Podcasts about federal authority

Send us a textWant to know more? Book your complimentary call: 

During a February 2023 lecture at Harvard Law School, Professor Daphna Renan, a scholar of presidential power and administrative governance, argued that the judiciary should not always have the final word on the Constitution. Instead, Renan believes the U.S. should move toward a more political constitutionalism, which would wrest some of the power from the Supreme Court and share it with democratically elected bodies like Congress.

2/5/24:  Northampton Mayor G.L. Sciarra's on Opioid Settlement funds & school budget deficits. Senator Jo Comerford explains the financial burden on school districts. WNEU Law Prof Bruce Miller on TX Gov Abbott's usurpation of the federal authority on the border. Megan Zinn & Anne Pinkerton, local author of Were You Close?; a sister's quest to know the brother she lost.

“The Federal Government is the problem, not the solution.” So said President Ronald Reagan. Karen Bracken is the Founder of Tennessee Citizens for State Sovereignty (TNCSS). (www.tncss.weebly.com) (www.tncss.substack.com) . TNCSS intends to be a ‘watchdog' group at the state level in Tennessee, which then intends to expand state by state nationwide. TNCSS is supporting a ‘Nullification Bill' now before Tennessee's legislature. Karen reminds us that our Federal Government and the Supreme Court are not the final arbiters of the Constitution. The proposed nullification bill intends to manage the overreach of the federal government. She claims the Federal Government is “out of its lane” and has overreached into too many areas, that the Constitution does not authorize their oversight of. For example, the Department of Education is not mandated to exist under our Constitution. Karen directs us to Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S.Constitution. She points to the 18 enumerated powers of the federal government. “If it's not listed there it falls to the state,” she says. SHE'S RIGHT! Before “Common Core”, before the Clinton Administration, education was a successful laboratory process, where states were not required to have common standards across the nation. “Federalizing education has proven to be a national disaster,” she says. The money coming in to colleges from the federal government, superseded the implementation of good education standards. Federal money distracted our politicians from good education system standards, she claims. Studies show a historic drop in national reading and math scores since the adoption of national Common Core curriculum standards. She now wants to invoke nullification when such federal actions are an ‘overreach'. Karen Bracken supports this notion of nullification to remove the State of Tennessee from federal oversight by the U.S. Department of Education. She claims the federal government has no Constitutional right or obligation to impose oversight in education. In this interview, education is just one focus. The concept of nullification was born from the notion that instead of taking up arms and fighting another ‘civil war', we can fix federal government overreach at the state levels first. Reaching U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators and seeking their support for this HB 0726 is essential. If Tennessee gets behind Karen Bracken and TNCSS in 2024, look for this movement to spread nationwide.Karen Bracken, “Our Constitution Limits Federal Authority To 18 Enumerated Powers?”Originally Recorded on Tuesday, January 16, 2024Season 2, Episode 230Learn More at: GeneValentino.comImage(s) Courtesy of: Gene Valentino  Join the Conversation: https://GeneValentino.com WMXI Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/NewsRadio981 More WMXI Interviews: https://genevalentino.com/wmxi-interviews/ More GrassRoots TruthCast Episodes: https://genevalentino.com/grassroots-truthcast-with-gene-valentino/ More Broadcasts with Gene as the Guest: https://genevalentino.com/america-beyond-the-noise/ More About Gene Valentino: https://genevalentino.com/about-gene-valentino/

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/ Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/ Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew LIVE At - http://Youtube.com/TimcastIRL Texas Declares SUPREMACY Over Federal Authority, Several States ALIGN With Texas, CIVIL WAR Trending Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Supreme Court is weighing border security and the extent to which states can challenge federal policy. Texas and Louisiana are contesting the Biden administration's guidelines on who should be prioritized for deportation. Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal and Theresa Cardinal Brown of the Bipartisan Policy Center joined John Yang to discuss the arguments. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

The Supreme Court is weighing border security and the extent to which states can challenge federal policy. Texas and Louisiana are contesting the Biden administration's guidelines on who should be prioritized for deportation. Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal and Theresa Cardinal Brown of the Bipartisan Policy Center joined John Yang to discuss the arguments. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

In this episode of Frankly Speaking we speak to Christer Viktorsson, the Director General of the Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation in the UAE about whether the world is ready for nuclear escalation as concerns grow that the conflict between Ukraine and Russia could turn nuclear. Also about how the UAE and Saudi Arabia can set an example for the rest of the world in the production of carbon-free emissions as ties between the two countries' nuclear officials continue to strengthen.

In a world where cyber-attacks are ever-changing, cybersecurity has to adapt accordingly. Joining us today to delve into the world of cloud security for federal agencies is Sandeep Shilawat, Vice President of Cloud and Edge Computing at ManTech. Sandeep has extensive experience in both Commercial and Federal technology markets. We'll get to hear his predictions on where the cloud world is heading, as well as what the Federal Authority to Operate (ATO) process will look like in the future. We learn the benefits of cloud compliance standards, as well as how FedRAMP is leveling the playing field in federal cloud computing. We also touch on the role of 5G in cloud computing, and why its presence will disrupt going forward. Join us as we pick Sandeep's brain for some insights into the present and future of federal cybersecurity.Tweetables“Visibility has become [the] single biggest challenge and nobody's dealing with cloud management in a multi-cloud perspective from cradle to grave.” — @Shilawat [0:09:03]“I think that having a managed cloud service is probably the first approach that should be considered by an agency head. I do think that that's where the market is heading. Sooner or later, it will probably become a de facto way of doing cloud security.” — @Shilawat [0:19:43]Comprehensive, full-stack cloud security Secure infrastructure, apps and data across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with Prisma Cloud.

Dr. Wes Bellamy, chair of the political science department at Virginia State University and former Vice-Mayor of Charlottesville, Virginia, joins us to talk about the heated gubernatorial race in Virginia as voters go to the polls today, and where the culture wars have colored the contest between former Democratic governor Terry McAuliffe and Republican candidate Glenn Youngkin. We talk about how the controversy over Critical Race Theory and education has become one of the main talking points in the campaign, which reflects greater political and cultural anxieties in the country, and how Biden's stalled infrastructure plan is having an effect in state-wide elections. Dr. Sharon Anderson, attorney and business consultant, former law school professor and lecturer at Howard Law, and the CEO and founder of KCG Consulting Services, joins us to talk about the debate over the Texas abortion law, SB 8, and how this controversy is raising questions about the power of states to challenge federal authority. We also talk about what it would mean to allow states to decide what constitutional rights are actually protected within them and which aren't, how the attorneys from Texas defended the law, and whether defenders of reproductive rights should be worried. Esther Iverem, multidisciplinary author and independent journalist, host of "On The Ground: Voices of Resistance From the Nation's Capital" on Pacifica Radio, and founding member of DC Poets Against the War, joins us to talk about a ballot initiative in Minneapolis where city residents will vote on replacing the Minneapolis Police Department with a Department of Public Safety, the Poor People's Campaign pushback on the investment framework Democrats are still hammering out, and Donald Trump's comments on a radio show about Israel's influence in U.S. politics. Zachary Siegel, freelance journalist and a journalism fellow at Northeastern University's Health in Justice Action Lab, joins us to discuss the new Hulu mini-series “Dopesick” and how the show glosses over the true story of the epidemic, while reinforcing racialized stereotypes about drug addiction, law enforcement, and the war on drugs.

The Federal Authority of Identity and Citizenship (ICA) in the UAE has warned its customers against fake emails from scamsters, using its name. In this episode, we discuss the implications of such scams. We also talk about drones delivering pizzas in South Korea and Apple repairing iPhone 12 models with faulty audio functions. Listen to #Pulse95Radio in the UAE by tuning in on your radio (95.00 FM) or online on our website: www.pulse95radio.com ************************ Follow us on Social. www.facebook.com/pulse95radio www.twitter.com/pulse95radio www.instagram.com/pulse95radio

This first part of a series discusses governmental authority to close schools, require masks, require citizens to shelter in place and to close businesses.  It discusses how states vary in their approaches to executive emergency power.  At the federal level, this first part explores federalism issues and  analyzes statutes that authorize executive action. This podcast is an excerpt from COVID-19 Litigation: A Discourse on Nondelegation, Constitutional Rights and Statutory Interpretation.  This first-of-its-kind analysis of pandemic litigation  is available on Amazon at: https://www.amazon.com/COVID-19-Pandemic-Litigation-Constitutional-Interpretation/dp/B09733DTVT/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=COVID-19+pandemic+litigation&qid=1624303183&s=books&sr=1-1

On July 10, 1821, the United States of America accepted possession of the Spanish Florida territory in a ceremony at St Augustine. Whatever tranquility the Seminoles enjoyed began to end with this change of ownership. They knew and trusted the Spanish authorities. They liked them because they left the Seminole alone. But these Americans were different. The Seminole had sided with the Spanish in the so-called Patriot War of 1812. Now the patriots were coming to town to run the peninsula. The Spanish days of benign neglect of the Seminoles began to end with this ceremony. The Historic Florida Militia is providing a living history interpretation with mock proclamation signings, musket and cannon firing, and living historians mingling with the public on July 9 and 10. Maria Alvarez. who run the company with her husband Bob, joins us to tell us about the importance of this transfer of authority to the United States. She also explains how her group brings to life various historic periods, such as Pedro Mendendez's founding in 1565 and Sir Francis Drake's 16th century raids and the British colonial period (1763-1783) in St Augustine's history.  FHM presents the past to the present for the future.    Host Patrick Swan is a board member with the Seminole Wars Foundation. He is a combat veteran and of theU.S. Army, serving in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, and Kosovo, and at the Pentagon after 9/11. A military historian, he holds masters degrees in Public History, Communication, and Homeland Security, and is a graduate of the US Army War College with an advanced degree in strategic studies. This podcast is recorded at the homestead of the Seminole Wars Foundation in Bushnell, Florida.  Like us on Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube. Get the latest episode without delay where and when you want it by subscribing through your favorite podcast catcher, such as iHeart, Stitcher, Spotify, DoubleTwist, Pandora, Podbean, Google podcasts, iTunes or directly from the Seminole Wars Foundation website www.seminolewars.us      

Welcome back, you, Inglorious Bastards, and Magnificent Bitches to Doc's Thought of the Day Your daily test of the Emergency Podcast System. Here is a clip from the last podcast. Today we States beginning to defy federal authority.Website - https://thatsonpoint.squarespace.com/Follow Us On;Bitchute-https://www.bitchute.com/channel/8SXcz1rqDyu7/YouTube-https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRNHroldv9kuaatarS7uclAMinds-https://www.minds.com/thatsonpoint/ToP Clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCn_fZ4JhHN05YLijsdmkYSQ/Paler:https://parler.com/profile/DocComeauSupport Us On;Subscribe Star-https://www.subscribestar.com/that-s-on-pointPatreon-https://www.patreon.com/ThatsOnPoint?fan_landing=true

Welcome back, you, Inglorious Bastards, and Magnificent Bitches to Doc's Thought of the Day Your daily test of the Emergency Podcast System. Here is a clip from the last podcast. Today we States beginning to defy federal authority.Website - https://thatsonpoint.squarespace.com/Follow Us On;Bitchute-https://www.bitchute.com/channel/8SXcz1rqDyu7/YouTube-https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRNHroldv9kuaatarS7uclAMinds-https://www.minds.com/thatsonpoint/ToP Clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCn_fZ4JhHN05YLijsdmkYSQ/Paler:https://parler.com/profile/DocComeauSupport Us On;Subscribe Star-https://www.subscribestar.com/that-s-on-pointPatreon-https://www.patreon.com/ThatsOnPoint?fan_landing=true

Constitutional Law Professor Robert Natleson joins the show to talk about the roll back of limits placed on Federal Authority and the impact of a possible Primary challenge for Ken Buck See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Tim and Adam see parallels between the Civil War Ft. Sumter and the modern rabble in Portland, they discuss Trump's ability to reopen states and federal action, and Tim asks, "Is it too late?" Support the show (http://Timcast.com/donate)

Watch The KrisAnne Hall Show on YouTube Today we discuss the depth of regulatory agencies, from the war on drugs to the war on property rights and the war on the mind of our youth. Time to start identifying the depth of the deep state so we can get to work on solutions! #LibertyFirst Ensure this Excellent Constitution Training Continues! Partner with The KrisAnne Hall Daily Journal and be a part of the force that will restore Americans with their Constitutional Principles! To JOIN with us just simple text- impact2020 to 33777 --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/the-krisanne-hall-show/support

AsktheTrucker "Live' Open Forum-ELD Exemptions and Federal Authority Provisions Saturday June 2nd 6PM EST Call in 347-826-9170 The discussions continue as truckers move full steam ahead addressing the 2 most pressing issues in the industry today. ELD mandate and the Federal Authority trucker wage provision. The ELD Mandate Exemptions H.R. 5948 H.R.5948 - To exempt motor carriers that own or operate 10 or fewer commercial vehicles from the electronic logging device mandates, and for other purposes The Anti-Trucker Wage legislation to be voted on in the Senate this month. The Federal Authority provision known as the Denham Amendment or F4A , which if passed in the 2018 FAA Reauthorization bill and THUD bill ( they are currently in both House versions), would minimize and limit trucker wages by way of a New Federal Law  

The latest moves by John Horgan are reminscent of the Salmon Wars of the late 90's. Guest: Tristin Hopper - National Post Columnist

Secession was “a right unknown in the Constitution”, one that, without doubt or question, would ultimately lead to “anarchy and war”, at least that would be what James G. Taliaferro, Delegate to the Louisiana Secessionist Convention, would argue as the state debated its place in the Union. Only 58 years earlier the territory had been purchased from the French at 3 cents per acre, but the US ban on the African slave trade and importation had created prosperity and it flourished. By 1840, only 28 years since it had been admitted as a full state, its premier city, New Orleans had grown to one of the largest and wealthiest in the country. Even as the population of the Bayou state grew to almost three quarters of a million, they knew that everything relied on the 47 to 48 percent of the population that lived in the bonds of that brutal and bitter subjugation known by that simple word: Slavery. They could not and would not abide under a President that would rip from them what they considered their property, and, in turn, destroy their prosperity. To many of them he wasn’t even their President. How could he be when he wasn’t even on the ballot in the state? He would not then be allowed to destroy their way of life. Action needed to be taken. On January 26th, 1861 it was by a vote of 113 to 17 as the Secessionist Convention made its intentions clear. The cannons would fire and the masses would gather an cheer as fireworks were set off and a sense of jubilation filled the people of the state, as if a burden was lifted from them. Louisiana would become the 6th State to leave the Union, joining with South Carolina, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, and Georgia in open defiance, declaring: We, the people of the State of Louisiana, in convention assembled, do declare and ordain, and it is hereby declared and ordained, That the ordinance passed by us in convention on the 22d day of November, in the year eighteen hundred and eleven, whereby the Constitution of the United States of America and the amendments of the said Constitution were adopted, and all laws and ordinances by which the State of Louisiana became a member of the Federal Union, be, and the same are hereby, repealed and abrogated; and that the union now subsisting between Louisiana and other States under the name of "The United States of America" is hereby dissolved. The truth was that Thomas Overton Moore perhaps had little intention of abiding by the results of the election if his side lost. Even as he was sworn in as the State’s 16th Governor in January of 1860, he declared, “At the North, a widespread sympathy with felons has deepened the distrust in the permanent Federal Government, and awakened sentiments favorable to a separation of states.” His view was that, “So bitter is this hostility felt toward slavery, which these fifteen states regard as a great social and political blessing, that it exhibits itself in legislation for the avowed purpose of destroying the rights of slaveholders guaranteed by the Constitution and protected by the Acts of Congress. Popular addresses, Legislative resolutions, Executive communications, the press and the pulpit, all inculcate hatred against us and war upon the institution of slavery – an institution interwoven with the very element of our existence.” When James Buchannan’s Vice President, John C. Breckinridge lost the general election, Moore would order the State Militia up. It would escalate the situation even before the convention met as he issued orders for them to seize all US Military posts within the state in the hopes of chasing the Federal Authority from their soil. Yet it would be short lived. Union blockades would block commerce and trade in what was the third largest port in the United States, and the almost 700,000 tons of import that would travel through New Orleans would trickle to a halt, even as the drums of war would replace the sounds of jubilation. By 1862 the government would abandon Baton Rouge even as the Union Army under General Benjamin Butler pushed forward to occupy New Orleans. The child of the Mississippi, the state would find that it had no friend in it as the Union Army pushed up it to take the state, battle by battle. By 1865, as the Confederacy collapsed, whatever prosperity once flowed through the state had long since evaporated as it was brought back into the Union, the resistance of many of its people long since broken.

There was little doubt that the John C. Calhoun who began his career as a Congressman representing the 6th District of South Carolina and who rose to serve as James Monroe’s Secretary of War, was a different man politically than the John C. Calhoun who was overwhelmingly selected to serve as the 7th Vice President of the United States under both John Quincy Adams and his successor Andrew Jackson. A supporter of protective tariffs, he would begin to oppose them and where he once advocated a strong Federal Government, his allegiances began to shift towards State’s Rights, and limited, more restrained authority. It would be this political realignment that would, on December 28th, 1832, lead him to become the first Vice President to resign the Office. The significance of Calhoun leaving the office was not in the fact that he had. Former Senator and Governor of New York turned Secretary of State Martin Van Buren would already be elected to replace Calhoun as Jackson’s Vice President. Increasingly at odds with President Jackson, Calhoun had assured Van Buren’s place as his successor in his attempt to destroy the man’s political career by casting the tie-breaking vote to block him from serving as US Minister to the United Kingdom. As the Nullification Debate raged on, Calhoun was the leader of that ideological movement that believed States had the right to nullify federal laws within their borders. As Senator Robert Y. Haynes had proven ill-equipped to defend South Carolina’s position, especially when faced Massachusetts Senator Daniel Webster in the Senate Debate, he would leave for the Governor’s Office while Calhoun would take over his seat in the Senate. Part of the issue here was that the Supreme Court, under then Chief Justice John Marshall, had already rejected Nullification as early as 1809 in the United States v. Peters, stating, “If the legislatures of the several States may, at will, annul the judgments of the courts of the United States, and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments, the Constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery, and the nation is deprived of the means of enforcing its laws by the instrumentality of its own tribunals. So fatal a result must be deprecated by all, and the people of Pennsylvania, not less than the citizens of every other State, must feel a deep interest in resisting principles so destructive of the union, and in averting consequences so fatal to themselves.” James Madison, one of the Chief Architects of the Constitution would assert that the Federal Courts, not the states, had the power to determine the Constitutionality of a federal law. Still, the Nullification Crisis was a long time coming in the new nation as States and the Federal Government both sought to assert their place and their power within the Republic. Yet despite most of the states challenging the Federal Authority at one point or another, Calhoun and South Carolina would stand alone in 1832 in their disregard of the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832, even though most of the Southern States still reliant on a slave economy had a stake in asserting the ability to invalidate Federal Law. The situation would escalate with South Carolina preparing to assert nullification by force if necessary and President Andrew Jackson ready to respond in kind. Eventually the issue would become moot as a compromise would be reached. Yet, as Andrew Jackson would recognize, the issue would be far from over, stating, “"the tariff was only a pretext, and disunion and southern confederacy the real object. The next pretext will be the negro, or slavery question." Still, until 1973, when Spiro Agnew stepped down, he was the only man to ever resign from the Vice Presidency. Though he would remain in the Senate and serve briefly as Secretary of State, the Presidency that he wanted would remain forever out of his grasp.

Just as the Denham Amendment attempted, but failed, to prevent Fair wages for truckers in last years Highway Bill known as the FAST ACT, once again the large motor carriers (ATA) have managed to slip in the same exact provision into H.R. 4441, the Aviation Innovation, Reform, and Reauthorization Act, otherwise known as the FAA Reauthorization Bill. The Act was introduced by the House of Representatives. The “AIRR” Act as it is called, is a bill designed to authorize aviation programs, but on pp 256-258, Title VI, Sec 611, labeled Federal Authority, the attack on driver wages was slipped in by these members of the U.S House of Transportation Committee. Listen to our last show explaining the dangers of the Denham Amendment and read more via OOIDA's Fighting for Truckers page. We believe this attack on wages exploits new CDL drivers. Attorney Christina Humphrey is our guest who will discuss Section A and B of the provisions within the FAA Reauthorization Bill. 347-826-9170 and press"1" to join the conversation.