology NetworkWelcome to Episode 7 of The Oncology Journal Club podcast. This is where we take a famously different approach to oncology research.Join our expert hosts as they navigate the latest developments with their trademark blend of critical analysis, clinical wisdom and humour. With this in mind please note: Warning: This episode does contain some strong language.This week, Kate kicks us off with her report from the ESMO GI meeting with her key highlights.Craig sparks a fascinating discussion about robotic surgery.And CJ takes up a listener's suggestion and talks us through the ATOMIC study. And of course, we've also got our regular PBS Updates and Blow Your Own Trumpet papers.To learn more about The Oncology Network, subscribe to our free weekly Newsletter and listen to other fantastic podcasts, visit our website: www.oncologynetwork.com.au. You'll also find the Show Notes on the website with links to papers, a transcript and bios of our hosts.The Oncology Podcast - An Australian Oncology Perspective

This week's VJOncology podcast episode highlights four breakthrough studies from ESMO GI 2025 in Barcelona, Spain, featuring expert insights on... The post Breakthrough advances from ESMO GI 2025 appeared first on VJOncology.

Dr. Shaalan Beg and Dr. Kristen Ciombor discuss practice-changing studies in GI cancers and other novel treatment approaches that were presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting. Transcript Dr. Shaalan Beg: Hello, I'm Dr. Shaalan Beg, welcoming you to the ASCO Daily News Podcast. I'm a medical oncologist and an adjunct associate professor at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. There were some remarkable advances in gastrointestinal cancers that were presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, and I'm delighted to be joined by Dr. Kristen Ciombor to discuss some exciting GI data. Dr. Ciombor is the Ingram Associate Professor of Cancer Research and a co-leader of Translational Research and the Interventional Oncology Research Program at the Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center. Our full disclosures are available in the transcript of this episode. Dr. Ciombor, it's great to have you on the podcast today. Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Thanks, Dr Beg. It's great to be here. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Alright, let's kick it off. Big year for GI cancers. We'll start off with LBA1. This was the ATOMIC study sponsored by NCI and the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) and the Alliance group. This is a randomized study of standard chemotherapy alone or combined with atezolizumab as adjuvant therapy for stage III mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer. Dr. Kristen Ciombor: I think this study was really definitely practice-changing, as you can tell because it was a Plenary. But I do have some concerns in terms of how we're actually going to implement this and whether this is the final answer in this disease subtype. So, as you said, the patients were enrolled with stage III resected mismatch repair deficient colon cancer, and then they were randomized to either modified FOLFOX6 with or without atezolizumab. And that's where it starts to become interesting because not many of us give FOLFOX for 6 months like was done in this study. Obviously, the study was done over many years, so that was part of that answer, but also the patients received atezolizumab for a total of 12 months. So the question, I think, that comes from this abstract is, is this practical and is this the final answer? I do think that this is practice-changing, and I will be talking to my patients with resected mismatch repair deficient colon cancer about FOLFOX plus atezolizumab. I think the big question is, do these patients need chemotherapy? And can we do a neoadjuvant approach instead? And that's where we don't have all the answers yet. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Yeah, but it has been great to see immunotherapy make its way into the adjuvant space after having made such a big impact in the metastatic space, but still some unanswered questions in terms of the need for chemotherapy and then the duration of therapy, which I guess we'll have to stay tuned in for the next couple of years to to get a lot of those questions answered. Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Yeah, but a big congratulations to the study team, to the NCTN, the NCI. I mean, this is really a great example of federally funded research that needs to continue. So, great job by the study team. The DFS 10% difference is really very large and certainly a practice-changing study. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Yeah, and and sticking with colon cancer, and and this another federally funded study, but this time funded by a Canadian cancer clinical trials group was LBA3510. This is the CHALLENGE study. It's a randomized phase 3 trial of the impact of a structured exercise program on disease-free survival for stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer. This study got a lot of buzz, a lot of mainstream press coverage, and a lot of discussions on what that means for us for the patients who we're going to be seeing next week in our clinic. What was your takeaway? Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Yeah, this is a really interesting study, and I was so glad to see it presented because this partially answers one of the questions that patients always have for us in clinic, right? You know, once they've completed their standard chemotherapy and surgery, what else can they do to help prevent recurrence? And so we've always known and sort of extrapolated that healthy lifestyle habits are good, but now we have data, particularly in these patients. Most of them were stage III colon cancer patients, those had high-risk stage II cancer. And basically, the goal was to increase their physical activity by at least 10 MET hours per week. So, my big question, of course, as I came into this presentation was, “Okay, what does that mean exactly? How does that translate to real life?” And really what the author presented and explained was that basically most patients could hit their target by adding a 45- to 60-minute brisk walk 3 to 4 times a week. So I think this is very approachable.  Now, in the confines of the study, this was a structured exercise program, so it wasn't just patients doing this on their own. But I do think kind of extrapolating from that, that this is very achievable for most patients. And not only did this prevent recurrence of their prior cancer, but actually the rate of new primary cancer diagnoses, was less, which is really interesting, especially in the breast and prostate cancer. So this was a really interesting, and I think practice-changing study as well, especially given that this is something that most patients can do. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Yeah, and there was a lot of discussion in the hallways after the presentation in terms of how this really changes our existing practice because most folks already recommend exercise as a way for improving outcomes in cancer patients. So we've already been doing that. Now we have some data on how much it can impact the benefit. But there was some discussion about what the actual degree of impact was. There was a drop-off rate in terms of how long folks were able to stick with this exercise regimen. But you've seen this in clinic when someone have their surgery, they have their chemotherapy, they've been so intimately involved with the oncology world, with the oncology practice, and they somehow feel that they're being let loose into this mean, angry world without any guidance and they're looking for something to do. “What more can I do in terms of my lifestyle?” And then here we have very solid data, as solid as can be for an intervention like exercise, showing that there is an impact and you can give a prescription for exercise when someone wraps up their chemotherapy for colon cancer, thanks to the study. Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Yeah. It was a great study. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Moving to gastroesophageal cancer, another late-breaking abstract. This is LBA5. The MATTERHORN trial was a phase 3 trial of durvalumab plus FLOT for resectable GE junction and gastric cancer. And again, another area where immunotherapy has made an impact, and here we're seeing it move closer for earlier-stage disease. What was your take-home for the MATTERHORN trial? Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Yeah, so this study looked at neoadjuvant perioperative durvalumab plus our current standard chemotherapy of FLOT versus placebo plus FLOT. And this was a large study, almost 1,000 patients were randomized. And the primary endpoint was event-free survival, and it was definitely met in favor of the D + FLOT arm, as Dr. Klempner discussed after Dr Janjigian's presentation. I do think there are still some unanswered questions here. Overall survival is not yet mature, so we do have to wait and see how that shakes out. But it's very interesting and kind of is reflective of what, as you said, we're looking at earlier and earlier lines of therapy, particularly with immunotherapy, in these GI cancer spaces. So it makes a lot of sense to test this and and to look at this. So the toxicity was pretty similar to what we would expect. Primary endpoint was met, but again, we'll have to wait and see what the survival data looks like. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Yeah, and in oncology, we know, especially for treatment that does add additional cost, it does add additional potential toxicity that we want to see that overall survival nudged. I did see some polls on social media asking folks whether their practices changed from this, and I think the results were favoring adding durvalumab for this group of patients but understanding that there are caveats to the addition of treatments and the eventual FDA approval in that indication as well. Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Exactly. I completely agree with that. Dr. Shaalan Beg: All right. How about we stick with gastroesophageal cancer? LBA4002 was trastuzumab deruxtecan versus ramucirumab plus paclitaxel for second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer or GE junction cancer. This was the DESTINY-Gastric04 study. And again, antibody-drug conjugates making a big impact across different diseases. And here we have more data in the HER2-positive gastric cancer space. Your thoughts on this study? Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Yeah, so this is a really important space in gastroesophageal cancer because the HER2 positivity rate is fairly high as compared to some of our other tumor types. So, I do think one of the important things was that patients did have biopsy confirmation of HER2 status, which was very important, and then they were randomized to either T-DXd versus the kind of second-line standard of ramucirumab-paclitaxel. So this was a great practical study and really answers a question that we had for a while in terms of does anti-HER2 therapy in the second-line really impact and improve survival. So we did see a statistically significant improvement favoring T-DXd. I do think it's always important to look at toxicity, though, too. And there was about almost 14% rate of interstitial lung disease, which of course is the most feared toxicity from some of these antibody-drug conjugates, especially T-DXd. So I do think it's important to keep that in mind, but this is definitely a great addition to the armamentarium for these HER2-positive patients. Dr. Shaalan Beg: And pancreas cancer was on the stage after a very long time with a positive clinical trial. This is Abstract 4006. These were preliminary results from a phase 2 study of elraglusib in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel alone for previously untreated metastatic pancreas cancer. This is a frontline clinical trial of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel plus/minus the study drug. There were other cohorts in this study as well, but they reported the results of their part 3B arm. And great to see some activity in the pancreas space. And your thoughts? Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Yeah, we definitely need better treatments in pancreas cancer. This was a very welcome presentation to see. The elraglusib is an inhibitor of GSK-3beta, and it's thought that that mediates drug resistance and EMT. And so this is, I think, a perfect setting to test this drug. So patients basically were randomized. Patients with metastatic pancreas cancer were randomized 2: 1 to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel plus or minus this elraglusib. So, what we saw was that overall survival was better with the addition of this new drug. And overall, not only the 1-year overall survival, but also median overall survival.  The thing that was interesting, though, was that we saw that the overall survival rates were 9.3 months with the combination versus 7.2 months with just gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. And that's a little bit lower than we've seen in other studies. So, not sure what was going on there. Was it the patients that were a bit sicker? Was it a patient selection, you know, thing? I'm not really sure how to explain that so much. Also, the toxicity profile was much higher in terms of visual impairment, with over 60% of patients being treated with the combination versus 9% with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. So these were mild, grade 1 and 2, but still something to be cautious about. Dr. Shaalan Beg: And especially with this being a phase 2 trial, making sure that in a larger study we're able to better evaluate the toxicity and see if the control arm in the larger confirmatory study performs differently will be really important before this compound makes it to the clinic in our space. But very exciting to see these kinds of results for pancreas adenocarcinoma. Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Yeah. Dr. Shaalan Beg: We've talked, it seems, a couple of times on this podcast about the BREAKWATER clinical trial. We did hear PFS and updated OS data, updated overall survival data on first-line encorafenib plus cetuximab plus modified FOLFOX6 for BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer. This was LBA3500. And eagerly anticipated results – we have all previously heard the progression-free survival results – but here we heard updated overall survival results, and very well-received study it seemed from the audience that time. So what are your takeaways on the updated results for BREAKWATER? Dr. Kristen Ciombor: In my opinion, this was one of the most practice-confirming studies. As you mentioned, we've already seen some of the preliminary data of BREAKWATER at prior meetings. But really what was particularly impactful for me was the median overall survival with the BREAKWATER regimen. So, again, patients received FOLFOX, encorafenib cetuximab in the first line if they had BRAF-mutated V600E-mutated colorectal cancer. And the median PFS was 12.8 months, which was actually really remarkable in this traditionally very aggressive, poor prognosis subtype of tumors. So, by seeing a median overall survival of 30.3 months was just incredible, in my opinion. Just a few years ago, that was considered the median overall survival for all comers for metastatic colorectal cancer. And we know the median overall survival was more in the less than 12 months range for BRAF. So this was incredibly impactful, and I think should be absolutely practice-changing for anyone who is eligible for this regimen.  I think again, where the practice meets the study is what's kind of important to think about too, how long did patients get FOLFOX, and certainly it adds toxicity to add a BRAF-targeted regimen on top of FOLFOX already. So, one of the other interesting things about the study, though, was that even though it didn't complete treatment, they actually did look at encorafenib/cetuximab alone and in the first line without chemotherapy. And those preliminary results actually looked okay, especially for patients who might not be able to tolerate chemotherapy, which we certainly see in practice. So, overall, definitely more data. And I agree that it's certainly practice-changing. Dr. Shaalan Beg: And it completely, as you mentioned, changes the outlook for a person who's diagnosed with BRAF-mutated metastatic colon cancer today versus even 7 or 8 years ago. Dr. Kristen Ciombor: And we're seeing this over and over in other subtypes too, but how you choose to treat the patient up front really matters. So really giving the right regimen up front is the key here. Dr. Shaalan Beg: And along the same lines, Abstract 3501 wanted to answer the question on whether people with MSI-high metastatic colorectal cancer need double checkpoint inhibitor therapy or is single therapy enough. So this [CheckMate-8HW] study compared nivo plus ipi with nivo alone, nivo monotherapy for MSI-high metastatic colorectal cancer. And we've known that both of these are fairly active regimens, but we also know the chance of immune-related adverse events is significantly higher with combination therapy. So this was a much-needed study for this group of patients. And what were your takeaways here? Dr. Kristen Ciombor: This, of course, has been really nivo-ipi in the first-line MSI-high metastatic colorectal cancer is now a standard of care. And not everybody is eligible for it, and there could be reasons, toxicity reasons, and other things too. But as we've been seeing for the last couple of years, immunotherapy clearly beats chemo in this space. And now looking at doublet versus single immunotherapy treatment in the first line, I think really nivo-ipi does beat out monotherapy. I will say, however, there is a caveat in that we still haven't seen the nivo-ipi versus nivo in the first line. So what has been presented thus far has been across all lines of therapy, and that does muddy the waters a little bit. So definitely looking forward and and we've asked this many times and based on the statistical plan and and what not, you know, we just haven't seen that data yet. But I do think it's becoming increasingly important to consider doublet immunotherapy for these patients as long as there are no contraindications. With the again, with the caveat that we have to have these toxicity discussions in the clinic with patients because many patients can tolerate it, you know, this regimen fairly well, but there can be very severe toxicities. So, I think an informed discussion should really be had with each patient before moving forward. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Yeah, informed decision, making them aware of the potential of real significant toxicities, immune-related toxicities with double therapy. But I am curious in your practice, how often do you see people choosing doublet therapy as frontline? Dr. Kristen Ciombor: So patients are really savvy, and a lot of times they've heard this data before or have come across it in patient advocacy groups and other things, and it's really nice to be able to have that conversation of the risk versus benefit. So I will say not all of my patients choose doublet, and many of them are still cured with immunotherapy monotherapy. So the big question there is, will we ever understand who actually needs the doublet versus who can still be cured or have very good long-term outcomes with just the single agent? And that has not been answered yet. Dr. Shaalan Beg: What a great point. So the last abstract I was hoping we could talk about is POD1UM-303 or the INTERAACT2 subgroup analysis and impact of delayed retifanlimab treatment for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. What were your thoughts here? Dr. Kristen Ciombor: This was a study, actually we saw at ESMO, we saw the primary data at ESMO last year, and this was an update with some exploratory analyses. But this was really an important study because once again, we're looking at immunotherapy in later lines of therapy. That's how we started looking at and investigating immunotherapy, and now we're moving it up and up in the treatment course. So this was a study of carboplatin/paclitaxel plus or minus retifanlimab. Actually it was retifanlimab versus placebo. And it was a positive study, as we heard last year. This actually led to FDA approval of this regimen last month, just before ASCO, and it has now been incorporated in the NCCN guidelines as the preferred first-line option.  So what I thought was important from the additional data presented at ASCO was looking at the different subgroups, it did not appear that patients with liver mets or not had different outcomes. So that was really good to see because sometimes in colon cancer we see that immunotherapy doesn't work as well when patients have liver mets. And interestingly, because we use immunotherapy in anal cancer without any biomarkers, unlike with colon cancer or some of the other tumor types, also the authors looked at PD-L1 status, and it did look like maybe patients did a little bit better if they had higher PD-L1 expression, but patients still could benefit even if they were PD-L1 negative. So that was important, I think, and we will continue to see further data come out from this study. I want to mention also that EA2176 just completed accrual, so that was carbo-taxol plus or minus nivolumab. And so we should be seeing that data sometime soon, which will hopefully also confirm the ongoing role for immunotherapy in the first-line setting for anal cancer. Dr. Shaalan Beg: That was a fantastic review. Thank you, Dr Ciombor. Thanks for sharing your valuable insights with us today on the ASCO Daily News Podcast. Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Thanks for having me here. Dr. Shaalan Beg: And thank you to our listeners for your time today. You will find links to the abstracts discussed today in the transcript of this episode. And if you value the insights that you hear on the podcast, please take a moment to rate, review, and subscribe, wherever you get your podcasts. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. More on today's speakers:   Dr. Shaalan Beg  @ShaalanBeg  Dr. Kristen Ciombor @KristenCiombor Follow ASCO on social media:    @ASCO on Twitter   @ASCO on BlueSky  ASCO on Facebook    ASCO on LinkedIn    Disclosures:   Dr. Shaalan Beg:   Consulting or Advisory Role: Ipsen, Cancer Commons, Foundation Medicine, Science37, Nant Health, Lindus Health Speakers' Bureau: Sirtex Research Funding (Inst.): Delfi Diagnostics, Universal Diagnostics, Freenome Dr. Kristen Ciombor: Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Incyte, Exelixis, Bayer, ALX Oncology, Tempus, Agenus, Taiho Oncology, Merck, BeiGene Research Funding (Inst.): Pfizer, Boston Biomedical, MedImmune, Onyx, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Incyte, Amgen, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Array BioPharma, Incyte, Daiichi Sankyo, Nucana, Abbvie, Merck, Pfizer/Calthera, Genentech, Seagen, Syndax Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Incyte, Tempus

CME credits: 0.50 Valid until: 11-06-2026 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/integrating-iv-iron-into-cancer-care-an-expert-overview-of-best-practices/35585/ Designed as a dynamic, intensive, and innovative web-based activity, this session will take learners on an in-depth exploration of cancer-related anemia (CRA) and chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) as disease states of vast clinical significance, emphasizing the robust prevalence, pathophysiology, and patient burden of CRA/CIA, as well as the prominent role of iron deficiency (ID) in their pathogenesis. Built upon on this foundation, expert faculty will guide attendees through a succinct but comprehensive review of the IV iron evidentiary base in CRA/CIA, including clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and the latest expert consensus guideline recommendations from the NCCN, ASCO/ASH, and ESMO. Practical clinical pearls for safely and effectively implementing IV iron into the real-world hematology/oncology clinic will be emphasized. =

Concluding their three-episode series filmed live in Chicago, your hosts wrap up the weekend with a discussion of the key bladder cancer presentations from the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting. They begin in the perioperative space, reviewing updated CREST data presented since AUA and revisiting the NIAGARA trial last seen at ESMO 2024, and end by covering the latest EV-302 updates in the metastatic setting.The View on GU with Lalani & Wallis integrates key clinical data from major conferences and high impact publications, sharing meaningful take home messages for practising clinicians in the field of genitourinary (GU) cancers. Learn more about The View on GU: theviewongu.caThis podcast has been made possible through unrestricted financial support by Novartis, Bayer, Astellas, Tolmar, Ipsen, J&J, Merck, Pfizer, Eisai and AbbVie.

Dr. Evandro de Azambuja discusses the final analysis of the APHINITY Breast Cancer trial just presented at ESMO Breast 2025.

This episode features leading experts Paolo Ghia, MD, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy, and Arnon Kater, MD, PhD, University... The post Updates to the ESMO CLL clinical practice guidelines and implications for relapsed therapy appeared first on VJHemOnc.

In this VJHemOnc podcast, experts Barbara Eichhorst, MD, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany, Lydia Scarfò, MD, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University... The post Updates to the ESMO CLL clinical practice guidelines: implications for frontline treatment appeared first on VJHemOnc.

Featuring an interview with Dr Seth Wander, including the following topics: The clinical utility of ESR1 mutations in HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer Grinshpun A et al. The clinical utility of ESR1 mutations in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023;37(1):169-81. Abstract (0:00) Imlunestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, as monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapy for ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer Jhaveri KL et al. Imlunestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, as monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapy in estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: Phase Ia/Ib EMBER study. J Clin Oncol 2024;[Online ahead of print]. Abstract (6:01) EORTC-2129-BCG: Elacestrant for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients with ctDNA relapse Ignatiadis M et al. EORTC-2129-BCG: Elacestrant for treating ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients with ctDNA relapse (TREAT ctDNA). ESMO 2024;Abstract 338TiP. (8:20) CME information and select publications  

In this JCO Article Insights episode, Ece Cali summarizes findings from the JCO article, "Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label Phase III TROPION-Lung01 Study." TRANSCRIPT Ece Cali: Hello and welcome to the JCO Article Insights. I'm your host Ece Cali and today we will be discussing the Journal of Clinical Oncology article the “Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label Phase III TROPION-Lung01 Study.”  Despite significant advances in non-small cell lung cancer treatment over the past decades, second line treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer without actionable genomic alterations have remained largely unchanged since 2000. Many clinical trials failed to demonstrate improved overall survival compared to docetaxel based regimens. TROPION-Lung01 is a global open label randomized phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd to docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Dato-DXd is an antibody drug conjugate targeting TROP2 and delivering deruxtecan, a DNA topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, as its payload. The trial is designed with dual primary endpoints of progression free survival, as assessed by blinded independent central review, and overall survival. The initial PFS results were presented at ESMO in 2023 and this article reports more detailed data and overall survival analysis of the trial.   In the TROPION-Lung01, 299 patients were randomly assigned to receive Dato-DXd and 305 patients to receive docetaxel. Patients were stratified by the presence of actionable genomic alterations, histology, treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy as the last line of therapy, and geographical region. The baseline characteristics of the patient population were overall balanced between the treatment arms. I'd like to highlight a couple of key points here. The median age was 63 years in the Dato-DXd and 64 years in the docetaxel arm. Similar to the many clinical trials in the thoracic oncology field, this is younger than the median age of lung cancer diagnosis in the US, which is around 70. African American and Hispanic patients were underrepresented in this trial with 41% of patients identifying themselves as white and 39% as Asian. The Ddocetaxel arm had a slightly higher percentage of male patients, 69% versus 61%. The majority of the trial population, 73%, had adenocarcinoma. Patients with actionable genomic alterations were included in this trial if they received one or more targeted therapy and platinum based chemotherapy prior to the enrollment. 17% of the trial population had an actionable genomic alteration in this trial.  When it comes to the efficacy results in the full analysis set, the PFS improvement was statistically significant. The median PFS was reported as 4.4 months for the Dato-DXd, and 3.7 months for the docetaxel arm with the hazard ratio of 0.75 and a P value of 0.004. However, after a median follow up of 23 months, the trial did not meet its primary endpoint of overall survival. The median overall survival was 12.9 months for patients treated with Dato-DXd and 11.8 months for patients treated with docetaxel with the hazard ratio of 0.94 and a P value of 0.53. Objective response was a secondary endpoint and the confirmed objective response rate was 26% with Dato-DXd, and 13% with docetaxel.  Now let's take a closer look at some of the subgroup analyses. Exploratory analyses of key subgroups in TROPION-Lung01 demonstrated differences in efficacy based on histology. In the nonsquamous subgroup, Dato-DXd showed a longer progression free survival of 5.5 months compared to 3.6 months with docetaxel with a hazard ratio of 0.84. However, in the squamous subgroup, Dato-DXd performed worse with a progression free survival of 2.8 months compared to 3.9 months with docetaxel corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.32. A similar trend was observed in the overall survival analyses, though confidence intervals crossed 1 in both histology subsets, in this case, the differences observed were not statistically significant. In the nonsquamous subset, the median overall survival was 14.6 months with Dato-DXd and 12.3 months with docetaxel with a hazard ratio of 0.84. In the squamous subset, both arms had shorter survival compared to the nonsquamous subset. The median overall survival with Dato-DXd was almost two months shorter, so 7.6 months, compared to 9.6 months with docetaxel corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.32. While these analyses suggest the potential survival benefit for Dato-DXd in nonsquamous subset, this trial was not powered to test this hypothesis hence these analyses remain exploratory. Another subgroup analysis of note was the group with actionable genomic alterations. Patients with actionable genomic alterations achieved a median PFS of 5.7 months with Dato-DXD and 2.6 months with docetaxel corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.35. Similarly, the median overall survival was longer in patients with actionable genomic alterations by almost six months, with a median overall survival of 15.6 months with Dato-DXd and 9.8 months with docetaxel corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.65.  Now, let's talk about safety. Grade 3 or higher treatment related adverse events occurred in 26% of patients with Dato-DXd and 42% with docetaxel. The most common adverse event of any grade seen in the Dato-DXd arm were stomatitis seen in 47% of patients, nausea in 34%, and alopecia in 32%. Treatment related interstitial lung disease occurred in 8.8% of patients on Dato-DXd and 4.1% of patients on docetaxel. Of note, grade 5 drug related ILD was more frequent with Dato-DXd. Seven patients on Dato-DXd and one patient on docetaxel died secondary to drug related ILD in this trial.  In summary, TROPION-Lung01 aims to address an unmet need for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer. For this population, the treatment options remain limited with poor survival outcomes. TROPION-Lung01 is a positive trial by design due to clinically modest improvement in PFS. However, the lack of overall survival improvement is disappointing. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggest Dato-DXd may offer survival advantage in specific subsets such as nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer and patients with actionable genomic alterations. However, these findings require further validation in a prospective trial since TROPION-Lung01 was not designed to address these questions. The data from this trial alone is not sufficient to argue for a change in clinical practice. However, it informs how the future trials using this drug should be tailored. This highlights the importance of studying potential predictive biomarkers earlier in the drug development and incorporating these biomarkers prospectively into the clinical trial designs.  Due to the lack of overall survival benefit in this trial, the biologic license application for accelerated approval of Dato-DXd for patients with previously treated nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer was voluntarily withdrawn. New BLA was submitted for Dato-DXd for patients with previously treated advanced EGFR positive non-small cell lung cancer. This BLA is based on data from TROPION-Lung05, TROPION-Lung01 and TROPION-PanTumor01. Of note, the results of TROPION-Lung05 trial have been just published in JCO.   This wraps up today's episode. Thank you for listening to JCO Article Insights. Please come back for more interviews and article summaries and be sure to leave us a rating and review so others can find our show. For more podcasts and episodes from ASCO, please visit asco.org/podcasts.   The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions.  Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.    

ESMO Immuno-Oncology Congress 2024 Highlights Description: In this episode of Lung Cancer Considered, host Dr. Narjust Florez and Dr. Alfredo Addeo discuss some of the data presented at The ESMO Immuno-Oncology Congress 2024, which took place in December 2024 in Geneva, Switzerland. Guest: Dr. Alfredo Addeo, Professor and Chief of Oncology, University Hospital of Geneva

In this episode of Onc Now, Jonathan welcomes Ahmad Awada, Head of the Oncology Department at Chirec Cancer Institute in Brussels and Editor in Chief of EMJ Oncology. Together they discuss groundbreaking developments in cancer care, the promise of targeted therapies, and the importance of global collaboration in oncology.  Timestamps:      (00:00)-Introduction  (01:20)-Reflecting on ESMO 2024  (07:37)-Looking ahead to ESMO 2025  (10:04)-Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Antibody-Drug Conjugates  (13:24)-New cytotoxics and molecular targeted therapies for solid tumours   (16:30)-Surgery of primary tumour in de novo metastatic breast cancer  (19:29)-Improving survival in cancer patients  (22:47)-Managing the risk of thromboembolism   (24:43)-Exciting advancements on the horizon   (29:38)-Wishes for oncology  

Lung Cancer Considered host Dr. Stephen Liu and two distinguished thoracic oncologists review the highlights from the recently completed ESMO Asia 2024 meeting, held in Singapore. The episode covers a number of trials, including an update on FLAURA2, TROPION-Lung01 and TROPION-Lung05, ALESIA, and PACIFIC 5. Guest: Dr. Misako Nagasaka, Associate Professor from the University of California, Irvine Guest: by Dr. Molly Li, Clinical Assistant Professor from Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Jonathan Rosenberg joins Brian and Tom to discuss this important phase 3 trial and efficacy and toxicity signals.

Dr. Vivek Subbiah returns for another edition of Vivek's Takes, sharing his insights on key updates from ESMO Congress 2024, including breakthroughs in neuroendocrine tumors, gastric cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. He also delves into the highlights of his AACR debate on integrating early cancer detection with AI, arguing for the transformative potential of humans with AI versus the readiness of AI today. Check out Chadi's website for all Healthcare Unfiltered episodes and other content. www.chadinabhan.com/ Watch all Healthcare Unfiltered episodes on YouTube. www.youtube.com/channel/UCjiJPTpIJdIiukcq0UaMFsA

Featuring perspectives from Dr Suresh S Ramalingam and Dr Gregory J Riely, including the following topics: Introduction: Tumor Treating Fields (0:00) Nontargeted Therapy for Lung Cancer — Dr Ramalingam (4:02) Targeted Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer — Dr Riely (33:50) CME information and select publications

Dr Suresh S Ramalingam from the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia, and Dr Gregory J Riely from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York, discuss the implications of recent data sets for the current and future management of lung cancer, moderated by Dr Neil Love. Produced by Research To Practice. CME information and select publications here (https://www.researchtopractice.com/PostESMO24/Lung).

This episode of Walk, Don't Run to the Doctor emphasizes the importance of building and maintaining a healthy microbiome for better health outcomes, disease prevention, and overall well-being. The microbiome, a complex population of microorganisms living in the gut, plays a significant role in protecting against cancer, regulating digestion, and supporting various metabolic and immune functions. A home-cooked diet, particularly a whole food omnivorous diet rich in fiber and fermented foods, helps to cultivate a resilient microbiome. Exercise, scant to moderate alcohol consumption (especially wine), and avoiding sugar, refined flours, and artificial sweeteners further enhance gut health. This episode also warns against overuse of antibiotics and reliance on probiotic supplements, advocating instead for a food-based approach through diet and lifestyle changes. Key Takeaways: Microbiome's Role in Health: The microbiome impacts everything from cancer prevention to appetite regulation, insulin sensitivity, immune function, and even brain health. Diet and Gut Health: A Mediterranean-style, omnivorous whole food, diet improves microbiome diversity and overall health, reducing risks for conditions like obesity, diabetes, and cancer. Fermented Foods: Incorporating fermented foods like yogurt, kefir, and kombucha supports a healthy microbiome and reduces cancer risk. Exercise and Lifestyle: Regular exercise promotes gut health and boosts immunity, while avoiding sugar, artificial sweeteners, and unnecessary antibiotics helps maintain microbiome balance. Natural Approach: The podcast recommends focusing on diet and lifestyle over probiotic or prebiotic supplements to build a resilient microbiome. For more insights and advice on reducing dependence on medications through lifestyle changes, make sure to subscribe to Walk, Don't Run to the Doctor. More references can be found at www.GreatMed.org Would you like Dr. Hassell to answer your question on the air?  Contact us! Phone/text: 503-773-0770 e-mail: info@GreatMed.org Write us a letter.  We love to hear from you.  This podcast is sponsored by our generous listeners.  Send questions, comments, and support to: 4804 NW Bethany Blvd., Suite I-2, #273 Portland OR 97229 References:           Zhang, X., et al. (2023). Modulating a prebiotic food source influences inflammation and immune-regulating gut microbes and metabolites: insights form the BE GONE trial. The Lancet, 98:104873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104873            Diez-Ozaeta, I. & Astiazaran, O. (2021). Fermented foods: An update on evidence-based health benefits and future perspectives. Food Research International, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111133            Perler, B., et al. (2023). The role of the gut microbiota in the relationship between diet and human health. Annual Reviews in Physiology, 85:449-68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-031522-092054            DeVos, W., et al. (2022). Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut-BMJ, 71:1020-1032. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326789            Kim, J., and Le, H. (2022). Potential role of the gut microbiome in colorectal cancer progression.  Frontiers in Immunology, 12: 807648. doi: 10.3389/immu.2021.807648            Pyo, Y., et al. (2024). Probiotic functions in fermented foods: Anti-viral, Immunomodulatory, and anti-cancer benefits. Foods, 13:2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13152386            Zhang, K., et al. (2019) Fermented dairy foods intake and risk of  cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 144: 2099-2108.            Michels, K. B., et al. (2020). Yogurt consumption and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 112(6), 1566–1575. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa244            Shams-White, M., et al. (2022). The 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Score and All-Cause, Cancer, and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Risk: A Longitudinal Analysis in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, Current Developments in Nutrition, Volume 6, Issue 6, nzac096,ISSN 2475-2991,https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac096.            Rad, A., et al. (2021). Postbiotics as promising tools for cancer adjuvant therapy. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 11(1), 1-5. https://apb.tbzmed.ac.ir            Sharma, A., et al. Final results of a phase I/II study to investigate efficacy of a high potency multistrain probiotic on chemo induced diarrhea. ESMO, 29(8). Doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy424            Luceron-lucas-Torres, M., et al. Association between wine consumption and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Nutriition, 10:1197745. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1197745            LeRoy, C., et al. (2020). Red  Wine Consumption  Associated with increased gut microbiota a-diversity in 3 independent cohorts. Gastroenterology, 158:270-272. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.024            Duan, J., et al. (2021). The mechanisms of wine phenolic compounds for preclinical anticancer therapies. Food and Nutrition Research, 65:6507. http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr:v65.6507            Zhao, L., et al. (2023). Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Liver Cancer and Chronic Liver Disease Mortality. JAMA, 330(6), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.12618            Debras, C., et al. (2022). Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study. PLoS medicine, 19(3), e1003950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003950            Zhang, J., et al. (2019). Oral antibiotic use and risk of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom, 1989-2012: a matched case-control study. Gut.BMJ; 68:1971-1978. doi: 10.1136/gutnl-2019-318593

Featuring perspectives from Dr Tanios Bekaii-Saab and Dr Philip A Philip, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) Colorectal Cancer, Anal Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer — Dr Philip (1:56) Gastroesophageal Cancers, Hepatocellular Cancer and Biliary Tract Cancers — Dr Bekaii-Saab (41:48) CME information and select publications

In Oncology Unplugged, a podcast series from MedNews Week, host Chandler Park, MD, a medical oncologist at the Norton Cancer Institute in Louisville, Kentucky, talks through key updates in genitourinary cancer research from the 2024 ESMO Congress. In this episode, Dr Park highlights potentially practice-changing data in prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer; spotlights the potential clinical implications of findings with the intravesical therapy TAR-200 in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC); and zooms in on data from the phase 3 NIAGARA trial (NCT03732677) of durvalumab (Imfinzi) plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with MIBC.

Drs. Diab and Patil discuss recent advances in treating HER2+ lung cancer that were presented at World Lung 2024 and ESMO 2024. They highlight the role of newer treatments and discuss treatment sequencing and response rates.

Dr Tanios Bekaii-Saab from Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona, and Dr Philip A Philip from the Henry Ford Cancer Institute in Detroit, Michigan, discuss recent research presentations on the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers, moderated by Dr Neil Love. Produced by Research To Practice. CME information and select publications here (https://www.researchtopractice.com/PostESMO24/GI).

Timothee Olivier and I discuss the top ESMO 2024 abstracts!

Welcome to the Oncology Brothers podcast! In this episode, hosts Drs. Rahul and Rohit Gosain are joined by Dr. Stephen Liu, Associate Professor and Director of Thoracic Oncology at the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center. Together, they dive into the latest findings from ESMO 2024, focusing on key studies in lung cancer that every community oncologist should be aware of. Episode Highlights: •⁠  ⁠LAURA Trial: Discussing the role of osimertinib in locally advanced unresectable EGFR-mutant lung cancer post-chemoradiation and its impact on CNS progression-free survival. •⁠  ⁠MARIPOSA and MARIPOSA-2 Studies: Exploring the importance of amivantamab in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, including insights on resistance patterns and treatment sequencing. •⁠  ⁠ADRIATIC Study: Analyzing the use of durvalumab as consolidation therapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer and its implications for practice, including updates on prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). Join us as we unpack these pivotal studies that are shaping the future of lung cancer treatment. Don't forget to check out our highlights on GI, GU, and breast cancer from ESMO 2024! Subscribe for more insights and updates in oncology! Website: http://www.oncbrothers.com/ X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers Contact us at info@oncbrothers.com    

Join us in this exciting episode of the Oncology Brothers podcast as we dive into the highlights from ESMO 2024, focusing on gastrointestinal malignancies. Hosts Drs. Rohit and Rahul Gosain are joined by Dr. Kristen Ciombor, a GI medical oncologist from Vanderbilt University, to discuss four key studies that have significant implications for clinical practice. In this episode, we covered: •⁠ ⁠LEAP-012 Study: An update on HCC treatment with Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab combined with TACE, exploring the promising progression-free survival (PFS) data and the need for mature overall survival (OS) results. •⁠ ⁠Keynote-811: The current standard of care for HER2-positive gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma, highlighting improved OS with Pembrolizumab, chemotherapy, and Trastuzumab. •⁠ ⁠POD1UM-303 Trial: A groundbreaking study in metastatic anal cancer that shows significant OS improvement with the addition of the PD-1 inhibitor Retifanlimab to chemotherapy. •⁠ ⁠NICHE-2 Study: A remarkable update on MSI-high patients, showcasing a 100% three-year disease-free survival rate with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Tune in for an insightful discussion that will keep you updated on the latest advancements in GI oncology! Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell for more conference highlights and oncology discussions. #OncologyBrothers #ESMO24 #GIMalignancies #CancerResearch #Podcast Subscribe for more updates and insights from the Oncology Brothers! Website: http://www.oncbrothers.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers Contact us at info@oncbrothers.com  

Catch up on the latest breakthroughs in bladder cancer management. In this episode of the BackTable Urology Podcast, Dr. Bogdana Schmidt (University of Utah) speaks with Dr. Andrea Apolo, a medical oncologist at the National Cancer Institute, about recent advancements in bladder cancer treatment presented at the 2024 European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress. --- SYNPOSIS They review pivotal trials like the NIAGARA and AMBASSADOR studies, the TAR-200 drug delivery system, the use of bladder-sparing treatment, and the role of ctDNA as a biomarker. Further, they detail the effectiveness of systemic therapies such as gemcitabine and pembrolizumab, the implications of perioperative immunotherapy, and the future role of antibody-drug conjugates. The conversation highlights the trend towards less invasive approaches while improving survival rates from bladder cancer. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction 03:49 - NIAGARA Trial 09:10 - Challenges in Bladder Cancer Treatment 18:56 - AMBASSADOR Trial 25:30 - Adjuvant Immunotherapy 29:30 - Exploring Biomarkers and ctDNA 36:34 - Surgery and Less Invasive Therapies 46:31 - Future Directions in Bladder Cancer Treatment --- RESOURCES ESMO https://www.esmo.org/

Join us as we dive into four pivotal studies: 1.⁠ ⁠NIAGARA Trial: Explore the groundbreaking findings on the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in the perioperative setting for patients with resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer, which may now set a new standard of care. 2.⁠ ⁠TiNiVO-2 Study: Learn why re-challenging patients with immunotherapy after progression on prior immunotherapy is not recommended, and what alternative treatments may be more effective. 3.⁠ ⁠PEACE-3 Study: Discover the implications of combining enzalutamide with radium-223 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and its impact on progression-free survival. 4.⁠ ⁠CONTACT-02 Study: Understand the results comparing cabozantinib with atezolizumab against a second novel hormonal therapy, and what this means for overall survival in specific patient populations.   Tune in for an insightful discussion that highlights the latest advancements in GU cancer treatment and their potential impact on clinical practice. Don't forget to check out our other episodes covering breast cancer, lung cancer, and GI malignancies from ESMO 2024!   Subscribe for more updates and insights from the Oncology Brothers!   Website: http://www.oncbrothers.com/   Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers   Contact us at info@oncbrothers.com

Tom and Brian finish discussing ESMO 2024 highlights. Even without a guest Tom still interrupts a lot.

Silke joins us to discuss ESMO 2024 highlights, then the birds start singing....

Recapping just some of the notable data coming out of ESMO 2024: -Final OS results from Keynote-522 (perioperative pembrolizumab in TNBC) -AMBASSADOR (adjuvant pembrolizumab in bladder cancer) -NIAGRA (perioperative durvalumab in bladder cancer) -ADRIATIC (discussed on ASCO recap Pod, but publication now available) -LEANOX (impact of lean body mass adjustment on oxaliplatin dose)

Uromigos Japan with Yuji, Hiroshi and Nobu is formed and discuss Hiroshi's ESMO data.

Fresh of the Presidential session address, Tom discusses his data with Petros commenting.

Matt Galsky describes his ESMO 2024 abstract of disitimab vedotiin + pembrlizumab in bladder cancer

Arun Azad describes this randomised phase II study of sequential 177Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel vs. docetaxel in mHSPC

Brad McGregor joins Brian and Tom to discuss a new HIF inhibitor, NKT2152, and preliminary data in RCC