Decision making; evaluation of evidence to make a decision
POPULARITY
Categories
Link Up w/The Morning Sickness Digitally All Over:Instagram: @hms_98_official, @bosskupd, @bretvesely, @dickToledoX/Twitter: @HMSon98, @DickToledo, @bretveselyFacebook: @HMSKUPDYouTube: @hmspodcast9320, @98kupdRequest/Call in/Wakeup Song line:(IN AZ) 585.9800More HMS: holmbergpodcast.com, 98kupd.comEmail: dtoledo@98kupd.com, bvesely@98kupd.com, bbogen@98kupd.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Bonus Episode: Baldoni & Wayfarer Strike Back Sponsored by Wayfair. Get organized, refreshed, and back on track this new year for WAY less. Shop all things home at Wayfair.com Go to rushhourwithdave.com for tickets to my upcoming Asheville NC, Stamford CT and Boston shows! On this bonus episode of The Rush Hour, we dive deep into the escalating legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni — and the stunning next move from Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios. After a major decision involving The New York Times, Baldoni and Wayfarer are preparing to appeal — signaling they're not backing down from the narrative that's taken over headlines. What exactly are they challenging? What does an appeal mean procedurally? And how could this reshape the public (and legal) fight between the two camps? We break down: Why Baldoni and Wayfarer believe the ruling deserves another look The legal strategy behind appealing a decision tied to The New York Times What this means for Blake Lively's position moving forward The PR chess match unfolding in real time This story isn't cooling off — it's entering a new phase. If you've been following every twist, this is the update you need.
Thank you, Donna Grande with GrandeConnections, for having me as your guest!! A seven-year-old falls in love with Giants football. Years later, she's calling plays, building culture, and proving that coaching is a craft earned in the film room, on the practice field, and through a thousand quiet acts of leadership. Coach Mikki St. Germain joins us to share how she moved from team mom to Varsity Special Teams Coordinator and D-Line Coach.We dig into the hard parts: being second-guessed, a sideline confrontation that crossed the line, and the moment she chose accountability over ego to protect her team's standards. She breaks down why “winning and learning” beats “winning and losing,” how players absorb their coach's mindset under pressure, and why belief, consistent, practiced, and visible, changes on and off the field. If you're ready to trade doubt for reps, bias for standards, and noise for purpose, hit play, subscribe, and leave a review with the bold move you'll take this week.Connect with Donna Connect with Coach Mikki We look forward to seeing you succeed! - www.KeepOnSharing.com - Code - KOSSupport the showJoin my guests on my YouTube Channel
https://skepticsandseekers.squarespace.com/blog-1/4sthe-worst-thing-that-god-ever-did-series
In this episode, Laura explores the difference between judgement and curiosity—and why learning to regulate our judgement is essential for becoming grounded, healthy adults. She explains how judgement is biologically protective, when it's necessary for safety, and when it crosses into harmful territory. Laura then offers a roadmap for shifting from judgement to curiosity while holding ethical boundaries for ourselves and others. If you've ever found yourself judging too quickly—or judging yourself even more harshly—this episode invites you into compassion, clarity, and deeper relational awareness for yourself and others.
Welcome to the February 19th entry of the Multifamily Collective with Mike Brewer.Today's tip tackles a critical tension in modern operations:Automation can scale your business — but it can't replace judgment.In a world full of smart systems, here's what still matters:Nuance: Automation handles rules. Humans handle gray areas.Discernment: Not every decision should be defaulted to a machine.Responsibility: You can't outsource accountability.Trust but verify: The same principle that applies to people also applies to technology.Ongoing refinement: Set-it-and-forget-it is a myth. The best leaders monitor and adjust.Strong operators understand this: technology should enhance human decision-making, not replace it.The future of multifamily doesn't belong to automation.It belongs to the leaders who know when to override it.And that's where your professional judgment still wins the day.MultifamilyCollective Blog: https://www.multifamilycollective.comThe Daily Collective Book: https://amzn.to/3YI6BDaHosted by: https://www.multifamilymedianetwork.com
Arrancamos 25 años atrás con el debut de The D4, la banda más incandescente del punk high energy neozelandés. Avanzamos en el tiempo hasta el último disco en solitario de su cantante y guitarrista Dion Lunadon, para adentrarnos después en una agitada y ecléctica selección de novedades y giras recomendadas.(Foto del podcast por Masao Nakagami; The D4 en Japón)Playlist;THE D4 “Come on” (6Twenty, 2001)THE D4 “Out of my head” (Out of my head, 2005)THE D4 “Judgement day” (2025)DION LUNADON “New York” (Memory burn, 2024)ANNA CALVI feat IGGY POP “God’s lonely man” (2026)IGUANA DEATH CULT “I like it, it’s nice” (2026)PARTY DOZEN “Ghost rider” (2025)DAMAGED BUG “End of the war” (2026)TWISTED TEENS “Circus clown” (Blame the clown, 2026)AUTORAMAS “Vose sabe” (Nada pode parar Os Autoramas, 2003)THE SCANERS “X-Ray glasses on” (The Scaners II, 2019)AWEFUL KANAWFUL “Hello, it’s me” (Endless pleasure, 2025)NICK WATERHOUSE “Dead room” (Holly, 2014)BRAD MARINO “Calling your bluff” (Agent of chaos, 2026)PAT TODD and THE RANKOUTSIDERS “Melody” (After the Dolls EP, 2026)Versión y original; DAVID JOHANSEN “Melody” (In style, 1979)YOUNG FRESH FELLOWS “Three gasconading saints” (Loft, 2026)Escuchar audio
Memories can be some of the most powerful creations of the human psyche. So how can we move forward from the painful ones? In this podcast, Bhante explains that during meditation, painful memories and fears about the past and future arise naturally because the mind's nature is to produce thoughts, and struggling against them only creates more suffering. Through mindfulness, meditators learn to recognize each thought—whether pleasant or painful—as simply a thought that arises and passes away, without judging, suppressing, or attaching to it. By gently returning to the present moment, understanding one's capacity, and not borrowing imagined future suffering, a person can respond to fear wisely while staying grounded in what can actually be done now.
SF 106.23 NT Survey: Romans 2:1-11 Righteous Judgement (Lesson 7) David Brignac
Sunday Morning Sermon with Pastor Jacob Gray from Ten Mile Baptist Church in McLeansboro, Illinois
Series: A Transformed Life — Preacher: Michael Young
Pastor Mike Rose Genesis 6:1-8
Listen Ad Free https://www.solgoodmedia.com - Listen to hundreds of audiobooks, thousands of short stories, and ambient sounds all ad free!
In this episode of The Gentle Rebel Podcast, I explore something that happened yesterday. I had another episode planned for this week, but I put it on the shelf for now because I’ve been drawn into a fascinating situation that did the rounds after the freestyle skier Eileen Gu was asked, by a reporter after competing at the winter Olympics, what she described as a ridiculous question. The whole thing struck me as reassuringly messy and human. The reporter wanted to know if she considered the two silver medals she had won as two silvers gained or two golds lost. Within hours, the internet had blown up. People were calling this reporter misogynistic and celebrating Gu’s response, describing it as owning him after such a stupid comment. https://youtu.be/npRgyn19FvA What Happened? Eileen Gu had just competed in her second freestyle skiing event of the Winter Olympics Milano Cortina 2026. She won two silver medals. The reporter from Agence France-Presse asked whether she viewed those medals as two silvers gained or two golds lost. Gu responded by saying she thought that was a ridiculous perspective to take. She spoke about all her achievements and the pride she takes in being the most decorated female freeskier in history, doing things that have never been done before. She previously won two gold medals and a silver medal in the same events at Beijing 2022. A Standard Question The clip has split opinions. But whether or not you think it’s a bad question, it is familiar to those who follow sports coverage. It’s not a surprising question to ask an odds-on favourite, especially if they have won previous competitions. Studies have shown that silver medalists often feel more disappointment soon after an event than bronze medalists, focusing on what they could have won rather than what they almost didn’t win. There is something interesting in that. Something worth exploring if you want to understand the psychology of elite competition. The question picks up on the contrast between what someone feels going into an event and how they feel about the outcome. Understanding Perspective is Misread as Having a Dig In football here in the UK, after a team draws a league game, they are often asked if they feel like it was one point gained or two points dropped. It depends on expectations. It depends on whether they felt they ought to win it or whether they would have been happy to take something from the game. This is never considered a ridiculous or insensitive question. It is understood as what it is, which is a curious probe into the team’s or player’s mindset and perspective. It’s an invitation to reflect on performance against expectations and share that with listeners to provide greater context for the result. The question is worded as, “Do you see it as this or that?” It invited Eileen Gu to share her perspective. He did not state his opinion. He asked how she saw it. But Gu seemed to interpret this question as his perspective (criticism, judgement, etc.) and took exception to it. Why did it land in The Wrong Way? This might have been a matter of timing. A post-event press conference might feel like the wrong moment for philosophical reflection, which is what this question invites. In the rawness of the moment, having just competed, having just finished second when you had hoped for first, the last thing you might want is someone asking you to frame your feelings. Maybe in time, there would be an opportunity to think about how it felt to come second on this occasion. But in that moment, the question lands differently, perhaps feeling like a criticism. What we might be seeing in Gu is a projection of disappointment, aimed at the perspective she reads into this question. An external representation of an inner voice. It would be understandable if she were disappointed. She has won gold before. She knows what that feels like. And now she has two silver medals. It is a vulnerable thing to admit publicly, and anyway, why should she? She doesn’t owe anyone an answer to that question. Misunderstanding the Culture of a Sport There is another layer here. Like most sports, freestyle skiing has its own culture. It is a discipline where being the odds-on favourite does not guarantee anything. The athletes understand that many factors determine their fortunes when they are out there competing. There seems to be a wonderful sense of camaraderie among them. Great appreciation for the work they all put in, the tricks they attempt, and the fact that whoever wins deserves it on the night. A question framed entirely around winning and losing might feel ignorant of the spirit and values tied to a sport’s culture. It might feel like an outsider imposing a mainstream sports narrative on something more nuanced. Last week, Ilia Malinin had a huge amount of expectation heaped on his shoulders as he competed in the men’s figure skating. The pressure was a lot to handle. He made mistakes. The commentators painted a picture that assumed skating for gold was a formality, that he would take it no matter what. So when he finished eighth, it was a shock. If he had finished second, you could fully imagine exactly the same question being asked of him. It would make sense because of the context. We project a lot of expectations and assumptions onto sports stars. But we don’t know what success means to them at a particular moment in their journey. As such, we don’t know whether they are disappointed or delighted when they finish in a particular position. We can’t know unless we ask. There are different ways to do so. This is a lesson that applies to so many areas of life. The Internet’s Role And this is also where social media comes into play. Because the clip lacked context, it was designed to spread as a rage-baiting weapon. Within hours, the reporter had been transformed into a villain. People used some rather unpleasant, even violent, rhetoric to describe him. A huge number of assumptions and projections were layered onto the messages accompanying the clip. There is still a great deal of misogyny and sexism in sport, as in everyday life. The way people talk about women at all levels and across many roles is steeped in it. So when we see a situation like this framed in that way, it can undermine efforts to change this landscape. If a standard question asked of countless athletes over countless years suddenly becomes proof of something sinister, the word loses its power. The charge becomes a rhetorical cudgel that can be dismissed and diluted by those who want us to believe it doesn’t exist. I don’t know anything about the reporter and his views. But if we take the clip as a standalone artefact (which is all we have) and pick the bones out of it, there’s nothing to support the charge of misogyny. If Gu were a man, the question would make sense. If the reporter were a woman, it would still be asked whether the athlete was male or female. Many describe the question as inane and stupid, which is a different point altogether. Others say it is fair and interesting. Judgement is in the eye of the beholder. If you want it to be terrible, it can be. If you want it to be good, it can be. The words are the same. The meaning changes depending on who is listening. And I think that is one of the main points here. A Reassuringly Human Response What I see in Gu’s response is reassuringly human. There is an air of defensiveness, with the inner voice of disappointment attaching itself to a target. The reporter became that for her as he asked a question that was the wrong thing to say at that time. Or maybe it was the perfect thing because it gave her an object toward which she could direct some cathartic scorn. This is yet another example of the internet turning a natural human exchange into a battle. This weird age we live in of competitive conversations. It has been framed pretty carelessly and somewhat recklessly into a polarising story. The real story that underpins it is about what we expect from public figures and how social media strips context from situations and amplifies outrage. We see the impact of the pressure to perform, not just on the slope, on the field, on the court, but in front of the press, in front of the media. And then to become some kind of symbolic figure for the way everybody has interpreted your response in that setting. Most of all, it is about how we listen. It is about what we hear. It is about what we bring to a twenty-second clip. What we project onto it, what we are subconsciously looking for, and the impact of being braced to hear certain things in certain ways.
St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Christian Church Lexington, Ma Podcast
Today our Church guides to begin a period of fasting on this Sunday known as Meatfare Sunday. Yet, the focus is not about what foods we may choose to abstain from, but rather our focus and the 2nd greatest gift Gods has given us (1st is Salvation) that being free will.Where should our focus be during this time? What are some practical things that I do on a daily basis that I can refocus in and around my soul?Listen…
home—body podcast: conversations on astrology, intuition, creativity + healing
Today I welcome Christine Eck back to the podcast to explore the subtle yet profound keys to caring for ourselves and our families.We discuss the complex, beautiful dance of transformation—especially from the lens of Ayurveda, holistic healing, and the universal mother principles Christine weaves throughout her work.Whether you're a parent, caregiver, or simply curious about deepening your self-care practices, this episode is full of wisdom, warmth, and practical insight.For me, the ease and joy of parenting has really unfolded as I've allowed the divine presence to come in. When I am tuned in to that Source, everything else feels different. All my relationships are different. — Christine Eck we discuss —why we can't heal for anyone elsethe sacred lessons of parentinghow ayurveda understands health holisticallythe sacred window of the postpartum periodpracticing love over judgmenthelping your kids learn to make sovereign choices LINKSIf you enjoyed the episode, check out —from Judgement to MysteryNow is the Seed for NextMore about our guest —www.sacredwindowstudies.comIG @sacredwindowstudiesFB @AyurvedaForPostpartumSacred Window PodcastSacred Window Blog Free Resources —Receive the 3 keys that unlocked every major Initiation in my life. Get 3 Keys for the Soul here for FREE.
Stags Leap Wine Cellars, Cabernet Sauvignon, Judgement of Paris, Fay Vineyard and interview w Marcus Notaro, Head Winemaker at Stags Leap Wine Cellars in the Napa Valley. ON THE ROAD with MR CA WINE is about California's cool, aspirational lifestyle and awesome wines hosted by Chuck Cramer, a California native, living in London and is the Director of European & Asian sales & marketing, Terlato Wines. This is a wine journey covering the hottest topics in CA wine, chatting along the way with the experts who make it all happen. This week's episode includes an interview with Marcus Notaro, Head Winemaker, Stags Leap Wine Cellars.
Robert H. Jackson was not an easy man to know, but "I found being in Robert Jackson's company on the whole a great pleasure," says G. Edward White, author of the new biography Robert H. Jackson: A Life in Judgement. A longtime ally of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jackson served as both Solicitor General and Attorney General before FDR nominated him to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, he often pined for his previous life as a small-town litigator in Jamestown, New York. A solitary worker by nature, Jackson did not relish the collegiate aspects of the court, and his influence was therefore limited. "Jackson was nominally gregarious, active, fun-loving, witty pleasant–but at the same time, he was remote," White tells Modern Law Library's host Lee Rawles. "In some ways, his gregariousness was a barrier to maybe a closer understanding of him." But as a litigator and as a justice, Jackson made important historical contributions. One major such contribution was in establishing the format and location of the post-World War II international military tribunals of Nazi leaders, now known as the Nuremberg Trials. Jackson took a leave of absence from the U.S. Supreme Court to be the country's lead negotiator as the United States, Great Britain, France and the Soviet Union debated how tribunals would take place. He then served as the United States' chief prosecutor. White and Rawles also discuss the roadblocks that have prevented Jackson from being better known in legal history; how Justice Felix Frankfurter tried to protect Jackson's post-death legacy; and Jackson's controversial cross-examination of Nazi politician Hermann Goering. In honor of the Olympics, White (who has written books on baseball and soccer) also shares his perspective on the benefits that athletics brings to lawyers.
Send a textIn this deeply honest and illuminating conversation, host Andrea Atherton welcomes special guest Tyler Blandin, a substance abuse counselor with over 20 years of professional and personal recovery experience. Together, they explore one of the most misunderstood truths in addiction treatment: you cannot force someone into recovery. With compassion and clinical insight, this episode unpacks the painful reality individuals face when they desperately want change. Tyler shares how true transformation begins with willingness, and how attempts to control or coerce often deepen shame and resistance rather than inspire healing.Andrea and Tyler also address the vulnerable question so many quietly ask: How do I know if I'm an addict or alcoholic? They clarify the difference between problematic use and addiction, discuss the emotional and behavioral markers that often go unnoticed, and demystify how programs like Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous actually work. Together, they gently dismantle common misconceptions about 12-step recovery, revealing the spiritual, communal, and accountability-based foundations that have helped millions find lasting sobriety.This episode also courageously confronts the cultural punishment model still embedded in how society responds to addiction. Andrea and Tyler examine the stigma surrounding medication-assisted treatment, particularly the shaming that can occur in some recovery spaces for those taking Suboxone. They explore how self-help communities can both save lives and, at times, unintentionally perpetuate harm. If you have ever loved someone struggling with addiction or questioned your own relationship with substances, this conversation offers clarity, hope, and a call toward more compassionate recovery pathways.Tyler Blandinhttps://emotionalnightmarespodcast.buzzsprout.com/30-minute Consultation with Andrea https://www.andreaatherton.com/booking-calendarAndrea Atherton Websitehttps://www.andreaatherton.com/Love Anarchy Websitehttps://www.andreaatherton.com/podcasthttps://loveanarchypodcast.buzzsprout.comLove Anarchy Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/loveanarchypodcast/Andrea Atherton Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/andreaatherton-17/
hThis powerful episode dives into how a mother's own childhood trauma can quietly shape the emotional lives of her children – and how that cycle can be broken. Drawing on a rare 12‑year study of around 300 mostly Black, highly disadvantaged families in the US Midwest, Dr Meeyoung Min unpacks how her team followed mothers and babies from birth through early adolescence to understand what really drives later mental health.Far from blaming mothers, the episode situates these risks in a wider context of poverty, limited opportunity, and unresolved trauma, and leans into hope rather than inevitability. Dr Min makes a compelling case for pregnancy and the early postnatal period as a “golden window” for support – from practical help and non‑judgemental social networks to community and faith groups that wrap around both parent and child – showing that with the right support, intergenerational patterns of harm can be disrupted and futures can be changed.The conversation reveals two major pathways: first, mothers who experienced more childhood maltreatment tend to struggle more with their own mental health, making it harder to stay emotionally available, regulate feelings, and use calm, consistent parenting – all of which is linked to greater anxiety, low mood, and acting‑out behaviours in their 12‑year‑olds. Second, prenatal exposure to substances such as cocaine, alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana appears to alter developing brain systems involved in stress, independently increasing the risk of externalising behaviour.You can read the main JCPP paper discussed in this episode, “Intergenerational transmission of maternal childhood maltreatment, prenatal substance exposure, and internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adolescence at age 12” via https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70030Get a free CPD/CME certificate for listening to this podcast by registering for a FREE ACAMH Learn account at https://www.acamhlearn.orgVisit https://www.acamh.orgFacebook and LinkedIn search / ACAMH Instagram https://www.instagram.com/assoc.camhBluesky https://bsky.app/profile/acamh.bsky.socialX https://x.com/acamh
Clement Manyathela speaks to Karyn Maughan, News24 Legal Journalist and Vuyo Zungula, the African Transformation Movement’s Parliamentary leader about the Constitutional Court’s delay in issuing the Phala Phala judgement.The Clement Manyathela Show is broadcast on 702, a Johannesburg based talk radio station, weekdays from 09:00 to 12:00 (SA Time). Clement Manyathela starts his show each weekday on 702 at 9 am taking your calls and voice notes on his Open Line. In the second hour of his show, he unpacks, explains, and makes sense of the news of the day. Clement has several features in his third hour from 11 am that provide you with information to help and guide you through your daily life. As your morning friend, he tackles the serious as well as the light-hearted, on your behalf. Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Clement Manyathela Show. Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 09:00 and 12:00 (SA Time) to The Clement Manyathela Show broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/XijPLtJ or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/p0gWuPE Subscribe to the 702 Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/v5mfetc Follow us on social media: 702 on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/Radio702 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Big Shocker Judgement Given by NGT Court - Whole Game Changes | Pain Point for China Lovers
COLLECTION TITLE - SERMON TITLE - SPEAKER We hope this message encourages and inspires you!Want more like this from CoastLife Church?YouTube: CoastLife Church - YouTubeFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/mycoastlifechurchInstagram: https://instagram.com/coastlifechurch...GIVE: https://www.mycoastlifechurch.com/giveLooking to get connected? We'd love to meet you! We offer several different ways to connect and be in community: Join a Together Group, Register for CoastLife+, or become a part of our Serve Team today by visiting: CoastLife Connect Card - CoastLife Church (churchcenter.com)Give: To support and be a part of or growth and global impact click here: https://www.mycoastlifechurch.com/give
Romans 2:1-16 God's impartial judgement
Aneirin Glyn - 'You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart.' How will God respond when Israel, persistently, refuses to do that? Elijah is summoned to Mount Sinai where God reveals what he will do. We see that God will not clear the guilty, and yet is also merciful and gracious.
Amos concludes with a final, weighty question: will the story end in judgment, or will it end in restoration? Pastor Marco traces the unavoidable justice of God against persistent sin, while also highlighting God's mercy and covenant faithfulness that promises renewal beyond ruin. Amos does not minimize judgment—but it also refuses to leave God's people without hope. The closing vision points forward to God's rebuilding work, the restoration of what was broken, and the wideness of God's redemptive plan. This final teaching brings the series to its doctrinal and pastoral endpoint: God is holy, judgment is real, and restoration is possible only by God's grace.
Wesley Wright Lighthouse Bible Church Sunday, February 15, 2026 Judgment Day 2Co 5:9-12 "Only God can judge me" is a common retort from the unbelieving word. They are correct technically, but often don't know it - God will judge the world via His Son. Jesus Christ is the Judge of the world. Joh 5:17-23; Acts 17:24-31; 2Ti 4:1 We and all people should expect a judgment: Heb 9:24-28 We discussed the believer's fate at the point of death last week. How do we square their entry into heaven with the coming judgment mentioned in 2Co 5:10? The judgment we read about in 2Co 5:10 isn't the judgment of sin. Sin was judged in full at the cross, so we believers have nothing to fear in the... for full notes: http://www.lbible.org/index.php?proc=msg&sf=vw&tid=1776
Jesus commands love for enemies and warns against hypocritical judgment. Kingdom citizens mirror the mercy of their King. True discipleship flows from a transformed heart. Visit us online at: RenewalChurch.net
Today let us journey together through Empathy and why we need to suspend Judgement to make Empathy work. You can email your comments to PahayanTalks@Gmail.com and also connect with me on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/vinodn/Also checkout my other Podcasts Other PodcastsAgile Malayali Malayalam PodcastCinema Malayali Malayalam PodcastVayanalokam Malayalam Book PodcastEnglish Podcast Penpositive OutclassYouTube ChannelsPahayan Talks Youtube ChannelAgile Malayali YouTube ChannelPenpositive YouTube ChannelAgile Positive Your Tube ChannelAgile Indian YouTube Channel
Jeremiah 25:1-14February 11, 2026Pastor Nick Shaffer
Supreme Court's Big Jolt to Reservation Politics | यह Judgement दिशा दशा सब बदल देगा | Sanjay Dixit
February 8, 2026 - Rev. Alexander S. Brown
Wednesday February 11, 2026V Week After EpiphanyToday's readings expose the cost of manipulation and invite us into the clarity of surrendered living. In Genesis 27:1–29, Jacob and Rebekah scheme to secure a blessing through deception, reminding us how easily we try to grasp what God intends to give in His time. Romans 12:1–8 calls us to present our bodies as living sacrifices and to be transformed by the renewing of our minds, discovering our true place in God's purpose. And in John 8:12–20, Jesus declares, “I am the light of the world,” offering guidance, truth, and life to all who will follow Him.This episode challenges us to step out of the shadows of self-reliance and into the light of Christ, where a surrendered life is shaped, directed, and used for God's glory.
603- Jamie Walden – Judgement. Is the End of the USA as we know it, Imminent? Right click to Download
When you take a flight do you judge certain behaviors of fellow travelers? Of course you do. And so are the flight attendants.
PLEASE ALWAYS READ THIS INFO BOX WHEN YOU VISIT TMVP BLOG. ***Especially please do not send any gift to this ministry unless you have read & understood the instructions below.*** DO NOT INTERACT WITH ANYONE ASKING FOR DONATIONS. Thank you. WEBSITE: WWW.THE-MASTERS-VOICE.COM PLEASE READ CAREFULLY: If you'd like to support this work, it is appreciated. Kindly use PayPal or email me for other options at mastersvoice@mail.com, and *please* give me some time to respond. If using PayPal PLEASE DO NOT send any gift with "Purchase Protection". I have an ordinary PayPal account, not a seller marketplace, so please do not damage my account by using "purchase protection" on your donation (as if I were making a sale to you). If you are not sure (especially if you sent in the past), please check the format of your gift on the PayPal receipt before sending. It is a freewill offering, I am not selling goods or services. Please use *only* the "Friends & Family" sending option. If you're outside the USA please DO NOT use PayPal, contact me instead at the email listed here & allow me a good window to respond. Thank you, God bless. PayPal ------- mastersvoice@mail.com.
Welcome to the Celestial Insights Podcast, the show that brings the stars down to Earth! Each week, astrologer, coach, and intuitive Celeste Brooks of Astrology by Celeste will be your guide. Her website is astrologybyceleste.com.