Podcasts about see people

In this episode of Reasons to Behold Podcast, Arnold and Tolu explore principles from Business Secrets from the Bible by Rabbi Daniel Lapin, emphasizing service to "God's other children" as a foundation for business, work, and life. This thought-provoking discussion challenges perspectives on value, ethical entrepreneurship, and even the concept of retirement. Key Themes Bounce Back Culture & Repentance – Tolu's experience of returning to unfinished learning as an example of biblical resilience. Wealth Through Service – The core idea that true success comes from serving others effectively. Value in Business – Examining whether modern enterprises (e.g., OnlyFans, fast food) genuinely provide lasting value. Ethical Entrepreneurship – Navigating profit-making while remaining aligned with biblical values. Retirement as a Man-Made Concept – Challenging the notion that work is something to escape, rather than a lifelong calling. Building Bulletproof Value – Becoming indispensable by consistently delivering meaningful contributions. Love Through Service – How serving others deepens relationships and transforms perspectives. Colossians 3 Mindset – Viewing work as service to God, even in unjust conditions. Personal Boundaries & Serving Well – Evaluating how self-imposed limitations might affect our ability to truly serve. Key Takeaways True Wealth Comes From Serving Others – Success is measured by the impact we have, not just financial gain. Bounce Back is Biblical – Quickly returning to purpose and learning reflects a godly mindset. Redefining Value – Not all profitable ventures align with lasting goodness. Work is God's Plan – Retirement is a cultural idea, whereas scripture supports lifelong service. Loving Through Serving – The more you give, the more love grows for those you serve. Action Steps Examine Your Work Ethic – Are you working as unto the Lord? Assess the Value You're Providing – Does your work contribute positively beyond profit? Challenge Your Boundaries – Reflect on whether your limitations hinder service. See People as God's Children – Approach interactions with a heart of service. Rethink Retirement – Consider long-term meaningful contribution over disengagement. Engage With RTB For updates, devotionals, and deeper discussions, join the Reasons to Behold community:

Thanks for joining us! We'd love to give you more information about who we are and how to get plugged in here at Hillside. Fill this page out on our website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://hmcworship.com/im-new/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow along in the YouVersion Bible App: http://bible.com/events/49391117Find the online bulletin and sermon notes:⁠ https://hmcworship.com/app/uploads/2_16_25-Bulletin.docx.pdf

In this episode, Jim Garrity talks about a tactic of some examining lawyers that should, but often doesn't, draw objections that their questions are “argumentative.” So, what is an improper, argumentative question or examination? Here, we're not talking about the questioner's tone or demeanor, i.e., arguing in the classic sense of yelling and bickering with the deponent. We're talking about questions where lawyers aren't really asking a question designed to elicit facts but are instead injecting their own commentary or viewpoint, or injecting insults, taunts, wisecracks, or similar language. "Argumentative" objections are objections to the form, and must be timely made or are waived.SHOW NOTESPeople v. Pawar, No. G037097, 2007 WL 477949, at *2 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2007) (“[W]ere they lying” queries are improper if they are merely argumentative. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at pp. 381, 384.) In Chatman, the prosecutor asked the defendant how the safe at a store was opened. (Id. at p. 379.) The defendant replied “he could not say; he never touched the safe,” eliciting the prosecutor's query, “ ‘Well, is the safe lying about you?' “ (Ibid.) The Supreme Court held the question of whether an inanimate object was “lying” was argumentative , defining argumentative inquiry as “speech to the jury masquerading as a question” which “does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Id. at p. 384.))Faile v. Zarich, No. HHDX04CV5015994S, 2008 WL 2967045, at *3 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 10, 2008) (Webster's. . . in the closest relevant definition, defines “argumentative” as “consisting of or characterized by argument: containing a process of reasoning: controversial”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) (Steven Goode, et al., Texas Practice Series: Courtroom Handbook on Texas Evidence § 611 cmt. 12 (2012); see United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir.N.Y.2005) (defining argumentative as “summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence”); accord Eddlemon v. State, 591 S.W.2d 847, 851 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1979) (trial court did not abuse discretion in finding the question, “You don't believe your own offense report?” argumentative). In other words, an argumentative objection concerns whether counsel is attempting to “argue” the case, not whether the counsel is “arguing” with the witness”)United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir. 2005) (“During the presentation of evidence one of the most commonly sustained objections is that a particular question is argumentative, Fed.R.Evid. 611(a) advisory committee's note to Subdivision (a) to 1972 Proposed Rules, and any summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence are improper and subject as a routine matter to being stricken, Mauet & Wolfson, supra, at 30”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) ("Many common law objections—including the objection of “argumentative”—are incorporated in the Texas Rules of Evidence. The common law argumentative objection is now governed by Tex.R. Evid. 611 which concerns the mode of interrogation and presentation. The argumentative objection is an objection commonly used, but not commonly understood. Pardee argues the objection should have been sustained because the State was “arguing” with the defendant. Argumentative, though, does not concern counsel's demeanor or tone. Professors Wellborn, Goode, and Sharlot explain the argumentative objection as follows: Counsel may not, in the guise of asking a question, make a jury argument or attempt to summarize, draw inferences from, or comment on the evidence. In addition, questions that ask a witness to testify as to his own credibility are improper.")People v. Chatman, 38 Cal. 4th 344, 384, 133 P.3d 534, 563 (2006) The prosecutor's question about whether the safe was “lying” requires a different analysis. The question was argumentative. An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable. The prosecutor's question whether “the safe [was] lying” is an example. An inanimate object cannot “lie.” Professor Wigmore has called cross-examination the “greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” (5 Wigmore on Evidence (Chadbourne rev. ed.1974) § 1367, p. 32.) The engine should be allowed to run, but it cannot be allowed to run amok. An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all. Defendant had already explained he had no explanation for the safe being open. Asking whether the safe was “lying” could add nothing to this testimony”)People v. Imbach, No. E040190, 2008 WL 510482, at *7–8 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2008) ("The prosecutor asked, “You found that to be inappropriate but not your other son's addiction to child pornography?” When defendant objected that the question was argumentative, the trial court overruled that objection. Defendant asserted the second “argumentative” objection when defendant's mother said she did not know how to answer that question and the prosecutor asked, “Is that because you didn't want to know?” The trial court sustained the defendant's objection to this second question. Both questions are argumentative, because they both are speeches by the prosecutor masquerading as questions. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at p. 384.) The trial court should have sustained both objections. However, we cannot say that by asking those two questions the prosecutor engaged in misconduct.")People v. Peoples, 62 Cal. 4th 718, 793–94, 365 P.3d 230, 288 (2016) (“Defendant observes that the prosecutor asked numerous argumentative questions when cross-examining defense witnesses. To list a few examples, the prosecutor asked defense expert Dr. Lisak, “how many hours are you into them for?” He said to defense expert Dr. Buchsbaum, “Let's quit guessing for awhile and look at the facts.” He said to defense expert Dr. Wu, “It's a pain in the butt to get these test scores.” And he asked prosecution expert Dr. Mayberg, “Did you have a heart attack last night when you looked at the raw data?”)People v. Burns, No. D081051, 2024 WL 2144151, at *15–17 (Cal. Ct. App. May 14, 2024), review denied (July 17, 2024) (excessive repetition of a question simply to make a point can cross line into improper argument”; “Burns makes a strong argument that the prosecutor's repetitive questioning regarding the drunk tank incident became argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.” (People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384.) “An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Ibid.) Instead, it may be aimed at agitating or belittling the witness (People v. Lund (2021) 64 Cal.App.5th 1119, 1148), or designed to engage the witness in an argument (People v. Johnson (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1230, 1236)”)People v. Mazen, No. B300193, 2021 WL 164356, at *5 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2021) The court overruled defendant's argumentative objection to the following question: “Would [accidentally placing the car in neutral] been important information to tell [Morales]?” The court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled the objection. The question sought to elicit relevant testimony regarding defendant's theory that Mario was hit by accident (CALCRIM No. 510). (See People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384 [“[a]n argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question” and does not seek to elicit relevant testimony].)”People v. Singh, No. H042511, 2018 WL 1046260, at *28 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2018) (“Each question anticipated an answer and was answerable; none was “a speech to the jury masquerading as a question”)People v. Basler, No. D068047, 2015 WL 9437926, at *23 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2015) ("Fung appears to identify three categories of objectionable questioning during his cross-examination by the prosecutor. The first category involves apparent sarcasm by the prosecutor. For example, after Fung provided additional details about his fight with another inmate while incarcerated, the prosecutor said, “Okay. You left that part out a couple of minutes ago; right?” Referencing the same fight, the prosecutor made light of Fung's claim of self-defense: “Did you have to defend yourself against him, too?” As another example, when Fung was discussing the extent of his injuries following the fight, the prosecutor said, “So, that's about how badly you were hurt? It looked like something you get by falling off a skateboard?” The court sustained objections to each of these questions, and a number of others, as argumentative." Also from Basler: "As we have noted, Fung contends the first two categories of questions were impermissibly argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even want an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.... An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (People v. Chatman (2006)”)People v. Nanez, No. F064574, 2014 WL 1928307, at *14–15 (Cal. Ct. App. May 15, 2014) (citing examples of argumentative examination by prosecutor including (a) the prosecutor's remark “Convenient” when a witness said they did not remember a particular fact, and (b) when prosecutor commented on witnesses testimony by saying “So that's the lie you're going with?”, and (c) when prosecutor asked witness “You wouldn't tell us if you're lying, of course, right?” and when witness said he would, prosecutor replied “There's another lie,” causing court to strike prosecutor's comment from the record)People v. Strebe, No. D057947, 2011 WL 2555653, at *7 (Cal. Ct. App. June 28, 2011) (trial courses sustained objection to question as argumentative where prosecutor asked witness “Do you remember anything about that evening that might be detrimental to your case?” In essence arguing to jury that witness was lying and only selectively remembered favorable facts)People v. Higgins, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 856, 873–74 (Ct. App. 2011), as modified (Jan. 21, 2011), as modified on denial of reh'g (Feb. 4, 2011) (guilty verdict reversed in part due to argumentative questions; among other jabs; in case where defendant explained his conduct as motived by depression due to death of his daughter's friend, prosecutor asked, “You'd agree with me that it's pretty pathetic if you're using the memory of a dead 17–year–old kid as an excuse in this trial, wouldn't you? Would you agree with me? Is that the legacy that you want [the dead teen] to have?”; other examples of prosecutor's argumentative questions included “Oh, the door was unlocked,” and “Isn't that convenient that all of a sudden, right after you've committed the crimes, that that's when you come to?”; further held, “The rule is well established that the prosecuting attorney may not interrogate witnesses solely ‘for the purpose of getting before the jury the facts inferred therein, together with the insinuations and suggestions they inevitably contained, rather than for the answers”)People v. Dixon, No. D047342, 2007 WL 2745207, at *10 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2007)  Dixon asked Hernandez who had taken the photographs near the time of the injury. Hernandez testified that the audio-visual person at his school had taken photographs of his injury. Dixon then asked, “Is it computer enhancement? Those could be computer enhanced-.” The prosecutor interrupted, “That's argumentative.” The court sustained the prosecutor's objection")United States v. Browne, No. SACR 16-00139-CJC, 2017 WL 1496912, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2017) (For each witness, the Court did not end Defense counsel's cross-examination until it became excessively cumulative and argumentative, at which time the Court was well within its authority to restrain the questioning pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a).”)Beving v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 3:18-CV-00040, 2020 WL 6051598, at *12 (S.D. Iowa Sept. 8, 2020) (Defendant may object to prejudicial or argumentative references to counsel at trial as permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence. See Fed. Rs. Evid. 403, 611(a)(3).)FRE 403: Argumentative questions may be viewed as unfairly prejudicial, misleading, or wasting time.FRE 611(a)(3), Witnesses and Presenting Evidence ((a) Control by the Court; Purposes. The court should exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: (1) make those procedures effective for determining the truth; (2) avoid wasting time; and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.FRCP 30, Depositions, (d) Duration; Sanction; Motion to Terminate or Limit. (3) Motion to Terminate or Limit, (A) Grounds. At any time during a deposition, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the ground that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party. 

Conversion comes with a Commission . . . I. Spiritual Blindness- We are Blind but think we See Clearly, until we Encounter Jesus! (1-9) II. Spiritual Sight- God Restores our Sight by His Spirit and His People! (10-19a) III. Spiritual Burden- We can See People the Way Jesus Does! (19b-31) Practical Implications o How can you identify some of your blind spots? o Where/who are you holding back from Speaking? o How are your participating in Every Member on Mission?

Feel like you're doing "all the things" and still not getting better? You're super knowledgable, you listen to tons of podcasts, you do things like intermittent fasting, and you work out and lower your carbs and see sunrise, yet you're STILL struggling. There's nothing wrong with you. You're not broken, but you might be doing THIS THING that is keeping you stuck. If you want to dive deeper with me, enrollment is open for the Winter 2025 Round of Blood Sugar Mastery. Learn more and enroll here! https://www.daniellehamiltonhealth.com/bloodsugarmasteryTODAY'S SPONSORSLeela Quantum Tech: Make sure to check out leelaq.com & use the code DANIHEALTH to get 10%  Oneskin: Check out oneskin.co/danihealth and use code DANIHEALTH for 15% off your order!STAY IN TOUCHThank you for listening to the show!You can find me on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/daniellehamiltonhealth and on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/DanielleHamiltonHealthMy website is https://www.daniellehamiltonhealth.com. Be sure to sign up for my weekly newsletter to get all the best tips, coupon codes, and to be the first to know about my upcoming programs!If you are liking the show, please head to Apple Podcasts or iTunes to leave the show a *5-star rating* & a quick review! It helps the show to grow and lets me know what you're liking!Thank you for subscribing, rating, reviewing, sharing and reposting the show! I appreciate each and every one of you!

"McElroy & Cubelic In The Morning" airs 7am-10am weekdays on WJOX-94.5!!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Have you ever thought you knew someone, only to realize you've been blind to who they truly are?

Message from Kevin Celestin on December 29, 2024

Is there anything worse than blending into the woodwork, not being noticed, not being understood?  It's painful when it happens to you, right? But we can do that same disservice to others. What if we didn't go through our days on autopilot, too busy, or too preoccupied to see the real people all around us? Support the showBe Encouraged podcast is practical, in the moment, quick encouragement.

Do you see people or projects? | Dale Kratzke | 24th November 2024 | Wimborne by New Life Community Church

Do you see people or projects? I Paul Williams I 24th November 2024 I Verwood by New Life Community Church

Do you see people or projects? I Tim Denne I 24th November 2024 I Fordingbridge by New Life Community Church

Should bad parking be punished with fines? A new pilot scheme in south and east Belfast could see people prosecuted for blocking pavements or access for residents, pedestrians or emergency services Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

When you can see someone for who they are and not who you want them to be, you can love them for who they are and not who you want them to be.  In this episode, Sara and Melissa discuss this, having expectations for others, finding our safe people, and everything in between. Resources Referenced: The Starter Membership The Happy Human Membership

* How many states are actually in play in the presidential race? * Congress won't pass a new farm bill, and it's hurting Louisiana farmers

The Holy Spirit empowers us to:1. See PEOPLE the way God sees PEOPLE.2. Move out of our COMFORT ZONES.3. UNDERSTAND the Lord's WILL.

On this weeks episode the team has a lot on their mind to discuss

Invented over 100 years ago by Walter Kilner, Dicyanin Goggles allow the wearer to see people's aura via a special coating on the glass. Used by the U.S Government as an early version of night-vision goggles, after live tests in Vietnam they were banned from use. But does this glass actually allow you to see the astral realm?You can get in touch with Josh and Pirate to tell them YOUR spooky stories at: paranormality.uk@gmail.comShow your support for the show by subscribing to our patreon: www.patreon.com/ParanormalityUKOr join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/ pPUcFxFKGWVisit our online store for all your merch needs... www.paranormalityuk.mymerchr.comYou can also watch the episodes on YouTube! www.youtube.com/channel/UC2b2p_zOHpfZDydnA5QD8sQ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Thank you for joining us as we're beginning a new series called, "How to be Christian During the Election” This week our guest preacher, David Myles, takes us through a sermon titled, "See People, Not Abstractions (Human Dignity).” If you haven't already, click ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠HERE⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to download the Sermon Application Guide to follow along. For more information on how to get connected with Five Oaks Church, visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.fiveoaks.church/connect-me

HAVE A STORY TO SUBMIT? ► https://www.reddit.com/r/mrgrinless/ SHOP MERCH: mrgrinless.com FOLLOW ME ON: ► Instagram - instagram.com/mrgrinless ► Twitter - twitter.com/mrgrinless ►YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@mrgrinless #scarystories #horrorstories #creepypasta #truescarystories #mrgrinless #scary #horror #horrorpodcast

In this episode of the Longevity Lab, hosts Juliet and Mackie explore common nutrition mistakes. They share their own lists of dietary pitfalls and tips for avoiding them. Whether it's eating too little or too much, or mismanaging macros, this discussion offers valuable insights on supporting your nutritional health over time. 00:00 Welcome to the Longevity Lab: Diving into Nutrition Mistakes02:15 Top Nutrition Mistakes: Eating Too Little08:05 The Importance of Tracking and Understanding Portions16:33 Navigating the All or Nothing Approach to Eating20:43 The Pitfalls of Labeling Foods as Good or Bad28:30 Embracing Your Inner Saboteur: A Guide to Self-Acceptance29:12 Expertise in Overcoming Self-Sabotage30:18 The Power of an Open Mindset in Dietary Changes31:46 Challenging Beliefs and Embracing Experimentation38:14 Navigating Nutrition: Common Mistakes and Solutions45:46 The Journey to a Healthier Relationship with Food48:13 Beware of One-Size-Fits-All Nutrition Advice Connect with us: Website: https://ultralife.co/ Instagram: Mackie: https://www.instagram.com/juliet_root Juliet: https://www.instagram.com/mackieroot --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ultralife/message

This episode is part of our, 'Stewarding the Awakening' series, discussing key truths that Christians need to understand in anticipation of the coming moves of God. Today, Bunni is joined by Pastor Shane Idleman of Westside Christian Fellowship in southern California. Shane is a bold pastor who is not afraid to speak to the culture, but he has also developed a culture of prayer and fasting within his church. In this conversation, Bunni and Shane discuss the ways in which Christians can stay in the place of prayer and remain connected to Jesus within a move of God and how we can see people after the Spirit through believing for the best in them. Learn more about Shane and Westside Christian Fellowship: https://westsidechristianfellowship.org Support Christians Engaged's efforts to educate and empower Christians nationwide: https://christiansengaged.org/donate⁠⁠ Conversations with Christians Engaged | Hosted by Bunni Pounds Listen, watch, and subscribe: https://christiansengaged.org/conversations-show Christians Engaged exists to awaken, educate, and empower believers in Jesus Christ to: ▪️ PRAY for our nation and elected officials regularly ▪️ VOTE in every local, state, and national election to impact our culture ▪️ ENGAGE our hearts in civic education or involvement for the well-being of our local communities and our nation Learn more: ⁠⁠https://christiansengaged.org/⁠⁠ Support our efforts: ⁠⁠https://christiansengaged.org/donate⁠⁠ Take the PLEDGE to PRAY, VOTE, & ENGAGE: ⁠⁠https://christiansengaged.org/pledge⁠

.

This is one of my favorite topics.... NOT. I'm not a huge AI art guy and I dont love the idea of it being sold in a "handmade" shop, but in case you want to know about it.. here it is.   Feel free to join my FB group to continue the conversation!  https://www.facebook.com/groups/723917178191483

Send us a Text Message.SummaryIn this conversation, Laurie  & Matilda discusses various topics including their busy schedule, the importance of self-care,  In this conversation, Laurie and Matilda discuss the importance of not making impulsive decisions based on astrology transits. Laurie advises against quitting a job just because the transits don't look favorable at the moment. They also talk about the intense energy and intuition that comes with being working with their abilities. They emphasize the importance of respecting the time and energy of readers of all kinds and not showing up drunk or stoned for readings. They also discuss the misconceptions around karma, twin flames, and karmic relationships.Chapters00:00 Introduction and Catching Up01:00 Feeling Overwhelmed with Work05:03 Pets and Personal Stories06:25 Career Paths and Mediumship09:14 Early Experiences with Mediumship12:13 Managing Mediumship Abilities15:27 Working in a Cemetery20:13 A Spooky Story22:00 Recent Events and Travel Plans23:30 Conclusion30:36 The Importance of Development and Mentorship for Psychics31:57 The Ability to See People's Souls32:14 The Challenge of People Not Loving the Same Way33:18 The Reality of Not Everyone Seeing People's Souls36:02 The Responsibility of Giving Real Readings38:45 The Importance of Taking Action in Manifestation41:26 The Energetic Wall When Reading for Unfocused Clients45:07 The Intensity and Energy of Being an Energy Worker46:03 The Limitations of Affirmations and Manifestation47:28 The Danger of Misusing Spiritual Concepts in Relationships49:55 The Importance of Educating on Karma and Twin Flames52:27 Personal Experiences with Abusive Relationships53:33 The Challenges of Dating as a Psychic

SanJuan asks the question about a passage preached this past Sunday in Matthew 9. Jesus saw everyone and had compassion on the crowd who followed him. This passage drove the question "How do you see people?" If you want God to use you, be ready to be the solution. The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few.

it is time to see people for who they really are and not what you wish them to be. stop with the negative cycle of false illusions, excuses, and endless forgiveness based on unrealistic expectations. there is no point in thinking and holding on to hope for someone to change when deep down you feel that they will never change. facing the reality of who someone truly is will help you with self awareness. understanding and accepting people for you they are will lead you to healthier relationships and personal growth. Watch the episode on YouTube! https://youtu.be/BOxGAV7GUDg?si=wcxosV2RWx7PZTot Support the podcast ! ❤️ https://www.buzzsprout.com/1981728/support  Subscribe to get the REAL DEAL from every episode ! https://www.buzzsprout.com/1981728/subscribeSubscribe to my Patreon where I post exclusive content to each Episode ! https://patreon.com/LisTalksVibesPodcast?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator&utm_content=join_link Follow the vibes on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/listalksvibes/?hl=enTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@listalksvibesAll my main social media accounts:-Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/listapiaaaa/?hl=en-TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@listapiaaa?_t=8e4Y9ZpHVH9&_r=1-makeup bookings/portfolio Instagram page @lisglamz Subscribe to the Lis Talks Vibes CLIPS YouTube channel where I post short segments of the full podcast! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp-V4pnjcFfOzONkHgCR3sw Checkout my audio Podcast on Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/3TSyq7RWoplDc27T7MQZHc?si=943b284a0eff4d00Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/lis-talks-vibes-podcast/id1623209652 Support the show

21 and 42 Days Session of the School of knowing and serving God in Ndoumbi.

In this episode of the Business Website Blueprint podcast, I'm sharing the biggest mistake that I see people making on their business website.   Grab the recommended website resources at https://ariannavernierdesign.com/resources Choose your website template to customize for your business at https://ariannavernierdesign.com/shop Schedule your website design VIP Days at https://ariannavernierdesign.com/services Check out my recent projects at https://ariannavernierdesign.com/portfolio   Check out today's show notes at https://ariannavernierdesign.com/the-biggest-mistake-people-make-on-their-business-website

Brokenness should move us to action because our brokenness moved Jesus to action.

Brokenness should move us to action because our brokenness moved Jesus to action.

The biggest mistake I see people make in business.

The biggest mistake I see people make in business.

Dana In The Morning Highlights 2/7Jose Altuve has signed an extension with the Astros worth $125 millionCommon Bond Cafe is donating a portion of King Cake sales towards TX Children'sWhat do you (or your coworkers) steal from the office? Be honest....

This week's theme on the Retirement Quick Tips Podcast is: How To Pick The Best Pension Option Today, I'm wrapping up the week by talking about the biggest mistake I see people make, and how you can avoid it when picking the best option for you.

This week, Paul reminds us to see other people as people in 2024.Join us for a weekly narration of Paul Tripp's popular devotional. You can subscribe to our email list to receive this devotional straight to your inbox each week, or read online at PaulTripp.com/Wednesday or on Facebook, Instagram, and the Paul Tripp App.If you've been enjoying the Wednesday's Word podcast, please leave us a review! Each review helps us reach more people with the transforming power of Jesus Christ.

Support the show

Knowledge Project Key Takeaways Check out the Knowledge Project Podcast Episode Page & Show NotesRead the full notes @ podcastnotes.orgBlake Eastman has dedicated his entire life to psychology and nonverbal behavior. In 2009 he founded The Nonverbal Group, a  behavioral research and education company in New York City which conducts large scale studies on human behavior and uses a wide range of technologies to systematically deconstruct and improve human communication. Eastman dives deep into a number of subjects revolving around how we communicate with one another, including the ability to read nonverbal cues, his thoughts on big talkers vs. silent types, how we can communicate with our partners without complaining, the value of watching ourselves communicate on video, understanding the power structures and social dynamics at work, and so much more.   Eastman has also served as an adjunct psychology professor at the City University of New York for six years where he taught General Psychology, Developmental Psychology, and Group Dynamics. He is also a former professional poker player and the founder of School of Cards, the first brick-and-mortar poker school in New York City. -- Want even more? Members get early access, hand-edited transcripts, member-only episodes, and so much more. Learn more here: https://fs.blog/membership/ Every Sunday our Brain Food newsletter shares timeless insights and ideas that you can use at work and home. Add it to your inbox: https://fs.blog/newsletter/ Follow Shane on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/ShaneAParrish Our Sponsors: MetaLab: Helping the world's top companies design, build, and ship amazing products and services. https://www.metalab.com Sidebar: Accelerate your career. https://www.sidebar.com/shane

Blake Eastman has dedicated his entire life to psychology and nonverbal behavior. In 2009 he founded The Nonverbal Group, a  behavioral research and education company in New York City which conducts large scale studies on human behavior and uses a wide range of technologies to systematically deconstruct and improve human communication. Eastman dives deep into a number of subjects revolving around how we communicate with one another, including the ability to read nonverbal cues, his thoughts on big talkers vs. silent types, how we can communicate with our partners without complaining, the value of watching ourselves communicate on video, understanding the power structures and social dynamics at work, and so much more.   Eastman has also served as an adjunct psychology professor at the City University of New York for six years where he taught General Psychology, Developmental Psychology, and Group Dynamics. He is also a former professional poker player and the founder of School of Cards, the first brick-and-mortar poker school in New York City. -- Want even more? Members get early access, hand-edited transcripts, member-only episodes, and so much more. Learn more here: https://fs.blog/membership/ Every Sunday our Brain Food newsletter shares timeless insights and ideas that you can use at work and home. Add it to your inbox: https://fs.blog/newsletter/ Follow Shane on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/ShaneAParrish Our Sponsors: MetaLab: Helping the world's top companies design, build, and ship amazing products and services. https://www.metalab.com Sidebar: Accelerate your career. https://www.sidebar.com/shane

I've recently had some lengthy conversations with physicians about whole life insurance. It dawned on me that for all the information out there about this sometimes polarizing product, many people are poised to make what I consider the most expensive mistake... buying something they don't need. Now, I'm not saying that no one needs whole life insurance, nor am I saying everyone needs it. What I cover in this episode is how nuanced the decision can be and why it's so polarizing out in the financial education space.  Then I walk through two case studies of people who came to me interested in whole life insurance with two very different results. With one, it totally made sense, with the other it did not.  Listen in to hear me walk through the decision making process I took them through to determine if whole life made sense for them. I also touch on the second most expensive mistake when it comes to this product: not structuring it properly. A lot of the information out there around this product is about what I call the 'old school' way of designing it. Where it often times has slower growth and minimal flexibility. If it does end up making sense for you to buy this product, please ask whomever you are working with about the options to enhance the growth and flexibility of this product, which may be better for you. If you're wondering if whole life insurance makes sense for you and you like the idea of going through a data-driven process that uses evidence to support the best path for you, a fee-based financial plan might be right for you. To book a free introductory call at a time of your choosing, click here. During this call, I'll help you figure out if a plan is right for you. Thanks for listening in and see you on one of my upcoming episodes about money mindset, practice management, DIY investing, and much more!

In a world of labels, how do we see past them to the people? How do we give others the most needed and appreciated gift of being seen as a person and not a problem? ----more---- Today we talk about seeing past the labels to the amazing people underneath. I offer three simple but very effective ways to let people keep their humanity. Because we are all people and we like to be treated as such. We all need to be seen for who we are and not our choices. And like it or not we all have some things in common. ----more---- It isn't too difficult to keep our focus on people. But it does take some practice. And the more we practice the better we will get at it. Let's start developing the best gift we can give this season and always. ----more---- Life is about our connection with people and labels. Be brave and see the people. ----more---- As always come follow more of the journey to brave on socials. @findingpawnee on Instagram and @Finding Pawnee 

On today's episode of Coffee with Keith, I want to share what I think is a mistake people make when coming out.  I understand why they do and am not try to guilt anyone in this discussion.  But, I still believe it is a mistake that we So, grab that coffee and let's chat today on the Coffee with Keith podcast.To connect with Keith on Instagram, visit here.To visit Keith's website to learn more, CLICK Here.Resources:FREE: Towardations-lgbtq (TM) FREE: 10 Questions you should ask yourself before coming outFREE: "5 Questions for the Bisexual Couple"FREE: Journal Prompts for the BisexualsFREE: Guide to better Biblical InterpretationJust a reminder that I do individual and group coaching. To learn more and to apply, simply visit the link. I hope to have you as a client very soon. Coaching Link There are three ways to support this podcast: 1) Give it a honest 5-star rating and review on whatever platform you use, 2) share the podcast with your friends, and 3) join the $5 a month membership on Patreon. Thanks and blessings, Keith Support the showI hope you get a lot from this podcast. Obviously, I am limited with the ability of help I can offer here but I always strive to provide as much practical help as I can to help you heal your trauma and create a fantastic life. If you could use more help from me, I encourage you to visit www.JKeithBrown.com and check out all the ways I can work with you. With all my love,Keith

There are 7.8 billion people in the world. That many people can feel overwhelming as we go through our day-to-day lives. We sometimes may want the world to be smaller, but we serve a big God who sees every, single person.  If we are following Jesus' example of hospitality, we need to make room for […]