Podcasts about nesc

Fresh off a Super 7 Nesc event at Mx207! Big weekend at Mx207 over Memorial Day Weekend alot of action packed weekend with a video that has gone viral on social media. Also hear about Travis's first regional on his road to Loretta Lynns.

Tehnologia schimbă în mod constant modul în care sunt construite produsele digitale, lansate afacerile și dezvoltate ideile. De la soluții scrise manual la platforme care automatizează procese întregi, dezvoltarea software devine tot mai accesibilă și mai rapidă.Această transformare afectează nu doar echipele tehnice, ci și modelul clasic de antreprenoriat. Startup-urile din zona tech joacă un rol esențial în definirea noilor standarde de inovație, eficiență și scalabilitate.Despre provocările și oportunitățile lumii tech de azi a vorbit Marian Hurducaș cu unul dintre antreprenorii tech reper ai României - invitat si la IQ Digital Summit Constanța -, Andrei Pitiș.Este un antreprenor cu exituri internaționale — precum cel de la Vector Watch, achiziționat de Fitbit / Google — și investitor cu peste 30 de ani de experiență în industria tech. E fondator și CEO @ Simple Capital, președinte al board-ului @ Pentest-Tools și Softbinator, advisor @ MultiversX și Bware Labs și co-fondator al Innovation Labs.Andrei Pitiș este și fondatorul și CEO-ul Genezio, startup românesc lansat în 2023 care ofera o soluție completă pentru testarea agenților AI generativi, precum chatbot-urile. Ajută, astfel, echipele să lanseze și să mențină produse fiabile și sigure. Platforma simulează scenarii reale și ruleaza teste automate sau manuale pentru a verifica performanța, corectitudinea și securitatea, atât înainte de lansare, cât și pe tot parcursul ciclului lor de viața. Integrarea ușoara și rapoartele detaliate oferă vizibilitate și control deplin asupra calității.

Ben Tackett Show Notes  TITLE:  Lunar Landings & Late-Night Shifts: Ben Tackett from Firefly Aerospace on Blue Ghost Mission 1” This week on Casual Space, it's one small step for your playlist — one giant landing for a Blue Ghost…this episode delivers big on space, story, and spirit! Beth is joined by Ben Tackett, Lead Systems Operator at Firefly Aerospace, to relive the extraordinary journey that took him from Purdue classrooms to helping land a spacecraft on the Moon. Ben shares how his early love of aerospace evolved into a hands-on career that's shaping the future of space exploration. From collaborating with Buzz Aldrin on a Mars colonization project, to working the operations console for Blue Ghost Mission 1, Ben gives us a raw and real look at what it takes to bring a mission like this to life.  In this episode, you'll hear about: The long nights, tight timelines, and 500+ hours of simulations that made history possible Real-time moments of awe: lunar images streaming in after touchdown The behind-the-scenes grit of small teams doing big things Why parking lot champagne tastes better after a lunar landing And what's next with Blue Ghost Mission 2, featuring payloads from the European Space Agency and a radio telescope bound for the far side of the Moon Ben's story is one of curiosity, commitment, and cosmic-scale inspiration — a reminder that behind every successful mission is a team of passionate people pushing past limits. This episode captures not just the technical triumph, but the human heartbeat of spaceflight.  Don't miss this inside look at a truly historic mission — and a glimpse of what's just over the horizon.   #CasualSpacePodcast #BlueGhostMission1 #FireflyAerospace #MoonLanding Credit/copyright for photo/video footage: Firefly Aerospace     About Ben Tackett: Ben is the lead systems operator for the Blue Ghost lunar program at Firefly Aerospace, current commercial New Space systems engineer , and a prior NASA hypersonic flight mechanics engineer.  For Blue Ghost, Ben maintains the technical "big picture" of the program and ensures that the sub-systems required to make a successful spacecraft work together towards a successful mission program. In addition to Blue Ghost, Ben has been a part of the Mars Sample Return initiative as Lead Flight Mechanics Engineer for development of the Earth Entry Vehicle, supported Aerocapture and Aerogravity-Assist initiatives, and completed multiple Verification & Validation efforts for the Artemis program with the NESC. Ben completed his education at Purdue University, focusing on hypersonic mission design, re-entry trajectory guidance and optimization, and aerospace systems engineering publishing a thesis on real-time trajectory optimization for onboard optimal control. If you enjoyed this episode and would like to share, I'd love to hear it!  YOU CAN HELP US SEND STORIES TO SPACE!  Please visit our GoFundMe campaign and help send more stories to space!  https://gofund.me/62f1ff87  Follow Casual Space Podcast and share your favorite episode: LinkedIn - @casualspacepodcast Facebook - @casualspacepodcast Instagram - @casualspacepodcast YouTube - @casualspacepodcast83 Got a great guest suggestion or idea for the show? E-mail me at beth@casualspacepodcast.com. Send your story to space TODAY! The window for STORIES of Space MISSION 03 AND MISSION 04 are NOW OPEN! Send your story, for free, to www.storiesofspace.com  

Weege, Rarick and Matthes talk about the Southwick national in 1995 that saw Honda teammates Samson and Henry go at it in 125's, the Mike's battle it out in 250's, Bernarndo has no shirt, NESC legend Mike Treadwell joins them as well to talk about his career best 6th OA! Go to https://www.foxracing.com/pulp-mx.html for some deals from Fox Racing

Weege and privateer hero Travis Delnicki talk about Travis's path into media, Foxboro SX preview, NESC talk and then we dive into 2026 silly season.

Juntas de Acción Comunal al servicio de PetroEl partido Liberal presentará proyecto de Ley para lograr su propia reforma laboral Graves disturbios en Bogotá por los indígenas que están en la Plaza de Bolívar Qué decían de la compra de los aviones Gripen. Parece que mejor eran los F16El ELN sigue secuestrando y matando. ¿Qué pasó con los diálogos de “paz”?El Ejército se retira de El Plateado CaucaEl gerente del Banco de la República, Leonardo Villar, respondió a las críticas del presidente Gustavo PetroFNA espera prestar dinero para educaciónEscándalo en la JEPNueva EPS en más problemas

Fresh off the first NESC race of 2025. Nick and Travis talk about their day at Southwick and stay tuned later into the episode to hear about Travis tell an unforunate story about his love life. 

The first of the Nature Restoration forums began this week, we hosted a panel hearing about some of the concerns of those involved. On the panel was Dr Aoibhinn Ni Suilleabhain, Vincent Roddy is President of the INHFA, Niamh Garvey is from NESC,Caroline Bocquel CEO of Bord Iascaigh Mhara and Dr Jimmy O'Keeffe from Natural Capital Ireland.

First show of 2025. 6 days out of the first NESC race of the year. Nick and Travis talk about their preason and are join by Tyler Holmes to talk about the changes coming to nesc in 2025 and more

MG - Daniel Șandru (preşedinte al Institutului de Investigare a Crimelor Comunismului şi Memoria Exilului Românesc) și Cosmin Popa (istoric)

FRAȚII VICOL ȘI DORIAN POPA SPUN POVESTEA MADE BY SOCIETY: UN BRAND ROMÂNESC PE SCENA INTERNAȚIONALĂ

Aradul Matinal este o emisiune de informații matinale pentru minți matinale servite în eter și-n online de Basil Mureșan și Mihai Molnar. Cel mai provincial morning show!Ne auzim în fiecare dimineață, de Luni până Vineri, de la 07:00 la 11:00 pe 99,1FM sau online pe ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://live.radioarad.ro⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Aradul Matinal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠este cel mai provincial morning show! 99,1 FM

În 2021 spuneau că își doresc să facă aplicații care să ajungă la ”one billion dollars business”, după ce, în 2019, luaseră aproape 500.000 de euro investiție pentru o aplicație dedicată cititorilor. Trei ani și mai multe pivotări mai târziu, Laurențiu Bălașa și Marius Iordache lucrează la dezvoltarea Bible Chat, una dintre aplicațiile europene cu cea mai rapidă creștere, care până acum a atras de la investitori câteva milioane de dolari. Ar putea fi următorul unicorn român.

România are câțiva tineri triatloniști care vor putea ajunge în viitor la Jocurile Olimpice. Este cazul lui Simon Vic-Vuillet, un român de 14 ani care este și cetățean francez, și care vrea să meargă pe urmele lui Felix Duchampt, francezul naturalizat ce a reprezentat România la ultimele două ediții ale Jocurilor Olimpice. Amalia Singuran este și ea o mare speranță a triatlonului din România.

Canotajul a fost sportul care și-a adus contribuția din plin, de-a lungul timpului, la succesul olimpic românesc.  La jocurile de la Paris, canotajul a obținut 5 medalii, 2 de aur, și 3 de argint. La gala “110 ani de olimpism în România”, Tudor Furdui a stat de vorbă cu Ancuța Bodnar, Amalia Bereș, Andrei Florin Cornea și Marian Enache, toți canotori premiați cu aur la Paris.

Cele mai importante știri ale zilei, alese de Recorder și grupate într-un newsletter audio. În fiecare seară, de luni până vineri.

In dieser Podcast-Episode sprechen die Mentorinnen der NESC Ausbildung über die langfristigen Effekte der Nervensystemarbeit und wie diese ihr Leben auch nach Abschluss der Ausbildung weiterhin positiv beeinflusst. Schon während der Ausbildung erleben viele Teilnehmer:innen tiefgreifende Veränderungen, doch die größten Fortschritte zeigen sich oft erst Monate oder sogar Jahre später. Im Interview teilen die Mentorinnen ihre persönlichen Erfahrungen darüber, wie tief die Arbeit mit dem Nervensystem geht und wie sie sich über die Jahre weiterentwickelt haben. Sie geben wertvolle Einblicke in ihre täglichen Routinen, die ihnen helfen, dauerhaft mit ihrem Nervensystem in Verbindung zu bleiben und teilen die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse zur Arbeit mit dem Nervensystem, die sie im Laufe der Zeit gelernt haben. Außerdem erzählen sie, was die NESC Ausbildung für sie so besonders macht und welche Aspekte sie am meisten schätzen und berichten von ihren schönsten Momenten in der Begleitung von Kund:innen und deren Heilungsprozessen. Alles Liebe und viel Spaß beim Anhören, Britta     MEHR ÜBER DIE NESC MENTORINNEN Isabella Bombik: Website | Instagram Larissa Schmidt: Website | Instagram Marlene Kölln: Website | Instagram Nina Fischer: Website | Instagram Sylwia Lehmann: Website | Instagram     ERGÄNZENDE LINKS Podcast-Episode 272: Warum somatische Übungen das Nervensystem nicht automatisch regulieren Podcast-Episode 255: Innere Heilung - Wie lange dauert die Regulation des Nervensystems? NeuroEmbodiment Online-Retreat ➔ zur Anmeldung NeuroEmbodied Soul Centering® (NESC) Coaching-Ausbildung: https://www.nesc-coaching.com/coaching-ausbildung/ 3-teiliges Video-Training: Die Neurobiologie echter Transformation: https://www.nesc-coaching.com/video-training   BEWERTE DEN PODCAST Ich würde mich riesig freuen, wenn du den Podcast auf iTunes bewertest und eine Rezension hinterlässt. Das hilft, dass der Podcast von Anderen noch leichter gefunden werden kann und dass noch mehr Leute Zugang zu den Themen bekommen. Vielen Dank schon mal dafür!

Youni, un startup românesc activ în domeniul educației, a primit o investiție în valoare de 1 milion de dolari. Fondul de investiții Early Game Ventures s-a alăturat noii runde de investiții finalizate recent de Youni. Cu runda actuală, investițiile în Youni se ridică la valoare de 2,3 milioane de dolari. Oana Coșman a discutat cu fondatorii companiei despre planurile lor de dezvoltare și despre cum ajută tinerii să meargă la facultăți în străinătate.

With Ireland facing a severe housing shortage and mounting pressure to meet climate targets, a new report from the National Economic and Social Council highlights ‘Modern Methods of Construction (MMC)' as a potential solution. We discuss this with Daithi Downey, Policy Analyst there at NESC.

With Ireland facing a severe housing shortage and mounting pressure to meet climate targets, a new report from the National Economic and Social Council highlights ‘Modern Methods of Construction (MMC)' as a potential solution. We discuss this with Daithi Downey, Policy Analyst there at NESC.

Prieteni, Vorbitorincii LEADERS îl are invitat pe Florin Talpeș, cofondatorul Bitdefender, apariție rară în peisajul media și unul dintre cei mai puternici oameni din IT-ul românesc. Stăm de vorbă despre siguranța noastră cibernetică și Dark Web, despre inteligența artificială și job-urile noastre, ce-ar trebui să facem noi, ca indivizi și societate.    02:30 Bitdefender s-a născut în România 04:09 Parteneriat cu Ferrari 09:54 Atacuri cibernetice 14:44 Încrederea nu se construiește cu promisiuni 26:47 Noul val de AI 38:56 AI-ul ne amenință locurile de muncă? 55:48 Este o industrie în care nu contează unde ești 1:07:13 Mr. T 1:22:38 Platforma Pipera 1:37:31 Listarea la Bursă 1:44:24 Campion, alături de soție, la Dans Sportiv Senior 1:57:53 Atuurile României 2:06:34 Ce ne lipsește 2:14:30 Sprijin pentru oamenii de viitor ai României 2:22:02 Știm toți candidații la președinție?    

Patru râuri din România au secat, câte mai sunt în pericol? Climatolog: Trebuie să fim conștienți cât de prețioasă a devenit apa (Europa Liberă) - Comisia Europeană avertizează din nou România cu privire la gaura bugetară: „Situația fiscală s-a deteriorat brusc”. Economist: nu mai este de ajuns majorarea TVA (Libertatea) - Prin ce trec bolnavii de Alzheimer și îngrijitorii din România, țara unde te bazezi pe sfaturi de la cunoștințe (PressOne) „Am ajuns să ne furăm apa unul de la altul” - Seceta a băgat satul românesc în sapă de lemn, iar țăranii sunt pe culmile disperării (Adevărul)Seceta a făcut ravagii, în această vară, în România. Conform datelor oficiale alimentarea cu apă este asigurată cu restricții în peste 658 de localități. Cele mai afectate de lipsa apei sunt județele Botoșani, Vaslui, Iași și Vrancea. Județul Botoșani a fost timp de secole un adevărat grânar al Moldovei, cu pământuri fertile și soiuri unicat de grâu. Comunități întregi trăiesc exclusiv din ceea ce le oferă pământul și animalelor domestice. Seceta de anul acesta a fost un adevărat cataclism pentru ”Bărăganul Moldovei„. Sate întregi sunt cuprinse efectiv de cea mai cruntă disperare. Soarele a pârjolit totul, începând din luna mai, pășuni, ogoare, totul. În cele mai multe sate, fântânile au secat cu totul.„Din 40 de fântâni bune, mai sunt două. Mă uit cum iese mâlul din găleată și plâng câte o oră. Mă trezesc noaptea și visez că a venit apa în fântână. Familia mea trăiește numai din laptele pe care-l dau la colectare. Murim cu zile dacă nu avem cu ce adăpa animalele”, spune un sătean din comuna Blândești, una dintre cele mai afectate de secetă. Un altul, din Gorbănești, venit cu o căruță plină cu butoaie, se oprește în fața unui puț din mijlocul câmpului efectiv ars de soare. „Nu are apă”, spune disperat. Se uită apoi către pășuni. Aproape izbucnește în lacrimi. „Este pârjolit totul, îi moarte, gata”.Situația apei este atât de gravă încât oamenii au ajuns să umble nopțile, kilometrii întregi, cu căruțele, căutând să ”fure” apă de la fântânile din alte comune.Reportajul integral în Adevărul. Patru râuri din România au secat, câte mai sunt în pericol? Climatolog: Trebuie să fim conștienți cât de prețioasă a devenit apa (Europa Liberă)Patru râuri importante din România au secat într-un interval de aproximativ o zi. Un raport al Apelor Române obținut de Europa Liberă arată că alte 37 de râuri sunt în pericol să sece. Nu este exclus ca și alte ape curgătoare, care nu sunt monitorizate, să fie secate deja. O cauză este vara anului 2024, care ar putea fi declarată cea mai caldă din înregistrări.Cercetătoarea Roxana Bojariu, coordonatoarea Secției de climatologie de la Administrația Națională de Meteorologie (ANM), spune că secarea celor patru râuri vine pe fondul unei „reduceri cronice de resurse de apă din sol”, la care se adaugă „o exploatare a pânzei de apă freatică mai intensă”.„Oamenii au încercat să suplinească lipsa de precipitații și au mers cu extragerea apei din pânza freatică într-un ritm mult mai intens. Toate lucrurile astea au contribuit la acest fenomen”, afirmă ea.Probleme cu seceta au și țările vecine României, după cum relatează birourile RFE/RL din Republica Moldova și Bulgaria.Cascada Saharna, una dintre atracțiile turistice din Moldova, s-a oprit din cauza secetei, în timp ce debitul cascadei Țipova a scăzut considerabil. Apa va reveni la toamnă, când va ploua, spun specialiștii de la Chișinău. Comisia Europeană avertizează din nou România cu privire la gaura bugetară: „Situația fiscală s-a deteriorat brusc”. Economist: nu mai este de ajuns majorarea TVA (Libertatea)Situația fiscală a României „s-a deteriorat brusc în 2023”, iar în acest an, Comisia Europeană estimează o nouă creștere a deficitului bugetar, astfel că Executivul european intenționează să propună o „intensificare a procedurii de deficit excesiv”, arată Comisia Europeană, pentru Libertatea.Economiștii consultați de ziar avertizează că România riscă amenzi, suspendarea acordării de fonduri europene, iar situația poate merge până la forțarea Guvernului de a majora două taxe majore, respectiv TVA și impozitul pe venit.Deficitul bugetar reprezintă diferența între veniturile și cheltuielile statului. România se află în procedură de deficit excesiv, iar până în data de 20 septembrie trebuie să trimită la Bruxelles un plan de măsuri pentru echilibrarea situației bugetare. Prin ce trec bolnavii de Alzheimer și îngrijitorii din România, țara unde te bazezi pe sfaturi de la cunoștințe (PressOne)Nu știu care e frigiderul. Nu știu cu ce să mă îmbrac. Nu știu unde e baia. Nu știu ce mă doare exact. Uneori nu știu ce nu știu.Conform celor mai recente estimări ale Alzheimer Europe, în 2018, 1,43% din populația României (peste 279 de mii de persoane) suferea de Alzheimer, iar evaluările arată că numărul bolnavilor s-ar putea dubla, în preajma anului 2050. Potrivit Societății Române de Alzheimer, în 2021, numărul global de ore de îngrijire informală oferită pacienților care locuiesc acasă a fost echivalent cu munca a peste 67 de milioane de lucrători cu normă întreagă.70% dintre îngrijitori sunt femei. OMS a lansat un plan global de acțiune pentru 2017-2025, care recomandă statelor să dezvolte strategii naționale coordonate pentru abordarea problemei și sisteme de susținere pentru persoanele care se ocupă de asta: programe  de instruire, resurse accesibile, prevenirea burnout-ului, crearea unor grupuri care să îi ajute și cu care să se consulte și integrarea pacienților în comunitate pentru a-i menține activi.În ciuda directivelor OMS, România încă nu are o strategie națională specifică de prevenție implementată corespunzător, scrie PressOne.

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/military-history

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/world-affairs

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/american-studies

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Waging and winning a nuclear war have been called “thinking about the unthinkable” but that's exactly what Edward Kaplan and I discussed in our interview about his recent book, The End of Victory: Prevailing in the Thermonuclear Age (Cornell UP, 2022). The current Dean of the School of Strategic Landpower at the US Army War College, Kaplan recounts the costs of failure in nuclear war through the work of the most secret deliberative body of the National Security Council, the Net Evaluation Subcommittee (NESC). From 1953 onward, US leaders wanted to know as precisely as possible what would happen if they failed in a nuclear war―how many Americans would die and how much of the country would remain. The NESC told Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy what would be the result of the worst failure of American strategy―a maximum-effort surprise Soviet nuclear assault on the United States. Kaplan details how NESC studies provided key information for presidential decisions on the objectives of a war with the USSR and on the size and shape of the US military. The subcommittee delivered its annual reports in a decade marked by crises in Berlin, Quemoy and Matsu, Laos, and Cuba, among others. During these critical moments and day-to-day containment of the USSR, the NESC's reports offered the best estimates of the butcher's bill of conflict and of how to reduce the cost in American lives. Taken with the intelligence community's assessment of the probability of a surprise attack, the NESC's work framed the risks of US strategy in the chilliest years of the Cold War. The End of Victory reveals how all policy decisions run risks―and ones involving military force run grave ones―though they can rarely be known with precision. Andrew O. Pace is a historian of the US in the world who specializes in the moral fog of war. He is currently a DPAA Research Partner Fellow at the University of Southern Mississippi and a co-host of the Diplomatic History Channel on the New Books Network. He is also working on a book about the reversal in US grand strategy from victory at all costs in World War II to peace at any price in the Vietnam War. He can be reached at andrew.pace@usm.edu or via andrewopace.com. Andrew is not an employee of DPAA, he supports DPAA through a partnership. The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DPAA, DoD or its components. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day

Calificată pentru prima dată la cea mai mare competiție sportivă din lume, luptătoarea Cătălina Axente a muncit enorm ca să prindă biletul pentru Paris. Într-un interviu realizat de Tudor Furdui, sportiva povestește cum a învins-o pe franțuzoaica Pauline Lecarpentier la Campionatele Mondiale de la Istanbul, cum s-a apucat de lupte și cum s-a schimbat acest sport de-a lungul anilor.

 Viktor Orban l-a rugat pe președintele Volodimir Zelensky să ia în considerare un armistițiu pentru o perioadă de timp prestabilită, care ar oferi posibilitatea de a accelera discuțiile de pace, relatează publicația maghiară Telex.hu. Viktor Orban a mers în vizită la Kiev pentru prima dată la atacul Rusiei asupra Ucrainei pentru a discuta despre soluții de pace și relațiile bilaterale. Unul din subiectele utilizat de Rusia pentru propagandă anti-ucraineană este reprezentat de drepturile minorităților.

Discutăm cu doamna Elena Marin, cofondatoare a organizației non-profit American Romanian Cultural Society și cu doamna Iulia Rugină, cofondator al asociației culturale Control N, despre Festivalul de film de la Seattle (1-3 noiembrie a.c.) 

Fresh off a double day at mx207 for NESC. Travis and Jack take on the North East Regional Loretta Lynn qualfier, Hear all about it and more!

Recent canalul TV BBC Four a difuzat primul serial românesc Spy/Master, inspirat din povestea generalului de Securitate Ion Mihai Pacepa, consilierul lui Nicolae Ceaușescu, a dezertat în 1978, refugiindu-se în Statele Unite. Co-scenarista serialului, Adina Sădeanu, a acordat un interviu în exclusivitate la RFI România.

First race ever NESC at 508 International. We welcome Jack back to the show. Hear what the guys have to say about the day and more

Nu avem o ediție obișnuită de Upgrade 100 Live Talks, ci una de Digitalination cealaltă producție a noastră - o realizăm împreună cu Aspen Institute România, și al cărei moderator cu normă întreagă este colegul Radu Puchiu, expert e-guvernare.  Deși suntem ultimii din Europa la digitalizare, vestea aparent bună ar fi că avem un Plan Național de acțiune privind deceniul digital. Ce cuprinde el, cum reușim să recuperăm decalajele și să ne atingem țintele pentru 2030?  Vei afla din această ediție de la Mirela Mărcuț, Head of Policy @ Transilvania IT Cluster dar și fondatoarea digitalpolicy.ro.  Mirela Mărcuț este și lector universitar doctor la Departamentul de Relații Internaționale și Studii Europene al Universității din Oradea, unde predă discipline legate despre influența Internetului și a tehnologiilor digitale în relațiile internaționale și politici digitale.  În 2015, a obținut titlul de doctor în relații internaționale și studii europene la Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai din Cluj Napoca, iar din 2016 activează în domeniul academic.  Cercetările sale se axează pe politici digitale și guvernanță cu accent pe Uniunea Europeană. În 2017, a obținut bursa Henri Rieben a Fundației Jean Monnet pentru Europa pentru a cerceta începuturile societății informaționale în Europa în arhivele lui Jacques Delors.  De asemenea, în 2020 a obținut o bursă DAAD de cercetare postdoctorală pentru a cerceta guvernanța orașelor inteligente din Germania.  Timpul liber și-l dedică articolelor de pe digitalpolicy.ro, unde traduce politicile digitale pe înțelesul tuturor.

După ceva timp, revine în muzică o trupă apărută pe final de anii '80, la Timișoara, un reper în istoria rock-ului românesc, pionierii genului psihedelic din România. Survolaj a inovat prin fuziunea de genuri, experimentând cu elemente de hard rock cu progresiv sau influențe jazz, pentru un sunet ce a devenit emblematic. Levi Molnar de la Survolaj, invitat în emisiunea RFI360. În august 2023, Survolaj revenea pe scenă și surprindea publicul printr-un concert acustic la Faber, în Timișoara, inclus în cadrul evenimentului „Remembering Oscar – „Totul e regie, bătrâne!”, dedicat împlinirii a 10 ani de la moartea lui Oscar Berger, fost regizor, cineast, director al ziarului Timișoara și unul dintre jurnaliștii implicați în transformarea post-revoluționară a României. Cred că surpriza a fost mai mare pentru ei, constatând că publicul îi dorește încă pe scenă, după atata timp de pauză. De atunci, cei patru, merg cu muzica lor acolo unde sunt ceruți iar cuvântul 'revenire' este deja depășit. Pare că Survolaj nu a lipsit de pe scena niciodată.„Ei nu mai cântau... Ei erau muzica... Tot corpul lor cânta, tot corpul lor era într-o stare de creaţie, toată fiinţa lor, şi sufletul, şi mintea, şi fiecare celulă din trup.” (Florian Pittiș 1990) 

Travis, Nick and Jack attend The Northeast Vet Championship at Southwick, talk about that race and also NESC at central and WSP Halloween race.

Episode 135- BY & Motts are back with a fresh mailbag episode for you this week. Prior to reading and reacting to your questions & stories the guys chat about the Hold The Line game that BY played in this week. Then the guys dip into the mailbag and cover all of your questions including: Size as a defenseman House hockey versus club A New England Sports Center observation Men's league goalies + more! BY & Motts wrap up the show answering the My Hockey Rankings question of the week.  Thank you for listening! Please rate, review, and subscribe! If you're interested in sponsoring the show, please reach out to us by email or DM us on Instagram! Leave us a voicemail: 347-6-SHRINK Email: RinkShrinks@gmail.com Instagram: @TheRinkShrinks Twitter: @RinkShrinks Website: www.therinkshrinks.com Today's Episode Was Sponsored By: Sparx Hockey TSR Hockey Franklin Sports My Hockey Rankings

Couple weeks off but the guys are back! Nick took a trip to washougal, Jack shows face at Nesc again, Travis is BACK...? Cory has some struggles tune in the hear all about it!

Episode 32 finaling some better audio! NESC spring series round 9 Crow Hill Mx the guys break down the weekend and more!

NASA Engineering and Safety Center Director Tim Wilson discusses the NESC's contributions to NASA mission success.

NASA Engineering and Safety Center Director Tim Wilson discusses the NESC's contributions to NASA mission success.

NASA Engineering and Safety Center Director Tim Wilson discusses the NESC's contributions to NASA mission success.

NASA Engineering and Safety Center Director Tim Wilson discusses the NESC's contributions to NASA mission success.

Mike Allen, Focus Ireland, discusses the latest NESC proposals for tax treatment of landlords.