Podcasts about theodor adorno

The philosophers of the Frankfurt School practiced a technique called negative dialectics, where concepts are defined as much by what you can't say about them as what you can. Appropriately, the Frankfurt School has ended up defined by what you can't say about them. You can't say that they invented a new form of left-wing thought called Cultural Marxism. This would be (according to Wikipedia) the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, a "far right anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that misinterprets Western Marxism, especially the Frankfurt School, as being responsible for modern progressive movements, identity politics, and political correctness". You're not supposed to dub them a transitional stage between Communism and postmodernism. You're not allowed to speculate that a lot of the academic humanities, as they're practiced today, descend from the Frankfurt School's brand of critical theory. You're not supposed to think of them as the point where the muscular pro-technology leftism of the early 1900s shattered into the pessimistic degrowth leftism of the present. Art is long, life is short. Most of us only manage to not do a few things in our limited span on Earth. But the Frankfurt School managed to not invent so many movements - to not be involved in so many of the crucial ideological shifts of the past century - that they caught my attention. Who were these people? What other aspects of our culture might we be unable to say they were involved in? For answers, I turned to the classic history of the group, Martin Jay's The Dialectical Imagination. The basics are simple enough: the School was founded in Frankfurt in 1923. It attracted great philosophers like Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse. When the Nazis took power in the early 1930s, the mostly-Jewish Frankfurters fled to America, where friendly locals helped them continue their work in affiliation with Columbia University. Mid-century Americans were suckers for sophisticated European intellectuals, and when the rise of fascism and World War II started dominating headlines, the German-Jewish Frankfurters were natural experts to help Americans process the situation. By the end of the war, they were firmly established as thought leaders. Some - including Horkheimer and Adorno - returned to Germany to rebuild its intellectual culture from the ruins; others stayed in America and remained relevant through the 60s and 70s. But figuring out what the Frankfurters believed is more complicated. Forget about the thin line between universally-acknowledged fact and fascist conspiracy theory. The School itself was famously coy, worrying that if they explained themselves too clearly, people would caricature their beliefs and integrate them into the existing capitalist system. Even when they did speak "clearly", it was in the sort of German philosophical register where "the negation of the negation" is a totally normal thing to say. Having only read a single book on them, I will no doubt fall into all the failure modes that they and their successors warned us against. But here are the analogies, intuition pumps, and parables that I found helpful. https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/book-review-the-dialectical-imagination

BIBLIOTECA SUBMERSA é a nova série de episódios do Podcast da Raphus Press, uma ironia bastante séria com o conceito de canônico e marginal, de popular e elitista, de aceito e não aceito, a partir das obras de autores que, aparentemente, tinham alguma influência (ou relevância) de certas obras ou autores no passado e que, hoje, parecem ausentes das livrarias, cadernos culturais, canais de vídeo na Internet. Nossa inspiração é Jorge Luis Borges e uma conhecida citação de Virginia Woolf: “Livros usados são selvagens, destituídos; surgem em grandes bandos de penas variadas e possuem certo encanto que falta aos volumes domesticados de uma biblioteca.” Episódio de hoje:  A multiplicidade da extinção (“Butcher's Crossing”, de John Williams)Obras citadas: “Butcher's Crossing”, John Williams (New York Review of Books, 2007); “Blood Meridian”, Cormac McCarthy (Picador, 2010); “Dialética do Esclarecimento”, Theodor Adorno e Max Horkheimer (Zahar, 2006); “A Narrativa Trivial”, Flávio Kothe (Editora da UnB, 2007).Ensaio a respeito da célebre fotografia da montanha de caveiras de búfalos (em inglês): https://theconversation.com/historical-photo-of-mountain-of-bison-skulls-documents-animals-on-the-brink-of-extinction-148780Tradução de “Butcher's Crossing” da Arte e Letra: https://arteeletra.com.br/produtos/butchers-crossing-cs275/Tradução de “Stoner” da Arte e Letra: https://arteeletra.com.br/produtos/stoner/ VISITE NOSSA LOJA VIRTUAL: https://linknabio.gg/raphuspress  Entre para a nossa sociedade, dedicada à bibliofilia maldita e ao culto de tenebrosos grimórios: o RES FICTA (solicitações via http://raphuspress.weebly.com/contact.html).Nosso podcast também está disponível nas seguintes plataformas:- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4NUiqPPTMdnezdKmvWDXHs- Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/podcast-da-raphus-press/id1488391151?uo=4- Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8xMDlmZmVjNC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw%3D%3D Apoie o canal: https://apoia.se/podcastdaraphus.Ou adquira nossos livros em nosso site: http://raphuspress.weebly.com. Dúvidas sobre envio, formas de pagamento, etc.: http://raphuspress.weebly.com/contact.html.Nossos livros também estão no Sebo Clepsidra: https://seboclepsidra.lojaintegrada.com.br/buscar?q=Raphus+Press

What has the far right learned from the Frankfurt School? And what can we learn from Frankfurt School thinkers like Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse to understand the appeal of the right? Paul Fleming sheds light on the fixation of conservatives like Christopher Rufo — who has set about remaking higher education — with cultural Marxism. He also discusses Adorno's insights into the attraction of authoritarian leaders. The post Fund Drive Special: What the Frankfurt School Teaches Us About the Right appeared first on KPFA.

Sean and Andy are joined by researcher A.J.A. Woods to discuss their new book The Cultural Marxism Conspiracy: Why the Right Blames the Frankfurt School for the Decline of the West. How did this basket of conspiracies come together in the post-60s moment? Who was Lyndon Larouche and how did he provide a bridge from quasi-Leninist elitism to the Reaganite New Right? What does culture even mean for the right and how has it taken such outsized importance for them? And, in the bonus for subscribers, what might an actual Marxism that is cultural look like and how many Beatles songs was Theodor Adorno responsible for writing?Become a supporter of our work at www.patreon.com/thiswreckageSong: Alien Nosejob - Kinks vs. Stones

Napoleon was bang voor Engeland, Rusland en Madame de Stael. De Frans-Zwitserse schrijfster en feministe wist zowel de Franse Revolutie als Napoleon te overleven, en werd evenzeer bewonderd als gevreesd door de mannen die haar stukken lazen. Margot Dijkgraaf schreef haar biografie. ‘Ze was de schrik van veel vrouwonvriendelijke heren en heertjes.' Mao Zedong en zijn dappere Rode Leger bevrijdden de arme Chinese boeren van de fascistische Chiang Kai-Shek en de Japanners. Dat verhaal staat in de Chinese geschiedenisboekjes en vond zijn weg naar het Westen, maar het zit anders. Dat blijkt uit Morgenrood boven China, het nieuwste boek van Frank Dikötter. ‘Een degelijk, helder en onthutsend boek', vindt recensent Pieter van Os.De Frankfurter Schule had een Nederlandse socioloog in dienst, die het nationaalsocialisme beter doorhad dan Theodor Adorno en Max Horkheimer. Over deze Andries Sternheim verscheen onlangs een boek, geschreven door de socioloog Bertus Mulder. Recensent Wim Berkelaar bespreekt het.

Tem quem acredite e tem quem não acredite, mas o horóscopo faz parte de nossas vidas. De presidente dos Estados Unidos acabando com a Guerra Fria a jovens usando signos para tomar decisões sobre namoro e trabalho, contamos a trajetória do horóscopo e como ele saiu da Babilônia para chegar nas páginas dos jornais mesmo sendo contrariado por estudos científicos e sendo associado com regimes autoritários.Este é mais um episódio do Escuta Essa, podcast quinzenal em que Denis e Danilo trocam histórias de cair o queixo e de explodir os miolos. Duas vezes por mês, sempre às quartas-feiras, no seu agregador de podcasts favorito!Ajude o Escuta Essa a voltar a ser semanal! Faça parte do Clube dos Escuteiros agora mesmo em apoia.se/escutaessaMande seus comentários e perguntas no Spotify, nas redes sociais, ou no e-mail escutaessa@aded.studio. A gente sempre lê mensagens no final de cada episódio!...NESTE EPISÓDIO- Joan Quigley escreveu o livro "What Does Joan Say?" para contar sua experiência como astróloga de Ronald Reagan.- Pesquisas mostram que a Geração Z usa o horóscopo para decidir se quer aceitar empregos.- Astrologia não tem qualquer amparo científico em estudos duplo-cego.- O filósofo Theodor Adorno escreveu "As estrelas descem à Terra" em 1953 para analisar as colunas de astrologia do jornal Los Angeles Times produzidas por Caroll Righter.- Phineas Taylor Barnum foi um empresário mais preocupado com o entretenimento do que com a veracidade de suas apresentações.- O efeito Barnum–Forer descreve o fato de que pessoas tendem a concordar com declarações genéricas sobre si mesmas caso acreditem que essas declarações foram feitas especialmente pra elas, especialmente se as afirmações forem elogiosas....AD&D STUDIOA AD&D produz podcasts e vídeos que divertem e respeitam sua inteligência! Acompanhe todos os episódios em aded.studio para não perder nenhuma novidade.

What has the far right learned from the Frankfurt School? And what can we learn from Frankfurt School thinkers like Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse to understand the appeal of the right? Paul Fleming sheds light on the fixation of conservatives like Christopher Rufo — who has set about remaking higher education — with cultural Marxism. He also discusses Adorno's insights into the attraction of authoritarian leaders. Theodore Adorno, “Anti-Semitism and Fascist Propaganda” New German Critique The post The Frankfurt School, Authoritarianism, and the U.S. Right appeared first on KPFA.

Der kritische Kongress tagt wieder. Dominik, Markus, Domsen und Chris sprechen in der neuen Ausgabe von der Terranische Kongress, über die neuesten Ausgaben der unterschiedlichen Serien im Perry Rhodan Universum. Markus hat leider eine fiese Erkältung und kann nicht in der ganzen Ausgabe dabei sein. Dieses Mal sprechen wir auch über den aktuellen Silberband. Mit Band Nr. 173 „Feuersturm“ wird der Tarkan-Zyklus in den Hadcover-Büchern abgeschlossen. Dei Hefte in dieser Folge: - Perry Rhodan Neo Nr. 376 - Als die Flüsse schwiegen - Pannor/Müller - Perry Rhodan Neo Nr. 377 - Invasion der Posbis - Lucy Guth - Perry Rhodan Neo Nr. 378 - Welt der Albträume - Ruben Wickenhäuser - Perry Rhodan Nr. 3365 - Wer über die Brücke geht - Wim Vandemaan - Perry Rhodan Nr. 3366 - Die ersten Shinobi - Olaf Brill - Perry Rhodan Nr. 3367 - Die kosmische Trasse - Uwe Anton - Perry Rhodan Nr. 3368 - Zwischen fremden Sternen - Leo Lukas - Perry Rhodan Nr. 3369 - Der Status Quo - Ben Calvin Hary - Silberband Nr. 173 - Feuersturm In der Ausgabe Currently Reading sprechen wir mal wieder über den Cappins-Zyklus, den Mythos-Zyklus und ein paar Planetenromane. Domsen ist immer noch im Percy Jackson Universum unterwegs. Bei den Perry Rhodan News gibt es in dieser Ausgabe nicht Neues. Wir freuen uns wie immer über euren Support und euer Feedback. Da Markus die Neo-Kategorie verpasst, könnt ihr euch unter diesem Link, die entsprechende Folge von Teelänge anschauen. Hier spricht Markus noch einmal über seine Meinung zu den aktuellen Neo-Ausgaben. Begleitend zu diesem Podcast will euch Chris noch zwei Vorlesungen von Dr. Walther Ziegler ans Herz legen. In jeweils 60 Minuten, werden die Grundzüge der kritischen Theorie von Theodor Adorno und die Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas. Wenn ihr mehr über den Weltendieb erfahren wollt, besucht den Blog. Den Link findet ihr in den Shownotes. Wenn ihr Feedback oder eure Meinung mitteilen wollt, schreibt einen Kommentar im Blogpost oder schreibt eine Mail an info@weltendieb.com. Ihr findet mich natürlich auch auf allen gängigen sozialen Netzwerken. Die Intromusik stammt vom Künstler  Sergey Cheremisinov. Der Song heißt Jump In Infinity und unterliegt der Creative Commons Lizenz (CC BY-NC 4.0). Ihr könnt uns finanziell auf Steady unterstützen. Dadurch bekommt ihr zeitexklusiven Zugriff auf Podcastfolgen und andere Boni. Alle Podcasts des Weltendieb bleiben frei verfügbar. Alle weiteren Informationen findet ihr unter diesem Link. 

Text: https://processthis.substack.com/p/not-perfect-just-forgiven-f1f Amid ICE terror and Epstein files in February 2026, my colleague Tripp Fuller asked if I'd write something on reactionaries, evangelicals, and fascism. Draws on critical theology, political philosophy, and psychoanalysis from Wilhelm Reich, Theodor Adorno, Gillian Rose, Louis Althusser, Walter Benjamin, Slavoj Zizek, and Robert Paxton. Builds on some arguments from my 2019 book Against: What Does the White Evangelical Want?

Tell me if this makes sense… We live in a world today characterized by a fetishized pornographic addiction to rape. If it were not so, Law & Order: SVU wouldn’t have made it past a single season – let alone, into SYNdication for nearly 30 years…! I loathe Adorno and the CULTural Marxists who SYNthesized (read: weaponized) Marx and Freud to the general detriment of mankind, beginning with the ‘West’. But, he raised some legit points, as often the baddies do. It’s their SOLUTIONS we all need be wary of. For nigh on 100 years, we’ve basked in the jaundiced glow of the Frankfurt School, as legions of university students continue having their minds and spirits poisoned in the name of ‘Progress’. See also the ancient Roman Collegium, a concept dating back to (at least) the days of Plato – who, incidentally, literally wrote the book on The Republic. I digress… In Adorno’s “Fetish-character” essay, he states, a fetish is a substitute object of desire.[1] I would submit that in the latent undercurrent of this Nietzschean ‘power-evolving universe’ of today’s America; men and women, by and large, secretly harbor a craven desire for rape. It sounds crazy! Until one considers the popularity of Law & Order: SVU for the last 27 years. America is Kung-Fu LARPing, with each new iteration of the ‘fetish substitute object of desire’ further blurring the lines between fantasy and reality (schizoaffective disorder) as we creep ever closer to the Chaos Magick of bringing these secret desires to life. But, beware; LARPing has consequences.[2] The Epstein Saga has been publicly ongoing for 2+ decades. More than a thousand witnesses have come forward – including dozens who’ve accused Trump (E. Jean Carroll) – and yet, only Epstein and Maxwell have been ‘brought to justice’. Speaking of ‘justice’, Thomas Massie probably said it best:[3] Congress created the Department of Justice, Congress funds the Department of Justice, and Congress is responsible for the oversight of the Department of Justice. When will we see justice? I’ll tell you what I’ve not seen. I’ve not seen any arrests from the revelations in the Epstein Files – over 3 million documents describing horrible things, describing unspeakable things, much of it redacted. Over two dozen people have resigned; CEOS, members of government, worldwide. But, I haven’t seen any arrests or investigations here in the United States, from this Department of Justice. Prince Andrew, Duke of York, who has since been stripped of his royalty, his royal titles, due to his affiliation with Jeffrey Epstein, has been arrested. Peter Mandelson, who previously served as UK’s Ambassador to the United States, resigned in disgrace from United Kingdom’s House of Lords and the Labor Party, and he’s been arrested. Former Prime Minister of Norway Thorbjorn Jagland has been charged. But, we don’t see any charges, arrests, or investigations in the United States. What do we see? We see our FBI Director celebrating in the locker room at the Olympics overseas. It’s fine to be proud of this country. But, we should be proud of this country because we have a system of justice that works. And yet we do not. … We need justice. We want the Department of Justice to get to work, and that’s what they need to do – now. The Trump (45/47) DOJ is unwilling to rat itself out – and so are the other 77+ million co-conspirators… And then there’s the 77 million co-conspirators who voted for Epstein’s best friend Trump as many as three times, knowing he’d been accused of sexual assault by dozens of women, and even after he was found liable for sexually assaulting E. Jean Carroll. For 77 million men and women it was not a dealbreaker! He rapes, but he saves. He saves more than he rapes … but he probably does rape.[4] Considering the aforementioned, what would be crazy is not acknowledging America’s fetishized pornographic addiction to rape – which is precisely what we’re doing. We are gaslighting ourselves at this point, as we turn a blind eye to our own culpability. After all – on the eve of America’s 250th Anniversary of Independence – wasn’t this always to be a government of, by, and for The People…? 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; …21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, …24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: …26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.28 And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. — Romans 1:18, 21–22, 24, 26–32 KJV 4 Rejoice in the Lord alway: [and] again I say, Rejoice.5 Let your moderation be known unto all men. The Lord [is] at hand.6 Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God.7 And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus. 8 Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things [are] honest, whatsoever things [are] just, whatsoever things [are] pure, whatsoever things [are] lovely, whatsoever things [are] of good report; if [there be] any virtue, and if [there be] any praise, think on these things. — Philippians 4:4–8 KJV #Links Clips [1:58] Etymology (the origins of words) was taken out of schools in the early 1900’s for a reason. (See also entry below) [5:39] Demons in the Headlines EXPOSED: The War for Power and Souls in D.C. | Strange Encounters | Ep 29 – YouTube (See also Blaze Media article below) [3:15] Rep. Massie Asks, “When Will We See Justice” Following Latest Epstein Files Revelations (See also C-SPAN Congressional Chronicle entry below[3:1]) Previous RWR broadcasts referenced 2026-02-25 2026-02-26 Proof of America’s fetishized pornographic addiction to rape Amanda Seyfried Wore A “Prosthetic [redacted]” For ‘Testament Of Ann Lee’ Amanda Seyfried will go to extreme lengths for a film role — especially when it comes to feeling comfortable during a nude scene. The actor wore what she described as a “prosthetic [redacted]” in her recent movie The Testament of Ann Lee, as she revealed in a Feb. 25 interview with BBC’s The Scott Mills Breakfast Show. “This movie, it needed to be graphic, so, like, I had a prosthetic [redacted],” she said in a clip posted to Instagram, which understandably perplexed Mills himself. When pressed for more details, she surprisingly had a rave review about the experience. “It was cool. It was exciting.” Seyfried plays the real-life Ann Lee, a Christian woman in 18th-century Great Britain who viewed herself as a representative of God and eventually founded a religious sect called Shakers, with the film capturing her group’s move across the pond to New York during the Colonial era. Son of megachurch pastor sentenced after horrific materials found at home ‘among worst investigators have seen’ An Indiana megachurch once known for preaching purity and sexual morality has found itself at the center of a scandal that has shaken a congregation, rattled political allies, and ended with a six-year prison sentence. Jonathan Peternel, 24, of Pendleton, was sentenced Friday after pleading guilty in January to one Level 4 felony count of child exploitation and three felony counts of possession of child sexual abuse material. The case drew intense public scrutiny not only because of the disturbing evidence uncovered by investigators, but because his father, Nathan Peternel, remains listed as lead pastor at Life Church and is a longtime mentor and close associate of Indiana Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith. Why Viewers Say You Should Watch ‘Nymphomaniac’ Alone Due to Its Graphic Scenes Both volumes of Lars von Trier’s Nymphomaniac are streaming on Netflix in the U.S., and its return to an easy, familiar platform has revived a warning that has followed the film since 2013: ‘Watch this one by yourself.‘ … So why does this movie come with a warning like that? The movie’s name actually answers that on its own. The term nymphomania is used to classify someone who has an uncontrollable compulsion toward sex, and that is exactly what the film follows across 2 volumes and 8 chapters. It opens with a woman named Joe, found beaten in an alley. A man named Seligman brings her home, and she begins telling him the story of her life from her earliest sexual memories through decades of escalating need. Von Trier was telling the story of a woman whose entire life is shaped by a compulsion she cannot control. … The discomfort the audience feels isn’t incidental. It’s the mechanism. Von Trier built the film so that watching it puts you closer to Joe’s experience than any non-explicit version ever could. The surface reading is addiction… What Joe is actually chasing is not sex but connection. Every encounter she describes to Seligman moves her further from other people rather than closer to them. Sex becomes the thing she reaches for because the thing she actually needs keeps slipping out of range. That distance between the act and the need behind it is where von Trier plants the real story. The compulsion is real, but the loneliness underneath it is what he keeps circling back to. He called this technique “Digressionism,” a term he coined to describe a storytelling style that deliberately wanders away from its own plot. He cited Marcel Proust as an influence. Nymphomaniac is the final film in what von Trier and critics call the Depression Trilogy. Following Antichrist in 2009 and Melancholia in 2011. After years infiltrating child exploitation rings, expert reveals an even DARKER American underworld | Blaze Media Demons in the Headlines EXPOSED: The War for Power and Souls in D.C. | Strange Encounters | Ep 29 – YouTube [31:30–33:26] Back to the politics piece; everybody within politics – even if they disagree with exploitation or whatever – they show partiality. And, I believe it’s, is it second Peter? … It says, ‘where partiality exists, exists every form of deceit and evil’. We can look it up … but I think that’s it. But, where partiality exists, exists all forms of evil. ***[Did he mean this passage?]For where envying and strife [is], there [is] confusion and every evil work. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, [and] easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. – James 3:16–17 KJV*** And, what is happening in our political world that I’ve that I’ve seen now is; you have career politicians – even if they claim to be Christians – they sell access. And, it might be access to conservative organizations. But, they sell access – and they’re partial to donors. … they’re unbelievably partial. And, they’re partial to their ‘club’, as opposed to the people they’re elected to represent. And, you have a bureaucracy that’s in place, and you have these elitists that are in place, that think that they can buy – because they have been able to buy your position – buy you, buy access to you, or buy access to somebody else, and ‘own’ – in this case, a US Senator, what I’m running for. But, it’s across the board for everything; Congressmen, even the President … Everything’s for sale. And, it’s ‘access’ that they’re selling, right? And, that’s the thing that stood out to me the most; partiality. More proof / Trump-Epstein Saga DOJ’s Epstein Files Screwups Get Worse With Unredacted Nudes and Images of Kids The Justice Department is under fire after newly released Jeffrey Epstein case materials reportedly included unredacted nude images and photos involving minors. Analysis by CNN uncovered nearly 100 explicit pictures of two naked young women on a beach, the news outlet reported. The materials also included photos showing a young girl kissing Epstein on the cheek. At least one unredacted image depicted Epstein alongside a nude female, and additional selfie-style nude photos of at least two other unidentified females were also published, with their ages unclear, according to CNN. Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which Congress passed and President Trump signed in late November, the DOJ is obligated to omit sexually explicit imagery and anything that might identify victims. The images have now been redacted. DOJ Gives Shameless Reason for Hiding Photo of Howard Lutnick and Jeffrey Epstein Donald Trump’s White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles is ‘Shocked’ the FBI Dared to Come for Her ‘Uncle Jeff’ shifts focus on Erika Kirk grooming allegations post-Epstein file release – We Got This Covered Most Americans in new survey dispute Donald Trump’s economic boom claim CBS’s new hire appeared 1,700 times in Epstein’s files, and John Oliver just exposed his disturbing emails – We Got This Covered Epstein Had Close Ties to Prosecutor Behind Key Provision of Plea Deal | The New Republic Turns out ICE is just a bunch of scared widdle guys Fear as senator discovers staggering true amount Trump spent on arming ICE – Raw Story Congressional Chronicle – Members of Congress, Hearings and More | C-SPAN.org[3:2] [standalone clip] Rep. Massie Asks, "When Will We See Justice" Following Latest Epstein Files Revelations | Video | C-SPAN.org The Purpose Of the System Is What It Does (POSIWID) Millions at Risk as Android Mental Health Apps Expose Sensitive Data US defense secrets sold to Russians for millions in crypto – Newsweek Tucker Carlson pushes DNA tests for Jews, ‘Khazar’ theory | The Jerusalem Post The largely discredited theory states that Ashkenazi Jews are genetically descended from a Turkic minority that converted to Judaism in the Middle Ages rather than from the 12 tribes of Israel. During Tucker Carlson’s interview last week with Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, both men made considerable waves with their takes on history and theology. Anthropic says it will not accede to Pentagon demands as deadline looms | AP News Anthropic said it sought narrow assurances from the Pentagon that Claude won’t be used for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons. But after months of private talks exploded into public debate, it said in a Thursday statement that new contract language “framed as compromise was paired with legalese that would allow those safeguards to be disregarded at will.” From the Wayback. Why – and why now – is Daily Mail breaking these stories out of the dust bin…? Secret mind-control techniques using TVs revealed in disturbing patent | Daily Mail Online Declassified CIA memo reveals plan to turn citizens into unwitting assassins | Daily Mail Online On the lighter / brighter side… Why age is an advantage for starting a business – Fast Company Sardonic levity, as Rome burns… Images That Might Indicate Society is in Decline | eBaum’s World Caller Dialogue David – WI Feminism dating back to early 1800s (CH: Owenism – Wikipedia) Valerie Solanas, SCUM Manifesto – Wikipedia Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil (1886)[5] Insanity in individuals is something rare–but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule. Bitchute: Etymology (the origins of words) was taken out of schools in the early 1900’s for a reason. Also on YouTube: Etymology ~ The Origins Of Words Was Taken Out Of Schools In The Early 1900s For A Reason – YouTube James – Vancouver The Scribner-Bantam English dictionary : Williams, Edwin B. (Edwin Bucher), 1891-1975 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive #Footnotes Clowney, David W. “On the Fetish-Character in Music and the Regression of Listening” Reading Notes for the 1938 Essay by Theodor Adorno. 3 Nov. 2005, p. 6, users.rowan.edu/~clowney/aesthetics/ReadingGuides/Adorno.ppt. Accessed 26 Feb. 2026. More (e.g., “course guides” at Clowney’s aesthetics page: users.rowan.edu/~clowney/aesthetics/. ︎ Berenson, Alex. “On the Dangers of Cosplay.” Substack.com, Unreported Truths, 11 Jan. 2026, alexberenson.substack.com/p/on-the-dangers-of-cosplay. Accessed 26 Feb. 2026. ︎ C-SPAN. “Congressional Chronicle – Members of Congress, Hearings and More.” C-SPAN.org, C-SPAN, 24 Feb. 2026, www.c-span.org/congress/?chamber=house&date=2026-02-24. Accessed 26 Feb. 2026. Click on “Speakers” tab, select Thomas Massie in “Speakers” dropdown menu, and see timestamp (10:45:03 AM) and transcript of Massie’s remarks. ︎ ︎ ︎ [Massie:] Congress created the Department of Justice, Congress funds the Department of Justice, and Congress is responsible for the oversight of the Department of Justice. When will we see justice? I’ll tell you what I’ve not seen. I’ve not seen any arrests from the revelations in the Epstein Files – over 3 million documents describing horrible things, describing unspeakable things – much of it redacted. Over two dozen people have resigned; CEOs, members of government, worldwide. But, I haven’t seen any arrests or investigations here in the United States, from this Department of Justice. Prince Andrew, Duke of York, who has since been stripped of his royalty, his royal titles, due to his affiliation with Jeffrey Epstein, has been arrested. Peter Mandelson, Who previously served as UK’s Ambassador to the United States, resigned in disgrace from United Kingdom’S House of Lords and the Labor Party, and he’s been arrested. Former Prime Minister of Norway, Thorbjorn Jagland has been charged. But, we don’t see any charges, arrests, or investigations in the United States. What do we see? We see our FBI Director celebrating in the locker room at the Olympics overseas. It’s fine to be proud of this country. But, we should be proud of this country because we have a system of justice that works. And yet we do not. Who are the men that should be investigated? I’ll name them right here. Leon Black; you don’t even have to see past the redactions to see that this man needs to be investigated. Jess Staley; accused of terrible things, it’s right there in the files. Why is he not being investigated? And, Leslie Wexner; why did the FBI list him as a co-conspirator in their own documents in a child sex trafficking case, and then tell him, according to him, that they had no questions for him? Why is that? Well, the Epstein Files Transparency Act requires the DOJ and the FBI to disclose to us their internal memos and emails about how they made those decisions, whether to prosecute or not prosecute. Yet, they have not delivered those memos. And, we still don’t have the memos and documents and emails from 2008, to explain why Jeffrey Epstein was given such a light sentence in what would have been an open and shut case of child sex trafficking, which allowed him to go back and recommit these terrible crimes, create hundreds of more victims, and ensnare so many other people in his conspiracy. Where are those documents that describe those decisions? We need justice. We want the Department of Justice to get to work, and that’s what they need to do – now! Jones, Marcie. “Gee, Look at All These Co-Conspirators in the Epstein Files That Pam Bondi and Kash Patel Say Never Existed.” Wonkette.com, Wonkette, 25 Feb. 2026, www.wonkette.com/p/gee-look-at-all-these-co-conspirators. Accessed 26 Feb. 2026. ︎ Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil. 1886. Gutenberg.org, Chapter IV. Apophthegms And Interludes, ln. 156, 4 Feb. 2013, gutenberg.org/files/4363/4363-h/4363-h.htm. Accessed 28 Feb. 2026. from The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche (1909-1913). ︎

We're joined by the four authors of *Digital Theory* — M. Beatrice Fazi, Alexander R. Galloway, Matthew Handelman, and Leif Weatherby — for a roundtable on their new collaborative work.Digital Theory (University of Minnesota Press, 2025) makes a deceptively simple but far-reaching claim: the digital is theoretical. Not in the sense that we theorize about it, but that digitality itself — mediation through discrete units — is a condition for thinking as such.Just to get it out of the way, listeners to the pod know that these four thinkers need no introduction. This is literally the cohort that we've held in our minds over the past few years (there's probably nobody whose shaped our brains as formatively on this subject than Alexander Galloway, whose writing was the subject of Marek's en route masters thesis and the first PDF sent between Marek and Roberto). The conversation opens up a series of productive disagreements within the group. What's the relationship between the digital and computation? For Fazi, the digital is discretization — "the cut" — while computation is systematization, building, constructing. This distinction allows the book to think the digital before and beyond the computer, back to proto-writing tokens and forward to whatever comes next. A major target here is what Galloway calls "analog philosophy," the dominant strain of theory over the last few decades that privileges affect, sensation, intensity, immanence. Deleuze is named directly as the great philosopher of the analog: obsessed with the fold, hostile to structuralism, drawn to "a language of breaths and screams." The authors aren't throwing Deleuze overboard entirely (to them the "Postscript on the Societies of Control" still hits) but they're skeptical that his ontology can account for digital technology as a form of thought. REFERENCES:*Digital Theory* (In Search of Media series), University of Minnesota Press, 2025 https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517920197/digital-theory/M. Beatrice Fazi - *Contingent Computation: Abstraction, Experience, and Indeterminacy in Computational Aesthetics*, Rowman & Littlefield, 2018 https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781786606082/Contingent-Computation-Abstraction-Experience-and-Indeterminacy-in-Computational-AestheticsAlexander R. Galloway - *Uncomputable: Play and Politics in the Long Digital Age*, Verso, 2021 https://www.versobooks.com/products/2656-uncomputable - "Golden Age of Analog," *Critical Inquiry* 48, no. 2 (2022) https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/717324 - Galloway's website and blog https://cultureandcommunication.org/galloway/Matthew Handelman - *The Mathematical Imagination: On the Origins and Promise of Critical Theory*, Fordham University Press, 2019 https://www.fordhampress.com/9780823283842/the-mathematical-imagination/Leif Weatherby - *Language Machines: Cultural AI and the End of Remainder Humanism*, University of Minnesota Press, 2025 https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/language-machines (our book of the year, for what it's worth) - *Transplanting the Metaphysical Organ: German Romanticism between Leibniz and Marx*, Fordham University Press, 2016 - Digital Theory Lab at NYU https://as.nyu.edu/faculty/leif-allison-reid-weatherby.htmlSome References Discussed:Gilles Deleuze, "Postscript on the Societies of Control" (1992)Theodor Adorno & Max Horkheimer, *Dialectic of Enlightenment*Euclid, *Elements*, Book V (on analog/logos)Jacques Lacan, *Seminar II: The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis* (on cybernetics)François Laruelle and Alain Badiou, on the genericEve Tuck, "Breaking Up with Deleuze"Hito Steyerl, "How Not to Be Seen: A Fucking Didactic Educational .MOV File" (2013)

As Oscar Season rolls around, Recall This Book looks back to John's 2019 discussion with Columbia University professor Sharon Marcus about The Drama of Celebrity, her tour-de-force account of how stars are born, publicized, and in time devoutly scrapbooked by adoring fans. They tackle a question at least as old as Sarah Bernhardt: who or what makes a star? Rather than crediting star making to the culture industry, to fans, or to star themselves, Sharon makes the case that all three forces together constitute a celebrity creation machine. After discussing her archival work on theatrical scrapbooking in Indiana, Sharon pulls from the vaults a marvelous Hollywood memoir, Brooke Haywood's Haywired. That triggers discussion of the studio system and how its models of celebrity are and are not with us today. Sharon's two Recallable Books also capitalize on mid-century notions of celebrity: Mommie Dearest by Christina Crawford and Edie: American Girl by Jean Stein and George Plimpton. John's choice, The Entertainer by Margaret Talbot, another biographical account written by a star's daughter, gives a slightly rosier perspective on the family memoir. Discussed in this episode: Sharon Marcus, The Drama of Celebrity Daniel Boorstin, The Image (“a person who is known for his well-knownness”) Theodor Adorno and Theodore Horkheimer, “Culture Industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment Henry Jenkins, “Textual Poachers“ Dick Herbdige, “Subculture: The Meaning of Style“ Mark Twain, Patented Scrapbook Innovator Brooke Hayward, Haywire Christina Crawford, Mommie Dearest Jean Stein, George Plimpton, Edie, American Girl Margaret Talbot, The Entertainer Read the episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

As Oscar Season rolls around, Recall This Book looks back to John's 2019 discussion with Columbia University professor Sharon Marcus about The Drama of Celebrity, her tour-de-force account of how stars are born, publicized, and in time devoutly scrapbooked by adoring fans. They tackle a question at least as old as Sarah Bernhardt: who or what makes a star? Rather than crediting star making to the culture industry, to fans, or to star themselves, Sharon makes the case that all three forces together constitute a celebrity creation machine. After discussing her archival work on theatrical scrapbooking in Indiana, Sharon pulls from the vaults a marvelous Hollywood memoir, Brooke Haywood's Haywired. That triggers discussion of the studio system and how its models of celebrity are and are not with us today. Sharon's two Recallable Books also capitalize on mid-century notions of celebrity: Mommie Dearest by Christina Crawford and Edie: American Girl by Jean Stein and George Plimpton. John's choice, The Entertainer by Margaret Talbot, another biographical account written by a star's daughter, gives a slightly rosier perspective on the family memoir. Discussed in this episode: Sharon Marcus, The Drama of Celebrity Daniel Boorstin, The Image (“a person who is known for his well-knownness”) Theodor Adorno and Theodore Horkheimer, “Culture Industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment Henry Jenkins, “Textual Poachers“ Dick Herbdige, “Subculture: The Meaning of Style“ Mark Twain, Patented Scrapbook Innovator Brooke Hayward, Haywire Christina Crawford, Mommie Dearest Jean Stein, George Plimpton, Edie, American Girl Margaret Talbot, The Entertainer Read the episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/film

As Oscar Season rolls around, Recall This Book looks back to John's 2019 discussion with Columbia University professor Sharon Marcus about The Drama of Celebrity, her tour-de-force account of how stars are born, publicized, and in time devoutly scrapbooked by adoring fans. They tackle a question at least as old as Sarah Bernhardt: who or what makes a star? Rather than crediting star making to the culture industry, to fans, or to star themselves, Sharon makes the case that all three forces together constitute a celebrity creation machine. After discussing her archival work on theatrical scrapbooking in Indiana, Sharon pulls from the vaults a marvelous Hollywood memoir, Brooke Haywood's Haywired. That triggers discussion of the studio system and how its models of celebrity are and are not with us today. Sharon's two Recallable Books also capitalize on mid-century notions of celebrity: Mommie Dearest by Christina Crawford and Edie: American Girl by Jean Stein and George Plimpton. John's choice, The Entertainer by Margaret Talbot, another biographical account written by a star's daughter, gives a slightly rosier perspective on the family memoir. Discussed in this episode: Sharon Marcus, The Drama of Celebrity Daniel Boorstin, The Image (“a person who is known for his well-knownness”) Theodor Adorno and Theodore Horkheimer, “Culture Industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment Henry Jenkins, “Textual Poachers“ Dick Herbdige, “Subculture: The Meaning of Style“ Mark Twain, Patented Scrapbook Innovator Brooke Hayward, Haywire Christina Crawford, Mommie Dearest Jean Stein, George Plimpton, Edie, American Girl Margaret Talbot, The Entertainer Read the episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/performing-arts

As Oscar Season rolls around, Recall This Book looks back to John's 2019 discussion with Columbia University professor Sharon Marcus about The Drama of Celebrity, her tour-de-force account of how stars are born, publicized, and in time devoutly scrapbooked by adoring fans. They tackle a question at least as old as Sarah Bernhardt: who or what makes a star? Rather than crediting star making to the culture industry, to fans, or to star themselves, Sharon makes the case that all three forces together constitute a celebrity creation machine. After discussing her archival work on theatrical scrapbooking in Indiana, Sharon pulls from the vaults a marvelous Hollywood memoir, Brooke Haywood's Haywired. That triggers discussion of the studio system and how its models of celebrity are and are not with us today. Sharon's two Recallable Books also capitalize on mid-century notions of celebrity: Mommie Dearest by Christina Crawford and Edie: American Girl by Jean Stein and George Plimpton. John's choice, The Entertainer by Margaret Talbot, another biographical account written by a star's daughter, gives a slightly rosier perspective on the family memoir. Discussed in this episode: Sharon Marcus, The Drama of Celebrity Daniel Boorstin, The Image (“a person who is known for his well-knownness”) Theodor Adorno and Theodore Horkheimer, “Culture Industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment Henry Jenkins, “Textual Poachers“ Dick Herbdige, “Subculture: The Meaning of Style“ Mark Twain, Patented Scrapbook Innovator Brooke Hayward, Haywire Christina Crawford, Mommie Dearest Jean Stein, George Plimpton, Edie, American Girl Margaret Talbot, The Entertainer Read the episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

As Oscar Season rolls around, Recall This Book looks back to John's 2019 discussion with Columbia University professor Sharon Marcus about The Drama of Celebrity, her tour-de-force account of how stars are born, publicized, and in time devoutly scrapbooked by adoring fans. They tackle a question at least as old as Sarah Bernhardt: who or what makes a star? Rather than crediting star making to the culture industry, to fans, or to star themselves, Sharon makes the case that all three forces together constitute a celebrity creation machine. After discussing her archival work on theatrical scrapbooking in Indiana, Sharon pulls from the vaults a marvelous Hollywood memoir, Brooke Haywood's Haywired. That triggers discussion of the studio system and how its models of celebrity are and are not with us today. Sharon's two Recallable Books also capitalize on mid-century notions of celebrity: Mommie Dearest by Christina Crawford and Edie: American Girl by Jean Stein and George Plimpton. John's choice, The Entertainer by Margaret Talbot, another biographical account written by a star's daughter, gives a slightly rosier perspective on the family memoir. Discussed in this episode: Sharon Marcus, The Drama of Celebrity Daniel Boorstin, The Image (“a person who is known for his well-knownness”) Theodor Adorno and Theodore Horkheimer, “Culture Industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment Henry Jenkins, “Textual Poachers“ Dick Herbdige, “Subculture: The Meaning of Style“ Mark Twain, Patented Scrapbook Innovator Brooke Hayward, Haywire Christina Crawford, Mommie Dearest Jean Stein, George Plimpton, Edie, American Girl Margaret Talbot, The Entertainer Read the episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/music

As Oscar Season rolls around, Recall This Book looks back to John's 2019 discussion with Columbia University professor Sharon Marcus about The Drama of Celebrity, her tour-de-force account of how stars are born, publicized, and in time devoutly scrapbooked by adoring fans. They tackle a question at least as old as Sarah Bernhardt: who or what makes a star? Rather than crediting star making to the culture industry, to fans, or to star themselves, Sharon makes the case that all three forces together constitute a celebrity creation machine. After discussing her archival work on theatrical scrapbooking in Indiana, Sharon pulls from the vaults a marvelous Hollywood memoir, Brooke Haywood's Haywired. That triggers discussion of the studio system and how its models of celebrity are and are not with us today. Sharon's two Recallable Books also capitalize on mid-century notions of celebrity: Mommie Dearest by Christina Crawford and Edie: American Girl by Jean Stein and George Plimpton. John's choice, The Entertainer by Margaret Talbot, another biographical account written by a star's daughter, gives a slightly rosier perspective on the family memoir. Discussed in this episode: Sharon Marcus, The Drama of Celebrity Daniel Boorstin, The Image (“a person who is known for his well-knownness”) Theodor Adorno and Theodore Horkheimer, “Culture Industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment Henry Jenkins, “Textual Poachers“ Dick Herbdige, “Subculture: The Meaning of Style“ Mark Twain, Patented Scrapbook Innovator Brooke Hayward, Haywire Christina Crawford, Mommie Dearest Jean Stein, George Plimpton, Edie, American Girl Margaret Talbot, The Entertainer Read the episode here.

As Oscar Season rolls around, Recall This Book looks back to John's 2019 discussion with Columbia University professor Sharon Marcus about The Drama of Celebrity, her tour-de-force account of how stars are born, publicized, and in time devoutly scrapbooked by adoring fans. They tackle a question at least as old as Sarah Bernhardt: who or what makes a star? Rather than crediting star making to the culture industry, to fans, or to star themselves, Sharon makes the case that all three forces together constitute a celebrity creation machine. After discussing her archival work on theatrical scrapbooking in Indiana, Sharon pulls from the vaults a marvelous Hollywood memoir, Brooke Haywood's Haywired. That triggers discussion of the studio system and how its models of celebrity are and are not with us today. Sharon's two Recallable Books also capitalize on mid-century notions of celebrity: Mommie Dearest by Christina Crawford and Edie: American Girl by Jean Stein and George Plimpton. John's choice, The Entertainer by Margaret Talbot, another biographical account written by a star's daughter, gives a slightly rosier perspective on the family memoir. Discussed in this episode: Sharon Marcus, The Drama of Celebrity Daniel Boorstin, The Image (“a person who is known for his well-knownness”) Theodor Adorno and Theodore Horkheimer, “Culture Industry” in Dialectic of Enlightenment Henry Jenkins, “Textual Poachers“ Dick Herbdige, “Subculture: The Meaning of Style“ Mark Twain, Patented Scrapbook Innovator Brooke Hayward, Haywire Christina Crawford, Mommie Dearest Jean Stein, George Plimpton, Edie, American Girl Margaret Talbot, The Entertainer Read the episode here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/popular-culture

Why do we keep gifts that we don't want, or can't currently use? What role do these play in our relationships with others, with time, and perhaps even our future selves? Sophie Woodward discusses the richly creative research project that took her into strangers' homes, drawers and cupboards, and led her to consider the gifts that lie “dormant” in our homes. Such items might appear “meaningless” or inactive, Sophie shows, but are far from dead or unimportant: “stuff” matters. Via examples of gifts ranging from inconveniently big plastic toys to alcohol repeatedly gifted by relatives, Sophie explains how, beyond theories of gifts from thinkers like Marcel Mauss on the function of exchange, or Theodor Adorno on the perfect gift, it's worth a deeper focus on the recipient – people, she observes, have an obligation not just to receive gifts but also to keep them, at least for a certain amount of time.Plus, we ask: is it ok for recipients to pre-empt and refuse gifts before they're given, or is gifting the prerogative of the giver? What can we do to reduce material overwhelm? We also celebrate Jane Bennett, who considers the powers of things, beyond the meanings we attribute to them.A thoughtful and exploratory conversation, crucial in a time of climate emergency, waste, and cost-of-living crises.Guest: Sophie Woodward; Hosts: Rosie Hancock, Alexis Hieu Truong; Executive Producer: Alice Bloch; Sound Engineer: David Crackles; Music: Joe Gardner; Artwork: Erin AnikerFind more about Uncommon SenseEpisode ResourcesBy Sophie WoodwardDormant Gifts: Animating the Imagined and Narrated Pasts and Futures of Gifts (2025)Live methods and live things: Cultivating attentiveness to dormant things to develop a vital sociology of the everyday (2025)Clutter in domestic spaces: Material vibrancy, and competing moralities (2021)Object interviews, material imaginings and ‘unsettling' methods: interdisciplinary approaches to understanding materials and material culture (2015)Sophie's profile at The University of Manchester and the Morgan Centre for Research into Everyday LivesFrom the Sociological Review FoundationNew Materialism – Nick J. Fox (2020)Shrinking domesticity – Mel Nowicki, Tim White, Ella Harris (2022)Discover our lesson plans for use in the classroom!Further resources“The Gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies” – Marcel MaussThe Opposite of Forgetfulness: Adorno on Gift-Giving – from Stuart Jeffries' “Grand Hotel Abyss: The Lives of the Frankfurt School”“Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things” – Jane BennettRead more about Jane Bennett.Support our work. Make a one-off or regular donation to help fund future episodes of Uncommon Sense: donorbox.org/uncommon-sense

ESPELEOLOGIA (s.f.) “é o estudo das cavernas, de sua gênese e evolução, do meio físico que elas representam, de seu povoamento biológico atual ou passado, bem como dos meios ou técnicas que são próprias ao seu estudo”. Na Raphus Press, no canal RES FICTA, os episódios de “Espeleologia” são comentários sobre questões que escapam do livro, envolvendo discussões teóricas mais amplas de poéticas e formas narrativas.Bibliografia do episódio de hoje: “Aesthetics and Politics”, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch, Bertolt Brecht, Georg Lukács, Fredric Jameson (Verso, 2007); “Um capítulo da história da modernidade estética”, Carlos Eduardo Jordão Machado (organização) (Editora Unesp, 2016); “A alma e o caos: 100 poemas expressionistas”, João Barrento (Relógio d'Água, 2001); “A Poesia do Expressionismo Alemão”, João Barrento (Presença, 1989).O livro “Um capítulo da história da modernidade estética”, organizado por Carlos Eduardo Jordão Machado, pode ser adquirido pela Amazon ou no link da Editora Unesp: https://www.livrariaunesp.com.br/um-capitulo-da-historia-da-modernidade-estetica-2-edicao-debate-sobre-o-expressionismo-carlos-eduardo-jordao-machado-editora-unesp-9788539305193/p Conheça a revolucionária narrativa onírica, "O Outro Lado": https://www.catarse.me/outrolado_latepledgeConheça a revolucionária narrativa onírica e expressionista de “O Outro Lado:Entre para a nossa sociedade, dedicada à bibliofilia maldita e ao culto de tenebrosos grimórios: o RES FICTA (solicitações via http://raphuspress.weebly.com/contact.html).Nosso podcast também está disponível nas seguintes plataformas:- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4NUiqPPTMdnezdKmvWDXHs- Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/podcast-da-raphus-press/id1488391151?uo=4- Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8xMDlmZmVjNC9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw%3D%3D Apoie o canal: https://apoia.se/podcastdaraphus.Ou adquira nossos livros em nosso site: http://raphuspress.weebly.com. Dúvidas sobre envio, formas de pagamento, etc.: http://raphuspress.weebly.com/contact.html.Nossos livros também estão no Sebo Clepsidra: https://www.seboclepsidra.com.br/marca/raphus-press.html

Beyond the Flush: Tonight Notes go here In this episode, you will be able to: Discover how David Bowie's Tonight album reshaped his sound and what it reveals about his artistic evolution in the 1980s. Uncover the unique creative spark that ignited when Iggy Pop and David Bowie joined forces, changing the rock scene forever. Explore how MTV revolutionized music in the 1980s by transforming artist visibility and fan engagement in ways still felt today. Analyze the cultural industry's influence on music production and distribution, revealing the forces shaping the sounds we love. Trace the surprising roots of reggae influences in rock music to understand how genre blending expanded musical boundaries in the 1980s. The key moments in this episode are: 00:00:02 - Introduction and Performance Setup for David Bowie's Tonight Album  00:01:06 - Theoretical Framework: Culture Industry and Critical Theory Context  00:04:31 - Star Wars vs Star Trek Metaphor: Capitalism and Post-Capitalist Desire in Music  00:05:36 - Historical Context of Bowie's Tonight Album: Contractual Obligation and Creative Disengagement  00:11:41 - Iggy Pop's Influence and Capitalist Industry Pressures on Bowie's Sound  00:17:01 - MTV Capitalism and the Shift to Visual Music Marketing  00:22:29 - Understanding the Culture Industry and Its Impact on Individuality  00:28:06 - Creative Expression as Natural Metaphor: The Toilet Analogy  00:30:41 - Bowie vs. Iggy: Raw Emotion and Artistic Authenticity  00:32:10 - MTV's Limitations: Processing Surface-Level Artistry Over Depth  00:33:11 - Marx's Metaphor of Plumbing and Capitalism in Culture  00:35:59 - Theodor Adorno on Fetishization of Culture and False Freedom  00:38:24 - Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari on Desire and Systemic Blockages  00:39:35 - Analyzing the Album's Artistic Intent and Production Challenges  00:47:21 - Musical Elements and Initial Reception of the Album's Opening Track  00:48:59 - Exploring the Meaning Behind "Loving the Alien" Lyrics  00:53:17 - Analyzing "Don't Look Down" and Its Musical Impact  00:55:49 - Comparing "God Only Knows": Bowie's Cover vs. Iggy Pop's Original  01:03:17 - The Energy and Authenticity of "Neighborhood Threat,"  01:05:28 - Reflections on Collaboration and Album Cohesion  01:05:50 - Exploring David Bowie's “Lust For Life” and “Blue Jean,” Songwriting & Video Insights  01:08:14 - Deep Dive into “Tumble and Twirl” and Borneo Horns Collaboration  01:11:48 - Critiquing Bowie's Cover and Original Track Interpretations  01:14:17 - The Impact of Fairlight Keyboard and 80s Production on Bowie's Music  01:21:43 - Evaluating David Bowie's Later Albums and Their Reception  01:24:42 - Philosophical Metaphors on Failure and Desire in Bowie's Music  01:26:58 - Predicting Changes in Bowie's Music and Industry Impact in the Late 1980s  01:29:29 - Navigating Bowie's Tin Machine Era and Next Listening Options  01:31:19 - Wrapping Up the Episode and Future Podcast Plans This podcast is powered by Pinecast.

Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer (1944) - The Culture Industry:Enlightenment as Mass DeceptionLisa Fevral:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJdvK5wMriowQqbGC7G0lDAhttps://twitter.com/LisaFevralhttps://www.instagram.com/lisafevral/ This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit lisafevral.substack.com

Jake Romm joins the podcast to explain why anti-semitism and zionism have more in common than separates them. In this conversation we discuss the work of mid-century thinkers such as Jean Paul Sartre, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, as well recent scholarship from Nadia Abu El-Haj and the writing of Palestinian political prisoners, to better understand the many consistencies between anti-semitic and zionist ideology. This conversation draws on two of Jake's recent essays ('Elements of Anti-Semitism' and 'Idée Fixe' both published in Parapraxis Magazine) and references a short course he recently ran with the Psychosocial Foundation titled Zionism as an Antisemitism. Jake Romm is a writer and human rights lawyer based in Brooklyn. He is associate editor of Protean Magazine and the US Representative for the Hind Rajab Foundation. His writing has appeared in The Nation, the Brooklyn Rail, The Baffler, Parapraxis and elsewhere. SUPPORT: www.buymeacoffee.com/redmedicineSoundtrack by Mark PilkingtonTwitter: @red_medicine__www.redmedicine.substack.com/

W 14 odcinku "Limitów AI" rozmawiamy de facto o storytellingu – narracjach na temat AI oraz o sile perswazji i jej społecznych skutkach. Zaczynamy od kiczu wedle szkoły frankfurckiej (Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno) – chodzi o takie masowo reprodukowane treści (narracje, obrazy), które są łatwe w odbiorze (zrozumiałe, emocjonalnie absorbujące) i które tym samym na masową skalą odwracają uwagę od spraw trudnych, złożonych i naprawdę ważnych, a w szczególności odwracają uwagę od spraw niewygodnych dla tych, którzy ten masowy obieg (re)produkcji treści kształtują z pozycji władzy. W rozmowie wspieramy się krytycznymi analizami m.in. Karen Hao, Kate Crawford oraz Sylwii Czubkowskiej. Pytanie brzmi zatem: do jakiego stopnia opowieści o AI to technologiczny kicz? Special Guests: Edyta Sadowska and Kasia Zaniewska.

Longe das rodas literárias, a caminho da sua casa, Paul Sheldon um escritor muito popular sofre um acidade e acaba resgatado por uma grande fã. Sorte? Achamos que não! Em Misery: Louca Obsessão Mr. King mostra que o amor pode - de fato! - ser demonstrado por dor, pés arrancados, traumas, além de tortura e sofrimento. Vem tirar suas próprias conclusões e ajudar Andreia D'Oliveira e Gabi Idealli a descobrir se a obra é apenas ficção ou um forte receio. Comentados no Episódio Lista do AFI dos 100 maiores heróis e vilões do cinema Misery: Louca Obsessão, romance escrito por Stephen King Misery: Louca Obsessão (1990 ‧ Terror/Crime ‧ 1h 47m), dirigido por Rob Reiner Artigo "A indústria cultural: o iluminismo como mistificação de massas" de Theodor Adorno e Max Horkheimer Livros em Cartaz 014 – Primavera King! À Espera de um Milagre (1999 ‧ Crime/Fantasia ‧ 3h 9m) dirigido por Frank Darabont O Aprendiz (1998 ‧ Terror/Ficção policial ‧ 1h 51m) dirigido por Bryan Singer Um Sonho de Liberdade (1994 ‧ Thriller/Ficção policial ‧ 2h 22m) dirigido por Frank Darabont

Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you'll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don't fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.                                                                                                                    – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025 After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom. Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview here as an online publication with downloadable options. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you'll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don't fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.                                                                                                                    – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025 After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom. Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview here as an online publication with downloadable options. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/literary-studies

Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you'll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don't fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.                                                                                                                    – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025 After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom. Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview here as an online publication with downloadable options. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you'll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don't fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.                                                                                                                    – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025 After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom. Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview here as an online publication with downloadable options. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

Are we already living in some kind of fascist or technocratic dystopia? How do we avert the AI dystopia? These are the types of things that you'll see thrown about in op-eds and analysis pieces all over the net and the press. Dystopia is doing some kind of work in our political vocabulary that goes beyond a reference to those iconic dystopian novels or their sort of contemporary successors. … Sometimes politics seems to be so absorbed in the train of fantasy and the imaginary that it becomes worrying. But like it or not, or like specific expressions of the political imagination or not, the political arena is an arena of the imagination. Habermas once said that people don't fight for abstractions, but they do battle with images.                                                                                                                    – Matthew Benjamin Cole, NBN interview 2025 After centuries of contemplating utopias, late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers began to warn of dystopian futures. Yet these fears extended beyond the canonical texts of dystopian fiction into post-war discourses on totalitarianism, mass society, and technology, as well as subsequent political theories of freedom and domination. Fear the Future: Dystopia and Political Imagination in the Twentieth Century (U of Michigan Press, 2025) demonstrates the centrality of dystopian thinking to twentieth century political thought, showing the pervasiveness of dystopian images, themes, and anxieties. Offering a novel reading of major themes and thinkers, Fear the Future explores visions of the future from literary figures such as Yevgeny Zamyatin, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell; political theorists such as Max Weber, Hannah Arendt, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, and Michel Foucault; and mid-century social scientists such as Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, David Reisman, C. Wright Mills, and Jacques Ellul. It offers a comparative analysis of distinct intellectual and literary traditions, including modern utopianism and anti-utopianism, mid-century social science, Frankfurt School critical theory, and continental political philosophy. With detailed case studies of key thinkers from the Enlightenment to the late twentieth century, the book synthesizes secondary literature and research from a range of disciplinary areas, including in political theory, intellectual history, literary studies, and utopian studies. This wide-ranging reconstruction shows that while dystopian thinking has illustrated the dangers of domination and dehumanization, it has also illuminated new possibilities for freedom. Professor Cole published his book with the University of Michigan Press as Open Access: find the detailed insights and arguments that Matthew discusses in our interview here as an online publication with downloadable options. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Theodor Adorno afirmou certa vez não possuir hobby algum, o que inicialmente pode parecer radical: o que uma pessoa sem hobbies faz na vida? Falamos neste episódio sobre o fenômeno do tempo livre no capitalismo e suas conexões com padrões de comportamento, tédio, a cultura do “do it yourself” (faça você mesmo), indústria cultural e alguns outros temas relacionados.- Nossa chave PIX: filosofiavermelha@gmail.com- Curso "Introdução à filosofia - dos pré-socráticos a Sartre": https://www.udemy.com/course/introducao-a-filosofia-dos-pre-socraticos-a-sartre/?couponCode=F12B3616964FA6AB0482- Curso "Filosofia para a vida: refletir para viver melhor": https://www.udemy.com/course/filosofia-para-a-vida-refletir-para-viver-melhor/?couponCode=8EECC0AF66D8DA12E5BE- Curso "Crítica da religião: Feuerbach, Nietzsche e Freud": https://www.udemy.com/course/critica-da-religiao-feuerbach-nietzsche-e-freud/?couponCode=8DA324F5CEF90917F959- Curso "A filosofia de Karl Marx - uma introdução": https://www.udemy.com/course/a-filosofia-de-karl-marx-uma-introducao/?couponCode=BDAC9250CEBD0B08E266- Inscreva-se gratuitamente em nossa newsletter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://filosofiavermelha.org/index.php/newsletter/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Apoia.se: seja um de nossos apoiadores e mantenha este trabalho no ar: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://apoia.se/filosofiavermelha⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Nossa chave PIX: filosofiavermelha@gmail.com- Adquira meu livro: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.almarevolucionaria.com/product-page/pr%C3%A9-venda-duvidar-de-tudo-ensaios-sobre-filosofia-e-psican%C3%A1lise⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Meu site: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.filosofiaepsicanalise.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠- Clube de leitura: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWEjNgKjqqI⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Nemški filozof Theodor Adorno, utemeljitelj frankfurtske šole, je trdil, da je napisati pesem po Auschwitzu barbarsko, saj se "prek principa estetske stilizacije nezamisljiva usoda vendarle kaže tako, kot da bi imela kak smisel". Seveda je poezija mogoča v najbolj nemogočih razmerah, ampak dejstvo je, da nas genocid zamaje v temelju naše človeškosti. Da to ni le beseda. Je groza, ki ostane, tudi ko se konča in tudi če je nočemo videti.

Bienvenidos a un nuevo Spaces en directo. Como si yo fuese el protagonista de Ellos Viven hoy vengo a soltarles una entradilla en forma de arenga. Ponte cómodo y abre tus oídos. ¡Abrelos porque te voy a contar la verdad que no quieren que sepas! Todo este rollo del nihilismo, la gente actuando como niños, obsesionada con memes estúpidos, videos de TikTok y cosas sin importancia vital, no es casualidad. No, no, no. Es un plan orquestado, una red tejida por las élites para mantenernos dormidos, distraídos y sin cuestionar nada. Déjame que te lo explique todo, pieza por pieza, porque esto es más grande de lo que parece. ¡Escucha bien, porque hasta la palabra "nihilista" tiene un trasfondo que te hace pensar quién quiere que pensemos en "nada"! La palabra viene del latín nihil, que significa "nada", puro vacío, la ausencia total de significado. Pero no te engañes, esto no es solo un capricho lingüístico, ¡es una pista de cómo nos han manipulado para abrazar el vacío! El término empezó a tomar forma en el siglo XVIII, pero se puso de moda en el XIX, cuando filósofos, escritores y, sí, ciertas élites comenzaron a jugar con la idea de que nada importa, que no hay verdad, ni Dios, ni propósito. La raíz latina nihil ya se usaba en la Antigua Roma, en textos legales y filosóficos, para hablar de cosas que no existían o carecían de valor. Pero el nihilismo como lo conocemos hoy empezó a gestarse con los pensadores modernos, sobre todo en Europa. Uno de los primeros en darle forma fue Friedrich Nietzsche, el filósofo alemán que en 1880 gritó a los cuatro vientos que "Dios ha muerto" (En Así hablo Zarathustra, 1883). Nietzsche no estaba celebrando, ¡estaba advirtiendo! Decía que sin un sistema de valores (como la religión o la moral tradicional), la humanidad caería en un abismo donde nada tiene sentido, un vacío que llamó nihilismo. Pero aquí viene lo sospechoso: mientras Nietzsche alertaba sobre el peligro, otros parecían encantados con la idea. ¿Quiénes? Los que querían una sociedad sin rumbo, fácil de controlar. El término "nihilista" se popularizó antes de Nietzsche, en Rusia, con los nihilistas rusos de los 1860s, un grupo de intelectuales y revolucionarios que rechazaban toda autoridad: el zar, la iglesia, la familia, todo. El escritor Iván Turguénev los inmortalizó en su novela Padres e hijos (1862), donde describe a un personaje, Bazarov, como un "nihilista" que no cree en nada, solo en la ciencia y la destrucción del viejo orden. Pero, ¿sabes qué? Algunos dicen que estos nihilistas no eran solo rebeldes, sino peones de un juego mayor. Potencias extranjeras y grupos subversivos financiaban ideas radicales para desestabilizar Rusia. ¿Te suena familiar? Es el mismo truco que usan hoy: siembra el caos, haz que la gente crea en "nada", y tendrás un rebaño sin dirección. Y aquí entra la conspiración: la palabra "nihilista" no solo describe a los que no creen en nada, sino que se ha convertido en una herramienta para los que quieren que vivas en el vacío. Fíjate en cómo la cultura moderna, desde Hollywood hasta las redes sociales, glorifica la idea de que "nada importa". ¿Por qué? Porque un nihilista no lucha, no cuestiona, no se organiza. Solo consume, se ríe de memes absurdos y se pierde en la matrix digital. Pero sigamos hablando de la antigua Roma ya que en la actualidad vivimos en un circo moderno, una versión 2.0 del "panem et circenses" de los romanos. En la antigua Roma, los emperadores daban pan y espectáculos para que el pueblo no se revelara. Hoy, las élites globales —los banqueros, los dueños de las Big Tech, los políticos corruptos— hacen lo mismo, pero con esteroides. Nos bombardean con Netflix, tendencias virales, influencers haciendo retos absurdos y realities que no aportan nada. ¿Por qué? Porque mientras estamos pegados al celular viendo un gato bailando o discutiendo sobre el último drama de Twitter, no estamos pensando en los problemas reales: la desigualdad, el control económico, las guerras que financian a escondidas. Esto no es nuevo, ¿sabes? Ya lo decían tipos como Theodor Adorno, un filósofo alemán de la Escuela de Frankfurt, que en los años 40 y 50 escribió sobre la "industria cultural". Este hombre, junto a su colega Max Horkheimer, advirtió que los medios masivos (cine, radio, prensa) no eran solo entretenimiento, sino herramientas para estandarizar el pensamiento y mantener a las masas pasivas. Adorno decía que la cultura pop nos convierte en consumidores obedientes, adictos a lo superficial, mientras las élites manipulan desde las sombras. Y eso fue antes de internet, ¡imagínate ahora con algoritmos que saben exactamente qué mostrarte para mantenerte enganchado! Pero no se queda ahí. Esto va más allá del entretenimiento. Hay una ingeniería social en marcha, un plan deliberado para degradar nuestra cultura y hacernos más tontos, más infantiles. Mira cómo han transformado la educación: menos filosofía, menos historia crítica, menos lógica, y más énfasis en cosas vagas como "habilidades socioemocionales" o en fomentar la cultura del grupo, o lo que es lo mismo, del rebaño. ¿Quién está detrás? Algunos señalan a fundaciones globalistas como la Rockefeller o la Open Society de George Soros, que supuestamente financian cambios curriculares para suavizar las mentes. Y no olvidemos a Hollywood y la música pop: letras vacías, películas que glorifican el hedonismo, la violencia o el individualismo extremo. Todo esto nos empuja a un nihilismo puro: si nada importa, si no hay valores profundos, ¿para qué luchar? Mejor nos quedamos viendo videos de 15 segundos en TikTok, riéndonos de cosas absurdas mientras el mundo se desmorona. Adorno lo vio venir y lo puso en practica con la puesta en marcha de grupos como Los Beatles: él decía que la cultura de masas nos aliena, nos hace olvidar quiénes somos y nos convierte en engranajes de una máquina capitalista que solo beneficia a los de arriba. Y hablando de tecnología, ¡aquí viene lo gordo! Las redes sociales no son un accidente, son armas psicológicas. Los algoritmos de plataformas como Instagram, TikTok o YouTube están diseñados para hackear tu cerebro. ¿Sabías que empresas como Meta contratan a neurocientíficos para perfeccionar sus sistemas? Es verdad, hay estudios, como los de Tristan Harris, exdiseñador de Google, que revelan cómo estas plataformas manipulan la dopamina, el químico del placer, para mantenerte enganchado. Cada "like", cada notificación, cada video absurdo que no puedes parar de ver es parte de un diseño para que no pienses, no reflexiones, no crezcas. Esto crea una sociedad infantil, incapaz de concentrarse más de 10 segundos, obsesionada con lo instantáneo. ¿Y quién controla estas empresas? Los mismos multimillonarios que financian agendas globales, como los de Silicon Valley o el Foro Económico Mundial. ¿Coincidencia? No lo creo. Ahora, conecta los puntos: este nihilismo, esta despreocupación, no es solo cultural, es un declive inducido. Hay teorías que dicen que todo esto forma parte de un plan mayor, algo como el "Nuevo Orden Mundial" o “El Gran Reset". El Foro Económico Mundial, liderado por tipos como Klaus Schwab, habla abiertamente de un "gran reseteo" para cambiar la economía y la sociedad. ¿Y qué mejor manera de controlar a la gente que debilitándola? Destruyen los valores tradicionales —familia, comunidad, religión— y los reemplazan con un individualismo vacío, un "sé tú mismo" que en realidad significa "consume y no pienses". Sin un propósito mayor, la gente cae en el nihilismo, se vuelve cínica, se ríe de todo, y se refugia en cosas absurdas como coleccionar Funko Pops o pelear en redes por tonterías. Esto no es espontáneo, ¡es un diseño! Mi teoría es que hay fuerzas más oscuras, no solo las mal llamadas élites, sino algo espiritual, como una guerra contra el alma humana. Esas elites psicopatas que Pedro Bustamente denomino elites psicopatocraticas. Mira lo que pasó con el arte: antes inspiraba, ahora tenemos "arte contemporáneo" que parece un chiste, como un plátano pegado a una pared vendido por millones. Eso no es arte, es una burla para mantenernos confundidos. En el informe Iron Mountain de 1966 que pidió el presiente Kennedy antes de ser asesinado se explicaba perfectamente como la degradación del arte fue planifica por la CIA, allí se decia: “También resulta instructivo observar que el carácter de la cultura de una sociedad mantiene una estrecha relación con su potencial para hacer la guerra dentro del contexto de su época. No es ningún accidente que la actual "explosión cultural" en los Estados Unidos tenga lugar en una época marcada por un desarrollo inusualmente rápido de la tecnología bélica. Esta relación se reconoce más generalmente de lo que dejaría entrever la literatura especializada en este tema. Por ejemplo, muchos artistas y autores están comenzando a expresar su preocupación acerca de las opciones de creatividad limitadas que prevén en un mundo sin guerras, quellos creen o esperan estará pronto entre nosotros. Actualmente, se están preparando para esta posibilidad realizando experimentaciones sin precedentes con formas carentes de sentido; sus intereses en años recientes se han focalizado crecientemente en diseños abstractos, emociones gratuitas, ocurrencias fortuitas y secuencias sin relación.” Y por si fuera poco, la sobrecarga de información nos ha fracturado. La posverdad, la polarización, las fake news: todo eso es parte del plan. En 2016, Oxford nombró "posverdad" como la palabra del año, describiéndola como un mundo donde los hechos objetivos importan menos que las emociones y las narrativas. ¿Y quién gana con esto? Los que controlan los medios y las plataformas. Si no confías en nada, si todo es un meme, entonces no hay verdad, no hay lucha, solo nihilismo. La gente se cansa, se rinde, y se entretiene con cosas absurdas porque es más fácil que enfrentar un mundo roto. Es como dijo Neil Postman en su libro Divirtiéndonos hasta la muerte (1985): “no nos están esclavizando con cadenas, sino con entretenimiento. Nos están matando con risas.” Entonces, ¿qué tenemos? Un plan maestro: usan los medios para distraernos, la tecnología para adormecernos, la educación para debilitarnos y la cultura para infantilizarnos. Todo para que no levantemos la cabeza y veamos quién mueve los hilos. La educación como decía Bertrand Rusell «estará bien confinada a la clase gobernante y al populacho no se le permitirá saber como estas convicciones fueron generadas«. ¿Los nombres? Algunos señalan a los Rockefeller, los Rothschild, el Foro Económico Mundial, las Big Tech. Yo sostengo que es más grande, que hay poderes que ni conocemos. Pero la prueba está a la vista: una sociedad nihilista, obsesionada con lo absurdo, que no sabe ni quién es Theodor Adorno ni por qué su advertencia sobre la cultura de masas es más relevante que nunca. Despierta, ¡esto no es un juego! Si quieres pruebas, mira las redes, busca los documentos filtrados de fundaciones globalistas publicados por Maria Desiluminate, Nuevo Desorden Mundial, o Desmontando a Babylon, o lee a Adorno, a Orwell, a Bertrand Ruseel o a Postman. Todo está ahí, pero tienes que querer verlo. ¡Despertad, porque nos tienen distraídos como marionetas en su circo! Las élites, desde los días de Adorno y su Escuela de Frankfurt hasta los titanes de Silicon Valley, han tejido un plan maestro: usar la industria cultural, los algoritmos dopamínicos y la posverdad para sumirnos en un nihilismo vacío. Nos inundan con entretenimientos absurdos —memes, TikToks, dramas de redes— para mantenernos infantiles, despreocupados y ciegos ante su control. La palabra "nihilista", nacida del latín nihil y moldeada por los rebeldes rusos y Nietzsche, es su arma secreta: nos convierten en creyentes de la "nada", mientras ellos mueven los hilos del poder desde las sombras. ………………………………………………………………………………………. ¡Agarraos porque os voy a contar una verdad oculta que los poderosos no quieren que sepais! Los sabateanos y el frankismo son la clave para entender cómo el mundo se sumió en el caos nihilista que vivimos hoy. Los sabateanos o sabateos son los discípulos del autoproclamado mesías judío Shabtai Tzvi, nacido en el imperio otomano, el cual se convirtió al Islam en 1666…¿bonita fecha, no creéis? Son partidarios de la Cábala y del Zohar y afirman la existencia de una ley oculta y secreta, los sabateos interpretaron la conversión de su líder como un mandamiento para practicar una religión oculta y secreta. Un tipo que en el siglo XVII se autoproclamó Mesías y dijo que la redención llegaba rompiendo todas las reglas. ¿Cumplir la Torá? ¡Pff, para qué! Él y sus seguidores sabateanos creían que el pecado era el camino a la salvación, una movida que ya olía a rebelión contra todo lo sagrado. Cuando Tzvi se convirtió al islam bajo presión otomana, sus seguidores más fieles, los Dönmeh, se volvieron criptojudíos, viviendo una doble vida mientras planeaban en las sombras. Esto no es teoría, ¡es historia pura que podéis rastrear! Luego aparece Jacob Frank, el verdadero cerebro maquiavélico. Este tipo, en el siglo XVIII, llevó el sabateanismo a otro nivel, diciendo que era el sucesor de Tzvi. Frank no solo quería romper las reglas, quería destruirlas por completo. Su lema era que el mundo debía caer en una "saturación de pecado" para forzar la llegada del Mesías. ¿Rituales raros? Claro, como esa movida en Lanškroun en 1756, donde sus seguidores bailaban alrededor de una mujer semidesnuda, diciendo que era la Shekhinah. Este es un término hebreo que viene de la raíz shajan ("habitar") y, en el judaísmo, se refiere a la presencia divina de Dios en el mundo, o a que una persona esta habitada por un espíritu, vamos que esta poseída. ¡Pura locura! Frank y sus frankistas se convirtieron al cristianismo en masa, pero no te engañes, era una fachada. En secreto, seguían con sus creencias locas, infiltrándose en la sociedad europea como una red oculta. Si cruzamos el charco hasta España y tenemos un siglo antes a los alumbrados, una secta mística del siglo XVI que también olía a subversión. Estos tipos, que surgieron alrededor de 1511 en Castilla, creían en un contacto directo con Dios a través de éxtasis y visiones, despreciando los sacramentos y la autoridad de la Iglesia. Decían que, al estar "iluminados" por Dios, no podían pecar, sin importar lo que hicieran. ¿Os suena familiar? Su idea de "dejamiento" (entregarse pasivamente a Dios) se parece mucho a la transgresión deliberada de Tzvi. La Inquisición los persiguió a muerte, encarcelando a líderes como Isabel de la Cruz y Pedro Ruiz de Alcaraz en 1524, porque veían en ellos un peligro herético con tintes protestantes. Pero, ¿y si los alumbrados eran un eco temprano de la misma mentalidad antinomiana que Tzvi predicaría después? ¡Es como si alguien estuviera sembrando la semilla de la rebelión espiritual en distintos frentes! Y aquí entra el jesuitismo, la gran pieza que conecta todo en esta conspiración. La Compañía de Jesús, fundada en 1540 por Ignacio de Loyola, se creó para ser la vanguardia de la Contrarreforma, combatiendo herejías como el protestantismo y, sí, los alumbrados. Pero esperad, ¡aquí hay algo turbio! Los jesuitas eran famosos por su disciplina, su infiltración en las élites y su "obediencia ciega", algo que algunos conspiranoicos dicen que se parece sospechosamente a las tácticas de los Dönmeh sabateanos, que se colaban en otras religiones mientras mantenían sus creencias secretas. Es famoso el tema de la monista secreta, un texto que habla de las técnicas de infiltración que usaban y usan los jesuitas. Donde esta permitido hacer cualquier maldad con tal de salirse con la suya. Curiosamente, Ignacio de Loyola fue investigado por la Inquisición en 1527 por posible simpatía con los alumbrados, aunque salió libre. ¿Coincidencia? ¡Yo digo que no! Quizás los jesuitas, mientras combatían herejías, aprendieron un par de trucos de los alumbrados sobre manipulación y control espiritual, usándolos para su propia agenda de poder. Ahora, aquí viene lo gordo: esta idea de "redención a través del pecado" es el germen del nihilismo que hoy nos tiene atrapados. Frank no solo quería romper las leyes judías, sino TODAS las leyes morales. ¿Os suena familiar? ¡Es el eco de Nietzsche gritando que "Dios ha muerto"! La filosofía de Nietzsche, con su rechazo a los valores tradicionales y su idea de que no hay verdad absoluta, no salió de la nada. Bebió directo de esa fuente envenenada del frankismo, que decía que destruir el orden moral era el camino a la libertad. Los frankistas, con su desprecio por el Talmud y las normas, fueron los primeros en decir que nada importa, que todo vale si sirve al "gran plan". ¡Eso es nihilismo puro, amigos! Y no creais que esto se quedó en el siglo XVIII. Los frankistas, con sus conversiones falsas al cristianismo, se metieron en las élites de Europa. Hay quienes dicen que familias poderosas, incluso en América, tienen raíces frankistas. ¿Nombres como Brandeis o Frankfurter te dicen algo? No es casualidad. Estos tipos sembraron las semillas de una ideología que destruye cualquier sentido de propósito, dejando un vacío que hoy llamamos nihilismo moderno. Desde el marxismo cultural hasta los movimientos que promueven el caos moral, todo tiene el ADN de esa "involución" que Frank predicaba. No era una regresión biológica, ¡era un plan para sumir al mundo en la anarquía espiritual! Lo más loco es cómo lo hicieron: los frankistas no solo querían pecar, querían que el mundo entero se hundiera en el pecado. Frank decía que el caos moral forzaría la redención, pero, ¿y si la redención nunca llega? Lo que queda es un mundo donde nadie cree en nada, donde los valores se derrumban. Eso es exactamente lo que Nietzsche teorizó después, y lo que hoy vemos en la cultura: un vacío donde todo es relativo, donde no hay bien ni mal. El solipsismo satanista que impera por todas partes. Los frankistas, con sus rituales y su infiltración, fueron los arquitectos de esta mentalidad. No lo digo yo, ¡lo dicen los hechos históricos! No es ninguna sorpresa que el frankismo tuviera hasta 50,000 seguidores en su momento, muchos en Polonia, donde se mezclaron con la nobleza católica. Desde ahí, su influencia se extendió como un virus. Si queréis pruebas, leed los primeros trabajos de Gershom Scholem, que destripó el sabateanismo y mostró cómo sus ideas eran una bomba de relojería. La evolución del estudio de Scholem sobre el sabbateanismo sirve como prueba de la creciente reticencia de Scholem y otros muchos a criticar el proyecto sionista tras el Holocausto y la Segunda Guerra Mundial y de su giro gradual desde la marginalidad hacia convicciones políticas más dominantes. En resumen, los sabateanos y Frank armaron el escenario para el nihilismo actual. Su plan de "redención a través del pecado" no era misticismo inocente, era una declaración de guerra contra los valores. Nietzsche solo tomó el testigo y lo gritó más alto. Hoy, cuando ves una sociedad que no cree en nada, que celebra la transgresión por la transgresión, estás viendo el legado de Frank y sus locos. ¡Despierta, que el nihilismo no es casualidad, es un plan que lleva siglos en marcha! ………………………………………………………………………………………. ¡Y hasta aquí el podcast de hoy, amigos! Hemos desentrañado cómo las distracciones modernas y la infantilización de la sociedad nos mantienen en una danza perpetua de entretenimiento vacío, lejos de la verdad incómoda. Como decía Orwell, “el pueblo que elige corruptos, impostores, ladrones y traidores no es víctima, sino cómplice”. Y en la misma línea, Russell nos advertía que “la mayoría de las personas preferirían morir antes que pensar; de hecho, muchas lo hacen”. Así que, mientras el mundo nos lanza notificaciones y pantallas para anestesiarnos, recordad: despertad, cuestionad, pensad. Pero, claro, si todo esto os parece demasiado... ¡hoy no, mañana! ………………………………………………………………………………………. Conductor del programa UTP Ramón Valero @tecn_preocupado Canal en Telegram @UnTecnicoPreocupado Un técnico Preocupado un FP2 IVOOX UTP http://cutt.ly/dzhhGrf BLOG http://cutt.ly/dzhh2LX Ayúdame desde mi Crowfunding aquí https://cutt.ly/W0DsPVq Invitados ………………………………………………………………………………………. Enlaces citados en el podcast: AYUDA A TRAVÉS DE LA COMPRA DE MIS LIBROS https://tecnicopreocupado.com/2024/11/16/ayuda-a-traves-de-la-compra-de-mis-libros/ MIRANDO HACIA ATRÁS VI: ANTICIPÁNDONOS A HG WELLS CUARTA PARTE https://tecnicopreocupado.com/2020/01/31/mirando-hacia-atras-vi-anticipandonos-a-hg-wells-cuarta-parte/ LA PEDAGOGÍA WALDORF CREADA POR STEINER, LA NEW AGE Y EL LUCIFERANISMO https://tecnicopreocupado.com/2018/04/02/la-pedagogia-waldorf-creada-por-steiner-la-new-age-y-el-luciferanismo/ APRENDER DEL PASADO PARA VALERNOS EN EL FUTURO https://tecnicopreocupado.com/2014/05/17/aprender-del-pasado-para-valernos-en-el-futuro/ DESTRUCCIÓN DE LA FAMILIA Y LOS VALORES https://tecnicopreocupado.com/2018/07/10/destruccion-de-la-familia-y-los-valores/ DESTRUCCIÓN DE LA FAMILIA Y LOS VALORES. 2ª PARTE https://tecnicopreocupado.com/2019/01/14/destruccion-de-la-familia-y-los-valores-2a-parte/ ………………………………………………………………………………………. Música utilizada en este podcast: Tema inicial Heros Epílogo Mañana - Los Iberos https://youtu.be/uVa-Yi07ZYk?feature=shared

Adi Nester is an Assistant Professor of German and Jewish Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her first monograph, Unsettling Difference: Bible, Music Drama, and the Critique of German Jewish Identity, appeared with Cornell University Press. The book studies the discourse of Jewish difference in the first half of the twentieth century through its expressions in biblical-themed musical dramas, their literary sources, and the intellectual debates surrounding the works. Adi's research and teaching concentrate on the interrelations between music, literature, and philosophy in the German and German Jewish traditions. She has published essays on topics ranging from the music philosophies of Theodor Adorno and Vladimir Jankélévitch, the role of Wagner's music in Thomas Mann's literature, and the language philosophy of Walter Benjamin, to the treatment of memory culture in the poetry and social critical writings of contemporary German-Jewish activist Max Czollek. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Adi Nester is an Assistant Professor of German and Jewish Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her first monograph, Unsettling Difference: Bible, Music Drama, and the Critique of German Jewish Identity, appeared with Cornell University Press. The book studies the discourse of Jewish difference in the first half of the twentieth century through its expressions in biblical-themed musical dramas, their literary sources, and the intellectual debates surrounding the works. Adi's research and teaching concentrate on the interrelations between music, literature, and philosophy in the German and German Jewish traditions. She has published essays on topics ranging from the music philosophies of Theodor Adorno and Vladimir Jankélévitch, the role of Wagner's music in Thomas Mann's literature, and the language philosophy of Walter Benjamin, to the treatment of memory culture in the poetry and social critical writings of contemporary German-Jewish activist Max Czollek. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/german-studies

Adi Nester is an Assistant Professor of German and Jewish Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her first monograph, Unsettling Difference: Bible, Music Drama, and the Critique of German Jewish Identity, appeared with Cornell University Press. The book studies the discourse of Jewish difference in the first half of the twentieth century through its expressions in biblical-themed musical dramas, their literary sources, and the intellectual debates surrounding the works. Adi's research and teaching concentrate on the interrelations between music, literature, and philosophy in the German and German Jewish traditions. She has published essays on topics ranging from the music philosophies of Theodor Adorno and Vladimir Jankélévitch, the role of Wagner's music in Thomas Mann's literature, and the language philosophy of Walter Benjamin, to the treatment of memory culture in the poetry and social critical writings of contemporary German-Jewish activist Max Czollek. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/jewish-studies

Adi Nester is an Assistant Professor of German and Jewish Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her first monograph, Unsettling Difference: Bible, Music Drama, and the Critique of German Jewish Identity, appeared with Cornell University Press. The book studies the discourse of Jewish difference in the first half of the twentieth century through its expressions in biblical-themed musical dramas, their literary sources, and the intellectual debates surrounding the works. Adi's research and teaching concentrate on the interrelations between music, literature, and philosophy in the German and German Jewish traditions. She has published essays on topics ranging from the music philosophies of Theodor Adorno and Vladimir Jankélévitch, the role of Wagner's music in Thomas Mann's literature, and the language philosophy of Walter Benjamin, to the treatment of memory culture in the poetry and social critical writings of contemporary German-Jewish activist Max Czollek. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/performing-arts

Adi Nester is an Assistant Professor of German and Jewish Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her first monograph, Unsettling Difference: Bible, Music Drama, and the Critique of German Jewish Identity, appeared with Cornell University Press. The book studies the discourse of Jewish difference in the first half of the twentieth century through its expressions in biblical-themed musical dramas, their literary sources, and the intellectual debates surrounding the works. Adi's research and teaching concentrate on the interrelations between music, literature, and philosophy in the German and German Jewish traditions. She has published essays on topics ranging from the music philosophies of Theodor Adorno and Vladimir Jankélévitch, the role of Wagner's music in Thomas Mann's literature, and the language philosophy of Walter Benjamin, to the treatment of memory culture in the poetry and social critical writings of contemporary German-Jewish activist Max Czollek. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/religion

Send us a textThe philosopher Theodor Adorno lays a powerful groundwork for thinking ethically about animals! Find out more! 

The would-be composer and philosopher Theodor Adorno played classical piano and came up with influential studies of authoritarianism, antisemitism and propaganda. He also wrote about the experience of listening to a radio voice. Jacob Downs's Essay for Radio 3 reflects on his insights and how far they remain relevant in a time of headphone listening, smart speakers and AI voices. Dr Jacob Kingsbury Downs lectures in Music at the University of Oxford and is an honorary research fellow at the University of Sheffield. He also works as a musician and arranger working with composers including Erland Cooper and Anna Phoebe. He is a New Generation Thinker on the scheme run by the BBC and the Arts and Humanities Research Council to share academic research on radio. Producer: Kirsty McQuire

We discuss John's art, his dissertation, “Communication & Control”, his “Theses on Punk Rock”, and briefly his “Fifteen Suppositions”. We also discuss Alain Badiou, Gilles Deleuze, Theodor Adorno, Michael Pisaro, Jacob Taubes, Simone Weil, Georges Bataille, Sergii Bulgakov, David Bentley Hart, Jordan Daniel Wood, St. Isaac of Nineveh, Jean-Phillipe Rameau, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and more.

With NAPLES 1925: Adorno, Benjamin, and the Summer That Made Critical Theory (Yale University Press, tr. Shelley Frisch), Martin Mittelmeier traces the roots of the Frankfurt School in southern Italy. We talk about the epiphany on the lip of a volcano in Lanzerote that brought this book to life, the years he spent poring over Theodor Adorno's writing (and the temptation to mimic Adorno's style), how Walter Benjamin's principle of porosity arose from both the tuff stone & the way of living of Naples, and the challenge of evoking the Naples of a century ago and how it led to a theory of society. We get into Critical Theory's attempts at understanding populism and oligarchic takeovers and why Adorno is having A Moment in Germany, the fun of speculating about meetings among great thinkers — yeah, I get into George Orwell, Henry Miller, and Inside the Whale —, the utopian aspect of local life in Naples and Capri, the complexities of reputation and destiny, and whether Critical Theory can hold up during the hyper-internet era. We also discuss the difficulties of translation with critical theory's associative language, why I need to read Hernán Diaz' Trust, his new work about Thomas Mann working with Adorno on Doctor Faustus in Pacific Palisades (a.k.a. Weimar Under The Palm Trees), how he's changed in the decade-plus since writing the book, and more. • More info at our site • Support The Virtual Memories Show via Stripe, Patreon, or Paypal, and subscribe to our e-newsletter

In his new book, Dr. Carl Trueman writes, “The very rhetoric and concepts of critical theory, the other, intersectionality, and their like have become influential tools of wielding power rather than dismantling it. And so—as Frankfurt School members Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno themselves would no doubt point out—things have become their opposite; the liberator has become the tyrant, the tools of freedom have become the weapons of oppression.” Perhaps Goethe's Mephistopheles captures critical theory best when he uttered to Faust, “I am the spirit that negates.” Join me and Dr. Carl Trueman as we discuss the philosophy and the danger of critical theory in his new book To Change All Worlds: Critical Theory from Marx to Marcuse. Stay up-to-date with the latest episodes of the Evangelization & Culture Podcast biweekly on WordOnFire.org, on YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. You can get more content like this in the quarterly print journal of the Word on Fire Institute, Evangelization & Culture.

In this episode, we discuss Theodor Adorno's essay “Free Time”, in which the critical theorist really lets his cantankerous old man flag fly. He argues that how our subjectivities are shaped by capitalist culture and work discipline makes it very difficult—maybe even impossible—to use our time off the clock in genuinely meaningful ways. Certainly we waste a lot of our precious hours consuming pointless, artless slop and participating in activities just because we feel like we're supposed to, but is it really the case that everything we do is just unfree pseudo-activity, at best blowing off steam before helplessly getting back to work? We broadly come down on the side of low culture and hobbies, but Marvel movies and Disney adults are definitely cause for concern.References:Theodor Adorno, “Free Time”, trans. Gordon Finlayson and Nicholas Walker, in The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, ed. J.M. Bernstein (New York: Routledge, 2001).leftofphilosophy.com | @leftofphilmusic:“Vintage Memories” by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com“My Space” by Overu | https://get.slip.stream/KqmvAN

We are joined by philosopher and Marxist intellectual Gabriel Rockhill to discuss the relevance and importance of the recently translated work, Western Marxism (Monthly Review Press, 2024) by Domenico Losurdo. In this discussion, we analyze Losurdo's book with a focus on extracting the most seminal insights and lessons from the text. We discuss the various Western Marxist thinkers that are critiqued in the text, from Michel Foucault, Hannah Arendt, Max Horkheimer, to Theodor Adorno and others. We discuss how this text can promote a shift in the western Marxist left in today's time and why it is hitting a nerve. Learn more about Western Marxism by Losurdo please visit (https://monthlyreview.org/product/western-marxism/).  Dr. Gabriel Rockhill is the Founding Director of the Critical Theory Workshop / Atelier de Théorie Critique, Professor of Philosophy and Global Interdisciplinary Studies at Villanova University, and the author or editor of ten books, as well as numerous scholarly and general public articles. He is also the Associate Director of Cultural Studies at Villanova University, Research Associate at the Laboratoire d'anthropologie politique – LAP (EHESS, Paris), one of the editors-in-chief of the World Marxist Review, and co-editor of the book series AIM–Anti-Imperialist Marxism.

Capitalism is a revolutionary situation of the last stage of pre-history, and the potential and possibility for freedom, or else it is just what Hegel said history has always been: the slaughter-bench of everything good and virtuous humanity has ever achieved. Marxism defined itself as the critical self-consciousness of this task of socialism in capitalism, but this has been eclipsed by the mere moral condemnation of catastrophe. This happened as a result of Marxism's own failure, over a hundred years ago, to make good on the crisis. This pattern has repeated itself since then, in ever more obscure ways.  Chris Cutrone's Marxism and Politics: Essays on Critical Theory 2006-2024 (Sublation Media, 2024) span the time of the Millennial Left's abortive search to rediscover a true politics for socialism in the history of Marxism: the attempted recovery of a lost revolutionary tradition. Cutrone's participation as a teacher alongside this journey into the heart of Marxism was guided by the Millennial investigation into controversial and divisive figures such as Vladimir Lenin, Rosa Luxembourg, Leon Trotsky, Georg Lukacs, Theodor Adorno and the Frankfurt School, and Marx himself. The question of a political party for socialism loomed large--but was abandoned. Readers of these essays will find no taboo unchallenged, as every aspect of Marxism's accumulated wreckage is underwritten by the red thread and haunting memory of what was once the world-historical character of socialist revolution. Can this Marxist "message in a bottle" cast adrift by hisotry yet be received? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Zionism, and the project of ethnic cleansing and colonial settlement in historic Palestine, is often rightly compared to other projects of European colonialism. But in a recent essay for Parapraxis, my guest Jake Romm argues that Zionism not only has been influenced by the European imperial project, but that it has also been massively shaped by anti-semitism, and that in its recapitulation of anti-semitic stereotypes, and even anti-semitic practice, it makes sense to view Zionism as a species of anti-semitism itself. We talked about how Jake came to this view via Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno's The Dialectic of Enlightenment, why he thinks Zionism has always been bent on the destruction of the Palestinian people and could never be content with merely exploiting Palestinian labour. And we also talked about the extreme machismo of Israeli society, and how October 7th was experienced as an emasculating event. Finally, we talked about Israel's likely turn to a permanent occupation of Gaza - and the possibility of the creation of new Israeli settlements in the territory.

Like the serious academics they are, Hannah and Marcelle not only researched Disney in academic journals, they also went to the happiest place on earth! They made custom Theodor Adorno t-shirts, scooped Marcelle's eight-year-old and Gender Playground co-host, Raimi Marx, and wen on their way! In this bonus episode, they answer your questions about the experience. Sharing one mic, Raimi, Marcelle and Hannah talk about managing expectations, capitalism's hold on joy, the relationship between surrealist world-making and psychedelics and so much more! If you enjoy this episode, head over to Patreon.com/ohwitchplease for Part II! The rest of the conversation is available at all our tiers. For just $5 USD/month you'll have access to the rest of this conversation (including the story about Robbie — the Disney employee who made a bad day better), all the bonus perks we've already released, and Hannah's new video podcast, Making Worlds.And, if you enjoyed this episode, please share it with family and friends! Word-of-mouth is the primary way we reach new listeners who are interested in feminist materialist critique, pop culture and laughing at and from within *the discourse.* Share the show today!***Material Girls is a new show that aims to make sense of the zeitgeist through materialist critique* and critical theory! Each episode looks at a unique object of study (something popular now or from back in the day) and over the course of three distinct segments, Hannah and Marcelle apply their academic expertise to the topic at hand.We'll be back in one week for a regular episode!*Materialist Critique is, at its simplest possible level, a form of cultural critique – that is, scholarly engagement with a cultural text of some kind – that is interested in modes of production, moments of reception, and the historical and ideological contexts for both. Materialist critique is really interested in the question of why a particular cultural work or practice emerged at a particular moment. Music Credits:“Shopping Mall”: by Jay Arner and Jessica Delisle ©2020Used by permission. All rights reserved. As recorded by Auto Syndicate on the album “Bongo Dance”. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, Emily Bazelon and David Plotz are joined by The Atlantic's Franklin Foer to discuss Joe Biden's White House and The Last Politician; the war in Ukraine and the possible meeting of Kim Jong Un and Vladimir Putin; and Americans' views on the value of higher education. Join us for Political Gabfest Live in Madison, Wisconsin on October 25!   Here are some notes and references from this week's show: The Last Politician: Inside Joe Biden's White House and the Struggle for America's Future by Franklin Foer Seung Min Kim, Stephen Groves, and Farnoush Amiri for AP: “How Biden and McCarthy struck a debt limit deal and staved off a catastrophe” Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias: “This was Biden's core promise …” Jasmine Wright for CNN: “Kamala Harris found her voice on abortion rights in the year after Dobbs. Now she's making it central to her 2024 message” Imtiaz Tyab for CBS News: “Ukraine counteroffensive makes “notable” progress near Zaporizhzhia, but it's a grinding stalemate elsewhere” Paul Tough for The New York Times Magazine: “Americans Are Losing Faith in the Value of College. Whose Fault Is That?” Ramesh Ponnuru in The Washington Post: “How to restore intellectual diversity on college campuses  Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. in The Washington Post: “Could income-share agreements help solve the student debt crisis?” Bullshit Jobs: A Theory by David Graeber  Sarah Wood for U.S. News & World Report: “Paying for Meals at College: What to Know About Costs” Nine Black Robes: Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences by Joan Biskupic  Here are this week's chatters:  Emily: Richard Fausset and Danny Hakim for The New York Times: “Georgia Judge Says Two Defendants in Trump Case Will Get Early Trial Together” and Sam Gringlas for NPR: “In the Trump Georgia case, conflicting legal strategies complicate the path to trial” Frank: The Dan Patrick Show: “Does Messi Make MLS Appear Inferior?”; How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization by Franklin Foer; Essays on Music by Theodor Adorno; and On Late Style: Music and Literature Against the Grain by Edward W. Said  David: One Life: Frederick Douglass at the National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian, Washington, D.C.; Michel Martin for NPR's All Things Considered: “Picture This: Frederick Douglass Was The Most Photographed Man Of His Time”; and NPR: “'What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July?': Descendants Read Frederick Douglass' Speech” Listener chatter from Nicole Dorn: Jennifer Senior for The Atlantic: “The Ones We Sent Away”  For this week's Slate Plus bonus segment, Frank, Emily, and David discuss the writing of The Last Politician: Inside Joe Biden's White House and the Struggle for America's Future.  In the latest Gabfest Reads, Emily, David, and John talk with Barbara Kingsolver about her best-selling book, Demon Copperhead.    Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com or X us @SlateGabfest. (Messages may be quoted by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.)   Podcast production by Cheyna Roth  Research by Julie Huygen Hosts Franklin Foer, Emily Bazelon, and David Plotz   Follow @SlateGabfest on X / https://twitter.com/SlateGabfest Slate Gabfest on Facebook / https://www.facebook.com/Gabfest/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week, Emily Bazelon and David Plotz are joined by The Atlantic's Franklin Foer to discuss Joe Biden's White House and The Last Politician; the war in Ukraine and the possible meeting of Kim Jong Un and Vladimir Putin; and Americans' views on the value of higher education. Join us for Political Gabfest Live in Madison, Wisconsin on October 25!   Here are some notes and references from this week's show: The Last Politician: Inside Joe Biden's White House and the Struggle for America's Future by Franklin Foer Seung Min Kim, Stephen Groves, and Farnoush Amiri for AP: “How Biden and McCarthy struck a debt limit deal and staved off a catastrophe” Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias: “This was Biden's core promise …” Jasmine Wright for CNN: “Kamala Harris found her voice on abortion rights in the year after Dobbs. Now she's making it central to her 2024 message” Imtiaz Tyab for CBS News: “Ukraine counteroffensive makes “notable” progress near Zaporizhzhia, but it's a grinding stalemate elsewhere” Paul Tough for The New York Times Magazine: “Americans Are Losing Faith in the Value of College. Whose Fault Is That?” Ramesh Ponnuru in The Washington Post: “How to restore intellectual diversity on college campuses  Mitchell E. Daniels Jr. in The Washington Post: “Could income-share agreements help solve the student debt crisis?” Bullshit Jobs: A Theory by David Graeber  Sarah Wood for U.S. News & World Report: “Paying for Meals at College: What to Know About Costs” Nine Black Robes: Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences by Joan Biskupic  Here are this week's chatters:  Emily: Richard Fausset and Danny Hakim for The New York Times: “Georgia Judge Says Two Defendants in Trump Case Will Get Early Trial Together” and Sam Gringlas for NPR: “In the Trump Georgia case, conflicting legal strategies complicate the path to trial” Frank: The Dan Patrick Show: “Does Messi Make MLS Appear Inferior?”; How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization by Franklin Foer; Essays on Music by Theodor Adorno; and On Late Style: Music and Literature Against the Grain by Edward W. Said  David: One Life: Frederick Douglass at the National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian, Washington, D.C.; Michel Martin for NPR's All Things Considered: “Picture This: Frederick Douglass Was The Most Photographed Man Of His Time”; and NPR: “'What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July?': Descendants Read Frederick Douglass' Speech” Listener chatter from Nicole Dorn: Jennifer Senior for The Atlantic: “The Ones We Sent Away”  For this week's Slate Plus bonus segment, Frank, Emily, and David discuss the writing of The Last Politician: Inside Joe Biden's White House and the Struggle for America's Future.  In the latest Gabfest Reads, Emily, David, and John talk with Barbara Kingsolver about her best-selling book, Demon Copperhead.    Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com or X us @SlateGabfest. (Messages may be quoted by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.)   Podcast production by Cheyna Roth  Research by Julie Huygen Hosts Franklin Foer, Emily Bazelon, and David Plotz   Follow @SlateGabfest on X / https://twitter.com/SlateGabfest Slate Gabfest on Facebook / https://www.facebook.com/Gabfest/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices