Podcasts about supreme court confirmation hearings

Alison Fragale reveals the keys to improving others' perceptions of you. — YOU'LL LEARN — 1) The critical missing piece for your advancement 2) Why your response to “How are you?” matters more than you think 3) The quickest way to get others to promote you Subscribe or visit AwesomeAtYourJob.com/ep988 for clickable versions of the links below. — ABOUT ALISON — Alison Fragale is the author of LIKEABLE BADASS: How Women Get the Success They Deserve and the Mary Farley Ames Lee Distinguished Scholar of Organizational Behavior at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Kenan-Flagler Business School. As a research psychologist, award-winning professor, international keynote speaker, and author, she is on a mission to help others — especially women — use behavioral science to work and live better. Her scholarship has been published in the most prestigious academic journals in her field and featured in prominent media outlets such as The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Financial Times, Boston Globe, and Inc. She lives in Chicago with her husband and three children, who are all named after professional athletes.• Book: Likeable Badass: How Women Get the Success They Deserve • Newsletter: The Upper Hand • Website: AlisonFragale.com — RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THE SHOW — • Study: “Gender, Race, and Interruptions at Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings” by Christina L. Boyd, Paul M. Collins Jr., and Lori A. Ringhand • Book: Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World by Cal Newport — THANK YOU SPONSORS! — • Jenni Kayne. Use the code AWESOME15 to get 15% off your order!• LinkedIn Jobs. Post your job for free at LinkedIn.com/BeAwesome• Hello Bello. Get 30% off your first customizable bundle with HelloBello.com/awesomeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Postscript invites authors to react to contemporary political events that engage their scholarship. Since the Supreme Court is wrapping up their term, three political scientists and one law professor joined Susan to talk about the power of the Federalist Society in shaping the courts (and how lawyers might strategically use political science research to get more progressive outcomes), how race, ethnicity, and gender issues have affected the construction of the U.S. Supreme Court over time, and a very lively discussion of this term's Supreme Court decisions – and also actions outside the Court like Chief Justice Roberts refusing to appear before Congress. Dr. Christine C. Bird, JD, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Oklahoma State University and the Director of the Bird Law and Public Policy Lab (LAPP). Her research examines elite interests' influence on public policymaking in the judicial system.  Dr. Zachary McGee, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Kenyon College focusing on American political institutions with an emphasis on Congress, political parties, interest groups, and the policy process. Christine and Zach recently co-wrote “Looking Forward: Interest Group Legal Strategy and Federalist Society Affiliation in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal,” for Polity's symposium on the Supreme Court as well as “Going Nuclear: Federalist Society Affiliated Judicial Nominees' Prospects and a New Era of Confirmation Politics” for American Politics Research (2023).  Dr. Paul Collins, PhD is Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His research focuses on understanding bias and inequality in the legal system, the selection and work of judges, and social movement litigation.  Dr. Lori A. Ringhand is the J. Alton Hosch Professor of Law at the University of Georgia College of Law. Her work on the confirmation process has been cited in major national and international media outlets. Paul and Lori previously published Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (Cambridge University Press) and they also contributed an article to the Polity Symposium entitled “Constructing the Supreme Court: How Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Have Affected Presidential Selection and Senate Confirmation Hearings.” Their co-authors Christina L. Boyd and Karson A. Pennington were unable to join us. Zac mentions Susan's article in the Polity symposium, The Politics of Law: Capricious Originalism and the Future of the Supreme Court. Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Postscript invites authors to react to contemporary political events that engage their scholarship. Since the Supreme Court is wrapping up their term, three political scientists and one law professor joined Susan to talk about the power of the Federalist Society in shaping the courts (and how lawyers might strategically use political science research to get more progressive outcomes), how race, ethnicity, and gender issues have affected the construction of the U.S. Supreme Court over time, and a very lively discussion of this term's Supreme Court decisions – and also actions outside the Court like Chief Justice Roberts refusing to appear before Congress. Dr. Christine C. Bird, JD, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Oklahoma State University and the Director of the Bird Law and Public Policy Lab (LAPP). Her research examines elite interests' influence on public policymaking in the judicial system.  Dr. Zachary McGee, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Kenyon College focusing on American political institutions with an emphasis on Congress, political parties, interest groups, and the policy process. Christine and Zach recently co-wrote “Looking Forward: Interest Group Legal Strategy and Federalist Society Affiliation in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal,” for Polity's symposium on the Supreme Court as well as “Going Nuclear: Federalist Society Affiliated Judicial Nominees' Prospects and a New Era of Confirmation Politics” for American Politics Research (2023).  Dr. Paul Collins, PhD is Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His research focuses on understanding bias and inequality in the legal system, the selection and work of judges, and social movement litigation.  Dr. Lori A. Ringhand is the J. Alton Hosch Professor of Law at the University of Georgia College of Law. Her work on the confirmation process has been cited in major national and international media outlets. Paul and Lori previously published Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (Cambridge University Press) and they also contributed an article to the Polity Symposium entitled “Constructing the Supreme Court: How Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Have Affected Presidential Selection and Senate Confirmation Hearings.” Their co-authors Christina L. Boyd and Karson A. Pennington were unable to join us. Zac mentions Susan's article in the Polity symposium, The Politics of Law: Capricious Originalism and the Future of the Supreme Court. Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/public-policy

Postscript invites authors to react to contemporary political events that engage their scholarship. Since the Supreme Court is wrapping up their term, three political scientists and one law professor joined Susan to talk about the power of the Federalist Society in shaping the courts (and how lawyers might strategically use political science research to get more progressive outcomes), how race, ethnicity, and gender issues have affected the construction of the U.S. Supreme Court over time, and a very lively discussion of this term's Supreme Court decisions – and also actions outside the Court like Chief Justice Roberts refusing to appear before Congress. Dr. Christine C. Bird, JD, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Oklahoma State University and the Director of the Bird Law and Public Policy Lab (LAPP). Her research examines elite interests' influence on public policymaking in the judicial system.  Dr. Zachary McGee, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Kenyon College focusing on American political institutions with an emphasis on Congress, political parties, interest groups, and the policy process. Christine and Zach recently co-wrote “Looking Forward: Interest Group Legal Strategy and Federalist Society Affiliation in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal,” for Polity's symposium on the Supreme Court as well as “Going Nuclear: Federalist Society Affiliated Judicial Nominees' Prospects and a New Era of Confirmation Politics” for American Politics Research (2023).  Dr. Paul Collins, PhD is Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His research focuses on understanding bias and inequality in the legal system, the selection and work of judges, and social movement litigation.  Dr. Lori A. Ringhand is the J. Alton Hosch Professor of Law at the University of Georgia College of Law. Her work on the confirmation process has been cited in major national and international media outlets. Paul and Lori previously published Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (Cambridge University Press) and they also contributed an article to the Polity Symposium entitled “Constructing the Supreme Court: How Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Have Affected Presidential Selection and Senate Confirmation Hearings.” Their co-authors Christina L. Boyd and Karson A. Pennington were unable to join us. Zac mentions Susan's article in the Polity symposium, The Politics of Law: Capricious Originalism and the Future of the Supreme Court. Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/politics-and-polemics

Postscript invites authors to react to contemporary political events that engage their scholarship. Since the Supreme Court is wrapping up their term, three political scientists and one law professor joined Susan to talk about the power of the Federalist Society in shaping the courts (and how lawyers might strategically use political science research to get more progressive outcomes), how race, ethnicity, and gender issues have affected the construction of the U.S. Supreme Court over time, and a very lively discussion of this term's Supreme Court decisions – and also actions outside the Court like Chief Justice Roberts refusing to appear before Congress. Dr. Christine C. Bird, JD, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Oklahoma State University and the Director of the Bird Law and Public Policy Lab (LAPP). Her research examines elite interests' influence on public policymaking in the judicial system.  Dr. Zachary McGee, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Kenyon College focusing on American political institutions with an emphasis on Congress, political parties, interest groups, and the policy process. Christine and Zach recently co-wrote “Looking Forward: Interest Group Legal Strategy and Federalist Society Affiliation in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal,” for Polity's symposium on the Supreme Court as well as “Going Nuclear: Federalist Society Affiliated Judicial Nominees' Prospects and a New Era of Confirmation Politics” for American Politics Research (2023).  Dr. Paul Collins, PhD is Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His research focuses on understanding bias and inequality in the legal system, the selection and work of judges, and social movement litigation.  Dr. Lori A. Ringhand is the J. Alton Hosch Professor of Law at the University of Georgia College of Law. Her work on the confirmation process has been cited in major national and international media outlets. Paul and Lori previously published Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (Cambridge University Press) and they also contributed an article to the Polity Symposium entitled “Constructing the Supreme Court: How Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Have Affected Presidential Selection and Senate Confirmation Hearings.” Their co-authors Christina L. Boyd and Karson A. Pennington were unable to join us. Zac mentions Susan's article in the Polity symposium, The Politics of Law: Capricious Originalism and the Future of the Supreme Court. Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

Postscript invites authors to react to contemporary political events that engage their scholarship. Since the Supreme Court is wrapping up their term, three political scientists and one law professor joined Susan to talk about the power of the Federalist Society in shaping the courts (and how lawyers might strategically use political science research to get more progressive outcomes), how race, ethnicity, and gender issues have affected the construction of the U.S. Supreme Court over time, and a very lively discussion of this term's Supreme Court decisions – and also actions outside the Court like Chief Justice Roberts refusing to appear before Congress. Dr. Christine C. Bird, JD, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Oklahoma State University and the Director of the Bird Law and Public Policy Lab (LAPP). Her research examines elite interests' influence on public policymaking in the judicial system.  Dr. Zachary McGee, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Kenyon College focusing on American political institutions with an emphasis on Congress, political parties, interest groups, and the policy process. Christine and Zach recently co-wrote “Looking Forward: Interest Group Legal Strategy and Federalist Society Affiliation in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal,” for Polity's symposium on the Supreme Court as well as “Going Nuclear: Federalist Society Affiliated Judicial Nominees' Prospects and a New Era of Confirmation Politics” for American Politics Research (2023).  Dr. Paul Collins, PhD is Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His research focuses on understanding bias and inequality in the legal system, the selection and work of judges, and social movement litigation.  Dr. Lori A. Ringhand is the J. Alton Hosch Professor of Law at the University of Georgia College of Law. Her work on the confirmation process has been cited in major national and international media outlets. Paul and Lori previously published Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change (Cambridge University Press) and they also contributed an article to the Polity Symposium entitled “Constructing the Supreme Court: How Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Have Affected Presidential Selection and Senate Confirmation Hearings.” Their co-authors Christina L. Boyd and Karson A. Pennington were unable to join us. Zac mentions Susan's article in the Polity symposium, The Politics of Law: Capricious Originalism and the Future of the Supreme Court. Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week. a look back at 30 years of Supreme Court justice nominees being asked about their positions on abortion and Roe v. Wade. This topic is particularly noteworthy right now because the Supreme Court recently heard an oral argument about a Mississippi law that is a direct challenge to the Court's 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, which established the legal right to abortion in the United States. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Matt's hair transitions from “'80s hair metal” to “'90s skate punk” ... Matt: The right's “groomer” slur is over the line ... Is there a QAnon element behind Florida's controversial education law? ... Bill: Culture war conflicts in public schools are inevitable ... Have Supreme Court confirmation hearings permanently devolved into tit-for-tat recrimination? ... What's worse: summarily blocking judicial appointments or smearing judicial nominees? ... The fault lines revealed by a 6-3 Supreme Court ...

Matt's hair transitions from “'80s hair metal” to “'90s skate punk” ... Matt: The right's “groomer” slur is over the line ... Is there a QAnon element behind Florida's controversial education law? ... Bill: Culture war conflicts in public schools are inevitable ... Have Supreme Court confirmation hearings permanently devolved into tit-for-tat recrimination? ... What's worse: summarily blocking judicial appointments or smearing judicial nominees? ... The fault lines revealed by a 6-3 Supreme Court ...

We're a little late this week, but it's worth it, as we are able to report on a lengthy conversation that our (returning) guest, Dean Vik Amar of the University of Illinois School of Law, had with the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, just hours before our podcast taping.  He offered Vik and his students a truly inside look at the Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings just conducted, as well as his perspective on confirmations in general, and some truly surprising perspectives and possible ideas for reform - and now, our listeners have this early access to them.

Sarah and her dear father discuss Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson being questioned during confirmation hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee for appointment to the Supreme Court. Got any questions for Sarah? Email the show: sarahsloanshow@gmail.com --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

The Senate confirmation hearings for President Joe Biden's Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, have concluded. They were quite ugly at times, and it seemed like nobody changed their mind about Judge Jackson or their vote. So, was it always like this? At what point did they start getting less civil? Does today's version of a Supreme Court confirmation hearing serve any vital purpose, or is it just fodder for Senators' campaign videos? Dr. Susan Liebell, Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's University is on the podcast to answer our questions about the history and future of Supreme Court hearings in front of the Senate. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Last week, the Senate held confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. This episode of No Bull includes just the questions and answers regarding national security law. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Only in recent years have Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings become contentious. Justices Scalia, Kennedy, O'Connor, and Stevens all received 100% votes in favor of confirmation. Ruth Bader Ginsburg? 97% More recently, however, nominations have become much more contentious and partisan. Neil Gosuch (2017) received 55% and Brett Kavanaugh (2018) received just 51%. In 2020, Amy Coney Barrett received zero votes from Senate Democrats. In this episode, I discuss how corruption of the court, the move from Originalism to Living Constitutionalism, has made confirmations and our politics in general much more volatile and contentious. A text version of this podcast is available here.

Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court confirmation hearings have wrapped, and our hosts are here to break down the week on Capitol Hill. Jonah, David, and Andrew then turn to the latest developments in the war in Ukraine. Plus, what do the guys make of those Ginni Thomas texts to Mark Meadows? Or Trump dropping his endorsement of Mo Brooks in the Alabama Senate race? Show Notes:-TMD: “Biden, World Leaders Huddle on Russia”-The Dispatch: “Inside the First Ukrainian City to Fall to Russia”-Washington Post: “Virginia Thomas urged White House chief to pursue unrelenting efforts to overturn the 2020 election, texts show”

It's a Feelin' Alright Thursday. Coming up, we have Senator John Cornyn from Texas. He is on the special Judiciary committee that is questioning Katanji Brown Jackson. We will get his take on if she will get confirmed. Plus we will have Campus Reform.

In the first hour of "Connections with Evan Dawson" on Friday, March 25, 2022, former public defender Danielle Ponder discusses her reactions to the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Also, Australia and India look to cement ties in education sector

Dave and Jason debate feedback on the war in Ukraine, discuss the absolute Gong Show that is the Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings, talk to their younger selves and address the Undertaker going into the HoF. 

Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson - Talk Radio KRLD broadcasting in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex asked Rob Crain to come on the air and give his thoughts.

Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson - iHeart's Talk Radio KOGO broadcasting in San Diego asked Rob Crain to come on the air and give his thoughts.

Wednesday was the third day of Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, but senators spent much of their time rehashing familiar lines of questioning. Republicans doubled down on charges Jackson is "soft on crime." And Jackson, like most nominees since Ruth Bader Ginsburg, did not comment on any potential issues that could come before the court. In an era of deep polarization, are the hearings just for show?This episode: White House correspondent Asma Khalid, justice correspondent Carrie Johnson, and senior political editor and correspondent Domenico Montanaro. Connect:Email the show at nprpolitics@npr.orgJoin the NPR Politics Podcast Facebook Group.Subscribe to the NPR Politics Newsletter.Find and support your local public radio station.

This week, judge Ketanji Brown Jackson faced questions about her judicial record and views on race, gender and other key issues. Reset recaps the Supreme Court nomination hearings on the fourth and final day of the confirmation process. GUESTS: Steven Schwinn, professor at the University of Illinois Chicago Law School; co-editor of the Constitutional Law Prof Blog Judith Browne Dianis, civil rights attorney and executive director of the Advancement Project

Adam and Mark welcome returning guest and friend of the show Harmeet Dhillon to the show to discuss the recent developments in the cases of her prominent clients including former President Trump and Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe. They also review some of the answers given in the Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings of Ketanji Brown Jackson as they analyze the political theatre on both sides of the aisle. Watch this episode & subscribe on YouTube at YouTube.com/AdamCarolla Please Support Our Sponsors: Geico.com Cerebral.com/Doubt CutsClothing.com/Doubt UE.com/Fits - promo code: Doubt

It's Taco Tuesday. Coming up, the guy who killed Bin Laden, Rob O'Neill, talks about what is really happening in Ukraine. Also on the show, Ed McGinnis, former Assistant Secretary for the Office of Nuclear Energy. He will tell us what the real reason is for the spike in gas prices

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's hearing proves all that the sold-out GOP has left is performance art. When will Republican voters figure this out? With right wingers believing Biden is illegitimate, when will Republican voters wake up? People who consider themselves the victim are generally the perpetrators who victimize others. Clinical Professor, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science-George Washington University Dr. Justin A. Frank reveals what Putin will do when cornered. Geeky Science! Will rubies and sapphires be raining down on Earth?See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode I discuss the confirmation hearing of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and the role that race played in the hearing.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson appears almost certain to be headed towards Senate confirmation as soon as the next US Supreme Court justice. What does it say about America that she is taking heat for representing Guantánamo detainees? Ted is dismayed by Jackson stated acceptance of late Justice Antonin Scalia's radical-right originalist theory of constitutional interpretation. Scott and Ted debate major talking points surrounding America's involvement in the war between Russia and Ukraine. Finally, Scott comes out as the most sexually repugnant thing you can be in the age of libertinism: a prude. Christine Emba's new book "Rethinking Sex: A Provocation" is the starting point of the discussion about how younger women feel pressured to do things in bed that they really don't want to do.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson appears almost certain to be headed towards Senate confirmation as soon as the next US Supreme Court justice. What does it say about America that she is taking heat for representing Guantánamo detainees? Ted is dismayed by Jackson stated acceptance of late Justice Antonin Scalia's radical-right originalist theory of constitutional interpretation. Scott and Ted debate major talking points surrounding America's involvement in the war between Russia and Ukraine. Finally, Scott comes out as the most sexually repugnant thing you can be in the age of libertinism: a prude. Christine Emba's new book "Rethinking Sex: A Provocation" is the starting point of the discussion about how younger women feel pressured to do things in bed that they really don't want to do.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's first day of Supreme Court hearings has concluded, one of the main questions asked was Justice Jackson's stance on the Constitution. Does she interpret the Constitution as it was originally written or does she believe the Constitution is a "living" document. John Rothmann presents the same question to the listeners and takes their calls. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On her first day of Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson told senators that she "stands on the shoulders" of those who came before her and that she decides cases "from a neutral posture." While she has broad support from Democratic senators, Republicans are likely to press her on her record as a public defender when questioning begins Tuesday.This episode: Congressional correspondent Susan Davis, justice correspondent Carrie Johnson, and legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg. Connect:Email the show at nprpolitics@npr.orgJoin the NPR Politics Podcast Facebook Group.Subscribe to the NPR Politics Newsletter.Find and support your local public radio station.

Today marks the start of confirmation hearings for President Biden's first Supreme Court Justice nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. As Americans prepare for a historic set of hearings in light of Judge Jackson potentially becoming the first U.S. female African American Justice, Democrats and Republicans are both anticipating how the vetting process will play out for the current U.S. Circuit Judge. Tennesse Republican Senator and Judiciary Committee member Marsha Blackburn joins to discuss why she believes Jackson deserves a respectful, yet thorough Senate evaluation, thoughts on the current humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, and the ongoing battle Americans are facing with inflation.   As a former police detective, Mark Fuhrman knows crime. His true crime show, The Fuhrman Diaries is entering its seventh season, premiering tonight on FOX Nation. This season, audiences can expect episodes covering chilling stories such as Jonestown, the Son of Sam, and Bill Cosby. Fuhrman joins the Rundown to discuss his knowledge of Cosby's questionable reputation at the height of his fame, the cult of Jim Jones, and how the Onion Field case changed police tactics.   Plus, commentary from FOX News Contributor Joe Concha. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's a very special return episode: Natasha is back and it's her birthday! Head to our Instagram on March 22nd to wish Natasha a happy birthday.In this episode, Allegra gives an update on the Jen Shah trial, pending motions regarding Real Housewives of Salt Lake City and the Hulu Special, The Housewife & the Shah Shocker, and Stuart Smith's guilty plea.Natasha talks a bit about Supreme Court Justice nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson and what to expect during the confirmation hearings which begin this week.We've also added a new section "stupid legal headlines" and discuss a lawsuit for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress involving a surprise delivery of a chocolate phallus.  Please remember to follow us on Instagram @legally40ish

History on Capitol Hill as confirmation hearings begin for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court. She gave her opening statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee.  The questions from senators begin tomorrow. We go In Depth into the confirmation hearings for Judge Jackson.  Dr. Fauci is warning of an uptick in COVID cases soon but this warning isn't necessarily full of doom-and-gloom.  People with medical debt are getting a big break thanks to the major credit reporting agencies.   The war in Ukraine raging on. Russia targeting a shopping mall. Ukraine pushing back as its military is refusing to walk away from the port city of Mariupol.  More refugees are leaving Ukraine. We look into where they're going and if many plan to return home.  We head to the Russian occupied city of Kherson where Russian troops have apparently attacked protesters.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

History on Capitol Hill as confirmation hearings begin for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court. She gave her opening statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee. The questions from senators begin tomorrow. We go In Depth into the confirmation hearings for Judge Jackson. Dr. Fauci is warning of an uptick in COVID cases soon but this warning isn't necessarily full of doom-and-gloom. People with medical debt are getting a big break thanks to the major credit reporting agencies.  The war in Ukraine raging on. Russia targeting a shopping mall. Ukraine pushing back as its military is refusing to walk away from the port city of Mariupol. More refugees are leaving Ukraine. We look into where they're going and if many plan to return home. We head to the Russian occupied city of Kherson where Russian troops have apparently attacked protesters.  To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Today marks the start of confirmation hearings for President Biden's first Supreme Court Justice nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. As Americans prepare for a historic set of hearings in light of Judge Jackson potentially becoming the first U.S. female African American Justice, Democrats and Republicans are both anticipating how the vetting process will play out for the current U.S. Circuit Judge. Tennesse Republican Senator and Judiciary Committee member Marsha Blackburn joins to discuss why she believes Jackson deserves a respectful, yet thorough Senate evaluation, thoughts on the current humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, and the ongoing battle Americans are facing with inflation.   As a former police detective, Mark Fuhrman knows crime. His true crime show, The Fuhrman Diaries is entering its seventh season, premiering tonight on FOX Nation. This season, audiences can expect episodes covering chilling stories such as Jonestown, the Son of Sam, and Bill Cosby. Fuhrman joins the Rundown to discuss his knowledge of Cosby's questionable reputation at the height of his fame, the cult of Jim Jones, and how the Onion Field case changed police tactics.   Plus, commentary from FOX News Contributor Joe Concha. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today marks the start of confirmation hearings for President Biden's first Supreme Court Justice nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. As Americans prepare for a historic set of hearings in light of Judge Jackson potentially becoming the first U.S. female African American Justice, Democrats and Republicans are both anticipating how the vetting process will play out for the current U.S. Circuit Judge. Tennesse Republican Senator and Judiciary Committee member Marsha Blackburn joins to discuss why she believes Jackson deserves a respectful, yet thorough Senate evaluation, thoughts on the current humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, and the ongoing battle Americans are facing with inflation.   As a former police detective, Mark Fuhrman knows crime. His true crime show, The Fuhrman Diaries is entering its seventh season, premiering tonight on FOX Nation. This season, audiences can expect episodes covering chilling stories such as Jonestown, the Son of Sam, and Bill Cosby. Fuhrman joins the Rundown to discuss his knowledge of Cosby's questionable reputation at the height of his fame, the cult of Jim Jones, and how the Onion Field case changed police tactics.   Plus, commentary from FOX News Contributor Joe Concha. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week. a look back at 30 years of Supreme Court justice nominees being asked their positions on abortion and Roe v. Wade. This topic is particularly noteworthy right now because the Supreme Court recently heard oral argument about a Mississippi law that is a direct challenge to the Court's 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, which established the legal right to abortion in the United States. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This week (October 19, 2020): There’s so much news again this week, with Jonathan covering everything from the Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings, to the Presidential Town Halls, to the New Wave of Coronavirus Cases. Meanwhile, Denberg, frustrated with his place in the team, reaches what may be a point of no return. Finally, Archie and Mr. McNalley bond over a shared interest in the Findings of the FinCEN Files! NEW Episodes Every MONDAY!! Twitter ► https://twitter.com/RadioYNT TimeCodes: (TimeCodes are Coming Soon!!) -Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing -Supreme Court v The US Census -Record Breaking Early Voting -Town Halls -Stalling Stimulus -An Attack in France -The Murdoch Monopoly -Ad Break -Local News -The FinCEN Files ABOUT THE SHOW: Yesterday’s News Today is about a team of newsmen from the 1920’s who attempt to report the strange news of 2020. Each week, they struggle with telling just the facts while making an entertaining news show that will appease modern audiences and algorithms alike. Part heavily researched news // Part old-time radio drama Written and performed by: Roger J Thacher & Dennis Shanaberg With Caitlin Wolfe as Scarlett Murdoch And Additional Research by Amadis Lee Nieves

A political analysis of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings from earlier in the week, and a look back at Pres. Trump's rally at the Des Moines Airport.

Peter and Darian are back again with the next installment of the newscast for Dr. D's Social Network. This time we discuss the coming US Elections on November 3rd, Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings, Life on Venus? Driverless Ride Hailing Cars now in Operation and The Nikola Debacle.  https://thedonut.co/ Music Credit: Yung Kartz - Huh?!

Hear the best and most important moments from last week's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, including remarks from Senators Josh Hawley, Mike Lee, and Ben Sasse. The post Judge Barrett Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings: The Best and Most Important Moments appeared first on Nebraska Family Alliance.

This week, the Senate held confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. On our Extra, guest Jane Mayer of The New Yorker discussed how the hearings are part of a years-long effort spearheaded by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and donors to conservative causes to reshape the federal judiciary.

This week, the Senate held confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. On our Extra, guest Jane Mayer of The New Yorker discussed how the hearings are part of a years-long effort spearheaded by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and donors to conservative causes to reshape the federal judiciary.

Both Sides of the Aisle — Natalie Gochnour is joined on The Right by Sen. Dan McCay, R-Riverton, and on The Left by Emily Hase, Chair of the Salt Lake County Democratic Party. They discuss ballots arriving in mailboxes, Sen. Romney’s statement on Washington D.C.’s disfunction, Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s SCOTUS confirmation hearings in the Senate, President […]

In three days of confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, Democratic senators focused on portraying Barrett as an extreme conservative and Republicans touted her credentials. Barrett, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and former law professor, spoke with ease about the constitution, case precedent and her originalist legal philosophy. She avoided questions about her legal views on issues that may face the Supreme Court such as abortion rights, the legality of the affordable care act and whether she would recuse herself from deciding conflicts around the 2020 election. We’ll discuss the confirmation hearings and the Supreme Court’s decision this week allowing the Trump Administration to stop the 2020 census count early.

It's Humpday!!! Danielle D'Souza-Gil on her new book "The Choice," and Jeremy Dys from First Liberty on the questions Amy Coney Barrett is getting and more!!

The Supreme Court confirmation hearings for nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett continue into the fourth day today. The Senate Judiciary set an Oct. 22nd vote on Barrett nomination after rejecting the Democrats call for a delay. For the final day of the hearings, outside witnesses will testify and Senators will ask them questions to help them decide on their vote.  ‘Inside Sources with Boyd Matheson,’ Opinion Editor at Deseret News, takes you inside the latest political news and current events, providing higher ground for today's discussions. Listen live Monday through Thursday from 11 am to noon at 1160 AM and 102.7 FM, online at KSLNewsradio.com, or on the app. Listen on-demand as a podcast on your favorite platform or web browser. Follow us on Facebook and Instagram.  Want more Boyd? Don’t forget to listen to his Deseret News podcast ‘Therefore, What?,’ sign up for his weekly newsletter, and follow him on Twitter. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today is the third day of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett, this will be Barrett’s last day of questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee. A lot has been said about Judge Barrett’s conservative views, faith, and even her life as a mother, but this attorney and professor of law have shown herself to be competent in her understanding of the constitution, as her blank notepad suggested yesterday. ‘Inside Sources with Boyd Matheson,’ Opinion Editor at Deseret News, takes you inside the latest political news and current events, providing higher ground for today's discussions. Listen live Monday through Thursday from 11 am to noon at 1160 AM and 102.7 FM, online at KSLNewsradio.com, or on the app. Listen on-demand as a podcast on your favorite platform or web browser. Follow us on Facebook and Instagram.  Want more Boyd? Don’t forget to listen to his Deseret News podcast ‘Therefore, What?,’ sign up for his weekly newsletter, and follow him on Twitter. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It's Taco Tuesday!!! Huge Show! Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Sen. John Cornyn and Kim Komando.

Today is the second day of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett, the hearings are being heavily impacted by an election right around the corner and a more-than-ever polarized nation in the midst of a pandemic. Issues of court-packing, healthcare, and constitutional precedent are being raised amid the heated hearings. Boyd is here to provide perspective so our audience can make this news make sense.  ‘Inside Sources with Boyd Matheson,’ Opinion Editor at Deseret News, takes you inside the latest political news and current events, providing higher ground for today's discussions. Listen live Monday through Thursday from 11 am to noon at 1160 AM and 102.7 FM, online at KSLNewsradio.com, or on the app. Listen on-demand as a podcast on your favorite platform or web browser. Follow us on Facebook and Instagram.  Want more Boyd? Don’t forget to listen to his Deseret News podcast ‘Therefore, What?,’ sign up for his weekly newsletter, and follow him on Twitter. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ryan talks to Washington Post Supreme Court Reporter Robert Barnes about the confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

The US Senate Judiciary Committee has begun a confirmation hearing for President Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, in what the chairman Lindsey Graham acknowledged would be a 'long contentious week'. Also in the programme: The Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov has rejected a proposal by Azerbaijan to bring its ally Turkey into talks about the future of the disputed Nagorno Karabakh region; and Qingdao China tests all of its nine million residents after just a handful of new coronavirus infections. Photo: Amy Coney Barrett. Credit: Reuters.

A.M. Edition for Oct. 12. Judge Amy Coney Barrett will face questions from the Senate this week. Big banks prepare to release quarterly results amid pandemic. Expert advice on taking your dog on fall camping trips. Marc Stewart hosts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Chad Benson and Jim Geraghty begin their liquid lunch with a discussion of the latest, yet unsurprising developments in the confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett. For round two they analyze the possible reasons why polls are showing falling confidence rates in a COVID-19 vaccine. With their last round of the day they return to Portland for a "Day of Rage," otherwise known in Portland as, "Sunday."

President Trump has been cleared of Covid and able to get back on the campaign trail. The debate scheduled for this week has been cancelled. The next debate between President Trump & Joe Biden will be October 22. Confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett start today.

President Trump has been cleared of Covid and able to get back on the campaign trail. The debate scheduled for this week has been cancelled. The next debate between President Trump & Joe Biden will be October 22. Confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett start today.

President Trump has been cleared of Covid and able to get back on the campaign trail. The debate scheduled for this week has been cancelled. The next debate between President Trump & Joe Biden will be October 22. Confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett start today.

Simon's live report for LBC with Shelagh Fogarty.

Today on AirTalk, we discuss the confirmation hearings for supreme court nominee Amy Coney Barrett and its political implications. Also on the show, we talk about the Lakers winning the 2020 NBA championship; break down protocols for going to the polls; and more.

Senate confirmation hearings on Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett begin on Monday, over Democrats' strenuous objection that the winner of the November election should pick the nominee. Meanwhile, House leaders have resumed negotiations with the White House over an economic stimulus bill, after President Trump abruptly pulled out of talks earlier this week.  At the same time, the White House coronavirus outbreak continues to widen, and President Trump continues his steroid regimen following his hospitalization for COVID-19. We'll discuss the latest news from Washington, DC with veteran journalists Peter Baker and Susan Glasser.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, joins the "Daily Signal News" podcast to talk about the committee's confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Barrett, set to begin next week.Senate Democrats, who generally have supported virtual hearings during the pandemic, now demand in-person hearings to consider Barrett. How is the Judiciary Committee's Republican leadership responding? What kind of questions will Barrett face? Blackburn breaks it down.We also cover these stories:The White House physician, Sean Conley, announces that President Trump no longer has symptoms of COVID-19.President Trump tweets: “Flu season is coming up! Many people every year, sometimes over 100,000, and despite the Vaccine, die from the Flu."The president breaks off negotiations with congressional Democrats over a new coronavirus relief bill.The "Daily Signal News” podcast is available on Ricochet, Apple Podcasts, Pippa, Google Play, and Stitcher. All of our podcasts may be found at DailySignal.com/podcasts. If you like what you hear, please leave a review. You also may leave us a message at 202-608-6205 or write us at letters@dailysignal.com. Enjoy the show! See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Sepideh Soltaninia is Canadian, Lachlan Carey is an Aussie, and they're both grad students at Princeton taking a look at something going on in the States that we might understand better by stepping back a bit. In this first episode of Same Same but Different, we they talk about the Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings of Brett Kavanaugh. (Check out the Canadian Supreme Court in the image.)

The confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh have been animated, to put it mildly. The circus-like atmosphere isn’t just a symptom of politics-as-usual. It’s an indicator that the American body politic has experienced some major shifts in how we perceive the role of our national government. What do these antics portend for the constitutional republic that our founders created? Is the Supreme Court supposed to be the linchpin on which our nation’s fate hangs?

Today's Rapid Response Friday is all about the conclusion of the Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings for Brett Kavanaugh.  What did we learn?  What's still outstanding?  Are liberals really guilty of trying to bribe Susan Collins?  And, most importantly:  what can we do about any of this??  Listen and find out! We begin, however, with an important Andrew Was Wrong. After that, we delve into all the week's issues surrounding the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, including:  (1) the status of Kavanaugh's nomination; (2) whether liberal crowdfunding efforts really count as efforts to "bribe" Republican Sen. Susan Collins; (3) an in-depth look at Kavanaugh's written answers to the Senate Judiciary Committee; (4) a shockingly misleading question from Opening Arguments's good friend, Sen. Ted Cruz; and finally (5) a preview of next Tuesday's discussion of a weird case called Glucksburg.  Phew! After all that, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #93 regarding double jeopardy.  Did Thomas learn enough from the Ashley Judd Law'd Awful Movie of the same name??  We'll find out!  And, of course, if you'd like to play along with us, just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag.  We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry! Appearances Andrew will be debating originalist (and Kavanaugh clerk!) Justin Reed Wilson in Louisville, Kentucky on September 27 at Impellizzeri's Pizza.  Be there and be square! Show Notes & Links This is the (ugh) Newsmax exclusive about Collins's accusations of "bribery;" you can click here to see what Ad Fontes thinks about Newsmax as an organization.  The bribery law, of course, is 18 U.S.C. § 201., and the court decision we discuss is McDonnell v. U.S., 136 U.S. 2355 (2016). Here's the late-breaking Feinstein letter. We strongly recommend reading Kavanaugh's answers.  If you can stomach his misuse of the word "precedent" every few lines. This is the transcript of Ted Cruz's "Washington Generals" questions of Kavanaugh, and if you want a head start on next week, you can start reading Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997). Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

Today's Rapid Response Friday tackles the ongoing Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings for Brett Kavanaugh -- including an analysis of documents that broke literally after we recorded the show!  Find out if any of this can slow down Kavanaugh's presumed path the SCOTUS. We begin, however, with listener feedback on our rather controversial Episode 205 (with Andrew Seidel) as well as follow-up emails regarding 3-D guns and our contributions to SwingLeft. After that, we break down the critical documents leaked today by Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) that show 1) Kavanaugh's nakedly partisan approach to the court; 2) Kavanaugh's nonexistent view of the value of precedent when it comes to Roe v. Wade; and 3) possible perjury.  Is this a big deal?  YES.  Will it move the needle?  We'll see. After that, we return to Yodel Mountain to discuss Paul Manafort's impending DC trial and the somewhat-overlooked plea by W. Samuel Patten.  Who's that?  Listen and find out! Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #92 regarding impeaching the testimony of a gang member at trial.  If you'd like to play along with us, just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag.  We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry! Recent Appearances Thomas was recently the guest masochist on this week's God Awful Movies, reviewing "New World Order."  It's hilarious -- don't miss it!  And if you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links Here are the Kavanaugh email and Kavanaugh email 2 documents discussed during the main segment.  For more Kavanaugh document fun, check out this comprehensive New York Times article. This is W. Samuel Patten's Criminal Information, to which he pled guilty, and here is the Statement of the Offense, which explains the connection to the Trump campaign and White House. Finally, this is the late-breaking document showing possible perjury. Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

In the midst of the contentious confirmation hearings of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, we explore the history of Supreme Court confirmation hearings and consider their constitutional implications. How did the Framers envision the Senate’s role in providing “advice and consent,” and how has it evolved over time? Guests: Lori Ringhand – professor at the University of Georgia School of Law and Adam J. White – research fellow at the Hoover Institution. This is the first episode in a two-part series covering the confirmation process. Join us next week for a post-hearing wrap-up.

Suffolk University, Suffolk University Law School, Boston, MA, Renee Landers, Elena Kagan, Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings, Barack Obama, US Supreme Court, SCOTUS

Since 1955, when John Marshall Harlan was nominated to the Supreme Court just after the Brown v. Board of Education decision, questions about race have played a central part in Supreme Court confirmation hearings. This was never truer than in the contentious confirmation hearings of the first Latina Supreme Court justice, Sonia Sotomayor. Sherrilyn Ifill, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Law, explores this history and examines whether race matters in judicial decision-making.