Podcasts about FRE

El desafío político de ver victorias en las derrotas y la astucia de frenar a tiempo ECDQEMSD podcast episodio 6161 Milei Mi Ego Conducen: El Pirata y El Sr. Lagartija https://canaltrans.com Noticias del Mundo: Elecciones parlamentarias en Argentina - Trump habla con Lula - Todo bien en la gira asiática - El misil de Putin - Más playeras - Real Madrid se queda con el clásico - Se confirmó, cantante y ex primer ministro, andan. Historias Desintegradas: Historia dudosa - Gemelas listas - Fiesta en la cerrada - La Sonámbula y el Salvador - Siempre sopa - Sopa de maní en Tarija - Lo videos legendarios - En los campos australianos - Indefendible - Churros y espárragos - Freír Monos - Bolivia requerimos explicaciones - Se abre el portal - Semana de Muertos - Llegan las mascotas y más... En Caso De Que El Mundo Se Desintegre - Podcast no tiene publicidad, sponsors ni organizaciones que aporten para mantenerlo al aire. Solo el sistema cooperativo de los que aportan a través de las suscripciones hacen posible que todo esto siga siendo una realidad. Gracias Dragones Dorados!! NO AI: ECDQEMSD Podcast no utiliza ninguna inteligencia artificial de manera directa para su realización. Diseño, guionado, música, edición y voces son de  nuestra completa intervención humana.

Author River Selby visits the Northwest Passages Book Club to talk about her new book "Hotshot: A Life on Fire." Spokesman-Review writer Elena Perry asks Selby about fighting wildland fires in the live interview at the Montvale Event Center Monday, Oct. 20, 2025 in Spokane, Washington.

In the latest episode of Tin Foil Hat, Sam Tripoli welcomes Danielle Mercy from The Rabbit Hole Podcast to explore how everything seems to circle back to satanism. They discuss how elements of major religions like Catholicism and modern Judaism may contain hidden occult ties, while scandals involving elites — from Epstein and Pizzagate to Diddy — reveal a deeper ritualistic system. The conversation also dives into satanic symbolism in movies, shows, concerts, and even memorials (including those tied to Charlie Kirk), suggesting these events serve as forms of energy harvesting and mass conditioning by hidden powers.   Please subscribe to the new Tin Foil Hat youtube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@TinFoilHatYoutube Check out Sam Tripoli's 4th Crowd Work Special "Deep Dish: Live From Chicago" Oct 4th on Youtube.com/SamTripoliComedy Grab your copy of the 2nd issue of the Chaos Twins now and join the Army Of Chaos: https://bit.ly/415fDfY Check out Sam "DoomScrollin with Sam Tripoli and Midnight Mike" Every Tuesday At 4pm pst on Youtube, X Twitter, Rumble and Rokfin! Join the WolfPack at Wise Wolf Gold and Silver and start hedging your financial position by investing in precious metals now!  Go to samtripoli.gold and use the promo code "TinFoil" and we thank Tony for supporting our show. CopyMyCrypto.com: The ‘Copy my Crypto' membership site shows you the coins that the youtuber ‘James McMahon' personally holds - and allows you to copy him. So if you'd like to join the 1300 members who copy James, then stop what you're doing and head over to: https://copymycrypto.com/tinfoilhat/ You'll not only find proof of everything I've said - but my listeners get full access for just $1 LiveLongerFormula.com: Check out https://www.livelongerformula.com/sam — Christian is a longevity author and functional health expert who helps you fix your gut, detox, boost testosterone, and sleep better so you can thrive, not just survive. Watch his free masterclass on the 7 Deadly Health Fads, and if it clicks, book a free Metabolic Function Assessment to get to the root of your health issues. Want to see Sam Tripoli live?  Get tickets at SamTripoli.com:   Las Vegas, NV:  Tin Foil Hat Comedy Live At The Virgin Hotel Nov 21st https://www.etix.com/ticket/p/95279813/tin-foil-hat-comedy-with-sam-tripoli-and-eddie-bravo-las-vegas-24-oxford   Minneapolis: Headlining The House Of Comedy Dec 11th-13th https://samtripoli.com/events/?paged=3   Morris Plains, NJ: New Year's Eve At The Dojo Of Comedy Dec 31st https://www.tiffscomedy.com/events/121228   Please Check Out Danielle Mercy's internet: Website: https://www.stayskeptical.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rabbit.holepodcast   Please check out Sam Tripoli's internet: Linktree: https://linktr.ee/samtripoli Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Stand Up Youtube Page: https://www.youtube.com/@SamTripoliComedy Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Comedy Instagram:  https://www.instagram.com/samtripolicomedy/ Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Podcast Clip Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/samtripolispodcastclips/    Huge Thank You To Our Sponsor: True Werk: TRUEWERK is hell-bent on creating the most technical, high-performance workwear in the world. The TRUEWERK story begins in the Colorado mountains where a trade worker knew there had to be a better solution than the wet, heavy gear that was weighing him down.  Check out the full lineup and get 15 percent off your first order at TRUEWERK.com/tinfoil. Fre Nicotine Pouches: Tin Foil Hat listeners don't follow the crowd—your nicotine pouches shouldn't either. While mainstream brands keep you stuck with weak, dry options, FRE delivers instant satisfaction with strengths up to 15mg. Thanks to Pre-Primed moisture technology, you get immediate performance instead of waiting. Don't let big tobacco decide what's enough—choose FRE and take control.  Got to https://frepouch.com/ and use the promocode TINFOIL to get 20% off!    

Su similitud al Maestro Splinter hacía pensar que era un buen hombre, pero no ECDQEMSD podcast episodio 6153 El Viejo Rata Conducen: El Pirata y El Sr. Lagartija https://canaltrans.com Noticias del Mundo: Francia posterga reformas - Gaza y los planes de reconstrucción - Trump juega batalla naval - Milei en Washington - Sheinbaum mintió - Brugada también - Adiós MTV - Todo Verificado Historias Desintegradas: El cliente no tiene razón - Dónde están las tortugas? - Vacas con sed - Me mordió un caballo - Espinaca y zapallo criollo - Freír churros - Tengo poder sin poder - Odio mi trabajo - Me separé y terminé en la doble A - Techo caído - Todo mejoró - Cuánto dormir - Pesadillas para despertar - Mujeres rurales - A lavarse la manos - Bastones blancos - El perro lazarillo y más... En Caso De Que El Mundo Se Desintegre - Podcast no tiene publicidad, sponsors ni organizaciones que aporten para mantenerlo al aire. Solo el sistema cooperativo de los que aportan a través de las suscripciones hacen posible que todo esto siga siendo una realidad. Gracias Dragones Dorados!! NO AI: ECDQEMSD Podcast no utiliza ninguna inteligencia artificial de manera directa para su realización. Diseño, guionado, música, edición y voces son de  nuestra completa intervención humana.

This episode dives deep into the complexities of character evidence in law, focusing on Federal Rules of Evidence 404 and 405. It explores the strategic considerations, exceptions, and the balance between fairness and truth in legal proceedings.In the intricate world of evidence law, character evidence stands as one of the most challenging areas for law students and practitioners alike. This blog post delves into the nuances of character evidence, focusing on Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 404 and 405, and the strategic considerations involved.Understanding the Basics: Character evidence generally refers to using a person's character or traits to prove they acted in a certain way on a specific occasion. Under FRE 404, such evidence is typically inadmissible due to the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion, and distraction from the main issues. The rule aims to prevent trials from devolving into character assassinations rather than focusing on the crime charged.Exceptions to the Rule: Despite the general prohibition, there are exceptions where character evidence can be admitted. These include the defendant's right to introduce evidence of their own pertinent character trait (FRE 404A2A), evidence of the victim's character in certain cases (FRE 404A2B), and when character is an essential element of a claim or defense (FRE 405B).Strategic Considerations: Introducing character evidence can be a double-edged sword. While it may bolster a defense, it also opens the door for the prosecution to introduce rebuttal evidence. Lawyers must carefully weigh the potential benefits against the risks of prejudice and distraction.Character evidence remains a contentious and complex area of law, balancing the need for fairness with the pursuit of truth. As legal professionals navigate these waters, understanding the strategic implications and exceptions is crucial for effective advocacy.TakeawaysCharacter evidence is generally inadmissible to prove conduct on a specific occasion.FRE 404 prohibits character evidence due to risks of unfair prejudice and confusion.Exceptions include the defendant's pertinent character trait and victim's character in certain cases.Character evidence can open the door for rebuttal evidence from the prosecution.FRE 405B allows character evidence when it's an essential element of a claim or defense.Strategic use of character evidence requires careful consideration of potential risks.The doctrine of chances is a debated non-propensity purpose under FRE 404B.FRE 412, the rape shield law, protects victims' past sexual history from being used in court.FRE 413, 414, and 415 allow prior similar acts in sex offense cases for propensity inference.Understanding the framework of character evidence is crucial for legal practitioners.Character evidence is generally inadmissible. FRE 404 prohibits character evidence. Exceptions include the defendant's character trait. Character evidence can open the door for rebuttal. FRE 405B allows character evidence as an essential element. Strategic use requires careful consideration. The doctrine of chances is debated. FRE 412 protects victims' past sexual history. FRE 413 allows prior similar acts for propensity. Understanding character evidence is crucial.character evidence, Federal Rules of Evidence, FRE 404, FRE 405, legal strategy

In this episode of Deep Dive, we explore the intricacies of evidence law, focusing on the federal rules of evidence 401, 402, and 403. We discuss the importance of these rules in shaping the factual universe considered by judges and juries, and how they serve as gatekeepers in litigation. The conversation delves into the balance between logical relevance and the potential for unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time, emphasizing the role of judges in maintaining fairness and efficiency in trials.Imagine standing in a courtroom, the air thick with anticipation as the fate of a case hangs in the balance. At the heart of this tension lies evidence law, the unsung hero of litigation. In our latest episode of Deep Dive, we unravel the complexities of the federal rules of evidence, focusing on rules 401, 402, and 403. These rules are the gatekeepers, shaping the factual universe that judges and juries consider.The Engine Room of Litigation: Evidence law is often described as the engine room of litigation. It dictates what the judge and jury can consider, making it a fundamental aspect of any legal proceeding. As we explore these rules, we discover their role in maintaining fairness and efficiency in trials. Rule 403, for instance, empowers judges to exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by dangers like unfair prejudice.Balancing Logic and Fairness: The balance between logical relevance and potential prejudice is crucial. Judges must navigate this delicate balance to ensure that trials remain fair and focused. Understanding these foundational rules is key to mastering more complex topics like hearsay. As we delve deeper, we see how the federal rules of evidence provide a sophisticated framework to manage information and ensure fair trials.The Art of Evidence: Mastering evidence law involves more than just memorizing definitions. It's about grasping the strategy and system behind these rules. Probative value and materiality define logical relevance under Rule 401, while conditional relevance under Rule 104B requires a connecting fact for evidence admissibility. This art of evidence is about balancing truth-seeking with fairness, a skill that every legal professional must hone.As we conclude our exploration, we invite you to reflect on the role of evidence law in the pursuit of justice. These rules are not just legal formalities; they are the backbone of a fair and efficient legal system. Join us in our next episode as we continue to delve into the fascinating world of law. Subscribe now to stay updated on our latest insights and discussions.TakeawaysEvidence law is fundamental in litigation, shaping the factual universe for judges and juries.Federal rules 401, 402, and 403 are essential gatekeepers for evidence admissibility.Rule 403 allows judges to exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by dangers like unfair prejudice.The balance between logical relevance and potential prejudice is crucial in trials.Judges play a key role in maintaining fairness and efficiency in the courtroom.Understanding the foundational rules helps in mastering complex topics like hearsay.The FRE provides a sophisticated framework to manage information and ensure fair trials.Probative value and materiality define logical relevance under Rule 401.Conditional relevance under Rule 104B requires a connecting fact for evidence admissibility.The art of evidence involves balancing truth-seeking with fairness.

Medellín, Colombia — once the heartbeat of Pablo Escobar's empire and the most dangerous city on Earth — has transformed in shocking ways. In this episode , Johnny dives deep into the hidden world of Medellín's modern drug trade.

The story so far: After a year and a half underground, we've made it to the best time of the year! We're back for week 2 of SELLOUT OCTOBER! During October, we watch mainstream horror movies that people have heard of before, and this week, we're waking up in the middle of the night, brewing some coffee to stay awake, and cracking into A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988)! Did we enjoy this entry in the Elm Street franchise, or would we rather discuss Freddy's anatomy, falling asleep on the toilet, and our dream warrior powers, while oozing praise for the one-and-only Screaming Mad George! Leave us a 30 second voicemail and if we like it we'll play it on the show: (949) 4-STABBY (949-478-2229)Next movie announced every Wednesday. New episodes every Monday. Follow us on the things:Website: https://www.stabbypod.comLinktree: https://www.linktr.ee/stabbystabbyInstagram:  @stabbypod  https://www.instagram.com/stabbypod/Letterboxd:   https://boxd.it/dp1ACSend us a text

The Sinaloa Cartel is unraveling—its leaders captured, its factions at war, and U.S. pressure at an all-time high. Yet in Nogales, Sonora, one of Mexico's most strategic border plazas, business continues as usual. In this episode, we travel to Nogales to uncover: -How the Chapitos betrayed El Mayo Zambada with the DEA's help -Why Nogales is vital for drug and human smuggling routes into the U.S. -First-hand accounts from locals and former smugglers inside cartel operations -The rise of retail drug markets (“tiendas”) across Mexico -How cartels enforce their own version of “law and order” in border towns From bloody betrayals in Culiacán to quiet cartel control in Nogales, this story reveals the new face of Mexico's underworld. Today's Episode Is #Sponsored By The Following: PrizePicks! Visit https://prizepicks.onelink.me/LME0/CONNECT and use code CONNECT and get $50 in lineups when you play your first $5 lineup! Ava! Take control of your credit right now. Download the Ava app today, and when you join using promo code CONNECT20, you'll save 20% for your first year—monthly or annual, your choice. FRE! Get 20% off you first order at https://frepouch.com using code CONNECT at checkout! Join The Patreon For Bonus Content! https://www.patreon.com/theconnectshow 00:00 Sinaloa Cartel in Crisis 02:03 Chaos and Violence in Culiacán 04:08 How Drug Trafficking Has Changed 05:24 Nogales: A Key Border Plaza 06:15 The Mechanics of Smuggling 08:17 This Episode Is Sponsored By PrizePicks and Ava! 11:31 Why Nogales Matters 13:01 Inside the World of a Cartel Operator 16:04 This Episode Is Sponsored By FRE 18:27 Cartel Evolution and Internal Rivalries 22:31 US Pressure and Crackdowns on Corruption 26:10 Retail Drug Markets in Mexico 30:05 Different Cartel Rules for Drugs 31:48 Cartel Justice and Crime in Nogales 33:24 Low-Key Tension on the Border 35:35 Why Locals Don't Break Away 36:19 Impunity and the Limits of Law Enforcement 37:12 What Really Matters in the Drug War 38:53 The Future of the Sinaloa Cartel 39:05 Closing Thoughts & Outro Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Simply Analog by Tin Box pres. Fre$h 01. Maureen Walsh - Thinking Of You 02. Elle Varner ft. J. Cole - Only Wanna Give It To You 03. Eric Benet - Why You Follow Me 04. Lauryn Hill - Sweetest Thing 05. Sybil - Don't Make Me Over 06. Kenny Thomas - Thinking About Your Love 07. Zhane - Request Line 08. LSG ft. LL Cool J, Busta Rhymes & Lil Kim - Curious 09. Randy Crawford - Give Me The Night 10. Joyce Sims - Come Into My Life 11. Sarah Conner ft. Ne Yo - Sexual Healing 12. Usher - U Remind Me 13. Wyclef Jean ft. Refugee Allstars - We Are Trying To Stay Alive 14. D'Influence - Hypnotize 15. R. Kelly - Step In The Name Of Love 16. Craig David - Time To Party 17. Lutricia McNeal - Stranded 18. Mark Morrison - Return Of The Mack 19. Groove Theory - Baby Luv 20. Mariah Carey & Jermaine Dupri - Get Your Number 21. Nelly - N Dey Say 22. Troi - Never Knew Love 23. Rappin' 4-Tay ft. Detriot Spinners - I'll Be Around 24. Eternal - Power Of A Woman 25. Cris Crqab - Liar Liar 26. Full Flava ft. Lorraine McIntosh - Make This A Special Night 27. Liberty X - A Night To Remember 28. DJ Cassidy ft. R. Kelly - Make The World Go Around 29. Blue - Supersexual 30. Mary J. Blige ft. Will Smith - Got To Be Real MORE FRE$H MIXTAPES ▶️ bit.ly/RAfresh reactivateasia.com FIND US ON OUR SOCIALS! FACEBOOK

Free 5 Day Magnetic Money Challenge: https://www.womensacademyoftransforma...I had one of my most successful years in business… and then I decided to burn it all down.Not because it wasn't working, but because I felt deeply misaligned. And here's the truth: money doesn't just respond to strategy, effort, or even success. Money responds to who you're being.In this video, I share why I chose to start over, the risks I took, and the identity shifts that allowed me to trust myself — even when I didn't know what was next. Because if you keep playing small, of course, you'll get small results. But when you become the embodiment of your work and dare to play bigger, money and opportunities rise to meet you.✨ Inside this video, you'll discover:Why alignment matters more than “success on paper”How money mirrors your identity, not just your actionsWhat it really means to embody your workWhy playing bigger is the key to bigger results

In the latest episode of Tin Foil Hat, Sam Tripoli welcomes special guest Kelsi Sheren for a powerful and eye-opening conversation that pulls no punches. We dive deep into the unsettling rise of communism in Canada and how it's reshaping the nation under the guise of progressive policy. From there, we expose the growing issue of information censorship—what you can't say in Canada might shock you. The discussion expands into replacement theory and how it's playing out across Western nations like Canada, Europe, Australia, and the United States, challenging listeners to question the narratives they've been fed. Things get even darker as we examine the MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying) program in Canada, uncovering its disturbing ties to eugenics and population control. But it's not all doom and gloom—we also explore the transformative power of psychedelics in healing trauma, offering hope and resilience in the face of an increasingly controlled world. This is one episode you don't want to miss. Please subscribe to the new Tin Foil Hat youtube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@TinFoilHatYoutube Check out Sam Tripoli new crowd work special "Black Crack Robots" now for free. https://youtu.be/_FKugOeYaLc Check out Sam Tripoli's 2nd New Crowd Work Special “Potty Mouth” on YouTube for free. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22j3Ds5ArjM Grab your copy of the 2nd issue of the Chaos Twins now and join the Army Of Chaos: https://bit.ly/415fDfY Check out Sam "DoomScrollin with Sam Tripoli and Midnight Mike" Every Tuesday At 4pm pst on Youtube, X Twitter, Rumble and Rokfin! Join the WolfPack at Wise Wolf Gold and Silver and start hedging your financial position by investing in precious metals now!  Go to samtripoli.gold and use the promo code "TinFoil" and we thank Tony for supporting our show. CopyMyCrypto.com: The ‘Copy my Crypto' membership site shows you the coins that the youtuber ‘James McMahon' personally holds - and allows you to copy him. So if you'd like to join the 1300 members who copy James, then stop what you're doing and head over to: CopyMyCrypto.com/TFH You'll not only find proof of everything I've said - but my listeners get full access for just $1 Want to see Sam Tripoli live?  Get tickets at SamTripoli.com: Kansas City, Mo: Headlining The Comedy Club of Kansas City August 28th-30th https://www.thecomedyclubkc.com/events/114717   Chicago: Headlining The Comedy Bar Sept 12th-13th https://www.eventbrite.com/cc/september-12-13-sam-tripoli-4497173   Tulsa, Ok:  Tin Foil Hat Comedy Is Headlining the Bricktown Comedy Club on Oct 10th https://bricktowntulsa.com/shows/310746   Oklahoma City, Ok: Tin Foil Hat Comedy Is Headlining the Bricktown Comedy Club on Oct 11th https://www.bricktowncomedy.com/events/112032   Austin, Tx:  Headlining The Fat Man At Comedy Mothership Oct 17th-19th https://samtripoli.com/events/?paged=2   Las Vegas, NV:  Tin Foil Hat Comedy Live At The Virgin Hotel Nov 21st https://www.etix.com/ticket/p/95279813/tin-foil-hat-comedy-with-sam-tripoli-and-eddie-bravo-las-vegas-24-oxford   Minneapolis: Headlining The House Of Comedy Dec 11th-13th https://samtripoli.com/events/?paged=3   Morris Plains, NJ: New Year's Eve At The Dojo Of Comedy Dec 31st https://www.tiffscomedy.com/events/121228   Please check out Kelsi Sheren's Internet: Website: https://www.kelsisheren.com Podcast:  the Kelsi Sheren Perspective https://bit.ly/3JGEnV7 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kelsie_sheren/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@thekelsisherenperspective Twitter: https://x.com/BrassandUnity   Please check out Sam Tripoli's internet: Linktree: https://linktr.ee/samtripoli Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Stand Up Youtube Page: https://www.youtube.com/@SamTripoliComedy Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Comedy Instagram:  https://www.instagram.com/samtripolicomedy/ Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Podcast Clip Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/samtripolispodcastclips/   Thank you to our sponsors: MeUndies: MeUndies signature super-soft MicroModal fabric is breathable, stretchy, and oh-so-comfy, making it ideal for all-day wear. If you need something even more breathable and summer-proof, check out the MoveMe line with Breathe fabric, which has moisture wicking and anti-odor technology perfect for working out or just keeping you extra cool on those sweltering days. Right now as a listener of my show, you can score sizzling summer deals like up to 50% off at MeUndies dot com slash tinfoil and enter promo code tinfoil. That's MeUndies dot com slash tinfoil, promo code tinfoil for up to 50% off! MeUndies—comfort that's made for summer. Fre Nicotine Pouches: Tin Foil Hat listeners don't follow the crowd—your nicotine pouches shouldn't either. While mainstream brands keep you stuck with weak, dry options, FRE delivers instant satisfaction with strengths up to 15mg. Thanks to Pre-Primed moisture technology, you get immediate performance instead of waiting. Don't let big tobacco decide what's enough—choose FRE and take control.  Got to https://frepouch.com/ and use the promocode TINFOIL to get 20% off!    

In Episode #916, Alan Paul Roberts exposes what he calls a coordinated globalist agenda to dismantle the 11 foundational pillars of society, warning that we are in the midst of a silent war on personal freedom, national sovereignty, and economic independence. He reveals how elite investors are taking control of the global food supply to manipulate populations, while pushing for a borderless world that dissolves the power of the nation-state. Roberts explains how law and order are being intentionally undermined to create chaos and justify authoritarian control, and how surveillance technologies are being rapidly expanded to monitor behavior and eliminate privacy. He also discusses the engineered collapse of the traditional banking system as a way to usher in a cashless society and programmable currency—tools designed to centralize power and strip individuals of financial autonomy. Please check out Alan Paul Roberts's Book "The Globalist Plan To Collapse Everything": https://globalcollapsebook.com Please subscribe to the new Tin Foil Hat youtube channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@TinFoilHatYoutube Check out Sam Tripoli new crowd work special "Black Crack Robots" now for free. https://youtu.be/_FKugOeYaLc Check out Sam Tripoli's 2nd New Crowd Work Special “Potty Mouth” on YouTube for free. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22j3Ds5ArjM Grab your copy of the 2nd issue of the Chaos Twins now and join the Army Of Chaos: https://bit.ly/415fDfY Check out Sam "DoomScrollin with Sam Tripoli and Midnight Mike" Every Tuesday At 4pm pst on Youtube, X Twitter, Rumble and Rokfin! Join the WolfPack at Wise Wolf Gold and Silver and start hedging your financial position by investing in precious metals now!  Go to samtripoli.gold and use the promo code "TinFoil" and we thank Tony for supporting our show. CopyMyCrypto.com: The ‘Copy my Crypto' membership site shows you the coins that the youtuber ‘James McMahon' personally holds - and allows you to copy him. So if you'd like to join the 1300 members who copy James, then stop what you're doing and head over to: CopyMyCrypto.com/TFH You'll not only find proof of everything I've said - but my listeners get full access for just $1 Want to see Sam Tripoli live?  Get tickets at SamTripoli.com: Kansas City, Mo: Headlining The Comedy Club of Kansas City August 28th-30th https://www.thecomedyclubkc.com/events/114717   Chicago: Headlining The Comedy Bar Sept 12th-13th https://www.eventbrite.com/cc/september-12-13-sam-tripoli-4497173   Tulsa, Ok:  Tin Foil Hat Comedy Is Headlining the Bricktown Comedy Club on Oct 10th https://bricktowntulsa.com/shows/310746   Oklahoma City, Ok: Tin Foil Hat Comedy Is Headlining the Bricktown Comedy Club on Oct 11th https://www.bricktowncomedy.com/events/112032   Austin, Tx:  Headlining The Fat Man At Comedy Mothership Oct 17th-19th https://samtripoli.com/events/?paged=2   Las Vegas, NV:  Tin Foil Hat Comedy Live At The Virgin Hotel Nov 21st https://www.etix.com/ticket/p/95279813/tin-foil-hat-comedy-with-sam-tripoli-and-eddie-bravo-las-vegas-24-oxford   Minneapolis: Headlining The House Of Comedy Dec 11th-13th https://samtripoli.com/events/?paged=3   Please check out Alan Paul Roberts's internet: Website: https://www.authoraproberts.com Twitter: https://x.com/AuthorAPRoberts   Please check out Sam Tripoli's internet: Linktree: https://linktr.ee/samtripoli Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Stand Up Youtube Page: https://www.youtube.com/@SamTripoliComedy Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Comedy Instagram:  https://www.instagram.com/samtripolicomedy/ Please Follow Sam Tripoli's Podcast Clip Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/samtripolispodcastclips/   Thank you to our sponsors:   Fre Nicotine Pouches: Tin Foil Hat listeners don't follow the crowd—your nicotine pouches shouldn't either. While mainstream brands keep you stuck with weak, dry options, FRE delivers instant satisfaction with strengths up to 15mg. Thanks to Pre-Primed moisture technology, you get immediate performance instead of waiting. Don't let big tobacco decide what's enough—choose FRE and take control.  Got to https://frepouch.com/ and use the promocode TINFOIL to get 20% off!    Ava: Ava is a credit-building app that makes it so easy to improve your credit FAST, so you can get better rates on loans, pay off debt faster, and keep more money in your pocket.  Take control of your credit right now. Download the Ava app (spelled A-V-A) today, and when you join using my promo code TINFOIL, your first month is totally FREE.          

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of evidence law, focusing on foundational concepts such as relevance, materiality, and probative value. It explores the federal rules of evidence, including general provisions, gatekeeping roles of the court, specific rules of relevance, and the implications of the rape shield law. The discussion also covers the nuances of witness testimony, hearsay exceptions, and the authentication and best evidence rule. Practical applications and trial strategies are examined, emphasizing the importance of understanding these rules in the pursuit of justice.In this enlightening episode, we delve into the foundational concepts of evidence law: relevance, materiality, and probative value. Discover how these principles shape the legal landscape, ensuring that only pertinent and significant evidence is considered in court. Whether you're a legal professional or simply curious about the intricacies of the law, this episode offers valuable insights into how evidence is evaluated and utilized in legal proceedings. Tune in to deepen your understanding of these critical legal concepts.TakeawaysUnderstanding evidence law isn't just about memorizing rules.Relevant equals material plus probative.The purpose of these rules is to ensure justice.You must make a timely objection or a motion to strike.The court must decide any preliminary question about admissibility.FRE 411 specifies that evidence of insurance is generally not admissible.FRE 412 is designed to protect victims in sex offense cases.The court may admit evidence of similar crimes in sexual assault cases.Every person is competent to be a witness unless stated otherwise.Hearsay is generally not admissible unless an exception applies.evidence law, relevance, materiality, probative value, federal rules of evidence, rape shield law, hearsay, witness testimony, authentication, trial strategies

Simply Analog by Tin Box pres. Fre$h 01. Eminem ft. Rihanna - Love The Way You Lie 02. 2 Chainz ft. Wiz Khalifa- We Own It (Fast & Furious) 03. Iggy Azalea ft. Charli XCX - Fancy 04. Sage The Gemini ft. IAmSu - Gas Pedal 05. T Pain ft. B.O.B. - Up Down 06. Omarion ft. Chris Brown - Post To Be 07. Kid Ink ft. Usher - Body Language 08. will.i.am ft. Miley Cryus, French Montana - Feelin' Myself 09. Drake - Find Your Love 10. Kid Ink ft. Chris Brown - Show Me 11. Kid Ink ft. Chris Brown - Main Chick 12. Trey Songz - Na Na 13. Jeremih ft. YG - Don't Tell Em 14. will.i.am ft. Cody Wise - Birthday 15. Chris Brown ft. Tyga - Loyal 16. Fuse ODG - Million Pound Girl 17. Trey Songz ft. Nicki Minaj - Touchin, Lovin 18. Chris Brown ft. Tyga - Ayo 19. Drake ft. Lil Wayne & Tyga - The Motto 20. Kid Ink ft. Chris Brown - Hotel 21. Rihanna - Diamonds 22. Natalie La Rose ft. Jeremih - Somebody 23. Fergie - L.A. Love 24. Ariana Grande ft. Iggy Azalea - Problem 25. Major Lazer & DJ Snake ft. MØ - Lean On 26. Jason Derulo & DJ Snake - Talk Dirty 27. DJ Snake & Lil Jon - Turn Down For What 28. Dillon Francis & DJ Snake - Get Low 29. Lil Jon ft. Tyga - Bend Ova 30. Omi - Cheerleader 31. Major Lazer ft. Busy Signal - Watch Out For This 32. Lethal Bizzle ft. Diztortion - Fester Skank 33. DJ Fresh & Jay Fay ft. Ms Dynamite - Dibby Dibby Sound 34. Jay Z & Kanye West - Ni**as In Paris 35. Beyonce - 7/11 36. Baauer - Harlem Shake 37. Beyonce ft. Jay Z - Drunk In Love 38. Skepta ft. JME - That's Not Me 39. Stormzy - Know Me From 40. Meridan Dan & JME - German Whip' 41. Lethal Bizzle ft. JME & Tempa T - Rari Workout 42. Tinie Tempah ft. 2 Chainz - Trampoline 43. Flo Rida ft. Sage The Gemini & Lookas - GDFR MORE FRE$H MIXTAPES ▶️ bit.ly/RAfresh reactivateasia.com FIND US ON OUR SOCIALS! FACEBOOK

FRE-akt vsté y ya https://www.ivoox.com/podcast-podcast-san-onofre_sq_f1146007_1.html Domingo 27 julio 2025 Enlace a las 33 1ªs angloentrevistas Siguientes 33 Ya disponible nuestro librito jenkins Angloentrevistas Traducidas, Vol. 2 https://libritosjenkins.bigcartel.com/product/angloentrevistas-traducidas-de-san-onofre-vol-2 SAN ONOFRE pisoteamos las flores, destrozamos la ilusión de lo ñiños y en general hacemos de Atila. Sí, el corredor de bolsa. Somos piratas digitales de medio pelo y mingitamos en el urinario del todopoderoso Marcel Ducahmp. A todo esto, la parte del león del proama de hoy gira en torno al cuarteto femenil brasilero AKT y su potente minielepé AKT3, de 1990. Vamos abriendo boca para lo que puede ser una de nuestras próximas entrevistas con Trinity, sagrado terceto carpetovetónico de Free Jazz. No desfallezcan, amigas onofritas, nosotras jamás lo hacemos, que nos quedan cinco episodios de la 27ª temporada y alguno promete ser sonado. Cheers!

Simply Analog by Tin Box pres. Fre$h 01. Rihanna ft. Jay-Z - Umbrella 02. Rihanna - Rude Boy 03. Bruno Mars - The Lazy Song 04. Gym Class Heroes ft. Adam Levine - Stereo Hearts 05. Jessie J ft. B.o.B. - Price Tag 06. Iyaz - Replay 07. Jason Derulo - It Girl 08. B.o.B. ft. Hayley Williams - Airplanes 09. Jason Derulo - Ridin' Solo 10. Sean Paul ft. Alexis Jordan - Got 2 Luv U 11. Professor Green ft. Lily Allen - Just Be Good To Green 12. Nicole Scherzinger ft. 50 Cent - Right There 13. Emeli Sandé - Next To Me 14. Yasmin - Finish Line 15. Aloe Blacc - I Need A Dollar 16. Jessie J - Who's Laughing Now 17. Lady Gaga - Alejandro 18. Rihanna ft. Drake - What's My Name 19. Kelly Rowland - Work 20. Christina Milian ft. Young Jeezy - Say I 21. Kanye West - Stronger 22. Loick Essien ft. Tanya Lacey - How We Roll 23. Jennifer Lopez - Do It Well 24. Nicole Scherzinger - Don't Hold Your Breath 25. Wretch 32 ft. Example - Unorthodox 26. Timbaland ft. Nelly Furtado & Justin Timberlake - Give It To Me 27. Dizzee Rascal ft. Calvin Harris & Chrome - Dance Wiv Me 28. Timbaland ft. Keri Hilson - The Way I Are 29. Lady Gaga - Paparazzi 30. Professor Green ft. Ed Drewett - I Need You Tonight MORE FRE$H MIXTAPES ▶️ bit.ly/RAfresh reactivateasia.com FIND US ON OUR SOCIALS! FACEBOOK

Simply Analog by Tin Box pres. Fre$h 01. Dr Dre & Snoop Dogg - The Next Episode 02. Snoop Dogg ft. Pharrell Williams - Drop It Like It's Hot 03. 50 Cent - In Da Club 04. Kanye West ft. Jamie Foxx - Gold Digger 05. J-Kwon - Tipsy 06. Blu Cantrell ft. Sean Paul - Breathe 07. 50 Cent - Candy Shop 08. Rihanna - Pon De Replay 09. Beyoncé - Single Ladies (Put A Ring On It) 10. Beyoncé ft. Jay-Z - Crazy In Love 11. Ice Cube ft Mack 10 & Ms Toi - You Can Do It 12. Destiny's Child - Bootylicious 13. Sean Paul - Get Busy 14. Akon - Belly Dancer (Bananza) 15. Missy Elliott - Work It 16. Ciara - Goodies 17. Usher - Yeah! 18. Kevin Lyttle - Turn Me On 19. Nelly - Hot In Herre 20. Pussycat Dolls ft. Snoop Dogg - Buttons 21. Britney Spears - I'm A Slave 4 U 22. Ciara ft. Missy Elliott - 1,2 Step 23. Pussycat Dolls ft. Busta Rhymes - Don't Cha 24. D'Banj - Oliver Twist 25. Sean Paul - Temperature 26. Sisqo - Thong Song 27. Missy Elliott ft. Ciara & Fatman Scoop - Lose Control 28. Black Eyed Peas - My Humps 29. Flo Rida ft. T-Pain - Low 30. Jay-Z & Kanye West - N***** In Paris MORE FRE$H MIXTAPES ▶️ bit.ly/RAfresh reactivateasia.com FIND US ON OUR SOCIALS! FACEBOOK

In this episode, Cass Duffill sits down with nervous system expert Nicole Gomez to explore why regulating your nervous system is essential for avoiding burnout—especially for entrepreneurs and practitioners. They discuss how childhood imprints shape our stress responses, the key signs of burnout, and a three-step process to rewire the nervous system. Nicole shares why grief is a critical step in healing and how processing emotions can transform your business, relationships, and self-worth.Key Takeaways:✅ Burnout is common among entrepreneurs, particularly women. ✅ A dysregulated nervous system leads to chronic stress, anxiety, and overwhelm. ✅ Childhood traumas influence how we operate in business and life. ✅ Healing requires grieving past wounds to release stored trauma. ✅ The breath is a tool for feeling and processing, not just calming down. ✅ Self-worth isn't tied to achievements or external validation. ✅ All areas of life—business, relationships, and health—are interconnected.

Discover how ancient Feng Shui principles can transform your practice space into a magnet for abundance and client success!In this practical episode, Feng Shui expert Lorraine Lewis shares actionable strategies to optimize your clinic's energy flow and create an environment that supports both practitioner wellbeing and client transformation.We also discuss ways to preserve and improve your energy, so your consults aren't so draining. Plus we delve into the year of the wood snake and what that means for us as practitioners.An exciting conversation you don't want to miss!Connect with Cass - WEBSITEConnect with Lorraine - WEBSITELet's Chat - Send an instant message now REGISTER HERE Struggling to attract consistent clients and grow your practice? Join the FRE training & discover the blueprint to build a thriving, impact-driven, and financially stable health & wellness practice – without burnout.Blueprint to Breakthrough: The Proven Roadmap to a Profitable, Thriving Practice!6pm Mon 31st March 2025 LIMITED TIME - FREE MASTERCLASS >> Blueprint to Breakthrough, Your Roadmap to a thriving practice! 6pm 31st March 2025 REGISTER NOW Free Resource: A Practitioner's Guide To Attracting Amazing Clients Enrolling for Mentoring Now - Limited Spaces Left. Find out more HEREJoin the FREE GROUP - Wellness Biz Growth HubSubscribe to my YouTube channel: Live Your Passion, Grow Your PracticeVisit my website www.cassduffill.comFollow me on Instagram: The Practitioner's Business Mentor Follow me on Facebook: The Practitioner's Business Mentor

Let's break down the main points of Evidence Law, focusing on how to challenge witnesses, protect confidential info, use expert testimony, and navigate those tricky hearsay exceptions.I. Impeachment: Discrediting a WitnessThe main goal here is to show that a witness isn't reliable, is biased, or can't keep their story straight. We have rules (FRE 607-609) that lay out how to do this.Prior Inconsistent Statements: If a witness says one thing now but said something different earlier, that's a red flag. For example, saying "I saw the defendant at the crime scene" in court but telling the police "I didn't see the defendant that night" earlier makes them look unreliable. These statements aren't considered hearsay if they're only used to show the witness isn't credible.Bias or Motive to Lie: If a witness has a reason to favor one side—like being the defendant's best friend or getting paid to testify—their testimony might be biased. Evidence of bias is always relevant.Conviction of a Crime: If a witness has been convicted of a felony or a crime involving dishonesty, that can be used to challenge their credibility. Crimes of dishonesty are always fair game, while felonies can be used if they're relevant enough to outweigh any potential prejudice. Convictions older than 10 years are generally off-limits.Reputation for Untruthfulness: If a witness has a reputation for lying, that can be used against them. This is usually done through testimony from others about the witness's character.II. Privileges: Protecting Confidential ConversationsCertain relationships—like those between attorneys and clients or spouses—come with the right to keep communications private. These privileges aren't absolute and have exceptions.Attorney-Client Privilege: Anything said between a lawyer and client for legal advice is protected. So, if a client confesses to their lawyer, the lawyer can't reveal that info. The client is the one who holds this privilege, but there are exceptions like if the communication was about committing a crime or fraud.Spousal Privileges:Spousal Immunity: In criminal cases, spouses can't be forced to testify against each other

In this episode, Jim Garrity talks about a tactic of some examining lawyers that should, but often doesn't, draw objections that their questions are “argumentative.” So, what is an improper, argumentative question or examination? Here, we're not talking about the questioner's tone or demeanor, i.e., arguing in the classic sense of yelling and bickering with the deponent. We're talking about questions where lawyers aren't really asking a question designed to elicit facts but are instead injecting their own commentary or viewpoint, or injecting insults, taunts, wisecracks, or similar language. "Argumentative" objections are objections to the form, and must be timely made or are waived.SHOW NOTESPeople v. Pawar, No. G037097, 2007 WL 477949, at *2 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2007) (“[W]ere they lying” queries are improper if they are merely argumentative. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at pp. 381, 384.) In Chatman, the prosecutor asked the defendant how the safe at a store was opened. (Id. at p. 379.) The defendant replied “he could not say; he never touched the safe,” eliciting the prosecutor's query, “ ‘Well, is the safe lying about you?' “ (Ibid.) The Supreme Court held the question of whether an inanimate object was “lying” was argumentative , defining argumentative inquiry as “speech to the jury masquerading as a question” which “does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Id. at p. 384.))Faile v. Zarich, No. HHDX04CV5015994S, 2008 WL 2967045, at *3 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 10, 2008) (Webster's. . . in the closest relevant definition, defines “argumentative” as “consisting of or characterized by argument: containing a process of reasoning: controversial”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) (Steven Goode, et al., Texas Practice Series: Courtroom Handbook on Texas Evidence § 611 cmt. 12 (2012); see United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir.N.Y.2005) (defining argumentative as “summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence”); accord Eddlemon v. State, 591 S.W.2d 847, 851 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1979) (trial court did not abuse discretion in finding the question, “You don't believe your own offense report?” argumentative). In other words, an argumentative objection concerns whether counsel is attempting to “argue” the case, not whether the counsel is “arguing” with the witness”)United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir. 2005) (“During the presentation of evidence one of the most commonly sustained objections is that a particular question is argumentative, Fed.R.Evid. 611(a) advisory committee's note to Subdivision (a) to 1972 Proposed Rules, and any summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence are improper and subject as a routine matter to being stricken, Mauet & Wolfson, supra, at 30”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) ("Many common law objections—including the objection of “argumentative”—are incorporated in the Texas Rules of Evidence. The common law argumentative objection is now governed by Tex.R. Evid. 611 which concerns the mode of interrogation and presentation. The argumentative objection is an objection commonly used, but not commonly understood. Pardee argues the objection should have been sustained because the State was “arguing” with the defendant. Argumentative, though, does not concern counsel's demeanor or tone. Professors Wellborn, Goode, and Sharlot explain the argumentative objection as follows: Counsel may not, in the guise of asking a question, make a jury argument or attempt to summarize, draw inferences from, or comment on the evidence. In addition, questions that ask a witness to testify as to his own credibility are improper.")People v. Chatman, 38 Cal. 4th 344, 384, 133 P.3d 534, 563 (2006) The prosecutor's question about whether the safe was “lying” requires a different analysis. The question was argumentative. An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable. The prosecutor's question whether “the safe [was] lying” is an example. An inanimate object cannot “lie.” Professor Wigmore has called cross-examination the “greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” (5 Wigmore on Evidence (Chadbourne rev. ed.1974) § 1367, p. 32.) The engine should be allowed to run, but it cannot be allowed to run amok. An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all. Defendant had already explained he had no explanation for the safe being open. Asking whether the safe was “lying” could add nothing to this testimony”)People v. Imbach, No. E040190, 2008 WL 510482, at *7–8 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2008) ("The prosecutor asked, “You found that to be inappropriate but not your other son's addiction to child pornography?” When defendant objected that the question was argumentative, the trial court overruled that objection. Defendant asserted the second “argumentative” objection when defendant's mother said she did not know how to answer that question and the prosecutor asked, “Is that because you didn't want to know?” The trial court sustained the defendant's objection to this second question. Both questions are argumentative, because they both are speeches by the prosecutor masquerading as questions. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at p. 384.) The trial court should have sustained both objections. However, we cannot say that by asking those two questions the prosecutor engaged in misconduct.")People v. Peoples, 62 Cal. 4th 718, 793–94, 365 P.3d 230, 288 (2016) (“Defendant observes that the prosecutor asked numerous argumentative questions when cross-examining defense witnesses. To list a few examples, the prosecutor asked defense expert Dr. Lisak, “how many hours are you into them for?” He said to defense expert Dr. Buchsbaum, “Let's quit guessing for awhile and look at the facts.” He said to defense expert Dr. Wu, “It's a pain in the butt to get these test scores.” And he asked prosecution expert Dr. Mayberg, “Did you have a heart attack last night when you looked at the raw data?”)People v. Burns, No. D081051, 2024 WL 2144151, at *15–17 (Cal. Ct. App. May 14, 2024), review denied (July 17, 2024) (excessive repetition of a question simply to make a point can cross line into improper argument”; “Burns makes a strong argument that the prosecutor's repetitive questioning regarding the drunk tank incident became argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.” (People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384.) “An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Ibid.) Instead, it may be aimed at agitating or belittling the witness (People v. Lund (2021) 64 Cal.App.5th 1119, 1148), or designed to engage the witness in an argument (People v. Johnson (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1230, 1236)”)People v. Mazen, No. B300193, 2021 WL 164356, at *5 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2021) The court overruled defendant's argumentative objection to the following question: “Would [accidentally placing the car in neutral] been important information to tell [Morales]?” The court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled the objection. The question sought to elicit relevant testimony regarding defendant's theory that Mario was hit by accident (CALCRIM No. 510). (See People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384 [“[a]n argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question” and does not seek to elicit relevant testimony].)”People v. Singh, No. H042511, 2018 WL 1046260, at *28 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2018) (“Each question anticipated an answer and was answerable; none was “a speech to the jury masquerading as a question”)People v. Basler, No. D068047, 2015 WL 9437926, at *23 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2015) ("Fung appears to identify three categories of objectionable questioning during his cross-examination by the prosecutor. The first category involves apparent sarcasm by the prosecutor. For example, after Fung provided additional details about his fight with another inmate while incarcerated, the prosecutor said, “Okay. You left that part out a couple of minutes ago; right?” Referencing the same fight, the prosecutor made light of Fung's claim of self-defense: “Did you have to defend yourself against him, too?” As another example, when Fung was discussing the extent of his injuries following the fight, the prosecutor said, “So, that's about how badly you were hurt? It looked like something you get by falling off a skateboard?” The court sustained objections to each of these questions, and a number of others, as argumentative." Also from Basler: "As we have noted, Fung contends the first two categories of questions were impermissibly argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even want an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.... An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (People v. Chatman (2006)”)People v. Nanez, No. F064574, 2014 WL 1928307, at *14–15 (Cal. Ct. App. May 15, 2014) (citing examples of argumentative examination by prosecutor including (a) the prosecutor's remark “Convenient” when a witness said they did not remember a particular fact, and (b) when prosecutor commented on witnesses testimony by saying “So that's the lie you're going with?”, and (c) when prosecutor asked witness “You wouldn't tell us if you're lying, of course, right?” and when witness said he would, prosecutor replied “There's another lie,” causing court to strike prosecutor's comment from the record)People v. Strebe, No. D057947, 2011 WL 2555653, at *7 (Cal. Ct. App. June 28, 2011) (trial courses sustained objection to question as argumentative where prosecutor asked witness “Do you remember anything about that evening that might be detrimental to your case?” In essence arguing to jury that witness was lying and only selectively remembered favorable facts)People v. Higgins, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 856, 873–74 (Ct. App. 2011), as modified (Jan. 21, 2011), as modified on denial of reh'g (Feb. 4, 2011) (guilty verdict reversed in part due to argumentative questions; among other jabs; in case where defendant explained his conduct as motived by depression due to death of his daughter's friend, prosecutor asked, “You'd agree with me that it's pretty pathetic if you're using the memory of a dead 17–year–old kid as an excuse in this trial, wouldn't you? Would you agree with me? Is that the legacy that you want [the dead teen] to have?”; other examples of prosecutor's argumentative questions included “Oh, the door was unlocked,” and “Isn't that convenient that all of a sudden, right after you've committed the crimes, that that's when you come to?”; further held, “The rule is well established that the prosecuting attorney may not interrogate witnesses solely ‘for the purpose of getting before the jury the facts inferred therein, together with the insinuations and suggestions they inevitably contained, rather than for the answers”)People v. Dixon, No. D047342, 2007 WL 2745207, at *10 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2007)  Dixon asked Hernandez who had taken the photographs near the time of the injury. Hernandez testified that the audio-visual person at his school had taken photographs of his injury. Dixon then asked, “Is it computer enhancement? Those could be computer enhanced-.” The prosecutor interrupted, “That's argumentative.” The court sustained the prosecutor's objection")United States v. Browne, No. SACR 16-00139-CJC, 2017 WL 1496912, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2017) (For each witness, the Court did not end Defense counsel's cross-examination until it became excessively cumulative and argumentative, at which time the Court was well within its authority to restrain the questioning pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a).”)Beving v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 3:18-CV-00040, 2020 WL 6051598, at *12 (S.D. Iowa Sept. 8, 2020) (Defendant may object to prejudicial or argumentative references to counsel at trial as permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence. See Fed. Rs. Evid. 403, 611(a)(3).)FRE 403: Argumentative questions may be viewed as unfairly prejudicial, misleading, or wasting time.FRE 611(a)(3), Witnesses and Presenting Evidence ((a) Control by the Court; Purposes. The court should exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: (1) make those procedures effective for determining the truth; (2) avoid wasting time; and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.FRCP 30, Depositions, (d) Duration; Sanction; Motion to Terminate or Limit. (3) Motion to Terminate or Limit, (A) Grounds. At any time during a deposition, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the ground that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party. 

Our non-alcoholic episode series during dry January continues this week. Joe and Caroline try several varieties of alcohol-removed wine by Fre. They discuss the process of making alcohol-removed wine, the price point, and the overall popularity of the NA beverage market.Remember, if you are participating in Dry January this year, you can still support your favorite Craft Breweries, even if you aren't drinking. Many places offer food and non-alcoholic options. Support local, drink local, even if it is not alcoholic!What We Are Drinking Sauvignon BlancAlcohol-removed WineFre (Sutter Home) | St. Helena, CAABV: Under 0.5% Pairing: Enjoy this crisp, delightful beverage on its own or with goat cheese, pesto chicken, and grilled fish."FRE alcohol-removed Sauvignon Blanc offers fresh notes of green grass, and soft, tropical fruit aromas. With each sip you will find bright acidity with delicious passion fruit and mango flavors, classically characteristic of a California Sauvignon Blanc. The slight dry finish will leave you reaching for another glass."***ChardonnayAlcohol-removed WineFre (Sutter Home) | St. Helena, CAABV: Under 0.5%Pairing: Try this Chardonnay with seafood dishes, roasted veal chops, creamy pastas, salads and mild cheeses."With its deep golden hue, and lively tropical fruit aromas, our alcohol-removed Chardonnay is elegance personified. Rich, creamy apple flavors mingle with crisp citrus notes on the palate, leading to an enjoyably tart finish."***MerlotAlcohol-removed WineFre (Sutter Home) | St. Helena, CAABV: Under 0.5%Pairing: Herb-crusted lamb chops, hearty stews, juicy hamburgers and pizza. "With its plush, luxurious taste, and gorgeous garnet color, our alcohol-removed Merlot delivers plenty of style and grace. With seductive black plum aromas and soft cherry and spice flavors, our Merlot is velvety smooth, with a full, rich finish—a classic beauty."***// About the Craft Parenting Podcast The Craft Parenting Podcast is hosted by Joe and Caroline, two Cincinnati parents who are also craft beer enthusiasts. Each week, they discuss their favorite local beers, parenting experiences, and adventures with their two children and two dogs.If you enjoyed this episode, please leave a rating and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.   // Follow us Facebook:: https://facebook.com/CraftParentingPodcast Instagram:: https://instagram.com/craftparentingpodcast/ X:: https://twitter.com/craftparenting YouTube:: https://youtube.com/@craftparenting Rumble:: https://rumble.com/c/CraftParenting Website:: https://craftparentingpodcast.com  #craftparenting #Podcast #nonalcoholicwine #NAWine #DryJanuary #newyearnewyou #craftbeerpodcast #drinkbeermadehereohio #drinklocalbeer #winelovers #supportlocalbusiness #drinklocal #Parenting #FamilyAdventures #viralvideoSupport the show

Karen Read is back in court for a Daubert Hearing. Dr. Russell is the Defense Expert Witness and is being questioned by both the Defense and the Prosecution to see if the testimony should come into the Re-Trial. Dr. Russell explained why she thinks the marks on John O'Keefe are specifically from a dog attack which is different than what she said on the stand in the first trial when she said it might be from a dog bite. The Prosecution was not done questioning Dr. Russell but it was time for court to end. It is scheduled to resume on Jan 7th, 2025, at 9am ET.A Daubert Hearing is used to challenge an expert witness. The Judge acts as the gatekeeper of the evidence when determining if there is sufficient reliability for admissibility under FRE 702. The court can examine the methodology and reasoning behind the expert's opinion.Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/MjU4nGT3TSsRESOURCESPrevious Voir Dire of Dr. Russell - https://youtube.com/live/Wzt0SgXLa7k Previous Testimony of Dr. Russell - https://youtube.com/live/-y57V1lkXeUThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Character Evidence and Impeachment This summarizes key themes and important facts from the provided excerpt of "Lecture Three: Character Evidence and Impeachment." I. Character Evidence: General Rule and Exceptions (FRE 404) General Rule: Character evidence is inadmissible to prove conduct. This rule aims to prevent unfair prejudice and ensure trials focus on specific actions, not broad character assessments. "The law bars this type of evidence to prevent unfair prejudice. If juries were allowed to rely on character evidence, there's a significant risk that they would punish a party for being a 'bad person' rather than for the specific act alleged." Exceptions (Criminal Cases): Defendant's Character: Defendants can introduce evidence of their relevant good character traits. However, this allows the prosecution to rebut with evidence of bad character. Victim's Character: Defendants can introduce evidence of the victim's relevant character, particularly in self-defense cases. The prosecution can then rebut. Homicide Cases: If a defendant claims the victim was the aggressor, the prosecution can introduce evidence of the victim's peacefulness. Exceptions (Civil Cases): Character evidence is rarely admissible but exceptions exist in cases like defamation, child custody, or negligent hiring where character is directly relevant. II. Methods of Proving Character (FRE 405) Reputation Evidence: Testimony about a person's general reputation in the community. "A witness might testify, 'In our neighborhood, John is known as an honest and trustworthy individual.'" Opinion Evidence: Testimony about a witness's personal opinion of an individual's character. "A close friend might testify, 'I've known Sarah for years, and in my opinion, she's a very honest person.'" Specific Instances of Conduct: Admissible only when character is an essential element of the case (e.g., negligent hiring). III. Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts (FRE 404(b)) General Rule: Evidence of other acts is inadmissible to prove character or conformity with that character. Permissible Purposes: Such evidence may be admissible to prove motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake/accident. Balancing Test: Under FRE 403, judges must weigh the probative value of "other acts" evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice. IV. Impeachment of Witnesses Purpose: To challenge a witness's credibility by showing bias, incapacity, inconsistency, or lack of truthfulness. Methods:Bias or Prejudice: Demonstrating a witness's personal stake in the trial outcome. Incapacity: Showing the witness's inability to perceive or recall events accurately. Prior Inconsistent Statements: Exposing contradictions between trial testimony and prior statements. Contradiction: Presenting evidence that directly contradicts the witness's testimony. V. Impeachment by Character Evidence (FRE 608 & 609) FRE 608 (Truthfulness): A witness's character for truthfulness can be attacked or supported by reputation or opinion evidence. Specific instances of conduct relating to truthfulness can be explored on cross-examination. FRE 609 (Criminal Conviction): Prior convictions involving dishonesty or false statements, or felonies, can be used for impeachment. The court must balance probative value against prejudicial effect. VI. Rehabilitation of Witnesses Purpose: To restore a witness's credibility after impeachment. Methods:Prior Consistent Statements: Rebutting claims of fabrication. Character for Truthfulness: Using reputation or opinion evidence to support the witness's honesty. The lecture concludes with hypothetical scenarios illustrating the application of these rules in practice. Understanding these concepts is crucial for both legal exams and effective courtroom practice. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Novinár Karol Sudor strávil 5 mesiacov prípravou textu o rodine Frešovcov, ktorí sa doma starajú  o ťažko chorého syna  Alana.  Videl zlyhanie štátu, obrovskú obetavosť členov rodiny aj pokroky, ktoré podľa mnohých beznádejný pacient Alan robí. S Karolom Sudorom sa rozprával Braňo Bezák.   Rodine Frešovcov môžete so starostlivosťou o ťažko chorého syna Alana pomôcť píspevkom priamo na ich transparentný účet. IBAN: SK69 0900 0000 0052 1137 9439

Evidence Law - Relevance and Prejudice Source: Excerpts from "Evidence Chapter 1: Relevance and Prejudice" Main Themes: Relevance: Defining and applying the concept of relevance as a cornerstone of evidence admissibility. Balancing Relevance and Prejudice: Understanding FRE 403 and the judicial balancing act between probative value and potential prejudicial impact of evidence. Conditional Relevance: Examining FRE 104(b) and situations where the relevance of evidence hinges on the establishment of other facts. Judge's Role: Highlighting the judge's critical function as a gatekeeper in ensuring fairness and managing the flow of evidence. Most Important Ideas/Facts: I. Relevance (FRE 401): Definition: Evidence is relevant if it makes a fact more or less probable than without the evidence, and that fact is of consequence to the case. Low Threshold: The bar for relevance is intentionally low to ensure potentially useful information is not prematurely excluded. Example: In a car accident case, the color of the traffic light at the time of the collision is relevant, while a party's favorite car color is not. Quote: "The threshold for relevance is deliberately low, aiming to ensure that potentially helpful evidence is not excluded prematurely." II. Balancing Relevance and Prejudice (FRE 403): Balancing Test: Relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or undue delay. Unfair Prejudice: Evidence that appeals to emotions and could lead the jury to decide based on bias rather than facts. Example: Graphic crime scene photos might be relevant but could be excluded if their emotional impact outweighs their probative value. Quote: "Even if evidence is relevant, it may be excluded if its probative value—meaning its ability to prove something important—is substantially outweighed by the risk of causing unfair prejudice, misleading the jury, confusing the issues, or wasting time." III. Conditional Relevance (FRE 104(b)): Contingent Relevance: When the relevance of evidence depends on the establishment of another fact. Example: An email might become relevant as proof of a contract if other evidence establishes the existence of offer and acceptance. Quote: "In some cases, the relevance of a piece of evidence depends on the establishment of another fact. This concept is known as conditional relevance, governed by FRE 104(b)." IV. Judge's Role: Gatekeeper: Judges assess relevance, balance probative value against potential prejudice, and control the flow of evidence. Discretion: FRE 403 provides judges with discretion to exclude even relevant evidence to ensure a fair trial. Limiting Instructions: Judges can instruct juries on the limited purpose for which certain evidence can be considered. Quote: "Judges serve as gatekeepers of the evidence presented in court, and their discretion in applying FRE 403 is crucial to ensuring a fair trial." Examples and Applications: The document provides various hypothetical scenarios illustrating how relevance and prejudice are applied in different legal contexts, such as personal injury, breach of contract, criminal cases, and defamation lawsuits. These examples demonstrate the complexity of applying these principles in practice. Key Takeaways: Understanding the interplay of relevance, prejudice, and conditional relevance is essential for effective legal analysis and advocacy. Judges play a vital role in ensuring fairness and preventing irrelevant or overly prejudicial evidence from influencing the jury. Mastering these fundamental concepts lays the foundation for understanding more complex evidentiary rules and exceptions. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Introduction (0:00:00). When Spencer knocks on doors, does anyone recognize him from the podcast?The Break (0:04:11). Results from Quinnipiac, Premiere Austin, and Premiere Fort Lauderdale. Who were the best teams ... and who were the Best Coach-Judges? Adrian Mebane (0:07:00). Loyola Chicago's newly-promoted advocacy director describes her new job duties, her goals, and her unusual gardening style. Main Interview: Jeremy Dailey (0:22:45). Georgia's coach talks about how mock trial changed his career trajectory, his relationship with his mentor Kellie Casey, how gay advocates are treated differently in mock and real courtrooms, cooking 500(!) New York Times recipes, his $15 principle when it comes to wine, and the new FRE rule that creates a privilege for his "hot takes." Vexatious Litigants (0:53:41). Should teams disclose their motions before trial? Judge Erickson says yes, and A.J. Bellido de Luna says no. We also hear about Judge losing football bets, A.J traveling to an "undisclosed location," and the immortal words, "May it please the court. May I blow my nose?"Mailbag Question (1:20:21). At tournaments that allow some schools to bring two teams, should we do anything for schools with one team to level the playing field?

On this episode: Our annual Ballot Measure Readability report explores the complexity of statewide ballot measure titles and summaries to determine the educational level voters might need to fully understand what they're being asked to weigh in on. We use the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) scales to determine how accessible these texts are based on objective factors, such as the number of syllables, words, and sentences in a text (Note: These scores focus solely on language structure, NOT the complexity of the ideas themselves).  For the 159 statewide ballot measures certified in 41 states for elections this fall, we found that the average FKGL was 16, which correlates with a bachelor's degree. The average FRE for ballot titles was 20, which also corresponds with college graduates.  Is that a big deal? Ballotpedia's Ryan Byrne runs through a handful of example measures from around the country while unpacking how developing measures works in different states and recent legislation aimed at making measures easier to understand for the average American. Check out the report to see the readability scores for measures in your state: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2024  Sign up for our Newsletters: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia_Email_Updates  Stream "On the Ballot" on Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts. If you have questions, comments, or love for BP, feel free to reach out at ontheballot@ballotpedia.org or on X (formerly Twitter) @Ballotpedia. *On The Ballot is a conversational podcast featuring interviews with guests across the political spectrum. The views and opinions expressed by them are solely their own and are not representative of the views of the host or Ballotpedia as a whole.

Það eru umbrotatímar í pólitíkinni. Við heyrum hvað fólki á förnum vegi finnst um stjórnarslitin og framtíðina - gefum fólki sem í morgun var á rölti um Kringluna, Borgartún, Katrínartún og Snorrabraut orðið. Og úr pólitíkinni yfir í önnur stórmál, kannski á öðrum skala. Freðinn risi úr öðru sólkerfi hefur undanfarið tekið þátt í að lýsa upp næturhimininn - við fáum Sævar Helga Bragason, jarðfræðing og vísindamiðlara með meiru, til þess að segja okkur frá Halastjörnunni Tsuchinshan-Atlas C/2023 A3. Við förum svo í heimsókn á Þjóðskjalasafn Íslands - þar segir Jón Torfi Arason, skjalavörður, okkur frá harmþrungu ástarbréfi sem fannst inni í vegg gamals húss á Ísafirði fyrir tæpum fimmtíu árum og skilaði sér nýlega til safnsins. Það reyndist vera frá manni sem skrifaði konu sinni frá holdsveikispítalanum í Laugarnesi. Tónlist: Nelson, Willie - Georgia on my mind. Una Torfadóttir - Í löngu máli.

On this special episode of the podcast, Scott is joined by current IRF board member Fre Eskens to preview next weeks World Championship in London, England! The guys start by discussing the format changes to look out for at this years championship, such as the increase in womens squads, double rounds of pool play, and the focus more being on squad play After setting the scene, Scott and Fre get into highlighting the storylines coming into this event such as the favourites and dark horses in each division before concluding with some answers to listeners questions and predicting their top 3 in all divisions!

Cuando se creó el Freón, un CFC, como refrigerante, fue todo un éxito para vender refrigeradores y todo tipo de aerosoles. Cuando en 1974 se apuntó a estos gases como causantes de un futuro daño irreversible a la capa de ozono, la industria implicada los acuso de agoreros del fin del mundo y puso resistencia a las advertencias de los científicos. En 1978 se prohibió en los aerosoles de EE. UU., y la alarma desapareció, mientras se usaba en otros productos. Nadie parecía preocuparse por falta de pruebas, hasta que midió el agujero en la Antártida y se estableció una relación causa-efecto. En los años 90, se seguía usando en los países más pobres y se financió su cambo para los más pobres. Fue la primera vez que se cerraron fábricas en el tercer mundo por causa del medio ambiente, quizás porque el agujero se vio que se cernía sobre EE. UU. y Europa más que en otras partes del mundo, por eso se presionó a los pobres para que dejaran de contaminar, porque nos afectaba a nosotros.

On this session, Larry and Fre$h decided to sit down with his barbershops owner, Mario Coralles. Showing Mario how they get down on the best podcast for the culture. Of course, starting of with a mental health check going right in to some new music by Pennsylvanias own and his friend Young Bane who's music has been played on the show before. They go into Marios barber origin story and how he came to starting a barbershop amongst a list of sub questions. They talk about Marios ultimate barbering goals and if he will even be a barber forever. Starting another shop, favorite and worse clients and the "why" of it all amongst an an in depth conversation between the 3. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/larry-hilton/support

Today's roundup of new deposition-related cases focuses on four rulings. One offers a great strategy to exclude hostile deponents' deposition testimony, where they answer your opponents' questions but refuse to let you fully and fairly cross-examine them. A second touches on the age-old question of whether "Form!" or "Objection!" is enough or whether you must articulate the specific evidentiary basis. The third offers an idea for administering a slightly modified oath to immature deponents who might not understand the standard oath. The fourth looks at a novel approach one party took in noticing an individual witness with an attached, lengthy 30(b)(6) list of topics relating to matters that seemed better suited for a corporate representative.Thanks for listening! And be sure to check out the book upon which this podcast is based, 10,000 Depositions Later: The Premier Litigation Guide for Superior Deposition Practice. Available on Amazon and almost everywhere else books are sold. Now in it's fourth edition at 600 pages. It's a career-saving resource.SHOW NOTESPerrot v. Kelly, et al., Case No. 18-cv-10147, 2023 WL 11873009 (D. Mass. October 27, 2003) (reserving right to exclude deponent's testimony if witness continued to thwart plaintiff's opportunity to fully and fairly examine her, under FRE 804 relating to witness "unavailability"; court appears to equate refusal to give testimony with unavailability)B.P., et al. v. City of Johnson City, et al., No. 2:23-cv-71-TRM-JEM, 2024 WL 3461408 (E. D. Tenn. July 18, 2024) (refusing to limit lawyer to word "Objection" during depositions, and stating that lawyers have obligation to state the specific basis for the objection and not limit it to "objection" or "form" alone; further declining to sanction lawyer for longer narrative objections about incomplete documents because they were not intended to coach witness as to a particular answer)People v. Lopez, 550 P.3d 731 (Ct. App. Colo 2024) (affirming conviction of criminal defendant over objection that trial judge conducted modified administration of oath to 10-year old witness; finding that modified oath is appropriate for an immature witness who may not understand standard oath)Jacobs, et al. v. Journal Publishing Company, et al., Case No. 21-690-MW/SCY, 2024 WL 3401048 (D. N. M. July 12, 2024) (rejecting plaintiffs' effort to depose individual by serving FRCP 30(b)(6)-style deposition notice with lengthy attached topic list)See, 30(b)(6)-style Deposition Notice Served on Individual, PACER CM/ECF Doc. No. 135-1 (showing notice with attached topic list and list of documents to be brought by individual deponent) Jacobs, et al. v. Journal Publishing Company, et al., Case No. 21-690-MW/SCY, 2024 WL 3401048 (D. N. M. July 12, 2024)

On this session, Ofcourse after the weekly mental health check Larry and Fre$h go in to a short topic of what their version of the bottom is followed up with some random thoughts he reads from the past week. Diving straight in to the main topic Larry speak on a facebook debate with once again someone who calls themselves a Christian yet doing everything they say their against closing the debate with similarities between Islam and Christianity since most don't know how parallel they are. Music play by Larry's long time friend and old rap mentor Joel “Legit” Miller. Ending the pod with the thought about a known statement mainly said by women,”come healed”. Sit back and enjoy as you listen to the best podcast for the culture. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/larry-hilton/support

Send us a Text Message.Welcome to the Second Act Success Career Podcast! I'm your host, Shannon Russell, and this is the first in a four-part Business Brainstorm Mini-Series. Are you ready to quit your nine-to-five job and start your own business? If you're feeling stuck in your current role and dreaming of becoming your own boss, this episode is for you.In this episode, we'll dive into how to plan your exit strategy from your current job to ensure a smooth and confident transition. You'll learn how to assess your skills, understand your financial needs, and come up with a viable business idea. We'll also discuss the importance of timing your exit and how to manage the emotional aspects of leaving a long-term job.Join me as I share practical tips and strategies to help you build the foundation for your new business while still working your nine-to-five. Plus, I'll provide insights on creating your brand identity and planning your marketing strategy.Don't forget to sign up for our free Business Brainstorm Mini-Bootcamp happening from July 30th to August 1st at secondactsuccess.co/brainstorm. You'll get two one-hour online workshops and a live Q&A session, plus a free business startup checklist to help you plan your next move.Tune in, get inspired, and start your journey toward Second Act Success! If you enjoy this episode, please share it with a friend, leave a review, and subscribe so you never miss an episode.SHOW NOTES:https://secondactsuccess.co/152--------Ready To Quit Your Job?Ready to quit your job and start a business? Unboss yourself and take the QUIZ! https://secondactsuccess.co/quizGet the FREE Career Change Planner to help you plan your next career move!https://secondactsuccess.co/plannerBook a FREE Discovery Call with host/career coach Shannon Russell - https://www.calendly.com/second-act-success/coaching-strategyLET'S CONNECT!Instagram - https://instagram.com/secondactsuccessFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/secondactsuccess.coTikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@secondactsuccessAll the latest - https://secondactsuccess.co/linksFREE Resources - https://secondactsuccess.co/resources REVIEW & SUBSCRIBE THE PODCAST!

On this session Larry and Fre$h set the bar straight on what might be a question in the community of women... Do we want whores or good girls. Going in to a question for the men this time on "do we avoid daddys girls like women avoid mama's boys?". they speak briefly on dating apps and Larrys most recent exchange with a woman he met on one. Lastly, Larry had a topic Fre$h might relate to a little too often; putting too much pressure on myself to get things done in 24 hours. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/larry-hilton/support

This powerful episode of the Family Plot Podcast is so full of stuff, we should wrap it in a bow!  Krys announces this week that she prefers to go by Arthur with male pronouns.  She also talks about dingoes, which Dean claims are his baby, or maybe just Merryl Streep's.  Then we focus on the life of Rosa Parks.  Her childhood, her first experiences with racism, her education and how she became a lifelong activist.  And while she was not the first to get arrested for refusing to give up her seat for a white passenger, doing so made her the face of the Freedom Movement.  We discuss her struggles and her continued activism later in life and so much more in this episode examining one of the people integral to the Freedom movement in the United States on this powerful episode of the Family Plot Podcast!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/family-plot--4670465/support.

In this episode, Jim tackles the problem of 30(b)(6) witnesses showing up with voluminous notes and documents to use in refreshing their memory about the topics to be addressed. Are these witnesses automatically required to give you those notes and materials ahead of time? If not, is there anything you can do to get them beforehand? And, what about getting copies of documents these and other deponents looked at before the deposition but didn't bring with? For the answers to these and other questions, listen in. And thanks for being a loyal listener of the podcast! We appreciate you!SHOW NOTESChampionX LLC, f/k/a Windrock, Inc. v. Resonance Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:21-CV-288-TAV-JE M (E. D. Tennessee Oct. 19, 2023) (providing that documents used during a deposition to refresh witnesses recollection must be produced to the adverse party while deposition is in progress, and need not be produced ahead of time, barring some other obligation)Arrowood Indem. Co. The Lubrizol Corp. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., No. 1:10 CV 2871, 2015 WL 12734892, at *2 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2015) (“Fed. R. Evid. 612. Rule 612 applies to depositions and deposition testimony through Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(c)”)Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 317 (3d Cir. 1985) This rule is applicable to depositions and deposition testimony by operation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(c) (“Examination and cross-examination of witnesses may proceed as permitted at the trial under the provisions of the Federal Rules of Evidence.”)Antero Res. Corp. v. Tejas Tubular Prod., Inc., 516 F. Supp. 3d 752, 753 (S.D. Ohio 2021) (“Importantly, Rule 612 applies to deposition testimony”)Antero Resources Corporation v. Tejas Tubular Products, Inc., 2021 WL363550, No. 2:19-CV-804 (S. D. Ohio Feb.2, 2021) (if witness uses documents for a testimonial purpose–as [the corporate representative did ]-any claim of work product protection over those documents is waived; further holding that, where conflict exists between the command of Fed. R. Evid. 612 to disclose materials used to refresh recollection, and protection provided by the attorney-client privilege, the weight of authority holds that privilege is waived).United States v. Holden, 557 F.3d 698, 703–04 (6th Cir. 2009) (“Rule 612 does not apply where a witness refers to documents for purposes other than refreshing recollection”)K & S Assocs., Inc. v. Am. Ass'n of Physicists in Med., No. 3:09-1108, 2012 WL 4364087, at *3 (M.D. Tenn. Sept. 21, 2012) (citing Nutramax Lab., Inc., 183 F.R.D. at 468, 473) (finding that documents were used for a “testimonial purpose” where the witness's review of them “unavoidably enhanced his recollection of events”)Gilbert v. Atlantic Trust Co., N.A., 2005 WL8176938 (D. N.H. Nov. 17, 2005) (order denying motion to compel documents reviewed by deponent prior to deposition, under FRE 612, because of movant's failure to establish predicate during deposition)FRE 612 - Writings Used to Refresh A Witness

Sometimes the most influential people in culture and style are so because they elevate and amplify the work of others. Legendary perfumer Frédéric Malle, through his brand Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle, is one of those trailblazers. What started as a long-shot experimental concept has become one of the most highly regarded players in the fragrance world. On this episode, Dan and Malle discuss his youth in Paris, the scent he hates the most, how he bet it all on the launch of his brand, and so much more. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Check out FYI FLI Episode 116 w/ Public speaker, Certified Financial Educator, and the founder of Gage St. Society: Fre Greene!   In this episode, Hassan and Fre chop it up about:  - The importance of having an “OUTSIDE” Fund  - The Biggest Benefit Of Being Financially LIT   - Planning for short term VS long term goals   If you're looking to be motivated, educated, and entertained…this podcast is for you!

If you know what the: Bene Gesserit, Muad'dib, Mahdi, Fedaykin, Kwisatz Haderach, Mentats, Panoplia Propheticus, Qadis as-Salaf, Sadu and Shai-Hulud are... Then you're probably well and truly prepared for DUNE Part 2. But if that word salad made less sense than Weird Al's Dada poetry, then you may be needing to gird your loins for some LORE HEAVY SCI-FI. In this podcast Jill is our own Benny Jesuit Mother figure, Dion is our erstwhile Moe Sizlak Haderach, and Quinny is still just a Shy Hulud with a Big... popcorn bucket. Paul Atreides unites with Chani and the Fremen while seeking revenge against the conspirators who destroyed his family. Facing a choice between the love of his life and the fate of the universe, he must prevent a terrible future only he can foresee. https://youtu.be/GC0bjMBGlfM A thank you to all you Fremen and Fre-women who join in on the Twitch stream, each Tuesday night at 7:30pm AEDT Plus a special thank you to those Members of the Navigators Guild who have allowed us the freedom to travel to the planet of Arrakis this show. We owe them big time for the Spice... If you want to assist us in paying them back feel free to drop some coin via our Ko-Fi jar and now also by subscribing on Twitch! If you like what we do, drop us a sub!  Every bit of your support helps us to (hopefully) keep entertaining you!  Don't fret if you can't be there for the recording though as you can catch them on Youtube usually within a day of recording. Make sure to subscribe there so you don't miss them! WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK! Send in voicemails or emails with your opinions on this show (or any others) to info@theperiodictableofawesome.com Please make sure to join our social networks too!  We're on: Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/TPToA/ Twitter: www.twitter.com/TPToA Facebook: www.facebook.com/PeriodicTableOfAwesome Instagram: www.instagram.com/theperiodictableofawesome/ https://youtu.be/U2Qp5pL3ovA?si=L32vMAMhz7wIa62k this clip had to be removed from the Youtube version. https://youtu.be/w4JRjW7Uvt8?si=RVHx24JqTRGxcIyU https://youtu.be/_u4O0P01nfI?si=E6BXLq6_Rvpb-d0Z

I'm thrilled to share with you the latest insights from this interview with finance expert Fred Moskowitz on the fascinating world of note investing. If you've ever been curious about how to turn debt into a profitable investment, this episode's is for you!

Anne Ghesquière reçoit dans Métamorphose Audrey Fella et Frédérique Lemarchand, l'une est historienne et essayiste et a beaucoup écrit sur la spiritualité et l'autre artiste-peintre poétesse. Aujourd'hui, avec Audrey et Frédérique approchons-nous des mystères de l'âme et du souffle de vie. Plongeons au plus profond de nous-même. Et ensemble, tentons de toucher du doigt le souffle le miracle. Épisode #442Retrouvez Audrey Fella dans un précédent podcast de Métamorphose :#300 Audrey Fella : Christiane Singer sur le fil de la merveilleRetrouvez Frédérique Lemarchand dans un précédent podcast de Métamorphose :#293 Frédérique Lemarchand : Le paradis est un état d'êtreAvec Audrey Fella et Frédérique Lemarchand j'aborderai les thèmes suivants (extrait des questions) :Pourquoi avez-vous toutes les deux intitulé ce livre 'CHAIR Lumière' ?Frédérique, comment la souffrance qui a été la vôtre vous a aussi connecté à l'art ?Frédérique, vous avez poursuivi votre formation avec le peintre chinois Cao Bei-An, en quoi l'approche orientale vous a-t-elle influencée ?Audrey, pour vous, Frédérique est-elle une amazone qui aurait dompté sa part animale ?Frédérique, tout le monde a- t -il la capacité de vivre « en Esprit », d'accepter et transcender l'épreuve, ou faudrait-il recevoir au fond une espèce de grâce ? L'épreuve est-elle nécessaire ?Audrey, quel rôle joue la foie ?Frédérique, vous dites qu'aujourd'hui vous êtes profondément guérie, que voulez-vous dire ?Audrey, quel parallèle voyez-vous entre Christiane Singer et Frédérique ?Qui sont nos invitées Audrey Fella et Frédérique Lemarchand ? :Audrey Fella est une historienne, essayiste et journaliste française, née en 1975. Ses recherches portent entre autres sur les femmes et le sacré, la mystique chrétienne et laïque, le chamanisme au féminin, et de nombreuses figures spirituelles.Frédérique Lemarchand est créatrice de spectacles vivants pluridisciplinaires, dessinatrice et peintre de performances au sein de différentes structures (hôpitaux, maisons de retraite, centres éducatifs, théâtres, scènes en plein air…). Elle a publié Chair Lumière chez Mama éditions : livre d'entretien, illustré des tableaux, et de sculptures.Quelques citations du podcast avec Audrey Fella et Frédérique Lemarchand :AF : L'art de Frédérique nous invite à faire un pas dans la Grande Vie, à agrandir la vie, à toucher ce qui est véritablement une liberté plus grande.FL : C'est la faille, c'est la fêlure, c'est la brisure du cœur qui a fait se faufiler la lumière.FL : C'est toujours par notre impuissance que la toute-puissance de l'esprit peut enfin se déverser et nous piloter.AF : Dans son art Frédérique se laisse faire, elle s'abandonne et quelque chose nait.FL : l'art oriental compte sur la poésie du spectateur, il ne dit pas tout.AF : L'épreuve c'est aussi accueillir notre vulnérabilité.Retrouvez Métamorphose Podcast sur Insta & FacebookInscrivez-vous à la Newsletter ici : https://www.metamorphosepodcast.com/Découvrez gratuitement La Roue Métamorphose et les 9 piliers de votre vie !Soutenez la Tribu Métamorphose, devenez actifs !Abonnez-vous à Métamorphose, le podcast qui éveille la conscience sur YouTube / Apple Podcast / Spotify / Deezer / Google Podcasts / CastBoxPhoto DR Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

JL Collins is known as “The Godfather of FI,” and for a good reason: He continues to be a pioneer in the FIRE (Financial Independence Retire Early) Movement and a thought-leader in the Financial Independence (FI) space.  Today, he joins us to discuss the origin story of his groundbreaking blog, the concept behind his new book, Pathfinders, shiny investing object syndrome, and more. In this episode you'll also learn more about: Defining what “the simple path to wealth” means  Breaking down what index funds are, the difference between active and passive investing, and what “self cleansing” means How chasing performance is the best way to underperform in investing  The 4% rule, the importance of understanding the cost of your comfortable lifestyle, purchasing things from a position of strength, and more   Other Links Mentioned in episode: The Simple Path To Wealth And All You Need To Know About Index Investing With JL Collins The Simple Path to Wealth: Your road map to financial independence and a rich, free life  How I Lost Money in Real Estate Before It Was Fashionable: A Cautionary Tale  Pathfinders: Extraordinary Stories of People Like You on the Quest for Financial Independence—and How to Join Them How To Quit Like A Millionaire So You Can Stop Working & Start Living With Kristy & Bryce Quit Like a Millionaire: No Gimmicks, Luck, or Trust Fund Required Tim Ferris & James Clear Episode Get The Budget Bootcamp for FREE Pre-order my new book, Your Journey to Financial Freedom and get access to FIRE STARTER Course for FREE Check out my personal website here. Join The Weekly Newsletter List Leave me a voicemail– Leave me a question on the Journey To Launch voicemail and have it answered on the podcast! YNAB –  Start managing your money and budgeting so that you can reach your financial dreams. Sign up for a free 34 days trial of YNAB, my go-to budgeting app by using my referral link. What stage of the financial journey are you on? Are you working on financial stability or work flexibility? Find out with this free assessment and get a curated list of the 10 next best episodes for you to listen to depending on your stage. Check it out here! Connect with JL: Website Twitter:@JLCollinsNH Facebook:@JLCollinsNH Connect with me: Instagram: @Journeytolaunch Twitter: @JourneyToLaunch Facebook: @Journey To Launch Join the Private Facebook Group Join the Waitlist for My FI Course Get The Free Jumpstart Guide Get The Budget Bootcamp for FRE

If you were to say "Figaro" three times in quick succession, I'm guessing most people would be able to sing it back to you as it is heard in Figaro's entrance aria, "Largo al factotum" in Rossini's The Barber of Seville. The opera has infiltrated popular culture from figure skating routines, to pasta commercials, and, of course, cartoons. It could be that The Barber of Seville was "pop culture" even when the play on which it was based premiered in 1775. For this special edition of Front Row Center, we'll talk with everyday folks about what comes to mind when they hear the name "The Barber of Seville" (@ 3:50), then I share some information about Pierre Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais, the playwright who seemed to have his pulse on the entire world (@9:30). After that I spoke with television, film, and theatrical hair and makeup artist Alfreda ("Fre") Howard about the importance of hair in society and working with hair of all types (@13:50). Finally, I was honored to speak with three legendary American interpreters of Rosina: Jennifer Larmore, Susanne Mentzer, and Frederica von Stade. They shared their thoughts on Rosina and pop culture, getting nervous before a performance, and what they like (or not) about getting their hair done (@20:50). This episode is based on a video I created for Cincinnati Opera in the summer of 2020, the first summer of the COVID crisis. You can find the complete video, including interviews, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGpA5mRO_Jk&t=3s. Don't forget to check out our Spotify Playlist for The Barber of Seville, which includes some of my favorite moments from the "giddy" score. https://open.spotify.com/playlist/7CbDF2gz53LqihhkcgKbBX?si=9205b4d83c174cbe And, visit the episode poll on the Spotify episode homepage. As always, you can always reach out to me through my website, www.michaeljbolton.com, or email me at mike@michaeljbolton.com. Thanks for listening!

We consult the Federal Rules of Evidence at FRE 611. www.patreon.com/stevelehto

We have a great show for you today!  Kiev O'Neil is back from vacation, recharged and ready to talk some pig-skin!   First, Kiev talks about some promos that we have at The Oddsbreakers.   Next, we get into the 2023 Big 10 preview with some plays and some great information!   Which teams are favored?   Which teams have a significant yards per play advantage or disadvantage from last year?  Who did they lose?  Who are the special players?  Finally, Kiev talks some UFC on ESPN with some FREE PLAYS!  Should you have any questions for the podcast, or games that you want us to cap during our shows, please message us at Info@TheOddsBreakers.com.  Have a wonderful week! USE PROMO CODE SUMMERWIN TO GET $100 OFF EVERY FOOTBALL PACKAGE AND $50 OFF EVERY MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP FOR THE FIRST MONTH!  Click here:   https://theoddsbreakers.com/premium-plays/ Offer expires August 1st, 2023 Follow our FREE PICKS telegram channel:  https://t.me/TheOddsBreakersFreePicks Follow Kiev O'Neil's NEW personal FREE PICKS telegram Channel:  https://t.me/KievONeil If you want to subscribe to support us and get some very frequent winners please Click Here to become a member of The OddsBreakers and gain access to premium plays BEFORE the line moves!  Or, you can visit theoddsbreakers.com and click shop and pick one of our great handicappers including Kiev O'Neil @OBKiev at only $84 per month on a 1 year subscription!  You could also support us at Patreon.com for only $10 a month to help us out and thank us for some free plays as well as get some extra benefits and merchandise. If you want to take ownership of your health, try AG1 and get a FREE 1-yearsupply of Vitamin D AND 5 Fre

This week Elsie is sharing the vision she has for her new home. She's breaking it down and sharing all her mood boards, plans, and current projects with you.  Elsie is also sharing an embarrassing story because she knows you all love it when she looks like a clown.  Visit the shownotes at abeautifulmess.com/podcast and write in to us at podcast@abeautifulmess.com or leave us a voicemail at 417-893-0011.   Thank you to this week's sponsor: Get 10% off during your first 3 months at ritual.com/abeautifulmess Save 40% off unlimited access to Calm's entire library at calm.com/abeautifulmess Receive a FRE sample pack at drinklmnt.com/abeautifulmess Get 30% off anything and everything at mykitsch.com/mess  

Today is a Rapid Response Friday, and Liz and Andrew break down all the developments with the two grand juries convened by Jack Smith to investigate Donald Trump's various crimes. Oh, and we also analyze the released portions of the Fulton County grand jury report which reveals a bit more than you might think! We've also learned that a bunch of Trump lawyers have been subpoenaed to testify or otherwise the subject of grand jury questions, and you may be wondering how that's possible, and we walk you through when privilege is.. not privilege! Notes Unredacted portions of Fulton County SPGJ Report https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23683158/2022-ex-000024-ex-parte-order-of-the-judge-5.pdf FRE 501 https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_501 Bobb says she's not a lawyer in documents case https://www.salon.com/2022/10/03/attorney-lawyers-up--and-says-shes-willing-to-cooperate-with-doj-in-mar-a-lago-case-report/  NYT Epshteyn story https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/14/us/politics/trump-lawyer-classified-documents-investigation.html -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law -Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos! -Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs -Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!