Podcasts about rousseau

durée : 00:20:01 - Lectures du soir - "J'ai vu de ces gens qu'on appelle vrais dans le monde. Toute leur véracité s'épuise dans les conversations oiseuses, à citer fidèlement les lieux, les temps, les personnes, à ne se permettre aucune fiction, à ne broder aucune circonstance, à ne rien exagérer."

durée : 00:20:02 - Lectures du soir - "Jeté dès mon enfance dans le tourbillon du monde, j'appris de bonne heure par l'expérience que je n'étais pas fait pour y vivre, et que je n'y parviendrais jamais à l'état dont mon cœur sentait le besoin."

Was genau ist eigentlich „Demokratie“? Stimmt es, dass „das Volk“ einen bestimmten Willen hat und den dann umsetzt? So ungefähr hatte Rousseau das verstanden. Der Ökonom Joseph Alois Schumpeter sagt: Dieses Verständnis ist völlig unrealistisch. Es gibt kein Gemeinwohl für alle. Stattdessen handeln in einer Demokratie eben doch Einzelne – aber mit der Unterstützung der Mehrheit. Demokratie funktioniert ähnlich wie ein Markt: Wer am besten „verkauft“, gewinnt. In dieser Episode fragen wir uns: Ist dieser Ansatz „demokratisch“ genug? Oder fehlt da etwas? Literatur: Joseph Alois Schumpeter, Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie, Stuttgart u.a. 10. Auf. 2020

This week on Crack the Book, we move from Rousseau's Social Contract to his Confessions, and let's just say my opinion hasn't improved. Before we get to the books, I share some strategies for getting through a book you don't like (because I needed to take my own advice this week). Then we move on to our two books for the week.In Confession's Book One, Rousseau recounts his early life with all the self-importance of a man convinced he's unlike anyone else who's ever lived. Between tragic beginnings, cruel masters, and an overshare about his youthful “discipline” preferences, I found little humility and even less personal growth. Rousseau insists his passions still rule him—no maturity, not even irony, just Rousseau being Rousseau.Thank goodness we had Voltaire's Candide, a complete tonal shift. This whirlwind satire—part travelogue, part absurdist adventure—follows Candide and his companions through war, earthquakes, El Dorado, and endless misfortune. Yet beneath the chaos lies a sharp moral insight: life's purpose isn't in grand philosophies or endless striving, but in the quiet wisdom to “cultivate our own garden.” The cinematic pacing (that Italo Calvino helpfully points out) is an interesting development, too.Preachy Rousseau and playful Voltaire were a great combination, and Candide was the clear winner of the two. Candide's brisk storytelling and biting humor still feel modern, even cinematic. One book made me roll my eyes; the other made me laugh out loud. Next week: Descartes, Spinoza, and Kant—wish me luck.LINKTed Gioia/The Honest Broker's 12-Month Immersive Humanities Course (paywalled!)My Amazon Book List (NOT an affiliate link)CONNECTThe complete list of Crack the Book Episodes: https://cheryldrury.substack.com/p/crack-the-book-start-here?r=u3t2rTo read more of my writing, visit my Substack - https://www.cheryldrury.substack.com.Follow me on Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/cldrury/ LISTENSpotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/5GpySInw1e8IqNQvXow7Lv?si=9ebd5508daa245bdApple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crack-the-book/id1749793321 Captivate - https://crackthebook.captivate.fm

durée : 00:20:00 - Lectures du soir - "Ces ravissements, ces extases que j'éprouvais quelquefois en me promenant ainsi seul, étaient des jouissances que je devais à mes persécuteurs : sans eux, je n'aurais jamais trouvé ni connu les trésors que je portais en moi-même."

durée : 00:19:57 - Lectures du soir - "Tout ce qui m'est extérieur m'est étranger désormais. Je n'ai plus en ce monde ni prochains, ni semblables, ni frères. Je suis sur la terre comme dans une planète étrangère, où je serais tombé de celle que j'habitais."

Original Recording Date: August 8, 2025Linsay Rousseau returns to the show to discuss the aftermath of the video game strike and her NAVA activities!Linsay's Website: https://linsayrousseau.com/Linsay's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@LinsayRousseauMy Website: https://robertjacksonvo.carrd.co/My YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@robertjackson6644

La Fédération interprofessionnelle de la santé du Québec (FIQ) a écouté l’entrevue avec Yannick Pinard, le président de l’Association des perfusionnistes du Québec. Il disait en entrevue qu’ils sont trop peu, qu’ils sont essentiels à la réalisation des chirurgies cardiaques et que leur syndicat, la FIQ, ne les représente pas suffisamment. La FIQ a voulu réagir. Entrevue avec Jérôme Rousseau, vice-président Organisation du travail, Pratique professionnelle et Négociation à la Fédération interprofessionnelle de la santé (FIQ). Regardez aussi cette discussion en vidéo via https://www.qub.ca/videos ou en vous abonnant à QUB télé : https://www.tvaplus.ca/qub ou sur la chaîne YouTube QUB https://www.youtube.com/@qub_radio Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

Pablo Rodriguez affirme que le Parti libéral du Québec n’a jamais été corrompu… | Lionel Carmant quitte ses fonctions de ministre : sera-t-il le Chrysria Freeland de M. Legault? | Censure: qu’est-ce qui se passe dans les bibliothèques du Québec? | Le bacon, ce n’est pas si bon que ça, finalement… | La FIQ souhaite réagir à une entrevue de Benoit Dutrizac Dans cet épisode intégral du 30 octobre, en entrevue : Mariève Talbot , directrice générale des Éditions de la courte échelle. Dr. Michael Bensoussan, gastro-entérologue. Jérôme Rousseau, vice-président Organisation du travail, Pratique professionnelle et Négociation à la Fédération interprofessionnelle de la santé (FIQ). Lino Zambito, lanceur d’alerte à la Commission Charbonneau. Jean-Louis Fortin, directeur du Bureau d’enquête de Québecor. Une production QUB Octobre 2025Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

This week on Crack the Book marks a jarring shift in tone — and in time. After months steeped in medieval imagination, we start there with Niccolò Machiavelli and end firmly in the Enlightenment with Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Their works, The Prince (1513) and The Social Contract (1762), straddle that uneasy moment when faith and hierarchy gave way to “rational” thinking. And wow, does it sound different. I didn't realize how accustomed my ear had become to the older world until now.First up, The Prince. I had only known it practically caricatured as a manual for ruthless rulers. Instead, I found that Machiavelli offers sharp, almost Aristotelian observations on how power works. Writing amid the chaos of Renaissance Italy — with popes, princes, and mercenaries vying for control — he tries to help leaders (well, Lorenzo di Medici) survive reality, not reinvent it. His advice is startlingly pragmatic: if you must be cruel, do it swiftly; keep the people's goodwill by leaving their money and families alone; and above all, don't be hated. Virtue matters less than the appearance of virtue — but even so, he respects human nature enough to work with it rather than against it. For someone with such a bad reputation, he's refreshingly honest.Before we move to Rousseau, I spend some time reviewing the Enlightenment: what it was, when it was, and how it changed thinking and therefore every other thing in the world! I think it's a necessary bridge between these two time periods and books.On to Rousseau. Two centuries and one worldview later, The Social Contract begins not with observation but with imagination: “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” Rousseau builds an elaborate theory of how people ought to behave, then blames reality when they don't. His faith in reason and “natural goodness” feels detached from the messiness of human life that Machiavelli understood so well. And by the time he turns his ire on the Church in his final pages, the tone borders on bitter — foreshadowing the excesses of the French Revolution.After this week, I find myself mourning the grounded wisdom of the Middle Ages. Machiavelli may be cynical, but at least he's real. Rousseau feels like a man disappointed that humanity refuses to fit his theory.LINKTed Gioia/The Honest Broker's 12-Month Immersive Humanities Course (paywalled!)My Amazon Book List (NOT an affiliate link)CONNECTThe complete list of Crack the Book Episodes: https://cheryldrury.substack.com/p/crack-the-book-start-here?r=u3t2rTo read more of my writing, visit my Substack - https://www.cheryldrury.substack.com.Follow me on Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/cldrury/ LISTENSpotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/5GpySInw1e8IqNQvXow7Lv?si=9ebd5508daa245bdApple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crack-the-book/id1749793321 Captivate -

De regering De Wever-Rousseau kondigt met trots aan dat ze “het strengste migratiebeleid ooit” op poten zal zetten. Want, zo klinkt het, onze sociale zekerheid kreunt onder de uitgaven voor migratie. Klopt dat wel, of zijn er andere factoren die druk zetten op onze sociale rechten? Waarom wijst de regering naar de migrant als schuldige? Zoveel vragen voor deze twee sterke stemmen voor een menselijk migratiebeleid: 

Bianca Gervais parle des collations de nos enfances. Virginie Fortin parle de ce que notre genre préféré de film d’horreur révèle sur notre personnalité Stéphane Rousseau se demande quelle est la relation des Fantastiques avec les fantômes? BONNE ÉCOUTE !

Seit vielen Jahren geistert das Schlagwort „Populismus“ durch die Medien. Was ist das eigentlich ganz genau? Der Politikwissenschaftler Jan-Werner Müller hat dazu eine klare These: Populismus ist die Behauptung eines einheitlichen „Volks“-Willens. Was heißt das ganz genau? Ist das etwas schlimmes? Und was hat dieses Thema in der Staatstheorie zu suchen? Darum geht es in der heutigen Episode. Es stellt sich heraus: Populismus berührt einen inneren Widerspruch im Begriff „Demokratie“. Und er klingt manchmal ziemlich nach Rousseau. Zu Recht? Literatur: Jan-Werner Müller, Was ist Populismus? Ein Essay, Berlin 2016 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Vom Gesellschaftsvertrag, NA Stuttgart 1977 Donald Trump [Steve Bannon], Inauguration Adress 20.1. 2017, YouTube Spiegel Online, Donald Trump deutet Lizenz-Verlust für missliebige TV-Sender an (19.9. 2025), Link

Vi kastar oss in i det litterära 1700-talets mitt. Vi följer Hedvig Charlotta Nordenflycht, den första svenska kvinnan som levde på sitt skrivande, genom hennes förälskelser, sorger och duster med profiler som Olof von Dalin och Rousseau. Hon stred för kvinnans rättigheter samtidigt som hon hade det monetära att fundera över, hyra, skrivbläck och frukostflingor skulle betalas.Få månatligt extraavsnitt och lyssna på avsnitten utan reklam genom att bli prenumerant, en av grimbergs utvaldahttps://historiepodden.supercast.com/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I've created a FREE guide with 7 cultural stories from France, designed to help you make real progress in French —not through boring drills, but through powerful, inspiring stories that immerse you in French culture.

Today we talk about the work of the philosopher Charles Taylor. First, we trace the historical origins of how he views the modern self. From the Greeks to the Reformation. From Descartes to Rousseau. The modern self to him is something "irreconcilably multileveled". Then we talk about our modern focus on authenticity as a moral ideal and why Taylor thinks many people misunderstand what it requires. Hope you love it! :) Sponsors: The Perfect Jean: https://theperfectjean.nyc Code: PT15  Better Help: https://www.BetterHelp.com/PHILTHIS Thank you so much for listening! Could never do this without your help.  Website: https://www.philosophizethis.org/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/philosophizethis  Social: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/philosophizethispodcast X: https://twitter.com/iamstephenwest Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/philosophizethisshow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Jean-Jacques Rousseau é uma figura complexa e, ao mesmo tempo, profundamente influente na história do pensamento ocidental. Sua proposta de reorganizar a sociedade humana com base na liberdade e na “vontade geral” impactou não apenas as revoluções políticas modernas, mas também influenciou, de maneira indireta, visões sobre a comunidade, a moralidade e a organização religiosa. Ao propor que o ser humano é bom por natureza e que a sociedade o corrompe, Rousseau introduz uma antropologia otimista que desafia a doutrina cristã da queda e a necessidade da graça redentora. Sua “vontade geral” — uma forma idealizada de soberania popular — promete a emancipação total do indivíduo pela coletividade, mas o faz à custa da singularidade da consciência, da transcendência divina e da autoridade espiritual. Neste episódio, exploramos as implicações dessa visão para a eclesiologia adventista e para o modelo organizacional da IASD. O objetivo é, simultaneamente, aprender com os alertas de Rousseau sobre participação e alienação, e criticar as armadilhas filosóficas de um pensamento que pode ameaçar as bases da ordem espiritual e eclesiástica.

durée : 00:58:06 - Avec philosophie - par : Géraldine Muhlmann, Nassim El Kabli - Dans la complexité du monde, la philosophie cherche à en dévoiler les fondements et les dynamiques profondes. Rousseau et Hegel, chacun à leur manière, interrogent les tensions entre nature et société, individu et totalité. - réalisation : Nicolas Berger - invités : Claire Pagès Professeure de philosophie à l'Université Paris Nanterre; Patrice Canivez Professeur émérite de philosophie morale et politique à l'université de Lille

What does Gulliver's Travels have to do with the development of the modern education system? Why does classical scholarship see renewed interests in periods of philosophical interest? Why spend 70 pages on one chapter detailing various components of philosophic history before getting to your point on education? Find out as we continue discussing Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind!Follow us on X!Give us your opinions here!

C dans l'air l'invité du 6 octobre 2025 avec Dominique Rousseau, constitutionnaliste, professeur à l'université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.Déflagration politique ce matin : quelques heures à peine après avoir formé son gouvernement, Sébastien Lecornu a remis lundi sa démission, fragilisé de l'intérieur par la fronde des Républicains de Bruno Retailleau, une décision qui place Emmanuel Macron au pied du mur. Nomination d'un nouveau Premier ministre ? Dissolution de l'Assemblée ?Troisième Premier ministre désigné en un an depuis la dissolution de juin 2024, Sébastien Lecornu, nommé le 9 septembre et qui devait tenir son premier Conseil des ministres lundi, s'est rendu aux premières heures de la matinée à l'Élysée pour remettre sa démission au président, qui l'a acceptée. "Les conditions n'étaient plus remplies" pour rester, a-t-il déclaré un peu plus tard depuis Matignon, regrettant "les appétits partisans" ayant conduit à sa démission. Il a regretté que son offre de renoncer à l'article 49.3 de la Constitution pour redonner la main au Parlement n'avait "pas permis" d'évacuer la menace d'une censure agitée par la gauche et le Rassemblement national.Il s'agit du gouvernement le plus bref de la Ve République, à peine plus d'une douzaine d'heures. Sa chute plonge la France dans une crise politique sans précédent depuis des décennies.Dominique Rousseau, constitutionnaliste, professeur à l'université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, est notre invité. Il analysera avec nous la situation politique inédite dans laquelle nous sommes. Il nous dira aussi quelles sont désormais les options du président de la République. Dissoudre une Assemblée figée en trois blocs ? Faire appel à un Premier ministre de gauche ? Faire appel à une personne non marquée à la tête d'un gouvernement technique ? Démissionner ? Et en cas de dissolution, dans quel délai doivent être organisée des élections législatives ?

Send us a textWhat does it take to race at a world-class level when running itself isn't an option? We sit with Meikael Beaudoin-Rousseau to trace a brutal knee injury—down to bone—and the long, confusing road back: tendon thickening, scar pain that burns like hot iron, false starts, and a fitness base built on a handbike, arms-only swims, and an elliptical. Meika is candid about uncertainty and the daily choice to believe that today could be the first day of the comeback. Then we go deep on what that mindset looks like on the start line, from a med-tent finish at Pikes Peak to a podium at the Rut VK, and how trail racing rewards whole-body fitness even when mileage is scarce.We widen the lens to the life that makes the athlete. Meika's a tri-citizen (United States, France, Canada) who grew up in California splitting time between ocean and Sierra, now based in Boulder's running community. He talks gardening, ocean kayak fishing with whales and dolphins, and the grounding joy of catching and cooking his own food. We cover Stanford, discovering pro trail running through Megan and David Roche, and why sub-ultra distances still feel like home while 50K races like OCC/CCC pull him toward longer adventures that feel like missions.The future of the sport takes center stage: how sub-ultra is booming, why FKTs and personal mountain projects should live alongside race series, and the role of storytelling in building real fandom. Meika shares honest takes on sponsorship trends, Brooks' investment in sub-ultra, anti-doping beyond race-day tests, world championships versus UTMB, and the calendar coordination needed for true head-to-heads. Through it all, he stays focused on longevity and authenticity—keeping the community feel while growing prize money, media, and opportunity.If this conversation fires you up, tap follow, share it with a friend who needs a spark, and leave a quick rating and review to help more trail fans find the show. Then tell us: what should trail running fix first as it grows?Follow Meikael on IG - @mountain_man_meikFollow James on IG - @jameslaurielloFollow the Steep Stuff Podcast on IG - @steepstuff_podUse code steepstuffpod for 25% off your cart at UltimateDirection.com! 

Can democracy survive without trust in the law? In this episode of How to Fix Democracy, host Andrew Keen speaks with Burt Neuborne, founding legal director of the Brennan Center for Justice and professor of law at NYU, about the complex relationship between law and trust in America. From Hobbes and Rousseau to Madison, Lincoln, and the U.S. Constitution itself, Neuborne explores how law can both deter or worst instincts and inspire our better angels.

Romanzo epistolare: genere narrativo tipico del Romanticismo, con lettere scritte dai protagonisti. Scopri le sue caratteristiche e i testi più celebri.

09-24 Greg Rousseau full 158 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 19:00:00 +0000 6v8NrptluCgq80CfU7vbGhrtuRgLDeT8 nfl,football,buffalo bills,greg rousseau,sports Bills Football nfl,football,buffalo bills,greg rousseau,sports 09-24 Greg Rousseau Every Play, every game right here on WGR Sports Radio 550, WGR550.com. The official voice of the Buffalo Bills! Football On-Demand Audio Presented by Northwest Bank, For What's Next. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False https://player.amperwavepodcasting.com?feed-link=https%3A%2F%2Frss.amperw

Gustav III (1746–1792) hade ett kluvet förhållande till upplysningens idéer. Hans reformer inom straffrätt, religionsfrihet, hälsa och kultur var tydliga uttryck för upplysningstänkandet. Samtidigt innebar inskränkningar i tryckfriheten och motståndet mot den franska revolutionen att han aldrig fullt ut kunde förena upplysningens ideal om frihet med sin egen enväldiga maktutövning.Redan som kronprins läste Gustav III upplysningsfilosofer som Voltaire, Rousseau och Montesquieu. Som kung blev han en av de främsta upplysta despoterna – en härskare som förenade enväldig makt med reformer inspirerade av upplysningens ideal. Men han föredrog att läsa upplysningsfilosofer framför att träffa dem.I detta avsnitt av Historia Nu samtalar programledaren Urban Lindstedt med historikern Hugo Nordland, aktuell med boken Överlevaren – En biografi om Gustav III (Historiska Media).Upplysningen förknippas ofta med förnuft, vetenskap, tolerans och samhälleliga reformer. I Frankrike fick rörelsen kanske sitt tydligaste uttryck i Encyklopedien (1751), där tidens samlade kunskap gjordes tillgänglig för allmänheten.Den svenska upplysningen utvecklades inte som en enhetlig rörelse utan antog upplysningsidéer inom vetenskap, litteratur och politik. Spridningen skedde genom vetenskapliga akademier, offentliga sällskap och tidningar, snarare än genom en samlad opinionsrörelse, och banade väg för reformer som ökad religions- och tryckfrihet samt tidig folklig folkbildning. Men vetenskapshistorikern Tore Frängsmyr har ifrågasatt om Sverige alls hade en upplysning i egentlig mening, och menat att det snarare rörde sig om pragmatiska nyttoreformer än en intellektuell rörelse inspirerad av franska filosofer.Samtidigt menar forskare som Marie-Christine Skuncke och Jakob Christensson att man mycket väl kan tala om en svensk upplysning – om än i en mer moderat, kristen och praktiskt orienterad form. Här symboliseras upplysningen snarare av sockenprästen som lärde bönder att vaccinera sina barn, lantmätaren som kartlade landet och provinsialläkaren som bidrog till folkets hälsa.Mot denna bakgrund framstår Gustav III som en central gestalt i 1700-talets kulturhistoria. Hans politik speglade både upplysningens inflytande och det svenska samhällets särdrag. I Lovisa Ulrikas omfattande bibliotek på Drottningholm tillgodogjorde han sig europeisk filosofi – särskilt påverkades han av fysiokraten Mercier de La Rivière och dennes idé om en ”naturlig ordning”. Till sin mor skrev han entusiastiskt:”Den är utomordentligt intressant och lägger fram nya och riktiga idéer, som tills nu har undgått till och med de mest upplysta politikers ögon.”Efter statsvälvningen 1772 genomförde Gustav III reformer som speglade Beccarias idéer om en humanare straffrätt: tortyr som förhörsmetod avskaffades och dödsstraffet begränsades från 1779 till att gälla endast mord, dråp och barnamord. Barnamordsplakatet 1778 gav ogifta mödrar rätt att föda anonymt för att minska barnamorden.Bildtext: Gustav III (i guldfärgad rock) tillsammans med sina bröder prins Fredrik Adolf och prins Karl, den senare sedermera kung Karl XIII. Gustav III framställs ofta som en upplyst despot – en monark som förenade enväldets makt med reformer präglade av upplysningstidens idéer. Konstnär: Alexander Roslin, Tre bröder. Licens: Public Domain.Musik: Elegant Arguments av Boris Skalsky, Storyblock AudioKlippare: Emanuel Lehtonen Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

durée : 02:00:11 - Le 5/7 - À 5h45 : Line Rousseau, agente de chorégraphes et danseurs. À 6H20 : Nicolas Philibert, cinéaste, parrain du festival Cinéma à la folie. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

durée : 00:05:30 - Déjà debout - par : Mathilde MUNOS - Ce matin dans Déjà Debout, Line Rousseau, agente de chorégraphes et danseurs. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

durée : 00:05:30 - Déjà debout - par : Mathilde MUNOS - Ce matin dans Déjà Debout, Line Rousseau, agente de chorégraphes et danseurs. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

6:30AM Hour 1 - Jeremy White and Joe DiBiase take a call from a listener who is concerned about Bills DE Greg Rousseau's performance. The guys break down some of Rousseau's advanced stats and discuss where he needs to improve.

Hour 1 of The Jeremy and Joe Show - The guys start their morning discussing the Bills crucial opportunity for the one-seed. They also examine Bills DE Greg Rousseau's interesting start to the year.

Durant le siècle des Lumières, un mouvement sans précédent s'est développé lorsque des philosophes comme Rousseau, Voltaire, Locke, Montesquieu ou Diderot ont combattu l'obscurantisme et l'ignorance. « Les lumières, c'est plus d'un siècle de débats, de discussions », affirme le philosophe Alexandre Dupeyrix.

Connect with Paul Rousseau: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-rousseau-60515226Boost Patients | Convert More Modern Vision Correction & Cataract Leads Into Patients | ⁠⁠https://www.boostpatients.com⁠⁠Boost follows up with your New Patient Inquiries 24/7, within 60 Seconds. Their Patient Concierge team calls, texts, and emails potential patients, following up for months and scheduling new patient consultations directly onto your calendar.

Barbara Carnevali"Emilio e Sofia 2.0"Festival Filosofiawww.festivalfilosofia.itFestival Filosofia, SassuoloSabato 20 settembre 2025, ore 18:00Barbara CarnevaliEmilio e Sofia 2.0Rileggere Rousseau all'epoca dei socialIn che modo rileggere Rousseau nell'epoca dei social può illuminare il rapporto tra immagine di sé e riconoscimento degli altri? Questa lezione recupera il percorso educativo di Emilio e di Sofia per mostrare come il lavoro di Rousseau consegni due questioni-chiave alla nostra epoca, ovvero il principio di autonomia e la ricerca di autenticità come tecniche di saggezza, forme di indipendenza dai social e dal sociale e fondamento dell'uguaglianza tra i sessi.Barbara Carnevali  è direttrice di studi in Filosofia e professoressa di Estetica sociale presso l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) di Parigi. Insegna anche all'Accademia di architettura dell'Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI). Il suo lavoro ruota intorno alla nozione di Estetica Sociale, che riflette sul rapporto tra forme sociali e forme estetiche. Un'altra parte rilevante della sua ricerca è dedicata alla modernità filosofica, in particolare alle forme dell'io moderno, e al rapporto tra filosofia e letteratura. I suoi studi fanno convergere filosofia, teoria sociale e letteratura, indagando le forme attraverso cui si rappresenta e si plasma l'esperienza moderna. Fa parte del comitato direttivo delle riviste “Intersezioni” e “European Journal of Philosophy” ed è editorialista per il quotidiano “La Stampa”. Tra i suoi libri: Romanticismo e riconoscimento. Figure della coscienza in Rousseau (Bologna 2004); Le apparenze sociali. Una filosofia del prestigio (Bologna 2012), di cui si segnala l'edizione in inglese ampiamente rivista e aggiornata: Social Appearances. A Philosophy of Display and Prestige (New York 2020); La linea rossa. Milano e il design della modernità (in corso di pubblicazione, Milano 2025). È componente del Comitato Scientifico del Consorzio per il festivalfilosofia.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

POUR COMMANDER MON LIVRE : Sur Amazon : https://amzn.to/3ZMm4CY Sur Fnac.com : https://tidd.ly/4dWJZ8ODans nos sociétés, l'espoir est valorisé. "L'espoir fait vivre", dit le dicton. Mais se pourrait-il que nous nous trompions ? Se pourrait-il que l'espoir, loin d'être positif, nous enferme dans la passivité et contribue à notre malheur ? Éléments de réflexion dans cet épisode.---Envie d'aller plus loin ? Rejoignez-moi sur Patreon pour accéder à tout mon contenu supplémentaire.

No Linhas Cruzadas desta semana, o dilema filosófico que atravessa séculos: Será que o Homem é o Lobo do Homem? Hobbes acredita que, sem o Estado, a vida seria violenta e brutal. Já pensadores como Rousseau e Marx contestaram essa visão, afirmando que é a sociedade que corrompe o homem. Andresa Boni e Luiz Felipe Pondé vão a fundo no embate entre gigantes. E, sem perder a provocação, Pondé afirma: “É melhor um Leviatã que funcione, mesmo não sendo bonzinho, do que um que seja simpático e incapaz de controlar a violência.”O programa explora também a troca de cartas entre Einstein e Freud sobre a guerra. Entre filosofia, psicanálise e política, o programa levanta uma questão urgente: como lidar com nossa ambivalência entre criação e destruição em um mundo cada vez mais instável?#SomosCultura#TVCultura #LuizFelipePondé #AndresaBoni #LinhasCruzadas #Direita #Política

durée : 01:11:36 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Catherine Liber - Il y a la nouvelle de Mérimée qui met en scène l'intraitable Colomba. Mais Maupassant, Bazin, Flaubert et Rousseau ont aussi écrit sur la Corse. "La Corse et les écrivains français", une émission d'analyses et de lectures, notamment par Jean Rochefort, produite par Paule Chavasse en 1969. - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé

C dans l'air l'invité du 8 septembre 2025 avec Dominique ROUSSEAU, juriste et professeur de droit constitutionnel.En se soumettant à un vote de confiance ce lundi, le Premier ministre devrait entrainer la démission de son gouvernement. En arrivant à Matignon pour succéder à Michel Banier, le 13 décembre dernier, François Bayrou disait : « Je sais que les chances de difficultés sont beaucoup plus importantes que les chances de succès ». Neuf mois plus tard, son discours à la tribune de l'Assemblée nationale aujourd'hui devrait sonner comme un baroud d'honneur. L'ensemble des oppositions a en effet fait savoir qu'elle voterait contre la question de confiance à l'Assemblée nationale. La chute de François Bayrou devrait ouvrir une nouvelle période d'incertitude. Le projet de loi de finances doit être, théoriquement, examiné au Parlement à partir du 15 octobre pour une publication au « Journal officiel » au plus tard le 31 décembre. Et ce, alors que les taux d'intérêt de la dette française s'envolent et que l'agence de notation Fitch doit rendre son verdict le 12 septembre sur la note souveraine de la France. Les turbulences au sommet de l'État auront aussi un impact sur la rentrée sociale, déjà marquée par le mouvement « Bloquons tout » du 10 septembre et par la mobilisation intersyndicale du 18 septembre. Dans ce contexte, Emmanuel Macron se retrouve en première ligne. Dominique Rousseau nous donnera son analyse de la situation politique actuelle, et de ce que devrait faire le président de la République en cas de chute du gouvernement Bayrou. Il reviendra également avec nous sur la crise de régime qui inquiète les observateurs, et sur l'efficacité ou non des institutions de de la Vème République pour résoudre l'impasse politique dans laquelle la France pourrait être plongée.

durée : 00:58:51 - Le Book Club - par : Marie Richeux - Anne Garréta, romancière, lauréate du Prix Médicis 2002 et oulipienne, nous reçoit chez elle et nous fait visiter sa bibliothèque. On y navigue entre les siècles, de Madame de Lafayette à George Sand, en passant par Rousseau, Flaubert, ou encore Laure Murat et Christine Angot. - réalisation : Vivien Demeyère - invités : Anne Garréta Ecrivaine, membre de l'Oulipo, enseigne la littérature aux Etats-Unis ainsi qu'à l'université Rennes 2

durée : 00:03:49 - Le Fil philo - Chatbots, IA, robots humanoïdes : peut-on vraiment être amis avec eux ? Pour Rousseau, l'amitié exige réciprocité. Or ces technologies imitent nos émotions, mais ne peuvent ni aimer ni compter sur nous. L'attachement n'est pas l'amitié.

Miroslav Volf critiques ambition, love of status, and superiority, offering a Christ-shaped vision of agapic love and humble glory.“'And if you received it, why do you boast as if it were not a gift?' If you received everything you have as a gift and if your existence as the recipient is also a gift, all ground for boasting is gone. Correspondingly, striving for superiority over others, seeking to make oneself better than others and glorying in that achievement, is possible only as an existential lie. It is not just a lie that all strivers and boasters tell themselves. More troublingly, that lie is part of the ideology that is the wisdom of a certain twisted and world-negating form of the world.”In Lecture 5, the final of his Gifford Lectures, Miroslav Volf offers a theological and moral vision that critiques the dominant culture of ambition, superiority, and status. Tracing the destructive consequences of Epithumic desire and the relentless “race of honors,” Volf contrasts them with agapic love—God's self-giving, unconditional love. Drawing from Paul's Christ hymn in Philippians 2 and philosophical insights from Rousseau, Nietzsche, and Max Scheler, Volf reveals the radical claim that striving for superiority is not merely harmful but fundamentally false. Through Christ's self-emptying, even to the point of death, we glimpse a redefinition of glory that subverts all worldly hierarchies. The love that saves is the love that descends. In a world ravaged by competition, inequality, and devastation, Volf calls for fierce, humble, and world-affirming love—a love that mends what can be mended, and makes the world home again.Episode Highlights“Striving for superiority over others… is possible only as an existential lie.”“Jesus Christ was no less God and no less glorious at his lowest point.”“To the extent that I'm striving for superiority, I cannot love myself unless I am the GOAT.”“God cancels the standards of the kind of aspiration whose goal is superiority.”“This is neither self-denial nor denial of the world. This is love for the world at work.”Show NotesAgapic love vs. Epithemic desire and self-centered striving“Striving for superiority… is possible only as an existential lie.”Paul's hymn in Philippians 2 and the “race of shame”Rousseau: striving for superiority gives us “a multitude of bad things”Nietzsche's critique of Christianity and pursuit of powerMax Scheler: downward love, not upward striving“Jesus Christ was no less God and no less glorious at his lowest point.”Self-love as agapic: “I am entirely a gift to myself.”Raphael's Transfiguration and the chaos belowDemon possession as symbolic of systemic and spiritual powerlessness“To the extent that I'm striving for superiority, I cannot love myself unless I am the GOAT.”“The world is the home of God and humans together.”God's love affirms the dignity of even the most unlovable creatureLove as spontaneous overflow, not moral condescension“Mending what can be mended… mourning with those who mourn and dancing with those who rejoice.”Production NotesThis podcast featured Miroslav VolfEdited and Produced by Evan RosaHosted by Evan RosaProduction Assistance by Taylor Craig and Macie BridgeA Production of the Yale Center for Faith & Culture at Yale Divinity School https://faith.yale.edu/aboutSupport For the Life of the World podcast by giving to the Yale Center for Faith & Culture: https://faith.yale.edu/giveSpecial thanks to Dr. Paul Nimmo, Paula Duncan, and the media team at the University of Aberdeen. Thanks also to the Templeton Religion Trust for their support of the University of Aberdeen's 2025 Gifford Lectures and to the McDonald Agape Foundation for supporting Miroslav's research towards the lectureship.

What exactly is culture? Is it just the food, clothing, and habits of a people, or is it something more? Does human nature really exist, or should we just be studying the differences between cultures to investigate humanity? Is culture downstream of politics, and what does this mean for the Cracker Barrel rebrand? Find out as we continue discussing Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind! Follow us on X! Give us your opinions here!

Dr. Noel Rousseau and Trevor Jones have combined forces to form a partnership whose sole focus is to help you beat the Yips. Both Trevor and Noel are PGA Golf Professionals and they bring their coaching/teaching insight and their extensive research into the Yips to the #OntheMark show. Suffering from the Yips is an awful malady and shockingly about 50% of the world's golfing population suffer from, or have suffered from the Yips.  Hence the urgency in Trevor and Noel's work and they share tips, tricks and thoughts to help you back to golf freedom.  They discuss: The Yips - What, How and Why? The fact that having the Yips is no longer a death penalty for golfers Solving the problem with more than just technical solutions Neuroscientific influences in the Yips The differences between the Yips in Putting and Chipping Contrasting and dealing with Type 1 and Type 2 Yips  FOPO - Fear of Other People's Opinions Exposure Therapy for success, and  Diffusion exercises and skills to compose the mind. Trevor also highlights the two ways a golfer will deal with the yips - the B.A.D. Way (Blind Spots, Avoidance and Distraction)  and the A.C.E. Way (Acknowledge, Compose and Engage). This podcast is also available for viewing on YouTube.  Search and subscribe to Mark Immelman.

In 2022 Counterweight, the organization that Helen Pluckrose founded and that was absorbed into the Institute for Liberal Values had a virtual conference on Alternatives to Diversity and Inclusion. Starting in 2025, we will be rolling out one talk a month that was presented at the conference. We sit down with the original presenters throughout 2025 to see what has changed since 2022. With Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives seemingly on the chopping block, we are curious to hear what our original participants are witnessing and experiencing on the ground. Is DEI really dead or just in remission? Are there healthy alternatives to DEI that we should consider, or do we throw the baby out with the bathwater and wipe our hands clean? What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments.This month Jennifer Richmond interviews Lyell Asher.  In the update to his original talk on Liberal Approaches to Diversity and Inclusion, where he gave us suggestions on how ways to “hack” DEI, we explore what has changed since 2022. His methods of introducing complexity and nuance into DEI conversations remains a viable “hack” for DEI, but we note that the fervor for DEI training has subsided or maybe gone underground. However, what has not changed much is the rise of the “bureaucratic class” in academia, responsible for implementing ideological pedagogy that maligns the pursuit of knowledge.Podcast Notes:How Ed Schools Became a Menace to Higher Education, Lyell Asher in Quillette https://quillette.com/2019/03/06/how-ed-schools-became-a-menace-to-higher-education/Look Who's Talking About Equity, Lyell Asher in Quillette https://quillette.com/2020/08/12/look-whos-talking-about-educational-equity/Understanding Ed School Ideology and Dysfunction | Lyell Asher, Hold my Drink Podcast (now Dissidents Podcast)Why Knowledge Matters: Rescuing Our Children from Failed Educational Theories, E.D. Hirsch, https://www.amazon.com/Why-Knowledge-Matters-Rescuing-Educational-ebook/dp/B07MTP1Q7Y/The Schools We Need and Why We Don't Have Them, E.D. Hirsch https://www.amazon.com/Schools-We-Need-Dont-Have-ebook/dp/B0036S4DX8/ How The Other Half Learns: Equality, Excellence, and the Battle Over School Choice, Robert Pondiscio https://www.amazon.com/How-Other-Half-Learns-Excellence-ebook/dp/B07PH9J87P/ Undoctrinate: How Politicized Classrooms Harm Kids and Ruin Our Schools―and What We Can Do About It, Bonnie Kerrigan Snyder https://www.amazon.com/Undoctrinate-Politicized-Classrooms-Schools_and-About/dp/1642939129 Episode 47: Undoctrinating the Classroom | Bonnie Snyder, Hold my Drink Podcast (now Dissidents Podcast The Longing for Total Revolution: Philosophic Sources of Social Discontent from Rousseau to Marx and Nietzsche, Bernard Yack https://www.amazon.com/Longing-Total-Revolution-Philosophic-Discontent-ebook/dp/B0CVPV7QHS/Why Colleges are Becoming Cults, Lyell Asher on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hybqg81n-MThe Cultural Matrix: Understanding Black Youth, Orlando Patterson https://www.amazon.com/Cultural-Matrix-Understanding-Black-Youth/dp/0674728750/Soft White Underbelly, YouTube Channel 

I bet you'd like to have an excuse to read some Aristotle, and Locke, Rousseau, Simone Weil, and other fun texts. Well, go read about this opportunity at partiallyexaminedlife.com/class, and then follow the link to enroll. Not sure? Watch a sample (a full seminar from last semester on Plato) of what such a class is really like.

The Secular Enlightenment by Professor Margaret C. Jacob, has been called a major new history on how the Enlightenment transformed people's everyday lives. It's a panoramic account of the radical ways that life began to change for ordinary people in the age of Locke, Voltaire, and Rousseau. In this landmark book, familiar Enlightenment figures share places with voices that have remained largely unheard until now, from freethinkers and freemasons to French materialists, anticlerical Catholics, pantheists, pornographers, readers, and travelers. Jacob, one of our most esteemed historians of the Enlightenment, reveals how this newly secular outlook was not a wholesale rejection of Christianity but rather a new mental space in which to encounter the world on its own terms. She takes readers from London and Amsterdam to Berlin, Vienna, Paris, and Naples, drawing on rare archival materials to show how ideas central to the emergence of secular democracy touched all facets of daily life. Human frailties once attributed to sin were now viewed through the lens of the newly conceived social sciences. People entered churches not to pray but to admire the architecture, and some began to spend their Sunday mornings reading a newspaper or even a risqué book. The secular-minded pursued their own temporal and commercial well-being without concern for the life hereafter, regarding their successes as the rewards for their actions and their failures as the result of blind economic forces. A wonderful work of intellectual and cultural history, The Secular Enlightenment demonstrates how secular values and pursuits took hold of eighteenth-century Europe, spilled into the American colonies, and left their lasting imprint on the Western world for generations to come. Margaret Jacob is Distinguished Professor of History at the University of California, Los Angeles. Her many books include The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons, and Republicans and The First Knowledge Economy: Human Capital and the European Economy, 1750-1850. Carrie Lynn Evans is a PhD student at Université Laval in Quebec City Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

To celebrate the release on July 29th of The War on Science, we have recorded 20 podcast interviews with authors from the book. Starting on July 22nd, with Richard Dawkins, we will be releasing one interview per day. Interviewees in order, will be:Richard Dawkins July 23rdNiall Ferguson July 24thNicholas Christakis July 25thMaarten Boudry July 26thAbigail Thompson July 27thJohn Armstrong July 28thSally Satel – July 30Elizabeth Weiss – July 31Solveig Gold and Joshua Katz – August 1Frances Widdowson – August 2Carole Hooven – August 3Janice Fiamengo – August 4Geoff Horsman – August 5Alessandro Strumia – August 6Roger Cohen and Amy Wax – August 7Peter Boghossian – August 8Lauren Schwartz and Arthur Rousseau – August 9Alex Byrne and Moti Gorin – August 10Judith Suissa and Alice Sullivan – August 11Karleen Gribble – August 12Dorian Abbot – August 13The topics these authors discuss range over ideas including the ideological corruption of science, historical examples of the demise of academia, free speech in academia, social justice activism replacing scholarship in many disciplines, disruptions of science from mathematics to medicine, cancel culture, the harm caused by DEI bureaucracies at universities, distortions of biology, disingenous and dangerous distortions of the distinctions between gender and sex in medicine, and false premises impacting on gender affirming care for minors, to, finally, a set of principles universities should adopt to recover from the current internal culture war. The dialogues are blunt, and provocative, and point out the negative effects that the current war on science going on within universities is having on the progress of science and scholarship in the west. We are hoping that the essays penned by this remarkable group of scholars will help provoke discussion both within universities and the public at large about how to restore trust, excellence, merit, and most important sound science, free speech and free inquiry on university campuses. Many academics have buried their heads in the sand hoping this nonsense will go away. It hasn't and we now need to become more vocal, and unified in combatting this modern attack on science and scholarship. The book was completed before the new external war on science being waged by the Trump administration began. Fighting this new effort to dismantle the scientific infrastructure of the country is important, and we don't want to minimized that threat. But even if the new attacks can be successfully combatted in Congress, the Courts, and the ballot box, the longstanding internal issues we describe in the new book, and in the interviews we are releasing, will still need to be addressed to restore the rightful place of science and scholarship in the west. I am hoping that you will find the interviews enlightening and encourage you to look at the new book when it is released, and help become part of the effort to restore sound science and scholarship in academia. With no further ado, The War on Science interviews…As always, an ad-free video version of this podcast is also available to paid Critical Mass subscribers. Your subscriptions support the non-profit Origins Project Foundation, which produces the podcast. The audio version is available free on the Critical Mass site and on all podcast sites, and the video version will also be available on the Origins Project YouTube. Get full access to Critical Mass at lawrencekrauss.substack.com/subscribe

Jeff Rousseau's story is one of redemption and difficult recovery. In the 1990s, Jeff fell into addiction and found himself caught in a world of meth—one that would ravage northeast Arkansas for decades. After multiple run-ins with the law, he eventually landed in prison, where he encountered Christ and began a slow but determined path to healing. Along the way, Jeff managed Paragould's beloved Bonanza restaurant (and even shares the secret Monterrey Chicken recipe), battled Lyme disease, and survived a severe case of COVID that left him on a ventilator and facing the possibility of a double lung transplant. But in a moment doctors couldn't explain, the scars in his lungs were gone. In this episode, Jeff reflects on what God has done, how far he's come, and where he's going next.

This week's Ruminant may have been recorded earlier this week, but it's aged like fine wine, as postliberalism continues to delegitimize itself, capitalism continues to triumph, state-run grocery stores are still a really stupid idea, and Rousseau is still wrong.Plus: the roots of economic resentment and Jonah's thoughts on the pervasive phenomenon of main character syndrome. Show Notes:—Tyler Cowen in The Free Press: “Why Won't Socialism Die?”—Tim Carney: The Big Ripoff: How Big Business And Big Government Steal Your Money—Scott Lincicome's Capitolism: “State-Run Supermarkets: A (Bad) Statist Solution in Search of a Problem”—EconTalk with Russ Roberts—Bearish on the Wednesday G-File The Remnant is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including Jonah's G-File newsletter, regular livestreams, and other members-only content—click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Thursday's Mark Levin Show, lower federal courts are ignoring Supreme Court rulings, with judges defying the Constitution and law on immigration. In LA, a judge rules that ICE roundups are racist, alleging indiscriminate arrests of brown-skinned people at Home Depots, car washes, farms, etc., due to ethnicity and a 3,000-daily quota. In addition, in New Hampshire, a judge upholds birthright citizenship via national injunction, citing long-standing practice over constitutional analysis. The media ignore this, while actions persist. The judges have changed, not the Constitution. Also, President Trump has made enormous progress domestically and internationally, but institutions are being turned against Americans. Democrats will inevitably win elections and use the permanent government, courts, and administrative state to try to permanently embed their ideology, making it irreversible. Zohran Mamdani's Stalinist Islamist fusion of ideologies has overtaken parts of Europe and is now infiltrating the U.S., funded by entities like Qatar, Hamas, Iran, and Communist China. Later, socialism is an economic ideology from Marxism, which is a broader life ideology encompassing socialism but extending to cultural, social, and political transformation. The modern activists and professors are unoriginal Karl Marx wannabes who regurgitate ideas from Marx, Hegel, and Rousseau. Thery reject individual liberty and free will as divisive and weak, favoring instead class unity and collective power. There is a comprehensive war on civil society, culture, and America's foundations—targeting family, economy, and liberty—rooted in deadly, anti-human Marxist principles that promote genocide and centralized power.  Afterward, there is a vile and destructive element within the Republican Party. Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene is undermining Trump and introducing amendments removing $500 million in military aid to Israel from the National Defense Authorization Act.  Finally, Mahmoud Khalil filed a $20 million claim against the Trump administration. Only in America does a pro Hamas protestor like this turnaround and bring a lawsuit when he should never have been here in the first place. David Schoen calls in to explain that Khalil is 100% deportable under U.S. Code sections 1227 and 1182 for endorsing and supporting Hamas. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices