Podcasts about final appeal

WEEK FIFTY-TWO: WEEKLY READING PAGE 124 Vayeilech “and he went” Torah: Deuteronomy 31:1-30 Nevi’im: Prophets/Poetic: Amos 3-9; Zechariah 1-14 Brit Chadashah: New Testament: Revelation 15-16 Scripture Memory: John 15:18-21 “If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. 19 If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own. But because you are not of the world, since I chose you out of the world, the world therefore hates you. 20 Remember the word that I said to you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My words, they will keep yours also. 21But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know Him who sent Me.”

WEEK FIFTY-TWO: WEEKLY READING PAGE 124 Vayeilech “and he went” Torah: Deuteronomy 31:1-30 Nevi’im: Prophets/Poetic: Amos 3-9; Zechariah 1-14 Brit Chadashah: New Testament: Revelation 15-16 Scripture Memory: John 15:18-21 “If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. 19 If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own. But because you are not of the world, since I chose you out of the world, the world therefore hates you. 20 Remember the word that I said to you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My words, they will keep yours also. 21But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know Him who sent Me.”

WEEK FIFTY-TWO: WEEKLY READING PAGE 124 Vayeilech “and he went” Torah: Deuteronomy 31:1-30 Nevi’im: Prophets/Poetic: Amos 3-9; Zechariah 1-14 Brit Chadashah: New Testament: Revelation 15-16 Scripture Memory: John 15:18-21 “If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. 19 If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own. But because you are not of the world, since I chose you out of the world, the world therefore hates you. 20 Remember the word that I said to you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My words, they will keep yours also. 21But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know Him who sent Me.”

May 11, 1982. Duluth, Minnesota. 33-year old married couple Larry and Debbie Race celebrate their 14th wedding anniversary by taking their boat out onto Lake Superior for an evening cruise. Hours later, Larry returns to shore and calls for help, claiming that a leak prompted them to evacuate the boat in a life raft before they became separated. Debbie's body is soon found washed up on shore and her cause of death is determined to be hypothermia. However, since the life raft cannot be found and there are a number of discrepancies in Larry's story, authorities suspect foul play and eventually charge him with Debbie's murder. Larry is convicted of the crime and receives a life sentence, but even after he is paroled 22 years later, Larry continues to maintain that Debbie's death was an accident. Was Larry Race wrongly convicted for the nonexistent murder of his wife, or was justice properly served? This week's episode explores one of the most heavily debated “Final Appeal” cases featured on “Unsolved Mysteries”.Support the show: Patreon.com/thetrailwentcoldPatreon.com/julesandashley

May 11, 1982. Duluth, Minnesota. 33-year old married couple Larry and Debbie Race celebrate their 14th wedding anniversary by taking their boat out onto Lake Superior for an evening cruise. Hours later, Larry returns to shore and calls for help, claiming that a leak prompted them to evacuate the boat in a life raft before they became separated. Debbie's body is soon found washed up on shore and her cause of death is determined to be hypothermia. However, since the life raft cannot be found and there are a number of discrepancies in Larry's story, authorities suspect foul play and eventually charge him with Debbie's murder. Larry is convicted of the crime and receives a life sentence, but even after he is paroled 22 years later, Larry continues to maintain that Debbie's death was an accident. Was Larry Race wrongly convicted for the nonexistent murder of his wife, or was justice properly served? This week's explores one of the most heavily debated “Final Appeal” cases featured on “Unsolved Mysteries”.Support the Show:Patreon.com/julesandashleyPatreon.com/thetrailwentcold

RTE's Crime Correspondent reports on Daniel Kinahan's failed bid to prevent his extradition from Dubai to Ireland.

People who should know better don't think there is a crisis in the Church, including people who had previously said that not only was there a crisis in the Church but that the SSPX should consecrate a dozen bishops! Now, they're silent or becoming voices complicit in defending acts like Cardinal Zuppi signing away the faith in an interfaith document.Sponsored by Nelson Insurance Advisorshttps://www.nelsonplan.comSources:https://substack.com/@returntotradition1Contact Me:Email: return2catholictradition@gmail.comSupport My Work:Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/AnthonyStineSubscribeStarhttps://www.subscribestar.net/return-to-traditionBuy Me A Coffeehttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/AnthonyStinePhysical Mail:Anthony StinePO Box 3048Shawnee, OK74802Follow me on the following social media:https://www.facebook.com/ReturnToCatholicTradition/https://twitter.com/pontificatormax+JMJ+#popeleoXIV #catholicism #catholicchurch #catholicprophecy#infiltration

Complete coverage of the State of Utah v. Kouri Richins. She's accused of murdering her husband Eric Richins by poisoning him with fentanyl in their Kamas, Utah home in March 2022. The prosecution alleges Kouri researched untraceable poisons, secretly increased Eric's life insurance to $1.9 million, and laced a Moscow Mule she made for her husband on the night he died.Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty. Her defense argues Eric's death was an accidental overdose and that he had a hidden history of drug use.This channel is dedicated exclusively to the Kouri Richins case—every witness, every exhibit, every argument through verdict.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #UtahMurderTrial #KamasUtah #FentanylMurder #TrueCrimeTrial #JusticeForEric #FullTrialCoverage #CourtRoom

On Monday, Hong Kong's pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai was sentenced to 20 years in prison for colluding with foreign forces under the city's controversial national security law. The family of the 78-year-old, who is a British citizen, have appealed to foreign governments to call for Lai's release. Lai's sentence, which is the harshest yet under this law, has caused global concern over whether this is an attempt by Beijing to crackdown on dissent and democracy in the Chinese territory. We speak to Danny Vincent, the BBC's Hong Kong reporter, who was the last journalist to interview Jimmy Lai. Producers: Sam Chantarasak and Chris Benderev Executive producer: James Shield Mix: Travis Evans Senior news editor: China Collins Photo: Jimmy Lai is escorted out of a Correctional Services Department vehicle and into the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong, China, 09 February 2021. Credit: Tyrone Sui/Reuters

Final AppealSupport the show: https://www.tan.org.au/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Pastor Nate Hobert continues our series through the book of Job, where we see Job's final appeal that puts both himself and God on trial.  Resources: Trusting God in the Darkness, Christopher Ash, Job commentary, Longman.

Every Thursday, Pantha Politix Podcast brings you real talk for the real world. Join Seven Da Pantha, Monster Elicit, and P7 for honest, engaging, and entertaining takes on topics relevant to Hip-Hop culture without pulling punches to protect "relationships". The frontline for real talk in podcasting, Pantha Politix Podcast might just change your perspective on what you see --and what you think you know.Follow the squad on IG, Facebook, or TikTok, stream us wherever you listen to podcasts or watch us on Rumble and YouTube! https://linktree.com/PanthaPolitixPod Gravitas OUT NOWhttps://sevendapantha.bandcamp.com/album/gravitas-da-album-2 Book Of The Monster Vol. 1 OUT NOW: https://monsterelicit.bandcamp.com/album/book-of-the-monster-volume-one Son Of The Morning OUT NOWhttps://mojobarnes.bandcamp.com/album/son-of-the-morning-2

Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.   Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies

Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.   Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.   Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/east-asian-studies

Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.   Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/lgbtq-studies

Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.   Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.   Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

1 Corinthians: A Church Gone Wild - Chapter 3-4Podcast from Nfluence Church | Granger, IndianaFeaturing: Pastor Lucas Miles

1 Corinthians: A Church Gone Wild - Chapter 3-4Podcast from Nfluence Church | Granger, IndianaFeaturing: Pastor Lucas Miles

info@calvaryem.org (Calvary Community Church of East Millst

As Paul is concluding his letter to the church at Rome, he makes two final appeals to them. Watch out for those who teach contrary to the doctrine they've received and avoid those who teach such things. The truth and right doctrine is a priority for the apostle Paul and should be for all Christians.

Ghislaine Maxwell and her legal team made their appeal in front of the 2nd circuit court of appeals yesterday and to say that they were skeptical of her narrative would be an understatement.   Maxwell and her team attempted to shield themselves within the confines of the ludicrous NPA Epstein secured, but theprosecutors and the Judges weren't having it.In this episode, we get a recap of what went down at Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal hearing and what the landscape might look like moving forward.(commercial at 8:40)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell faces skeptical panel in appeal of US sex trafficking conviction | ReutersBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Have you ever wondered about the incredible cost behind God's creation and the gift of salvation? In this eye-opening video, we dive deep into the beauty of God's creation, the purpose behind it, and the ultimate price paid for our salvation. Discover how God's love and sacrifice are woven into every detail of His plan for humanity. Whether you're seeking answers, inspiration, or a deeper connection with your faith, this message will leave you in awe of God's incredible love. Don't miss this life-changing exploration of creation, redemption, and the priceless gift of salvation. Watch now and be transformed! 00:00 Introduction and Opening Praise 00:22 Exploring the Hymn 'At Calvary' 01:15 The Cost of Salvation 01:24 Creation by God's Word 05:02 The Unique Creation of Man 05:48 The Word and Salvation 06:22 The Costliness of Salvation 08:43 Final Appeal and Blessings

Understanding Salvation: How Satan Blinds Us In this episode, we discuss the greatness of God and the importance of taking time to be holy. We dive deep into the topic of salvation, focusing on how Satan keeps people in darkness by blinding their eyes and hardening their hearts. Using various Bible scriptures, we explain how Satan's deception prevents people from seeing the truth and receiving spiritual healing. We also explore how the Holy Spirit works to remove this blindness and bring conviction, leading people to repentance and salvation. Join us as we share the powerful message of God's love and the need to trust Him. 00:00 Introduction and Praise 00:38 The Importance of Salvation 00:58 Satan's Power and Deception 02:14 Spiritual Blindness 02:59 Parables and Understanding 04:01 Conversion and Spiritual Healing 07:18 The Role of the Holy Spirit 07:52 Conviction and Repentance 09:07 The Story of Jonah and Nineveh 10:21 Final Appeal and Conclusion

www.marktreichel.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/ The NCUA Appeal Process: A Complete Guide # NCUA Appeal Process with Mark Treichel## OverviewThis episode covers the formal appeal process at NCUA, detailing how credit unions can appeal examination findings and supervisory determinations.## Key Points About Initial Response to Examination Findings- Start with the examiner level - resolving issues at the lowest level is most time and cost-efficient- Common reasons for appeals include:  - Factual errors not corrected  - CAMEL code downgrades  - Requirements that could negatively impact member service  - Requirements affecting capital building or earnings  - Requirements impacting liquidity control## What Can Be AppealedMaterial supervisory determinations that may significantly affect:- Capital- Earnings - Operating flexibility- Nature/level of supervisory oversightSpecifically includes:- Composite examination ratings of 3, 4, or 5- Loan loss reserve adequacy determinations- Classification of significant loans/assets- Federal consumer financial law compliance determinations- Certain waiver requests/additional authority applications## Appeal Process Timeline1. Initial Appeal to Regional Director   - Must file within 30 days of examination   - Regional Director has 30 days to respond2. Secondary Appeal Options (if Regional Director denies)   - 30 days to appeal to either:     - Office of Examination & Insurance, OR     - Supervisory Review Committee (recommended path)   - These bodies have 60 days to respond   - Can request oral hearing with Supervisory Review Committee3. Final Appeal to NCUA Board   - 30 days to file after previous denial   - Board has 90 days to decide   - May request oral hearing (not guaranteed)Total timeline can extend 8-12 months, especially if oral hearings are involved.## Important Considerations- Must follow each step sequentially - cannot skip levels- Component CAMEL ratings cannot be directly appealed, but arguments about components support composite rating appeals- Document resolutions are negotiable- Appeals create an administrative record- Partial victories possible at each level- Success likelihood typically increases at higher levels- "Tie goes to the runner" - burden of proof is on the credit union## ResourcesRelated regulations:- Part 746, Subpart A of NCUA regulations- Preamble to final rule provides important context## Contact InformationFor more information or consultation about appeals:- Connect with Mark Treichel on LinkedIn- Contact Credit Union Exam Solutions*Note: This episode expands on an earlier podcast about the regional appeal process featuring Todd Miller.*

Jimmy Lai, one of Hong Kong's most influential pro-democracy figures, has testified in court for the first time in a national security trial that may see him sentenced to life in jail.Also in the programme: Washington is sending anti-personnel landmines to Ukraine in a reversal of previous policy as the Russian advance gathers pace; and we speak to Richard Flanagan, the first writer to win both the Booker Prize for fiction and the Baillie Gifford Prize for non-fiction.(Picture: Media mogul Jimmy Lai, founder of Apple Daily, arrives at the Court of Final Appeal, in a prison van in Hong Kong. Credit: Reuters).

Full series: Chapters 00:00:00 Respect for Understanding 00:01:10 Call for Women's Rights 00:01:33 The Role of Education 00:02:26 French Society and Morality 00:04:32 Contending for Women's Rights 00:06:54 Arguments Against Oppression 00:08:45 The Impact of Exclusion 00:10:33 The Need for Equitable Laws 00:11:54 Conclusion and Final Appeal

July 8, 1983. Winter Haven, Florida. 47-year old Nancy Drake is viciously attacked inside her church after being bludgeoned with a claw-toothed hammer during an apparent robbery. Nancy is left comatose, but when she wakes up, she has no memory of the incident. Suspicion turns towards Nancy's 45-year old husband, Thomas Drake, who took out a life insurance policy on her while conducting a secret affair with another woman. Thomas is charged with attempted murder and found guilty at trial, but shortly thereafter, Nancy claims that her memory has returned and she now recalls being attacked by another man. This leads to Thomas receiving a new trial, but he is found guilty a second time and remains incarcerated to this day. Did Thomas Drake attempt to bludgeon his wife to death with a hammer, or was someone else responsible? On this episode of “The Path Went Chilly”, Jules and Robin explore a controversial “Final Appeal” case from “Unsolved Mysteries” which did not even air on television until over 16 years after it was originally produced. Patreon.com/julesandashleyPatreon.com/thetrailwentcold

Queensland's political leaders make their last-ditch appeal to voters as the state heads to the poll this weekend

Queensland's political leaders make their last-ditch appeal to voters as the state heads to the poll this weekend

July 8, 1983. Winter Haven, Florida. 47-year old Nancy Drake is viciously attacked inside her church after being bludgeoned with a claw-toothed hammer during an apparent robbery. Nancy is left comatose, but when she wakes up, she has no memory of the incident. Suspicion turns towards Nancy's 45-year old husband, Thomas Drake, who took out a life insurance policy on her while conducting a secret affair with another woman. Thomas is charged with attempted murder and found guilty at trial, but shortly thereafter, Nancy claims that her memory has returned and she now recalls being attacked by another man. This leads to Thomas receiving a new trial, but he is found guilty a second time and remains incarcerated to this day. Did Thomas Drake attempt to bludgeon his wife to death with a hammer, or was someone else responsible? On this episode of “The Path Went Chilly”, Jules and Robin explore a controversial “Final Appeal” case from “Unsolved Mysteries” which did not even air on television until over 16 years after it was originally produced.Patreon.com/julesandashleyPatreon.com/thetrailwentcold

AP correspondent Charles de Ledesma reports Apple and Google both face defeats in European Union legal cases.

Critics are urging Australian judges serving on Hong Kong's highest court to resign. Fellow foreign justices have stepped down, some in response to the enactment of national security laws, which aims to stifle dissent and democratic freedoms. The involvement of foreign judges on Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal has a long history. Hong Kong was aiming to maintain its common law system after it was handed back by the British to China in 1997. But some critics say Hong Kong's current retention of this system is a move to preserve the city's international image, and prove the independence of Hong Kong's judiciary from Chinese rule.

On February 20 and 21, the High Court in the United Kingdom heard Julian Assange's case for the right to appeal his extradition to the United States. Clearing the FOG speaks with Chip Gibbons, a lawyer and journalist with Defending Rights and Dissent, who attended the hearing. Gibbons describes the intentional efforts by the UK court to prevent media from covering the hearing, which is ironic as the hearing was fundamentally about the attack on press freedom, and what Julian Assange's options are depending on what the court decides. Gibbons makes the point that the United States has given up all pretense of protecting Assange's health and life if he is extradited, even though that admission would be enough to block his extradition, revealing the lack of regard for the law and Assange's human rights that has been evident throughout this prosecution. For more information, visit PopularResistance.org.

(2:06) The Rothschild Connection That Must Not Be Named The Rothschild dynasty has always been known for shrewd insights that pay dividends down the road, as well as their globalist machinations. Which makes this connection all the more interesting(27:43) Google's RACISM: one picture is worth a thousand words, but there are THOUSANDS of pictures. One of the wealthiest, most powerful companies in the world (thanks to US govt) is also one of the most bigoted, biased, hateful — as the ugly panorama of actions and corporate culture continue to expand(51:46) "CENSORSHIP = SPEECH": Will SCOTUS Agree Corporations Must Be Free to Censor Whomever Feds Tell Them To Censor? The Supreme Court will way in to challenges about both Florida & Texas state laws to stop censorship. CNN and the left portray these laws as censorship of the corporations. Is "content moderation" corporate "free speech" or government censorship? Do corporations even HAVE rights? SCOTUS knew the answer 78 years ago, here it is…(1:05:19) Ill conceived law in Florida will make it easy for unelected officials (i.e., bureaucrats) to sue anyone who criticizes them for defamation(1:08:19) Ireland law will take censorship to a level not even seen in EU. Possession of hateful material (such as Bibles) will be a felony(1:19:04) INFLATION + WAR = GOLD. Multiple analysts make he case Also, the first M1 Abrams tank to see service in Ukraine is now smoldering metal — "burns just like the rest of them" mocked the Russians(1:33:13) Nigeria, desperate to push CBDC, now closes access to multiple crypto sites(1:37:08) National Parks are going cashless. Fani Willis says cash payments are just fine for her although she has used Civil Asset Forfeiture and RICO to steal it from others claiming the mere presence of cash is evidence of criminal activity. Most likely true in HER case as she mistakenly thinks she was accused of being a "cash whore" (not hoarder). If the shoe fits…(1:45:30) So why is Trump still so wildly popular, especially with Christian? Here's one possible explanation(1:56:15) All Black Female NY Supreme Court Will Hear Trump's Final Appeal of $500M Judgement Only 1.5% of lawyers are black female but 100% of NY State Supreme Court. What are the chances? What are Trump's chances. And one of the "Supremes" is named — looks like "Nothing But Heartaches" from Diane & the Supremes(2:02:00) INTERVIEW Wargaming the American Apocalypse Desc: What's the greatest threat to America — and what we can DO about it? Jack Lawson, CivilDefenseManual.com answersFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHT

(2:06) The Rothschild Connection That Must Not Be Named The Rothschild dynasty has always been known for shrewd insights that pay dividends down the road, as well as their globalist machinations. Which makes this connection all the more interesting(27:43) Google's RACISM: one picture is worth a thousand words, but there are THOUSANDS of pictures. One of the wealthiest, most powerful companies in the world (thanks to US govt) is also one of the most bigoted, biased, hateful — as the ugly panorama of actions and corporate culture continue to expand(51:46) "CENSORSHIP = SPEECH": Will SCOTUS Agree Corporations Must Be Free to Censor Whomever Feds Tell Them To Censor? The Supreme Court will way in to challenges about both Florida & Texas state laws to stop censorship. CNN and the left portray these laws as censorship of the corporations. Is "content moderation" corporate "free speech" or government censorship? Do corporations even HAVE rights? SCOTUS knew the answer 78 years ago, here it is…(1:05:19) Ill conceived law in Florida will make it easy for unelected officials (i.e., bureaucrats) to sue anyone who criticizes them for defamation(1:08:19) Ireland law will take censorship to a level not even seen in EU. Possession of hateful material (such as Bibles) will be a felony(1:19:04) INFLATION + WAR = GOLD. Multiple analysts make he case Also, the first M1 Abrams tank to see service in Ukraine is now smoldering metal — "burns just like the rest of them" mocked the Russians(1:33:13) Nigeria, desperate to push CBDC, now closes access to multiple crypto sites(1:37:08) National Parks are going cashless. Fani Willis says cash payments are just fine for her although she has used Civil Asset Forfeiture and RICO to steal it from others claiming the mere presence of cash is evidence of criminal activity. Most likely true in HER case as she mistakenly thinks she was accused of being a "cash whore" (not hoarder). If the shoe fits…(1:45:30) So why is Trump still so wildly popular, especially with Christian? Here's one possible explanation(1:56:15) All Black Female NY Supreme Court Will Hear Trump's Final Appeal of $500M Judgement Only 1.5% of lawyers are black female but 100% of NY State Supreme Court. What are the chances? What are Trump's chances. And one of the "Supremes" is named — looks like "Nothing But Heartaches" from Diane & the Supremes(2:02:00) INTERVIEW Wargaming the American Apocalypse Desc: What's the greatest threat to America — and what we can DO about it? Jack Lawson, CivilDefenseManual.com answersFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHT

Krystal and Emily discuss Alabama's SCOTUS ruling embryos are kids, Trump team plots abortion ban, Nikki Haley home state humiliation, SCOTUS rejects hearing affirmative action case, Biden spox glitches over sexual assault IDF allegations, IDF chief tells troops to stop posting war crimes online, Assange final appeal hearing begins, Jon Stewart skewers BlueAnon and Tucker Carlson, and former miner JD Belcher reveals Coal Barons dirty secrets.   To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: https://breakingpoints.supercast.com/   Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

20 February 2024 - David Clements Live 6PM ET - Tucker Interview of Mike Benz - Digital Millennium Copyright Act.  If you'd like to send a message to Congress, it's linked below! Follow us on Social Media: https://libertylinks.io/ConservativeDaily https://libertylinks.io/JoeOltmann https://libertylinks.io/Apollo Message to Congress - URGENT: Assange's Final Appeal! Demand Congress Stop Assange's Extradition & Drop ALL Charges! - https://conservative-daily.com/julian-assange/urgent-assanges-final-appeal-demand-congress-stop-assanges-extradition-and-drop-all-charges

20 February 2024 - Joe Oltmann and David Clements Live 12PM EST - Uniparty Narrative is Failing - Chinese Nationals at Our Border - TDS.  If you'd like to send a message to Congress, it's linked below! Follow us on Social Media: https://libertylinks.io/ConservativeDaily https://libertylinks.io/JoeOltmann https://libertylinks.io/Apollo Message to Congress - URGENT: Assange's Final Appeal! Demand Congress Stop Assange's Extradition & Drop ALL Charges! - https://conservative-daily.com/julian-assange/urgent-assanges-final-appeal-demand-congress-stop-assanges-extradition-and-drop-all-charges

It's Friday, December 29th, A.D. 2023. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes heard at www.TheWorldview.com. I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com) Colorado school kept parents in the dark over gender identity rooming scheme In June 2023, Jefferson County, Colorado Public Schools sponsored an overnight trip for fifth-grade students to Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. Serena and Joe Wailes had a daughter in fifth grade who attended the trip. They were assured in multiple parent meetings, leading up to the trip, that male and female students would be staying not only in different hotel rooms, but also on completely different floors. And they were told that their daughter would room with three other girls. However, their daughter learned that her bedmate was a boy, pretending to be a girl, from another school, reports Alliance Defending Freedom. Genesis 1:27 says, “So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” When the 11-year-old girl expressed her concern, the chaperones, consistent with wacky public school district policy, told her to lie about the reason and say she needed to switch beds to be closer to the air conditioner. When the boy said he too wanted to be closer to the air conditioner, the girl again expressed her dissatisfaction and was finally moved to a new room with only one other biological girl under the false premise that the other girl was sick and needed more space. Throughout all the events of the night, the Colorado public school chaperones were required to follow the inane district's explicit policy, which disregarded the girl's feelings and privacy, repeatedly putting her in difficult positions, and disregarding her privacy concerns. The Waileses have two children who are currently in fourth grade and are scheduled to go on the same trip next year. But the Waileses do not want to be lied to again about the sexes of the students with whom their children will be rooming. Therefore, Alliance Defending Freedom sent a demand letter in late December on the Waileses' behalf asking the Colorado public school to clarify whether it will allow parents to make informed decisions for their children. Truth be told, the Waileses should seriously consider not letting their children to go on the school trip at all or consider homeschooling. ‘Hyper-vaccination' of children likely behind rise in autism and transgenderism Dr. Peter McCullough, an eminent cardiologist and prominent critic of the COVID medical establishment, provided a comprehensive well-documented presentation to colleagues regarding crimes of the “biopharmaceutical complex,” the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the causes of the hundreds of thousands of deaths from the COVID shot. Now he's pointing to studies that now show a connection between the “hyper-vaccination” of children, high rates of autism, and individuals going forward for transgender surgery, reports LifeSiteNews.com. McCullough, who has made the case that no one in the world has more authority on the topic of COVID-19 than him, provided detailed analysis of multiple scientific studies and data reports demonstrating the government's intentional suppression of effective early treatments for the virus, the best course of preparation for the projected next pandemic in nasal sprays, and how children “going natural with no shots” have better overall health outcomes. Proverbs 13:10 says, “Wisdom is found in those who take advice.” Sounds like Dr. McCullough is offering some compelling wisdom for parents today. Republican Lauren Boebert switches districts In a just-released video, conservative firebrand Lauren Boebert has announced she will switch congressional districts for the 2024 election from the Third in the west to the Fourth in the east, after scraping to re-election in 2022 by only 546 votes, reports the Daily Mail. Boebert, a 37-year-old grandmother and mother of four sons, said that she had made the decision to continue her fight against 'the socialists and communists taking over our country.' She made headlines over the summer after she was caught on camera groping her date, vaping at a performance of the musical Beetlejuice in Denver, and then giving ushers the finger when she was asked to leave and declaring: 'Do you know who I am?' She also sparked controversy by heckling Joe Biden in his 2022 State of the Union address. Boebert announced her switch of districts in a Facebook video published on Wednesday. Listen. BOEBERT: “Today, I am announcing my candidacy for the 2024 Republican nomination to represent Colorado's Fourth Congressional district in the United States House of Representatives. “This announcement is a fresh start following a pretty difficult year for me and my family. I had never been in politics before and I've never been through a divorce, something I never intended to go through. I've made my own personal mistakes and have owned up and apologized for them. It's tested my faith, my strength, and my abilities both as a mom and a congresswoman. “We have to protect our majority in the House, win the Senate, and win the presidency.” Undercover pro-life videographers lose final appeal to avoid $16 million penalty for exposing baby parts scandal And finally, pro-life activists lost their final motion to prevent a $16 million punitive judgment against them for releasing undercover videos of abortion industry insiders discussing the harvesting and sale of organs from aborted babies, reports LifeSiteNews.com. Operation Rescue made the announcement Friday concerning appeals by the pro-life investigative group Center for Medical Progress, attorney Steve Cooley, Operation Rescue's Troy Newman, and pro-life activists Sandra Merritt and Albin Rhomberg. Starting in 2015, Center for Medical Progress began releasing a series of secretly-recorded conversations with officials from Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation.  Those undercover videos set off a firestorm of controversy and a string of revelations about the abortion industry breaking multiple federal laws against profiting off human tissue, altering abortion procedures for the sake of procuring better tissue samples, and potentially even committing partial-birth abortions or infanticide.  In addition, there were video examples of abortion workers displaying callousness toward the humanity of the children they killed in their gruesome line of work. The pro-life heroes at Center for Medical Progress had done the right thing in keeping with the command of Proverbs 31:8.  It says, “Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves.” Disturbingly, neither the Obama nor Trump administrations took action against the abortion organizations over the revelations, but the pro-lifers who exposed their activities were hit with various lawsuits and felony charges on claims of trespassing, misidentifying themselves with fake driver's licenses, and recording people without their consent. Last year, Center for Medical Progress appealed the nearly $16 million judgment against them, arguing that the federal Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act had been misapplied. Sadly, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear that appeal in October. Close And that's The Worldview in 5 Minutes on this Friday, December 29th in the year of our Lord 2023. Subscribe by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com. Or get the Generations app through Google Play or The App Store. I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

For personal reasons, the latest episode of The Trail Went Cold has been delayed until March 29, 2023. In its place this week, please enjoy one of our exclusive bonus Patreon episodes from our archives, and we look forward to profiling a new case for you next week. Thanks for your patience. May 11, 1982. Duluth, Minnesota. 33-year old married couple Larry and Debbie Race celebrate their 14th wedding anniversary by taking their boat out onto Lake Superior for an evening cruise. Hours later, Larry returns to shore and calls for help, claiming that a leak prompted them to evacuate the boat in a life raft before they became separated. Debbie's body is soon found washed up on shore and her cause of death is determined to be hypothermia. However, since the life raft cannot be found and there are a number of discrepancies in Larry's story, authorities suspect foul play and eventually charge him with Debbie's murder. Larry is convicted of the crime and receives a life sentence, but even after he is paroled 22 years later, Larry continues to maintain that Debbie's death was an accident. Was Larry Race wrongly convicted for the nonexistent murder of his wife, or was justice properly served? This month's bonus Patreon episode explores one of the most heavily debated “Final Appeal” cases featured on “Unsolved Mysteries”. “The Trail Went Cold” is on Patreon. Visit www.patreon.com/thetrailwentcold to become a patron and gain access to our exclusive bonus content. “The Trail Went Cold” is doing a weekly livestream show on Vokl every Thursday from 7:00-8:00 PM ET as part of their “True  Crime Thursday” line-up. For more information, please visit their website. “The Trail Went Cold” is going to be appearing on podcast row at “Crimecon UK” at the Tower Bridge, Leonardo Royal Hotel & Spa in London on June 10-11, 2023, as well as “Crimecon” at the World Center Marriott in Orlando, Florida on September 22-24, 2023. To get a 10 % discount on the purchase of tickets to either event, please use our specialized promo  code, “COLD23”, by visiting https://www.crimecon.co.uk or https://www.crimecon.com. The Trail Went Cold is produced and edited by Magill Foote. All music is composed by Vince Nitro.