Podcasts about Certiorari

Court process to seek judicial review of a decision of a lower court

  • 53PODCASTS
  • 89EPISODES
  • 45mAVG DURATION
  • 1MONTHLY NEW EPISODE
  • Mar 3, 2025LATEST

POPULARITY

20172018201920202021202220232024


Best podcasts about Certiorari

Latest podcast episodes about Certiorari

Assorted Calibers Podcast
Assorted Calibers Podcast Ep 334: Beatings Will Continue Until the Second Amendment is Observed

Assorted Calibers Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 3, 2025 77:23


In This Episode Erin and Weer'd discuss: Operation Blazing Sword has joined with other 2A orgs to file a Petition for Certiorari in Antonyuk v. James; Democrats expressing regret for electing David Hogg toe the DNC; Kash Patel has been sworn in as FBI Director... and is also ATF Acting Director? Maine's new firearm waiting period law being blocked by a Federal judge. Xander talks about how many guns you should have to support the Second Amendment; and David explains "rim jam" and how to avoid it. Did you know that we have a Patreon? Join now for the low, low cost of $4/month (that's $1/podcast) and you'll get to listen to our podcast on Friday instead of Mondays, as well as patron-only content like mag dump episodes, our hilarious blooper reels and film tracks. Show Notes Main Topic Operation Blazing Sword Petition for Certiorari Filed in Antonyuk v. James Dems Having Major Buyer's Remorse After David Hogg Starts Texting Them Outrageous Messages FBI Director Kash Patel to be named ATF chief Video: Why We SHOULDN'T Abolish the ATF (…Yet) Federal judge blocks Maine's firearm waiting period Gun Lovers and Other Strangers Ram Jam - Black Betty The Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute Rim (Firearms) 45 ACP 308 Winchester 25 ACP 32 ACP 38 Super 6.5 Japanese 22 Long Rifle 22 Winchester Magnum Rimfire 8 millimeter Lebel 7.62 by 54 R 303 British Lee Enfield Bloke on the Range: Why Lee-Enfield Rimjams Are Not A Big Deal Bloke on the Range: Some Modern .303 Rimjams Smith & Wesson Model 52 Brena Bock Author Page David Bock Author Page Team And More  

Our Curious Amalgam
#304 Is Per Se Here to Stay? Criminal Antitrust Cases Beyond United States v. Brewbaker

Our Curious Amalgam

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 16, 2024 27:02


In the U.S., so-called "per se" antitrust crimes require nothing more than proof that the conduct occurred, relieving prosecutors of the difficult job of proving harm to competition. Is the Fourth Circuit's 2023 opinion in U.S. v. Brewbaker part of a growing judicial trend toward limiting the prosecution of per se cases? Ann O'Brien, the co-leader of Sheppard Mullin's Antitrust and Competition Practice Group, joins Alicia Downey and Brendan Coffman to talk about Brewbaker and its implications for applying the per se standard in criminal antitrust actions. Listen to this episode to hear about whether the rule of reason might be applied in the criminal context and the U.S. Department of Justice's possible responses to a changing legal landscape. With special guest: Ann M. O'Brien, Partner, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP Related Links: Ann O'Brien & Emme Tyler, “Chipping Away at Per Se: Is Brewbaker a Harbinger or Aberration?” ABA Antitrust Law Section Committee Articles (June 6, 2024) United States v. Brewbaker, 87 F.4th 563 (4th Cir. 2023) United States v. Brewbaker, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari of the United States, No.23-1365 (S. Ct. June 28, 2024) Hosted by: Alicia Downey, Downey Law LLC and Brendan Coffman, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

UPSC Podcast : The IAS Companion ( for UPSC aspirants )
Polity EP 15 Fundamental Rights | Article 32 Right to constitutional remedies | Constitution | UPSC podcast | laxmikant

UPSC Podcast : The IAS Companion ( for UPSC aspirants )

Play Episode Listen Later May 12, 2024 8:58


Welcome back to THE IAS COMPANION! Today, we delve into the cornerstone of our constitutional framework: the Right to Constitutional Remedies, enshrined within Article 32 of our Constitution. Let's unravel its intricacies: Essence of Article 32: Article 32 is hailed as the soul and heart of our Constitution, empowering every citizen to seek redressal for the infringement of their fundamental rights. Provisions of Article 32: It guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights and vests expansive powers in the Supreme Court to issue various writs. Judicial Interpretation and Significance: The Supreme Court has affirmed Article 32 as a basic feature of the Constitution, endowing it with wide-ranging powers to protect fundamental rights. Scope and Limitations: Article 32 is exclusively for enforcing fundamental rights and requires a direct violation of a fundamental right for its invocation. Concurrent Jurisdiction with High Courts: While the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction, high courts under Article 226 coexist, providing flexibility in seeking legal recourse. Writs – Types and Scope: Writs like Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, and Quo Warranto serve as potent tools for protecting individual rights and upholding the rule of law. In essence, Article 32 exemplifies our nation's commitment to justice, liberty, and the rule of law. It ensures equitable access to legal remedies and upholds the sanctity of fundamental rights. As we uphold these values, let's continue to illuminate the path to a more equitable and inclusive society. Thank you. #UPSC #IASprep #civilserviceexam #IASexamination #IASaspirants #UPSCjourney #IASexam #civilservice #IASgoals #UPSC2024 #IAS2024 #civilservant #IAScoaching #aUPSCmotivation #IASmotivation #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAStips #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity #UPSCpreparation #IASpreparation #UPSCguide #IASguide #UPSCtips #IAStips #UPSCbooks #IASbooks #UPSCexamstrategy #IASexamstrategy #UPSCmentorship #IASmentorship #UPSCcommunity #IAScommunity --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theiascompanion/message

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
NEW: Smith v. Hamm (Jan 2024) Sotomayor, Dissenting from Denials of Stay and Certiorari (Execution by Nitrogen Hypoxia)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 16, 2024 9:39


Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari in Smith v. Hamm (January 25, 2024).   Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts

Bonita Radio
QPEN Sin gasolina el FEI contra Mariana Nogales

Bonita Radio

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 6, 2024 58:28


¡Qué Palo… Es Noticia! 06/02/2024 Mariana Nogales Molinelli le sigue comiendo los dulces al FEI. No ha lugar el Certiorari para seguir insistiendo en acusarla. Lisie Burgos no le rinde cuentas al pueblo por gastos de su oficina para enaltecer su imagen de fundamentalista religiosa pero le pide a sus constituyentes que la apoyen porque no quiere usar mascarilla en la Cámara. Pierluisi culpa a las víctimas de la violencia en su contra. Juez de Guayama decide que el Camino del Indio le pertenece al pueblo. ¡Sintoniza y comparte! #periodismodeinvestigación #periodismoindependiente #franciscopares #luisirrizarrypabon #pedropierluisi

Bonita Radio
QPEN Sin gasolina el FEI contra Mariana Nogales

Bonita Radio

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 6, 2024 58:28


¡Qué Palo… Es Noticia! 06/02/2024 Mariana Nogales Molinelli le sigue comiendo los dulces al FEI. No ha lugar el Certiorari para seguir insistiendo en acusarla. Lisie Burgos no le rinde cuentas al pueblo por gastos de su oficina para enaltecer su imagen de fundamentalista religiosa pero le pide a sus constituyentes que la apoyen porque no quiere usar mascarilla en la Cámara. Pierluisi culpa a las víctimas de la violencia en su contra. Juez de Guayama decide que el Camino del Indio le pertenece al pueblo. ¡Sintoniza y comparte! #periodismodeinvestigación #periodismoindependiente #franciscopares #luisirrizarrypabon #pedropierluisi

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Tingley v. Ferguson (2023) | Thomas & Alito Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 19, 2024 12:45


Today I'll be reading two very brief opinions dissenting from the denial of certiorari in Tingley v. Ferguson, issued back on December 11th, 2023. The first dissent is from Justice Thomas and is only around 4 pages long; the second is Justice Alito's dissent, which is only a few paragraphs long and is written as if it were meant to be read at the end of Thomas' dissent - so, that's what I'm going to do. Enjoy. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-942_kh6o.pdf Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts, or stream directly from your browser at whatscotuswroteus.com

Health & Veritas
Reshma Ramachandran: Will the Supreme Court Upend Healthcare Regulation?

Health & Veritas

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 18, 2024 35:14


Howie and Harlan are joined by Reshma Ramachandran, a Yale family physician and co-director of Yale Collaboration for Regulatory Rigor, Integrity, and Transparency. They discuss the potential ramifications for healthcare regulation if the Supreme Court overturns the Chevron decision requiring judges to defer to federal agencies. Harlan looks at surveys suggesting an erosion of trust in medicine; Howie reports on the growing measles outbreak. LInks: Trust in Healthcare “Nurses First, Doctors Distant Second in Healthcare Provider Ratings” “KFF Health Tracking Poll: Health Care Issues Emerge as Important Topics on 2024 Campaign Trail, Plus Concerns Loom Large Around Medicaid Unwinding” Reshma Ramachandran “What is Ayurveda?” “On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit: BRIEF OF DR. RESHMA RAMACHANDRAN AND DR. JOSEPH S. ROSS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS” “Agencies' Power Under Scrutiny in Supreme Court Arguments” “Supreme Court could reel in power of federal agencies with dual fights over fishing rule” “Case brought to Supreme Court by herring fishermen may gut federal rulemaking power” Reshma Ramachandran: “Medical Product Industry Ties to Patient Advocacy Organizations' Executive Leadership” Reshma Ramachandran: “Do Advocacy Groups Always Put Patient Interests First?” “Citizens United Explained” The Measles Outbreak “Another person infected with measles at a Northeast daycare as Philadelphia outbreaks grows to nine cases” “Traveler Who Had Connecting Flight at DFW Airport Tests Positive for Measles: Officials” CDC: Measles Cases and Outbreaks Read an unedited transcript of this episode. Learn more about the MBA for Executives program at Yale SOM. Email Howie and Harlan comments or questions.

Health & Veritas
Reshma Ramachandran: Will the Supreme Court Upend Healthcare Regulation?

Health & Veritas

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 18, 2024 35:14


Howie and Harlan are joined by Reshma Ramachandran, a Yale family physician and co-director of Yale Collaboration for Regulatory Rigor, Integrity, and Transparency. They discuss the potential ramifications for healthcare regulation if the Supreme Court overturns the Chevron decision requiring judges to defer to federal agencies. Harlan looks at surveys suggesting an erosion of trust in medicine; Howie reports on the growing measles outbreak. LInks: Trust in Healthcare “Nurses First, Doctors Distant Second in Healthcare Provider Ratings” “KFF Health Tracking Poll: Health Care Issues Emerge as Important Topics on 2024 Campaign Trail, Plus Concerns Loom Large Around Medicaid Unwinding” Reshma Ramachandran “What is Ayurveda?” “On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit: BRIEF OF DR. RESHMA RAMACHANDRAN AND DR. JOSEPH S. ROSS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS” “Agencies' Power Under Scrutiny in Supreme Court Arguments” “Supreme Court could reel in power of federal agencies with dual fights over fishing rule” “Case brought to Supreme Court by herring fishermen may gut federal rulemaking power” Reshma Ramachandran: “Medical Product Industry Ties to Patient Advocacy Organizations' Executive Leadership” Reshma Ramachandran: “Do Advocacy Groups Always Put Patient Interests First?” “Citizens United Explained” The Measles Outbreak “Another person infected with measles at a Northeast daycare as Philadelphia outbreaks grows to nine cases” “Traveler Who Had Connecting Flight at DFW Airport Tests Positive for Measles: Officials” CDC: Measles Cases and Outbreaks Read an unedited transcript of this episode. Learn more about the MBA for Executives program at Yale SOM. Email Howie and Harlan comments or questions.

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Part 1: Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al. | Colorado Primary Ballot Petition for Writ of Certiorari

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 8, 2024 28:53


Today I'll be reading Donald Trump's petition for writ of certiorari regarding the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to exclude him from the Colorado primary election ballot - a petition that the Court recently granted. I know I still owe you all a second half to the Nixon opinion, but I've had a lot of listeners requesting to hear these documents, so I've made an executive decision to read them first. Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al., filed January 4, 2023.  

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Part 2: Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al. | Colorado Primary Ballot Petition for Writ of Certiorari

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 8, 2024 25:26


Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al., filed January 4, 2023.  

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Fischer v. United States | Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Granted Dec 11, 2023)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 19, 2023 21:08


Fischer v. United States petition for writ of certiorari filed September 11, 2023; granted by the Supreme Court December 13, 2023 Listen to audio of Supreme Court opinions on What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts.

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Part 2: Fischer v. United States | Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Granted Dec 13, 2023)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 19, 2023 17:06


Fischer v. United States petition for writ of certiorari filed September 11, 2023; granted on December 13, 2023 Listen to audio of Supreme Court opinions on What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts.

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Part 2: Special Counsel Petition for Expedited Writ of Certiorari Before Judgement in Election Case | U.S. v. Trump (Dec 11, 2023)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 13, 2023 13:19


Listen to the second half of Special Counsel Jack Smith's petition for a writ of certiorari before judgement to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in United States, Petitioner v. Donald J. Trump (December 11, 2023). Listen to audio of Supreme Court opinions on What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts.

The Daily Beans
One Thing In Common

The Daily Beans

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 12, 2023 39:27


Tuesday, December 12th, 2023Today, A Very Special Daily Beans. I know everyone is a little tired of living through history, but today was a historic day in the news. Special Counsel Jack Smith filed for an expedited briefing schedule in the DC coup case in both the Appeals court and the Supreme Court, and both his motions were granted - mirroring history and what happened in Watergate 50 years ago. We will discuss those filings, the historical parallels, and the headlines of the day including Kate Cox being forced to travel to another state to seek life-saving healthcare; pre-trial motions filed in the Hunter Biden case; Rudy Giuliani's defamation trial begins. Plus Allison delivers your good news. Dana is out and about.Promo Codes:New customers get $5 off a Lume Starter Pack with code DAILYBEANS at lumedeodorant.com. That's over 40% off your Starter Pack.Go to JOINdeleteme.com/Dailybeans and use promo code Dailybeans for 20% off.How We Win The House 2024!https://swingleft.org/fundraise/howwewin2024Want some sweet Daily Beans Merchhttps://shop.dailybeanspod.com/products/fani-t-willis-teeSubscribe to Lawyers, Guns, And MoneyAd-free premium feed: https://lawyersgunsandmoney.supercast.comSubscribe for free everywhere else:https://lawyersgunsandmoney.simplecast.com/episodes/1-miami-1985Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Follow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Posthttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrotehttps://twitter.com/dailybeanspodhttps://www.tiktok.com/@muellershewrotehttps://instagram.com/muellershewroteDana Goldberghttps://twitter.com/DGComedyhttps://www.instagram.com/dgcomedyhttps://www.facebook.com/dgcomedyhttps://danagoldberg.comHave some good news; a confession; or a correction?Good News & Confessions - The Daily BeansFrom the Good Newshttps://mswmedia.com/show/one-sweet-dream-a-beatles-podcasthttps://health-connected.org Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercast https://dailybeans.supercast.com/Or Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Special Counsel Petition for Expedited Writ of Certiorari Before Judgement in Election Case | U.S. v. Trump (Dec 11, 2023)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 12, 2023 19:38


Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's petition for a writ of certiorari before judgement to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in United States, Petitioner v. Donald J. Trump (December 11, 2023). Listen to audio of Supreme Court opinions on What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts.

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
DuPont v. Abbott | Thomas, Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 30, 2023 10:50


Justice Thomas, dissenting from the Court's denial of certiorari in E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Abbott (November 20, 2023), a case in which DuPont asked the Court to review the District Court's application of collateral estoppel. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-13_d18e.pdf   Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts. www.whatscotuswroteus.com

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Johnson v. Prentice | Jackson, Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 29, 2023 15:16


Justice Jackson, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, dissenting from the denial of certiorari in a case involving an Eighth Amendment challenge to a prisoner's conditions of confinement: Johnson v. Prentice (2023). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-693_21p3.pdf   Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts. www.whatscotuswroteus.com  

Summarily - A Podcast for Busy Lawyers
How do you pronounce certiorari?

Summarily - A Podcast for Busy Lawyers

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 24, 2023 28:26


Robert and Lindsey review opinions from September. CPPB, LLC v. Taurus Apopka City Ctr., LLC, 6th DCA (denial of motion to dissolve lis pendens).Greathouse v. State, 2d DCA (preservation of cause challenge).Collins v. State, 5th DCA (evidentiary hearing; newly discovered evidence).Gurolla v. State, 5th DCA (discovery violation).State v. Victorino and Hunter, 5th DCA (applicability of amended death penalty statute).In Re: Jane Doe, 5th (judicial waiver where a minor seeks abortion).T.G. United, Inc. v. AADD Properties, LLC, 5th DCA (eviction proceedings; court  registry). City of Jacksonville v. Jacksonville Hosp. Holdings, L.P., 11th Cir. (voluntary dismissal under rule 41). Summarily is sponsored by BetterHelp and The Law Office of Scott N. Richardson, P.A. Click the BetterHelp link (BetterHelp.com/Summarily) for 10% off your first month of BetterHelp.   Thank you for listening. Please share the podcast with your friends and colleagues, and rate and review the show.Send your questions, comments, and feedback to summarilypod@gmail.com.Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided on this podcast is not intended to be legal advice.  You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice. If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer.  The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast's advertisers.  This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only.  Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast's creator is prohibited.

Stuff You Missed in History Class
Isabel González and Gonzales v. Williams

Stuff You Missed in History Class

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 20, 2023 41:52 Transcription Available


Gonzales v. Williams is one of the Insular Cases, and because it was about the citizenship status of Isabel González of Puerto Rico, it stands out from the many other Insular Cases that focus on goods and tariffs. Research:  Burnett, Christina Duffy. "'They say I am not an American...': The Noncitizen National and the Law of American Empire.” Virginia Journal of International Law. Vol. 48, No. 4. 2008. Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States at October Term, 1903. “Gonzalez v. Williams.” No. 225.. Argued December 4, 7, 1903.-Decided January 4, 1904. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep192/usrep192001/usrep192001.pdf Connecticut General Assembly Office of Legislative Research. “OLR Research Report.” 3/3/1997. https://www.cga.ct.gov/PS97/rpt/olr/htm/97-R-0359.htm Erman, Sam. “Almost Citizens: Puerto Rico, the U.S. Constitution, and Empire (Studies in Legal History).” Cambridge University Press. 2018. Erman, Sam. “Meanings of Citizenship in the U.S. Empire: Puerto Rico, Isabel Gonzalez, and the Supreme Court, 1898 to 1905.” Journal of American Ethnic History. Summer 2008. Volume 27. Number 4. Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27501851 Fifty-first Congress. “An act in amendment to the various acts relative to immigration and the importation of aliens under contract or agreement to perform labor.” chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://govtrackus.s3.amazonaws.com/legislink/pdf/stat/26/STATUTE-26-Pg1084a.pdf Halperin, Anna Danziger. “Isabel González and Puerto Rican Citizenship: A Q&A with Historian Sam Erman.” New York Historical Society Museum and Library. https://www.nyhistory.org/blogs/isabel-gonzalez-and-puerto-rican-citizenship-a-qa-with-historian-sam-erman On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court Of Appeals For The Tenth Circuit. “Brief of the Descendants of Dred Scott and Isabel Gonzalez as Amici Curae in support of the Petitioners.” No. 21-1394 in the Supreme Court of the United States. Silsby, Gilen. “The Legal Story Behind Puerto Rico's Colonial Conundrum.” USC TrojanFamily. Spring 2019. https://news.usc.edu/trojan-family/sam-erman-usc-puerto-rican-citizenship/ Silsby, Gilen. “Who in the world was Isabel Gonzalez?” With Sam Erman. USC Gould School of Law. 10/17/2018. https://gould.usc.edu/about/news/?id=4489 Women and the American Story. “Puerto Rican Citizenship.” https://wams.nyhistory.org/industry-and-empire/expansion-and-empire/puerto-rican-citizenship/ New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]), 25 Nov. 1906. Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers. Lib. of Congress. https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1906-11-25/ed-1/seq-13/ See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Burns v. Mays (April 24, 2023) Justice Sotomayor, Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Ineffective Assistance of Council, Death Penalty)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 28, 2023 16:40


Audio of Justice Sotomayor's dissent from denial of certiorari in Burns v. Mays (April 24, 2023)  

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Donziger v. United States (March 27, 2023) Justice Gorsuch, Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Chevron, Texaco, Court-appointed Prosecutors, Separation of Powers)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 26, 2023 11:06


Audio of Donziger v. United States (March 27, 2023) Justice Gorsuch Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari.  

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Brown v. Louisiana (April 3, 2023) Justice Jackson Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Failure to disclose codefendant's confession in a death penalty case)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 26, 2023 7:29


  Audio of Justice Jackson's April 3, 2023 dissent from denial of certiorari in Brown v. Louisiana    

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Chapman v. Doe (March 20, 2023) Justice Jackson, Dissenting to Grant for Certiorari (Abortion, Munsingwear Vacatur, Dobbs v. Jackson, Mootness)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 21, 2023 8:16


Audio of Chapman v. Doe (March 20, 2023) Justice Jackson, Dissenting to Grant for Certiorari (Abortion, Munsingwear Vacatur, Dobbs v. Jackson, Mootness)  

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
City of Ocala v. Art Rojas (Mar 6, 2023) Justice Thomas, Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 7, 2023 9:29


Audio of Justice Thomas, Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari in City of Ocala v. Art Rojas (Mar 6, 2023)  

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
City of Ocala v. Art Rojas (Mar 6, 2023) Justice Gorsuch on Denial of Certiorari (Lemon Test, Kennedy v. Bremerton, Establishment Clause)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 6, 2023 6:43


Audio of Justice Gorsuch's statement regarding denial of certiorari in City of Ocala v. Art Rojas (March 6, 2023)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Davis v. United States (Feb 21, 2023) Justice Jackson Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari (Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Plea Deal Negotiation)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 6, 2023 6:23


Audio of Davis v. United States (Feb 21, 2023) Justice Jackson Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari   This episode, I will be reading Justice Jackson's dissent to the denial of cert in Davis v. United States, decided Feb 21, 2023. Enjoy.

Today's Tax Talk with Attorney Steven Leahy
Toth Hurts - IRS Unfairness - The United Supreme Court declined certiorari on the case Toth vs. United States. Certiorari is the process by which an appellate court has the discretion to review decis

Today's Tax Talk with Attorney Steven Leahy

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 27, 2023 19:18


Thursday January 26, 2023 - The United Supreme Court declined certiorari on the case Toth vs. United States. Certiorari is the process by which an appellate court has the discretion to review decisions made by trial courts. Becase the Supreme Court refused to hear this case the appellate court's decision stands. And that decision stinks! I think a clear violation of the Eighth Amendment to the Constituion. The Eight Amendment simply says "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Justice Gorsuch dissented from the denial of certiorari. Monica Toth, an American citizen who failed to report a foreign bank account as required by law. The Internal Revenue Service assessed a civil penalty against Ms. Toth for her failure to report, which she argued violated her rights under the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Justice Gorsuch noted that protection against excessive punitive economic sanctions is “fundamental” and “deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition". He further argued that it would be wrong for governments to evade constitutional scrutiny by labeling fines as "civil" rather than "criminal". In addition, he pointed out other reasons why taking up this case was worth consideration such as incentivizing governments to impose exorbitant civil penalties and clashing with original understanding of Eighth Amendment. Some Judges write for other Judges to help them understand the legal basis for a certain ruling, or even provide their own interpretation of an existing law. This can help inform future decisions on similar cases, since the opinion can serve as precedent. Some judges write with lawyers in mind, crafting legal opinions that are complex and highly technical, so that attorneys can use them as powerful tools when advocating for their clients. Some judges write for the public, with the intention of making legal opinions easier to understand and more accessible to a wider audience. Justice Gorsuch writes for the public. Attorney Steven A. Leahy reviews Justice Gorsuch's opinion on Today's Tax Talk. https://reason.com/2022/08/30/this-grandmother-didnt-submit-the-proper-banking-form-now-the-irs-wants-2-1-million-from-her/ https://reason.com/2023/01/23/supreme-court-declines-case-challenging-excessive-irs-penalties/ https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-courts-gorsuch-dissent-calls-217-mln-tax-penalty-excessive-2023-01-23/ https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/supreme-court-punt-in-tax-fine-case-leaves-uncertainty-in-wake --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/steven-leahy1/message

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Toth v. United States (Jan 23, 2023) Justice Gorsuch Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Foreign Bank Accounts, IRS Reporting Requirements)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 24, 2023 6:41


Audio of new opinion related to orders: Toth v. United States (Jan 23, 2023) Justice Gorsuch Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari.

El Supremazo
Pueblo v. Bonilla Rosado, 2022 TSPR 147 (Resolución)

El Supremazo

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 9, 2023 32:25


En este episodio, el Lcdo. Miguel A. Rodríguez Ramos discute la Resolución del Tribunal Supremo en Pueblo v. Bonilla Rosado, 2022 TSPR 147, donde el Tribunal proveyó No Ha Lugar al recurso de Certiorari presentado por el Sr. José Bonilla Rosado, en el que solicitaba se revocara la determinación del foro apelativo intermedio en la que revocó la Resolución emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia. En particular, el licenciado Rodríguez Ramos analiza el Voto particular disidente del Juez Asociado Estrella Martínez, al cual se unió la Jueza Presidenta Oronoz Rodríguez. Illinois v. Perkins, 496 U.S. 292, 297-298 (1990): “Miranda forbids coercion, not mere strategic deception by taking advantage of a suspect's misplaced trust in one he supposes to be a fellow prisoner. As we recognized in Miranda: “[C]onfessions remain a proper element in law enforcement. Any statement given freely and voluntarily without any compelling influences is, of course, admissible in evidence.” 384 U.S., at 478, 86 S.Ct., at 1629. Ploys to mislead a suspect or lull him into a false sense of security that do not rise to the level of compulsion or coercion to speak are not within Miranda 's concerns. Cf. Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 495–496, 97 S.Ct. 711, 714, 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977) (per curiam); Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412, 106 S.Ct. 1135, 89 L.Ed.2d 410 (1986) (where police fail to inform suspect of attorney's efforts to reach him, neither Miranda nor the Fifth Amendment requires suppression of prearraignment confession after voluntary waiver). Miranda was not meant to protect suspects from boasting about their criminal activities in front of persons whom they believe to be their cellmates. This case is illustrative. Respondent had no reason to feel that undercover agent Parisi had any legal authority to force him to answer questions or that Parisi could affect respondent's future treatment. Respondent viewed the cellmate-agent as an equal and showed no hint of being intimidated by the atmosphere of the jail. In recounting the details of the Stephenson murder, respondent was motivated solely by the desire to impress his fellow inmates. He spoke at his own peril”. Agradecimiento a: Laurimar Meléndez por el arte de “El Supremazo” Lcdo. Michael Hernández por el intro y outro. Nos pueden contactar mediante correo electrónico a: supremazopr@gmail.com

The Outlook By Brooke
Petition of Certiorari

The Outlook By Brooke

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 24, 2022 11:26


The facts are coming in slow here lately but we will take them as they come! --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/brooke034/support

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Shoop v. Cunningham (Nov 14 2022) Justice Thomas Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 19, 2022 29:31


Audio of Shoop v. Cunningham (Nov 14 2022) Justice Thomas Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari.  

All Crime No Cattle
Ep 100: Revenge in Kaufman County, Part II

All Crime No Cattle

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 17, 2022 98:34


Just two months after Kaufman County Assistant District Attorney Mark Hasse was murdered in broad daylight, District Attorney Mike McLelland and his wife Cynthia McLelland were killed in a home invasion. With three dead and a community held in fear, a helpful tip leads to a mountain of evidence against the killers.Sources:1.) Austin, B. (2013, April 18). Former Kaufman official's wife says he killed DA, Assistant. KERA News. https://www.keranews.org/texas-news/2013-04-17/former-kaufman-officials-wife-says-he-killed-da-assistant2.) Casey, K. (2018). In Plain Sight: The Kaufman County Prosecutor Murders. William Morrow.3.) Emily, J. (2014, December 30). Wife of convicted Kaufman County killer sentenced to 40 years in prison. The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2018/07/29/wife-of-convicted-kaufman-county-killer-sentenced-to-40-years-in-prison/4.) Eric Lyle Williams v the State of Texas On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 17-7603 (The Supreme Court of the United States). 5.) Ford, D. (2013, March 27). Colorado governor: Shooting suspect Evan Ebel had “bad streak.” CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2013/03/26/us/evan-ebel-profile/index.html6.) Hargrove, B. (2013, May 2). The Killings in Kaufman. Dallas Observer. https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/the-killings-in-kaufman-64295837.) Heinz, F. (2013, April 2). Search warrant sheds light on McLelland investigation. NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth. https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/search-warrant-sheds-light-on-mclellan-investigation/2073056/8.) Hennessy-Fiske, M., & Pearce, M. (2013, April 1). Slayings of Texas prosecutors called unprecedented. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-xpm-2013-apr-01-la-na-nn-texas-prosecutor-kaufman-county-20130401-story.html9.) Hernandez, S. (2021, September 21). Kaufman County DA recalls 2013 murders. The Courier of Montgomery County. https://www.yourconroenews.com/neighborhood/moco/news/article/Kaufman-County-DA-recalls-2013-murders-16475313.php10.) Interim Kaufman district attorney gets 24-hour security as authorities scramble for leads in slayings. (2013, April 3). The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2013/04/03/interim-kaufman-district-attorney-gets-24-hour-security-as-authorities-scramble-for-leads-in-slayings/11.) Kaufman County District Attorney Mike McLelland, wife found dead in home. (2013, March 31). The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2013/03/31/kaufman-county-district-attorney-mike-mclelland-wife-found-dead-in-home/ 12.) Lindsley, G. E. (2014, December 17). Kim Williams provides gruesome murder details. The Kaufman Herald. http://www.kaufmanherald.com/hot_news/article_6bdeebda-8600-11e4-96dd-9725c54eff63.html13.) Mitchell, K. (2016, May 27). White supremacist gang conspired to kill Colorado prisons director, new documents allege. The Denver Post. https://www.denverpost.com/2016/05/27/white-supremacist-gang-conspired-to-kill-colorado-prisons-director-new-documents-allege/14.) Nicholson, E. (2013, April 15). Kaufman County murders: Eric Williams, a segway-riding justice of the peace, is the top suspect. Dallas Observer. https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/kaufman-county-murders-eric-williams-a-segway-riding-justice-of-the-peace-is-the-top-suspect-711580315.) Schlesinger, R. (2016, December 10). Target Justice. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/target-justice-48-hours-probes-texas-prosecutor-killings-hasse-mclelland/ 16.) Timms, E., Eiserer, T., Emily, J., Sides, E., & Pruet, J. J. (2013, April 14). Complex picture arises of ex-Kaufman justice of peace eyed in case. The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2013/04/14/complex-picture-arises-of-ex-kaufman-justice-of-peace-eyed-in-case/17.) Two challengers try to unseat Kaufman County district attorney accused of DWI. (2010, February 24). The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2010/02/24/two-challengers-try-to-unseat-kaufman-county-district-attorney-accused-of-dwi/ 18.) Vendetta. (2015, February 27). In Dateline. NBC. https://www.nbcnews.com/dateline/video/vendetta--part-2-499608131883Good News Sources:1.) Burns, Ahraya. “You've Got to See the Adorable New Baby Hippo Born at the Dallas Zoo.” NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/dallas-zoo-welcomes-baby-hippo/3119148/.2.) Ramos, Harriet. “Meet the Baby: Fort Worth Zoo Welcomes Western Lowland Gorilla to the Troop.” Fort Worth Star-Telegram, November 9, 2022. https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/fort-worth/article268535742.html.Check out more All Crime No Cattle at our website allcrimenocattle.com.Visit our Patreon page to support the show and earn some awesome rewards: https://patreon.com/allcrimenocattle. Get some ACNC merch: https://www.teepublic.com/stores/all-crime-no-cattle-podcast-shop?ref_id=9435. Find us on Twitter: @ACNCpodcast and on Instagram: @allcrimenocattle. Tip Jar: https://paypal.me/allcrimenocattle.And always remember, crime is bigger in Texas, y'all!

SCOTUScast
Merrill v. Milligan - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 16, 2022 55:59


On October 4, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Merrill v. Milligan.Following the 2020 Census, the Alabama Legislature redrew its congressional district lines to account for shifts in the state's population. With these new lines, only one of the state's seven congressional districts was majority-minority. Several plaintiffs sued, asserting the districts violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and sought the creation of an additional majority-minority district to account for the growing African American population in Alabama.The District Court enjoined the districts, holding that they violated the VRA. Alabama appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted Certiorari and stayed the district court's injunctions.Featuring:David Warrington, Partner, Dhillon Law Group Inc. Moderator: Michael Dimino, Professor of Law, Widener University Commonwealth Law School

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Buffington v. McDonough (Nov 7, 2022) Gorsuch Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (V.A. Benefits, Chevron Deference)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 15, 2022 33:34


Audio of Buffington v. McDonough (Nov 7, 2022) Gorsuch Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (V.A. Benefits, Chevron Deference)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Anthony v. Louisiana (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Sotomayor Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Harmless-error, Structural-error, Prosecutor Testimony)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 15, 2022 33:58


Audio of Anthony v. Louisiana (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Sotomayor Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Harmless-error, Structural-error, Prosecutor Testimony).

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Clendening v. United States (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Thomas Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari (Injured Military Personnel, Federal Tort Claims Act)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 13, 2022 8:45


Justice Thomas Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari in Clendening v. United States (Nov 7, 2022) Case Keywords: Injured Military Personnel, Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), Feres v. United States (1950), Feres doctrine, injury incident to military service, Camp Lejeune, U.S. Sovereign Immunity.   Contact the Show Music and Sound Effects by Epidemic Sound  

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Khorrami v. Arizona (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Gorsuch Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari (12 Member Jury, Right to Impartial Jury)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 13, 2022 21:35


Audio of Justice Gorsuch Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari in Khorrami v. Arizona (November 7, 2022) On Monday, November 7th, the Court issued orders that included a long list of denials that, in turn, inspired five dissenting opinions from four justices. Two of the five dissents were penned by Justice Gorsuch - one of which dissented from the Court's denial of Khorrami v. Arizona, arguing that juries with fewer than 12 people violate the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.   Music by Epidemic Sound

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Chinn v. Shoop (Nov 7, 2022) Justice Jackson Dissenting to Denial of Certiorari

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 12, 2022 5:22


Audio of Justice Jackson's dissent to denial of certiorari in Chinn v. Shoop (2022). On Monday, the Court issued orders that included a long list of denials which produced five different dissents - including Justice Jackson's first ever opinion as a Supreme Court Justice - dissenting to the denial of certiorari in Chinn v. Shoop (2022) Case Keywords: capital case, Brady v. Maryland, Strickland v. Washington, reasonable probability materiality standard, intellectual disability   Music by Epidemic Sound  

What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Thomas v. Lumpkin (2022) Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari (Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Juror Bias, Impartial Jury)

What SCOTUS Wrote Us

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 2, 2022 29:17


Decided October 11, 2022. Thomas v. Lumpkin (ineffective assistance of counsel, juror bias, impartial jury). Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.   Access this SCOTUS opinion here.  

All Crime No Cattle
Ep 99: Revenge in Kaufman County, Part I

All Crime No Cattle

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 30, 2022 82:27


In 2013, Kaufman County Assistant District Attorney Mark Hasse was murdered in what appeared to be a retaliatory act related to his caseload. Local, state, and federal agencies joined together to find the people responsible. However, in his decades-long career, ADA Hasse had prosecuted hundreds of cases and locating the one connected to his murder would prove difficult.Sources:1.) Casey, K. (2018). In Plain Sight: The Kaufman County Prosecutor Murders. William Morrow.2.) Emily, J. (2014, December 30). Wife of convicted Kaufman County killer sentenced to 40 years in prison. The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2018/07/29/wife-of-convicted-kaufman-county-killer-sentenced-to-40-years-in-prison/3.) Eric Lyle Williams v the State of Texas On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 17-7603 (The Supreme Court of the United States).4.) Hargrove, B. (2013, May 2). The Killings in Kaufman. Dallas Observer. https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/the-killings-in-kaufman-64295835.) Heinz, F. (2013, April 2). Search warrant sheds light on McLelland investigation. NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth. https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/search-warrant-sheds-light-on-mclellan-investigation/2073056/6.) Hennessy-Fiske, M., & Pearce, M. (2013, April 1). Slayings of Texas prosecutors called unprecedented. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-xpm-2013-apr-01-la-na-nn-texas-prosecutor-kaufman-county-20130401-story.html7.) Hernandez, S. (2021, September 21). Kaufman County DA recalls 2013 murders. The Courier of Montgomery County. https://www.yourconroenews.com/neighborhood/moco/news/article/Kaufman-County-DA-recalls-2013-murders-16475313.php8.) Interim Kaufman district attorney gets 24-hour security as authorities scramble for leads in slayings. (2013, April 3). The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2013/04/03/interim-kaufman-district-attorney-gets-24-hour-security-as-authorities-scramble-for-leads-in-slayings/10.) Ford, D. (2013, March 27). Colorado governor: Shooting suspect Evan Ebel had “bad streak.” CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2013/03/26/us/evan-ebel-profile/index.html11.) Kaufman County District Attorney Mike McLelland, wife found dead in home. (2013, March 31). The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2013/03/31/kaufman-county-district-attorney-mike-mclelland-wife-found-dead-in-home/ 12.) Mitchell, K. (2016, May 27). White supremacist gang conspired to kill Colorado prisons director, new documents allege. The Denver Post. https://www.denverpost.com/2016/05/27/white-supremacist-gang-conspired-to-kill-colorado-prisons-director-new-documents-allege/13.) Nicholson, E. (2013, April 15). Kaufman County murders: Eric Williams, a segway-riding justice of the peace, is the top suspect. Dallas Observer. https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/kaufman-county-murders-eric-williams-a-segway-riding-justice-of-the-peace-is-the-top-suspect-711580314.) Schlesinger, R. (2016, December 10). Target Justice. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/target-justice-48-hours-probes-texas-prosecutor-killings-hasse-mclelland/ 15.) Timms, E., Eiserer, T., Emily, J., Sides, E., & Pruet, J. J. (2013, April 14). Complex picture arises of ex-Kaufman justice of peace eyed in case. The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/2013/04/14/complex-picture-arises-of-ex-kaufman-justice-of-peace-eyed-in-case/16.) Two challengers try to unseat Kaufman County district attorney accused of DWI. (2010, February 24). The Dallas Morning News. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2010/02/24/two-challengers-try-to-unseat-kaufman-county-district-attorney-accused-of-dwi/ 17.) Vendetta. (2015, February 27). In Dateline. NBC. https://www.nbcnews.com/dateline/video/vendetta--part-2-499608131883Check out more All Crime No Cattle at our website allcrimenocattle.com.Visit our Patreon page to support the show and earn some awesome rewards: https://patreon.com/allcrimenocattle. Get some ACNC merch: https://www.teepublic.com/stores/all-crime-no-cattle-podcast-shop?ref_id=9435. Find us on Twitter: @ACNCpodcast and on Instagram: @allcrimenocattle. Tip Jar: https://paypal.me/allcrimenocattle.And always remember, crime is bigger in Texas, y'all!

Teleforum
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Merrill v. Milligan

Teleforum

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 27, 2022 60:04


On October 4, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Merrill v. Milligan.Following the 2020 Census, the Alabama Legislature redrew its congressional district lines to account for shifts in the state's population. With these new lines, only one of the state's seven congressional districts was majority-minority. Several plaintiffs sued, asserting the districts violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and sought the creation of an additional majority-minority district to account for the growing African American population in Alabama.The District Court enjoined the districts, holding that they violated the VRA. Alabama appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted Certiorari and stayed the district court's injunctions.We will break down the argument on the same day, October 4, 2022.Featuring:David Warrington, Partner, Dhillon Law Group Inc. Moderator: Michael Dimino, Professor of Law, Widener University Commonwealth Law School

ADV. ARUN DESHMUKH SHOW
249 Hindi Certiorari Writ सरसिओराय रिट का अधिकार #constitutionalrights

ADV. ARUN DESHMUKH SHOW

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 20, 2022 5:30


सरशिओराय रिट का अधिकार जानिए Writ of Certiorari is one of the important writ available to each Indian Citizen. It is the Constitutional remedy available to each citizen. One can go directly to High Court or Supreme Court for justice under writ petition. Lion adv. Arun Deshmukh is a well known Social worker and sports lover. A person with Giver mentality and stubborn leadership attitude he develops quickly friendship with anyone. Always on a look to help others rather than seeing profits in others relations. Has his own enemy but even has good relationship with them also. Its difficult to maintain enmity with Arunsir as he never thinks evil even of his enemy. Arunsir has dedicated much of his time in developing young kids and helped them to reach Nationals in game of KHO KHO. As a treasurer of Shree Samartha Vyayam mandir and the main kho kho coach he was honored by Maharashtra State with the coveted Dadoji Konddev Award given for the best Sports Coach of any sports field. He was conferred for kho kho in the year 2011 for the year 2008-2009. Arunsir has coached at Shree Samartha Vyayam Mandir from 1985 to 1989 for Volleyball and Athletics then for kho kho from 1999 till 2014 for Volleyball and Langadi from 2014 till 2022. Arun Sir has started to coach at vaibhav Sports Club from 2021 onward. At Kirti College another long innings as a Coach he had continued. from 1989 till 2022 he is continuously coaching at Kirti College and bringing lots of cherish and results.

ADV. ARUN DESHMUKH SHOW
248 Marathi Certiorari writ सरशिओराय रिट चा अधिकार #Constitutional Remedies

ADV. ARUN DESHMUKH SHOW

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 19, 2022 5:35


Certiorari writ सरशिओराय रिट चा अधिकार #Constitutional Remedies. our Indian constitution provides us constitutional remedies as our right. With help of this constitutional remedies wherein different writs Exists. These are primarily used as a safeguard to guard your constitutional rights

MacBreak Weekly (Audio)
MBW 838: It's A Long Way to Certiorari - USB-C & EU, Tony Blevins, Tim Cook in EU

MacBreak Weekly (Audio)

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 4, 2022 147:17


The EU will require USB-C charging for mobile devices by the end of 2024. Apple loses second bid to challenge Qualcomm patents at U.S. Supreme Court. Ventura 10 beta seeded to devs. Apple seeds fourth iOS 16.1 and tvOS 16.1, fifth iPadOS 16.1 betas to developers. Adaptive Transparency for AirPods Pro 1. It's a bug! Apple's Tony Blevins to leave after making crude remarks in Daniel Mac TikTok. 'Storming' iPhone 14 Pro demand sees assembler Foxconn set new record revenue. Dynamic Island UI result of years of discussion, biggest iOS change in five years – Apple execs. TSMC reportedly overpowers Apple in negotiations over price increases. Apple publishes new design guidelines for Live Activities on the iPhone 14 Pro's Dynamic Island. Tim Cook's European Vacation - Visits the "Ted Lasso" set, has private audience with the Pope. Apple hopes you'll forgive Will Smith by Christmas / Emancipation, a new movie starring Smith. Picks of the Week Jason's Pick: Now Playing Plus Andy's Pick: "Fletch" Book Series Alex's Pick: Qlab 5 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: hover.com/twit ZipRecruiter.com/macbreak cachefly.com

MacBreak Weekly (Video HI)
MBW 838: It's A Long Way to Certiorari - USB-C & EU, Tony Blevins, Tim Cook in EU

MacBreak Weekly (Video HI)

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 4, 2022 147:58


The EU will require USB-C charging for mobile devices by the end of 2024. Apple loses second bid to challenge Qualcomm patents at U.S. Supreme Court. Ventura 10 beta seeded to devs. Apple seeds fourth iOS 16.1 and tvOS 16.1, fifth iPadOS 16.1 betas to developers. Adaptive Transparency for AirPods Pro 1. It's a bug! Apple's Tony Blevins to leave after making crude remarks in Daniel Mac TikTok. 'Storming' iPhone 14 Pro demand sees assembler Foxconn set new record revenue. Dynamic Island UI result of years of discussion, biggest iOS change in five years – Apple execs. TSMC reportedly overpowers Apple in negotiations over price increases. Apple publishes new design guidelines for Live Activities on the iPhone 14 Pro's Dynamic Island. Tim Cook's European Vacation - Visits the "Ted Lasso" set, has private audience with the Pope. Apple hopes you'll forgive Will Smith by Christmas / Emancipation, a new movie starring Smith. Picks of the Week Jason's Pick: Now Playing Plus Andy's Pick: "Fletch" Book Series Alex's Pick: Qlab 5 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: hover.com/twit ZipRecruiter.com/macbreak cachefly.com

All TWiT.tv Shows (MP3)
MacBreak Weekly 838: It's A Long Way to Certiorari

All TWiT.tv Shows (MP3)

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 4, 2022 147:17


The EU will require USB-C charging for mobile devices by the end of 2024. Apple loses second bid to challenge Qualcomm patents at U.S. Supreme Court. Ventura 10 beta seeded to devs. Apple seeds fourth iOS 16.1 and tvOS 16.1, fifth iPadOS 16.1 betas to developers. Adaptive Transparency for AirPods Pro 1. It's a bug! Apple's Tony Blevins to leave after making crude remarks in Daniel Mac TikTok. 'Storming' iPhone 14 Pro demand sees assembler Foxconn set new record revenue. Dynamic Island UI result of years of discussion, biggest iOS change in five years – Apple execs. TSMC reportedly overpowers Apple in negotiations over price increases. Apple publishes new design guidelines for Live Activities on the iPhone 14 Pro's Dynamic Island. Tim Cook's European Vacation - Visits the "Ted Lasso" set, has private audience with the Pope. Apple hopes you'll forgive Will Smith by Christmas / Emancipation, a new movie starring Smith. Picks of the Week Jason's Pick: Now Playing Plus Andy's Pick: "Fletch" Book Series Alex's Pick: Qlab 5 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: hover.com/twit ZipRecruiter.com/macbreak cachefly.com

Radio Leo (Audio)
MacBreak Weekly 838: It's A Long Way to Certiorari

Radio Leo (Audio)

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 4, 2022 147:17


The EU will require USB-C charging for mobile devices by the end of 2024. Apple loses second bid to challenge Qualcomm patents at U.S. Supreme Court. Ventura 10 beta seeded to devs. Apple seeds fourth iOS 16.1 and tvOS 16.1, fifth iPadOS 16.1 betas to developers. Adaptive Transparency for AirPods Pro 1. It's a bug! Apple's Tony Blevins to leave after making crude remarks in Daniel Mac TikTok. 'Storming' iPhone 14 Pro demand sees assembler Foxconn set new record revenue. Dynamic Island UI result of years of discussion, biggest iOS change in five years – Apple execs. TSMC reportedly overpowers Apple in negotiations over price increases. Apple publishes new design guidelines for Live Activities on the iPhone 14 Pro's Dynamic Island. Tim Cook's European Vacation - Visits the "Ted Lasso" set, has private audience with the Pope. Apple hopes you'll forgive Will Smith by Christmas / Emancipation, a new movie starring Smith. Picks of the Week Jason's Pick: Now Playing Plus Andy's Pick: "Fletch" Book Series Alex's Pick: Qlab 5 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: hover.com/twit ZipRecruiter.com/macbreak cachefly.com

All TWiT.tv Shows (Video LO)
MacBreak Weekly 838: It's A Long Way to Certiorari

All TWiT.tv Shows (Video LO)

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 4, 2022 147:58


The EU will require USB-C charging for mobile devices by the end of 2024. Apple loses second bid to challenge Qualcomm patents at U.S. Supreme Court. Ventura 10 beta seeded to devs. Apple seeds fourth iOS 16.1 and tvOS 16.1, fifth iPadOS 16.1 betas to developers. Adaptive Transparency for AirPods Pro 1. It's a bug! Apple's Tony Blevins to leave after making crude remarks in Daniel Mac TikTok. 'Storming' iPhone 14 Pro demand sees assembler Foxconn set new record revenue. Dynamic Island UI result of years of discussion, biggest iOS change in five years – Apple execs. TSMC reportedly overpowers Apple in negotiations over price increases. Apple publishes new design guidelines for Live Activities on the iPhone 14 Pro's Dynamic Island. Tim Cook's European Vacation - Visits the "Ted Lasso" set, has private audience with the Pope. Apple hopes you'll forgive Will Smith by Christmas / Emancipation, a new movie starring Smith. Picks of the Week Jason's Pick: Now Playing Plus Andy's Pick: "Fletch" Book Series Alex's Pick: Qlab 5 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: hover.com/twit ZipRecruiter.com/macbreak cachefly.com

Radio Leo (Video HD)
MacBreak Weekly 838: It's A Long Way to Certiorari

Radio Leo (Video HD)

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 4, 2022 147:58


The EU will require USB-C charging for mobile devices by the end of 2024. Apple loses second bid to challenge Qualcomm patents at U.S. Supreme Court. Ventura 10 beta seeded to devs. Apple seeds fourth iOS 16.1 and tvOS 16.1, fifth iPadOS 16.1 betas to developers. Adaptive Transparency for AirPods Pro 1. It's a bug! Apple's Tony Blevins to leave after making crude remarks in Daniel Mac TikTok. 'Storming' iPhone 14 Pro demand sees assembler Foxconn set new record revenue. Dynamic Island UI result of years of discussion, biggest iOS change in five years – Apple execs. TSMC reportedly overpowers Apple in negotiations over price increases. Apple publishes new design guidelines for Live Activities on the iPhone 14 Pro's Dynamic Island. Tim Cook's European Vacation - Visits the "Ted Lasso" set, has private audience with the Pope. Apple hopes you'll forgive Will Smith by Christmas / Emancipation, a new movie starring Smith. Picks of the Week Jason's Pick: Now Playing Plus Andy's Pick: "Fletch" Book Series Alex's Pick: Qlab 5 Hosts: Leo Laporte, Alex Lindsay, Andy Ihnatko, and Jason Snell Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/macbreak-weekly. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: hover.com/twit ZipRecruiter.com/macbreak cachefly.com

Supreme Court Opinions
Shurtleff v City of Boston

Supreme Court Opinions

Play Episode Listen Later May 6, 2022 1:37


Shurtleff v City of Boston, (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Background. Boston, Massachusetts allows groups to have their flags flown over Boston City Hall. A Christian group, Camp Constitution, sought to have the city fly a Christian flag. Camp Constitution and its director Hal Shurtleff teach that the United States was created as a "Christian nation." After the city denied their application, the first denial of more than a few hundred applications, Shurtleff sued. The city prevailed in the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and Shurtleff appealed to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court. Certiorari was granted in the case on September 30, 2021. On May 2, 2022, the Court unanimously ruled that the City of Boston violated the First Amendment by denying Shurtleff's application to fly the flag. Reactions. The Joe Biden administration and the American Civil Liberties Union sided with the Christian group. The administration said that "The city cannot generally open its flagpole to flags from private civic and social groups while excluding otherwise similar groups with religious views".

Supreme Court Opinions
Supreme Court Opinion: Ramirez v. Collier + Houston Community College System v. Wilson + Badgerow v. Walters

Supreme Court Opinions

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 29, 2022 5:48


Ramirez v. Collier (2022), is a United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Background. On July 19, 2004, 20-year-old John Henry Ramirez (born June 29, 1984), a former United States Marine, accompanied by two female acquaintances, murdered 46-year-old convenience store worker Pablo Castro outside a Times Market in Corpus Christi, Texas. Ramirez stabbed Castro a total of twenty-nine times, resulting in his death. The trio stole less than two dollars from Castro and fled the scene without entering the store. The two female acquaintances were captured a day later but Ramirez fled to Mexico and was not captured until 2008. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death soon thereafter. Ramirez was originally scheduled to be executed in September 2020. That warrant was withdrawn. In 2021, Ramirez filed suit to challenge the Texas execution protocol under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, seeking to have his minister be allowed to lay hands on his body and audibly pray during the execution process. The district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit both denied stays of execution, the latter over the dissent of Judge James L Dennis. Ramirez then filed a petition for a writ of certiorari. Houston Community College System v. Wilson (2022), is a United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Background. David Buren Wilson was elected a member of the Houston Community College System's board in 2013 who was censured for repeated incidences of what other members of the Board of Trustees deemed to be behavior that was not becoming of an elected official or beneficial to the HCC system. Wilson filed suit claiming that the censure was an offense to his First Amendment rights. Supreme Court. Certiorari was granted in the case on April 26, 2021. In a March 24, 2022 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Wilson's First Amendment rights were not violated by his fellow board members' censure of him because the censure did not result in any hindrance of his ability to exercise his free speech in his capacity as an elected official and member of the public. The opinion cites the fact that the use of censure by elected bodies to address the behavior and actions of their members is a practice with a long history in the United States, and it also states that the censure itself constitutes an exercise of First Amendment rights by Wilson's colleagues on the board who voted to reprimand him.

Supreme Court Opinions
Supreme Court Opinion: United States v. Zubaydah

Supreme Court Opinions

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 20, 2022 3:28


United States v Zubaydah, (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the state secrets privilege. Background. Abu Zubaydah was captured by the United States in Pakistan in 2002 and has been alleged to be a member of Al Qaeda. While in custody he had been transferred to multiple sites, including several black sites operated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), before he was transferred indefinitely to the Guantanamo Bay detention camp by 2003. While the information on these sites was classified, activities at one site in Poland became public knowledge after Zubaydah and his council requested an investigation in 2010 from Polish officials into his treatment while at a black site in Poland. The report found that Zubaydah had been subjected to waterboarding and other forms of torture at the black site under direction of two CIA contractors. Zubaydah sought disclosures from the two contractors in 2017 through federal courts to testify to their role in his detention. The CIA objected, claiming that any information regarding the black site was classified and could not be disclosed, even if the responses that Zubaydah sought did not reveal anything about the site's location. Zubayday countered that the site's general location in Poland had already been revealed to the public through other means. He prevailed in the district court and a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, over Judge Ronald M. Gould's dissent. Judge Daniel Bress, joined by 11 colleagues, dissented from the denial of rehearing en banc. Supreme Court. Certiorari was granted in the case on April 26, 2021. Oral arguments were heard on October 6, 2021. On March 3, 2022, a fractured Court reversed the Ninth Circuit in a mostly 7–2 vote. The majority decision was written by Justice Stephen Breyer, joined in full by Chief Justice John Roberts and in part by Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Breyer acknowledged that while information about the CIA black site in Poland had been identified in public, the type of information that Zubaydah sought "would tend to confirm (or deny) the existence of a CIA detention site in Poland", and thus there was reasonable cause for the government to consider any further confirmation a matter of national security, since this potentially could expose the existence of black sites in other countries. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurrence to the judgment which Justice Samuel Alito joined. Thomas agreed with the judgment of the majority, but believed that Zubaydah did not need the information he was requesting from the contractors to pursue his case. Justice Elena Kagan also wrote a concurrence, but stated the case should be remanded to the district court to review what information Zubaydah sought that could be separated from state secrets. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the dissent, joined by Sonia Sotomayor. Gorsuch argued that the fact that Zubayduh was held at a black site in Poland between 2002 and 2003 was now public knowledge and thus no longer a state secret, and was concerned about the over-classification of information by the government. He also stated, in agreement with Kagan, that the case should be remanded to district court to separate out what information could be obtained without evoking any state secret privilege.

Supreme Court of the United States
National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, No. 21A244 [Arg: 1.07.2022]

Supreme Court of the United States

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 9, 2022 128:05


QUESTION PRESENTED:Whether the Supreme Court should issue a stay of OSHA's vaccine-or-testing regime for all businesses with 100 or more employees.Date                   Proceedings and Orders Dec 17 2021  | Application (21A244) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.Dec 20 2021 | Response to application (21A244) requested by Justice Kavanaugh, due by 4 p.m., Thursday, December 30, 2021.Dec 20 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by Washington Legal Foundation.Dec 22 2021 | Application (21A244) referred to the Court.Dec 22 2021 | Consideration of the applications (21A244 and 21A247) for stay presented to Justice Kavanaugh and by him referred to the Court is deferred pending oral argument. The applications are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. The applications are set for oral argument on Friday, January 7, 2022.Dec 22 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by Former OSHA Administrators Charles Jeffress, David Michaels, and Gerard Scannell. VIDED.Dec 23 2021 | Because the Court has consolidated these applications for oral argument, future filings and activity in 21A244 and 21A247 will now be reflected on the docket of No. 21A244. Subsequent filings in No. 21A244 and/or 21A247 must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 21A244. Any document submitted in connection with either of these applications must include on its cover the application number and caption for each application in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in only one application, the docket entry will reflect that; a document filed in both applications will be noted as “VIDED.”Dec 23 2021 | Motion for divided argument filed by applicants. VIDED.Dec 23 2021 | Replies, if any, shall be filed by 10 a.m., Monday, January 3, 2022. VIDED.Dec 23 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by Constitutional Accountability Center. VIDED.Dec 27 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by National Employment Lawyers Association and Jobs With Justice Educational Fund. VIDED.Dec 28 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by Tore Says LLC. VIDED.Dec 28 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by Liberty, Life and Law Foundation. VIDED.Dec 29 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed byDefending The Republic, Inc. VIDED.Dec 29 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by Standard Process Inc. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for divided argument filed by applicants GRANTED. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for Leave to File and Brief of Amici Curiae of Members of Congress not accepted for filing. (January 03, 2022)Dec 30 2021 | Response to application from respondents Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al. filed. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by American Public Health Association, et al. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by Local Unions 1249 and 97 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Response to application from respondents American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by America's Frontline Doctors. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by We The Patriots USA, Inc. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by American Medical Association, et al. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by Center for Medical Freedom, et al. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by Advancing American Freedom. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by National Disability Rights Network, et al. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by Small Business Majority, et al. VIDED.Dec 30 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief filed by the IU Family for Choice, not Mandates, Inc. VIDED.Jan 03 2022 | Reply of applicant National Federation of Independent Business, et al. filed.Jan 03 2022 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by Texas Values, et al. VIDED.Jan 03 2022 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by Members of Congress. VIDED.Jan 03 2022 | Reply of Ohio, et al. in support of application submitted.Jan 05 2022 | Motion of Jason Feliciano , et al.Jan 06 2022 | Motion of Alsco, Inc. for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Emergency Applications for a Stay or Injunction Pending Certiorari Review; For Leave to File Without 10 Days' Notice; and For Leave to File in Paper Format of Alsco, Inc. submitted.Jan 06 2022 | Motion of 400 Physicians, Surgeons, Nurses, and Medical Professionals Opposing OSHA's Unconstitutional Overreach Leave to File Attached Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Applicants of 400 Physicians, Surgeons, Nurses, and Medical Professionals Opposing OSHA's Unconstitutional Overreach submitted.Jan 06 2022 | Motion for Leave to File; and Amici Brief of Two Unnamed Workers in Support of Application for Stay, Grant of Certiorari, and Reversal of Two Unnamed Workers submitted.Jan 06 2022 | Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief and Brief of American Commitment Foundation, Inc. submitted.Jan 07 2022 | Argued. For applicants in 21A244: Scott A. Keller, Washington, D. C. For applicants in 21A247: Benjamin M. Flowers, Solicitor General, Columbus, Ohio. For respondents: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. VIDED.★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

S&C Critical Insights
Grant of Certiorari in Pivotal Software v. Zhung Tran

S&C Critical Insights

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 13, 2021 18:13


In this episode of S&C's Critical Insights, David Rein and Julia Malkina discuss the Supreme Court's recent grant of certiorari in Pivotal Software v. Zhung Tran. The issue before the Court is whether the automatic stay of discovery pending a motion to dismiss for securities actions in federal court also applies in state court. David and Julia discuss how this issue has been decided in state courts, the key issues and arguments likely to be presented to the Supreme Court, and the implications that might result from the Court's eventual decision. Visit us at www.sullcrom.com

Teleforum
Certiorari and Stinson Deference

Teleforum

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 21, 2021 59:15


The U.S. Supreme Court recently signaled a retreat from deference to agency guidance in Kisor v. Wilkie, in which the Court narrowed judicial deference available to agencies construing their own ambiguous regulations. But what about judicial deference to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, the agency housed in “within the Judicial Branch,” and which Justice Scalia derided as a “junior varsity Congress,” making policy choices that should be committed to the legislature? In Stinson v. United States, the Supreme Court held that courts should defer to the commentary the Sentencing Commission issued construing their formally adopted Sentencing Guidelines, unless they are “inconsistent with, or a plainly erroneous reading of,” the relevant Guideline. The Stinson Court required such deference even if the Commission's interpretation “may not be compelled by the guideline text.” On June 17, the Supreme Court's conference is slated to include discussion on a series of cases percolating up from the courts of appeals that all raise similar challenges to the use of Stinson deference in deciding criminal defendants' sentences. The Court seems poised to grant certiorari to one or more of these cases challenging deference in order to resolve a broad and deep split among the circuits that reflects inconsistencies in sentencing nationwide. Or, at least, it would explain why the court has been holding some of these cert petitions for over six months in order to consider all of them together—perhaps in order to select the best vehicle from among the slew of petitions clamoring for the Court's consideration. Here to discuss the pending Stinson deference cert petitions is appellate attorney John Elwood, a partner at Arnold & Porter who is better known in some circles as the relist guru on SCOTUSblog. John filed a petition for certiorari on behalf of Zimmian Tabb in a case out of the Second Circuit—one of the first Stinson deference cases to reach the Supreme Court last fall. John will explain what's at stake in the reconsideration of Stinson deference, including the following questions: Do constitutional due process and the rule of lenity preclude Stinson deference when commentary to a Sentencing Guideline would increase a sentence? Do courts owe deference to Guidelines commentary that appears to expand the scope of the Sentencing Guidelines? Post-Kisor, may courts defer to commentary without first determining whether the pertinent Guideline is ambiguous? Post-Kisor, must courts apply canons of construction like the rule of lenity before granting the agency deference? And, practically speaking, what might the Supreme Court be looking for to select the best vehicle for reconsideration of Stinson deference from among the pending cert petitions? Moderating the discussion will be New Civil Liberties Alliance Executive Director and General Counsel, Mark Chenoweth. NCLA authored another of the cert petitions pending before this week's conference at the Court on behalf of a defendant in the Eighth Circuit, Marcus Broadway. Featuring:-- John P. Elwood, Partner, Arnold & Porter -- Moderator: Mark Chenoweth, Executive Director and General Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance

The Dictionary
#C131 (certiorari to cess)

The Dictionary

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 20, 2021 15:35


I read from certiorari to cess.     The word of the episode is "cerumen".     dictionarypod@gmail.com https://www.facebook.com/thedictionarypod/ https://twitter.com/dictionarypod https://www.instagram.com/dictionarypod/ https://www.patreon.com/spejampar 917-727-5757

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.
Chauvin Trial Day 18, SCOTUS Orders & Justice Thomas, 60-Minutes' Ron Desantis Fake News

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 8, 2021 130:20 Transcription Available


The government continues presenting its case against Derek Chauvin with a doctor and Chief of Police. Justice Thomas pens an interesting concurring opinion regarding Big Tech that raises eyebrows. Ron Desantis is the subject of a CBS 60 Minutes hit piece that takes him out of context. And more! Join criminal defense lawyer Robert F. Gruler in a discussion on the latest legal, criminal and political news, including:​​ • Judge Cahill conducts a “Schwartz Hearing” to question jurors about potential misconduct.​• Dr. Langenfeld testifies today he believed that asphyxia could have been the cause of death based on the information that he had the time.​• Minneapolis Chief of Police Medaria Arradondo testifies today and says that Chauvin should have “in no way” kept Floyd pinned down.​• United States Supreme Court issues new orders and grants Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Biden vs. Knight First Amendment Institute over big tech censorship.​• Justice Thomas drafts concurring opinion, analogizing big tech platforms to common carriers.​• The Supreme Court will hear the case, but Judge Thomas expresses concern that the case does not address the real issues.​• CBS 60-Minutes' Sharyn Alfonsi selectively edits interview with Governor Ron Desantis to make it look like he is inappropriate accepting campaign contributes.​• Transcript of the interview show major portions of text selectively deleted by Sharyn Alfonsi.​• Publix and Democrat state official blasé CBS 60-Minutes smear as “absolutely false.”​• As always, your questions and live Locals.com chat after the news!​​LIVECHAT QUESTIONS: ​• https://watchingthewatchers.locals.com/​​CLUBHOUSE AFTER PARTY DISCUSSION:​• https://www.joinclubhouse.com/event/MR00rXK6​• Join the Club: https://www.joinclubhouse.com/club/watching-the-watcher​​Connect with us:​• Locals! https://watchingthewatchers.locals.com​• Podcast (audio): https://watchingthewatchers.buzzsprout.com/​• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robertgruleresq​• Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RobertGrulerEsq​• Robert Gruler Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/RobertGrulerEsq/​• Miss Faith Instagram https://www.instagram.com/faithie_joy/​• Clubhouse: @RobertGrulerEsq @faith_joy​• Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/robertgruleresq​• Homepage with transcripts (under construction): https://www.watchingthewatchers.tv​​Don't forget to join us on Locals! https://watchingthewatchers.locals.com​​Why Locals? We head over to Locals to continue the conversation before, during and after the show. You can also grab the slides (and other stuff) from the show as well as a free PDF copy of Robert's book which is also available to buy on Amazon here: https://rcl.ink/hHB​​Other tips? Send to tips@rrlawaz.com or tag @RobertGrulerEsq on twitter.​​#WatchingtheWatchers #DerekChauvin #ChauvinTrial #GeorgeFloyd #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #Certiorari #JusticeThomas #RonDesantis #60minutes #FakeNews

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.
Derek Chauvin Trial Day 2 Analysis, Alex Jones Supreme Court, Gretchen Whitmer Criminal Charges

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 10, 2021 118:48 Transcription Available


Jury selection starts in the Derek Chauvin Trial on Day 2 after the court finishes discussing other motions in limine. Alex Jones' free speech case is docketed with the Supreme Court and we poke inside. Gretchen Whitmer facing inquiry from a local prosecutor who is floating the idea of criminal charges for Michigan's nursing home debacle. And more! Join criminal defense lawyer Robert F. Gruler in a discussion on the latest legal, criminal and pollical news, including:• Derek Chauvin trial day 2 starts with a discussion on the remaining motions in limine.• Sundeep Iyer, a private attorney from New York, joins the Government's prosecution team.• Discussion on whether other officers can testify about Chauvin's use of force.• Motion in limine addresses government Witness, Genevieve Hanson, a firefighter, who was at the scene.• Jury selection starts with Juror #1, a woman from Mexico who speaks English as a second language.• Juror #3 says she can try to be impartial but can't make any promises and is promptly excused.• Steven Schleicher, another private lawyer, joins the Government's prosecution team.• Mr. Schleicher implies that Chauvin's defense is using racial characteristics to disqualify potential jurors and invokes a Batson challenge.• Alex Jones' free speech lawsuit is docketed with the Supreme Court.• Background on the Sandy Hook claims and litigation involving Alex Jones.• Alex Emric Jones v. Erica Lafferty Petition for Writ of Certiorari review.• Supreme Court sets response deadline for Lafferty to file on March 22, 2021.• Macomb County Prosecutor says criminal charges possible against Governor Whitmer over nursing home deaths.• Peter Lucido started looking into the situation as a State Senator and recently become a prosecutor.• Michigan Attorney General says there is no basis to open an investigation and Governor Whitmer responds.• Review of Michigan statutes that might implicate Governor Whitmer.• Court proceeding held over zoom goes haywire after Defendant is caught in the home of the victim.• Coby James Harris is arrested again without bond for violation of release conditions in Michigan.• Prosecuting attorney Deborah Davis notices something is off during the hearing.• Judge Jeffrey Middleton canceled Coby Harris' bond as he is re-arrested by police.• As always, your questions and live Locals.com chat after the news!LIVECHAT QUESTIONS: https://watchingthewatchers.locals.com/LIVE Q&A ON CLUBHOUSE AFTER THE SHOW!https://www.joinclubhouse.com/event/m717gwnoConnect with us:• Locals! https://watchingthewatchers.locals.com• Podcast (audio): https://watchingthewatchers.buzzsprout.com/• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robertgruleresq• Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RobertGrulerEsq• Robert Gruler Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/RobertGrulerEsq/• Miss Faith Instagram https://www.instagram.com/faithie_joy/• Clubhouse: @RobertGrulerEsq @faith_joy• Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/robertgruleresq• Homepage with transcripts (under construction): https://www.watchingthewatchers.tvDon't forget to join us on Locals! https://watchingthewatchers.locals.comWhy Locals? We head over to Locals to continue the conversation before, during and after the show. You can also grab the slides (and other stuff) from the show as well as a free PDF copy of Robert's book which is also available to buy on Amazon here: https://rcl.ink/hHBOther tips? Send to tips@rrlawaz.com or tag @RobertGrulerEsq on twitter.#WatchingtheWatchers #DerekChauvin #GeorgeFloyd #ChauvinTrial #GovWhitmer #Michigan #BigGretchRona #NursingHomeScandal #AlexJones #SCOTUS #FreeSpeech #1A #SupremeCourt

My History Can Beat Up Your Politics
Granting of Certiorari: The Hidden Process Behind the Supreme Court

My History Can Beat Up Your Politics

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 27, 2021 28:15


A bit about an obscure procedure that can mean everything, from a 2011 episode.

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.
Merrick Garland AG Confirmation, SCOTUS Certiorari Orders, Dominion vs. Lindell MyPillow Lawsuit

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 23, 2021 145:34 Transcription Available


The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing on the confirmation of Merrick Garland as the next U.S. Attorney General. The United States Supreme Court issues a slew of new orders for the upcoming term. MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell facing new lawsuit from Dominion of 2020 election claims. And more! Join criminal defense lawyer Robert F. Gruler to discuss the latest legal, political and criminal news, including:• Merrick Garland confirmed as new United States Attorney General?• Refresher background on the role of the U.S. Attorney General• Who is Merrick Garland? What is his background?• Merrick Garland opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee• SCOTUS drops new orders, agreeing to hear new cases and disposing of others - we review the list• U.S. Supreme Court drops several Election 2020 Litigation cases - what made the list?• Supreme Court Judges deny Trump's request to halt inquiry into tax records• Founder and CEO of MyPillow Mike Lindell facing new lawsuit from Dominion Voting Systems for $1.3 billion• Filed in U.S. District Court for the DC Circuit, we review the new lawsuits• Arizona prisons holding inmates beyond their release date? • New Whistleblowers detail software problems in Arizona prisons causing prison staff to calculate release dates manually• Oklahoma Representative Kevin McDugle (R-OK) authors a new bill allowing people to run over protestors• Other solutions to protestors blocking streets are proposed under the new bill• As always, your questions and live Locals.com chat after the news!NOTE: The live chat portion of the show will be taking questions from the live chat on the Locals platform (not on YouTube)To join, head over to https://watchingthewatchers.locals.com and look for today's show thread.Connect with us:• Locals! https://watchingthewatchers.locals.com• Podcast (audio): https://watchingthewatchers.buzzsprout.com/• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robertgruleresq• Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RobertGrulerEsq• Robert Gruler Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/RobertGrulerEsq/• Miss Faith Instagram https://www.instagram.com/faithie_joy/• Clubhouse: @RobertGrulerEsq @faith_joy• Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/robertgruleresq• Homepage with transcripts (under construction): https://www.watchingthewatchers.tvDon't forget to join us on Locals! https://watchingthewatchers.locals.comWhy Locals? We head over to Locals to continue the conversation before, during and after the show. You can also grab the slides (and other stuff) from the show as well as a free PDF copy of Robert's book which is also available to buy on Amazon here: https://rcl.ink/hHBOther tips? Send to tips@rrlawaz.com or tag @RobertGrulerEsq on twitter.#WatchingtheWatchers #MerrickGarland #SCOTUS #Dominion #MyPillow #Lawsuits #Litigation #Whistleblowers

The VERY UNofficial AICP Study Guide Podcast
Episode 20: Writs of Certiorari

The VERY UNofficial AICP Study Guide Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 18, 2021 16:15


Yeah…so I'm going to need everything you got on that case please?  That's how I imagine the U.S. Supreme Court asks a lower court for their files, at least.  We kick off some case reviews in this episode with Mugler v. Kansas and The U.S. v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Company. Mugler v. Kansas:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mugler_v._Kansashttps://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/123/623.html U.S. v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Company:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Gettysburg_Electric_Railway_Co.https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/160/668/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettysburg_Electric_Railway

Immigration Review
Special Episode - Interview with Ed Ramos, Partner at KKTP (jurisdiction, discretion, petitions for review, and petitions for certiorari)

Immigration Review

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 27, 2021 40:39


[1:48] Introduction [2:53] Interview with Ed RamosClick this link to learn more about Ed!Helpful resources for issues discussed on the episode:Mechanics of filing a PFR Practice Advisory on Guerrero-Lasprilla Practice Advisory on materiality post-PatelPractice Advisory on jurisdiction post-Patel*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.www.kktplaw.com/Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, San Diego, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwisewww.docketwise.com/immigration-review"Modern immigration software & case management"*Want to become a patron of Immigration Review? Check out our Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/immigrationreview *CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: "Immigration Review Podcast" or @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreview*About your host: https://www.kktplaw.com/attorney/gregg-kevin-a/*More episodes at: https://www.kktplaw.com/immigration-review-podcast/*Featured in the top 15 of Immigration Podcast in the U.S.! https://blog.feedspot.com/immigration_podcasts/DISCLAIMER: Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide specific legal advice. Rather, the Immigration Review® podcast offers general information and insights regarding recent immigration cases from publicly available sources. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the podcast host. The Immigration Review® podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. MUSIC CREDITS: "Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/immigrationreview)

LegalMatters
Το Certiorari στην υπόθεση twitter parody και η αμοιβή της Επιτροπής Πολιτογραφήσεων

LegalMatters

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 19, 2021 20:07


Το Certiorari στην υπόθεση twitter parody και η αμοιβή της Επιτροπής Πολιτογραφήσεων.Συζήτηση στο ραδιόφωνο του Πολίτη με την Κατερίνα Ηλιάδη στις 19/01/2021.

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.
Sen. Josh Hawley Objects to Electoral Votes, Trump's New SCOTUS Lawsuit, Judge Abrams Gardner in GA

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 31, 2020 145:57 Transcription Available


Big news as Senator Josh Hawley becomes the first U.S. Senator to confirm he will object to the counting of electoral votes on January 6h – what does this mean? President Trump files new lawsuit against Joe Biden in new petition for Writ of Certiorari with U.S. Supreme Court. Judge Abrams Gardner in Georgia issues order preventing removal of registered voters from Georgia rolls in lead up to special election, and more! Join criminal defense lawyer Robert F. Gruler to discuss the latest criminal, election and legal news, including:• Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo) announces he will object to the counting of electoral votes next week – what does this mean?• Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell introduces S.5085, a new Senate bill to increase COVID-19 relief payments and address section 230 – we review• Trump legal team files a new (12/29) Supreme Court petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court in Trump et. al. vs. Biden et. al – what's inside?• In a run up to the Georgia special election, Ralph Russell identifies over 4,000 ineligible voters in Georgia and lodges election complaint – we break it down• Federal Judge Leslie Abrams Gardner, Sister of Stacey Abrams, issues order preventing Georgia elections boards from removing voters from registration rolls• Journalist Dave Biscobing (@DaveBiscobing15) with Arizona affiliate ABC15 reveals massive treasure trove of police misconduct (Brady) data after extensive investigation• Your questions and live chat after the presentation!Don't forget to join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/KDXEZBqvxDThe show starts at 5pm AZ time (4pm PT, 6pm Central, 7pm ET).NEW! Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/robertgruleresqNEW! Audio only podcast: https://watchingthewatchers.buzzsprout.coMDiscord is our free chat server for ongoing discussions before, during and after the livestream as well as sneak previews of slides for the upcoming shows: https://discord.gg/KDXEZBqvxDOther tips? Send to tips@rrlawaz.com or tag @RobertGrulerEsq on twitter.#watchingthewatchers #scotus #electionlitigation #objection #joshhawley #electoralvotes #Missouri #staceyabrams #leslieabramsgardner #mitchmcconnell #specialelection #Georgia #senate #runoff #abc15 #brady #badpopo

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.
Trump's Supreme Court Lawsuit, Sidney Powell at White House, Congress' 2.4T COVID-19 Spending Bill

Watching the Watchers with Robert Gruler Esq.

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 22, 2020 135:17 Transcription Available


New election litigation activity as Donald Trump (the campaign) files suit before the United States Supreme Court. Rumors surround Trump and his legal team's strategies moving forward. Congress on the verge of passing a massive new government spending bill to avoid shut down. And more! Join criminal defense lawyer Robert F. Gruler to discuss the latest criminal, election and legal news, including: • Trump tweets over the weekend about election news and rumors circulate he met with Sidney Powell and others in the Oval Office • Trump and his legal team submit two new filing to the United States State Supreme Court, a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari and a Motion for Expedited Consideration • A look at Trump's new lawsuit, which renews claims from three lower court Pennsylvania cases • Congress on the verge of passing a massive new spending bill that provides some COVID-19 relief – or does it? • New spending bill also helps some unexpected people from around the world – what's inside? • Your questions and live chat after the presentation!Don't forget to join us on Discord: https://discord.gg/KDXEZBqvxDThe show starts at 5pm AZ time (4pm PT, 6pm Central, 7pm ET).NEW! Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/robertgruleresqNEW! Audio only podcast: https://watchingthewatchers.buzzsprout.com/Discord is our free chat server for ongoing discussions before, during and after the livestream as well as sneak previews of slides for the upcoming shows: https://discord.gg/KDXEZBqvxDOther tips? Send to tips@rrlawaz.com or tag @RobertGrulerEsq on twitter.#electionupdates #watchingthewatchers #SCOTUS #electionlitigation #sidneypowell #rudygiuliani #alito #supremecourt #boockvar #Pennsylvania #lawsuits

Corpus Juris
Hawaii Appellate Procedure > Appeal Bonds in Civil Cases and Writs of Certiorari in the Hawaii Supreme Court

Corpus Juris

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 5, 2020 4:49


This episode covers hawaii appellate procedure with an emphasis on appeal bonds in civil cases and writs of certiorari in the Hawaii Supreme Court! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

PA'LANTE MI GENTE!
ACONTECIMIENTOS EN LA LEY DE CANCELACION DE DEPORTACION/REMOCION

PA'LANTE MI GENTE!

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 29, 2020 50:44


#034 En este episodio la abogada Barbara Vazquez del bufete de abogados de inmigración, Vazquez & Servi, P.C. los pone al día sobre lo que esta sucediendo con la ley de cancelación de deportación/remoción que ha vuelto a surgir en las noticias y ha vuelto a la Corte Suprema de la nación bajo un escrito de certiorari (Writ of Certiorari).  Se espera que, para noviembre 2020, el Supremo decida si el gobierno puede cumplir con su deber bajo la ley en cuanto a los requisitos de una notificación de comparecencia (“NTA”, por sus siglas en ingles) que por ley debe contener la fecha y hora de la audiencia en ese documento singular, o si puede cumplir con su deber con un documento subsecuente. Como podrán escuchar en este episodio, este punto es de suma importancia para personas quienes se encuentran en trámite de remoción y quienes desean defenderse contra la deportación aplicando a la cancelación de remoción. La importancia del tema es que dado a que una notificación de comparecencia, o “NTA”, es el documento que una vez servido al individuo y archivado con el tribunal de inmigración hace que pare de contar el tiempo de los 10 años de presencia física y continúa requeridos como uno de los requisitos estatutarios principales para ser elegible a la cancelación de deportación/remoción. Si el documento es deficiente por no contener la fecha y hora de la audiencia, el argumento es, que tampoco debe servir para detener el reloj de los 10 años. ¡Escuchen este episodio y SUBSCRIBASE a nuestro podcast PA'LANTE MI GENTE! Haga “clic” en el enlace

Civil Discourse
Summer of SCOTUS: Writ of Certiorari

Civil Discourse

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 19, 2020 63:31


In this episode, Nia and Aughie discuss the application for a hearing before the Supreme Court, called a writ of certiorari.

Ipse Dixit
Christa Laser on Equitable Defenses in Patent Law

Ipse Dixit

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 17, 2020 45:13


In this episode, Christa Laser, a senior associate at WilmerHale in Washington D.C., discusses her article "Patent Law's Equitable Defenses: The Coming Battle of Dynamic and Traditional Interpretive Regimes," which will be published in the University of Miami Law Review. Laser begins by discussing the difference between legal and equitable regimes and defenses. She describes the equitable defenses available in patent law, and explains why it is unclear how courts should apply them under the Patent Act. She observes that different interpretive approaches suggest different applications of those defenses. And she discusses her draft article "Certiorari in Patent Cases at the Supreme Court," which she co-authored with Judge Arthur Gajarsa. Laser is on Twitter at @ChristaLaser.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The LI Law Podcast
Ep 32: Michael P. Reynolds, Esq., tax certiorari attorney, explains why every property owner should grieve property taxes now.

The LI Law Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 22, 2020 26:02


Welcome to the LI Law Podcast.  We feature legal issues and developments which affect Long Island residents and business owners.  The podcast focuses on Long Island law topics and includes greater New York court and legislative happenings.  If you are one of the approximate 8 million residents of Long Island (Nassau, Suffolk, Queens, and Kings counties), or want to enjoy all law-related matters on Long Island, this podcast is for you! Our guest on this 32nd episode is Michael P. Reynolds, Esq., a tax certiorari attorney.  Mike Reynolds has worked both as a Deputy County Attorney and as a petitioner's attorney in the field of tax certiorari.  He is a former prosecutor and the current President of the Society of Professional Investigators. In his public appearances, Mr. Reynolds discusses the numbers behind your tax bill, what the County is looking at in determining fair market value, and what it isn't.  The approach to assessments varies from New York City to Montauk. This makes for an interesting collection of challenges and solutions for property owners. EVERY taxpayer needs to know what goes into a tax bill and nearly EVERY taxpayer should be protesting, EVERY year.  This year's deadline to file a tax grievance is March 2, 2020 in NYC and Nassau County, but Mike recommends giving yourself a Valentine's Day gift and filing in February. Michael P. Reynolds, Esq.'s contact information is: Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. 990 Stewart Ave. Ste. 300. Garden City, NY 11530 (516) 741-6565 (516) 592-5732 direct mreynolds@msek.com    https://www.msek.com/ Please contact us with your general questions or comments at LILawPodcast@gmail.com.  No podcast is a substitute for competent legal advice.  Please consult with the attorney of your choice concerning specific legal questions you may have. Your host, Zehava Schechter, is an attorney admitted to the New York Bar for 30 years.  She concentrates her private practice in estate planning, administration, and litigation; real estate law; contracts, and business formation and dissolution.  If you like this podcast, you may wish to look for Zehava's monthly articles in the Malverne/West Hempstead Herald.  

Short Circuit
Short Circuit 118 (11/26/19)

Short Circuit

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 26, 2019 27:24


SWAT destroys an innocent persons house, Baltimore food trucks, and making innocent owners whole in civil forfeiture cases. Use iTunes? itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/short…cuit/id309062019 Use Android (RSS)? feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundclo…247/sounds.rss Newsletter: ij.org/about-us/shortcircuit/ Want to email us? shortcircuit@ij.org Consent to SWAT destroying your house: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2019/07/25/18-35300.pdf Maryland’s law of the land clause: https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Court-of-Appeals-Brief-FINAL.pdf Miami forfeiture cert petition: https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Salgado-v.-United-States-of-America-Petition-for-a-Writ-of-Certiorari.pdf

SCOTUStalk
SCOTUS spotlight: John Elwood on petitions for certiorari

SCOTUStalk

Play Episode Listen Later May 13, 2019 22:03


In this week’s episode of SCOTUStalk, Amy Howe of Howe on the Court briefly covers the latest Supreme Court news before speaking with John Elwood about the essentials concerning petitions for certiorari. Elwood is a partner at Vinson & Elkins and the author of “Relist Watch.”(In the episode, Elwood suggested there were eight previously rescheduled cases. He later clarified with us that there were five: Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Tennessee Department of Revenue, Hunter v. United States, JTEKT Corp. v. GKN Automotive, Williams v. United States and Shular v. United States.) See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal
Considering Sullivan: Justice Thomas’s Concurrence in McKee v. Cosby, Denial of Certiorari (Ep. 63)

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 2, 2019 25:11


This week Patrick Hao, IPLJ Online Editor, and Alessandra Dagirmanjian, IPLJ Notes and Articles Editor, speak with Erik Bierbauer, Vice President of Litigation at NBC Universal and Adjunct Professor of Law at Fordham University. They discuss Justice Thomas's analysis of the landmark First Amendment case, New York Times v. Sullivan, in a recent denial of certiorari to Kathrine McKee. Erik shares his thoughts on Justice Thomas's interpretation of Sullivan and how a reconsideration of the case could affect defamation law. Our theme song is Roller Blades by Otis McDonald. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts and leave us a review! Website: www.fordhamiplj.org Twitter: @FordhamIPLJ Instagram: @Fordhamiplj Facebook: www.facebook.com/FordhamIPLJ Patreon: www.patreon.com/fordhamiplj

This Week in Guns
This Week In Guns-290 – Certiorari

This Week in Guns

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 8, 2019 64:01


Welcome to This Week in Guns! This show is brought to you by the Firearms Radio Network, Second Call Defense & Patriot Patch Company This podcast offers commentary on the latest firearms industry news, information and buzz. Returning guests this week are Zane Mungillo and Andy Montoya Complete show notes here! https://firearmsradio.tv/this-week-in-guns

This Week in Guns
This Week In Guns-290 – Certiorari

This Week in Guns

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 8, 2019 64:01


Welcome to This Week in Guns! This show is brought to you by the Firearms Radio Network, Second Call Defense & Patriot Patch Company This podcast offers commentary on the latest firearms industry news, information and buzz. Returning guests this week are Zane Mungillo and Andy Montoya Complete show notes here! https://firearmsradio.tv/this-week-in-guns

This Week in Guns
This Week In Guns-290 – Certiorari

This Week in Guns

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 8, 2019 64:01


Welcome to This Week in Guns! This show is brought to you by the Firearms Radio Network, Second Call Defense & Patriot Patch Company This podcast offers commentary on the latest firearms industry news, information and buzz. Returning guests this week are Zane Mungillo and Andy Montoya Complete show notes here! https://firearmsradio.tv/this-week-in-guns

Opening Arguments
OA248: The Cert(iorari) Show!

Opening Arguments

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 29, 2019 73:42


Today's episode features a deep dive into a bunch of different issues around granting the writ of certiorari -- "cert" -- and some of the intricacies of how the Trump administration is trying to take advantage of the activist Supreme Court.  Oh, and we also tackle a lawsuit that's being grossly misrepresented by the media. We begin with a discussion of the unique procedure of "cert before judgment."  What is it, how rare is it, and... why is the Trump administration trying to deploy it with alarming frequency?  Listen and find out! Then, we revisit litigation regarding the census that we first discussed back in Episode 232, and the administration's effort to... get cert before judgment (of course). Our main segment looks at something Andrew has never seen before:  essentially, a four-justice dissent from a denial of certiorari.  Why is this weird?  Listen and find out as we dissect that very opinion in Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. Next, we tackle a recent clickbaity headline involving a dishwasher allegedly showered with money for "skipping work to go to church."  Find out why the reporting on this case has been totally irresponsible and what really happened. After all that, it's time for the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #111, which involved a contract for defective water bottles.  As always, remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Appearances None!  If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links "Cert before judgment" is governed by Supreme Court Rule 11. We first discussed the census litigation back in Episode 232.  You can read the motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, as well as the U.S. reply. Click here to read the "statement" regarding the denial of cert in Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. Click here to read the CBS news report on the Hilton lawsuit, and here to read the (even worse) reporting by the Friendly Atheist blog. By contrast, you can read the actual Jean Pierre Hilton overtime lawsuit and the jury's verdict.  Oh, and here's the EEOC's statement limiting punitive damages in retaliation cases to just $300,000 (not $21 million). Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

Out d'Coup Podcast
Out d'Coup | U.S. Internment Camps are Back; Road to Authoritarians Paved; Soul of Democratic Party; Colleen Bradley's Petition to Supreme Court; Waiting on Janus; Space Force and Beer!

Out d'Coup Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 22, 2018 102:22


Internment camps? Prison camps? ProPublica’s audio of kids crying in cages after being separated from families finally gets people’s attention. Right before the dam broke, Trump was receiving the highest approval ratings of his presidency, according to last weekend’s Gallup poll. Hungary - homeland to Sebastian Gorka and his Fascist loving dad - passes “Stop Soros” laws and bans aid to undocumented immigrants. In a feat of astonishing tone deafness, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said this week, “On World Refugee Day, we join the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and our international partners in commemorating the strength, courage, and resilience of millions of refugees worldwide who have been forced to flee their homes due to persecution and conflict….This commitment to the world’s most vulnerable individuals remains a critical component of America’s national security policy.” Democrats helped set the table for this shit show, by the way. Just listen to Chuck Schumer’s speech at Georgetown Law in 2009.  Oh, yeah. Hey, media….the brutality and racism IS THE FREAKING POLICY. Did we mention that the US backed out of the UN human rights commission? Sinclair Media forces its affiliates to air segments blaming media for overreacting about child separation. Trump encourages Washington Post employees to strike hours after it dropped huge scoop on Russian collusion. And it was good to see Rachel Maddow off the Russia story for a bit. Good to have you back. LOCK HIM UP! Paul Manafort goes to prison for witness tampering. Gets put in “solitary confinement” for his own protection? Ocasio-Cortez faces off against Joe Crowley for the heart and soul of the democratic party this Tuesday in New York City.  Ocasio-Cortez is endorsed by groups like Our Revolution and the Democratic Socialists of America Still waiting for the Janus v. AFSCME ruling to drop. Looks like Monday at this point. Republican-oriented polling firm releases poll showing ⅔ of Americans and majority of union households would support a ruling in favor of Janus. Melania wears a jacket that says “I really don’t care. Do u?” on an airplane to visit immigrant children separated from their families. Elon Musk registers a domain named “Pravda” that would rate journalists credibility. Speaking of Elon Musk, Musk goes on a twitter claiming that he is a socialist and Marx was a capitalist because he wrote a book on capitalism. Closer to home in PA, the budget is done. Protests to shut down the Berks Detention Center. 17-year-old Antwon Rose was unarmed and shot and killed by East Pittsburgh. Police.  Colleen Bradley files Petition for Writ of Certiorari to SCOTUS. We’ve got the hard copy. Now is the time to pay attention, step up, and get behind this case. In today’s last call, Trump’s Space Force is officially “Separate but Equal to the Air Force” and may be used to fight Asteroids. Epic dust storm on Mars covers the planet. Canada legalizes pot. Free Will hosts Sour Sunday #3 this coming Sunday and they are bringing out The Pomisher (2018) – Sour Ale Aged in Oak Casks with Pomegranate – 6.3% ABV. And...yes there’s an and...Blushing Apricot – Sour Ale Aged in Oak Casks with Apricots – 5.3% ABV. Kevin Mahoney of Raging Chicken Press is teaming up with Colleen Fitzgerald from A Home, Stony Run, to bring you a new podcast: Free Range. Free Range focuses on food, politics, and communities of resistance...or community as resistance. What a better way to ground our political organizing than in the very ground we walk upon. The people, places, and processes of sustenance. We’ll be posting all show updates and information about the project on our Facebook page. Just look for Free Range on Facebook and be sure to like us. 

Undisclosed
S1, Bonus Episode – Certiorari

Undisclosed

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 4, 2018 39:16


June 4, 2018 / Rabia, Susan, and Colin provide an update on the Adnan Syed case. Episode scoring music by Blue Dot Sessions, Patrick Cortes, and Chris Zabriskie. This episode was sponsored by Blue Apron, Quicken Loans and Squarespace. www.BlueApron.com/Undisclosed  Quicken Loans - www.RocketMortgage.com/Undisclosed  www.SquareSpace.com/Undisclosed use offer code UNDISCLOSED #undisclosed #freeadnan Support the show.

Eminent Domain
14. Four Cases to Watch in 2018

Eminent Domain

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 16, 2018 24:32


The Sos/Roaring Fork Transit Authority Wall. In Episode 14, we discuss four cases to watch in 2018: Ganson v. City of Marathon – http://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1749304.html Sammons v. United States of America – http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-5th-circuit/1864827.html Sos v. Roaring Fork Transportation Authority – https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_of_Appeals/Opinion/2017/16CA1198-PD.pdf Schmitz v. Denton County Cowboy Church and the Town of Ponder – http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1872871.html Some other helpful links: The Pacific Legal Foundation blog on the Ganson case:  https://pacificlegal.org/case/ganson-v-city-of-marathon-florida/ The Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Sammons case:  http://www.inversecondemnation.com/files/sammons-cert-petition—final-filed.pdf The http://www.inversecondemnation.com blog on the Sos case:  http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/2017/11/colorado-app-clarifies-state-constitutions-damaging-clause-forcing-a-neighbor-to-provide-lateral-sup.html A link to the book, Tribe of Mentors:  https://tribeofmentors.com/ The ProPublica articles on eminent domain and border wall can be found here: https://features.propublica.org/eminent-domain-and-the-wall/the-taking-texas-government-property-seizure/ https://features.propublica.org/eminent-domain-and-the-wall/texas-border-wall-uncompensated-victims/ https://features.propublica.org/eminent-domain-and-the-wall/eminent-domain-border-wall-godfrey-garza-hidalgo-texas/ More information on the ALI-CLE Eminent Domain Conference in Charleston can be found here: https://www.ali-cle.org/course/Eminent-Domain-and-Land-Valuation-Litigation-CZ005 More information on the Texas Eminent Domain Superconference in Austin can be found here: https://cle.com/product.php?proid=1693&page=Eminent_Domain ​Also, please share your thoughts on the show or this episode with me. I’m on Twitter @J_Clint.    My webpage bio is here: http://www.lockelord.com/professionals/s/schumacher-j-clint The post Podcast Episode 14 – Four Cases to Watch in 2018 appeared first on Eminent Domain Podcast.

Eminent Domain
11. Damaging Clauses with Professor Maureen "Molly" Brady

Eminent Domain

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 16, 2017 34:03


Professor Maureen Brady In Episode 11, Professor Molly Brady from the University of Virginia joins us to discuss damaging clauses and her recent law review article. She has done some great research and is an enthusiastic and informative guest. In the opening statement, we discuss the case of Brott v. United States. The recently filed Petition for Writ of Certiorari can be found here:  http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/2017/11/new-cert-petition-property-owners-entitled-to-jury-article-iii-judge-in-federal-inverse-cases.html Professor Brady’s article on damaging clauses can be accessed here:  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3028880 Professor Brady’s website is:  http://www.maureenebrady.com/ More information about Professor Brady’s collegiate event, the Hammer Throw can be found here:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammer_throw ​More information on the referenced CLE International Eminent Domain Conference in Las Vegas can be found here: http://www.cvent.com/events/eminent-domain-conference/event- summary-458cb7e43cfe4e15b6ebc6069315879a.aspx?i=7b140083-c8e2-4699-9afe-b8367a56e057 More information on the ALI-CLE Eminent Domain Conference in Charleston can be found here: https://www.ali-cle.org/course/Eminent-Domain-and-Land-Valuation-Litigation-CZ005 Also, please share your thoughts on the show or this episode with me.  I’m on Twitter @J_Clint. My webpage bio is here: https://www.lockelord.com/professionals/s/schumacher-j-clint The post Podcast Episode 11 – Damaging Clauses with Professor Maureen "Molly" Brady appeared first on Eminent Domain Podcast.

Butler Podcast
EXTRAORDINARY WRITS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS

Butler Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 23, 2017 28:30


Extraordinary Writs:  Certiorari, Prohibition, and Mandamus.  The ins and outs of appellate relief via an extraordinary writ were covered by Carol in depth in this webinar.

Introduction to Political Economy: Duke Course
Lecture 15: A Problem with Political Choice — Impossibility

Introduction to Political Economy: Duke Course

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 10, 2016 56:45


COURSE OVERVIEW: Introduction to Political Economy is a self-contained and nontechnical overview of the intellectual history of political economy, the logic of microeconomics, and the definitions used in macroeconomics. It introduces the notion of a political economy, emphasizing the moral and ethical problems that markets solve, and fail to solve. LECTURE OVERVIEW: 1. Three stages of social choice: Deciding how to decide how to decide (forming a group identity) Deciding how to decide (choosing a constitution, and rules) Deciding (normal choices, using fixed rules) 2. Access rules (introducing a bill, Writ of Certiorari, moved and seconded, etc) require less than a majority. 3. Decision rules usually (but not always) require a majority 4. Changing the rules requires a supermajority 5. Constituting a group requires unanimous consent, or (what amounts to the same thing) a means of exiting. Forced entry into membership is actually a restriction on exit. 6. Arrow's Theorem 7. An example: Interest Groups--The National Rifle Association 8. Rousseau, and Buchanan-Tullock, and "optimal majority." 9. Borda Count: Examples of ways of choosing

Supreme Podcast
Certiorari Granted - Affirmative Action Revisited

Supreme Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 29, 2015 8:52


On this episode, we review the the Court's grant of review for the second time to Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, which asks whether the Fifth Circuit’s re-endorsement of the University of Texas at Austin’s use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions decisions can be sustained under this Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including the Court's 2013 decision in the Fisher case.

Glen Galbraith's Business Law Lectures

Introduction to courts and court systems.

Glen Galbraith's Business Law Lectures

Introduction to courts and court systems.

Finnegan IP Law Podcast Series
Supreme Court Denies Petition for Certiorari in Nuijten v. Dudas

Finnegan IP Law Podcast Series

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 6, 2008