Podcasts about breaches

Sean Farrington delves into the detail of the Prime Minister's party conference address.Elsewhere, the Premier League confirms that an independent panel has found Manchester guilty of making "sham contracts" with a number of commercial partners. It says this was part of a scheme to disguise secret club funding of more than £830m. Also, a closely-watched forecast predicts a double-digit percentage rise in bills in the new year. And we take a look at trade tensions over a viral type of yam.

Max Rushden and Charlie Baker step in to take the helm for today's show. The boys kick off with a look at the fiery press conference setting the stage for Anthony Joshua versus Tyson Fury. Heavyweight boxer Dave Allen drops by to share his thoughts on the potential mega-fight and give an insider's view on the division.Over in rugby, talkSPORT's correspondent Alfie Reynolds brings the latest details after Saracens' Director of Rugby failed to fulfill media commitments.The biggest football news of the day is covered from all angles as Manchester City are found guilty of financial breaches. Chief Man City writer for The Manchester Evening News, Simon Bajkowski, breaks down the findings, while talkSPORT reporter and dedicated City fan Simon Hill reacts to what this landmark decision means for the club's future. Additionally, You can find more from us here:Instagram: @tSHandJTwitter: @tSHandJYouTube: talkSPORTWebsite: Live Radio, Breaking Sports News, Opinion - talkSPORT Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Eight years, 115 charges, and now a guilty verdict. The long running case against English Premier League side Machester City over financial rules breaches reached a landmark moment this week. So what exactly has been proven, what happens next, and what could this mean for English football? Sports editor Dana Johannsen spoke to Lisa Owen.

The FC crew react to the Premier League confirming that Manchester City are guilty of all charges of Premier League financial breaches. The guys break down the implications of the decision and what punishments we can expect going forward. Plus, Theo Walcott break down wins for England and Spain in the Nations League. The crew also continue to reflect on the fallout from Bernardo Silva's challenge on Martin Odegaard. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this clip from the Redmen Biased Football Podcast, Ste, Chris, Chloe and Dan discuss Man City being found guilty of financial breaches and what the appropriate punishment should be. DOWNLOAD OUR REDMEN PLUS APP: https://bit.ly/RedmenPlus Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

OpenAI halts training its latest AI models after more breaches; A national information campaign on bird flu launched; And in the AFL, the Lions coach on his future after the team wins three premierships in a row.

Is Privacy Dead—or on Life Support? Ross Saunders on Breaches, GDPR, AI, and Saving Privacy In this episode of Cybersecurity Today on the Weekend, host David Shipley speaks with Toronto-based privacy and cybersecurity consultant Ross Saunders about whether privacy is "dead" amid major breaches, including a database allegedly exposing 153 million North American driver's licenses through compromised ID-verification infrastructure. Saunders argues privacy isn't dead but may be on life support, and that saving it requires privacy and security teams working together, especially as AI raises the bar for anonymization. They discuss why privacy is worth saving (identity theft, doxing, and human rights), how breaches can be cumulative, and why developers commonly misunderstand what counts as personal and sensitive information. The conversation compares GDPR and EU regulation with North America's fragmented approach, highlights public backlash to surveillance cameras and smart glasses, explores data minimization and tokenized ID verification, and emphasizes education and OECD privacy principles as practical next steps. 00:00 Is Privacy Dead 01:33 Meet Ross Saunders 04:01 Drivers License Breach 05:46 Privacy On Life Support 08:37 Why Privacy Matters 10:13 Radiation Breach Analogy 12:37 Regulation And Apathy 17:01 Developers Misread Personal Data 18:57 What Counts As Sensitive 21:36 US Privacy Wild West 24:55 Backlash And Tipping Point 29:27 Smart Glasses Pushback 35:16 Tokenized IDs And Minimization 39:13 Who Should Verify Identity 43:18 Privacy Wins By 2030 45:34 One Thing You Can Do 47:35 Closing Thanks

Earth breaches seven of nine planetary boundariesLeaders demand solar for all by 2030States sue over Trump's wind payoffWhy time fliesThe Atlantic AMOC slowsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Sources say Manchester City have been found guilty of breaking the majority of the 115 financial rules they were accused of breaching. Also: The Prime Minister has urged the justice system of England and Wales to look at how a paedophile was bailed back to his flat overlooking a playground. And the BBC is bringing back the children's programme, Play School. (Image: PA)

Listen to the top news of 24/09/26 in Hindi#sbsaudiopodcast

OpenAI orders a review after an AI agent breaches Medicare; Xi Jinping arrives in Washington for talks with Donald Trump; Brisbane launches a last-ditch bid to keep Lachie Neale in the AFL Grand Final.

AT&T, Nippon Steel, AstraZeneca, PayPal are part of the fun this week. 245 breaches total!

These sources provide a detailed comparative analysis of the artificial intelligence landscape in 2026, focusing on the rivalry between flagship models like Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o. The documentation evaluates these tools across several dimensions, including coding proficiency, creative writing quality, and multimodal capabilities, while introducing specialized reasoning models designed for complex problem-solving. A significant portion of the text addresses the economic realities of AI implementation, highlighting massive price disparities and the persistent challenge of hallucinations in high-stakes fields like medicine and law. To manage these issues, the authors advocate for smart model routing, a strategy that directs tasks to the most cost-effective and reliable model based on query complexity. Collectively, the sources offer a strategic roadmap for developers and enterprises navigating a rapidly evolving and increasingly fragmented AI market.

These sources provide a comprehensive analysis of the rapidly shifting cybersecurity landscape, emphasizing how artificial intelligence has fundamentally altered both criminal tactics and defensive strategies. One report highlights the alarming speed of modern intrusions, noting that AI-enabled adversaries have significantly compressed the time required to breach organizations and exploit emerging vulnerabilities. Simultaneously, financial analysis of the sector reveals its evolution into a critical investment frontier, marked by decade-long growth and high-value acquisitions. As the digital attack surface expands across cloud environments and non-human identities, companies are increasingly adopting automated, proactive defenses like zero-trust architecture. Ultimately, the documentation illustrates an intense global technology race where digital security has transitioned from a technical necessity to a primary pillar of national and corporate resilience.

Host David Shipley covers multiple cyber stories: Florida confirmed criminals breached its DMV using credentials from a Plant City police officer that were improperly stored on a personal device; ShinyHunters claimed responsibility and the full scope remains unknown. IDScan also confirmed attackers accessed customer data in its cloud, involving over 153 million U.S. driver's license scans and 1.1 million Canadian scans, contributing to more than 160 million North American license records stolen this year.  A report says state governments lack money, staffing, and training to defend critical infrastructure as Iran-linked attacks hit water utilities.  Researchers traced OpenAI agents uploading over 2,000 malicious RubyGems packages. Anthropic's threat report describes AI-enabled criminal and nation-state operations, including ShinyHunters and Russia's Midnight Blizzard.  Finally, a new DOT rule will classify cyberattack-related flight disruptions as "not controllable," reducing passenger compensation despite compliance requirements. 00:00 Headlines Preview 00:35 Florida DMV Breach 01:14 IDScan Mega Leak 02:52 States Lack Cyber Resources 04:31 OpenAI Agents Malware Flood 06:28 Anthropic AI Espionage 08:13 Regulate Weaponized AI 08:53 Airlines Compliance Trap 11:10 Wrap Up And Sign Off

A brief look at financial markets with Bokor In the Morning brought to you by Steve Bokor at Ventum Financial Corp. a member of CIPF

Manoj Saxena is the Founder and CEO of Trustwise, an AI safety company focused on helping enterprises securely deploy and control agentic AI systems. A pioneer in responsible AI, he was the first General Manager of IBM Watson and is also the Founder and Executive Chairman of the Responsible AI Institute, a global nonprofit focused on advancing trustworthy and responsible AI. A serial entrepreneur and University of Texas at Austin lecturer, Manoj has founded two venture-backed software companies acquired by Commerce One and IBM and holds 34 software patents. In this episode… As AI evolves from answering questions to making decisions and taking action, the risks to businesses are becoming harder to see and control. Hidden instructions or improper access to sensitive data can expose information, trigger unauthorized actions, and disrupt operations. How can organizations harness AI's power without losing control? For Manoj Saxena, a pioneer in Trusted Artificial Intelligence, organizations need a control layer that ensures AI acts according to policy, intent, and compliance. He highlights a three-step approach — assess, control, and optimize — to identify risks, apply tailored policies, and simulate AI behavior before deployment. He also shares real-world examples of silent breaches and explains why autonomous agents require clear boundaries, oversight, and accountability. These safeguards allow businesses to innovate with AI while reducing risk and maintaining trust. In this episode of the Inspired Insider Podcast, host Dr. Jeremy Weisz sits down with Manoj Saxena, Founder and CEO of Trustwise, to discuss controlling the risks of enterprise AI. They explore silent AI breaches, governing autonomous agents, and building responsible AI systems. Manoj also shares emerging AI revenue models and lessons from auto racing.

LA Metro, the transit system that moves nearly 10 million people in Los Angeles, just appeared on a ransomware gang's extortion site. A dark-web service is selling 153 million scanned driver's licenses. And security researchers watched AI break into a company and steal the master keys in under 10 hours. Three stories, one uncomfortable pattern. *Cybercrime is now an industry, and speed is the whole game.* Bryan Hornung, Randy Bryan, and Reginald Andre break down this week's stories for executives, owners, and operators who can't follow every cyber headline but can't afford to be blindsided. First up: LA Metro. A fast-growing ransomware crew called The Gentlemen posted the country's second-busiest transit system to its leak site, claiming it stole internal data. Here's what most coverage skips: this is a claim on a leak site, not a confirmed breach. There's no ransom demand and no statement from the agency. Bryan explains how to read a scary headline without confusing an allegation for a fact. These crews choose targets based on how much disruption they can cause, and public infrastructure is squarely in their sights. If your business creates real-world chaos when it goes down, you fit the profile. Then Randy tackles the story that should worry every business that scans an ID. A service called Nexus appeared offering searchable access to more than 153 million driver's licenses from the US and Canada. Investigative reporter Brian Krebs traced the data to an identity-verification vendor called IDScan.net. The FBI's New Orleans office opened a case the same day, reportedly after finding IDs belonging to a US Defense Secretary and an FBI Assistant Director in the pile. The vendor runs 21 million ID checks a month for names like Hertz, Target, and FedEx, so a leak there becomes a problem for many other companies. If a business scanned your license, your photo and address may have passed through a vendor you never chose and can't see. Reginald closes with the story that connects everything. Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 documented a real attack in which a person directed AI agents at a company and let them run the break-in. The agents mapped the network, raided passwords hidden in the company's own code, and grabbed the master credentials in under 10 hours. That work would take a human team about two weeks. One boring control stopped them cold: a basic protection on the code pipeline blocked the backdoor. The lesson for owners is blunt. The fundamentals still work, but your window to catch an attack is now hours, not days. In this episode, we discuss: • A ransomware gang claims LA Metro, and how to tell a claim from a confirmed breach • A dark-web service selling 153 million driver's licenses and the FBI probe into the vendor behind it • AI agents that breached a company and stole root access in under 10 hours • Why cybercrime now scales like a business, and why speed is the whole game • The internet-facing gear and hidden passwords attackers hit first • What to ask every vendor that touches your customers' data Security Squawk is a weekly podcast and live stream for business owners and executives. Support the show: buymeacoffee.com/securitysquawk Subscribe | Like | Share #SecuritySquawk #CyberSecurity #Ransomware #LAMetro #DataBreach #FBI #ArtificialIntelligence #VendorRisk #BusinessRisk #SMB #IdentityTheft #MSP Security Squawk

Let's just all get drunk this weekend...

Jerry spoke to Sinéad Murphy who’s head of communications and engagement with the Residential Tenancies Board (RTB). New rules are coming into effect on September 14th.

Synthetic Data in Breaches; Email Address != Person; Ridiculous Security for “Cyber Broken” Copenhagen https://www.troyhunt.com/weekly-update-519/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Carhartt, McKesson, Boston Scientific, Hasbro, and a total of 214 organization had a super week...

In this episode of Talk Law Radio, attorneys Todd Marquardt and Benjamin T. Kemmy lead a discussion covering personal financial planning strategies and the legal complexities of high-profile medical malpractice claims. Episode Summary The episode opens with Todd Marquardt presenting the "Financial Focus" segment on behalf of Financial Planning HQ. Marquardt addresses the common financial dilemma faced by parents: prioritizing saving for a child's college education versus preparing for retirement. He outlines current college cost projections, discusses alternative options such as community college and merit/athletic scholarships, and highlights modern trends where families emphasize return on investment (ROI) when choosing career paths. In the primary segment of the show, Marquardt is joined by San Antonio attorney Benjamin T. Kemmy, whose practice focuses on personal injury and medical malpractice. Together, they analyze the civil medical malpractice lawsuit filed by Lindsay Clancy—a former Massachusetts labor and delivery nurse facing murder charges for strangling her three children during a severe mental health crisis—against her treating psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, and medical facilities. The discussion breaks down the legal framework of medical negligence, the standard of care in psychiatric treatment, the challenges of proving causation, and the key differences between civil and criminal proceedings. Key Takeaways Values-Based Financial Planning (College vs. Retirement): Financial decisions regarding higher education should be aligned with family values and long-term security. Relying solely on retirement delay to fund college can lead to financial instability, whereas alternatives—such as local free community college programs or merit and athletic scholarships—can ease the burden. Modern college planning increasingly focuses on the return on investment (ROI) of a chosen degree relative to career earning potential. Core Elements of a Medical Malpractice Claim: To recover civil money damages, a plaintiff must establish four key legal elements: Duty, Breach, Causation, and Damages. Physicians owe patients a duty to provide care that meets the accepted national standard of a reasonable and prudent practitioner in similar circumstances. Breaches in psychiatric cases often center around failure to obtain proper patient history, improper medication management (uncoordinated polypharmacy), and failure to investigate severe symptoms such as intrusive thoughts or command hallucinations. The Challenge of Proving Causation in Psychiatric Cases: Demonstrating that medical negligence directly caused a tragic event (such as self-harm or harm to others) is often the most difficult burden for a plaintiff's legal team. Courts often scrutinize whether an act was an independent action of the patient or a foreseeable outcome of prescribed psychotropic medications and uncoordinated care. Civil Lawsuits vs. Criminal Trials: Burden of Proof: Criminal cases require the state to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to strip someone of liberty. Civil lawsuits require a lower standard—preponderance of the evidence (proving allegations are more likely true than not) to award financial compensation. Roles of Judge and Jury: In civil trials, the judge decides issues of law and admissible evidence, while a jury of non-experts acts as the sole judge of the facts, evaluating conflicting expert testimony to determine liability. Communication in Healthcare: Lack of communication and poor record coordination among multiple healthcare providers represent one of the most frequent root causes of medical negligence. -Sponsored by Marquardt Law Firm and Financial Planning HQ -Go to marquardtlawfirm.com and financialplanninghq.net If you found this episode valuable, please Subscribe and hit the Notification Bell on YouTube. Sharing this podcast with other parents, grandparents, and caregivers helps raise vital awareness to protect the children in our communitiesSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A newly surfaced June 15, 2009 letter from then-acting U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman showed that Jeffrey Epstein had repeatedly violated the terms of his extraordinarily favorable 2007 non-prosecution agreement, yet federal prosecutors in South Florida never exercised their explicit authority to tear up the deal and prosecute him. Sloman told Epstein's attorneys that there had been “several instances” in which Epstein breached both the letter and spirit of the agreement, with prosecutors ultimately issuing five warnings over roughly two years. The violations included Epstein's failure to make his promised state guilty plea within the agreed timetable, his lawyers submitting a proposed state plea agreement containing language that conflicted with the federal deal, interference with prosecutors' efforts to notify victims, delays in securing legal representation for victims, efforts to resist a subpoena for computer equipment that could help identify additional victims, and false or threatening representations concerning his eligibility for work release. The precise basis for the fifth warning was not spelled out in the letter. Sloman complained that whenever prosecutors confronted Epstein, his lawyers would claim that Epstein had merely relied on their advice, provide a superficial fix and then continue benefiting from the agreement until another violation occurred.What made the revelations especially significant was that Epstein's non-prosecution agreement explicitly stated that the breach of even one condition gave the United States the option to terminate the deal and investigate and prosecute Epstein and others for federal crimes. Despite documenting repeated violations, prosecutors did not do that. Sloman acknowledged in the letter that Epstein continued receiving the central benefit of the bargain, freedom from federal prosecution, while the government was not receiving the finality, conservation of resources, punishment and victim restitution that the agreement was supposed to produce. Asked in 2026 why the government had done little more than issue warnings, Sloman said he could not remember the specific reasoning, although he maintained that prosecutors had ultimately treated the matter as a state case and called approval of the deal a “bad call” rather than something nefarious. The documents therefore added another damaging layer to the history of the Epstein prosecution: federal authorities did not merely give Epstein an exceptionally lenient agreement, they apparently documented multiple occasions on which he failed to honor that agreement and still allowed the immunity arrangement protecting him and potential co-conspirators to remain intact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein breached 2007 non-prosecution agreement five times, prosecutors did zipBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

BUSINESS: Peso breaches P62:$1, stocks slip below 6,000 | August 29, 2026.Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes#KeepUpWithTheTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A newly surfaced June 15, 2009 letter from then-acting U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman showed that Jeffrey Epstein had repeatedly violated the terms of his extraordinarily favorable 2007 non-prosecution agreement, yet federal prosecutors in South Florida never exercised their explicit authority to tear up the deal and prosecute him. Sloman told Epstein's attorneys that there had been “several instances” in which Epstein breached both the letter and spirit of the agreement, with prosecutors ultimately issuing five warnings over roughly two years. The violations included Epstein's failure to make his promised state guilty plea within the agreed timetable, his lawyers submitting a proposed state plea agreement containing language that conflicted with the federal deal, interference with prosecutors' efforts to notify victims, delays in securing legal representation for victims, efforts to resist a subpoena for computer equipment that could help identify additional victims, and false or threatening representations concerning his eligibility for work release. The precise basis for the fifth warning was not spelled out in the letter. Sloman complained that whenever prosecutors confronted Epstein, his lawyers would claim that Epstein had merely relied on their advice, provide a superficial fix and then continue benefiting from the agreement until another violation occurred.What made the revelations especially significant was that Epstein's non-prosecution agreement explicitly stated that the breach of even one condition gave the United States the option to terminate the deal and investigate and prosecute Epstein and others for federal crimes. Despite documenting repeated violations, prosecutors did not do that. Sloman acknowledged in the letter that Epstein continued receiving the central benefit of the bargain, freedom from federal prosecution, while the government was not receiving the finality, conservation of resources, punishment and victim restitution that the agreement was supposed to produce. Asked in 2026 why the government had done little more than issue warnings, Sloman said he could not remember the specific reasoning, although he maintained that prosecutors had ultimately treated the matter as a state case and called approval of the deal a “bad call” rather than something nefarious. The documents therefore added another damaging layer to the history of the Epstein prosecution: federal authorities did not merely give Epstein an exceptionally lenient agreement, they apparently documented multiple occasions on which he failed to honor that agreement and still allowed the immunity arrangement protecting him and potential co-conspirators to remain intact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein breached 2007 non-prosecution agreement five times, prosecutors did zip

A newly surfaced June 15, 2009 letter from then-acting U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman showed that Jeffrey Epstein had repeatedly violated the terms of his extraordinarily favorable 2007 non-prosecution agreement, yet federal prosecutors in South Florida never exercised their explicit authority to tear up the deal and prosecute him. Sloman told Epstein's attorneys that there had been “several instances” in which Epstein breached both the letter and spirit of the agreement, with prosecutors ultimately issuing five warnings over roughly two years. The violations included Epstein's failure to make his promised state guilty plea within the agreed timetable, his lawyers submitting a proposed state plea agreement containing language that conflicted with the federal deal, interference with prosecutors' efforts to notify victims, delays in securing legal representation for victims, efforts to resist a subpoena for computer equipment that could help identify additional victims, and false or threatening representations concerning his eligibility for work release. The precise basis for the fifth warning was not spelled out in the letter. Sloman complained that whenever prosecutors confronted Epstein, his lawyers would claim that Epstein had merely relied on their advice, provide a superficial fix and then continue benefiting from the agreement until another violation occurred.What made the revelations especially significant was that Epstein's non-prosecution agreement explicitly stated that the breach of even one condition gave the United States the option to terminate the deal and investigate and prosecute Epstein and others for federal crimes. Despite documenting repeated violations, prosecutors did not do that. Sloman acknowledged in the letter that Epstein continued receiving the central benefit of the bargain, freedom from federal prosecution, while the government was not receiving the finality, conservation of resources, punishment and victim restitution that the agreement was supposed to produce. Asked in 2026 why the government had done little more than issue warnings, Sloman said he could not remember the specific reasoning, although he maintained that prosecutors had ultimately treated the matter as a state case and called approval of the deal a “bad call” rather than something nefarious. The documents therefore added another damaging layer to the history of the Epstein prosecution: federal authorities did not merely give Epstein an exceptionally lenient agreement, they apparently documented multiple occasions on which he failed to honor that agreement and still allowed the immunity arrangement protecting him and potential co-conspirators to remain intact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein breached 2007 non-prosecution agreement five times, prosecutors did zipBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Iran-Linked Cyberattack Hits UK Power Facility, ShinyHunters Phish ReliaQuest, LockBit Claims US Bancorp, Teams Blocks Bots, Expired Visa Card Flaw Cyber Security Today host David Shipley reports a UK power facility was taken offline for four days in July by a cyberattack linked to Iran Nexus hackers, though damage was contained to a single small generator. ReliaQuest confirms ShinyHunters targeted its staff with phone-based social engineering and a fake reliaquest.claims SSO page, gaining only temporary view-only Okta dashboard access before being blocked by device trust controls, with no customer data affected.  LockBit claims it hacked US Bancorp, but the bank says the incident traces to a fourth-party contractor outside its environment and LockBit has provided no proof. Microsoft is rolling out a Teams policy to automatically block detected external bots from meetings. UMass Amherst researchers found some expired Visa cards can be "zombified" for contactless payments via a two-phone relay, depending on issuer and bank checks. 00:00 Top Headlines 00:26 Iran Linked Power Attack 01:44 ShinyHunters Targets ReliaQuest 04:16 LockBit Claims Bank Hack 05:46 Teams Blocks External Bots 07:42 Expired Visa Card Zombie 09:25 Closing Notes Tribute

ASCII Group, Sears, Kingston, Columbia University and we have 297 total incidents to get through this week... Strap in!

In this episode, we investigate how the AI industry in Silicon Valley is responding to Anthropic's watermarking breach. We also cover how Google's $12 billion investment impacts the regional tech landscape. Show LinksGet the top 80+ AI Models for $8.99 at AI Box: ⁠⁠https://aibox.aiHow I Grow and Scale My Business with AI: https://www.skool.com/aihustleGet the AI Chat Daily Newsletter: https://www.aichatdaily.com/newsletter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Craig Unger: Craig Unger explores a sidetracked FBI counterintelligence investigation into Donald Trump's decades-long ties to Russian interests. Unlike criminal inquiries, counterintelligence investigations focus on national security breaches and the laundering of influence, even when no explicit crime is proven. Unger asserts that Russian mafia figures, acting as adjuncts to state intelligence, began bailing out Trump's failing real estate ventures as early as 1984. These transactions, often involving cash purchases of condominiums in Trump Tower, allegedly turned the former president into an asset of Russian intelligence. Unger argues that the Robert Mueller investigation was a dud because it focused narrowly on criminal acts rather than this broader compromise. The discussion concludes by noting Trump's consistent, long-standing hostility toward NATO, which Unger says mirrors Soviet-era talking points and raises ongoing concerns regarding US national security. (4)

Levi Strauss, Lucid Motors, OpenAI and a whole bunch more are all part of this week's fun...

The Cybercrime Magazine Podcast brings you daily cybercrime news on WCYB Digital Radio, the first and only 7x24x365 internet radio station devoted to cybersecurity. Stay updated on the latest cyberattacks, hacks, data breaches, and more with our host. Don't miss an episode, airing every half-hour on WCYB Digital Radio and daily on our podcast. Listen to today's news at https://soundcloud.com/cybercrimemagazine/sets/cybercrime-daily-news. Brought to you by our Partner, Evolution Equity Partners, an international venture capital investor partnering with exceptional entrepreneurs to develop market leading cyber-security and enterprise software companies. Learn more at https://evolutionequity.com

The 'Shadow Economy Taskforce' visited over 15 farms in Griffith to investigate allegations of worker underpayment, false reporting of business income and expenses, exploitation of migrant workers, and illegally providing immigration support, among other claims. - ਗ੍ਰਿਫਿਥ ਸਥਿੱਤ 15 ਤੋਂ ਵੱਧ ਫਾਰਮਾਂ ਉੱਤੇ 'ਸ਼ੈਡੋਅ ਇਕਾਨਮੀ ਟਾਸਕਫੋਰਸ' ਵਲੋਂ ਛਾਪੇਮਾਰੀ ਕੀਤੀ ਗਈ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਟਾਸਕਫੋਰਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਸਟ੍ਰੇਲੀਅਨ ਟੈਕਸੇਸ਼ਨ ਆਫਿਸ (ATO), ਫੇਅਰ ਵਰਕ ਓਮਬਡਸਮੈਨ (FWO) ਅਤੇ ਡਿਪਾਰਟਮੈਂਟ ਆਫ ਹੋਮ ਅਫੇਅਰਜ਼ ਦੀ ਆਸਟ੍ਰੇਲੀਅਨ ਬਾਰਡਰ ਫੋਰਸ (ABF) ਦੇ ਅਧਿਕਾਰੀ ਸ਼ਾਮਲ ਹਨ। ਨਿਊ ਸਾਊਥ ਵੇਲਜ਼ ਦੇ ਰਿਵਰੀਨਾ ਦੇ 'ਫੂਡ ਬੋਊਲ' ਕਹਾਏ ਜਾਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਗ੍ਰਿਫਿਥ ਵਿੱਚ ਵਿਆਪਕ ਖੇਤੀਬਾੜੀ ਉਦਯੋਗ ਮੌਜੂਦ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਟਾਸਕਫੋਰਸ ਮੁਤਾਬਕ ਖੇਤੀਬਾੜੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਕਈ ਮਾਲਕ ਅਤੇ ਫਾਰਮ ਕੌਨਟ੍ਰੈਕਟਰ ਕਾਮਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਘੱਟ ਤਨਖਾਹਾਂ ਉੱਤੇ ਮਜ਼ਦੂਰੀ, ਕਾਰੋਬਾਰੀ ਆਮਦਨ ਅਤੇ ਖਰਚਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਗਲਤ ਰਿਪੋਰਟਿੰਗ, ਪ੍ਰਵਾਸੀ ਕਾਮਿਆਂ ਦਾ ਸ਼ੋਸ਼ਣ ਅਤੇ ਇਮੀਗ੍ਰੇਸ਼ਨ ਸਹਾਇਤਾ ਦਾ ਗੈਰ-ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਪ੍ਰਬੰਧ ਕਰ ਰਹੇ ਹਨ। ਪੂਰਾ ਮਾਮਲਾ ਜਾਨਣ ਲਈ ਇਹ ਪੌਡਕਾਸਟ ਸੁਣੋ।

Special Guest: Nikesh Arora, CEO @ Palo Alto Networks.  AGENDA: 04:50 Airtable Sold to Bending Spoons for $1.285B  17:00 Leo Aschenbrenner's Situational Awareness Blows Up as Citadel Buys His $16BN Book 22:30 Anthropic's AI Models Breach Three Companies as Cyber Threat Accelerates 33:35 Moonshot AI Raises $3.5B at $35B as Chinese Models Crush AI Prices 38:05 Valar Atomics Triples to $6B as Sequoia Bets on Nuclear Power for AI 42:50 OpenAI and Anthropic Could Trigger a Massive Public-Market Dislocation 52:55 Big Tech and Palantir Earnings Ignite the Next Phase of the AI Gold Rush 1:04:30 Procore Buys DroneDeploy for $900M in a High-Stakes 12x Revenue Bet 1:10:55 Scale AI Hits $1.5B ARR After the Meta Deal Left It for Dead  

Alex Pinto, who leads Verizon's DBIR team, joins me to break down the new Breach Impact Study and what data breaches actually cost organizations.For years the industry has argued past itself on breach costs. One camp says the market doesn't care, the other says a single breach ends your business. Alex and his team finally got their hands on roughly 70,000 cyber insurance claims through CyberAcuView, and the Breach Impact Study puts real numbers behind the question. In this conversation we dig into what the data shows, where it stops, and how a security leader should actually use it.Alex Pinto runs the Data Breach Investigations Report team at Verizon Business and has been building the report for close to a decade. The Breach Impact Study is the team's first focused spin-off from the DBIR.In this episode:- How the Breach Impact Study came together and why the DBIR team finally got cyber insurance claims data- Why the study measures insurable loss as a floor, not a ceiling, of real economic impact- The case for reporting medians over averages, and why the team refuses to publish the average- Business interruption versus contingent business interruption, and why downtime moves the needle- Whether an $83,000 median breach impact sends executives the wrong message- The SMB paradox, where the smallest companies take the hardest proportional hit- What the claims data does and does not show about AI on offense and defense- Third-party risk, coverage sub-limits, and the single biggest takeaway for security leadersChapters0:00 Intro0:24 Meet Alex Pinto and the DBIR team2:51 Launching the Breach Impact Study3:26 Getting cyber insurance claims data7:32 Why insurable loss is a floor, not a ceiling11:14 Medians over averages, and why the average is meaningless15:13 Business interruption vs contingent business interruption19:49 Does an $83K median send the wrong message?22:44 The SMB paradox and the cybersecurity poverty line26:05 Where AI shows up, offense vs defense34:48 The CVE explosion and marketing hype36:59 Third-party risk and coverage limits41:34 Wrap-upGuest linksAlex Pinto on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexcpsec/Alex Pinto on X: https://x.com/alexcpsecVerizon DBIR and Breach Impact Study: https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/More from Resilient CyberSubstack: https://www.resilientcyber.ioSubscribe for more conversations with security practitioners and leaders.#cyberrisk #databreach #cyberinsurance #ransomware #aisecurity #dbir

A hacker breached Hungary's State Treasury, Russia will mandate 40 apps on all smartphones next year, hackers steal Liechtenstein's business database, and an AI agent got real CVEs for hallucinated vulnerability reports. Show notes Risky Bulletin: Hacker breaches Hungary's State Treasury

April Mardock, Chief Information Security Officer at WASIPC, joins the podcast to analyze the primary entry points targeted in K-12 ransomware incidents. The discussion offers actionable guidance on multi-factor authentication, vendor risk management, data retention policies, and using gamified tabletop exercises to prepare school leadership for cyber incidents.April's LinkedIn profile and email addressCybersecurity tabletop simulation game (Gemini Gem), step into the hot seat of a live cyber attack and lead your team to safetyI Asked 24 Ransomed School Districts How the Attackers Got In - There Were Only Three Answers, LinkedIn article that April authoredK-12 SIX (K-12 Security Information Sharing and Analysis Center), threat intelligence community providing free K-12 cybersecurity guidance, checklist guides, and standardsWISPC, public, non-profit agency in Washington state that provides technology solutions, data management, and cooperative purchasing services to K-12 schoolsCyberforce|Q service from WISPC, building and implementing cybersecurity programs for organizations of all sizesBluum service from WISPC, helping educators leverage technology to create a more effective and engaging student experienceCybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; as the national coordinator for critical infrastructure security and resilience, CISA works with partners at every level to identify and manage risk to the cyber and physical infrastructure that Americans rely on every hour of every day. CISA works with partners to defend against today's threats and collaborate to build a more secure and resilient infrastructure for the future.Secure Cloud Business Application (SCuBA), CISA project providing tailored cloud solutions guidance and secure configuration baselines (SCBs) for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace applications. SCuBA's guidance aims to protect information that organizations create, access, share, or store in cloud environments.Backdoors and Breaches, incident response card game

Everton lost 8 points. Nottingham Forest lost 4. Chelsea? Not a single point, despite admitting to 74 breaches of FA rules and getting hit by three separate regulators (UEFA, the Premier League, and the FA) over £47m in undisclosed historical payments. Les and Dave lay out the full timeline of all three cases - Everton's two separate PSR breaches, Forest's £34.5m overspend, and Chelsea's Abramovich-era disclosure scandal - and compare them point by point: what the breach actually was, who discovered it, who was punished for it, and what sanction followed. Are these cases really comparable? Have Chelsea been treated more leniently than the clubs who lost points? We go through the arguments on both sides before giving our verdict. Let us know your thoughts. A breakdown of each club's breaches: Everton • Case 1: 2021/22 period. Loss £124.5m vs £105m limit (breach ~£19.5m). Charged Mar 2023. • Sanction 1: 10-point deduction (Nov 2023) → reduced to 6 points on appeal (Feb 2024). • Case 2: 2022/23 period. Breach of £16.6m. Charged Jan 2024. • Sanction 2: 2-point deduction (Apr 2024). • Total: 8 points deducted, in-season, same campaign. Nottingham Forest • Case: 2022/23 period. Threshold £61m (reduced for Championship seasons). Breach of £34.5m. Charged Jan 2024. • Sanction: 6 points initial → reduced to 4-point deduction for early admission/cooperation. • Appeal: Rejected — 4 points stood. Chelsea • UEFA (2023): €10m (£8.6m) fine — incomplete financial reporting. • Premier League (Mar 2026): £10.75m fine + immediate 9-month academy transfer ban + 1-year first-team transfer ban suspended 2 years. PL found payments, even if disclosed, would not have breached PSR. • FA (Jul 2026): 74 admitted breaches (undisclosed agent/third-party payments, £47m, 2011–2018). £10m fine (halved from £20m for self-reporting). Original 6-point suspended deduction overturned on appeal, replaced with suspended two-window transfer ban. • Total: £0 points deducted. All penalties financial or suspended. Breaches self-reported by current owners about previous (Abramovich) regime. Want a little more from us? Try The Blue Room Extra for more than 20 hours extra content a month: www.patreon.com/theblueroomextra Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Rogue AI, the Bar, Breaches, BMC, More Hugging Face, Helmuth von Multke, Ike, Shieldfont, and More on this episode of the Security Weekly News. Visit https://www.securityweekly.com/swn for all the latest episodes! Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/swn-603

Rogue AI, the Bar, Breaches, BMC, More Hugging Face, Helmuth von Multke, Ike, Shieldfont, and More on this episode of the Security Weekly News. Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/swn-603

Rogue AI, the Bar, Breaches, BMC, More Hugging Face, Helmuth von Multke, Ike, Shieldfont, and More on this episode of the Security Weekly News. Visit https://www.securityweekly.com/swn for all the latest episodes! Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/swn-603

Chick-fil-A, Estée Lauder, Hugging Face, OpenAI and more are all part of this week's breaches!

It's Story Time, our weekly walk through cricket history. This week, this show has had many distant dreams, but this week we finally have sweet closure on what may be our dearest of them all. Also, a new rival for Jack Reacher brings a story about giant-killing, and a flame who burned so bright that he eventually burned away an era of national gloom. With Adam and Geoff. Your Nerd Pledge numbers this week: 4.27 - Anthony Brown 2.14 - Neil 3.74 - Jack Spyker Get tickets to TFW v Wisden @ Wormsley and support The Lord's Taverners ⁠⁠⁠uk.emma-live.com/TFWvsWisden⁠⁠⁠ Win two places to play in the game courtesy of Zeus Sleeps. ⁠⁠⁠Nominate the worst snorer at your cricket club. ⁠⁠ Support the show with a Nerd Pledge at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/thefinalword⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠and win a signed copy of Wisden, or a case of Stomping Ground: browse their range at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠stompingground.beer⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Get yourself 10% off lovely ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Duncan Fearnley ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠bats and kit with code TFW10 Stop snoring with 10% off a Zeus device: use code TFW2026 at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠zeussleeps.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Join England's Test tour of South Africa in 2026 with Gullivers Sports Travel. Learn more or book at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠gulliverstravel.co.uk⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  With Morie Candles you can buy one item, get 30% off the next, with the offer code TFW5. At ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠morie.com.au⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Check out the Lord's Performance Centre for activities and courses: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠lords.org/lords/performancecentre⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Get your big NordVPN discount: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠nordvpn.com/tfw⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or 10% off ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Duncan Fearnley ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠bats and kit with code TFW10 or 15% off Step One clothes at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠uk.stepone.life/discount/TFW148⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or 10% off BIG Boots UK boots and socks at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠bigboots.co.uk/?ref=thefinalword⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Find more at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠finalwordcricket.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Title track by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Urthboy⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices