Kash's Corner

“You can't help but notice the coincidence that it was literally immediately following the Devon Archer testimony,” says Kash Patel.In this episode of Kash's Corner, we discuss the third indictment of former President Donald Trump, the precedent it sets, and why he believes the judge should recuse herself.“Look past the Trump cycle of 2024. Go to '28. Go to '32. Are we going to say that any president or anybody running for president who decides to say they won the election, but didn't, is going to be prosecuted for that? I mean, how are we going to get people to run for elected office if the fear is you can't say you won anymore?” says Kash Patel.“We don't live in the Soviet Union. We live in the United States of America, where the Constitution dictates our freedom of speech. And if they're going to criminalize that, which they have done here, it is a very dangerous slope,” says Kash Patel.Also an announcement from Kash Patel: “With the campaign for the presidency in full swing, we're going to take a time-out on Kash's Corner's weekly publication. But fear not, Jan and I are going to come back regularly and me specifically on Epoch Times, EpochTV, and NTD to do weekly, regular hits and interviews when our schedules permit. And we will return to Kash's Corner after the 2024 election cycle. So fear not. You'll have more of me and Jan than you know what to do with. But we appreciate the audience's understanding, especially with the scheduling in the pending 2024 election cycle.”

In this Season 7 finale of Kash's Corner, we take a look at John Durham's recent testimony in Congress and Hunter Biden reaching a deal to plead guilty to tax charges—exactly as Kash Patel predicted on the show in early May.What have we learned from this six-year investigation into the Russiagate saga? What key question did special counsel John Durham fail to properly answer? And why didn't Congress press him on it?Did Hunter Biden receive preferential treatment? What does his pretrial diversion agreement mean?This is the Season 7 finale of Kash's Corner. We'll be back in a few weeks!

What happens now after the arraignment of former President Donald Trump in the classified-documents case? Will there be pre-trial motions? What will the government do? Is the defense team fully formed, and who should be on it? Why should the defense wait before filing a motion to dismiss?And what do we know about the audio recordings of conversations between the Bidens and the owner of Burisma that Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has been talking about?We discuss all this and more on this week's episode of Kash's Corner.

On June 8, former President Donald Trump said he'd been informed by his attorneys that he had been indicted by special counsel Jack Smith as part of the investigation into his handling of classified documents.It's the two-tier system of justice playing out yet again, argues Kash Patel, from Russiagate to impeachment No. 1 to impeachment No. 2 to the weaponization of the Jan. 6 committee to the cover-up of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. What does all this mean for America?Kash Patel and Jan Jekielek sit down for a live show of Kash's Corner in Prescott, Arizona.

The FBI has repeatedly declined a request from House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) to hand over an internal document detailing an alleged “criminal scheme” involving President Joe Biden's family. Rep. Comer says he's going to move forward on holding FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress.What Congress should do, says Kash Patel, is to fence the money of the FBI. “There's a fencing process on Capitol Hill. Without getting into all the details … you can just imagine an imaginary fence goes around a big pile of money, and Congress has the lock and key. And if the FBI wants their big pile of money in this fence, they have to comply with a request from Congress, i.e. give us the document unredacted.”We also discuss former FBI Director James Comey's response to the Durham report and recent news that the DOJ has charged two alleged Chinese agents for a bribery scheme targeting Falun Gong practitioners in the United States.The suspected Chinese agents bribed what they thought was an IRS official—actually an FBI undercover agent—with thousands of dollars, and promised $50,000 more, in an attempt to strip the tax-exempt status of an entity run by Falun Gong practitioners, according to court filings.

In this episode of Kash's Corner, we take a look at the alarming pattern of retaliatory conduct across the DOJ, FBI, and IRS. IRS whistleblowers say their entire team was removed from the Hunter Biden tax fraud case.We also take a look at a letter from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) asking Special Counsel John Durham for more details about the former FBI officials who declined to cooperate with his investigation into the origins of the Russia probe.“We need to find out why John Durham failed to call in the likes of [James] Comey, [Peter] Strzok, [Bill] Priestap, [Kevin] Clinesmith, Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS, and others,” Patel says. Sens. Grassley and Johnson should call John Durham to testify under oath in a publicized interview, according to Patel.Lastly, we take a look at recent reporting in The New York Times that the FBI's investigation into the Clinton Foundation for alleged corruption was not only closed in 2021, but that all the evidence was “returned or otherwise destroyed,” the New York Times writes, citing the FBI.

“This was the one opportunity for John Durham to fix the two-tier system of justice. He was the man charged with that duty. And he had that opportunity. And in my opinion, Jan, he failed. And this will only degrade the FBI and DOJ and our intel communities further,” says Kash Patel, who was the chief investigator of the House Intelligence Committee's Russiagate investigation back in 2017 and 2018.“In the Durham report, it states that Kevin Clinesmith declined to participate. What do you mean ‘declined to participate'? Jan, do you remember the Mueller investigation? Was anyone allowed to decline their participation?” Patel says.“Individuals like Kevin Clinesmith, Peter Strzok, James Comey, Andy McCabe … none of them were brought under subpoena and compelled to testify,” Patel says.So what's next? And in particular, for the Americans who feel increasingly disillusioned about accountability, what does Kash Patel see as the way forward?

This week on Kash's Corner, we discuss a major new House Oversight memorandum released on Wednesday. Investigators say millions of dollars from China and other foreign entities went to President Joe Biden and nearly a dozen members of his family.New details have also emerged surrounding the origins of the “51-intel letter” discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020. The CIA expedited review of the letter for confidential information, allowing former acting CIA director Michael Morell to successfully get it published in Politico just days before the final presidential debate between then-President Donald Trump and Biden, according to a new House Judiciary report. At the debate, then-candidate Biden cited the letter as evidence that the Hunter Biden laptop story was “a bunch of garbage.”

“I believe Hunter Biden will be charged, and soon, but I think they'll roll it up into what we call this global plea agreement, where he basically gets charged with some Mickey Mouse lower-level offenses, walks into a super light sentence, and then they will cover up the cover-up,” says Kash Patel.This week on Kash's Corner, we discuss recent statements by Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Attorney General Merrick Garland related to investigations into President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden, the end of federal vaccine mandates—with some key exceptions—and the Biden administration's recent announcement that the United States is sending 1,500 more active-duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border.

Former acting CIA director Michael Morell was recently asked under oath about the origins of the intel letter discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop story as possible Russian disinformation.He testified under oath that a call from now-Secretary of State Antony Blinken “triggered” the creation of the letter, which was signed by 51 current and former members of the intelligence community.When questioned further, he said, “one intent was to share our concern with the American people that the Russians were playing on this issue; and two, it was [to] help Vice President Biden.”“I wanted [Biden] to win the election,” he testified, according to a letter sent to Blinken by House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan and Intelligence Chairman Mike Turner.This isn't the first time this ex-CIA boss has stirred up hot-button issues in the lead-up to a presidential election, according to John Solomon and Nick Givas's reporting in Just the News. In 2012, he edited official talking points about the deadly 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack to remove references to al-Qaeda. And in the summer of 2016, he was one of the first major figures to publicly claim Trump was a Russian asset in a New York Times op-ed.In this episode of Kash's Corner, we also take a look at Sen. Chuck Grassley's recent allegations that the FBI falsely labeled information as Russian disinformation “to bury it”—and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's seeking to prevent Trump from speaking about the evidence in his case.

In this episode of Kash's Corner, we take a look at the two Chinese men recently arrested by the FBI in connection with a secret Chinese police station in New York City. This is just one among multiple Chinese Communist Party (CCP) police outposts in the United States, according to the watchdog group Safeguard Defenders.In two separate cases, the DOJ is charging 40 Chinese officials and police with conducting a coordinated harassment campaign against Chinese dissidents residing in the United States.And we continue looking at the Pentagon leaks. How did the suspected leaker, a 21-year-old Air National Guardsmen, get access to so many pages of classified documents?

Why is the FBI targeting churches? Who approved the memos singling out Catholic churches and associating terms like “red pill” and “based” with domestic violent extremism?How did classified intelligence on Ukraine end up spreading online for weeks without being detected?And what does Kash Patel—as the person in charge of the Defense Department's transition from the Trump administration to the Biden administration—make of National Security Council spokesman John Kirby saying recently the Trump administration was not forthcoming when it came to plans for the Afghanistan withdrawal?We discuss all this and more in this week's episode of Kash's Corner.

“As a prosecutor, you either have the facts and the law to bring the case or you don't. You're not supposed to go in there and create a novel legal theory. That's the job of the state legislature,” says Kash Patel.In this episode, Kash Patel and Jan Jekielek do a deep dive into the 34-count indictment and the 13-page statement of facts released on April 4 after former President Donald Trump was arraigned in the Stormy Daniels “hush money” payment case.What is the legal basis of the case? Why did Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg issue a speaking indictment? What does Patel think the defense's strategy should be?Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is part of the NIH, received $400 million from Moderna in a “catch-up payment,” according to a newly disclosed contract that The Epoch Times obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.So where is the money going? Which government officials are getting the money?Kash Patel argues that it poses a major conflict of interest for scientists at the NIH to be able to receive royalties from patents.“Do people in the Department of Agriculture who work with private-sector farmers and come up with some new seed receive millions of dollars from the farming industry? No,” Patel said.“What about the army guy that comes up with the technology for our next aerial asset, [and] we enter into a contract with Lockheed Martin or Boeing to make billions of dollars worth of this? Is he going to get a royalty from that? Absolutely not,” he said.The NIH received up to $2 billion in royalties from 34 drug contracts between 1991 and 2019, according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.We also take a look at new allegations of bribery in FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried's case. On top of the 12 counts he was already indicted on, he's now being charged for allegedly bribing Chinese officials to the tune of over $40 million to get his accounts in China unfrozen.Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

Why was the Manhattan grand jury unexpectedly delayed in the alleged Trump “hush money” case?Did District Attorney Alvin Bragg withhold exculpatory evidence?“As a prosecutor, you're not allowed to withhold evidence of innocence or something that might be damaging to your case to the grand jury you're presenting to. And that's essentially what Costello said,” says Kash Patel, in reference to recent testimony by Michael Cohen's former lawyer, Robert Costello.We also take a look at the recent Saudi-Iran deal brokered by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and the CCP's ambitions to replace the petrodollar with the yuan.China has also offered a 12-point peace plan to end the Russia-Ukraine War. Vladimir Putin welcomed the proposal during a recent joint press conference with Xi Jinping.“It's a total farce for China to go in and say, we're going to be the peace negotiators … They're committing genocide in their own country,” Kash Patel says. “But just think about the messaging and the propaganda that the CCP gains from this. … They're getting the narrative out there that China, the CCP, is the peace negotiators of the modern day, not the United States of America.”Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

Recently, the New York Times published a lengthy piece claiming John Durham's investigation was flawed and “failed to find wrongdoing in the origins of the Russia inquiry.” Subsequently, a number of congressmen have called for Durham and Bill Barr to be investigated. What's really going on?“They do these preemptive strikes when they know something is about to happen,” says Kash Patel.We also discuss House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan's (R-Ohio) investigation into the federal government's collusion with big tech to suppress free speech. Jordan recently subpoenaed the CEOs of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft. Patel says Jordan should also send subpoenas in the other direction—to the FBI and DOJ—for all communications, contracts, and agreements with the tech giants.“Once you run those two subpoenas on a parallel track, Jan, then you can get some real documentation and answers for the American people because someone is going to get caught lying,” Patel says.And finally, we take a look at the Chinese spy balloon, the other downed aerial objects, and the train filled with toxic chemicals in Ohio that recently derailed. Are these events connected?

“I can tell you without equivocation that during my tenure, there was not one shred of intelligence that came across that showed that even the possibility of a balloon from the Chinese Communist Party or otherwise was going to cross the territorial waters of the United States of America,” says Kash Patel.Defense officials have said Chinese spy balloons entered U.S. airspace at least three times during the Trump administration. During a press briefing on Feb. 6, Air Force Gen. Glen VanHerck, commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), said that those Chinese spy balloons had gone undetected at the time.Kash Patel argues the Biden administration is trying to distract from its own failures. We discuss the Chinese spy balloons and President Joe Biden's State of the Union address.Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVusRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

“The information—and the bulleted information specifically in that email—is information, in my opinion, that could only have come from a classified source and a classified document …Where did this email come from? Hunter Biden's laptop. This document has been known to the FBI for years,” said Kash Patel.Was there classified information on Hunter Biden's laptop? Was this the true origin of the investigation into Joe Biden's classified documents?Kash's Corner looks at recent reporting by New York Post journalist Miranda Devine. And discusses the recent indictment of ex-FBI official Charles McGonigal, a key player in the Russiagate scandal. He was indicted for aiding sanctioned Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. Notably, Deripaska had previously hired Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous, discredited “Steele dossier.” Tonight, Patel connects the dots and breaks down what he sees going on.

"The information—and the bulleted information specifically in that email—is information, in my opinion, that could only have come from a classified source and a classified document …Where did this email come from? Hunter Biden's laptop. This document has been known to the FBI for years,” said Kash Patel.Was there classified information on Hunter Biden's laptop? Was this the true origin of the investigation into Joe Biden's classified documents?Kash's Corner looks at recent reporting by New York Post journalist Miranda Devine. And discusses the recent indictment of ex-FBI official Charles McGonigal, a key player in the Russiagate scandal. He was indicted for aiding sanctioned Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. Notably, Deripaska had previously hired Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous, discredited “Steele dossier.” Tonight, Patel connects the dots and breaks down what he sees going on.Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVusRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

“I don't believe for one second that this investigation of the classified documents began in November of 2022 like we're being told now,” says Kash Patel.Classified documents have been found in multiple locations linked to President Joe Biden, including the Biden Penn Center and in the garage and an adjacent room at his Wilmington home. Hunter Biden, who does not have a security clearance, had access to the garage.The FBI and DOJ's handling of the Biden classified documents scandal puts the two-tiered system of justice in America on full display, Patel says. And the timing is no coincidence.“I still believe, as I said last week, that there's going to be more and more and more classified documents found … There are people in the Democratic Party and the establishment media who don't want Joe Biden to run for reelection … And they're clearing the political wickets for whoever might come next,” says Patel.Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVusRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

In this episode of Kash's Corner, we discuss revelations that Joe Biden mishandled classified documents during his tenure as Vice President and that this has been known since before the midterm elections. Kash Patel reflects on the disparity in the media's treatment of this event versus the FBI's raid on Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago.We also discuss the House's new Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government and who they should be investigating. This includes Anthony Fauci, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, as well as the FBI, DOJ, and other intelligence and law enforcement agencies, Patel says. Patel also reveals what Congress can do should any government employees violate their subpoenas.“If you can't trust the Department of Justice, or they won't do their job, the Speaker of the House, after a vote of the full Congress, can order the Sergeant at Arms, who's the number one cop for Congress, to go and arrest individual citizens and government employees who violate congressional subpoenas,” explains Patel.

Two years on from the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol breach, we revisit what really happened in the weeks and days leading up to January 6. Crucial evidence Kash Patel shared with the January 6 committee was omitted from the final report, and his deposition was only released in the final moments of the 117th Congress without any of the evidentiary exhibits he asked to be included, he says.“I asked for the DoD timeline, the long version, the short version. I asked for the Capitol Police timeline. I asked for Mayor Bowser's letter. I asked for relevant media articles that they were citing about me to be included into the record. They excluded all of it,” says Patel.We also discuss the protracted election for House Speaker and the recent Twitter Files, published by Matt Taibbi, detailing the overwhelming number of requests to censor that flooded into Twitter from various government sectors, including the FBI, the Senate Intelligence Committee, and the office of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). “Requests arrived and were escalated from all over: from Treasury, the NSA, virtually every state, the HHS, from the FBI and DHS, and more,” Taibbi writes. Many were honored.

n this episode of Kash's Corner, we discuss Elon Musk's latest “Twitter Files” drop on censorship of COVID-19 related information, including vaccine harms to children, and Kash Patel reflects on his time as chief of staff at the Department of Defense during Operation Warp Speed and the initial COVID-19 vaccine rollout.We also discuss the release of the final Jan. 6 committee report, which notably did not include Patel's deposition.“There were hundreds, if not thousands of depositions taken,” says Patel. “I know they haven't released all of them. They probably haven't even released half of them.”

It was recently revealed that in Nov. 2017, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI issued a grand jury subpoena to Google for Kash Patel's personal records, emails, and credit card information. “And I wasn't the only one. We've confirmed at least one other senior congressional staffer was subpoenaed,” says Kash Patel.At the time, Patel was senior counsel and chief investigator for the House Intelligence Committee's Russiagate investigation under then-Chairman Devin Nunes.“If you send out a subpoena to investigate a member of Congress and/or his staff, the Attorney General must sign off on that. That means Rod Rosenstein himself…had to have personally signed off on it,” says Patel. Attorney General Jeff Sessions had recused himself and vested authority in Rosenstein.Two months later, in a closed-door meeting in January 2018, Rosenstein threatened to subpoena the records of Devin Nunes and his staff, Patel says. He would later deny issuing such a threat when asked by Rep. Jim Jordan under oath.“How is it that Rod Rosenstein threatened to subpoena my emails and my records along with Congressman Nunes' in January of 2018. Yet he had already knowingly authorized it two months prior?” says Patel.In this episode, we discuss these growing scandals for the DOJ and FBI, and we also look at a recent “Twitter Files” drop that shows the FBI paid Twitter over $3.4 million between Oct. 2019 and Feb. 2021. This is just the tip of the iceberg, argues Patel.“I bet you it's ten times that amount… In January, the Republicans have to demand every relationship agreement between the FBI and every big tech company and every single dollar of our money that was spent by the FBI to put on the largest disinformation campaign to rig a presidential election,” says Patel.“And if anyone thinks that it was a one-off, they are completely wrong.”

In this episode of Kash's Corner, we dive into the latest installments of the “Twitter Files,” from Twitter blacklists to employees having access to direct messages to the play-by-play of how former President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter.“There's no two ways of reading everything we've covered about Twitter. It's one direction, one-way censorship, political bias, actors at the FBI and the intelligence community telling Twitter what to censor. And still, it's just a deafening silence from the mainstream media,” says Kash Patel.Much has been revealed in the “Twitter Files.” But much still remains to be uncovered. How did Twitter work with the FBI and DOJ? What did those internal communications look like? And how did Twitter systematically suppress alternative voices when it came to COVID policy?We also discuss WNBA basketball player Brittney Griner being released by Russian authorities in a prisoner swap for convicted arms dealer Victor Bout, known as the “Merchant of Death.” Prosecutors said he'd been working to sell millions of dollars worth of weapons to a designated foreign terrorist group based in Colombia to kill Americans.

Earlier this week, Elon Musk confirmed that Twitter deputy general counsel and former FBI general counsel James Baker had been “exited” from the company. He'd reportedly been “vetting” the first batch of internal Twitter files before their release to independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss.While he was at the FBI, Baker played a key role in the Russia collusion probe, including the FISA warrant to surveil then-Trump 2016 presidential campaign aide Carter Page.“James Baker was the one running blocking-and-tackle campaigns at the FBI to prevent the disclosure of documents we lawfully subpoenaed from Congress … Fast forward … he was running the same operation that he ran as FBI General Counsel inside of Twitter HQ,” says Kash Patel.It has also now been revealed that the FBI had regular meetings with Twitter (and other tech giants) in the lead-up to the 2020 elections. Were these authorized directly by then-Attorney General Bill Barr and FBI director Christopher Wray?“I want to know every contract the FBI has with Twitter,” says Patel. “I believe that they do have working-level engagement agreements with Twitter. And those need to be made public. Are taxpayer dollars funding part of this censorship scheme?”Musk should release all the Twitter censorship files without redactions, Patel says, and he should also fire Perkins Coie, which was still representing Twitter as late as Dec. 6, according to court documents.Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVusRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

In this episode of Kash's Corner, we discuss the impending release of the Jan. 6 committee's final report.Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) recently stated the committee will “scrub” some evidence containing personal identifiable information. But is personal identifiable information the only evidence that will be redacted?“What the Republicans should be doing right now… is writing letters to the head of the committee, Bennie Thompson and Speaker Pelosi while she's still speaker and say, ‘We are demanding every single document this committee has produced in its investigation to be turned over to the Republican caucus immediately,'” says Kash Patel.We also discuss the protests in China, Elon Musk saying he will release files on Twitter censorship, and Apple allegedly threatening to remove Twitter from the App Store.Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVusRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

What did the FBI know in the weeks and days leading up to the Jan. 6 Capitol breach? Is the Department of Justice possibly committing Brady violations?“When Christopher Wray told the world that the FBI had no … verifiable or credible evidence that January 6 was going to happen, that's a complete and total lie because they had placed FBI confidential human sources there,” argues Kash Patel.“The Department of Justice is taking an active position to prosecute people when they have not fully investigated the case and know[ing] there's information out there that might be beneficial to a number of the defendants they are currently prosecuting.”We discuss recent reporting about FBI informants within Proud Boys, Christopher Wray's testimony on Jan. 6, and likely Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy's plans to remove Rep. Adam Schiff, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and Rep. Ilhan Omar from committee assignments.

“What the Republican Party has to do is decide: Are we going to jump in and play by the same rules that the Democrats have been and go big on mail-in ballots? And my advice to the Republican Party is yes,” says Kash Patel.In this episode of Kash's Corner, we discuss the results of the midterm elections and Trump's recent announcement he's running for president in 2024.With Congress now split, Kash breaks down the three investigations he believes House Republicans should launch “on day one.” How can House Republicans force federal agencies to turn over documents?“Republicans should remind America and the agencies more importantly … that they control the purse strings,” says Kash Patel.Follow EpochTV on social media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVusRumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTVTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTVGettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtvFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVusGab: https://gab.com/EpochTVTelegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

In this episode of Kash's Corner, we discuss Igor Danchenko's acquittal of four counts of lying to the FBI and the strategy the defense used to win over the jury. Kash Patel reflects on the trial's key takeaways and whether Americans should have any faith in the FBI moving forward. “Now, thanks to John Durham, we know definitively that James Comey, Andy McCabe, Peter Strzok, and all the others at the FBI—Thibault, Auten, Somma—lied to a federal court, lied to the American public and intentionally—intentionally—did not do their jobs because they knew the answers to the questions about the Steele dossier, its source network, and its veracity would fail and would destroy their investigation,” says Kash Patel. Are we living in a ‘post-truth' America? “These political witch hunts and prosecutions are very real, whether it's January 6 or otherwise,” says Kash. We also discuss the next steps for Durham, whether any corrupt FBI agents will be prosecuted, and what viewers can expect on the next season of Kash's Corner.

On this episode of “Kash's Corner,” we discuss developments in the Igor Danchenko Trial, including FBI Agent Brian Auten's bombshell testimony about the FBI's offer to Christopher Steele. “Now we learned that there was an offer of one million U.S. dollars to Christopher Steele?” says Kash Patel. “Remember when we broke the news that the DNC and Hillary Clinton had paid for the Steele dossier? … This news is as important and as significant as that.” We also reflect on the media's “circular reporting” of Russiagate, and speculate as to whether John Durham has a shot at winning. “This is intentional, unlawful activity by our government partnering with the media to pump out disinformation,” says Patel. “We almost need a new word for how bad this is.”

On this episode of Kash's Corner, we discuss the Chinese fentanyl threat, Elon Musk offering to buy Twitter again at the original price, and allegations by former Hunter Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski that the FBI buried evidence of Biden family wrongdoing. “Call logs don't lie. Text messages don't lie. Photos don't lie. Internet traffic data … it's hard empirical data,” Patel says. “The fact that [Bobulinski] laid out this amount of information, and the FBI has never talked to him since that interview, not one phone call, not one email … as a former national security prosecutor, to me, that is totally unacceptable,” Patel says.

In this livestream episode, we'll discuss FBI whistleblower Steve Friend's allegations of FBI abuse in the handling of probes into the events of Jan. 6, 2021, the recent Nord Stream pipeline explosions, the Igor Danchenko case, and what Kash Patel calls the “confidential human source corruption cover-up network.” We also touch on the situation at the border, and the significance of the White House walking back so many of President Joe Biden's statements. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

“What were they investigating [Igor Danchenko] for circa 2009, 2010? … Basically trying to buy classified information and sell it to a foreign government. … And they closed the investigation because they lose him, but it turns out, he was in America the whole time.” In this episode of Kash's Corner, we discuss revelations that Igor Danchenko was a paid FBI confidential human source and was previously being investigated by the FBI for allegedly trying to buy and sell classified information. The investigation was closed in 2010 “after the FBI incorrectly believed that the defendant had left the country,” according to a recent filing by special counsel John Durham. We also discuss Russian President Vladimir Putin's recent threats to use nuclear force, the appointment of a special master in the Trump Mar-a-Lago case, the New York attorney general filing a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump and three of his children, and recent FBI whistleblower allegations detailed in separate letters to the FBI from Sen. Chuck Grassley and Rep. Jim Jordan. The letters allege the FBI has become politicized and the FBI's Washington Field Office is artificially inflating the threat of violent extremism domestically. The FBI's Washington headquarters should be disbanded and agents sent back to the field, Kash Patel argues. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

In this special episode of Kash's Corner, New York Times best-selling author Lee Smith guest hosts with Jan Jekielek and dives into new John Durham filings in the Igor Danchenko case. “Wait a minute—the FBI had this guy under a counterintelligence investigation, and then they hire him as a confidential human source?” Danchenko was the subject of an FBI investigation from 2009 to 2011 for apparently talking to a Brookings Institution coworker about selling classified information for money. According to a new filing in the Danchenko case, the FBI signed Danchenko on as a paid confidential human source in March 2017. According to Lee Smith, the FBI has “outsourced” its lies, and John Durham should go after the agency to hold to account the people behind Russiagate and the Mar-a-Lago raid—scandals that Lee Smith views as intrinsically connected. “They bury their corruption, and they make it impossible for people to ask questions. And then they turn it around on the people who are asking questions, saying, ‘Oh, no, no no. You're the problem. You're the one who's going to get people killed,” says Lee Smith. In 2017, Congressman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) was accused of endangering sources after demanding documents from the DOJ, and a recent New York Times article suggests that documents at Mar-a-Lago could compromise human intelligence sources. Will Igor Danchenko ultimately be acquitted like Michael Sussmann? Did DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz know Danchenko was an FBI confidential source when he put out his 2019 report? “The scandal grows larger and larger the more information we have,” says Lee Smith.

In this episode of Kash's Corner, Kash Patel discusses Judge Cannon's ruling to allow a Special Master to review the Mar-A-Lago search warrant case, and her criticism of the DOJ & FBI for their handling of Trump's personal items during the raid. “And so basically, what the judge is saying is, ‘I, as an article III court officer – the judge -, do not trust you – the FBI and DOJ – based on your own conduct, and based upon the warrants that you applied for and executed,” says Kash Patel. As Danchenko's lawyers seek dismissal of Durham's indictment, new court filings indicate that the FBI knew the Steele Dossier was false early on. “You now have the number one source of the Steele dossier pleading in federal court during a criminal investigation of him, telling the world and the judge that ‘the Steele dossier was BS, I was its main source, and I told the FBI that in January of 2016,'” says Kash Patel. Kash Patel dives into new discoveries in the FBI's censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story, including Mark Zuckerberg's admission on Joe Rogan, and former FBI agent Thibault's dealings with Tony Bobulinski. Kash Patel argues that the FBI must make records of their conversation with Mark Zuckerberg public. “It's simple. Release the documents What are they going to say? ‘The Mark Zuckerberg 302s are classified?' Those 302s need to be made public yesterday,” says Kash Patel. BUY Jan 6 DVD: https://www.epochtv.shop/product-page/dvd-the-real-story-of-january-6, Promo Code “Kash” for 20% off. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

In this episode of Kash's Corner, Kash Patel discusses the Mar-a-Lago affidavit and argues that the DOJ and FBI deliberately revealed his name in an effort to intimidate and threaten him. “Two names were unredacted: President Trump's and mine,” says Kash Patel. “The only thing they cared about was putting my name on blast again, after knowing that I had been threatened before because of their careless conduct on the Jan. 6 committee for doing the same exact thing.” FBI agent Timothy Thibault recently announced he will “retire.” According to Kash Patel, Thibault is trying to avoid being investigated and prosecuted for his role in Russiagate and covering up the Hunter Biden laptop story. “Mr. Thibault was on a trip to Prague with Bruce and Nellie Ohr as an agent for the FBI in early 2016, when we said the Russiagate investigation was getting going … In government, there are no coincidences,” says Kash Patel. What is the real reason behind the DOJ's opposition to appointing a special master to review and verify the Mar-a-Lago raid process? Were the seized Mar-a-Lago documents recently released to the public actually a staged FBI photo-op to incriminate former President Donald Trump? “It's like going into a murder scene and finding the gun in the garbage can and one of the murder suspects on the ground, and taking the gun and putting it in his hand and taking a photo with him pointing it at the person that's dead … It's literally ‘investigatory 101,'' says Kash Patel. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

In this episode of Kash's Corner, Kash Patel discusses Dr. Anthony Fauci's retirement from public service, new documents showing potential White House involvement in the Mar-a-Lago raid, and developments in the Igor Danchenko case, led by special counsel John Durham. A newly disclosed letter, first published by Just the News, shows the Biden administration asking the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in April to let the FBI look over documents from former President Donald Trump's home. “There was communications underlying these letters between the National Archivist, and the Department of Justice, and the White House, directly showing the White House Counsel's Office and White House aides talking to the DOJ,” says Kash Patel. What is “executive privilege”? Does a current sitting president have the power to waive his predecessor's claims to executive privilege? And if the gavel switches hands in November, will Republicans use congressional authority to investigate the Mar-a-Lago raid and Fauci's alleged misconduct? Kash Patel breaks down the levers Congress has to prosecute agency officials. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

In this episode of Kash's Corner, Kash Patel addresses the Iranian fatwa on Salman Rushdie, possible U.S. reentry into the nuclear deal, and recent developments surrounding the Mar-a-Lago raid. “There is no way on planet Earth that the Department of Justice did not tell the White House Counsel's Office of this raid,” claims Kash. Kash Patel discusses details that have been omitted from media coverage of the raid and demands the release of concealed documents relating to Mar-a-Lago and Russiagate. He also explains how Congress can compel intelligence agencies to hand over unreleased documents. “When you call the DOJ and FBI and you place a hold … on the distribution of taxpayer dollars to fund those agencies, they will overnight provide you with thousands of documents.” Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

In this episode of Kash's Corner, Kash Patel dives into the Mar-a-Lago raid and the many unanswered questions surrounding it. “Nothing these guys do is inadvertent. Everything they do is intentional, including this intentional raid on President Trump's home,” argues Kash Patel. We discuss what Kash Patel sees as the failure to apply blind justice as well as the government's abandonment of due process and its selective application of the law. “Jurisdiction is supposed to be blind,” says Kash Patel. “They are selectively applying federal jurisdiction by going to a magistrate judge that they know hates President Trump as much as they do, and applying their political bias to what's supposed to be an apolitical investigation.” Does this constitute a modern-day Watergate? “It's the same individuals that ran Russiagate. It's the same individuals that said Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation. It's the same individuals that falsified FISA warrants. These people are running this investigation? When is it going to be enough?” Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

Disclaimer: Kash Patel is a board member of Trump Media & Technology Group, the company that owns Truth Social. On this special episode of Kash's Corner, Kash Patel sits down with his old boss, former Congressman Devin Nunes, now CEO of Trump Media & Technology Group, to reflect on their time in Washington and what it was like trying to expose egregious misconduct in the Department of Justice, FBI, and beyond. “This was something that we never knew could exist—that you could somehow get a contractor that could become politicized to go out and use the powers of the state to essentially spy on your political opponents … That's what happened,” says Nunes. They discuss lessons from the Michael Sussmann trial, what's coming next in the Igor Danchenko trial, and how Nunes sees the Department of Justice and other agencies being held accountable if the gavel changes hands. “There's going to have to be an investigation like none that's ever been done before, directly at the Department of Justice and everything below,” argues Nunes. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

Whistleblowers have recently come forward alleging widespread misconduct within the FBI and DOJ and a cover-up of the Hunter Biden laptop story, according to a letter from Sen. Chuck Grassley demanding answers and accountability. “Here you have an actual journalistic investigation, which proves the merits of the Hunter Biden laptop and its contents. And then what do you have? Individuals who swore an oath to protect America politicize the national security apparatus because they don't want Donald Trump elected,” says Kash Patel. And as the Jan. 6 committee continues to withhold critical information from the public about what happened on Jan. 6, Liz Cheney effectively exonerated Trump of the “insurrection” charge in a recent interview on Fox News, says Kash Patel. Leaked text messages from Cassidy Hutchinson, the Jan. 6 committee's star witness, have undermined her testimony, putting even more holes in the entire Jan. 6 narrative.

In the days leading up to Jan. 6, 2021, President Donald Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard, but official government documents show Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Washington mayor Muriel Bowser, and the D.C. Capitol Police each declined the offer. “The fact that President Trump authorized security for the Capitol and he ordered the transition of government—he could legally and factually not have been orchestrating a coup to conduct an insurrection,” says Kash Patel. Why hasn't the FBI turned over all documentation related to January 6? Were there undercover government agents in the crowd that day? And why was Trump supporter Rosanne Boyland, who died that day, repeatedly beaten by a Capitol Police officer even while she was unconscious?

Two days before the Capitol breach on Jan. 6, 2021, then-President Donald Trump personally authorized the use of up to 20,000 National Guardsmen to support local law enforcement if requested. But no request, as required by law, came from the Capitol police or from Mayor Muriel Bowser, says Kash Patel, who was serving as chief of staff at the Department of Defense at the time. What really happened in the days leading up to Jan. 6? In the Season 4 finale of Kash's Corner, we'll dive into the Jan. 6 Capitol breach, issues of censorship and national security, and what's next in the Durham investigation. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

The acquittal of ex-Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was “a straight-up case of jury nullification … which basically says we don't care what the facts are, we're going to find you not guilty anyway,” argues Kash Patel. The jury's short deliberation time means “they didn't really look at the evidence.” For future cases, Patel argues that special counsel John Durham should try to bring them outside of Washington. There are “creative ways to have lawful jurisdiction if you want to do it,” he says. What's next for John Durham? Will tech executive Rodney Joffe be indicted next? Evidence has also emerged that Rodney Joffe had circumvented his FBI handler, that the FBI had set up and maintained a secure vault at the Perkins Coie office, and that Michael Sussmann had a badge giving him access to FBI headquarters. What's really going on? We discuss all this and more in this episode of Kash's Corner. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

Kash Patel and Jan Jekielek break down revelations from the trial of ex-Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann—from revelations that tech executive Rodney Joffe was an FBI source for years to evidence that Sussmann billed the Clinton campaign for thumb drives he bought from Staples and gave to the FBI. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

Was the Russia collusion narrative an “October surprise” to damage the Trump 2016 campaign? Why was tech executive Rodney Joffe terminated as an FBI confidential informant? Will he be charged next by special counsel John Durham? We discuss all this and more in this episode on the trial of ex-Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann. Follow EpochTV on social media: Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

“In March of 2017 … [then-FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe] is admitting—in a meeting with the team running the Russiagate investigation—that there is no connection between Alfa Bank and Trump Tower,” according to newly released FBI notes, says Kash Patel. These handwritten FBI and DOJ notes incriminate top officials and expose a conspiracy against Donald Trump, Kash says. “As the lead Russiagate investigator, I never saw these notes. We asked for them. And they told us—they, the Department of Justice, the FBI—told us they did not exist.” In this episode, Kash explains what he's found in these newly released documents and why the judge's recent order in the Michael Sussmann case was not a huge blow to special counsel John Durham's case, unlike what many have claimed. Kash and Jan also take a look at the firestorm of protests occurring outside the homes of Supreme Court justices since the leak of a draft ruling on Roe v. Wade. Will the justices be influenced?

What will be the consequences of the leak of the Supreme Court's draft opinion on Roe v. Wade? What form should a proper investigation take? What will be the role of the new Disinformation Governance Board under the Department of Homeland Security? Its new head, Nina Jankowicz, is under fire for past comments she's made, including citing Christopher Steele's “expertise” on the evolution of disinformation and questioning the authenticity of the Hunter Biden laptop. And what might be contained in the documents that ex-Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann and other Clinton campaign associates are trying to keep from special counsel John Durham? We discuss all these questions and more in this episode of Kash's Corner.

“You can't say it's attorney-client privilege, and then sneakily have it sent out to six different media outlets because you want that story, that narrative … out in the mainstream media.” The defense strategy for ex-Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann is backfiring, says Kash Patel. While Clinton associates including former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, campaign manager Robby Mook, campaign lawyer Marc Elias, opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and tech executive Rodney Joffe have jumped into the fray to issue pleadings asserting attorney-client and work-product privileges, special counsel John Durham “completely destroys them with their own work,” Kash says. In this episode, Kash and Jan break down what's in John Durham's latest pleadings, the judge's order, the defense's filings, and the stunning misfiled emails between Fusion GPS and members of the media—which were erroneously publicized without redactions.

“[Durham] now has Clinton world burying Michael Sussmann, the defendant in this case.” Clinton campaign affiliates are throwing former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann under the bus, says Kash Patel. And in a last-ditch effort to protect themselves, they are trying to hide evidence behind attorney-client privilege, he argues. Kash and Jan break down special counsel John Durham's latest filing and the significance of the flurry of responses from Clinton campaign affiliates, including former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, campaign manager Robby Mook, campaign lawyer Marc Elias, opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and tech executive Rodney Joffe. According to Durham's filing, the CIA knew in early 2017 that the Alfa Bank allegations tying Trump to Russia were likely false. At the same time, the FBI intentionally avoided coming to conclusions on the veracity of these allegations, Kash argues. We discuss all this and more in this episode of Kash's Corner.