Podcasts about Ad hominem

COMMON TROLLING TACTICS: Ad Hominem attacks, Whataboutism, Just Asking Questions, Devil's advocate, Sockpuppets, Astroturfers, Do Your Own Researchers, Strawman, Tribalism, Tone policing, Hate mongering, Concern trolling, Moving the Goalposts, Red herring, False dilemma, Circular reasoning, DARVO, Thought terminating cliches, Outrage baiting, Derailing, Dogpiling, Virtue Signaling. HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM: Name the tactic: ("This is a classic strawman.")Refocus on facts: ("Here is what we're actually discussing.")Set boundaries: ("If you keep [tactic], I'm done.")Disengage if needed: Don't feed the damn trolls.Samantha North on Internet Trolling Tactics https://samanthanorth.com/internet-trolling-tacticsSamantha North on Astroturfing: https://samanthanorth.com/astroturfing-on-social-mediaLogical Fallacy List: https://opexsociety.org/body-of-knowledge/effective-arguing-beware-of-logical-red-herrings/Donate to the Palestinian Children's Relief Fund: www.pcrf.netGET AN OCCASIONAL PERSONAL EMAIL FROM ME: www.makeyourdamnbedpodcast.comTUNE IN ON INSTAGRAM FOR COOL CONTENT: www.instagram.com/mydbpodcastOR BE A REAL GEM + TUNE IN ON PATREON: www.patreon.com/MYDBpodcastOR WATCH ON YOUTUBE: www.youtube.com/juliemerica The opinions expressed by Julie Merica and Make Your Damn Bed Podcast are intended for entertainment purposes only. Make Your Damn Bed podcast is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Get bonus content on PatreonSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/make-your-damn-bed. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

COMMON TROLLING TACTICS: Ad Hominem attacks, Whataboutism, Just Asking Questions, Devil's advocate, Sockpuppets, Astroturfers, Do Your Own Researchers, Strawman, Tribalism, Tone policing, Hate mongering, Concern trolling, Moving the Goalposts, Red herring, False dilemma, Circular reasoning, DARVO, Thought terminating cliches, Outrage baiting, Derailing, Dogpiling, Virtue Signaling. HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM: Name the tactic: ("This is a classic strawman.")Refocus on facts: ("Here is what we're actually discussing.")Set boundaries: ("If you keep [tactic], I'm done.")Disengage if needed: Don't feed the damn trolls.Samantha North on Internet Trolling Tactics https://samanthanorth.com/internet-trolling-tacticsSamantha North on Astroturfing: https://samanthanorth.com/astroturfing-on-social-mediaLogical Fallacy List: https://opexsociety.org/body-of-knowledge/effective-arguing-beware-of-logical-red-herrings/Donate to the Palestinian Children's Relief Fund: www.pcrf.netGET AN OCCASIONAL PERSONAL EMAIL FROM ME: www.makeyourdamnbedpodcast.comTUNE IN ON INSTAGRAM FOR COOL CONTENT: www.instagram.com/mydbpodcastOR BE A REAL GEM + TUNE IN ON PATREON: www.patreon.com/MYDBpodcastOR WATCH ON YOUTUBE: www.youtube.com/juliemerica The opinions expressed by Julie Merica and Make Your Damn Bed Podcast are intended for entertainment purposes only. Make Your Damn Bed podcast is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Get bonus content on PatreonSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/make-your-damn-bed. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Pensamos la vida, reflexiones con el filósofo Ricardo Piñero. 

#MRMARKET: The ad hominem failure. Liz Peek, The Hill, Fox News. 1916 Woodrow Wilson

The ad hominem fallacy happens when we attack someone's character or label them as a "heretic" rather than engaging their arguments. This week's episode will explore the ad hominem fallacy, discuss how it gets abused in christological debates (past and present), and offer several tips to help us avoid committing this fallacy ourselves. Visit Amazon to buy your copy of my book Wisdom Christology in the Gospel of John: https://a.co/d/6nFEbZg                Please consider supporting this Podcast and future projects by donating at: https://www.paypal.me/10mintruthtalks          To view the notes from this episode please click the link below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HU3TEj_vpDTqAiTpxH6-6-A509EiRY6cGyegVL4RnQk/edit?usp=sharing   Check out some of my videos on YouTube at: https://www.youtube.com/@BiblicalUnitarianPodcast           Follow us on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/OneGodPodcast 

Echoes of New Eden returns, we have Btown in the chat to tell his side of the story of his 6.7 Trillion Heist! We also talk about the train wreck that is the Voyage Ceremony

A Reason For Hope with Pastor Scott Richards! Sharing the Word one question of the heart at a time. Tags: Israel Update, Ad Hominem, and The Blood of Abel

Caleb Ontiveros speaks with Johnathan Bi, an entrepreneur and philosopher, about Friedrich Nietzsche's critique of Stoicism and egalitarianism.The conversation begins with Jonathan sharing his personal journey from STEM to philosophy, setting the stage for a deep dive into Nietzsche's challenging ideas. They explore Nietzsche's opposition to Stoic egalitarianism and his concept of "higher men." The discussion delves into the psychology behind moral beliefs and value systems, examining how Nietzsche's insights can be applied to critically examine our own philosophical commitments.https://greatbooks.io/Johnathan's YouTube(01:50) From Hating Humanities to Loving Philosophy(06:06) Silicon Valley Detour(11:01) The Life of Action VS Contemplation(19:58) Philosophy as a Way Of Life(27:43) Nietzsche's Challenge To Stoicism(31:04) The Equality Illusion(39:20) Nietzsche on Epictetus(50:04) Nietzsche For Every Day Life(56:31) Why Ad Hominems Win & Metaethics***Subscribe to The Stoa Letter for weekly meditations, actions, and links to the best Stoic resources: www.stoaletter.com/subscribeDownload the Stoa app (it's a free download): stoameditation.com/podIf you try the Stoa app and find it useful, but truly cannot afford it, email us and we'll set you up with a free account.Listen to more episodes and learn more here: https://stoameditation.com/blog/stoa-conversations/Thanks to Michael Levy for graciously letting us use his music in the conversations: https://ancientlyre.com/

Unleashed: The Political News Hour with Bruce Robertson – This weekend, the world changes with an attempt on Donald Trump's life. The Democrats and media, after years of attacks and propaganda, escalate their efforts. Despite their actions, Trump remains protected and resilient. The breakdown in security at his rally raises questions about an inside job. This event exposes the depths of political corruption and desperation.

Temas: Programación Social, biocomputadoras, IA, Conciencia Artificial, Posthumanismo, Androides, Robots, Servidores, Células, Neuronas, GPT-5, OpenAI, Transhumanismo, Bioservidores, Células ADN, Células Musculares, Computadora Cuántica Emisión: 04/07/2024 Temporada 8 Episodio 07 Abstract: La revolución informática y robótica está aquí, las posibilidades de desarrollo está a un grado vertiginoso, y la búsqueda tanto de máquinas que puedan apoyar y asiste a humanos de forma permanente está llevándonos a la creación de cuerpos lo más similares a los humanos para generar empatía, mientras que por otro lado se habla ya de pequeñas conciencias nacientes de forma artificial que se están tratando de ocultar, pero que pronto nos guste o no, saldrán a la luz. Mónica Maciel y Salvador Gaviño Romero comienzan las Conexiones. Gracias por Suscribirte: http://bit.do/byjsq Follow en Twitter: http://bit.do/byjqZ Like en FB: http://bit.do/byjri WEB: http://www.elajoproducciones.com Podcast Ivoox: http://bit.do/bKae7 Ajófono: (+52 MX) 56.100.56.1.56 Ajomail: elajo.producciones@gmail.com #Conexiones Fondo del programa: Cortesía de El Último Escriba Animación Intro El Ajo Producciones: El Último Escriba Logo Conexiones: Roberto Connolly Música Fondo: Kevin Macleod https://incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/ Copyright Disclaimer! Title 17, US Code (Sections 107-118 of the copyright law, Act 1976): All media in this video is used for purpose of review & commentary under terms of fair use. All footage, & images used belong to their respective companies. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. **** Enlaces de Interés ***** Anacrónico ¡Ya Disponible! : https://a.co/d/8Z5OABJ https://open.spotify.com/artist/08MlOZSrQ6psjZbZWEVCgH?si=j6fSsfBATw-HwwjInMyOCg

Eflatun “Konuşma, aklını kullanma sanatıdır.” diyor. Her konuda her yerde pek çok itiraz dinliyor, okuyoruz. Bunların büyük bölümü konuyla ilgili bir cümleyle başlıyor ardından taa Aristo'dan beri Safsata Kılavuzu'nda tanımlanan örneklerden birine dönüşüveriyor. En çok kullanılan da “argumentum ad hominem”, bir argümanı ya da hükmü, delillerle değil, hükmü ya da argümanı ileri süreni karalamak suretiyle çürütmeye kalkışmak anlamındadır ve mantık ilminde safsataya girer. AB'YE GİREBİLİR MİYDİK? Bu tartışma hiç bitmiyor. Niye almıyorlar sorusuna cevaplar çeşitli. Çoğunluk suçu Türkiye'de buluyor. Öyleydi böyleydi derken işin faturası her seferinde anlamsız yere Türkiye'ye çıkıyor. Türkiye'nin bu konuda gösterdiği gayret yok sayılıyor. Bugünlerde Avrupa Parlamentosu seçimleri var. 400 milyon insan seçimlerde oy kullanacak. Nüfusa göre en büyük ülke Almanya 83 milyon ile en kalabalık AB ülkesi. Onu 64 milyon ile Fransa takip ediyor. Geri kalan ülkeler İtalya, İspanya ve diğerleri. Türkiye eğer Avrupa Birliği'ne alınmış olsaydı 85 milyon nüfusuyla Avrupa Parlamentosu'na en fazla temsilci gönderecek ülke olacaktı. Belki de bu nedenle 2005 yılından itibaren her ülke Türkiye'yi Avrupa'ya almayacaklarını art arda sürekli açıkladı. Türkiye düşmanlaştırıldı ki bu, Avrupa'da aşırı sağ partiler iktidar veya iktidar ortağı olmadan önceydi. Hal böyle iken Türkiye'ye Avrupa kapılarını kapatan Batı'nın tutumu görülmeden sorunun odağı olarak Türkiye'nin görülmesini içselleştiren yerli siyasetçilerimize her seferinde hayretle bakıyorum. YENİLGİDEN SONRA Cambridge Üniversitesi Siyaset ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Öğretim Üyesi Prof. Ayşe Zarakol'un kitabı aldığı ödül ile dikkatimi çekmişti. Yenilgiden Sonra başlığı altında ‘Doğu Batı ile Yaşamayı Nasıl Öğrendi' sorusunu kitabın kapağına taşıyan Zarakol'un kitabı klişelere takılmadan son derece mesafeli bir noktadan Batı'nın Batı dışı toplumları damgalayan-lekeleyen bakışına ışık tutuyor. Ayşe Zarakol diyor ki: “Batılı olmayanların uluslararası sisteme dâhil edilme tarzının yol açtığı tedirginlikleri ve bu tedirginliklerin dünya siyasetinin temel dinamiklerini nasıl biçimlendirdiğini araştırdım. Batı'yı saplantı haline getiren ülkelerden yola çıktım. Rusya, Japonya ve Türkiye örneklerinde kendini hakir görme Batı'yı yüceltme davranışlarında gördüğüm benzerlikler bu konuyu ele almama sebep oldu. Bu üç ülke de Batı tarafından mağlup edilmiş imparatorlukları bitirilmişti. Sekiz yıllık çalışmanın ürünü olarak Yenilgiden Sonra/Doğu Batı ile Yaşamayı Nasıl Öğrendi kitabı Cambridge yayınlarından (After Defeat: How The East Learned to Live With The West) 2010'da çıkıyor. “Türkiye hakkında bir kitap yazmaktan ziyade Amerika'da o zamanlar hâkim olan uluslararası ilişkiler teorilerine eleştirel bir bakış açısı getirebilmek, Türkiye, Japonya, Rusya örneklerini beraber değerlendirerek, gözden kaçırdıkları bazı dinamiklerin aslında dünya siyaseti için ne kadar önemli olduğunu inkâr edilemeyecek şekilde göstermek istedim. Mevcut hâkim görüş; ‘Bir ülkenin dış politikasını tamamen askeri ve ekonomik gücü belirler, diğer faktörler önemsizdir.' Benim amacım askeri ve ekonomik gücü yadsımak değil ama dış politikayı belirleyen başka önemli şeyler de olduğunu göstermekti.”

“The Meaning Of Memorial Day” “Rules Of The Road And Political Ad Hominem” “Racism And The Democrat Party” “Violent Inaction”

They are name-calling in congressional committees and judges don't like it when witnesses roll their eyes. It's summer travel time in North America, and as we get ready to go see those relatives we really disagree with, we're re-airing an episode on getting along across difference. Dr. Sturg breaks down the research on how you can get along and maybe even help someone change their mind. Why do grown adult politicians call other people mean names? Personal attacks are designed to make you trust the other person less, and they are deceptive. In this episode of UnSpun, learn about how those attacks work, and how a little laughter can make politics easier to take, as Dr. Sturg and Canadian comedy influencer Brittlestar talk about the power of comedy in news. Send us your questions and comments at theunspunpodcast@gmail.com and don't forget to like and subscribe! Follow Dr. SturgTwitter - Prof. Amanda Sturgill (@DrSturg) / XWebsite - Sturg saysThe Book - We are #AltGovhttps://rowman.com/ISBN/9781538162095/We-Are-#ALTGOV-Social-Media-Resistance-from-the-Inside

When you resort to name calling, you lose all credibility.

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for March 6, 2024 is: ad hominem • ad-HAH-muh-num • adjective Something described as ad hominem involves an attack on an opponent's character rather than an answer to assertions or points that the opponent has made. // The debate between the mayoral candidates was going smoothly until the ad hominem attacks began. See the entry > Examples: “Ad hominem arguments are viewed, almost universally, as bad, bad, bad.... Students are taught to differentiate between their opponent and their opponent's argument. The rationale for doing so makes perfect sense. In theory, a person's merits are irrelevant to whether their argument makes logical sense. An argument depends on nothing more than whether its conclusion follows its premises; the speaker, you might say, is just the messenger.” — Mehdi Hasan, Win Every Argument: The Art of Debating, Persuading, and Public Speaking, 2023 Did you know? Ad hominem literally means “to the person” in New Latin (Latin as used since the end of the medieval period). In centuries past, the term was used in the phrase “argument ad hominem” (or argumentum ad hominem, to use the full New Latin phrase) to refer to a method of persuasion in which one introduces issues that relate personally to one's opponent, such as the opponent's habits, practices, or circumstances, instead of just sticking to principles or facts. What exactly came into play in such persuasions eventually expanded, and ad hominem came to describe an attack aimed at an opponent's character rather than their ideas. The hostile nature of such attacks has led to an understanding of the term as meaning “against the person,” rather than its original Latin meaning of “to the person.”

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for March 6, 2024 is: ad hominem • ad-HAH-muh-num • adjective Something described as ad hominem involves an attack on an opponent's character rather than an answer to assertions or points that the opponent has made. // The debate between the mayoral candidates was going smoothly until the ad hominem attacks began. See the entry > Examples: “Ad hominem arguments are viewed, almost universally, as bad, bad, bad.... Students are taught to differentiate between their opponent and their opponent's argument. The rationale for doing so makes perfect sense. In theory, a person's merits are irrelevant to whether their argument makes logical sense. An argument depends on nothing more than whether its conclusion follows its premises; the speaker, you might say, is just the messenger.” — Mehdi Hasan, Win Every Argument: The Art of Debating, Persuading, and Public Speaking, 2023 Did you know? Ad hominem literally means “to the person” in New Latin (Latin as used since the end of the medieval period). In centuries past, the term was used in the phrase “argument ad hominem” (or argumentum ad hominem, to use the full New Latin phrase) to refer to a valid method of persuasion by which one takes advantage of an opponent's interests or feelings in a debate, instead of just sticking to general principles. What exactly came into play in such persuasions eventually expanded, and ad hominem came to describe an attack aimed at an opponent's character rather than their ideas. It's in this decidedly less civil application that ad hominem appears today. The hostile nature of such attacks has led to an understanding of the term as meaning “against the person,” rather than its original Latin meaning of “to the person.”

Merriam-Webster's Word of the Day for March 6, 2024 is: ad hominem • ad-HAH-muh-num • adjective Something described as ad hominem involves an attack on an opponent's character rather than an answer to assertions or points that the opponent has made. // The debate between the mayoral candidates was going smoothly until the ad hominem attacks began. See the entry > Examples: “Ad hominem arguments are viewed, almost universally, as bad, bad, bad.... Students are taught to differentiate between their opponent and their opponent's argument. The rationale for doing so makes perfect sense. In theory, a person's merits are irrelevant to whether their argument makes logical sense. An argument depends on nothing more than whether its conclusion follows its premises; the speaker, you might say, is just the messenger.” — Mehdi Hasan, Win Every Argument: The Art of Debating, Persuading, and Public Speaking, 2023 Did you know? Ad hominem literally means “to the person” in New Latin (Latin as used since the end of the medieval period). In centuries past, the term was used in the phrase “argument ad hominem” (or argumentum ad hominem, to use the full New Latin phrase) to refer to a valid method of persuasion by which one takes advantage of an opponent's interests or feelings in a debate, instead of just sticking to general principles. What exactly came into play in such persuasions eventually expanded, and ad hominem came to describe an attack aimed at an opponent's character rather than their ideas. It's in this decidedly less civil application that ad hominem appears today. The hostile nature of such attacks has led to an understanding of the term as meaning “against the person,” rather than its original Latin meaning of “to the person.”

In Deutschlands beliebten DRAG-Podcast stürzen sich Margot Schlönzke und Jurassica Parka wieder in ein Hörvergnüglichen Monatsrückblick. ENDLICH geht "Der Wixer des Monats" mal nicht an altbekannte Titelverteidiger*innen und endlich gibt es auch reichlich gute Nachrichten zu berichten. Neben einem kleinem Crash-Curs "Populimus erkennen und benennen" gibt es aber auch wieder viel absurdes und persönliches, heißes aus der Gerüchteküche und eine richtig - also wirklich RICHTIG - geile Sau des Monats.Und dann erklären die beiden Ahnungslos aber Wortgewaltig, was sich da eigentlich im Fußball abgespielt hat. Und Margot hat die AfD-Niedersachsen verklagt. Wir sind gespannt!Wenn Euch gefällt, was wir so für Euch machen, dann könnt ihr uns gerne dafür ein paar Euronen mit dem Verwendungszweck "Podcast" senden. www.paypal.me/schloenzke www.paypal.me/jurassicaparka

In this episode the hosts discuss logical fallacies, focusing on ad hominem attacks. They introduce Brandon Wallace as a new co-host and announce his new podcast, "Truth and Shadow," launching in November. The hosts explore different types of ad hominem attacks, including circumstantial ad hominem and guilt by association, and the fallacy of arguing from commitment. They emphasize the importance of constructive dialogue and avoiding personal attacks. The hosts also discuss the credentials fallacy, sharing personal experiences and emphasizing the need for logical arguments supported by evidence.https://unrefinedpodcast.com/Timestamps:Ad Hominem Attacks (00:03:08) Discussion about ad hominem logical fallacy, where an argument attacks a person instead of dealing with the argument itself.Circumstantial Ad Hominem (00:04:44) Explanation of circumstantial ad hominem, which points out that someone's circumstances or attributes determine their viewpoint.Guilt by Association (00:06:14) Discussion of guilt by association, attacking a person's associates instead of addressing the argument.Ad Hominem Attacks and Educational Credentials (00:11:07) The hosts discuss the ad hominem logical fallacy and how it is often used to attack someone's educational credentials.Attacking Based on School Affiliation (00:11:45) The hosts mention the fallacy of attacking someone based on the school they attended, using the example of being accused of not being able to speak thoroughly about evangelical topics because of attending a certain college etcImportance of Constructive Dialogue and Avoiding Name-Calling (00:13:20) The hosts emphasize the need for constructive dialogue, avoiding personal attacks, and focusing on logic and evidence to support claims instead of name-calling.This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/4656375/advertisement

They don't have truth on their side, and they don't have morality on their side, so all they can ever do is attack the sources of the ideas and information that are opening people's eyes to the criminality of Israel and its western allies. Reading by Tim Foley.

In this episode, Adam, Grant & Jessy talk about their past and current attention spans. Also discussed: the changing ways folks consume media, parenting challenges, and how annoying ad hominem attacks are. Got a topic suggestion for us? Reach out on Instagram @clampcast or on our Discord server.Mentions: Hand Tool RescueMorley Kert Chris Powell of Full Steam DesignsAustin Saunders of High Caliber CraftsmanCLAMPmendations:Jessy: Random Number Generator Horror Podcast No.9 Adam: Escape the Field movie Grant: Walking Dead: World Beyond TV showAsk Us Anything question:"How to deal with ad hominem attacks?" - @dwwoodbuildsThank you to our top patrons:Chad's Custom Creations David Wood from dwwoodbuildsBrad from I'm Gonna Make Joe Hrdina Scott Oram from Dad it Yourself DIY Jarrad Jenkins Miguel Angel Vilela Overall Makerworks Tripp SouthernSupport the showWhere to find us: Adam - @makermackey on Youtube and Instagram and at makermackey.com Grant - @thegrantalexander on Youtube and Instagram and at thegrantalexander.com Jessy - @jessyratfink on Instagram CLAMP - @clampcast on Instagram , on YouTube and at clampcast.com Want to support CLAMP? Check out our Patreon! Also, big thanks to TFTurning for the theme music.

Journalist/Supermom, Maura Gallucci and Filmmaker/Author Steve Stockman join Andrew & I… News stuff will come up of course, but if we talk about our lives and what's important to us each, I think that makes it interesting. I acknowledge my treatments. I've been using my forced laziness to sit and talk with more friends than ever before. Side effects are not terrible, but it's good to be near a couch and a bathroom. I'm reading a book about Jesus. How did that happen? It has to do with Women's Undergarments. I feel guilty about the small things I'm buying on Amazon. Not the big stuff. The little stuff. And I was sent a graphic. It could be the training manual for FOX. But let's not dwell on politics too much. It's kind of a “how to spot dishonest conversation” guide. Listening to the audio on Podcast Service? See the Video at: - BobRivers.com: https://bobrivers.com/the-bob-rivers-show-20230901 or..- YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXIEFvswGdQ - YouTube Channel: https://YouTube.com/@BobRiversShow --> ( Please 'Like' and 'Subscribe' for Livestream notifications

El PP debe abandonar su actitud ad hominem al decir que no pactará con Vox. Lo que tiene que hacer el partido de Feijóo, frente a los de Abascal, es proteger sus políticas –lo que los separa– y negociar sobre lo que los une. Está por decretarse, al parecer, el fin definitivo de la mascarilla obligatoria. El amuleto pasará a la historia como el símbolo de todo el despotismo y analfabetismo pseudocientífico que dominó España durante la pandemia de covid. Para celebrar la noche de San Juan, con su calidad única de purificación y renacimiento, y se declamó el poema de Raúl González Tuñón. Y se dijo del sumergible Titan lo único que cabe en estos casos, sin postureo adversativo e inmoral: descanse en paz. Y fue así que Espada yiró.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is part 2 of the series on The Definition of Marriage in Public Law & American Politics. Dr. Mather provides introductory instruction on the concept of a logical fallacy. Professor Mather then focuses on specific instruction in 3 informal logical fallacies from Irving Copi's 10th Edition of Introduction to Logic: 1) Ad Hominem, Abusive 2) Begging the Question 3) Equivocation He provides a brief introduction on their relevance to the legal materials (e.g., judicial opinions) in the definition of marriage in public law and American politics. The Republican Professor is a pro-nailing the Definition of Marriage in Public Law and American Politics podcast. Subscribe to TRP Substack at https://therepublicanprofessor.substack.com/ Warmly, Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D. The Republican Professor Podcast The Republican Professor Newsletter on Substack https://therepublicanprofessor.substack.com/ https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/podcast/ https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/articles/ YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublicanProfessor Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRepublicanProfessor Twitter: @RepublicanProf Instagram: @the_republican_professor

Inconsistency usually means someone is not trustworthy or credible...but does that also mean their arguments or claims are wrong? When you can recognize the foolishness, you won't get fooled by it! Sign up here for the Purpose Pursuit Teen Homeschool Conference April 25-27: www.wellspentsolutions.com/homeschool And use THINK10 to get $10 off the All Access Pass! Here's how you can purchase the Logical Fallacies ebook: https://www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/offers/z6xbAcB2 Want to test yourself on how well you can recognize fallacies in real life? Take the Meme Fallacy Quiz! www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/quiz. To learn more about Crazy Thinkers Membership: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/quiz Send me any questions, comments or even the fallacies you're seeing around you! think@filteritthroughabraincell.com Or, tag me on Instagram: @filteritthroughabraincell Sign up on my email list at: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/contact

When someone has a bias, does that automatically mean their argument is going to be wrong? Not necessarily. Don't fall for this common thinking error! When you can recognize the foolishness, you won't get fooled by it! Sign up here for the Purpose Pursuit Teen Homeschool Conference April 25-27: www.wellspentsolutions.com/homeschool And use THINK10 to get $10 off the All Access Pass! Here's how you can purchase the Logical Fallacies ebook: https://www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/offers/z6xbAcB2 Want to test yourself on how well you can recognize fallacies in real life? Take the Meme Fallacy Quiz! www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/quiz. To learn more about Crazy Thinkers Membership: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/quiz Send me any questions, comments or even the fallacies you're seeing around you! think@filteritthroughabraincell.com Or, tag me on Instagram: @filteritthroughabraincell Sign up on my email list at: www.filteritthroughabraincell.com/contact

Join host RS2 as he stakes his claim. See if he can make the grade takes in the journey traveled and sees how much more is there, if the right steps are taken.

Join host RS2 as he stakes his claim. See if he can make the grade takes in the journey traveled and sees how much more is there, if the right steps are taken.

Part 2 of a 2-part special on the topic of logic and fallacies, covering further examples of logical fallacies, where they show up in common arguments made against Satanism, and why such arguments fail. Suggested sites: https://infidels.org/library/modern/constructing-a-logical-argument/ https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com Content: 00:00 - Intro / recap 02:48 - No True Scotsman 04:13 - No, that's not the No True Scotsman fallacy 08:24 - Equivocation 11:56 - Moving the Goal Posts / Gish Gallop 15:06 - Bill's LHA Anecdote / Dunning-Kruger Effect 18:13 - Non Sequiturs / Affirmation of the Consequent 20:51 - Red Herring / Whataboutism 23:24 - Slippery Slope fallacy (and what it isn't) 32:58 - Probability fallacies: Intro 34:24 - Appeal to Popularity / Bandwagon 36:24 - Texas Sharp-Shooter / Correlation vs. Causation 38:35 - Anecdotal 39:58 - The stupidity of "deathbed recant" stories 43:51 - More Appeal fallacies: Appeal to Antiquity / Newness 46:09 - Appeal to Emotion 48:07 - Appeal to Authority 50:14 - Ad Hominem 52:06 - Reducto ad Hiterlium / Godwin's Law 53:22 - "No, that's not ad hominem" 54:38 - Tu Quoque 57:02 - Circular Logic / Begging the Question / Special Pleading 01:00:36 - Fallacies of Division & Composition 01:04:24 - Closing Thoughts  

In which Wolf opens day 8's door... Watch this episode on YouTube here: https://youtu.be/6PIB3_OIUSE

Lisa and I discuss the blessings and reasons for fasting. I take another look at Musk's Twitter Dump, consider the folly of ad hominem arguments, give a final consideration to the Beattitudes and rank the top 5 Christmas shows of the 70s.

Bad Religion vocalist Greg Graffin talks his new book Punk Paradox plus:- When punk became accepted by the mainstream- Writing in a relatable way- Staying in one lane at a time creativley- Having a songwriting partner in Brett Gurewitz- Pre-punk influences- Bad Religions plans for 2023- Not everything you write being gold & much more!Check out the Power Chord Hour radio show every Friday night at 8 to midnight est on 107.9 WRFA in Jamestown, NY. Stream the station online at wrfalp.com/streaming/ or listen on the WRFA app.Donate to help show costs -https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/pchanthonyhttps://cash.app/$anthmerchpowerchordhour@gmail.comInstagram - www.instagram.com/powerchordhourTwitter - www.twitter.com/powerchordhourFacebook - www.facebook.com/powerchordhourYoutube - www.youtube.com/channel/UC6jTfzjB3-mzmWM-51c8LggSpotify Episode Playlists - https://open.spotify.com/user/kzavhk5ghelpnthfby9o41gnr?si=4WvOdgAmSsKoswf_HTh_MgGreg Graffin/Bad Religionhttps://www.hachettebooks.com/titles/greg-graffin/punk-paradox/9780306924583/https://badreligion.comhttps://www.instagram.com/greggraffinhttps://www.instagram.com/badreligionbandhttps://twitter.com/DoctorGraffinhttps://twitter.com/badreligionhttps://www.facebook.com/greggraffinpagehttps://www.facebook.com/badreligion

In this episode, we discuss some of the most common logical fallacies that are used in debates and discussions. The Strawman, the Ad Hominem, the Red Herring. Those are the only ones with cool names, but we go through seven in total. With each of them, we give actual examples and walk through how they work. We also talk about how to avoid falling into these patterns and why people who actually engage with other's arguments like Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson have stood out for being willing to do so and have had some measure of success in changing people's minds about fairly controversial issues. Engaging with actual arguments and understanding and avoiding logical fallacies is worth the effort. It is in some ways the duty we have toward one another and is a way of demonstrating our love for others. Please join us as we discuss this important issue. #SufficiencyOfScripture #TCT2022 Production of Reformation Baptist Church of Youngsville, NC Hosts - Dan Horn, Jonathan Sides, Charles Churchill and Joshua Horn Technical Director - Timothy Kaiser Theme Music - Gabriel Hudelson

In this episode, we discuss some of the most common logical fallacies that are used in debates and discussions. The Strawman, the Ad Hominem, the Red Herring. Those are the only ones with cool names, but we go through seven in total. With each of them, we give actual examples and walk through how they work. We also talk about how to avoid falling into these patterns and why people who actually engage with other's arguments like Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson have stood out for being willing to do so and have had some measure of success in changing people's minds about fairly controversial issues.--Engaging with actual arguments and understanding and avoiding logical fallacies is worth the effort. It is in some ways the duty we have toward one another and is a way of demonstrating our love for others. Please join us as we discuss this important issue.---SufficiencyOfScripture--TCT2022---Production of Reformation Baptist Church of Youngsville, NC-Hosts - Dan Horn, Jonathan Sides, Charles Churchill and Joshua Horn-Technical Director - Timothy Kaiser-Theme Music - Gabriel Hudelson

In this episode, we discuss some of the most common logical fallacies that are used in debates and discussions. The Strawman, the Ad Hominem, the Red Herring. Those are the only ones with cool names, but we go through seven in total. With each of them, we give actual examples and walk through how they work. We also talk about how to avoid falling into these patterns and why people who actually engage with other's arguments like Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson have stood out for being willing to do so and have had some measure of success in changing people's minds about fairly controversial issues.--Engaging with actual arguments and understanding and avoiding logical fallacies is worth the effort. It is in some ways the duty we have toward one another and is a way of demonstrating our love for others. Please join us as we discuss this important issue.---SufficiencyOfScripture--TCT2022---Production of Reformation Baptist Church of Youngsville, NC-Hosts - Dan Horn, Jonathan Sides, Charles Churchill and Joshua Horn-Technical Director - Timothy Kaiser-Theme Music - Gabriel Hudelson

Allison Kaplan Sommer, Don Futterman and Noah Efron discuss three topics of incomparable importance and end with an anecdote about something in Israel that made them smile this week. Hear the Extra-Special, Special Extra Segment on Patreon   —Ad Hominem, Ad Absurdum, Ad Victorium & Ad Nauseum— We watched hundreds of election ads, so you don't have to. What do they tell us about that the parties are trying to tell voters? —Thesis – Antithesis – Screw You!— Maybe nothing makes people as mad as beloved celebrity changing political camps. How come? —After the Holidays— For a month, during the holidays, it's almost impossible to do anything. Then the world comes crashing back. —Oh, Kanye!— For our most unreasonably generous Patreon supporters, in our extra-special, special extra discussion: Why didn't Kanye's tweet bug Israeli Jews (who, one imagines, Kanye's also gone to Death Con 3 on). All this and Meshi Kleinstein, the daughter of two of the most popular singers in Israel's history, now singing on her own (and also with her folks)!

Carter analyzes yesterday's Media Matters hit piece on Matt Walsh. :: For a full description of this episode, visit: https://unsafespace.com/ep0871

Carter analyzes yesterday's Media Matters hit piece on Matt Walsh. :: For a full description of this episode, visit: https://unsafespace.com/ep0871

This episode, like the episode last week, is what I like to call a "lighthouse" episode. It's more about what to watch out for than what to do. I'm continuing my discussion of ideas that inspired me from therulesofcivilconversation.org. Two more logical fallacies to beware of: the ad hominem and genetic fallacies. Additional Leadership Resources Take our free DISC Assessment. Check out our video series, What You Should Do in the First 45 Days of Your New Role. Follow us on Facebook. Follow us on LinkedIn.

News Even Politico has noticed that southern European countries will have a hard time staying in the Eurozone (https://www.politico.eu/article/mind-the-gap-southern-european-economies-have-diverged-spain-italy-portugal-greece/) Craig Wright loses suit against Hodlnaut (https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/timeline-of-hodlonaut-craig-wright-case), still costs $112,000 to Hodlnaut Economics The silent depression (https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2020/02/11/the-silent-depression-trundling-is-the-new-booming/) shows that personal experience of financial hardship m Tokenomics Long form pieces about Kyle Davies and Su Zu (https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/three-arrows-capital-kyle-davies-su-zhu-crash.html) of 3ac Nova Labs, aka Helium, is still aquiring startups (https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/18/freedomfi_nova/) in a bid to remain relevant No premine, but insiders take 35% cut every month (https://coinmarketcap.com/alexandria/article/what-is-helium-hnt-features-tokenomics-and-price-prediction) Helium lies about business partnerships (https://decrypt.co/106420/helium-pledges-rigorous-process-after-salesforce-lime-deny-partnerships), a typical scam technique Brian Armstrong claims he would shut down Coinbase ETH staking (https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/1560016827253551104) rather than comply with OFAC censorship Top 4 ETH staking pools make up nearly 58% of staking (https://bmpro.substack.com/p/the-ethereum-merge-risks-flaws-and) Bitcoin Education Mapping the nodes of the bitcoin peer to peer network (https://medium.com/@gloriazhao/map-of-the-bitcoin-network-c6f2619a76f3) by Gloria Zhao Feedback Remember to get in touch bitcoindadpod@protonmail.com or @bitcoindadpod on twitter Consider joining the matrix channel (https://matrix.to/#/#bitcoin:jupiterbroadcasting.com) using a matrix client like [element](https://element.io/get-started Corrections None today! Value for Value Podcasting 2.0 to support an indepenent podcasting ecosystem (https://podcastindex.org/) Recomended Podcasting2.0 apps: Fountain (https://www.fountain.fm/) podcast app (Android) Podverse (https://podverse.fm/) (Cross platform and self hostable) Castamatic (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/castamatic-podcast-player/id966632553) (Apple)+ Podcasting 2.0 to support an indepenent podcasting ecosystem (https://podcastindex.org/) Sponsors and Acknowledgements The Adopting Bitcoin Conference (https://adoptingbitcoin.org/2022/) November 15, 16 & 17, 2022 in El Salvador, use promo code BITCOINDAD for a 21% discount Music by Lesfm from Pixabay Self Hosted Show (https://selfhosted.show/) courtesy of Jupiter Broadcasting (https://www.jupiterbroadcasting.com/)

Dave and Ray Ray discuss an SBC Voices "satire" piece that deals with the SBC and women pastors and then they do the first Meme theology of 2022! They discuss the alleged "separation of church and state," guns, and "forced to carry."

Sean Hannity thinks that if you don't want to be poor you should be willing to work "70, 80, 90 hours a week," so Ben Burgis & the GTAA crew start with that and then review an impromptu debate that Ben & Connor Halbleib (Berniecrat & Democratic nominee in Kentucky's 5th Congressional district) had with a Callin caller on Medicare for All. The main event is Ben's unlocked interview with Rock Perlstein, author of "Before the Storm," "Nixonland," "The Invisible Bridge" and (most recently) "Reaganland," which was previously released to GTAA patrons. At the end of the main show, Dr. Jennifer Burgis joins Ben for a brief philosophy segment (on the what the Ad Hominem fallacy is vs. what the internet thinks it is) and then Mean Djene Bajalan from This is Revolution hangs out in the postgame for patrons!Watch This is Revolution:https://www.youtube.com/c/THISISREVOLUTIONpodcastOrder Rick Perlstein's latest book:https://www.powells.com/book/reaganland-americas-right-turn-1976-1980-9781476793054...and while you're at it order Ben's latest book:https://redemmas.org/titles/36536-christopher-hitchens-what-he-got-right-how-he-went-wrong-and-why-he-still-matters/Follow Rick on Twitter: @rickperlsteinFollow Djene on Twitter: #djenebajal@nFollow Ben on Twitter: @BenBurgisFollow GTAA on Twitter: @Gtaa_ShowBecome a GTAA Patron and receive numerous benefits ranging from patron-exclusive postgames every Monday night to our undying love and gratitude for helping us keep this thing going:patreon.com/benburgisVisit benburgis.com

Episode 78!!!!! (3:40) Last week's discussion on Episode 77 about age discussion sparked a tension filled comment section on our FB page where Steph was personally attacked for her opinion, Steph responds and then the conversation turns to why women and more specifically black women attack each other. (26:00) We discuss the WHO declaring Monkey pox a global emergency. (29:05) CEO of WWE Vince McMahon retires!! (46:47) Top Ten RNB Albums of all time from 1980-1989. (1:06:29) Random conversations about Shaq and if Eminem is an all time great rapper. (1:20:00) Conversation turns to Gospel Singer Kim Burrell and her controversial statements she made at church and the fallout from it. EMAIL: Theshortdeskpodcast@gmail.comTWITTER: TheshortdeskFB/IG: Theshortdesk PodcastFor the Love of PodcastLearn what the best podcasters in the world are doing to stand out!Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Whiskeylodeon - The Drunk Nickelodeon Rewatch PodcastYour new favorite drunk Nickelodeon rewatch podcast!Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify REMelations: A Comedy Dream Interpretation PodcastWelcome to REMelations! Join best friends Mindy and Brooke as they share their...Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Cash vs TrashJoin us as we look at the number 1 movie and a box office bomb from 1970 to 2021!Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify MorganMan SportsHome of your Atlanta Falcons and Call of Duty League Content. Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

This week we bring you another edition of Ad Hom classics. Featuring Chris, Ryne, Jeremy, Tabitha and more. 

This week we revisit some old episodes while we move studios and regroup for a few weeks. These chunks of fun are from 2016 and 2017. Appearances by Chris , Jeremy , Ryne , Steve and more. 

A lot of Christian women seem to have the mistaken idea that “speaking the truth in love” equates to being “nice.” We should always be smiling and sweet and never say anything that might hurt someone's feelings or could rock the boat. But what does the Bible say about our tone? Michelle and Amy dig […]

Logic is an important study that everyone should have at least a basic knowledge of. This includes fallacies. Fallacy simply means a mistake in reasoning. Fallacies, when we can see them, can help us see when someone is saying something that isn't true. This leads to people properly avoiding these mistakes. However, people can also incorrectly call something a fallacy that isn't. One of the most common examples of this is the fallacy known as ad hominem. Ad hominem usually refers to "name calling," or making a statement about the person arguing instead of the argument. However, we see all over the Bible making direct and often offensive claims about people, and sometimes even calling them names. However, they do this while also attacking the argument they're up against. This should tell us that name calling isn't always a fallacy, and can potentially be used appropriately to accentuate a point. When we argue biblically, we should be ready to defend ourselves from claims that we're just "name calling" when we are really pointing out truth.Listen to the episode for more!  _____________________________________________________________________ Good Monsters on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVwB26yxtYWUopfFPhAsb8wGood Monsters on BitChute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CDw0Zu3shEqS/Good Monsters on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/goodmonsterspodcast/Good Monsters on Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/6CqhvtMGood Monsters on Apple Podcast https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/good-monsters/id1528869516Podcast Episodes on Buzzsprout https://www.buzzsprout.com/1300948/episodesIntro and Outro is Dreaming Days by Ketsa and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...