Podcasts about requesting

How to Successfully Hire and Manage a Virtual Assistant for Your Insurance BusinessRunning an insurance practice means juggling countless tasks, and as your client roster grows, so does the need for reliable support. In this week's episode of the Insurance Business Babes podcast, hosts Kathe Kline and Joanna Wyckoff dive deep into hiring virtual assistants (VAs)—sharing years of hands-on wisdom from building their own teams. Here are the best nuggets from their conversation, expanded for our blog readers.Why and When to Hire a Virtual AssistantMost insurance agents hit a breaking point as their client base approaches 300 or more. When that happens, administrative work starts eating into sales time, client service suffers, and time off becomes a dream. As Joanna says, “We girl boss a little too hard to the sun and you start getting overwhelmed.” If you're constantly frazzled or avoiding your ringing phone, it's time to bring on support—before burnout sets in.Where to Find Qualified Virtual AssistantsBoth hosts swear by onlinejobs.ph, a popular platform for hiring VAs from the Philippines. Filipino VAs are known for excellent English, polite customer service, and strong work ethic. Kathe recommends paying a little extra for the six-month support/transition package, giving the VA a local contact to help them adjust and ensuring smoother onboarding for you.Other options include Upwork (especially if you need part-time help), or hiring services like Hire Heroes, which pre-screen and prepare candidates for the insurance industry.Screening and Selecting the Right CandidateTo avoid sifting through hundreds of resumes, Joanna suggests:Requesting a video introduction to gauge English proficiency, personality, and customer-facing skills.Asking for a portfolio if you're hiring for specialized skills (like marketing).Giving clear, specific application instructions to spot high attention to detail.Kathe is a fan of assigning paid trial tasks to top candidates. This hands-on approach shows who's truly capable and reliable.Training & Managing Your Virtual AssistantBefore hiring, spend time recording your processes using screen capture tools. This library of “how-to” videos becomes a training goldmine for your VA—and any future hires. Kathe reminds us never to do one-on-one trainings without recording: “Chances are, you're going to have to hire another virtual assistant someday.”Embrace cultural differences—be explicit with expectations, offer positive feedback, and always have clear agreements regarding pay, 13th month bonuses, and holidays. Tools like Hubstaff or TimeProof help with accountability by capturing regular screen shots of your VA's work.Compensation & RetentionPay competitively, offer regular bonuses, and recognize holidays. Both Kathe and Joanna emphasize generosity—helping your VA feel valued pays dividends in loyalty and performance. Clear key performance indicators (KPIs) and regular check-ins keep everyone on the same page.Final ThoughtsThe sooner you invest in hiring and training a VA, the sooner you'll reclaim your time for sales, strategy, and some well-deserved balance. As Kathe says, “Your life will change for the better from that point forward.”Ready to take your insurance business to the next level? Don't wait—start your hiring journey today!This episode is sponsored by ⁠CertifiedMedicareAgents.com⁠. Use the coupon code BABES2024 for a free lifetime BRONZE membership.

Requesting a vote recount, the release of political prisoners from Belarus, a round-table discussion with Ukraine about shared history, the World Justice Forum, the second person from Poland in space, and much more!Thanks for tuning in!Let us know what you think and what we can improve on by emailing us at info@rorshok.com. You can also contact us on Twitter & Instagram @rorshokpoland Like what you hear? Subscribe, share, and tell your buds.BBC News Polska: https://www.bbc.com/polskaRorshok Ocean Update Job Description: https://rorshok.com/updates/ocean/writer/We want to get to know you! Please fill in this mini-survey: https://forms.gle/NV3h5jN13cRDp2r66Wanna avoid ads and help us financially? Follow the link: https://bit.ly/rorshok-donate

In heaven, God's will is perfectly completed. Requesting that it be fulfilled here on earth is a recognition that His will for our lives is indeed perfect. Aligning ourselves with that will begin with prayer. Praying for God's Kingdom to come is asking for the presence of Christ. When you pray for God's kingdom to come, you are asking for the global swelling of the Church. In praying these words, we are asking for Him, before we are seeking for us.Praying for God's will to be done, is a prayer of submission.Matthew 6:10, Matthew 3:1-2, Matthew 4:17, Matthew 6:33 , Matthew 20:28, Luke 22:42, John 4:34, John 5:30, John 6:38, Colossians 1:17, 2 Corinthians 12:9

06-17-25 - BR - TUE - It's Natl Mascot Day But Does Anyone Have A Pic w/Mascot Brady - GenZ Is Requesting Sex Rooms At Work Now - Not Cleaning Hummingbird Feeders Can Kill ThemSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

06-17-25 - BR - TUE - It's Natl Mascot Day But Does Anyone Have A Pic w/Mascot Brady - GenZ Is Requesting Sex Rooms At Work Now - Not Cleaning Hummingbird Feeders Can Kill ThemSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdf

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdf

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia's behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses.The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury's potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense's strategy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Cardi B Responds To Offset Requesting Spousal Support "you've seen the baby only 5 times!"

When it comes to your business, how much self-belief do you have? In today's episode, we're answering this question and exploring why self-belief is so important when you work for yourself.As well as discussing how our relationship with self-belief has changed over the years, we dive into the differences between inner work and external validation. We also share some of the things we've tried to boost our self-belief. Links and Further ReadingThe Art of Requesting, Receiving and Giving FeedbackTransform Your Business with Co-Mentoring What Gives Us the Business ScariesIs self-belief something you need to work on? Or are you already nailing it? We'd love to hear from you! Join the conversation on Substack to share your experiences.Connect With UsFriends With Business Benefits on Substackcharlieswift.comlove-audrey.comFind Us On Instagram@loveaudrey83@_charlieswiftSubscribe to Our Mailing ListsFranky's Mailing ListCharlie's Mailing List Get full access to Friends with Business Benefits at friendswithbusinessbenefits.substack.com/subscribe

In this podcast episode we discuss Lori Vallow requesting a re-trial in her recent Arizona case

Douglas Wigdor, representing accuser Cassandra Ventura, submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian opposing Sean "Diddy" Combs' request for a gag order in his federal case. Wigdor argued that while Combs seeks to restrict public statements from accusers and their attorneys, his own family and legal team have been vocal in the media. He highlighted public comments from Combs' son, Quincy, and his mother, Janice Combs, as well as statements from Combs' attorney, Marc Agnifilo, who labeled the prosecution as racially motivated. Wigdor contended that if Combs' representatives are permitted to speak publicly, accusers and their legal counsel should have the same right, suggesting that Combs' request for a gag order is both hypocritical and unjust.We also get a look at a letter sent by the prosecutors....In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding United States v. Sean Combs, the prosecution references a recent decision by Judge Ho in United States v. Adams, 24 Cr. 556 (DEH), as additional support for denying the defendant's motion concerning alleged leaks. The attached decision, labeled as Exhibit 1, is presented to bolster the government's position against the defendant's Leak Motion.(commercial at 10:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.55.0.pdfsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.56.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a recent letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team expressed concern over extensive pretrial publicity that they believe is compromising his right to a fair trial and the integrity of grand jury proceedings. They referenced a pending motion to limit extrajudicial statements by potential witnesses and their counsel, which the government has opposed, with Combs' reply due on November 8, 2024. Citing the immediate risk posed by ongoing public statements related to the grand jury, they requested the court to promptly restrict such extrajudicial comments during the motion's consideration.In this episode, we take a look at that motion.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Draft Combs 23.1 Letter 110124 [trg]Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Graham explores how the Elusive Comet cybercrime gang are using a sneaky trick of stealing your cryptocurrency via an innocent-appearing Zoom call, and Carole goes under the covers to explore the extraordinary lengths bio-hacking millionaire Bryan Johnson is attempting to extend his life.All this and more is discussed in the latest edition of the "Smashing Security" podcast by cybersecurity veterans Graham Cluley and Carole Theriault.Warning: This podcast may contain nuts, adult themes, and rude language.Episode links:Elusive Comet advisory - Security Alliance.Mitigating Elusive Comet Zoom remote control attacks - Trail of Bits.Aureon Capital: The Fake VCs who Almost Hacked Me - David Z Morris.Requesting or giving Remote Control - Zoom knowledgebase article.Has Bryan Johnson's anti-aging experiment backfired? Biohacker spending $2 million-a-year admits to a costly misstep - Economic Times. How Blueprint Founder Bryan Johnson Sought Control Via Confidentiality Agreements - The New York Times.Anti-aging mogul Bryan Johnson claims NY Times preparing ‘hit piece' about alleged use of prostitutes, drugs - NY Post.KOReader - document reader for E Ink devices.Killing Thatcher: The IRA, the Manhunt and the Long War on the Crown - Bookshop.org.The Urge - Our history of addiction by Carl Erik Fisher.Smashing Security merchandise (t-shirts, mugs, stickers and stuff)Sponsored by:Vanta – Expand the scope of your security program with market-leading compliance automation… while saving time and money. Smashing Security listeners get $1000 off!1Password Extended Access Management – Secure every sign-in for every app on every device.SUPPORT THE SHOW:Tell your friends and colleagues about “Smashing Security”, and leave us a review on Apple Podcasts or Podchaser.Become a supporter via

Requesting a test or procedure from a clinician can raise tricky issues

Requesting a test or procedure from a clinician can raise tricky issues

2012's Total Recall lacks the bizarre charm of Paul Verhoeven's 1990 film. Substituting Mars for dystopian earth, the movie ultimately feels like just any other action movie. Whereas the 1990 version was full of oddities, one-liners, and gore galore, this Total Recall is just a bland, PG-13 wannabe. What it lacks in personality and style, though, it does make up for with a few kinetic action scenes and solid special effects. Those, however, were not enough to save it from the critics' wrath. At 30% on Rotten Tomatoes—compared to 82% for the 1990 version—there wasn't much behind the spectacle to warrant a recommendation. Fans agreed. Thus, with a gross of $211.8 million on a budget of $125, audiences clearly felt this trip wasn't worth taking. Now, sit back, shake the memory fog with a Super Fun Hazy Hop from Paperback Brewing, and get your ass to the Colony! The Thunderous Wizard, Chumpzilla, and Bling Blake are dreaming of better days on Mars! This Week's Segments: Introduction/Plot Breakdown – What is real?! (0:00) Lingering Questions – Which Arnold movie would send us over the edge if they remade it? (30:47) The "Fall Enslaves Us" Trivia Challenge – The Thunderous Wizard challenges the field to trivia about the movie. (53:46) Recommendations – We offer our picks for the week and next up: We continue our Wretched Remakes series with The Crow! Yes, the one everyone hated. (1:07:20) And, as always, hit us up on Threads, X, Facebook, or Instagram to check out all the interesting factoids from this week's episode!

Welcome solo and group practice owners! We are Liath Dalton and Evan Dumas, your co-hosts of Group Practice Tech. In our latest episode, we debunk two common but dangerous myths about cross jurisdictional practice for therapists.  We discuss: Common myths we hear about practicing telehealth across jurisdictions The risks of unpermitted practice The threshold of client risk (and the only instances where cross-jurisdictional practice is permitted for clients in crisis) What constitutes client abandonment and what doesn't Requesting temporary practice permission from a different jurisdiction Our recent training on navigating legal-ethical cross-jurisdictional teletherapy practice for therapists Listen here: https://personcenteredtech.com/group/podcast/ For more, visit our website. PCT Resources New CE Training: Navigating Legal-Ethical Cross-Jurisdictional Teletherapy Practice in 2025: A Guide for Mental Health Professionals -- on-demand legal-ethical CE training. *Ideal for both leadership and any and all clinicians that provide client care via teletherapy* the must-know information on the current considerations for how to legally and ethically navigate cross-jurisdictional teletherapy practice. In particular, we will address licensure compacts, recent legal developments, state-specific rules, risk management strategies, custodian of record obligations, and working with minors across state lines. PCT's Clinical Staff Teletherapy Training PCT's Teletherapy Director and Supervisor Training for Group Practices PCT's Teletherapy Manuals and Forms for Group Practices Group Practice Care Premium weekly (live & recorded) direct support & consultation service, Group Practice Office Hours -- including monthly session with therapist attorney Eric Ström, JD PhD LMHC + assignable staff HIPAA Security Awareness: Bring Your Own Device training + access to Device Security Center with step-by-step device-specific tutorials & registration forms for securing and documenting all personally owned & practice-provided devices (for *all* team members at no per-person cost) + assignable staff HIPAA Security Awareness: Remote Workspaces training for all team members + access to Remote Workspace Center with step-by-step tutorials & registration forms for securing and documenting Remote Workspaces (for *all* team members at no per-person cost) + more For Solo Practitioners: PCT's Telemental Health Certificate Program

This week we look into whether its RIGHT or WRONG to Venmo Request Your Friends for casual dinners, coffees or drinks? What is the protocol on that? Podcast guest favorite Lily Lester joins host Isa Medina to look at both extremes. They also chat about steam room and gym etiquette, college friends, and treating yourself.If you like the podcast subscribe, share with a friend or give us 5 stars!!! It would mean everything!!!!!!Follow the pod @imrighturwrongpodcastFollow the host @isaamedinaa

We have invited some VIP guest artists on the show - like Andy Squyres, Dan Haseltine, Tina Boonstra, Candace Coker, and several more - to share with us THEIR song requests for artists they admire. -— TRACK LIST FOR EP.109 -—Great Love - Jacob EarlyNew Day in the Dark - John Mark McMillanEileen's Song - Burlap To CashmereNo Place Better (Psalm 84) - Caroline CobbHard To Get - Rich MullinsHeart of God - Zach WilliamsYou Needed Me - Anne MurrayBeautiful Secret Life - Matthew Clark-— CREDITS —-Host/Producer – Dave TroutSPONSOR1: Ross King's “Tools Not Rules” – https://rosskingmusic.com/SPONSOR2: Bellsburg Store - https://richmullins25.com/storeEmail: gourmetmusicpodcast@gmail.comAll Songs are used with permission or under fair use provisions(c) 2025 UTR Media. All Rights Reserved. A 501(c)(3) non-profit organization - https://utrmedia.org

Scripture Reading: Acts 25:1–26:11 25 Now three days after Festus arrived in the province, he went up to Jerusalem from Caesarea. 2 So the chief priests and the most prominent men of the Jews brought formal charges against Paul to him. 3 Requesting him to do them a favor against Paul, they urged Festus to summon him to Jerusalem, planning an ambush to kill him along the way. 4 Then Festus replied that Paul was being kept at Caesarea, and he himself intended to go there shortly. 5 “So,” he said, “let your leaders go down there with me, and if this man has done anything wrong, they may bring charges against him.” 6 After Festus had stayed not more than eight or ten days among them, he went down to Caesarea, and the next day he sat on the judgment seat and ordered Paul to be brought. 7 When he arrived, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem stood around him, bringing many serious charges that they were not able to prove. 8 Paul said in his defense, “I have committed no offense against the Jewish law or against the temple or against Caesar.” 9 But Festus, wanting to do the Jews a favor, asked Paul, “Are you willing to go up to Jerusalem and be tried before me there on these charges?” 10 Paul replied, “I am standing before Caesar's judgment seat, where I should be tried. I have done nothing wrong to the Jews, as you also know very well. 11 If then I am in the wrong and have done anything that deserves death, I am not trying to escape dying, but if not one of their charges against me is true, no one can hand me over to them. I appeal to Caesar!” 12 Then, after conferring with his council, Festus replied, “You have appealed to Caesar; to Caesar you will go!” 13 After several days had passed, King Agrippa and Bernice arrived at Caesarea to pay their respects to Festus. 14 While they were staying there many days, Festus explained Paul's case to the king to get his opinion, saying, “There is a man left here as a prisoner by Felix. 15 When I was in Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews informed me about him, asking for a sentence of condemnation against him. 16 I answered them that it was not the custom of the Romans to hand over anyone before the accused had met his accusers face-to-face and had been given an opportunity to make a defense against the accusation. 17 So after they came back here with me, I did not postpone the case, but the next day I sat on the judgment seat and ordered the man to be brought. 18 When his accusers stood up, they did not charge him with any of the evil deeds I had suspected. 19 Rather they had several points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a man named Jesus who was dead, whom Paul claimed to be alive. 20 Because I was at a loss how I could investigate these matters, I asked if he were willing to go to Jerusalem and be tried there on these charges. 21 But when Paul appealed to be kept in custody for the decision of his Majesty the Emperor, I ordered him to be kept under guard until I could send him to Caesar.” 22 Agrippa said to Festus, “I would also like to hear the man myself.” “Tomorrow,” he replied, “you will hear him.” 23 So the next day Agrippa and Bernice came with great pomp and entered the audience hall, along with the senior military officers and the prominent men of the city. When Festus gave the order, Paul was brought in. 24 Then Festus said, “King Agrippa, and all you who are present here with us, you see this man about whom the entire Jewish populace petitioned me both in Jerusalem and here, shouting loudly that he ought not to live any longer. 25 But I found that he had done nothing that deserved death, and when he appealed to His Majesty the Emperor, I decided to send him. 26 But I have nothing definite to write to my lord about him. Therefore I have brought him before you all, and especially before you, King Agrippa, so that after this preliminary hearing I may have something to write. 27 For it seems unreasonable to me to send a prisoner without clearly indicating the charges against him.” 26 So Agrippa said to Paul, “You have permission to speak for yourself.” Then Paul held out his hand and began his defense: 2 “Regarding all the things I have been accused of by the Jews, King Agrippa, I consider myself fortunate that I am about to make my defense before you today, 3 because you are especially familiar with all the customs and controversial issues of the Jews. Therefore I ask you to listen to me patiently. 4 Now all the Jews know the way I lived from my youth, spending my life from the beginning among my own people and in Jerusalem. 5 They know, because they have known me from time past, if they are willing to testify, that according to the strictest party of our religion, I lived as a Pharisee. 6 And now I stand here on trial because of my hope in the promise made by God to our ancestors, 7 a promise that our twelve tribes hope to attain as they earnestly serve God night and day. Concerning this hope the Jews are accusing me, Your Majesty! 8 Why do you people think it is unbelievable that God raises the dead? 9 Of course, I myself was convinced that it was necessary to do many things hostile to the name of Jesus the Nazarene. 10 And that is what I did in Jerusalem: Not only did I lock up many of the saints in prisons by the authority I received from the chief priests, but I also cast my vote against them when they were sentenced to death. 11 I punished them often in all the synagogues and tried to force them to blaspheme. Because I was so furiously enraged at them, I went to persecute them even in foreign cities.OutlineFestus Arrives in the ProvinceNew governor, new chances for better Roman-Jewish relationsNew governor, new chances to get prosecutionsA change of venueFestus Judges PaulPaul's case is prioritizedThe judge takes his seat and the prosecution makes its accusationsPaul defends himselfFestus offers a change of venuePaul appeals to CaesarRome: the supreme courtDoes Paul choose Rome and reject Israel?King Agrippa and Bernice Arrives at CaesareaHistorical question: what is Luke's source?Festus request of King Agrippa and BerniceKing Agrippa and BernicePomp and fanfarePaul's DefenseNot a trial—Paul is innocentThe climactic speech of Paul's apologetic ministryPaul argues for the gospel, not his innocencePaul's respectful and honest introductionPaul narrates his life to establish ethos—he has always been a law-abiding JewPaul is on trial because of his hope in the promise—the resurrection!Paul himself used to be a hater

Mike and Charlie discussed the landing spots for Bengals star defensive end Trey Hendrickson and LSU baseball's strong 13-1 start to the 2025 season. Marlon Favorite, a former Saints & LSU standout, joined Sports Talk. Favorite praised new LSU DL coach Kyle Williams and Saints defensive pass game coordinator Terry Joseph. He emphasized the importance of nose tackles and outside linebackers in a 3-4 defensive scheme. Favorite also questioned LSU's usage of star LB Harold Perkins. Mike, Jeff, and Charlie played their daily "Triple Option" segment.

Stephen Serda is back with another episode of the Daily Fix: Patriots were interested in trading for Thuney. Mitch Morse calls it a career. Add Trey Hendrickson to the list of players seeking a trade. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This episode provides a tactical question to elicit useful feedback by taking responsibility for seeking it out and framing the request in a way that encourages advice rather than judgment. Understand that your manager giving you feedback is your responsibility, which means you should actively seek it out rather than waiting. Discover how a simple question can shift the dynamic with your manager to get better feedback, focusing on advice for the future rather than dwelling on past behaviours. Learn the tactical question to ask your manager: "What do you think will hold me back from growing?" or a modified version like, "What do you think will hold me back from getting X promotion?". Explore why framing your feedback request as seeking advice is more effective because managers generally enjoy giving advice and it focuses on future improvement. Understand that the intent is not to analyze past behavior but to identify potential roadblocks to future success and growth.

In this first curated episode by Bri of Elevated Impressions / Be Wise Consulting, we hear from her and her friend Jamie about creating mutually beneficial relationships with other vendors in the event industry. It's an episode full of tips like: How to initiate a connection What kind of traits stand out to event planners Industry research & immersing yourself in your community Requesting tours of local venues Getting other vendors to sell your services Preferred vendor lists & which ones you actually want to be on There is SO much to digest from this conversation and I know there's something for you to take away from it no matter where you are in your business or what kind of region you live in. You'll hear Bri and Jamie each give their perspectives on what they would look for in each other's roles, their preferred payment processes and a couple of clear action items you can implement right away.    And in the UGlu Hotline, hear about another very cool way to be involved in your community!   RESOURCES MENTIONED: Presenting sponsor: 17hats (get 50% off your 1st year)  Curated Month by: @elevatedimpressionsma  Other sponsors & resources: Havin' A Party Wholesale (save 5% on orders $200+ with code PODCAST) Courtney Lynette Creative Co 2025 Bright Balloon Business Planner  UGlu by Pro Tapes (save 5% on orders $200+ at Havin' A Party with code PODCAST)  Call into the UGlu Hotline to ask a question or leave advice! (262) 221-8514 Balloon Boss Mastermind & Summit  - - - - Get bonus episodes 50 Ideas for Email Marketing | Join the Bright Balloon email list  Freeform Freedom | More courses  @thebrightballoon  The Bright Balloon on YouTube 

Seth and Sean are joined by Adam Spolane to talk about what they'll be watching for in today's Astros Spring training game and Jose Altuve seeing time in Left Field on Friday, dive in and assess Clint Stoerner's take that the Texans have coddled CJ Stroud too much, and if the Texans should see about any of the 4 players who have been granted permission by their team to seek trades.

Victoria Cavaliere, a Bloomberg editor, joins Megan Lynch amid the confusion over Elon Musk's email to millions of federal workers, demanding they explain their roles in the government. Several agencies told their employees to ignore the email.

Jonathan and Jake continue their conversation about Myles Garrett doing the Browns a favor by requesting a trade.

Gavin does a lot of records requests. In this episode, he answers questions about the process and his experience.- What is the process?- What agencies are the best to work with?- What agencies aren't so great? --Join the Milwaukee Mafia Newsletter and get updates about the Mafia and Gavin https://milwaukeemafia.com/join-the-mailing-list/Got a question about this episode? Email Gavin and Eric at milwaukeemafia@gmail.comExplore the Milwaukee Mafia Wiki: https://milwaukeemafia.com/Become part of the Family: https://www.patreon.com/Milwaukeemafia--Gavin Schmitt is the leading historical expert on the mafia in Wisconsin. He has written several books on the subject and regularly speaks across the country.Get Gavin's Books: https://www.amazon.com/Gavin-Schmitt/e/B00E749XFSBook Gavin for a Presentation: https://gavinschmitt.com/

Give your feedback here:https://forms.gle/vvgrEMXjDySg9wS76Hi! Welcome to the sleep podcast by Slow. I'm Oda, a licensed clinical psychologist.Through my years of working with people struggling with depression, anxiety and stress, I've seen one thing again and again—when life feels overwhelming and out of control, sleep is often the first thing to suffer.Luckily, there are ways to improve your sleep, and that's what we'll explore together in upcoming episodes.This sleep podcast will offer you ways to reconnect with yourself, to unwind, and to learn how to care for your physical and mental health.We will talk about the science of sleep, the role of stress and emotions, and simple, practical strategies you can use to sleep better and feel better. Most importantly—I want this to be your space, and we're looking for listener feedback to guide our future episodes. Now imagine this:Have you ever felt like your patience runs out faster after a bad night's sleep? Maybe you snapped at a coworker, struggled to be present with your family, or felt disconnected from your friends? Do you feel like stress is keeping your body tense, making it impossible to truly rest? Or maybe you lie awake replaying conversations or overanalyzing something that happened several days ago?Do any of these situations resonate with you? What is keeping you awake right now? Take a moment and try to connect with your emotions, what are they telling you? You are not the only one struggling with sleep, and you don't have to figure it out alone. Whatever you're struggling with, I'd love to hear from you.Send in your thoughts, questions, or experiences, and let's explore them together.You can contact me confidentially and directly by clicking the link here:https://forms.gle/vvgrEMXjDySg9wS76I want to wish you a good night's sleep, and now over to tonight's sleep soundscape. Comment bellow the number that resonates with your struggles:Work & Productivity Overthinking 1. Replaying a mistake from the day – “Why did I say that in the meeting? I should've worded it differently.” 2. Worrying about tomorrow's to-do list – “I have so much to do tomorrow—what if I don't get everything done?” 3. Thinking about an unread email or unfinished task – “Did I forget to send that email? What if I made a mistake?” 4. Second-guessing a conversation with a coworker – “Did I sound rude when I responded? I hope they didn't take it the wrong way.”Social & Relationship Overthinking 5. Replaying a conversation from earlier – “Did I embarrass myself? Why did I say that?” 6. Worrying about a text you sent – “They haven't replied yet. Did I upset them?” 7. Overanalyzing an argument – “I should've said this instead… Maybe they're still mad at me.” 8. Thinking about a social event – “What if I say something awkward? What if no one talks to me?”Financial & Life Stressors 9. Worrying about bills or money – “How am I going to afford that upcoming expense?” 10. Thinking about career choices – “Am I on the right path? What if I made the wrong decision?” 11. Stressing about the future – “Where will I be in five years? Am I doing enough with my life?” 12. Regretting past financial decisions – “I shouldn't have spent so much on that today… What was I thinking?”Health & Well-being Overthinking 13. Googling symptoms late at night – “What if this headache is something serious?” 14. Worrying about sleep itself – “If I don't fall asleep soon, I'll be exhausted tomorrow.” 15. Feeling guilty about not exercising – “I should have worked out today. I need to be healthier.” 16. Stressing about unhealthy habits – “Why did I eat so much junk food today? I really need to do better.”

Nick and Jonathan are joined by Chris Fedor of Cleveland.com to discuss the Cavs. Then, they react to Myles Garrett's explosive comments about his trade request on The Rich Eisen Show.

Nick and Jonathan react to Myles Garrett's explosive comments about his trade request on The Rich Eisen Show.

Andy and Jeff talk to callers to hear their thoughts on Myles Garrett requesting a trade.

Why are librarians requesting armed security guards in LA County?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

There are some people that have issues with Mississippi Valley State University. The HBCU’s marching band was invited to perform at Donald Trump’s inauguration. Now MSU marching band is asking for donations to get to the inauguration. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textReflecting on four impactful years, we share the growth and evolution of Palm Harbor Local, celebrating community stories while looking toward a promising future in 2025. We explore the importance of community engagement, upcoming events, and opportunities for local business partnerships.• Reflecting on the podcast's origin during challenging times • Highlighting early guests who shared their inspiring stories • Plans for more community events in 2025 to deepen engagement • Exploring potential partnerships for local businesses • Envisioning a vibrant downtown Palm Harbor as a destination • Requesting volunteers for events and community initiatives • Encouraging listeners to subscribe for updates and engagement opportunitiesStroll through the laid-back streets of the Palm Harbor community with this informative podcast, proudly brought to you by Donnie Hathaway with The Hathaway Group, your trusted guide and local expert in navigating the diverse and ever-changing property landscape of Palm Harbor. Work with me + FREE Resources Would you like help buying a home in Palm Harbor? - Buyer ConsultationWould you like help selling your house in Palm Harbor? - Seller Marketing ConsultationDownload our free buyer's guide today - Buyer's Guide

In a recent letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team expressed concern over extensive pretrial publicity that they believe is compromising his right to a fair trial and the integrity of grand jury proceedings. They referenced a pending motion to limit extrajudicial statements by potential witnesses and their counsel, which the government has opposed, with Combs' reply due on November 8, 2024. Citing the immediate risk posed by ongoing public statements related to the grand jury, they requested the court to promptly restrict such extrajudicial comments during the motion's consideration.In this episode, we take a look at that motion.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Draft Combs 23.1 Letter 110124 [trg]Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

(00:00) Zolak and Bertrand open the show by reacting to Jerod Mayo being fired. (13:19) We touch on how many reporters changed their tune over the last few weeks about Jerod Mayo’s future. (24:52) The crew continues to go back and forth on the signs at Gillette Stadium yesterday that Jerod Mayo was going to be fired. (31:52) We react to the breaking news of the Patriots requesting an interview with Ben Johnson.

In a recent letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team expressed concern over extensive pretrial publicity that they believe is compromising his right to a fair trial and the integrity of grand jury proceedings. They referenced a pending motion to limit extrajudicial statements by potential witnesses and their counsel, which the government has opposed, with Combs' reply due on November 8, 2024. Citing the immediate risk posed by ongoing public statements related to the grand jury, they requested the court to promptly restrict such extrajudicial comments during the motion's consideration.In this episode, we take a look at that motion.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Draft Combs 23.1 Letter 110124 [trg]

Attention-seeking behavior is quite common; however, our learners often don't know how to wait to receive attention. They also may not know how to properly seek attention, and it's our job to teach them. Here, we discuss the value of attention and effective strategies to teach our learners how to request and gain attention.We start by defining attention-seeking behaviors and how to assess them, including how to identify more subtle behaviors and the importance of identifying the function of the behavior. We also discuss how to introduce replacement skills, request attention programs, proper use of reinforcement, and how to use role play and practice scenarios.What's Inside:Strategies to teach our learners how to request and gain attentionHow to introduce replacement skillsHow to use role play and practice scenariosMentioned In This Episode:HowToABA.com/joinHow to ABA on YouTubeFind us on FacebookFollow us on InstagramFunctions of Behavior Cheat Sheet

Earn up to $400K a year as a freelance GOVERNMENT CONTRACT CONSULTANT: https://www.govclose.com/sales-certification   These tools are essential for researching government contracts and getting the competitive advantage. I use them everyday, and my aim is to teach how I use them and how you can leverage these websited for your business. 00:00 Introduction to Government Contracting Tools 00:13 Establishing Your Niche in Government Contracting 01:30 Leveraging USA Spending for Insights 03:12 Analyzing Government Contracts and Competition 04:28 Success Stories and Testimonials 06:04 Understanding Government Spending and Fiscal Years 09:45 Finding and Responding to Sources Sought 20:34 Creating and Managing Opportunities in GovClose 30:49 Ensuring Email Delivery to Government Agencies 31:53 The Importance of Confirming Receipt 32:17 Building Relationships with Government Offices 33:27 Requesting and Conducting Follow-Up Meetings 34:09 The Power of Personal Connections in Sales 34:55 Effective Sales Strategies for Government Contracts  37:34 Prospecting and Upselling to Government Clients 44:13 Navigating Government Contracting Certifications 47:26 Analyzing Government Spending Data 55:54 Understanding Cybersecurity Requirements 58:05 Final Thoughts and Q&A

Peter Wilson explains preparing for court, mindset, Martial Arts, the dangers of vapes and lots more.   About my Guest: Ex Royal Navy gunner and armourer, turned professional fighter. Owned and ran own martial arts gym for about 30 years. Always been aware of something not being right in the world, went deep into it after losing over £1million of property in 1 week including own home. So been up and been down even living in a car for a while with his wife Janine and 4 dogs.   --- Help Support the show through my Business Partners :  Find Virtual Assistants at https://va.world/ Upgrade Your Brain    Unleash & Use Your Uniqueness   https://braingym.fitness/⁠    -------------------------- Awakening Podcast Social Media / Coaching My Other Podcasts    ⁠⁠⁠https://roycoughlan.com/⁠⁠   Health & Wellness Products   https://partnerco.world/   My Website https://partner.co/?custid=N6543249    ------------------ What we Discussed:   - Getting a YouTube Strike on our Last Interview ( 1 min) - The committee of 300 (3:20 mins) - How they control the World (5:30 mins) - Getting the Mindset for going to Court (9 mins) - Not feeling pain while fighting (14 mins) - Don't get Angry in the Court room (17:20 mins) - My Criminal case (21 mins) - Is there any Legal Person using Common Law (23:40 mins) - Peters story of how he nearly got put in jail (24:30 mins) - How he nearly got 10-12 yrs in prison while in the Navy (29 mins) - There was no support when his brother passed (30 :15 mins) - Have forgiveness for all (33 mins) - His books to help children (36:40 mins) - Pick the right Marial Arts Class (37:45 mins) - All the Champions the Club created (38:30 mins) - The dangers of Underarm deordants & Perfume (41 mins) - The reaction we both get from Aftershave or perfume (44 mins) - Sea Air & Salt benefits (45 mins) - The Dangers of Vapes (47 mins) - Toxic fake vegan food (49 mins) - You do not need to stand in Court (51:30 mins) - Referring to your Children as your Property (54 mins) - Word Combat in Court 58:30 mins) - Have you the right to record in Court ( 1 hr 1 min) - The Bill of Rights (1hr 3:30 mins) - How do we know the Jury are not corrupt (1 hr 4:30 mins) - How does the Jury work ( 1 hr 6 mins) - The games the lawyers play ( 1 hr 11 mins) - Keith Starmer and failed lawyers (1hr 12:30 mins) - The power of Sworn Affidavits (1hr 15 mins) - Using GDPR against Carpark Companies (1 hr 17 mins) - The danger of Supermarket loyalty cards (1hr 21 mins) - Requesting your data from the supermarket ( 1 hr 25 mins) - A tiny area in the supermarket that is healthy food (1 hr 29 mins) - Mckenzie friend in Court (1 hr 34:30 mins)   How to Contact Peter:   https://www.claimyourstrawman.com/   https://www.checkmatethematrix.com/   https://linktr.ee/PeterWilsonReturnToDemocracy     ------------------------------ More about the Awakening Podcast: All Episodes can be found at www.awakeningpodcast.org     Help Support the show through my Business Partners :   Upgrade Your Brain    Unleash & Use Your Uniqueness   https://braingym.fitness/⁠    -------------------------- Awakening Podcast Social Media / Coaching My Other Podcasts    ⁠⁠⁠https://roycoughlan.com/⁠⁠   Health & Wellness Products   https://partnerco.world/   My Website https://partner.co/?custid=N6543249   Our Facebook Group can be found at https://www.facebook.com/royawakening

Is it OK to ... ? I got lots of mail in response to the Wedding Etiquette show that aired on 9.11.24, and in this Friday Follow Up Q&A I'm opening my mailbox and sharing your questions! We'll talk through ... Inviting kids to the wedding, Requesting a specific dress code,  A tiny wedding chappel that can't accomodate everyone, The etiquette surrounding your wedding parties, When to actually send Thank You notes, and lots more. Enjoy, And be in touch with your questions anytime at weddingplanningpodcast.co/contact