Podcasts about FRE

Simply Analog by Tin Box pres. Fre$h 01. Rihanna ft. Jay-Z - Umbrella 02. Rihanna - Rude Boy 03. Bruno Mars - The Lazy Song 04. Gym Class Heroes ft. Adam Levine - Stereo Hearts 05. Jessie J ft. B.o.B. - Price Tag 06. Iyaz - Replay 07. Jason Derulo - It Girl 08. B.o.B. ft. Hayley Williams - Airplanes 09. Jason Derulo - Ridin' Solo 10. Sean Paul ft. Alexis Jordan - Got 2 Luv U 11. Professor Green ft. Lily Allen - Just Be Good To Green 12. Nicole Scherzinger ft. 50 Cent - Right There 13. Emeli Sandé - Next To Me 14. Yasmin - Finish Line 15. Aloe Blacc - I Need A Dollar 16. Jessie J - Who's Laughing Now 17. Lady Gaga - Alejandro 18. Rihanna ft. Drake - What's My Name 19. Kelly Rowland - Work 20. Christina Milian ft. Young Jeezy - Say I 21. Kanye West - Stronger 22. Loick Essien ft. Tanya Lacey - How We Roll 23. Jennifer Lopez - Do It Well 24. Nicole Scherzinger - Don't Hold Your Breath 25. Wretch 32 ft. Example - Unorthodox 26. Timbaland ft. Nelly Furtado & Justin Timberlake - Give It To Me 27. Dizzee Rascal ft. Calvin Harris & Chrome - Dance Wiv Me 28. Timbaland ft. Keri Hilson - The Way I Are 29. Lady Gaga - Paparazzi 30. Professor Green ft. Ed Drewett - I Need You Tonight MORE FRE$H MIXTAPES ▶️ bit.ly/RAfresh reactivateasia.com FIND US ON OUR SOCIALS! FACEBOOK

Simply Analog by Tin Box pres. Fre$h 01. Dr Dre & Snoop Dogg - The Next Episode 02. Snoop Dogg ft. Pharrell Williams - Drop It Like It's Hot 03. 50 Cent - In Da Club 04. Kanye West ft. Jamie Foxx - Gold Digger 05. J-Kwon - Tipsy 06. Blu Cantrell ft. Sean Paul - Breathe 07. 50 Cent - Candy Shop 08. Rihanna - Pon De Replay 09. Beyoncé - Single Ladies (Put A Ring On It) 10. Beyoncé ft. Jay-Z - Crazy In Love 11. Ice Cube ft Mack 10 & Ms Toi - You Can Do It 12. Destiny's Child - Bootylicious 13. Sean Paul - Get Busy 14. Akon - Belly Dancer (Bananza) 15. Missy Elliott - Work It 16. Ciara - Goodies 17. Usher - Yeah! 18. Kevin Lyttle - Turn Me On 19. Nelly - Hot In Herre 20. Pussycat Dolls ft. Snoop Dogg - Buttons 21. Britney Spears - I'm A Slave 4 U 22. Ciara ft. Missy Elliott - 1,2 Step 23. Pussycat Dolls ft. Busta Rhymes - Don't Cha 24. D'Banj - Oliver Twist 25. Sean Paul - Temperature 26. Sisqo - Thong Song 27. Missy Elliott ft. Ciara & Fatman Scoop - Lose Control 28. Black Eyed Peas - My Humps 29. Flo Rida ft. T-Pain - Low 30. Jay-Z & Kanye West - N***** In Paris MORE FRE$H MIXTAPES ▶️ bit.ly/RAfresh reactivateasia.com FIND US ON OUR SOCIALS! FACEBOOK

In this episode, Cass Duffill sits down with nervous system expert Nicole Gomez to explore why regulating your nervous system is essential for avoiding burnout—especially for entrepreneurs and practitioners. They discuss how childhood imprints shape our stress responses, the key signs of burnout, and a three-step process to rewire the nervous system. Nicole shares why grief is a critical step in healing and how processing emotions can transform your business, relationships, and self-worth.Key Takeaways:✅ Burnout is common among entrepreneurs, particularly women. ✅ A dysregulated nervous system leads to chronic stress, anxiety, and overwhelm. ✅ Childhood traumas influence how we operate in business and life. ✅ Healing requires grieving past wounds to release stored trauma. ✅ The breath is a tool for feeling and processing, not just calming down. ✅ Self-worth isn't tied to achievements or external validation. ✅ All areas of life—business, relationships, and health—are interconnected.

Discover how ancient Feng Shui principles can transform your practice space into a magnet for abundance and client success!In this practical episode, Feng Shui expert Lorraine Lewis shares actionable strategies to optimize your clinic's energy flow and create an environment that supports both practitioner wellbeing and client transformation.We also discuss ways to preserve and improve your energy, so your consults aren't so draining. Plus we delve into the year of the wood snake and what that means for us as practitioners.An exciting conversation you don't want to miss!Connect with Cass - WEBSITEConnect with Lorraine - WEBSITELet's Chat - Send an instant message now REGISTER HERE Struggling to attract consistent clients and grow your practice? Join the FRE training & discover the blueprint to build a thriving, impact-driven, and financially stable health & wellness practice – without burnout.Blueprint to Breakthrough: The Proven Roadmap to a Profitable, Thriving Practice!6pm Mon 31st March 2025 LIMITED TIME - FREE MASTERCLASS >> Blueprint to Breakthrough, Your Roadmap to a thriving practice! 6pm 31st March 2025 REGISTER NOW Free Resource: A Practitioner's Guide To Attracting Amazing Clients Enrolling for Mentoring Now - Limited Spaces Left. Find out more HEREJoin the FREE GROUP - Wellness Biz Growth HubSubscribe to my YouTube channel: Live Your Passion, Grow Your PracticeVisit my website www.cassduffill.comFollow me on Instagram: The Practitioner's Business Mentor Follow me on Facebook: The Practitioner's Business Mentor

Let's break down the main points of Evidence Law, focusing on how to challenge witnesses, protect confidential info, use expert testimony, and navigate those tricky hearsay exceptions.I. Impeachment: Discrediting a WitnessThe main goal here is to show that a witness isn't reliable, is biased, or can't keep their story straight. We have rules (FRE 607-609) that lay out how to do this.Prior Inconsistent Statements: If a witness says one thing now but said something different earlier, that's a red flag. For example, saying "I saw the defendant at the crime scene" in court but telling the police "I didn't see the defendant that night" earlier makes them look unreliable. These statements aren't considered hearsay if they're only used to show the witness isn't credible.Bias or Motive to Lie: If a witness has a reason to favor one side—like being the defendant's best friend or getting paid to testify—their testimony might be biased. Evidence of bias is always relevant.Conviction of a Crime: If a witness has been convicted of a felony or a crime involving dishonesty, that can be used to challenge their credibility. Crimes of dishonesty are always fair game, while felonies can be used if they're relevant enough to outweigh any potential prejudice. Convictions older than 10 years are generally off-limits.Reputation for Untruthfulness: If a witness has a reputation for lying, that can be used against them. This is usually done through testimony from others about the witness's character.II. Privileges: Protecting Confidential ConversationsCertain relationships—like those between attorneys and clients or spouses—come with the right to keep communications private. These privileges aren't absolute and have exceptions.Attorney-Client Privilege: Anything said between a lawyer and client for legal advice is protected. So, if a client confesses to their lawyer, the lawyer can't reveal that info. The client is the one who holds this privilege, but there are exceptions like if the communication was about committing a crime or fraud.Spousal Privileges:Spousal Immunity: In criminal cases, spouses can't be forced to testify against each other

In this episode, Jim Garrity talks about a tactic of some examining lawyers that should, but often doesn't, draw objections that their questions are “argumentative.” So, what is an improper, argumentative question or examination? Here, we're not talking about the questioner's tone or demeanor, i.e., arguing in the classic sense of yelling and bickering with the deponent. We're talking about questions where lawyers aren't really asking a question designed to elicit facts but are instead injecting their own commentary or viewpoint, or injecting insults, taunts, wisecracks, or similar language. "Argumentative" objections are objections to the form, and must be timely made or are waived.SHOW NOTESPeople v. Pawar, No. G037097, 2007 WL 477949, at *2 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2007) (“[W]ere they lying” queries are improper if they are merely argumentative. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at pp. 381, 384.) In Chatman, the prosecutor asked the defendant how the safe at a store was opened. (Id. at p. 379.) The defendant replied “he could not say; he never touched the safe,” eliciting the prosecutor's query, “ ‘Well, is the safe lying about you?' “ (Ibid.) The Supreme Court held the question of whether an inanimate object was “lying” was argumentative , defining argumentative inquiry as “speech to the jury masquerading as a question” which “does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Id. at p. 384.))Faile v. Zarich, No. HHDX04CV5015994S, 2008 WL 2967045, at *3 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 10, 2008) (Webster's. . . in the closest relevant definition, defines “argumentative” as “consisting of or characterized by argument: containing a process of reasoning: controversial”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) (Steven Goode, et al., Texas Practice Series: Courtroom Handbook on Texas Evidence § 611 cmt. 12 (2012); see United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir.N.Y.2005) (defining argumentative as “summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence”); accord Eddlemon v. State, 591 S.W.2d 847, 851 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1979) (trial court did not abuse discretion in finding the question, “You don't believe your own offense report?” argumentative). In other words, an argumentative objection concerns whether counsel is attempting to “argue” the case, not whether the counsel is “arguing” with the witness”)United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir. 2005) (“During the presentation of evidence one of the most commonly sustained objections is that a particular question is argumentative, Fed.R.Evid. 611(a) advisory committee's note to Subdivision (a) to 1972 Proposed Rules, and any summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence are improper and subject as a routine matter to being stricken, Mauet & Wolfson, supra, at 30”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) ("Many common law objections—including the objection of “argumentative”—are incorporated in the Texas Rules of Evidence. The common law argumentative objection is now governed by Tex.R. Evid. 611 which concerns the mode of interrogation and presentation. The argumentative objection is an objection commonly used, but not commonly understood. Pardee argues the objection should have been sustained because the State was “arguing” with the defendant. Argumentative, though, does not concern counsel's demeanor or tone. Professors Wellborn, Goode, and Sharlot explain the argumentative objection as follows: Counsel may not, in the guise of asking a question, make a jury argument or attempt to summarize, draw inferences from, or comment on the evidence. In addition, questions that ask a witness to testify as to his own credibility are improper.")People v. Chatman, 38 Cal. 4th 344, 384, 133 P.3d 534, 563 (2006) The prosecutor's question about whether the safe was “lying” requires a different analysis. The question was argumentative. An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable. The prosecutor's question whether “the safe [was] lying” is an example. An inanimate object cannot “lie.” Professor Wigmore has called cross-examination the “greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” (5 Wigmore on Evidence (Chadbourne rev. ed.1974) § 1367, p. 32.) The engine should be allowed to run, but it cannot be allowed to run amok. An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all. Defendant had already explained he had no explanation for the safe being open. Asking whether the safe was “lying” could add nothing to this testimony”)People v. Imbach, No. E040190, 2008 WL 510482, at *7–8 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2008) ("The prosecutor asked, “You found that to be inappropriate but not your other son's addiction to child pornography?” When defendant objected that the question was argumentative, the trial court overruled that objection. Defendant asserted the second “argumentative” objection when defendant's mother said she did not know how to answer that question and the prosecutor asked, “Is that because you didn't want to know?” The trial court sustained the defendant's objection to this second question. Both questions are argumentative, because they both are speeches by the prosecutor masquerading as questions. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at p. 384.) The trial court should have sustained both objections. However, we cannot say that by asking those two questions the prosecutor engaged in misconduct.")People v. Peoples, 62 Cal. 4th 718, 793–94, 365 P.3d 230, 288 (2016) (“Defendant observes that the prosecutor asked numerous argumentative questions when cross-examining defense witnesses. To list a few examples, the prosecutor asked defense expert Dr. Lisak, “how many hours are you into them for?” He said to defense expert Dr. Buchsbaum, “Let's quit guessing for awhile and look at the facts.” He said to defense expert Dr. Wu, “It's a pain in the butt to get these test scores.” And he asked prosecution expert Dr. Mayberg, “Did you have a heart attack last night when you looked at the raw data?”)People v. Burns, No. D081051, 2024 WL 2144151, at *15–17 (Cal. Ct. App. May 14, 2024), review denied (July 17, 2024) (excessive repetition of a question simply to make a point can cross line into improper argument”; “Burns makes a strong argument that the prosecutor's repetitive questioning regarding the drunk tank incident became argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.” (People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384.) “An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Ibid.) Instead, it may be aimed at agitating or belittling the witness (People v. Lund (2021) 64 Cal.App.5th 1119, 1148), or designed to engage the witness in an argument (People v. Johnson (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1230, 1236)”)People v. Mazen, No. B300193, 2021 WL 164356, at *5 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2021) The court overruled defendant's argumentative objection to the following question: “Would [accidentally placing the car in neutral] been important information to tell [Morales]?” The court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled the objection. The question sought to elicit relevant testimony regarding defendant's theory that Mario was hit by accident (CALCRIM No. 510). (See People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384 [“[a]n argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question” and does not seek to elicit relevant testimony].)”People v. Singh, No. H042511, 2018 WL 1046260, at *28 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2018) (“Each question anticipated an answer and was answerable; none was “a speech to the jury masquerading as a question”)People v. Basler, No. D068047, 2015 WL 9437926, at *23 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2015) ("Fung appears to identify three categories of objectionable questioning during his cross-examination by the prosecutor. The first category involves apparent sarcasm by the prosecutor. For example, after Fung provided additional details about his fight with another inmate while incarcerated, the prosecutor said, “Okay. You left that part out a couple of minutes ago; right?” Referencing the same fight, the prosecutor made light of Fung's claim of self-defense: “Did you have to defend yourself against him, too?” As another example, when Fung was discussing the extent of his injuries following the fight, the prosecutor said, “So, that's about how badly you were hurt? It looked like something you get by falling off a skateboard?” The court sustained objections to each of these questions, and a number of others, as argumentative." Also from Basler: "As we have noted, Fung contends the first two categories of questions were impermissibly argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even want an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.... An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (People v. Chatman (2006)”)People v. Nanez, No. F064574, 2014 WL 1928307, at *14–15 (Cal. Ct. App. May 15, 2014) (citing examples of argumentative examination by prosecutor including (a) the prosecutor's remark “Convenient” when a witness said they did not remember a particular fact, and (b) when prosecutor commented on witnesses testimony by saying “So that's the lie you're going with?”, and (c) when prosecutor asked witness “You wouldn't tell us if you're lying, of course, right?” and when witness said he would, prosecutor replied “There's another lie,” causing court to strike prosecutor's comment from the record)People v. Strebe, No. D057947, 2011 WL 2555653, at *7 (Cal. Ct. App. June 28, 2011) (trial courses sustained objection to question as argumentative where prosecutor asked witness “Do you remember anything about that evening that might be detrimental to your case?” In essence arguing to jury that witness was lying and only selectively remembered favorable facts)People v. Higgins, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 856, 873–74 (Ct. App. 2011), as modified (Jan. 21, 2011), as modified on denial of reh'g (Feb. 4, 2011) (guilty verdict reversed in part due to argumentative questions; among other jabs; in case where defendant explained his conduct as motived by depression due to death of his daughter's friend, prosecutor asked, “You'd agree with me that it's pretty pathetic if you're using the memory of a dead 17–year–old kid as an excuse in this trial, wouldn't you? Would you agree with me? Is that the legacy that you want [the dead teen] to have?”; other examples of prosecutor's argumentative questions included “Oh, the door was unlocked,” and “Isn't that convenient that all of a sudden, right after you've committed the crimes, that that's when you come to?”; further held, “The rule is well established that the prosecuting attorney may not interrogate witnesses solely ‘for the purpose of getting before the jury the facts inferred therein, together with the insinuations and suggestions they inevitably contained, rather than for the answers”)People v. Dixon, No. D047342, 2007 WL 2745207, at *10 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2007)  Dixon asked Hernandez who had taken the photographs near the time of the injury. Hernandez testified that the audio-visual person at his school had taken photographs of his injury. Dixon then asked, “Is it computer enhancement? Those could be computer enhanced-.” The prosecutor interrupted, “That's argumentative.” The court sustained the prosecutor's objection")United States v. Browne, No. SACR 16-00139-CJC, 2017 WL 1496912, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2017) (For each witness, the Court did not end Defense counsel's cross-examination until it became excessively cumulative and argumentative, at which time the Court was well within its authority to restrain the questioning pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a).”)Beving v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 3:18-CV-00040, 2020 WL 6051598, at *12 (S.D. Iowa Sept. 8, 2020) (Defendant may object to prejudicial or argumentative references to counsel at trial as permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence. See Fed. Rs. Evid. 403, 611(a)(3).)FRE 403: Argumentative questions may be viewed as unfairly prejudicial, misleading, or wasting time.FRE 611(a)(3), Witnesses and Presenting Evidence ((a) Control by the Court; Purposes. The court should exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: (1) make those procedures effective for determining the truth; (2) avoid wasting time; and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.FRCP 30, Depositions, (d) Duration; Sanction; Motion to Terminate or Limit. (3) Motion to Terminate or Limit, (A) Grounds. At any time during a deposition, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the ground that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party. 

Our non-alcoholic episode series during dry January continues this week. Joe and Caroline try several varieties of alcohol-removed wine by Fre. They discuss the process of making alcohol-removed wine, the price point, and the overall popularity of the NA beverage market.Remember, if you are participating in Dry January this year, you can still support your favorite Craft Breweries, even if you aren't drinking. Many places offer food and non-alcoholic options. Support local, drink local, even if it is not alcoholic!What We Are Drinking Sauvignon BlancAlcohol-removed WineFre (Sutter Home) | St. Helena, CAABV: Under 0.5% Pairing: Enjoy this crisp, delightful beverage on its own or with goat cheese, pesto chicken, and grilled fish."FRE alcohol-removed Sauvignon Blanc offers fresh notes of green grass, and soft, tropical fruit aromas. With each sip you will find bright acidity with delicious passion fruit and mango flavors, classically characteristic of a California Sauvignon Blanc. The slight dry finish will leave you reaching for another glass."***ChardonnayAlcohol-removed WineFre (Sutter Home) | St. Helena, CAABV: Under 0.5%Pairing: Try this Chardonnay with seafood dishes, roasted veal chops, creamy pastas, salads and mild cheeses."With its deep golden hue, and lively tropical fruit aromas, our alcohol-removed Chardonnay is elegance personified. Rich, creamy apple flavors mingle with crisp citrus notes on the palate, leading to an enjoyably tart finish."***MerlotAlcohol-removed WineFre (Sutter Home) | St. Helena, CAABV: Under 0.5%Pairing: Herb-crusted lamb chops, hearty stews, juicy hamburgers and pizza. "With its plush, luxurious taste, and gorgeous garnet color, our alcohol-removed Merlot delivers plenty of style and grace. With seductive black plum aromas and soft cherry and spice flavors, our Merlot is velvety smooth, with a full, rich finish—a classic beauty."***// About the Craft Parenting Podcast The Craft Parenting Podcast is hosted by Joe and Caroline, two Cincinnati parents who are also craft beer enthusiasts. Each week, they discuss their favorite local beers, parenting experiences, and adventures with their two children and two dogs.If you enjoyed this episode, please leave a rating and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.   // Follow us Facebook:: https://facebook.com/CraftParentingPodcast Instagram:: https://instagram.com/craftparentingpodcast/ X:: https://twitter.com/craftparenting YouTube:: https://youtube.com/@craftparenting Rumble:: https://rumble.com/c/CraftParenting Website:: https://craftparentingpodcast.com  #craftparenting #Podcast #nonalcoholicwine #NAWine #DryJanuary #newyearnewyou #craftbeerpodcast #drinkbeermadehereohio #drinklocalbeer #winelovers #supportlocalbusiness #drinklocal #Parenting #FamilyAdventures #viralvideoSupport the show

Karen Read is back in court for a Daubert Hearing. Dr. Russell is the Defense Expert Witness and is being questioned by both the Defense and the Prosecution to see if the testimony should come into the Re-Trial. Dr. Russell explained why she thinks the marks on John O'Keefe are specifically from a dog attack which is different than what she said on the stand in the first trial when she said it might be from a dog bite. The Prosecution was not done questioning Dr. Russell but it was time for court to end. It is scheduled to resume on Jan 7th, 2025, at 9am ET.A Daubert Hearing is used to challenge an expert witness. The Judge acts as the gatekeeper of the evidence when determining if there is sufficient reliability for admissibility under FRE 702. The court can examine the methodology and reasoning behind the expert's opinion.Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/MjU4nGT3TSsRESOURCESPrevious Voir Dire of Dr. Russell - https://youtube.com/live/Wzt0SgXLa7k Previous Testimony of Dr. Russell - https://youtube.com/live/-y57V1lkXeUThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Character Evidence and Impeachment This summarizes key themes and important facts from the provided excerpt of "Lecture Three: Character Evidence and Impeachment." I. Character Evidence: General Rule and Exceptions (FRE 404) General Rule: Character evidence is inadmissible to prove conduct. This rule aims to prevent unfair prejudice and ensure trials focus on specific actions, not broad character assessments. "The law bars this type of evidence to prevent unfair prejudice. If juries were allowed to rely on character evidence, there's a significant risk that they would punish a party for being a 'bad person' rather than for the specific act alleged." Exceptions (Criminal Cases): Defendant's Character: Defendants can introduce evidence of their relevant good character traits. However, this allows the prosecution to rebut with evidence of bad character. Victim's Character: Defendants can introduce evidence of the victim's relevant character, particularly in self-defense cases. The prosecution can then rebut. Homicide Cases: If a defendant claims the victim was the aggressor, the prosecution can introduce evidence of the victim's peacefulness. Exceptions (Civil Cases): Character evidence is rarely admissible but exceptions exist in cases like defamation, child custody, or negligent hiring where character is directly relevant. II. Methods of Proving Character (FRE 405) Reputation Evidence: Testimony about a person's general reputation in the community. "A witness might testify, 'In our neighborhood, John is known as an honest and trustworthy individual.'" Opinion Evidence: Testimony about a witness's personal opinion of an individual's character. "A close friend might testify, 'I've known Sarah for years, and in my opinion, she's a very honest person.'" Specific Instances of Conduct: Admissible only when character is an essential element of the case (e.g., negligent hiring). III. Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts (FRE 404(b)) General Rule: Evidence of other acts is inadmissible to prove character or conformity with that character. Permissible Purposes: Such evidence may be admissible to prove motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake/accident. Balancing Test: Under FRE 403, judges must weigh the probative value of "other acts" evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice. IV. Impeachment of Witnesses Purpose: To challenge a witness's credibility by showing bias, incapacity, inconsistency, or lack of truthfulness. Methods:Bias or Prejudice: Demonstrating a witness's personal stake in the trial outcome. Incapacity: Showing the witness's inability to perceive or recall events accurately. Prior Inconsistent Statements: Exposing contradictions between trial testimony and prior statements. Contradiction: Presenting evidence that directly contradicts the witness's testimony. V. Impeachment by Character Evidence (FRE 608 & 609) FRE 608 (Truthfulness): A witness's character for truthfulness can be attacked or supported by reputation or opinion evidence. Specific instances of conduct relating to truthfulness can be explored on cross-examination. FRE 609 (Criminal Conviction): Prior convictions involving dishonesty or false statements, or felonies, can be used for impeachment. The court must balance probative value against prejudicial effect. VI. Rehabilitation of Witnesses Purpose: To restore a witness's credibility after impeachment. Methods:Prior Consistent Statements: Rebutting claims of fabrication. Character for Truthfulness: Using reputation or opinion evidence to support the witness's honesty. The lecture concludes with hypothetical scenarios illustrating the application of these rules in practice. Understanding these concepts is crucial for both legal exams and effective courtroom practice. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Novinár Karol Sudor strávil 5 mesiacov prípravou textu o rodine Frešovcov, ktorí sa doma starajú  o ťažko chorého syna  Alana.  Videl zlyhanie štátu, obrovskú obetavosť členov rodiny aj pokroky, ktoré podľa mnohých beznádejný pacient Alan robí. S Karolom Sudorom sa rozprával Braňo Bezák.   Rodine Frešovcov môžete so starostlivosťou o ťažko chorého syna Alana pomôcť píspevkom priamo na ich transparentný účet. IBAN: SK69 0900 0000 0052 1137 9439

Evidence Law - Relevance and Prejudice Source: Excerpts from "Evidence Chapter 1: Relevance and Prejudice" Main Themes: Relevance: Defining and applying the concept of relevance as a cornerstone of evidence admissibility. Balancing Relevance and Prejudice: Understanding FRE 403 and the judicial balancing act between probative value and potential prejudicial impact of evidence. Conditional Relevance: Examining FRE 104(b) and situations where the relevance of evidence hinges on the establishment of other facts. Judge's Role: Highlighting the judge's critical function as a gatekeeper in ensuring fairness and managing the flow of evidence. Most Important Ideas/Facts: I. Relevance (FRE 401): Definition: Evidence is relevant if it makes a fact more or less probable than without the evidence, and that fact is of consequence to the case. Low Threshold: The bar for relevance is intentionally low to ensure potentially useful information is not prematurely excluded. Example: In a car accident case, the color of the traffic light at the time of the collision is relevant, while a party's favorite car color is not. Quote: "The threshold for relevance is deliberately low, aiming to ensure that potentially helpful evidence is not excluded prematurely." II. Balancing Relevance and Prejudice (FRE 403): Balancing Test: Relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or undue delay. Unfair Prejudice: Evidence that appeals to emotions and could lead the jury to decide based on bias rather than facts. Example: Graphic crime scene photos might be relevant but could be excluded if their emotional impact outweighs their probative value. Quote: "Even if evidence is relevant, it may be excluded if its probative value—meaning its ability to prove something important—is substantially outweighed by the risk of causing unfair prejudice, misleading the jury, confusing the issues, or wasting time." III. Conditional Relevance (FRE 104(b)): Contingent Relevance: When the relevance of evidence depends on the establishment of another fact. Example: An email might become relevant as proof of a contract if other evidence establishes the existence of offer and acceptance. Quote: "In some cases, the relevance of a piece of evidence depends on the establishment of another fact. This concept is known as conditional relevance, governed by FRE 104(b)." IV. Judge's Role: Gatekeeper: Judges assess relevance, balance probative value against potential prejudice, and control the flow of evidence. Discretion: FRE 403 provides judges with discretion to exclude even relevant evidence to ensure a fair trial. Limiting Instructions: Judges can instruct juries on the limited purpose for which certain evidence can be considered. Quote: "Judges serve as gatekeepers of the evidence presented in court, and their discretion in applying FRE 403 is crucial to ensuring a fair trial." Examples and Applications: The document provides various hypothetical scenarios illustrating how relevance and prejudice are applied in different legal contexts, such as personal injury, breach of contract, criminal cases, and defamation lawsuits. These examples demonstrate the complexity of applying these principles in practice. Key Takeaways: Understanding the interplay of relevance, prejudice, and conditional relevance is essential for effective legal analysis and advocacy. Judges play a vital role in ensuring fairness and preventing irrelevant or overly prejudicial evidence from influencing the jury. Mastering these fundamental concepts lays the foundation for understanding more complex evidentiary rules and exceptions. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Trudeau lied about India's plots and mayhem. He went to a Taylor Swift concert like other teenaged girls while Montreal burns. Will these protesters be charged and found guilty of mischief like Pat King just was?  Canada is sliding into chaos.CHAPTERS:00:00 - Intro00:27 - Trudeau's Funny Money02:46 - No Trump Bump03:58 - Trudeau's India Problem11:25 - Trudeau's Lies About India17:04 - Bossenault's Departure Explained22:30 - Trudeau at Taylor Swift Concert Amid Crisis26:10 - Sympathy for Trudeau's Daughter?27:19 - Pat King Found Guilty33:18 - END#IndiaControversy#news #ctvnews #pmmodi #canadanews #indiacanada#indiacanada #pmmodi #canadaindia #indiacanadanews #canadanewsSUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM JOIN THE KRAYDEN'S RIGHT RESISTANCE:-Stand on Guard Store Merch with a Message: https://standonguard.store/-Substack FREE or Paid Subscription: https://davidkrayden.substack.com/-Buy Me a Coffee (1 time support): https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kraydensright-Join YouTube Membership: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1ED4fuuXo07MoobImXavaQ/joinLocals / Rumble Subscriber Option: https://kraydensright.locals.com/Pay Direct on Paypal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/standonguard...SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL TO KEEP SEEING THIS CHANNEL-Please SUBSCRIBE & HIT the bell. This is FREE and it will help you BEAT Trudeau's censorship so you get notifications on my YouTube Channel even when the censorship laws come into FULL effect so Trudeau and YT cannot hide this content: https://www.youtube.com/@KraydensRightwithDavidKrayden -And/or subscribe and hit the notifications on my Rumble channel to also keep informed of the latest Canadian news you won't hear on the msm https://rumble.com/user/KraydensRight...MORE ways you can find and support my work:   -Krayden's Right Substack: https://davidkrayden.substack.com/-Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/KraydensRight-Twitter: https://twitter.com/DavidKrayden-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KraydensRight-YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KraydensRightwithDavidKrayden-Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/stand-on-guard-with-david-krayden/id1684148154-Spotify Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/1YfyNi7gqJpRYS7iuGcWhw...✨FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the US Copyright Law.#davidkrayden #kraydensright #standonguard #cdnpoli #uspoli #ukpoli #news #independentjournalists ....NEW!! You can now find Stand on Guard with David Krayden on most podcasts: Apple, Spotify, Google, Amazon, Youtube music, Substack.

WBZ's Jordan Rich talks with Matt Robinson of matts-meals.com about Fre non-alcoholic wines. Get all the news you need by listening to WBZ NewsRadio 1030 on the free #iHeartRadio app! Or ask Alexa to play WBZ NewsRadio on #iHeartRadio.

Introduction (0:00:00). When Spencer knocks on doors, does anyone recognize him from the podcast?The Break (0:04:11). Results from Quinnipiac, Premiere Austin, and Premiere Fort Lauderdale. Who were the best teams ... and who were the Best Coach-Judges? Adrian Mebane (0:07:00). Loyola Chicago's newly-promoted advocacy director describes her new job duties, her goals, and her unusual gardening style. Main Interview: Jeremy Dailey (0:22:45). Georgia's coach talks about how mock trial changed his career trajectory, his relationship with his mentor Kellie Casey, how gay advocates are treated differently in mock and real courtrooms, cooking 500(!) New York Times recipes, his $15 principle when it comes to wine, and the new FRE rule that creates a privilege for his "hot takes." Vexatious Litigants (0:53:41). Should teams disclose their motions before trial? Judge Erickson says yes, and A.J. Bellido de Luna says no. We also hear about Judge losing football bets, A.J traveling to an "undisclosed location," and the immortal words, "May it please the court. May I blow my nose?"Mailbag Question (1:20:21). At tournaments that allow some schools to bring two teams, should we do anything for schools with one team to level the playing field?

On this episode: Our annual Ballot Measure Readability report explores the complexity of statewide ballot measure titles and summaries to determine the educational level voters might need to fully understand what they're being asked to weigh in on. We use the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) scales to determine how accessible these texts are based on objective factors, such as the number of syllables, words, and sentences in a text (Note: These scores focus solely on language structure, NOT the complexity of the ideas themselves).  For the 159 statewide ballot measures certified in 41 states for elections this fall, we found that the average FKGL was 16, which correlates with a bachelor's degree. The average FRE for ballot titles was 20, which also corresponds with college graduates.  Is that a big deal? Ballotpedia's Ryan Byrne runs through a handful of example measures from around the country while unpacking how developing measures works in different states and recent legislation aimed at making measures easier to understand for the average American. Check out the report to see the readability scores for measures in your state: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2024  Sign up for our Newsletters: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia_Email_Updates  Stream "On the Ballot" on Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts. If you have questions, comments, or love for BP, feel free to reach out at ontheballot@ballotpedia.org or on X (formerly Twitter) @Ballotpedia. *On The Ballot is a conversational podcast featuring interviews with guests across the political spectrum. The views and opinions expressed by them are solely their own and are not representative of the views of the host or Ballotpedia as a whole.

Það eru umbrotatímar í pólitíkinni. Við heyrum hvað fólki á förnum vegi finnst um stjórnarslitin og framtíðina - gefum fólki sem í morgun var á rölti um Kringluna, Borgartún, Katrínartún og Snorrabraut orðið. Og úr pólitíkinni yfir í önnur stórmál, kannski á öðrum skala. Freðinn risi úr öðru sólkerfi hefur undanfarið tekið þátt í að lýsa upp næturhimininn - við fáum Sævar Helga Bragason, jarðfræðing og vísindamiðlara með meiru, til þess að segja okkur frá Halastjörnunni Tsuchinshan-Atlas C/2023 A3. Við förum svo í heimsókn á Þjóðskjalasafn Íslands - þar segir Jón Torfi Arason, skjalavörður, okkur frá harmþrungu ástarbréfi sem fannst inni í vegg gamals húss á Ísafirði fyrir tæpum fimmtíu árum og skilaði sér nýlega til safnsins. Það reyndist vera frá manni sem skrifaði konu sinni frá holdsveikispítalanum í Laugarnesi. Tónlist: Nelson, Willie - Georgia on my mind. Una Torfadóttir - Í löngu máli.

On this special episode of the podcast, Scott is joined by current IRF board member Fre Eskens to preview next weeks World Championship in London, England! The guys start by discussing the format changes to look out for at this years championship, such as the increase in womens squads, double rounds of pool play, and the focus more being on squad play After setting the scene, Scott and Fre get into highlighting the storylines coming into this event such as the favourites and dark horses in each division before concluding with some answers to listeners questions and predicting their top 3 in all divisions!

Cuando se creó el Freón, un CFC, como refrigerante, fue todo un éxito para vender refrigeradores y todo tipo de aerosoles. Cuando en 1974 se apuntó a estos gases como causantes de un futuro daño irreversible a la capa de ozono, la industria implicada los acuso de agoreros del fin del mundo y puso resistencia a las advertencias de los científicos. En 1978 se prohibió en los aerosoles de EE. UU., y la alarma desapareció, mientras se usaba en otros productos. Nadie parecía preocuparse por falta de pruebas, hasta que midió el agujero en la Antártida y se estableció una relación causa-efecto. En los años 90, se seguía usando en los países más pobres y se financió su cambo para los más pobres. Fue la primera vez que se cerraron fábricas en el tercer mundo por causa del medio ambiente, quizás porque el agujero se vio que se cernía sobre EE. UU. y Europa más que en otras partes del mundo, por eso se presionó a los pobres para que dejaran de contaminar, porque nos afectaba a nosotros.

On this session, Larry and Fre$h decided to sit down with his barbershops owner, Mario Coralles. Showing Mario how they get down on the best podcast for the culture. Of course, starting of with a mental health check going right in to some new music by Pennsylvanias own and his friend Young Bane who's music has been played on the show before. They go into Marios barber origin story and how he came to starting a barbershop amongst a list of sub questions. They talk about Marios ultimate barbering goals and if he will even be a barber forever. Starting another shop, favorite and worse clients and the "why" of it all amongst an an in depth conversation between the 3. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/larry-hilton/support

Today's roundup of new deposition-related cases focuses on four rulings. One offers a great strategy to exclude hostile deponents' deposition testimony, where they answer your opponents' questions but refuse to let you fully and fairly cross-examine them. A second touches on the age-old question of whether "Form!" or "Objection!" is enough or whether you must articulate the specific evidentiary basis. The third offers an idea for administering a slightly modified oath to immature deponents who might not understand the standard oath. The fourth looks at a novel approach one party took in noticing an individual witness with an attached, lengthy 30(b)(6) list of topics relating to matters that seemed better suited for a corporate representative.Thanks for listening! And be sure to check out the book upon which this podcast is based, 10,000 Depositions Later: The Premier Litigation Guide for Superior Deposition Practice. Available on Amazon and almost everywhere else books are sold. Now in it's fourth edition at 600 pages. It's a career-saving resource.SHOW NOTESPerrot v. Kelly, et al., Case No. 18-cv-10147, 2023 WL 11873009 (D. Mass. October 27, 2003) (reserving right to exclude deponent's testimony if witness continued to thwart plaintiff's opportunity to fully and fairly examine her, under FRE 804 relating to witness "unavailability"; court appears to equate refusal to give testimony with unavailability)B.P., et al. v. City of Johnson City, et al., No. 2:23-cv-71-TRM-JEM, 2024 WL 3461408 (E. D. Tenn. July 18, 2024) (refusing to limit lawyer to word "Objection" during depositions, and stating that lawyers have obligation to state the specific basis for the objection and not limit it to "objection" or "form" alone; further declining to sanction lawyer for longer narrative objections about incomplete documents because they were not intended to coach witness as to a particular answer)People v. Lopez, 550 P.3d 731 (Ct. App. Colo 2024) (affirming conviction of criminal defendant over objection that trial judge conducted modified administration of oath to 10-year old witness; finding that modified oath is appropriate for an immature witness who may not understand standard oath)Jacobs, et al. v. Journal Publishing Company, et al., Case No. 21-690-MW/SCY, 2024 WL 3401048 (D. N. M. July 12, 2024) (rejecting plaintiffs' effort to depose individual by serving FRCP 30(b)(6)-style deposition notice with lengthy attached topic list)See, 30(b)(6)-style Deposition Notice Served on Individual, PACER CM/ECF Doc. No. 135-1 (showing notice with attached topic list and list of documents to be brought by individual deponent) Jacobs, et al. v. Journal Publishing Company, et al., Case No. 21-690-MW/SCY, 2024 WL 3401048 (D. N. M. July 12, 2024)

On this session, Ofcourse after the weekly mental health check Larry and Fre$h go in to a short topic of what their version of the bottom is followed up with some random thoughts he reads from the past week. Diving straight in to the main topic Larry speak on a facebook debate with once again someone who calls themselves a Christian yet doing everything they say their against closing the debate with similarities between Islam and Christianity since most don't know how parallel they are. Music play by Larry's long time friend and old rap mentor Joel “Legit” Miller. Ending the pod with the thought about a known statement mainly said by women,”come healed”. Sit back and enjoy as you listen to the best podcast for the culture. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/larry-hilton/support

Send us a Text Message.Welcome to the Second Act Success Career Podcast! I'm your host, Shannon Russell, and this is the first in a four-part Business Brainstorm Mini-Series. Are you ready to quit your nine-to-five job and start your own business? If you're feeling stuck in your current role and dreaming of becoming your own boss, this episode is for you.In this episode, we'll dive into how to plan your exit strategy from your current job to ensure a smooth and confident transition. You'll learn how to assess your skills, understand your financial needs, and come up with a viable business idea. We'll also discuss the importance of timing your exit and how to manage the emotional aspects of leaving a long-term job.Join me as I share practical tips and strategies to help you build the foundation for your new business while still working your nine-to-five. Plus, I'll provide insights on creating your brand identity and planning your marketing strategy.Don't forget to sign up for our free Business Brainstorm Mini-Bootcamp happening from July 30th to August 1st at secondactsuccess.co/brainstorm. You'll get two one-hour online workshops and a live Q&A session, plus a free business startup checklist to help you plan your next move.Tune in, get inspired, and start your journey toward Second Act Success! If you enjoy this episode, please share it with a friend, leave a review, and subscribe so you never miss an episode.SHOW NOTES:https://secondactsuccess.co/152--------Ready To Quit Your Job?Ready to quit your job and start a business? Unboss yourself and take the QUIZ! https://secondactsuccess.co/quizGet the FREE Career Change Planner to help you plan your next career move!https://secondactsuccess.co/plannerBook a FREE Discovery Call with host/career coach Shannon Russell - https://www.calendly.com/second-act-success/coaching-strategyLET'S CONNECT!Instagram - https://instagram.com/secondactsuccessFacebook - https://www.facebook.com/secondactsuccess.coTikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@secondactsuccessAll the latest - https://secondactsuccess.co/linksFREE Resources - https://secondactsuccess.co/resources REVIEW & SUBSCRIBE THE PODCAST!

On this session Larry and Fre$h set the bar straight on what might be a question in the community of women... Do we want whores or good girls. Going in to a question for the men this time on "do we avoid daddys girls like women avoid mama's boys?". they speak briefly on dating apps and Larrys most recent exchange with a woman he met on one. Lastly, Larry had a topic Fre$h might relate to a little too often; putting too much pressure on myself to get things done in 24 hours. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/larry-hilton/support

This powerful episode of the Family Plot Podcast is so full of stuff, we should wrap it in a bow!  Krys announces this week that she prefers to go by Arthur with male pronouns.  She also talks about dingoes, which Dean claims are his baby, or maybe just Merryl Streep's.  Then we focus on the life of Rosa Parks.  Her childhood, her first experiences with racism, her education and how she became a lifelong activist.  And while she was not the first to get arrested for refusing to give up her seat for a white passenger, doing so made her the face of the Freedom Movement.  We discuss her struggles and her continued activism later in life and so much more in this episode examining one of the people integral to the Freedom movement in the United States on this powerful episode of the Family Plot Podcast!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/family-plot--4670465/support.

In this episode, Jim tackles the problem of 30(b)(6) witnesses showing up with voluminous notes and documents to use in refreshing their memory about the topics to be addressed. Are these witnesses automatically required to give you those notes and materials ahead of time? If not, is there anything you can do to get them beforehand? And, what about getting copies of documents these and other deponents looked at before the deposition but didn't bring with? For the answers to these and other questions, listen in. And thanks for being a loyal listener of the podcast! We appreciate you!SHOW NOTESChampionX LLC, f/k/a Windrock, Inc. v. Resonance Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:21-CV-288-TAV-JE M (E. D. Tennessee Oct. 19, 2023) (providing that documents used during a deposition to refresh witnesses recollection must be produced to the adverse party while deposition is in progress, and need not be produced ahead of time, barring some other obligation)Arrowood Indem. Co. The Lubrizol Corp. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., No. 1:10 CV 2871, 2015 WL 12734892, at *2 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2015) (“Fed. R. Evid. 612. Rule 612 applies to depositions and deposition testimony through Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(c)”)Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 317 (3d Cir. 1985) This rule is applicable to depositions and deposition testimony by operation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(c) (“Examination and cross-examination of witnesses may proceed as permitted at the trial under the provisions of the Federal Rules of Evidence.”)Antero Res. Corp. v. Tejas Tubular Prod., Inc., 516 F. Supp. 3d 752, 753 (S.D. Ohio 2021) (“Importantly, Rule 612 applies to deposition testimony”)Antero Resources Corporation v. Tejas Tubular Products, Inc., 2021 WL363550, No. 2:19-CV-804 (S. D. Ohio Feb.2, 2021) (if witness uses documents for a testimonial purpose–as [the corporate representative did ]-any claim of work product protection over those documents is waived; further holding that, where conflict exists between the command of Fed. R. Evid. 612 to disclose materials used to refresh recollection, and protection provided by the attorney-client privilege, the weight of authority holds that privilege is waived).United States v. Holden, 557 F.3d 698, 703–04 (6th Cir. 2009) (“Rule 612 does not apply where a witness refers to documents for purposes other than refreshing recollection”)K & S Assocs., Inc. v. Am. Ass'n of Physicists in Med., No. 3:09-1108, 2012 WL 4364087, at *3 (M.D. Tenn. Sept. 21, 2012) (citing Nutramax Lab., Inc., 183 F.R.D. at 468, 473) (finding that documents were used for a “testimonial purpose” where the witness's review of them “unavoidably enhanced his recollection of events”)Gilbert v. Atlantic Trust Co., N.A., 2005 WL8176938 (D. N.H. Nov. 17, 2005) (order denying motion to compel documents reviewed by deponent prior to deposition, under FRE 612, because of movant's failure to establish predicate during deposition)FRE 612 - Writings Used to Refresh A Witness

The Best Evidence Rule is a fundamental principle in the law of evidence that governs the admissibility of written documents or recordings in court. This rule is codified in the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) under Rule 1002, which stipulates that to prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided by the rules or by law. The essence of the Best Evidence Rule is to prevent inaccuracies and fraud that might arise from relying on copies or secondary evidence, ensuring that the evidence presented in court is as reliable as possible. The Best Evidence Rule requires that, when a party seeks to prove the contents of a document, recording, or photograph, the original of that item must be produced in court. The term "original" refers to the actual document or recording itself, as opposed to a copy. This rule is predicated on the notion that the original piece of evidence is the most accurate and reliable source of information regarding its contents. By mandating the presentation of original evidence, the rule aims to preserve the integrity of the evidence and reduce the possibility of misunderstandings, alterations, or distortions that might occur with secondary reproductions. The requirement to produce the original document, recording, or photograph is based on the principle that the original is the best source of evidence about its contents. This requirement applies when the content of the document is directly in dispute or is relevant to the outcome of the case. For example, if the terms of a contract are at issue, the original contract document must be produced to prove what the parties agreed upon. However, the Best Evidence Rule is not without exceptions. The FRE and various state laws provide several circumstances under which secondary evidence of a document's content may be admissible, such as: Loss or Destruction: If the original document has been lost or destroyed, and this loss was not due to bad faith on the part of the party seeking to introduce the evidence, a copy may be used. Unavailability of the Original: If the original is not obtainable through any available judicial process or procedure, secondary evidence is allowed. Control by Opposing Party: If the original is in the control of the opposing party, who has been put on notice but fails to produce it, secondary evidence can be introduced. Public Records: Copies of public records are admissible when certified as correct by the public office where they are held. Summaries: In cases where the documents are voluminous and cannot be conveniently examined in court, summaries or charts may be used, provided the original documents are available for examination. It's important to note that the Best Evidence Rule applies only when the contents of the document are in question. If a fact could be proven through testimony without reference to the document's contents, the rule does not apply. Definition of Best Evidence Rule Requirement to Produce Original Writing/Recording --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Sometimes the most influential people in culture and style are so because they elevate and amplify the work of others. Legendary perfumer Frédéric Malle, through his brand Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle, is one of those trailblazers. What started as a long-shot experimental concept has become one of the most highly regarded players in the fragrance world. On this episode, Dan and Malle discuss his youth in Paris, the scent he hates the most, how he bet it all on the launch of his brand, and so much more. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Check out FYI FLI Episode 116 w/ Public speaker, Certified Financial Educator, and the founder of Gage St. Society: Fre Greene!   In this episode, Hassan and Fre chop it up about:  - The importance of having an “OUTSIDE” Fund  - The Biggest Benefit Of Being Financially LIT   - Planning for short term VS long term goals   If you're looking to be motivated, educated, and entertained…this podcast is for you!

If you know what the: Bene Gesserit, Muad'dib, Mahdi, Fedaykin, Kwisatz Haderach, Mentats, Panoplia Propheticus, Qadis as-Salaf, Sadu and Shai-Hulud are... Then you're probably well and truly prepared for DUNE Part 2. But if that word salad made less sense than Weird Al's Dada poetry, then you may be needing to gird your loins for some LORE HEAVY SCI-FI. In this podcast Jill is our own Benny Jesuit Mother figure, Dion is our erstwhile Moe Sizlak Haderach, and Quinny is still just a Shy Hulud with a Big... popcorn bucket. Paul Atreides unites with Chani and the Fremen while seeking revenge against the conspirators who destroyed his family. Facing a choice between the love of his life and the fate of the universe, he must prevent a terrible future only he can foresee. https://youtu.be/GC0bjMBGlfM A thank you to all you Fremen and Fre-women who join in on the Twitch stream, each Tuesday night at 7:30pm AEDT Plus a special thank you to those Members of the Navigators Guild who have allowed us the freedom to travel to the planet of Arrakis this show. We owe them big time for the Spice... If you want to assist us in paying them back feel free to drop some coin via our Ko-Fi jar and now also by subscribing on Twitch! If you like what we do, drop us a sub!  Every bit of your support helps us to (hopefully) keep entertaining you!  Don't fret if you can't be there for the recording though as you can catch them on Youtube usually within a day of recording. Make sure to subscribe there so you don't miss them! WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK! Send in voicemails or emails with your opinions on this show (or any others) to info@theperiodictableofawesome.com Please make sure to join our social networks too!  We're on: Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/TPToA/ Twitter: www.twitter.com/TPToA Facebook: www.facebook.com/PeriodicTableOfAwesome Instagram: www.instagram.com/theperiodictableofawesome/ https://youtu.be/U2Qp5pL3ovA?si=L32vMAMhz7wIa62k this clip had to be removed from the Youtube version. https://youtu.be/w4JRjW7Uvt8?si=RVHx24JqTRGxcIyU https://youtu.be/_u4O0P01nfI?si=E6BXLq6_Rvpb-d0Z

I. Introduction to Evidence A. Purpose and Importance of Evidence Law. Evidence law serves a foundational role in the legal process, ensuring that trials are conducted fairly and that decisions are based on reliable, relevant information. Its primary purposes are: To Ascertain the Truth: Evidence law helps in uncovering the truth by allowing certain pieces of information to be presented in court while excluding others that are unreliable, irrelevant, or prejudicial. To Ensure Fairness: By providing clear rules for what evidence can be considered, evidence law aims to create a level playing field for all parties in a legal dispute. To Enhance Efficiency: Evidence rules streamline the legal process by preventing the introduction of evidence that would waste time or distract from the main issues of the case. To Protect Rights: Specific rules of evidence are designed to safeguard constitutional and statutory rights, such as the right against self-incrimination and the right to confront witnesses. B. Sources of Evidence Law Evidence law in the United States is primarily derived from two sources: Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE): The FRE governs proceedings in the federal courts and serves as a model for many states. They were enacted to bring uniformity to federal evidence law and are regularly updated to address new legal challenges, including those arising from technological advancements. State Evidence Codes: Each state has its own set of evidence rules, which may closely follow the FRE or diverge based on local legal traditions and needs. State supreme courts and legislatures are responsible for creating and modifying these rules. In addition to these codified rules, common law principles still influence evidence law, especially in areas not fully covered by the FRE or state codes. C. Types of Evidence. Evidence can be classified into several types, each with specific rules governing its use: Direct Evidence: Directly proves a fact without needing inference, such as eyewitness testimony that a person was seen at a crime scene. Circumstantial Evidence: Requires inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. For example, finding a suspect's fingerprints at a crime scene does not directly prove they committed the crime but requires an inference. Real Evidence: Tangible items that are directly involved in the case at hand, such as a weapon used in a crime. Demonstrative Evidence: Evidence created for trial to demonstrate or illustrate a testimony or a fact, such as charts, maps, diagrams, and models. Digital Evidence: Information stored or transmitted in digital form that is relevant to the case. This includes emails, digital photographs, text messages, and information stored on electronic devices. D. Overview of the Admissibility of Evidence The admissibility of evidence is governed by a set of criteria designed to ensure that only relevant, reliable, and fair evidence is presented to the trier of fact (judge or jury). Key considerations include: Relevance: Evidence must be relevant to be admissible, meaning it must make a fact in question more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Reliability: Certain types of evidence must meet specific reliability standards to be admissible, such as scientific evidence, which must be based on scientifically valid principles and methods. Prejudice vs. Probative Value: Even if evidence is relevant, it may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury. Hearsay Rule: Hearsay, or statements made outside the courtroom offered for the truth of the matter asserted, is generally inadmissible unless it falls under one of the many exceptions to the hearsay rule. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome to the Newcomer Investor Channel!  I love to chat about great businesses with awesome people. Please note: this podcast is not financial advice. I'm not telling YOU what to do... I'm just sharing what I do! Newcomer Investor on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NewcomerInvest Subscribe on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@newcomerinvestor/featured Email me at ⁠iamthenewcomerinvestor@gmail.com⁠  TIMESTAMPS (0:00) - Intro (0:55) - Understanding the nuance between Brookfield Corporation (BN) and Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) (7:00) - Brookfield Asset Management 2023 review: huge dividend raise; lots of capital raised; why BAM thrived when others struggled; stable FRE margins; majority permanent strategies = able to plan better; credit, oak tree, reinsurance; is brookfield too promotional? (15:00) - Brookfield Corporation 2023 review: finally accelerating buybacks; also nice dividend raise; brookfield's real estate segment; what I am doing now with my brookfield shares

Es fin de mes como siempre nos acompaña Amanda Calderón, nos trae las mejores recomendaciones de libros. La empleada de Freída McFadden Lo que nos queda del mundo de Erik J.Brown Empieza, sigue o déjalo de Trey Godwy See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

I'm thrilled to share with you the latest insights from this interview with finance expert Fred Moskowitz on the fascinating world of note investing. If you've ever been curious about how to turn debt into a profitable investment, this episode's is for you!

Anne Ghesquière reçoit dans Métamorphose Audrey Fella et Frédérique Lemarchand, l'une est historienne et essayiste et a beaucoup écrit sur la spiritualité et l'autre artiste-peintre poétesse. Aujourd'hui, avec Audrey et Frédérique approchons-nous des mystères de l'âme et du souffle de vie. Plongeons au plus profond de nous-même. Et ensemble, tentons de toucher du doigt le souffle le miracle. Épisode #442Retrouvez Audrey Fella dans un précédent podcast de Métamorphose :#300 Audrey Fella : Christiane Singer sur le fil de la merveilleRetrouvez Frédérique Lemarchand dans un précédent podcast de Métamorphose :#293 Frédérique Lemarchand : Le paradis est un état d'êtreAvec Audrey Fella et Frédérique Lemarchand j'aborderai les thèmes suivants (extrait des questions) :Pourquoi avez-vous toutes les deux intitulé ce livre 'CHAIR Lumière' ?Frédérique, comment la souffrance qui a été la vôtre vous a aussi connecté à l'art ?Frédérique, vous avez poursuivi votre formation avec le peintre chinois Cao Bei-An, en quoi l'approche orientale vous a-t-elle influencée ?Audrey, pour vous, Frédérique est-elle une amazone qui aurait dompté sa part animale ?Frédérique, tout le monde a- t -il la capacité de vivre « en Esprit », d'accepter et transcender l'épreuve, ou faudrait-il recevoir au fond une espèce de grâce ? L'épreuve est-elle nécessaire ?Audrey, quel rôle joue la foie ?Frédérique, vous dites qu'aujourd'hui vous êtes profondément guérie, que voulez-vous dire ?Audrey, quel parallèle voyez-vous entre Christiane Singer et Frédérique ?Qui sont nos invitées Audrey Fella et Frédérique Lemarchand ? :Audrey Fella est une historienne, essayiste et journaliste française, née en 1975. Ses recherches portent entre autres sur les femmes et le sacré, la mystique chrétienne et laïque, le chamanisme au féminin, et de nombreuses figures spirituelles.Frédérique Lemarchand est créatrice de spectacles vivants pluridisciplinaires, dessinatrice et peintre de performances au sein de différentes structures (hôpitaux, maisons de retraite, centres éducatifs, théâtres, scènes en plein air…). Elle a publié Chair Lumière chez Mama éditions : livre d'entretien, illustré des tableaux, et de sculptures.Quelques citations du podcast avec Audrey Fella et Frédérique Lemarchand :AF : L'art de Frédérique nous invite à faire un pas dans la Grande Vie, à agrandir la vie, à toucher ce qui est véritablement une liberté plus grande.FL : C'est la faille, c'est la fêlure, c'est la brisure du cœur qui a fait se faufiler la lumière.FL : C'est toujours par notre impuissance que la toute-puissance de l'esprit peut enfin se déverser et nous piloter.AF : Dans son art Frédérique se laisse faire, elle s'abandonne et quelque chose nait.FL : l'art oriental compte sur la poésie du spectateur, il ne dit pas tout.AF : L'épreuve c'est aussi accueillir notre vulnérabilité.Retrouvez Métamorphose Podcast sur Insta & FacebookInscrivez-vous à la Newsletter ici : https://www.metamorphosepodcast.com/Découvrez gratuitement La Roue Métamorphose et les 9 piliers de votre vie !Soutenez la Tribu Métamorphose, devenez actifs !Abonnez-vous à Métamorphose, le podcast qui éveille la conscience sur YouTube / Apple Podcast / Spotify / Deezer / Google Podcasts / CastBoxPhoto DR Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

JL Collins is known as “The Godfather of FI,” and for a good reason: He continues to be a pioneer in the FIRE (Financial Independence Retire Early) Movement and a thought-leader in the Financial Independence (FI) space.  Today, he joins us to discuss the origin story of his groundbreaking blog, the concept behind his new book, Pathfinders, shiny investing object syndrome, and more. In this episode you'll also learn more about: Defining what “the simple path to wealth” means  Breaking down what index funds are, the difference between active and passive investing, and what “self cleansing” means How chasing performance is the best way to underperform in investing  The 4% rule, the importance of understanding the cost of your comfortable lifestyle, purchasing things from a position of strength, and more   Other Links Mentioned in episode: The Simple Path To Wealth And All You Need To Know About Index Investing With JL Collins The Simple Path to Wealth: Your road map to financial independence and a rich, free life  How I Lost Money in Real Estate Before It Was Fashionable: A Cautionary Tale  Pathfinders: Extraordinary Stories of People Like You on the Quest for Financial Independence—and How to Join Them How To Quit Like A Millionaire So You Can Stop Working & Start Living With Kristy & Bryce Quit Like a Millionaire: No Gimmicks, Luck, or Trust Fund Required Tim Ferris & James Clear Episode Get The Budget Bootcamp for FREE Pre-order my new book, Your Journey to Financial Freedom and get access to FIRE STARTER Course for FREE Check out my personal website here. Join The Weekly Newsletter List Leave me a voicemail– Leave me a question on the Journey To Launch voicemail and have it answered on the podcast! YNAB –  Start managing your money and budgeting so that you can reach your financial dreams. Sign up for a free 34 days trial of YNAB, my go-to budgeting app by using my referral link. What stage of the financial journey are you on? Are you working on financial stability or work flexibility? Find out with this free assessment and get a curated list of the 10 next best episodes for you to listen to depending on your stage. Check it out here! Connect with JL: Website Twitter:@JLCollinsNH Facebook:@JLCollinsNH Connect with me: Instagram: @Journeytolaunch Twitter: @JourneyToLaunch Facebook: @Journey To Launch Join the Private Facebook Group Join the Waitlist for My FI Course Get The Free Jumpstart Guide Get The Budget Bootcamp for FRE

If you were to say "Figaro" three times in quick succession, I'm guessing most people would be able to sing it back to you as it is heard in Figaro's entrance aria, "Largo al factotum" in Rossini's The Barber of Seville. The opera has infiltrated popular culture from figure skating routines, to pasta commercials, and, of course, cartoons. It could be that The Barber of Seville was "pop culture" even when the play on which it was based premiered in 1775. For this special edition of Front Row Center, we'll talk with everyday folks about what comes to mind when they hear the name "The Barber of Seville" (@ 3:50), then I share some information about Pierre Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais, the playwright who seemed to have his pulse on the entire world (@9:30). After that I spoke with television, film, and theatrical hair and makeup artist Alfreda ("Fre") Howard about the importance of hair in society and working with hair of all types (@13:50). Finally, I was honored to speak with three legendary American interpreters of Rosina: Jennifer Larmore, Susanne Mentzer, and Frederica von Stade. They shared their thoughts on Rosina and pop culture, getting nervous before a performance, and what they like (or not) about getting their hair done (@20:50). This episode is based on a video I created for Cincinnati Opera in the summer of 2020, the first summer of the COVID crisis. You can find the complete video, including interviews, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGpA5mRO_Jk&t=3s. Don't forget to check out our Spotify Playlist for The Barber of Seville, which includes some of my favorite moments from the "giddy" score. https://open.spotify.com/playlist/7CbDF2gz53LqihhkcgKbBX?si=9205b4d83c174cbe And, visit the episode poll on the Spotify episode homepage. As always, you can always reach out to me through my website, www.michaeljbolton.com, or email me at mike@michaeljbolton.com. Thanks for listening!

Your next trial could succeed or fail based on whether the expert's opinion gets admitted or excluded. Based on their recent presentation to financial experts, we cover three key cases—Kelly, Sargon, and Sanchez—that govern expert opinions. We also cover some fundamentals and tips to protect expert work product.Some things experts should remind their attorneys:“Don't email me. Pick up the phone instead.”“My opinion is only as good as the facts you've told me to base them on.”“Kelly and Sargon are different objections!”“I am a CPA, not Warren Buffet.”Regarding the new amendments to FRE 702: “Expect a tougher fight on admissibility, especially on methodology and reliability of application.”Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal's weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext's newest technology, CoCounsel, the world's first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.Other items discussed in the episode:Schreiber v. Estate of Kiser (1999) 22 Cal.4th 31.Du-All Safety, LLC v. The Superior Court of Alameda County (2019) 34 Cal.App.5th 485.)Townsend v. Olivo (D4d2 Jun. 15, 2021) no. E073183 (non-pub.) (Tim's writeup).People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24 (Tim's writeup)Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California (2012) 55 Cal.4th 747, 769 (Tim's writeup).People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665Bushling v. Fremont Medical Center (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 493, 510People v. Wakefield (N.Y. 2022) 38 N.Y.3d 367, 371[authorizing use of TrueAllele Casework System - probabilistic genotyping as generally accepted in the scienti fic community]Siemon v. Regents of the University of California (D1d1 Oct. 19, 2022 no. A160654) 2022 WL 12083207 (nonpub. opn.) (Tim's writeup).Kline v. Zimmer, Inc. (D2d8 May 26, 2022) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ 2022 WL 1679539 (review pending as of 8/23/23) (Tim's writeup).Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (D1d4 Sept. 21, 2021) 2021 WL 4272711 no. A159609 (Tim's writeup).Zuniga v. Alexandria Care Center, LLC (D2d7 Aug. 13, 2021) 2021 WL 3579021 no. B297023 (Tim's writeup).Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal's YouTube channel.

Jordan Peterson has lost a court case in his attempt to overturn the College of Ontario Psychologists' mandate for his "social media sensitivity training" in order to keep his license as a clinical psychologist. But Jordan is fighting back, and it's war. Jordan promised to carry out the regulatory board's re-education training publicly with the full weight of public pushback. #jordan #jordanpeterson #jordanbpeterson Taken from Johnny Massacre's World episode 675: https://youtube.com/live/EHOmC9Ms-P4

Many people have found hope, love, peace, and forgiveness in Jesus. It is His light that guides us through the darkness in our lives. However, there are still many out there who haven't come to have faith in God and Jesus. Despite this, Jesus has not forgotten them. As His believers, we have the opportunity to share with others the truth we found in Christ.In this episode of the Revelations Podcast, JoAnn Doyle joins us to discuss sharing Christ in the Middle East. JoAnn imparts inspiring stories of women who found faith in Christ and sought to share His light with the people around them.Join us to learn how we can bravely share the truth, even with those who seem so distant. Listen to this episode just for you!Here are three reasons why you should listen to this episode:Open your hearts to Muslims as you hear their struggles and stories.Be inspired to have faith in God and the truth of His Word..Learn how you, as a missionary, can bring Christ into the lives of those around you.ResourcesMore from the Revelations Podcast: Website | Instagram | Apple PodcastWomen Who Risk: Secret Agents for Jesus in the Muslim World by Tom and JoAnn Doyle: Amazon | WebsiteUncharted Ministries: Website | Not ForgottenHear more stories on I Found the TruthBible Verses:John 1:12 Chronicles 20John 8:32Romans 1:162 Timothy 2:9Episode Highlights[06:25] JoAnn's JourneyJoAnn was a quiet and shy child who grew up not knowing Jesus.She first heard the gospel at 16 after struggling with terrifying and evil dreams.JoAnn married Tom when she was 20. Together, God has taken them around the world to share the love of Christ.JoAnn: “He is the only one where we can come out of that darkness and into His glorious light. He can take a shy girl, a broken girl, and make her whole. That is what so many Muslim women feel. That they're back in the darkness, they're stuck in the shadows, they're broken, they have no voice. But they come to faith in Christ and he gives them a whole new paradigm shift.”[08:49] How JoAnn Found Jesus ChristIn the past, JoAnn felt an emptiness, praying to God to help her fill it. Afterward, she experienced multiple scary dreams. She learned of the gospel through a friend and accepted Jesus. From there, she came to have faith in God. Jesus became a light in the darkness.Many Muslims are battling demonic forces. Similarly, she realized her dreams were spiritual warfare. Through Christ, they can break free of their hold.[12:35] Their Calling to the Middle EastTom was a pastor before he was invited to lead bible tours in Israel. They heeded the call to work in the Middle East.The tragedy of 9/11 gave them the opportunity to reach out to struggling Muslims.Many Muslims experienced dreams and visions of Jesus. It is through these visions that they come to know Him as the Savior.Unfortunately, the Word of God is not prevalent in the Middle East. Illiteracy, access, and fear stop many Muslims from getting to know Christ.JoAnn: “He pursued each one of us so that we could have not only eternal life in the afterlife after we take our last breath here. But that we could have an abundant life with Him right now, here on Earth.”[17:30] Going Into the UnchartedThey answered God's call to go into places difficult to reach. They built churches and stood by the persecuted.Uncharted is the umbrella ministry, while Not Forgotten is the women's division.One day, JoAnn had a vision of Jesus calling her to reach out to Muslim women. These women's stories showed her the evils they've endured.One of the Muslim women she was talking to kept turning her head to the side. She learned it was because her husband had made her deaf in one ear.These women are not forgotten by God, nor are they forgotten by JoAnn. She hopes to share with them the light of Jesus.[23:07] Life in the Middle EastLife is especially difficult for women.At a young age, girls are taught that their fathers do not love them. Women do not have a voice and are often abused.In their culture, honor and shame affect their whole life and community. God has called women to be spiritual influences in their families. When these women come to have faith in God and Jesus, they can share the truth with their families.[30:25] About MuslimsMuslims believe Jesus is a prophet rather than the Son of God. They don't believe that He was resurrected after death.Their god, Allah, is not a god of love and forgiveness. Their laws don't include love, kindness, forgiveness, and others.Most Muslims have not read the Koran. Mostly, they learn about it during prayer.Practices and beliefs often differ depending on the country and the conservativeness of the family.[32:40] Leila's Story: Coming to Have Faith in GodThe stories in Women Who Risk are of real, ordinary women who experienced the extraordinary through God.Leila, one of the women JoAnn met, experienced abuse at the hands of the men in her family.Her family sought refuge in Syria, where she received an invitation to a Christian church. There, she experienced worship that brought her warmth and hope.Leila told the truth about how she felt and her difficulties as a Muslim woman.Many women experience feeling safety, peace, love, and wholeness in Jesus Christ.Reagan: “You can just ask Him, ‘Jesus, I want to stop going my own way. I'm not satisfied with my life. I want You to be the Lord of my life. And forgive me for my sins and not following You. It's time for me to follow You and be obedient to Your calling.''”[44:49] Kady and Amina's Story of Learning to Have Faith in GodKady was a religious Muslim who dreamed about Jesus. After her prayers were answered, Kady came to have faith in GodShe shares her experience with Amina and encouraged her to pray. That night, Jesus answers Amina's prayers.Together they attend an underground bible study that strengthened their faith.Despite the consequences of believing in Christ, they face the risk and share the gospel with others.[55:02] Bravely Sharing the Truth of ChristMany people lived desperate lives before meeting God. Now, they have a holy boldness that allows them to share their joy and hope with others.Many former Muslims become full of holy boldness through their transformation in Christ.The Holy Spirit works in our lives when we share the truth without shame. Hope and truth are the armor that God gives us. JoAnn: “It's a beautiful combination. Not being ashamed of the gospel, knowing that it's the power unto salvation, and then doing it in a way that's kind and loving. How do you say no to that?”[59:24] Your Prayers Can HelpThe COVID pandemic has prevented JoAnn and Tim from visiting the Middle East. Fortunately, Israel has opened their borders once again.You can pray for many divine opportunities to share the gospel. In the past, people used to pray for missionaries to reach difficult areas. Now, we are all missionaries, called to share the hope within us.When you see a Muslim woman, show them you see them. Don't be afraid to share with her that she is loved.Take the opportunity to develop a friendship with her. This way, you can bring Jesus into their lives.About JoAnnJoAnn Doyle is the president and founder of the Not Forgotten division of the Uncharted Ministries. Together with her husband, Tom, they answer God's call to work full time in the Middle East. JoAnn opened her heart to the women of the Middle East. She founded The Not Forgotten Ministry, where their team reaches out to all women, especially Muslims. JoAnn co-authored multiple books with Tom, including Breakthrough - The Return of Hope to the Middle East and Women Who Risk: Secret Agents for Jesus in the Muslim World. She continues to inspire women to reach out to Muslim women all around the world. Connect and get to know JoAnn on Uncharted Ministries.Enjoyed this Episode?If you did, subscribe and share it with your friends!Post a review and share it! If you enjoyed tuning in, then leave us a review. You can also share this with your friends and family. This episode will inspire you to share the light of Christ with others just like JoAnn did! Help others learn to have faith in God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit, that they may find peace.Have any questions? You can connect with me on Instagram.Thank you for tuning in! For more updates, tune in on Apple Podcasts.  kw: to have faith in Godmeta: Learn to bravely share God's truth as JoAnn imparts inspiring stories of women who came to have faith in God and sought to share His light.

We consult the Federal Rules of Evidence at FRE 611. www.patreon.com/stevelehto

We have a great show for you today!  Kiev O'Neil is back from vacation, recharged and ready to talk some pig-skin!   First, Kiev talks about some promos that we have at The Oddsbreakers.   Next, we get into the 2023 Big 10 preview with some plays and some great information!   Which teams are favored?   Which teams have a significant yards per play advantage or disadvantage from last year?  Who did they lose?  Who are the special players?  Finally, Kiev talks some UFC on ESPN with some FREE PLAYS!  Should you have any questions for the podcast, or games that you want us to cap during our shows, please message us at Info@TheOddsBreakers.com.  Have a wonderful week! USE PROMO CODE SUMMERWIN TO GET $100 OFF EVERY FOOTBALL PACKAGE AND $50 OFF EVERY MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP FOR THE FIRST MONTH!  Click here:   https://theoddsbreakers.com/premium-plays/ Offer expires August 1st, 2023 Follow our FREE PICKS telegram channel:  https://t.me/TheOddsBreakersFreePicks Follow Kiev O'Neil's NEW personal FREE PICKS telegram Channel:  https://t.me/KievONeil If you want to subscribe to support us and get some very frequent winners please Click Here to become a member of The OddsBreakers and gain access to premium plays BEFORE the line moves!  Or, you can visit theoddsbreakers.com and click shop and pick one of our great handicappers including Kiev O'Neil @OBKiev at only $84 per month on a 1 year subscription!  You could also support us at Patreon.com for only $10 a month to help us out and thank us for some free plays as well as get some extra benefits and merchandise. If you want to take ownership of your health, try AG1 and get a FREE 1-yearsupply of Vitamin D AND 5 Fre

The practice of Christian Meditation helps us live with the peace of Christ. Relax to the sounds of peaceful meditation music. Narrated by Chloë Elmore. Are you a rule follower? Meditate on Matthew 15:8. Find peace and rest during this guided meditation for mind and body with deep breathing, prayer, and scripture. Use these meditations as a Bible study in the morning to center yourself on the truth in God's word. For more Bible meditations, download the Abide app: https://abide.co/awesomeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hey, Fre fans. Your Men in Red came back from a road trip to Providence Park in Portland with 3 points and a historic victory against Rose City. I don't fully understand how they did it, but it was in large part due to the stellar play by Brian Gutierrez and Chris Brady. Next up for the Chicago Fire, another difficult road trip-this time to a resurgent Sporting Kansas City. Tune in for what our host thinks will change the game for the Fire Nick also discusses the problem with Apple TV and MLS broadcasters and addresses the latest Fire coaching rumors. Let us know what you think via social media, and enjoy the next match. Let's go, Fire!

Qool DJ Marv Live at Soho House Manhattan - June 13 2023 - Satisfaction - - - https://www.youtube.com/@qooldjmarv/https://linktr.ee/qooldjmarv + https://sohohouseny.com/ + https://qooldjmarv.bandcamp.com/album/notes-from-the-booth-season-one-instrumentals +https://qooldjmarv.bandcamp.com/album/new-age-music-vol-4

On today's edition of the podcast Eric is joined Mary Clarkson to discuss some of the latest headlines from the Houston restaurant and bar scene. The pair discuss Chef Benchawan Jabthong Painter taking home the James Beard Award for Best Chef: Texas, Bun B opening the first brick-and-mortar location for Trill Burgers, and the trio of French culinary industry professionals who are opening a Fre... wait... they're not opening a French restaurant? In the Restaurants of the Week section Albi and The Chelsea are featured. In the Guest of the Week portion Andrew Geisel of Citizens of Montrose joins the show. Andrew speaks with Eric about his career, what's led him up to this point, how the relationship with his other co-owners started, how that relationship has grown over time, how he would describe the concept of what they're doing with Australian Cafes, the idea behind their menu, expanding their brand outside of New York City, why Houston was the right choice for their next city, how they've been received so far, what's next for Citizens and more!  Follow Eric on Instagram and Twitter, plus check out some of his latest articles at Culturemap.com: Talented Houstonian Wins James Beard Award for Best Chef: Texas Bun B Opens First Brick-and-Mortar Location of Wildly Popular Trill Burgers in Montrose Veteran Houston French Chefs Are Not Opening a French Restaurant in River Oaks 2 Top Houston Eateries Reserve Spots on Robb Report's Prestigious Best New Restaurants List Where to Eat in Houston: Father's Day Feasts and Specials from Korean BBQ, 'Manmosa' Brunches, and More Houston's Masterchef Champ Christine Ha Opens New Spring Branch Restaurant Devoted to Her Favorite Sandwiches

DJ Jazzywhut!! CONNECTS  https://www.instagram.com/dj_jazzywhut/ DONATE TO DJ JAZZYWHUT PAY PAL @jazford72@gmail.com ZIZ's MUSIC - https://zizmusicyall.bandcamp.com/ 4DADJS RADIO MERCH - ⁠⁠http://corprewcrafts.com/shop/ols/products/4dadjsradiocom-tshirt-by-ziz?fbclid=PAAaY9PP0JJADF_69usysWK05ts0EI0Xk-vNaTxYOypn01EEVcifhBu51K-_s⁠⁠⁠ Ziz Connects https://youtube.com/c/Zizyall ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.4dadjsradio.com ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://instagram.com/4dadjs_radio/ https://www.instagram.com/ziz_yall/ https://linktr.ee/Ziz134 DONATE TO THE SHOW ON CASH APP - $Letschopitupwziz ****You have a small or large business and would like to sponsor the show, contact us through this email- tapinradiowziz@gmail.com**** Playlists- Lord Realm x Sankofa x DJ Jazzywhut!! - T.E.U.S Anthem 2023 Memphis Reigns x Remshot - Kia Ora Ma Peoplez Aka The Eaze Up Show Theme Memphis Reigns, The - Boombox (Prod. Remshot) Justo The MC, DK & Uncle Fester Ft. Ghettosocks - Inner Peace Odd Holiday - Varsity Team Amadeus360 Ft. Keith Murray & Billie Splyff - Don't Do That Mookdatruth Ft. Brogawd & Yearofjordn - Dirty Bodegas Itz Ayo Bigz x Fazeonerok - Time Out (Prod. Nar) Goya Gumbani Ft. The Hotel & Lord Apex - Bye Bye Bye J Scienide Ft. Damu The Fudgemunk - You're A Sitting Duck Thrust OG x BoFaat - Inspired By The Greats Slik Jack - Never Satisfied (Prod. ThisIsHipHopp) Matt Maddox Ft. Tone Spliff - Free Reign (Prod. Nokohai Productions) Jay Worthy x Roc Marciano - Wake Up Certain.Ones - Disoriented (Prod. Wann Sklobi) Len-Dor - Minds of the Youth LuGhz x Masta Congo Ft. Lo Gun - F The B.S. Jay Cartesian Ft. Co-City - Resort Sam Be Yourself Ft. Ronnie Alpha & Nathan Hui-Yi - Die With A Buzz Bru Lei x Headnodic - Youngins Bub Styles x Retrospec Ft. Plaza, Fre$co Van Gogh & Al Bundles - Lemon Biscuits Killy Shoot - Maintain (Prod. by Chuck Chan) Sach - Meaning Of Life Anyone? Propaganda Ft. Derek Minor, Theory Hazit & Krum - Some Mud Mud (Beat Flip) Smokeintheeye - Live Many Times (Prod. Pagez) Mestizo - Show Of Hands Oakland Gmos - Shame Kennedy White Ft. Guilty Simpson & BlaQ Chidori - Watch 'Em General Backpain X ECTO-84 - Bifurcate Dj E.Rex, Chris Rivers, Lega-C & Mikey D - The Conqueror DJ R Dub L Ft. RePete23, Blaq Poet, Sayzee, Pacewon, Ruste Juxx, Young Humpty - Deathwish P.Dap Ent Ft. Killz Tha Beast, Buttaraspy, BJM the Rapper & BJM Beats - Stop Play'n Rasheed Chappell - Show You How (Prod. Little Vic) Eff Yoo x Level 13 - Drogas (Blocktober Remix) The F.O.G. Ft. Dynas - The Whole Leaf Mogly x Shottie - Top 3 & Not 3 JustMe & Cas Metah Ft. Aceyalone, Mouf Warren & Blast Mega - Kung Fu Movie Villain ilajide - Live From Jump Aaqil Ali X Shogun Wiz - Weed Clouds Joe Sig & Im'peretiv Ft. Josiah The Gift - Mufasa Approach - Again --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/4dadjsradio/message

In today's show, we are discussing some great dividend growth stocks from Sweden. Actually, there were enough Swedish dividend stocks to choose from and it shows that the Nordics produce very stable businesses. So, in today's show, we discussed the following topics: Johnson & Johnson's talc powder settlement and our thoughts about it 2 dividend hikes from $STZ and $FDX 7 Sweden dividend growth stocks: $AAK.ST, $ASSA-B.ST, $SWEC-B.ST, $WIHL.ST, $VIT-B.ST, $ABB.ST, $EVO.ST Your listener questions and some of the following stocks were mentioned: $ATCO.ST, $LOOMIS.ST, $AXFO.ST, $HPOL-B.ST, $FRE.DE, $CIBUS.ST, $JM.ST We hope you enjoyed today's show and feel free to join the discussion in the Dividend Talk Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/dividendtalk

This week Elsie is sharing the vision she has for her new home. She's breaking it down and sharing all her mood boards, plans, and current projects with you.  Elsie is also sharing an embarrassing story because she knows you all love it when she looks like a clown.  Visit the shownotes at abeautifulmess.com/podcast and write in to us at podcast@abeautifulmess.com or leave us a voicemail at 417-893-0011.   Thank you to this week's sponsor: Get 10% off during your first 3 months at ritual.com/abeautifulmess Save 40% off unlimited access to Calm's entire library at calm.com/abeautifulmess Receive a FRE sample pack at drinklmnt.com/abeautifulmess Get 30% off anything and everything at mykitsch.com/mess  

Today is a Rapid Response Friday, and Liz and Andrew break down all the developments with the two grand juries convened by Jack Smith to investigate Donald Trump's various crimes. Oh, and we also analyze the released portions of the Fulton County grand jury report which reveals a bit more than you might think! We've also learned that a bunch of Trump lawyers have been subpoenaed to testify or otherwise the subject of grand jury questions, and you may be wondering how that's possible, and we walk you through when privilege is.. not privilege! Notes Unredacted portions of Fulton County SPGJ Report https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23683158/2022-ex-000024-ex-parte-order-of-the-judge-5.pdf FRE 501 https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_501 Bobb says she's not a lawyer in documents case https://www.salon.com/2022/10/03/attorney-lawyers-up--and-says-shes-willing-to-cooperate-with-doj-in-mar-a-lago-case-report/  NYT Epshteyn story https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/14/us/politics/trump-lawyer-classified-documents-investigation.html -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law -Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos! -Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs -Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!