POPULARITY
5 episodes with Circuit judge
4 episodes with Circuit judge
3 episodes with Circuit judge
3 episodes with Circuit judge
3 episodes with Circuit judge
4 episodes with Circuit judge
2 episodes with Circuit judge
2 episodes with Circuit judge
2 episodes with Circuit judge
In this episode, Kate is joined by the founder of Divorce Recovery Seminars, author, former barrister, and family court judge Christopher Compston to discuss his personal experience of divorce through his unique professional legal lens.About the episode:Kate and Christopher start by discussing Christopher's parents' divorce and how this formed his view of marriage. He shares an invaluable insider perspective on the legal process having worked as a barrister and a judge. Christopher then goes on to explore his own experience of adultery and divorce. Kate and Christopher finish off by sharing some tips on how to recover, move on and lead a happy life after divorce, as well as some hard-hitting truths about how painful the experience can truly be.About our guest:Christopher Compston is a former barrister and was a Circuit Judge for nearly thirty years, dealing with everything from criminal to family matters. He retired in 2013. Twice married, he has had six children. For many years he and his current wife, Caroline, attended Holy Trinity Church in Brompton where he started and ran Divorce Recovery seminars for ten years. Christopher has written two books on the subject: ‘Recovering from Divorce' (1993) and ‘Breaking Up Without Cracking Up' (2011).More resources:You can learn more about Restored Lives on their website, and you can purchase Christopher's book ‘Breaking Up Without Cracking Up' on Amazon.Get in touch with amicable for information on the legal, financial and parenting aspects of separation. Book a free 15-minute consultation with an amicable expert today.#LifeAfterDivorce
9th Circuit judge criticized for posting video to YouTube featuring assault rifle, weapons demo Please Subscribe + Rate & Review KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson – KMJ’s Afternoon Drive Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
9th Circuit judge criticized for posting video to YouTube featuring assault rifle, weapons demo Please Subscribe + Rate & Review KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Afternoon Drive with Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi & E. Curtis Johnson – KMJ’s Afternoon Drive Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
We Like Shooting Episode 603 This episode of We Like Shooting is brought to you by: Brownells, Midwest Industries, Gideon Optics, XTech Tactical, Blue Alpha, Mitchell Defense, Rost Martin, and Bowers Group Welcome to the We Like Shooting Show, episode 603! Our cast tonight is Jeremy Pozderac, Aaron Krieger, Nick Lynch, and me Gear Chat Nick - Bag Plate Buzz Bag plate update Nick - HK G36: The .22 Twist HK G36 .22 Savage - Halo Rifle Mod Fun 3D RDB Halo Rifle mods Shawn - Optic Multi Tool: A Must-Have for Shooting Enthusiasts (no summary available) Shawn - Mitchell's Cool 338 Arc Setup Mitchell Defense 338 Arc featuring a faxon barrel Bullet Points Shawn - Innovative Torque System for Precision Gun Maintenance Real Avid has launched a new line of fixed torque limiters designed for DIY gun enthusiasts and professional gunsmiths, aiming to enhance the precision of firearm assembly and maintenance. These limiters help achieve the correct torque on gun components, which is crucial for optimal performance and preventing damage. Each limiter is pre-set for common torque specifications and is compact for easy storage, available at a cost-effective price. Shawn - Smokeless Range: Affordable Dry Fire Training Solution (no summary available) Shawn - Lightweight Reliability: Midwest Industries AR15 Review All Firearms News subscribers can now access their magazine content digitally on various mobile devices. Gun Fights Step right up for "Gun Fights," the high-octane segment hosted by Nick Lynch, where our cast members go head-to-head in a game show-style showdown! Each contestant tries to prove their gun knowledge dominance. It's a wild ride of bids, bluffs, and banter—who will come out on top? Tune in to find out! WLS is Lifestyle WLS Posse Kicks Off! WLS Posse Launch! Understanding the Distinction Between Gun Culture and Gun Community The article discusses the distinction between the terms "gun community" and "gun culture," highlighting their differing implications and attitudes towards firearm ownership and the Second Amendment. It emphasizes that while the gun community is broad and inclusive of various enthusiasts, the gun culture represents a more rigid adherence to the principle of absolute Second Amendment rights. This differentiation impacts how members of the gun community perceive their roles and responsibilities regarding gun ownership and usage. Aaron's Alley 3D-Printed Freedom: Gun Edition 3D-Printed Freedom: Gun Edition Going Ballistic Judge Goes Rogue: Gun Ruling Madness 9th Circuit Judge so fed up with the stupidity of his colleagues that he makes a video in addition to his dissent on their ruling. Gun Control Fearmongers Exposed Dems Want Patel Removed at ATF; Gun Group Asks ‘What Are They Afraid Of?' Fewer ATF Agents, More Freedom! Report: Kash Patel to Cut ‘as Many as 1,000 ATF Agents' Aussies Love Gun Bans, Apparently Australia Doubles Down on Civilian Disarmament with New Weapon Laws Trump Snips the Surgeon General's Anti-Gun Rhetoric The Trump administration has decided to eliminate a report from the Surgeon General addressing gun violence, which many gun control advocates hailed as crucial. This move is seen as a setback for efforts to impose more gun regulations, energizing the gun community by reinforcing the narrative that the government is siding with Second Amendment rights. When Dogs Go Bang: A Lesson in Gun Safety from Tennessee A Tennessee man was accidentally shot by his pit bull while he was sleeping, raising eyebrows about pet safety and gun handling. This incident is likely to fuel debates within the gun community regarding responsible ownership and the potential for further gun control discussions, although many in the community might see it as a...
Circuit court judicial candidate Brian Smestad joined me for a conversation about why he became a lawyer and more importantly, why he wants to become a judge to serve the citizens of St Croix Co. Brian has a good mix of old-school smarts combined with embracing new technologies to serve the community better. Take a listen and allow him to EARN your vote.https://www.smestadforjudge.com/Donate: Make checks payable to:Friends of Brian Smestad P.O. Box 292, Hudson WI 54016FreeConservativeTalk
Join us as the Honorable Andre M. Davis, a retired judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, shares insights from his extensive legal career. Judge Davis discusses his early influences as a law clerk in the courts where he eventually served, his professional journey through the state and federal benches, and what motivates him today.
What’s Trending: Rantz: Judge claims ‘female only’ Olympus Spa is akin to ‘whites only’ business. Quite a few Washington schools are only giving students a matter of minutes to eat their lunch. Some Democrats can’t even commit to deporting criminal illegal aliens. // LongForm: GUEST: Republican strategist Christopher Gergen explains why GOP performed so disastrously in WA this election cycle. // Democrats still can’t figure out why they lost?
VETERAN MONTH ICYMI: On Midday Mobile host Sean Sullivan talked to Circuit Judge Michael Windom talked about Veteran Court. He explained the programs that are in place to help Veterans that have had legal problems. Listen here to hear them explain: If you or someone you know needs help call 1-251-574-8477
In the few days left before the 2024 election, Election Connection host Ruth Newman invited Dee Pregliasco, former President of the Louisville League of Women Voters and retired attorney and judge, to discuss various election-related items. Included were voting information resources; where to find reputable and non-partisan information sources on candidates and issues; the two amendments on the KY 2024 ballot; a discussion of the rise in Authoritarianism and more. Ruth ended by presenting what she was able to glean from the Internet on candidates for Circuit Judge, 30th Judicial District, 9th Division.
Join The Heritage Foundation and the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy for a symposium on election law and the conservative legal movement. This symposium will bring together leading practitioners, academics, and public officials to discuss lawfare, election integrity, and the future of the conservative legal movement in this area. Throughout a day of engaging panels, these experts will dissect the most consequential legal issues shaping this election and the conservative movement. Agenda Panel I: Election Lawfare in the 21st Century John C. Yoo, Distinguished Visiting Professor, School of Civic Leadership, University of Texas at Austin and Emanuel S. Heller Chair in Law, University of California at Berkeley David Thompson, Managing Partner, Cooper & Kirk PLLC Taylor Meehan, Partner, Consovoy McCarthy PLLC Joe Nixon, Litigation Counsel, Public Interest Legal Foundation (Moderator) Panel II: Voting Rights Litigation John Gore, Partner, Jones Day The Hon. Edmund LaCour, Alabama Solicitor General Brad Schlozman, Member, Hinkle Law Firm The Hon. Eric Dreiband, Partner, Jones Day (Moderator) Keynote Addresses The Hon. Chad Readler, Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Panel III: Legal Challenges Ahead for the Trump 47 Campaign Mike Davis, President & Founder, Article III Project Dan McLaughlin, Senior Writer, National Review Online and Fellow at National Review Institute Steve Roberts, Partner, Holtzman Vogel The Hon. Daniel Jorjani, Chief Operating Officer and Principal Deputy General Counsel, Citizens United (Moderator) Panel IV: The Frontier of Campaign Finance The Hon. Allen Dickerson, Commissioner, Federal Election Commission Jessica Furst Johnson, Partner, Holtzman Vogel Zachary Parks, Partner, Covington & Burling LLP Logan Knight, Articles Chair, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (Moderator) Closing Remarks Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow and Manager, Election Law Reform Initiative, The Heritage Foundation
Today, Hunter is joined once again by Leah Nelson, and this time, she is joined by Judge Stepehen Wallace. On today's episode, Leah and Judge Wallace are her to unveil their years long research into the fines and fees that the Jefferson County, Alabama Courts are extracting from criminal defendants. As will surprise no one who listens to the show, the fines and fees program fails the accused, fails victims, fails to fund the legal system, and thus, fails the entire state of Alabama. Guests: Leah Nelson, Co-Founder, Jefferson County Equitable Fines and Fees Project, Alabama Stepehen Wallace, Circuit Judge, Jefferson County, Birmingham, Alabama Resources: Coverage of Aug. 2024 Releases https://aldailynews.com/court-fee-system-inefficient-discriminatory-research-finds/ https://aldailynews.com/column-crime-and-garnishment/ https://aldailynews.com/capitol-journal-september-13-2024/ Oct. 2024 paper with IBM https://krvarshney.github.io/pubs/LaraYejasJMNSTNBV_aies2024.pdf Aug. 2024 with MDRC https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/JeffCoFines%26Fees_Brief_FInal.pdf Background reading on-- Brookside (the Ferguson of Alabama): https://www.al.com/bankingoncrime/ Alabama tax policy and how the Alabama constitution encourages reliance on fines and fees: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/27/opinion/alabama-fines-fees.html Contact Hunter Parnell: Publicdefenseless@gmail.com Instagram @PublicDefenselessPodcast Twitter @PDefenselessPod www.publicdefenseless.com Subscribe to the Patron www.patreon.com/PublicDefenselessPodcast Donate on PayPal https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=5KW7WMJWEXTAJ Donate on Stripe https://donate.stripe.com/7sI01tb2v3dwaM8cMN Trying to find a specific part of an episode? Use this link to search transcripts of every episode of the show! https://app.reduct.video/o/eca54fbf9f/p/d543070e6a/share/c34e85194394723d4131/home
In today's episode we delve into the art of mediating a complex divorce. Navigating the choppy waters of a high-stakes divorce can be overwhelming, but mediation can offer a more effective and streamlined approach—if you follow the right strategies. Episode Highlights Five Keys to Successful Mediation Transforming Divorce Negotiations Expert Guidance for a Balanced Resolution Guest Spotlight: Judge Jessica Ticktin We are thrilled to welcome Judge Jessica Ticktin to the episode. A retired Circuit Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, Jessica served as the Administrative Judge in the family, probate, and guardianship division in South Palm Beach. With her extensive experience on the bench and her dedication to mediating family, probate, guardianship, and civil disputes, Judge Ticktin brings invaluable expertise to our discussion. Her deep understanding of the legal landscape and passion for resolving disputes amicably make her an exceptional resource for navigating the complexities of divorce mediation. Journey Beyond Divorce Resources: Book a Free Rapid Relief Call: http://rapidreliefcall.com Follow JBD on Instagram: @journey_beyond_divorce A word from our sponsors: Soberlink is a revolutionary tool designed to support individuals in their journey to sobriety. As a leading provider of remote alcohol monitoring, Soberlink offers a secure and reliable solution that helps people stay accountable and transparent in their recovery process. We're grateful for Soberlink's commitment to enhancing the recovery process and providing valuable resources to our listeners. Learn more about how Soberlink can make a difference in your journey at www.soberlink.com/jbd ======= TalkingParents provides a comprehensive platform designed to simplify co-parenting and enhance communication between parents. With secure messaging, a shared calendar, and features for tracking parenting time, TalkingParents ensures that all important details and agreements are documented and accessible. Whether you're coordinating schedules or sharing crucial documents, TalkingParents offers a reliable solution for maintaining clarity and organization in your co-parenting arrangement. We're grateful for TalkingParents' support in simplifying co-parenting and enhancing communication for our listeners. Discover how TalkingParents can bring clarity and organization to your co-parenting journey at www.talkingparents.com/jbd
On today's episode, Andy & DJ discuss a former aide to New York Governors charged with acting as an agent of the Chinese Government, Kamala Harris proposing a Trudeau-style 'communist' government housing plan, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit Judge's plan to reverse Judge Cannon's Mar-A-Lago dismissal.
Colette Safford is a candidate for Will County circuit judge. She talks to Patti Vasquez and Dwayne Kennedy. Visit her website: www.colettesaffordforjudge.com. Catch "Driving It Home with Patti Vasquez" weekdays from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. Central on WCPT (heartlandsignal.com/wcpt820).
Branch County's Circuit Judge tells us about the nomination process that put him on the November ballot for Michigan Supreme Court.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
It's time to reform the Supreme Court. The founders would not recognize the modern incarnation of what Alexander Hamilton called “the least dangerous” branch. The Court wields far more power on far more issues than it did in the 18th century. And it does so in the absence of adequate checks and balances. The individual justices hold this power longer than they ever have. For the first 180 years of U.S. history, justices served an average of approximately 15 years. In recent years, justices have served an average of 26 years. Momentum for reform is growing. Numerous polls have shown overwhelming bipartisan support for term limits and an enforceable code of ethics. The president and vice president have both announced their support for real change. Listen to this discussion from August 13th with Supreme Court experts to talk about what exactly these proposals entail and what they would mean for American democracy. Speakers: Cristina Rodríguez, Leighton Homer Surbeck Professor of Law, Yale Law School; Co-Chair, Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States Diane Wood, Circuit Judge (ret.), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Director, American Law Institute; Senior Lecturer, University of Chicago Law School Alicia Bannon, Director, Judiciary Program, Brennan Center for Justice; Editor in Chief, State Court Report Moderator: Michael Waldman, President, Brennan Center; Member, Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States Produced with support from the Kohlberg Center on the U.S. Supreme Court Please give us a boost by liking, subscribing, and sharing with your friends. If you're listening on Apple Podcasts, please give it a 5-star rating. You can keep up with the Brennan Center's work by subscribing to our weekly newsletter, The Briefing: https://go.brennancenter.org/briefing
Send us a Text Message.Mark and Jason talk to Republican Candidates in the Circuit Judge and St Francois County District 2 Commissioners in the August Primaries as well as Farmington Police Chief Chris Bullock and Paul Williams with Big River Chautauqua. Time Marks00:08:14-Toti-ly Awesome Radio Story00:11:54-News00:17:32-Birthdays00:29:00-Events00:37:47-David Kater Interview00:48:18-Michael Barton Interview00:54:57-Jerel Poor Interview01:01:10-Brice Secrest Interview01:08:36-Chris Bullock Interview01:21:24-Paul Williams Interview01:36:15-Sports01:40:16-Music01:43:25-Facebook Giveawayparklandrx.comcallnicholson.comfscb.comdiscoverfarmingtonmo.comsavealot.comwww.BetterHelp.com/TheBarnhttp://www.betterhelp.com/TheBarn http://www.betterhelp.com/TheBarnThis episode is sponsored by www.betterhelp.com/TheBarn and brought to you as always by The Barn Media Group. YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/@TheBarnPodcastNetwork SPOTIFY https://open.spotify.com/show/09neXeCS8I0U8OZJroUGd4?si=2f9b8dfa5d2c4504 APPLE https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1625411141 I HEART RADIO https://www.iheart.com/podcast/97160034/ AMAZON https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/7aff7d00-c41b-4154-94cf-221a808e3595/the-barn All equipment used in the making of this video:Shure Sm7b https://amzn.to/3uAMzMAShure Sm58 ...
This week on The DeCesare Group Podcast, join Jim DeCesare for his conversation with retired Warren Circuit Judge Steve Wilson. Wilson talks about his more than forty years of public service, what he's up to since he retired and of course breaks down what it's like to be the lead singer of a band for two decades while presiding on the bench. Check out DiZZorderly Conduct https://www.dizzorderlyconduct.com/ If you enjoy The DeCesare Group Podcast, leave us a review, and to learn more about The DeCesare Group visit our website, https://www.thedecesaregroup.com/.
Interviews with candidates for Judge in Circuit 21, Division 1: Paul Gwaltney, Michael Simms and Natalie Sal.
NCLA continues to fight on behalf of Honorable Judge Pauline Newman as she faces unjust attempts from her colleagues to remove her from a constitutionally appointed lifetime position as a Federal Cir. Judge. This case isn't just about restoring her to the bench—it is about the very independence of the federal judiciary and the ability of each federal judge to fulfill the office constitutionally entrusted to her. Mark and Vec are joined by NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel Geg Dolin who provides updates on Judge Pauline Newman's case against the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Candidate for Circuit Judge, Paul Gwaltney is in-studio. Plus, Dave speaks with Lesley Nash, staff attorney for Mountain State Justice about their lawsuit challenging Morgantown's 2005 ordinance restricting panhandling.
Join us on an exciting episode of the Luke Branquinho Show as we sit down with none other than former 5th Circuit Judge turned steer wrestler, Bud Hallman! Discover the unique journey of this remarkable individual as he shares insights into his transition from the courtroom to the rodeo arena. From upholding the law to mastering the art of steer wrestling, Bud's story is sure to inspire and captivate. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bandit-productions/support
Trigger Warning: Domestic Violence CasesIlluminating Hope, a podcast of Hope House brings you Voices of Justice, a series of podcasts where law enforcement officials, judges, and advocates come together to unravel the entangled web of domestic violence. Join us as we dive into the complex challenges faced by those on the front lines of justice, exploring real-life stories, legal nuances, and the human side of these cases. In each episode, our guests share their experiences, insights, and perspectives, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of domestic violence. Tune in for a compelling journey into the criminal justice system, where compassion meets the pursuit of truth, and where professionals strive to bring justice to those affected by the cycle of abuse.Judge Sill-Rogers was appointed to the Jackson County Circuit Court (16th Judicial Circuit) in September 1993. She obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in administration of justice from the University of Missouri-Kansas City. She obtained her law degree from George Washington University National Law Center. Her judicial assignment since her appointment was handling a domestic docket in Family Court. She is a member of The Missouri Bar, the Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Association, and the Association of Woman Lawyers of Greater Kansas City. She served as a member and of the board past president of Operation Breakthrough, Inc., president of Lawyers Encouraging Academic Performance, a Core Team Leader of the Jackson County Safe Family Coalition and was the founding president of the Kansas City Youth Court. She received the Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Foundation award for community service. Additionally, she received an award from the Daily Record in 2006 as a Legal Leader of the Year. Hope House Domestic Violence Hotline 816-461-HOPENational Domestic Violence Hotline 800-799-7233
Tylar Tapp from Hot Springs joins us from his law offices to discuss his run for Circuit Judge. Tapp's law practice is focused on family law, along with personal injury and criminal law. He has practiced in 50 of 75 counties across Arkansas. He has also served as a substitute (or special) judge on multiple occasions learning the distinctions of the highest performing judges. He discusses the importance learning and understanding the context of accused offenders. Early voting began February 20th. The election is scheduled for March 5, 2024. NOTE: HSV Inside Out was not compensated for Mr. Tapp's appearance. As a community minded podcast we share his story so citizens can make their own determination about whom to support. Thanks to our exclusive media partner, KVRE • Join Our Free Email Newsletter • Subscribe To The Podcast Anyway You Want • Subscribe To Our YouTube Channel (click that bell icon, too) • Join Our Facebook Group • Tell Your Friends About Our Show • Support Our Sponsors (click on the images below to visit their websites) __________________________________________
Longtime mid-Missouri Judge Kevin Crane announced last week that he will not seek re-election in 2024. 13th judicial Circuit Judge Crane says it's been a privilege and honor to serve the citizens of Boone and Callaway counties for the past 34 years. Judge Crane will serve his final year in office in 2024. Former Deputy Missouri Attorney General Jesus Osete has announced he will run for the position. Counselor Osete joined us live on 939 the Eagle's "Wake Up Mid-Missouri', telling listeners that this will be an old-fashioned grassroots campaign. He plans to knock on as many doors as possible in both Boone and Callaway counties, and predicts it will take about $100,000 to run for this race. Counselor Osete has argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and the Missouri Supreme Court:
This month we have Her Honour Judge Alison Raeside on our podcast. Alison is a Circuit Judge and was the first sitting Judge in the UK to take maternity leave so has pathed the way for us all. Alison has had four children, with her final son being born when she was 47 (when her eldest was 16). It is such an honour to hear from Alison and her experiences, including how to get on in a male dominated environment with limited support (including no maternity leave policy or pay, and no female loos!). Alison was often the only woman in the room and, as she says, there was more chance of being in the Supreme Court if you were called “David” than if you were a woman. Do listen to hear all of Alison's practical tips, including her discovery that commuting is a “complete waste of time” and that you should be a “submarine parent”! Alison is passionate about allowing flexibility and working from home, including for court hearings. Alison also touches on how important it is that there are more women Judges to ensure that our law-makers and enforcers reflect society. Alison is hugely inspiring in terms of how she has navigated a successful career alongside parenthood and we hope you enjoy this episode as much as we did. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
20230706- Dr. Betsy McCaughey And A Sitting Circuit Judge Talk SCOTUS Rulings by Kevin McCullough Radio
Listen back to Kevin McCullough's discussion on recent SCOTUS rulings with the honrorable Amul Thapar, circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. They also discuss Clarence Thomas in Judge Thapar's new book, 'The People's Justice: Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him . https://a.co/d/gu1iLq1
NCLA Asks U.S. District Court to Stop Unconstitutional Suspension of Circuit Judge Pauline Newman Chief Judge Kimberly Moore and the Judicial Council of the U.S. Court of Appeals for theFederal Circuit have indefinitely suspended highly-respected veteran Judge Pauline Newman from hearing new cases—and they did so before investigating her. The 1980 Judicial Conduct and Disability Act does not authorize such indefinite or pre-investigatory suspensions. Another federal statute requires Federal Circuit panels to be comprised of a fair draw from all the Court's active judges. Hence, suspending Judge Newman also infringes on the right of every Federal Circuit plaintiff and defendant to have their cases heard by a fair draw from all the Court's active judges. Moreover, Judge Newman herself has an interest in fulfilling the duties of her judicial office, which cannot be taken away without due process of law. Judges singling out other federal judges for suspension is not due process and violates Congress' sole constitutional authority to impeach federal judges. Vec and Senior Litigation Counsel Greg Dolin discuss NCLA's recent amended Complaint and Motion for a Preliminary Injunction in Newman v. Moore.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Agreeing to Disagree: How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of ConscienceIn one of the most thorough accounts of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, Nathan S. Chapman and Michael W. McConnell provide an insightful overview of the legal history and meaning of the clause, as well as its value for promoting equal religious freedom and diversity in contemporary America.The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion", may be the most contentious and misunderstood provision of the entire U.S. Constitution. It lies at the heart of America's culture wars. But what, exactly, is an "establishment of religion"? And what is a law "respecting" it?Many commentators reduce the clause to "the separation of church and state." This implies that church and state are at odds, that the public sphere must be secular, and that the Establishment Clause is in tension with the Free Exercise of Religion Clause. All of these implications misconstrue the Establishment Clause's original purpose and enduring value for a religiously pluralistic society. The clause facilitates religious diversity and guarantees equality of religious freedom by prohibiting the government from coercing or inducing citizens to change their religious beliefs and practices.In Agreeing to Disagree, Nathan S. Chapman and Michael W. McConnell detail the theological, political, and philosophical underpinnings of the Establishment Clause, state disestablishment, and the disestablishment norms applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. Americans in the early Republic were intimately acquainted with the laws used in England, the colonies, and early states to enforce religious uniformity. The Establishment Clause was understood to prohibit the government from incentivizing such uniformity. Chapman and McConnell show how the U.S. Supreme Court has largely implemented these purposes in cases addressing prayer in school, state funding of religious schools, religious symbols on public property, and limits on religious accommodations. In one of the most thorough accounts of the Establishment Clause, Chapman and McConnell argue that the clause is best understood as a constitutional commitment for Americans to agree to disagree about matters of faith.Nathan S. Chapman is the Pope F. Brock Associate Professor of Professional Responsibility at the University of Georgia School of Law, and a McDonald Distinguished Fellow of Law and Religion at the Emory Center for Law and Religion. He was formerly the Executive Director of the Stanford Constitutional Law Center. Michael W. McConnell is the Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School, and a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. From 2002 to 2009, he served as a Circuit Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. He has argued sixteen cases in the United States Supreme Court, six of which involved the Religion Clauses. McConnell is also co-editor of Religion and the Constitution and Christian Perspectives on Legal Thought. His most recent book is The President Who Would Not Be King: Executive Power under the Constitution.Buy the book from Wellington Square Bookshop - https://wellingtonsquarebooks.indiecommerce.com/book/9780195304664
Recently, the application of Textualism by the Supreme Court of the United States--the predominant method of statutory interpretation that favors the plain meaning of text over legislative intent, statutory purpose, or legislative history--has given rise to rich debate as to its legitimacy, vitality, and future application. This webinar will explore and advance that debate with some of the leading minds in the field. Featuring:Prof. Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law SchoolProf. William Baude, Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law SchoolProf. Emily Bremer, Associate Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law SchoolProf. Christopher J. Walker, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School[Moderator] Hon. Gregory G. Katsas, Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Related Links: The 2023 Scalia Lecture: Beyond Textualism?, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 46, 2023, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4464561Interpreting the Administrative Procedure Act: A Literature Review, 98 Notre Dame L. Rev. (forthcoming 2023), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=4340363.
U.S. Circuit Judge Pauline Newman v. Chief Judge Kimberly Moore Without citing any legal authority and prior to the conclusion of any investigation, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Chief Judge Kimberly Moore has removed fellow U.S. Circuit Judge Pauline Newman from hearing cases for an indefinite period. She has also impeded Judge Newman's access to chambers phone and computer, and unilaterally decided that the judicial assistant working for Judge Newman “is no longer an employee of the Newman chambers.” Vec discusses NCLA's new lawsuit, Newman v. Moore, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Update in Federal Trade Commission v. Precision Patient Outcomes, Inc. The Federal Trade Commission, in its initial filing before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, falsely accused Precision Patient Outcomes, Inc. and CEO Margrett Lewis of unlawfully marketing and selling a dietary supplement called COVID Resist. The problem for FTC is PPO and Ms. Lewis never sold such a product—and FTC knows that. During six months or more of investigation, PPO provided FTC clear proof such sales never happened. Vec discusses NCLA's latest counterclaims against the Federal Trade Commission in FTC v. PPO.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Today's guests are two Stanford University undergraduate students, Josiah Joner and Walker Stewart, who shed light on the coercion, censorship, declining standards, and wavering administrators at what is supposed to be one of the most elite academic institutions in the world. Walker and Josiah explain what happened in March where Stanford Law School students, supported by administrators and the Dean of DEI shouted down and ridiculed a sitting Circuit Judge who was invited to speak. They also dive into whether this was an inevitable result of the way Stanford has managed its DEI initiatives on campus and concerns for the future.
In these unprecedented times in America many of the foundational truths and principles that have guided our grand experiment in self-governance since its very beginning are being openly challenged and undermined like never before. Not the least of those is the principle of FREE SPEECH. In this episode, Mike sits down for an exclusive interview with his former classmate, the Hon. Kyle Duncan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, to discuss his shocking experience last Thursday that has captured the nation's attention. What is at the root of this effort to censor and silence opposing viewpoints--and how do we defend and preserve the free marketplace of ideas? You don't want to miss this important exchange. SHOW NOTES: Standford Law heckles federal judge (Fox News) www.MikeandKellyJohnson.com Produced by Strong Wave Media, LLC © 2023 Mike and Kelly Johnson
Last week, A U.S. appeals court denied requiring a minimum airplane seat size rule necessary for passenger safety. Therefore, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cannot be forced to adopt minimum requirements, the court found. FAA has no compelling evidence that the tight seating slowed down emergency exits and caused medical risks like blood clots. Listen to this week's episode to hear Tom discuss the Circuit Judge's decision.
John’s guest this week is Judge Rosemary Aquilino, a Circuit Judge of Ingham County, Michigan. Among the many times that she has made an impact on Michigan and American public life, she was the judge who sentenced Dr. Nasser of Michigan State University for having taken sexual liberties with American gymnasts. But that is just one part of her fascinating career.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Jeff Nance is originally from Charleston, South Carolina, served in the Sydney Australia Mission, and graduated from Brigham Young University in Political Science as an ROTC scholarship student, and from BYU's J. Reuben Clark Law School. He served in the 101st Airborne Division, then in many capacities in Okinawa, Japan, in the civilian personnel branch, and later in Bad Kreuznach, Germany and Vicenza, Italy. He served as the Chief, Military Justice and then Chief of Operational Law of V Corps and deployed to Iraq, where he oversaw the initial reconstitution of the Iraqi criminal courts system. Back in the United States, he served as USATDS Region II Regional Defense Counsel before being selected to serve as a Military Judge. Promoted to Colonel, he was transferred back to Germany and deployed several times to preside over scores of courts-martial in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kuwait. He later served as Circuit Judge and then as Chief Circuit Judge in the 3rd Judicial Circuit and 2nd Judicial Circuit. In his 13+ years as a military judge, Colonel Nance presided over hundreds of courts-martial, including some of the Army's most complex and high-profile cases. After retiring from active duty in October 2018, he was sworn in as an Immigration Judge with the Department of Justice. Being in the Army for 30 years and living all over the world has given Jeff and his wife Jeneen many service opportunities. He is currently serving as a bishop in his eighth bishopric and has served as a nursery leader, youth Sunday School teacher, primary teacher, elders quorum president, high priest group leader, and stake high counselor. Jeff and Jeneen are the proud parents of three children and three grandchildren. Highlights 02:00 Kurt shares Jeff's background and how they met. 06:00 Jeff shares his schooling and career path to becoming a judge in the military. 21:10 The last case that Jeff worked on was the very high profile case, United States vs. Bergdahl. Jeff shares some of the background of the case. 31:20 After getting out of the military Jeff was called as bishop in Charleston. He describes his experience of getting called. 37:10 Advice to those that have to judge. Being a judge in Israel is helping people to repent. Where do justice and mercy come together? 40:30 How do you balance justice and mercy? It's not just about paying the price for what they've done. It's about being redeemed. You must judge each case differently. 46:20 The process of making decisions when judging. How do you know you are making the right decision? Jeff shares what he refers to as the "Parley principle." 52:50 Impossible calls to make. Jeff talks about having doubts about decisions that he made but how he finds peace with it also. 56:00 Reprove with sharpness only when the spirit indicates to do so. 1:01:45 The church system versus the legal system. Jesus always leaned towards mercy. 1:05:00 Our role 99% of the time is to help people apply the Atonement. Leaders need to discuss what things that person needs for repentance and in some cases what needs to be done to protect the name of the church. 1:07:50 Jeff's experience in the church helped him more in his career than his career has helped him in the church. 1:09:30 Jeff shares his final thoughts and the biggest things that he has learned in his time in leadership. Links TRANSCRIPT coming soon Watch on YouTube Get 14-day access to the Core Leader Library Ranked in the Top 20 The Leading Saints Podcast has ranked in the top 20 Christianity podcasts on iTunes. Over 500,000 Listens Each Month Over 10 million Total Downloads Part of the nonprofit Leading Saints' mission is to help ...
In days of old the local Sheriff would protect the town and lock up the ‘bad guys' until the Circuit Judge showed up for a trial and a sentencing. There were no ‘reentry' programs, support services or opportunities to redeem oneself. Modern times, in most cases has changed the thought process around reform and reentry and thankfully people like Sheriff Patrick J. Cahillane of the Hampshire County Sheriff's Department believe that the offerings of resources, such as housing, for those he calls ‘de-incarcerated' are not only needed but life-changing to prevent recidivism.
Dave is back and questions the leadership of Morgantown City Council. Monongalia County Prosecutor Perri Jo DeChristopher joins the show after being appointed Circuit Judge. American Red Cross' Jason Keeling has details on a blood drive in Morgantown.
Immigrant parents planted the Limentato roots in Illinois, growing the branches of Sam into the Champaign family. Currently, Judge Sam Limentato has found himself working tirelessly over the past months to retain his position as Circuit Judge in Champaign County. Listen to why Sam found it difficult to label himself as one political party over the other since he's in a position of inherent neutrality, why the need to serve others caused him to take a leap away from his law firm and into the uncertain position of circuit judge, why he wears a red judge's robe once a year, the mix and balance of negative cases with positive outcomes like adoptions and marriages, why he tears up when he talks about his dad and the crossover in personal injury law and family courtroom judgements.This is not a political podcast. I am not a political person. I am a center, neutral, apolitical type. I just want the best person for the job. That's it. I've decided to release Sam's podcast on actual election day so that by this time you listen, you've already probably decided who you are going to vote for. Therefore, this won't really influence your decision but just promote an overall message of the importance of voting. However and whoever. Just vote.
We talk with Calvin Taylor about his career in law and his current campaign for Circuit Judge. Also big thanks to Southern Magnolia Smiles, Hilltree Marketing, and Calvin Taylor for Circuit Court Judge for the support! Want to be a part of the pelican gang? Check out our merch here.
I'm joined by Judge John Reynolds to talk about the rise in crime, and what part do judges play in the Justice System. We also cover his election for Circuit Judge in Jessamine and Garrard counties. You can find out more about Judge Reynolds at www.reynoldsforjudge.com.
Justice William O. Douglas could be known for his fiery opinions, turbulent personal life and longtime presidential ambitions. But Judge M. Margaret McKeown is shining a light on his groundbreaking environmental advocacy in Citizen Justice: The Environmental Legacy of William O. Douglas—Public Advocate and Conservation Champion. McKeown, who sits on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, was on a hike when she came upon a cabin belonging to two friends of the justice, Olaus and Margaret Murie. Learning more about the Muries' history as environmental advocates and preservationists brought her down the path that led to Citizen Justice, she tells the ABA Journal's Lee Rawles in this episode of the Modern Law Library. Seeing himself as entitled to advocate as a citizen for causes he believed in—despite his seat on the U.S. Supreme Court—Douglas did not hesitate to lobby federal agencies and the general public to protect wilderness areas from development. McKeown discusses how this could conflict with the code of ethics that she and other federal judges–but not U.S. Supreme Court justices–are bound by, and the implications for public trust. Douglas' childhood in Yakima, Washington, was marked by frailty and illness, but he became an avid outdoorsman and hiker in his adolescence and adulthood, keeping up a brisk clip and covering many miles per day. One of his favorite areas to hike in the Washington, D.C., area was along the disused Chesapeake & Ohio Canal. When the editorial board of the Washington Post advocated for the construction of a parkway on top of the old canal, Douglas wrote a letter strenuously objecting, and invited the editors to join him on a 187-mile hike of the length of the C&O Canal to see the wilderness he wanted to protect. It became the first of his “protest hikes,” and marked one of his favorite methods for convincing others of the importance of conservation: taking people on camping, fishing and hiking trips into wilderness areas. A loyal New Dealer, one of the few areas of disagreement Douglas had with President Franklin D. Roosevelt was FDR's bend towards conservation over preservation on public lands, McKeown says. She discusses the development of the conservation and environmental movements, in which Douglas was a powerful player. Douglas was the first justice to even use the word “environmental” in a Supreme Court opinion. She also delves into Douglas' positions on Native American rights, which were supportive—unless they were pitted against the interests of fish.
Judge Dan Stidham serves as a Circuit Judge in Arkansas, but he is best known for representing Jessie Misskelley during the West Memphis 3 case. Judge Stidham opens up on this episode about his involvement in the case as well as the sudden loss of his own son just last year.
“The incentives are out of whack,” says Eric Post, a tenant's rights attorney with BASTA, Inc. The past two years have seen a dramatic increase in evictions, he says. Why? Because that is the simplest way to raise the rent.Eric talks with Jeff Lewis and Tim Kowal about the flaws in California's landlord-tenant legal system, the near-impossibility of staying eviction judgments pending appeal, and the important differences between appeals in the appellate division and the Court of Appeal.Eric also explains why it can be fairly easy to forum shop a case up to unlimited civil.Finally, the discussion turns to Judge Carter's bold effort to solve a piece of the Los Angeles homeless problem via injunction, though ultimately reversed by the 9th Circuit last year.Eric Post's LinkedIn profile.Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Sign up for Tim Kowal's Weekly Legal Update, or view his blog of recent cases.Receive a 25% lifetime discount on Casetext at CaseText.com/CALP.Other items discussed in the episode:BASTA, Inc.Episode 18 with tenant's rights attorney Fran Campbell.Tim's post on Judge David Carter's homelessness injunction overturned by the 9th Circuit: $1 Billion LA Homelessness Injunction Reversed by 9th Circuit: Judge's Independent Factual Investigation Was Improper
On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. In a 6-3 decision, the Court reversed and remanded the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, holding that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; that Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey are overruled; and that the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions. Chief Justice Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan filed a dissenting opinion.Please join our team of legal experts to discuss the significance of this case.Featuring:Prof. Daniel Farber, Sho Shato Professor of Law, University of California - Berkeley; former law clerk, Justice John Paul StevensCarrie Severino, President, Judicial Crisis Network; former law clerk, Justice Clarence ThomasModerator: Hon. Thomas B. Griffith, former Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Please join the Federalist Society's Practice Groups for a virtual event on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court decided this case in a 6-3 decision. The Court reversed and remanded the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, holding that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; that Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey are overruled; and that the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions. Chief Justice Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan filed a dissenting opinion.Please join our team of legal experts to discuss the significance of this case.Featuring:Prof. Daniel Farber, Sho Shato Professor of Law, University of California - Berkeley; former law clerk, Justice John Paul StevensCarrie Severino, President, Judicial Crisis Network; former law clerk, Justice Clarence ThomasModerator: Hon. Thomas B. Griffith, former Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. CircuitHost: Dean Reuter, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, The Federalist Society
Today marks the start of confirmation hearings for President Biden's first Supreme Court Justice nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. As Americans prepare for a historic set of hearings in light of Judge Jackson potentially becoming the first U.S. female African American Justice, Democrats and Republicans are both anticipating how the vetting process will play out for the current U.S. Circuit Judge. Tennesse Republican Senator and Judiciary Committee member Marsha Blackburn joins to discuss why she believes Jackson deserves a respectful, yet thorough Senate evaluation, thoughts on the current humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, and the ongoing battle Americans are facing with inflation. As a former police detective, Mark Fuhrman knows crime. His true crime show, The Fuhrman Diaries is entering its seventh season, premiering tonight on FOX Nation. This season, audiences can expect episodes covering chilling stories such as Jonestown, the Son of Sam, and Bill Cosby. Fuhrman joins the Rundown to discuss his knowledge of Cosby's questionable reputation at the height of his fame, the cult of Jim Jones, and how the Onion Field case changed police tactics. Plus, commentary from FOX News Contributor Joe Concha. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
