Podcasts about rcc

  • 409PODCASTS
  • 2,484EPISODES
  • 38mAVG DURATION
  • 5WEEKLY NEW EPISODES
  • Aug 27, 2025LATEST

POPULARITY

20172018201920202021202220232024

Categories



Best podcasts about rcc

Show all podcasts related to rcc

Latest podcast episodes about rcc

Christian Apologetics Research Ministry

Matt Slick Live (Live Broadcast of 08/27/2025) is a production of the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry (CARM). Matt answers questions on topics such as: The Bible, Apologetics, Theology, World Religions, Atheism, and other issues! You can also email questions to Matt using: info@carm.org, Put "Radio Show Question" in the Subject line! Answers will be discussed in a future show. Topics Include: Matt Announces The Release of New WebSite Articles—Priesthood Table of The RCC and EO, Levels of Reward in Heaven/The Need to Equip The Saints so We Can Reach The Lost/ Caller Wants to Know if Matt Has a "Go To" Bible Verse to Live By/Which Translation Does He Prefer, and Why there are Currently so Many/ Matt Discusses the Current State of Artificial Intelligence for Websites/Email Question—A "Oneness" Dress Issue/ Can God Destroy a "Spirit?"/Why Eternal "Punishment" Requires Experience/ Matt Discusses Problems with "Soul Sleep" and "Annihilationism"/How this Relates to The Dual Nature of Jesus/A "Oneness" Problem Examined/ 1 Peter 2:8—Does God Appoint Disobedience?/ August 27, 2025

The Uromigos
Episode 436: The History of IO in RCC - Part 2

The Uromigos

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 25, 2025 36:29


We continue our conversation with Mike Atkins and David McDermott, discussing IO-based combination therapy in RCC.

River Community Church Podcast
Lamentations - Chronological Bible

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 24, 2025


ASCO Daily News
The Gut Microbiome and Immunotherapy: Researching the Connection

ASCO Daily News

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 21, 2025 18:47


Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal and Dr. Arielle Elkrief discuss the clinical relevance of the gut microbiome in cancer immunotherapy and the importance of antibiotic stewardship, as well as interventions currently being explored to treat gut dysbiosis and optimize immunotherapy response. TRANSCRIPT Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: Hi everyone, I'm Dr. Monty Pal, welcoming you to the ASCO Daily News Podcast. I'm a medical oncologist. I'm a professor and vice chair of academic affairs at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Los Angeles.  Today we're here to discuss one of my favorite topics, which is the gut microbiome. It's almost hard to avoid the gut microbiome nowadays if you look at medical literature within oncology. It's an emerging phenomenon, but there are a couple of individuals that I would really define as pioneers in the field. And one of them is actually with me today, Dr. Arielle Elkrief, to discuss the clinical relevance of the gut microbiome, particularly amongst patients receiving immunotherapy, although I imagine our conversation today will take many twists and turns. Arielle is an assistant professor and clinician scientist in the Department of Oncology at the University of Montreal, and she is co-director of the CHUM Microbiome Center there.  FYI for the listeners, we have our full disclosures in the transcript of this episode.  Arielle, thank you so much for joining us today. Dr. Arielle Elkrief: Thanks so much, Monty. This is going to be amazing. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: Well, I have to tell you what sort of inspired me to bring you on as a guest. It was one of many things, but it was this really terrific ASCO Educational [Book] article that you wrote. Now, I have to tell you, I've read all the articles sort of cover to cover in the book, and they're always a wonderful primer, so if our audience is studying for board research or something of that sort, it's a terrific resource to go through. I have to tell you, this piece on the gut microbiome that you wrote is nothing short of a masterpiece. If you read this cover to cover, it's actually going to give you, I think, a sense of the current state and future state of the field. I wanted to start by just sort of beginning with sort of the origin story for a lot of this, which is this association between the gut microbiome and immunotherapy response. This takes us back several years to this pivotal series of papers in Science. Maybe you could walk our audience through that. Dr. Arielle Elkrief: Absolutely. Well, thank you so much for your kind words about the ASCO [Educational] Book. It was a team effort with a lot of key opinion leaders in the field, so I'm really glad to learn that you've liked it.  Moving backwards in terms of how we came to understand that the gut microbiome is essential to priming a response to cancer immunotherapy actually goes back to 2015 and seminal papers that looked at what happens when we take mice that are germ-free mice that have never been exposed to a microbiome. These are mice that are born by cesarean section and essentially live in a bubble. And when we give those mice tumors and treat them, in the first papers with anti-CTLA-4 treatment, we realized that these antibodies don't work at all. And that was the first observation that the presence of a gut microbiome was essential to mounting an anti-cancer immune response. When we supplemented those same mice with beneficial bacteria or feces from responder patients, we were able to restore the response to immunotherapy. And so those were really the first preclinical observations that made us understand the critical role of the microbiome in immunotherapy response. Moving a little bit in the future, we examined the fecal microbiome composition using shotgun metagenomic sequencing in different cohorts of patients with solid tumors, namely lung cancers, kidney cancers, and also skin tumors like melanoma, and found that patients who responded to immunotherapy had a distinct microbiome that was characterized by beneficial bacteria compared to patients who experienced resistance to immunotherapy that had a dysbiotic or diseased microbiome. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: So, you know, it's interesting, these techniques that we're using to sequence the gut, they're a little bit different. So I wonder if you can give the audience a quick primer on these techniques that you're so well versed in, shotgun metagenomic sequencing, 16S rRNA sequencing. If you had to describe this in 30 seconds, which is a tall task, how would you do that? Dr. Arielle Elkrief: That's a tall task. Much of what we know about the microbiome initially came from a technique called 16S rRNA sequencing. This is a technique that amplifies the 16S region and basically tells you at the genus level what's going on at the level of bacterial composition. This technique is fast, relatively cheap, and can be performed on a laptop computer, which is excellent. The problem is that it's prone to a lot of technical variations. Different primers might give you different results, and you're really limited at the genus resolution. You can't get a good resolution in terms of species, and we're learning that different species from the same genus might have different physiological properties, and the same thing goes at the strain level. So when we really zone in and look at inter-species changes, we're seeing that these actually have specific functions in the host. So that brings us to metagenomic sequencing, which is a whole genome sequencing, next-generation sequencing based method that looks at the whole composition and gives you information not only on bacteria, but you might also get fungal and viral properties. You can zoom in on the strain level. You can also get functional output, so we can examine what the metabolic properties of specific species or strains might look like. The negative aspects of shotgun metagenomic sequencing is that it takes a lot of computational power in order to analyze the results and it might take a little bit longer. And certainly, within the clinical setting, not something that's feasible yet.  And that brings us to more novel point-of-care biomarker tools that we've collaborated in developing along with Dr. Laurence Zitvogel and Dr. Lisa Derosa at Gustave Roussy, that learning from the shotgun metagenomics results designed a probe using quantitative PCR which looks for this specific bacteria we know to be important and developed a ratio of harmful bacteria to beneficial bacteria. This is called the TOPOSCORE, and it actually is able to predict quite nicely the response to immunotherapy using a stool sample and a really good turnaround time of almost 72 hours. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: That was a perfect overview and a lot of information in a short amount of time. It also makes you take out your high school biology textbooks, doesn't it, to understand that the bacterial ribosome, right, is a different size and shape, and that's what we're sequencing here. But these techniques I think are incredibly important, and I'm glad you actually discussed this, this RT-PCR based strategy of calculating the TOPOSCORE. It lends itself to this phenomenon of dysbiosis, and I think for our audience, that's going to be an important term to understand as time goes on. There's the normal healthy gut and then there's this phenomenon of dysbiosis, which is, I guess, simply put, an unhealthy gut. But tell us about, you know, how often you see dysbiosis in a cancer patient, maybe versus a normal healthy adult. Dr. Arielle Elkrief: So, I think we can split up your question into two parts. One is we know from cohort studies and population level-based studies that the microbiome of patients with cancer is distinct from healthy patients or healthy people. And we know that because of the global composition. We also think that there are diversity metrics that lend themselves to being described as dysbiotic. But we do know that the microbiome of people with cancer is distinct from healthy volunteers. That's the first point.  In terms of how frequently dysbiosis occurs in patients with cancer, it's not very well defined. We know that even among healthy people, there is a certain level of dysbiosis. Laurence in her talk mentioned that to be about 10% to 20%. And the other fascinating component is that when we're thinking about dysbiosis and the cancer associated microbiome, in terms of the species that are enriched, it's quite striking that a lot of these dysbiotic or negative bacteria are also found to be enriched in patients with metabolic disease, like cardiovascular disease, for example. And so it's unclear if dysbiosis is the cause or consequence, but there definitely seems to be a general pattern of disease when looking at the microbiome compared to healthy people. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: That's interesting. So, I'll tell you, my second favorite portion of your article, and I'll tell you my favorite portion as well in the context of this podcast, but my second favorite part was the section around antibiotic stewardship. You know, the utilization of antibiotics in a very pragmatic fashion amongst our patients. Can you describe why that's so critical in the context of the microbiome? Dr. Arielle Elkrief: Antibiotics can disrupt the gut microbiome composition. We know this from mouse studies, but also cohort studies of patients that are exposed to antibiotics. And most importantly, we know that patients who are exposed to antibiotics, either before or during the immunotherapy period, have significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival to immunotherapy. And this is true for immunotherapy in the monotherapy setting, but also when combined with chemotherapy. What's striking is that when we look at patients who are just treated with chemotherapy, we don't see the negative outcome of antibiotics on outcome and progression-free survival and overall survival, suggesting that the negative impact of antibiotics on outcomes is really specific to immunotherapy backbones. The other important point is that this negative signal is maintained even after adjusting for standard prognostic variables in the specific malignancies that we're looking at. And then most importantly, at the mechanistic level, we were able to actually pinpoint the mechanism behind this antibiotic related dysbiosis. And we see this with a bloom of negative bacteria which induces a loss of MAd-CAM, which is an endothelial gut checkpoint immune marker, and that causes an efflux of immunosuppressive T cells, which are usually in the gut, to go straight into the tumor where they make the tumor unamenable to an immunotherapy response. And so now we finally have the mechanism as to why antibiotics are harmful and why we need to practice antibiotic stewardship. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: And just to be clear for the audience, I mean, if a patient needs antibiotics, they need antibiotics. But perhaps it just suggests that, and we have, I suppose, this predilection as oncologists, just for the minor cold or cough or what have you, we maybe should be a little bit more cognizant of whether or not antibiotics are truly necessary. Is that fair? Dr. Arielle Elkrief: Absolutely. So what we're advocating for is antibiotic stewardship, and this is the clear recommendation that we can make. So that means confirming a bacterial infection. If it's there and antibiotics are indicated, to choose the most narrow spectrum for the shortest course and constantly re-evaluate the indication of antibiotics. And of course, we need to work with our colleagues in infectious diseases who've done incredible work in antibiotic stewardship. And all along this process we also need to be mindful of other medications and polypharmacy, such as proton pump inhibitors or narcotics, for example, we think that these other medications which are frequently prescribed in our cancer population can also potentially have negative impacts on the microbiome and immunotherapy response. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: I think that's a terrific summary and big guidance for the audience.  I promised you I'd tell you my favorite part of your article, and this is this huge table. I think the table is two and a half pages long, if I remember correctly, but it's an awesome table, and I highly recommend our audience to check this out. It lists literally every therapeutic trial for the microbiome under the sun. And so it begins with the approach of fecal microbiota transplant, which I'm going to ask you to tell us about in a second, but it also hinges on a lot of really cool sort of novel therapies, live bacterial products, mixes of different microbial products. Maybe take us through this whole approach of FMT (fecal microbiota transplantation). I actually wasn't aware of the dozens of trials that you listed there in this space. It seems like it's a very active area of research. Dr. Arielle Elkrief: Definitely. So, as you alluded to, FMT or fecal microbiota transplantation is the most well studied and direct way to modify the patient's microbiome. This technique aims to replace the patient's dysbiotic microbiome with that of a healthy microbiome, either from a healthy donor volunteer that's been heavily screened, or from a patient who experienced response to immunotherapy. And, as three landmark studies so far that have been published demonstrated the potential of FMT to reduce primary resistance or secondary resistance to immunotherapy, and this has been in melanoma.  We also recently reported on the results of our FMT-LUMINate trial, which looked at patients with lung cancer and melanoma. Once again, FMT, when combined with immunotherapy was safe and led to a higher proportion of responses than we would normally expect.  We're now also looking at randomized trials that have come out. So the first being the TACITO trial in kidney cancer, which compared FMT plus pembrolizumab and axitinib to placebo in patients with RCC, and again, FMT was safe and feasible and also led to an increased progression-free survival at one year, meeting the study's primary endpoint.  And so, so far, there's a wealth of data really showing the promise of FMT when combined with immunotherapy, and we're now in the process of conducting larger randomized trials, including in melanoma with the CCTG (Canada Cancer Trials Group) in our ME17 or Canbiome2 trial, where we're going to be enrolling 128 patients with metastatic melanoma to receive FMT and standard of care immunotherapy compared to standard of care immunotherapy alone. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: You're very humble, so I've got to highlight for our audience. This was a mega grant that Arielle received to fund really the largest prospective exploration of FMT that will exist to date. So I'm really excited about that. I wish this was something we could participate in stateside.  Before we jump into the other approach, which is live bacterial products and mixes thereof, where do you see FMT going? I think that one of the perceived challenges with FMT is that it's hard to implement, right? You need to have a really robust framework when it comes to gastroenterology, the preparation's challenging. Is there a way to envision FMT use being more generalized? Dr. Arielle Elkrief: Those are great questions. So we're lucky in Canada to work with pioneers in FMT, Michael Silverman, Saman Maleki, and John Lenehan in London, Ontario, who had this really robust FMT healthy donor screening program, which literally screens for every pathogen under the sun, and we haven't had any problems with feasibility or implementing FMT in Canada. But I think that once we're going to hopefully start doing larger scale, randomized phase three studies, that we might run into problems with scalability. And I think also with regards to reproducibility, and that's the feedback that we're getting from some regulatory authorities, especially at the level of the FDA, where there are some concerns around inter- and intra-donor variability because, of course, we can't guarantee that every fecal sample is going to be the same. So that has really pushed the field to think about other strategies, such as live biotherapeutic products which take modified FMT or bacteria from stools from either healthy donors or from responder patients and basically turn them into drugs that are regulated as drugs and can then be studied in the context of investigational new drugs or products. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: I like this and, you know, I do think that there's a future for it. We just have to kind of put our heads together and figure out how to get over all of these logistical hurdles, but, you know, I agree, I think your group and others have demonstrated, especially with this trial that you're fanning out all throughout Canada, that it can potentially be done.  This is a topic that could probably go on for another couple of hours, right, especially based on the size of the table that you put together in this brilliant article, but tell us about live bacterial products or LBPs, as we call them these days. What's the current status, what's the future there? And maybe I'll give you less than two minutes here, although again, I realize it's a two-hour topic. Dr. Arielle Elkrief: You're probably better suited to speak about that because you've been one of the pioneers in terms of this. So we can think about LBPs in terms of single strain organisms, like CBM588 for an example, which your group did some amazing work in showing that, in a randomized setting, that this led to better responses than we would expect compared to just work with controls. We also know that LBPs can have multiple strains, up to 30. We're collaborating with a company called Cannabis Bioscience that is actually working on much larger communities of consortia. And so we're really excited about the direction that that's taking in terms of taking these LBPs and developing them from the drug perspective. In addition to LBPs, we know that there are other ways that we can change the microbiome, notably prebiotics, which are compounds which can have a beneficial impact on the microbiome. And one of these is camu camu, which I know your group is leading a clinical trial looking at camu camu and kidney cancer, and we're excited to see how that compares to FMT or LBPs, because that might be a potentially scalable alternative. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: That's awesome. What a terrific overview, and that was less than two minutes. I don't know how you did it. That's terrific.  Arielle, this has been such an insightful conversation. I just want to thank you for, again, a terrific article in the ASCO Educational Book. I highly recommend all of our listeners to go there and check it out, and also for sharing all these terrific insights on the podcast today. Dr. Arielle Elkrief: Thank you so much, Monty. Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal: And thanks to our listeners, too. If you value the insights that you heard today on the ASCO Daily News Podcast, please rate, review, and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks, everyone. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Find out more about today's speakers:    Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal  @montypal Dr. Arielle Elkrief Follow ASCO on social media:     @ASCO on Twitter    ASCO on Bluesky   ASCO on Facebook     ASCO on LinkedIn     Disclosures:    Dr. Sumanta (Monty) Pal:   Speakers' Bureau: MJH Life Sciences, IntrisiQ, Peerview  Research Funding (Inst.): Exelixis, Merck, Osel, Genentech, Crispr Therapeutics, Adicet Bio, ArsenalBio, Xencor, Miyarsian Pharmaceutical  Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Crispr Therapeutics, Ipsen, Exelixis  Dr. Arielle Elkrief: Honoraria: AstraZenica, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, EMD Serono Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb Research Funding (Inst.): Kanvas Bioscience, AstraZeneca, Merck Other Relationship: Royal College of Surgeons and Physicians of Canada, Cedar's Cancer Center (Henry R. Shibata Fellowship), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

The Uromigos
Episode 435: The History of IO in RCC - Part 1

The Uromigos

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 18, 2025 27:52


The fathers of IO therapy in RCC - Michael Atkins and David McDermott - join us to take a tour through IO development in RCC over the last 20 years.

River Community Church Podcast
Small Group Sunday - Miscellaneous Messages

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 17, 2025


Boomer & Warrener in the Morning
Matt's Golf Round + The Morning Report

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 15, 2025 50:56


On hour one of the Big Show Matt Rose, George Rusic, and GVP talk about Matty's game in round two of the Pro-Ams at the RCC, the wildest shots in golf, and Intern Raygan Johnson's last day in the studio. A special guest pops in to share his thoughts on golf, then the guys talk about Johnny Unitas's broken jaw and hardcore career.(26:29) The Morning Report with Matty Rose, bringing you the latest in sports. The Calgary Flames new center ice, Blue Jays wrap up their series with the Cubs, Matt goes over the rest of the contenders in MLB, the PGA weeks away from the FedEx Cup, the Rogers Charity Classic here in Calgary, Week 11 of the CFL, and the Calgary Surge Playoff update.  The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rogers Media Inc. or any affiliate.

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning
Jon Morosi on the Jays + RCC w/ Stuart Skinner and Scott McCarron

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 15, 2025 49:04


On hour three of the Big Show with George Rusic, Matty Rose, and Garret Vander Ploeg, they are joined by Jon Morosi. They breakdown the Toronto Blue Jays recent series against the Chicago Cubs, the pitching, Max Scherzer, John Schneider's expiring contract, the quality of the bullpen, Shane Bieber, AAA rehabs, Wade Boggs and his superstitions. The guys close out the segment talking about what meats are the best.(29:57) Surprise Guess Stuart Skinner joins the home of the Calgary Flames on Sportsnet. He shares his thoughts going into the Legends of Hockey Golf Tournament at the Rogers Charity Classic. Before answering questions about his offseason work, superstitions, and what he enjoys about the RCC. Before the end of the hour Scott McCarron, who's teeing off at the RCC later today joins the show. Talking about his experience between the PGA and Champions tours and how he's been preparing for the tournament this weekend.  The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rogers Media Inc. or any affiliate.

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning
Live From The Rogers Charity Classic + The Morning Report

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 49:02


On hour one of the Big Show Patrick Dumas and Matt Rose are down at Canyon Meadows Golf Course getting ready to open up the Rogers Charity Classic. Today is Pro-Am round one and the fellas break it down, before Dumas gets a welcome back to the show after his vacation to Guatemala City. (22:14) The Morning Report with Patrick Dumas has all the latest in sports. Including, the Blue Jays game against the Cubs, Week 11 in the CFL with the Stamps on bye, continuing NFL camps, the Hlinka-Gretzky Cup in Czechia and Slovakia, and more RCC, before wrapping it up with some local sports. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rogers Media Inc. or any affiliate.

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning
Miller Brady and Corey Pavin on RCC

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 43:45


On hour three of the Big Show with Patrick Dumas and Matt Rose, the President of the PGA Champions Tour Miller Brady talks RCC. What he loves about the event, what Canyon Meadows offers, the golfers competing, and how the tour would prepare for Tiger Woods, if he decided to join the Champions Tour. (10:21) Corey Pavin joins the show, sharing his experience of his cameo on the new Happy Gilmore 2 film, how it happened, what it was like, and all the fun he had on set. After the guys are done discussing Corey's stint in Hollywood, the conversation moves to the RCC. What Corey enjoys whilst he's in the city, the Champions tour, how he's been playing, how he practices to win, and what he is most looking forward to this weekend. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rogers Media Inc. or any affiliate.

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning
Chris Dornan Talks RCC + Dave Dickenson

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2025 54:56


On hour two of the Big Show with Patrick Dumas and Matt Rose bring in Chris Dornan, the PR director of the RCC! The three discuss some of the tournament history, it's impact on the community, what to look forward to this weekend, and the excitement behind the Legends of Hockey tournament.   (20:41) The Calgary Stampeders head coach, Dave Dickenson, takes time from the teams bye week to talk with Patrick and Matt. The trio talk the Stamps most recent game, a win over Winnipeg, Vernon Adams Jr., and the defensive competition. Wes Martin, a RCC Golfer Calgary Qualifier, who shot a nine under to get into the tournament at Highwood Country Club. He talks with Patrick and Rose about that stellar score, how he did it, how he got to this point in his golfer career, and how he plans to tackle the RCC. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rogers Media Inc. or any affiliate.

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning
Brent Krahn and Dustin Wolf Fresh Off Battle of Alberta Golf Tournament!

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 12, 2025 50:17


On hour three of the Big Show with Rusic and Rose, Brent Krahn comes in, talking goalies in the show, the to early power rankings, and his thoughts on the Connor Zary situation. (24:41) Dustin Wolf talks his golf game nearing the Legends of Hockey Golf Tournament at the RCC this weekend, his offseason training regimen, and takes some time to answer questions from the fans. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rogers Media Inc. or any affiliate.

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning
Adam Stanley Talks Golf + NHL Power Rankings

Boomer & Warrener in the Morning

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 12, 2025 42:19


On hour two of the Big Show with Rusic and Rose, Sportsnet's Adam Stanley joins the guys. Sharing his Ryder Cup predictions, thoughts on Canadian golfer Corey Conners, Tommy Fleetwood, Justin Rose, all of this heading into the RCC weekend. The textline rounds out the segment with listeners hole-in-one stories.(24:47) At the bottom of the hour the boys pick it up with some early NHL power rankings. Going over the top ten which include, the Dallas Stars, Edmonton Oilers, and Vegas Golden Knights, before diving down the rankings for your Calgary Flames. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the position of Rogers Media Inc. or any affiliate.

River Community Church Podcast
Jeremiah 29 - Chronological Bible

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2025


Message from Terry Williams on August 10, 2025

Oncology Brothers
Managing Toxicities of TKIs and HIF-2 inhibitor in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

Oncology Brothers

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2025 18:47


Welcome back to the Oncology Brothers podcast! In this episode, Drs. Rahul and Rohit Gosain are joined by world-renowned medical oncologist Dr. Monty Pal from the City of Hope. Together, they dived deep into the management of side effects associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and HIF-2 alpha inhibitors used in treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Episode Highlights: • Understanding TKIs and HIF-2 Inhibitors: A discussion on the available oral treatment options for RCC, including cabozantinib, lenvatinib, and axitinib. • Dosing Strategies: Insights on starting doses, titration, and the importance of managing side effects without compromising quality of life. • Common Side Effects: hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, and how they relate to the class effect of these medications. • Clinical Pearls: Dr. Pal shared valuable tips on managing toxicities, including the use of treatment breaks and supportive care strategies. • Second-Line Treatments: A look at tivozanib and belzutifan, including their unique side effects and management strategies. Join us as we emphasized the importance of maintaining quality of life for patients undergoing treatment for metastatic RCC.  Follow us on social media: •⁠  ⁠X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers •⁠  ⁠Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers •⁠  Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Don't forget to check out our other episodes for more insights on treatment algorithms, conference highlights, and challenging cases from the community.

TBSラジオ「荻上チキ・Session」
小林康秀さん(RCC)~東京都写真美術館で開催中の「被爆80年企画展・ヒロシマ1945」について【FrontLine Session】

TBSラジオ「荻上チキ・Session」

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2025 30:57


出演:小林康秀さん(RCC中国放送 アナウンサー) 2025年8月6日(水)「FrontLine Session」より 発信型ニュース・プロジェクト「荻上チキ・Session」 ★月~金曜日 17:00~20:00 TBSラジオで生放送 パーソナリティ:荻上チキ、南部広美 番組HP:⁠荻上チキ・Session⁠ 番組メールアドレス:⁠ss954@tbs.co.jp⁠ 番組Xアカウント:⁠@Session_1530⁠ ハッシュタグは ⁠#ss954 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Stirling Baptist Church Podcast
03-08-2025 -Rich towards God - Part 2 - Luke 12 vs 13-21 - Arno De Bruin

Stirling Baptist Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 4, 2025 42:49


03-08-2025 -Rich towards God - Part 2 - Luke 12 vs 13-21 - Arno De Bruin by RCC

River Community Church Podcast
Jeremiah 7:1-25 - Chronological Bible

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 3, 2025


Message from Jim Lewis on August 3, 2025

The Truth Central with Dr. Jerome Corsi
The Biden, Obama Administrations' Corruption and Collaboration with the Deep Church

The Truth Central with Dr. Jerome Corsi

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 1, 2025 67:11


Dr. Corsi talks with Mike McCormick, former stenographer for Joe Biden and author of The Case to Impeach and Imprison Joe Biden, about the Obama/Biden administrations' teaming up with Pope Francis and Cardinal Theodore McCarrick and other elements of the Deep State and Deep Church to promote the woke agenda and to fortify the efforts of the globalist elite. McCormick will discuss this subject in-depth in his next book.Visit The Corsi Nation website: https://www.corsination.comIf you like what we are doing, please support our Sponsors:MyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpGet Dr. Corsi's new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays Proves Two Headshots from the Right Front and One from the Rear, here: https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20W8UDU55IGJJ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ymVX8y9V--_ztRoswluApKEN-WlqxoqrowcQP34CE3HdXRudvQJnTLmYKMMfv0gMYwaTTk_Ne3ssid8YroEAFg.e8i1TLonh9QRzDTIJSmDqJHrmMTVKBhCL7iTARroSzQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=jerome+r.+corsi+%2B+jfk&qid=1710126183&sprefix=%2Caps%2C275&sr=8-1Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comGet your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/corsi-nation--5810661/support.

Inside Aesthetics
Dr Raquel Amado and Dr Anoob Pakaar-Hull - 'Masterclass Series: (Chapter 7) - Combining regenerative treatments' #308

Inside Aesthetics

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2025 76:25


Episode 308 hosts Dr Raquel Amado (Dental Surgeon from Kent, UK) and Dr Anoob Pakkar-Hull (Cosmetic Physician from London, UK) In our 'Masterclass Series' we host global experts to teach us about fillers, bio-stimulators, bio-remodellers, polynucleotides, exosomes and other products. (For toxin insights, check out our other mini-series, 'The Tox Talks') In Chapter 7 we discuss various different combination treatments that are commonly used in regenerative aesthetics. Raquel and Anoob discuss their experiences and insights with various treatment modalities and cocktails of microtoxin, the various biostimulators, polynucleotides, PRP and exosomes.  Our conversation also highlights their upcoming RCC meeting that will be held in the Azores. RCC will showcase experts for in-depth lectures and debates about these innovative treatments. The event is non-sponsored and aims to foster open, unbiased discussions and on the efficacy and safety of these advanced regenerative therapies. 00:00 Introduction 01:29 IA Competition Details 02:13 Introducing Dr. Raquel Amado and Dr Anoob Pakkar-Hull 07:07 Microtoxin and Combination Therapies 08:47 Exploring Regenerative Aesthetics 15:04 Microtoxin and NCTF: A Powerful Combination 22:50 Biostimulators and Bio Remodelers 32:26 PRP: Experiences and Insights 36:14 Challenges with PRP Consistency 36:49 Equipment and Variability in PRP 37:46 Historical and Current Uses of PRP 38:18 Combining PRP with Other Treatments 40:19 Introduction to Polynucleotides 40:56 Mechanisms and Benefits of Polynucleotides 43:57 Combining Polynucleotides with Other Treatments 50:27 Exosomes: Sources and Uses 53:18 Patient Communication and Treatment Customization 59:15 Debating the Efficacy of Regenerative Treatments 01:04:15 Future of Regenerative Medicine and Conferences 01:08:02 RCC Conference Overview and Invitation   FIND OUT MORE ABOUT REGENERA COLLECTIVE CONFERENCE & BUY TICKETS - IA LISTENERS GET 15% off BY USING THE CODE IA15! CHECK OUT OUR PATREON & GET A 7 DAYS FREE TRIAL! BROWSE OUR IA OFFERS FOR DISCOUNTS & SPECIALS YOUR A BRAND OR COMPANY & WANT TO WORK WITH US APPLY TO BE A GUEST ON OUR PODCAST CONTACT US  

BackTable Podcast
Ep. 561 Dosimetry University VI: Challenging Case Review with Dr. Tyler Sandow and Dr. Zach Berman

BackTable Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2025 48:55


When is Y90 the right treatment for metastatic disease? Join Drs. Tyler Sandow, Zach Berman and host Kavi Krishnasamy in the conclusion of Dosimetry University where they discuss the complexities of treating different variations of metastatic disease and review how they've approached complicated cases with Y90. --- SYNPOSIS The interventional oncologists first outline the types of metastases that they treat, including colorectal, lung, cholangiocarcinoma, breast, gastric, RCC, and melanoma. The doctors then discuss the potential for Y90 to provide palliative relief by reducing tumor-related pain. The conversation also covers key differences between treating liver-dominant and liver-only disease, along with their algorithm for patients not on systemic chemotherapy.The episode then covers advanced concepts in Y90, such as sub-ablative dosing, the possibility of creating an abscopal effect, and how radiation thresholds change depending on treatment goals. They outline their approach to partition dosimetry, using SPECT/CT to calculate tumor-to-normal ratios, and explain how they modify particle counts and microsphere activity, using flow augmentation based on tumor vascularity. Additional discussion includes the impact of mutation status, prior lines of chemotherapy, and tumor response criteria like RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. The experts conclude with a case series that illustrates decision-making around when to consider Y90, thermal ablation, TACE, or alternative approaches—even in complex cases like sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The session underscores the nuanced nature of advanced dosimetric techniques and the evolving landscape of interventional oncology. --- TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - Introduction 01:30 - Types of Metastases Treated with Y9002:50 - Liver-Dominant vs. Liver-Only Disease 07:20 - Sub-Ablative Dosing and the Abscopal Effect09:55 - Tips for Partition Dosimetry 15:30 - Clinical Factors in Treatment Planning23:50 - Choosing Ablation, Resection, or Y90 for mCRC30:27 - Case Series: Colorectal Metastases, Biliary Complications, and more46:00 - Final Thoughts: The Evolving Field --- RESOURCES RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST Criteria:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9161105/ COLLISION Trial:https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA3501 BackTable Episode on COLLISION Trial:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQLKcv1BRVM FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX, FOXFIRE-Global:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(17)30457-6/fulltext

Foundation Stones
Practicing What You Preach

Foundation Stones

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 28, 2025 41:08


Today, we have a guest message from Rick Dickinson, RCC's campus administrator and lead pastor of Refuge Church Malin. This message comes from our evening sessions during our mission trip to Paisley. Enjoy and be challenged by this powerful word! Support the show

Two Onc Docs
Localized Kidney Cancer x Uromigos 2025 UPDATES (Part 1)

Two Onc Docs

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 28, 2025 20:18


Today's episode we will cover 2025 updates for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with Dr. Tom Powles and Dr. Brian Rini from the urologic oncology podcast Uromigos! We will discuss risk factors, the presentation, staging, and treatment options. 

Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go
S1 Ep172: Key Advances Across Kidney Cancer Research and Management at KCRS 2025

Oncology Peer Review On-The-Go

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 28, 2025 14:01


At the 2025 Kidney Cancer Research Summit hosted by KidneyCAN, CancerNetwork® spoke with a variety of leading experts about key developments in the research and management of kidney cancer. Throughout the meeting, presenters shared their findings related to updated clinical trial results, personalized cancer vaccines, potential biomarkers of interest, and other advancements in the field. Thomas Powles, MBBS, MCRP, MD, discussed outcomes from a quality-adjusted survival time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of the phase 3 LITESPARK-005 trial (NCT04195750), in which investigators evaluated treatment with belzutifan (Welireg) vs everolimus (Afinitor) among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Powles, a professor of genitourinary oncology, lead for Solid Tumor Research, and director of Barts Cancer Institute at St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, stated that these data demonstrate how belzutifan is more active and better tolerated than everolimus in this patient population. David A. Braun, MD, PhD, assistant professor at Yale School of Medicine and member of the Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology within the Yale Cancer Center, detailed his presentation on a personalized neoantigen cancer vaccine as a treatment for those with RCC. Based on his presentation, Braun highlighted how neoantigen vaccines may effectively yield T-cell responses in patients, illustrating a need for additional, larger studies to elucidate the clinical activity of this modality in an adjuvant setting. Additionally, Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD, a medical oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, spoke about his presentation on how kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) may serve as a prognostic biomarker of response to therapy in patients with RCC. His research posed questions on how KIM-1 can inform the use of adjuvant therapy or specific therapeutic combinations like nivolumab (Opdivo) plus ipilimumab (Yervoy) for this patient population. Eric Jonasch, MD, gave an overview of his presentation focused on the Kidney Cancer Research Consortium, a research partnership spanning 7 institutions dedicated to facilitating mechanistic, hypothesis-testing clinical trials in RCC. Jonasch, a professor in the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology of the Division of Cancer Medicine at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, described how this collaboration aims to link identifiable biological characteristics of RCC subtypes to specific treatment strategies while developing predictive biomarkers. KidneyCAN is a nonprofit organization with a mission to accelerate cures for kidney cancer through education, advocacy, and research funding. You can learn more about KidneyCAN's work here: https://kidneycan.org/ References 1. Powles T, de Velasco G, Choueiri TK, et al. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of belzutifan versus everolimus in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): LITESPARK-005 (LS-005). Presented at the 2025 Kidney Cancer Research Summit; July 17-18, 2025; Boston, MA. Abstract 13. 2. Braun DA. Personalized vaccines in kidney cancer: a journey from concept to clinic. Presented at the 2025 Kidney Cancer Research Summit; July 17-18, 2025; Boston, MA. 3. Xu W. From bench to bedside: advancing KIM-1 as a tool for clinical decision-making. Presented at the 2025 Kidney Cancer Research Summit; July 17-18, 2025; Boston, MA. 4. Jonasch E. Building the infrastructure for discovery: a clinical trial consortium to accelerate kidney cancer research. Presented at the 2025 Kidney Cancer Research Summit; July 17-18, 2025; Boston, MA.

Redemption Hill Church
Philippians 1:1-11 – Joy/Full

Redemption Hill Church

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2025 39:56


This Sunday, we get to hear from a very good friend of mine, Gentry Morris. Gentry is the Lead Pastor at Reston Community Church in Northern Virginia where he serves the RCC family through preaching, teaching, and helping people find deep hope in the gospel of Jesus. Before coming to RCC, Gentry served as a pastor in Washington state and in church planting ministry in Belfast, Northern Ireland. He also has been involved in worship ministry and writing songs for the local church. Gentry plans to preach from Philippians 1:1-11 on finding joy and contentment in our lives, rooted in the gospel, and extending through us in generosity.  ------------------------------------------- Connect with us on Social Media ⁠Website⁠ | ⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠Threads⁠ | ⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠Vimeo⁠------------------------------------------- Download our App⁠Apple App Store⁠ | ⁠Google Play Store⁠

River Community Church Podcast
Isaiah 59-66 - Chronological Bible

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2025


Message from Trace Kendrick on July 27, 2025

The Truth Central with Dr. Jerome Corsi
Inside Hollywood's Whitewashing of the Catholic Church Coup Against Pope Benedict

The Truth Central with Dr. Jerome Corsi

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 23, 2025 64:22


Keen observers questioned why Pop Benedict XVI really "stepped down" from his post prematurely to make room for the current Pope Francis (Jorge Mario Bergoglio) in 20113. While Pope Benedict was maligned by the mainstream media Pope Francis was heralded by the same MSM members as an Obama-like rockstar, bringing in a Globalist/Socialist agenda into the Roman Catholic Church. While the truth behind the scenes indicates Francis was installed through manipulation by the Obama/Biden administration while the three re-promoted known pedophile Cardinal Theodore McCarrick to international prominence. Together, they worked hard to advance the Globalist Agenda. Hollywood, however, dutifully attempted to Whitewash the controversial Pope Francis installment as a friendly and amicable transition through the Obama-led Netflix service's movie "The Two Popes."Mike McCormick, author of THE CASE TO IMPEACH AND IMPRISOIN JOE BIDEN, and Biden's former stenographer, got to see some of what really happened up close. Mike joins Dr. Jerome Corsi on The Truth Central to talk about it.Visit Mike McCormick's substack here: https://mmccormick.substack.com/p/the-deep-state-hollywood-evil-behindVisit The Corsi Nation website: https://www.corsination.comIf you like what we are doing, please support our Sponsors:MyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpGet Dr. Corsi's new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays Proves Two Headshots from the Right Front and One from the Rear, here: https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20W8UDU55IGJJ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ymVX8y9V--_ztRoswluApKEN-WlqxoqrowcQP34CE3HdXRudvQJnTLmYKMMfv0gMYwaTTk_Ne3ssid8YroEAFg.e8i1TLonh9QRzDTIJSmDqJHrmMTVKBhCL7iTARroSzQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=jerome+r.+corsi+%2B+jfk&qid=1710126183&sprefix=%2Caps%2C275&sr=8-1Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comGet your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/corsi-nation--5810661/support.

River Community Church Podcast
Isaiah - The Servant Songs - Chronological Bible

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 20, 2025


OncoAlert
The OncoAlert

OncoAlert

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 17, 2025 5:15


From game-changing trial results to the evolving science behind personalized cancer care, this week's OncoAlert Round Up dives into the most impactful studies shaking up the oncology landscape. We explore the TALAPRO-2 trial's final analysis showing that talazoparib plus enzalutamide significantly improves survival in men with HRR-deficient mCRPC—especially those with BRCA1/2 alterations—positioning it as a potential new standard of care. Plus, we unpack new insights into geriatric assessment in oncology, breastfeeding post–HR+ breast cancer (POSITIVE trial), non-clear cell RCC, brain metastases at single-cell resolution, MMR-deficient cancer treatment, microbiome modulation, and more. Whether you're a clinician, researcher, or just passionate about cancer science, this episode delivers everything you need to stay ahead.Listen now and subscribe for your weekly dose of cutting-edge cancer care.

The Jefferson Exchange
Economic gardeners help small businesses grow in the Rogue Valley

The Jefferson Exchange

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 16, 2025 14:36


Joining the Exchange are Ruth Swain, Director of RCC's SBDC and Tim Busald, SBDC Business Advisor.

The Jefferson Exchange
Economic gardeners help small businesses grow in the Rogue Valley

The Jefferson Exchange

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 16, 2025 14:36


Joining the Exchange are Ruth Swain, Director of RCC's SBDC and Tim Busald, SBDC Business Advisor.

The Uromigos
Episode 431: IMPACT series - Axel Bex on Impactful RCC Clinical Trials

The Uromigos

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 14, 2025 43:59


Axel Bex joins the show to discuss trials that he thinks have impacted RCC. We also discuss consolidative approaches, neoadjuvant trials and what can impact an academic career.

River Community Church Podcast
King Hezekiah - Miscellaneous Messages

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 13, 2025


CCO Medical Specialties Podcast
Conversations in Chronic Cough: An Otolaryngologist's Perspective

CCO Medical Specialties Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 11, 2025 18:07


Listen as Michael S. Benninger, MD, describes his approach to the diagnosis and management of chronic cough and refractory chronic cough in the context of a clinically relevant case.PresenterMichael S. Benninger, MDProfessor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryLerner College of MedicineThe Cleveland ClinicPresident, International Association of PhonosurgeryCleveland, OhioLink to full program:https://bit.ly/4kweynG

River Community Church Podcast
Micah 5:3-5 - Miscellaneous Messages

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 6, 2025


River Community Church Podcast
Amos - Miscellaneous Messages

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 29, 2025


Message from Trace Kendrick on June 29, 2025

ASCO Daily News
Innovations in GU Cancer Treatment at ASCO25

ASCO Daily News

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 26, 2025 29:46


Dr. Neeraj Agarwal and Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching discuss important advances in the treatment of prostate, bladder, and kidney cancers that were presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting. TRANSCRIPT Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Hello, and welcome to the ASCO Daily News Podcast. I am Dr. Neeraj Agarwal, your guest host of the ASCO Daily News Podcast today. I am the director of the Genitourinary Oncology Program and a professor of medicine at the University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute and editor-in-chief of the ASCO Daily News.  I am delighted to be joined by Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching, a GU medical oncologist and the clinical program director of the GU Center at the Inova Schar Cancer Institute in Virginia. Today, we will be discussing some key abstracts in GU oncology that were presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting.  Our full disclosures are available in the transcript of this episode.  Jeanny, it is great to have you on the podcast. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Oh, thank you so much, Neeraj. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Jeanny, let's begin with some prostate cancer abstracts. Let's begin with Abstract 5017 titled, “Phase 1 study results of JNJ-78278343 (pasritamig) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.” Can you walk us through the design and the key findings of this first-in-human trial? Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Yeah, absolutely, Neeraj. So this study, presented by Dr. Capucine Baldini, introduces pasritamig, a first-in-class T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds KLK2 on prostate cancer cells and CD3 receptor complexes on T cells. KLK2 is also known as human kallikrein 2, which is selectively expressed in prostate tissue. And for reference, KLK3 is what we now know as the PSA, prostate-specific antigen, therefore making it an attractive and specific target for therapeutic engagement. Now, while this was an early, first-in-human, phase 1 study, it enrolled 174 heavily pretreated metastatic CRPC patients. So many were previously treated with ARPIs, taxanes, and radioligand therapy. So given the phase 1 nature of this study, the primary objective was to determine the safety and the RP2D, which is the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives included preliminary assessment of antitumor activity. So, pasritamig was generally well tolerated. There were no treatment-related deaths. Serious adverse events were rare. And in the RP2D safety cohort, where patients received the step-up dosing up to 300 mg of IV every 6 weeks, the most common treatment-related adverse events were low-grade infusion reactions. There was fatigue and grade 1 cytokine release syndrome, what we call CRS. And no cases of neurotoxicity, or what we call ICANS, the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, reported. Importantly, the CRS occurred in just about 8.9% of patients. All were grade 1. No patients required tocilizumab or discontinued treatment due to adverse events. So, this suggests a favorable safety profile, allowing hopefully for outpatient administration without hospitalization, which will be very important when we're thinking about bispecifics moving forward. In terms of efficacy, pasritamig showed promising activity. About 42.4% of evaluable patients achieved a PSA50 response. Radiographic PFS was about 6.8 months. And among patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was about 16.1% in those with lymph node or bone metastases, and about 3.7% in those with visceral disease, with a median duration of response of about 11.3 months. So, altogether, this data suggests that pasritamig may offer a well-tolerated and active new potential option for patients with metastatic CRPC.   Again, as a reminder, with the caveat that this is still an early phase 1 study. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Thank you, Jeanny. These are promising results for a bispecific T-cell engager, pasritamig, in prostate cancer. I agree, the safety and durability observed here stand out, and this opens the door for further development, possibly even in earlier disease settings.  So, shifting now from immunotherapy to the evolving role of genomics in prostate cancer. So let's discuss Abstract 5094, a real-world, retrospective analysis exploring the prognostic impact of homologous recombination repair gene mutations, especially BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Can you tell us more about this abstract, Jeanny? Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Sure, Neeraj. So this study was presented by Dr. David Olmos, represents one of the largest real-world analyses we have evaluating the impact of homologous recombination repair, or what we would call HRR, alterations in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. So, this cohort included 556 men who underwent paired germline and somatic testing. Now, about 30% of patients had HRR alterations, with about 12% harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and 16% having alterations in other HRR genes. Importantly, patients were stratified via CHAARTED disease volume, and outcomes were examined across treatment approaches, including ADT alone, doublet therapy, and triplet therapy. The prevalence of BRCA and HRR alterations were about similar between the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and the metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, with no differences observed, actually, between the patients with high volume versus low volume disease.  So, the key finding was that BRCA and HRR alterations were associated with poor clinical outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. And notably, the impact of these alterations may actually be even greater in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer than previously reported in metastatic CRPC. So, the data showed that when BRCA mutations are present, the impact of the volume of disease is actually limited. So, poor outcomes were observed across the board for both high-volume and low-volume groups. So, the analysis showed that patients with HRR alterations had significantly worse outcomes compared to patients without HRR alterations. Median radiographic progression-free survival was about 20.5 months for the HRR-altered patients versus 30.6 months for the non-HRR patients, with a hazard ratio of 1.6. Median overall survival was 39 months for HRR-altered patients compared to 55.7 months for the non-HRR patients, with a hazard ratio of 1.5. Similar significant differences were observed when BRCA-mutant patients were compared with patients harboring non-BRCA HRR mutations. Overall, poor outcomes were independent of treatment of ARPI or taxanes. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Thank you, Jeanny. So, these data reinforce homologous recombination repair mutations as both a predictive and prognostic biomarker, not only in the mCRPC, but also in the metastatic hormone-sensitive setting as well. It also makes a strong case for incorporating genomic testing early in the disease course and not waiting until our patients have castration-resistant disease. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Absolutely, Neeraj. And I think this really brings home the point and the lead up to the AMPLITUDE trial, which is LBA5006, a phase 3 trial that builds on this very concept of testing with a PARP inhibitor, niraparib, in the hormone-sensitive space. Can you tell us a little bit more about this abstract, Neeraj? Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Sure. So, the AMPLITUDE trial, a phase 3 trial presented by Dr. Gerhardt Attard, enrolled 696 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and HRR gene alterations. 56% of these patients had BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Patients were randomized to receive abiraterone with or without niraparib, a PARP inhibitor. The majority of patients, 78% of these patients, had high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and 87% of these patients had de novo metastatic HSPC. And 16% of these patients received prior docetaxel, which was allowed in the clinical trial. So, with a median follow-up of nearly 31 months, radiographic progression-free survival was significantly prolonged with the niraparib plus abiraterone combination, and median was not reached in this arm, compared to abiraterone alone, which was 29.5 months, with a hazard ratio of 0.63, translating to a 37% reduction in risk of progression or death. This benefit was even more pronounced in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 subgroup, with a 48% reduction in risk of progression, with a hazard ratio of 0.52. Time to symptomatic progression also improved significantly across all patients, including patients with BRCA1, BRCA2, and HRR mutations. Although overall survival data remain immature, early trends favored the niraparib plus abiraterone combination. The safety profile was consistent with prior PARP inhibitor studies, with grade 3 or higher anemia and hypertension were more common but manageable. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events remained low at 11%, suggesting that timely dose modifications when our patients experience grade 3 side effects may allow our patients to continue treatment without discontinuation. These findings support niraparib plus abiraterone as a potential new standard of care in our patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with HRR alterations, and especially in those who had BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Thank you, Neeraj. This trial is especially exciting because it brings PARP inhibitors earlier into the treatment paradigm. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Exactly. And it is exciting to see the effect of PARP inhibitors in the earlier setting.  So Jeanny, now let's switch gears a bit to bladder cancer, which also saw several impactful studies. Could you tell us about Abstract 4502, an exploratory analysis from the EV-302 trial, which led to approval of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab for our patients with newly diagnosed metastatic bladder cancer? So here, the authors looked at the outcomes in patients who achieved a confirmed complete response with EV plus pembrolizumab. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Sure, Neeraj. So, EV-302 demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free and overall survival for patients previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer, I'll just call it metastatic UC, as a frontline strategy, establishing EV, which is enfortumab vedotin, plus pembro, with pembrolizumab as standard of care in this setting.  So, this year at ASCO, Dr Shilpa Gupta presented this exploratory responder analysis from the phase 3 EV-302 trial. Among 886 randomized patients, about 30.4% of patients, this is about 133, in the EV+P arm, and 14.5% of the patients in the chemotherapy arm, achieved a confirmed complete response. They call it the CCR rates. So for patients who achieved this, median PFS was not reached with EV+P compared to 26.9 months with chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.36, translating to a 64% reduction in the risk of progression. Overall survival was also improved. So the median OS was not reached in either arm, but the hazard ratio favored the EV+P at 0.37, translating to a 63% reduction in the risk of death. The median duration of complete response was not reached with EV+P compared to 15.2 months with chemotherapy. And among those patients who had confirmed CRs at 24 months, 78% of patients with the EV+P arm remained progression-free, and around 95% of the patients were alive, compared to 54% of patients who were progression-free and 86% alive of the patients in the chemotherapy arm. Safety among responders were also consistent with prior reports. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 62% of EV+P responders and 72% of chemotherapy responders. Most adverse events were managed with dose modifications, and importantly, no treatment-related deaths were reported among those who were able to achieve complete response.  So these findings further reinforce EV and pembro as the preferred first-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, offering a higher likelihood of deep, durable responses with a fairly manageable safety profile. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Thank you for the great summary, Jeanny. These findings underscore the depth and durability of responses achievable with this combination and also suggest that achieving a response may be a surrogate for long-term benefit in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.  So now, let's move to Abstract 4503, an exploratory ctDNA analysis from the NIAGARA trial, which evaluated perioperative durvalumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. So what can you tell us about this abstract? Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Absolutely, Neeraj. So, in NIAGARA, presented by Dr. Tom Powles, the addition of perioperative durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, gem/cis, significantly improved event-free survival, overall survival, and pathologic complete response in patients with cisplatin-eligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Recall that this led to the U.S. FDA approval of this treatment regimen on March 28, 2025.  So, a planned exploratory analysis evaluated the ctDNA dynamics and their association with clinical outcomes, which was the one presented recently at ASCO. So, the study found that the incidence of finding ctDNA positivity in these patients was about 57%. Following neoadjuvant treatment, this dropped to about 22%, with ctDNA clearance being more common in the durvalumab arm, about 41%, compared to the chemotherapy control arm of 31%. Notably, 97% of patients who remained ctDNA positive prior to surgery failed to achieve a pathologic CR. So, this indicates a strong association between ctDNA persistence and lack of tumor eradication. So, postoperatively, only about 9% of patients were ctDNA positive. So, importantly, durvalumab conferred an event-free survival benefit regardless of ctDNA status at both baseline and post-surgery. Among patients who were ctDNA positive at baseline, durvalumab led to a hazard ratio of 0.73 for EFS. So, this translates to a 27% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence, progression, or death compared to the control arm. In the post-surgical ctDNA-positive group, the disease-free survival was also improved with a hazard ratio of 0.49, translating to a 51% reduction in the risk of recurrence.  So, these findings underscore the prognostic value of ctDNA and suggest that durvalumab provides clinical benefit irrespective of molecular residual disease status. So, the data also supports that ctDNA is a promising biomarker for future personalized strategies in the perioperative treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Thank you, Jeanny. It is great to see that durvalumab is improving outcomes in these patients regardless of ctDNA status. However, based on these data, presence of ctDNA in our patients warrants a closer follow-up with imaging studies, because these patients with positive ctDNA seem to have a higher risk of recurrence. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: I agree, Neeraj.  Let's round out the bladder cancer discussion with Abstract 4518, which reported the interim results of SURE-02, which is a phase 2 study evaluating neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Can you tell us more about this abstract, Neeraj? Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Sure, Jeanny. So, Dr Andrea Necchi presented interim results from the SURE-02 trial. This is a phase 2 study evaluating neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab, followed by a response-adapted bladder-sparing treatment and adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.  So, in this interim analysis, 40 patients were treated and 31 patients were evaluable for efficacy. So, the clinical complete response rate was 38.7%. All patients achieving clinical complete response underwent bladder-sparing approach with a repeat TURBT instead of radical cystectomy. Additionally, 51.6% of patients achieved excellent pathologic response with a T stage of 1 or less after neoadjuvant therapy. The treatment was well tolerated, with only 12.9% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher adverse events without needing dose reduction of sacituzumab. Molecular profiling, interestingly, showed that clinical complete response correlated with luminal and genomically unstable subtypes, while high stromal gene expression was associated with lack of response.  These results suggest that sacituzumab plus pembrolizumab combination has promising activity in this setting, and tolerability, and along with other factors may potentially allow a bladder preservation approach in a substantial number of patients down the line. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Yeah, agree with you, Neeraj. And the findings are very provocative and support completing the full trial enrollment and further exploration of this strategy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer in order to improve and provide further bladder-sparing strategies. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Agree. So, let's now turn to the kidney cancer, starting with Abstract 4505, the final overall analysis from CheckMate-214 trial, which evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab, so dual checkpoint inhibition strategy, versus sunitinib in our patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Yeah, absolutely, Neeraj. So, the final 9-year analysis of the phase 3 CheckMate-214 trial confirms the long-term superiority of nivolumab and ipilimumab over sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. So, this has a median follow-up of 9 years. Overall survival remains significantly improved with the combination. So, in the ITT patient population, the intention-to-treat, the hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.71. So, this translates to a 29% reduction in the risk of death. 31% of patients were alive at this 108-month follow-up compared to 20% only in those who got sunitinib. So, similar benefits were observed in the intermediate- and poor-risk groups with a hazard ratio of 0.69, and 30% versus 19% survival at 108 months.  Importantly, a delayed benefit was also seen in those favorable-risk patients. So, the hazard ratio for overall survival improved from 1.45 in the initial report and now at 0.8 at 9 years follow-up, with 35% of patients alive at 108 months compared to 22% in those who got sunitinib. Progression-free survival also favored the nivo-ipi arm across all risk groups. At 96 months, the probability of remaining progression-free was about 23% compared to 9% in the sunitinib arm in the ITT patient population, 25% versus 9% in the intermediate- and poor-risk patients, and 13% compared to 11% in the favorable-risk patients. Importantly, at 96 months, 48% of patients in the nivo-ipi responders remained in response compared to just 19% in those who got sunitinib. And in the favorable-risk group, 36% of patients who responded remained in response, although data were not available for sunitinib in this subgroup.  So, this data reinforces the use of nivolumab and ipilimumab as a durable and effective first-line effective strategy for standard of care across all risk groups for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Thank you, Jeanny. And of course, since ipi-nivo data were presented, several other novel ICI-TKI combinations have emerged. And I'm really hoping to see very similar data with TKI-ICI combinations down the line. It is really important to note that we are not seeing any new safety signals with the ICI combinations or ICI-based therapies, which is very reassuring given the extended exposure. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Absolutely agree with you there, Neeraj.  Now, going on and moving on to Abstract 4514, which is the KEYNOTE-564 trial, and they reported on the 5-year outcomes of adjuvant pembrolizumab in clear cell RCC in patients who are at high risk for recurrence. Can you tell us a little bit more about this abstract, Neeraj? Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: Sure. So, the KEYNOTE-564 trial established pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first adjuvant regimen to significantly improve both disease-free survival and overall survival compared to placebo after surgery for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. So, Dr Naomi Haas presented the 5-year update from this landmark trial.  A total of 994 patients were randomized to receive either pembrolizumab or placebo. The median follow-up at the time of this analysis was approximately 70 months. Disease-free survival remained significantly improved with pembrolizumab. The median DFS was not reached with pembrolizumab compared to 68.3 months with placebo, with a hazard ratio of 0.71, translating to a 29% reduction in risk of recurrence. At 5 years, 60.9% of patients receiving pembrolizumab remained disease-free compared to 52.2% with placebo. Overall survival also favored pembrolizumab. The hazard ratio for OS was 0.66, translating to a 34% reduction in risk of death, with an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 87.7% with pembrolizumab compared to 82.3% for placebo. Importantly, these benefits were consistent across all key subgroups, including patients with sarcomatoid features. In addition, no new serious treatment-related adverse events have been reported in the 3 years since treatment completion.  So, these long-term data confirm pembrolizumab as a durable and effective standard adjuvant therapy for patients with resected, high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: Thank you for that wonderful summary, Neeraj. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: That wraps up our kidney cancer highlights. Any closing thoughts, Jeanny, before we conclude? Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching: It's been so wonderful reviewing these abstracts with you, Neeraj. So, the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting showcased a lot of transformative data across GU cancers, from first-in-class bispecifics to long-term survival in RCC. And these findings are already shaping our clinical practices. Dr. Neeraj Agarwal: I agree. And we have covered a broad spectrum of innovations in GU cancers with strong clinical relevance.  So, thank you, Jeanny, for joining me today and sharing your insights.  And thank you to our listeners for joining us. You will find links to the abstracts discussed today in the transcript of this episode. If you find these conversations valuable, please take a moment to rate, review, and subscribe to the ASCO Daily News Podcast wherever you listen. Thank you so much. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions.  Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Find out more about today's speakers:    Dr. Neeraj Agarwal     @neerajaiims     Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching   Follow ASCO on social media:       @ASCO on Twitter       ASCO on Bluesky   ASCO on Facebook       ASCO on LinkedIn       Disclosures:   Dr. Neeraj Agarwal:   Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Nektar, Lilly, Bayer, Pharmacyclics, Foundation Medicine, Astellas Pharma, Lilly, Exelixis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Eisai, Seattle Genetics, EMD Serono, Janssen Oncology, AVEO, Calithera Biosciences, MEI Pharma, Genentech, Astellas Pharma, Foundation Medicine, and Gilead Sciences  Research Funding (Institution): Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Pfizer, Exelixis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Calithera Biosciences, Celldex, Eisai, Genentech, Immunomedics, Janssen, Merck, Lilly, Nektar, ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Crispr Therapeutics, Arvinas  Dr. Jeanny Aragon-Ching:   Honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs Inc., Pfizer/EMD Serono   Consulting or Advisory Role: Algeta/Bayer, Dendreon, AstraZeneca, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi, EMD Serono, MedImmune, Bayer, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, Immunomedics, Amgen, AVEO, Pfizer/Myovant, Exelixis,    Speakers' Bureau: Astellas Pharma, Janssen-Ortho, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas/Seattle Genetics

PrevenTable
S5 Ep 9: The Collective

PrevenTable

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 25, 2025 29:41


In honor of The Collective's grand opening, we brought in certified peer specialist John Singer to provide insight into his motivation for creating a recovery community center in Jefferson County. He explains the ability of RCC's to lower barriers to recovery, our partnership with Jefferson Franklin Community Action Corporation, and why transportation services to treatment are so important in JeffCo. Come visit us at The Collective now!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

JCO Precision Oncology Conversations
JCO PO Article Insights: Real-Time Monitoring in RCC with ctDNA

JCO Precision Oncology Conversations

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 25, 2025 7:05


In this JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights episode, Natalie DelRocco summarizes "Real-Time Monitoring in Renal Cell Carcinoma With Circulating Tumor DNA: A Step Forward, but How Far?" by Zeynep B. Zengin et al. published on February 28, 2025. TRANSCRIPT The guest on this podcast episode has no disclosures to declare. Natalie DelRocco: Hello, and welcome to JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights. I'm your host, Natalie DelRocco, and today we will be discussing the editorial, "Real-Time Monitoring in Renal Cell Carcinoma With Circulating Tumor DNA: A Step Forward, but How Far?" This editorial by Zengin and Kotecha discusses the impact of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and its potential applications in renal cell carcinoma - we'll call this RCC for the remainder of the podcast. This article was published in February of 2025, and I think this is really timely because ctDNA is currently an emerging biomarker of interest in many different cancers. Having shown promise in certain cancers, other types of cancers are really targeting ctDNA to see if it can be used as a prognostic or a predictive biomarker in their specific field of oncology. Sometimes it is found that ctDNA is a prognostic marker that's associated with outcome, but it's not always clear whether it is a predictive biomarker that can help modify treatment and to what extent it could be helpful modifying treatment. This is what the authors of this editorial really focus on. They focus on the applications of ctDNA in RCC by interpreting the accompanying article, "Longitudinal Testing of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma" by Basu et al. So, the editorial authors begin by giving examples of cancers where ctDNA has been shown to be useful in cancer monitoring - for example, locally advanced urothelial carcinoma - and they give examples of when it has not been shown to be useful in monitoring colorectal cancer. And this just highlights the variability of ctDNA as a biomarker. It's not always a useful biomarker, but sometimes it is. The authors note that RCC may fall into the latter category - that is, the "not useful" category - due to the low ctDNA shedding which characterizes RCC. However, metastatic RCC - we'll call this ‘mRCC' for the remainder of the podcast - may be a target for use of ctDNA clinically due to advanced assay development, according to the authors. Basu et al, in the original work that the editorial accompanies, showed in a retrospective study of 92 patients with mRCC that ctDNA detectability was associated with poorer PFS, regardless of receipt of active treatment versus no receipt of active treatment. That's important because ctDNA can be directly affected by therapy. The authors of the editorial believe that this is a particularly promising result for a few reasons. Firstly, the estimated hazard ratios were quite large. A hazard ratio of 3.2 was seen in the active treatment group versus a hazard ratio of 18 was observed in the no-active-treatment group. I will note that a hazard ratio of 18 with an extremely wide confidence interval is an unusual observation. So, when interpreting this result, I would consider the direction and magnitude of the effect to be suggestive of promise but needing to be validated in the future to improve precision. And the authors of the editorial do agree with this; they note the same. The authors also note that a single-patient example was used to show how that ctDNA positivity can be used in mRCC to monitor and prompt imaging if disease progression is suspected. And then that way, disease progression can be caught earlier. That to say, there is a real target for clinical use, which isn't always the case. Sometimes we know that ctDNA is associated with outcome, but we don't quite know how we can modify when we know that ctDNA is positive. In this case, the editorial authors show that we can use ctDNA positivity to monitor patients for disease progression. Despite the promise of the study, the editorial does highlight that the study inherits typical retrospective study limitations. For example, there is a heterogeneous cohort. There is variability in data collection, particularly nailing down specific time points, which can always be a challenge when collecting biological samples as part of a study. And small sample size - although 92 patients is great for renal cell carcinoma, it is a challenging sample size with respect to precision of those hazard ratio estimates, which we've already talked about. The authors additionally note that ctDNA could be used to direct therapy, not just to monitor for disease progression. So, both monitoring and changing therapy would certainly require further study and validation, which is discussed by the authors of this editorial. We would want larger, prospective studies showing the same association before we would be comfortable modifying treatment for patients based on their ctDNA positivity level. Thank you for listening to JCO Precision Oncology Article Insights. Don't forget to give us a rating or a review, and be sure to subscribe so that you never miss an episode. You can find all ASCO shows at asco.org/podcasts. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.

River Community Church Podcast
Jonah - Miscellaneous Messages

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 22, 2025


Message from Trace Kendrick on June 22, 2025

River Community Church Podcast
2 Chronicles 16 - Miscellaneous Messages

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 15, 2025


The Talk at Revolution Community Church
Living With the End in Mind Week 8

The Talk at Revolution Community Church

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 15, 2025 30:34


Join us this week as we wrap up our latest series, week 8 of "Living With the End in Mind". Not only is our series ending, but today is the day we say goodbye to Pastor Nathan and family as they continue to diligently follow God's direction for their lives. May God continue to bless the Pelehowskis AND Revolution Community Church as their paths part towards the future that God has laid out before them. The Pelehowskis are moving, but the positive impact they're leaving behind will forever leave RCC changed for the better. Remember, YOU matter because GOD SAYS you matter.Visit us at revolutioncc.org

The Feisty Women's Performance Podcast
IVF: The Marathon No One Signs Up For - Episode 2 with Alexandra Stewart M.A., RCC, PMH-C

The Feisty Women's Performance Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 9, 2025 59:36 Transcription Available


Episode 2 - The Emotional Highs & Lows of IVFIn this second episode of our series on IVF, co-host Jill Van Gyn explores the emotional complexities of fertility treatments, with a special focus on IVF and pregnancy loss. Joining her is Alexandra Stewart M.A., RCC, PMH-C, a seasoned fertility therapist with personal and deep expertise in reproductive mental health.They unpack the often unspoken psychological toll of infertility, highlighting:the emotional resilience required to endure repeated treatmentsthe grief of pregnancy lossthe impact of societal and self-imposed expectations on the journey to parenthoodthe unexpected toll it can take on relationships and partnershipsAlexandra shares invaluable insights on the importance of therapy as both a coping mechanism and a community-building tool. She also offers guidance on how to support oneself or a loved one through the profound ups and downs of reproductive challenges.Whether you're facing fertility challenges yourself or supporting someone who is, this conversation offers empathy, understanding, and hope.Trigger Warning: This episode includes sensitive discussions about pregnancy loss.Get 25% off all courses through the end of June 2025! Purchase a Feisty On-Demand Course: learning.feisty.co Sign up to Receive The Feisty 40+ Newsletter:https://www.feistymenopause.com/blog/Feisty-40-plus Sign up to Receive The Feist Newsletter:https://www.womensperformance.com/the-feist Follow us on Instagram:@feisty_womens_performance Feisty Media Website:https://livefeisty.com/ https://www.womensperformance.com/ Support our Partners:Previnex: Get 15% off your first order with the code PERFORMANCE at https://www.previnex.com/

Two Onc Docs
ASCO Annual Meeting 2025 GU Updates

Two Onc Docs

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 9, 2025 12:59


This week's episode will be focusing on exciting data in GU presented at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting in prostate (including prognostication of PSA response in mCSPC, AMPLITUDE - PARPi in mCSPC), RCC (including updates in KN-564, CM-214 and PDIGREE), and finally bladder CA (with updates in NIAGARA and EV-302) among others. 

River Community Church Podcast
Ecclesiastes - Miscellaneous Messages

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 8, 2025


Rochester Christian Church
When Anxiety Meets Sovereignty

Rochester Christian Church

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 4, 2025 35:59


In this powerful message, Pastor Connor unpacks what happens when the anxiety of life collides with the unshakable sovereignty of God. Drawing from Matthew 6:25–33, we're reminded that God sees, knows, and provides for every detail of our lives — from the birds of the air to the lilies of the field, and especially for you.When worry creeps in, Jesus calls us to trust in the Father's care and to seek first His Kingdom. Discover the peace that comes from letting go of control and holding tight to His promises.

River Community Church Podcast
1 Kings 8 - Miscellaneous Messages

River Community Church Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 1, 2025


The Uromigos
Episode 418: ASCO 2025 - Biomarkers in RCC

The Uromigos

Play Episode Listen Later May 31, 2025 44:55


David McDermott joins us on the heels of his outstanding discussion of the clinical science symposium on RCC biomarkers.

Red Cup Confidential
Season 4|EP 188| A Flower in a room full of Weeds

Red Cup Confidential

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025 65:34


Whew, the timeline is HOT and we got a lot to unpack! This week we're back in the mix with a heavy pour of tea, updates, and that signature RCC vibes .