Podcasts about contradict

SHOW NOTES: On this show…we are trying to achieve a balance between open-mindedness and firm beliefs as we navigate the middle ground. Staying true to your convictions is one position you can take but how does that stance affect the way you embrace new ideas and differing opinions? Ever feel like you're walking a mental tightrope, trying to keep an open mind while staying true to what you believe? It's like trying to balance on a seesaw with a curious toddler on one end and a stubborn goat on the other—challenging, unpredictable, and sometimes a little funny in hindsight. In this episode, we're exploring how to navigate the middle ground between welcoming new ideas and standing firm in your values. We'll tackle the fear of being too easily swayed, the risks of being stuck in your ways, and that frustrating paralysis that comes from overthinking it all. Let's dive in, find our balance, and discover how to approach life's challenges with curiosity and confidence.  Let's make sure we all understand the definition of Open-Mindedness: The willingness to consider new ideas and perspectives. Misconception: Being open-minded means accepting everything without question. Feel risky? If so, you might have fear around: Losing your identity. Being coerced into decisions you wouldn't normally make. The slippery slope of “people-pleasing” or over-compromise. I hear you—it's exhausting trying to make sense of the conflicting messages we're bombarded with daily. “Stand your ground!” but “Embrace diverse ideas.” “If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything!” yet “You're narrow-minded if you don't change your mindset to fit everyone else's.” Whoa, slow down! Where do we even start? For me, it's all about a multi-pronged approach. I pray, listen to my heart, try to see the bigger picture, and seek knowledge—always in that order. I trust myself, but let's be real, I don't know everything, and I can't navigate life's challenges alone. When I feel that pressure or tension to believe something or act a certain way, I take a step back and ask, “Why?” Why am I feeling this way? This simple pause keeps me from rushing into conclusions or making impulsive decisions. Here's the thing: I think many of us adopt an idea and fiercely protect it before we've really researched or tested it. It's human nature to want to feel confident and certain, but what if we took a moment to explore, question, and truly understand? That's where real balance and growth begin. At Psychology Compass I found how you have to Contradict yourself to become more open-minded On Forbes, Dr. Alice G. Walton offers 7 Science-Backed Methods To Get You Out Of Your Head On The Table's YouTube channel, I found Changing Your Mind: Virtue or Vice.  So what happens when you find yourself in this overwhelming push/pull situation in your thinking? What causes it and how do we overcome it? Fear of Making the “Wrong” Decision or Offending Others The Issue: Many of us freeze at the thought of making a decision that might upset someone or turn out to be a mistake. This fear can be paralyzing, leading to second-guessing or endless deliberation. How to Overcome It: Embrace the idea that no decision is ever truly final—most can be adjusted or revisited. Shift your mindset from “right vs. wrong” to “learning and growing.” Instead of aiming for perfection, aim for progress. Being Stuck in Indecision Due to Conflicting Inner Voices The Issue: One part of you says, “Stay safe and stick to what you know,” while another whispers, “Take a risk and explore new possibilities.” This inner tug-of-war can leave you immobilized. How to Overcome It: Practice tuning into each voice without judgment. Ask yourself, “What's the worst-case scenario? What's the best-case scenario?” Write these down and weigh the options. Sometimes seeing your thoughts in writing can bring clarity. Here are some more practical ways to break free: 1. Pause and Reflect Without Judgment When faced with pressure or indecision, step back and take a breather. Don't rush into action or self-criticism. Use simple tools like deep breathing, journaling, or a quiet walk to clear your head. 2. Set Boundaries: Know When to Listen and When to Step Away Not every conversation or input requires your full engagement. If external opinions are overwhelming you, give yourself permission to politely step back. A simple, “Thank you for sharing—I need some time to think this through,” can go a long way. 3. Practice Mindful Decision-Making Approach decisions with intentionality. Focus on what aligns with your values and goals rather than what pleases others. Break larger decisions into smaller steps to make them feel less daunting, and celebrate each small step forward. CHALLENGE: Pause and reflect the next time you feel pulled in opposite directions—take a moment to tune into your heart, weigh your values, and explore new perspectives without judgment. Commit to standing firm in what matters most to you while staying open to growth, knowing that true balance is found in the space between.   I Know YOU Can Do It!

Berry Tramel joined DJ & PK to tear into the College Football Playoff committee and what he makes of their process for selecting the 12-team playoff field.

This week the team dives into the question of whether faith and science contradict each other. The idea that faith and science oppose each other has grown in popularity, but is that really true? Do we have to choose between faith and science or can they be compatible? How do we address popular scientific theories such as evolution and the age of the earth? How do we engage with people who disagree on these subjects?

This week the team dives into the question of whether faith and science contradict each other. The idea that faith and science oppose each other has grown in popularity, but is that really true? Do we have to choose between faith and science or can they be compatible? How do we address popular scientific theories such as evolution and the age of the earth? How do we engage with people who disagree on these subjects?

Question: Though I've read your excellent discussions on eternal security, I still need understanding of the following Scriptures—Romans 11:21-22: “...if thou continue in His goodness” sounds conditional; Colossians 1:22-23, “If ye continue in the faith…” ditto; Hebrews 3:6, 14 have the same idea; 2 Peter 2:20-22 speaks of those who have “escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord…and who were washed…being entangled again and overcome.” If these apparent contradictions could be covered in a future “Q&A,” it would be greatly appreciated.Response: The New Testament contains frequent exhortations to godly living, to “continue in the faith” and to “hold fast the confidence firm unto the end” (Hebrews 3:6, 14) and to “walk worthy of the Lord” (Ephesians 4:1; Colossians 1:10), and warns of being “cut off” (Romans 11:22).The exhortation is to two classes of people: (1) Those who are false professors, in order to show them that their lives demonstrate that they do not truly know the Lord; and (2) Christians who are living in disobedience, to warn them that if they continue to dishonor their Lord, He will severely discipline them. The latter could be “cut off” from fellowship with other believers, or from this life....

Will Levis & Brian Callahan contradict each other, pointing to a much deeper Titans QB issue Powered by BetMGM.com For More Titans coverage follow us here: https://www.atozsports.com/nashville Podcasts: https://www.atozsports.com/podcasts Facebook:   / atozsportsnashville   Instagram:   / atozsports   Twitter:   / atozsports   TikTok:   / atozsportsnashville   #AtoZSports #TennesseeTitans #NFLFootball Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Contradict

Is James statement that justification is by works and not faith alone in contradiction to Paul's statement that justification is by grace alone through faith? Is justification based on faith AND works? The bible is never in contradiction for God cannot contradict himself.

What is the source of our rights, natural Law or the state? Unfortunately, too many people who should know better choose the latter. David Gordon makes short work of their internal contradictions.Original article: How to Contradict Yourself about Rights

What is the source of our rights, natural Law or the state? Unfortunately, too many people who should know better choose the latter. David Gordon makes short work of their internal contradictions.Original article: How to Contradict Yourself about Rights

Send us a textWe sit down with New Testament scholar Dr. Michael Licona ( @MikeLiconaOfficial ) to discuss his book Jesus, Contradicted: Why the Gospels Tell the Same Story Differently. Dr. Licona tackles one of the most common objections to the reliability of the Gospels: their apparent discrepancies. Instead of forcing strained harmonizations, Licona explains how the Gospels fit within the genre of ancient biography, allowing for narrative flexibility. He compares the Gospel accounts with the works of Plutarch and other ancient sources, showing how common literary techniques of the time account for differences in reporting. We'll also explore how these differences align with the doctrines of divine inspiration and inerrancy of Scripture. Don't miss this fascinating conversation that brings clarity to the complexities of the Gospel narratives!Book: https://a.co/d/5qw5mzB

Naturally, a person should avoid sin as one avoids fire. The Torah's penalties serve two purposes: to repair the blemish and address its impact on the community. Jewish theologians disagree on whether angels have a body. https://www.torahrecordings.com/rebbe/igroskodesh/011/012/3784

Send us your Questions and Comments HereDid Ancient Israel believe that the earth was flat and had a solid dome over it? Did they believe stars were living beings rather than balls of gas? Should the way they viewed the world affect the reliability of the Bible? Join us for the second part of our series on inspiration and inerrancy!Send your questions to information@apologetics.orgPart 1 of the Inspiration Series:https://theuniversenextdoor.buzzsprout.com/235413/15582797-did-god-providentially-or-directly-inspire-the-bible-inspiration-and-inerrancy-series-pt-1Were Stars viewed as Angels in the Bible?https://theuniversenextdoor.buzzsprout.com/235413/14595788-were-stars-viewed-as-angels-in-the-bibleSupport the Show.

Send us a Text Message.Ethan Hoover & Matthew Maher discuss “Discerning the Devil's Playbook” and break down the four plays from Nazi Germany that are currently at play in America. Listen in and join the conversation!Show Notes:IntroPlay #1 - Contradict The TruthWhat is Biblical Truth?Romans 1 - Where We're AtComparison to Nazi Germany (& History of Nazi Germany)OutroResources: Discerning The Devil's Playbookhttps://www.amazon.com/Discerning-Devils-Playbook-Germany-Currently/dp/0998630691/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2GJRO5D55XPAN&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.2x33CWr_P0HqeCUNR6xxCXOY2Qt1sZyZRzyKJqhIvwTGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.OYhc5lAByaU4dBzVxknemdXW0xF18P__EJs2PIPwyEQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=discerning+the+devil%27s+playbook&qid=1722264534&sprefix=discerning+the+de%2Caps%2C115&sr=8-1&fbclid=IwY2xjawEXUoFleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHbbrGL9yYXqzR_FmVIMQr7qQmz8Y60KcUy1vhn683Nx1Rjpzshg-mywC2A_aem_ckU8vYZdoip4KCTasKJtaAGot questions?Submit your question relating to our Season 3 content for our Question & Response episode here. Follow us on Instagram! Follow @rechurchedpodcast or click here. Learn More: To learn more about the podcast and your hosts, visit our website. Looking to sponsor Rechurched? Apply to be a sponsor!

The weekly podcast of Journey Church, led by Pastor JJ Vasquez. 

Some of us use mindset and attitude as synonyms. But if we think about it, then maybe we shouldn't. Mindset is a way of thinking. Attitude is a way of being.

Show Notes: The Iconoclastic Shocking Biblical Teachings of Yeshua( Jesus) vs. The Religious World/Christianity Part 1 [Key Verse: Matt 10:32-33] 32 “Whoever acknowledges(Confesses) me before others, I will also acknowledge(Confess) before my Father in heaven. 33 But whoever disowns(Contradicts) me before others, I will also disown(Contradict) before my Father in heaven. Has Christianity Contradicted the CHRIST?????? For those who wish to support the [Show] and its [Research] with Donations, please send all funds and gifts to :$aigner2019 (cashapp) or https://www.paypal.me/Aigner2019 or Zelle (1-617-821-3168).}

Show Notes: The Iconoclastic Shocking Biblical Teachings of Yeshua( Jesus) vs. The Religious World/Christianity Part 2 [Key Verse: Matt 10:32-33] 32 “Whoever acknowledges(Confesses) me before others, I will also acknowledge(Confess) before my Father in heaven. 33 But whoever disowns(Contradicts) me before others, I will also disown(Contradict) before my Father in heaven. Has Christianity Contradicted the CHRIST?????? For those who wish to support the [Show] and its [Research] with Donations, please send all funds and gifts to :$aigner2019 (cashapp) or https://www.paypal.me/Aigner2019 or Zelle (1-617-821-3168).}

A recent reddit thread was posted with apparent proof that the DOD has been controlling what UAP information is released to the public and just how FOIA releases them. What can be done about this if anything? Kristian Harloff discusses.

Kellen Moore gave an answer at his press conference yesterday that flies in the face of something our head coach told us last season.

Two events in recent history share a common thread. The White House loudly declares the 31st of March to be the Transgender Day of Visibility, and on Easter nonetheless. Not long before, an Obama appointed Judge adheres to the Second Amendment, but for a man who entered the United States Illegally. What do these two events have in common? Strategy. The news that a Judge appeared to side with the Second Amendment when it came to a man who entered the United States illegally divided Gun Culture. However, this is unlikely a simple divide and conquer strategy. Not long after, the attempt to promote a queer holiday, not directly in place of a Christian holiday, either opted to replace it, or something more nefarious. It illustrates a worldview that treats either Christianity or Queer as a religion, relegating the other to a mere fashion statement. Not to be mistaken as a mere misuse of terms, this episode delves into both events, and illustrates the possible strategy of both, inspired by a theology of self worship. This Episode has been sponsored by Obsidian Arms, a manufacturer of tools, parts and firearms, as well as operating as an OEM shop for those looking to bring excellence to the market. Their Minnesota-based shop builds and cuts parts out of U.S.-sourced materials. Their gunsmith tools, custom firearms, and capabilities can be found at www.obsidianarms.comFollow Obsidian Arms on Instagram at @obsidianarmsSupport the REDACTED Culture Cast at redactedculture.locals.comSSP and boutique products at redactedllc.comFollow us on Instagram at @redactedllc

In a courtroom showdown marked by fiery exchanges and allegations of misconduct, the defense team for Karen Read asserted on Tuesday that a federal expert's analysis contradicts Massachusetts prosecutors' claims regarding the death of Boston police officer John O'Keefe. The case, which has captured widespread attention, centers on Read's alleged involvement in O'Keefe's killing during a snowstorm in 2022. Read, who has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder charges, maintains her innocence, asserting that she is being framed and is a victim of a cover-up orchestrated by authorities. As arguments unfolded during a hearing at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, the defense levied accusations of prosecutorial misconduct against the Norfolk District Attorney's office, intensifying the legal battle. The crux of the defense's argument revolves around the findings of a federal reconstruction expert, whose investigation challenges the prosecution's narrative. Defense attorney Alan Jackson revealed in court that the expert's analysis concluded that there was no evidence to suggest that O'Keefe was struck by an SUV, as alleged by the prosecution. "The federal investigators hired... a professional reconstructionist... to look into exactly this issue," Jackson stated. "Their conclusion, to a person, was his injuries were inconsistent with the damage on the car... In other words, the car didn't hit him, and he wasn't hit by the car." Jackson further contended that personal relationships between individuals residing at the crime scene and responding police officers compromised the integrity of the case, casting doubt on the reliability of the evidence presented by the prosecution. Prosecutor Adam Lally pushed back against the defense's assertions, accusing them of attempting to obscure the facts. Describing their approach as "defense by obfuscation," Lally emphasized the substantial evidence presented to the grand jury, which allegedly implicates Read in O'Keefe's death. "What the defense is obfuscating from is the overwhelming evidence... which clearly demonstrate[s] that the defendant, Karen Read, killed John O'Keefe," Lally asserted. Despite the impassioned arguments from both sides, the judge refrained from issuing a ruling on the defense's motions, opting to deliberate further. Originally slated to commence on Tuesday, the trial has been rescheduled for April 16, allowing for additional time for legal proceedings to unfold. As the legal battle ensues, the case continues to garner public scrutiny, with the quest for justice for John O'Keefe and the truth surrounding his death remaining at the forefront of attention. The outcome of the ongoing courtroom drama promises to shape the trajectory of Read's fate and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a courtroom showdown marked by fiery exchanges and allegations of misconduct, the defense team for Karen Read asserted on Tuesday that a federal expert's analysis contradicts Massachusetts prosecutors' claims regarding the death of Boston police officer John O'Keefe. The case, which has captured widespread attention, centers on Read's alleged involvement in O'Keefe's killing during a snowstorm in 2022. Read, who has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder charges, maintains her innocence, asserting that she is being framed and is a victim of a cover-up orchestrated by authorities. As arguments unfolded during a hearing at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, the defense levied accusations of prosecutorial misconduct against the Norfolk District Attorney's office, intensifying the legal battle. The crux of the defense's argument revolves around the findings of a federal reconstruction expert, whose investigation challenges the prosecution's narrative. Defense attorney Alan Jackson revealed in court that the expert's analysis concluded that there was no evidence to suggest that O'Keefe was struck by an SUV, as alleged by the prosecution. "The federal investigators hired... a professional reconstructionist... to look into exactly this issue," Jackson stated. "Their conclusion, to a person, was his injuries were inconsistent with the damage on the car... In other words, the car didn't hit him, and he wasn't hit by the car." Jackson further contended that personal relationships between individuals residing at the crime scene and responding police officers compromised the integrity of the case, casting doubt on the reliability of the evidence presented by the prosecution. Prosecutor Adam Lally pushed back against the defense's assertions, accusing them of attempting to obscure the facts. Describing their approach as "defense by obfuscation," Lally emphasized the substantial evidence presented to the grand jury, which allegedly implicates Read in O'Keefe's death. "What the defense is obfuscating from is the overwhelming evidence... which clearly demonstrate[s] that the defendant, Karen Read, killed John O'Keefe," Lally asserted. Despite the impassioned arguments from both sides, the judge refrained from issuing a ruling on the defense's motions, opting to deliberate further. Originally slated to commence on Tuesday, the trial has been rescheduled for April 16, allowing for additional time for legal proceedings to unfold. As the legal battle ensues, the case continues to garner public scrutiny, with the quest for justice for John O'Keefe and the truth surrounding his death remaining at the forefront of attention. The outcome of the ongoing courtroom drama promises to shape the trajectory of Read's fate and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this week's Sermon Extra Pastors Nick Cady and Stephen Pomeroy discuss Matthew 5:32 and why it says that a woman commits adultery if her husband divorces her, and the question of whether Christians can actually have enemies, and if Jesus contradicts the Law of Moses. To listen to Sunday's sermon: https://whitefieldschurch.com/sermons Check out more about other topics from Pastor Nick's blog: nickcady.org --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/whitefieldschurch/support

In this special live episode, Pastor Steve Vinay from Abiding Grace Church joins us to walk through James 2 and Romans 4, to discuss how James and Paul are actually standing back to back fighting against 2 different issues, rather than seeing them as contradicting each other. Abiding Grace Church Websitewww.abidinggracechurch.comSermon Audio of Abiding Grace Church https://www.sermonaudio.com/source_detail.asp?sourceid=agcsouthhills

The post 99. Does the Bible Contradict Science? Flat Earth Theory appeared first on South Spring Baptist Church.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

John Solomon: Did President Biden's brother Jim contradict his testimony in Congress? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

[01:27]Transgenderism Is Being Forced on UsMore and more laws and policies are being passed in the United States to enforce transgenderism on the public. Authorities are demanding that students learn about it in schools; parents who don't support gender transition are losing custody of their children; teachers are being fired for not using incorrect pronouns. These authoritarian measures will continue to increase.Redefining Family [22:00]Do Dinosaurs Contradict the Bible?Is Earth 6,000 years old? If so, where did the dinosaurs go, and what about the Ice Age? We look at how to reconcile the best science and archaeology with the Bible—and the answer may not be what you think.“Dinosaurs, the Ice Age, and Early Man: Evidence Against the Bible?” [38:40]The Heritage of the Holy Roman EmpireAs Europe confronts challenges to its identity, more and more people are celebrating the heritage of the Holy Roman Empire. We talk about the history they're overlooking, and why this is alarming.“The Holy Roman Empire Goes Public—Big Time!”“The Holy Roman Empire Revives in Austria”The Holy Roman Empire in Prophecy [52:56]One of the Best Things You Can Do for Your SonWe conclude the program by talking about one of the best things you can do for your son.

We read the Bible because we are looking for answers. Why? Because over time people have had confidence in the validity of its Truth. However, that is not as much the case today. One of the things people point today as to a reason why they don't read the Bible is because they believe the Bible contradicts itself. But, does it really? Today, Brett discusses why the Bible is trustworthy and true. To be part of a Bible reading plan, go to http://newlife.church/Bible2024 or http://newlife.church/Bible Share your stories, prayer requests, or your response to this devotional in the comments below. If you would like to know more about New Life, who we are, what we believe, or when we meet, visit http://newlife.church. Or you can fill out a digital connection card at http://newlife.church/connect - we would love to get to know you better!

We read the Bible because we are looking for answers. Why? Because over time people have had confidence in the validity of its Truth. However, that is not as much the case today. One of the things people point today as to a reason why they don't read the Bible is because they believe the Bible contradicts itself. But, does it really? Today, Brett discusses why the Bible is trustworthy and true. To be part of a Bible reading plan, go to http://newlife.church/Bible2024 or http://newlife.church/Bible Share your stories, prayer requests, or your response to this devotional in the comments below. If you would like to know more about New Life, who we are, what we believe, or when we meet, visit http://newlife.church. Or you can fill out a digital connection card at http://newlife.church/connect - we would love to get to know you better!

In a recent video that went viral, progressive Christian minister Brandan Robertson claimed that the problem with evangelicalism is that it focuses too much on the teachings of Paul and not enough on the teachings of Jesus. Robertson went on to claim that Paul even contradicts Jesus on a number of important points, and that when that happens, we should go with the teachings of Jesus instead of Paul's. What Robertson said was not unique. Rather, it is a common claim within the movement of progressive Christianity. In this episode, we discuss Robertson's specific claims and why we believe a number of things that he says are misleading or outright false. We also explore some of the tenants of progressive Christianity more generally and discuss how tethering ourselves to the historic Christian tradition helps us from coming up with innovative ways to arrive at old heresies. READ FULL SHOW NOTES HERE Visit kainosproject.com to find other resources to help you tackle ancient truths in everyday settings, and be sure to subscribe to our email list to get all of our fresh content delivered straight to your inbox.Subscribe on Apple PodcastsFollow on Spotify Discover more Christian podcasts at lifeaudio.com and inquire about advertising opportunities at lifeaudio.com/contact-us.

A series of letters in Sichos illustrating the Rebbe's approach to reconciling archaeological evidence with our traditions. Part I: Dead Sea Scrolls, Arch of Titus Part II: Aleppo Codex, Biblical Archaeology --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/yechiel-krisch1/support

A series of letters in Sichos illustrating the Rebbe's approach to reconciling archaeological evidence with our traditions. Part I: Dead Sea Scrolls, Arch of Titus Part II: Aleppo Codex, Biblical Archaeology --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/yechiel-krisch1/support

The post 98. Does the Bible Contradict Itself? appeared first on South Spring Baptist Church.

The St. Paul Center's daily scripture reflections from the Mass for the Fifth Day in the Octave of Christmas by Dr. John Bergsma. Christmas Weekday/ Thomas Becket, Bishop, Martyr First Reading: First John 2: 3-11 Responsorial Psalm: Psalms 96: 1-2a, 2b-3, 5b-6 Alleluia: Luke 2: 32 Gospel: Luke 2: 22-35 Learn more about the Mass at www.stpaulcenter.com

The St. Paul Center's daily scripture reflections from the Mass for the Fifth Day in the Octave of Christmas by Dr. John Bergsma. Christmas Weekday/ Thomas Becket, Bishop, Martyr First Reading: First John 2: 3-11 Responsorial Psalm: Psalms 96: 1-2a, 2b-3, 5b-6 Alleluia: Luke 2: 32 Gospel: Luke 2: 22-35 Learn more about the Mass at www.stpaulcenter.com

The post 97. Does the Bible Contradict Itself? Unpacking the Genealogies of Jesus // Christmas 2023 appeared first on South Spring Baptist Church.

Welcome to Grace in Focus radio. Today, Bob Wilkin and David Renfro are answering a question about responsibility for sin and unlimited atonement. If Ezekiel 18:20 says that each person is responsible for their own sin, how can Christ bear the sins of the world? There are also some Lexicon recommendations and a discussion about

Welcome to Grace in Focus radio. Today, Bob Wilkin and Leon Adkins are looking at a question concerning Romans 5:9. Does this verse deal with justification or with the sanctification of a believer? How does this verse actually support Zane's view of the meaning and use of “salvation” in Romans? Bob and Leon will offer

Chad Lewis is a pastor, teacher, and author who holds three degrees; philosophy, literature, and a Masters in ancient Near Eastern and Jewish studies. He is an incredible resource of knowledge both theologically and Philosophically. He joins us today to go over a number of different questions that so many of us have. Enjoy! Got any questions or topics you'd like to hear about? You can email us at thingsyoudonthearinchurchpod@gmail.com Like our content? Consider helping us grow through Patreon, a follow, or subscribe! Leave a rating on whatever platform you listen on and write some nice comments YOUTUBE here PATREON  here INSTAGRAM: www.instagram.com/thingsyoudonthearinchurchpod --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thingsyoudonthearinchurch/support

Habakkuk chapter two. Full disclosure: It's a challenging chapter. Here at The Ridge, we are committed to teaching through the Bible in its entirety. Because if we don't know the hard parts, we don't know the whole story. Habakkuk chapter two centers on two words: discipline and wrath. We'll examine the Biblical definitions of these words, what they mean and how all of this applies to us today. Message by Mike Van Rees Scripture referenced: Habakkuk 2:5–15 Read the Beyond the Sermon devotionals. Get the devotional each week! Sign up to receive the Beyond the Sermon blog in your inbox. 

One of the dangers we can fall into in reading the Bible is reading it selectively. We dwell on the passages we are comfortable with and ignore those that raise questions and challenge us. In particular, passages that deal with God's wrath and judgement take a back seat to famous verses like John 3:16. So how do we go steer away from selective reading of the Bible and engage with every part as the inspired word of God? Join Will Herron, Director of Discipleship, and Mike Van Rees as they discuss this and more on this weeks post sermon discussion.  Read the Beyond the Sermon devotionals. Get the devotional each week! Sign up to receive the Beyond the Sermon blog in your inbox. 

A look at SBF's testimony with his lawyers and how he set to counter the story presented by his former FTX colleagues Nishad Singh, Caroline Ellison, and Gary Wang. Today's Sponsor: Kraken Kraken: See what crypto can be - https://kraken.com/TheBreakdown Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://pod.link/1438693620 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/nathanielwhittemorecrypto Subscribe to the newsletter: https://breakdown.beehiiv.com/ Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW

Bruce, Adam, and Caleb discuss the textual and narrative differences between the four gospel accounts of Jesus' life and ministry. Should the differences worry Christians? How should Christians respond when confronted with supposed contradictions and errors in Scripture? Show Notes: Support 1517 1517 Podcasts The 1517 Podcast Network on Apple Podcasts 1517 on Youtube What's New from 1517: Join the 1517 Academy Freedom Lessons Street Team Finding God in the Darkness: Hopeful Reflections from the Pits of Depression, Despair, and Disappointment by Bradley Gray More from the hosts: Caleb Keith Scott Keith Adam Francsisco Bruce Hilman  

Welcome to Grace in Focus radio. Today, Bob Wilkin and Steve Elkins are answering a few questions wrapped into one. How is teaching about the Bema related to Calvinism? Also, can supporters of abortion and of homosexuality be presently saved? Bob Wilkin and Steve Elkins will offer their thoughts about these things.

070623 20 Min 3 Clips That Directly Contradict Narrative Headlines Today WOW by Kate Dalley

Howie Kurtz on CNN obtaining leaked audio of former President Trump from 2021 discussing sensitive documents, growing tensions in Russia amidst the Wagner group rebellion, news outlets resurfacing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s conspiracy theories and the Biden Campaign's pushing of “Bidenomics” as a campaign message. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices