Podcasts about critical philosophy

Ein Vortrag des Erziehungswissenschaftlers Markus Rieger-LadichModeration: Katja Weber **********"Ich als alter weißer Mann..." - diese Aussage signalisiert: Ich bin auf der Höhe der Zeit, ich kenne die gängigen Diskurse. Aber als ritualisierte Beichte bringt diese Erkenntnis gar nichts, meint der Erziehungswissenschaftler Markus Rieger-Ladich.Markus Rieger-Ladich ist Professor für Allgemeine Erziehungswissenschaft an der Universität Tübingen. 2022 erschien sein Band "Das Privileg. Kampfvokabel und Erkenntnisinstrument". Seinen Vortrag mit dem Titel "Was heißt hier Privileg? - Privilegienkritik neu gedacht" hat er auf Einladung des Hörsaals am 11. Oktober 2024 anlässlich des Pocast-Festivals Beats & Bones gehalten. **********Schlagworte: +++ Freiheitsrechte +++ Menschenrechte +++ Feminismus +++ Klassismus +++ Status +++ Soziologie +++ Erziehungswissenschaftler +++ Tradition +++**********Ihr hört in diesem Hörsaal:00:02:20 - Gespräch vor dem Vortrag und was Rieger-Ladichs Oma damit zu tun hat00:08:04 - Beginn Vortrag: Einleitung, These und Überblick00:10:33 - Privileg aus rechtstheoretischer Perspektive00:16:41 - Der Begriff Privileg in der Bildungssoziologie der 1960er und 1970er Jahre00:17:49 - Privilegienkritik als Kampfbegriff in emanzipatorischen Bewegungen00:38:30 - Herausforderungen für einen Neustart der Debatte00: 42:32 - Publikumsfragen nach dem Vortrag**********Empfehlungen aus der Folge:Mohamed Amjahid. Unter Weißen. Was es heißt, privilegiert zu sein. München: Hanser Berlin 2017.Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte: Privilegien. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung 2024.Rolf Becker/Wolfgang Lauterbach (Hrsg.): Bildung als Privileg. Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit. 5., erweitere Auflage. Wiesbaden: SpringerVS 2016.Pierre Bourdieu/Jean-Claude Passeron. Die Illusion der Chancengleichheit: Untersuchungen zur Sozio-logie des Bildungswesens am Beispiel Frankreichs. Stuttgart: Klett 1971.Pierre Bourdieu. Bildung. Aus dem Französischen von Barbara Picht u.a. Mit einem Nachwort von Markus Rieger-Ladich. Berlin: Suhrkamp 2018.Esme Choonara/Yuri Prasad. Der Irrweg der Privilegientheorie. In: International Socialism 142 (2020), S. 83-110.Combahee River Collective. Ein Schwarzes feministisches Statement (1977). In: Natascha A. Kelly (Hrsg.): Schwarzer Feminismus. Grundlagentexte. Münster: Unrast 2019, S. 47-60.Didier Eribon. Betrachtungen zur Schwulenfrage. Aus dem Französischen von Bernd Schwibs und Achim Russer. Berlin: Suhrkamp 2019.Roxane Gay. Fragwürdige Privilegien. In: Dies.: Bad Feminist. Essays. München: btb 2019, S. 31-36.Michael S. Kimmel/Abby L. Ferber (Hrsg.): Privilege. A Reader. New York: Routledge 2017.Maria-Sibylla Lotter. Ich bin schuldig, weil ich bin (weiß, männlich und bürgerlich). Politik als Läuterungsdiskurs. In: Herwig Grimm/Stephan Schleissig (Hrsg.): Moral und Schuld. Exkulpationsnarrative in Ethikdebatten. Baden-Baden: Nomos 2019, S. 67-86.Peggy McIntosh. Weißsein als Privileg. Die Privilege Papers. Nachwort von Markus Rieger-Ladich. Ditzingen: Reclam 2024.Walter Benn Michaels. Der Trubel um Diversität. Wie wir lernten, Identitäten zu lieben und Ungleichheiten zu ignorieren. Aus dem Englischen übersetzt von Christoph Hesse. Berlin: Tiamat 2021.Linda Martín Alcoff. Das Problem, für andere zu sprechen. Ditzingen: Reclam 2023.Charles W. Mills. Weißes Nichtwissen. In: Kristina Lepold/Marina Martinez Mateo (Hrsg.): Critical Philosophy of Race. Ein Reader. Berlin: Suhrkamp 2021, S. 180-216,Heinz Mohnhaupt. Privilegien als Sonderrechte in europäischen Rechtsordnungen vom Mittelalter bis heute. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann 2024.Heinz Mohnhaupt/Barbara Dölemeyer (Hrsg.): Das Privileg im europäischen Vergleich. 2 Bände. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann 1997/1999.Toni Morrison. Die Herkunft der Anderen. Über Rasse, Rassismus und Literatur. Mit einem Vorwort von Ta-Nehisi Coates. Aus dem Englischen von Thomas Piltz. Reinbek: Rowohlt 2018.Markus Rieger-Ladich. Identitätsdebatte oder: Das Comeback des Privilegs. In: Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 66 (2021), S. 97-104.Markus Rieger-Ladich. Das Privileg. Kampfvokabel und Erkenntnisinstrument. Ditzingen: Reclam 2022.Markus Rieger-Ladich. Privilegien. In: Merkur 77 (2023), Heft 889, S. 71-80.Markus Rieger-Ladich. Neustart der Privilegienkritik. Ein Plädoyer. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 21 (2024), S. 4-10.Jörg Scheller. (Un)Check Your Privilege. Wie die Debatte um Privilegien Gerechtigkeit verhindert. Stuttgart: Hirzel 2022.Steffen Vogel. Das Erbe von 68: Identitätspolitik als Kulturrevolution. In: Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 66 (2021), S. 97-104.Katharina Walgenbach. Bildungsprivilegien im 21. Jahrhundert. In: Meike Sophia Baader/Tatjana Freytag (Hrsg.): Bildung und Ungleichheit in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS 2017, S. 513-536. **********Mehr zum Thema bei Deutschlandfunk Nova:Soziologie: Freundschaften hängen auch vom Geldbeutel abSoziologie: Warum die Klimakrise polarisiertSoziologie: Geld als Kriegsmittel - Wie effektiv das ist**********Den Artikel zum Stück findet ihr hier.**********Ihr könnt uns auch auf diesen Kanälen folgen: TikTok auf&ab , TikTok wie_geht und Instagram .

Miguel Gualdrón Ramírez is an assistant professor of Philosophy at the University of Oregon. His research interests include Critical Philosophy of Race, Latin American and Caribbean Philosophy, Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art, 18th and 19th century German Philosophy, and 20th century Continental Philosophy. Gualdrón Ramírez studied philosophy as an undergraduate and MA student at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and earned a PhD in Philosophy from DePaul University, Chicago. Before joining UO, he was Assistant Professor in the Philosophy and Religion Department at the University of North Texas (2021-2023) and Visiting Professor of Philosophy at Oxford College of Emory (2018-2020).

DESCRIPTION: To cap off Black History Month 2024 we are sharing with you two episodes from Research & Resource Rounds that discuss articles whose authors are rising Black scholars. Dr. Desiree Valentine is an assistant professor for Philosophy at Marquette University who specializes in Critical Philosophy of Race, Feminist Philosophy, Queer Theory, and Disability Bioethics. Dr. Justin Bullock is a Nephrology Fellow at the University of Washington and, newly, the Co-Director of the Docs With Disabilities Initiative. These shows are two of our favorites, both reflecting crucial developments in thinking, research, and mentorship to promote diversity, equity, inclusion, and access in healthcare. Ep 5: Desiree Valentine proposes the lens of Racialized Disablement, a conceptual tool for highlighting how racism and ableism are locked in a constant dynamic interchange where the manifestations and significations of one shape the other—and vice versa. As heuristic and pedagogical tool, Racialized Disablement helps break down how and why race and disability, racism and ableism are inseparable. Across history, medical practices, healthcare, and other sociopolitical contexts the concepts of disability and race are inextricably linked and, in fact, co-constructing, as are their counterparts ableism and racism. Ep 15: Episode 15 discusses “‘Yourself in all your forms': A grounded theory exploration of identity safety in medical students” (Bullock et al. 2023). Bullock and his colleagues develop a theory of identity safety through careful analysis of 16 in-depth interviews with 3rd and 4th medical students with a diverse range of identities and experiences. The article identifies and describes key dimensions of identity threat, threat mitigation, and identity safety. Three factors contributing to identity safety that emerged from the team's analysis: Agency to serve, upholding personhood, and a sense of belonging. Identity safety manifested as students sharing a particular minoritized identity with their attending physician, wearing a particular item or hair style, presenting themselves in a particular way, or feeling respected as unique individuals by both their peers and supervisors. When experiencing identity safety, students felt empowered to draw on their own unique experiential knowledge grounded in their particular identities when treating a patient. Recommended resources citations: Stergiopoulos, Erene, Ligia Fragoso, and Lisa M. Meeks. 2021. “Cultural Barriers to Help-Seeking in Medical Education.” JAMA Internal Medicine 181 (2): 155–56. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7567. Jain, Neera. Oct 4, 2023. “Dream Research Rounds 9: The Capability Imperative: Revealing Ableism in Medical Education.” Webinar.” https://www.docswithdisabilities.org/post/dream-research-rounds-9-the-capability-imperative-revealing-ableism-in-medical-education ********************************************************************* Ep 5 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12979 Transcript: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jh04JjGtb48EF1WlOtvkOa9E7_-1W-G6/edit Ep 15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15174 Transcript Keywords: Identity safety Identity threat Threat mitigation Medical Racism Racialized Disablement Diversity in Medicine   Produced by: Zoey Martin-Lockhart Audio editor: Jacob Feeman Digital Media: Zoey Martin-Lockhart  

This week Coop and Taylor take a crack at Deleuze's Kant's Critical Philosophy. We cover the famous phrase, "time is out of joint", the categorical imperative, the law, and much more. Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/muhh Twitter: @unconscioushh

In dieser Folge spricht Robin Celikates mit Kristina Lepold und Marina Martinez Mateo über Anspruch und Zielsetzung des von ihnen herausgegebenen Readers zum Thema „Critical Philosophy of Race.“ Neben einer umfassenden und instruktiven Einleitung der Herausgeberinnen versammelt der Band eine Auswahl einschlägiger Texte dieser noch jungen Disziplin, um sie - zum Teil in deutscher Erstübersetzung – einem deutschsprachigen Publikum zugänglich zu machen. In dem Gespräch geht es unter anderem um die Fragen, welchen Beitrag die Philosophie zur begrifflichen Erfassung des Rassismus leisten kann; welche Schwierigkeiten und Herausforderungen sich für die Übertragung der US-amerikanischen Diskussion und ihrer Kategorien auf den europäischen und den deutschen Kontext ergeben; und welche Implikationen die Critical Philosophy of Race spezifisch für die Kritische Theorie haben kann – und haben sollte

In our last episode on Kant we engage with a critical question, in what way does Kant's philosophy precipitate the State? Through this question we are able to engage two of the most untimely (become timely) philosophers of the 20th century, Gilles Deleuze and Theodor Adorno. We engage with the nature of doubling that still confounds thinkers to this day (i.e. simulation theory), the atomized form of subjectivity, and the problems within Kant's moral thought.

Today's episode features Jordan Botello. He is a PhD Student and Graduate Teaching Fellow in the Department of Philosophy at The Graduate Center, CUNY in New York City. Currently he teaches at Brooklyn College. His areas of interest are Metaphysics, Philosophy of Language, Critical Philosophy of Race, Philosophy of Law and Philosophy of Religion. In particular, he has been doing research on the semantics/pragmatics of racial slurs and the implications this has for appropriation and free speech laws. He also does research on theorizing about racial justice. Before that, he was a J.T. & Margaret Talkington Fellow and Graduate Instructor in the Department of Philosophy at Texas Tech University, where he earned his MA in Philosophy. Jordan also founded the Minorities and Philosophy (MAP) chapter at Texas Tech. Jordan is also a TExES Social Studies 7-12 (232) Certified Educator in the state of Texas. He taught high school in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. #OurClassroom #MulticulturalClassroom #criticalracetheory #criticalphilosophyofrace #charlesmills#CUNY #BrooklynCollege #podcast #OurClassroomPodcast #education Credits:Guest: Jordan BotelloHost: Roberto GermánEditor: Jabi Marketing (Javier Roche)

In this first episode of Diversifying Reading with Shareen Wilkinson, Shareen talks to Darren Chetty about his involvement with Penguin and The Runnymede Trust's Lit in Colour initiative. They talk about why it's important for all children to have access to a representative range of books, as well as ideas to support parents. Darren Chetty is a Lecturer at UCL Institute of Education and has taught in London primary schools for twenty years. His research focuses on philosophy for children, multiculturalism and racism. Among his many books, columns and articles, he is the author of ‘You Can't Say That! Stories Have to be About White People' an essay in The Good Immigrant, edited by Nikesh Shukla. Read more about the Lit in Colour research and find out what we're doing to support the initiative, including lots of practical tips and reading recommendations to share with parents on our website. Further reading Penguin's (in)complete book lists The Good Immigrant: 21 writers reflect on race in contemporary Britain, edited by Nikesh Shukla (2017) Reflecting Realities Survey of Ethnic Representation in Children's Literature, CLPE November 2021 Critical Philosophy of Race and Education edited by Judith Suissa and Darren Chetty (2021) Secret Gardens: A Study of the Golden Age of Children's Literature by Humphrey Carpenter (2009) ‘Mirrors, Windows, and Sliding Glass Doors' by Rudine Sims Bishop in Perspectives: Choosing and Using Books for the Classroom. Vol. 6, no. 3, Summer 1990. (PDF) Darren's 'Beyond the Secret Garden' column in Books for Keeps Musical Truth: A musical history of modern black Britain in 28 songs by Jeffrey Boakye (2021)

In this episode we are joined by Joel Michael Reynolds for a wide-ranging discussion about disability theory. We dig into the relationship between disability and white supremacy, the idea of politics as differential capacitation, genomics and medicalization, justice as equity, and more. Naturally we put full-bore social constructivism on blast. Leftists gotta be materialists, you know?patreon.com/leftofphilosophy | @leftofphilReferences:Joel Michael Reynolds, “The Meaning of Ability and Disability.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 33.3 (2019).Joel Michael Reynolds, “Genopower: On Genomics, Disability, and Impairment.” Foucault Studies 31 (forthcoming).Joel Michael Reynolds, “Disability and White Supremacy.” Critical Philosophy of Race (forthcoming).Joel has also graciously compiled a comprehensive list of literature related to disability theory and politics, which you can find here.Music: Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 43 What's happening in our schools? It's obvious to everyone that Critical Race Theory (and the other Theories of Critical Social Justice) have been incorporated into them at virtually every level and in most subjects all across the nation, but the line is that "Critical Race Theory isn't being taught in our schools." To unpack this lie, we have to understand that Critical Theories require praxis, so while the formal and narrow theory of Critical Race Theory may not be being taught in specific, Critical Race Praxis (CRaP) is throughout our schools. It was brought in by Critical Pedagogy, which is the application of Critical Theory to education, which also requires the implementation of Theory, which is known as "praxis." Once you understand this, it's far easier to understand one of the big reasons that (classical) liberals are so ineffective at fighting back against Critical Theories and other forms of Critical Philosophy: it's because they think the argument is about ideas rather than implementation. Praxis is the religious duty of Critical Theorists, and they can keep liberals busy arguing about whether or not the Theory should be taught or banned or not taught or not banned or its details or whatever other thing that doesn't matter while they still go forward applying Theory via praxis in whatever setting. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, James Lindsay breaks down the distinction and intrinsic relationship between Critical Theory and Critical Praxis and thus why almost the entire discussion of what to do about this problem coming from liberal quarters misses the point and remains ineffective. Join him here to learn where the target is and how to fight this pernicious ideology more effectively. Support New Discourses: paypal.me/newdiscourses newdiscourses.locals.com/support patreon.com/newdiscourses subscribestar.com/newdiscourses youtube.com/channel/UC9K5PLkj0N_b9JTPdSRwPkg/join Website: newdiscourses.com Follow: facebook.com/newdiscourses twitter.com/NewDiscourses instagram.com/newdiscourses newdiscourses.locals.com pinterest.com/newdiscourses linkedin.com/company/newdiscourses minds.com/newdiscourses reddit.com/r/NewDiscourses Podcast: @newdiscourses podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/new-…es/id1499880546 bit.ly/NDGooglePodcasts open.spotify.com/show/0HfzDaXI5L4LnJQStFWgZp stitcher.com/podcast/new-discourses © 2021 New Discourses. All rights reserved.

Critical philosophy has always challenged the division between theory and practice. At its best, it aims to turn contemplation into emancipation, seeking to transform society in pursuit of equality, autonomy, and human flourishing. Yet today's critical theory often seems to engage only in critique. These times of crisis demand more. In Critique and Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action (Columbia University Press, 2020), Bernard E. Harcourt challenges us to move beyond decades of philosophical detours and to harness critical thought to the need for action. In a time of increasing awareness of economic and social inequality, Harcourt calls on us to make society more equal and just. Charting a vision for political action and social transformation, Harcourt argues that instead of posing the question, “What is to be done?” we must now turn it back onto ourselves and ask, and answer, “What more am I to do?”. The book advocates for a new path forward that constantly challenges each and every one of us to ask what more we can do to realize a society based on equality and justice. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education.

Critical philosophy has always challenged the division between theory and practice. At its best, it aims to turn contemplation into emancipation, seeking to transform society in pursuit of equality, autonomy, and human flourishing. Yet today’s critical theory often seems to engage only in critique. These times of crisis demand more. In Critique and Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action (Columbia University Press, 2020), Bernard E. Harcourt challenges us to move beyond decades of philosophical detours and to harness critical thought to the need for action. In a time of increasing awareness of economic and social inequality, Harcourt calls on us to make society more equal and just. Charting a vision for political action and social transformation, Harcourt argues that instead of posing the question, “What is to be done?” we must now turn it back onto ourselves and ask, and answer, “What more am I to do?”. The book advocates for a new path forward that constantly challenges each and every one of us to ask what more we can do to realize a society based on equality and justice. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Critical philosophy has always challenged the division between theory and practice. At its best, it aims to turn contemplation into emancipation, seeking to transform society in pursuit of equality, autonomy, and human flourishing. Yet today's critical theory often seems to engage only in critique. These times of crisis demand more. In Critique and Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action (Columbia University Press, 2020), Bernard E. Harcourt challenges us to move beyond decades of philosophical detours and to harness critical thought to the need for action. In a time of increasing awareness of economic and social inequality, Harcourt calls on us to make society more equal and just. Charting a vision for political action and social transformation, Harcourt argues that instead of posing the question, “What is to be done?” we must now turn it back onto ourselves and ask, and answer, “What more am I to do?”. The book advocates for a new path forward that constantly challenges each and every one of us to ask what more we can do to realize a society based on equality and justice. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

Critical philosophy has always challenged the division between theory and practice. At its best, it aims to turn contemplation into emancipation, seeking to transform society in pursuit of equality, autonomy, and human flourishing. Yet today's critical theory often seems to engage only in critique. These times of crisis demand more. In Critique and Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action (Columbia University Press, 2020), Bernard E. Harcourt challenges us to move beyond decades of philosophical detours and to harness critical thought to the need for action. In a time of increasing awareness of economic and social inequality, Harcourt calls on us to make society more equal and just. Charting a vision for political action and social transformation, Harcourt argues that instead of posing the question, “What is to be done?” we must now turn it back onto ourselves and ask, and answer, “What more am I to do?”. The book advocates for a new path forward that constantly challenges each and every one of us to ask what more we can do to realize a society based on equality and justice. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

Critical philosophy has always challenged the division between theory and practice. At its best, it aims to turn contemplation into emancipation, seeking to transform society in pursuit of equality, autonomy, and human flourishing. Yet today's critical theory often seems to engage only in critique. These times of crisis demand more. In Critique and Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action (Columbia University Press, 2020), Bernard E. Harcourt challenges us to move beyond decades of philosophical detours and to harness critical thought to the need for action. In a time of increasing awareness of economic and social inequality, Harcourt calls on us to make society more equal and just. Charting a vision for political action and social transformation, Harcourt argues that instead of posing the question, “What is to be done?” we must now turn it back onto ourselves and ask, and answer, “What more am I to do?”. The book advocates for a new path forward that constantly challenges each and every one of us to ask what more we can do to realize a society based on equality and justice. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology

Critical philosophy has always challenged the division between theory and practice. At its best, it aims to turn contemplation into emancipation, seeking to transform society in pursuit of equality, autonomy, and human flourishing. Yet today’s critical theory often seems to engage only in critique. These times of crisis demand more. In Critique and Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action (Columbia University Press, 2020), Bernard E. Harcourt challenges us to move beyond decades of philosophical detours and to harness critical thought to the need for action. In a time of increasing awareness of economic and social inequality, Harcourt calls on us to make society more equal and just. Charting a vision for political action and social transformation, Harcourt argues that instead of posing the question, “What is to be done?” we must now turn it back onto ourselves and ask, and answer, “What more am I to do?”. The book advocates for a new path forward that constantly challenges each and every one of us to ask what more we can do to realize a society based on equality and justice. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Critical philosophy has always challenged the division between theory and practice. At its best, it aims to turn contemplation into emancipation, seeking to transform society in pursuit of equality, autonomy, and human flourishing. Yet today’s critical theory often seems to engage only in critique. These times of crisis demand more. In Critique and Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action (Columbia University Press, 2020), Bernard E. Harcourt challenges us to move beyond decades of philosophical detours and to harness critical thought to the need for action. In a time of increasing awareness of economic and social inequality, Harcourt calls on us to make society more equal and just. Charting a vision for political action and social transformation, Harcourt argues that instead of posing the question, “What is to be done?” we must now turn it back onto ourselves and ask, and answer, “What more am I to do?”. The book advocates for a new path forward that constantly challenges each and every one of us to ask what more we can do to realize a society based on equality and justice. Kai Wortman is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Education, University of Tübingen, interested in philosophy of education. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

Today we are discussing why Right Thinking is the foundation of everything else that we do, both in our lives and in our training and handling of Protection Dogs. Acting Right is a byproduct of Thinking Right and understanding the cycle of development in our thoughts will help each of us do the things we need to do.Next we address the idea many people have of "Wrong" training methods. No training method is wrong if it is accomplishing its intended purpose. But we need to understand what the ultimate purpose of a training method is so that we can choose the method that best fits our goals.Finally, I talk about Why Almost all training advice is wrong...except mine, of course [smirk]. But so much of what I hear people discuss when it comes to dog training is based on the assumption that other people have the same goals and objectives as the ones giving the advice. We should ask the question, what are you trying to accomplish first. When we understand what the objective is, we can begin discussing the best ways to get there. But without that understanding, most training advice falls short of having any helpful meaning.

Denis Diderot was an 18th-century French philosopher, art critic, and writer, best known for serving as co-founder, chief editor, and contributor to the Encyclopédia along with Jean le Rond d'Alembert. He was an important member of the Age of Enlightenment, who claims the Encyclopédia as its crowning achievement. Diderot used his influence in society to bring to light the unfair treatment of the working class caused by his contemporaries in power. However, his work brought the wrath of the government upon him. Today, we bring in Andrew S. Curran to give us a closer look at Diderot's life and the politics of his era. Guest: Andrew S. Curran is the William Armstrong Professor of the Humanities. He has served on the editorial board of Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture and is presently on the board of Critical Philosophy of Race and Diderot Studies. Curran also received a National Endowment for the Humanities Public Scholars award in 2016. He has authored such books as Sublime Disorder: Physical Monstrosity in Diderot's Universe, The Anatomy of Blackness: Science and Slavery in an Age of Enlightenment, as well as the topic of today's show, Diderot and the Art of Thinking Freely. The post The Life of Denis Diderot appeared first on KPFA.

www.purestformpodcast.com 00:00 : Intro 05:20 : Segment 1 - Critical Philosophy regarding Film 19:45 : Segment 2 - Critical Philosophy regarding Music 33:00 : Segment 3 - Listener Question 40:20 : Outro iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/purest-form-podcast/id1420375432?mt=2 Twitter: https://twitter.com/PurestPodcast Email: matt@purestformpodcast.com

This is one of the papers from our 2017 Annual Conference, the Future of Phenomenology. Information and the full conference booklet can be found at www.britishphenomenology.org.uk Ashley Woodward is lecturer in philosophy at the University of Dundee. He obtained a B.A. (Hons) at LaTrobe University and a PhD in philosophy at the University of Queensland. He is a founding member of the Melbourne School of Continental Philosophy and is an on-going editor of Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy. He is also a member of the Scottish Centre for Continental Philosophy: http://scotcont-phil.org/ He has published three monographs: Lyotard: The Inhuman Condition. Reflections on Nihilism, Information, and Art. ( Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016); Understanding Nietzscheanism (Chesham: Acumen, 2011); Nihilism in Postmodernity: Lyotard, Baudrillard, Vattimo (Aurora, Colorado: The Davies Group, 2009). His most recent publication is an edited collection, Acinemas: Lyotard’s Philosophy of Film, ed. with Graham Jones (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017). Lesson of Darkness: Phenomenology and Lyotard’s Aesthetics This paper examines the relationship of Jean-François Lyotard’s aesthetics to phenomenology, especially the works of Mikel Dufrenne and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. It argues that Lyotard invents what could be called a postphenomenological aesthetics, which critiques and moves beyond key aspects of phenomenology, but nevertheless continues to be governed by problems of this tradition. Lyotard cites Merleau-Ponty as opening the problem of difference in the aesthetic field, yet believes that the phenomenological approach can never adequately account for it. Lyotard critiques Dufrenne and Merleau-Ponty on what he calls a ‘metaphysics of continuity’ which governs their works: the continuity is between silence and signification, or the dark ground of Being or Nature and the light of linguistic meaning. For both, the continuity is given through the mediation of expression, the immanence of the sensory in the poetic, and is grounded in a unitary ontology. Lyotard argues that these approaches cannot do justice to the radical alterity of aesthetic experience, and seeks to accentuate the differences between the sensory and language, and to locate difference in the transgressive and deconstructive effects between these two heterogenous orders. For Lyotard this is not simply an abstract theoretical matter, but one which concerns the capacity of art to be engaged in critical, political practice. After outlining Lyotard’s critiques of Dufrenne and Merleau-Ponty, the paper will demonstrate how his late aesthetics, which have received little critical attention, can be seen to return to phenomenological themes but in the form of a reversal. The last section will then clarify the notion of a postphenomenological aesthetics by noting the parallel between Lyotard’s work and some recent attempts to develop a Speculative Realist aesthetics: the suggestion that Kant’s third Critique outlines an access to the real beyond conceptual categories imposed by a subject is a path which Lyotard also explored. Lyotard’s ‘lesson of darkness’ is that the secret power of art can never be brought out into the light of phenomenal appearance, or be subordinated to a stratum of meaning continuous with knowledge, but can only be registered negatively as the mark of a deconstitution. Artworks do not testify to the birth of perception, but to its resurrection.

Charles discusses Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy by Michael Polyani and the profound influence the book had on his business. When it was published in 1958, “Personal Knowledge” challenged a prevailing philosophical idea – that all knowledge is objective, absolute and independent of individual experience. By reframing it as a personal discipline, Polanyi reclaims knowledge […]Join the conversation and comment on this podcast episode: https://ricochet.com/podcast/on-books/personal-knowledge-towards-a-post-critical-philosophy/.Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing: https://ricochet.com/membership/.Subscribe to On Books in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Annabelle Lever (Geneva) Democracy, epistemology and the problem of all-white juries Generously supported by Aristotelian Society, Min...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Omar Khan (Runnymede Trust) Critical Philosophy of Race: Here in the Future Generously supported by Aristotelian Society, Mind Associa...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Omar Khan (Runnymede Trust) Critical Philosophy of Race: Here in the Future Generously supported by Aristotelian Society, Mind Associa...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Nathaniel Adam Tobias Coleman (ICwS & UCL) Michael Gove, William Wilberforce, and the defect of durable degradation Generously support...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Nathaniel Adam Tobias Coleman (ICwS & UCL) Michael Gove, William Wilberforce, and the defect of durable degradation Generously support...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Annabelle Lever (Geneva) Democracy, epistemology and the problem of all-white juries Generously supported by Aristotelian Society, Min...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Nicholas Kwesi Tsri (UCD) Africans are not black: Why the use of the term 'black' for Africans should be banned Generously supported b...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Gabriella Beckles-Raymond (Canterbury Christ Church) Mixed Race Masquerades: The Myth of Multiracial Harmony in Britain Generously sup...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Gabriella Beckles-Raymond (Canterbury Christ Church) Mixed Race Masquerades: The Myth of Multiracial Harmony in Britain Generously sup...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Brian Klug (Oxford) Tricks of Language: Naming Bigotry against Muslims and Jews Generously supported by Aristotelian Society, Mind As...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Meena Dhanda (Wolverhampton) Enacting legal protection against Caste-discrimination: Why the delay? Generously supported by Aristoteli...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Meena Dhanda (Wolverhampton) Enacting legal protection against Caste-discrimination: Why the delay? Generously supported by Aristoteli...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Professor Onora O'Neill (Chair, EHRC) Opening Address Professor Robert Bernasconi (Penn State) Theorizing Racism in Britain: The Contrib...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Brian Klug (Oxford) Tricks of Language: Naming Bigotry against Muslims and Jews Generously supported by Aristotelian Society, Mind As...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Dr Nicholas Kwesi Tsri (UCD) Africans are not black: Why the use of the term 'black' for Africans should be banned Generously supported b...

Institute of Philosophy and Institute of Commonwealth Studies Critical Philosophy of Race: Here and Now Professor Onora O'Neill (Chair, EHRC) Opening Address Professor Robert Bernasconi (Penn State) Theorizing Racism in Britain: The Contrib...