Podcasts about Pardee

In this episode of the Commune Podcast, Jeff Krasno welcomes back Dr. Mary Pardee to take a hard look at one of the most polarizing debates in nutrition: seed oils. Are they the villains behind inflammation and heart disease—or have we been misled by oversimplified health claims? Dr. Pardee breaks down what the data actually show, from omega-6 fatty acids and inflammation to the real story behind trans fats and oil processing. She and Jeff also discuss the pitfalls of viral nutrition trends, how to interpret studies without getting lost in headlines, and why critical thinking is essential in an age of health misinformation. This show is supported by: LMNT: Get a free sample pack with any purchase at DrinkLMNT.com/COMMUNE Tia: Join Tia today at AskTia.com and enter promo code COMMUNE25 and get the first 3  months of your annual membership FREE. Mimio: Get 25% off with code COMMUNE25 at Mimiohealth.com Vivobarefoot: Go to Vivobarefoot.com/commune where you'll receive 25% off Igniton: Visit igniton.com and use code Commune75 for $75 off your order of two bottles or more.

Send us a textExercise is not just about looking good. It is medicine.Dr. Mary Pardee is back with us to talk about why movement is one of the most powerful and most overlooked prescriptions we have. We get into muscle as “money in the bank” for aging, how to think about strength training if you hate weights, and why consistency beats motivation every single time.Speaking about resilience and muscle, Dr. Pardee put it this way: “Yeah, it's like a retirement account, right? Where you have something to fall back on if times get tough.”We also cover sarcopenia, brain health, mitochondria, and the kind of “dose” of exercise that really changes your future. This one is packed with practical stuff you can use today.Find Dr. Mary here: Instagram: @dr.marypardee Website: modrnmed.com

⚡️The House of Rags Returns to Curmudgeon's Corner | Episode 57⚡️ They're back — and this time, it's personal... again. Join us for a thunderous reunion on Curmudgeon's Corner Ep. 57 as we welcome Jamie Pardee and Eddie Colon, the unstoppable forces behind The House of Rags (THOR). These two detailing legends have been on the show before — individually, together, and everywhere in between — but this time? We're pulling no punches and diving deep into the latest madness from the rag gods themselves.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Good Friday 2025

Hebrews

Hebrews

Hebrews

Hebrews

Hebrews

In this episode, we start off with a 5 second box breath, then dive into a beautiful conversation with Quentin Pardee Collins, an actor, stuntman, musician, father, surfer and fellow Heavy Hitter. So many skills and we dive into it all. Tune in to hear Quentins story and make sure to check out his music and socials to see all the epic things he's up to.Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/7jqtX8BwfzksAooooPNGum?si=WZlk2WbxTF2sdWhNLa0s8gIG: @quentinpcollinsOne love.

Last fall, Hurricane Helene devastated the western Appalachian region of North Carolina. Jay Kirby, the CEO of UNC Health Pardee, joins us on the podcast this week to discuss how the hospital responded to the challenges and influx of need created by the natural disaster. We explore stories of resilience, hope, and recovery in the face of adversity. Tune in to hear firsthand how healthcare providers stepped up during one of the region's most difficult times.

Hebrews

In this episode, Jim Garrity talks about a tactic of some examining lawyers that should, but often doesn't, draw objections that their questions are “argumentative.” So, what is an improper, argumentative question or examination? Here, we're not talking about the questioner's tone or demeanor, i.e., arguing in the classic sense of yelling and bickering with the deponent. We're talking about questions where lawyers aren't really asking a question designed to elicit facts but are instead injecting their own commentary or viewpoint, or injecting insults, taunts, wisecracks, or similar language. "Argumentative" objections are objections to the form, and must be timely made or are waived.SHOW NOTESPeople v. Pawar, No. G037097, 2007 WL 477949, at *2 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2007) (“[W]ere they lying” queries are improper if they are merely argumentative. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at pp. 381, 384.) In Chatman, the prosecutor asked the defendant how the safe at a store was opened. (Id. at p. 379.) The defendant replied “he could not say; he never touched the safe,” eliciting the prosecutor's query, “ ‘Well, is the safe lying about you?' “ (Ibid.) The Supreme Court held the question of whether an inanimate object was “lying” was argumentative , defining argumentative inquiry as “speech to the jury masquerading as a question” which “does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Id. at p. 384.))Faile v. Zarich, No. HHDX04CV5015994S, 2008 WL 2967045, at *3 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 10, 2008) (Webster's. . . in the closest relevant definition, defines “argumentative” as “consisting of or characterized by argument: containing a process of reasoning: controversial”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) (Steven Goode, et al., Texas Practice Series: Courtroom Handbook on Texas Evidence § 611 cmt. 12 (2012); see United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir.N.Y.2005) (defining argumentative as “summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence”); accord Eddlemon v. State, 591 S.W.2d 847, 851 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1979) (trial court did not abuse discretion in finding the question, “You don't believe your own offense report?” argumentative). In other words, an argumentative objection concerns whether counsel is attempting to “argue” the case, not whether the counsel is “arguing” with the witness”)United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir. 2005) (“During the presentation of evidence one of the most commonly sustained objections is that a particular question is argumentative, Fed.R.Evid. 611(a) advisory committee's note to Subdivision (a) to 1972 Proposed Rules, and any summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence are improper and subject as a routine matter to being stricken, Mauet & Wolfson, supra, at 30”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) ("Many common law objections—including the objection of “argumentative”—are incorporated in the Texas Rules of Evidence. The common law argumentative objection is now governed by Tex.R. Evid. 611 which concerns the mode of interrogation and presentation. The argumentative objection is an objection commonly used, but not commonly understood. Pardee argues the objection should have been sustained because the State was “arguing” with the defendant. Argumentative, though, does not concern counsel's demeanor or tone. Professors Wellborn, Goode, and Sharlot explain the argumentative objection as follows: Counsel may not, in the guise of asking a question, make a jury argument or attempt to summarize, draw inferences from, or comment on the evidence. In addition, questions that ask a witness to testify as to his own credibility are improper.")People v. Chatman, 38 Cal. 4th 344, 384, 133 P.3d 534, 563 (2006) The prosecutor's question about whether the safe was “lying” requires a different analysis. The question was argumentative. An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable. The prosecutor's question whether “the safe [was] lying” is an example. An inanimate object cannot “lie.” Professor Wigmore has called cross-examination the “greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” (5 Wigmore on Evidence (Chadbourne rev. ed.1974) § 1367, p. 32.) The engine should be allowed to run, but it cannot be allowed to run amok. An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all. Defendant had already explained he had no explanation for the safe being open. Asking whether the safe was “lying” could add nothing to this testimony”)People v. Imbach, No. E040190, 2008 WL 510482, at *7–8 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2008) ("The prosecutor asked, “You found that to be inappropriate but not your other son's addiction to child pornography?” When defendant objected that the question was argumentative, the trial court overruled that objection. Defendant asserted the second “argumentative” objection when defendant's mother said she did not know how to answer that question and the prosecutor asked, “Is that because you didn't want to know?” The trial court sustained the defendant's objection to this second question. Both questions are argumentative, because they both are speeches by the prosecutor masquerading as questions. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at p. 384.) The trial court should have sustained both objections. However, we cannot say that by asking those two questions the prosecutor engaged in misconduct.")People v. Peoples, 62 Cal. 4th 718, 793–94, 365 P.3d 230, 288 (2016) (“Defendant observes that the prosecutor asked numerous argumentative questions when cross-examining defense witnesses. To list a few examples, the prosecutor asked defense expert Dr. Lisak, “how many hours are you into them for?” He said to defense expert Dr. Buchsbaum, “Let's quit guessing for awhile and look at the facts.” He said to defense expert Dr. Wu, “It's a pain in the butt to get these test scores.” And he asked prosecution expert Dr. Mayberg, “Did you have a heart attack last night when you looked at the raw data?”)People v. Burns, No. D081051, 2024 WL 2144151, at *15–17 (Cal. Ct. App. May 14, 2024), review denied (July 17, 2024) (excessive repetition of a question simply to make a point can cross line into improper argument”; “Burns makes a strong argument that the prosecutor's repetitive questioning regarding the drunk tank incident became argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.” (People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384.) “An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Ibid.) Instead, it may be aimed at agitating or belittling the witness (People v. Lund (2021) 64 Cal.App.5th 1119, 1148), or designed to engage the witness in an argument (People v. Johnson (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1230, 1236)”)People v. Mazen, No. B300193, 2021 WL 164356, at *5 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2021) The court overruled defendant's argumentative objection to the following question: “Would [accidentally placing the car in neutral] been important information to tell [Morales]?” The court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled the objection. The question sought to elicit relevant testimony regarding defendant's theory that Mario was hit by accident (CALCRIM No. 510). (See People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384 [“[a]n argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question” and does not seek to elicit relevant testimony].)”People v. Singh, No. H042511, 2018 WL 1046260, at *28 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2018) (“Each question anticipated an answer and was answerable; none was “a speech to the jury masquerading as a question”)People v. Basler, No. D068047, 2015 WL 9437926, at *23 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2015) ("Fung appears to identify three categories of objectionable questioning during his cross-examination by the prosecutor. The first category involves apparent sarcasm by the prosecutor. For example, after Fung provided additional details about his fight with another inmate while incarcerated, the prosecutor said, “Okay. You left that part out a couple of minutes ago; right?” Referencing the same fight, the prosecutor made light of Fung's claim of self-defense: “Did you have to defend yourself against him, too?” As another example, when Fung was discussing the extent of his injuries following the fight, the prosecutor said, “So, that's about how badly you were hurt? It looked like something you get by falling off a skateboard?” The court sustained objections to each of these questions, and a number of others, as argumentative." Also from Basler: "As we have noted, Fung contends the first two categories of questions were impermissibly argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even want an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.... An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (People v. Chatman (2006)”)People v. Nanez, No. F064574, 2014 WL 1928307, at *14–15 (Cal. Ct. App. May 15, 2014) (citing examples of argumentative examination by prosecutor including (a) the prosecutor's remark “Convenient” when a witness said they did not remember a particular fact, and (b) when prosecutor commented on witnesses testimony by saying “So that's the lie you're going with?”, and (c) when prosecutor asked witness “You wouldn't tell us if you're lying, of course, right?” and when witness said he would, prosecutor replied “There's another lie,” causing court to strike prosecutor's comment from the record)People v. Strebe, No. D057947, 2011 WL 2555653, at *7 (Cal. Ct. App. June 28, 2011) (trial courses sustained objection to question as argumentative where prosecutor asked witness “Do you remember anything about that evening that might be detrimental to your case?” In essence arguing to jury that witness was lying and only selectively remembered favorable facts)People v. Higgins, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 856, 873–74 (Ct. App. 2011), as modified (Jan. 21, 2011), as modified on denial of reh'g (Feb. 4, 2011) (guilty verdict reversed in part due to argumentative questions; among other jabs; in case where defendant explained his conduct as motived by depression due to death of his daughter's friend, prosecutor asked, “You'd agree with me that it's pretty pathetic if you're using the memory of a dead 17–year–old kid as an excuse in this trial, wouldn't you? Would you agree with me? Is that the legacy that you want [the dead teen] to have?”; other examples of prosecutor's argumentative questions included “Oh, the door was unlocked,” and “Isn't that convenient that all of a sudden, right after you've committed the crimes, that that's when you come to?”; further held, “The rule is well established that the prosecuting attorney may not interrogate witnesses solely ‘for the purpose of getting before the jury the facts inferred therein, together with the insinuations and suggestions they inevitably contained, rather than for the answers”)People v. Dixon, No. D047342, 2007 WL 2745207, at *10 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2007)  Dixon asked Hernandez who had taken the photographs near the time of the injury. Hernandez testified that the audio-visual person at his school had taken photographs of his injury. Dixon then asked, “Is it computer enhancement? Those could be computer enhanced-.” The prosecutor interrupted, “That's argumentative.” The court sustained the prosecutor's objection")United States v. Browne, No. SACR 16-00139-CJC, 2017 WL 1496912, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2017) (For each witness, the Court did not end Defense counsel's cross-examination until it became excessively cumulative and argumentative, at which time the Court was well within its authority to restrain the questioning pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a).”)Beving v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 3:18-CV-00040, 2020 WL 6051598, at *12 (S.D. Iowa Sept. 8, 2020) (Defendant may object to prejudicial or argumentative references to counsel at trial as permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence. See Fed. Rs. Evid. 403, 611(a)(3).)FRE 403: Argumentative questions may be viewed as unfairly prejudicial, misleading, or wasting time.FRE 611(a)(3), Witnesses and Presenting Evidence ((a) Control by the Court; Purposes. The court should exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: (1) make those procedures effective for determining the truth; (2) avoid wasting time; and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.FRCP 30, Depositions, (d) Duration; Sanction; Motion to Terminate or Limit. (3) Motion to Terminate or Limit, (A) Grounds. At any time during a deposition, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the ground that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party. 

Christmas Eve service.

Our Family

Our Family

When healing becomes an endless to-do list, something's wrong. Dr. Mary Pardee learned this the hard way. Trapped in a maze of treatments for her chronic gut issues, she discovered that the path to health isn't about doing more - it's about doing less. In this conversation, Dr. Pardee shatters common myths about integrative medicine. Forget endless supplement protocols. Question over testing. Stop chasing every new wellness trend. We dive deep into the gut-brain connection, exploring how emotional patterns can lock us into chronic illness - and how breaking these patterns can unlock healing.  Dr. Pardee shares the exact strategies that transformed both her health and the lives of thousands of her patients. Think social media "health experts" are making you healthier? Think again.  We expose how the democratization of health information is both empowering patients and drowning them in confusion. This isn't just another conversation about functional medicine - it's a roadmap to simpler, more effective healing.  Whether you're struggling with chronic health issues or simply questioning conventional approaches to wellness, prepare to rethink everything you thought you knew about getting better. Ready to transform your approach to health? Join us for an eye-opening discussion that will change how you think about healing - and show you why sometimes, less really is more. The Medical Disruptor Live is a show broadcasted live by Dr. Efrat Lamandre every week with the express purpose of providing free, factual, and practical functional medicine tips to help people prevent disease naturally. Through giving healthy nutrition tips, tips on intermittent fasting, managing stress through diet, and advocating self improvement for her patients, Doctor E hopes to help you take control of your health destiny and become the GameChanger in your life. Schedule a Consult today at drefratlamandre.com/consultation Check us out on social media: drefratlamandre.com/instagram drefratlamandre.com/facebook drefratlamandre.com/tiktok 00:00:00 - Introduction to Functional Medicine 00:03:00 - The Importance of Addressing Root Causes 00:06:00 - Integrative Approaches to Chronic Illness 00:09:00 - Breaking the Chronic Illness Feedback Loop 00:12:00 - The Role of Gut Health and the Microbiome 00:15:00 - Challenges in Functional Medicine 00:18:00 - Debunking Myths About Alternative Treatments 00:21:00 - Influence of Social Media on Healthcare Perspectives 00:24:00 - Simplicity in Health Routines 00:27:00 - Practical Advice for Better Sleep 00:30:00 - Diet Simplification and Common Pitfalls 00:33:00 - Revolutionizing Healthcare Communication 00:36:00 - Why Context Matters in Functional Medicine 00:39:00 - Empowering Patients Through Knowledge 00:42:00 - Final Reflections and Closing Thoughts

We...Responding to Political Reality

We...Responding to Political Reality

On this week's episode of Inside the Headset, we sit down with Payton Pardee, the Special Teams Coordinator for the San Antonio Brahmas. In this conversation, Coach Pardee discusses landing his first coaching job, learning how to recruit and manage rosters, and the uniqueness of his experience coaching in the UFL. Coach Pardee is preparing for his second season with the Brahmas after a 7-3 season this past spring.   Follow Coach Pardee and the San Antonio Brahmas on social media here:  @CoachPardee & @XFLBrahmas  Show Notes:   1:05 Following in your grandfather's footsteps, landing your first coaching job, and navigating the transition from a player to a coach.  22:42 Building a network to help you as a young coach, learning to recruit amid change, and managing rosters at the college and the professional level.  42:01 Prioritizing player development in the UFL, navigating the XFL/UFL merger and job transition, and how you have grown in the profession.  

Ever wondered how ancient wisdom can seamlessly blend with modern healing to create a balanced life?   In this episode of Rooted in Wellness, I'm joined by Dr. Mary Pardee who blends ancient wisdom with modern healing practices to transform your gut health for overall well-being.   Dr. Pardee dives into the underlying reasons for poor gut health and how grounding meditation, mindfulness and community can be crucial in the healing process – as well as the importance of understanding the gut-brain axis and microbiome connection and how stress and environment impact your gut health.   We also discuss the practical tips on optimizing gut health through nutrition and how to Integrate Western and Eastern medicine for a holistic approach to healthcare.   Dr. Mary Pardee is a Functional Medicine doctor who specializes in gut-brain health. Her number one priority is to be a doctor who listens, is empathetic, and finds the root cause. She's also the founder of Modern Med clinic here in LA, has a Doctorate in Naturopathic Medicine, is a Functional Medicine Certified Practitioner, and has a Bachelor of Science in Human Nutrition.  We also discuss..   (12:35) Healing Journey (19:36) The Mind-Body Connection in Healthcare (28:14) The Gut-Brain Connection in Health (40:52) The Gut-Brain Connection (50:47) Environment, Nutrition, & Gut Health (58:12) Wellness Supplements (01:02:16) Returning to Ancient Healing Rituals (01:08:47) Empowerment Through Understanding Epigenetics (01:19:21) Optimizing Gut Health Through Nutrition (01:22:51) Holistic Approach to Western Medicine Thank you to our sponsors: BiOptimizers: Go to bioptimizers.com/mona and use promo code MONA upon checkout to save 10% off your order! To learn more about Mona Sharma: Website: https://www.monasharma.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/monasharma/   To learn more about Dr. Mary Pardee: Website: https://www.modrnmed.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dr.marypardee/ https://www.instagram.com/modrnmed/  

Ever experience constipation or anxiety? Many women can relate… Get ready to dive into the complex connections between the gut-brain axis, mental health, and hormones with returning guest Dr. Mary Pardee, a leading expert in gut health. We debunk myths, highlight the latest research, and provide actionable strategies to nurture both gut health and mental well-being.In this episode you'll learn: * What to implement today for better gut health* How mental health impacts amenorrhea * What to do if your digestion gives you anxiety* If probiotics are really worth it* How fasting can impact constipation* And more…Dr. Mary Pardee became a Functional Medicine specialist focusing on gut-brain health to fill the void left by her own journey, longing for a doctor who would truly listen, empathize and uncover the root causes of her health challenges. From childhood through early adulthood, she battled chronic stomach issues including constipation, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), and reflux. Traditional medical treatments provided temporary relief through medications, but failed to address the underlying issues. Driven by her own struggles, Dr. Pardee returned to school with a mission to heal herself and others. Today, she is grateful to have overcome gastrointestinal symptoms and regained her quality of life, no longer constrained by dietary restrictions. Her focus has since shifted to longevity and preventative medicine, where she helps individuals extend both their lifespan and health span.This episode is brought to you by Beeya:* If you or anyone you know have been struggling with hormonal imbalances and bad periods, go to https://beeyawellness.com/free to download the free guide to tackling hormonal imbalances and to learn more about Beeya's seed cycling bundle.* Plus, get $10 off your order by using promo code BEHINDHEREMPIRE10Follow Yasmin:* Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/yasminknouri/* Website: https://www.behindherempire.com/Follow Dr. Mary:* Website: https://www.modrnmed.com/* Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dr.marypardee/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In today's episode, Dr. Pardee and I discuss all things related to blood work and the importance of various tests for our overall health. Dr. Pardee emphasizes the significance of blood work as a window into our body's internal health. While external symptoms may be noticeable, blood work can reveal underlying issues that may not have any visible signs. Tests like the Comprehensive Metabolic Panel and Lipid Panel are crucial in detecting early signs of diseases like heart disease and diabetes. She then sheds some light on homocysteine. Homocysteine levels can provide valuable insights into our body's methylation cycle and potential deficiencies in essential vitamins and cofactors. Elevated homocysteine levels have been associated with increased risks of cardiovascular diseases and cognitive impairment. Testing homocysteine and addressing any imbalances can help reduce these risks. If you've ever been curious about what your blood work results mean or why certain tests are important, this episode is a must-listen! Dr. Pardee's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dr.marypardee/?hl=en Modrn Med Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/modrnmed/ Dr. Pardee's Website: https://www.modrnmed.com/ For 30% off at Truly Free Use Code JUSTINGREDIENTS at https://trulyfreehome.com/ Want more Just Ingredients content: https://www.instagram.com/stories/just.ingredients/3277567597818090802/ https://www.instagram.com/just.ingredients.podcast/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/2433401933539581/ Find our non-toxic product line here: https://justingredients.us/