POPULARITY
Categories
O economista Haroldo Bonfá, da Pharos Consultoria, faz o balanço do início da colheita do café no Brasil. Em relação ao arábica, a tendência é que as atividades comecem a ganhar ritmo a partir do início de junho. Quanto aos preços, a sinalização é de queda. A entrada da safra e a perspectiva positiva para o ciclo de 2026 influenciaram para uma desvalorização.
Dòmhnall Angaidh Moireasdan ann an còmhradh le Derek 'Pluto Moireach mu snùcair.
Mesmo “deslocados”, os Napa chegaram à final. Seremos sempre forasteiros? Podemos voltar a ganhar? E que mitos rodeiam as segundas vezes na cultura popular? São os temas desta semana no Pop Up. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen to ASCO's JCO Oncology Practice, Art of Oncology Practice article, "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last” by Dr. David Johnson, who is a clinical oncologist at University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. The article is followed by an interview with Johnson and host Dr. Mikkael Sekeres. Through humor and irony, Johnson critiques how overspecialization and poor presentation practices have eroded what was once internal medicine's premier educational forum. Transcript Narrator: An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last, by David H. Johnson, MD, MACP, FASCO Over the past five decades, I have attended hundreds of medical conferences—some insightful and illuminating, others tedious and forgettable. Among these countless gatherings, Medical Grand Rounds (MGRs) has always held a special place. Originally conceived as a forum for discussing complex clinical cases, emerging research, and best practices in patient care, MGRs served as a unifying platform for clinicians across all specialties, along with medical students, residents, and other health care professionals. Expert speakers—whether esteemed faculty or distinguished guests—would discuss challenging cases, using them as a springboard to explore the latest advances in diagnosis and treatment. During my early years as a medical student, resident, and junior faculty member, Grand Rounds consistently attracted large, engaged audiences. However, as medicine became increasingly subspecialized, attendance began to wane. Lectures grew more technically intricate, often straying from broad clinical relevance. The patient-centered discussions that once brought together diverse medical professionals gradually gave way to hyperspecialized presentations. Subspecialists, once eager to share their insights with the wider medical community, increasingly withdrew to their own specialty-specific conferences, further fragmenting the exchange of knowledge across disciplines. As a former Chair of Internal Medicine and a veteran of numerous MGRs, I observed firsthand how these sessions shifted from dynamic educational exchanges to highly specialized, often impenetrable discussions. One of the most striking trends in recent years has been the decline in presentation quality at MGR—even among local and visiting world-renowned experts. While these speakers are often brilliant clinicians and investigators, they can also be remarkably poor lecturers, delivering some of the most uninspiring talks I have encountered. Their presentations are so consistently lackluster that one might suspect an underlying strategy at play—an unspoken method to ensure that they are never invited back. Having observed this pattern repeatedly, I am convinced that these speakers must be adhering to a set of unwritten rules to avoid future MGR presentations. To assist those unfamiliar with this apparent strategy, I have distilled the key principles that, when followed correctly, all but guarantee that a presenter will not be asked to give another MGR lecture—thus sparing them the burden of preparing one in the future. Drawing on my experience as an oncologist, I illustrate these principles using an oncology-based example although I suspect similar rules apply across other subspecialties. It will be up to my colleagues in cardiology, endocrinology, rheumatology, and beyond to identify and document their own versions—tasks for which I claim no expertise. What follows are the seven “Rules for Presenting a Bad Medical Oncology Medical Grand Rounds.” 1. Microscopic Mayhem: Always begin with an excruciatingly detailed breakdown of the tumor's histology and molecular markers, emphasizing how these have evolved over the years (eg, PAP v prostate-specific antigen)—except, of course, when they have not (eg, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, etc). These nuances, while of limited relevance to general internists or most subspecialists (aside from oncologists), are guaranteed to induce eye-glazing boredom and quiet despair among your audience. 2. TNM Torture: Next, cover every nuance of the newest staging system … this is always a real crowd pleaser. For illustrative purposes, show a TNM chart in the smallest possible font. It is particularly helpful if you provide a lengthy review of previous versions of the staging system and painstakingly cover each and every change in the system. Importantly, this activity will allow you to disavow the relevance of all previous literature studies to which you will subsequently refer during the course of your presentation … to wit—“these data are based on the OLD staging system and therefore may not pertain …” This phrase is pure gold—use it often if you can. NB: You will know you have “captured” your audience if you observe audience members “shifting in their seats” … it occurs almost every time … but if you have failed to “move” the audience … by all means, continue reading … there is more! 3. Mechanism of Action Meltdown: Discuss in detail every drug ever used to treat the cancer under discussion; this works best if you also give a detailed description of each drug's mechanism of action (MOA). General internists and subspecialists just LOVE hearing a detailed discussion of the drug's MOA … especially if it is not at all relevant to the objectives of your talk. At this point, if you observe a wave of slack-jawed faces slowly slumping toward their desktops, you will know you are on your way to successfully crushing your audience's collective spirit. Keep going—you are almost there. 4. Dosage Deadlock: One must discuss “dose response” … there is absolutely nothing like a dose response presentation to a group of internists to induce cries of anguish. A wonderful example of how one might weave this into a lecture to generalists or a mixed audience of subspecialists is to discuss details that ONLY an oncologist would care about—such as the need to dose escalate imatinib in GIST patients with exon 9 mutations as compared with those with exon 11 mutations. This is a definite winner! 5. Criteria Catatonia: Do not forget to discuss the newest computed tomography or positron emission tomography criteria for determining response … especially if you plan to discuss an obscure malignancy that even oncologists rarely encounter (eg, esthesioneuroblastoma). Should you plan to discuss a common disease you can ensure ennui only if you will spend extra time discussing RECIST criteria. Now if you do this well, some audience members may begin fashioning their breakfast burritos into projectiles—each one aimed squarely at YOU. Be brave … soldier on! 6. Kaplan-Meier Killer: Make sure to discuss the arcane details of multiple negative phase II and III trials pertaining to the cancer under discussion. It is best to show several inconsequential and hard-to-read Kaplan-Meier plots. To make sure that you do a bad job, divide this portion of your presentation into two sections … one focused on adjuvant treatment; the second part should consist of a long boring soliloquy on the management of metastatic disease. Provide detailed information of little interest even to the most ardent fan of the disease you are discussing. This alone will almost certainly ensure that you will never, ever be asked to give Medicine Grand Rounds again. 7. Lymph Node Lobotomy: For the coup de grâce, be sure to include an exhaustive discussion of the latest surgical techniques, down to the precise number of lymph nodes required for an “adequate dissection.” To be fair, such details can be invaluable in specialized settings like a tumor board, where they send subspecialists into rapturous delight. But in the context of MGR—where the audience spans multiple disciplines—it will almost certainly induce a stultifying torpor. If dullness were an art, this would be its masterpiece—capable of lulling even the most caffeinated minds into a stupor. If you have carefully followed the above set of rules, at this point, some members of the audience should be banging their heads against the nearest hard surface. If you then hear a loud THUD … and you're still standing … you will know you have succeeded in giving the world's worst Medical Grand Rounds! Final Thoughts I hope that these rules shed light on what makes for a truly dreadful oncology MGR presentation—which, by inverse reasoning, might just serve as a blueprint for an excellent one. At its best, an outstanding lecture defies expectations. One of the most memorable MGRs I have attended, for instance, was on prostaglandin function—not a subject typically associated with edge-of-your-seat suspense. Given by a biochemist and physician from another subspecialty, it could have easily devolved into a labyrinth of enzymatic pathways and chemical structures. Instead, the speaker took a different approach: rather than focusing on biochemical minutiae, he illustrated how prostaglandins influence nearly every major physiologic system—modulating inflammation, regulating cardiovascular function, protecting the gut, aiding reproduction, supporting renal function, and even influencing the nervous system—without a single slide depicting the prostaglandin structure. The result? A room full of clinicians—not biochemists—walked away with a far richer understanding of how prostaglandins affect their daily practice. What is even more remarkable is that the talk's clarity did not just inform—it sparked new collaborations that shaped years of NIH-funded research. Now that was an MGR masterpiece. At its core, effective scientific communication boils down to three deceptively simple principles: understanding your audience, focusing on relevance, and making complex information accessible.2 The best MGRs do not drown the audience in details, but rather illuminate why those details matter. A great lecture is not about showing how much you know, but about ensuring your audience leaves knowing something they didn't before. For those who prefer the structured wisdom of a written guide over the ramblings of a curmudgeon, an excellent review of these principles—complete with a handy checklist—is available.2 But fair warning: if you follow these principles, you may find yourself invited back to present another stellar MGRs. Perish the thought! Dr. Mikkael SekeresHello and welcome to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology, which features essays and personal reflections from authors exploring their experience in the oncology field. I'm your host, Mikkael Sekeres. I'm Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Hematology at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami. What a pleasure it is today to be joined by Dr. David Johnson, clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School. In this episode, we will be discussing his Art of Oncology Practice article, "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last." Our guest's disclosures will be linked in the transcript. David, welcome to our podcast and thanks so much for joining us. Dr. David JohnsonGreat to be here, Mikkael. Thanks for inviting me. Dr. Mikkael SekeresI was wondering if we could start with just- give us a sense about you. Can you tell us about yourself? Where are you from? And walk us through your career. Dr. David JohnsonSure. I grew up in a small rural community in Northwest Georgia about 30 miles south of Chattanooga, Tennessee, in the Appalachian Mountains. I met my wife in kindergarten. Dr. Mikkael SekeresOh my. Dr. David JohnsonThere are laws in Georgia. We didn't get married till the third grade. But we dated in high school and got married after college. And so we've literally been with one another my entire life, our entire lives. Dr. Mikkael SekeresMy word. Dr. David JohnsonI went to medical school in Georgia. I did my training in multiple sites, including my oncology training at Vanderbilt, where I completed my training. I spent the next 30 years there, where I had a wonderful career. Got an opportunity to be a Division Chief and a Deputy Director of, and the founder of, a cancer center there. And in 2010, I was recruited to UT Southwestern as the Chairman of Medicine. Not a position I had particularly aspired to, but I was interested in taking on that challenge, and it proved to be quite a challenge for me. I had to relearn internal medicine, and really all the subspecialties of medicine really became quite challenging to me. So my career has spanned sort of the entire spectrum, I suppose, as a clinical investigator, as an administrator, and now as a near end-of-my-career guy who writes ridiculous articles about grand rounds. Dr. Mikkael SekeresNot ridiculous at all. It was terrific. What was that like, having to retool? And this is a theme you cover a little bit in your essay, also, from something that's super specialized. I mean, you have had this storied career with the focus on lung cancer, and then having to expand not only to all of hematology oncology, but all of medicine. Dr. David JohnsonIt was a challenge, but it was also incredibly fun. My first few days in the chair's office, I met with a number of individuals, but perhaps the most important individuals I met with were the incoming chief residents who were, and are, brilliant men and women. And we made a pact. I promised to teach them as much as I could about oncology if they would teach me as much as they could about internal medicine. And so I spent that first year literally trying to relearn medicine. And I had great teachers. Several of those chiefs are now on the faculty here or elsewhere. And that continued on for the next several years. Every group of chief residents imparted their wisdom to me, and I gave them what little bit I could provide back to them in the oncology world. It was a lot of fun. And I have to say, I don't necessarily recommend everybody go into administration. It's not necessarily the most fun thing in the world to do. But the opportunity to deal one-on-one closely with really brilliant men and women like the chief residents was probably the highlight of my time as Chair of Medicine. Dr. Mikkael SekeresThat sounds incredible. I can imagine, just reflecting over the two decades that I've been in hematology oncology and thinking about the changes in how we diagnose and care for people over that time period, I can only imagine what the changes had been in internal medicine since I was last immersed in that, which would be my residency. Dr. David JohnsonWell, I trained in the 70s in internal medicine, and what transpired in the 70s was kind of ‘monkey see, monkey do'. We didn't really have a lot of understanding of pathophysiology except at the most basic level. Things have changed enormously, as you well know, certainly in the field of oncology and hematology, but in all the other fields as well. And so I came in with what I thought was a pretty good foundation of knowledge, and I realized it was completely worthless, what I had learned as an intern and resident. And when I say I had to relearn medicine, I mean, I had to relearn medicine. It was like being an intern. Actually, it was like being a medical student all over again. Dr. Mikkael SekeresOh, wow. Dr. David JohnsonSo it's quite challenging. Dr. Mikkael SekeresWell, and it's just so interesting. You're so deliberate in your writing and thinking through something like grand rounds. It's not a surprise, David, that you were also deliberate in how you were going to approach relearning medicine. So I wonder if we could pivot to talking about grand rounds, because part of being a Chair of Medicine, of course, is having Department of Medicine grand rounds. And whether those are in a cancer center or a department of medicine, it's an honor to be invited to give a grand rounds talk. How do you think grand rounds have changed over the past few decades? Can you give an example of what grand rounds looked like in the 1990s compared to what they look like now? Dr. David JohnsonWell, I should all go back to the 70s and and talk about grand rounds in the 70s. And I referenced an article in my essay written by Dr. Ingelfinger, who many people remember Dr. Ingelfinger as the Ingelfinger Rule, which the New England Journal used to apply. You couldn't publish in the New England Journal if you had published or publicly presented your data prior to its presentation in the New England Journal. Anyway, Dr. Ingelfinger wrote an article which, as I say, I referenced in my essay, about the graying of grand rounds, when he talked about what grand rounds used to be like. It was a very almost sacred event where patients were presented, and then experts in the field would discuss the case and impart to the audience their wisdom and knowledge garnered over years of caring for patients with that particular problem, might- a disease like AML, or lung cancer, or adrenal insufficiency, and talk about it not just from a pathophysiologic standpoint, but from a clinician standpoint. How do these patients present? What do you do? How do you go about diagnosing and what can you do to take care of those kinds of patients? It was very patient-centric. And often times the patient, him or herself, was presented at the grand rounds. And then experts sitting in the front row would often query the speaker and put him or her under a lot of stress to answer very specific questions about the case or about the disease itself. Over time, that evolved, and some would say devolved, but evolved into more specialized and nuanced presentations, generally without a patient present, or maybe even not even referred to, but very specifically about the molecular biology of disease, which is marvelous and wonderful to talk about, but not necessarily in a grand round setting where you've got cardiologists sitting next to endocrinologists, seated next to nephrologists, seated next to primary care physicians and, you know, an MS1 and an MS2 and et cetera. So it was very evident to me that what I had witnessed in my early years in medicine had really become more and more subspecialized. As a result, grand rounds, which used to be packed and standing room only, became echo chambers. It was like a C-SPAN presentation, you know, where local representative got up and gave a talk and the chambers were completely empty. And so we had to go to do things like force people to attend grand rounds like a Soviet Union-style rally or something, you know. You have to pay them to go. But it was really that observation that got me to thinking about it. And by the way, I love oncology and I'm, I think there's so much exciting progress that's being made that I want the presentations to be exciting to everybody, not just to the oncologist or the hematologist, for example. And what I was witnessing was kind of a formula that, almost like a pancake formula, that everybody followed the same rules. You know, “This disease is the third most common cancer and it presents in this way and that way.” And it was very, very formulaic. It wasn't energizing and exciting as it had been when we were discussing individual patients. So, you know, it just is what it is. I mean, progress is progress and you can't stop it. And I'm not trying to make America great again, you know, by going back to the 70s, but I do think sometimes we overthink what medical grand rounds ought to be as compared to a presentation at ASH or ASCO where you're talking to subspecialists who understand the nuances and you don't have to explain the abbreviations, you know, that type of thing. Dr. Mikkael SekeresSo I wonder, you talk about the echo chamber of the grand rounds nowadays, right? It's not as well attended. It used to be a packed event, and it used to be almost a who's who of, of who's in the department. You'd see some very famous people who would attend every grand rounds and some up-and-comers, and it was a chance for the chief residents to shine as well. How do you think COVID and the use of Zoom has changed the personality and energy of grand rounds? Is it better because, frankly, more people attend—they just attend virtually. Last time I attended, I mean, I attend our Department of Medicine grand rounds weekly, and I'll often see 150, 200 people on the Zoom. Or is it worse because the interaction's limited? Dr. David JohnsonYeah, I don't want to be one of those old curmudgeons that says, you know, the way it used to be is always better. But there's no question that the convenience of Zoom or similar media, virtual events, is remarkable. I do like being able to sit in my office where I am right now and watch a conference across campus that I don't have to walk 30 minutes to get to. I like that, although I need the exercise. But at the same time, I think one of the most important aspects of coming together is lost with virtual meetings, and that's the casual conversation that takes place. I mentioned in my essay an example of the grand rounds that I attended given by someone in a different specialty who was both a physician and a PhD in biochemistry, and he was talking about prostaglandin metabolism. And talk about a yawner of a title; you almost have to prop your eyelids open with toothpicks. But it turned out to be one of the most fascinating, engaging conversations I've ever encountered. And moreover, it completely opened my eyes to an area of research that I had not been exposed to at all. And it became immediately obvious to me that it was relevant to the area of my interest, which was lung cancer. This individual happened to be just studying colon cancer. He's not an oncologist, but he was studying colon cancer. But it was really interesting what he was talking about. And he made it very relevant to every subspecialist and generalist in the audience because he talked about how prostaglandin has made a difference in various aspects of human physiology. The other grand rounds which always sticks in my mind was presented by a long standing program director at my former institution of Vanderbilt. He's passed away many years ago, but he gave a fascinating grand rounds where he presented the case of a homeless person. I can't remember the title of his grand rounds exactly, but I think it was “Care of the Homeless” or something like that. So again, not something that necessarily had people rushing to the audience. What he did is he presented this case as a mysterious case, you know, “what is it?” And he slowly built up the presentation of this individual who repeatedly came to the emergency department for various and sundry complaints. And to make a long story short, he presented a case that turned out to be lead poisoning. Everybody was on the edge of their seat trying to figure out what it was. And he was challenging members of the audience and senior members of the audience, including the Cair, and saying, “What do you think?” And it turned out that the patient became intoxicated not by eating paint chips or drinking lead infused liquids. He was burning car batteries to stay alive and inhaling lead fumes, which itself was fascinating, you know, so it was a fabulous grand rounds. And I mean, everybody learned something about the disease that they might otherwise have ignored, you know, if it'd been a title “Lead Poisoning”, I'm not sure a lot of people would have shown up. Dr. Mikkael Sekeres That story, David, reminds me of Tracy Kidder, who's a master of the nonfiction narrative, will choose a subject and kind of just go into great depth about it, and that subject could be a person. And he wrote a book called Rough Sleepers about Jim O'Connell - and Jim O'Connell was one of my attendings when I did my residency at Mass General - and about his life and what he learned about the homeless. And it's this same kind of engaging, “Wow, I never thought about that.” And it takes you in a different direction. And you know, in your essay, you make a really interesting comment. You reflect that subspecialists, once eager to share their insight with the wider medical community, increasingly withdraw to their own specialty specific conferences, further fragmenting the exchange of knowledge across disciplines. How do you think this affects their ability to gain new insights into their research when they hear from a broader audience and get questions that they usually don't face, as opposed to being sucked into the groupthink of other subspecialists who are similarly isolated? Dr. David Johnson That's one of the reasons I chose to illustrate that prostaglandin presentation, because again, that was not something that I specifically knew much about. And as I said, I went to the grand rounds more out of a sense of obligation than a sense of engagement. Moreover, our Chair at that institution forced us to go, so I was there, not by choice, but I'm so glad I was, because like you say, I got insight into an area that I had not really thought about and that cross pollination and fertilization is really a critical aspect. I think that you can gain at a broad conference like Medical Grand Rounds as opposed to a niche conference where you're talking about APL. You know, everybody's an APL expert, but they never thought about diabetes and how that might impact on their research. So it's not like there's an ‘aha' moment at every Grand Rounds, but I do think that those kinds of broad based audiences can sometimes bring a different perspective that even the speaker, him or herself had not thought of. Dr. Mikkael SekeresI think that's a great place to end and to thank David Johnson, who's a clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School and just penned the essay in JCO Art of Oncology Practice entitled "An Oncologist's Guide to Ensuring Your First Medical Grand Rounds Will Be Your Last." Until next time, thank you for listening to JCO's Cancer Stories: The Art of Oncology. Don't forget to give us a rating or review, and be sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode. You can find all of ASCO's shows at asco.org/podcasts. David, once again, I want to thank you for joining me today. Dr. David JohnsonThank you very much for having me. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Show notes: Like, share and subscribe so you never miss an episode and leave a rating or review. Guest Bio: Dr David Johnson is a clinical oncologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School.
Você gerencia, contrata e lidera SDR's? Sabe como montar e organizar um processo de PRÉ- VENDAS?O SDR (profissionais de pré-vendas) é a linha de frente de qualquer estratégia comercial moderna e a engrenagem que conecta marketing e vendas com foco total em GERAÇÃO DE OPORTUNIDADES QUALIFICADAS. Conversamos com uma líder já viveu a terceirização, enfrentou o desafio de internalizar o time, lidou com um mercado, ainda em educação, e sabe o quanto é difícil conquistar investimento — financeiro e humano — para que a MÁQUINA COMERCIAL FUNCIONE DE VERDADE.Nossa convidada já gerenciou uma equipe de nada mais nada menos que 60 pessoas!Pensando em todos esses pontos, no episódio de hoje, Leandro Munhoz (@le_munhoz) e Daniel Mestre (@danielrmestre) conversam com Cristiane Silva (LinkedIn) sobre ESTRUTURAÇÃO DA ÁREA DE PRÉ-VENDAS.
Isabel Vaz, a mulher mais influente da saúde privada em Portugal, não deixou cair Ricardo Salgado. Foi das poucas pessoas que não o fez. Um ato de coragem ou uma incompreensível loucura?
O Bate-Pronto de hoje debaterá a nova crise interna na CBF, que pode resultar até na destituição do presidente Ednaldo Rodrigues. O programa também atualizará as principais informações do futebol mundial.
Muito bom dia, boa tarde e boa noite queridos ouvintes, meu nome é Sérgio Sacani, sou editor do blog Space Today e do canal Space Today no Youtube e trago para vocês mais uma edição do podcast Horizonte de Eventos.E no programa de hoje!!!Vamos desenterrar a incrível e pouco conhecida saga da Kosmos 482, uma missão soviética destinada a Vênus em 1972 que falhou logo após o lançamento. Descobriremos como essa falha, em plena Guerra Fria, levou à queda de destroços misteriosos na Nova Zelândia e deixou uma cápsula espacial, um verdadeiro 'fantasma de Vênus', orbitando a Terra por mais de 50 anos! Exploraremos os desafios de pousar no inferno venusiano, os segredos por trás da missão, sua longa jornada orbital e o que sua história nos ensina sobre a exploração espacial e o crescente problema do lixo espacial.Então você já sabe, se prepara, chegou a hora da ciência invadir o seu cérebro!!!!Imaginem o cenário: estamos em 1972, no auge da Corrida Espacial. A União Soviética, após ver os americanos cravarem a bandeira na Lua, está determinada a manter sua dianteira na exploração dos planetas. O alvo da vez é Vênus, o nosso vizinho mais próximo, um mundo coberto por nuvens densas e com uma superfície tão hostil que desafia a imaginação. Uma nave sofisticada, parte do lendário programa Venera, é lançada com a missão de penetrar essa atmosfera esmagadora e talvez até pousar em solo venusiano.Mas algo, algo crucial, dá terrivelmente errado logo após o lançamento. O último estágio do foguete falha. A nave, em vez de seguir sua jornada interplanetária, fica presa, girando e girando ao redor da Terra numa órbita elíptica e instável, como um **carro que patina no gelo e não consegue sair do lugar**. O que poderia ter acontecido?E a história só fica mais estranha a partir daí.Poucos dias depois, objetos metálicos misteriosos começam a cair do céu na Nova Zelândia, do outro lado do mundo, causando espanto e teorias mirabolantes. Eram esferas de titânio com inscrições em russo! Seriam destroços da missão fracassada? O governo soviético nega veementemente qualquer relação. Por que tanto segredo?Enquanto isso, a nave principal se desfaz em órbita, seus pedaços reentrando na atmosfera ao longo dos anos... exceto um. Um fragmento específico, que muitos acreditam ser a parte mais importante da missão – a cápsula de descida, projetada para suportar o inferno de Vênus – permanece lá em cima. Por décadas! Cinquenta anos orbitando a Terra como um espectro silencioso da Guerra Fria, um segredo soviético flutuando no espaço, como uma **mensagem numa garrafa que nunca chegou ao seu destino**. O que aconteceu com essa cápsula? Ela ainda está lá? Ou já caiu?O que era exatamente essa missão Venera-72? Por que ela falhou de forma tão dramática? Que segredos essa cápsula perdida guardou por tanto tempo em sua jornada solitária? E o que a queda dos seus destroços nos ensina sobre a exploração espacial e seus perigos?Para entendermos completamente a história da Kosmos 482, precisamos primeiro ajustar nossos relógios e calendários. Voltemos para o início da década de 1970, mais precisamente para o ano de 1972. A Guerra Fria, aquela disputa tensa e multifacetada entre os Estados Unidos e a União Soviética, estava em pleno vapor, e um dos seus palcos mais visíveis e simbólicos era, sem dúvida, o espaço. Mas por que o espaço se tornou um campo de batalha tão importante nessa disputa ideológica?
Nesta mensagem, o Pr. Rafael Lemos, com o texto em Lucas, capítulo 15, versículos 11 ao 32, nos traz uma reflexão diferente sobre a parábola do filho pródigo.Na parábola acima, contada por Jesus em Lucas 15, vemos a trajetória de um jovem que decide romper com tudo: com a casa do pai, com os valores que recebeu, com o ambiente de amor e segurança. Ele parte em busca de liberdade, mas acaba encontrando o fundo do poço. É nesse ponto, no momento mais baixo de sua vida, que ocorre algo fundamental:“Caindo em si, disse: Quantos trabalhadores de meu pai têm pão com fartura, e eu aqui morro de fome!” (Lucas 15:17)Esse versículo marca o turning point da história — o momento de consciência, de arrependimento, de clareza. “Cair em si” é um processo espiritual profundo. Não é apenas reconhecer que as coisas deram errado; é perceber quem se é, onde se está, e quem é Deus.O filho, ao "cair em si", não apenas sente fome de pão, mas fome de sentido, de pertencimento, de reconciliação. E essa mudança interior o impulsiona a voltar, ainda que sem garantias, apenas com a esperança de ser aceito como servo. No entanto, ao retornar, encontra um pai que corre ao seu encontro, o abraça, o restaura como filho e celebra sua volta.Aplicações práticas: Cair em si é o começo da restauração. Muitas vezes, estamos cegos por nossas próprias escolhas, justificativas ou orgulho. O Espírito Santo nos conduz a esse momento de lucidez espiritual.Reconhecer o erro não é fraqueza, mas o primeiro passo de volta ao coração do Pai.O amor do Pai é maior do que nossa culpa. Ele não apenas nos perdoa, mas nos restaura.Conclusão: “Cair em si” é um ato de graça. É quando, mesmo em meio à dor ou desilusão, uma luz se acende dentro de nós e nos mostra que ainda há caminho de volta. A casa do Pai nunca deixou de estar de portas abertas. E mais do que isso: o Pai nunca deixou de esperar.Talvez hoje seja o momento de “cair em si” e dar o primeiro passo de volta.Se esta mensagem edificou a sua vida, curta e compartilhe com mais pessoas.Deus te abençoe!
Passando a Limpo: Nesta sexta-feira (2), Igor Maciel e a bancada do programa conversam com Fabrício Marques. O Secretário de Planejamento, Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional de Pernambuco conversa sobre o empréstimo de R$ 1,5 bi para obras. O programa também conta com a participação de Eliane Cantanhêde, repercutindo as fraudes do INSS e a demissão (ou não) do Ministro da Previdência Social, Carlos Lupi.
Quando falamos de imposto de renda, muitas pessoas já ficam com medo de cair na malha fina do leão. Não é à toa que muitos brasileiros demoram a entregar a declaração do IR e muitas vezes acabam deixando o prazo passar.Em 2025, é importante considerar as mudanças do IR e fazer a declaração do jeito certo para não pagar mais impostos e até mesmo conseguir as restituições devidas, evitando a malha fina e qualquer outra complicação com a Receita Federal.Mas como fazer isso? O que é preciso saber para não ter problemas com o IR? Na continuação deste bate-papo especial, Richard e Reinaldo Domingos trazem o passo a passo para fazer a declaração do jeito certo e não ficar com nenhuma pendência na Receita.Veja agora mesmo o que eles revelaram e descubra tudo que você precisa sobre o imposto de renda para nunca mais ter medo do leão!Para tudo sobre contabilidade, acompanhe a Confirp nas redes sociais: @confirpcontabilidadeConheça a DFLIX, o primeiro streaming de Educação Financeira do Brasil: https://dflix.com.br/
Confira mais um episódio do PFC Debate. Falamos de todos os assuntos possíveis, sobre corrida ou não, de um jeito que você não vai acreditar.SEJA MEMBRO DO CANAL!!!200 Debates; Sabor do gel; Fortalecimento; Melhor amador e melhor amadora; Cair em prova.Tem isso e muito mais no cardápio variado com tudo que o PFC Debate sempre oferece. Escute, informe-se e divirta-se.Lista de casamento Enio e AndressaCompre o livro da CamilaSiga quem faz o PFC Debate: Enio, Gigi, Marcos, Camila, Duda, Ana e Thainara.SEJA MEMBRO DO CANAL NO YOUTUBEUse nossos cupons de desconto:KEEP RUNNING BRASIL - PFCCARAMELO - PFC10MARATONA DE FLORIPA - PFC10FOCO RADICAL - PFC10SPORTBR - PFC10CLUBE DE AUTORES - PFC10LIVE! RUN XP - PFC15MARATONA MONUMENTAL DE BRASÍLIA - PFC10CORRIDA INTEGRAÇÃO - PFC10
Este é só um trecho da aula completa da música "Smooth", com Santana & Rob Thomas, que você encontra aqui no podcast "Aprenda Inglês com Música". Use a lupa do podcast para encontrar a aula completa para ouvir ;) Quer dar aquele up no seu inglês com a Teacher Milena ?
As maiores notícias de tecnologia do dia estão aqui no Hoje no TecMundo! Falamos sobre o caso grave envolvendo o ChatGPT e conversas de teor sexual com menores, um golpe bilionário que usa o INSS como isca, o tarifaço de Trump afetando o Amazon Prime Day, o lançamento dos satélites da Amazon para competir com a Starlink e a reentrada de uma nave soviética após 53 anos no espaço!
O mês de abril se aproxima do fim, e o chamado “Efeito Maio” já é discutido por vários pecuaristas. Esse fenômeno acontece, normalmente, na virada do mês, quando vários produtores se sentem obrigados a vender seus animais por falta de pasto, e a ação em manada joga as cotações para baixo. Em 2025, no entanto, o cenário parece ser diferente.
O recuo dos ataques de Trump ao presidente do banco central dos EUA e uma possibilidade de baixar as tarifas à China alavancaram as bolsas pelo mundo no dia de hoje. Confira no #MinutoB3 os impactos do clima mais ameno no cenário mundial#Ibovespa #Trump #dólarEste conteúdo foi gerado por inteligência artificial
Send me feedback!Vic Kaplan joins me to discuss his candidacy for NJ Governor.Vic Kaplan has worked in a variety of services, ranging from translation to sales. He was the second-best Libertarian vote-getter in the 2024 congressional races and was endorsed by CAIR for his staunch peace stance. Mr. Kaplan is currently serving as VP of Membership for the NJ Libertarian Party.SUPPORT THE SHOWLocals for $5/monthRumble Rants: Click green dollar sign during the showRumble Subscription: Click subscribe $5/monthHOW AM I DOING?Email: libertydadpod@gmail.comSHOW NOTESCampaign SiteX (formerly Twitter) FacebookWait Song: Smoke RisingMusic by: CreatorMix.comVideo
A Apple está de olho em anúncios, a Meta não quer a IA da Apple, e o vibe coding está chegando a Cupertino.
A Apple está de olho em anúncios, a Meta não quer a IA da Apple, e o vibe coding está chegando a Cupertino.
Bom dia! Vamos para mais uma #MensagemDoDiaA Escritura de hoje está em (Atos 16:25–26, NVI) "Por volta da meia-noite, Paulo e Silas estavam orando e cantando hinos a Deus; os outros presos os escutavam. De repente, houve um terremoto tão violento que os alicerces da prisão foram abalados. Imediatamente, todas as portas se abriram, e as correntes de todos se soltaram."Correntes cairãoEm Atos 16, Paulo e Silas estavam nas ruas de Filipos anunciando o evangelho. Mesmo sem cometerem crime algum, foram falsamente acusados, espancados e lançados na prisão. Eles tinham todos os motivos para estarem frustrados, amargurados ou desanimados. Mas, em vez disso, escolheram fazer algo incomum: por volta da meia-noite, começaram a orar e louvar a Deus, e todos os prisioneiros os ouviam.Provavelmente os outros presos pensaram: "Esses dois são diferentes. Acabaram de ser maltratados, mas ainda estão louvando?" Foi nesse momento que Deus interveio de forma sobrenatural: um terremoto sacudiu os alicerces da prisão, as portas se abriram e as correntes de todos caíram.Uma atitude incomum levou a um milagre incomum.Talvez você esteja enfrentando dias difíceis, injustiças ou decepções. Em vez de se entregar à tristeza ou ao ressentimento, escolha fazer como Paulo e Silas: louve a Deus mesmo no meio da escuridão. O louvor abre portas, quebra correntes e prepara o caminho para reviravoltas extraordinárias.Vamos fazer uma oraçãoPai, obrigado porque Tu és digno de todo o meu louvor, mesmo nas circunstâncias mais difíceis. Obrigado porque és meu defensor e nada foge ao Teu controle. Eu escolho Te louvar, crendo que o Teu poder é capaz de abrir portas e quebrar correntes. Em nome de Jesus, Amém.
JD Vance deixa cair troféu da equipa campeã universitária de futebol americanod76d127e-1
No podcast ‘Notícia No Seu Tempo’, confira em áudio as principais notícias da edição impressa do jornal ‘O Estado de S.Paulo’ desta terça-feira (08/04/2025): O presidente Donald Trump ameaçou impor tarifas ainda mais altas a produtos da China após retaliação do governo chinês à taxação de 34% imposta pelos EUA. A disputa entre as duas maiores economias do mundo novamente abalou as Bolsas. No Brasil, o Ibovespa caiu 1,31%, aos 125,5 mil pontos – segundo operadores, os negócios também foram afetados pelo desempenho das ações da Petrobras. O dólar teve alta de 1,30% e foi a R$ 5,91. No exterior, o mercado acionário foi fortemente afetado, em especial na Ásia e na Europa. O temor dos investidores é de que o tarifaço de Trump leve a uma recessão global, com efeitos que também poderiam chegar ao Brasil. Em entrevista no fim do dia na Casa Branca, Trump rechaçou a hipótese de recuo em sua estratégia e indicou que parte das medidas pode se tornar permanente. E mais: Política: Decretos de Lula ampliam poder e ganhos de organização internacional com R$ 710 milhões em contratos Metrópole: Quase 11 milhões no Brasil usam apostas de forma perigosa Internacional: EUA e Irã devem negociar acordo nuclear pela 1ª vez em 10 anos Caderno 2: 600 obras de Andy Warhol em São PauloSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
O mercado dos doces gourmet é um campo minado para quem procura guloseimas saudáveis. Não basta ser sem açúcar, a moda atual são os produtos “sem poliois”.Mas o que será que entra nessas receitas quando saem o açúcar e os poliois?Voltadas a um público que está disposto a pagar mais para evitar os danos do açúcar, muitas marcas exploram a ingenuidade do consumidor.Os absurdos vão desde o uso de ingredientes proibidos até as alegações de baixo impacto glicêmico — algo que frequentemente não é verdade e pode colocar em risco a saúde dos diabéticos.Para evitar que você caia nessas falsas promessas, a Sari investigou a fundo os ingredientes e as tabelas nutricionais dos produtos Haoma e Moon Milk, duas marcas que se apresentam como saudáveis e livres de açúcar — agora também “sem poliois!” —, mas não passam de uma enganação.Neste episódio listamos 5 bons motivos para você pensar duas vezes antes de comprar produtos como Haoma ou Moon Sugar.Links relacionados:Para ler os comentários no post no instagramA farsa dos doces gourmetDoce ilusãoSucraloseGuia de adoçantesEstamos no Instagram: Dr. Souto - Sari Fontana Para ser avisado sobre cada novo episódio e receber os links das matérias mencionadas e as referências bibliográficas por e-mail, cadastre-se gratuitamente em https://drsouto.com.br/podcastAdquira seu livro - UMA DIETA ALÉM DA MODA: Amazon (também na versão Kindle)"Dance of the Sugar Plum Fairy"Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Veja o Desafio dos 100k ao Milhão com o Felipe Martorano: https://lvnt.app/84yha727/03 - POMO4 -5%, Vai Parar de Cair?Olá, seja bem-vindo a mais um Fechamento de Mercado, comigo Flávio Conde e Victor Sartori, que falará de FIIs, hoje é 5ª. feira, dia 27 de março, e o programa de hoje é dedicado ao Joanílson, Quem está mentindo 22 horas, Mezali, William e Augsto Eng.O Ibovespa subiu 0,47%, aos 133.148 pontos, com volume apenas razoável de R$ 21 bi versus média de R$ 25 bi das quintas.1º. Por que o mercado performou assim?O Ibovespa oscilou o dia inteiro no campo positivo batendo 133,7 mil, no máximo do dia, às 15h, tendo sido o mínimo de 132,5 mil, às 10h10, para fechar aos 133.148 pontos e fechou pela primeira vez acima dos 133 mil desde o pregão de 2 de outubro de 2024, quando subiu 0,77% e terminou com 133.514,94 pontos. E lá se vão quase seis meses.2º. O dólar comercial oscilou nesta quinta-feira, mas a tendência foi sempre de alta, para fechar com mais 0,34%, a R$ 5,752. É a segunda alta seguida.3º. Já os juros caíram, mas foi mais nos juros futuros de curto prazo, 2025-27, recuando e de longo prazo caindo menos. Os juros dos títulos do Tesouro Prefixado 2032 recuaram de 15,07% e fecharam a 15,04% a.a. Porém, ainda acima dos 15% que mostra insegurança com o longo prazo. Já o IPCA+ 2029 manteve-se em 7,91% a.a., o maior nível em 90 dias, muito próximo dos 8% a.a. da época da votação do impeachment de Dilma, em 2016.4º. As bolsas americanas caíram pelo segundo dia de fortes altas, segunda e terça, com Dow Jones -0,37% e Nasdaq -0,53% com investidores temendo que o impacto de tarifas mais altas de importação, a partir, de 2 de abril, principalmente, das fabricantes de automóveis que caíram entre -3% e -8% hoje com a tarifa de 25% para carros e caminhões estrangeiros bem como para autopeças. 5º. Na B3, 9 ações subiram entre as 15 mais negociadas com destaques para: 6º. Seis ações caindo entre as 15 mais negociadas com destaques para: 7º. As 5 maiores altas da B3: JBSS3 +5.83% R$ 41,95, HAPV3 +5.38% R$ 2,35, COGN3 +5.15% R$ 2,04, YDUQ3 +4.93% R$ 12,14, BEEF3 +4.84% R$ 6,07Papéis da Cogna (COGN3) também operaram no campo positivo do índice e avançaram 5,15%. Em relatório, o Bradesco BBI destacou, após encontro com executivos da empresa de educação, que a receita e o lucro antes de juros, impostos, depreciação e amortização (Ebitda) da companhia devem crescer dois dígitos em 2025.Diante das boas perspectivas, o banco elevou o preço-alvo para a ação da Cogna de R$ 2,50 para R$ 3,10. O banco também elevou a estimativa de lucro líquido para 2025 em 36% para R$ 454 milhões (38% acima do consenso).8º . As 5 maiores baixas da B3: POMO4 -4.98% R$ 6,68, CVCB3 -2.58% R$ 2,27, VAMO3 -2.28% R$ 5,15, IRBR3 -2.0% R$ 51,57, CPFE3 -1.61% R$ 37,80
O Bate-Pronto de hoje atualizará as informações envolvendo a troca no comando técnico da Seleção Brasileira e projetará a grande final do Paulistão. Corinthians e Palmeiras decidem hoje, em Itaquera, quem será o campeão estadual de 2025. No jogo de ida, no Allianz Parque, o Timão venceu por 1 a 0. O programa também debaterá as principais informações do futebol mundial.
00:00 Introdução00:25 Popularidade do Governo Derrete00:40 Efeitos Colaterais do Rombo nas Contas Públicas02:10 Mercado Financeiro Dê Olho nas Eleições em 202602:52 Déficit Primário03:49 Déficit Nominal04:55 Dívida Pública05:18 IPCA (Inflação)06:56 Taxa de Juros (Selic)07:22 Fundos de Investimentos08:18 Investimentos dos Brasileiros10:20 Por Que a Bolsa de Valores Pode Explodir13:30 Conclusão
Passagens Complementares:Provérbios 16, 18Mateus 26, 41Romanos 11, 20Filipenses 2, 12
00:00 Novas Regras do Imposto de Renda00:39 Isenção de Imposto de Renda 02:17 Rombo nas Contas Públicas02:44 Novo Imposto sobre Ricos05:38 Como Calcular o Novo Imposto 06:14 Investimentos que Continuam Isentos06:58 Quantos Brasileiros Vão Pagar o Novo Imposto07:36 Os Ricos Vão Embora do Brasil09:54 Conclusão
Acho ótimo que alguns analistas estejam começando a bater nisso lá fora... não, Trump não é um "asset" russo. Trump pode ter mil defeitos, pode estar defendendo causas desconhecidas de nós até agora... mas não é um asset russo. Cair no jogo dos "de sempre" é um erro que não se pode cometer. === Pois é! Saiu a primeira versão impressa de um dos nossos e-books! o/ O “Manual do Guerrilheiro Anti-Woke”, agora se chama “O Que É a Cultura Woke e Como Combatê-la”! Você pode comprar um exemplar nos seguintes locais: Livraria PH Vox: https://livrariaphvox.com.br/o-que-e-a-cultura-woke-e-como-combate-la Amazon: https://www.amazon.com.br/que-cultura-Woke-como-combat%C3%AA/dp/6585676106/ Mercado Livre: https://produto.mercadolivre.com.br/MLB-5094839498-o-que-e-a-cultura-woke-e-como-combat-la-_JM === Contribua pelo Pix Silikast: 1f28519c-9458-46ad-b5bb-429fb366229e
O IBGE liberou os dados sobre a inflação brasileira no dia de hoje. O IPCA atingiu valores históricos no últimos mês, algo que não se via há mais de 2 décadas, o que mostra como o poder de compra da nossa moeda está se deteriorando cada vez mais. Mas quem é o violão da destruição do real? Será que o salário mínimo tem acompanhado a inflação para que o trabalhador brasileiro mantenha seu poder de compra?
O Art Talks é o canal do Arteref.com. Aqui falamos sobre assuntos relacionados ao mercado de arte. Neste programa de perguntas e respostas, falamos de 5 questões: As NFTs tiveram algum tipo de impacto no mercado de arte? Como cair no gosto de críticos, galerias, colecionadores de arte? O Marchand escolhe a obra ou o artista? Como monto meu curriculum de artista pra enviar para as galerias? Qual a diferença entre um portfólio e um site? ⤵ ️ Deixe o seu comentário abaixo dizendo o que você achou deste vídeo!
Passagens Complementares:Mateus 26, 411 Coríntios 10, 13Tiago 1, 13-14
Palestinians point to Israel's retention of 600+ bodies after Trump's remark "Palestinians are pushing back against US President Donald Trump's fiery demand that Hamas return Israeli captives and bodies of those killed, reminding him that Israel has long been keeping hundreds of bodies of Palestinians. According to multiple media sources, Israel is holding 665 bodies, including those of 59 children. Israeli officials say they keep Palestinian bodies as leverage — to deter attacks, to trade in future negotiations. Palestinians and human rights groups call it something else — collective punishment." Ukraine, US to hold talks next week to end war "President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he would travel to Saudi Arabia and his team would stay on to hold talks with US officials about ending the war between Ukraine and Russia. The talks follow a letter from Zelenskyy to US President Donald Trump. "There was an apology, there was an acknowledgment that the United States has done so much for the country of Ukraine, and a sense of gratitude,"" US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff told reporters in describing the tone of Zelenskyy's letter." EU leaders agree to boost defence following decades of hesitation "European Union leaders have committed to a massive step in defence cooperation following decades of hesitation. The 27 leaders signed off on a move on Thursday to loosen budget restrictions so willing EU countries can increase military spending. They also urged the European Commission, the EU's executive branch, to explore new ways to facilitate significant defence spending in all member states, a statement said." CAIR urges Muslim immigrants not to leave US ahead of potential Trump ban "The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) warned regular immigrants in the US not to travel overseas this month ahead of potential President Donald Trump's Muslim travel ban. CAIR Government Affairs Director said they do not know ""for sure"" whether the administration will issue a new ban or which countries would be targeted. CAIR encourages the Trump administration to reconsider any plans to impose any new total travel bans on Muslim-majority countries under the guise of protecting national security, the official said." Turkish researcher to study women astronauts' health on all-female spaceflight "Begum Aydogan Mathyk, an obstetrics and gynecology researcher at the University of South Florida, will investigate the health of an all-women flight team scheduled for 2026. Underlining the lack of studies on women's health in space, she pointed out that while animal reproduction studies have been conducted in space, her approach is different. Mathyk highlighted the importance of moving women's health studies from Earth to space, as the long-term effects of space on women astronauts' reproductive health and hormonal systems remain unknown."
Sousa Tavares critica a forma com o PM geriu a crise política, recusando assumir erros no caso da empresa familiar: "só empurrado" deu algumas explicações. O cronista considera, no entanto, que ainda há tempo de evitar novas eleições e uma "guerra de egos" que "os portugueses não entendem" desde que alguém (Montenegro ou Pedro Nuno Santos) dê um passo atrás. Entende ainda que o PR pode ter um papel nesse sentido, mas "já devia ter tentado intervir". Falamos ainda da "cilada" de Trump que Zelensky "avaliou mal".See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Foguetão da SpaceX explode e pela segunda vez voltam a cair detritos do céu8803ed99-54fb-
João Ferreira (PCP) acusa o PS de "taticismo político". Pinotes Batista (PS) invoca a estabilidade para justificar o voto contra. Paulo Núncio (CDS) considera irresponsável deitar o Governo abaixo.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A apresentação de uma moção de censura ao governo por parte do PCP tem o chumbo garantido com o voto contra do PS e do PSD e é a razão invocada pelo governo para recuar na ideia de apresentar uma moção de confiança. A crise acaba aqui ou pode evoluir para uma CPI ou uma moção de censura apresentada pelo PS. Neste episódio extra, conversamos com Pedro Marques Lopes e Pedro Siza Vieira.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Técnicos do Ibama recomendam rejeição de licença para pesquisar petróleo na Foz do Amazonas. E Moraes reage a governo Trump e diz que Brasil deixou de ser colônia em 1822.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Nem mesmo mudança na Secom ajudou o petista a melhorar sua aprovação junto ao eleitorado.Meio Dia em Brasília traz as principais notícias e análises da política nacional direto de Brasília. Com apresentação de José Inácio Pilar e Wilson Lima, o programa aborda os temas mais quentes do cenário político e econômico do Brasil. Com um olhar atento sobre política, notícias e economia, mantém o público bem informado. Transmissão ao vivo de segunda a sexta-feira às 12h. Inscreva-se no canal e ative o sininho para receber as notificações e não perder nenhum programa! Siga O Antagonista no X, nos ajude a chegar nos 2 milhões de seguidores! https://x.com/o_antagonista Acompanhe O Antagonista no canal do WhatsApp. Boletins diários, conteúdos exclusivos em vídeo e muito mais. https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va2S... Ouça O Antagonista | Crusoé quando quiser nos principais aplicativos de podcast. Leia mais em www.oantagonista.com.br | www.crusoe.com.br
Hamas announces halt in talks until Israel frees Palestinian prisoners "Hamas leader Mahmoud Mardawi announced the resistance group would halt negotiations with Israel until Palestinian prisoners held by Tel Aviv are released. The decision comes after Israel cancelled freeing of 620 Palestinian prisoners, initially set for Saturday. The United States backed Israel's decision. Separately, Israel has heightened its military readiness near Gaza, while President Donald Trump reaffirmed support for Israel's war on enclave." Germany's Christian political alliance declares election victory "Germany's opposition leader, Friedrich Merz, declared victory as projections showed his Christian conservative political alliance securing 28.5 percent of the vote, surging past rivals. Merz urged swift coalition talks to restore Germany's leadership. Chancellor Olaf Scholz's Social Democratic Party SPD, suffered a historic defeat at 16.5 percent, while the far-right Alternative for Germany AfD, soared to 20.6 percent. Coalition negotiations remain uncertain, with smaller parties struggling to meet the 5 percent threshold. Voter turnout hit a record high of 84 percent." US pushes for Ukraine-Russia peace deal based on Istanbul pact "The US says it is ""very close"" to brokering a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, modeled after the Istanbul Protocol Agreement, says Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff. Speaking to CNN, he stressed that the war was ""provoked"" and must end. Meanwhile, Ukraine has resisted US pressure to withdraw its European-backed UN resolution demanding Russia's withdrawal, according to officials, setting the stage for a high-stakes vote on Monday." CAIR condemn Musk's claim that US Muslim aid groups are terrorists "The Council on American-Islamic Relations CAIR has condemned Elon Musk for amplifying claims that US Muslim aid groups receiving USAID funds are “terrorist organisations.” CAIR warns that such rhetoric fuels Islamophobia and puts Muslim Americans at risk. Musk's post targeted over a dozen nonprofits, including Islamic Relief and Palestine Children's Relief Fund. ""Anyone who sees the word 'Islam' in the name of an American charity and then immediately declares that the charity must be a 'terrorist organisation' is a hateful person,"" CAIR said." Thousands gather in Beirut to mourn Hezbollah leaders killed by Israel "People gathered in Beirut to mourn the late Hezbollah leaders, Hassan Nasrallah and Hashem Safieddine. Hezbollah's Naim Qassem condemned Israel for breaching a ceasefire deal and stressed the group's readiness to defend Lebanon. The funeral comes after a fragile ceasefire, marking the end of intense clashes between Israel and Hezbollah. Despite Israel's delayed withdrawal, Qassem vowed that neither Israel nor the US would pressure Lebanon into submission. The fallen leaders were assassinated in September and October of 2024."
Nesta segunda parte da conversa em podcast, a radialista, autora e apresentadora Ana Markl fala de como lida com a síndrome do impostor, e de como aprendeu com a terapeuta que esse sentimento até pode ser um aliado para não se deixar levar pela fogueira das vaidades. E revela aqui os desafios da perimenopausa, algo que não esperava tão cedo, e como pode ser libertadora. Conta ainda de como a maternidade a levou à terapia há 5 anos, um lugar de escuta e autoanálise que passou a ser para si fundamental. Ana fala ainda de como a sexualidade pode melhorar com a idade e ainda nos dá música e lê um excerto do livro “Outra Autobiografia”, de Rita Lee. Boas escutas!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Sporting não tem mesmo um dia de folga, Porto na Liga Europa e Volta ao Algarve.
Arnaldo Ribeiro, Danilo Lavieri, Eduardo Tironi, Juca Kfouri e Mauro Cezar debatem o empate do São Paulo contra o Velo Clube e a vitória do Corinthians contra o Santos de Neymar.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
On Tuesday's Mark Levin Show, President Trump has come into office and wants to slash the government and control the bureaucracy. But the swamp doesn't allow the people's will to take hold. We have a massive federal government, and it grows and grows. The judiciary has become an arm of a massive, centralized government, protecting its interests against Trump. Judge Loren AliKhan, a Biden appointed Judge, temporarily blocked Trump's plan to pause federal aid spending. AliKhan is an extremist leftist who thinks she can decide what the President can do or not. Also, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Defense Department Inspector General to investigate Gen Mark Milley's actions to “undermine the chain of command” during Trump's first term, which could result in Milley being demoted and stripped of a star. He's also pulling his security detail and clearance immediately. Later, the Senate Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, just delivered for the Hamas front group CAIR and worldwide terrorism and prevented a majority vote on sanctioning the American-hating, Israel/Jew-hating ICC, which is led by Marxist-Islamists. The Democrat Party has crossed a redline from which it can never recover. Afterward, Caroline Kennedy calls her cousin, RFK Jr., a 'predator' before his HHS hearing. Predator? Perhaps Caroline is confusing RFK with Uncle Teddy. Now, there was a predator. They hate RFK Jr. because he campaigned for Trump. Finally, Professor Sadegh Zibakalam is a very brave man. He gave us an inside look at the Iranian people, who are rooting for Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump. He was indicted by Iran for saying that young Iranians are praising Netanyahu as a hero. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Our guest today, Amena Bakali of @hassansonholiday, is an award-winning travel educator, consultant, and travel blogger. Hear her expert tips on how to plan your next 'Umrah to get spiritually uplifted without going financially bankrupt.If that isn't a hook, hear a real-life example of 'Umrah for a family of 4 for $500 in flights...TOTAL. That's right! Learn the mindset shift and strategy for 'Umrah on points, and stay for insider tea on how to get the best out of your pilgrimage, with or without kids.Tune in at 6pm EST on Apple podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or head to our website to listen right now. Our links to this episode are on the website under the Podcast tab. Share this episode with family members or friends with 'Umrah dreams and staycation budgets so they can learn how to make pilgrimage more accessible and affordable.Links:Hassan on Holiday WebsiteAmena on InstagramFor a free online course on discount travel points (They don't pay us!)Podcasts for travel points a. https://pointmetofirstclass.com/podcast (Neither does she!) b. https://10xtravel.com/podcast/ c. https://frequentmiler.com/frequent-miler-on-the-air/ (Neither do they!) 5. Report an incident to CAIR 6. The FYI Bullying Toolkit 7. Purchase QuadM tickets today! Or head to @quadmshops on IGDid you know you can send us a text? Feedback, questions, or recommendations welcomed!Support the show1. Web: www.mommyingwhilemuslim.com2. Email: salam@mommyingwhilemuslim.com3. FB: Mommying While Muslim page and Mommyingwhilemuslim group4. IG: @mommyingwhilemuslimpodcast5. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrrdKxpBdBO4ZLwB1kTmz1w