Podcasts about Chatman

LSU men's basketball coach Matt McMahon brought another impotant piece of the LSU Basketball program back to Louisiana with the April 2024 announcement that Baton Rouge native Michael Chatman will be the head men's basketball strength and conditioning coach for the Tigers.Chatman has served for the past five seasons as the Sports Performance Coach for the men's basketball team at Stanford.The native of Baton Rouge graduated from Southeastern Louisiana University with a degree in applied science and earned his master's degree in exercise science from California University of Pennsylvania.Early in his career, Chatman served as assistant strength and conditioning coach for a little over a year at Southern University of Baton Rouge and then spent a year-and-a-half working for legendary coach Gayle Hatch's weightlifting program as assistant strength coach.He has spent time at Michigan, Texas and Penn State before being named the Director of Basketball Performance in 2016 at Southern Mississippi. In 2017, he moved to Towson where he was the Assistant Athletic Director of Strength and Conditioning at Towson.In 2019 he was named to the staff at Stanford.He is known, among other things, for his development of movement and mobility protocols and has also worked with team nutritionists and athletic trainers. In working with various sports he has stressed life lessons and etiquette importance in teaching skills beyond the weight room. He works with his student-athletes to go the extra mile, both inside and outside the weight room.To View This Episode- https://youtu.be/vOD98NmsSr4#lsu #whoknewinthemoment #philfriedrich #podcast #lsubasketball #strengthtraining

For people with disabilities, ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft can be a lifeline or a pain — or both. Abigail Cochran shares what she learned from individuals with disabilities about what's working and what's not.Show Notes:Cochran, A. L. (2022). How and why do people with disabilities use app-based ridehailing? Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2556-2562.99% Invisible podcast episode on the “curb cut effect.”Venkataram, P. S., Flynn, J. A., Bhuiya, M. M. R., Barajas, J. M., & Handy, S. (2023). Framing availability and usability of transportation for people with disabilities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100961.Cochran, A. L., & Chatman, D. G. (2021). Use of app-based ridehailing services and conventional taxicabs by adults with disabilities. Travel Behaviour and Society, 24, 124-131.

Absolutely LOVED this talk with my pal and former Fearless Fostering member, Christi Chatman. In addition to being a foster mama, Christi is a therapist and big believer in therapy (especially embodied therapy for all that we hold in our bodies) for foster mamas. She shares her foster care journey thus far, what was painful and frustrating, as well as encouragement for how to persevere and heal from the wounds of foster mama trauma. You can find Christi on Instagram here: https://www.instagram.com/christi_chatman/ Learn more about my Fearless Fostering Program and apply here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1dDWEAyUJFNC6gQj4R7bBb9bFZKcFWCl-yTY8pW2NZfA/edit#response=ACYDBNh_D4bXIebgjtBJjip3XwLSi-s24mCfEL9UiioWUgIo-D9Fp0mdpM1ekqlzMcjtGJc

For our 4th week in our series on the fruit of the Spirit, Steve Chatman from Rising Above Ministries, brought a great message on patience. We encourage you to listen to it today if you haven't already!

You're Not Broken – The System Is: A Raw Conversation About Healing with Lucy AphramorThis episode of Fly to Freedom is not just a conversation about recovery. It's a deep reckoning with the systems that have shaped how we think about food, health, and bodies — and how we can begin to reclaim our truth.Julia is joined by Lucy Aphramor (they/them), a radical dietitian, poet, and justice-centred educator whose Well Now approach reimagines nutrition through the lens of compassion, lived experience, and social change. Together, they unpack the myths of weight management, the fallacy of 'healthy eating' guidelines, and the oppressive roots of mainstream public health narratives.Lucy shares powerful insights about:Why public health nutrition is an equity issueHow traditional health education often reinforces oppressionThe myth of evidence-based weight lossWhy eating disorder recovery is inseparable from social justiceWhat it means to centre community, compassion, and care in healingHow body shame is socially shaped, and why self-compassion is essential for unlearningA poetic lens on health, worth, and resistanceThis episode is a must-listen if you've ever felt confused by health advice, struggled with body image, or questioned the deeper systems influencing eating disorders. Whether you're in recovery or supporting someone who is, Lucy's wisdom offers a radical shift in how we can approach healing — not just as individuals, but as a community.

Todd Chatman of Solidarity International to free slaves from South Sudan. Todd Chatman joins us to tell us what you can do to help. https://csi-usa.org/metaxas/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Do people drive less because they live in buildings that don't provide parking, or do they live in buildings that don't provide parking because they drive less? That question has huge implications for how we build and rebuild our cities, yet researchers have struggled for decades to answer it conclusively. UCLA professor Adam Millard-Ball joins us to discuss new research that finally — we hope — puts the question to bed. Taking advantage of San Francisco's affordable housing lottery, Millard-Ball and colleagues find that (as-good-as-)randomly assigning tenants to different buildings and neighborhoods has substantial impacts on their transportation choices, with lower parking ratios resulting in less driving and more transit use. We talk about what this means for housing and parking policy, and what it says about the behavioral shifts needed to make cities more affordable, accessible, and sustainable.Show notes:Millard-Ball, A., West, J., Rezaei, N., & Desai, G. (2022). What do residential lotteries show us about transportation choices?. Urban Studies, 59(2), 434-452.Free summary of article at Transfers Magazine.Chatman, D. G. (2013). Does TOD need the T? On the importance of factors other than rail access. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(1), 17-31.On parking cash-out programs: Shoup, Don. (2017). Opinion: Here's an easy way to fight L.A.'s traffic and boost transit ridership — reward commuters who don't drive. Los Angeles Times.Blumenberg, E., & Pierce, G. (2017). The drive to work: The relationship between transportation access, housing assistance, and employment among participants in the welfare to work voucher program. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(1), 66-82.King, D. A., Smart, M. J., & Manville, M. (2019). The poverty of the carless: Toward universal auto access. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X18823252.

Todd Chatman of Solidarity International to free slaves from South Sudan. Todd Chatman joins us to tell us what you can do to help. https://csi-usa.org/metaxas/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today on the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Security Awareness Series, Chris is joined by Julie Chatman. Julie is a distinguished cybersecurity executive with nearly two decades of experience in cybersecurity strategy, risk management, and AI governance.   She began her career in the U.S. Navy, serving on active duty as a Hospital Corpsman specializing in Medical Laboratory Science & Technology. Her transition into cybersecurity began at the FBI, where strong mentorship shaped her approach to leadership, problem solving, and talent development.   She currently serves as the Deputy Chief Information Security Officer for Finance at the Virginia Information Technologies Agency (VITA), where she is focused on driving risk reduction across state agencies. The role is part of a strategic engagement through her company, ResilientTech Advisors.   Julie leads CyberPath Coaching, where she draws on her experience as an active CISO to mentor cybersecurity professionals, accelerate their growth, and prepare them for executive roles. She works with individuals breaking into the field, mid-career professionals, aspiring CISOs, and cybersecurity entrepreneurs. [May 19, 2025]   00:00 - Intro 00:53 - Intro Links: -          Social-Engineer.com - http://www.social-engineer.com/ -          Managed Voice Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/vishing-service/ -          Managed Email Phishing - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/se-phishing-service/ -          Adversarial Simulations - https://www.social-engineer.com/services/social-engineering-penetration-test/ -          Social-Engineer channel on SLACK - https://social-engineering-hq.slack.com/ssb -          CLUTCH - http://www.pro-rock.com/ -          innocentlivesfoundation.org - http://www.innocentlivesfoundation.org/                                                02:03 - Julie Chatman Intro 03:14 - A Hungry Brain 04:25 - We Are Mushroomed 05:54 - Being an Enabler 10:13 - Speak Their Language 13:33 - Assigning Responsibility 16:05 - A Tool, Not a Replacement 20:35 - Career Challenges 22:40 - Strategic Empathy 23:46 - Setting Boundaries 24:15 - Narrative Control 25:38 - Staying Positive 29:39 - The Target is the Same 32:09 - Book Recommendations -          World War Z  - Max Brooks 33:20 - Mentors -          MB Kinder -          Martha Williams 35:14 - Find Julie Chatman Online -          Website: cyberpathcoaching.net -          LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/julie-chatman-mba-infosec 35:54     Wrap Up & Outro -          www.social-engineer.com -          www.innocentlivesfoundation.org

..AND WE'RE BACK..... ON THE PATHPOD! The PathPod, originally championed by Mr. Magsino, has always been a platform for the genuine voices of our school – capturing real perspectives on College life, culture, and the unique characters that make our community shine. Now, as it turns the page to a new chapter, we're excited to continue this tradition, because the voices of our community truly matter!   In this exciting second episode, Mr. Drumond co-hosts alongside three of our dynamic Year 12 students – Nick, Lucas, and Wren. Join them for a lively conversation about escape rooms that capture their unique personalities, a shared passion for Manga, Musicals, and Pokémon, and a nostalgic trip down memory lane as they reflect on their journey at the College. Get ready for laughs, insights, and a celebration of creativity and friendship!   Massive shoutout to djAUDIONICS for the PathPod Intro track! A student in our College who designed, produced and mixed these songs. Follow his music on Spotify by clicking on the link or searching up "djAUDIONICS". 

Todd Chatman of Solidarity International to free slaves from South Sudan. Todd Chatman joins us to tell us what you can do to help. https://csi-usa.org/metaxas/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Every year we partner with Christian Solidarity International to free slaves from South Sudan. Todd Chatman joins us to tell us what you can do to help. https://csi-usa.org/metaxas/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Todd Chatman of CSI discusses freeing slaves in South Sudan and how you can partner in this effort.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Pilgrimage Formation Curator Ryan Bonfiglio speaks with the Rev. Jamie Butcher (Covenant Presbyterian, Atlanta) and the Rev. Kelly Chatman about the push and pull of dislocation, the connection between belonging and accountability, and their reflections on our Northern Ireland immersion experience.

Rock talks with Justen Chatman, Performance Scientist for the Los Angeles Rams. Listen in and smash the subscribe button!TIME STAMPS2:30 Justen Chatman's origin story4:30 Performance Science with the LA Rams7:00 Narrowing down what to look for12:15 Wearable tech in jerseys and pads16:00 Justen's thesis20:00 What gets him excited and challenged22:30 Culture shock between South Carolina and California25:00 Justen's role with the team28:00 Justen's own training30:00 Game time33:30 Integrating performance science with rehab36:00 Getting along with everyone39:00 Unexpected relationships44:30 Future plansGET TO KNOW JUSTEN CHATMANLINKEDIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justen-chatman-cpss-cscs-usaw-689781201/INSTA: https://www.instagram.com/justchaty/LA RAMS: https://www.therams.com/GET TO KNOW ROCKY SNYDERMEET: Visit the Rocky's online headquarters: RockySnyder.comREAD: Grab a copy of his new "Return to Center" book: www.rockysnyder.comINSTA: Instagram fan, check him out at https://www.instagram.com/rocky_snyder/FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/rocky.snyder.77LINKEDIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rocky-snyder-cscs-cafs-nsca-cpt-a77a091/TRAIN WITH ROCKY WORKOUT: Want to meet Rocky and get a private workout: https://rfcsantacruz.com/INSTA: https://www.instagram.com/rockysfitnesssc/FACEBOOK: Facebook.com/RockysFitnessCenter

Megan & Rocky welcome Texas Football OL parents Jeanine Chatman, mother of Jaydon Chatman, and Michael Goosby, father of Trevor Goosby, to talk about the program, development, the transfer portal, recruiting, and more!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Listen in to the last week of our study on Philippians! 

Join Gators Breakdown host David Waters as he analyzes Florida's offensive and defensive line outlook for 2025. The Gators' O-line looks strong with four returning starters, anchored by All-American center Jake Slaughter. Hear insights from O-line coach Rob Sale and players Jake Slaughter and Austin Barber on their development. Plus, defensive line coach Gerald Chatman discusses the impressive transformation of his unit and their mindset heading into the new season. #FloridaGators #GatorsBreakdown #SpringFootball #GoGators #FloridaVictorious #FloridaGators #CFB #SECFootball #CollegeFootball #SpringPractice JOIN Gators Breakdown Plus: https://gatorsbreakdown.supportingcast.fm/ Get Florida Gators merch at Fanatics: https://fanatics.93n6tx.net/DVYxja Get Gators Breakdown merch: https://gatorsbreakdownmerch.com Questions or comments? Send them to gatorsbreakdown@gmail.com You can be the difference! For the first time ever, YOU can directly impact the outcome on the field by joining Florida Victorious! Want to help the Gators win? Want a better game day experience? Just like when you pack The Swamp, your unwavering support through Florida Victorious empowers the Gators to be their best! Join today and be the difference in making the orange and blue victorious. JOIN: https://floridavictorious.com/join-now/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Former BYU women's basketball player Jess Chatman joins the show to talk about the news of Amber Whiting not returning to coach BYU. Mitch Harper and Matt Baiamonte later discuss candidates to fill the vacancy.

20250219- That Kevin Show and Todd Chatman of CSI Partner To Liberate Slaves by That KEVIN Show

Former BYU women's basketball player Jess Chatman offers her insights on the current trends surrounding both the men's and women's teams, highlighting their strengths and pinpointing areas where improvements can be made.

2-5-2025

In this episode, Jim Garrity talks about a tactic of some examining lawyers that should, but often doesn't, draw objections that their questions are “argumentative.” So, what is an improper, argumentative question or examination? Here, we're not talking about the questioner's tone or demeanor, i.e., arguing in the classic sense of yelling and bickering with the deponent. We're talking about questions where lawyers aren't really asking a question designed to elicit facts but are instead injecting their own commentary or viewpoint, or injecting insults, taunts, wisecracks, or similar language. "Argumentative" objections are objections to the form, and must be timely made or are waived.SHOW NOTESPeople v. Pawar, No. G037097, 2007 WL 477949, at *2 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2007) (“[W]ere they lying” queries are improper if they are merely argumentative. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at pp. 381, 384.) In Chatman, the prosecutor asked the defendant how the safe at a store was opened. (Id. at p. 379.) The defendant replied “he could not say; he never touched the safe,” eliciting the prosecutor's query, “ ‘Well, is the safe lying about you?' “ (Ibid.) The Supreme Court held the question of whether an inanimate object was “lying” was argumentative , defining argumentative inquiry as “speech to the jury masquerading as a question” which “does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Id. at p. 384.))Faile v. Zarich, No. HHDX04CV5015994S, 2008 WL 2967045, at *3 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 10, 2008) (Webster's. . . in the closest relevant definition, defines “argumentative” as “consisting of or characterized by argument: containing a process of reasoning: controversial”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) (Steven Goode, et al., Texas Practice Series: Courtroom Handbook on Texas Evidence § 611 cmt. 12 (2012); see United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir.N.Y.2005) (defining argumentative as “summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence”); accord Eddlemon v. State, 591 S.W.2d 847, 851 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1979) (trial court did not abuse discretion in finding the question, “You don't believe your own offense report?” argumentative). In other words, an argumentative objection concerns whether counsel is attempting to “argue” the case, not whether the counsel is “arguing” with the witness”)United States v. Yakobowicz, 427 F.3d 144, 151 (2d Cir. 2005) (“During the presentation of evidence one of the most commonly sustained objections is that a particular question is argumentative, Fed.R.Evid. 611(a) advisory committee's note to Subdivision (a) to 1972 Proposed Rules, and any summation-like remarks by counsel during the presentation of evidence are improper and subject as a routine matter to being stricken, Mauet & Wolfson, supra, at 30”)Pardee v. State, No. 06-11-00226-CR, 2012 WL 3516485, at *6 (Tex. App. Aug. 16, 2012) ("Many common law objections—including the objection of “argumentative”—are incorporated in the Texas Rules of Evidence. The common law argumentative objection is now governed by Tex.R. Evid. 611 which concerns the mode of interrogation and presentation. The argumentative objection is an objection commonly used, but not commonly understood. Pardee argues the objection should have been sustained because the State was “arguing” with the defendant. Argumentative, though, does not concern counsel's demeanor or tone. Professors Wellborn, Goode, and Sharlot explain the argumentative objection as follows: Counsel may not, in the guise of asking a question, make a jury argument or attempt to summarize, draw inferences from, or comment on the evidence. In addition, questions that ask a witness to testify as to his own credibility are improper.")People v. Chatman, 38 Cal. 4th 344, 384, 133 P.3d 534, 563 (2006) The prosecutor's question about whether the safe was “lying” requires a different analysis. The question was argumentative. An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable. The prosecutor's question whether “the safe [was] lying” is an example. An inanimate object cannot “lie.” Professor Wigmore has called cross-examination the “greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” (5 Wigmore on Evidence (Chadbourne rev. ed.1974) § 1367, p. 32.) The engine should be allowed to run, but it cannot be allowed to run amok. An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all. Defendant had already explained he had no explanation for the safe being open. Asking whether the safe was “lying” could add nothing to this testimony”)People v. Imbach, No. E040190, 2008 WL 510482, at *7–8 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2008) ("The prosecutor asked, “You found that to be inappropriate but not your other son's addiction to child pornography?” When defendant objected that the question was argumentative, the trial court overruled that objection. Defendant asserted the second “argumentative” objection when defendant's mother said she did not know how to answer that question and the prosecutor asked, “Is that because you didn't want to know?” The trial court sustained the defendant's objection to this second question. Both questions are argumentative, because they both are speeches by the prosecutor masquerading as questions. (Chatman, supra, 38 Cal.4th at p. 384.) The trial court should have sustained both objections. However, we cannot say that by asking those two questions the prosecutor engaged in misconduct.")People v. Peoples, 62 Cal. 4th 718, 793–94, 365 P.3d 230, 288 (2016) (“Defendant observes that the prosecutor asked numerous argumentative questions when cross-examining defense witnesses. To list a few examples, the prosecutor asked defense expert Dr. Lisak, “how many hours are you into them for?” He said to defense expert Dr. Buchsbaum, “Let's quit guessing for awhile and look at the facts.” He said to defense expert Dr. Wu, “It's a pain in the butt to get these test scores.” And he asked prosecution expert Dr. Mayberg, “Did you have a heart attack last night when you looked at the raw data?”)People v. Burns, No. D081051, 2024 WL 2144151, at *15–17 (Cal. Ct. App. May 14, 2024), review denied (July 17, 2024) (excessive repetition of a question simply to make a point can cross line into improper argument”; “Burns makes a strong argument that the prosecutor's repetitive questioning regarding the drunk tank incident became argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even expect an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.” (People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384.) “An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (Ibid.) Instead, it may be aimed at agitating or belittling the witness (People v. Lund (2021) 64 Cal.App.5th 1119, 1148), or designed to engage the witness in an argument (People v. Johnson (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1230, 1236)”)People v. Mazen, No. B300193, 2021 WL 164356, at *5 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2021) The court overruled defendant's argumentative objection to the following question: “Would [accidentally placing the car in neutral] been important information to tell [Morales]?” The court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled the objection. The question sought to elicit relevant testimony regarding defendant's theory that Mario was hit by accident (CALCRIM No. 510). (See People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 384 [“[a]n argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question” and does not seek to elicit relevant testimony].)”People v. Singh, No. H042511, 2018 WL 1046260, at *28 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2018) (“Each question anticipated an answer and was answerable; none was “a speech to the jury masquerading as a question”)People v. Basler, No. D068047, 2015 WL 9437926, at *23 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2015) ("Fung appears to identify three categories of objectionable questioning during his cross-examination by the prosecutor. The first category involves apparent sarcasm by the prosecutor. For example, after Fung provided additional details about his fight with another inmate while incarcerated, the prosecutor said, “Okay. You left that part out a couple of minutes ago; right?” Referencing the same fight, the prosecutor made light of Fung's claim of self-defense: “Did you have to defend yourself against him, too?” As another example, when Fung was discussing the extent of his injuries following the fight, the prosecutor said, “So, that's about how badly you were hurt? It looked like something you get by falling off a skateboard?” The court sustained objections to each of these questions, and a number of others, as argumentative." Also from Basler: "As we have noted, Fung contends the first two categories of questions were impermissibly argumentative. “An argumentative question is a speech to the jury masquerading as a question. The questioner is not seeking to elicit relevant testimony. Often it is apparent that the questioner does not even want an answer. The question may, indeed, be unanswerable.... An argumentative question that essentially talks past the witness, and makes an argument to the jury, is improper because it does not seek to elicit relevant, competent testimony, or often any testimony at all.” (People v. Chatman (2006)”)People v. Nanez, No. F064574, 2014 WL 1928307, at *14–15 (Cal. Ct. App. May 15, 2014) (citing examples of argumentative examination by prosecutor including (a) the prosecutor's remark “Convenient” when a witness said they did not remember a particular fact, and (b) when prosecutor commented on witnesses testimony by saying “So that's the lie you're going with?”, and (c) when prosecutor asked witness “You wouldn't tell us if you're lying, of course, right?” and when witness said he would, prosecutor replied “There's another lie,” causing court to strike prosecutor's comment from the record)People v. Strebe, No. D057947, 2011 WL 2555653, at *7 (Cal. Ct. App. June 28, 2011) (trial courses sustained objection to question as argumentative where prosecutor asked witness “Do you remember anything about that evening that might be detrimental to your case?” In essence arguing to jury that witness was lying and only selectively remembered favorable facts)People v. Higgins, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 856, 873–74 (Ct. App. 2011), as modified (Jan. 21, 2011), as modified on denial of reh'g (Feb. 4, 2011) (guilty verdict reversed in part due to argumentative questions; among other jabs; in case where defendant explained his conduct as motived by depression due to death of his daughter's friend, prosecutor asked, “You'd agree with me that it's pretty pathetic if you're using the memory of a dead 17–year–old kid as an excuse in this trial, wouldn't you? Would you agree with me? Is that the legacy that you want [the dead teen] to have?”; other examples of prosecutor's argumentative questions included “Oh, the door was unlocked,” and “Isn't that convenient that all of a sudden, right after you've committed the crimes, that that's when you come to?”; further held, “The rule is well established that the prosecuting attorney may not interrogate witnesses solely ‘for the purpose of getting before the jury the facts inferred therein, together with the insinuations and suggestions they inevitably contained, rather than for the answers”)People v. Dixon, No. D047342, 2007 WL 2745207, at *10 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2007)  Dixon asked Hernandez who had taken the photographs near the time of the injury. Hernandez testified that the audio-visual person at his school had taken photographs of his injury. Dixon then asked, “Is it computer enhancement? Those could be computer enhanced-.” The prosecutor interrupted, “That's argumentative.” The court sustained the prosecutor's objection")United States v. Browne, No. SACR 16-00139-CJC, 2017 WL 1496912, at *6 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2017) (For each witness, the Court did not end Defense counsel's cross-examination until it became excessively cumulative and argumentative, at which time the Court was well within its authority to restrain the questioning pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(a).”)Beving v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 3:18-CV-00040, 2020 WL 6051598, at *12 (S.D. Iowa Sept. 8, 2020) (Defendant may object to prejudicial or argumentative references to counsel at trial as permitted by the Federal Rules of Evidence. See Fed. Rs. Evid. 403, 611(a)(3).)FRE 403: Argumentative questions may be viewed as unfairly prejudicial, misleading, or wasting time.FRE 611(a)(3), Witnesses and Presenting Evidence ((a) Control by the Court; Purposes. The court should exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of examining witnesses and presenting evidence so as to: (1) make those procedures effective for determining the truth; (2) avoid wasting time; and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.FRCP 30, Depositions, (d) Duration; Sanction; Motion to Terminate or Limit. (3) Motion to Terminate or Limit, (A) Grounds. At any time during a deposition, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the ground that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party. 

Happy Monday friends and neighbors! Today the ladies are taking the lead! We have a special episode this morning to preview something exciting and for the benefit of young people in 2025. Our friends Natalie Bonner, founder of Talented Tenth Social Services, Inc. and Lebia Chatman, founder of Creating Space LLC are joined by Kimberly Svevo of LCFS (Lutheran Child & Family Services) to talk about the All Youth Leadership Conference. This will be the first conversation about this upcoming initiative that the public can learn about. Working with our very own East Aurora School District 131, 2025 promises to be an exciting year for the youth of Aurora! Let's get ready to learn! Here's the news: - Join the City of Aurora's Human Relations Commission today and let your voice and ideas be heard! The commission conducts in-person meetings at City Hall in the Council Chambers Conference Room at 5:30 pm, every second Thursday of the month. See the flyer for more details and visit the website to apply here: https://www.aurora-il.org/1078/Human-Relations-Commission - Visit Alive Aurora every Monday, Wednesday and Friday for Drop In Space for 5th through 12th graders! From 3:00 pm to 7:00 pm there will be a variety of activities to take part in, teen-led and teen-driven. See the flyer for more details and follow the Alive Center on Facebook and Instagram! Have a great rest of the day! Good Morning Aurora will return with more news, weather and the very best of Aurora. Subscribe to the show on YouTube at this link: https://www.youtube.com/c/GoodMorningAuroraPodcast The second largest city's first daily news podcast is here. Tune in 5 days a week, Monday thru Friday from 9:00 to 9:30 am. Make sure to like and subscribe to stay updated on all things Aurora. Threads: https://www.threads.net/@goodmorningaurorailInstagram: goodmorningaurorailSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6dVweK5Zc4uPVQQ0Fp1vEP...Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/.../good-morning.../id1513229463Anchor: https://anchor.fm/goodmorningauroraACTV (Aurora Community Television): https://www.aurora-il.org/309/Aurora-Community-TV #positivevibes #positiveenergy #kanecountyil #bataviail #genevail #stcharlesil #saintcharlesil #elginil #northaurorail #auroraillinois #cityofaurorail #auroramedia #auroranews #goodmorningaurora #morningnews #morningshow #monday #talentedtenthsocialservices

On this episode of the Giants Huddle podcast, Paul Dottino chats with Giants defensive lineman, Elijah Chatman, about what he’s learned in his rookie year, John Schmeelk speaks to Stephen Holder, who covers the Colts for ESPN, about the matchup, and Bob Papa has his weekly sit down with Head Coach Brian Daboll. :00 - Elijah Chatman 14:34 - Stephen Holder 33:08 - Brian DabollSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

É chegada a hora da rodada de Natal! Dois times entraram e dois saíram da última temporada, mas uma coisa continua a mesma: estaremos em frente à TV. E para falar sobre os jogos e nossos palpites convidamos nosso amigo Camarada Wood. Ah, e tem um extra nesse episódio! Conversamos com a nova treinadora da Seleção Brasileira. Vem ouvir!

Van herinneringen aan Chatman tot BIZARRE uitkomsten in ChatGPT: we hebben deze week heel veel om over bij te praten.

Columbus is one of the top fashion cities in the country. From the local designers who call Columbus home to the national retailers based here, during this episode we'll talk about what makes Columbus' fashion scene unique and get a preview of this year's Fashion Week Columbus. Join us as we chat with Keira Chatman, executive director of the Columbus Fashion Council, and Lindsey Drahos, owner of Hosful Collective.

Great interview with the incredible Pastor Billy E. Chatman Jr. on his new book, the power of GOD, health, wellness, family, the storm on the way , closing demonic doors, and more! Pastor Billy E. Chatman Jr. is a highly respected religious leader, community advocate, and inspirational speaker who has dedicated his life to serving others and spreading the message of love, faith, and empowerment. Born on June 23, 1972, in the city of Tampa, Florida, Pastor Chatman's journey to becoming a spiritual leader began early in his life. Preaching his first message at the age of 16, Pastor Chatman exhibited a deep sense of compassion and a desire to make a positive impact on the lives of those around him. Raised in the Church of God in Christ, he developed a strong faith and a belief in the power of God. These values laid the foundation for his future calling as a pastor. At the age of ten years old, Pastor Chatman had an upper room experience that solidified his commitment to his faith. He devoted himself to studying the Bible, attending church services, and seeking guidance from spiritual mentors. His unwavering dedication and hunger for spiritual knowledge led him to pursue higher education in theology. Pastor Chatman studied at Devry Business College, he also studied at the International Christian Bible College, where he honed his theological understanding and acquired the necessary skills to effectively minister to others. Throughout his academic journey, he developed a profound understanding of the scriptures, biblical teachings, and the complexities of human spirituality. Pastor Chatman is the proud husband of Nikita L Chatman of 31 years. He is the father of two beautiful children, Reonna Chatman and Billy E Chatman III. Pastor Chatman embarked on his mission by answering the call to spread the word of God and make a positive difference in the lives of his community at the age of 20, giving him over thirty years in ministry. He became the youth pastor at a local church, where he provided spiritual guidance, delivered powerful sermons, and offered support to young people facing various challenges. After Pastor Chatman retired from the fire department he started the Kingdom of Deliverance Worship Center. Under his leadership, the church flourished, attracting a diverse and vibrant congregation. His dynamic preaching style, coupled with his ability to connect with people from all walks of life, made him a beloved figure in the community. In the year 2013 God inspired him and his wife to move to his hometown in Tampa to start a church. Today that church is called the “Tampa Revival Center”. Tamparevivalctr.com Www.Billyechatman.com Show hosted by: Terrance Hutchinson Certified Health and Wellness Coach & Consultant --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/yourbestlifestyles/support

Beware of Ancient STD's Interview with Billy E. Chatman Jr. In this Faith and Family Fellowship episode, Dallas interviews Billy E. Chatman Jr., author of Beware of Ancient STD's. About the Book: Billy E. Chatman Jr.'s book draws from his personal experience of contracting an STD at 13, using it as a metaphor for spiritual warfare. He reflects on how this painful experience parallels the effects of coming into contact with demonic spirits, which can corrupt the soul through spiritual rather than physical means. The book emphasizes the importance of guarding one's "eye gates" and "ear gates" to protect the soul from demonic influence. Chatman explores how both believers and non-believers unwittingly open themselves to demonic forces and offers guidance on identifying and closing these spiritual portals. Through biblical teachings, he aims to equip readers to battle and defeat the demonic attacks on themselves and their families. Connect with the Author: https://www.billyechatman.com/ Thank you for listening and supporting the 'Faith and Family Fellowship PODCAST SHOW'. We are excited to connect with our listeners on our various platforms. Below are just some of the ways you can connect with us and support our various Christian Ministry projects worldwide. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Support the Show⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (https://cash.app/$laymedownministry) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Connect with us on Various Platforms⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (https://linktr.ee/faithandfamilyfellowship) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Connect with Lay Me Down Ministries ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠(https://www.facebook.com/LayMeDownMinistries) For Marketing and Publishing needs, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Buscher's Social Media Marketing LLC⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (https://www.facebook.com/buscherssmm)

GIANTS WIN!!! However despite the win we have to remember that this was a game of two halves and there are so many questions. Is Malik Nabers on course for OROTY? Can Jones lead this team to be competitive? Is Bowen's defense finally clicking? Join the guys for the first winning game review of the season and let's see who get's kudos, who still needs to show up and who gets player of the game recognition 00:00 - Intro 00:27 - Opening Segment - London Meetup and College Football Update 08:16 - Giants News - Injury Reports 10:43 - Browns Review - Offense (Jones, Singletary, Nabers and more) 46:32 - Browns Review - Defense (Dex, Chatman, Burns and more) 1:08:29 - Browns Review - Special Teams 1:14:28 - Giant Stat Leaders After 3 Weeks 1:20:20 - Closing Thoughts

This convo was a blast to have with one of my former colleagues at Towson. Mike and I caught up in person at the CSCCa national conference in May this year. ___FREE EMAIL COURSEAspiring https://strengthcoachnetwork.com/aspiring-leadAssistant https://strengthcoachnetwork.com/assistant-leadDirector https://strengthcoachnetwork.com/director-lead___Strength Coaches CEUs

In this episode, Phil Newton interviews his pastors, John Sarver and Joshua Chatman. They discuss planting Midtown Baptist Church in Memphis, why churches should plant churches, planting with another staff elder, and more. 

Steve joins Becky to chat about our upcoming event for dads, Base Camp! Find out more as you listen to this episode. Related Links Find out more about Base Camp! *Email Steve Chatman with any questions about this event at schatman@risingaboveministries.org.

Breaking down some injury updates, Chatman's hustle and a few thoughts after Week2 of the pre-season.

We continue our Summer of Stories with an interview with Steve Chatman, our vice-president here at Rising Above! Related Links Sib Show

Decatur FC head coach Campbell Chapman drops by to talk about the last match of the regular season in the WPSL Southeast- the win over UFA- and what's next with the WPSL franchise

Ohio State men's basketball beat reporter Adam Jardy talks about Taison Chatman will miss sophomore season with torn ACL on the latest episode of the BuckeyeXtra basketball podcast. During this edition we recap how alumni week went and provide our takeaways from this event.

Carrie Sheffield shares her latest book, "Motorhome Prophecies: A Journey of Healing and Forgiveness" (continued).See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Todd Chatman from Christian Solidarity International on freeing slaves today. Partner with our show at: https://csi-usa.org/metaxas/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Christian Solidarity International spokesperson Todd Chatman joins Eric to discuss CSI's upcoming campaign to free slaves in Sudan. To donate go to metaxastalk.com and click the banner at the top of the page. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Christian Solidarity International spokesperson Todd Chatman joins Eric to discuss CSI's upcoming campaign to free slaves in Sudan. To donate go to metaxastalk.com and click the banner at the top of the page. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Chris shares big news with his co-hosts, who can't seem to focus on this episode's guests: true crime podcasters Donna and Jobeth. Starring Ike Barinholtz, Neil Casey, Lisa Gilroy, Liz Cackowski, and Emily Spivey. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Busy Phillips joins Chris to enlighten his listeners on the importance of reproductive rights. Unfortunately, Chris derails the conversation, much to Busy's annoyance. Starring Ike Barinholtz, Neil Casey, Lisa Gilroy, and Busy Phillips. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this improvised comedy podcast, Ike Barinholtz stars as controversial shock jock host Chris Chatman. Chatman's hit podcast was canceled but he's listened, learned, and is back on the mic to finally win over a few female listeners.Or maybe even just one. In each episode, Chatman and his co-hosts Frankie (Lisa Gilroy) and the Professor (Neil Casey) unpack hot-button issues with expert guests but offend pretty much everyone in the process. Guest stars include Amy Poehler, Fred Armisen, Ashley Nicole Black, Carla Cackowski, Craig Cackowski, Liz Cackowski, Jessica St. Clair, E.R. Fightmaster, Ego Nwodim, Busy Philipps, Emily Spivey, and Alice Stanley Jr. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this improvised comedy podcast, Ike Barinholtz stars as controversial shock jock host Chris Chatman. Chatman's hit podcast was canceled but he's listened, learned, and is back on the mic to finally win over a few female listeners. Or maybe even just one. In each episode, Chatman and his co-hosts Frankie (Lisa Gilroy) and the Professor (Neil Casey) unpack hot-button issues with expert guests but offend pretty much everyone in the process. Guest stars include Amy Poehler, Fred Armisen, Ashley Nicole Black, Carla Cackowski, Craig Cackowski, Liz Cackowski, Jessica St. Clair, E.R. Fightmaster, Ego Nwodim, Busy Philipps, Emily Spivey, and Alice Stanley Jr. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this improvised comedy podcast, Ike Barinholtz stars as controversial shock jock host Chris Chatman. Chatman's hit podcast was canceled but he's listened, learned, and is back on the mic to finally win over a few female listeners. Or maybe even just one. In each episode, Chatman and his co-hosts Frankie (Lisa Gilroy) and the Professor (Neil Casey) unpack hot-button issues with expert guests but offend pretty much everyone in the process. Guest stars include Amy Poehler, Fred Armisen, Ashley Nicole Black, Carla Cackowski, Craig Cackowski, Liz Cackowski, Jessica St. Clair, E.R. Fightmaster, Ego Nwodim, Busy Philipps, Emily Spivey, and Alice Stanley Jr. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this improvised comedy podcast, Ike Barinholtz stars as controversial shock jock host Chris Chatman. Chatman's hit podcast was canceled but he's listened, learned, and is back on the mic to finally win over a few female listeners. Or maybe even just one. In each episode, Chatman and his co-hosts Frankie (Lisa Gilroy) and the Professor (Neil Casey) unpack hot-button issues with expert guests but offend pretty much everyone in the process. Guest stars include Amy Poehler, Fred Armisen, Ashley Nicole Black, Carla Cackowski, Craig Cackowski, Liz Cackowski, Jessica St. Clair, E.R. Fightmaster, Ego Nwodim, Busy Philipps, Emily Spivey, and Alice Stanley Jr. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices