Podcast appearances and mentions of Neil Malhotra

Neil Malhotra, the Edith M. Cornell professor of political economy at Stanford Graduate School of Business, aims to identify the nature of our tumultuous political moment in his work. In this episode, Malhotra explores rising distrust, shifting political identities, and what these changes mean for individuals — and businesses. Plus, the billion-dollar question: “Is Trump creating a movement that is separate from himself or is it identified with himself?” Malhotra asks. “It remains to be seen.”Is there a political question you'd like us to explore? Email us at ifthenpod@stanford.edu.This episode was recorded on December 18, 2024.Related Content:Neil Malhotra faculty profile: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/neil-malhotraA Surprising Discovery About Facebook's Role in Driving PolarizationPulling Back From Polarization: How Business Leaders Can Step Up10 Tips for Tackling Political Polarization in the Workplace and BeyondHow the Supreme Court's Abortion Ruling Played in the Court of Public OpinionIf/Then is a podcast from Stanford Graduate School of Business that examines research findings that can help us navigate the complex issues we face in business, leadership, and society. Each episode features an interview with a Stanford GSB faculty member.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Neil Malhotra joins The Great Battlefield podcast to talk about his career as a Professor at the Stanford University Business School, his writings on social impact entrepreneurship, business ethics, political polarization and his current study on the political views of small business owners.

Você já foi ouvido numa pesquisa de intenção de voto? Como uma pesquisa que entrevista 50 mil pessoas pode ser mais precisa que uma que entrevista 2 milhões? E como mesmo os institutos de opinião mais avançados ainda erram ao tentar medir os votos dos eleitores? A história das pesquisas eleitorais envolve ciência, algumas gafes e nosso desejo de saber o que vai acontecer amanhã. Este é o terceiro episódio do Escuta Essa: Eleições, nossa série em 4 partes com histórias eleitorais. Todas as quartas-feiras até o fim de outubro, no seu agregador de podcasts favorito, você tem um dever cívico com a gente! Não deixe de enviar os episódios do Escuta Essa para aquela pessoa com quem você também gosta de compartilhar histórias e aproveite para mandar seus comentários e perguntas no Spotify, nas redes sociais , ou no e-mail escutaessa@aded.studio. A gente sempre lê mensagens no final de cada episódio! ... NESTE EPISÓDIO -O The New York Times, que chegou a hospedar o FiveThirtyEight por muitos anos, tem um texto sobre como foi a revolução criada por Nate Silver na cobertura política com números. -O artigo que explora se pesquisas de opinião pública podem funcionar como profecias autorrealizáveis é de David Rothschild e Neil Malhotra, publicado em Research and Politics em 2014. -Um dos que interpretou que o maior equívoco das pesquisas de 2016 foi o erro na proporção de eleitores sem diploma universitário foi John Anzalone, que trabalhou na campanha de Joe Biden em 2020. -A interpretação de que as primeiras pesquisas eleitorais em 1824 simbolizam a origem de três tendências americanas, a da democratização, da centralização e da quantificação, foi de Tom Smith no seu trabalho “The First Straw?”, de 1990. -O trabalho que questiona a interpretação dos erros da revista Literary Digest em 1936 é “Presidente”, de Dominic Lusinchi, de 2012. -A história dos erros nas pesquisas eleitorais americanas é contada no livro “Lost in a Gallup”, de W. Joseph Campbell, de 2020. -É possível conferir o histórico de participação popular nas eleições americanas no Elect Project. -Dois vídeos explicam bem como funcionam as pesquisas eleitorais no Brasil, um da Folha e um do Nexo. ... AD&D STUDIO A AD&D produz podcasts e vídeos que divertem e respeitam sua inteligência! Acompanhe todos os episódios em ⁠aded.studio⁠ para não perder nenhuma novidade.

In this episode, neurosurgeons Neil Malhotra, MD,. and James Schuster, MD, PhD, discuss the nuances and intricacies of spinal cancer, and the innovations, early diagnosis, research, and expertise in surgery, radiology, and medicine that motivate spinal oncology care at the Penn Spine Center.

On this episode: Stanford political science professor Neil Malhotra on how the media affects polarization, the intersection of business and politics, and more. Stream "On the Ballot" on Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts. If you have questions, comments, or love for BP, feel free to reach out at ontheballot@ballotpedia.org or on Twitter @Ballotpedia. More about Malhotra:  https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/neil-malhotra    Check out Malhotra on Twitter: https://twitter.com/namalhotra  Sign Up for BP's Newsletters: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia_Email_Updates  *On The Ballot is a conversational podcast featuring interviews with guests across the political spectrum. The views and opinions expressed by them are solely their own and are not representative of the views of the host or Ballotpedia as a whole.

As Republicans play chicken with the debt ceiling, could America suffer a Liz Truss-esque financial meltdown? Alex Andreou speaks to Neil Malhotra, a professor of political economy at Stanford Graduate School of Business, to discuss this financial showdown being played out by Congress.  “Republicans see it as part of a game – this is an opportunity to extract concessions.”  “It's like Liz Truss' financial plans, it's hard to know what might happen.”  “As you found in the UK – what happens first is that the markets anticipate everything.”  “If you're willing to let the country go down, you're in a much stronger negotiating position than if you're not. Republicans are in a stronger position because they're viewed as though they'd tank the whole thing.”  Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/bunkercast  Presented by Alex Andreou. Music and Audio Production by Jade Bailey. Lead Producer: Jacob Jarvis. Group Editor: Andrew Harrison. THE BUNKER is a Podmasters Production Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this "Best of 2022" throwback HCI Podcast episode, check out the popular episode: The Biggest Issues Facing Social Innovation and Responsible Capitalism Over the Next Decade, with Dr. Neil Malhotra. Please consider supporting the podcast on Patreon and leaving a review wherever you listen to your podcasts! Check out Ka'Chava at www.Kachava.com/HCI. Check out the HCI Academy: Courses, Micro-Credentials, and Certificates to Upskill and Reskill for the Future of Work! Check out the LinkedIn Alchemizing Human Capital Newsletter. Check out Dr. Westover's book, The Future Leader. Check out Dr. Westover's book, 'Bluer than Indigo' Leadership. Check out Dr. Westover's book, The Alchemy of Truly Remarkable Leadership. Check out the latest issue of the Human Capital Leadership magazine. Each HCI Podcast episode (Program, ID No. 592296) has been approved for 0.50 HR (General) recertification credit hours toward aPHR™, aPHRi™, PHR®, PHRca®, SPHR®, GPHR®, PHRi™ and SPHRi™ recertification through HR Certification Institute® (HRCI®). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Neil Malhotra author of "Frontiers In Social Innovation" by The Best Business Minds

Corruption is an unfortunate fact of business life. How can you remain ethical and still survive when it seems that everyone else is playing the game? Soji Apampa is one entrepreneur who believes there are ways to strategically navigate a corrupt system. Hear how his NGO in Nigeria is helping entrepreneurs to keep their hands clean. And listen to true stories from business owners across Africa and South Asia about the real cost of corruption on lives and livelihoods.When it comes to dealing with corruption, you are definitely not alone. Which is a key reason why Soji Apampa created an NGO dedicated to the issue. In 1995 the Integrity Organization was born and later the Convention on Business Integrity for the sole purpose of dealing with the issue of corruption in Nigeria. The organization's early goal was simple according to Apampa: “We would like to be that matchstick that starts the bush fire. And even if the matchstick gets extinguished, so long as the fire spreads, we will have achieved something.” Twenty-five years later, they've achieved far more, studying corruption and explaining how it actually operates to help others avoid it — in Nigeria and beyond. “The reasons why people fall prey is, number one, they don't know the rules. So, you don't know the rules, you do the wrong thing, they just charge you. If you do the right thing in the first place, you can avoid those petty charges to start with,” Apampa suggests.Apampa encourages people to do the right thing from the start to avoid the “slippery slope” of corruption. “For many wise organizations, they just bite the bullet from the start and do the right thing, and they can avoid the bulk of it. But if you pay once, they keep coming. And imagine you do that with four or five agencies, then you're totally at their mercy,” he says.Unfortunately, the only way many small businesses can avoid corruption is to stay small and under the radar, but this ends up hampering their growth. So, one of Apampa's goals is to help educate people on how to be ethical within an unethical environment. Leadership, he believes, is the best place to start.“If you're trying to be ethical as a small business, it starts from the posture of the leader,” Apampa explains. “Everyone takes a cue from there. It's not enough for you as the chief executive to be a moral person or an ethical person if you cannot put in the systems for compliance to ensure that even those who want to act immorally or unethically cannot.”Apampa believes there can be upsides to operating ethically within a corrupt system. “The whole anti-corruption thing is not always all bad, because if you are trying to survive by doing it ethically, you have to be more innovative than those who are willing to do the bad things.”Listen to Apampa's advice on how to develop strategies and structures for avoiding or navigating corruption in your business environment.This episode is based on research and materials developed by Ken Shotts and Neil Malhotra. To learn more about regulation, corruption, and leading with values, check out these resources, featuring the two of them:Are You an Ethical Leader? | Stanford GSB (Article)Leading with Values - Class Takeaways | Stanford GSB (Video)Leadership and Ethics: How to Communicate Your Core Values | Think Fast Talk Smart (Podcast)Psaltry International Ltd: Challenges Refining Cassava Starch in Rural Nigeria | Ken Shotts, Geoffrey Otieno (Case Study)Thank you to the voice actors who brought this episode to life:See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this HCI Podcast episode, Dr. Jonathan H. Westover talks with Dr. Neil Malhotra about the biggest issues facing social innovation and responsible capitalism over the next decade. See the video here: https://youtu.be/S3Nm43Gd-1U. Neil Malhotra (https://www.linkedin.com/in/neil-malhotra-011b1459/) is Edith M. Cornell Professor of Political Economy in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. He also holds a courtesy appointment in the Department of Political Science. He serves as the Director of the Center for Social Innovation at the Stanford GSB. He received his MA and PhD in political science from Stanford University. He received a BA in economics from Yale University. He is the author of Leading with Values and the editor of Frontiers in Social Innovation. He has authored over 80 articles on numerous topics including American politics, political behavior, and survey methodology. Please consider supporting the podcast on Patreon and leaving a review wherever you listen to your podcasts! Check out BetterHelp.com/HCI to explore plans and options! Go to cardiotabs.com/innovations and use code innovations to get a free Mental Health Pack featuring Cardiotabs Omega-3 Lemon Minis and Curcumin when you sign up for a subscription. Check out Zapier.com/HCI to explore their business automations! Check out the HCI Academy: Courses, Micro-Credentials, and Certificates to Upskill and Reskill for the Future of Work! Check out the LinkedIn Alchemizing Human Capital Newsletter. Check out Dr. Westover's book, The Future Leader. Check out Dr. Westover's book, 'Bluer than Indigo' Leadership. Check out Dr. Westover's book, The Alchemy of Truly Remarkable Leadership. Check out the latest issue of the Human Capital Leadership magazine. Ranked #5 Workplace Podcast Ranked #6 Performance Management Podcast Ranked #7 HR Podcast Ranked #12 Talent Management Podcast Ranked in the Top 20 Personal Development and Self-Improvement Podcasts  Ranked in the Top 30 Leadership Podcasts Each HCI Podcast episode (Program, ID No. 592296) has been approved for 0.50 HR (General) recertification credit hours toward aPHR™, aPHRi™, PHR®, PHRca®, SPHR®, GPHR®, PHRi™ and SPHRi™ recertification through HR Certification Institute® (HRCI®). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Neil Malhotra is the Edith M. Cornell Professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, where he directs the Center for Social Innovation. He is the author of "Leading with Values" (Cambridge University Press) and the editor of "Frontiers in Social Innovation" (Harvard Business Review Press). He has authored over 75 academic articles on topics such as the relationship between business and society.Read a full transcript and more at https://wecandothis.co/episodes/028Buy Frontiers in Social Innovation → https://amzn.to/3mOCuqoThe Center for Social Innovation → https://gsb.stanford.edu/experience/about/centers-institutes/csiInstagram → https://instagram.com/wecandothiscoTwitter → https://twitter.com/wecandothisco–––Follow Sean at the links below:Instagram → https://instagram.com/seanpritzkauTwitter → https://twitter.com/seanpritzkau–––EPISODE CREDITS:Music by Darren King on Soundstripe

A fascinating, wide-ranging, and spirited discussion about the state of social entrepreneurship and innovation today, touching on key questions including how to effectively measure impact, the true availability of impact investment, how to manage hybrid social businesses –as well as the challenges social entrepreneurs face keeping focussed on the mission while generating cash flow and profit. Professor Malhotra also discusses some of the  research and insights from his recent book Frontiers in Social Innovation-and reflects on some of the key trends that will impact future social innovation.  Neil Malhotra is the Edith M. Cornell Professor of Political Economy at Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Louise and Claude N. Rosenberg, Jr. Director of the Center for Social Innovation, where he has developed a curriculum focused on social issues, impact measurement, and mission-driven business, amongst other topics.  Neil recently edited Frontiers in Social Innovation: The Essential Handbook for Creating, Deploying, and Sustaining Creative Solutions to Systemic Problems    

Disaster Economics, Do We Have The Will To Change? I was writing a piece for this week on the efforts of humanitarians in the world. (This is because I had a great interview published on June 7 on Prepare. Response. Recover.) I could not shake the need to talk about disaster economics. As the hurricane season is upon us, Alex is heading to Flordia with an early-season storm as I read these words. We need to look at some history to address the future. On February 1, 1953, a fierce, sustained storm created a massive surge in the North Sea off the coast of Holland. Floodwaters overtopped the dikes, swallowing half a million acres of land and killing nearly two thousand people. Within weeks of the storm, the government of Holland created a plan known as the Delta Plan, which is a set of recommendations for flood-control measures. Over the next four decades, the Dutch invested billions of guilders in a vast collection of dams and barriers, culminating in constructing the Maeslant (Mas Lont) Barrier, an enormous movable seawall to protect the port of Rotterdam. Since the Delta Plan, the Netherlands has not been flooded by the sea again.In the United States, policymakers fail to look at how disasters and the recovery process are costing taxpayers more money, time, and effort than if we invest in prevention, infrastructure improvements, and meaningful mitigation efforts. Brock Long stated in an interview, "we're in a vicious cycle of communities being impacted by disasters and having to constantly rebuild. And it's almost as if we're not learning anything from what mother nature and history has taught us." In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, which brought havoc to the Northeast and inflicted tens of billions of dollars in damage, it's overwhelmingly clear that parts of the U.S. need a Delta Plan of their own. Sandy was not an isolated incident: Hurricane Irene caused nearly sixteen billion dollars in damage, and Hurricane Michael caused $25.1 billion. There is a growing consensus that extreme weather events are becoming more common and damaging. The annual cost of natural disasters in the U.S. has doubled over the past two decades. Instead of just cleaning up after disasters hit. We need to ask whether we can find the political will to invest in such ideas. Although politicians have called for significant new investment in disaster prevention, reports from Washington suggest that Congress will be more willing to spend money on relief than on preparedness.That's what history would lead you to expect: for the most part, the U.S. has shown a marked bias toward relieving victims of disaster while underinvesting in prevention. A study by the economist Andrew Healy and the political scientist Neil Malhotra showed that, between 1985 and 2004, the government spent annually, on average, fifteen times as much on disaster relief as on preparedness.Politically speaking, it's always easier to shell out money for a disaster that has already happened, with clearly identifiable victims, than to invest money in protecting against something that may or may not occur in the future. Healy and Malhotra found that voters reward politicians for spending money on post-disaster cleanup but not for investing in disaster prevention, and it's only natural that politicians respond to this incentive. The federal system complicates matters, too: local governments want decision-making authority, but major disaster-prevention projects are bound to require federal money. And much crucial infrastructure in the U.S. is owned by the private sector, not the government, making it harder to do something like bury power lines.These are genuine hurdles, and safeguarding the great expanse of the Atlantic coast is a much more expensive proposition than defending Holland's smaller one. But there's a more fundamental problem: the U.S., as a rule, tends to underinvest in public infrastructure. We've been skimping on the maintenance of roads and bridges for decades. The American Society of Civil Engineers gives the nation's infrastructure a grade of C-minus; however, 11 of the 17 infrastructure categories evaluated are graded in the "D" range. In addition, they found that 70% of the nation's electrical transmission and distribution lines are well into the second half of their expected 50-year lifespans. In the United States, utility customers experienced just over eight hours of power interruptions in 2020, more than double the amount in 2013, when the government began tracking outage lengths. Last four times as long as those in France and seven times as long as those in the Netherlands. This isn't because of a lack of resources; the U.S. is the biggest economy. Though we may have the most incredible twenty-first-century technology in our homes, we're stuck with mid-twentieth-century roads and wires.Meaningful disaster-prevention measures will undoubtedly be expensive: Yet inaction can be even more costly; after Katrina, the government had to spend more than a hundred billion dollars on relief and reconstruction—and there are good reasons to believe that disaster-control measures could save money in the long run.  The A.S.C.E. estimates that federal spending on levees pays for itself six times over. That is, the investment in infrastructure is saving taxpayers money. The federal government is already on the hook for all the damage caused by disasters. To be prudent stewards of taxpayers' money, we need to address how much those disasters cost and put money into prevention and preparedness programs. What To Read Global Risk Report 2022: Implications for crisis managementThe Global Risk Report identifies global risk perceptions among risk experts and world leaders in business, government, and civil society. It presents the results of the latest Global Risks Perception Survey, followed by an analysis of critical risks emanating from current economic, societal, environmental, and technological tensions. The report concludes with reflections on enhancing resilience, drawing from the lessons of the last two years of the Covid-19 pandemic.Accounting for probabilities in conflictIn his latest blog, Phil Trendall says that we must stop hiding behind likelihood calculations when it comes to emergency planning. The U.K. needs to think about what civil protection looks like in a war that could escalate.PodcastsThe Todd DeVoe Show  What Disaster Recovery Teaches U.S.Have you ever thought about what happens with the personal effects of the disaster zone? Robert A. Jensen has written an up-close and personal look at the complex work behind the yellow tape. He has chronicled the grim job of sorting through the personal effects and what the unique tool the repeated exposure to mass death brings.Prepare Respond Recover For Waffle House, Keeping the Doors Open is About CommunityIn the Southern U.S., spotting the iconic Waffle House sign means a hot meal, a stop on a long drive, or a place to gather with friends. Waffle House is Americana at its best and a symbol of pride for Southerners. Following the 2011 Joplin Tornado, F.E.M.A. Director Craig Fugate created the Waffle House Index, an informal metric that helped F.E.M.A. determine the storm's impact based on if the local Waffle House restaurants were closed or open. But even before the index, continuity of operations was ingrained in the culture of Waffle House. We are joined in this episode by Will Mizell, VP of People for Waffle House, to talk about how they prepare, respond, and recover from a disaster. While it may not make fiscal sense to remain open, Waffle House keeps operations going for the communities they serve. Don't be surprised if you happen to be in a Waffle House after a bad storm. The person working the grill may very well be the C.E.O. Business Continuity Today The IoT and A.I. Helping With Decision MakingAs organizations look at ways to address the most significant challenges, from natural disasters to sustainability, they need to invest in the IoT solutions embedded with advanced analytics to better prepare for and react to these incidents.With connected sensors and long-range, low-power IoT technology leveraging artificial intelligence, organizations can harness real-time data and advanced analytics to deliver meaningful results.Combining IoT-enabled analytics, devices, and networks will accelerate intelligent decisions and improve overall response time if a natural disaster occurs.Supportershttps://www.disastertech.com/https://titanhst.com/https://www.ndemevent.com/en-us/show-info.html Get full access to The Emergency Management Network at emnetwork.substack.com/subscribe

Are your organisational values embedded within your agency? Do you actually remember what they are? Often they're written on a poster in the hallway and mentioned in induction but otherwise not very prevalent. But organisational values and taking a values-led approach to change leadership can help you effectively deliver and immerse your transformational program. My guest today is Ami Summers. Ami is a leadership development consultant, engagement specialist, an accredited coach and director of Craft Coaching and Development. Craft Coaching and Development is passionate about finding new methods to elevate your life and your business in a way that aligns with your values. They use proven frameworks, evidence-based strategies and tools to help you define the meaningful outcomes you're trying to achieve. In this episode, we're exploring values-led leadership and how leaders can demonstrate their commitment to organisational values and help embed cultural change. Ami shares how organisational values help both individuals and teams to understand what behaviours will be encouraged and brings people together by instilling principles. We discuss practical ways leaders can demonstrate their commitment to organisational values and cement them into the behaviour of their team. Ami describes organisational values as a guiding light, like a compass, showing you your path. This episode is invaluable for change leaders to incorporate into their transformational programs to enact effective change. LINKS:Resources mentioned: Book: Leading with Values by Neil Malhotra and Ken ShottsSteve Jobs Speech: Steve Jobs last speech before deathConnect with Ami: Website: https://craftcoachinganddevelopment.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/amisummers/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/craftcoachinganddevelopment/ Connect with me: Website:https://www.everchange.com.au/LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/drkatebyrne/

Social innovation is all about designing and applying solutions to improve people's lives, and this is something Stanford Political Economy professor, Neil Malhotra, teaches and knows extremely well. As the Director of the Graduate School of Business' Center for Social Innovation, Neil begins with an introduction of what they do at Stanford in terms of social innovation and Stanford's connection with Silicon Valley as the startup scene. Neil talks about a book he co-authored with his colleagues entitled Frontiers in Social Innovation. He tells us what inspired them to write this book and the valuable insights that they share with their readers. Whether you're a seasoned businessperson or early stage entrepreneur, Neil and his co-authors provide advice that will equip you with the skills and tools you need to create and scale your impact-driven business. Neil explains how you can carry out impact measurement in the right way, analyzing the correct metrics, and he also highlights the fields are already oversaturated with businesses and which ones need more attention. One important concept he talks about is the theory of change and how to apply it so that your business model translates into impact. There are some nuggets of wisdom in this episode, so listen to find out more.Neil's key lessons and quotes from this episode were:“Having a good theory of change is a really good starting point.” (14:40)“Don't be intimidated. Don't immediately go to lean approaches. A lot of these more rigorous approaches are in the hands of your toolkit that you might not realize.” (17:03)“The more skepticism you can decrease, it's not only the right thing to do, but it's going to be the most effective in growing your enterprise.” (24:38)“If there's not a trade-off, then there's no such thing as social entrepreneurship. It's just entrepreneurship. There is no such thing as impact investing. It's just investing.” (33:51)In this episode, we also talked about:Neil's book Frontiers in Social Innovation (5:46)Neil's advice on how to effectively measure impact (14:28)Standardization in the impact space (26:04)What to do and what not to do when creating an impact-driven business (30:22)The future of social innovation according to Neil (40:11)Support the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/impacthustlers)

Neil discusses how nonprofits, for-profits, & government organizations can work together to have real impact on today's social issues.

Publication bias can distort our picture of scientific evidence. One plausible solution to publication bias is to create a home for work that for, whatever reason, struggles to find a home in a good journal. Would that work? One place to get some evidence on this is to look at our experience with preprint servers. This podcast is a read through of the (initial version of the) article Publication bias without editors? The case of preprint servers, published on New Things Under the Sun.Articles mentioned:Frankel, Alexander, and Maximilian Kasy. Forthcoming. Which Findings Should be Published? American Economic Journal: MicroeconomicsBaumann, Alexandra, and Klaus Wohlrabe. 2020. Where have all the working papers gone? Evidence from four major economics working paper series. Scientometrics 124: 2433-2441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03570-xLarivière, Vincent, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Benoit Macaluso, Staša Milojević, Blaise Cronin, and Mike Thelwall. 2014. arXiv E-prings and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(6): 1157-1169. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23044Tsunoda, Hiroyuki, Yuan Sun, Masaki Nishizawa, Xiaomin Liu, and Kou Amano. 2020. The influence of bioRxiv on PLOS ONE's peer-review and acceptance time. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 57(1) e398. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.398Fanelli, Daniele, Rodrigo Costas, and John P. A. Ioannidis. 2017. Meta-assessment of bias in science. PNAS 114(14): 3714-3719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618569114Franco, Annie, Neil Malhotra, and Gabor Simonovits. 2014. Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science 345(6203): 1502-1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484Brodeur, Abel, Nikolai Cook, and Anthony Heyes. 2020. Methods Matter: p-hacking and publication bias in causal analysis in economics. American Economic Review 110(11): 3634-60. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190687

Publication bias is when academic journals make publication of a paper contingent on the results obtained. How big of an issue is this really?This podcast is an audio read through of the (initial version of the) article Publication Bias is Real, published on New Things Under the Sun.Articles mentioned:Frankel, Alexander and Maximilian Kasy. Forthcoming. Which findings should be published? American Economic Journal: Microeconomics. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mic.20190133&&from=fBreznau, Nate, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, Muna Adem, Jule Adriaans, Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea, Henrik K. Andersen, et al. 2021. Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty. MetaArXiv. March 24. doi:10.31222/osf.io/cd5j9.Dwan, Kerry, Douglas G. Altman, Juan A. Arnaiz, Jill Bloom, An-Wen Chan, Eugenia Cronin, et al. 2008. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias. PLoS ONE 3(8): e3081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003081Franco, Annie, Neil Malhotra, and Gabor Simonovits. 2014. Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science 345(6203): 1502-1505. DOI: 10.1126/science.1255484Andrews, Isaiah, and Maximilian Kasy. 2019. Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias. American Economic Review 109(8): 2766-94. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180310Camerer, Colin F., Anna Deber, Eskil Forsell, Teck-Hua Ho, Jürgen Huber, Magnus Johanson et al. 2016. Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science 351(6280): 1433-1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251) aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716Christensen, Garret, and Edward Miguel. 2018. Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research. Journal of Economic Literature 56(3): 920-80. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171350Wolfson, Paul J., and Dale Belman. 2015. 15 years of research on U.S. employment and the minimum wage. Tuck School of Business Working Paper No. 2705499. http://dx.doi.

Connie & Alex talk tech news and then quiz Neil Malhotra, a professor of political economics at Stanford's business school, on why Governor Newsom's recall election could have a big impact on tech for years to come. Music: 1. "Inspired" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3918-inspired)2. "Dream Catcher" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4650-dream-catcher)3. "Blippy Trance" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/5759-blippy-trance)4. "Pamgaea" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4193-pamgaea)5. "EDM Detection Mode" by Kevin MacLeod (https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3687-edm-detection-mode)License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license

As you're sitting around this Election Day, waiting for results to come in, sports might be the furthest thing from your mind. Just as when you watched your favorite college football team play on Saturday, electoral politics probably were the last thing you wanted to think about.But what if there actually is a relationship between the two, a link between the outcomes of Saturday's games and Tuesday's election? That was the premise pursued by Andrew J. Healy, Neil Malhotra and Cecilia Hyunjung Mo in their 2010 study, "Irrelevant Events Affect Voters' Evaluations of Government Performance."The new season of the Out Of Left Field Podcast officially will begin next week. But we couldn't let this Election Day pass uncommented upon. And so today's story revisits that decade-old study and tries to project which college football games played over the weekend will have a lasting impact on the Great American Experiment.If you know of any out of left field stories that deserve to be told, visit our Contact page (https://outoflf.com/contact/) and let us know.As always, I want to thank everyone involved in the total team effort behind this episode:* George Hochbrueckner, for the closing theme. Check out his album, Celticafricousticelectric on iTunes.* Scott Holmes Music (https://scottholmesmusic.com/) for the opening theme, Hotshot.* Dr. Neil Malhotra, Professor, Political Economy at the Stanford Graduate School or Business.* Jessica Berenblat of JB Arthouse (https://www.jbarthouse.net) for the cover design.* Rachel Blechman of Tinbear Consulting (https://tinbearconsulting.com/) for her technical guidance and for building a new internet home for Out Of Left Field (OutOfLF.com).* Our sponsors, Everipe Blender-Ready Superfood Smoothies (everipe.com), which has rescued breakfast-time for my family; Soggy Doggy (soggydoggydoormat.com), because it’s a lot easier to shelter in place when your place doesn’t smell like wet dog; and Electra-Craft (http://electra-craft.com/), whose coffee machines keep us all fully caffeinated and surprisingly productive in our new working- and schooling-from-home situation. 

This is episode 1 of Ask a Political Scientist's special election series! We're talking polarization with Prof. Neil Malhotra, Ph.D. (Stanford) and comedian & teacher Sarah Garner! Join us to discuss what it is, how bad it is, how we got here -- and what to do about it. This is an audio recording of our live-streaming YouTube episode, which aired live on Sept. 24, 2020, at 7p ET. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to catch us live (and submit your questions in real time) every Thursday, 7p ET, between now and Election Day: bit.ly/askaps.

Billions of dollars in donations will flow to candidates this year. Citizens suspect all that money buys the donors' influence. But just how different are donors' views in each party from those of citizens? Neil Malhotra finds that Republican donors are more conservative than Republican citizens on economic issues but Democratic donors are more liberal on social issues. Both parties' donors are more pro-globalization than their voters. So which do the candidates follow: the donors or the voters? Jordan Kujala finds that donors make candidates more inconsistent with their electorates and increase polarization in both parties. Photo: Michael Vadon / CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)

Virtual reality and augmented reality are two tech spaces to watch carefully in 2020. Riot Games already won a sports Emmy for the use of an augmented reality dragon in the 2018 Worlds but true VR esports are still a few years away. Neil Malhotra is the founder of vRotors, a game that combines VR and drone racing which gives a glimpse into what VR esports may look like in the future. If you enjoyed the podcast, please rate and subscribe, it helps us out a ton! Multiple new episodes each week. For daily esports news, check out the Esports Minute (https://esportsminute.fireside.fm/). Follow Mitch on Twitter @Mitch_Reames (https://twitter.com/Mitch_Reames) Follow Esportz Network on Twitter (https://twitter.com/EsportzNetwork), Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/esportznetwork/), and Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/EsportzNetwork) @EsportzNetwork Or visit our website esportznetwork.com (https://www.esportznetwork.com/) for updates on what's to come! Special Guest: Neil Malhotra.

Georges Markarian, MD, MBA, FAANS, FACS, Board-Certified Neurosurgeon, and Dr. Neil Malhotra, Neurosurgeon at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, join host Christian Terwiesch to discuss the future of neurosurgery on Work of Tomorrow.Neurosurgery, or neurological surgery, is the medical specialty concerned with the prevention, diagnosis, surgical treatment, and rehabilitation of disorders which affect any portion of the nervous system including the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerves, and extra-cranial cerebrovascular system. (Wikipedia) See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Neil Malhotra, Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery and Vice Chair of Operations in the Department of Neurosurgery at Penn Medicine, explains how he balances experimental research and patient care, as well as how robotics plays a role in surgical innovation. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

I am joined by returning guest Professor Neil Malhotra. We spoke about President Trump, the immigration ban and the power of institutions. Neil is the Professor of Political Economy in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. We recorded today on the campus of Stanford University at the Graduate School of business, live from the Seminar series : moving forward after political confrontation and are joined by a cross section of students and faculty from across the university.

I am joined by returning guest Professor Neil Malhotra. We spoke about President Trump, the immigration ban and the power of institutions. Neil is the Professor of Political Economy in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. We recorded today on the campus of Stanford University at the Graduate School of business, live from the Seminar series : moving forward after political confrontation and are joined by a cross section of students and faculty from across the university.

My guest today is Professor Neil Malhotra. Neil Malhotra is Professor of Political Economy in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. He also holds a courtesy appointment in the Department of Political Science. He serves as the Louise and Claude N. Rosenberg, Jr. Co-Director of the Center for Social Innovation at the Stanford GSB.He has authored over 60 articles on numerous topics including American politics, political behavior, and survey methodology. His research has been published in the American Political Science Review, the American Journal of Political Science, the Journal of Politics, Science, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, among other outlets. He currently serves as an Associate Editor of Public Opinion Quarterly and the Journal of Experimental Political Science.He received his MA and PhD in political science from Stanford University, where he was the Melvin & Joan Lane Stanford Graduate Fellow. He received a BA in economics from Yale University.We spoke today about the elephant in the room, the President – elect Donald Trump, the future of the Republican and Democratic parties and what this means for the USA.

My guest today is Professor Neil Malhotra. Neil Malhotra is Professor of Political Economy in the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. He also holds a courtesy appointment in the Department of Political Science. He serves as the Louise and Claude N. Rosenberg, Jr. Co-Director of the Center for Social Innovation at the Stanford GSB.He has authored over 60 articles on numerous topics including American politics, political behavior, and survey methodology. His research has been published in the American Political Science Review, the American Journal of Political Science, the Journal of Politics, Science, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, among other outlets. He currently serves as an Associate Editor of Public Opinion Quarterly and the Journal of Experimental Political Science.He received his MA and PhD in political science from Stanford University, where he was the Melvin & Joan Lane Stanford Graduate Fellow. He received a BA in economics from Yale University.We spoke today about the elephant in the room, the President – elect Donald Trump, the future of the Republican and Democratic parties and what this means for the USA.

More at http://philosophytalk.org/shows/money-and-morality. Does our system of credit and money make upward social mobility possible for anyone willing to work hard? Or is it just a big Ponzi scheme? Are corporations the essential structures necessary to harness the capital, energy, intelligence, and leadership on a scale large enough to make and market the inventions that define modern life? Or are they just devices for evading responsibility and rewarding greed? Ken and John put these questions and more to Neil Malhotra from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

We talk to Neil, the VP of Claridge Homes about the history of the company, the Lebreton Flats project, the tallest condo in Ottawa, other developments in the city, the involvement of the community and much, much more. Music from Roberta Bondar, the band, not the astronaut!

We talk to Neil, the VP of Claridge Homes about the history of the company, the Lebreton Flats project, the tallest condo in Ottawa, other developments in the city, the involvement of the community and much, much more. Music from Roberta Bondar, the band, not the astronaut!

Host: Lee Freedman, MD Guest: Neil Malhotra, MD How much do quality improvement efforts improve quality of life for neurosurgical patients? Host Dr. Lee Freedman talks to Dr. Neil Malhotra, assistant professor of neurosurgery at the University of Pennsylvania and the Penn Neurological Institute of the Pennsylvania Hospital, about new efforts to improve outcomes in this area. They also look at latest treatments and techniques in Dr. Malhotra's area of surgical expertise, the treatment of degenerative disc disease.

Host: Lee Freedman, MD Guest: Neil Malhotra, MD How much do quality improvement efforts improve quality of life for neurosurgical patients? Host Dr. Lee Freedman talks to Dr. Neil Malhotra, assistant professor of neurosurgery at the University of Pennsylvania and the Penn Neurological Institute of the Pennsylvania Hospital, about new efforts to improve outcomes in this area. They also look at latest treatments and techniques in Dr. Malhotra's area of surgical expertise, the treatment of degenerative disc disease.