Podcasts about principal consultant

Keeping up with the laws and regulations in all the different jurisdictions relevant for your business already feels overwhelming. In this RSAC podcast, we are excited to be joined by two members of the RSAC Program Committee, who will simplify the tangle by highlighting the most important elements of the global legal and regulatory landscape for the cybersecurity community. Tune into this podcast as we explore how organizations can stay ahead of these changes and highlight the key sessions attendees can look forward to regarding regulations at the upcoming RSAC 2026 Conference. Speakers: John Elliott, Principal Consultant, Withoutfire Laura Koetzle, Head of Community Research, RSAC Tatyana Sanchez, Senior Coordinator, Content & Programming, RSAC Kacy Zurkus, Director, Content, RSAC

Environment Top 5: Chartered Week special, focused on debunking myths about Chartership, what the benefits are for you and your employers and top tips from two Chartered Environmentalists themselves. We cover:Myths on the Chartered Environmentalist (CEnv) applicationExplore why charterships might be valued by employersDifferent routes to CEnvWho could be a CEnv Some top tips for your applicationThis special episode of EnvCast features two Chartered Environmentalists, Kirsty Ayres and Richard Deaville   Speaker bios:Kirsty Ayres achieved Chartered Environmentalist in 2020 via the Institute of Water. She is a Principal Consultant at WRc (Water Research Centre) with 14 years' experience in the water industry, specialising in holistic source-to-tap solutions to achieve multiple benefits. She is also currently the SE Area Chair of the Institute of Water, leading a team of volunteers to plan great events for members. To further her own development, Kirsty trained as a Professional Registration Assessor to conduct reviews and interviews of future professional registration applicants and sits on the Institute of Water Environmental Panel to ensure a consistent approach is applied to all applications.Rich Deaville is a Chartered Environmentalist via ISEP with over 20 years of experience across a wide range of built environment projects working in consultancy, client and Main contractor roles. I've worked on a variety of different projects from small scale refurbishments to large national projects with a range of environmental and sustainability challenges and opportunities. Currently I'm working as a Senior Environmental Advisor with Burns & McDonnell who are a 100% employee‑owned engineering and construction firm that helps design and build the infrastructure that keeps communities running. They've been around since 1898 and now operate from more than 75 offices worldwide, taking on projects across a wide mix of industries.Professional registration:Registered status as a Chartered Environmentalist (CEnv), Registered Environmental Practitioner (REnvP) or Registered Environmental Technician (REnvTech) are available. To find out more about our registrations visit: https://socenv.org.uk/professional-re…Check out our other platforms: YouTube: Society for the Environment //Website: socenv.org.uk // LinkedIn: society-for-the-environment

Franz Thoma is Principal Consultant at TNG Technology Consulting, and an organizer of MuniHac. Franz sees functional programming and Haskell as a tool for thinking about software, even if the project is not written in Haskell. We had a far-reaching conversation about the differences between functional and object-oriented programming and their languages, software architecture, and Haskell adoption in industry. 

In this episode, Liz Hutson, Principal Consultant and Owner at EGH, LLC, shares practical strategies for resilient project planning.

In this episode, Liz Hutson, Principal Consultant and Owner at EGH, LLC, shares practical strategies for resilient project planning.

Share your Field Stories!Welcome back to Environmental Professionals Radio, Connecting the Environmental Professionals Community Through Conversation, with your hosts Laura Thorne and Nic Frederick! On today's episode, we talk with Lee Clauss, Southern California Project Manager with The Trust for Public Land and Principal Consultant at LSC Consulting, specializing in Indigenous land stewardship, sovereignty, and cultural resource management. Read her full bio below.Help us continue to create great content! If you'd like to sponsor a future episode hit the support podcast button or visit www.environmentalprofessionalsradio.com/sponsor-formShowtimes: 1:31 - Nic's New Job!7:13 - Interview with Lee Clauss Starts22:37 - What needs to Change?33:03 - What is the Process of Giving Land Back?40:36- #Fieldnotes with Lee!Please be sure to ✔️subscribe, ⭐rate and ✍review. This podcast is produced by the National Association of Environmental Professions (NAEP). Check out all the NAEP has to offer at NAEP.org.Connect with Lee Clauss at Lee Clauss | LinkedIn Guest Bio: Lee Clauss currently serves as a Project Manager on the Trust for Public Land'sCalifornia Land Protection team.  She is an applied anthropologist/archaeologist andadvocate for Native American communities' sovereignty. She has 25 years ofexperience in historic preservation and environmental law, regulatory compliance andpublic policy analysis. Her background includes Indigenous lands and culturalstewardship, curation, and community-based planning and research. Clauss regularlyprovides training on land return pathways, repatriation, Indigenous science, Tribalconsultation, environmental justice, and data sovereignty.  Prior to her time at TPL, Leeworked for and with multiple Tribal governments in Arizona, North Carolina, andCalifornia.Music CreditsIntro: Givin Me Eyes by Grace MesaOutro: Never Ending Soul Groove by Mattijs MullerSupport the showThanks for listening! A new episode drops every Friday. Like, share, subscribe, and/or sponsor to help support the continuation of the show. You can find us on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and all your favorite podcast players.Support the showThanks for listening! A new episode drops every Friday. Like, share, subscribe, and/or sponsor to help support the continuation of the show. You can find us on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and all your favorite podcast players.

Podcast: PrOTect It All (LS 27 · TOP 10% what is this?)Episode: OT Cybersecurity That Works: Tabletop Exercises, Critical Controls & Building TrustPub date: 2026-02-16Get Podcast Transcript →powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarizationYou can't secure OT environments with checklists alone - you secure them with trust, clarity, and focused action. In this episode of Protect It All, host Aaron Crow sits down with OT security expert Dean Parsons to unpack what actually improves cybersecurity maturity in manufacturing, water, and wastewater environments. From remote access blind spots to outdated network architecture, they explore the practical gaps many organizations face - and how to fix them without massive budgets. A central theme? Tabletop exercises. Not as a compliance checkbox - but as a powerful tool to build collaboration between IT and OT teams, clarify roles, and stress-test real incident response plans before a crisis hits. You'll learn: Why tabletop exercises accelerate OT maturity The importance of trust between engineers and IT teams How focusing on the SANS 5 Critical Controls drives meaningful progress Why visibility and architecture matter more than shiny tools How to improve OT security without overwhelming teams or budgets The human and process factors that determine response success Whether you're leading OT security, managing critical infrastructure, or trying to bridge IT and engineering teams, this episode delivers practical, experience-backed strategies you can implement immediately. Tune in to learn how to strengthen OT security through people, process, and purposeful action - only on Protect It All. Key Moments:  03:57 "Improved IT-OT Collaboration Tabletops" 08:57 "ICS Security Priorities" 12:16 "Accelerating ICS Cybersecurity Programs" 15:07 Trusted Expertise Builds Credibility 17:28 "Engineering Role in Incident Response" 20:53 "Cybersecurity: Tabletops Gain Traction" 26:34 "Control Systems, Protocol Abuse Insights" 27:51 Secure Architecture Enables Network Visibility 33:07 "Targeted Network Monitoring Essentials" 35:23 Prioritize Critical Assets Strategically 37:50 "Bridging IT and OT Expertise" 41:56 Critical Infrastructure Security Risks 44:30 ICS Leadership and Threat Strategy 48:14 "Power Plant Walkthrough Insights" 52:02 Critical Cyber Asset Management 57:29 "SANS Courses: Essential and Valuable" About the guest :  Dean Parsons is a SANS Principal Instructor and the CEO and Principal Consultant of ICS Defense Force. Over the past two decades, Dean has built and led industrial cyber defense programs, conducted incident response and digital forensics in live plants and partnered with operators and engineers to maintain both safety and uptime across major industrial sectors. He helps organizations align investment and policy decisions with operational priorities, developing risk metrics and tabletop exercises that unify operations, engineering, and cybersecurity so organizations in any industrial sector can prioritize and measure what matters. How to connect Dean : https://www.linkedin.com/in/dean-parsons-cybersecurity Connect With Aaron Crow: Website: www.corvosec.com  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aaronccrow Learn more about PrOTect IT All: Email: info@protectitall.co  Website: https://protectitall.co/  X: https://twitter.com/protectitall  YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@PrOTectITAll  FaceBook:  https://facebook.com/protectitallpodcast   To be a guest or suggest a guest/episode, please email us at info@protectitall.co Please leave us a review on Apple/Spotify Podcasts: Apple   - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/protect-it-all/id1727211124 Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/1Vvi0euj3rE8xObK0yvYi4The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Aaron Crow, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.

In this episode, Subhi Saadeh sits down with Elaine (Yi Ling Tan), Creator and Principal Consultant at MedTech Chopsticks, to break down China medical device market access and regulatory compliance under the NMPA.The conversation explores why Western companies often underestimate China's regulatory expectations — particularly when assuming EU or U.S. approvals, ISO standards, or FDA clearances will translate directly. Elaine explains how China requires demonstration of safety and effectiveness against applicable local standards primarily GB (national standards) and YY (medical device industry standards) including both mandatory and recommended variants (e.g., GB vs GB/T, YY vs YY/T).The episode dives into China's local type testing model and the role of Product Technical Requirements (PTRs) in defining test methods, parameters, accessories, and applicable standards for registration.Elaine also outlines how China's quality system expectations align to China Medical Device GMP rather than ISO 13485 including major GMP updates taking effect in November 2026 and discusses implications for foreign manufacturers.Additional discussion topics include China agents and authorized representatives, clinical evaluation expectations, post-market reporting requirements, and how China's device classification system can influence regulatory strategy.⏱️ Timestamps00:00 Welcome + Meet Elaine (MedTech Chopsticks)00:38 Why China Is Different: Local Standards vs EU/US Assumptions03:35 GB & YY Standards Explained (National vs Industry Standards)05:07 Local Type Testing & PTRs: Building China Product Technical Requirements06:52 China GMP Updates: Key Differences vs ISO 1348512:42 China Agent vs EU Authorized Rep: Roles & Responsibilities15:19 Choosing Local Test Labs: NMPA-Designated Testing Considerations18:42 Planning Early: Standards Gaps, Clinical Evaluation & PMS Risks24:43 China Certification & Device Classification Changes (Class I/II/III)28:38 Where to Find Elaine + ClosingSubhi Saadeh is the Founder and Principal at Let's Combinate. With a background in Quality, Manufacturing Operations and R&D he's worked in Large Medical Device/Pharma organizations to support the development and launch of Hardware Devices, Disposable Devices, and Combination Products for Vaccines, Generics, and Biologics. Subhi serves currently as the International Committee Chair for the Combination Products Coalition(CPC) and as a member of ASTM Committee E55 and also served as a committee member on AAMI's Combination Products Committee.For questions, inquiries or suggestions please reach out at letscombinate.com or on the show's LinkedIn Page.

 In our February 2026 Community Chat, and with members of the Caribbean tech community, an HR Consultant and Founder and CEO of Persolve Limited in Trinidad and Tobago, Joel-Ann Cook-Walcott, and a long-time friend of the Show, Steven Williams, the Executive Director of Sunisle Communications Inc., and the Principal Consultant of Data Privacy and Management Advisory Services in Barbados, the panel discusses:   *  The evolving need for Caribbean digital sovereignty, and   *  Will the Silicon Valley tech culture shape the Caribbean workplace?   The episode, show notes and links to some of the things mentioned during the episode can be found on the ICT Pulse Podcast Page (www.ict-pulse.com/category/podcast/)       Enjoyed the episode?  Do rate the show and leave us a review!       Also, connect with us on: Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/ICTPulse/   Instagram –  https://www.instagram.com/ictpulse/   Twitter –  https://twitter.com/ICTPulse   LinkedIn –  https://www.linkedin.com/company/3745954/admin/   Join our mailing list: http://eepurl.com/qnUtj    Music credit: The Last Word (Oui Ma Chérie), by Andy Narrell Podcast editing support:  Mayra Bonilla Lopez   ---------------  

In this episode, Ann M. Richardson, MBA, Founder and Principal Consultant at LeadWell Healthcare Consultants, shares the key challenges and opportunities she sees across healthcare, from access constraints and clinician burden to responsible AI adoption. She discusses how thoughtful technology partnerships can better support care teams, improve patient engagement, and help leaders navigate complexity with credibility and compassion.

Aida Wang is a top-billing legal recruiter at Just Legal who specialises in private practice placements for bengoshi (Japan-qualified lawyers). With a unique background as a professional translator and interpreter between English and Mandarin Chinese, Aida brings a fresh perspective on bridging communication gaps - not just between languages, but between lawyers and law firms.Aida shares practical advice on deal sheets, career planning, and why speaking to a recruiter from day one of your legal career journey in Japan can change your career trajectory.If you enjoyed this episode and it inspired you in some way, we'd love to hear about it and know your biggest takeaway. Head over to Apple Podcasts to leave a review and we'd love it if you would leave us a message here!In this episode you'll hear:The critical importance of creating and maintaining a deal sheet from day one of your careerWhy you should speak to a recruiter early in your career, not just when you're actively lookingThe biggest misconception about Japanese bengoshi lawyers How Aida helps candidates and clients create compelling stories to help find a perfect matchAbout AidaAida Wang is a Tokyo-based legal recruiter specialising in Bengoshi (Japan-qualified lawyer) searches for private practice, with a particular focus on supporting  associates and counsels as they navigate the critical transition points in their legal careers.Currently a Principal Consultant at Just Legal, Aida works with both Japanese and international law firms, recruiting Japanese Bengoshi and foreign-qualified attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. She is known for her thoughtful, relationship-driven approach and for offering market insight that goes well beyond simply filling roles. In her first quarter at Just Legal, Aida quickly made her mark as a top biller which is a reflection of her proactive mindset, deep preparation, and ability to truly understand both candidates and clients.Before moving into legal recruitment, Aida spent over a decade working as a Chinese–English freelance translator and interpreter, including roles in media, film, and news translation. This earlier career laid the foundation for what has become a defining theme of her professional life: bridging gaps - between languages, cultures, expectations, and ultimately, legal careers. Her background in interpreting gives her a rare ability to listen carefully, read between the lines, and translate what lawyers want into what the market is really asking for.Aida holds a Bachelor's degree from National Chengchi University in Taiwan, along with a Master's degree in Interpreting and Translation from the University of Bath in the UK. She has also completed Japanese language studies at Keio University. Having lived and worked in Taiwan, the Bahamas, the United States, the UK, and Japan, she brings a genuinely global perspective to her work. She is a native speaker of Mandarin and English, with business-level Japanese, and regularly supports cross-border legal careers in the Japanese market.Through her conversations with Bengoshi across multiple practice areas, Aida frequently hears one recurring challenge: how to develop clients and bring in work before holding a partner title. This insight shapes much of her advisory work with senior associates who are thinking carefully about long-term career sustainability, visibility, and progression within private practice.Outside of work, Aida enjoys cooking and crafting with her eight-year-old son, a creative counterbalance to her professional life that reflects the same curiosity and care she brings to her career.Connect with AidaLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hsinyuaidawang/ Just Legal: https://www.justsearchgroup.com/justlegal/consultants/aida-wang LinksAfternoon Tea: https://www.afternoon-tea.net/ Connect with Catherine LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/oconnellcatherine/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawyeronair

Welcome to the CanadianSME Small Business Podcast, hosted by SK Uddin. In this episode, we explore product marketing and go to market strategy, with a focus on turning early stage products into category leaders.Our guest is Laurier Mandin, Founder and Principal Consultant at Graphos Product, creator of the CLIMB scoring system and author of I Need That. Laurier shares practical insights on buyer psychology, specialization, and building products that stand out in an AI driven market.Key HighlightsStatus Quo Bias: Why products must be dramatically better to overcome buyer resistance and trigger behavior change. Human Advantage in an AI Era: How entrepreneurs can leverage human insight and creativity to stay profitable and relevant. Power of Specialization: Why focusing on a specific niche creates uniqueness and avoids costly go to market mistakes. Remote First Operations: Lessons from shifting to a fully remote model and what it reveals about efficiency and culture. Future of Graphos Product: Laurier's vision for helping builders and risk takers bring better products to market.Special Thanks to Our Partners:UPS: https://solutions.ups.com/ca-beunstoppable.html?WT.mc_id=BUSMEWAGoogle: https://www.google.ca/A1 Global College: https://a1globalcollege.ca/ADP Canada: https://www.adp.ca/en.aspxFor more expert insights, visit www.canadiansme.ca and subscribe to the CanadianSME Small Business Magazine. Stay innovative, stay informed, and thrive in the digital age!Disclaimer: The information shared in this podcast is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered as direct financial or business advice. Always consult with a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation.

In this conversation, GWIC host Dr. Hemma R. Lomax and Shalini Rajoo explore the critical role of decision rubrics in governance, accountability, and trust, especially in the context of AI. Shalini shares her journey from law to compliance, emphasizing the importance of understanding systems and the impact of leadership on decision-making processes. They discuss how transparency and clarity in decision-making can build trust within organizations and the necessity of responsible AI governance. Practical tips for improving decision quality are also provided, highlighting the importance of self-awareness and critical thinking in leadership. Takeaways: The biggest risk in governance is unclear decisions. AI amplifies existing clarity or confusion in decision-making. Systems and rules reflect the identities of their architects. Everyone has an impact on those around them every day. Leadership is about improving the people around you. It's not just about rules; it's about how people behave. Decision rubrics provide consistency and predictability in outcomes. Transparency in decision-making processes builds trust. Slowing down to ask questions can lead to better decision-making. Writing down the reasons for decisions brings clarity and accountability. Sound bites: "Systems and rules are not inherently neutral." "Transparency in decision making builds trust." "Slow is smooth, and smooth is fast." Chapters: 00:00 Introduction to Decision Rubrics and Governance 02:55 Shalini's Journey: From Law to Governance 06:09 The Impact of Systems on Leadership and Accountability 09:09 Transitioning to Compliance and Ethics 11:49 Understanding Decision Rubrics in Compliance 15:06 The Role of Leadership in Decision Making 18:03 Designing Conditions for Effective Decision Making 20:47 The Importance of Transparency in Decision Processes 24:09 Decision Rubrics: Building Trust in Organizations 26:49 AI and Governance: Leadership Infrastructure Failures 29:47 Responsible AI: The Role of Ethics and Compliance 32:55 Practical Tips for Improving Decision Quality 36:00 Conclusion: The Future of Decision Making in AI Guest Biography: Shalini Rajoo is the Founder and Principal Consultant of Shalini Rajoo Advisory, LLC, where she partners with organizations to design governance, compliance, and decision-making systems that are resilient, trustworthy, and aligned to real operational pressures. Across more than two decades in law, compliance, HR, and organizational leadership, Shalini has helped companies and leaders move beyond check-the-box frameworks to build structures that embed accountability, clarity, and performance into everyday decisions. She began her career in South Africa, first as a public prosecutor and then leading regulatory work with the Department of Trade and Industry, collaborating with legislative and executive stakeholders on corporate, competition, and consumer law. After relocating to the U.S., Shalini practiced commercial litigation. She later served as Director of Global Business Conduct for a Fortune 500 company, where she redesigned ethics and compliance systems, led global risk assessments, and championed psychological safety and integrity-based practices. Today, Shalini's work centers on helping leaders clarify decision rights, governance architectures, and accountability pathways — especially as organizations adopt AI and automation. She recently spoke at the Opal Group's Corporate Governance & Ethics in the Age of AI conference, where she reframed AI governance as a leadership-infrastructure challenge rather than a purely technical or compliance one.

In this episode of The Broadband Bunch, host Brad Hine sits down with Earnie Holtrey, Principal Consultant at Mytra Consulting and former Deputy Director of the Indiana Broadband Office, for a conversation about the evolution of state broadband initiatives and the road ahead for BEAD implementation. Earnie shares his journey from rural community development to leading statewide broadband programs, offering a behind-the-scenes look at how Indiana built one of the nation's most successful “Broadband Ready Communities” efforts. Earnie discusses what true broadband readiness means today, how communities can streamline permitting and collaboration, and the challenges providers face as BEAD funding moves from planning into construction. He explains the growing need for compliance, reporting, and project management support—especially for smaller and regional ISPs navigating federal grant requirements for the first time. Will BEAD fully close the digital divide? What happens after BEAD funding is spent? And how are state broadband offices evolving from policy hubs into long-term infrastructure program managers? Find out in this episode.

In this episode of Clarasys podcast, Principal Consultant and AI Lead Sarah Rigby sits down with Mahbub Gani, Principal Data Scientist at Sage, to explore how one of the world's leading software companies is harnessing AI to drive business value, transform customer experience, and stay ahead in a rapidly evolving landscape. From Sage's journey with classical machine learning to the latest advances in generative and agentic AI, Mahbub shares practical lessons on cutting through the hype, designing for scale, and building a culture that embraces change. Discover how Sage balances experimentation with robust delivery, manages the surprises that come with innovation, and ensures high adoption rates across teams. You'll also hear candid advice for organisations at the start of their AI journey, including why slowing down and thoughtful strategy matter more than ever. Whether you're curious about the business impact of AI, looking for tips on driving adoption, or want to understand the future of agentic AI, this episode is packed with actionable insights and honest reflections from the front lines of enterprise AI. Listen here or visit our website for the transcript: https://clarasys.com/insights/thinking/podcast/ai-in-action-practical-lessons-on-adoption-and-opportunity-from-sage

In this episode, we hear from MJ Leslie, Founder and Principal Consultant at Chapter 3, a Halifax-based sales and marketing growth consultancy. Chapter 3 helps startups and small businesses turn ideas into actionable growth strategies, blending strategy, storytelling and practical solutions to tackle modern sales challenges. MJ joins us to share insights on relationship-driven selling, the role of AI in sales, and how Atlantic Canadian startups can stand out in a competitive market. Produced by Unbound Media

India's shopping experience – from e-commerce to physical retail stores – is changing in unprecedented ways. Buying and selling is no longer a mere transaction but a finely curated exercise designed to leave an impression on the consumer. While online stores overhaul their interfaces to offer the sensory inputs that digital mediums conventionally lack, brick-and-mortar stores are also reinventing themselves and leveraging data to keep up with changing demands. In this episode of Unusual Suspects, host Gaurav Choudhury speaks to Shriram PM Monga, co-founder and Principal Consultant at SRED Real Estate Advisory, to understand how the Indian real estate landscape has evolved over the years and where it is headed.  

Careers in FinTech aren't linear.So why do we still hire like they are?In this episode of FinTech's DEI Discussions, Nadia is joined by Alexandra Sheller, Advisor and Principal Consultant at The Bridgeview Group Ltd, recorded live at FinTech Connect 2025.They explore what inclusion really looks like when markets shift, careers zig-zag, and talent doesn't fit a traditional CV. From skills-first hiring and empathy in leadership to the small changes that unlock overlooked potential, this conversation is practical, honest, and grounded in real industry experience.FinTech's DEI Discussions is powered by Harrington Starr, global leaders in Financial Technology Recruitment. For more episodes or recruitment advice, please visit our website www.harringtonstarr.com

Rachel Shaw is known nationally as the authority on how to implement and manage the FEHA/ADA Disability Interactive Process for candidates and employees. Her trainings and seminars are highly anticipated by Human Resource and Risk Management professionals as informative, dynamic and packed with real-life practical solutions.Rachel is the President and Principal Consultant of Shaw HR Consulting, Incorporated. With more than 15 years of executive-level Human Resources experience, Rachel is recognized statewide as a leader in helping public and private sector employers manage their most challenging personnel issues. Rachel and her team provide comprehensive solutions to employers on how to successfully manage the interconnected roles of human resources, workers' compensation and disability compliance to successfully reduce litigation, the costs of claims and improve employee-employer relations throughout the process.

Start our new season with a powerful episode featuring Dr Tony Power, a leading expert in justice and safety management. In this insightful conversation, Dr Power explains what Just Culture truly means and emphasizes its critical role in improving safety management and driving organizational learning. Through real-world examples, he shares why a meaningful Just Culture must be grounded in values, purpose, and consistent behaviors, not simply treated as a checklist. Dr Power underscores the importance of engaging in open dialogue with all stakeholders and provides practical strategies for implementing Just Culture effectively across organizations. He also offers guidance on how leaders can navigate the legal and regulatory complexities that are often challenging to address. Tune in as Dr Power explores how to build fairness, trust, and a learning culture within your organization, offering actionable insights for bringing Just Culture into action in a meaningful and sustainable way. Don't miss this enlightening episode of The Safety Guru! About the Guest: Dr Tony Power is a leading specialist in justice and safety management, with over 17 years of experience spanning the aviation, legal, and higher education sectors. He holds a PhD from Swinburne University, where he developed risk management frameworks for regulating safety-critical industries in changing environments. He is the Founder & Principal Consultant of Just Culture Consulting, a specialist consulting practice helping organisations embed just culture to build fairer, safer, and more innovative workplaces. For more information: www.justculture.com.au Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Clinical trial budgeting remains one of the biggest bottlenecks in study startups, driving delays, rework, and frustration across sponsors, CROs, and research sites. In this episode of the Clinical Trial Podcast, recorded live at Research Revolution, a clinical research conference hosted by Florence Healthcare, we take a hard look at why clinical trial budget negotiations continue to break down—and what experienced operators are doing differently. This conversation brings together sponsor, site, and consultant perspectives to unpack the real drivers of delay, including slow escalation pathways, unclear or inconsistent budget justifications, misaligned expectations, and communication gaps between stakeholders. Rather than rehashing theory, this episode focuses on practical, experience-driven insights you can actually apply. In this episode, you'll learn: The most common causes of delays during clinical trial budget negotiations How sites can create clear, defensible budget justifications without triggering endless revision cycles What sponsors look for when approving higher-than-expected line items Best practices for internal rate cards, fee schedules, and budgeting templates How improved communication and transparency can reduce negotiation friction and speed study startup This episode features insights from: Kristen McKenna, Senior Manager and Investigator Contracts Lead at Pfizer Heidi Castle, Director of Business Development at Mercy Research Matt Lowery, CEO and Principal Consultant at The Pathways Group If you're involved in clinical trial budgeting, contracting, or study startup - whether at a sponsor, CRO, or research site - this episode offers practical insights to help you navigate negotiations more effectively and avoid common pitfalls. Listen to the episode to hear how sponsor, site, and consultant leaders approach clinical trial budgeting and study startup.

On this episode Fred Goldstein invites Steve Kheloussi, PharmD, MBA, FAMCP, Principal Consultant at Kheloussi Consulting, LLC, in the first installment of our four-part series on rare diseases. We discuss a practical overview of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the current treatment landscape, and the evidence gaps that complicate payer decision-making. We also touch on the importance of what patients and caregivers need to maintain function, reduce fatigue, and navigate the significant emotional and practical burdens of care. This podcast is supported by an independent medical education grant from ITF Therapeutics. AMCP offers CPE for this podcast through December 31, 2026. For additional information and to claim credit, please visit:  ⁠The Power of Partnership: Bridging Patients and Payers in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Management⁠. Find all of our network podcasts on your favorite podcast platforms and be sure to subscribe and like us. Learn more at www.healthcarenowradio.com/listen

In this episode, Scott Polenz, Principal Consultant at CHG Healthcare Advisory Services, shares a practical roadmap for healthcare leaders to improve physician alignment, engagement, and retention. He discusses creating structured onboarding, fostering trust and communication, and establishing an Office of Physicians and APP Relations to support long-term success.This episode is sponsored by CHG Healthcare.

Happy New Year and officially welcome to 2026! Fresh start in the New Year! For my second show in the Best of Brave Women at Work Series, I was excited to re-share my show with Dr. Shawnte Elbert. Dr. Shawnte Elbert has faced her fair share of career struggles, but unlike my traditional position of overdriving when I face challenges, Shawnte introduced me to a concept that I love and have referenced since our initial conversation: inhale faith, exhale fear. In today's Best of podcast, Shawnte gives me a beautiful masterclass in letting go of the need to control and leaning on something much greater: our faith. Here is my hope for you: I hope that you can lean into your faith to overcome any fears that you face in 2026.Before we get started, let me share more about Shawnte:Dr. Shawnté Elbert, EdD, MCHES, CWHC, is the founder and CEO of Elbert Innovative Dr. Shawnté Elbert is a nationally recognized leader in public health, health equity, and mental healthcare innovation. She is the Founder & Principal Consultant of Elbert Innovative Solutions (EIS), advising organizations on equity-driven leadership, workforce development, and systems change.Dr. Elbert is also the Regional Director and Director of Training and Development at Growth & Empowerment Mental Healthcare Services, LLC (G&E). She oversees comprehensive training for clinical and non-clinical staff and ensures that mental healthcare services are effective, culturally responsive, and equity-centered. She is also a co-founder of Sister WELLS Counseling, Coaching & Consulting, PLLC, alongside Dr. Charla Blumell and Dr. Sherrá Watkins. Sister WELLS is a collective of experienced wellness and leadership professionals dedicated to leadership development, holistic wellness, and guiding individuals toward authentic transformation. Rooted in their shared sisterhood and passion for equity-driven change, the practice brings a unique and deeply personal approach to leadership and well-being.Dr. Elbert has worked across healthcare, higher education, and community health sectors to champion policies and practices centered on justice, access, and well-being. She is a sought-after speaker and consultant known for her engaging and transformative approach to tackling complex health and equity issues.

Marissa Rosen is the Founder, Owner, and Principal Consultant of Climate Social, a boutique communications agency she launched in 2015 to help impact-driven organizations and leaders share their stories and drive meaningful change. Her work spans public relations, social media, branding, copywriting, and creative campaigns that strengthen community engagement and inspire action. In addition to advising clients, Marissa has built her own thought leadership through writing, speaking, and media appearances across the climate, energy, and sustainability space.

In this episode, Liz Hutson, Principal Consultant and Owner at EGH, LLC, shares why intentional rest is essential for effective leadership, especially in fast paced, high performance environments.

In this episode, Liz Hutson, Principal Consultant and Owner at EGH, LLC, shares why intentional rest is essential for effective leadership, especially in fast paced, high performance environments.

Collective action is the engine of public health transformation. In this episode of the Public Health Insight Podcast, Dr. Vinu Ilakkuvan shares the tactics that turn community frustration into real-world victories, like Pittsburgh's fight for public water. The conversation also explores how building coalitions, fostering local connections, and embracing joy can challenge entrenched power and spark lasting change. References for Our Discussion◼️An overview of the commercial determinants of health◼️Pop Health   ◼️Gaslit Blogs Guest◼️Dr. Vinu Ilakkuvan, DrPH, Founder and Principal Consultant, PoP HealthHost(s)◼️Purva Mehta, BMSc, MScProducer(s)◼️Abhinya Gulasingam◼️Gordon Thane, BMSc, MPH, PMP®Production Notes◼️ Music from Johnny Harris x Tom Fox: The Music RoomSubscribe to the NewsletterSubscribe to The Insight newsletter so you don't miss out on the latest podcast episodes, live events, job skills, learning opportunities, and other engaging professional development content here.Leave Us Some FeedbackIf you enjoy our podcasts, be sure to subscribe and leave us a rating on Apple Podcast or Spotify, and spread the word to your friends to help us get discovered by more people. You can also interact directly with the podcast episodes on Spotify using the new “comment” feature! We'd love to hear what you think.Send us a Text Message to let us know what you think.

Morten Handberg, Principal Consultant at Wind Power LAB, returns to discuss blade damage categorization. From transverse cracks and leading edge erosion to carbon spar cap repairs, he explains what severity levels really mean for operators and why the industry still lacks a universal standard. Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us! Welcome to Uptime Spotlight, shining Light on Wind. Energy’s brightest innovators. This is the Progress Powering tomorrow. Morten, welcome back to the program. Thanks, Allen. It’s fantastic to be back again. Boy, we have a lot to discuss and today we’re gonna focus on categorization of damage, which is a super hot topic across the industry. What does a cat five mean? What does a category three mean? What does a category 5.9 I’ve I’ve seen that more recently. Why do these defect categories matter? Morten Handberg: Well, it matters a lot because it really tells you as, uh, either an OEM or as an operator, how should you respond to your current blade issue. So you need to have some kind of categorization about what the defect type is and what the severity is. The severity will tell you something about the repairability and [00:01:00] also something about the part of the blade that is affected. The type of the defect tells you something about what is the origin From an operational point of view, it doesn’t make as much sense in a way because you really just wanna know, can this be repaired or not? You know? And you know, what does it need to repair? That’s what you need, what you really need to focus on as an operator, whether it’s then del elimination, erosion, peeling. Uh, transverse cracks, it’ll all come down to repairs. It does matter for you because it will tell you an underlying, you know, are there reason why I’m keep seeing all these damages? So that’s why you need to know the category as well. But purely operational. You just need to know what is the severity side know, what does it take to repair it? Allen Hall: So as the operator, a lot of times they’re getting information from different service providers or even the OEM. They’re getting multiple inputs on what a damage is in terms of a category. Are we getting a lot of conflicting information about this? Because the complaint from [00:02:00] I hear from operators is the OE EMM says this is a category four. The ISP says is a category five. Who am I to believe right Morten Handberg: now? Well, there is a lot of, a bit different opinions of that. It almost becomes a religious issue question at some point, but it, it really dives down to that, you know, there is no real standardization in the wind industry. And we’ve been discussing this, uh, I wanna say decades, probably not that much, but at least for the past 11 years I’ve been, been hearing this discussion come up. Uh, so it’s, it’s something this was just been struggling with, but it also comes down to that. Each OEM have their own origin. Uh, so that also means that they have trended something from aeronautics, from ship building industry, from, you know, uh, from, from some other composite related industry, or maybe not even composite related. And that means that they are building their own, uh, their own truth about what the different defects are. There is a lot of correlation between them, but there is still a lot of, lot of tweaks [00:03:00] and definitions in between and different nomenclature. That does add a a lot of confusion. Allen Hall: Okay, Morten Handberg: so Allen Hall: that explains, I mean, because there isn’t an industry standard at the moment. There is talk of an industry standard, but it does seem like from watching from the outside, that Europe generally has one, or operators specifically have one. Uh, EPRI’s been working on one for a little while. Maybe the IEC is working on one, but there isn’t like a universal standard today. Morten Handberg: There is not a universal standard. I mean, a lot of, a lot of OEMs or service providers will, will, will claim that they have the standard, they have the definition in wind power lab. We have our own. That we have derived from the industry and in, in general. But there is not an, uh, an industry agreed standard that everyone adheres to. That much is true. You could say in Europe, a lot of owners have come together, uh, in the Blade Forum, and they have derived, there’s a standard within that. Um, uh, and with a lot of success, they’d written, the [00:04:00] Blade Hamburg I think was very helpful because it was operator driven, um, approach. Allen Hall: So there is a difference then between defects that are significant and maybe even classified as critical and other defects that may be in the same location on the blade. How are those determined? Morten Handberg: The way that I’ve always approached is that I will look at firstly what kind of blades type it is. So how is it structured? Where are the load carrying elements of the blade? That’s very important because you can’t really say on a business V 90 and a Siemens, uh, 3.6 that the defect in the same position will mean the same thing. That’s just not true because they are structured in very different ways. So you really need to look at the plate type just to start with. Then you need to look at, is it in a. In a loaded part of the blade, meaning is it over the, the load carrying part, um, uh, laminates? Is it in a, in a shell area? And you know, what is the approximate distance from the roof? Is that, that also tells you something [00:05:00] about the general loads in the area. So you know, you need to take that into consideration. Then you also need to look at how much of the blade is actually affected. Is it just surface layers? Is it just coating or is it something that goes, uh, through the entire laminate stack? And if that is on the, on the beam laminate, you’re in serious trouble. Then it will be a category five. If the beam laminate is vectored. And if you’re lucky enough that your blade is still sitting on the turbine, you should stop it, uh, to avoid a complete BA bait collapse. Uh, so, so you need, so, so that, you know, you can, that, that is very important when you’re doing defect categorizations. So that means that you need Allen Hall: internal inspections on top of external Morten Handberg: inspections. If you see something, uh, that is potentially critical, then yeah, you should do an internal inspection as well to verify whether it’s going through, um, the entire lemonade stack or not. That that’s a, that’s a good, good, good approach. Um, I would say often, you know, if you see something that is potentially critical, uh, but there is still a possibility that could be repaired. Then I might even also just send up a repair [00:06:00] team, uh, to see, you know, look from the outside how much of the area is actually affected, because that can also pretty quickly give you an indication, do we need to take this blade down or not? Sometimes you’ll just see it flat out that, okay, this crack is X meters long, it’s over sensitive area of the blade. You know, we need to remove this blade. Uh, maybe when, once it’s down we can determine whether it’s repairable or not, but. We, but it’s not something that’s going to be fixed up tower, so there’s not a lot of need for doing a lot of added, um, add added inspections to verify this, this point. Allen Hall: Let’s talk about cracks for a moment, because I’ve seen a lot of cracks over the last year on blades and some of them to me look scary because they, they are going transverse and then they take a 90 degree and start moving a different direction. Is there a, a rule of thumb about cracks that are visual on the outside of the blade? Like if it’s how, if they’re [00:07:00] closer to the root they’re more critical than they’re, if they’re happening further outers or is there not a rule of thumb? You have to understand what the design of the blade is. Morten Handberg: Well, I mean the general rule of thumb is transfers cracks is a major issue that’s really bad. That’s, uh, you know, it’s a clear sign, something. Severely structural is going on because the transverse crack does not develop or develop on its own. And more likely not once it starts, you know, then the, uh, the, the strain boundaries on the sides of the cr of the crack means that it requires very little for it to progress. So even if in a relatively low loaded area with low strain, once you have a, a transverse crack, uh, present there, then it will continue. Uh, and you mentioned that it’s good during a 90 degree. That’s just because it’s doing, it’s, it’s taking the least path of the path of least resistance, because it’ll have got caught through the entire shell. Then when it reaches the beam, the beam is healthy. It’s very stiff, very rigid laminate. So it’s easier for it to go longitudinal towards the [00:08:00] root because that’s, that, that, that’s how it can progress. That’s where it has the, uh, you know, the, the, the strain, uh, um, the, the strain high, high enough strain that it can actually, uh, develop. That that’s what it would do. So transverse cracks in general is really bad. Of course, closer to root means it’s more critical. Um, if there is a crack transverse crack, uh, very far out in the tip, I would usually say, you know, in the tip area, five, 10 meter from the tip, I would say, okay, there’s something else going on. Something non load related. Probably causes, could be a lightning strike, could be an impact damage. That changed the calculation a little bit because then, you know, it’s not a load driven issue. So that might give you some time to, you know, that you can operate with something at least. But again, I, I don’t want to make any general rules that people then didn’t go out and say, well, I did that, so, and, but my blade still broke. That’s not really how it works. You need to really, you need to, to, uh, look at cracks like that individually. You can’t make a a common rule. Allen Hall: Another [00:09:00] area, which is under discussion across the industry are surface defects and there are a variety of surface defects. We’re seeing a lot of hail damage this year. Uh, that’s getting categorized as lightning damage. And so there’s obviously a different kind of repair going on. Hail versus lightning. Are there some standards regarding surface defects? Uh, the visuals on them? Is there a guideline about Morten Handberg: it? Well, I mean, uh, some of the, uh, some of the, how do you say, omic couture, some of the, uh, some of the standards, they do provide some guideline to determine which surface kind of surface defect it is, you could say, on the operational points, as long as it’s surface related. Then the repair methodology is the same, whether it’s peeling, erosion, voids, chipping scratches, the repair is the same. So that in principle does not change anything. But in the reason why it matters is because we need to understand the [00:10:00] underlying issue. So if you have lot of peeling, for instance, it means you have a very low quoting quality, and that is something that is either post post repair related or it’s manufacturing related, depending on the blade, on the age of your blade. So that’s very important for you to know because if you have peeling somewhere, then more likely than not, you’ll also have have issues with it elsewhere because, you know, tend to, they tend to follow each other, you know, coding quality issues. So that’s a good thing to know for you as an operator that you, this is just one of many, erosion is important, but often gets miscategorized because erosion is a leading edge issue. Um, so we only see it on the, on the very edge of the leading edge. So approximately 40 millimeter band. That’s typically what we see, and it’s straight on the leading edge. So if someone’s claiming that they see lead, leading edge erosion on the, on the pressure side, shell or ide, shell, it’s miscategorizing because that’s what you, that’s not why they have to have the ring. Uh, impacts ring can still, still [00:11:00] hit the shells, but when it hits the, the, the shell areas, it will ricochet because it hits it at an angle. Leading edge gets straight on. So it gets the entire impact force and that’s why you get the erosion issue because of, of fatigue essentially. Uh, coding fatigue. So that’s very important. There is something that you know you can really utilize if you just know that simple fact that it’s always a leading edge, it’s always uniform. It, you can track that. And if you have leading edge erosion in one area, you will have it in the entire wind farm. So you don’t need to do that much inspection to determine your erosion levels, voids, pinholes. They are manufacturing driven because they are driven by either imperfections in the coating, meaning you have a sand, grain dust, or you had, uh, air inclusions underneath your coating. And they will weaken the structure. And that means that, um, rain effect or other effects causing strain on your coating will accelerate a lot faster. So they will develop and create these small, um, yeah, uh, how do you [00:12:00] say, small defined holes in your coating. So that’s why it’s important to know. But if you’re running a wind farm 15 years, 10 years down the line. Then it’s more important for you to know that it’s a surface defect and you need to fix it by doing coating repair. You don’t need to think so much about the, the underlying issue, I would say. Allen Hall: Okay. I think that’s been miscategorized a number of times. I’ve seen what I would consider to be some sort of paint adhesion issue because it’s sort of mid cord and not near the leading edge, but sometimes it just looks like there’s massive peeling going on and maybe, uh, it’s easy to assume that maybe is erosion. It’s just a weak adhesion of paint. That that’s what you’re saying? Morten Handberg: Yeah. If it’s, if it’s midspan, if it’s shell related, then it’s, it’s a, it’s a coating quality related issue. It doesn’t really have anything to do with erosion. Um, you could say erosion. We can, we can, we can, uh, we can look at in, in, in two areas. So you have the out or third of the leading edge. [00:13:00] That’s where you would have the theoretical leading edge erosion breakdown, because that’s where you have rain impact high enough that it will cause some kind of degradation, but that all of your leading edge will suffer in the same way because the tip speed of the outer four meters of your blade. Versus the re the other, you know, uh, 10, 12 meters depending on length of your blade. Sometimes it’s a lot longer, but they are getting degraded in a much different way. So the out of pew meters, they can get what’s called structural erosion. So that means that the erosion goes fast enough and it’s progressive enough that you can start to damage the laminate underneath. You won’t see that further in because the, the impact is just not that great and you will likely not see structural erosion over the lifetime, but the out a few meters, that’s important. And that’s where you need, need to focus your, that that’s where you need to pay attention on what kind of materials you add because that can save you a lot of repair, re, re repair. And, uh, down the line, how do you categorize Allen Hall: leading edge erosion? A lot of [00:14:00] times I see it, uh, from operators. Let’s say it’s, uh, category four because it’s into the fiber. But is it always a structural issue? Is there a lot of loading on the leading edges of these blades where you would have to come back with structural applies to repair it? Or is it just a aerodynamic shape and does it really depend upon who the OE Em is? Morten Handberg: Well, I mean, I’ve seen erosion category five as well, and I think it’s a mis misinterpretation. I think it’s, you know, people are trying it to raise awareness that, hey, there was a serious issue with erosion, but it’s a wrong way to use the severities. Because if we look at severity five, severity five, if you have a critical issue, your blade is about to come down if you don’t do anything. So category five means you need to stop your turbine. Maybe you can repair it, but that really depends on the, uh, on what is damaged by, on, on, on the blade. And you can determine that once you removed it and looked at it on, on, on the ground. But you need to stop. Category four is a severe structural damage. It’s not something that [00:15:00] is causing an immediate threat, but it’s something that will progress rapidly if you don’t do anything. So here you need to look at the damage itself. So how does it affect the structure and can you operate it curtailed, uh, or can you operate it, uh, or can you operate normally and repair it within a short time window? That’s what you can use because it’s something that is. Uh, that can, that can develop into an, into an imminent issue if you don’t react to it. Severity three is more for your, is more your annual maintenance schedule. So that is your, your minor structural damages and it’s your erosion issues. So that’s something that there is a severity Three, you need to look at it for next year’s budget. Severity two means that. Something that’s gradually degradating your coating on the blade, but it’s not something that means anything at this point in time. So one is your coating, is your surface damage or minor surface damage. Pinholes uh, contamination. It’s really light issue, so it’s not something you really need to consider. So. [00:16:00] Severity ones, you, you really mean that, that it’s, you don’t need to think about this anymore. You know, it’s, it’s not an issue. So erosion will fall typically within severity two to severity four. Severity four being you have a hole in your blade from erosion, basically. Uh, because you can still have structural degradation of deleting it and still being a severity three, because it does not really change your maintenance cycle in any, in any way. You don’t need to do anything immediate to fix it. Um, so that’s why I would put most of erosion defects in severity three and just say, okay, it’s something we need to plan a leading edge, a leading edge ERO repair campaign next year or the year after, depending on the severity of it. That’s why, how I, I would approach, Allen Hall: that’s good insight, because I do think a lot of operators, when they do see a hole in the leading edge, think I have to stop this turbine. But at the same token, I have seen other operators with holes. I could put my fist through. That are continuing to use those blades and they will say, it’s not structural, it’s not [00:17:00] great aerodynamically, but the, we’re still making power here. We’re still making rated power. Even with the hole and the leading edge, it’s not going to progress anymore. It’s a, it’s a, it’s a progression that we understand. That’s how they describe it. It will get worse, but it’s not gonna get catastrophic worse. Morten Handberg: I mean, if you run it long enough, at some point, something secondary will happen. Sure. But again, that’s also why we use the severity four category for erosion, where you have severe structural degradation because it does starting to mean something for the integrity of the blade. It will not mean that it’s coming down right away when you see a hole in the blade from erosion. That’s, that’s the entire purpose of it. But it does it, you use it to raise awareness that there is something you need to look at imminently or at least react to, uh, and make a plan for. You can’t just pull, you can’t just delay it until next year’s, uh, maintenance campaign. We have an active issue here, so that’s why I think severity four applies to erosion. That has penetrated all structural layers. Allen Hall: Are there some [00:18:00] blade damages that are just can’t be repaired or, or just have too much difficulty to repair them, that it’s not worth it? And how do you know? How do you understand? That blade is not repairable versus the one next to it which looks similar, which can be repaired. What goes into that assessment? Morten Handberg: So one is, is the, is the beam laminate damaged? If it is, then uh, either it comes down to a commercial decision. It’s simply not fixable and, and restoring it in, you know, restoring it back, uh, to original form ship. And there’s also the, the, uh, the, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, uh, returning element of carbon fiber, because carbon fiber adds another level of complexity repairs, because you’re so dependent on the pristine quality of the carbon for it to, to, for, to utilize the, the, uh, mechanical strength of carbon. And if you, if you don’t apply it in the right way, then you can create some high stress zones. Where, you know, the [00:19:00] cure is as bad as the disease really. So that’s why you have to be extra careful with carbon repairs. But they can be done. But it, you know, it really comes down to a commercial decision then. So in principle, unless the blade is deformed, uh, or, or, or damaged in such a way that you have to remove a large part of the s shell lemonade in a loaded area, then most things they can, in principle, be repaired. It’s just a matter of is the, is the cost of the repair. Cheaper than the cost of a new blade. And that calculation might, you know, depend on are there any, any spare blades available? Is this blade, uh, still in production? And if I don’t repair this, then I don’t have any blade for my turbine and then I can’t operate anymore. That also changed the calculus right along quite a lot, so I think. For a lot of damages. It, it’s more of a, it’s often more of a commercial decision rather than a technical, because ca glass fiber is very forgiving. You can repair a lot, even if it’s really severe. I mean, I’ve seen blade repairs that took [00:20:00] 3000 hours, but it was deemed worthwhile because you couldn’t get a, a bare blade. And in most other cases, that would’ve been been scrapped, you know, without, you know, without blinking. Um, so, so, you know, if you really want to, you could repair it. In a lot of cases, Allen Hall: how difficult is it to repair carbon protrusions, because it does seem like when they manufacture those protrusions, there’s a lot of quality control going into it. The fibers have to be in the right direction all the time, and they’re really compacted in there. They’re tight, tight block of carbon that you’re purchasing and sliding into into this blade. Are they really repairable in sections or is it you have to take out the whole length of a pultrusion and replace it? I’m, I’m trying to understand the difficulty here because there’s a lot of operators in the United States now that have some portion of their fleet is carbon spar cap, not a lot of it, but some of it. How [00:21:00] difficult is that to repair? Morten Handberg: Well, it’s difficult enough that a lot of OEMs, they will say if you have a damage to the carbon, it’s a non-repairable defect. That is to a large extent the general rule. Um, there are, there are, uh, there are ways and some of it is replacement of the protrusion. Um, other, another method is, is to do a vacuum infusion lamination. I’ve also seen some repairs with success where, uh, glass fiber is utilized instead of carbon fiber. So you reply, so you, you, um, you calculate the mechanical strength of the carbon. And then replace that with an equal amount, you know, strength wise of glass fiber. The problem is you are to a degree playing with little bit with fire because you are then changing the structure of the blade. You are increasing the thickness and thereby you are changing the stiffness. So it’s, you have to be really [00:22:00] careful, uh, it’s possible. And uh, again. All if all other options are out and you want this blade really to get up and running again because it’s your only option. Maybe it’s worthwhile to, to investigate, but it requires a lot of insight in and also a little bit of, uh, how do you say, uh, you don’t, you shouldn’t be too risk adverse if you go down that that route, but, but again, it is possible. It is technically possible. But it’s something you do for the outer, uh, outer areas of the blade where you have less loads and you’re less sensitive. Allen Hall: Can those carbon repairs be done up tower or are they always done with the rotor set or the blade drop down to ground? Morten Handberg: I know some carbon repairs have been done up tower, but in general it’s down tower also, just because if you have damage to your carbon, it means you have a severe structural issue. So you wouldn’t generally try to do it that well, I would, not in general, but, but the, the, the cases I’ve seen that, that has been downturn repairs. Yeah. Allen Hall: Do you think about the categories differently? If it includes carbon [00:23:00] as a structural element? Morten Handberg: No, because carbon is part of the load carrying laminate. If you’re to the load carrying laminate, then it becomes a four or five immediately. Um, so, uh, so I would say the same rule applies because ag again, it’s a very rough scale, but it applied, but it gives you a sense of where, you know, what is the urgency, which is what I think we in generally need. And I like the more simple model because it’s more applicable to the general industry and it’s easier for, uh, you know, it’s easier to, to implement. Um. And it is easier to understand than if you have a too too gradual, uh, scale because it’s difficult for the people who are sitting and assessing to determine if, uh, you know, what, what category it is. And it’s difficult for the people who have to read the report afterwards. And it’s also about, you know, what is the purpose? And in general, I would say, well, this, the defect categorization, the severe categorization is to determine can this be repaired or not? That’s what we use it [00:24:00] for. So that, that, that’s how we, it should be applied. Allen Hall: Is the industry going to have a universal standard? Soon. Is that possible? Or is this really gonna be country by country, region by region? How we think about blade defects and blade repairs? Morten Handberg: I think that. Given the, uh, the, how do you say, the individual interests in having their own model from the different OEMs or service providers? I think the, when they’re choosing a pope, they have an easy task ahead of them, you know, deciding that. Then we have the agreeing on an on inte standard and on plate. Allen Hall: Pope is currently an American, so that tells you something. The world has shifted. There is still hope. Maybe there is still hope because it, it is a very difficult problem and I hear a lot of conflicting opinions about it and they’re not wrong. The opinions I hear when they’re explained to me, they have a rationale as to why. They’re calling something a cat four versus a cat three. [00:25:00] It all makes sense, but when you get two engineers in the room, they’re rarely are going to agree. So I’m just thinking maybe, maybe there isn’t a, a yeah, maybe there isn’t a time where we’re all gonna come together. Morten Handberg: I think that, you know, it’s, it’s also about what are you willing to accept and what are you willing to s. You know, as an OEM, as a blade engineer, as a service provider, in order to make common agreement. Because I think if we were willing to, you know, set aside differences, um, and then agree on, okay, what is the, what, what is that, what is the, the ma the industry needs and what, what fulfills the purpose? We could agree tomorrow, but that’s not where we are, uh, at the moment. So, so I don’t see that happening anytime soon. But yes, there, there was a way to do an in to make an international standard. Um, for blades and I, I would say maybe it’s, if the IC made, made, made one, then maybe that that could, uh, that could fix it. Uh, maybe if, uh, they’re starting to become more [00:26:00]focused from governments, uh, and you know, that it wind industry becomes recognized as critical infrastructure. That then there is a requirement for international standards on what are defects, to make it easier to determine what is critical or not, so that proper reaction can be made. That will also help it. But again, as long as it’s only about late experts having to agree with each other and that’s the only then, then we’re, then we will not get to a point where we’re going to agree on, on everything. No. Allen Hall: Wow. This is a continual discussion about blade defects and categorization and Morton. I really appreciate. You’re giving us your thoughts about it because I trust you one and two, you’re on the leading edge of what the industry is thinking. So it’s very good to get you in here and explain where categorization is and, and two operators that are listening to this podcast understand you’re probably getting a lot of different opinions about categorization. You need to sit down and figure it out for yourself, or reach out to Morton who can explain what you should be thinking and how you should be [00:27:00]thinking about this problem. Morton, how do people get ahold of you to learn more? Morten Handberg: Easiest way is to reach out to me on LinkedIn. Um, I have a very active profile there. You can always write me and I’ll always write, write, write it back. You can also write to me on my company email, m me h@windpowerapp.com. Um, those are the two easiest way to get, uh, get in, in, uh, get in touch me. And I would say, as an owner, what you need to know. Is it a structural issue or is a surface issue you have? And then plan your repairs from there. That is, that is the. Basic, yeah, that, that you need to have, and then forget about the others, the other side of it, you know, if it’s one defect type or another, that’s not necessarily what’s going to help you. It’s all about getting the blades repaired. And, uh, and the turbine up and running again. That should be the focus. Allen Hall: Absolutely. Morton, we love having you on the podcast. Thank you so much for joining us. It’s good to be here. See [00:28:00] you.

Over the past several years, CL0P has executed multiple mass exploitation campaigns using zero-day vulnerabilities in popular software products that resulted in mass data exfiltration. In this talk we'll take a look at the vulnerabilities that enabled their access, discuss ways defenders could have detected the exploits, and explore hardening recommendations to make public facing applications harder to compromise. About the speaker: Peter Ukhanov is a Principal Consultant with the Google Public Sector (Mandiant) IR team. Prior to joining Mandiant, Peter worked at Dragos focusing on OT/ICS environments. He started his career in incident response and digital forensics in 2014 at the Defense Information Systems Agency, spending almost 7 years supporting various Department of Defense entities.

What if the real force shaping our health isn't our doctor, our diet, or even our zip code - but the invisible hand of corporate power?In this eye-opening episode of the Public Health Insight Podcast, we go beyond the usual talk of social determinants to expose the deeper, upstream forces that shape our health: the commercial and political power wielded by corporations. Tune in as we sit down with public health disruptor Vinu Ilakkuvan, who unpacks how corporate interests manipulate narratives, shift blame onto individuals, and quietly influence everything from policy to what's on our grocery store shelves - in essence the root causes of the root causes.References for Our Discussion◼️An overview of the commercial determinants of health   ◼️Gaslit Blogs Guest◼️Dr. Vinu Ilakkuvan, DrPH, Founder and Principal Consultant, PoP HealthHost(s)◼️Purva Mehta, BMSc, MScProducer(s)◼️Abhinya Gulasingam◼️Gordon Thane, BMSc, MPH, PMP®Production Notes◼️ Music from Johnny Harris x Tom Fox: The Music RoomSubscribe to the NewsletterSubscribe to The Insight newsletter so you don't miss out on the latest podcast episodes, live events, job skills, learning opportunities, and other engaging professional development content here.Leave Us Some FeedbackIf you enjoy our podcasts, be sure to subscribe and leave us a rating on Apple Podcast or Spotify, and spread the word to your friends to help us get discovered by more people. You can also interact directly with the podcast episodes on Spotify using the new “comment” feature! We'd love to hear what you think.Send us a Text Message to let us know what you think.

How to Transform Your Construction Business: Insights from Leyah Valgardson HostetterIn this episode, host Josh Elledge interviews Leyah Valgardson Hostetter—Founder and Principal Consultant of Leyah&Co. Leyah shares her unique perspective on why the construction industry struggles with consistency, communication, and client satisfaction, and how business owners can fix these problems by intentionally designing a standout client experience. Drawing from her decades of experience and her work coaching over 150 construction owners, Leyah explains how client experience, operational alignment, and team empowerment can transform chaotic businesses into smooth-running, referral-generating powerhouses.Designing a Client Experience That Sets You ApartLeyah explains that many construction companies suffer from predictable reputation challenges—missed deadlines, unclear communication, and constant firefighting—but these issues often stem from the lack of an intentionally designed client experience. She teaches business owners to first define how they want clients to feel at every stage of the project, and then build backward to create workflows, timelines, and touchpoints that support that experience. This shift not only creates consistency but also positions the company as a trustworthy, client-centered leader in a competitive landscape.She also highlights that behind-the-scenes operations must match the promise made to clients. When team roles are unclear, workflows inconsistent, or processes change from project to project, chaos becomes inevitable. By mapping out every client touchpoint, identifying breakdowns, and establishing standardized systems, construction owners can drastically reduce overwhelm while improving efficiency and client satisfaction. Leyah's Experience Blueprint workshop guides companies through this process by aligning client experience design with operational excellence.Finally, Leyah discusses the emotional toll on owners who feel overworked, overwhelmed, and constantly “on call.” She emphasizes that sustainable success requires empowering teams, clarifying expectations, and building repeatable systems that free the owner from daily firefighting. With industry competition tightening for 2025–2026, she stresses that businesses that prioritize client experience, systematization, and operational clarity now will be the ones that thrive in the near future.About Leyah Valgardson HostetterLeyah Valgardson Hostetter is the Founder and Principal Consultant of Leyah&Co., where she helps construction business owners transform their operations through intentional client experience design, workflow optimization, and team alignment. With more than two decades of experience and a proven track record working with over 150 construction leaders, Leyah is known for bringing clarity, structure, and strategy to complex business challenges.Connect with Leyah on LinkedIn.About Leyah&Co.Leyah&Co. helps construction companies streamline their operations, elevate their client experience, clarify roles, and implement systems that reduce chaos and increase referrals. Through consulting, workshops, and team alignment strategies, the company helps construction leaders build operational excellence and long-term competitive advantage.Links Mentioned in This EpisodeLeyah Valgardson Hostetter on LinkedIn

Episode SummaryEver found yourself staring at your screen on a Wednesday afternoon wondering, "Why does this organisation even exist? What am I actually doing here that matters?" You're not alone. In this episode, Dr Austin Tay dives deep into the crisis of meaning at work, unpacking two groundbreaking research papers that finally explain what's missing when work feels meaningless—and more importantly, what makes organisations genuinely matter.Learn the five-characteristic framework that helps you distinguish between organisations with a genuine purpose and those just performing it. By the end of this episode, you'll know exactly how to audit your workplace, assess your alignment, and decide your next steps.What You'll Learn

What drives someone to leave a traditional career path and take on the hidden forces shaping our health? In this episode of the Public Health Insight Podcast, Dr. Vinu Ilakkuvan traces her journey from an early interest in journalism to biomedical engineering and economics, and ultimately to public health. She reflects on the pivotal moments, values, and experiences that inspired her to found Pop Health and Gaslit, and explains why empowering communities is at the heart of her mission.References for Our Discussion◼️An overview of the commercial determinants of health   ◼️Gaslit Blogs Guest◼️Dr. Vinu Ilakkuvan, DrPH, Founder and Principal Consultant, PoP HealthHost(s)◼️Purva Mehta, BMSc, MScProducer(s)◼️Abhinya Gulasingam◼️Gordon Thane, BMSc, MPH, PMP®Production Notes◼️ Music from Johnny Harris x Tom Fox: The Music RoomSubscribe to the NewsletterSubscribe to The Insight newsletter so you don't miss out on the latest podcast episodes, live events, job skills, learning opportunities, and other engaging professional development content here.Leave Us Some FeedbackIf you enjoy our podcasts, be sure to subscribe and leave us a rating on Apple Podcast or Spotify, and spread the word to your friends to help us get discovered by more people. You can also interact directly with the podcast episodes on Spotify using the new “comment” feature! We'd love to hear what you think.Send us a Text Message to let us know what you think.

My guest this week is Nathan Bartrop, a corporate governance and company secretary specialist with experience across ASX-listed, unlisted, and not-for-profit companies. We discussed his background in law, accounting, and ASX compliance, including his time as a listings advisor during the global financial crisis. Nathan now lectures on corporate governance and runs his consultancy, White Label Corporate, while serving as Principal Consultant at CSB Corporate Services.Blog post available at: https://www.sharesforbeginners.com/blog/nathan-bartropWatch on YouTube right here.

In this episode of the HR Mixtape, host Shari Simpson welcomes Rachel Shaw, President and Principal Consultant of Shaw HR Consulting, to discuss the evolving landscape of reasonable accommodations under the ADA. This conversation is particularly timely as it reflects the significant shifts in workplace dynamics since the pandemic, emphasizing the importance of inclusive leadership and creative problem-solving in HR practices. Rachel shares insights on fostering a culture that values employee experience and the role of technology, including AI, in enhancing HR processes. Listener Takeaways: Learn how to approach ADA accommodations with a mindset focused on finding solutions. Discover why the interactive process is essential for effective communication and employee support. Explore strategies for leveraging technology to streamline accommodation requests and improve efficiency. Hit “Play” to gain valuable insights that can transform your approach to HR! Guest(s): Rachel Shaw, President and Principal Consultant, Shaw HR Consulting

Mastering B2B SaaS Pricing: Expert Strategies from Dan Balcauski of Product TranquilityIn this episode, host Josh Elledge sits down with Dan Balcauski, Founder and Principal Consultant of Product Tranquility, to uncover the true science behind effective B2B SaaS pricing. With over two decades in software and deep expertise in pricing strategy, Dan explains why pricing is often misunderstood, what founders consistently overlook, and how SaaS leaders can turn pricing from a liability into a powerful growth lever. This blog breaks down the episode's most actionable insights to help SaaS founders and product leaders build value-driven, scalable pricing systems.Why Most SaaS Pricing Fails—and What to Do InsteadDan explains that the biggest mistake in SaaS pricing is choosing numbers before validating whether customers actually perceive value. Founders often rush to set a price—$49, $99, $1,000—without first understanding the customer's pain, alternatives, or what makes the product meaningfully different. Instead, Dan recommends charging something early, engaging customers in honest conversations about value, and validating willingness to pay through real-world interactions rather than internal assumptions.He emphasizes that pricing is ultimately about value, not features. Early-stage founders frequently offer too much for too little, or price too high without proving outcomes. Avoiding these pitfalls requires asking the right questions, initiating value conversations early, and documenting everything customers say about cost, alternatives, and perceived ROI.Dan also stresses the importance of selecting a pricing model that aligns with how the customer receives value. Whether subscription-based, usage-based, or outcome-based, the model must match customer expectations and internal economics. This approach helps avoid unnecessary friction in the buying process while increasing expansion potential over time.About Dan BalcauskiDan Balcauski is the Founder and Principal Consultant of Product Tranquility, where he helps B2B SaaS companies build value-based pricing and packaging strategies. With over 20 years of experience in product management and pricing, Dan works with SaaS CEOs and product leaders to align pricing with customer value and business goals. Connect with Dan on LinkedIn.About Product TranquilityProduct Tranquility is a boutique consulting firm specializing in pricing, packaging, and product strategy for B2B SaaS companies. Through proven frameworks and deep market analysis, Product Tranquility helps SaaS founders create pricing systems that accelerate revenue, improve customer alignment, and scale sustainably across growth stages.Links Mentioned in This EpisodeDan Balcauski LinkedInProduct Tranquility WebsiteKey Episode HighlightsPricing must begin with validating customer value—not picking numbersWhy charging something early leads to stronger product feedbackHow to start pricing conversations earlier in the customer journeyChoosing the right pricing model based on value deliveryWhy packaging and tiered pricing increase conversionsHow to use the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity MeterCommon pricing pitfalls (anchoring too low, freemium overuse, feature-based pricing)Why pricing is an iterative, evolving process—not a one-time...

What's the secret to keeping your hospital's equipment safe, reliable, and budget-friendly? On this episode of Power Supply, we're joined by Marc Schlessinger, Principal Consultant and Investigator at ECRI, to dive into the world of capital replacement planning for medical devices. Marc breaks down the real factors that determine how long equipment actually lasts—from utilization rates and technology shifts to the "graveyard closets" of unused gear sitting in every OR—and shares how a smart 10-year plan can save hospitals from costly surprises. Whether you're managing budgets, maintaining devices, or just want to know what keeps your hospital's equipment running, this episode delivers real-world insights, actionable tips, and a few laughs along the way. Tune in today! Once you complete the interview, jump on over to the link below to take a short quiz and download your CEC certificate for 0.5 CECs! – https://www.flexiquiz.com/SC/N/ps16-04 #PowerSupply #Podcast #AHRMM #HealthcareSupplyChain #SupplyChain #CapitalPlanning #Equipment #Budget #MedicalDevices

Send us a textWhat does boiling pasta have to do with a conversation on AI and security? In this episode of Exchanges, host Ginny Lebeck is joined by guests Dr. Michael Green, Principal Consultant for Hitachi Solutions Empower Data Platform, and Alex Rigaud, VP of Incubation Solutions, live from Microsoft Ignite in San Francisco, to discuss the future of security in the age of AI. In this episode, you'll hear from Michael and Alex as they discuss:How organizations are embedding AI at every layer and rethinking security as a core function How the era of AI agents and Co-workers is changing the way organizations approach threats and data governance Why organizations should be asking “where to AI?” as it relates to their data and workflows Why observability, security, and governance require a new level of maturity in automated environments And more!global.hitachi-solutions.comglobal.hitachi-solutions.com

Greg Sanborn, Principal Consultant at ERA Group, shares how purposeful planning and authentic relationship building has helped his business grow amid tariffs, rising costs and market uncertainty. Learn why traditional prospecting may fall flat in his industry and how Greg's credibility-driven approach has helped his business achieve long-term strength and stability. The views expressed by Enterprise.ing® presenters or guests are those of the presenter or guest and not, necessarily, of Enterprise Bank & Trust or its affiliates. All content, related materials and third party website links are for informational purposes only and do not constitute an endorsement by Enterprise Bank & Trust. Enterprise Bank & Trust does not make any warranty, express or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and specifically disclaims any legal liability or responsibility for accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. Enterprise Bank & Trust is not under any obligation to update or correct any materials or content provided in connection with this podcast. All statements and opinions are subject to change without notice. ©2025 Enterprise Bank & Trust. All Rights Reserved.

Join us as we chat with Melissa Breor, the Executive Director of the Chicopee Chamber, and Samalid Hogan, who is the CEO and Principal Consultant at Greylock Management Consulting. They are well known individuals throughout the region because of the important past roles that they have held. Samalid was the former Executive Director at the MSBDC in Springfield and Melissa worked at the Northampton Chamber for many years. They have partnered up to do a series of workshops in Chicopee sponsored by the City of Chicopee. 13 workshops to be exact. Their topics will include business planning, capital resources, financial planning, energy, and impact. For more information, please go to: www.bit.ly/chicopeebizworkshops www.chicopeechamber.org https://cas5-0-urlprotect.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=www.greylockmanagementconsulting.com&umid=aab3390f-3b3f-4a78-80bc-1693e43314ca&rct=1763419700&auth=8789d1923baeef5cdc1c0bb41e7be32625ccae84-079ec4e8fa4b8db345931e6faf7e2615997599f1

Text us your thoughts on the episode or the show!In this episode of OpsCast, hosted by Michael Hartmann and powered by MarketingOps.com, we are joined by Penny Hill, Founder and Principal Consultant at Three Threads Consulting. Penny has built her career at the intersection of marketing, operations, and strategy, helping teams simplify complexity, connect departments, and make data more meaningful.The conversation centers on one of the most common sources of friction in go-to-market teams: attribution and alignment. Penny shares insights on why teams often clash over credit, what “marketing contribution” truly means, and how simplifying metrics and conversations can drive stronger collaboration and better outcomes.In this episode, you will learn:Why attribution continues to challenge marketing and sales alignmentHow to simplify performance measurement without losing insightWays to present metrics that build trust with executives and peersHow Marketing Ops professionals can shift the focus from “who gets credit” to “how we win together”This episode is perfect for Marketing Ops, RevOps, and go-to-market professionals who want to improve collaboration, clarity, and trust across their organizations.Episode Brought to You By MO Pros The #1 Community for Marketing Operations Professionals Ops Cast is brought to you in partnership with Emmie Co, an incredible group of consultants leading the top brands in all things Marketing Operations. Check the mount at Emmieco.comSupport the show

Morten Handberg, Principal Consultant at Wind Power LAB, joins the show to discuss the many variables within wind turbine blades that operators may not be aware of. From design to materials and operation, understanding your blades is crucial to making informed decisions in the field. Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard's StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes' YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us! Welcome to Uptime Spotlight, shining light on wind. Energy's brightest innovators. This is the progress Powering tomorrow. Allen Hall: Morten, welcome back to the program.  Morten Handberg: Thank you so much, Allen. It's fantastic to be back. It's, uh, I really, really happy to be back on the show to discuss blades with you guys.  Allen Hall: So you're a resident blade whisperer, and we wanted to talk about the differences between types of blades even within the same manufacturer, because I think there's a lot of misunderstanding if I buy a specific OEM turbine that I'm getting the same design all the time, or even just the same basic materials are that are used. That's not the case anymore.  Morten Handberg: No, I mean, there's always been variations. Uh, so the B 90 is a very good example because initially was, was released with, uh, with the, with the glass fiber spark cap. [00:01:00] But at later iterations it was, then they then switched it to carbon fiber for, for, for larger, for larger turbines, for higher rated power. But it, it, but it sort of gave that you were not a hundred percent sure. When you initially looked at it, was this actually a ca a glass fiber, uh, beam or a carbon fiber was only when you started to learn the integral, you know, what, what to read in, in the naming convention that you could understand it. But it caused a little confusion about, you know, I'm looking at glass fiber blade or, or a carbon fiber blade. So it's been there for a while, but we're seeing it more and more pronounced with, um. Uh, OEMs changing to signs, uh, or OEMs merging together, but keeping their integral design for, for, for various purposes. And then for the, for the, for the people, not in, uh, not in the loop or not looking behind the curtain. They don't, you don't know, know, know the difference. So I think it's really important that we, that we sort of highlight some of those things to make it easier for people to, to, to know, to know this. Allen Hall: There was a generational change. [00:02:00] Uh, even in the 1.5 megawatt class. There were some blades that were fiberglass and then they, there was a trend to move to carbon fiber to make them lighter, but then the designers got better and started putting fiberglass in, where now you have 70 meter blades that are fiberglass worth 35 meter blades, may have had carbon. Yeah, it's hard to keep up with it.  Morten Handberg: You know, it's really difficult to know. I mean, for, for, for the longer blades, it's becoming more and more pronounced that they will be, uh, there will be carbon fiber reinforced. But a good, uh, example of where it doesn't really apply is actually with, uh, with Siemens cesa. Because if you look at Siemens, Cade said, you know, it's, it's Siemens, uh, the original OEM Siemens at the original OEM Cade that merged. Quite a few years back, but you know, we still see the very sharp, uh, difference between the two different designs because whenever you install a Siemens Esso turbine offshore, it's the Siemens integral blade, it will. And, and they kept that, [00:03:00] uh, and that blade is produced in one cast, it's called the Integral Blade because that's their inherited design.

Dr. Melanie Lashlee Adams, Executive Director and Principal Consultant, Executive Education at Belmont University, discusses the institution's comprehensive Executive Education programs that equip learners with the tools they need to grow their careers and lead their organizations toward impactful outcomes. The conversation explores fundamental leadership concepts, emphasizing self-awareness, emotional intelligence, and the importance of building trust and team collaboration. Dr. Lashlee Adams highlights different certificate programs, along with their executive coaching and custom solutions for individuals and organizations in Middle Tennessee, as well as across the state and nation. She talks about some of the trends and highlights Belmont's shift toward whole-person leadership, and she encourages listeners to explore their Executive Education programs, which include options both in-person and online.SummaryBelmont University and Belmont University Executive Education - Dr. Melanie Lashlee Adams, Executive Director and Principal Consultant, Executive Education at Belmont University, discusses the institution's diverse offerings, including in-person and online graduate programs, a strong music business program, and a new college of medicine. She highlights Belmont's vibrant campus community and its role as a leading educational institution in Nashville, Tennessee, and beyond. Dr. Lashlee Adams then describes Belmont University Executive Education as the professional development arm that provides customized leadership and organizational development curriculum, consulting, executive coaching, certificate programs, and public workshops to support organizations and individuals in Middle Tennessee and across the country. She and her team assess organizational culture and leadership needs through questions about talent development, current challenges, and long-term goals, tailoring solutions to each client's unique requirements.Leadership Fundamentals and Emotional Intelligence - Dr. Lashlee Adams discusses the fundamentals of leadership, emphasizing that it is not solely about a position of authority but involves inspiring and engaging others effectively. She highlights the importance of self-awareness, including understanding one's communication style, stress reactions, and unproductive behaviors, as a foundation for leadership growth and impact. She also mentions the role of emotional intelligence in adapting to the needs of others and building trust, which are crucial for team collaboration and achieving leadership goals.Servant Leadership Development Programs - Dr. Lashlee Adams and Jeremy discuss the importance of leadership skills in developing a healthy team culture and their transferability to personal relationships. They explore how servant leadership can positively impact the community beyond the workplace. Dr. Lashlee Adams explains their range of leadership development programs, including certificate courses, short workshops, and industry-specific training, available both in-person and online.Whole-Person Leadership and Employee Well-being - Dr. Melanie Lashlee Adams then talks about current trends, discussing the shift towards whole-person leadership, emphasizing the importance of serving employees' holistic needs beyond job descriptions. She highlights the focus on creating safe, inclusive, and meaningful work experiences, which requires building trust and psychological safety within teams. Dr. Lashlee Adams encourages listeners to visit Belmont University's Executive Education website for more information on leadership programs, executive coaching, and upcoming workshops.Visit https://www.belmont.edu/executive-edu... to learn more and connect with Belmont University Executive Education.

In this episode, Liz Hutson, Principal Consultant and Owner at EGH, LLC, shares practical strategies for gaining team buy-in during times of change.

In this episode of The Dairy Podcast Show, Dr. Patrick French, Principal Consultant and Founder of PF Bovidae, discusses the use of sorghum silage as a forage source for milk cows in the High Plains. He highlights the benefits of sorghum, such as water conservation and land efficiency. Dr. French also addresses the challenges and key considerations when feeding sorghum silage, outlining the research gaps that remain in understanding its full potential for dairy nutrition. Tune in on all major platforms!"The dairies in the High Plains are exploring sorghum not just for water conservation but for its potential to support sustainable dairy production."Meet the guest: Dr. Patrick French is the Principal Consultant and Founder of PF Bovidae, focusing on consulting for dairies in the High Plains region. With over a decade of experience, his work centers on enhancing dairy operations by introducing sustainable practices, such as the use of sorghum silage as a cost-effective and water-efficient forage alternative.Liked this one? Don't stop now — Here's what we think you'll love!Dr. Michael Hutjens: Buffer Benefits for Dairy Cows | Ep. 58Dr. Michael Steele: Colostrum Feeding Strategies | Ep. 104Dr. Miguel Morales: Transition Cows & Calcium Balance | Ep. 126What you'll learn:(00:00) Highlight(01:12) Introduction(03:47) High Plains dairies(05:02) Sorghum silage(08:17) Practical sorghum applications(13:02) Starch content in sorghum(21:32) Advice for nutritionists(24:42) Final three questionsThe Dairy Podcast Show is trusted and supported by innovative companies like: Protekta* Afimilk* Evonik* Priority IAC* Adisseo- ICC- AHV- dsm-firmenich- Berg + Schmidt- Natural Biologics- SmaXtec

This episode, hosted by Etienne Nichols, delves into the critical impact of a U.S. government shutdown on the medical device industry, specifically focusing on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guest Michael Nilo, President and Principal Consultant of Nilo Medical Consulting Group and a former FDA Scientific Reviewer, offers an insider's perspective on which FDA functions halt and which remain active during a funding lapse. He clarifies that while the processing of new, user-fee-supported marketing applications like PMAs and 510(k)s typically stops, essential activities like active review of already-filed submissions, post-market safety surveillance, enforcement of recalls, and Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) reviews continue, drawing on existing user fee reserves.The discussion pivots to the significant slowdowns that occur, notably the suspension of non-MDUFA-goal-tied interactions, such as Q-submissions (Pre-Submissions) and most interactive reviews. For startups and small manufacturers, the halting of the crucial small business designation processing can be particularly detrimental, leading to astronomically higher user fees once the government reopens. Michael emphasizes that the industry should anticipate this political risk and plan submission timelines strategically, positioning a government shutdown as an "uncontrollable natural disaster" that requires proactive risk mitigation.Michael provides actionable advice for MedTech leaders to pivot during a shutdown. He recommends using the enforced delay to significantly improve the quality of submissions—making them easier to navigate and review once the FDA is fully operational—to gain a crucial advantage over the backlog of queued submissions. Furthermore, companies should utilize the time to focus on parallel activities such as process validation, refining quality systems, and strengthening commercial and reimbursement strategies. Michael stresses the importance of remembering the core mission: getting life-improving technologies to patients, and using any delay as an opportunity to emerge stronger and more prepared for commercial launch.Key Timestamps1:45 - The initial effects of a shutdown: What truly stops at the FDA (new submissions) versus what keeps running (existing reviews, IDEs, post-market surveillance).3:50 - Why active review of filed submissions continues—the role of the user fee "reserve."5:58 - Critical functions that stop or slow down: Pre-submissions (Q-subs), interactive reviews, new policy guidance, and routine inspections.7:25 - The major impact of halting the small business designation process on user fees for new manufacturers.8:36 - MDUFA (Medical Device User Fee Amendments) explained: How user fees fund the FDA and maintain operations during a lapse.11:51 - Direct effects on a MedTech company's runway and the loss of interactive review.13:17 - Actionable advice: Improving submission quality for easier review to mitigate the post-shutdown backlog.15:00 - Strategic pivot: Focusing on parallel work like process validation and quality system refinement.16:03 - Communicating with investors and partners: Positioning the shutdown as an uncontrollable event and shortening the commercial launch gap.18:50 - Looking ahead: Planning submissions around budget resolution deadlines to anticipate shutdown risk.20:53 - Final advice: Keeping the patient-focused mission in mind and maximizing internal...

Failing forward as a food scientist and food designer w/ Dr. Bryan Quoc Le Dr. Bryan Quoc Le is a PhD-level food scientist, author of the book 150 Food Science Questions Answered, host of the upcoming documentary The Flavor Matrix, and Founder and Principal Consultant at Mendocino Food Consulting.Links:https://www.mendocinofoodconsulting.com/https://www.instagram.com/bryanquocleTags:Book Publishing,Consulting,Content Marketing,Creator Economy,Entrepreneur,Mental Health,Science,Small Business,Thought Leader,Writer,Failing forward as a food scientist and food designer w/ Dr,Podmatch,Live Video Podcast InterviewSupport PEG by checking out our Sponsors:Download and use Newsly for free now from www.newsly.me or from the link in the description, and use promo code “GHOST” and receive a 1-month free premium subscription.The best tool for getting podcast guests:https://podmatch.com/signup/phantomelectricghostSubscribe to our Instagram for exclusive content:https://www.instagram.com/expansive_sound_experiments/Subscribe to our YouTube https://youtube.com/@phantomelectricghost?si=rEyT56WQvDsAoRprRSShttps://anchor.fm/s/3b31908/podcast/rssSubstackhttps://substack.com/@phantomelectricghost?utm_source=edit-profile-page

In this episode, Liz Hutson, Principal Consultant and Owner at EGH, LLC, shares a practical three-step framework to achieve goals by visualizing success, manifesting the outcome, and mapping a clear path forward.

In this episode, Liz Hutson, Principal Consultant and Owner at EGH, LLC, shares insights on how clarity fuels confidence and commitment during times of change.