Podcast appearances and mentions of Andrew Maynard

Konflikt synar vad som hände den 17 september när personsökare exploderade över hela Libanon. Hur gick det till när sprängmedel hamnade i de små apparaterna och vad säger det om framtidens krigföring? Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. Medverkande: Alican Kiraz, cybersäkerhets- och techexpert, Håkon Høydal, journalist på norska dagstidning VG, Martin Bernsen, presstalesperson på norska säkerhetspolisen PST, Jihane Sfeir, historiker och Libanonexpert vid det fria universitetet i Bryssel, Philip Ingram, tidigare underrättelseofficer, numera kommentator om underrättelse- och säkerhetsfrågor i Storbritannien, Brian Green, expert på teknik kopplat till etik på Santa Clara University, Andrew Maynard, professor på avancerad teknologiomställning, på Arizona State University mflProgramledare: Fernando Ariasfernando.arias@sr.seReportrar: Lina Malers och Esfar AhmadTekniker: Tor SigvardssonProducent: Anja Sahlberganja.sahlberg@sr.se

Send us a textEver wondered how architecture can be more than just buildings? Join us as we chat with Kevin Hui of Archimarathon, an architecture tour curator, educator, YouTuber and social media savant. Kevin shares his inspiring journey from creating architecture running tours to collaborating with Andrew Maynard on a YouTube channel, especially during the pandemic. Get ready to explore the critical issue of Melbourne's declining studio culture and discover Kevin's innovative co-working studio space designed to revive camaraderie and bridge the gap between academic learning and real-world practice.Kevin and our hosts dive into the necessity of making architecture communication accessible to a broader audience. Learn the benefits of fostering open and relatable dialogues about architecture, which help students and enthusiasts alike to appreciate the human side of acclaimed architects. This episode is packed with insights on how to make complex architectural ideas more relatable and engaging for everyone.From spontaneous, humor-infused architecture tours to the discrepancies between architectural photography and real-life experiences, we cover it all. Kevin takes us behind the scenes on the logistics of running dynamic architecture tours that blend infotainment with education. We also discuss the evolving methods of teaching architecture, the irreplaceable value of experiencing architecture in person, and the importance of genuine interactions in digital content creation. Tune in for an episode brimming with authenticity, education, and a fresh perspective on architecture.If you are interested in joining one of the acclaimed Archimarathon tours you can find out more at, https://www.archimarathon.com/, or check out their amazing YouTube series at, https://www.youtube.com/c/archimarathon.Episode Chapters:0:00 - Reviving Architecture Studio Culture12:48 - Improving Architecture Communication Accessibility18:11 - Architectural Tours28:57 - Exploring Discrepancies in Architecture Perception40:21 - Modern Education Critique and Collaboration55:57 - InterviewsFollow us on @designpriciplespod on Instagram.If you wish to contact us hit our DMs or email us on info@designprinciplespod.com

AMSE Science Report with Andrew Maynard

This episode takes a retrospective review on 2023 and one of the most transformative technologies of our time - generative AI. Our panel of experts, including Punya Mishra, Sean Leahy, Rachna Mathur, and Kellie Kreiser, explores the impact of AI on various fields and reflects on personal experiences with this transformative technology. From academic conferences to real-life applications and philosophical musings, this discussion is a must-listen for anyone interested in the intersection of AI, education, and daily life.What does this all mean - and where is it going?Key Episode Highlights include: Introduction to the Panel: A warm welcome to our esteemed guests Punya Mishra, Sean Leahy, Rachna Mathur, and Kellie Kreiser.The Evolution of AI in Education: The panel debates how AI is becoming a normalized tool in education, shedding light on its rapid integration into lesson planning and its potential to democratize knowledge.Generational Divide in AI Perception: Discussions pivot to the varying levels of comfort and skepticism towards AI among different generations, noting a split between enthusiasts and skeptics.AI's Impact Over the Past Year: The conversation moves towards the significant advancements in generative AI in 2023, from AI-generated music to multimodal platforms combining text and imagery.AI in Family Life: Sean shares how AI has become part of his family's routine, especially with his children, reflecting on the immediacy with which younger generations have adopted and adapted to AI.Closing Thoughts: The episode concludes with a reflection on the speed of AI's development and its implications for the future, both in education and beyond. Shared Links: Me|We Exhibit!  Graduate students showcase shows AI as a tool for learning, creating | ASU Enterprise TechnologyAndrew Maynard's Substack - The Future of Being Human - https://futureofbeinghuman.comArtificial Intelligence, Responsible Innovation, and the Future of Humanity with Andrew Maynard 

Source

Americans have intimate relationships with their cellphones. A recent report found 89% of Americans say they check their phones within the first 10 minutes of waking up, and 60% sleep with their phone at night. And during the day, nearly one-third of American adults reported being online "almost constantly" in 2021, up from 21% in 2015. "I remember being attached to [my phone] and when I was texting my girlfriend, I remember the screen just kind of came alive," said Jose Briones, an advocate of digital minimalism. "I get this rush of, 'Wow, like, somebody cares about me.' And I put a lot of my value not on the person necessarily or the notification that I got, but also on the phone, because the phone is the medium through which I receive this amazing, loving text." But its not just phones holding our gaze. Watches, doorbells, even many refrigerators are now "smart." Partly in response to how ubiquitous this technology has become in the fabric of modern life, Joe Hollier co-founded Light, a company that sells minimalist cellphones. "There's no social media, no infinite feed of any kind, clickbait news, and there's no email," Hollier told Under the Radar. "So, really all of the things the phone does — calling, texting, setting an alarm — are just really utilitarian based. And the idea is that you're not pulling out the phone. So, we like to say it's a phone designed to be used as little as possible, because it's about the time and the space that it gives you to not be staring at a screen." Hollier is one of a number of Americans attempting to separate themselves from the seemingly inescapable reach of technology. These digital minimalists are willing to change their habits to go back to a simpler, less technology-centered lifestyle. "We can decide how much technology we embrace, how we embrace it, and how we really find the value in our life," said Andrew Maynard, professor of advanced technology transitions at Arizona State University. "My camera is a fully manual camera and I get joy and pleasure out of that. ... That's a choice I make. And I think a lot of people forget that they can make these decisions for themselves, how much or how little technology they have in their lives. Of course, the difficulty is when we've got tech companies trying to push it down our throats, sometimes it's difficult to pull back from that." GUESTS Joe Hollier, co-founder of Light, a company that sells minimalist cellphones Jose Briones, digital minimalism YouTuber and advocate, moderator of the subreddit, “r/dumbphones” Andrew Maynard, professor of advanced technology transitions at Arizona State University

In the latest Jaguar Enthusiast Podcast, Wayne catches up with Andrew Maynard, owner of the very first Jaguar XJR15, known at the time as R9R. He talks us through how he came to buy the car and also what it is like to live with an XJR15.

How does the science of today lead us into the future we've imagined? To find out, Dr. Charles Liu and co-host Allen Liu welcome scientist, futurist and podcaster Andrew Maynard, PhD from Arizona State University. Dr. Maynard's career has taken him from physicist to futurist, with sojourns in risk analysis, nanotechnology, synthetic biology, artificial intelligence, and of course, science communication.    To begin, we travel back to Andrew's early days studying aerosol physics, using electron microscopy to analyze minute airborne particles… like asbestos fibers. And, given the pandemic we've all been living through, it's not surprising that Chuck, Allen and Andrew end up discussing the airborne particle on everyone's mind these days: the COVID-19 virus. You'll find out exactly how big nanoparticles are: 10,000 times thinner than a human hair!   Andrew is also a futurist, and we slide right into a discussion of nanobots, and why man-made mechanical nanobots are unlikely – the physics just don't work at this scale – but biological molecules that behave like microscopic machines are at work right now inside each and every one of us.    Our first question comes from Stacey Severn, who is the Community Manager for The LIUniverse and a serious science fiction fan. She asks, “How plausible is it for the nanites described in “Star Trek: They Next Generation” to become real? Andrew relates the story of scientist Eric Drexler, who wrote a book called “Engines of Nature” that speculated on the possibility of creating nanites. Unfortunately, physics at the nano scale works very differently than at larger sizes.   Moving on, Chuck asks about She-Hulk, who became a green superpowered being through a blood transfusion from the Incredible Hulk. Could a transfusion cause a systemic change to a living being? Surprisingly, in principal, it's possible. We look at gene editing using CRISPR and creating gene drives, where you can change the genetic makeup of a whole species like malaria-bearing mosquitoes.    What about finding extra-terrestrial life? Andrew puts on his risk-analysis hat to look at the possibility, and the potential risks to humanity. Andrew explains why he's not really worried about alien diseases, but much more concerned about the hypothesis of contacting an advanced species – and not for the reasons you might expect. (Hint: we're the danger, not the advanced, evolved aliens!)   Our next question comes from a fan named Benjy and is also related to Star Trek: Will we ever have transporter technology that can move living creatures from one place to another. We look at the digitization of information, 3-D printing, DNA replication, and the similarities to and differences from transporter technology.    Finally, Chuck asks Andrew about science communication and how to become successful on YouTube as an academic. Despite the fact that Andrew describes himself as having “no talent and no time” he started his own YouTube channel called Risk Bites, which has racked up 4 million views across all his videos, which isn't bad for an academic channel. The key: staying focused on empowering other people to do really cool stuff.   If you'd like to know more about Andrew, check out the Mission Interplanetary podcast at ASU he co-hosts here: https://missioninterplanetary.com/.   We hope you enjoy this episode of The LIUniverse, and, if you do, please support us on Patreon.    Credits for Images Used in this Episode: – Biomolecules translating DNA into a protein – Bensaccount at en.wikipedia, CC-BY 3.0 – Animation of CRISPR editing a gene – UC Berkeley, Video by Roxanne Makasdjian and Stephen McNally, Additional footage provided by Keck Graduate Institute (KGI) and Ella Maru Studio, CC-BY 2.5 – Timelapse of a 3D printer – RepRapPro, CC-BY 3.0

Can your passions for science, science fiction, space, fossils and even opera lead you to a life of adventure and maybe a career in science?    To find out, Dr. Charles Liu and co-host Allen Liu welcome returning guest Geoff Notkin, The Meteorite Man, and the co-hosts of the “Mission: Interplanetary” podcast, physicist/futurist Dr. Andrew Maynard and chemist/astronaut Dr. Cady Coleman.    All three of our guests have had interesting journeys and adventures in their careers. They're here to discuss how the circuitous paths scientists often take in our lives, in an episode that connects, as Cady so perfectly sums up, pieces of the universe falling to earth, science fiction, real space stations, future space stations, physics, astrophysics and shopping!   Chuck starts off the episode talking about… The thrill of the hunt. Geoff describes how he fell in love with exploration and adventure, and spent half his childhood hunting for fossils on the “Jurassic Coast” of Dorset, UK and the other half in the museum looking at meteorites.    Although she's most famous as an astronaut who flew on two space shuttle missions and was a member of Expedition 27 to the ISS, Cady tells us about her 2 1/2-month long expedition to Antarctica looking for meteorites. You'll hear how the sheer number of meteorites that have been found there has transformed the study of meteorites. She also shares how living in tents and moving around the Antarctic environment relate to training for space travel. Find out the geologic reason why we're more likely to find meteorites in Antarctica than anywhere else, and the challenges posed to that search by runny noses, moraines, and apple cores.   Next, Charles and Andrew discuss his surprising path, from teenage opera singer (something his co-host Cady discovers for the first time along with the rest of us!) to physicist to futurist, with sojourns in risk analysis, the early days of nanotechnology, synthetic biology, artificial intelligence, and of course, science communication.    Naturally, with this crew, we'd get around to talking about risk and asteroids. We start off with the Chelyabinsk meteor, which airburst over a heavily populated area in Siberia, Russia in 2013 where about a million people live. Andrew explains that calculating the probability of a large meteor hitting Earth isn't very straightforward, while his co-host Cady talks about how we're working to have better measurements and more understanding about asteroids and meteors.   And then we get to “show and tell.” Geoff shares his favorite find, an elephant's head-shaped iron meteorite he dug up at one of the 15 Henbury meteor craters from a single event in Australia 4600 years ago. Andrew shows off his set of the original CDs for “The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy” radio series by Douglas Adams, after which Cady describes the poster for Expedition 42 to the ISS with its obvious connection. (If you don't know why the number 42 is important… READ THE BOOKS! They're sci-fi classics.) Cady shares the stuffed penguin she brought back from her trip to Antarctica that has actually been to the South Pole. (Believe it or not, there's more than one gift shop in Antarctica!) And finally, Charles shares something that co-host Allen Liu actually got for him from Allen's trip to Antarctica – to see what, though, you're going to have to watch the episode.   If you'd like to know more about Geoff, check out his YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAcGREEGQbQV3x-CnOXcXTg. And you can find out more about Andrew and Cady and the Mission Interplanetary podcast here: https://missioninterplanetary.com/.   We hope you enjoy this episode of The LIUniverse, and, if you do, please support us on Patreon.    Credits for Images Used in this Episode: – A glacial moraine in Antarctica – Warren B. Hamilton /USGS, Public Domain – Meteor exploding over Chelyabinsk, Russia – Aleksandr Ivanov, CC-BY 3.0 – The largest of the Henbury Craters – Michael Bemmerl, CC-BY 3.0 de – ISS Expedition 42 poster – NASA Space Flight Awareness, Public Domain

The Metaverse is a loaded word promising a bright, immersive future while at the same time raising important questions about the very nature of humanity. We are joined today by Professor Andrew Maynard to help us unpack what the Metaverse is and what might be in store for us for the future. Andrew Maynard is a scientist, author, and founder of Arizona State University's Future of Being Human community, where he's also a professor in the ASU School for the Future of Innovation in Society. Andrew is an elected Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, is a member of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research President's Advisory Council, has served on a number of National Academies of Sciences committees, and has testified before congressional committees on several occasions. Although he trained as a physicist, Andrew's work increasingly cuts across boundaries as it explores the ethical and socially beneficial development and use of transformative new technologies. He has worked with a number of organizations on approaches to ensuring new technologies benefit as many people as possible, and is a regular contributor to the WEF annual list of top ten emerging Technologies.In addition to his academic writing, Andrew's work has appeared in publications ranging from The Washington Post and Scientific American, to Slate, Salon, and OneZero. He co-hosts the podcast Mission: Interplanetary with former NASA astronaut Cady Coleman, and is the author of the books Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies, and Future Rising: A Journey from the Past to the Edge of Tomorrow. He can be found online at andrew.maynard.net, on twitter at @2020science, and in real life buried in a good book!    

NASA's Nick Jedrich and Andrew Maynard discuss the benefits of developmental assignments.

NASA's Nick Jedrich and Andrew Maynard discuss the benefits of developmental assignments.

NASA's Nick Jedrich and Andrew Maynard discuss the benefits of developmental assignments.

NASA's Nick Jedrich and Andrew Maynard discuss the benefits of developmental assignments.

A discussion showing casing how science fiction mirrors real life or perhaps the other way around.

The Arizona State University professor and director of the Risk Innovation Lab discusses the ideas of risk and safety in driving, the advent of new technology like Tesla's “Full Self Driving” beta system, and the role of regulation in a software age.

In today's episode of Future Rising , Andrew Maynard takes inspiration from William Anders' 1968 photograph “Earthrise” as he considers our relationship to what comes next, and our collective and individual responsibilities to it.Check out Bill Anders' Earthrise photo here: https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1249.html For more on the book Future Rising: A Journey from the Past to the Edge of Tomorrow, check out http://futurerisingbook.comWe'll be positing new episodes of Future Rising on Monday's Wednesday's and Fridays. Please subscribe on your favorite podcast platform if you don't want to miss them. And please do leave us a review!Host:Professor Andrew MaynardWeb: http://andrewmaynard.netTwitter: http://twitter.com/2020scienceInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/literallyandrewmaynard/ 

Over the next few weeks scientist and author Andrew Maynard will be taking you on a journey from the past to the edge of tomorrow as he reads through the book Future Rising. It's a journey that starts with the big bang, and ends with our responsibility to future generations. Along the way, there'll be plenty twists and turns, some intriguing new ideas, and even a few surprises. Episode 1 drops Monday May 17 For more on the book Future Rising: A Journey from the Past to the Edge of Tomorrow, check out http://futurerisingbook.comWe'll be positing new episodes of Future Rising on Monday's Wednesday's and Fridays. Please subscribe on your favorite podcast platform if you don't want to miss them. And please do leave us a review!Host:Professor Andrew MaynardWeb: http://andrewmaynard.netTwitter: http://twitter.com/2020scienceInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/literallyandrewmaynard/

Sustainability เป็นเรื่องที่พูดคุยกันอย่างแพร่หลายในแวดวงการออกแบบ แต่ดูเหมือนว่าจริงๆแล้วไม่มีใครรู้จริงเกี่ยวกับการออกแบบยังไงให้ยั่งยืน Kevin Hui และ Andrew Maynard แห่ง Archimarathon เลยอธิบายไว้ว่า "Sustainability ในสถาปัตยกรรม ก็เหมือนกับกับเซ็กของวัยรุ่น"

On the final day of 2020, John and Lynn celebrate the year-end and a new beginning with a best-of show featuring interviews previously aired that inspired them to carve out the work needed to change our world for the better in terms of technology. ( 01:40) The first guest is Dr. Andrew Maynard, an expert on socially responsible technology development. He writes that human beings have a responsibility and indeed can play a role in shaping technology to serve and be useful instead of taking us down the wrong path—his new book, Future Rising: A Journey From the Past to the Edge of Tomorrow . ( 27:10) Then, how to protect ourselves and our children in the cyber world. Cybersecurity expert and Retired Army Colonel, Terry McGraw is the second guest on this year end show. John and Lynn speak with Terry about the steps Utah parents can take to secure their children's data while they learn online. Terry also discusses how Utah's local and state officials are taking steps to protect their

Dr. Andrew Maynard, author and professor at College of Global Futures of Arizona State University, talks to Tonya Hall about the technological crossroads humanity is facing. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Tonya Hall speaks to Dr. Andrew Maynard, professor at Arizona State University and author of Future Rising, about why we need to step back and examine where technology is taking us. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of Cool Science Radio John and Lynn's guest is Andrew Maynard , PhD. Professor Maynard is an expert on the socially responsible development of technology. He writes that human beings have a responsibility to change the future for the better. They discuss his new book, Future Rising: A Journey From the Past to the Edge of Tomorrow .

Andrew Maynard is our first ever return guest, as he calls in to chat about his upcoming book Future Rising: A Journey from the Past to the Edge of Tomorrow.   Dr. Maynard, who is a professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at ASU, provides a highly original perspective on our relationship with the future. Humanity has gained the ability not only to imagine the future, but to design and engineer it. And yet, we so often struggle to come to terms with what this means and the responsibility that comes with this ability. How do we build this future responsibly? How do we learn from the past? How do we give everyone a voice in the conversation? Will we ever get a working lightsaber? This are just a few of the questions we cover. Find the Book: Future Rising on Amazon.com Andrew's Previous Book: Films From The Future

Andrew Maynard (@2020science) is the Director of the Risk Innovation Lab at Arizona State University, a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society and the author of Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies. [spreaker type=player resource="episode_id=39343831" width="100%" height="80px" theme="light" playlist="false" playlist-continuous="false" autoplay="false" live-autoplay="false" chapters-image="true" episode-image-position="right" hide-logo="true" hide-likes="false" hide-comments="false" hide-sharing="false" hide-download="true"]

Andrew Maynard (@2020science) is the Director of the Risk Innovation Lab at Arizona State University, a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society and the author of Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies. Andrew's research focuses on risk innovation and the responsible development and use of emerging technologies. He is especially interested in effective approaches to developing socially responsive, responsible and beneficial technologies; understanding and responding to the technology and society dynamic; and effective science communication and engagement – particularly through social media.Andrew is widely published in the academic press and in public media and stretch from physics and nanotechnology to toxicology, risk perception, governance, and policy. He writes regularly for the journal Nature Nanotechnology and is a frequent contributor to The Conversation. He also directs and produces the YouTube science education channel “Risk Bites” and blogs at 2020science.org.Andrew’s science training is in nanoparticle analysis – and for many years he conducted and led research on aerosol exposure in occupational settings. In the early 2000’s he became increasingly involved in guiding US federal initiatives supporting nanotechnology research and development, and in addressing potential risks. In 2005 he became Chief Science Advisor for the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (and later the Synthetic Biology Project) at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, and for five years helped inform national and global initiatives addressing the responsible development of nanotechnology. Over this period, he became increasingly interested in science communication and science policy and began working closely with academics, policymakers, industry, non-government organizations, and journalists, on science-informed decision making. This interest continued between 2010 - 2015 as Director of the University of Michigan Risk Science Center, and Chair of the Environmental Health Sciences Department. In 2015 he joined the faculty of the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University to continue his work and collaborations on socially responsible, responsible and beneficial research and development.In the course of his work, Andrew has testified before congressional committees, has served on National Academy panels, and has worked closely with organizations such as the World Economic Forum and the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) that promote public-private partnerships.In our wide-ranging conversation, we cover many things, including:- The biggest risks to humanity's future- Why Andrew is excited and terrified about AI and synthetic biology- Which areas of technology are most susceptible to negative consequences- The reason Ex Machina is such a terrifying example of artificial intelligence- How we can use science fiction to ask deep philosophical questions about society- Why Andrew is that worried about the killer AI scenario- The big difference between corporations and universities when it comes to technological innovation- How Andrew thinks about risk and why it is different than most- Why man's reach exceeds his grasp and what to do about it- The reason Andrew is optimistic and pessimistic about the future- Why nanotechnology has disappointed to date and where we go from here- Is China or the US a more surveillance driven country?

Episode 7--The Politics of Geoengineering, Climate, and COVID-19 featuring Jane FlegalShobita and Jack discuss the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its implications in the United States and Britain, and interview Jane Flegal, Program Officer overseeing US climate at The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, a Fellow at the Institute for Science, Innovation, and Society at the University of Oxford, Adjunct Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University.Links Related to the Podcast:- Ezra Klein (2019). "The geoengineering question." Vox. December 23.- Jane A. Flegal, Anna-Maria Hubert, David R. Morrow, Juan B. Moreno-Cruz (2019). "Solar Geoengineering: Social Science, Legal, Ethical, and Economic Frameworks." Annual Review of Environment and Resources. October.- David E. Winickoff, Jane A. Flegal, and Asfawossen Asrat (2015). "Engaging the Global South on climate engineering research." Nature Climate Change. June 24.- Jane A. Flegal and Aarti Gupta (2018). "Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research? Scrutinizing emerging expert visions of equity." International Environmental Agreement: Politics, Law and Economics. 18: 45-61.- Jane A. Flegal and Andrew Maynard (2017). "'Geostorm' is a very silly movie that raises some very serious questions." Popular Science. October 22.- Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (2020). "Remembering Steve Rayner: the person who framed the geoengineering debate."- Morgan Ames (2019). The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death, and Legacy of One Laptop per Child. MIT Press.- Virginia Eubanks (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.Full transcript available at thereceivedwisdom.org.

Andrew Maynard is a scientist, professor, and expert in nanotechnology. He joins the show to answer: how likely is it that microscopic robots will go awry and turn the world into gray goo? What cool inventions are on the horizon? And finally, what are the good and bad portrayals of nanotechnology in science fiction?

In this episode, Andrew Maynard joins us. He is a scientist, author, and one of the nation’s leading thinkers on socially responsible and ethical innovation. His work involves exploring the socially responsible and responsive development of emerging and converging technologies, including synthetic biology and gene editing, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence.As Director of the ASU Risk Innovation Lab, he is pushing the boundaries of how we think about risk and learn to succeed as we develop increasingly complex technologies. Andrew is also an active member of World Economic Forum's Council on Nanotechnology.Andrew’s popular science/technology book Films from the Future explores socially responsible and ethical approaches to innovation through the lens of twelve science fiction movies, while his latest book, Future Rising, takes readers on a unique journey through humanity’s relationship with the future, and our responsibility to it. You can pre-order it using this link, I've already pre-ordered mine.---This episode will air during one of the most uncertain times I have ever experienced. The world is facing a big challenge with the outbreak of COVID-19 and it seems to be stress-testing most of the complex systems our daily lives rely upon, such as the economy, healthcare, court systems, geopolitics, and so forth. That being said, I am confident that we will excel in solving this challenge and, most importantly, that we will learn from this crisis and start to take a more humble approach to life, rather than just continue to do the things we do as if nothing happened.This episode -- and the books that Andrew has written - - have taught me a lot about our relationship with the future and the responsibility to it. This conversation comes as a remainder that all of us are designers of the future, and we can create it as a "better place than the one we came from". As Sam Harris puts it, without further delay I bring you, Andrew Maynard. ---Website: https://therealandrewmaynard.comBooks: Future Rising: A Journey from the Past to the Edge of Tomorrow and Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi MoviesTwitter: @2020ScienceYouTube Channel: Risk Bites ---HIGHLIGHTS(2:45) Andrew’s Trajectory.(5:11) Sci-Fi Movies as a way of teaching everyone that the future involves everyone.(6:12) The problem with mining / the risks of mining.(7:21) Complex Systems and how COVID-19 has affected them.(8:50) Andrew’s take on COVID-19.(10:09) Risk Bites on Youtube - A guide for students living with coronavirus.(11:29) What can we do to prevent getting infected with COVID-19.(12:24) The biggest challenge with COVID-19.(13:39) Films From The Future: How it relates with what’s happening in today’s world and with COVID-19.(14:54) Will COVID-19 teach us humility?(17:54) Films From The Future and Future Rising: the distinction between them.(18:00) Films From The Future.(18:19) Future as an object: a different way of thinking about the future and understand our relationship with it.(19:06) Future Rising.(19:18) A responsibly-created future.(19:45) Earth as a spaceship.(20:15) Consciously thinking about the future.(21:07) Our spaceship need maintenance.(22:18) What’s the relation with sci-fi movies and the technologies we create?(23:18) Do sci-fi movies create the ideas of the technologies we make, or do pre-existing technologies while recording sci-fi movies push innovation?(23:42) Minority Report and its relevance in today’s world.(24:25) The hidden consequences of Alexa, Siri, Google Play.(24:37) Do we think before we adopt new technologies?(25:30) FAMA - A talent screening software.(26:12) Are we treating people as means and not ends when it comes to creating new technologies? How will new technologies affect individuals in their daily lives?(27:50) Can Artificial Intelligence Machines deceive us?(29:20) Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence live in the Fifth Dimension - WOW.(30:40) Should we focus on understanding the human brain first before we create an Artificial one?(31:05) How can we create an AI machine without biases, if the ones who are creating them have biases themselves?(32:50) Having humility is vital to create sentient machines - WOW.(33:34) The power of “What If” Questions in creating the future.(34:20) A Transhumanist perspective on the future of the human species.(35:32) The power of our biological heritage: Resiliency - WOW.(37:11) Possibility vs Probability: What’s the difference?(38:05) Is it likely that we can live in a world with Universal Basic Income?(39:10) Can we excel as human beings without needing to work?(40:40) could UBI transform people’s lives and help them create the life they want?(43:08) Can we price in the uncertainty variable in the technologies we create?(44:30) Distinction Between Fragile Complex Systems and Adaptable Complex Systems.(45:36) What makes us, us?(46:00) We are at a point where we can conceive creating artificial sentient beings - WOW.(47:20) The technologies we create reflect our own values, our own soul - WOW.(47:55) Are we creating our technologies with the intention of making them beautiful, such as art?(49:10) Our technology reflects who we are - WOW.(49:46) Morality and Ethics and their relationship with the future of technology.(50:00) The future of Cloning (Never Let Me Go).(51:20) Will a clone have a soul?(52:12) Declaration of Cloning - The relationship between religion and the technologies we create.(53:55) Let’s focus on what’s amazing of our humanity and what surrounds us - WOW.(54:30) We are a creation worthy of respect.(56:00) The future belongs to all of us who are creating it, not only experts.(56:55) The risks and benefits of having a consensus about the future we are building.(59:00) The distinction between “should we do it” and “can we do it”.(1:00:42) Can science and philosophy work together?(1:02:15) What future does Andrew see in the next twenty years? What’s his own vision of it?(1:03:25) Having a future where more people can create what they imagine - WOW.(1:04:00) Closing remarks. ---Thanks for tuning in for this edition of Through Conversations Podcast!If you find this episode interesting, consider subscribing to it. Also, you can share it with anyone who comes to your mind.Keep the conversation going:Instagram: @through_conversationspodcastTwitter: @ThruConvPodcastWebsite: throughconversations.com

The design of any building is an act of looking into the future. The look of our cities and neighbourhoods evolve with every building that architects design. Throughout history, many architects have had aspirations for what our cities should look like. Some designs have shown buildings interconnected with nature, others are dystopic visions of cities run by machines without any considerations for people. Weather architects are mainly concerned with climate change, emerging technologies, or changes in the social structure of work, there are many things that are going to change the fabric of cities in the future. In this episode of Hearing Architecture, we’ve asked architects from around Australia what our cities and towns will look like in 2050. The more support we get from you the more episodes we get to make. So if you’d like to show your support please rate, review, and subscribe to Hearing Architecture in your favourite podcast app. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Justin Carrier, Steven Postmus, Sue Dugdale, Jane Wetherall, Damian Madigan, Dik Jarman, Jo Rees, Peter Stutchbury, Yvette Breytenbach, Jefa Greenaway, Rob McGauran Jane Caught, Nicholas Braun, Timothy Moore, Amelia Borg, Professor Philip Thalis, Andrew Maynard, Joe Agius, Shaneen Fantin and Belinda Allwood. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The Australian Institute of Architects production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

This week's episode features the 1st-place team in the Mid-Atlantic Conference, the New Jersey 87s.Adam Houli and Matthew Kiernan are the co-owners and co-coaches for the organization that's only in their 3rd year of operating a junior hockey franchise. However, based off of their successes to date, you would never had guessed that.As for the player on this week's podcast, Andrew Maynard is in his 2nd season with the 87's, and may be the most improved player in the EHL this year. After tallying 24 points in 33 games last season, Maynard already has 43 points in 26 games to date this year.

Architects used to draw everything with set squares, compasses, and rulers, then came the mechanical drafting table. During this time architects had to draw every part of their drawings individually, then came dye-line machines and printers. By this time studios were filled with large format drafting tables, printers and plotters, and then computers were slowly introduced so you could do most things on a small monitor. After this, fax machines allowed drawings to be sent by phone so it took less time for everyone in the project team to get drawings and instructions, but this was soon replaced by email. To see how engineers and architects drawings worked together, some firms started playing with Building Information Management, which allowed multiple people in a team to see how the parts of the building come together in 3D. These days there’s a lot of discussion around parametric modeling, Artificial Intelligence, and automated manufacturing. With so many ways of designing architecture throughout history, there seems to be an almost unending conveyor belt of technology that architects need to use to do their job.  In this episode of Hearing Architecture we’ve asked architects from around Australia what will happen to architecture as more advanced technology is introduced into the studio. The more support we get from you the more episodes we get to make. So if you’d like to show your support please rate, review, and subscribe to Hearing Architecture in your favourite podcast app. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Justin Carrier, Steven Postmus, Lee Hillam, Jo Rees, Jefa Greenaway, Rod Simpson, Sue Dugdale, Amelia Borg, Timothy Moore, Jane Caught, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Rob McGauran, Professor Philip Thalis, Dik Jarman, and Andrew Maynard. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The Australian Institute of Architects production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

Becoming an architect takes a long time. In Australia, a student has to spend a minimum of 5 years at university in order to get an architecture degree. During this time, students learn about the design process, the history and theories that have shaped the profession, and practical building techniques. After graduation, it still takes at least 2 years to get enough experience to become registered. Despite having all those years of study under their belt, architects need to continue educating themselves in order to keep up with the evolving built environment landscape. Not only do architects have to stay up-to-date with the core areas of competency, but they can also tailor their professional development towards the areas that they specialize in. With so many elements that architects need to understand from business through to detailing, it’s an ongoing task for architects to keep their knowledge base current. In this episode of Hearing Architecture, we’ve asked architects from around Australia how they continue to learn and develop their practices in their fast-evolving profession. This episode of Hearing Architecture features the following guests: Jefa Greenaway, Justin Carrier, Steven Postmus, Damian Madigan, Andrew Maynard, Sue Dugdale, Peter Stutchbury, Yvette Breytenbach, Joe Agius, Amelia Borg, Nicholas Braun, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Dik Jarman, Lee Hillam, and Joe Rees. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The Australian Institute of Architects production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

Dr. Andrew Maynard, professor at the school for the future of innovation in society at Arizona State University, sits down with Tonya Hall to talk about lessons regarding morality and ethics that can be gained through science-fiction movies. FOLLOW US  - Subscribe to ZDNet on YouTube: http://bit.ly/2HzQmyf - Watch more ZDNet videos: http://zd.net/2Hzw9Zy - Follow ZDNet on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ZDNet - Follow ZDNet on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ZDNet - Follow ZDNet on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ZDNet_CBSi - Follow ZDNet on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ZDNe... - Follow ZDNet on Snapchat: https://www.snapchat.com/add/zdnet_cbsi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

As Australia’s population continues to rise, the demand for housing continues to intensify. To meet this demand, apartment buildings are building built at a rapid pace. Most high streets around the country are growing 6 storeys taller above the existing 2 storey row houses. In some streets, you might notice a single house being torn down to clear space for 2 or 3 townhouses on the same block. All of these types of developments increase housing density. While this meets the need for more houses, it is also increasing the number of people who want to use services like public transport, library’s, and schools. While there’s so much focus on getting the houses built, there’s a parallel need to make sure all the extra people in a community don’t exhaust the services and amenities in an area. As our cities as towns continue to grow, we need to make sure that while we make buildings that accommodate everyone we don’t reduce the amenity that made an area so good in the first place.  In this episode of Hearing Architecture, we’ve asked architects from around Australia if high-density developments are being planned with communities in mind. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Damian Madigan, Jane Wetherall, Jefa Greenaway, Rod Simpson, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Rob McGauran, Amelia Borg, Timothy Moore, Jane Caught, Andrew Maynard, Professor Philip Thalis, Lee Hillam, and Dik Jarman. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The Australian Institute of Architects production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

One of the things that makes Australia great is our richness of diversity. There are people from so many cultural backgrounds, language groups, and belief systems, which influences the way they want to live and shape their buildings. Allowing for these differences in the architecture process can raise some interesting opportunities. When an architect works with a client from a different background they’ll need to learn how to design for that clients needs and the architect might not have experienced that before. It’s these collaborations that can help the way Australian buildings evolve over time. However, when buildings are designed to meet the needs of large number of people in Australia, the results sometimes only meet the minimum requirements for a narrow demographic of our diverse community. By working with an architect, it should be possible to get much closer to the individual needs of all the people who make up our rich multicultural society. In this episode of Hearing Architecture we’ve asked architects from around Australia how empathy, understanding and diversity impacts their clients and the community. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Jefa Greenaway, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Andrew Maynard, Sue Dugdale, Dik Jarman, Professor Philip Thalis, Jo Rees, Jessica Mountain, Emily Van Eyk, Kylee Schoonens, and Lee Hillam. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The AIA production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

In 1980 the median house price in Melbourne was $40,800. Fast forward to 2016 and the median price of a house was $713,000. With property prices rising across the country, the concept of the Australian Dreamhouse on its own block with a front and back yard is becoming more like a fantasy. This was in part because median income didn’t have the same rate of growth as property prices, so the gap between house income and house expense became wider every year. This increased gap means that many Australian’s are finding it harder to own a home. To address this there are more apartments being built in our major cities than ever before, with most apartments having smaller floor areas than stand-alone houses. As Australians look for homes they can afford, architects are designing new forms of housing that can meet the needs of a growing population with complex financial burdens.  In this episode of Hearing Architecture, we’ve asked architects from around Australia how architects can play an active role in addressing housing affordability. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Rob McGauran, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Jo Rees, Rod Simpson, Kylee Schoonens, Professor Philip Thalis, Joe Agius, Lee Hillam, Peter Stutchbury, Timothy Moore, Jane Caught, Andrew Maynard, Yvette Breytenbach, and Jefa Greenaway. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The Australian Institute of Architecture production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

E40 Laura Burford with LAD Enterprizes and ASU Professor Andrew Maynard How comfortable are you working with and managing risks? What tools and techniques do you use for managing risks on your projects as well as personally with your own career? How did PMI do with managing the risk of rolling our the new PMI […] The post E40 Laura Burford with LAD Enterprizes and ASU Professor Andrew Maynard appeared first on Business RadioX ®.

How comfortable are you working with and managing risks? What tools and techniques do you use for managing risks on your projects as well as personally with your own career? How did PMI do with managing the risk of rolling our the new PMI logo? Listen to hear Laura Burford and Andrew Maynard discuss risk management, innovation and entrepreneurship. Laura was a speaker at the recent 50th Anniversary PMI Global Conference. With all the buzz of the new PMI logo we heard from Laura how the rollout was received at the conference. Laura also shares her story and evolution from corporate employee to independent consultant and how she is now using those experiences to help others seeking to branch out on their own. Andrew, as an Academic, Scientist and Author, enjoys breaking boundaries and examining risk specifically with social movements and personal attitudes.​ He is the Director of the ASU Risk Innovation Lab and shares how they are taking an innovation mindset and applying that to risk. Andrew and Laura also share how story-telling has become an important tool they use as authors and within their careers. ​ Tune in for upcoming shows with Project Management leaders and subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcast, iHeartRadio, Spotify, Spreaker, Stitcher or your favorite podcast platform! Thanks to our sponsor THE PMO SQUAD. Visit www.thepmosquad.com to learn about the Purpose Driven PMO, PMO as a Service, and all their project management services.

The beginning of an architecture project usually starts with some form of communication. It can be a conversation over a coffee, through an email from a client listing a dozen items that they “must have”, or standing in an old building with a bunch of people describing what they can see in their head while they gesticulate in the direction of where new windows and walls could be. After this, everyone wants to agree on what was just discussed so there’s as little difference between what was implied and what was inferred. To do this, an architect will usually start making drawings. This process is so successful that architects are now synonymous with drawings. Even the idea of building something without a drawing sounds like a paradox. This makes architects experts in explaining what the end result of a project will look and feel like, which helps minimise the chance of clients turning up to a building site and being surprised by what’s been built. It may be second nature to architects, but even when a project has literally hundreds of drawings, it can still be difficult to understand what’s going to end up on-site. In this episode of Hearing Architecture we’ve asked architects from around Australia why drawings are so important to the profession of architecture and how drawings can help communicate to clients and the wider community. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Peter Stutchbury, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Joe Agius, Amelia Borg, Nicholas Braun, Timothy Moore, Jo Rees, Damian Madigan, Andrew Maynard, Lee Hillam, Steven Postmas, Jessica Mountain, Emily Van Eyk, Jane Wetherall, Professor Philip Thalis, Dik Jarman, Sue Dugdale, and Jefa Greenaway. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The AIA production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

Before any architecture project starts, there needs to be a client who has the vision to build something. Once they’ve committed to build, they’ll need some specialists to work through all of the mandatory building requirements. In Australia, these include the local planning scheme, national construction code, and some specific design guidelines. So with all of those requirements being handled by the professionals, what is the client’s role while all of this is going on? Some might think that they’re just meant to sit back until they’re called upon to pay a bill or attend a design meeting? But the client had the vision to have the project built in the first place. So does that mean they get their monies worth by getting involved in every single aspect of the architectural process as it moves from one consultant to the next? Or would this slow down the project team from achieving their aspirations? In this episode of Hearing Architecture, we’ve asked architects from around Australia what makes a good client and what a client can do to get the most out of an architect. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Damian Madigan, Rod Simpson, Sue Dugdale, Peter Stutchberry, Justin Carrier, Kylee Schoonens, Steven Postmus, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Professor Philip Thalis, Rob McGauran, Jo Rees, Lee Hillam, Dik Jarman, Yvette Breytenbach, Jefa Greenaway, Hugh Mcguire, and Andrew Maynard. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The AIA production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore.

Australians love to renovate their homes. You can tell we do because there are so many DIY TV programs that show us how to give it a go. But when you watch programs like Grand Designs, The Block, or House Rules there’s rarely an architect to be seen. With many programs like this out there a lot of people might assume that design, renovation, and building can all be easily undertaken by anyone at home as long as they have the time and money. Now, this is true to some extent, and a lot of people have a great deal of fun renovating their homes. But it might be hard to know how far you can go yourself before things start to get dangerous or it becomes more costly than if some professionals had taken it on. In this episode of Hearing Architecture we’ve asked architects from around Australia how architects are portrayed to the public and how clients can be involved in the design process. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Damian Madigan, Rod Simpson, Sue Dugdale, Lee Hillam, Peter Stutchberry, Justin Carrier, Steven Postmus, Nicholas Braun, Jane Caught, Timothy Moore, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Joe Agius, Rob McGauran, Jo Rees, Dik Jarman, Hugh Mcguire, and Andrew Maynard. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The AIA production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, Monique Woodward, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore.  This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

In 2017 the Australian Institute of Architects awarded Melbourne based Architect Peter Elliot with the Gold Medal, which is the Institutes highest honour. As part of his gold medal tour, he told younger architects “to let the theory come later”. Some Architects were taken aback by this because they’d spent so much time studying how to embed design theory into their work. In this episode of Hearing Architecture, we’ve asked architects from around Australia to tell us what they think about the use of theory in architecture. This episode of Hearing Architecture featured the following guests: Damian Madigan, Rod Simpson, Sue Dugdale, Kylee Schoonens, Peter Stutchberry, Justin Carrier, Steven Postmus, Nicholas Braun, Jane Caught, Timothy Moore, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Professor Philip Thalis, Joe Agius,Yvette Breytenbach, Jefa Greenaway, Rob McGauran, Jo Rees, Dik Jarman, Andrew Maynard and Peter Elliott. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The AIA production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

When you start to look for it, architecture is everywhere and it’s the stage on which we play out our lives. It doesn’t matter whether we’re working in it, living in it, or resting in it, it’s part of our lives and memories. In this episode of Hearing Architecture we’ve asked architects from around Australia to tell us what they think architecture’s role is in culture: is it informed by culture or does it inform culture? This episode of Hearing Architecture features the following guests: Damian Madigan, Rod Simpson, Sue Dugdale, Kylee Schoonens, Peter Stutchberry, Justin Carrier, Steven Postmus, Nicholas Braun, Jane Caught, Timothy Moore, Shaneen Fantin, Belinda Allwood, Professor Philip Thalis, Joe Agius, Rob McGauran, Jefa Greenaway, Dik Jarman, and Andrew Maynard. The interviews in this episode were produced around Australia by EmAGN committee members: Jamileh Jahangiri, Daniel Hall, Kirsty Volz, Kali Marnane, Chris Morley, Sam McQueeney, Reece Currey, Brad Wetherall, Jess Beaver, Bede Taylor, Rebecca Webster, and Daniel Moore. The AIA production team was Daniela Crawley, Stacey Rodda, and Thom McKenzie. Produced by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. Written and Directed by Daniel Moore. This content is brought to you by the Australian Institute of Architects Emerging Architects and Graduates Network, in collaboration with Open Creative Studio. This content does not take into account specific circumstances and should not be relied on in that way. This content does not constitute legal, financial, insurance, or other types of advice. You should seek independent verification or advice before relying on this content in circumstances where loss or damage may result. The Institute endeavours to publish content that is accurate at the time it is published, but does not accept responsibility for content that may or will become inaccurate over time.

Jason Howell speaks with Andrew Maynard, professor in the Arizona State University School for the Future of Innovation in Society, about his book Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies. They dive into his book discussing whether sci-fi films like Jurassic Park, Limitless, Ghost in the Shell, and Ex Machina is predicting or creating our future, responsible innovation, what Andrew finds really disturbing about AI, the ethics of Elon Musk's Neuralink technology, and more. Buy "Films from the Future": https://amzn.to/2T3ORiT Host: Jason Howell Guest: Andrew Maynard Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/triangulation. Sponsor: capterra.com/triangulation

Jason Howell speaks with Andrew Maynard, professor in the Arizona State University School for the Future of Innovation in Society, about his book Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies. They dive into his book discussing whether sci-fi films like Jurassic Park, Limitless, Ghost in the Shell, and Ex Machina is predicting or creating our future, responsible innovation, what Andrew finds really disturbing about AI, the ethics of Elon Musk's Neuralink technology, and more. Buy "Films from the Future": https://amzn.to/2T3ORiT Host: Jason Howell Guest: Andrew Maynard Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/triangulation. Sponsor: capterra.com/triangulation

Jason Howell speaks with Andrew Maynard, professor in the Arizona State University School for the Future of Innovation in Society, about his book Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies. They dive into his book discussing whether sci-fi films like Jurassic Park, Limitless, Ghost in the Shell, and Ex Machina is predicting or creating our future, responsible innovation, what Andrew finds really disturbing about AI, the ethics of Elon Musk's Neuralink technology, and more. Buy "Films from the Future": https://amzn.to/2T3ORiT Host: Jason Howell Guest: Andrew Maynard Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/triangulation. Sponsor: capterra.com/triangulation

Jason Howell speaks with Andrew Maynard, professor in the Arizona State University School for the Future of Innovation in Society, about his book Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies. They dive into his book discussing whether sci-fi films like Jurassic Park, Limitless, Ghost in the Shell, and Ex Machina is predicting or creating our future, responsible innovation, what Andrew finds really disturbing about AI, the ethics of Elon Musk's Neuralink technology, and more. Buy "Films from the Future": https://amzn.to/2T3ORiT Host: Jason Howell Guest: Andrew Maynard Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/triangulation. Sponsor: capterra.com/triangulation

Estonian cybersecurity expert Liisa Past joins Andrew Maynard and Heather Ross to talk about Estonia's digital election system, iVoting, and what happened when Estonia found a vulnerability in the firmware that supports its entire digital identity infrastructure -- right before an election!

Questions continue to swirl around a car crash involving a state senator. Andrew Maynard, a Democrat from Stonington, was already recovering from a fall at his home in 2014 that left some questioning his ability to serve before the most recent incident. Support the show: http://wnpr.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.